Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] .. 27 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 17 post(s) |
Loki O'Grady
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
24
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:04:00 -
[571] - Quote
Citricioni wrote:I think an official version of "SOMER Blink" would be the most appropriate variant ...
Just like other OOG tools like EveMON and EFT, there is no need for CCP to come up with a replacement to Blink. There are probably a dozen replacements already being developed. Somer has already shown us just how much isk people are willing to gamble away - you could fund an entire alliance with the amount of profit that is raked in. |
Jake Rivers
Senex Legio
217
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:05:00 -
[572] - Quote
Well done CCP and CSM!
Senex Legio |
Mia Pawsaldo
C.Q.B
0
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:09:00 -
[573] - Quote
So finally got to the end of this thread after reading it all.
Incredibly entertaining, as it was mostly full of grr goon tinfoil hatters, people who don't read and people who don't know what RMT actually is.
Some posts gave me a down right giggle, CCP Falcon's fifty shades of dumb comment was a highlight.
But thanks to the CSM and CCP community team for getting this sorted quickly and correctly.
|
Sirinda
Ekchuah's Shrine Comporium
389
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:10:00 -
[574] - Quote
My likes and upvotes. All of them. |
Bobmon
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
77
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:11:00 -
[575] - Quote
With Somer Closing down I would like to point out that there are other sites too that you can use to make lots of isk!
For instance our dear Advertior: iwantIsk.com
Chief Editor of Evenews24.com GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢ @BobmonEve |
Darbarmic
Cosmic Cimmerians Usurper.
0
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:15:00 -
[576] - Quote
SOMERBLINK created a huge amount of plex sales , from which CCP has been the main benefactor. Plex sales , which wouldnt have otherwise arisen , simply through the content SOMERBLINK provided , wether it be good or bad.
Will CCP be willing to disclose the real money revenue they have enjoyed as a result of SOMERBLINK's content , providing full tranparency, care and concern, and perhaps reimburse the gambling addicts among us . Or possibly fund a gambling rehabilitation program from those proceeds.
Who is really being protected here , the game, the players or the bottom line . |
Enaris Kerle
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
153
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:20:00 -
[577] - Quote
Darbarmic wrote:Plex sales , which wouldnt have otherwise arisen A bold claim. Care to show any data to back that up?
Darbarmic wrote:perhaps reimburse the gambling addicts among us Why would they? Gallente born and raised, and tutored as a pleasure slave and courtesan to the exotic tastes of the Amarri court. Jade's career veered violently off course when a diplomatic envoy's transport was blown to pieces in mysterious circumstances and she was rescued from the escape pods by the enigmatic genetic mastermind Athule Snanm. |
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
4415
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:22:00 -
[578] - Quote
Darbarmic wrote:SOMERBLINK created a huge amount of plex sales , from which CCP has been the main benefactor. Plex sales , which wouldnt have otherwise arisen , simply through the content SOMERBLINK provided , wether it be good or bad.
Will CCP be willing to disclose the real money revenue they have enjoyed as a result of SOMERBLINK's content , providing full tranparency, care and concern, and perhaps reimburse the gambling addicts among us . Or possibly fund a gambling rehabilitation program from those proceeds.
Who is really being protected here , the game, the players or the bottom line . There is absolutely no way to proof a single PLEX was sold due to SOMER which wouldn't have been sold otherwise. It's all incidental claims. There are no numbers, no comparison and no verifiability. All statements like these try to do is displaying SOMER as a godsend for EVE and CCP being stupid for destroying it.
To me it merely shows what bottom tier opinion manipulation is utilised by SOMER and consorts. Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |
flakeys
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
2417
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:31:00 -
[579] - Quote
It is nice to finally be able to place a face/faces on all the gambling adddicts though.
