| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

Fenrix Mernher
Critical Mass Inc. Nexus Fleet
4
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 15:07:00 -
[421] - Quote
Hun Jakuza wrote:This is why i hate CCP and his BoB friends. (N3.) This is not the first time when this happend. I remember CCP cheat when they give to Bob, T2 BPO-s. I remember when we catched/trapped 7 southern titan in low sec when they tried to invasion north. The node crashed same like now and the successfully ambush went to garbage. 2 days later the nodes broke again when we catched Sir Molle's titan + 4 other one. I remember when we tried to attack north and when we jumped to enemy system all ammos missing from loaded guns of whole fleet and we missed our ammos from our cargoholds too. I remember when we trapped in south 12 super carrier + 40 carrier the node crashed again in delve. I remember when we trapped 70 of Atlas dreads we got black screens and the server crashed again instantly. Always this save operations happend accidently isn't ? The engineers jus accidently push the buttons isn't ? GTFO and dont affect the 0,0 fights and gameplaying u tard CCP.
lol, just lol.
This will be a long war, server issues 2 weeks ago helped 30 goon dreads get away, last night it helped TEST carriers. With ccps servers almost guaranteed to be no better at handling 200 nerds on grid in the next few months it'll happen again and benefit someone else. Such is eve :P |

Kainos Kerensky
Shadows Of The Requiem Unclaimed.
483
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 15:08:00 -
[422] - Quote
Ban Bindy wrote: I'd pin a medal on the guy who reset the servers. But that's just my burning envy of Goons and all the super fun super cool super bad stuff they do. They're all like Shaft. In fact, I think it might have been the Goons who arranged for the crash themselves, those crazy crazy guys. To give us all that good content they're always taking credit for.
Best day in Eve in months, actually.
As much as I hate Goons, and I do, you are a f**king idiot.
CCP failed, Goons would have (sadly) won the field, TEST (sadly) was able to surive. There will be more fights and Eve goes on.
Kainos Kerensky SOTR CEO "Prepare for teh Vandersex!" www.sotr-corp.com
|

Powers Sa
678
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 15:15:00 -
[423] - Quote
Fenrix Mernher wrote:
Wait CFC leadership are seriously telling you this was going to be the death blow to the defense of fountain? Or is this something you've theorised yourself?
I suspect they aren't stupid enough to believe it themselves and I hope they don't consider their line members stupid enough to believe it.
Campaigns are decided by a few big fights for which you break and cripple opposition. This would have been one of those.
To imply that isn't possible, or wasn't going to happen, shows me how little you know. lol |

knobber Jobbler
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
247
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 15:16:00 -
[424] - Quote
Fenrix Mernher wrote:
Wait CFC leadership are seriously telling you this was going to be the death blow to the defence of fountain? Or is this something you've theorised yourself?
There is no final blow in this kind of war, its one of attrition. Its never been advertised by CFC leadership as anything different to that.
The point of this is, its not what was lost or not lost, its the fact that we never got to find out. A mistake was made that could easily have been mitigated. CFC could have lost that fight and we'd still all say "i was there when..." and joke about the FC who bungled the cap escalation.
|

Hrald
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
115
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 15:22:00 -
[425] - Quote
So if I get it right, the summation of CFC demands thus far in the thread have been:
Every server gets its own node so that they never miss out on cap kills because they are the only ones who have had this happen to them. The person responsible should be fired. Game code should be entirely rewritten from the ground up to satisfy their butthurt. All TEST ships should be destroyed and kills granted to every CFC ship in system, but the CFC dreads that were saved by server outage should remain (since there are no demands to remove them).
Listen to yourselves. :cripes: |

Kainos Kerensky
Shadows Of The Requiem Unclaimed.
483
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 15:33:00 -
[426] - Quote
Hrald wrote:
Listen to yourselves. :cripes:
Said the pot while calling the kettle black. Kainos Kerensky SOTR CEO "Prepare for teh Vandersex!" www.sotr-corp.com
|

