Everyone is biased but you, huh Jenn?

Everyone is biased but you, huh Jenn?

I love how Jenn tries to shove everyone into a box that fits her whine.

I don't live in hisec Jenn. Stop assuming, it makes you look really foolish.

It's crazy that incursions are considered solo ISk.... Those other 9-39 players must all be bots?

WH c4-6 is also not considered solo content.

Upgraded complexes in null is also built on community.

FW needs to pay for peoples ships or they stop FWing to make ISk. Less PvP targets. More pirate tears. Soloable but also designed to be easily manipulated and exploited, flying anything worth monies usually gets you friendly killed.

High sec missions is the closest thing eve has to casual play that can be played at any pace and still make enough for a plex.

I love how Jenn tries to shove everyone into a box that fits her whine.

I don't live in hisec Jenn. Stop assuming, it makes you look really foolish.

You can't shove everyone into a "hisec only player" or "nullsec only player" box anyway. It is a foolish assumption and labeling tactic that only serves to segregate community and create some artifical "US" and "THEM" bullshit.

Many players of EVE move around from WH, Null, Lowsec, Hisec on a regular basis. Not all of us are quite so narrow-minded as you would like to assume.

i wonder sometimes if the npc alts are all just the same dude

like a monster with a dozen heads

i wonder sometimes if the npc alts are all just the same dude

like a monster with a dozen heads

Not everyone, just posters from high sec.

Not everyone, just posters from high sec.

More serioulsy, some people can put aside their own self interest, i can. I make a MINT doing SOe missions, incursioning with ISN and tvp and throwing away caracals in FW (which I started doing after I saw this last year). But being able to profit from something doesn't make that something the right way to go.

This is the right wayfor combat pve to go (in descending order):

-Wormholes
-Sov null
-npc null
-low sec
-FW low sec
-high sec (most automated security so the trade off should be least income)

And this is what actually happens for individual income via combat pve:

-Wormholes
-FW
-High sec (incursions and "pirate" missions)
-NPC null
-SOV null
-regular high sec (damn near tied with sov null, TEST it)
-Low sec (still dead last)

The only place that works right is wormholes (mega risk, mega isk). Can you people not see this?

i wonder is posting from a npc alt makes one unable to see reality lol.

Who said anything about "solo isk"? Please link.

I use an NPC alt so you can't harrass my main in game if you disagree that strongly. Animosity is great.

Scroll up. You even counter argued it. And gave examples contradicting a 2 month old char or something. I dunno it was a while ago..............-

I use an NPC alt so you can't harrass my main in game if you disagree that strongly. Animosity is great.

Scroll up. You even counter argued it. And gave examples contradicting a 2 month old char or something. I dunno it was a while ago..............-

Considering you are a bot-aspirant miner I think we can safely ignore anything you say.

In other words you are a risk averse highsec pubbie.

Not everyone, just posters from high sec.

More serioulsy, some people can put aside their own self interest, i can. I make a MINT doing SOe missions, incursioning with ISN and tvp and throwing away caracals in FW (which I started doing after I saw this last year). But being able to profit from something doesn't make that something the right way to go.

This is the right wayfor combat pve to go (in descending order):

-Wormholes
-Sov null
-npc null
-low sec
-FW low sec
-high sec (most automated security so the trade off should be least income)

And this is what actually happens for individual income via combat pve:

-Wormholes
-FW
-High sec (incursions and "pirate" missions)
-NPC null
-SOV null
-regular high sec (damn near tied with sov null, TEST it)
-Low sec (still dead last)

The only place that works right is wormholes (mega risk, mega isk). Can you people not see this?

Is this you Jenn, or are you going to spin this such as to claim it is not? Do I need to quote you line by line just to get you to admit what you are now denying?

Unbelievable.

I'm also pretty sure that, without counter arguments, valid facts, or even accurate observations, that last post is only a ment to attack and derail arguments.

Should high sec be less safe? No. Eve needs a theme park that is valid enough to keep at least half the logged on numbers subscribed to keep eve online. Dont like it. Unsubscribe button is overthere. ^

Gotta afk mine all the things. Speaking of afk, don't you have a node to crash so you can ***** about it?

Nope I hope the nodes stay active and the battle finishes either way. All the big nodes in highsec should be on reserve for nullsec battles. Enjoy mission running in 10% TiDi.

Start by nerfbatting the outliers in missioning and it would already help. Some corp are indeed out fo whack (SoE, Thukker, ...) and would require adjustement imo. You could also amke them more available in null to drag the price down a bit by using thier ebtter ratio for the LP. Making that ratio better that it is now could be considered too.

Put a better LP reward on incursion in low and null. Don't add ISK, just more LP. They have to become worthwhile to run in lower security space even if you can hardly field a pimp fleet which reduce your sites/unit fo time.

You will never really need more than 3 nodes (2 staging system + 1 fighting system) as long as SOV stays the same.

Nope I hope the nodes stay active and the battle finishes either way. All the big nodes in highsec should be on reserve for nullsec battles. Enjoy mission running in 10% TiDi.

Good thing that'll never happen. Enjoy your turkey shoot~

You literally admitted to using an NPC alt to avoid consequences, that's literally the definition of risk averse highsec pubbie right there.

Where are your numbers? Where is your test standard? What control conditions did you use to come to this conclusion?

Its easy to say what you feel or hope and have NOTHING to support it except your hate for hi-sec.

Here it is in a nutshell again. I really dont care where has the best isk/hr. Should I want to get what I call the best isk/hr then its on me to go get it not for CCP to give it to me. I have read several threads where you yourself have refferenced the same thing.

Stop looking for CCP to hand it to you and go get it.

And again, post only to attack someone without any contribution to the topic.

if I am a high sec pubbie, what's it matter? I'm keeping eve online valid by logging in and enjoying internet space ships.

Do some market research and realise EvE isn't in a very secure position in the MMO scene, the last expansion and live event didn't generate much buzz, dust 514 is considered, by raw numbers as a f2p console fps, a failure in investment and profitability, and radical changes (for positive or negative to your playstyle) are going to happen. Or eve will just to continue to limp on. 10yrs, but in decline, a very slow one but still predictive models show over the next year. I did a whole post on it like 3 pages ago. Loom outside of eve and realise only a small number of people Enjoy the very niche gameplay that is eve. And only a slice of that pie even cares to try null sec.

Animosity doing its role. I've been a casual eve player since launch. Seen the stars. Seen the stars get a resolution update.
I'm not important. Just someone who enjoys my cake. Please stop trying to force me to enjoy your slice of cake