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|
Han Ostus
Drunken Shipping Drunk Void Drifters
0
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:32:00 -
[580] - Quote
I've been asking myself, if SOMER was actively encouraging players to spend real money on PLEX to convert into ISK (through them), and then gamble it away on their website, couldn't you make a case that this subjects them to gambling oversight bodies? I.E. wouldn't they need a gambling license? |
|
|
CCP Falcon
8348
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:43:00 -
[581] - Quote
Chribba wrote:I'm happy to see that CCP and CSM have managed to get this resolved so quickly. While it always sucks to see it coming to actions like this I am glad that a stance was taken and violators punished properly (unless there's shady stuff that we don't know of... hope not [*not fully recovered my bitterness from last year]).
Thank you for the update.
/c
No shady stuff, and the reprimands issued are the same as any other player of EVE Online.
The only difference in treatment is the fact that we've publicly spoken about these reprimands, due to the fact that this is a large scale issue that potentially affects tends of thousands of our players.
Hope this answers your concern.
CCP Falcon || Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon
Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3 |
|
Garai Nolen
Xyjax
20
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:44:00 -
[582] - Quote
Hakaari Inkuran wrote:I'm more wondering why it took players to bring the issue up in the first place. CCP was perfectly capable of visiting the site and looking at the new promotion (literally all they had to do was look at it), do they not keep close tabs on their affiliates?
... Somer is not and never has been an affiliate of CCP. They are a player in EVE, like any other. Period.
Markee Dragon, on the other hand, is an official 3rd party time-code reseller for CCP with an actual business relationship with CCP (except they don't call it a time-code now but, whatever, haven't had coffee yet and I'm not looking up the new name :)
Somer was an affiliate of Markee Dragon under whatever affiliate program Markee has, completely independent from CCP.
THERE IS NO BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOMER AND CCP, other than as a generic player governed by the EULA. That's kind of the point. When the community reported a player they believed to be violating the EULA, CCP investigated and took action as they would in any other case with any other regular player. EVEoj - EVE Online JavaScript library: http://eve-oj.xyjax.com/ |
ExplorerAlTNewb
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:44:00 -
[583] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:BigSako wrote:So, technically EvENews24 and TheMittani are both RMT-ing, right? ISK -> Writers Writers -> Articles Users read Articles and see advertisement on website Mittani gets money for advertisement http://i.imgur.com/i6L5GGY.pngjust my .02 ISK. Paying ISK to writers for articles and opinion pieces is explicitly allowed by CCP, as long as they're Eve related. Monetisation of websites via ads is also OK with CCP as far as I know. What isn't allowed is offering an ISK/ingame incentive to buy ETC/GTC from an affiliate, i.e. buying the resulting PLEX back at an inflated ISK price, when that affiliate gives you a RL cash kickback for every sale.
.. its not just EVE Related. http://imgur.com/sCn0H1u
The scenario is basic, certain 3rd parties use ISK to pay EVE Players to create EVE content & services....
This is supposely OK"ed
And one (possibly more) of the 3rd parties uses ISK to pay EVE Players to create content & services that have nothing to do with EVE Online.
This hasnt been answered, and will most likely get ignored unless more focus is shined on it.
Multiple CSM are a part of the "entity" that is doing it so they will deflect away from this. There is also the forum crashers & non sense wing working at odds ends to cover up / jam up everything as best they can. |
Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2766
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:58:00 -
[584] - Quote
ExplorerAlTNewb wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:BigSako wrote:So, technically EvENews24 and TheMittani are both RMT-ing, right? ISK -> Writers Writers -> Articles Users read Articles and see advertisement on website Mittani gets money for advertisement http://i.imgur.com/i6L5GGY.pngjust my .02 ISK. Paying ISK to writers for articles and opinion pieces is explicitly allowed by CCP, as long as they're Eve related. Monetisation of websites via ads is also OK with CCP as far as I know. What isn't allowed is offering an ISK/ingame incentive to buy ETC/GTC from an affiliate, i.e. buying the resulting PLEX back at an inflated ISK price, when that affiliate gives you a RL cash kickback for every sale. .. its not just EVE Related. http://imgur.com/sCn0H1uThe scenario is basic, certain 3rd parties use ISK to pay EVE Players to create EVE content & services.... This is supposely OK"ed And one (possibly more) of the 3rd parties uses ISK to pay EVE Players to create content & services that have nothing to do with EVE Online. This hasnt been answered, and will most likely get ignored unless more focus is shined on it. Multiple CSM are a part of the "entity" that is doing it so they will deflect away from this. There is also the forum crashers & non sense wing working at odds ends to cover up / jam up everything as best they can. If you have reason to believe a specific site is breaking CCP rules you should send an email to [email protected] with your concerns, not air it out on the forums publicly. |
Darbarmic
Cosmic Cimmerians Usurper.
1
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:59:00 -
[585] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Darbarmic wrote:SOMERBLINK created a huge amount of plex sales , from which CCP has been the main benefactor. Plex sales , which wouldnt have otherwise arisen , simply through the content SOMERBLINK provided , wether it be good or bad.
Will CCP be willing to disclose the real money revenue they have enjoyed as a result of SOMERBLINK's content , providing full tranparency, care and concern, and perhaps reimburse the gambling addicts among us . Or possibly fund a gambling rehabilitation program from those proceeds.
Who is really being protected here , the game, the players or the bottom line . There is absolutely no way to proof a single PLEX was sold due to SOMER which wouldn't have been sold otherwise. It's all incidental claims. There are no numbers, no comparison and no verifiability. All statements like these try to do is displaying SOMER as a godsend for EVE and CCP being stupid for destroying it. To me it merely shows what bottom tier opinion manipulation is utilised by SOMER and consorts.
It is common knowledge , unless you are trolling this topic.
i can provide proof only of plexes i have bought myself for the purpose of playing BLINK.
Order Date: 2014-08-03 Reference: 262676 Markee Dragon Game Codes RECEIPT Sold To:xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.com, 0xxxxxxxxxxxxx QtyDescription Price Amount 2Eve Online 2 Plex These codes have a new redemption process. No longer can they be redeemed in game. Please use http://www.eveonline.com/activate to create your PLEX. Fly Safe!34.9969.98 Paid By: PayPal Subtotal: 69.98 Tax: 0.00 Shipping: 0.00 Total: $69.98
Special Instructions
Software Registration Key(s): Eve Online 2 Plex: C9BXSJ5SZSHG4KY9NHMPPKGLV Eve Online 2 Plex: C9BXSNREEYERTZAM2LYVX7U8S
Markee Dragon Game Codes Hereford, AZ, USA 85615 [email protected] (512) 666-7740
For security purposes we have tracked your IP
I have many of these .
plz stay on topic, rather than have me try to prove what i have said .
|
Felicia Tennyson
Tennyson Court
6
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:31:00 -
[586] - Quote
I can't speak for individuals such as you who bought plexes for the purpose of playing Blink, what I would've assume then is that the more people spend time to play casino online, they spend less time playing spaceships online.
Maybe this explains why the PCU peaked out about 3 years ago and declining ever since somercasino online grew bigger and bigger. The space is already empty, don't make it emptier by only using Eve client as a wallet storing your in-game currency and facilitate ISK transactions and actually spend more time play on the casino website, it's hurting the game environment more than helping (since you are really not playing spaceship online but casino online).
you may as well make EveCoin with EveCoinWallet and join the bitcoin wagon and go gamble with plenty of bitcoin casino and pokers around the cyberspace
|
Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
730
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:34:00 -
[587] - Quote
Garai Nolen wrote:Hakaari Inkuran wrote:I'm more wondering why it took players to bring the issue up in the first place. CCP was perfectly capable of visiting the site and looking at the new promotion (literally all they had to do was look at it), do they not keep close tabs on their affiliates? ... Somer is not and never has been an affiliate of CCP. They are a player in EVE, like any other. Period. Markee Dragon, on the other hand, is an official 3rd party time-code reseller for CCP with an actual business relationship with CCP (except they don't call it a time-code now but, whatever, haven't had coffee yet and I'm not looking up the new name :) Somer was an affiliate of Markee Dragon under whatever affiliate program Markee has, completely independent from CCP. THERE IS NO BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOMER AND CCP, other than as a generic player governed by the EULA. That's kind of the point. When the community reported a player they believed to be violating the EULA, CCP investigated and took action as they would in any other case with any other regular player.