Zixie Draco
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
181
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 15:35:00 -
[427] - Quote
How about everyone go to your captain's quarters to sit and think about what just happened here. Would you like a kitten? |

Arte
Orion's Fist Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 15:41:00 -
[428] - Quote
1Robert McNamara1 wrote:
2. Z9PP-H, E-IO0O, and 4-EP12 are constantly getting hit with timers and big giant alliance crushing fights are going to happen there for the foreseeable future. Place all 3 of these systems on their own reinforced nodes. If you don't have that many spare nodes, have the reinforcement follow the iHUB and Station timers. You have 20,000 players watching those timers and responding to them, please give them some attention to guide your server balance decisions.....
that seems like a good idea, considering the amount of 'interested parties' there are in this war.
|

Sabrina Scatterbrain
United Souls Research And Development
14
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 15:46:00 -
[429] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote: So you are comparing a video game losing service for a few minutes to a real life job where I assume you would be fired because the action would have caused financial harm to whoever was involved?
Again I request anyone who actually (Not just raging on the forums like in idiot) feels that a CCP employee ought to lose his or her job or punished for a simple mistake that was likely due to the excitement over the battle happening in a game they maintain. I personally request anyone that feels that way biomass their character and leave EVE for good. In my opinion the game will be better without them.
Do you know how on average how difficult it is to land a similar job if you have been terminated from your existing one? Many jobs won't even bother looking at the application (Some even admit this) if the person applying is not currently working.
A job is not a charitable position. If you do not perform your job satisfactorily and chyte on customers, intentional or not, you should not be doing that job. Yes, it may be hard finding another job after being fired, that is because a prospective employee will be aware that you screwed up your last job and they most likely do not want to deal with you.
Actions have consequences in real life, not just in EVE. If you work at McD's and **** in the fries odds are that Burger King will not hire you. |

brutalbutneutral
Prepare To Meet Thy Doom
4
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 15:57:00 -
[430] - Quote
Malou Hashur wrote:brutalbutneutral wrote:Funny how everybody in this thread completely forgets this is still just a game  Everybody had fun didn't they? Isn't that the point of playing games? A perfect example of a comment by someone who really has no clue.
Lol and that clue being? It really isn't important that some coalition get's some computer generated place to park there pixelated ships. In the end when all is done, you just go to work/sleep/dinner have a life.
You all do realise that you're doing the bidding of a single person being it Mittani or Montolio or whatever right? So ONE person is dictating all your'e playstyle. This to me seems weird. Investing hundreds of hours just to do what 1 person says. The more i type about it, the more rediculous i find it.
Oh well..... Carry on i guess |

Speedkermit Damo
Callide Vulpis Curatores Veritatis Alliance
77
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 16:04:00 -
[431] - Quote
Too many sweet goon tears,
Brodie! we're gonna need a bigger cup! Don't Panic.
|

Freelancer117
so you want to be a Hero
68
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 16:07:00 -
[432] - Quote
to summarize this debacle up by a fanfest 2009 quote from Darius Johnson (ex-CEO Goonswarm, Ex-CCP)
"We're not here to ruin THE game. We're here to ruin YOUR game."  Eve rule no.1: The players will make a better version of the game, then CCP initially plans.
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg http://bit.ly/1a5dQGs |

Speedkermit Damo
Callide Vulpis Curatores Veritatis Alliance
77
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 16:18:00 -
[433] - Quote
Freelancer117 wrote:to summarize this debacle up by a fanfest 2009 quote from Darius Johnson (ex-CEO Goonswarm, Ex-CCP) "We're not here to ruin THE game. We're here to ruin YOUR game." 
LOL, Isn't karma a *****. Don't Panic.
|

