EVE Search - Sticky:[Summer 2014] Pirate Faction Cruisers

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Sticky:[Summer 2014] Pirate Faction Cruisers

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 47 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 17 post(s)
Cannibal Kane The Kane Inquisition 3714	Posted - 2014.04.24 07:04:00 - [1201] - Quote Flyinghotpocket wrote: King Fu Hostile wrote: Flyinghotpocket wrote: King Fu Hostile wrote: So CCP why did you have to make the Vigilant even more useless as it currently is? What was the reasoning for the PG nerf? almost nothing is changing with the vigilant. except now it cant have the best tank and the best guns. so settle down It can't even fit a 1600mm RRT, T2 MWD and neutrons currently on TQ. Again, why did it need the nerf? i dont no what RRT means but currently on TQ. and obviously it needs a nerf because you have to choose between tank and dps. and here the vigilant clearly gets both. [Vigilant, 56] Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Damage Control II Medium Capacitor Booster II, Navy Cap Booster 800 Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Federation Navy Stasis Webifier Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Medium Trimark Armor Pump II Medium Trimark Armor Pump II Medium Ancillary Current Router II Valkyrie II x5 Fitting a ANC Rig currently is not required if you bling it up. I don't mind fitting nerfs, what does bother me it is being done on a ship already rarely used. If you are going to nerf a ship that is popular to curb it's use like they did with Cane I can understand. The Vigilant I don't. If you want to change I would understand if they tried to make it more popular.. but not in this instance. "I saw him fight by the monument in Jita. He flowed in his Machariel like a Shinto spirit, 800MM shells sprouting in his passing. His hair flowed in the corona of his target's warp core breach. It was truly majestic. And while everyone stared in awe I stole the loot and ran off. Because I am like that." - NEONOVUS
King Fu Hostile Imperial Collective Unsettled. 49	Posted - 2014.04.24 07:41:00 - [1202] - Quote Flyinghotpocket wrote: King Fu Hostile wrote: Flyinghotpocket wrote: King Fu Hostile wrote: So CCP why did you have to make the Vigilant even more useless as it currently is? What was the reasoning for the PG nerf? almost nothing is changing with the vigilant. except now it cant have the best tank and the best guns. so settle down It can't even fit a 1600mm RRT, T2 MWD and neutrons currently on TQ. Again, why did it need the nerf? i dont no what RRT means but currently on TQ. and obviously it needs a nerf because you have to choose between tank and dps. and here the vigilant clearly gets both. [Vigilant, 56] Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Damage Control II Medium Capacitor Booster II, Navy Cap Booster 800 Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Federation Navy Stasis Webifier Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Medium Trimark Armor Pump II Medium Trimark Armor Pump II Medium Ancillary Current Router II Valkyrie II x5 T2 fitting rig, gg
Kagura Nikon Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness 1341	Posted - 2014.04.24 10:17:00 - [1203] - Quote If you are goign to fly a pirate cruiser seriously you will use t2 rigs if needed. These ships are intended to use in situatiosn where the death chance is rather under control "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!"
King Fu Hostile Imperial Collective Unsettled. 49	Posted - 2014.04.24 10:57:00 - [1204] - Quote She was using a T2 ACR as an argument that "yeah you can fit a Vigi on TQ now" and still needed meta 4 plate and prop. Anyway, even that abomination won't fit after this absolutely unnecessary nerf to an underused ship.
Flyinghotpocket Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica 318	Posted - 2014.04.24 12:41:00 - [1205] - Quote King Fu Hostile wrote: T2 fitting rig, gg so your gonna cry over a extra 35 mil on this ship? fine you CAN put on a t1 ACR by putting on a meta4 cap injector. oh, and my t2 trimarks last i checked arnt those like 10 mil or somthing? super cheap compared to years ago where it was like 500mil for a t2 trimark or something ridiculous. There is no reason this day and age to not be using t2 rigs on everyship since they became so cheap. about that 1600 plate comment. yeah meta4 1600's are still very standard in alot of ships NOT excluding the vigilant. I wont even discuss the meta4 prop comment. Cannibal Kane wrote: Fitting a ANC Rig currently is not required if you bling it up. I don't mind fitting nerfs, what does bother me it is being done on a ship already rarely used. If you are going to nerf a ship that is popular to curb it's use like they did with Cane I can understand. The Vigilant I don't. If you want to change I would understand if they tried to make it more popular.. but not in this instance. vigilant rarely used? i see this ship used more than the diemost on most hac gangs. it isn't rarely used by a long shot.
epicurus ataraxia Z3R0 Return Mining Inc. Illusion of Solitude 738	Posted - 2014.04.24 14:53:00 - [1206] - Quote elitatwo wrote: epicurus ataraxia wrote: The Gila is severely hampered by the neglect of the entire drone weapon system, there are only 2 possible fits. T2 heavy missiles with precision missiles (if you have those skills) or rapid lights. Maybe you just need to get used to 'drone-kiting'. The Stratios, the Astero and some other boats can do it, with the new Eos as posterchild for heavy drone kiting. The whole point of the movement to a mobile drone system rather than sentries, is exactly this, the gain of movement on the battlefield, The stratios too would benefit greatly from this superdrone concept, but not if the drone weapons system neglected light drones. The astero? Yes please. Hence the only two possible fits, stratios would not even have that option. There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE
Alvatore DiMarco Capricious Endeavours Ltd 2142	Posted - 2014.04.24 15:09:00 - [1207] - Quote It's too bad EWAR drones didn't get sorted out before all this pirate rebalancing started. Then Guristas pilots could be wailing with rage over how their mission ships now bonus drones that don't even deal damage and the superdrones could be put on the SoE ships. Ah, but that's a different scenario for a different reality than this one.
Rab See Fool Mental Junket 60	Posted - 2014.04.25 12:49:00 - [1208] - Quote King Fu Hostile wrote: She was using a T2 ACR as an argument that "yeah you can fit a Vigi on TQ now" and still needed meta 4 plate and prop. Anyway, even that abomination won't fit after this absolutely unnecessary nerf to an underused ship. An underused ship is one that can be replaced with another easily. With the changes, this ship will become essential (a I have repeatedly said) for gate and WH work. The Moo can no longer do this, it came down to a cruiser choice, and now its the only one. Once people realise this, the value .. price, will go up markedly. In the pvp I engage in we nearly always take a Vigi or Moo in armour gangs. It will be obvious which to use from now on. But lets get back to the Cynabal, it been bent over and left there for all to see. The Vigilant will simply have to work a little to do what it used to.
T0adwart Kiwis In Space 3	Posted - 2014.04.27 22:56:00 - [1209] - Quote Rain6637 wrote: Rain6637 wrote: would you mind posting that fit just want to add that targeting range can be shorter than drone control range, for the purpose of assisting. wondering if it could be fit differently with that in mind. because Ebag Trescientas wrote: Okay, yeah, it's a fit no one would ever use. The DPS isn't that much more than 3 DDA's (635) or even 2 DDA's (561), and the loss of any high slot DPS means a net DPS loss. But I wouldn't mind having an alt sitting at 100km with two medium drones on /assist on me. :) as a multiboxer, drone assist is something I would trade tank for, and I'm too lazy to try to figure out on my own what fit you are referring to. not a biggie, though... the drone assist alts i trained fly ishtars anyway. If you use this for pve, your drones will be dead long before they engage.. for pvp, well how long will it take for the drones to get where they going ie 100km . Never used a any of the assist features as I am a noob, but looking at the forums, everyone uses sentry drone carriers and drone assist in pvp is with sentries, for a reason I assume. Regardless, its a long long train to get to a sentry ishtar, a gila was a nice stepping stone in sentry drone passive tanking if that is what you were aiming for, ie gila, rattlesnake. Will the rattlesnake now become a heavy drone boat ?? in which case I will need to join the masses and get a drake.. sigh
motie one Aliastra Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2014.04.29 00:03:00 - [1210] - Quote [quote=CCP Rise]I'm back! Getting to finally show you guys these is very exciting! I hope you understand the delay. The drone changes outlined in this Dev Blog had a big enough impact on the balance for pirate cruisers and battleships that we really wanted to wait on posting these. Thankfully, that's happened and we can get on with it! So, there's a lot of changes here but the precedents set in the frigate pass should be mirrored fairly well. Here's some high level explanation on each of the Cruisers: Phantasm: Role bonus to Afterburner speed Major buffs to base speed and slot layou Ashimmu: Infinite Energy Vampire (remember these are getting a buff as well, check the thread here for details Web range bonus instead of effectiveness Adding a low slot and losing a high - the low slot should be more useful in most setups Added drone bay/bandwidth Gila: Medium drone powerhouse (remember the Medium Drone buff in the above linked Dev Blog) We expect a lot of feedback here, I'll do my best to answer questions as they come, but the basic thinking is that this is new and interesting, very powerful, and frees it from overlap with the Ishtar (which simply does sentries better) Vigilant: Keeping the web bonus Fixing strangenesses in the attributes by lowering PG some, adding some base speed to catch it up with other cruisers and finally giving it decent lock range Cynabal: Warp speed multiplier increased (moves through space more like a frigate now) Slight fitting tweaks And here's the details: PHANTASM Amarr Cruiser Bonus: 7.5% bonus to Medium Energy Turret tracking speed Caldari Cruiser Bonus: 20% bonus to Afterburner velocity bonus (was 5% energy turret damage) Role Bonus: 150% bonus to Medium Energy Turret damage (was 100% energy turret damage) Slot layout: 4H(-1), 6M, 5L(+2); 3 turrets, 0 launchers Fittings: 890 PWG(-35), 380 CPU(-45) Defense (shields / armor / hull) : 2700(+266) / 2175 / 2065 Capacitor (amount / recharge / cap per second) : 1800(+105) / 495000 (+3750) / 3.5 Mobility (max velocity / agility / mass / align time): 228(+64) / .62(-.06) / 9600000 / 8.25s Drones (bandwidth / bay): 15 / 15 Targeting (max targeting range / Scan Resolution / Max Locked targets): 59km / 275 / 7 Sensor strength: 20 Signature radius: 120(-10) Cargo Hold: 410 ======================================================================================== ======================================================================================== GILA [ Role Bonus: 500% bonus to medium drone damage and hitpoints (was 50% bonus to Light Missile and Rocket max velocity) Slot layout: 5H, 6M, 4L; 0 turrets, 4 launchers(+1) Fittings: 670 PWG(+40), 400 CPU(+50) Defense (shields / armor / hull) : 3200(+12) / 2200(-125) / 2490 Capacitor (amount / recharge / cap per second) : 1400(+25) / 530000 (-1250) / 2.85 Mobility (max velocity / agility / mass / align time): 195(+31) / .66 / 9600000 / 8.78s Drones (bandwidth / bay): 20(-105) / 100(-300) Targeting (max targeting range / Scan Resolution / Max Locked targets): 58km (+3km) / 285 / 7 Sensor strength: 22 Signature radius: 145(-5) Cargo Hold: 440 ======================================================================================== Light missile and rocket velocity going? That was not the bonus at all! This was, Special Ability: 50% bonus to light, heavy and heavy assault missile velocity So what is happening to our heavy and heavy assault missiles?

gawrshmapooo Es and Whizz Hedonistic Imperative 44	Posted - 2014.04.29 08:59:00 - [1211] - Quote Flyinghotpocket wrote: King Fu Hostile wrote: So CCP why did you have to make the Vigilant even more useless as it currently is? What was the reasoning for the PG nerf? almost nothing is changing with the vigilant. except now it cant have the best tank and the best guns. so settle down Its tank isn't all that great really. I mean yea, a 1600 plate gives you some work room, but you still don't have much EHP, and the hull costs 300mil (240 as of this writing, most likely because of these changes). "Lowering PG some" just to balance out weirdness in the attributes would be fine. A ten percent cut isn't "some" If Rise thinks the Vigilant is OP, that's fine, nerf it, but say it's OP. 1,200 PG is a nice round number too, I don't see what's strange about it at all. I don't get it. A ten percent nerf "just because" seems rather drastic and doesn't have a point to me.
gawrshmapooo Es and Whizz Hedonistic Imperative 45	Posted - 2014.04.29 09:35:00 - [1212] - Quote Arthur Aihaken wrote: Laiannah Sahireen wrote: Please just shut up already Another recipient of the block feature. Yes, it's the start of the week - as in an anticipated dev update. Which could very well apply to the Pirate cruisers thread - except everyone's ecstatic with the changes (particularly the Gila and Vigilant). I'm not happy with the Vigilant. I doubt Rise is going to change anything just because we ask him. The Vigilant as it stands now is a very powerful tool in a very, very small number of situations. This is offset by its high cost, high skill requirements to fly properly, and by its lack of general usefulness (I have only seen two or three other people flying Vigilants in the past year.) A vigilant with an 800 plate (Because of the lack of PG), a Trimark, and two (faction) EANMs AND a damage control has ~25k ehp. For 250-300 mil that is not worth it to me. (My current 1600 Vigi has 34k) As it stands now I have to put a current router on it to make the fit work anyway. Again, if Rise mentioned that he did this because he felt the Vigilant was too powerful, or for literally any reason at all, I would accept it. But "Hey you are losing a third of your ehp just because I felt like it" just leaves me scratching my head.
epicurus ataraxia Z3R0 RETURN MINING INC. Illusion of Solitude 741	Posted - 2014.04.29 11:57:00 - [1213] - Quote CCP Rise, is it a typo. Previously the Gila ALSO had a velocity (range) bonus to HAMs and Heavy missiles. This seems to be missing in your post when you only refer to dropping the bonus on lights and rockets? Rockets??? Where did a rocket bonus come from??? Can you confirm we are not losing the velocity bonus to heavy and Ham launchers? As that IS somewhat of a game changer! There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 5521	Posted - 2014.04.29 12:00:00 - [1214] - Quote epicurus ataraxia wrote: Can you confirm we are not losing the velocity bonus to heavy and Ham launchers? Of course you're losing the velocity bonus. The ship doesn't get 4 bonuses. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws." -áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
Sgt Ocker Last Bastion of Freedom 181	Posted - 2014.04.29 12:55:00 - [1215] - Quote Kaarous Aldurald wrote: epicurus ataraxia wrote: Can you confirm we are not losing the velocity bonus to heavy and Ham launchers? Of course you're losing the velocity bonus. The ship doesn't get 4 bonuses. Correct, it will have 3 bonuses of which only 2 can be used at any given time to achieve anything close to "optimal use" with a split weapon system. 4% to resists is a given, can't not use that 1 - Leaving 2 bonuses, Drones and Missiles of which only 1 can be fully utilized at a time. 3 DDA's for max drone damage. or 3 BCU's to optimize missile damage. Fit for max Drones = So so Missiles Fit for max missiles = Meh Drones Try to fit for both, you're likely to end up with less than desirable results. My new fit is likely to go along the lines of - Max Missile Dps (3 BCU's) with drone support (ship bonus only)
epicurus ataraxia Z3R0 RETURN MINING INC. Illusion of Solitude 741	Posted - 2014.04.29 14:03:00 - [1216] - Quote Sgt Ocker wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: epicurus ataraxia wrote: Can you confirm we are not losing the velocity bonus to heavy and Ham launchers? Of course you're losing the velocity bonus. The ship doesn't get 4 bonuses. Correct, it will have 3 bonuses of which only 2 can be used at any given time to achieve anything close to "optimal use" with a split weapon system. 4% to resists is a given, can't not use that 1 - Leaving 2 bonuses, Drones and Missiles of which only 1 can be fully utilized at a time. 3 DDA's for max drone damage. or 3 BCU's to optimize missile damage. Fit for max Drones = So so Missiles Fit for max missiles = Meh Drones Try to fit for both, you're likely to end up with less than desirable results. My new fit is likely to go along the lines of - Max Missile Dps (3 BCU's) with drone support (ship bonus only) Thanks Ocker, i realise something is screwy here, Rise has cut and pasted directly from the worm it seems. The Gila has never had a rocket bonus so unusual for it to give it up. It has a Ham and heavy missile velocity bonus and he HAS NOT said that is being given up. It was also a special ship bonus Not a racial bonus so quite a lot of confusion there. It would be nice to have CCP Rise let us know what exactly he means as giving up bonuses that do not exist is rather wierd? There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE
Sheimi Madaveda Arma Purgatorium Neutral in Local. 13411	Posted - 2014.04.30 02:23:00 - [1217] - Quote I'm surprised that so many people think the Vigilant changes are horrible. Sure, there's a PG nerf but if you needed Neutrons on the ship then you have been using it very poorly because the main reason to field a Vigilant is for the web it provides. Were it not for that web, you would have picked a Deimos instead. Following that line of reasoning, lowering guns to Ions isn't a big deal because you're a LOT faster to close range or otherwise apply that web, which again, is the entire point of flying Serpentis to begin with. Now, the problem with the Vigilant is that you have t1 resists... so you do need quite a bit of buffer compared to t2 variants. This is what a balanced DPS/Tank Vigilant would look like. It has 43k EHP and 772 DPS before heating its guns. ========================================= [Vigilant, Summertime Heat] Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Internal Force Field Array I 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Medium Capacitor Booster II Federation Navy Stasis Webifier Warp Disruptor II Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Medium Anti-Explosive Pump II Medium Trimark Armor Pump II Medium Ancillary Current Router I Hammerhead II x5 ========================================== For a setup that uses a Vigilant only for its web, this is what it'd look like. It's about 6-15 over on PG or something, but that is easy to fix. 651 DPS before heat and 51k EHP with about 75% resists across the board. [Vigilant, Webifier] Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Internal Force Field Array I 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Medium Capacitor Booster II Federation Navy Stasis Webifier Warp Disruptor II Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Medium Anti-Explosive Pump II Medium Trimark Armor Pump II Medium Ancillary Current Router I Hammerhead II x5 Arma Purgatorium - Once for the State, Now for the King Low Sec, PvP, Industrial - Open for Recruiting http://armapurgatorium.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/arpur_recruit1.png-á
Sheimi Madaveda Arma Purgatorium Neutral in Local. 13411	Posted - 2014.04.30 02:30:00 - [1218] - Quote epicurus ataraxia wrote: snip It has a Ham and heavy missile velocity bonus and he HAS NOT said that is being given up. It would be nice to have CCP Rise let us know what exactly he means as giving up bonuses that do not exist is rather wierd? In reply to blocked quoted post, Rise might have also meant, 10% bonus to kinetic and thermal missile damage and velocity (was 10% drone damage and hitpoints) Who knows, the original message is clearly an error, do you have a special relationship that gives you dev like knowledge? possibly it should be CCP rise who answers for himself rather than you doing his job for him? You are clueless. If the bonus is not there, then it is -wait for it- NOT THERE. I do not see a missile velocity bonus on the rework, therefore it will not be there. It does not take a supercomputer to figure this one out. You are certainly not the first to have thought these things but the OP is still the same. It would have been changed by now if your line of reasoning was correct. What evidence do you have that the original message is an error? If it refers to the missile velocity bonus Arma Purgatorium - Once for the State, Now for the King Low Sec, PvP, Industrial - Open for Recruiting http://armapurgatorium.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/arpur_recruit1.png-á
motie one Aliastra Gallente Federation 4	Posted - 2014.04.30 08:56:00 - [1219] - Quote Sheimi Madaveda wrote: epicurus ataraxia wrote: snip It has a Ham and heavy missile velocity bonus and he HAS NOT said that is being given up. It would be nice to have CCP Rise let us know what exactly he means as giving up bonuses that do not exist is rather wierd? In reply to blocked quoted post, Rise might have also meant, 10% bonus to kinetic and thermal missile damage and velocity (was 10% drone damage and hitpoints) Who knows, the original message is clearly an error, do you have a special relationship that gives you dev like knowledge? possibly it should be CCP rise who answers for himself rather than you doing his job for him? You are clueless. If the bonus is not there, then it is -wait for it- NOT THERE. I do not see a missile velocity bonus on the rework, therefore it will not be there. It does not take a supercomputer to figure this one out. You are certainly not the first to have thought these things but the OP is still the same. It would have been changed by now if your line of reasoning was correct. What evidence do you have that the original message is an error, anyways? I am also wondering. Did you notice that the entire bonus quoted is wrong? There was never a bonus to maximum rocket velocity. He has made a cut and paste error in his posting. He has simply posted the Worm information. So is it any suprise that people are wondering what the new bonuses actually are? Ccp Rise did say let me know If you see any typos, I don't think he said, you are clueless, suck it up!
Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore 1189	Posted - 2014.04.30 10:53:00 - [1220] - Quote Weaselior wrote: Does the Gila really get a 500% bonus to medium drones instead of the 50% you'd expect, or is that a typo? edit: oh, it only gets two drones, gotcha I think it's a typo and they meant 200%. A 500% bonus on two medium drones is the equivalent of 12 medium drones. Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) And bring back the missile Inquisitor!!

KaDa en Bauldry Aliastra Gallente Federation 22	Posted - 2014.04.30 16:12:00 - [1221] - Quote Reaver Glitterstim wrote: Weaselior wrote: Does the Gila really get a 500% bonus to medium drones instead of the 50% you'd expect, or is that a typo? edit: oh, it only gets two drones, gotcha I think it's a typo and they meant 200%. A 500% bonus on two medium drones is the equivalent of 12 medium drones. It gets that strange bonus to two mediums, instead of the usual drone bonus to 5 heavies it previously had. 200% would be a brutal nerf to it's drone dps. Don't forget about ship insurance before undocking. Don't forget about copy-paste saving before posting.
Sgt EVE Garage Bagage 2	Posted - 2014.05.01 14:54:00 - [1222] - Quote comparison vigilant old - new old [Vigilant, pvp] 5x Heavy Neutron Blaster II (Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M) Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I Medium Electrochemical Capacitor Booster I (Navy Cap Booster 800) Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I 2x Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Damage Control II 2x Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Medium Anti-Explosive Pump I Medium Trimark Armor Pump I Medium Ancillary Current Router I 5x Hammerhead II new [Vigilant, pvp new] 5x Heavy Ion Blaster II (Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M) Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I Medium Electrochemical Capacitor Booster I (Navy Cap Booster 800) Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I 2x Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Damage Control II 2x Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Medium Anti-Explosive Pump I Medium Trimark Armor Pump I Medium Ancillary Current Router I 5x Hammerhead II result: -7% damage, -20% range no big nerf but compared to the other new faction cruisers it now has medium damage, medium speed, weak tank and closest range. and this all for a barely used and very expensive ship.
Cage Man 425	Posted - 2014.05.02 00:16:00 - [1223] - Quote When will be seeing some love to missile users ?? a missile bonused pirate faction cruiser will be welcomed and is much needed. The thick plottens... CCP, When can my crane get its black paint job back??
Martin Ryan Volition Cult The Volition Cult 3	Posted - 2014.05.03 19:07:00 - [1224] - Quote Pleeeeaaase, (pretty please) - DON'T nerF the cynabal's powergrid... all my specific cyn/arty fit training will be for nothing! I was reaaally looking forward to flying this too :'-(
Omnathious Deninard Novis Initiis 2334	Posted - 2014.05.05 11:25:00 - [1225] - Quote The Gila's role bonus paints a pretty good picture about how terrible medium drones are. The Worm gets a 300% bonus, the rattlesnake gets a 275% bonus, the gila gets a 500% bonus?! Think it might be time to take a look at medium drones and maybe stray away from the old linear progression that drones have? -á --á
Silvetica Dian Manson Family Advent of Fate 1012	Posted - 2014.05.05 11:52:00 - [1226] - Quote Omnathious Deninard wrote: The Gila's role bonus paints a pretty good picture about how terrible medium drones are. The Worm gets a 300% bonus, the rattlesnake gets a 275% bonus, the gila gets a 500% bonus?! Think it might be time to take a look at medium drones and maybe stray away from the old linear progression that drones have? The worm always used lights so a modest dps increase. The RS always used sentry/heavy so drone damage stays the same. The gila used to use sentry/heavy but now will use mediums. The large bonus is to keep the damage output comparable to those whilst allowing the better application of mediums. A unique and valuable bonus. Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 5764	Posted - 2014.05.05 11:57:00 - [1227] - Quote Silvetica Dian wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: The Gila's role bonus paints a pretty good picture about how terrible medium drones are. The Worm gets a 300% bonus, the rattlesnake gets a 275% bonus, the gila gets a 500% bonus?! Think it might be time to take a look at medium drones and maybe stray away from the old linear progression that drones have? The worm always used lights so a modest dps increase. The RS always used sentry/heavy so drone damage stays the same. The gila used to use sentry/heavy but now will use mediums. The large bonus is to keep the damage output comparable to those whilst allowing the better application of mediums. A unique and valuable bonus. Yeah, the hefty medium drone bonus is likely to compensate for the loss of sentry drones. As far as their state of balance, I would actually venture to say that medium drones are in about as good of a state of balance as light drones are. Once the racial drone rebalance hits I think we might actually see use of Amarr drones somewhere besides sentries, for example. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws." -áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
Omnathious Deninard Novis Initiis 2335	Posted - 2014.05.05 13:46:00 - [1228] - Quote Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Silvetica Dian wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: The Gila's role bonus paints a pretty good picture about how terrible medium drones are. The Worm gets a 300% bonus, the rattlesnake gets a 275% bonus, the gila gets a 500% bonus?! Think it might be time to take a look at medium drones and maybe stray away from the old linear progression that drones have? The worm always used lights so a modest dps increase. The RS always used sentry/heavy so drone damage stays the same. The gila used to use sentry/heavy but now will use mediums. The large bonus is to keep the damage output comparable to those whilst allowing the better application of mediums. A unique and valuable bonus. Yeah, the hefty medium drone bonus is likely to compensate for the loss of sentry drones. As far as their state of balance, I would actually venture to say that medium drones are in about as good of a state of balance as light drones are. Once the racial drone rebalance hits I think we might actually see use of Amarr drones somewhere besides sentries, for example. I have to disagree about medium drones being balanced properly, at least as a medium weapon system. Of the medium class ships that would use drones as there primary DPS: Arbitrator 5 bonused medium drones. Curse 5 bonused medium drones. Pilgrim 5 bonused medium drones. Legion 5 bonused medium drones. Vexor 3 bonused large drones. VNI 5 bonused large drones. Ishtar 5 bonused large drones. Stration 4 bonused large drones. Proteus 4 bonused large drones. (Old) Gila 5 bonused large drones. Myrmidon 4 bonused large drones. Eos 5 bonused large drones. Prophecy 3 bonused large drones. -á --á
Juin Tsukaya Perkone Caldari State 0	Posted - 2014.05.05 14:44:00 - [1229] - Quote The medium drone bonus is sweet. but unless it speeds up significantly. then it still won't be as good as a sentry. too easily popped in pve when they re-target to your drones. they wont have the time to get recalled when more then 40 km away. and lets face it, that happens often in L3 missions. being that far away
Arthur Aihaken Erebus Solia 3469	Posted - 2014.05.05 22:34:00 - [1230] - Quote These Gilas are going to be awesome with a pair of GeckosGÇª Oh wait, bandwidth nerf. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 47 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.