EVE Search - ISS to manage station in EC-P8R as public outpost

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

ISS to manage station in EC-P8R as public outpost

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Raem Civrie	Posted - 2006.04.08 02:44:00 - [271] Edited by: Raem Civrie on 08/04/2006 02:46:31 :\| --- Chairman of the Ice Mining Guild
Munch	Posted - 2006.04.08 02:52:00 - [272] The nice thing is that there is ISS in every region
Hamatitio	Posted - 2006.04.08 04:10:00 - [273] ISS:0.0 as Caldari Navy:Caldari Soveirghntyanty. Thats my analogy for the day. --- I Post on the forums for Fate. Im cool. Industrialists wanted
Randay	Posted - 2006.04.08 04:25:00 - [274] ecp8r farming, ------------------------------------------- "Det hSr kan betyda krig!"
Hoshi	Posted - 2006.04.08 08:49:00 - [275] Originally by: Mr Trouble Originally by: Hoshi Considering the argument wasnt made until page 3 that won't do much good would it? SO are you going to comment on the issue or make yourself look anymore foolish by dancing around it? If you don't want to comment you would do much better just ignoring it. It doesn't really matter much to me as we are already shooting at you, I am not the one you are going to have to work hard to try convince you are still neutral. It's all those other alliances living in the areas around your outposts that are currently not shooting you. Hoshi, shut the **** up and read the offical TRUST annoucement will you. This thread is dead, it needs to be locked. You would love that wouldn't you. Hoping to sweep the whole issue under the carpet before even more take notice. You really think the Trust statement changes what you have done? especially considering it's fairly apperent to anyone who pays any attention at all it was done under as much distress as your original actions. They where desperate to get it back and did what it took to do so, even if it meant selling their soul to the devil. I seem to remember almost the exact thing happening down south with an outpost during Gs invasion of stain. Their action are if not defendable at least understandable seeing the circumstances, yours are not. I do hope they lock this thread soon so ISSs comment here can't be edit out but will stay so the public can see them and make up their own mind about you. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kai Jyokoroi	Posted - 2006.04.08 09:10:00 - [276] Originally by: James Lyrus Originally by: sidthesexist Originally by: James Lyrus Originally by: Amerame ISS is now taking side in wars ? F1 F2 F3 ? When you have a 'diplomatic situation' sometimes a 3rd party is needed as mediation. And sometimes the 3rd party has an alterior motive and dies... Motive? Yes. Ulterior one? No. I'm interested in stability and development in 0.0. (After all, I'm not a big fan of making round trips to empire for more ships) I think the ISS stands for that, and even with this move, still does. BoB are still shooting ISS as far as I'm aware, this strikes me as something that _could_ be acceptable to everyone concerned. ISS is not a military power, and therefore no 'threat' to the area. The best defense is to be something where attacking is less of a benefit than not doing so. I'm pretty sure that having some of the current military forces in the area occupying it would prove enough of a threat to warrant further fighting. Well, I'm not a fan of moving up to Empire to get ships either, but what you say and what you do are two different things - the t2 frig prices in ISS Marginis are stupid. I'd never pay 30 mil for an AF or 20 mil for an inty, especially when a quick run in a t1 mwd/stabs frig can get me to Empire in 10 minutes to pick up the same ship for a good 40% less. Buying shares for the first two made sense - buying shares for this one simply won't (Me, I just don't see the profit potential in it...) _____________ ...Yer ma's nags
Butter Dog	Posted - 2006.04.08 09:10:00 - [277] Originally by: Hoshi You would love that wouldn't you. Hoping to sweep the whole issue under the carpet before even more take notice. You really think the Trust statement changes what you have done? especially considering it's fairly apperent to anyone who pays any attention at all it was done under as much distress as your original actions. They where desperate to get it back and did what it took to do so, even if it meant selling their soul to the devil. I seem to remember almost the exact thing happening down south with an outpost during Gs invasion of stain. Their action are if not defendable at least understandable seeing the circumstances, yours are not. I do hope they lock this thread soon so ISSs comment here can't be edit out but will stay so the public can see them and make up their own mind about you. There is really only one fitting reply to this post: I guess some people are not happy whatever happens. I think you will find the TRUST statement completely blows a hole through the arguement that ISS are in BoB's pockets. But if you're that desperate to flame the ISS you want to keep dead thread alives with posts like the above, feel free. It only makes you look stupid. See you in KDF ------------------ The ISS Navy is recruiting. See this thread for further details. www.eve-iss.com
Psychopat	Posted - 2006.04.08 09:53:00 - [278] Originally by: Hamatitio Did anyone even read the post? Trust gave them the outpost... Trust didnt give the outpost to Iss. BOB did. Trust mearly came in later on and oked the deal. That fact is what has people upset, And naturaly so. And who in there right mind would use Butter Dog as a name? MoooooÖ
Y Ashanti	Posted - 2006.04.08 09:55:00 - [279] Originally by: Psychopat BOB did. Trust mearly came in later on and oked the deal. That fact is what has people upset, And naturaly so. Could ISS have held the outpost if TRUST wouldn't have ok-ed the deal? Very unlikely.
Psychopat	Posted - 2006.04.08 09:56:00 - [280] And will they still hold it? Most likley not MoooooÖ
Krackerjack	Posted - 2006.04.08 11:47:00 - [281] Originally by: Psychopat And will they still hold it? Most likley not Two facts for you Mr Flametard: 1) TRUST did give them the outpost, see the official statement from them in this forum 2) I don't see another 600 man fleet coming along to lock down an ISS system for a week, when they will have no Capital Ship arrays to destroy. It would be a complete waste of time and no-one in their right mind would bother doing it. You can crawl back under your bridge now.
Audrea	Posted - 2006.04.08 12:06:00 - [282] Originally by: Krackerjack Originally by: Psychopat And will they still hold it? Most likley not Two facts for you Mr Flametard: 1) TRUST did give them the outpost, see the official statement from them in this forum 2) I don't see another 600 man fleet coming along to lock down an ISS system for a week, when they will have no Capital Ship arrays to destroy. It would be a complete waste of time and no-one in their right mind would bother doing it. You can crawl back under your bridge now. 1 and 2 is true, except that if there is alliance which decides to pick up on ISS (for the fun perhaps, since no capital shipyards or anything is there) - wouldnt wait for them to fill the system with poses: they would lock down, destroy 1-2 poses quickly and retake.. or keep it rinse and repeat to check just how far ISS is determined to 'manage' outpost for the good of all of eve Even if not, ISS will have enormouse difficulties fueling those 30 poses: from what I understood, this system is camped ever since eve was made, and that will surely make it difficult to get indy with fuel even from the station itself warp to pos ---------------------------------------------- All my posts are my own opinions and dont not represent any organization until stated otherwise.
Quartex	Posted - 2006.04.08 12:41:00 - [283] Edited by: Quartex on 08/04/2006 12:41:53
Jasmine Constantine	Posted - 2006.04.08 12:48:00 - [284] Good move ISS and Trust. Sensible play. _________________
Denrace	Posted - 2006.04.08 13:21:00 - [285] Just wait until CCP release anchorable Outpost defences. Can you say "XXL" Dual Giga Pulse Laser Battery? ________________________________________
Turkantho	Posted - 2006.04.08 13:58:00 - [286] Originally by: Hoshi ... I seem to remember almost the exact thing happening down south with an outpost during Gs invasion of stain. \0/ someones remebers that G were the first to ever conquer an outpost, thx just another milestone of this great alliance. I'm proud to have been a part of G ________ As[G]ard... well not any longer :(
Silmas	Posted - 2006.04.08 14:05:00 - [287] Originally by: ProphetGuru Watching you lemmings cry, whine, speculate, and basically dance to our tune is kinda funny tho. Don't get mad..... it's true and their is 10 pages of evidence here here as proof. I resent the poor choise of words there. We lemmings are too proud to forumspam - let alone cry, whine, or speculate. We however dance alot!
Butter Dog	Posted - 2006.04.08 14:20:00 - [288] Edited by: Butter Dog on 08/04/2006 14:21:35 Originally by: Audrea Originally by: Krackerjack Originally by: Psychopat And will they still hold it? Most likley not Two facts for you Mr Flametard: 1) TRUST did give them the outpost, see the official statement from them in this forum 2) I don't see another 600 man fleet coming along to lock down an ISS system for a week, when they will have no Capital Ship arrays to destroy. It would be a complete waste of time and no-one in their right mind would bother doing it. You can crawl back under your bridge now. 1 and 2 is true, except that if there is alliance which decides to pick up on ISS (for the fun perhaps, since no capital shipyards or anything is there) - wouldnt wait for them to fill the system with poses: they would lock down, destroy 1-2 poses quickly and retake.. or keep it rinse and repeat to check just how far ISS is determined to 'manage' outpost for the good of all of eve Even if not, ISS will have enormouse difficulties fueling those 30 poses: from what I understood, this system is camped ever since eve was made, and that will surely make it difficult to get indy with fuel even from the station itself warp to pos A representative from your alliance has already requested you stop your ignorant flaming in ISS threads. Camping a system for 7 days 23/7 killing shuttles is no-ones idea of fun. I strongly suggest you follow the advice given by your alliance representative and stop making yourself look so stupid. ------------------ The ISS Navy is recruiting. See this thread for further details. www.eve-iss.com
Audrea	Posted - 2006.04.08 16:05:00 - [289] Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 08/04/2006 14:21:35 Originally by: Audrea Originally by: Krackerjack Originally by: Psychopat And will they still hold it? Most likley not Two facts for you Mr Flametard: 1) TRUST did give them the outpost, see the official statement from them in this forum 2) I don't see another 600 man fleet coming along to lock down an ISS system for a week, when they will have no Capital Ship arrays to destroy. It would be a complete waste of time and no-one in their right mind would bother doing it. You can crawl back under your bridge now. 1 and 2 is true, except that if there is alliance which decides to pick up on ISS (for the fun perhaps, since no capital shipyards or anything is there) - wouldnt wait for them to fill the system with poses: they would lock down, destroy 1-2 poses quickly and retake.. or keep it rinse and repeat to check just how far ISS is determined to 'manage' outpost for the good of all of eve Even if not, ISS will have enormouse difficulties fueling those 30 poses: from what I understood, this system is camped ever since eve was made, and that will surely make it difficult to get indy with fuel even from the station itself warp to pos A representative from your alliance has already requested you stop your ignorant flaming in ISS threads. Camping a system for 7 days 23/7 killing shuttles is no-ones idea of fun. I strongly suggest you follow the advice given by your alliance representative and stop making yourself look so stupid. Where you see flames, I see an attempt to have a nice discussion, but obviously you have nothing to reply, and resort to personal flames and smack, not me. Oh and who the hell are you to tell me what to do? exactly, nobody ---------------------------------------------- All my posts are my own opinions and dont not represent any organization until stated otherwise.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.