Warren Morris
Flames of the Phoenix Here Be Dragons
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 16:21:00 -
[434] - Quote
Hun Jakuza wrote:This is why i hate CCP and his BoB friends. (N3.) This is not the first time when this happend. I remember CCP cheat when they give to Bob, T2 BPO-s. I remember when we catched/trapped 7 southern titan in low sec when they tried to invasion north. The node crashed same like now and the successfully ambush went to garbage. 2 days later the nodes broke again when we catched Sir Molle's titan + 4 other one. I remember when we tried to attack north and when we jumped to enemy system all ammos missing from loaded guns of whole fleet and we missed our ammos from our cargoholds too. I remember when we trapped in south 12 super carrier + 40 carrier the node crashed again in delve. I remember when we trapped 70 of Atlas dreads we got black screens and the server crashed again instantly. Always this save operations happend accidently isn't ? The engineers jus accidently push the buttons isn't ? GTFO and dont affect the 0,0 fights and gameplaying u tard CCP.
Learn how to write English ....Tard |

Sabrina Scatterbrain
United Souls Research And Development
14
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 16:21:00 -
[435] - Quote
Speedkermit Damo wrote:Freelancer117 wrote:to summarize this debacle up by a fanfest 2009 quote from Darius Johnson (ex-CEO Goonswarm, Ex-CCP) "We're not here to ruin THE game. We're here to ruin YOUR game."  LOL, Isn't karma a *****.
It would be karma if players ruined the goons game, not CCP. Logic, it's half the battle, try it sometime. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3813
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 16:27:00 -
[436] - Quote
Sabrina Scatterbrain wrote:Speedkermit Damo wrote:Freelancer117 wrote:to summarize this debacle up by a fanfest 2009 quote from Darius Johnson (ex-CEO Goonswarm, Ex-CCP) "We're not here to ruin THE game. We're here to ruin YOUR game."  LOL, Isn't karma a *****. It would be karma if players ruined the goons game, not CCP. Logic, it's half the battle, try it sometime. Don't bother, it's too hard for the players to do it, CCP sometimes has to step in
Remember the GM shield extenders? There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over. TEST Defence, Please Ignore
Projecting regards and power all over your space. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/%27Regard%27_I_Power_Projector |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3813
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 16:28:00 -
[437] - Quote
Powers Sa wrote:Fenrix Mernher wrote:Wait CFC leadership are seriously telling you this was going to be the death blow to the defense of fountain? Or is this something you've theorised yourself?
I suspect they aren't stupid enough to believe it themselves and I hope they don't consider their line members stupid enough to believe it. Campaigns are decided by a few big fights for which you break and cripple opposition. This would have been one of those. To imply that isn't possible, or wasn't going to happen, shows me how little you know. Please tell me you aren't surprised.
This is General Discussion, you know. There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over. TEST Defence, Please Ignore
Projecting regards and power all over your space. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/%27Regard%27_I_Power_Projector |

Sebastian Hoch
Black Lance Fidelas Constans
38
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 17:05:00 -
[438] - Quote
I can tell from an IT Leadership perspective this looks like the failure in change control process or a lack of will to enforce the process that is there. In other words when a node is down you have a couple really smart guys going cowboy on it fixing it by hacking away at various control points in the system. That gives you the fastest and best result in most cases but then you will have outliers like this that are devastating to your reputation. What we don't see is how many times and how much engineers 'going cowboy' to make the game better real time has actually made the game better--I bet they are unsung heroes in this regard.
It is a fairly simple matter to establish a process that will prevent this kind of mistake, but I can tell you that CCP's technical staff will despise and ridicule being constrained in this way. You also have to put teeth behind process compliance even if it means letting someone go that does not get it. In the end, you will probably end up exchanging a fast response for stability but change control mistakes are too much of a liability when they are so public and significantly affect so many players. This is a PR disaster for CCP, and I expect it will be reported in the broader gaming press soon.
How you say? Rather then genius cowboys hacking away at the CLI until you get the result needed, change commands have to be explicitly written and approved by multiple senior technical leaders and a t least one senior manager/VP who's involvement insures that everyone is taking it seriously enough. The exact players in this reflect the risk involved in a change.
The 'soft' remapping of a node is a common affair so a template procedure and set of commands should be put in place that is adapted to each situation. Upon full approval, the commands are executed with a script (or cut and paste). If there are significant errors the change is failed, queued for later review by a Problem Management process and if the change is still needed, the writing and approval process must start over. Yes it sucks but this is how companies that wear big boy pants do it |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3813
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 17:24:00 -
[439] - Quote
Sebastian Hoch wrote:I can tell from an IT Leadership perspective this looks like the failure in change control process or a lack of will to enforce the process that is there. In other words when a node is down you have a couple really smart guys going cowboy on it fixing it by hacking away at various control points in the system. That gives you the fastest and best result in most cases but then you will have outliers like this that are devastating to your reputation. What we don't see is how many times and how much engineers 'going cowboy' to make the game better real time has actually made the game better--I bet they are unsung heroes in this regard.
It is a fairly simple matter to establish a process that will prevent this kind of mistake, but I can tell you that CCP's technical staff will despise and ridicule being constrained in this way. You also have to put teeth behind process compliance even if it means letting someone go that does not get it. In the end, you will probably end up exchanging a fast response for stability but change control mistakes are too much of a liability when they are so public and significantly affect so many players. This is a PR disaster for CCP, and I expect it will be reported in the broader gaming press soon.
How you say? Rather then genius cowboys hacking away at the CLI until you get the result needed, change commands have to be explicitly written and approved by multiple senior technical leaders and a t least one senior manager/VP who's involvement insures that everyone is taking it seriously enough. The exact players in this reflect the risk involved in a change.
The 'soft' remapping of a node is a common affair so a template procedure and set of commands should be put in place that is adapted to each situation. Upon full approval, the commands are executed with a script (or cut and paste). If there are significant errors the change is failed, queued for later review by a Problem Management process and if the change is still needed, the writing and approval process must start over. Yes it sucks but this is how companies that wear big boy pants do it Man, you sound like you could be a consultant in this field.
CCP should hire you.
CCP Comply There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over. TEST Defence, Please Ignore
Projecting regards and power all over your space. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/%27Regard%27_I_Power_Projector |

Toshiro Ozuwara
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises Test Alliance Please Ignore
243
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 18:28:00 -
[440] - Quote
Zagdul is on record saying it would have been a deathblow (and he may be right).
PL and N3 are on record as saying they would have poured everything into this fight until it all burned down.
This is the Eve we deserve. Sadly, even without the mistake by CCP, the server probably couldn't handle the scale of fight it was going to escalate to anyway. Will Fountain be Goonswarm's Waterloo?Read all about it in COAD. |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
854
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 18:32:00 -
[441] - Quote
Very suspicious. The Tears Must Flow |

Barakach
Jolly Codgers Get Off My Lawn
161
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 18:42:00 -
[442] - Quote
Hrald wrote:So if I get it right, the summation of CFC demands thus far in the thread have been:
Every server gets its own node so that they never miss out on cap kills because they are the only ones who have had this happen to them. The person responsible should be fired. Game code should be entirely rewritten from the ground up to satisfy their butthurt. All TEST ships should be destroyed and kills granted to every CFC ship in system, but the CFC dreads that were saved by server outage should remain (since there are no demands to remove them).
Listen to yourselves. :cripes:
Their complaint was don't have bad algorithms and poor management design that encourages human mistakes.
Anyone who is a programmer or admin in a real enterprise would know that this kind of human mistake is entire unacceptable and would normally result in a firing. These kinds of problems are easily avoidable.
How does a tool that handles system moves, offer nary a complaint when someone tries to erroneously shutdown and transfer a critical system?
Here's an analogy. Say you're in the medical field and on your chart that you're supposed inject embalming fluid into your live patient? Would that send up a red flag and be like... hmm.. that might kill someone. Or do you just blindly keep on trucking and be like... ooops, human error. |

Phillip Morning
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 18:43:00 -
[443] - Quote
We will just have to wait and see how it goes down next time. Hopefully there will be plenty more goon tears to collect |

Spc One
The Chodak Void Alliance
200
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 18:52:00 -
[444] - Quote
Roxy Jovovich wrote:**** YOU CCP **** YOU It's a new nerf ccp is doing.
 |

Jumpshot244
EntroPrelatial Industria Here Be Dragons
7
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 18:52:00 -
[445] - Quote
Wonder if this one will make it into the EvE true stories collection |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3814
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 18:57:00 -
[446] - Quote
Jumpshot244 wrote:Wonder if this one will make it into the EvE true stories collection Heh, the climatic end.
The connection to the server was closed. There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over. TEST Defence, Please Ignore
Projecting regards and power all over your space. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/%27Regard%27_I_Power_Projector |

Aemon Cross
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 18:58:00 -
[447] - Quote
So funny, all these Testes coming out commenting about goon tears. It was TEST tears that were flowing in that fight. Of course, that may be the reason the server went down... If enough TEST people /petitioned that they were going to unsub in a fit of nerd rage, then CCP may have to act for no other reason than to maintain revenue.
Let's face it, they need profit to run the game.
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3814
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 18:59:00 -
[448] - Quote
Barakach wrote:Hrald wrote:So if I get it right, the summation of CFC demands thus far in the thread have been:
Every server gets its own node so that they never miss out on cap kills because they are the only ones who have had this happen to them. The person responsible should be fired. Game code should be entirely rewritten from the ground up to satisfy their butthurt. All TEST ships should be destroyed and kills granted to every CFC ship in system, but the CFC dreads that were saved by server outage should remain (since there are no demands to remove them).
Listen to yourselves. :cripes: Their complaint was don't have bad algorithms and poor management design that encourages human mistakes. Anyone who is a programmer or admin in a real enterprise would know that this kind of human mistake is entire unacceptable and would normally result in a firing. These kinds of problems are easily avoidable. How does a tool that handles system moves, offer nary a complaint when someone tries to erroneously shutdown and transfer a critical system? Here's an analogy. Say you're in the medical field and on your chart that you're supposed inject embalming fluid into your live patient? Would that send up a red flag and be like... hmm.. that might kill someone. Or do you just blindly keep on trucking and be like... ooops, human error. Just following orders?
Sounds familar...
There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over. TEST Defence, Please Ignore
Projecting regards and power all over your space. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/%27Regard%27_I_Power_Projector |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3814
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 18:59:00 -
[449] - Quote
Aemon Cross wrote:So funny, all these Testes coming out commenting about goon tears. It was TEST tears that were flowing in that fight. Of course, that may be the reason the server went down... If enough TEST people /petitioned that they were going to unsub in a fit of nerd rage, then CCP may have to act for no other reason than to maintain revenue.
Let's face it, they need profit to run the game. They had us right where they wanted us. There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over. TEST Defence, Please Ignore
Projecting regards and power all over your space. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/%27Regard%27_I_Power_Projector |

Levaria
Incertae Sedis
10
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 19:05:00 -
[450] - Quote
Just stopping in to relish, bathe and frolic in the TEST and CFC tears...
But IMHO CCP, really? REALLY? Come one ten years baby...TEN years, this happens more often then not, and having been in multiple large Null Sec power bloc alliances this is bullshit. Barely broke 2.2k limit on the system and poof. Perhaps some sort of warning system or a popup box like we get before emergency DT stating "Hey you battle hardened killers, fyi NODE is going to be reinforced, prepare for awesome and or disco's."
A heads up would be nice. In addition what is the point of TIDI if it will not be used. When you guys are needed to reinforce a node..You are not there or the request is ignored, when we have so called "Organic battles", you poke and prod the poor gerbil in the server box and try to make him run faster, and then this craptastrophy happens. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |