I think everyone involved will disagree to the relevance.

Hey, CCP, why don't you give the CFC one free node crash at the time of our choosing? We get one 'get out of whelp free card' to match the one your engineer just handed test.

AND YET THE CFC DIDN'T DROP A SINGLE CAPITAL. And they know why they didn't either. 300 megas aint gonna do much against a super blob.

lol you guys think you would have actually killed 112 TEST carriers before this escalated? LOL. Test would have dropped supers... then the CFC... then all TEST friends and then all the cfc supers would die. You guys should be thanking CCP.

Hey, CCP, why don't you give the CFC one free node crash at the time of our choosing? We get one 'get out of whelp free card' to match the one your engineer just handed test.

In the attempt to improve the overall fight quality and node stability in the Z9PP system at 22:41 UTC by moving away all non-critical services from this node, our engineers unfortuntely made a mistake and actually moved the critical system from the current server node instead of moving all other systems. As result every pilot in this system lost connection to the node and therefore to Tranquility.

The system Z9PP is online and accessible again now.

It is extremely unfortunate to make such a mistake and we apologize deeply for disrupting one of the truly epic battles in the history of EVE; especially since this battle already raged on for several hours and was still heating up for more! We are very sorry about this incident and will make sure that such mistakes won't happen again.

We would have told test that but actualyl it's

Stay logged off. Stay safe.

You do realize how old the EVE codebase is, right? There's no guarantees of ease of integration even if this particular command was new. It's pretty :pohr: either way, but every programmer knows that this is just daily life. Decade-old code is never a good thing.

Ayures, seriously, why is this level of incompetence acceptable? When it happened to CFC dreads, why was it acceptable then? Modern IT systems should be creating archival images at regular intervals - intervals that actually shorten as usage increases due to the need to back-up a higher volume of data flow and state changes. Why is losing customer data acceptable, rather than a 5-10 minute (hell, 10% tidi, make it a half hour, an hour!) rollback?

You said (more than once) 'sure, we'll trade you for the dreads', and I'm saying that I think that'd be preferable to continued substandard service. I notice you don't seem to be respond to that - from me, or anyone else who's saying it. Why not?

Do you prefer substandard service?

Actually you've got it wrong - CCP still owes us 3 more.

Only if it accidentally triggers and remaps VFK instead.

Or Jita

Only a small fraction of the playerbase.

I would like to point out that Michael Bolton of Test fame was recently recruited by CCP. Could he be manipulating the servers via having friends in the right places? It would benefit CCP to take a serious look at their internal affairs and recruitment from the eve community. They will always have a bias in the matter. Not to mention that CCP screegs aka DARIUS Johnson being fired over some trivial matter? CCP are on a fuckgoons roll right now.

I would like to point out that Michael Bolton of Test fame was recently recruited by CCP. Could he be manipulating the servers via having friends in the right places? It would benefit CCP to take a serious look at their internal affairs and recruitment from the eve community. They will always have a bias in the matter. Not to mention that CCP screegs aka DARIUS Johnson being fired over some trivial matter? CCP are on a fuckgoons roll right now.

Remember all those times when CFC dreads were ordered to not log back in?

And then all the TESTies flooded into the forums to demand that the dreads be destroyed and someone at CCP fired? Oh, wait...

Ayures, seriously, why is this level of incompetence acceptable? When it happened to CFC dreads, why was it acceptable then? Modern IT systems should be creating archival images at regular intervals - intervals that actually shorten as usage increases due to the need to back-up a higher volume of data flow and state changes. Why is losing customer data acceptable, rather than a 5-10 minute (hell, 10% tidi, make it a half hour, an hour!) rollback?

You said (more than once) 'sure, we'll trade you for the dreads', and I'm saying that I think that'd be preferable to continued substandard service. I notice you don't seem to be respond to that - from me, or anyone else who's saying it. Why not?

Do you prefer substandard service?

Well, duh, we make use of POS mechanics. Everyone knows POS mechanics affect only a small fraction of the playerbase, remember?

AND YET THE CFC DIDN'T DROP A SINGLE CAPITAL. And they know why they didn't either. 300 megas aint gonna do much against a super blob.

Goons confirmed for worst sportmanship in Esports

woah woah woah, downtime happens in US Primetime?

You are not a very bright person I take it...

Well we are typically known for our honour and integrity.

You are not a very bright person I take it...