Hmm no business contract existed as far as I know but CCP promoted them (i.e. on the login screen), helped them with promotions and events, etc. the relationship between them certainly wasn't the same as a generic player.
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:carbomb wrote:I might be wrong, quite often am but this seems to me that someone at ccp signed off on this without reading it properly. Someone higher caught it after the scheme had started and called a stop. Somer in protest posted copies of the conversations showing the given consent and rather than admit that they f**ked up, ccp digs a breach of service out of their pocket and bans somer.
just saying Someone in sales, who should have passed it to legal but didn't, signed off on a proposal that was worded in such a way that it appeared to say one thing, and meant another, thus obscuring the true intent. TL;DR SomerBlink attempted to pull the wool over CCP's eyes, and failed due to those pesky Eve players.
Did you actually read the proposal? because if what CCP got was word for word as posted by Somer its pretty clear as to its intentions - if Somer intentionally side stepped CCP procedure to get someone to OK it under another pretext, et. then tht is another matter and one I have no info on. |
De'Veldrin
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
2914
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:34:00 -
[588] - Quote
Hawkr Trimodian wrote:And What about that Volcano. I am convinced this is the gods being offended by the unfair Treatment of Somer........ A huge volcano in Iceland may be getting ready to erupt: [Update, Aug. 20, 2014: Iceland's National Crisis Coordination Center has been activated, and a large uninhabited area surrounding the volcano has been evacuated. The Icelandic Met Office reports that about 1,000 small earthquakes occurred near the volcano on Tuesday. Also on Tuesday, Iceland's Civil Protection raised the nation's threat level from Uncertainty Phase to Alert Phase.]
Wait wait...how do you evacuate an uninhabited area? Did they import people to evacuate? De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null. |
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
4417
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:36:00 -
[589] - Quote
Darbarmic wrote:rather than have me try to prove what i have said . Do you even realize how silly this sounds? Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
20291
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:36:00 -
[590] - Quote
ExplorerAlTNewb wrote: its not just EVE Related. http://imgur.com/sCn0H1uThe scenario is basic, certain 3rd parties use ISK to pay EVE Players to create EVE content & services.... This is supposely OK"ed And one (possibly more) of the 3rd parties uses ISK to pay EVE Players to create content & services that have nothing to do with EVE Online. This hasnt been answered, and will most likely get ignored unless more focus is shined on it. Multiple CSM are a part of the "entity" that is doing it so they will deflect away from this. There is also the forum crashers & non sense wing working at odds ends to cover up / jam up everything as best they can. TMC stopped paying isk for non eve related content after the last SomerBlink debacle as far as I know; as it was deemed to be in contravention of CCP's policy with regards to isk for OOG services. A member of the mittens.com staff/mods team will be able to confirm this one way or the other.
If you feel that TMC has broken the rules, you should take it up with CCP, who will investigate the allegation and deal with it accordingly; probably by filing under B for burn it and then throwing all related paperwork into the nearest volcano because the allegation had no substance.
Also there appears to be something missing from your image, a date stamp, without it there's no way of telling how old it is.
Nil mortifi sine lucre. |
|
Aivo Dresden
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
368
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:39:00 -
[591] - Quote
I'm extremely disappointed, even disgusted by how this was handled. CCP Falcon, how low you have fallen. This whole thing was nothing more than a CCP sponsored and CSM fueled witch hunt.
Somer had authorization from your own VP and then you go ahead claiming this was not from your 'legal' department and therefore not valid. Are you for real? What kind of shoddy internal system do you have, if your VP can make deals without running them past legal first? I don't know if that's just sheer incompetence or pure amateurism. To then come back on them, at the expense of one of your players is completely unacceptable.
Secondly, you take actions against Somer's accounts because he disclosed 'private' communication. These are message between in this context, corporate entities. Not CCP and a player. He is well within his rights to publish approval or permission given for certain promotions and say they were approved by CCP, if in fact your own VP approved them in the first place.
You had a CSM fueled witch hunt, with our precious Goon CSMs leading the charge. And CCP sponsored it all, threw Somer to the wolves. I'm so disappointed by how you handled this, words can't express.
You caused this situation and you sacrificed Somer hoping it would calm the masses. You should be ashamed of yourself, truly. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
23995
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:41:00 -
[592] - Quote
ExplorerAlTNewb wrote:.. its not just EVE Related. http://imgur.com/sCn0H1uThe scenario is basic, certain 3rd parties use ISK to pay EVE Players to create EVE content & services.... This is supposely OK"ed And one (possibly more) of the 3rd parties uses ISK to pay EVE Players to create content & services that have nothing to do with EVE Online. Do you have any proof of this? And to qualify as RMT, do you have any evidence that the ISK is paid out in exchange for real cash?
Rroff wrote:Did you actually read the proposal? because if what CCP got was word for word as posted by Somer its pretty clear as to its intentions The intent was clear after the fact when it became apparent how you were meant to parse the sentences (which was different from the intuitive sense). Even so, the way it was actually enacted was now how it was described GÇö the proposal was written to suggest that no extra ISK would be paid out, and the actual scheme hinged entirely on extra ISK being paid out. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skillplan 2.2. |
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
252
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:44:00 -
[593] - Quote
Describing a post as 'lawyer-speak' (or did I say lawyer language?) is now a personal attack. That's rich.
...
CCP has always known that Somer made money from his website. CCP gave this guy unique ships just for kicks. CCP's VP of Sales corresponded with this guy regularly. CCP approved this latest promotion and learned about it FROM SOMER HIMSELF, not through some SUPER-AWESOME investigation. CCP's VP of Sales thought Somer was JOKING when he asked for consent from legal (presumably because the idea was so preposterous to her.)
If this episode is so wonderfully 'transparent' then why doesn't the initial post contain any of that information?
If Somer was just a player like everyone else and didn't have a business relationship with CCP, I would also like (as a regular player of EVE Online like Somer) regular emails from CCP's VP of Sales making friendly inquiries into my plans for the month.
...
As far as RMT, I loathe gold farmers who then turn around and RMT because that combination breaks MMO's. But it's the gold farming, the botting, the multi-boxers, the exploiters who break the game for people who play the game as intended (because it becomes impossible for them to compete.) NOT some guy who runs a gambling website and makes a few shekels out of the deal with CCP's full knowledge and consent and then gets banned because someone at CCP got butthurt that actual communications demonstrating shady behavior by CCP (yet again) were made public.
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
23997
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:46:00 -
[594] - Quote
Aivo Dresden wrote:I'm extremely disappointed, even disgusted by how this was handled. CCP Falcon, how low you have fallen. This whole thing was nothing more than a CCP sponsored and CSM fueled witch hunt. How on earth is it a witch hunt? They're enforcing the EULA GÇö is this now a bad thing?
Quote:You had a CSM fueled witch hunt, with our precious Goon CSMs leading the charge. What do the goons have to do with anything and why does it matter? How is it a GÇ£goon CSMGÇ¥ when 85% of the CSM aren't goons? You're not making any sense here.
AkJon Ferguson wrote:CCP has always known that Somer made money from his website. CCP gave this guy unique ships just for kicks. CCP's VP of Sales corresponded with this guy regularly. CCP approved this latest promotion and learned about it FROM SOMER HIMSELF, not through some SUPER-AWESOME investigation. Making money was never the issue. And no, CCP did not approve this latest promotion GÇö they approved something very different, that Somer then used as a cover for a drastically different scheme that broke the rules.
Quote:As far as RMT, I loathe gold farmers who then turn around and RMT because that combination breaks MMO's. But But nothing. RMT isn't allowed. Period. The form is irrelevant. You don't get to skip past the rules just because you don't engage in the regular type of rule-breaking and instead come up with a new kind. He could have made money without RMTing but instead chose to simply revive a simplified version of the same scheme that was shut down hard a year ago. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skillplan 2.2. |
Garai Nolen
Xyjax
21
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:48:00 -
[595] - Quote
Aivo Dresden wrote:Secondly, you take actions against Somer's accounts because he disclosed 'private' communication. These are message between in this context, corporate entities. Not CCP and a player. He is well within his rights to publish approval or permission given for certain promotions and say they were approved by CCP, if in fact your own VP approved them in the first place.
No, they aren't. If they were, he'd already be in violation of the EULA for being a "corporate entity" using EVE for business purposes. These were precisely between "CCP and a player". Anything else would be exactly the sort of privileged/special/favouritist relationship that CCP is/was accused of fostering with Somer, which is pretty much THE source of the community backlash.
As for his rights to publish them... certainly, he is well within his legal rights to publish (in most jurisdictions anyway). But CCP can ban his accounts for any reason they see fit, and publishing private CCP correspondence is one of those reasons clearly spelled out in the EULA that people get smacked with all the time.
Pretty much all of your arguments appeal to Somer's "special status", which is exactly the problem. No other player entity enjoys this special status with CCP. If CCP wants to spell out how we can apply for this same special status, great, we'll all be on even footing with Somer. Otherwise they MUST treat Somer like any average Joe regular player subject to the same EULA as anyone else, because that's exactly what he is. EVEoj - EVE Online JavaScript library: http://eve-oj.xyjax.com/ |
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
20291
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:53:00 -
[596] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:carbomb wrote:I might be wrong, quite often am but this seems to me that someone at ccp signed off on this without reading it properly. Someone higher caught it after the scheme had started and called a stop. Somer in protest posted copies of the conversations showing the given consent and rather than admit that they f**ked up, ccp digs a breach of service out of their pocket and bans somer.
just saying Someone in sales, who should have passed it to legal but didn't, signed off on a proposal that was worded in such a way that it appeared to say one thing, and meant another, thus obscuring the true intent. TL;DR SomerBlink attempted to pull the wool over CCP's eyes, and failed due to those pesky Eve players. Did you actually read the proposal? because if what CCP got was word for word as posted by Somer its pretty clear as to its intentions - if Somer intentionally side stepped CCP procedure to get someone to OK it under another pretext, etc. then that is another matter and one I have no info on. Yes I've read the proposal, have you?
Proposal, with the relevant parts highlighted for your convenience The justification is an outright lie, SomerBlink was rewarding players with extra isk by paying above market value for the PLEX they were purchasing.
The highlighted part of the workflow doesn't specify the price that SomerBlink would pay for the PLEX, it merely says best price. Which is basically an ambigous term to try and cover their arse.
Nil mortifi sine lucre. |
Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
730
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:53:00 -
[597] - Quote
Tippia wrote:[quote=ExplorerAlTNewb]The intent was clear after the fact when it became apparent how you were meant to parse the sentences (which was different from the intuitive sense). Even so, the way it was actually enacted was now how it was described GÇö the proposal was written to suggest that no extra ISK would be paid out, and the actual scheme hinged entirely on extra ISK being paid out.
The bit about extra ISK was context sensitive albeit in the description of a relatively complex system I can see why people might lose sight of the context but it was pretty plain to me on first read (as you can see in the Somer thread where I explained how it worked before all this kicked off). |
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
252
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:54:00 -
[598] - Quote
Aivo Dresden wrote:I'm extremely disappointed, even disgusted by how this was handled. CCP Falcon, how low you have fallen. This whole thing was nothing more than a CCP sponsored and CSM fueled witch hunt.
Somer had authorization from your own VP and then you go ahead claiming this was not from your 'legal' department and therefore not valid. Are you for real? What kind of shoddy internal system do you have, if your VP can make deals without running them past legal first? I don't know if that's just sheer incompetence or pure amateurism. To then come back on them, at the expense of one of your players is completely unacceptable.
Secondly, you take actions against Somer's accounts because he disclosed 'private' communication. These are message between in this context, corporate entities. Not CCP and a player. He is well within his rights to publish approval or permission given for certain promotions and say they were approved by CCP, if in fact your own VP approved them in the first place.
You had a CSM fueled witch hunt, with our precious Goon CSMs leading the charge. And CCP sponsored it all, threw Somer to the wolves. I'm so disappointed by how you handled this, words can't express.
You caused this situation and you sacrificed Somer hoping it would calm the masses. You should be ashamed of yourself, truly.
You captured it so well. Thanks.
I'm especially disgusted with Mang and Ali who were both +5 before this incident but have demonstrated themselves to be complete tools. |
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
6036
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:55:00 -
[599] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:Hawkr Trimodian wrote:And What about that Volcano. I am convinced this is the gods being offended by the unfair Treatment of Somer........ A huge volcano in Iceland may be getting ready to erupt: [Update, Aug. 20, 2014: Iceland's National Crisis Coordination Center has been activated, and a large uninhabited area surrounding the volcano has been evacuated. The Icelandic Met Office reports that about 1,000 small earthquakes occurred near the volcano on Tuesday. Also on Tuesday, Iceland's Civil Protection raised the nation's threat level from Uncertainty Phase to Alert Phase.] Wait wait...how do you evacuate an uninhabited area? Did they import people to evacuate?
A common necessity. They have to canvas the area and run-off all of the looky-loos who inventively want to gawk at things like this first-hand.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
23997
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 14:00:00 -
[600] - Quote
Rroff wrote:The bit about extra ISK was context sensitive albeit in the description of a relatively complex system I can see why people might lose sight of the context but it was pretty plain to me on first read (as you can see in the Somer thread where I explained how it worked before all this kicked off). GǪand that GÇ£context sensitivenessGÇ¥ is there solely to confuse matter and hide what is actually going on: namely that, contrary to the rules and contrary to the policy put in place the last time he tried this scheme, extra ISK will be paid out for ensuring that he gets real-life cash. If it's context sensitive, it has no place in the proposal GÇö it is only injected to throw off the perception of (read: lie about) how the program will work.
There is exactly one mention of extra ISK in the proposal, in a sentence that claims there will be none. That is because if the proposal would describe where the extra ISK comes in, it would instantly be slapped down for the RMT scheme (carbon-copied from last year) it is.
Garai Nolen wrote:No, they aren't. If they were, he'd already be in violation of the EULA for being a "corporate entity" using EVE for business purposes. These were precisely between "CCP and a player". Anything else would be exactly the sort of privileged/special/favouritist relationship that CCP is/was accused of fostering with Somer, which is pretty much THE source of the community backlash.
As for his rights to publish them... certainly, he is well within his legal rights to publish (in most jurisdictions anyway). But CCP can ban his accounts for any reason they see fit, and publishing private CCP correspondence is one of those reasons clearly spelled out in the EULA that people get smacked with all the time. GǪand, if anything, the GÇ£corporate entityGÇ¥ defence would mean that he was leaking corporate deal flow information, which is an even bigger nono and very possible real-life illegal, depending on the partnership structure. If that's the view one wants to take, he should probably be happy that all that happened was a ban, as opposed to a ban and a hoard of bearded Icelandic vikings lawyers (arguably much more frightening) ripping his business apart. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skillplan 2.2. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] .. 27 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |