If there were a problem, CCP would resolve it yes?

Ive seen mission agents in Null

So, like, wtf?

Ever tried to run them?

Ever seen any in sov nul?

1) No, the Nullgimps make that hard and refuse to even consider a deal

2) No, and the Nullgimps make it hard to go and look anyway. But I would imagine the LP rewards from agents in NPC Null are superior to the non-existant LP rewards from the non-existant agents in Sov Null.

However, the position that Highsec has it better than Null because of the existance of LP is demonstratably false.

It took them years to fix things such as the sentinel. Hell, for 9 years there were many ships that had no use at all. There are many issues that have been around for far too long.

There are no mission agents in sov null sec.

1) No, the Nullgimps make that hard and refuse to even consider a deal

Yup I believe I said that

So that means no LP.

The issue is with anoms in sov space, not the handful of NPC null missions.

How do you call someone else a gimp when it's you who failed to do what you wanted to (run a null sec mission) not them?

I run null sec missions when I choose to and have yet to lose a mission ship in NPC Delve, Fountain, Curse or Venal. it's easy when you know how to play the game and aren't scared of other people....

So why not just pop into NPC Null for your LP?

Not only can these handful of systems not support tens of thousand players but if we even try they will be **** caged by every hostile power going.

Plus it does not fix the problem of the vast bulk of null sec being useless.

Plus it does not fix the problem of the vast bulk of null sec being useless.

Neither does nerfing HS...

Here we all go again, talking around in circles, bouncing between industry and missions. If there were a problem, CCP would resolve it yes? And since they don't seem to be pushing initiatives in high sec and instead they are pushing a dumbass deployable in Null Sec, what message are you hearing from that Baltec?

The message is this - There is too much money in Nullsec. If the end result of any data, graphs, charts, opinions, conjecture, or magically derived functions of the most bizarre mathematics showed anything else - CCP would make a change... Since they are not, it seems clear to me that they know something you don't.

If we cannot buff it then that leaves but one option.

Actually, CCP's right hand doesn't seem to be talking to its left. Their own economist stated that inflation was fine and so were the isk sinks and faucets.

My house is ******.

Your house should be ****** too.

Because that philosophy has always improved the quality of life for all parties involved.

My house is ******.

Your house should be ****** too.

Because that philosophy has always improved the quality of life for all parties involved.

This is about game balance. If there is no reason to go to null then people will not go to null, if the only way to fix the game is to nerf high sec then thats what must happen.

Not only can these handful of systems not support tens of thousand players but if we even try they will be **** caged by every hostile power going.

Plus it does not fix the problem of the vast bulk of null sec being useless.

This is about game balance. If there is no reason to go to null then people will not go to null, if the only way to fix the game is to nerf high sec then thats what must happen.

Well thats one reason not to go.

As we both pointed out, its hard to do much if you are just going to get shot to pieces.

Maybe Jenn can give me some tips on how to avoid the CoT system-sweeping fleets.

Well thats one reason not to go.

As we both pointed out, its hard to do much if you are just going to get shot to pieces.

Maybe Jenn can give me some tips on how to avoid the CoT system-sweeping fleets.

Oh, that's just hyperbole and you know it. Especially for an inappropriate comparison in the first place.

Buffing the other areas of space would cause inflation. Inflation is a bad, bad thing, especially with regards to new player retention.

Being brought down to par with the rest of space is not some heinous punishment, you've been enjoying the imbalance for years now anyway.

If you want Null Sec to be like High sec, you know, loads of infinite ISK and no risk from AFK cloaky ******* or "oh **** a neutral, I'd better dock up", there is already a place in the game for that - it's called High Sec.

It's not 100% safe mind you, but it is safe enough.

******* move already. Or stay there and HTFU.

Why is it that if it sucks for you it's "imbalance"?

Why on earth would they *not* shoot you? Given the existence of cyno ships, neutral is as good as hostile.

It always makes me laugh to see "well just go highsec yourself!" as the response.

Not only is it not a good way to defend something suspected of being overpowered by telling me I should be doing it too, but all of highsec should pray that the Goons never actually do this. The result would be, while hilarious, highly detrimental to the average citizen of highsec.

In short, yes.

Apparently, they dont shoot Jenn

I was hoping for her secret.

But sadly its not forth-coming.

Just old tried and tested (and failing) options.

Looks like I shall have to devise my own.

Oh wait, I DO kill probers in Nullsec

Silly me, how did I forget. Maybe some enterprising soul will use the same technique to kill Null Missioners.

Its easy, so Im suprised they dont already.