Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

David Coverdale
Hysterical Hyena Hydrogen Hybrid Hypothesis
0
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 19:35:00 -
[1] - Quote
At present moment, there remains only 1 system controlled by Caldari in faction warfare (Ladistier). Even the most devoted low-sec Caldari pvp'ers could not protect their home systems from the Gal invasion, but there doesn't seem to be any forum activity regarding this fact. Did I miss something? |

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
405
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 19:40:00 -
[2] - Quote
Yes. We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

Quentin Marshall
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 19:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
I don't understand how Caldari didn't take at least a couple systems back to prevent 100% warzone dominance. They can easily plex back systems far beyond the reach of where Gallente base out of. This would've been a good troll. |

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
405
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 19:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Quentin Marshall wrote:I don't understand how Caldari didn't take at least a couple systems back to prevent 100% warzone dominance. They can easily plex back systems far beyond the reach of where Gallente base out of. This would've been a good troll. You assume there's somewhere we can't reach, or that we wouldn't move to counter them as soon as we noticed. Remember, even if you're going for a headshot, it takes about 2 days of plexing unopposed to flip a system. We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
66
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
A lot of former Cal Mil are in Gal Mil now so I guess they are winning. |

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos
370
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
the tear posts on this subject by calmil noobs. Probably some people on the calmil side figuring out what they are doing wrong and not posting.
Anyway, the best fixes can come from CCP. The best we can hope is that CCP disconnects the lp from higher tier system they've set up, and no one ever again takes the entire warzone. Better to have continual push pull than wild swings progressing to an inevitable down and out.  CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, please give us a persisting-áoff button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals. |

Combatevolved
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
57
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:28:00 -
[7] - Quote
Quentin Marshall wrote:I don't understand how Caldari didn't take at least a couple systems back to prevent 100% warzone dominance. They can easily plex back systems far beyond the reach of where Gallente base out of. This would've been a good troll. Quite simple. The swarm of gal alts dplexing is far greater than caldari members combined. |

Degnar Oskold
Justified Chaos
125
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
Pushing Calmil out will mean that us in GalMil will be free for the true objective.... claiming Nullsec systems FOR THE FEDERATION! |

Arla Sarain
68
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 21:03:00 -
[9] - Quote
Quentin wrote: They can easily plex back systems far beyond the reach of where Gallente base out of. This would've been a good troll. No one can be bothered to babysit a system 18 hours per day and make sure they don't deplex everything you just plexed.
Structure bashing was probably the most fun thing Gallente did in the last month, so them talking about our "tears on this subject" posts is amusing. Tryhards.
inb4 QQ more. |

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos
370
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 21:27:00 -
[10] - Quote
Arla Sarain wrote:Quentin wrote: They can easily plex back systems far beyond the reach of where Gallente base out of. This would've been a good troll. No one can be bothered to babysit a system 18 hours per day and make sure they don't deplex everything you just plexed. Structure bashing was probably the most fun thing Gallente did in the last month, so them talking about our "tears on this subject" posts is amusing. Tryhards. inb4 QQ more. See, this is what I'm talking about. What is this I don't even. Maybe if you figured out how to fight and hold your home systems you wouldn't be in this situation.
We did, and we withstood your hordes of farmer alts (which btw you've always had more of until the last month or so) and siege attempts on our base systems . Anyway, view this as a favor for both of us. Maybe CCP will realize that increasingly rewarding the faction with the upperhand, through consistently increasing lp with each tier, is the dumbest way to run a perpetual war.
There should be built in emergency braking as the steep downhill looms closer. Plenty of rp and backstory rationales could be used to explain it. Planetary rebellions in conquered territories accumulate strength over time, or supply lines and war funds become stretched as the complete victory comes closer. Whatever. This situation can be fixed by CCP. Whether you lot will realize what you are doing wrong and actually fix it who knows.
And, btw, it's been a blast of pvp. Only not with calmil. Which is the true tragedy of the situation. CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, please give us a persisting-áoff button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals. |
|

Arla Sarain
68
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 21:47:00 -
[11] - Quote
I don't see what you are talking about. We did figure it out - sorry we don't have an advantageous time-zone spread and an abundance of time to compete over the little bar in the top left corner. How many farmers have actually been relevant ever since the plex changes? I mean people joining Caldari to plex farm are the same people who have a hanger in Jita and constantly ask if Tama is clear. Those are typically new people who join to "try out PvP and earn some cash on the side" but end up flying some borke risk averse fit that doesn't really farm plexs well and all it does is warp out as soon as they hear the engagement beep.
Caldari farmers are extinct, not Squids. Same squids that were playing are the same ones logging on now. And there aren't/weren't as many as you keep repeating we have. It's flattering even. |

Aves Enderas
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
2
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 22:36:00 -
[12] - Quote
Deacon Abox wrote:Arla Sarain wrote:Quentin wrote: They can easily plex back systems far beyond the reach of where Gallente base out of. This would've been a good troll. No one can be bothered to babysit a system 18 hours per day and make sure they don't deplex everything you just plexed. Structure bashing was probably the most fun thing Gallente did in the last month, so them talking about our "tears on this subject" posts is amusing. Tryhards. inb4 QQ more. See, this is what I'm talking about. What is this I don't even. Maybe if you figured out how to fight and hold your home systems you wouldn't be in this situation. We did, and we withstood your hordes of farmer alts (which btw you've always had more of until the last month or so) and siege attempts on our base systems . Anyway, view this as a favor for both of us. Maybe CCP will realize that increasingly rewarding the faction with the upperhand, through consistently increasing lp with each tier, is the dumbest way to run a perpetual war. There should be built in emergency braking as the steep downhill looms closer. Plenty of rp and backstory rationales could be used to explain it. Planetary rebellions in conquered territories accumulate strength over time, or supply lines and war funds become stretched as the complete victory comes closer. Whatever. This situation can be fixed by CCP. Whether you lot will realize what you are doing wrong and actually fix it who knows. And, btw, it's been a blast of pvp. Only not with calmil. Which is the true tragedy of the situation. 
Or, you know, those of us in Gal Mil could just stop constantly pushing Cal Mil out of every home they try and make and thus causing all the problems you claim CCP should be responsible for. But why take ownership when you can blame someone else \o/ |

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos
370
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 22:58:00 -
[13] - Quote
Arla Sarain wrote: I don't see what you are talking about. We did figure it out - sorry we don't have an advantageous time-zone spread and an abundance of time to compete over the little bar in the top left corner. How many farmers have actually been relevant ever since the plex changes? I mean people joining Caldari to plex farm are the same people who have a hanger in Jita and constantly ask if Tama is clear. Those are typically new people who join to "try out PvP and earn some cash on the side" but end up flying some borke risk averse fit that doesn't really farm plexs well and all it does is warp out as soon as they hear the engagement beep.
Caldari farmers are extinct, not Squids. Same squids that were playing are the same ones logging on now. And there aren't/weren't as many as you keep repeating we have. It's flattering even. TZ differential has nothing to do with it. With 6000 to 9000 toons in your militia you've had plenty of numerical tz coverage. It is the quality of that TZ coverage that has been your downfall. But then you appear to already know that, since you mention the Jita centric pve types and the constant "is the Tama gate clear?" crowd. I pity you for having to deal with those types. We have them too, but probably not in the numbers you do.
Yeah, I see some of you same guys out there fighting. I'm happy you're still there. I even miss the Happy Endings guys. It was fun to fight Calmil and not the pirate entities. However, you are still missing something collectively that has led you to this unpleasant position again. It's been said in many threads but you keep not fixing it, and I'm not going to blurt it out for you again.
CCP needs to implement some fixes to the lp farming portions of the equation. But you guys need to realize what you are doing wrong strategically as well.
Maybe we will have a better system, and more enjoyable fights in the future. That is what we all hope for. Until then sorry to put you into highsec. But it is the stated goal of this portion of the game. SO we have to pursue it to the end.  CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, please give us a persisting-áoff button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals. |

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos
370
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 23:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
Aves Enderas wrote: Or, you know, those of us in Gal Mil could just stop constantly pushing Cal Mil out of every home they try and make and thus causing all the problems you claim CCP should be responsible for. But why take ownership when you can blame someone else \o/ I'd rather have a game opponent that eventually learns through tough knocks to the point where they actually become a real challenge to beat, than one I can just keep boringly beating up on so much that I play other games all the time. vOv CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, please give us a persisting-áoff button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals. |

Combatevolved
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
57
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 23:15:00 -
[15] - Quote
Deacon Abox wrote:Aves Enderas wrote: Or, you know, those of us in Gal Mil could just stop constantly pushing Cal Mil out of every home they try and make and thus causing all the problems you claim CCP should be responsible for. But why take ownership when you can blame someone else \o/ I'd rather have a game opponent that eventually learns through tough knocks to the point where they actually become a real challenge to beat, than one I can just keep boringly beating up on so much that I play other games all the time. vOv
Start enjoying playing other games for a whole 6-12 months. |

Arla Sarain
68
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 23:35:00 -
[16] - Quote
Deacon Abox wrote:With 6000 to 9000 toons These numbers are useless.
You have slightly less as far as statistics are concerned, but where the fudge are they? They are ghost alts. You shouldn't even use militia chat numbers as a metric. They are people that never commit, never get involved, and are largely irrelevant.
The blunt reality is, you have about 60 people playing consistently, a recent boom in activity. We have about 40 people playing spread pretty thin. Sometimes we manage to get 60 and go do a fight or two with you if everyone is feeling like messing around 14j out with plenty other nuances.
The End. |

Cromwell Savage
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
196
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 00:26:00 -
[17] - Quote
Are squids complaining of plexing alts?
Hahahahahahahahahaha!
FW is dead regardless...broken mechanics that encourage kicking the other side out of lo-sec. Absolutely brilliant!!!!! |

sytaqe violacea
Theory of Mind
19
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 02:37:00 -
[18] - Quote
Recently, I persuaded my friends to return to Calmil after they got tired being pirate for 3 months. And now, they has trouble re-deploying. Where did Calmil move to after losing their home system? |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2464
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 03:01:00 -
[19] - Quote
We're taking Ichoriya next. |

Yuri Antollare
Justified Chaos
85
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 03:09:00 -
[20] - Quote
sytaqe violacea wrote:Recently, I persuaded my friends to return to Calmil after they got tired being pirate for 3 months. And now, they has trouble re-deploying. Where did Calmil move to after losing their home system?
Rumors abound as to some variant of hi-sec or non-FW lowsec. You would have thought that once they lost Kinakka, those squids would have just collapsed back to the next home system and so forth and so forth. For some reason though when the going gets tough over there they prefer to just drop FW or move to hi-sec.
There were at least two of the sieges that would have been swung/lasted too long for us if the squids had engaged in even some basic moves helping each other out.
It is what it is though, they'd prefer to give up and talk about the farming alts that took Kinakka, or the Gall deplexing alt that killed all the Diesel corp squids pushing up the backwater systems threatening the WZ push. |
|

Deen Wispa
Justified Chaos
731
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 03:33:00 -
[21] - Quote
I'm going to say some stuff that will probably make some of my militia pilots and corpmates irate, but it needs to be said.
There is simply no need to continue beating up on an opponent that is not as coordinated and experienced as we are. Everyone around here already knows that Gallente is superior in virtually every facet of FW. We are overachievers, in fact.
I'm just coming back into the game. I no longer have the sort of time that I used to have for this game. When I log on, I just want to create fun content or be a part of it. Logging on and seeing 30-50 pilots plexing a system with no competition. Moaning on comms about why the enemy hasn't shown up. That's not fun. Being a cog in the machine. Trying to get a word in with 5 other people talking over each other. Not fun. Being in a large group where I can't get to know my fellow gamers. Where I can't teach and/or learn from my fellow pilots. Sucks.
The ethos of FW was always about a place where you can have an impact. Where you're not just a number. Where multiple groups of pilots can have an impact. A place where our personal actions truly matter and will have a ripple effect throughout the warzone.
Man. Things have truly changed over the last two years I've been here. Nowadays, people are more interested in trying to get 500 kills a month rather than find meaning and impact in some of their battles.
We blame CCP for the current mechanics without taking any responsibility. We grief the competition and constantly kick them out of their space because we can. We tell them that it's not our fault we're highly organized and that they need to step up their game. But to accept personal responsibility for the current ecosystem we've created. Never.
An interesting narrative that we tell and convince ourself of nowadays.
This narrative sounds familiar to another large group of pilots in another region of space.... High Five. Yeah! C'est La Eve . |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2466
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 04:19:00 -
[22] - Quote
Yeah it sucks when players band together to accomplish a common goal.
I can't believe we've destroyed FW after a two week offensive. Well done! |

Baron' Soontir Fel
Justified Chaos
240
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 04:37:00 -
[23] - Quote
While I agree with your first points about why I joined the warzone/FW/Eve ( I really hate 20+ fights) and probably one of the main reasons I haven't been playing much at all (other than PvE'ing) since the Huola campaign, I disagree with putting blame on ourselves.
Why would we even try to blame ourselves for being the best/doing the best we can? What I liked about FW was the ability for 100 man fights and the 5 man fights. They both have their uses, and both are important. (the 5 man fights much less useful now with the huge difference between oplexing+deplexing)
I have my own thoughts on the subject seeing as GalMil was part of a pretty long and hard time period at Tier 1 vs Tier 3/4 against TEST and other CalMil groups. There was a significant risk of losing Eha at the time and better men than me went ABCD to defend it against all odds. We've been at T4/CalMil at T1 for maybe a month and they've already failscaded? We were even facing the swarms of deplexing AND oplexing alts back then. All these excuses I'm hearing about deplexing alts or similar are ones that we had to face before. Maybe this will be CalMils forge.
The issue at hand is not how Caldari militia got where they are today. It's how they will act in the future.
(pro hint: start fighting outnumbered and stop bringing griffins) |

CheesusCrust
HildCo Interplanetar Villore Accords
9
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 04:37:00 -
[24] - Quote
The death of the stabbed cloaky frigate farmer/bot has sadly crippled Caldari Militia plexing percentages. Let's see if CVA steps up after the AT. |

Julianus Soter
Moira. Villore Accords
213
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 04:47:00 -
[25] - Quote
Interesting point cheesus ;)
And just to add my 0.02 ISK... I don't think it's improper to push an advantage to 100% warzone control. Factional Warfare is the most lucrative PVP-oriented activity in the history of Eve Online, besides perhaps wormhole space, and is vastly more accessible in terms of skillpoints.
The failure of the Caldari Militia to provide any meaningful resistance is the direct result of successive generations of inept leadership and egotistical fleet commanders, who believed that they could win the war effort on their own without coordinating with fellow Caldari membership.
By purging the warzone, we give a chance for new leadership and new personnel to step up to the challenge. We gladly accept any new comers to the facwar zone, friend or foe, and we will be happy to share with you our ample supply of antimatter charges ;) Moira. Corporation CEO, Executor, Villore Accords, @Julianus_Soter https://zkillboard.com/alliance/99001634/ |

Christopher Mabata
Dominion Tenebrarum Reverberation Project
154
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 05:20:00 -
[26] - Quote
When Test left the Caldari millita were left with a few all star linked and high implanted pilots who fought back quite valiantly, but in the end it was all hands on deck and meat shield ahoy, battles are won by soldiers and wars are won by exceptional and talented individuals, and while numbers dont win you the war they sure do help. Is it bad if your friend says "that was a Metaphor" and you say "Meta 4? Get Tech II or faction" ?I love the sound of silent explosions in Space.-á |

Julianus Soter
Moira. Villore Accords
214
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 05:50:00 -
[27] - Quote
And with that, we have just liberated the Ladistier system. The Presidential station shall return back under Federation control.
Well done, people. Moira. Corporation CEO, Executor, Villore Accords, @Julianus_Soter https://zkillboard.com/alliance/99001634/ |

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
300
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 06:15:00 -
[28] - Quote
Deen,
Now that we have our victory we welcome the Caldari to come back and take everything that isn't a home system, and we invite them to try and take those.
How long it takes some enterprising Caldari groups to counter attack remains to be seen. Thankfully we still have PL, BL, Snuff, Stay Frosty, etc. to do battle with.
For now I'm happy to kick back and enjoy till Friday, - Than BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Epikurus
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
33
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 08:58:00 -
[29] - Quote
Deacon Abox wrote: TZ differential has nothing to do with it. With 6000 to 9000 toons in your militia you've had plenty of numerical tz coverage.
My sides.
That aside though, grats on the clean sweep!
Edit - Should just add that I don't really understand the criticisms being aimed at the Gal offensive from their own side. It's true that if you want a certain ecosystem then you have to take certain ecological measures but really it is CCP's job to play gamekeeper, not the pilots in FW. It would be odd indeed if one side didn't aim for a territorial victory when they had the chance. I'm just surprised it didn't come sooner. |

Cirrila
SQUIDS.
3
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 09:09:00 -
[30] - Quote
Why are people allowed to switch sides according to who is actually winning ? I would personaly never switch side because it seems unrealistic and lame to me. It is like jumping between axis and allies or horde and alliance to me. I dont give a crap if we are loosing or winning once I join one side i stay. Or are pilots just mercenaries ? |
|

Danny John-Peter
Snuff Box
497
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 09:11:00 -
[31] - Quote
It probably has something to do with Caldari being an un-cooridnated mess that can't pull anything close to a proper gang while Gal-Mil are quite capable of fielding decent sized HAC fleets.
Its not all about plexing alts, people have to have a reason to stay in a militia that isn't just sitting in a plex 24/7. |

Epikurus
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
33
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 09:25:00 -
[32] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:
Its not all about plexing alts, people have to have a reason to stay in a militia that isn't just sitting in a plex 24/7.
It's not really about plexing alts at all since there is nothing to stop anyone having plexing alts. Where GalMil shines is in their commitment to plexing. They simply have more guys who are willing to be dedicated to that task but anyone who wants to put significant time and effort into that role would be a fool not to make use of alts.
|

Joshua Foiritain
Coreli Corporation Ineluctable.
932
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 09:38:00 -
[33] - Quote
Add pirate factions to fw \o/ DRUGS DRUGS DRUGS | Coreli Corporation, Serpentis Loyalists DRUGS DRUGS DRUGS | Small gang PVP & drug production DRUGS DRUGS DRUGS | Ship Replacement program DRUGS DRUGS DRUGS | Multiple roaming fleets per day |

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
375
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 09:57:00 -
[34] - Quote
so if i understand , people want us to share the WZ ( lets say fifty-fifty) with calmil , never try to take the other 50% , have only 1V1 fights , or small gangs fights ( and here it comes the definition of Small??)
Sounds like the null sec agreement between PL and co and CFC and this is the Majors iussue in 0.0 and you guys want to bring this kind of thing in The FW .... after some calmil cynobitching for Razor ? now we will spread their bullshit politic too?
ok :( RENAME WH systems With the name of REAL Universe Stellar Name like KOI-730 etc etc It will be awesome.
GalMIl>>ALL |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1572
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 10:31:00 -
[35] - Quote
Cromwell Savage wrote:Are squids complaining of plexing alts?
Hahahahahahahahahaha! Now that is funny!
FW is dead regardless...broken mechanics that encourage kicking the other side out of lo-sec. Absolutely brilliant!!!!!
Edit - As long as docking rights are tied to occupancy, I'm done with FW. Five years to go from complaining that there were not enough squids in lo-sec to actively kicking them out.... What a waste.
and before things were like that FW was dead because the war was irrelevant. People are just whining. If you lost you lost, it is no one else fault except of your side. Organize and go take back something, and stop whining. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1572
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 10:32:00 -
[36] - Quote
Cirrila wrote:Why are people allowed to switch sides according to who is actually winning ? I would personaly never switch side because it seems unrealistic and lame to me. It is like jumping between axis and allies or horde and alliance to me. I dont give a crap if we are loosing or winning once I join one side i stay. Or are pilots just mercenaries ?
Well jumping to the losing side is always fun, gives you more targets. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Arla Sarain
72
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 10:53:00 -
[37] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote: the war was irrelevant. People are just whining. If you lost you lost, it is no one else fault except of your side. The war IS irrelevant... No one is whining. We are just baffled. We lost a label and you make it sound like we lost an arm and a leg.
gf. |

Shad owLord
The Great Harmon Institute Of Technology Enemy Spotted.
4
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 11:22:00 -
[38] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:It probably has something to do with Caldari being an un-cooridnated mess that can't pull anything close to a proper gang while Gal-Mil are quite capable of fielding decent sized HAC fleets.
Its not all about plexing alts, people have to have a reason to stay in a militia that isn't just sitting in a plex 24/7.
It has nothing to do with coordination. Due to the transient nature of calmil pilots, at best half our pilots have the SP to fly cruisers, and only a percentage of that half have hacs trained. With the introduction in Kronos of more large plex's and the Gal hac fleets, we have no counter (not because there isnt one - just we cant physically field them in the numbers required), ergo we mainly have to concede the larges, add to this the departure of farmers for the other side and a few other issues that are well documented on these forums at present we can no longer hold systems from the Gals. We realised this a while back, which is why you've seen little in the way of defense, throwing away billions of isk trying to defend the undefendable is just stupid.
Were still here, were more co-ordinated than ever, but were not so stupid as to throw away what limited isk our guys have thes days on situations we have zero chance of winning. Sadly I dont see that situation changing in the forseeable future either.
P.S. You all should listen more to Deen |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1573
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 11:30:00 -
[39] - Quote
Arla Sarain wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote: the war was irrelevant. People are just whining. If you lost you lost, it is no one else fault except of your side. The war IS irrelevant... No one is whining. We are just baffled. We lost a label and you make it sound like we lost an arm and a leg. gf.
The war WAS not relevant before dockign rights were associated with the war results. I was in minmatar militia back then and it was a full whatever scenario since absolutely NOTHIGN on the war result mattered. Now is much better. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
68
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 12:54:00 -
[40] - Quote
Deen making way too much sense. |
|

Degnar Oskold
Justified Chaos
125
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 12:59:00 -
[41] - Quote
FW zone controlled, next stop F7C-H0? |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
101
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 13:05:00 -
[42] - Quote
As I posted before, FW is totally dead and ****** up.
Gals are tlhe last to notice that.
I think CCP broke FW by Intention - because it was the best game content EVE had and thus threatend null sex. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1080
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 13:36:00 -
[43] - Quote
Deen Wispa wrote:I'm going to say some stuff that will probably make some of my militia pilots and corpmates irate, but it needs to be said.
There is simply no need to continue beating up on an opponent that is not as coordinated and experienced as we are. Everyone around here already knows that Gallente is superior in virtually every facet of FW. We are overachievers, in fact.
I'm just coming back into the game. I no longer have the sort of time that I used to have for this game. When I log on, I just want to create fun content or be a part of it. Logging on and seeing 30-50 pilots plexing a system with no competition. Moaning on comms about why the enemy hasn't shown up. That's not fun. Being a cog in the machine. Trying to get a word in with 5 other people talking over each other. Not fun. Being in a large group where I can't get to know my fellow gamers. Where I can't teach and/or learn from my fellow pilots. Sucks.
The ethos of FW was always about a place where you can have an impact. Where you're not just a number. Where multiple groups of pilots can have an impact. A place where our personal actions truly matter and will have a ripple effect throughout the warzone.
Man. Things have truly changed over the last two years I've been here. Nowadays, people are more interested in trying to get 500 kills a month rather than find meaning and impact in some of their battles.
We blame CCP for the current mechanics without taking any responsibility. We grief the competition and constantly kick them out of their space because we can. We tell them that it's not our fault we're highly organized and that they need to step up their game. But to accept personal responsibility for the current ecosystem we've created. Never.
An interesting narrative that we tell and convince ourself of nowadays.
This narrative sounds familiar to another large group of pilots in another region of space....
TL;DR, basically, join QCATS, play LOL, stop posting. |

Ig Asho
The Sadistic Clowns Mordus Angels
10
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 14:44:00 -
[44] - Quote
Gratz to galmil
Just gonna give a quick synopsis from the calmil side of the last few months and a little explanation as to why things went the way they did.
Basically once galmil were able to ship into ishtars / other hacs / t2 logi consistently it was all over. Sure the warzone was still reasonably close at the time, but it was over right then. Most of calmil (both general mil and even within the major alliances) cannot fly many t2 ships and basically all out refuses to fly anything worth more than 50 mil (and even that is a stretch). Can't tell you how many times I asked for shinier or bigger ships and got condors. Its just amazing.
The only real counter we had was trying to pull in nullsec alliances to assist (which was hit or miss), informing snuff of when fights happened and hoping for the best in a 3 way, or dropping caps (yup that was my chimera ya'll saw in basically every fight for a solid 2 weeks, good on ya'll to finally get it when we screwed up a drop w/ RZR)
Along with the sheer inability to ship up you have basically Templis operating as their own entity, straight up refusing the rest of the militia into their fleets quite often. MBLOC could not care less about warzone control and while I love the guys, really can't fly much beyond frigs. Then you have the non-stop drama from GHIOT which has caused obscene amounts of infighting detracting from our ability to fight gals.
So anyway.... props to gals on taking over everything, the pressure ya'll applied really just kept calmil reeling and they couldn't ever recover post-innia. Really enjoyed running fleets against ya'll, don't really recall ever being headshotted while fc'ing at all.
Sorry for length:
TL:DR: Calmil shoots itself in foot, galmil applies pressure |

Epikurus
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
34
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 15:26:00 -
[45] - Quote
Ig Asho wrote:MBLOC could not care less about warzone control and while I love the guys, really can't fly much beyond frigs.
That's harsh man! We can almost fly T1 cruisers now too  |

RonPaul Rox
Justified Chaos
44
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 15:46:00 -
[46] - Quote
Julianus Soter wrote:Interesting point cheesus ;)
The failure of the Caldari Militia to provide any meaningful resistance is the direct result of successive generations of inept leadership and egotistical fleet commanders, who believed that they could win the war effort on their own without coordinating with fellow Caldari membership.
i think if we had saved innia for last they MAY have all come together to fight for it. I viewed Innia as their version of our Eha, and we head-shotted it. http://imgur.com/EGjYLSL
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1351
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 15:49:00 -
[47] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote: It really is amazing how all the people who dont play eve any more seem to want input as though their opinion matters in the slightest. .
So you think the opinions of the huge number of pvpers who have stopped playing faction war over the years should not matter to ccp at all? The only opinions that should matter are the 50 of you who like the new Null Sec Junior game fw has become?
Since the disinterest in fw is also coming from many of the great gallente faction war pvper's its hard for you to argue the game is really great and they are just bitter because they are not winning. They won too. They just don't care very much.
Its time to finally face it. The game sucks. The 50 of you who do not realize it shouldn't matter. You will play no matter how bad the game is. For that reason it is your opinion that should not matter to ccp.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

chatgris
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
732
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 15:49:00 -
[48] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote: TL;DR, basically, join QCATS, play LOL, stop posting.
It's Robocraft now!
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
It really is amazing how all the people who dont play eve any more seem to want input as though their opinion matters in the slightest.
Some of us stopped playing for a reason, still follow the game from a distance and still know enough about the game to be able to form coherent opinions about what could make the game better.
Not defending anyone in particular, but making the point that someone who doesn't play much can still have valid input.
|

Danny John-Peter
Snuff Box
498
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 15:50:00 -
[49] - Quote
Ig Asho wrote:informing snuff of when fights happened and hoping for the best in a 3 way
Hi. |

Epikurus
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
34
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 15:52:00 -
[50] - Quote
RonPaul Rox wrote:Julianus Soter wrote:Interesting point cheesus ;)
The failure of the Caldari Militia to provide any meaningful resistance is the direct result of successive generations of inept leadership and egotistical fleet commanders, who believed that they could win the war effort on their own without coordinating with fellow Caldari membership.
i think if we had saved innia for last they MAY have all come together to fight for it. I viewed Innia as their version of our Eha, and we head-shotted it.
I am morally certain that if Innia was the last thing on the map then the first priority of the guys who live around Heydieles and Ladistier would have been the retaking of Heyd and Ladistier.
Can't help but wonder if it is time for Muhammed to go to the mountain since the mountain most definitely isn't going to come to Muhammed ... |
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1351
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 16:03:00 -
[51] - Quote
chatgris wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote: TL;DR, basically, join QCATS, play LOL, stop posting.
It's Robocraft now! Crosi Wesdo wrote:
It really is amazing how all the people who dont play eve any more seem to want input as though their opinion matters in the slightest.
Some of us stopped playing for a reason, still follow the game from a distance and still know enough about the game to be able to form coherent opinions about what could make the game better. Not defending anyone in particular, but making the point that someone who doesn't play much can still have valid input.
Chatgris you should be a kindergarten teacher. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Deen Wispa
Justified Chaos
735
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 16:08:00 -
[52] - Quote
Baron' Soontir Fel wrote:While I agree with your first points about why I joined the warzone/FW/Eve ( I really hate 20+ fights) and probably one of the main reasons I haven't been playing much at all (other than PvE'ing) since the Huola campaign, I disagree with putting blame on ourselves.
Exactly. That is what many pilots gravitate towards. That's what we hunger for.
It's not about putting blame on us per se. But I think that we have to see ourselves as keepers of the flame...err the game. I guess there is a certain naivete in my statement. Afterall, we are conditioned to want to win at all cost and the idealogy of sportsmanship and going easy on your opponent makes me sound crazy and foolish in such a cutthroat game. But I know this game and FW is flawed and will never be perfect. Which is why I think it's important to see how our contributions impact the game as well rather than simply putting the burden on the enemy.
I have this great MinutemanKirk story that I'd like to share some other time about how we purposely downsized our fleet to fight a Bolsterbomb gang back in the day. It's a great lesson on restraint. One of the first lessons I learned when trying to FC.
Quote: Maybe this will be CalMils forge.
We've heard this one for many years. Caldari has always been like this. In fact, as time passes by, I'm more inclined to believe it's not even how bad Caldari is, but how much we overachieve as a group. You could replace Blue Steel with the Golden Army or Trust In Rust, and I think the Green Machine would still win out. We are THAT organized.
I've heard talks over the year about certain FCs or leaders wanting to switch over to Caldari for the sake of GFs and reclaiming that exhilaration of the game and of fighting outnumbered. But everyone talks themself out of it because
A) They know it's more work than they want to put into it. B) And that one person's contributions will have no impact on CalMil. C) They're likely to get primaried right off the bat in any fight for being a turncoat
PS- I don't get the obsession with people getting angry about how QCATS dedicate their time to this game or lack thereof. Or what other games they play and the bitter passive aggressive vitriol people have had towards them for years. They are good people.
I came in when they were at their peak and started to slow down. It's like some big insecurity some of you have with them...that their casual playstyle and idealogies is so different from yours that people choose to ostracize them or those who share similar views. Not everyone is unemployed or has time to play 30 hours a week.
They were the pillar of GalMil for years. Their FC lineup was stellar. The ecosystem that Gallente has today is partly because of what they built. God forbid that I mention I play some other game or make an opinion contrary to the Gallente mainstream, and get ostracized for it in public or private. High Five. Yeah! C'est La Eve . |

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
301
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 16:14:00 -
[53] - Quote
I can't wait for Friday! BLFOX is currently recruiting |

chatgris
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
732
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 16:23:00 -
[54] - Quote
Deen Wispa wrote:I've heard talks over the year about certain FCs or leaders wanting to switch over to Caldari for the sake of GFs and reclaiming that exhilaration of the game and of fighting outnumbered. But everyone talks themself out of it because
A) They know it's more work than they want to put into it. B) And that one person's contributions will have no impact on CalMil. C) They're likely to get primaried right off the bat in any fight for being a turncoat
Just thought I'd add in:
D) It's almost impossible to switch a corp over to Caldari and we don't want to lose our awesome BC ranking by switching to another corp.
|

RonPaul Rox
Justified Chaos
44
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 16:28:00 -
[55] - Quote
Deen Wispa wrote:
PS- I don't get the obsession with people getting angry about how QCATS dedicate their time to this game or lack thereof. Or what other games they play and the bitter passive aggressive vitriol people have had towards them for years. They are good people.
I came in when they were at their peak and started to slow down. It's like some big insecurity some of you have with them...that their casual playstyle and idealogies is so different from yours that people choose to ostracize them or those who share similar views. Not everyone is unemployed or has time to play 30 hours a week.
They were the pillar of GalMil for years. Their FC lineup was stellar. The ecosystem that Gallente has today is partly because of what they built. God forbid that I mention I play some other game or make an opinion contrary to the Gallente mainstream, and get ostracized for it in public or private.
i think it was just crosi trolling them, its easy to tell when when crosi is trolling on comms, but on the forums he just sounds like an A-hole, when he's really not http://imgur.com/EGjYLSL
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1085
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 16:35:00 -
[56] - Quote
chatgris wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote: TL;DR, basically, join QCATS, play LOL, stop posting.
It's Robocraft now! Crosi Wesdo wrote:
It really is amazing how all the people who dont play eve any more seem to want input as though their opinion matters in the slightest.
Some of us stopped playing for a reason, still follow the game from a distance and still know enough about the game to be able to form coherent opinions about what could make the game better. Not defending anyone in particular, but making the point that someone who doesn't play much can still have valid input.
Making suggestions about the game is one thing, calling people polesmokers and idiots is quite another. The opinions deen posted about our push are also not suggestions to improve the game, they are just an obsolete preference.
Also thanks ronpaul, but im not trolling, and i am an *******! |

JAF Anders
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
296
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 16:47:00 -
[57] - Quote
"Lastly, those who are difficult to move, but on that account susceptible of very deep feelings; men who stand in the same relation to the preceding as red heat to a flame are the best adapted by means of their Titanic strength to roll away the enormous masses, by which we may figuratively represent the difficulties which beset command in war. The effect of their feelings is like the movement of a great body, slower, but more irresistible." The pursuit of excellence and stabbed plexing alts. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1351
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 16:47:00 -
[58] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote: It really is amazing how all the people who dont play eve any more seem to want input as though their opinion matters in the slightest.
Crosi Wesdo wrote: Making suggestions about the game is one thing, ...!
Does the opinion of formerly active players matter in the slightest or not?
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1085
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 16:51:00 -
[59] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote: It really is amazing how all the people who dont play eve any more seem to want input as though their opinion matters in the slightest.
Crosi Wesdo wrote: Making suggestions about the game is one thing, ...!
Does the opinion of formerly active players matter in the slightest or not?
Making suggestions abot how to fix the game, sure. Telling active players how to play with the current mechanics, not so much. |

Eric de'Locke
Rapid Withdrawal
7
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 16:57:00 -
[60] - Quote
As a fairly new member to FW, I've on just scratched the surface of what can be achieved in Eve. I've flown with and fought some incredible pilots that make this game so enjoyable. Willing to share and answer questions, even if they are on the "opposite side." As well as some arrogant twats that quote "this is Eve" because that can get away with being twats.
So please understand when I say this: The reason why Galmil has conquered all of their FW space isn't because we are well organised, supplied or answer calls for help when needed. It's much more simple than that. We stick to our guns. Yes, some Galmil have left to become pirate or join a null sec corp for whatever reason. But the majority of us have made a decision to fight for and defend Gallente space, no matter what, and that's what we do. Simple as. Everything else is just gravy. |
|

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
411
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 16:59:00 -
[61] - Quote
Deen Wispa wrote: It's not about putting blame on us per se. But I think that we have to see ourselves as keepers of the flame...err the game. I guess there is a certain naivete in my statement. Afterall, we are conditioned to want to win at all cost and the idealogy of sportsmanship and going easy on your opponent makes me sound crazy and foolish in such a cutthroat game. But I know this game and FW is flawed and will never be perfect. Which is why I think it's important to see how our contributions impact the game as well rather than simply putting the burden on the enemy. Personally, I feel it's just a step in our continuous evolution as the Gallente Militia. From back in the day with EVOKE and Vlillirier, to more recently with TEST's entrance into the militia last fall, GalMil has essentially proved beyond a doubt that we can defend any core system from every threat we've faced to date. Not to say we can't be beat - one day it will happen, that's kind of the nature of the beast. But so far, CalMil as a whole haven't been able to come up with anything that could break us. That's a testament to our collective determination and willingness to do the hard work of showing up to fight outnumbered, day in and day out, regardless of the cost - just to make it as costly and difficult as possible to dislodge us from our chosen homes.
We have CalMil to thank for that, and we have the leadership of the various GalMil corps to thank for that. And we've got the willingness to set aside personal differences - and we've got a LOT of big egos in GalMil - when the chips are down to thank for that. These were all hard lessons to learn.
Then, we proved that we could take essentially any system we chose when we chose to take it. That happened in Innia, Kehjari, OMS / Heyd back last year. We even demonstrated that we could blunt a headshot attempt in a system halfway across the map - there's a very compelling argument to be made that Huola would have burned if we hadn't shown up.
Holding the warzone in the face of the old plex mechanics, with the farmer hordes it inspired, wasn't feasible. Wasn't possible to organize, too much work that folks didn't want to deal with. Trying to mount an offensive while chasing "rabbit plexers" all over the WZ was just going to cause too much burnout far too quickly. So, we focused on shipping up to shinier doctrines, picking fights with local pirate / neutral gangs over POSes and POCOs. Stretching our legs, finding new ways to fight, sharpening our knives for the inevitable return of CalMil.
And they did push back, in early-mid July, capturing several non-core systems. We didn't mount a serious defense for any of them, until Rakapas. And once we successfully defended Rakapas, eliminating the threat that Okkamon posed was a logical next step. We noticed that the Kronos changes meant that the defensive burden was significantly reduced, which raised the question - could we take the warzone again? Was it feasible?
With our higher tier, the deplexing burden on our core corporations was significantly reduced, freeing us up for offensive operations. We were able to take Okkamon, even with the influence of neutrals and a 2-jump reship burden, even so soon after Huola. It seemed feasible. So folks kept rolling, and rolling, and rolling. BOHICA joined GalMil, corps left CalMil, resistance started to crumble.
The rest is history, as they say.
The question, of course, is what we do next. We've got plenty of high SP, high skill, well equipped neutrals in our WZ to play with. Plenty of structures to scout out and scrap over. And, of course, it's really an open question of how long, and how hard, we want to defend how much of the WZ we now control. If the point was to take up the challenge and see if we could do it, and we've met that challenge, then how much of the WZ do we need to keep locked down? We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
44
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 17:04:00 -
[62] - Quote
with all due respect to the veterans, as a newb, i don't know this "restraint" you are all telling.
i'm so inexperienced to gauge the current situation and asses that what we did will have a negative impact to the future of FW.
all i can say is, "i'll cross the bridge when i get there".
for now, i'll enjoy this opportunity and be thankful that i have been a part of this as early as now in my EvE experience. Just Add Water |

Yuri Antollare
Justified Chaos
86
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 17:10:00 -
[63] - Quote
Deen Wispa wrote:Baron' Soontir Fel wrote:While I agree with your first points about why I joined the warzone/FW/Eve ( I really hate 20+ fights) and probably one of the main reasons I haven't been playing much at all (other than PvE'ing) since the Huola campaign, I disagree with putting blame on ourselves. Exactly. That is what many pilots gravitate towards. That's what we hunger for. It's not about putting blame on us per se. But I think that we have to see ourselves as keepers of the flame...err the game. I guess there is a certain naivete in my statement. Afterall, we are conditioned to want to win at all cost and the idealogy of sportsmanship and going easy on your opponent makes me sound crazy and foolish in such a cutthroat game. But I know this game and FW is flawed and will never be perfect. Which is why I think it's important to see how our contributions impact the game as well rather than simply putting the burden on the enemy.
People play the sandbox how they want to, capturing the entirety of the warzone is afterall the technical goal of each milita. Many would not view a pity parade as sportsmanship either, it is not on us to de-escalate our level of organization or to pull punches when and where we choose. Yes it is infact entirely on our opponents to beat us, and if they really can't its up to the Devs to change the rules of the game, there really is no other way in reality.
Much of this "you'll regret it later" talk fails to take into account what the alternative was. A crippled caldari militia that in large fights by their own admission was reduced to baiting for batphones, or that in small gang fights routinely brought overwhelming levels of bull**** to every inconsequential knockabout fight. Why would we choose to live next to groups of squids that provide near 0 worthwhile content? We enjoy our solo and small gang content and on that front the squids were the worst thing to happen to our neck of the woods.
I know you weren't around so won't have much of the context, but we started the WZ push when the squids had about 7 systems left. This was a situation where it became a crime not to take the whole warzone as the squids were letting it fall apart around them anyway. How is it the high road to artificially string up an opponent for us to beat down a little here and there?
off topic: I don't know of anyone that has a problem with QCATS, I do know plenty of people that have a problem with dropins that open the intramilitia discourse, on a public thread, with insults. |

Shad owLord
The Great Harmon Institute Of Technology Enemy Spotted.
6
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 17:30:00 -
[64] - Quote
Ig Asho wrote:Gratz to galmil
Just gonna give a quick synopsis from the calmil side of the last few months and a little explanation as to why things went the way they did.
Basically once galmil were able to ship into ishtars / other hacs / t2 logi consistently it was all over. Sure the warzone was still reasonably close at the time, but it was over right then. Most of calmil (both general mil and even within the major alliances) cannot fly many t2 ships and basically all out refuses to fly anything worth more than 50 mil (and even that is a stretch). Can't tell you how many times I asked for shinier or bigger ships and got condors. Its just amazing.
The only real counter we had was trying to pull in nullsec alliances to assist (which was hit or miss), informing snuff of when fights happened and hoping for the best in a 3 way, or dropping caps (yup that was my chimera ya'll saw in basically every fight for a solid 2 weeks, good on ya'll to finally get it when we screwed up a drop w/ RZR)
Along with the sheer inability to ship up you have basically Templis operating as their own entity, straight up refusing the rest of the militia into their fleets quite often. MBLOC could not care less about warzone control and while I love the guys, really can't fly much beyond frigs. Then you have the non-stop drama from GHIOT which has caused obscene amounts of infighting detracting from our ability to fight gals.
So anyway.... props to gals on taking over everything, the pressure ya'll applied really just kept calmil reeling and they couldn't ever recover post-innia. Really enjoyed running fleets against ya'll, don't really recall ever being headshotted while fc'ing at all.
Sorry for length:
TL:DR: Calmil shoots itself in foot, galmil applies pressure
More or less spot on
I will add though your info on the alliances is a little out of date, early problems GHIOT had are more or less gone, and BLOC consistantly fly whatever the FC's have asked them to bring. And I'll just leave it at that.
|

Moglarr
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
9
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 17:37:00 -
[65] - Quote
Shad owLord wrote:[not throwing away isk]
Across Kinakka, Pavanakka, Asakai and Heydieles. About 177.2b ISK was lost in all the sieges (that includes neutrals) with CalMil and allies losing approximately 41.54b ISK and GalMil losing about 37.19b ISK. I think both sides fought hard, and did what they could. From what I saw we couldn't overcome the Gallente's superior numbers and spread of pilots, had trouble keeping people together and getting pilots to log in. The Gallente worked hard to take our systems and they paid for them too. We simply have to try and find a way to overcome them.
I like the idea of sportsmanship, in general, but there is no point in "going easy". If you're after a certain type of fight, then yes fit the type of fleet for that job. If you want a 1v1, you wander around solo and try to find it, want a small gang then you git a few firgates up and roll out, want to take a system you deploy as many pilots in the target system as you can and use the right ships for each plex to hold the system. But when you do that, at least be aware of what you're doing. I understand trolling local and being an ass to bait fights, but if you have a blob in one system bigger than all the active pilots in CalMil don't complain about not getting fights. Any Gallente pilots who did not want to take the warzone were not forced to participate in the conquest, simple as that. I am sure there were discussions and debates over it, but at the end of the day no one forces anyone to do anything thing. |

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos
372
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 17:44:00 -
[66] - Quote
Deen Wispa wrote: It's not about putting blame on us per se. But I think that we have to see ourselves as keepers of the flame...err the game. I guess there is a certain naivete in my statement. Afterall, we are conditioned to want to win at all cost and the idealogy of sportsmanship and going easy on your opponent makes me sound crazy and foolish in such a cutthroat game. But I know this game and FW is flawed and will never be perfect. Which is why I think it's important to see how our contributions impact the game as well rather than simply putting the burden on the enemy.
I have this great MinutemanKirk story that I'd like to share some other time about how we purposely downsized our fleet to fight a Bolsterbomb gang back in the day. It's a great lesson on restraint. One of the first lessons I learned when trying to FC. Yuri probably responded to this better than I can. However, you are extrapolating a tactical lesson to a strategic lesson. Tactically, for gf sake, it made sense to Kirk to "downsize" the fleet (and here I suspect you are referring to shiptype, and not fleet size, but whatever) in order to get that gf. This lesson however, should not be imposed at the strategic level of what this portion of the game has as it's stated goal. If the warzone can be taken, take it.
CCP is the one that should provide a fix to the too often WZ sweep phenomenon. They could limit lp for dplexing in conquered space. Call it npc resistance and overburdened budgets on the side of the then current conquering faction, it really doesn't matter what rationale is used. If dplexing Iralaja (once conquered by Galmil) or some such system for either faction was not an lp farmable pursuit, that task would depend solely on dedicated intent to take the warzone. This would be a built in brake on running the table. Running the table would happen less often. We'd hopefully have a less dispirited Calmil to fight with.
That is only one internal brake CCP could put into FW. There are many ways they could put diminishing returns (a la lp accumulation) or even penalties as wz control grows too large. A big part of the problem is the tiers increasing the lp payout. Once you are up the snowball will gather more speed and mass as it rolls downhill. Easy dplexing of conquered territory allows further pvp sieging of enemy home systems. Once you are down in tier you can't even get to the apex of the hill to see the downhill, and you're stuck in the suck. You're snowball starts to melt.
Deen Wispa wrote: In fact, as time passes by, I'm more inclined to believe it's not even how bad Caldari is, but how much we overachieve as a group. You could replace Blue Steel with the Golden Army or Trust In Rust, and I think the Green Machine would still win out. We are THAT organized. No it is still a problem of Caldari entities not working together and organizing for fights. They have the numbers. It is upon them to figure out how to organize to defend or attack. Once CCP changes the rules to support the underdog in it's time of severe need hopefully they will find the will and not just say **** it. That makes us both better. I hope they do.
Deen Wispa wrote: PS- I don't get the obsession with people getting angry about how QCATS dedicate their time to this game or lack thereof. Or what other games they play and the bitter passive aggressive vitriol people have had towards them for years. They are good people.
I came in when they were at their peak and started to slow down. It's like some big insecurity some of you have with them...that their casual playstyle and idealogies is so different from yours that people choose to ostracize them or those who share similar views. Not everyone is unemployed or has time to play 30 hours a week. Ok, what is this. You go from praise to slam in the same post. Right, all the people that participated in this latest WZ conquest were unemployed in rl. Again, Yuri probably addressed your concern about Qcats better than I can. I really would love to be in some Chatgris fleets again.
The long and short of it is we are not responsible for maintaining an ecosystem in this game. CCP can change the parameters under which we operate to try to accomplish a healthy ecosystem. That is their job. I hope the squids do find this their forge, or who knows, enough veterans on Galmil side decide Capitals and Nullsec are worth trying.
CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, please give us a persisting-áoff button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals. |

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
412
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 17:48:00 -
[67] - Quote
Moglarr wrote:I am sure there were discussions and debates over it, but at the end of the day no one forces anyone to do anything thing. This.
Fact is, getting more than 30-40 folks in one fleet can be tough, even for us. Of course, there were up to 3 GalMil fleets operating in system simultaneously, each doing their own thing. And while this was happening, other folks were ignoring it all completely and doing whatever it is they liked to do.
Props to you for admitting that you don't want folks to take it easy on you. I truly do hope that CalMil can find a way to work closer together and I look forward to the challenges you bring once you get yourselves sorted out. GalMil never asked, nor did we ever expect, our opponents to take it easy on us - and here we are, hip deep in 60 links, covered in the sweat of our own success. Regardless of how many folks look askance at the pursuit of this particular goal, it IS an achievement, and one we can and should be proud of.
Like I said earlier, I look forward to seeing what else we can achieve.
We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

Cromwell Savage
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
198
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 19:40:00 -
[68] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Cromwell Savage wrote:Are squids complaining of plexing alts?
Hahahahahahahahahaha! Now that is funny!
FW is dead regardless...broken mechanics that encourage kicking the other side out of lo-sec. Absolutely brilliant!!!!!
Edit - As long as docking rights are tied to occupancy, I'm done with FW. Five years to go from complaining that there were not enough squids in lo-sec to actively kicking them out.... What a waste. and before things were like that FW was dead because the war was irrelevant. People are just whining. If you lost you lost, it is no one else fault except of your side. Organize and go take back something, and stop whining.
Check my faction there shipwreck...
|

Cromwell Savage
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
198
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 19:41:00 -
[69] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
TL;DR, basically, join QCATS, play LOL, stop posting.
What's the matter Crosi....not happy that someone outside QCats doesn't drink the same Kool-Aid?
Don't worry...we'll be out of your hair soon enough...
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1086
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 20:03:00 -
[70] - Quote
Cromwell Savage wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:
TL;DR, basically, join QCATS, play LOL, stop posting.
What's the matter Crosi....not happy that someone outside QCats doesn't drink the same Kool-Aid? Don't worry...we'll be out of your hair soon enough...
Come and go as you wish. But if you think its cool for your corpmate to come here and call people idiotic polesmokers for playing a computer game in a certain way, then get offended when the criticism is reversed, were better of without you. |
|

Cromwell Savage
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
198
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 20:07:00 -
[71] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cromwell Savage wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:
TL;DR, basically, join QCATS, play LOL, stop posting.
What's the matter Crosi....not happy that someone outside QCats doesn't drink the same Kool-Aid? Don't worry...we'll be out of your hair soon enough... Come and go as you wish. But if you think its cool for your corpmate to come here and call people idiotic polesmokers for playing a computer game in a certain way, then get offended when the criticism is reversed, were better of without you.
So that justifies you attempting to shut down Deen's dissenting opinion with a snide quip? Not to mention an entire corp because one member ruffled your feathers?
Sensitive much?
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1086
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 20:19:00 -
[72] - Quote
Cromwell Savage wrote: So that justifies you attempting to shut down Deen's dissenting opinion with a snide quip? Not to mention an entire corp because one member ruffled your feathers?
Sensitive much?
But nex is justified in calling the leadership of the entire gallente militia polesmokers and idiots?
Inconsistent much?
Deens opinion has been addressed very well by his own corpmates and a few caldari militia peeps. This is a forum, i cant delete deens post so i dont kow what you mean by 'shut him down'. Do you mean i shouldnt disagree with him? |

Cromwell Savage
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
199
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 20:29:00 -
[73] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
But nex is justified in calling the leadership of the entire gallente militia polesmokers and idiots?
Inconsistent much?
Deens opinion has been addressed very well by his own corpmates and a few caldari militia peeps.
Nexx is a BAMF who has killed more squids than most Gal corps. It is no secret that he never holds back on his opinion and he is more than free to express that opinion. While I may not approve of his delivery methods...if you have an issue with him, then man up and take it to him. Don't be some forum douche throwing snide remarks about a corp you can't even bothered to communicate with when in the same alliance.
You might want to look up elitism. You like to throw that our way, but your remarks about us and Deen's opinion says volumes about your own. Just because Deen's opinion was "addressed very well by his own corpmates and a few caldari militia peeps" still does not explain yours.
Oh, and as an example of our 'elitism'.....we purposefully held off on any corp move until after the war zone was fully taken at the request of our corpies who were helping so that they could continue to help..... (See, even if we disagree in corp...we don't shut down our members).
I would say it's been good flying with you, but after what I have seen of you the last few days....not so much...
07 |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1086
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 20:43:00 -
[74] - Quote
Cromwell Savage wrote: Nexx is a BAMF who has killed more squids than most Gal corps. It is no secret that he never holds back on his opinion and he is more than free to express that opinion. While I may not approve of his delivery methods...if you have an issue with him, then man up and take it to him. Don't be some forum douche throwing snide remarks about a corp you can't even bothered to communicate with when in the same alliance.
Nex is a BAMF who can randomly generalise and a abuse people, as is his right because kb. I suggest that inactive players opinions in a corp that did almost nothing in this push is irrelevant and IM the douche lol. I have to hope this is a troll.
As for the alliance, since qcats lack any consistent leadership i have been supporting your EU tz and helped getting them content for the last year around nisuwa. I persoanlly supplied and FC'd the vast majority of the nisuwa defence against tekithas talons of blood and probably spent more time herding cats than anyone since chatgris. I know, i dont register on forums or join in with pointlessly doomed vindicator fleets so im not a team player. Ok crom lol. |

Hamlyn Medley
Moira. Villore Accords
3
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 20:48:00 -
[75] - Quote
Funny... people talk about Cal and Gal just like a country of some sort... and just like a country, they all have problems and they all have hot brazilian waxed chicks... SOO yeah... gal mil won (yay motherf!), Caldari is a mess, minmatar mil (for some reason) shots gal mil (!) and Amarr is a mith (like the ones you tell your children before bed)
(please please understand my jokes and don't give them credit [unless the minmatar mil... that part is true])
we can point out every problem but... just like a country... you know what is wrong, there is tons of reasons... all you need to do is change... Come on, change a country is hard, there is lots of politics and stuff... but here we are kind of free... there is even a site (the true eve history stuff) that show us we can screw the game as much as we want because everyone is free to do what the hell they want you want to bump a titan out of a pos just for revenge? fine! http://themittani.com/news/disgruntled-director-leads-death-titan you want to dismantle a huge alliance and screw the entire game? good! http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/eve-true-stories-the-comic-book-based-on-true-events-20.000-years-into-the-future/
so stop complaing... stop trying to fight ghosts... Cal mil is a mess? fine, go there and fix it... gal is huge? Nice, Napoleon was huge too... and look what the russians (dam you russians) did to him... This Sh** will only get better if you move your finger from the lower part of the keyboard to the PF1 PF2 PF3 buttons
and sorry for my engrish... |

Cromwell Savage
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
200
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 21:01:00 -
[76] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cromwell Savage wrote: Nexx is a BAMF who has killed more squids than most Gal corps. It is no secret that he never holds back on his opinion and he is more than free to express that opinion. While I may not approve of his delivery methods...if you have an issue with him, then man up and take it to him. Don't be some forum douche throwing snide remarks about a corp you can't even bothered to communicate with when in the same alliance.
Nex is a BAMF who can randomly generalise and a abuse people, as is his right because kb. I suggest that inactive players opinions in a corp that did almost nothing in this push is irrelevant and IM the douche lol. I have to hope this is a troll. As for the alliance, since qcats lack any consistent leadership i have been supporting your EU tz and helped getting them content for the last year around nisuwa. I persoanlly supplied and FC'd the vast majority of the nisuwa defence against tekithas talons of blood and probably spent more time herding cats than anyone since chatgris. I know, i dont register on forums or join in with pointlessly doomed vindicator fleets so im not a team player. Ok crom lol. Good luck in your future of not logging in.
Yes, we did almost nothing in this push...because we fundamentally disagreed with it. We would rather have squids living in low-sec vice occupancy bragging rights. So as with Dean's post....any dissention is to be ignored and deemed irrelevant? As if we haven't done anything in the last 5 years of FW ourselves?
When the game started to dry up for what we wanted...we stopped being as active. Occupancy, endless plex fighting, chasing farrmers......not so much. But again, you don't want to hear that. We're 'irrelevant' because we don't see it like you do...
Yes, your actions as a quick reaction FC are good and were appreciated. Have never said otherwise.
LOL...we'll have plenty of fun when we do log in. If not, we'll find something that does... Just can't get one post out without being a smart ass, can you? :P
Anyhow...have fun. 07
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1087
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 21:09:00 -
[77] - Quote
Cromwell Savage wrote:So as with Dean's post....any dissention is to be ignored and deemed irrelevant? As if we haven't done anything in the last 5 years of FW ourselves?
Not quite, its irrelevant because no one cares what deen or qcats opinion on the push was. The time was perfect for a push. Not doing so would have been a massive missed opportunity to bring the militia closer and trial by fire for many new peeps in wide open fleets as is testified in these various threads. |

Cromwell Savage
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
200
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 21:15:00 -
[78] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cromwell Savage wrote:So as with Dean's post....any dissention is to be ignored and deemed irrelevant? As if we haven't done anything in the last 5 years of FW ourselves?
Not quite, its irrelevant because no one cares what deen or qcats opinion on the push was. The time was perfect for it. Not doing so would have been a massive missed opportunity to bring the militia closer and trial by fire for many new peeps in wide open fleets as is testified in these various threads.
We honestly never expected anything different. But we still weren't going to jump on the bandwagon (as a corp) for something we did not want. The mood of Gal Mil was set on a full system push, and it has been achieved. As such, we have plans to go in a different direction to attempt to resurrect our interest in this game since FW no longer does. |

Degnar Oskold
Justified Chaos
126
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 21:58:00 -
[79] - Quote
With the Warzone secure and basically acting as an ISK fountain, we should be well positioned to strike out to claim GalMil sovspace. We can't be ejected from our homes in Placid and Black Rise; we can farm away for all the ships we need more efficiently than nullbears and push out. |

Pinky Feldman
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
742
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 22:37:00 -
[80] - Quote
Oh hey, its 2012 all over again. Funny how the mechanics change, but the conversations stay the same.
The moar you cry the less you pee |
|

Pinky Feldman
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
742
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 00:10:00 -
[81] - Quote
Deen Wispa wrote:Baron' Soontir Fel wrote:While I agree with your first points about why I joined the warzone/FW/Eve ( I really hate 20+ fights) and probably one of the main reasons I haven't been playing much at all (other than PvE'ing) since the Huola campaign, I disagree with putting blame on ourselves. Exactly. That is what many pilots gravitate towards. That's what we hunger for. It's not about putting blame on us per se. But I think that we have to see ourselves as keepers of the flame...err the game. I guess there is a certain naivete in my statement. Afterall, we are conditioned to want to win at all cost and the idealogy of sportsmanship and going easy on your opponent makes me sound crazy and foolish in such a cutthroat game. But I know this game and FW is flawed and will never be perfect. Which is why I think it's important to see how our contributions impact the game as well rather than simply putting the burden on the enemy. I have this great MinutemanKirk story that I'd like to share some other time about how we purposely downsized our fleet to fight a Bolsterbomb gang back in the day. It's a great lesson on restraint. One of the first lessons I learned when trying to FC. Quote: Maybe this will be CalMils forge. We've heard this one for many years. Caldari has always been like this. In fact, as time passes by, I'm more inclined to believe it's not even how bad Caldari is, but how much we overachieve as a group. You could replace Blue Steel with the Golden Army or Trust In Rust, and I think the Green Machine would still win out. We are THAT organized. I've heard talks over the year about certain FCs or leaders wanting to switch over to Caldari for the sake of GFs and reclaiming that exhilaration of the game and of fighting outnumbered. But everyone talks themself out of it because A) They know it's more work than they want to put into it. B) And that one person's contributions will have no impact on CalMil. C) They're likely to get primaried right off the bat in any fight for being a turncoat PS- I don't get the obsession with people getting angry about how QCATS dedicate their time to this game or lack thereof. Or what other games they play and the bitter passive aggressive vitriol people have had towards them for years. They are good people. I came in when they were at their peak and started to slow down. It's like some big insecurity some of you have with them...that their casual playstyle and idealogies is so different from yours that people choose to ostracize them or those who share similar views. Not everyone is unemployed or has time to play 30 hours a week. They were the pillar of GalMil for years. Their FC lineup was stellar. The ecosystem that Gallente has today is partly because of what they built. God forbid that I mention I play some other game or make an opinion contrary to the Gallente mainstream, and get ostracized for it in public or private.
I think that the most amusing thing in regards to ecosystems and what each side desires in terms of fight sizes go is the fact that if you swapped the core Minmatar groups with the Caldari groups that come and go, both warzones would be pretty content. I still think that the biggest defining change that Inferno brought was station lockout and part of me wonders how FW would be different in terms of groups that stay longterm would be if that was not a feature.
The second most amusing thing is when people bring up numbers like they're meaningful or brag about coordination like its some super impressive feat. Raw militia numbers don't really matter and have never mattered without knowing the absolute breakdown of their loyalties, activity, and reasons for being in the militia. In reality in terms of focused efforts, you can generally narrow things down to the top 5 groups. As far as coordination goes, winning or achieving strategic objectives isn't really an accurate measurement since you're really only as strong as your greatest opponent. That's not to say that the Gallente aren't, it's just an observation.
Anyways, congratulations on taking the entire warzone again. With the Gallente groups that move on to try new things due to a lacking Caldari opponent, part of me is sad to see the slow decay of FW.
The moar you cry the less you pee |

Terranid Meester
Tactical Assault and Recon Unit
229
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 01:19:00 -
[82] - Quote
I don't care if the Caldari are destroyed forever! Onto Jita & New Caldari! To new enemies! |

Super Chair
Project Cerberus Templis CALSF
651
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 10:25:00 -
[83] - Quote
Cromwell Savage wrote:we have plans to go in a different direction to attempt to resurrect our interest in this game
So you, nexx and chat are applying right? 
Benefits include:
Teemo hate Dota 2 lessons |

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
377
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 10:40:00 -
[84] - Quote
Cromwell Savage wrote:
Edit - If the squids rebound...we still have the option to return for some good old squid bashing.
Seems like TesT is coming back with Brave if so would you stay ? ^^ RENAME WH systems With the name of REAL Universe Stellar Name like KOI-730 etc etc It will be awesome.
GalMIl>>ALL |

Nameira Vanis-Tor
Hoplite Brigade Iron Oxide.
41
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 14:04:00 -
[85] - Quote
Irya Boone wrote:Cromwell Savage wrote:
Edit - If the squids rebound...we still have the option to return for some good old squid bashing.
Seems like TesT is coming back with Brave if so would you stay ? ^^
Link please? That would be interesting! |

Super Chair
Project Cerberus Templis CALSF
652
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 03:13:00 -
[86] - Quote
Irya Boone wrote:Cromwell Savage wrote:
Edit - If the squids rebound...we still have the option to return for some good old squid bashing.
Seems like TesT is coming back with Brave if so would you stay ? ^^
I thought brave already had a 100+ member corp in gal mil |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1098
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 04:21:00 -
[87] - Quote
Super Chair wrote:Irya Boone wrote:Cromwell Savage wrote:
Edit - If the squids rebound...we still have the option to return for some good old squid bashing.
Seems like TesT is coming back with Brave if so would you stay ? ^^ I thought brave already had a 100+ member corp in gal mil
In my experience, that equates to 2 people i have ever met. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2488
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 04:21:00 -
[88] - Quote
Super Chair wrote:Irya Boone wrote:Cromwell Savage wrote:
Edit - If the squids rebound...we still have the option to return for some good old squid bashing.
Seems like TesT is coming back with Brave if so would you stay ? ^^ I thought brave already had a 100+ member corp in gal mil I think they meant that they are both joining Gallente for the LP. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1098
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 04:23:00 -
[89] - Quote
I for one welcome the new gallente TEST NEWBIE overlords! |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
810
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 14:14:00 -
[90] - Quote
Quentin Marshall wrote:I don't understand how Caldari didn't take at least a couple systems back to prevent 100% warzone dominance. They can easily plex back systems far beyond the reach of where Gallente base out of. This would've been a good troll.
no profit on that, better to grind highsec level 4 missions than farm fw plexes with tier 1.
CCP nerfed fw farming once again to point where it is not profitable enough, and same happened than last time, someone took all systems because farmers who were supposed to keep thing moving are gone.
why it was gallente who took systems was clear, caldari vetarans quit long time ago when CCP did same nerf and i bet they are not coming back to take systems, so gallente was once again kicking ball to empty goal after game was over.
CCP sure can not learn from their previous mistakes. |
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1106
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 14:18:00 -
[91] - Quote
Bad Messenger wrote:no profit on that, better to grind highsec level 4 missions than farm fw plexes with tier 1.
CCP nerfed fw farming once again to point where it is not profitable enough, and same happened than last time, someone took all systems because farmers who were supposed to keep thing moving are gone.
why it was gallente who took systems was clear, caldari vetarans quit long time ago when CCP did same nerf and i bet they are not coming back to take systems, so gallente was once again kicking ball to empty goal after game was over.
CCP sure can not learn from their previous mistakes.
We got fights everywhere apart from your home ground. You speak for a militia that either thinks your group are ignorant at best or for the most part have no idea you exist.
The goal was open because you have no team. |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
811
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 19:22:00 -
[92] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Bad Messenger wrote:no profit on that, better to grind highsec level 4 missions than farm fw plexes with tier 1.
CCP nerfed fw farming once again to point where it is not profitable enough, and same happened than last time, someone took all systems because farmers who were supposed to keep thing moving are gone.
why it was gallente who took systems was clear, caldari vetarans quit long time ago when CCP did same nerf and i bet they are not coming back to take systems, so gallente was once again kicking ball to empty goal after game was over.
CCP sure can not learn from their previous mistakes. We got fights everywhere apart from your home ground. You speak for a militia that either thinks your group are ignorant at best or for the most part have no idea you exist. The goal was open because you have no team.
it is not about fights, it is about game mechanics |

Makrov Putin
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
1
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 20:24:00 -
[93] - Quote
If the Caldari had as good a damage control in actual Pew Pew as they did with forum QQ this whole topic would have never even happened. |

Arla Sarain
73
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 20:29:00 -
[94] - Quote
Makrov Putin wrote:Iforum QQ t > post > "QQ QQ QQ"
Get over yourself. |

Makrov Putin
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
1
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 20:31:00 -
[95] - Quote
Arla Sarain wrote:Makrov Putin wrote:Iforum QQ t > post > "QQ QQ QQ" Get over yourself. If you guys were half as good at strategy and flying internet spaceships as you are at posturing on a forum that would help also. :) |

Arla Sarain
73
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 20:40:00 -
[96] - Quote
Makrov Putin wrote: If you guys were half as good at [insert stuff] as you are at [insert more stuff] that would help also. :)
And you wouldn't need to deploy 3 Guardians and a random assortment of T3s and HACs to fight a Nighthawk and a bunch of frigs.
But tryharding is the trend, all the cool kids are doing it. |

Makrov Putin
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
1
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 20:43:00 -
[97] - Quote
I heard all races of Eve players can fly all the ships. Confirm or deny? |

Makrov Putin
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
1
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 20:48:00 -
[98] - Quote
That being said you are either too lazy as a group to train for them or option B too risk averse to fly them. Neither of which is a Gal Mil problem. |

Arla Sarain
73
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 21:44:00 -
[99] - Quote
Makrov Putin wrote:risk averse How does risk aversion precede an escalation reaction?
We are in frigs. You react with T2/T3 cruisers. Who the hell is risk averse?
But then "Calmil we just want you to get a group and fight us pretty please we really want to fight".
Le Dumb. |

Makrov Putin
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
1
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 21:58:00 -
[100] - Quote
This may come as a shock but, no one in this game is obligated to give you a "good fight". Improvise, adapt and overcome, or get crushed beneath a mighty boot. |
|

Zazu Prota
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
2
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 22:10:00 -
[101] - Quote
Makrov Putin wrote:This may come as a shock but, no one in this game is obligated to give you a "good fight". Improvise, adapt and overcome, or get crushed beneath a mighty boot.
I don't think you made your point yet.
Could you add in some Sun Tzu quotes? |

Makrov Putin
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
1
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 22:17:00 -
[102] - Quote
I'm not refined enough for Sun Tzu quotes. I still laugh at armpit music and fart jokes. |

Arla Sarain
73
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 22:23:00 -
[103] - Quote
Makrov Putin wrote:This may come as a shock but, no one in this game is obligated to give you a "good fight". Improvise, adapt and overcome, or get crushed beneath a mighty boot.
Just saying that by being mindful you can avoid being a bloody hypocrite. I'm not sure why you think I think you are obliged to do anything. It's actually flattering that you keep doing the same nonsense all the time. |

Makrov Putin
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
1
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 22:25:00 -
[104] - Quote
Arla Sarain wrote:Makrov Putin wrote:This may come as a shock but, no one in this game is obligated to give you a "good fight". Improvise, adapt and overcome, or get crushed beneath a mighty boot. Just saying that by being mindful you can avoid being a bloody hypocrite. I'm not sure why you think I think you are obliged to do anything. It's actually flattering that you keep doing the same nonsense all the time. Enjoy Docking in Jita btw. At least the market is stocked  |

Phox Jorkarzul
Deep Void Merc Syndicate
106
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 05:34:00 -
[105] - Quote
Makrov Putin wrote:Arla Sarain wrote:Makrov Putin wrote:This may come as a shock but, no one in this game is obligated to give you a "good fight". Improvise, adapt and overcome, or get crushed beneath a mighty boot. Just saying that by being mindful you can avoid being a bloody hypocrite. I'm not sure why you think I think you are obliged to do anything. It's actually flattering that you keep doing the same nonsense all the time. Enjoy Docking in Jita btw. At least the market is stocked 
look at you forum warrioring you carebear you. Blasters for life
https://neverpheedthetroll.blogspot.com |

Dread Operative
Snuff Box
368
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 09:12:00 -
[106] - Quote
I'm to drunk to read so I just have one thing to say, pew pew pew pew pew pew pew!!!!!!! |

Makrov Putin
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
2
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 09:16:00 -
[107] - Quote
Phox Jorkarzul wrote:Makrov Putin wrote:Arla Sarain wrote:Makrov Putin wrote:This may come as a shock but, no one in this game is obligated to give you a "good fight". Improvise, adapt and overcome, or get crushed beneath a mighty boot. Just saying that by being mindful you can avoid being a bloody hypocrite. I'm not sure why you think I think you are obliged to do anything. It's actually flattering that you keep doing the same nonsense all the time. Enjoy Docking in Jita btw. At least the market is stocked  look at you forum warrioring you carebear you. I was trying to RP, but I don't think I'm doing it right. |

Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
45
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 11:46:00 -
[108] - Quote
Arla Sarain wrote:Makrov Putin wrote: If you guys were half as good at [insert stuff] as you are at [insert more stuff] that would help also. :)
And you wouldn't need to deploy 3 Guardians and a random assortment of T3s and HACs to fight a Nighthawk and a bunch of frigs. But tryharding is the trend, all the cool kids are doing it.
logic gold.
so you blame others for your inadequacies?  Just Add Water |

Squatdog
State Protectorate Caldari State
141
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 16:36:00 -
[109] - Quote
Uh oh, Caldari just flipped two systems back to back.
It seems that even a blob of 17+ simply wasn't enough to provide the 2v1 odds Gallente require to win at PVP. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2505
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 16:41:00 -
[110] - Quote
Squatdog wrote:Uh oh, Caldari just flipped two systems back to back. Damn you! You just made alot of "FW is unfair" nerds eat their words! |
|

Phaade
Perimeter Defense Systems Templis CALSF
245
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 16:55:00 -
[111] - Quote
Yuri Antollare wrote:sytaqe violacea wrote:Recently, I persuaded my friends to return to Calmil after they got tired being pirate for 3 months. And now, they has trouble re-deploying. Where did Calmil move to after losing their home system? Rumors abound as to some variant of hi-sec or non-FW lowsec. You would have thought that once they lost Kinakka, those squids would have just collapsed back to the next home system and so forth and so forth. For some reason though when the going gets tough over there they prefer to just drop FW or move to hi-sec. There were at least two of the sieges that would have been swung/lasted too long for us if the squids had engaged in even some basic moves helping each other out. It is what it is though, they'd prefer to give up and talk about the farming alts that took Kinakka, or the Gall deplexing alt that killed all the Diesel corp squids pushing up the backwater systems threatening the WZ push.
Hey, Yuri and his infinite brilliance in action!
I'm sure Gallente having about 3 or 4 times the active numbers has nothing to do with it.
It's difficult to defend a system with 5-8 guys against a 24 / 7 plex fleet of 40 to 60. Literally logged in at 5:00 AM randomly with 50 frogs in Pav.
Even with a coordinated Caldari defense effort, which there were at times, we were unable to stave off the endless hordes of Frogs. There are simply too many.
I'm not sure why you are so proud of yourselves. It's like the Persians boasting about being victorious over the Greeks at Thermopylae. |

Pinky Feldman
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
742
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 17:04:00 -
[112] - Quote
Phaade wrote:
I'm not sure why you are so proud of yourselves. It's like the Persians boasting about being victorious over the Greeks at Thermopylae.
This is EVE dude. Its literally what everyone on every side in the history of ever has and always does. EVE is real.
The moar you cry the less you pee |

Phaade
Perimeter Defense Systems Templis CALSF
245
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 17:08:00 -
[113] - Quote
Pinky Feldman wrote:Phaade wrote:
I'm not sure why you are so proud of yourselves. It's like the Persians boasting about being victorious over the Greeks at Thermopylae.
This is EVE dude. Its literally what everyone on every side in the history of ever has and always does. EVE is real.
Uhh.......
Not sure which history books you are reading. |

Phaade
Perimeter Defense Systems Templis CALSF
245
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 17:21:00 -
[114] - Quote
Makrov Putin wrote:This may come as a shock but, no one in this game is obligated to give you a "good fight". Improvise, adapt and overcome, or get crushed beneath a mighty boot.
With the way the FW plexes work, you can't just "improvise, adapt, and overcome" 4 times your numbers.
You should know this. |

Rinai Vero
Moira. Villore Accords
329
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 17:26:00 -
[115] - Quote
I'm too lazy to quote myself from earlier on the subject of "and that's why TEST conquered Eha." |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2505
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 18:57:00 -
[116] - Quote
Phaade wrote:I'm not sure why you are so proud of yourselves. It's like the Persians boasting about being victorious over the Greeks at Thermopylae. The Persians didn't finish off Greece.... I believe the "home system" of Sparta never fell.
|

Squatdog
State Protectorate Caldari State
143
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 01:02:00 -
[117] - Quote
Phaade wrote:
I'm sure Gallente having about 3 or 4 times the active numbers has nothing to do with it.
It's difficult to defend a system with 5-8 guys against a 24 / 7 plex fleet of 40 to 60. Literally logged in at 5:00 AM randomly with 50 frogs in Pav.
Even with a coordinated Caldari defense effort, which there were at times, we were unable to stave off the endless hordes of Frogs. There are simply too many.
I'm not sure why you are so proud of yourselves. It's like the Persians boasting about being victorious over the Greeks at Thermopylae.
This.
The only reason Caldari managed to flip two systems so quickly was that it was during Russian primetime, with numerous Russian pirate corps persuaded to help even the odds against the inevitable Gallente blob. If it was US TZ, there would be 50+ Gal polesmokers looking for 'good fights'.
Also, the rampant farming of Gallente defensives by stabbed, cloaky farming alts has devalued Gal LP to the point where it's no longer as lucrative for non-militia entities to AFK 'defend' with T1 frigs. |

Yuri Antollare
Justified Chaos
98
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 01:20:00 -
[118] - Quote
Phaade wrote:Yuri Antollare wrote:sytaqe violacea wrote:Recently, I persuaded my friends to return to Calmil after they got tired being pirate for 3 months. And now, they has trouble re-deploying. Where did Calmil move to after losing their home system? Rumors abound as to some variant of hi-sec or non-FW lowsec. You would have thought that once they lost Kinakka, those squids would have just collapsed back to the next home system and so forth and so forth. For some reason though when the going gets tough over there they prefer to just drop FW or move to hi-sec. There were at least two of the sieges that would have been swung/lasted too long for us if the squids had engaged in even some basic moves helping each other out. It is what it is though, they'd prefer to give up and talk about the farming alts that took Kinakka, or the Gall deplexing alt that killed all the Diesel corp squids pushing up the backwater systems threatening the WZ push. Hey, Yuri and his infinite brilliance in action! I'm sure Gallente having about 3 or 4 times the active numbers has nothing to do with it. It's difficult to defend a system with 5-8 guys against a 24 / 7 plex fleet of 40 to 60. Literally logged in at 5:00 AM randomly with 50 frogs in Pav. Even with a coordinated Caldari defense effort, which there were at times, we were unable to stave off the endless hordes of Frogs. There are simply too many. I'm not sure why you are so proud of yourselves. It's like the Persians boasting about being victorious over the Greeks at Thermopylae.
No snarkiness, just my honest opinion.
During the attack on Okkamon, the Calmill defending pushed us far enough that we were starting to reevaluate. The two jump reship distance and some extremely tenacious defending pushed the length of the siege out to what (I struggle to remember) about 5-6 days? We redoubled our efforts, I suspect there was a logistics hiccup on Heiians side, and that was that.
My point though is that it was an extremely close fight. In that fight (according to our stats compiled with API) Heiian pilots lost almost 10b in ships. Templis, a perennial top two of their militia, lost slightly over 500m in Okkamon. OMG lost under 100m in ships. These are ships losses tallied by what corp flag the ship was flying under when it was killed., not who handed them out.
This is the start, finish and middle of what's been going wrong on your side for far longer than I care to remember. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1112
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 01:26:00 -
[119] - Quote
Squatdog wrote:Phaade wrote:
I'm sure Gallente having about 3 or 4 times the active numbers has nothing to do with it.
It's difficult to defend a system with 5-8 guys against a 24 / 7 plex fleet of 40 to 60. Literally logged in at 5:00 AM randomly with 50 frogs in Pav.
Even with a coordinated Caldari defense effort, which there were at times, we were unable to stave off the endless hordes of Frogs. There are simply too many.
I'm not sure why you are so proud of yourselves. It's like the Persians boasting about being victorious over the Greeks at Thermopylae.
This. The only reason Caldari managed to flip two systems so quickly was that it was during Russian primetime, with numerous Russian pirate corps persuaded to help even the odds against the inevitable Gallente blob. If it was US TZ, there would be 50+ Gal polesmokers looking for 'good fights'. Also, the rampant farming of Gallente defensives by stabbed, cloaky farming alts has devalued Gal LP to the point where it's no longer as lucrative for non-militia entities to AFK 'defend' with T1 frigs.
We didnt want those systems anyway. Occupancy is stupid and doesnt matter. Also the mechanics are broken, etc. |

Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
85
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 03:10:00 -
[120] - Quote
Interesting things happening behind closed doors at the moment. |
|

Vincintius Agrippa
F L O O D
57
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 03:16:00 -
[121] - Quote
I was away all summer and my pc was broke. From what I can gather, I think most people have set up galmil alts to take advantage of the tiers and haul in the isk. Some major guys left and went pirate, others joined test when they were in fw and left with them.
Why? well, from what ive experienced it is quite difficult to offensively solo plex after the changes. Npc navy spawn repeatedly until plex is captured. Id like to say every 60-90seconds. Their dps is irrelevant, but their repping draws the plex out. For a novice atleast, It takes about 60 or more seconds to kill these rats. Having 6 or 7 and more of these guys pop up adds another 6 or 7 minutes to a 10 minute plex. Its really not worthwhile for a few thousand LP. The problem only gets worse when you go up in plex sizes. No one even bothers with Large plexes. Every system I passed last night had about 5 or more Larges that hadnt been opened. Mediums are tricky as well. It takes too long to kill npc's and they spawn entirely to much. I had 10 thoraxes spawn in my plex......
Alot of these guy stack lp and buy ships and modules. They couldnt do it anymore. The way things are set up the gallente are in perfect position. Already having 65-70 of 100 systems in their possession at the time of the change the tiered system served them better.
The gallente dont even half to defend plexes most of the time. At t4 they can deplex at a profitable rate, however they just run missions. I plexed though 6 systems last night and the gallente paid me no mind. Every Time I thought someone would attack, A mission beacon would pop up and disappear. Local would go from me and a war target, to just me.
The Lp payout from lvl mission enables the gallente to make around 60-80k lp (if im not mistaken) and donate a portion to keep them in t4. Thus, the cycle resumes. MOre people create galmil alts. Less people plex gal systems. I honestly think they do it 24/7 because a lot of the corps killboards have been cold for almost 2 months now. Hardly any fleets........ Only YOU can prevent internet bullying! |

Vincintius Agrippa
F L O O D
57
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 03:27:00 -
[122] - Quote
I dont really know of anyone who completely left calmil for gallente. Except for Borg maybe. We got tired of Khan Farshatok and his Napoleon/Vladimir Putin/Joseph Stalin/******/The Godfather/Anne Hathaway complex.
He's a turd and you can keep him and his minions. Only YOU can prevent internet bullying! |

Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
85
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 03:41:00 -
[123] - Quote
Vincintius Agrippa wrote:I dont really know of anyone who completely left calmil for gallente. Except for Borg maybe. We got tired of Khan Farshatok and his Napoleon/Vladimir Putin/Joseph Stalin/******/The Godfather/Anne Hathaway complex.
He's a turd and you can keep him and his minions.
why do you need those shades tho? |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2505
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 03:46:00 -
[124] - Quote
Vincintius Agrippa wrote:I dont really know of anyone who completely left calmil for gallente. Except for Borg maybe. We got tired of Khan Farshatok and his Napoleon/Vladimir Putin/Joseph Stalin/******/The Godfather/Anne Hathaway complex.
He's a turd and you can keep him and his minions. Khan was actually pretty cool when he was in Gallente. Total a**hole when he was Caldari.  |

Mabego Tetrimon
Spiritus Draconis Drunk 'n' Disorderly
25
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 12:50:00 -
[125] - Quote
yei, victory, VICTORY
take it squids....take it
|

Squatdog
State Protectorate Caldari State
143
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 01:13:00 -
[126] - Quote
Mabego Tetrimon wrote:yei, victory, VICTORY
take it squids....take it
We just retook two systems despite being relentlessly blobbed, is that what you mean?
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1112
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 02:03:00 -
[127] - Quote
When we come there we take your homes. Perhaps it would be a good idea not giving us a reason to take your home again.
We have allowed you to take a couple of systems back and you show no gratitude? |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Drunk 'n' Disorderly
377
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 02:20:00 -
[128] - Quote
There like Nature Reserves for the endangered species that is cal mil,
Gallente have donated these systems to the cause of stopping them being hunted to extinction
You too can help the cause donate 300m isk now to help feed and home such a cute and defenseless creature GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Squatdog
State Protectorate Caldari State
143
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 04:07:00 -
[129] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:When we come there we take your homes. Perhaps it would be a good idea not giving us a reason to take your home again.
Then you lose the systems in a matter of days because Gallente can't blob everywhere at once...and as we all know, if Gallente can't blob, they can't fight.
|

Silverbackyererse
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
81
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 06:46:00 -
[130] - Quote
Squatdog wrote:
Then you lose the systems in a matter of days because Gallente can't blob everywhere at once...and as we all know, if Gallente can't blob, they can't fight.
QFT
http://imgur.com/AcFK9AD
|
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2506
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 06:58:00 -
[131] - Quote
Squatdog wrote:Then you lose the systems in a matter of days because Gallente can't blob everywhere at once...and as we all know, if Gallente can't blob, they can't fight.
If that's true, why didn't you try it BEFORE we took all the systems?
Possible Reasons: 1. Lack of competitive spirit. 2. Enjoy giving up the entire warzone. 3. Wait for Gallente to achieve goal so they don't try as hard. |

Silverbackyererse
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
81
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 07:22:00 -
[132] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Squatdog wrote:Then you lose the systems in a matter of days because Gallente can't blob everywhere at once...and as we all know, if Gallente can't blob, they can't fight.
If that's true, why didn't you try it BEFORE we took all the systems? Possible Reasons: 1. Lack of competitive spirit. 2. Enjoy giving up the entire warzone. 3. Wait for Gallente to achieve goal so they don't try as hard.
Stop blaming Caldari for your current situation XGal - you put yourselves in this position, now you need to dig yourselves back out of it again.  |

Super Chair
Project Cerberus Templis CALSF
658
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 08:39:00 -
[133] - Quote
A detailed account of the last few weeks
Right now while FW sov can generate content it boils down to which side is willing to sit at their computer 16 hours a day, fights or no fights. Sometimes if no one is willing to fight you, you have to do a little work to get said fights (such as the small group that pushed vlil because some screaming war eagles didn't want to fight us ) but if you call everyone everytime you want to take a system you shouldn't be surprised that people with smaller numbers or less time to invest just find it easier to just deny you guys content and take the system back at their convenience after the blob moves on. That's not to say calmil corps won't come out for a few fights, we're just not going to go full neckbeard for weeks on end.
You guys are really good at blobbing systems though, congrats. You're starting to play FW a lot like some people play null, so I honestly don't blame corporations like QCATS for wanting to leave FW with a distaste for the way FW has been going since they cannot just log in and go a couple jumps for pew pew like the "good ole days".
This doesn't mean cal mil is going to go anywhere though and you should realize that by now. FW mechanics still require you to spread out instead of show up for a reinforcement timer with hundreds of dudes like it is in null if you want to hold everything. Maybe you guys should just declare the entire warzone a fortress and stock ships in every system  |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Drunk 'n' Disorderly
378
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 09:28:00 -
[134] - Quote
i for one welcome our new pizza overlords had fun fighting them last night and even outnumbered buy 4-5 people still came bk a few times, there was a bit of shittalk in local but also some serious stuff and links to each other for future fights forged between fcs.
Dont think these guys are gunna be shitlords like test and evoke and actually do have skills GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
379
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 10:14:00 -
[135] - Quote
Yep because Only 30 People in galmil stay logged evry day during 16+ hours straight to take systems .... ? i know can't cure your retardation but ...
During all the Plexes fleets only 2 or 3 people stayed more than 5 hours plexing , we got 5 or more different FC in a day, except Sundays .. Even if it's a Game , you can play it seriously ( as chess). Are you sure only Galmil has teenagers living in their grandma basement?
Quote:Then you lose the systems in a matter of days because Gallente can't blob everywhere at once...and as we all know, if Gallente can't blob, they can't fight.
Just LOL , remind me which systems we lost? hysera and heyd .. 2 systems of UCF/REVO/old man gang and all the Russians pirates of lowsec , did'nt see many calmil in the area when the fell and i don't think calmil has something to do with this sov swap.
But anyway we were right about taking the WZ because if i believe what you are saying .. calmil is back on track  CCP it's time to remove Off Grid Boost and to Put Them on Killmail TOO, same for Logi....Open that damn door !! |

GavinGoodrich
The Great Harmon Institute Of Technology Enemy Spotted.
74
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 10:58:00 -
[136] - Quote
Long live the war. Haaaaaalp my head's on fire |

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
311
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 13:05:00 -
[137] - Quote
Now we need the Caldari to try and take the entire warzone. BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Alexander Eisenhower
Gallente Rebels Inc. Villore Accords
34
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 13:29:00 -
[138] - Quote
Degnar Oskold wrote:Pushing Calmil out will mean that us in GalMil will be free for the true objective.... claiming Nullsec systems FOR THE FEDERATION!
Wait.....what??? |

Silverbackyererse
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
81
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 13:30:00 -
[139] - Quote
Super Chair wrote:
Rational stuff.
Stop that right now Superchair. You'll get this thread locked for content. |

Moglarr
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
14
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 13:49:00 -
[140] - Quote
There seems to be a reoccurring theme that one side owes the other "good fights" and "content". I would disagree with that opinion. I do not owe the Gallente militia pilots anything, except the mutual understanding that I will try to make them become dead, and they will do the same to me. Can that lead to interesting interactions and combat? Yes. Can that lead to tactics being employed that people would scoff at? Also yes, and I think it should be up to their peers to condemn the actions if they do not agree with them. When it came to the various system invasions, the goal of the Gallente was not "for the good and honourable fights" but for total system control. Anyone who says otherwise is dumb, and lacks situational awareness. Or perhaps my perception is wrong, I logged in to find fleets outnumbering my side, my comrades reported similar things. The Gallente deployed in high enough constant numbers that their enemy was not motivated to engage them, that was part of the objective. Did I like the tactic? Obviously not, I was on the receiving end. Would I use that tactic? Absolutely. That is how you take a system, as I see it. You deploy overwhelming force until the iHub is vulnerable. The downside to it is that it isn't fun, it makes logging in for both sides boring because nothing is happening.
Honestly, I don't know how your pilots didn't go insane just spinning buttons all day. Congratulations on keeping them logged on long enough for that because I have found, during my search for a home that I loath plexing. Good company only makes it bearable.
Super Chair wrote:A detailed account of the last few weeksRight now while FW sov can generate content it boils down to which side is willing to sit at their computer 16 hours a day, fights or no fights. Sometimes if no one is willing to fight you, you have to do a little work to get said fights (such as the small group that pushed vlil because some screaming war eagles didn't want to fight us  ) but if you call everyone everytime you want to take a system you shouldn't be surprised that people with smaller numbers or less time to invest just find it easier to just deny you guys content and take the system back at their convenience after the blob moves on. That's not to say calmil corps won't come out for a few fights, we're just not going to go full neckbeard for weeks on end. You guys are really good at blobbing systems though, congrats. You're starting to play FW a lot like some people play null, so I honestly don't blame corporations like QCATS for wanting to leave FW with a distaste for the way FW has been going since they cannot just log in and go a couple jumps for pew pew like the "good ole days". This doesn't mean cal mil is going to go anywhere though and you should realize that by now. FW mechanics still require you to spread out instead of show up for a reinforcement timer with hundreds of dudes like it is in null if you want to hold everything. Maybe you guys should just declare the entire warzone a fortress and stock ships in every system 
Quoted for truth. |
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2508
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 14:11:00 -
[141] - Quote
Don't know what the fuss is all about. Most of the time, taking a home system generates a ton of content (Okkamon, Pav/Kinakka, Asakai), and sometimes it doesn't (Heyd, Ladistier). Whatever. We were in "Take Warzone Beast Mode" and accept that one of the consequences was no fights at the end.
The only thing lolworthy here is Squatdog's assessment only because he was spot on in his analysis. The way to beat the blob is to spread out and force fights in many places. The Amarr did this exact thing to the Minmatar when they were down to just Sahtogas and it worked for them. Caldari could have potentially royally griefed us Gallente militia neckbeards if they had employed this strategy BEFORE all the systems were taken. Maybe we would have adjusted, maybe we wouldn't have - we'll never know.
Whatever. Good to see you back. Never thought you'd leave.
I think it's time to add "We didn't want to maintain total warzone control anyways" 
Edit: Also, you guys still have us in total time warzone controlled with a score of about 180 days to 4.  |

Squatdog
State Protectorate Caldari State
145
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 16:31:00 -
[142] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Squatdog wrote:Then you lose the systems in a matter of days because Gallente can't blob everywhere at once...and as we all know, if Gallente can't blob, they can't fight.
If that's true, why didn't you try it BEFORE we took all the systems? Possible Reasons: 1. Lack of competitive spirit. 2. Enjoy giving up the entire warzone. 3. Wait for Gallente to achieve goal so they don't try as hard.
4. The teeming hordes of stabbed, cloaky farming alts who 'defend' the contested Gal systems for free LP once they get over 30%.
But you already knew that.
Quote:Just LOL , remind me which systems we lost? hysera and heyd .. 2 systems of UCF/REVO/old man gang and all the Russians pirates of lowsec , did'nt see many calmil in the area when the fell and i don't think calmil has something to do with this sov swap..
Probably because Gallente were blobbing with fleets of 50+ after spending hours running from even fights.
There was a Gallente blob of 17+ attempting to prevent Heyd and Hysera from being flipped, but it got completely slaughtered because they didn't have the magical 2 to 1 odds Gallente need to win at PVP. |

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
311
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 16:33:00 -
[143] - Quote
Looks like we got lucky and a nullsec group already joined caldari and are trying to revive them. Hopefully they can cap 20-50 systems quickly and revive some of the other Caldari. BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
811
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 16:40:00 -
[144] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Don't know what the fuss is all about. Most of the time, taking a home system generates a ton of content (Okkamon, Pav/Kinakka, Asakai), and sometimes it doesn't (Heyd, Ladistier). Whatever. We were in "Take Warzone Beast Mode" and accept that one of the consequences was no fights at the end. The only thing lolworthy here is Squatdog's assessment only because he was spot on in his analysis. The way to beat the blob is to spread out and force fights in many places. The Amarr did this exact thing to the Minmatar when they were down to just Sahtogas and it worked for them. Caldari could have potentially royally griefed us Gallente militia neckbeards if they had employed this strategy BEFORE all the systems were taken. Maybe we would have adjusted, maybe we wouldn't have - we'll never know. Whatever. Good to see you back. Never thought you'd leave. I think it's time to add "We didn't want to maintain total warzone control anyways"  Edit: Also, you guys still have us in total time warzone controlled with a score of about 180 days to 4. 
Thing is simple, it is not profitable to plex on tier 1 anymore, so no one does it , game mechanics is broken just like it was last time gallente took all systems. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1112
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 16:59:00 -
[145] - Quote
Bad Messenger wrote:Thing is simple, it is not profitable to plex on tier 1 anymore, so no one does it , game mechanics is broken just like it was last time gallente took all systems.
But they were fine when you guys held the warzone. Im beginning to notice a pattern! |

Arla Sarain
73
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 17:01:00 -
[146] - Quote
I heard
Gallente next 36h Tama Something Something
Confirm? |

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos
377
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 17:16:00 -
[147] - Quote
Bad Messenger wrote: Thing is simple, it is not profitable to plex on tier 1 anymore, so no one does it , game mechanics is broken just like it was last time gallente took all systems. Whereas it wasn't way back when you took the warzone? 
To be serious with you BM, we all agree that the lp system is ******. And we've been saying so. But it wasn't lp farmers that plexed your home systems and flipped the bunkers.
Anyway, love the tears of those others that complain about gallente "blobs". Love the claims of "200 Gallente in local" (obviously someone who's overview is so ****** up he can't differentiate between neutrals and Galmil but only sees those that aren't blue or purple to him ). Love to see ole' Squat Dog back and posting.
As was just said above, don't worry, you'll have a nullsec alliance join you soon. Eventually your Navy Raven farming hordes will be back and all will be well. CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, please give us a persisting-áoff button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals. |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
811
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 17:32:00 -
[148] - Quote
Deacon Abox wrote:Bad Messenger wrote: Thing is simple, it is not profitable to plex on tier 1 anymore, so no one does it , game mechanics is broken just like it was last time gallente took all systems. Whereas it wasn't way back when you took the warzone?  To be serious with you BM, we all agree that the lp system is ******. And we've been saying so. But it wasn't lp farmers that plexed your home systems and flipped the bunkers. Anyway, love the tears of those others that complain about gallente "blobs". Love the claims of "200 Gallente in local" (obviously someone who's overview is so ****** up he can't differentiate between neutrals and Galmil but only sees those that aren't blue or purple to him  ). Love to see ole' Squat Dog back and posting. As was just said above, don't worry, you'll have a nullsec alliance join you soon. Eventually your Navy Raven farming hordes will be back and all will be well. 
Back when Caldari took all systems there was no isk/lp reward at all, so making isk was not driving everyone to join one side and farm easy money :).
I bet there is no single Caldari who is mad about losing system for their own farming alts, but thing that even everyone is happy with current easy isk with tier 4 for ever system, it is not still working as game mechanics CCP inteded it to be. |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
811
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 17:40:00 -
[149] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Bad Messenger wrote:Thing is simple, it is not profitable to plex on tier 1 anymore, so no one does it , game mechanics is broken just like it was last time gallente took all systems. But they were fine when you guys held the warzone. Im beginning to notice a pattern! As for squatdog, i imagine he is just trolling. He wasnt even there for any of the systems that put up a defence. All he did was sit in Ladister for the 13 day campaign keeping it stable as though that was going to stop us. Okkamon took us nearly a week to capture, numerical superiority swung from fairly even in EU tz, though they often stayed docked due to lack of FC, sometimes we would sit there plexing with 20-25 people in local as they logged in. They would be sat with equal numbers for sometimes 2 hours before making a move. Twice during Okkamon siege there were over 100 squids in 3 separate fleets during US tz compared to our 40-60 number. But ultimately their procrastination in the EU, lack of AU tz and inconsistent US tz cost them the system.
CCP designed FW on way that isk keeps it flip flopping, but then they nerfed farmers on tier1, so best is to farm on one side with high tier.
If you can do easily bigger plexes you can sure do lvl4 fw missions too , so why to plex with tier1 when you can do missions with tier4. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1113
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 18:21:00 -
[150] - Quote
Bad Messenger wrote:Deacon Abox wrote:Bad Messenger wrote: Thing is simple, it is not profitable to plex on tier 1 anymore, so no one does it , game mechanics is broken just like it was last time gallente took all systems. Whereas it wasn't way back when you took the warzone?  To be serious with you BM, we all agree that the lp system is ******. And we've been saying so. But it wasn't lp farmers that plexed your home systems and flipped the bunkers. Anyway, love the tears of those others that complain about gallente "blobs". Love the claims of "200 Gallente in local" (obviously someone who's overview is so ****** up he can't differentiate between neutrals and Galmil but only sees those that aren't blue or purple to him  ). Love to see ole' Squat Dog back and posting. As was just said above, don't worry, you'll have a nullsec alliance join you soon. Eventually your Navy Raven farming hordes will be back and all will be well.  Back when Caldari took all systems there was no isk/lp reward at all, so making isk was not driving everyone to join one side and farm easy money :). I bet there is no single Caldari who is mad about losing system for their own farming alts, but thing that even everyone is happy with current easy isk with tier 4 for ever system, it is not still working as game mechanics CCP inteded it to be.
So if isk is the driving factor then the mechanic is broken? When will-power and bragging rights are the driving factor the mechanics are sound? No matter how utterly skewed and biased the mechanics actually were?
Well, by that standard we still win. We were at tier 4 before the push, and were at tier 4 now. People didnt earn a great deal of LP in this push. So its pretty clear that our motivation here was the same as your motivation back then. To win, not make isk.
Since the specific mechanics dont matter (by your standards) when judging if mechanics are broken, and all that matters is that occupancy is driven by the will to win and not isk, its pretty clear that our victory is every bit as valid as yours. Well, tbh a lot more valid since more than 20 people dominating the after downtime spawn can play now :) |
|

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
811
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 18:37:00 -
[151] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Bad Messenger wrote:Deacon Abox wrote:Bad Messenger wrote: Thing is simple, it is not profitable to plex on tier 1 anymore, so no one does it , game mechanics is broken just like it was last time gallente took all systems. Whereas it wasn't way back when you took the warzone?  To be serious with you BM, we all agree that the lp system is ******. And we've been saying so. But it wasn't lp farmers that plexed your home systems and flipped the bunkers. Anyway, love the tears of those others that complain about gallente "blobs". Love the claims of "200 Gallente in local" (obviously someone who's overview is so ****** up he can't differentiate between neutrals and Galmil but only sees those that aren't blue or purple to him  ). Love to see ole' Squat Dog back and posting. As was just said above, don't worry, you'll have a nullsec alliance join you soon. Eventually your Navy Raven farming hordes will be back and all will be well.  Back when Caldari took all systems there was no isk/lp reward at all, so making isk was not driving everyone to join one side and farm easy money :). I bet there is no single Caldari who is mad about losing system for their own farming alts, but thing that even everyone is happy with current easy isk with tier 4 for ever system, it is not still working as game mechanics CCP inteded it to be. So if isk is the driving factor then the mechanic is broken? When will-power and bragging rights are the driving factor the mechanics are sound? No matter how utterly skewed and biased the mechanics actually were? Well, by that standard we still win. We were at tier 4 before the push, and were at tier 4 now. People didnt earn a great deal of LP in this push. So its pretty clear that our motivation here was the same as your motivation back then. To win, not make isk. Since the specific mechanics dont matter (by your standards) when judging if mechanics are broken, and all that matters is that occupancy is driven by the will to win and not isk, its pretty clear that our victory is every bit as valid as yours. Well, tbh a lot more valid since more than 20 people dominating the after downtime spawn can play now :)
Are you mad about something? is it so hard to admit that once again CCP nerfed victory for gallente, sad thing that they used same method than last time and you do not still get it. |

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
422
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 18:42:00 -
[152] - Quote
Personal opinion, but folks who claim ISK UBER ALLES as the only valid determinant of the FW mechanics are missing the large number of folks for whom it's KMS UBER ALLES and GUDFITES UBER ALLES and EPEEN UBER ALLES. Sure, Tier and isk/LP ratios matter in terms of sustainability for a lot of pilots, but we Gallente haven't been in it for the iskies. Lots of us in the more active GalMil corps have relied on incursions / exploration / WHs / PI / industry for our isk rather than missions and plexing.
Point being - incentives matter, but the amount of influence they have is exactly how much influence you give them. We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
811
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 18:49:00 -
[153] - Quote
Veskrashen wrote:Personal opinion, but folks who claim ISK UBER ALLES as the only valid determinant of the FW mechanics are missing the large number of folks for whom it's KMS UBER ALLES and GUDFITES UBER ALLES and EPEEN UBER ALLES. Sure, Tier and isk/LP ratios matter in terms of sustainability for a lot of pilots, but we Gallente haven't been in it for the iskies. Lots of us in the more active GalMil corps have relied on incursions / exploration / WHs / PI / industry for our isk rather than missions and plexing.
Point being - incentives matter, but the amount of influence they have is exactly how much influence you give them.
point is that you won war without enemy. ofc some people fight but reason is not always to keep systems, it is just to have fights. |

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
422
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 20:17:00 -
[154] - Quote
Bad Messenger wrote:point is that you won war without enemy. ofc some people fight but reason is not always to keep systems, it is just to have fights. Not our fault if they looked at us and said "Gallente too stronk. Too manly. We run now."
It would have been more satisfying to have a momentous, climatic battle when we finally too Heyd and Lad, but if you don't bother to show up to defend your homes and then say our victory is cheaper as a result... yeah. Doesn't really add up my friend.
We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1113
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 20:17:00 -
[155] - Quote
Bad Messenger wrote:point is that you won war without enemy. ofc some people fight but reason is not always to keep systems, it is just to have fights.
Thats kinda ironic. Most of the gallente give caldari props for their warzone domination back in the day, but by your own standards it was meaningless.
You guys won occupancy during the 1h after downtime with the non random spawns, leaving all plex to spawn randomly for the rest of the day. The defensive advantage this presented to defending any system of your choice was paramount to caldari success back then. I doubt there were more than 3 gallente even trying to fight back given how irrelevant the mechanic was.
Im sure you got fights here and there, but i doubt they had anything at all to do with occupancy since hardly anyone ever fought in plexes. On the other hand, i have more than 2x the kills and 3xthe isk destroyed this month than you have ever had in a single month over the last 8 years. And its nearly all occupancy related. Interesting to know who actually did fight to win the warzone huh?
And with regards station lockouts making FW broken, i was against them too. But there is no denying that it killed ****** station games and forces people to come out and fight wheras before there was no penalty for apathy. Also, low-sec was utterly dead before LP for plex and station lockouts.
Only downside is people might have to travel to find pvp, THE HORROR!!! |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2508
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 00:37:00 -
[156] - Quote
So if it was deplexing alts earning massive isk at Tier 4 that kept Caldari at bay, then what happened to those deplexing alts? Why'd they let you guys capture three systems?
Really, it's a combination of deplexing alts and full neckbeard attention to capturing the warzone. One alone can be defeated, but deplexing alts at higher tiers + neckbeards is almost impossible to stop. That's a fair assessment.
Now that we have it out of our system, we can expect the Caldari neckbeards to try to do the same thing to us in a few months. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2508
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 00:39:00 -
[157] - Quote
Bad Messenger wrote:point is that you won war without enemy. ofc some people fight but reason is not always to keep systems, it is just to have fights. Our (fail) leadership at the time did the same thing when you guys took the warzone. They quit at about Aldranette/Esesier and hoped that you'd move on to something else once you took the warzone.
|

Pinky Feldman
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
742
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 00:52:00 -
[158] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Don't know what the fuss is all about. Most of the time, taking a home system generates a ton of content (Okkamon, Pav/Kinakka, Asakai), and sometimes it doesn't (Heyd, Ladistier). Whatever. We were in "Take Warzone Beast Mode" and accept that one of the consequences was no fights at the end. The only thing lolworthy here is Squatdog's assessment only because he was spot on in his analysis. The way to beat the blob is to spread out and force fights in many places. The Amarr did this exact thing to the Minmatar when they were down to just Sahtogas and it worked for them. Caldari could have potentially royally griefed us Gallente militia neckbeards if they had employed this strategy BEFORE all the systems were taken. Maybe we would have adjusted, maybe we wouldn't have - we'll never know. Whatever. Good to see you back. Never thought you'd leave. I think it's time to add "We didn't want to maintain total warzone control anyways"  Edit: Also, you guys still have us in total time warzone controlled with a score of about 180 days to 4. 
Yeah, but how many Caldari leaders were actually active that had a reason to do that compared to the number of active Gallente. Saying that Caldari could have done that when the only people with the skills and knowledge to push back a warzone were only there for PVP in an already small room isn't really comparable.
The only reason that I know that your push against little opposition actually took a respective amount of coordination is because our push back took a considerable effort too and the Minmatar militia we faced at the time in my opinion was less motivated than the Gallente militia was as a group. Another big motivating factor for us as well was the fact that the Minmatar wanted to get a medal for the first time. If they were going for a second medal attempt, I highly doubt any of us would have cared enough.
The moar you cry the less you pee |

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
381
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 01:23:00 -
[159] - Quote
We knew it !! after all these moanings and crying a 0.0 alliance came to rescue our eternal frenemies :)
Welcome in Pasta , and welcome in leading Calmil they had waited for you to save them
(now they won't have to cynobitch to get some 0.0 alliance to come handle their fights for them , that a goo thing for liquid ozone availabilty  CCP it's time to remove Off Grid Boost and to Put Them on Killmail TOO, same for Logi....Open that damn door !! |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2508
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 01:43:00 -
[160] - Quote
Irya Boone wrote:We knew it !! after all these moanings and crying a 0.0 alliance came to rescue our eternal frenemies :) Welcome in Pasta , and welcome in leading Calmil they had waited for you to save them (now they won't have to cynobitch to get some 0.0 alliance to come handle their fights for them , that a goo thing for liquid ozone availabilty  It usually happens right BEFORE we take Ladistier. This time it took three days after... 
Pasta is former Draketrain, so they know what's up - at least Lacco does. Should be some fun pew.
|
|

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
311
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 01:51:00 -
[161] - Quote
Arla Sarain wrote:I heard
Gallente next 36h Tama Something Something
Confirm?
Sure. Hopefully the Caldari just get it over with quickly and don't give up because a couple dozen pilots are looking for fights. BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Baron' Soontir Fel
Justified Chaos
246
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 01:52:00 -
[162] - Quote
A lot of people's arguments here fall flat when you realize GalMIl level 4 missions require a HAC or T3 to run. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2508
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 01:53:00 -
[163] - Quote
Pinky Feldman wrote:Yeah, but how many Caldari leaders were actually active that had a reason to do that compared to the number of active Gallente. Apparently not enough. Maybe it's time they got some new ones.
|

Squatdog
State Protectorate Caldari State
145
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 02:02:00 -
[164] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Bad Messenger wrote:Thing is simple, it is not profitable to plex on tier 1 anymore, so no one does it , game mechanics is broken just like it was last time gallente took all systems. But they were fine when you guys held the warzone. Im beginning to notice a pattern! As for squatdog, i imagine he is just trolling. He wasnt even there for any of the systems that put up a defence. All he did was sit in Ladister for the 13 day campaign keeping it stable as though that was going to stop us. Okkamon took us nearly a week to capture, numerical superiority swung from fairly even in EU tz, though they often stayed docked due to lack of FC, sometimes we would sit there plexing with 20-25 people in local as they logged in. They would be sat with equal numbers for sometimes 2 hours before making a move. Twice during Okkamon siege there were over 100 squids in 3 separate fleets during US tz compared to our 40-60 number. But ultimately their procrastination in the EU, lack of AU tz and inconsistent US tz cost them the system.
It must be wonderful to live in your fantasyland.
Heyd got blobbed with fleets of 50+ and it was hilarious watching your Ladi fleet of 20+ repeatedly zerg to Heyd every time the Russians managed to scrape together remotely even numbers.
Once the US TZ blob disbanded, the remaining Gals got completely slaughtered to the point where they ran away and Ladi was deplexed from 22% to stable. Then the blob returned and peaked at 150+ for the ihub bash.
|

Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
45
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 02:29:00 -
[165] - Quote
Bad Messenger wrote:
point is that you won war without enemy. ofc some people fight but reason is not always to keep systems, it is just to have fights.
Not GalMil's problem if CalMil is incompetent.
Why would a power-house country gimp itself against a third-world country in a war?  Just Add Water |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
811
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 02:37:00 -
[166] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Bad Messenger wrote:point is that you won war without enemy. ofc some people fight but reason is not always to keep systems, it is just to have fights. Our (fail) leadership at the time did the same thing when you guys took the warzone. They quit at about Aldranette/Esesier and hoped that you'd move on to something else once you took the warzone.
it is not same, i bet you did not have alts on caldari side doing offencive plexes for lp/isk like caldari had now alts on gallente making lp/isk.
reason why no one defend ladistier could be that all was attacking it with alts. |

Zazu Prota
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
2
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 04:15:00 -
[167] - Quote
hi hello I am here to forum war.
"grrr liberals grrr"
"muh lp"
"y u blob"
k think its covered bye )) |

Minmatar Citizen08787
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 04:42:00 -
[168] - Quote
Wow, I still remember when FW was a way to get low sec fights without going pie... |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2508
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 05:42:00 -
[169] - Quote
Bad Messenger wrote:reason why no one defend ladistier could be that all was attacking it with alts. Ladi was near 0% until the main fleet came in. |

Niden
Moira. Villore Accords
123
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 07:52:00 -
[170] - Quote
My 0.02 ISK in the debate: FW: Game Over
/N Moira corp | Villore Accords | Gallente militia |-á Lowlife on Crossing Zebras | @Niden_GMVA |
|

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
381
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 10:14:00 -
[171] - Quote
Squatdog wrote:
Once the US TZ blob disbanded, the remaining Gals got completely slaughtered to the point where they ran away and Ladi was deplexed from 22% to stable. Then the blob returned and peaked at 150+ for the ihub bash.
Bad messenger :reason why no one defend ladistier could be that all was attacking it with alts.
Humm guys get your story in phase .. one says lad was defended and the defenders slaughtered galmil , and the other one say no one defended Lad ... so who to believe , and i want to believe in someone :(
Anyway , still want to have the number of active pilots in galmil and calmil or now that some 0.0 alliance come aboard on your side it's not relevant now? ( but it was 1 week ago)
still want to fix the mechanics ? ^^ CCP it's time to remove Off Grid Boost and to Put Them on Killmail TOO, same for Logi....Open that damn door !! |

Milan Nantucket
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
157
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 12:37:00 -
[172] - Quote
David Coverdale wrote:At present moment, there remains only 1 system controlled by Caldari in faction warfare (Ladistier). Even the most devoted low-sec Caldari pvp'ers could not protect their home systems from the Gal invasion, but there doesn't seem to be any forum activity regarding this fact. Did I miss something? They all defected to galmil with their alts. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1356
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 13:37:00 -
[173] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Don't know what the fuss is all about. Most of the time, taking a home system generates a ton of content (Okkamon, Pav/Kinakka, Asakai), and sometimes it doesn't (Heyd, Ladistier). Whatever. We were in "Take Warzone Beast Mode" and accept that one of the consequences was no fights at the end. The only thing lolworthy here is Squatdog's assessment only because he was spot on in his analysis. The way to beat the blob is to spread out and force fights in many places. The Amarr did this exact thing to the Minmatar when they were down to just Sahtogas and it worked for them. Caldari could have potentially royally griefed us Gallente militia neckbeards if they had employed this strategy BEFORE all the systems were taken. Maybe we would have adjusted, maybe we wouldn't have - we'll never know. Whatever. Good to see you back. Never thought you'd leave. I think it's time to add "We didn't want to maintain total warzone control anyways"  Edit: Also, you guys still have us in total time warzone controlled with a score of about 180 days to 4. 
Sure they could have tried to spread out the blob to keep the systems. But no one cared enough to bother. At least not the people who have been in fw long enough to really understand the occupancy mechanics.
The pvp corps are leaving and being replaced with corps where every member has a plexing alt. Call it the "new Gallente."
The forums are full of the same very vocal 6 people who think fw occupancy is something worth caring about. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2509
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 14:22:00 -
[174] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Sure they could have tried to spread out the blob to keep the systems. But no one cared enough to bother. At least not the people who have been in fw long enough to really understand the occupancy mechanics.
The pvp corps are leaving and being replaced with corps where every member has a plexing alt. Call it the "new Gallente."
The forums are full of the same very vocal 6 people who think fw occupancy is something worth caring about. That's their option. Eve is a sandbox afterall.
Meanwhile those 6 guys are getting lots of pvp in FW precisely because they "care" about it. Yesterday it was Tama. We lost the system but got some really good pew out of it.
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1114
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 14:51:00 -
[175] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Sure they could have tried to spread out the blob to keep the systems. But no one cared enough to bother. At least not the people who have been in fw long enough to really understand the occupancy mechanics.
The pvp corps are leaving and being replaced with corps where every member has a plexing alt. Call it the "new Gallente."
The forums are full of the same very vocal 6 people who think fw occupancy is something worth caring about. That's their option. Eve is a sandbox afterall. Meanwhile those 6 guys are getting lots of pvp in FW precisely because they "care" about it. Yesterday it was Tama. We lost the system but got some really good pew out of it.
We were terrible though, we were outnumbered 2 to 1 so we docked up. OH WAIT, we didnt. |

Fourteen Maken
House of Shire
138
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 16:33:00 -
[176] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Sure they could have tried to spread out the blob to keep the systems. But no one cared enough to bother. At least not the people who have been in fw long enough to really understand the occupancy mechanics.
The pvp corps are leaving and being replaced with corps where every member has a plexing alt. Call it the "new Gallente."
The forums are full of the same very vocal 6 people who think fw occupancy is something worth caring about. That's their option. Eve is a sandbox afterall. Meanwhile those 6 guys are getting lots of pvp in FW precisely because they "care" about it. Yesterday it was Tama. We lost the system but got some really good pew out of it. We were terrible though, we were outnumbered 2 to 1 so we docked up. OH WAIT, we didnt.
It's not for lack of balls, those players stuck with calmil after everyone saw the writing on the wall. They didn't care about losing ships, you would have got fights if it was even remotely realistic, but in the end it was just stupid to pad galmil kill boards.
The fleet i was in had some early success, was up for hours winning some losing some, reshipping and flying straight back out. We didn't dock until galmil came with massive fleets of armor hacs and assault frigs with logi, I also saw a lot of minmattar in local so you dragged everything available in both militias to roflstomp us. We flew into it once for a laugh got barbecued, and saw we were nowhere near breaking the reps so we went back to ship up, but not enough of our players had the skills to ship up to that level and the fleet disintegrated as yet more orange filed in from all over both warzones. We wanted to fight but it was ridiculous, even though we dragged everything available in militia into that fleet to stage an 11th hour defence, we were outnumbered, outgunned, outrepped, just completely over matched, so we just said fk this whats on telly, and I don't think you got any good fights again after that night.
If you want to control the warzone keep doing what you did, it will work 100% of the time when you have such a big advantage, and there's no shame in that either btw. Just don't blame us for not bringing the fights when you didn't come looking for fights, you wanted to roll the warzone: mission accomplished, well done, but whats next? |

Gorski Car
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
318
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 16:57:00 -
[177] - Quote
Dont worry we got this caldari. Tama now warzone next #GORSKI4CSM https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4265138#post4265138
|

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
311
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 17:10:00 -
[178] - Quote
Gorski Car wrote:Dont worry we got this caldari. Tama now warzone next
Can we hold you to that? BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Dread Operative
Snuff Box
370
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 17:46:00 -
[179] - Quote
Please please please attack Nis. |

Aves Enderas
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
8
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 22:07:00 -
[180] - Quote
Dread Operative wrote:Please please please attack Nis.
Please this. We will welcome you with hugs! |
|

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
381
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 01:22:00 -
[181] - Quote
ah thank go pasta came to save caldari , i hope you won't cyno for CFC ...because you know ... the old calmil ...  CCP it's time to remove Off Grid Boost and to Put Them on Killmail TOO, same for Logi....Open that damn door !! |

Zazu Prota
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
3
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 01:35:00 -
[182] - Quote
Irya Boone wrote:ah thank go pasta came to save caldari , i hope you won't cyno for CFC ...because you know ... the old calmil ... 
Is this english ?  |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
1114
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 01:49:00 -
[183] - Quote
Zazu Prota wrote:Irya Boone wrote:ah thank go pasta came to save caldari , i hope you won't cyno for CFC ...because you know ... the old calmil ...  Is this english ? 
All gallente are french! |

Squatdog
State Protectorate Caldari State
145
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 04:42:00 -
[184] - Quote
Irya Boone wrote:Squatdog wrote:
Once the US TZ blob disbanded, the remaining Gals got completely slaughtered to the point where they ran away and Ladi was deplexed from 22% to stable. Then the blob returned and peaked at 150+ for the ihub bash.
Bad messenger :reason why no one defend ladistier could be that all was attacking it with alts. Humm guys get your story in phase .. one says lad was defended and the defenders slaughtered galmil , and the other one say no one defended Lad ... so who to believe , and i want to believe in someone :( Anyway , still want to have the number of active pilots in galmil and calmil or now that some 0.0 alliance come aboard on your side it's not relevant now? ( but it was 1 week ago) still want to fix the mechanics ? ^^
It was defended literally by two people.
Which was more than enough until Gallente started blobbing with fleets of 30+
|

Silverbackyererse
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
82
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 05:12:00 -
[185] - Quote
Squatdog wrote:
It was defended literally by two people.
Same number that took it back from Irya's Tipiaks last time as I recall.
Sup Irya? Vive La Distier! |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
106
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 06:47:00 -
[186] - Quote
What many bros here do not realize:
FW needs a working inner system to have healthy corps that want to fight.
There is nothing remotely working in FW - it is getting the null sex stagnation sickness - because of poor game design. |

May Arethusa
PillowBrigade Inc
14
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 06:54:00 -
[187] - Quote
Ah, the bluster and bravado in this thread warms my heart.
Congratulations by the way.
Admitting defeat is never easy, but drawing a line and withdrawing once it had been crossed was probably the one good decision CalMil made in this whole affair. I can only hope everyone higher up the chain learned as much as I did about our weaknesses and flaws as a Militia.
As far as the mechanics being broken goes, I couldn't really think of a better situation than this to put that theory to the test. FW certainly needs a lot of work, but we're in an ideal position to see just how much of an impact the plexing changes have had. I'll be interested in seeing if one of our upcoming mini-expansions attempts to overhaul the whole FW system in the not too distant future. |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
106
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 07:51:00 -
[188] - Quote
Admiting defeat is easy.
None can win all time - it would be extremly boring to autowin.
Strange thing in EVE: the players want to autowin - that leads to stagnation, like in null sex.
Success without risk is simply not worth playing.
If the game mechanics are worth it there is still an incentive to fight if you loose- adaption is the base skill of combat.
There is nothing in FW that is worth fighting for - FW is FF, faction farming.
The problem with autowin is - our have none to play/ fight with.
So game design is about balance. |

RonPaul Rox
Justified Chaos
46
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 08:02:00 -
[189] - Quote
Gorski Car wrote:Dont worry we got this caldari. Tama now warzone next
whatever, im just glad we'll have fights again http://imgur.com/EGjYLSL
|

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
381
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 08:11:00 -
[190] - Quote
Silverbackyererse wrote:Squatdog wrote:
It was defended literally by two people.
Same number that took it back from Irya's Tipiaks last time as I recall. Sup Irya? Vive La Distier!
ahahah need something to fix the memories :) yep 2 proud feloow calmil defended Lad ... ok you got me on this one , you won 
hope i gonna see you again in a firetail/daredevil that works fine this time ^^ CCP it's time to remove Off Grid Boost and to Put Them on Killmail TOO, same for Logi....Open that damn door !! |
|

Super Chair
Project Cerberus Templis CALSF
660
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 09:34:00 -
[191] - Quote
Every page on this thread is much like a year of Brittany spears career, less and less entertaining and more desperate with each one  |

Marc Callan
Nuclear Manhattan Limited
462
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 11:25:00 -
[192] - Quote
One thing I will note: people get burned out from constant combat. I've noticed it in Real Life, in null, and in Black Rise. Rousing victories do tend to mitigate that, but crushing defeats will exacerbate it. That's just human psychology.
As for the end of the recent campaign, at the risk of invoking Godwin's Law, it sounds like it somewhat resembled the end of the Battle of France in World War II - specifically, Dunkirk. Was Operation Dynamo unfair to the Wehrmacht? "We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be." - Kurt Vonnegurt |

Fourteen Maken
House of Shire
138
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 13:40:00 -
[193] - Quote
Marc Callan wrote:One thing I will note: people get burned out from constant combat. I've noticed it in Real Life, in null, and in Black Rise. Rousing victories do tend to mitigate that, but crushing defeats will exacerbate it. That's just human psychology.
As for the end of the recent campaign, at the risk of invoking Godwin's Law, it sounds like it somewhat resembled the end of the Battle of France in World War II - specifically, Dunkirk. Was Operation Dynamo unfair to the Wehrmacht?
http://themittani.com/content/20-inside-failure-cascade
I think that pretty much sums up what happened to Calmil.
Quote:Defenses Against Cascade:
The best defense against a cascade that I have discovered is having a monolithic alliance structure, where the 'alliance' amounts to one corporation. It is much harder to put a corporation into a cascade than it is an alliance, because CCP has structured corporations as dictatorships with one absolute authority. Alliances have competing CEOs and a variety of different interests; the monolithic corporation may still have some amount of infighting and scheming, but much less than the more common oligarchy. The only example of a monolithic alliance that I know of is Goonswarm, which is the Goonfleet corporation, plus several much smaller member corporations. Rather than having an oligarchy and shared power between a number of member corporation CEOs, the monolithic alliance has only one leader, and the consent or membership the ancillary corporations (while helpful) is not strategically necessary.
It is also helpful to have an ethnic, national or cultural identity outside of EVE to bind the pilots to identifying with the alliance. There are a number of ethnic organizations in EVE, and these tend to be more resistant to cascade than non-ethnic organizations. The smaller the ethnic group or more isolated the language, the better a defense against cascade there is. Right now, Russian and German players have a number of alliances which they could join, so the need to stick to a particular alliance is minimal. There is only one Polish alliance, by contrast, and perhaps two Hungarian alliances. Those pilots are very invested in their alliance's health.
In practice, this means that a monolithic or ethnic/national/cultural alliance can be repeatedly brought to a state of helplessness, but it is very hard to shift pilot identification and induce collapse.
should be interesting reading for calmil |

Adrie Atticus
the shadow plague The Bastion
269
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 14:14:00 -
[194] - Quote
Irya Boone wrote:ah thank go pasta came to save caldari , i hope you won't cyno for CFC ...because you know ... the old calmil ... 
We won't drop via a pasta cyno unless they provide at least a super we can kill, preferably theirs. |

Capqu
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
631
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 14:17:00 -
[195] - Quote
TAMA STATUS: CALDARI
CALDARI STATUS: #1
NO BRAKES ON THE CALDARI TRAIN
UP NEXT: SUJARENTO
GALLENTE PLEBS COWER IN THEIR STAGING
"YOU'LL NEVER TAKE TAMA" - GALLENTE HEAD FC PREGUNA IN TAMA LOCAL 2 DAYS AGO
GLORY TO THE STATE
PEACE THROUGH POWER
CALDARI PRIDE WORLD WIDE
                       
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNpMiT5qpyI |

Theophilas
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
30
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 14:24:00 -
[196] - Quote
why shrek is **** why shrek is **** |

El Space Mariachi
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
119
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 14:28:00 -
[197] - Quote
watch as the galcucks cower in fear while bulldari strongmen culturally enrich their systems
Adrie Atticus wrote:Irya Boone wrote:ah thank go pasta came to save caldari , i hope you won't cyno for CFC ...because you know ... the old calmil ...  We won't drop via a pasta cyno unless they provide at least a super we can kill, preferably theirs.
we are glad THE BASTION, the CFC's elite rapid deployment wing, lead by Grand Vizier Carnernos on behalf of their Suzerain The Mittani are willing to help but their aid isn't needed gay gamers for jesus |

mr Oll
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
4
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 14:30:00 -
[198] - Quote
#FreeHeth |

emAugust
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
16
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 14:40:00 -
[199] - Quote
-
I came to chew bubblegum and kick cuckmil ass and I am all outta bubblegum.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZAPtFRpuu8
#CAL PRIDE WORLD WIDE
          
              
       
BODY & BLOOD. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2510
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 15:01:00 -
[200] - Quote
Rahelis wrote:There is nothing in FW that is worth fighting for .. There is nothing in this game worth fighting for - unless you decide it's worth it.
|
|

Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
90
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 15:05:00 -
[201] - Quote
To go left you must go right. |

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
311
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 15:08:00 -
[202] - Quote
Capqu wrote:TAMA STATUS: CALDARI
CALDARI STATUS: #1
NO BRAKES ON THE CALDARI TRAIN
UP NEXT: SUJARENTO
GALLENTE PLEBS COWER IN THEIR STAGING
"YOU'LL NEVER TAKE TAMA" - GALLENTE HEAD FC PREGUNA IN TAMA LOCAL 2 DAYS AGO
GLORY TO THE STATE
PEACE THROUGH POWER
CALDARI PRIDE WORLD WIDE
                       
This made me laugh pretty damn hard, thanks Capqu!
On a side note, how long until you guys try and take the warzone? Anything we can do to help speedup the process?
Edit: You didn't even mention taking the mighty stronghold of Hasama! BLFOX is currently recruiting |

emAugust
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
16
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 15:12:00 -
[203] - Quote
Might I take this opportunity to suggest that PASTA is in fact recruiting                 |

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
311
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 15:23:00 -
[204] - Quote
Classic null move, come to FW to try and recruit pvp pilots 
Now then, hurry up and take some more systems please! BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
90
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 19:55:00 -
[205] - Quote
Thanatos Marathon wrote:Classic null move, come to FW to try and recruit pvp pilots  Now then, hurry up and take some more systems please!
Pasta isn't classic null tho. |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
813
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 23:16:00 -
[206] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Rahelis wrote:There is nothing in FW that is worth fighting for .. There is nothing in this game worth fighting for - unless you decide it's worth it.
sometimes it is profitable to fight for something, but now in fw it is more profitable to just stay on same side and farm. make isk no war. |

Fenris Orion
Rapid Withdrawal
11
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 03:54:00 -
[207] - Quote
Capqu wrote:TAMA STATUS: CALDARI
CALDARI STATUS: #1
NO BRAKES ON THE CALDARI TRAIN
UP NEXT: SUJARENTO
GALLENTE PLEBS COWER IN THEIR STAGING
"YOU'LL NEVER TAKE TAMA" - GALLENTE HEAD FC PREGUNA IN TAMA LOCAL 2 DAYS AGO
GLORY TO THE STATE
PEACE THROUGH POWER
CALDARI PRIDE WORLD WIDE
                       
Your guys fielded a decent number of Tristans in Sujarento last night....
You fools merely adopted the Tristan.... We were born with them, molded by them. By the time you figure them out, you will have lost them all. Even your Worm pilot, despite your Tengu/Loki links, couldn't hold my little Tristan down. This new push by CalMil will be fun indeed!
http://weknowmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/were-gonna-free-the-****-out-of-you.jpg |

Yun Kuai
Justified Chaos
184
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 04:52:00 -
[208] - Quote
Since when did hiding in a POS next to a Titan become marching? Oh you nullbears never learn. When will people realize that fighting an enemy who only bridges an exact counter to your fleet and constantly has caps on standby is not fun to fight.
Hope you got lotion next to your chair for all those blue balls you're gonna get. --------------------------------------------------------::::::::::::--:::-----:::---::::::::::::--------------:::----------:::----:::---:::----------------------:::::::-------:::---:::----::::::-------------------:::-----------:::--:::----:::---------------------::::::::::::----:::::::----:::::::::::::------- |

emAugust
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
16
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 05:23:00 -
[209] - Quote
Thanatos Marathon wrote:Classic null move, come to FW to try and recruit pvp pilots  Now then, hurry up and take some more systems please!
It's just a have fun move. We really like playing this game. We try to find other people who really like playing this game :] |

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
381
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 09:30:00 -
[210] - Quote
yep , recruit all the caldari pvpers please !!! tell them about SRP etc etc CCP it's time to remove Off Grid Boost and to Put Them on Killmail TOO, same for Logi....Open that damn door !! |
|

HHHNNNGGG
Sanchez's Little Helpers
9
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 10:29:00 -
[211] - Quote
Irya Boone wrote:yep , recruit all the caldari pvpers please !!! tell them about SRP etc etc
pasta doesn't have srp and are in fact, very very poor pilots in terms of isk and skillpoints. so when you see all the trash fits, please don't mock their pilots too much they are getting by with whatever scraps they can manage to sell to jita buy orders.
their only solace is to fly glorious caldari ships to crush the galcuck defense union. |

Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders
1911
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 10:46:00 -
[212] - Quote
Your style is... funny.
So GalMil's prize for taking the warzone is the opportunity to fight a bunch of teenagers? Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter! |

Burneddi
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
108
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 13:53:00 -
[213] - Quote
Yun Kuai wrote: Since when did hiding in a POS next to a Titan become marching? Oh you nullbears never learn. When will people realize that fighting an enemy who only bridges an exact counter to your fleet and constantly has caps on standby is not fun to fight.
LOL
we have caps? |

El Space Mariachi
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
120
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 13:53:00 -
[214] - Quote
HHHNNNGGG wrote:Irya Boone wrote:yep , recruit all the caldari pvpers please !!! tell them about SRP etc etc pasta doesn't have srp and are in fact, very very poor pilots in terms of isk and skillpoints. so when you see all the trash fits, please don't mock their pilots too much they are getting by with whatever scraps they can manage to sell to jita buy orders. their only solace is to fly glorious caldari ships to crush the galcuck defense union.
as assistant to the chief of staff of love squad i can confirm this unaffiliated neutral third party's appraisal of our poorness gay gamers for jesus |

Burneddi
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
108
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 13:59:00 -
[215] - Quote
El Space Mariachi wrote: as assistant to the chief of staff of love squad i can confirm this unaffiliated neutral third party's appraisal of our poorness
The most expensive ship I own is my bumping Typhoon |

El Space Mariachi
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
120
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 14:03:00 -
[216] - Quote
Burneddi wrote:El Space Mariachi wrote: as assistant to the chief of staff of love squad i can confirm this unaffiliated neutral third party's appraisal of our poorness
The most expensive ship I own is my bumping Typhoon
i have a raven gay gamers for jesus |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1356
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 14:33:00 -
[217] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Rahelis wrote:There is nothing in FW that is worth fighting for .. There is nothing in this game worth fighting for - unless you decide it's worth it.
FW has overwhelming numbers of people deciding the occupancy war is not worth it.
At some point a rational person might decide to try and figure out why that is.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
425
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 14:50:00 -
[218] - Quote
Cearain wrote: FW has overwhelming numbers of people deciding the occupancy war is not worth it.
At some point a rational person might decide to try and figure out why that is.
PROTIP: People who care about occupancy warfare don't generally care about LP or isk, beyond that needed to sustain the occupancy war.
Thus, those saying it's "not worth it" either don't have the organizational support to effectively engage in occupancy warfare, or are more interested in farming LP. We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1356
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 15:12:00 -
[219] - Quote
Veskrashen wrote:Cearain wrote: FW has overwhelming numbers of people deciding the occupancy war is not worth it.
At some point a rational person might decide to try and figure out why that is.
PROTIP: People who care about occupancy warfare don't generally care about LP or isk, beyond that needed to sustain the occupancy war. Thus, those saying it's "not worth it" either don't have the organizational support to effectively engage in occupancy warfare, or are more interested in farming LP.
You are just going in circles.
Why wouldn't there be all sorts of organizational support if lots of people want to win the occupancy war?
There is very little organizational support because so few care to win it.
As far as your claim that the 500,000 other account holders who find winning the fw occupancy war is not worth their time are all just isk farmers and only the 100 or so who care about the occupancy war want to play a fun engaging game, well I won't even go there. Perhaps you can think about your conclusion yourself.
Bottom line this last sweep proved that the interest in faction war occupancy is at an all time low since inferno. Are we setting the bar so low that having 1 or 200 characters caring about the occupancy war is sufficient? That is fairly pathetic when you have a mmo with 500,000 accounts.
But really keep thinking you're right and the other 99.98% of players don't get how great it is to rabbit plex with an alt account. Keep thinking the problem is with everyone else. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

GavinGoodrich
The Great Harmon Institute Of Technology Enemy Spotted.
75
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 15:23:00 -
[220] - Quote
So yeah...gg wp n' all that gallente. Try not to take this game too seriously, though. All this FW stuff is voluntary, not obligatory. We vote with our feet and our ships on what we feel like doing. I'm sure the pride of getting all the systems was great n' all, but how much of your free time did that suck up?
Man, Dota 2 is addicting. I might just give a few bil of the ships i pre-assembled in ichy to somebody else to use 'cause I'm movin' house soon and it seems like a waste, but resubbing when there's so many other good games that don't take up SO MUCH OF YOUR TIME to play are out there.
Also, May had a nice post a few pages back.
Long live the war. Not to sound like a condescending ****, but yeah...the war continues with or without 100% control. Haaaaaalp my head's on fire |
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1115
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 15:39:00 -
[221] - Quote
GavinGoodrich wrote:So yeah...gg wp n' all that gallente. Try not to take this game too seriously, though. All this FW stuff is voluntary, not obligatory. We vote with our feet and our ships on what we feel like doing. I'm sure the pride of getting all the systems was great n' all, but how much of your free time did that suck up?
Man, Dota 2 is addicting. I might just give a few bil of the ships i pre-assembled in ichy to somebody else to use 'cause I'm movin' house soon and it seems like a waste, but resubbing when there's so many other good games that don't take up SO MUCH OF YOUR TIME to play are out there.
Also, May had a nice post a few pages back.
Long live the war. Not to sound like a condescending ****, but yeah...the war continues with or without 100% control. *edit* and you guys may be rivals on the forums but seriously, everyone teams up vs. a random 3rd party all the time.
Squids + pies vs. frogs Squids vs. pies + frogs Pies + pies vs. Squids Pies + pies vs. Galls random 0.0'ers vs. whoever else is around at the time.
The list goes on.
Just don't take this **** too seriously.
Who are you talking to? |

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos
378
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 15:39:00 -
[222] - Quote
GavinGoodrich wrote:. . . , everyone teams up vs. a random 3rd party all the time.
Squids + pies vs. frogs Squids vs. pies + frogs Pies + pies vs. Squids Pies + pies vs. Galls random 0.0'ers vs. whoever else is around at the time.
The list goes on.
Just don't take this **** too seriously.
You missed the Squids + Frogs vs. pies , which has happened quite a bit in my 2+ years of FW. Remember Damar Day  
Anyway, good to see the squids with some new fighting spirit. And now maybe we can get unanimous support for fixing lp accumulation (whilst remembering that farming played some part but alone, and by quite a good margin, did not take the warzone).
CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, please give us a persisting-áoff button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals. |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
814
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 15:58:00 -
[223] - Quote
Yun Kuai wrote:Since when did hiding in a POS next to a Titan become marching? Oh you nullbears never learn. When will people realize that fighting an enemy who only bridges an exact counter to your fleet and constantly has caps on standby is not fun to fight. Hope you got lotion next to your chair for all those blue balls you're gonna get.
well, same goes with other tactics too so... who is not learning is the question |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
814
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 16:01:00 -
[224] - Quote
Veskrashen wrote:Cearain wrote: FW has overwhelming numbers of people deciding the occupancy war is not worth it.
At some point a rational person might decide to try and figure out why that is.
PROTIP: People who care about occupancy warfare don't generally care about LP or isk, beyond that needed to sustain the occupancy war. Thus, those saying it's "not worth it" either don't have the organizational support to effectively engage in occupancy warfare, or are more interested in farming LP.
why to do same thing for cause when doing same elsewhere give lot of isk? |

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders
313
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 17:10:00 -
[225] - Quote
Bad Messenger wrote:why to do same thing for cause when doing same elsewhere give lot of isk?
Fun BLFOX is currently recruiting |

GavinGoodrich
The Great Harmon Institute Of Technology Enemy Spotted.
76
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 19:22:00 -
[226] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:GavinGoodrich wrote:stuff Who are you talking to?
...Everyone on this forum in general? Haaaaaalp my head's on fire |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1115
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 19:48:00 -
[227] - Quote
GavinGoodrich wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:GavinGoodrich wrote:stuff Who are you talking to? ...Everyone on this forum in general?
Why? Maybe i missed the post you were responding to, seemed a bit random. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1356
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 20:16:00 -
[228] - Quote
Thanatos Marathon wrote:Bad Messenger wrote:why to do same thing for cause when doing same elsewhere give lot of isk? Fun
I agree with your answer. Isk can only be used ingame so what is the point if there is nothing fun to do with it? The question is whether getting an alt to rabbit plex (which we have already seen many in the gallente have done) is fun.
The overwhelming response from most people who thoroughly understand the mechanics is that they couldn't care less about the overall occupancy war. Now some people do think it's fun no doubt. Sasawong must have found it enjoyable for him and his alt Sheltering sky to get that many vp. But the vast majority who see how the occupancy game is played decide its not worth their time.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2513
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 20:54:00 -
[229] - Quote
Cearain wrote:The overwhelming response from most people who thoroughly understand the mechanics is that they couldn't care less about the overall occupancy war. Maybe they should. Invariably, we get orders of magnitude MORE pvp fighting for occupancy than we get not fighting for it.
|

Epikurus
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
35
|
Posted - 2014.09.05 23:44:00 -
[230] - Quote
Veskrashen wrote:Cearain wrote: FW has overwhelming numbers of people deciding the occupancy war is not worth it.
At some point a rational person might decide to try and figure out why that is.
PROTIP: People who care about occupancy warfare don't generally care about LP or isk, beyond that needed to sustain the occupancy war. Thus, those saying it's "not worth it" either don't have the organizational support to effectively engage in occupancy warfare, or are more interested in farming LP.
This is more or less a textbook example of a false dichotomy. I'm certainly not interested in defending Cearain's position but your 'either/or' is far from exhaustive. |
|

Fenris Orion
Rapid Withdrawal
11
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 00:22:00 -
[231] - Quote
Dear god, so much crying and foolishness in this thread.
Taking and especially keeping control of systems is of chief importance to people actively engaged in FW (non-farming-alts). Why!? Because all of our stuff is in stations, and if we loose control of the system we can't use those stations. Ergo: taking and keeping systems is a major effort and generates fantastic PVP opportunities in strategically important systems.
If you missed this concept somewhere along the way, do us all a favor, and go play WOW or something.
I wonder how many CalMil have ships and gear locked up in stations all across the war zone right now... I have a bunch of loot locked up in Tama right now myself, and put up quite a fight trying to disrupt the iHub bash for it. Hilarious fun, btw, killed an Oracle with my Astero before anyone could get to me.
Glad to have active targets again. Bring on the Squid Pasta! |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
107
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 07:45:00 -
[232] - Quote
It is called alts, bro - no one cares for station lockouts. The concept ws flawed right from the start.
Every single aspect for FF/FW has serious desigh flaws.
I guess - guess - that CCP made FF/FW in the same mode they did WHs. Write some random code and look what players do with it.
Without being too critical with CCP - the dev`s cleary have none to zero understandings of big parts of their own product - them all being 100% nullbears. That sickness is found in the whole industry and military worldwide - ppl doing decisions mostly have no clue what they are doing.
If you would make LPs only for enemy farmer kills - young players would have no chance having success in FF. All accesses to FF space would be insta perma campef 23/7.
If you would make FF playable for high skilled players, many FF guys would never go to null sex - which is now a 100% farming zone. CCP does want to herd young players to nulls sex, where they bore themselves until they unsub. FW would have cap and BS fights and 3 years before and threaten null sex.
If you would make FF only accessible with say a standing of 3 or 5 with the npc empire - most ppl would never join FF. Only the diehards would play and thus absolutly dominate FW.
So CCP tries to make FF playable for everyone - 0.5 standing with an empire is way too low. You get 0.5 faction standing with beginners missions - that is a real bad idea to herd EVE noobs into FF. Think of begginner getting L4 high sec missions - that would be the same level of stupidness.
CCP does not understand that ppl join FF/FW for fun - I did that for over 3 years. CCP assumes that every EVE player is a nullbear and ONLY interested in farming. I never was interested in farming - but in my milita (Amarr) only about a handful of players feel the same way like me.
It would be damn simple to make Faction War far better than null sex - that is what CCP fears.
A structures, balanced and hard fought game enviroment is anathema to all that CCP wants in high and low sec. Same goes to WH space, CCP wants that the whole game is pointed via null sex.
As long as null sex is such a boring mess CCP is simply failing to design a well balanced game. |

Arla Sarain
73
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 09:01:00 -
[233] - Quote
Fenris Orion wrote:Dear god, so much crying and foolishness all of our stuff is in stations, and if we loose control of the system we can't use those stations. taking and keeping systems is a major effort and generates fantastic PVP opportunities in strategically important systems.
<- 8 months old and not as clueless as the quoted guy. |

Yang Aurilen
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
405
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 09:40:00 -
[234] - Quote
Fenris Orion wrote:Dear god, so much crying and foolishness in this thread.
Taking and especially keeping control of systems is of chief importance to people actively engaged in FW (non-farming-alts). Why!? Because all of our stuff is in stations, and if we loose control of the system we can't use those stations. Ergo: taking and keeping systems is a major effort and generates fantastic PVP opportunities in strategically important systems.
If you missed this concept somewhere along the way, do us all a favor, and go play WOW or something.
I wonder how many CalMil have ships and gear locked up in stations all across the war zone right now... I have a bunch of loot locked up in Tama right now myself, and put up quite a fight trying to disrupt the iHub bash for it. Hilarious fun, btw, killed an Oracle with my Astero before anyone could get to me.
Glad to have active targets again. Bring on the Squid Pasta!
Zero. Black frog and alts exists for a reason. Heck I still have my missioning bomber in innia because I'm too lazy to actually contract it to an alt and fly it out. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1356
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 13:18:00 -
[235] - Quote
Fenris Orion wrote:Dear god, so much crying and foolishness in this thread.
Taking and especially keeping control of systems is of chief importance to people actively engaged in FW (non-farming-alts). Why!? Because all of our stuff is in stations, and if we loose control of the system we can't use those stations. Ergo: taking and keeping systems is a major effort and generates fantastic PVP opportunities in strategically important systems.
If you missed this concept somewhere along the way, do us all a favor, and go play WOW or something.
I wonder how many CalMil have ships and gear locked up in stations all across the war zone right now... I have a bunch of loot locked up in Tama right now myself, and put up quite a fight trying to disrupt the iHub bash for it. Hilarious fun, btw, killed an Oracle with my Astero before anyone could get to me.
Glad to have active targets again. Bring on the Squid Pasta!
Try your best to actually win occupancy for about a year and then come back and tell me about the rich strategy of the game.
Let me say you will either be like XG and Sasawong sitting an alt in plexes, or you will be like the other 499,900 players who think fw occupancy is not worth their time. Not to mention the numerous fw vets who left fw and often eve altogether.
And as far as WOW why would I play that? Thats a false dichotomy. There are other better games to learn/play with actual strategy. Eve can be good if they can get it so it delivers multiple entertaining fights in an hour and a half or so. But I am not interested in rabbit plexing with an alt. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders
314
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 13:53:00 -
[236] - Quote
Cearain maybe you should just move a bunch of ships to tama and see how long it takes you to get fights when you are undocked and flying around the system. Feel free to poke your head into suj/ked as well. All decent systems to find a few fights per hours no prob. BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1356
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 14:26:00 -
[237] - Quote
Thanatos Marathon wrote:Cearain maybe you should just move a bunch of ships to tama and see how long it takes you to get fights when you are undocked and flying around the system. Feel free to poke your head into suj/ked as well. All decent systems to find a few fights per hour no prob.
I could find alot of fights in null sec by undocking in a select few blobby null sec systems as well.
Ideally Faction war would to be a mechanic that forced people to spread out to defend their systems throughout the effected regions. CCP has had varying success at this. But the current iteration is as close to null sec as it has ever been. With the new disparaty between offensive and defensive plexing and Gallente's alt d-plexing army fw has never been such a blob for the win game.
The other issue is what would going to tama or ked really do from an occupancy perspective? I am sure I would gain more vp by having 4 alts rabbit plexing systems. I was in rvb and looked for something beyond just random fights with no overriding objective. And I had good fun doing it for a while. I played faction war that way and have fun doing that too, but its better in a neutral corp since you don't have to hassle around with de-plexing alts to dock and can shoot all the fw players. But again that game play is only fun for a while. CCP still needs to put it all together where fighting for occupancy as efficiently as possible does not involve any alts rabbit plexing. Until that happens you will have a choice whether you want to get as much pvp as possible or you want to gain occupancy as much as possible. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2513
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 14:46:00 -
[238] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Try your best to actually win occupancy for about a year and then come back and tell me about the rich strategy of the game.
We've done it twice and I've tried to tell you all about it but you won't listen.  |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1356
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 16:46:00 -
[239] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Try your best to actually win occupancy for about a year and then come back and tell me about the rich strategy of the game.
We've done it twice and I've tried to tell you all about it but you won't listen. 
I listened. Your alt captured over 100 plexes in 2 weeks. Your main didn't even have that many vp during that week.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1115
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 17:15:00 -
[240] - Quote
Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Try your best to actually win occupancy for about a year and then come back and tell me about the rich strategy of the game.
We've done it twice and I've tried to tell you all about it but you won't listen.  I listened. Your alt captured over 100 plexes in 2 weeks. Your main didn't even have that many vp during that week.
Why have a dog and wag your own tail? If people allow these toothless alts to operate, they clearly dont care enough about the area. Why would someone sit their pvp toons in an area no one is fighting for?
Horses for courses my silly friend. I dont light cynos with my pvp toons either, or haul, or any number of other activities.
Bring fights to my alts and ill bring my pvp toon to your fights.
I know you just like to spout inconsistent objections to how everyone else plays the game and accuse people with far more kills this year than you have ever had of being farmers, because you are terrible at eve and have barely participated in FW on anythihng other than a solo grunt level, but posting the same tired nonsense and offering no solutions or at best things that would make it worse grows tiresome.
Stop posting, thanks. |
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1356
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 17:28:00 -
[241] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Try your best to actually win occupancy for about a year and then come back and tell me about the rich strategy of the game.
We've done it twice and I've tried to tell you all about it but you won't listen.  I listened. Your alt captured over 100 plexes in 2 weeks. Your main didn't even have that many vp during that week. Why have a dog and wag your own tail? If people allow these toothless alts to operate, they clearly dont care enough about the area....
I'm not interested in chasing alts that will just hide in a neighboring system. If that's your thing then your playing the right game.
CCP has ignored the core issue with plexing for so long, that the main fw players are now defending alt plexing for the win. Everyone else has walked away from the game.
One thing we do agree on is that very few people care about winning the occupancy war.
Keep spending your time logging in alts and orbitting buttons, if that is fun for you. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Drunk 'n' Disorderly
379
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 17:40:00 -
[242] - Quote
Cearain wrote: IF UR NOT PLAYING THE GAME HOW I THINK IT SHOULD BE PLAYED UR DOING IT WRONG !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Fixed that for ya GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2513
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 18:55:00 -
[243] - Quote
Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Try your best to actually win occupancy for about a year and then come back and tell me about the rich strategy of the game.
We've done it twice and I've tried to tell you all about it but you won't listen.  I listened. Your alt captured over 100 plexes in 2 weeks. Your main didn't even have that many vp during that week. That's execution of tactics, not the rich strategy part.
|

Fenris Orion
Rapid Withdrawal
11
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 19:12:00 -
[244] - Quote
Cearain wrote:
Try your best to actually win occupancy for about a year and then come back and tell me about the rich strategy of the game
I have done exactly that for over a year and a half now, and I can tell you that you and your crybaby cohorts are utterly clueless. I have helped and at times lead the charge to take and defend systems up and down the eastern front of the Gallente/Caldari war zone. It's what FW is all about, farming alts spending all their time in quite systems are annoying at best, and a completely side-bar subject in terms of FW game content.
Either go somewhere else to cry, or bring yourself to Tama and show us how superior your skills are.... We'll add you to our killboards like everyone else.
|

Fenris Orion
Rapid Withdrawal
11
|
Posted - 2014.09.06 19:19:00 -
[245] - Quote
Yang Aurilen wrote:Fenris Orion wrote:Dear god, so much crying and foolishness in this thread.
Taking and especially keeping control of systems is of chief importance to people actively engaged in FW (non-farming-alts). Why!? Because all of our stuff is in stations, and if we loose control of the system we can't use those stations. Ergo: taking and keeping systems is a major effort and generates fantastic PVP opportunities in strategically important systems.
If you missed this concept somewhere along the way, do us all a favor, and go play WOW or something.
I wonder how many CalMil have ships and gear locked up in stations all across the war zone right now... I have a bunch of loot locked up in Tama right now myself, and put up quite a fight trying to disrupt the iHub bash for it. Hilarious fun, btw, killed an Oracle with my Astero before anyone could get to me.
Glad to have active targets again. Bring on the Squid Pasta! Zero. Black frog and alts exists for a reason. Heck I still have my missioning bomber in innia because I'm too lazy to actually contract it to an alt and fly it out.
You missed the point. Control of stations situated in forward positions close to where the action is allows you to reship quickly to address whatever the enemy is fielding in the area (or when you loose fights, which is inevitable if you're actually playing the game).
We made a push to take Rakapas, for example, to do exactly that. Next on the list was Okkamon, and the residents there put up a great fight.
You can pay someone else to go get your stuff for you, or you can regroup to take it back yourself. Don't be a coward, come and get it. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1116
|
Posted - 2014.09.07 00:07:00 -
[246] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Try your best to actually win occupancy for about a year and then come back and tell me about the rich strategy of the game.
We've done it twice and I've tried to tell you all about it but you won't listen.  I listened. Your alt captured over 100 plexes in 2 weeks. Your main didn't even have that many vp during that week. Why have a dog and wag your own tail? If people allow these toothless alts to operate, they clearly dont care enough about the area.... I'm not interested in chasing alts that will just hide in a neighboring system. If that's your thing then you're playing the right game. CCP has ignored the core issue with plexing for so long, that the main fw players are now defending alt plexing for the win. Everyone else has walked away from the game. One thing we do agree on is that very few people care about winning the occupancy war. Keep spending your time logging in alts and orbitting buttons, if that is fun for you.
I dont agree with you on a single point you have made in the last 2 years. meanwhile, i have won FW twice, and you might have logged in to eve twice...
Stop posting please because you are utterly ignorant, thats as polite as i can put it. |

Atezasha
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.09.07 02:52:00 -
[247] - Quote
U got rekt |

Silverbackyererse
The Church of Awesome
82
|
Posted - 2014.09.07 05:55:00 -
[248] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:........meanwhile, i have won FW twice......... .
And we can all see those diamonds shining out your arse from 50km away. 
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1116
|
Posted - 2014.09.07 06:44:00 -
[249] - Quote
Silverbackyererse wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:........meanwhile, i have won FW twice......... . And we can all see those diamonds shining out your arse from 50km away. 
So jelly. |

IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome
1241
|
Posted - 2014.09.07 11:16:00 -
[250] - Quote
The once was a man from Enaluri Who played Dota2 with a fury
He tried things in Null sec And it wasn't fun sec
So he came back to FW laugh at really crap alliance names like Spaceship Bebop.
Damn - my limerick doesn't rhyme.
 Docked since 2009. |
|

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
381
|
Posted - 2014.09.07 13:38:00 -
[251] - Quote
How things going for the new leadership of calmil , i mean Pasta Did they spread new doctrines , new fleets comps , because since they're back calmil is rolling all over the place 
so i suppose the game mechanics are ok now ,right ? 
Anyway thank you Pasta for steping for your little brothers. CCP it's time to remove Off Grid Boost and to Put Them on Killmail TOO, same for Logi....Open that damn door !! |

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
380
|
Posted - 2014.09.07 13:42:00 -
[252] - Quote
Hey, I didn't choose this alliance name, but you gotta admit sometimes you feel like this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDU9FP5_B2M
until you get blowed up 
CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, please give us a persisting-áoff button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals. |

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Spaceship Bebop
315
|
Posted - 2014.09.07 13:56:00 -
[253] - Quote
Other times maybe you're just feeling a bit salty
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOmA8LOw258 BLFOX is currently recruiting |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2513
|
Posted - 2014.09.07 15:59:00 -
[254] - Quote
IbanezLaney wrote:So he came back to FW laugh at really crap alliance names like Spaceship Bebop. ..... Damn - my limerick doesn't rhyme.  Couple things: 1. All you had to do was figure out how to use the word "hop" in your limerick. 2. It may or may not be a crap name, but it's OUR name. So frick off! 
|

Terhiss
Moira. Villore Accords
66
|
Posted - 2014.09.07 16:04:00 -
[255] - Quote
I endorse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aw3fN3OPk3A |

Theroine
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
98
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 00:46:00 -
[256] - Quote
IbanezLaney wrote:The once was a man from Enaluri Who played Dota2 with a fury He tried things in Null sec And it wasn't fun sec So he came back to FW laugh at really crap alliance names like Spaceship Bebop. Damn - my limerick doesn't rhyme.  Don't be so jelly fella, What's with the ennui, Run out of Nutella? Going caffeine free? If I must tell ya, Your forum fu of late Is rather reprobate Step up to the plate or get left behind mate!
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1357
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 02:08:00 -
[257] - Quote
Fenris Orion wrote:Cearain wrote:
Try your best to actually win occupancy for about a year and then come back and tell me about the rich strategy of the game
I have done exactly that for over a year and a half now, and I can tell you that you and your crybaby cohorts are utterly clueless. I have helped and at times lead the charge to take and defend systems up and down the eastern front of the Gallente/Caldari war zone. It's what FW is all about, farming alts spending all their time in quite systems are annoying at best, and a completely side-bar subject in terms of FW game content. Either go somewhere else to cry, or bring yourself to Tama and show us how superior your skills are.... We'll add you to our killboards like everyone else.
You think alts are a sidebar. Meanwhile XG has his alt capturing over 100 plexes in 2 weeks and helping gallente capture all caldari systems.
I'm not interested in arguing with the clueless.
Have fun in your occupancy efforts, where you think the alts are just a sidebar.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Yuri Antollare
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
98
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 02:38:00 -
[258] - Quote
I like the summation of your argument there, it's exactly what it was 12 pages ago.
You argue, wall of text and talk past almost everyone individually in Galmill for 13 pages, and your argument is verbatim what it was at the start...
Thats an incredible amount of close mindedness and arrogance even for you.
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1116
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 03:17:00 -
[259] - Quote
He doesnt care how much pvp people are getting, while people use alts to do things in eve, its broken lol.
He does waver on his main arguments though. 2 main ones are, too little pvp, occupancy is driven mainly by alts.
He will simply ignore that there is more pvp than ever over occupancy, and occupancy is less dominated by alts than it has been since inferno.
This is why i think he is simply a troll. If not, he is so out of touch it serves no purpose reading his posts. |

Super Chair
Project Cerberus Templis CALSF
664
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 05:14:00 -
[260] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:He doesnt care how much pvp people are getting, while people use alts to do things in eve, its broken lol.
He does waver on his main arguments though. 2 main ones are, too little pvp, occupancy is driven mainly by alts.
He will simply ignore that there is more pvp than ever over occupancy, and occupancy is less dominated by alts than it has been since inferno.
This is why i think he is simply a troll. If not, he is so out of touch it serves no purpose reading his posts.
Who?  |
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1116
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 05:18:00 -
[261] - Quote
Super Chair wrote:Who? 
That was my point really. |

IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome
1242
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 06:38:00 -
[262] - Quote
Theroine wrote:IbanezLaney wrote:The once was a man from Enaluri Who played Dota2 with a fury He tried things in Null sec And it wasn't fun sec So he came back to FW laugh at really crap alliance names like Spaceship Bebop. Damn - my limerick doesn't rhyme.  Don't be so jelly fella, What's with the ennui, Run out of Nutella? Going caffeine free? If I must tell ya, Your forum fu of late Is rather reprobate Step up to the plate or get left behind mate!
I thought it would be stupendous to troll XGallentius I didnt mean harm So get back to your barn You alliance name is lame And I feel your pain You spent a billion isk So I could take the ****

Docked since 2009. |

Theroine
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
100
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 09:11:00 -
[263] - Quote
IbanezLaney wrote:Theroine wrote:IbanezLaney wrote:The once was a man from Enaluri Who played Dota2 with a fury He tried things in Null sec And it wasn't fun sec So he came back to FW laugh at really crap alliance names like Spaceship Bebop. Damn - my limerick doesn't rhyme.  Don't be so jelly fella, What's with the ennui, Run out of Nutella? Going caffeine free? If I must tell ya, Your forum fu of late Is rather reprobate Step up to the plate or get left behind mate! I thought it would be stupendous to troll XGallentius I didnt mean harm So get back to your barn You alliance name is lame And I feel your pain You spent a billion isk So I could take the ****  While your retort in a couplet, shows W & T your inner frog, Alas you're not there yet W & T is not agog. Break out of your self-absorbed fog! If you want your prose to boil, best try a rhyme royal! |

IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome
1244
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 11:10:00 -
[264] - Quote
Theroine wrote:IbanezLaney wrote:Theroine wrote:IbanezLaney wrote:The once was a man from Enaluri Who played Dota2 with a fury He tried things in Null sec And it wasn't fun sec So he came back to FW laugh at really crap alliance names like Spaceship Bebop. Damn - my limerick doesn't rhyme.  Don't be so jelly fella, What's with the ennui, Run out of Nutella? Going caffeine free? If I must tell ya, Your forum fu of late Is rather reprobate Step up to the plate or get left behind mate! I thought it would be stupendous to troll XGallentius I didnt mean harm So get back to your barn You alliance name is lame And I feel your pain You spent a billion isk So I could take the ****  While your retort in a couplet, shows W & T your inner frog, Alas you're not there yet W & T is not agog. Break out of your self-absorbed fog! If you want your prose to boil, best try a rhyme royal! 
The Gallente act all mean and bad But most just wish they knew their dads Their mothers were all easy wimminz Out on the town drinking and sinnin Lots of men and no protection Whos kid is whos is just for guessin DNA might give an answer But whats the point when hes on welfare

Docked since 2009. |

Yun Kuai
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
186
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 12:33:00 -
[265] - Quote
IbanezLaney wrote:The once was a man from Enaluri Who played Dota2 with a fury He tried things in Null sec And it wasn't fun sec So he came back to FW laugh at really crap alliance names like Spaceship Bebop. Damn - my limerick doesn't rhyme. 
See I told them that name was bad. Damn it now no one is going to take us even remotely seriously  --------------------------------------------------------::::::::::::--:::-----:::---::::::::::::--------------:::----------:::----:::---:::----------------------:::::::-------:::---:::----::::::-------------------:::-----------:::--:::----:::---------------------::::::::::::----:::::::----:::::::::::::------- |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1357
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 15:55:00 -
[266] - Quote
Yuri Antollare wrote:I like the summation of your argument there, it's exactly what it was 12 pages ago.
You argue, wall of text and talk past almost everyone individually in Galmill for 13 pages, and your argument is verbatim what it was at the start...
Thats an incredible amount of close mindedness and arrogance even for you.
The fact that XGs alt had over captured over 100 plexes in 2 weeks leading up to taking all caldari systems is pretty much a summation of faction war. I realize there are some in the galmilitia that don't like that fact. So you come on the forums and rage against me for bringing it up.
If you mean argument as in bickering/namecalling yes there has been that. (see your post above you in no way address the fact regarding XGs alt, you just express your anger with me. )
This is pretty much the model:
1)Cearain posts a fact and some argument based on the fact. 2)Gallente players come in and shout "you're stubborn" or "you're opinion doesn't matter" Or "you're arrogant" or "you are just mad" or "you're a crybaby," or "go play wow" One guy says he doesn't have the attention span to finish a newspaper article, so there is no way he can handle my 5 paragraph response etc etc. This isn't really "argument" in the logical sense of the word.
If you mean argument as in actually engaging the facts I raise there really hasn't been much. There has a been a little bit though.
One galmilitia argued that vp and plexes are irrelevant to the occupancy war. But between his claims versus ccps dev blogs and my own eyes I will believe the latter. Do you think vp are irrelevant? Do you think the alts rabbit plexing everywhere are irrelevant to the occupancy war? I said if gallente had no rabbit plexing alts they would be lucky to be at tier 2. Do you disagree? You need the alt plexers to deal with the enemy alt plexers. That is how the game works. I don't blame anyone. I and many others just don't care for it.
Crosi makes a completely different argument. He argues that it is fine that most plexes are captured with alts. He is entitled to his opinion. I just think paying for alts to rabbit plex is no fun. It's unclear that crosi and I even disagree about anything that actually happens in the game. We just disagree on whether playing the current game is worth a persons time or not.
That's really a summation of the threads here.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2514
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 16:00:00 -
[267] - Quote
Cearain wrote: Do you think vp are irrelevant? Do you think the alts rabbit plexing everywhere are irrelevant to the occupancy war? I said if gallente had no rabbit plexing alts they would be lucky to be at tier 2. Do you disagree?
I disagree. Your entire argument rests on "rabbit" plexing alts when in fact my alt stood her ground in every plex. Unfortunately she died 99% of the time because her ships were unfit. (1% of the time the guy raiding the plex loses point - pro pvp)
|

JAF Anders
Quantum Cats Syndicate
312
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 16:23:00 -
[268] - Quote
Yun Kuai wrote:See I told them that name was bad. Damn it now no one is going to take us even remotely seriously 
It really is awful, though -- almost as bad as Samurai Pizza Cats. But hey, at least you didn't put any numbers in it. The pursuit of excellence and stabbed plexing alts. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1117
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 16:37:00 -
[269] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Crosi makes a completely different argument. He argues that it is fine that most plexes are captured with alts. He is entitled to his opinion. I just think paying for alts to rabbit plex is no fun. It's unclear that crosi and I even disagree about anything that actually happens in the game. We just disagree on whether playing the current game is worth a persons time or not.
That's really a summation of the threads here.
Not even close, ive siad dozens of times that in the current iteration, NO systems have been taken by evasion tactics. There is an advantage to alt defensive tactics which imo is not the end of the world since it ensures that systems only change hands if there is a concerted pvp push. Such a ppush attracts a pvp response.
I know this is far too complicated for you to keep up with. Carry on misrepresenting what everyone else is saying though, wouldnt want you to accidentally listen to something and have your delusions shattered. |

Princess Nexxala
Quantum Cats Syndicate
772
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 17:24:00 -
[270] - Quote
FW scrubs lolz 
nom nom
|
|

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
425
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 17:40:00 -
[271] - Quote
Cearain wrote:One galmilitia argued that vp and plexes are irrelevant to the occupancy war. But between his claims versus ccps dev blogs and my own eyes I will believe the latter. Do you think vp are irrelevant? Do you think the alts rabbit plexing everywhere are irrelevant to the occupancy war? I said if gallente had no rabbit plexing alts they would be lucky to be at tier 2. Do you disagree? You need the alt plexers to deal with the enemy alt plexers. That is how the game works. I don't blame anyone. I and many others just don't care for it.
It's a bit more complicated than "VP are irrelevant" and "alts don't matter".
First, XG's alt capping 100 plexes is irrelevant if those plexes did not contribute towards capturing a system. And no, random plexing backwater nowhereville systems DOESN'T MATTER to occupancy warfare for the most part. If and only if it's part of a dedicated campaign to conquer those systems does it make a real difference. See, if CalMil plexes up a non-station system away from the front lines, they get tasty tasty LPs and rack up some VPs. XG's alt then dies in a fire deplexing it, getting crap LP and the same VP. Net change - none. Even if CalMil plexed it all the way up to vulnerable with no opposition, it wouldn't matter unless the PvP focused crews came along and bashed the hub to take it. Which they'd only bother with if they wanted the space. Otherwise, it's better for CalMil to let GalMil alts deplex it down so they can keep getting the tasty tasty offensive LP instead of the crap defensive LP.
In short, LP farming via alts is indeed a thing. It happens on both sides. It's an isk/LP generating activity that has little to no impact on warzone control as measured by systems held. It may impact Tier, due to the impact of LP being leeched from the hubs, but that's a rather poor stand-in for warzone control as it's more accurately a reflection of economic incentives than actual player control of a warzone.
I also think you really underestimate the impact of the Kronos changes on plexing, as that alone made a huge difference in our warzone with respect to the amount of alt plexing pressure we were under. Which is why we deliberately made a push to get a buffer prior to the Kronos release. We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1357
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 17:55:00 -
[272] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:Crosi makes a completely different argument. He argues that it is fine that most plexes are captured with alts. ...
Not even close,...There is an advantage to alt defensive tactics which imo is not the end of the world .
Are most plexes captured by these alts or not? One of XG's alts captured more plexes than his main. So we know that its true for him.
Crosi Wesdo wrote: Ive siad dozens of times that in the current iteration, NO systems have been taken by evasion tactics. .
This is vague. Are you claiming that no offensive plexing alt has ever contributed to the contested level of a system that was ultimately flipped? Or are you just saying offensive alts did not join in the bunker bust at the end? If its the first you are wrong. I know my alts contributed to the contested level of systems that were filpped. If its the latter your point is trivial.
Crosi Wesdo wrote: [Alt defensive plexing] ensures that systems only change hands if there is a concerted pvp push. .
Since defensive plexing alts are now so powerful it's often true that a system will reach a point where the offensive side must be able to have a blob that can hold the single system sufficiently long. They have to bring the blob in and force out the dplexing alts and any fleets that may come. This is the null sec junior aspect of faction war. If that is your thing you already have null sec. As I said before thats not really interesting to me. I think Faction war can and should be a war that is fought through pvp throughout the warzone. Again I don't think we disagree about how things work just whether the game is worth playing.
Crosi Wesdo wrote: Such a ppush attracts a pvp response.
Unless the other side can not get a matching blob. In that case the system just falls. Sort of like several of the last Caldari systems.
Now that I answered your substantive comments, this is where you can go back to name calling. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1357
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 18:06:00 -
[273] - Quote
Veskrashen wrote: It's a bit more complicated than "VP are irrelevant" and "alts don't matter".
First, XG's alt capping 100 plexes is irrelevant if those plexes did not contribute towards capturing a system.
They were relevant to prevent Gallente from losing the system. Faction war occupancy is won by winning more systems than you lose. So both making sure you don't lose a system and helping to gain a system are important. In both cases the vp is important.
Veskrashen wrote: And no, random plexing backwater nowhereville systems DOESN'T MATTER to occupancy warfare for the most part. If and only if it's part of a dedicated campaign to conquer those systems does it make a real difference. See, if CalMil plexes up a non-station system away from the front lines, they get tasty tasty LPs and rack up some VPs. XG's alt then dies in a fire deplexing it, getting crap LP and the same VP. Net change - none. Even if CalMil plexed it all the way up to vulnerable with no opposition, it wouldn't matter unless the PvP focused crews came along and bashed the hub to take it. Which they'd only bother with if they wanted the space. Otherwise, it's better for CalMil to let GalMil alts deplex it down so they can keep getting the tasty tasty offensive LP instead of the crap defensive LP..
If they want to win occupancy then they win the system. The vp is important to winning the system because if you don't get enough the system is invulnerable to being flipped.
If they don't care about occupancy they may leave it to offensive plex thats true. But that doesn't change the fact that vp is important for those who want to win occupancy.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

greg01
Inglorious-Basterds Caldari State Capturing
35
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 19:09:00 -
[274] - Quote
Here I sit broken hearted Tried to S**t but only Farted.
Scottish Pub Toilet Banter.... Silver understands!
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1117
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 19:10:00 -
[275] - Quote
After the new changes the systems that have changed hands to gallente were caldari home systems. One of them started at 50%, the rest of them started less than 20% to stable. Alts impact on these systems were minimal since they were actively defended and attacking with alts is dramatically reduced.
Defensive plexers are not powerful, and do not require a blob to counter since by definition they cannot effectively fight even a single hostile neutral or wt. If a system contested rate grows too high and defensive alts are being denied by pvp attackers, a pvp defence is mounted. If the attackers dont have the numbers to repel the proper defence, then imo they dont deserve the system. If they do, they take the system. Hopefully there is some good fights in the meantime.
You didnt answer a single point. You just dodged them, as is your way. I expect you still argue here just to save face in some way, while being painfully unaware that you have no credibility, nor have you had any for as long as ive seen you post on this forum.
As for name calling, if the shoe fits etc. |

Phaade
Perimeter Defense Systems Templis CALSF
246
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 19:40:00 -
[276] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote: Do you think vp are irrelevant? Do you think the alts rabbit plexing everywhere are irrelevant to the occupancy war? I said if gallente had no rabbit plexing alts they would be lucky to be at tier 2. Do you disagree?
I disagree. Your entire argument rests on "rabbit" plexing alts when in fact my alt stood her ground in every plex. Unfortunately she died 99% of the time because her ships were unfit. (1% of the time the guy raiding the plex loses point - pro pvp)
So you post to rebut his point....then concede his point...?
What?
This thread has gotten even worse. Hard to believe. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1117
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 20:20:00 -
[277] - Quote
Phaade wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote: Do you think vp are irrelevant? Do you think the alts rabbit plexing everywhere are irrelevant to the occupancy war? I said if gallente had no rabbit plexing alts they would be lucky to be at tier 2. Do you disagree?
I disagree. Your entire argument rests on "rabbit" plexing alts when in fact my alt stood her ground in every plex. Unfortunately she died 99% of the time because her ships were unfit. (1% of the time the guy raiding the plex loses point - pro pvp) So you post to rebut his point....then concede his point...? What? This thread has gotten even worse. Hard to believe. Edit: the only person posting with any sense of reality is Cearain. And he's a friggin Goon. Crosi, and the rest of you Gayllente, can deny the roll your alt plexer's play all you want. The fact of the matter is when there are 4x the farmers AND 2-4x the active pvp pilots, there is no reasonable way for the opposing faction to fight back. At least under the current system. The ability of your alt plexer's to defend every possible offensive plexing attempt we make, simultaneously blobbing target systems, is what won you the warzone. Once a system reachers a certain contested level, hordes of Gayllente deplex alts show up. Caldari probably would have done the same thing if they could. I personally wouldn't because sitting in a plex with 40 dudes is disgustingly boring. The point is the FW system is incredibly flawed, and could be so much better.
I present the fact that caldari are taking back systems as refutation of your numbers and your understanding of the roll that alts play. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2116

|
Posted - 2014.09.08 20:26:00 -
[278] - Quote
I have removed a rule breaking post and those quoting it.
The Rules: 4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.
ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1358
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 21:23:00 -
[279] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Phaade wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote: Do you think vp are irrelevant? Do you think the alts rabbit plexing everywhere are irrelevant to the occupancy war? I said if gallente had no rabbit plexing alts they would be lucky to be at tier 2. Do you disagree?
I disagree. Your entire argument rests on "rabbit" plexing alts when in fact my alt stood her ground in every plex. Unfortunately she died 99% of the time because her ships were unfit. (1% of the time the guy raiding the plex loses point - pro pvp) So you post to rebut his point....then concede his point...? What? This thread has gotten even worse. Hard to believe. Edit: the only person posting with any sense of reality is Cearain. And he's a friggin Goon. Crosi, and the rest of you Gayllente, can deny the roll your alt plexer's play all you want. The fact of the matter is when there are 4x the farmers AND 2-4x the active pvp pilots, there is no reasonable way for the opposing faction to fight back. At least under the current system. The ability of your alt plexer's to defend every possible offensive plexing attempt we make, simultaneously blobbing target systems, is what won you the warzone. Once a system reachers a certain contested level, hordes of Gayllente deplex alts show up. Caldari probably would have done the same thing if they could. I personally wouldn't because sitting in a plex with 40 dudes is disgustingly boring. The point is the FW system is incredibly flawed, and could be so much better. I present the fact that caldari are taking back systems as refutation of your numbers and your understanding of the roll that alts play.
Crosi, you are implying that gallente militia has more alts plexing than Caldari. Just saying.
Phaede's post is a fairly straightforward description of how the current mechanics work. There is nothing really controversial there, unless you want to obfuscate what happened so you can believe in Gallente magic and secret strategies.
Is Gallente letting Caldari back in or are they truly powerless to resist this Caldari offensive? That I don't know. But if Gallente want the systems back then they should get in a blob and take them back. After that they can use their alts exactly as Phaede described. My hunch is Gallente rank and file have had enough of this occupancy war and really doesn't care enough to take them back. The winning strategy with these mechanics is a pretty boring one. But that is a completely subjective opinion of mine, I admit it.
Phaede: talking realistically and sensibly about faction war occupancy mechanics will lead to a few but very vocal forum bullies trying to shout you down to get you to stop posting. You have been warned.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2515
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 22:03:00 -
[280] - Quote
Phaade wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote: Do you think vp are irrelevant? Do you think the alts rabbit plexing everywhere are irrelevant to the occupancy war? I said if gallente had no rabbit plexing alts they would be lucky to be at tier 2. Do you disagree?
I disagree. Your entire argument rests on "rabbit" plexing alts when in fact my alt stood her ground in every plex. Unfortunately she died 99% of the time because her ships were unfit. (1% of the time the guy raiding the plex loses point - pro pvp) So you post to rebut his point....then concede his point...? What? This thread has gotten even worse. Hard to believe. I can actually fit my alt's ship with pvp mods to get the same exact result. In that case I guess it's OK and we won FW fair and square.
Anyways, haters gonna hate. If it were all about deplexing alts, then why hasn't anybody else taken the entire warzone over the past couple years? Don't tell me your side didn't try to do it because I was there defending my home systems when you did.
|
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2515
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 22:05:00 -
[281] - Quote
Cearain wrote: The winning strategy with these mechanics is a pretty boring one. But that is a completely subjective opinion of mine, I admit it. You have no idea what the winning strategy is. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1117
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 22:06:00 -
[282] - Quote
I never said eve was not a numbers game (there are strategies for dealing with being outnumbered though). I just told phaade his numbers were incorrect, not that his analysis would be false if the numbers were true. Last time i was on i could only raise 11 people to go fight a 60 man squid force + potentially 40 squid friendly russian pies. Perhaps an element of burnout along side some fracturing of unified comms with the gallente in the eastern warzone contributed. Fact is, caldari is fighting back with a fairly active corp of 450 fresh nullbears and their regulars undocking in numbers again now there isnt a decent fight to be had. Cal mil has always had good numbers, its not our fault they divide themselves for us.
Your analysis of alts on the other hand is quite consistently derpy though. You want occupancy to be pvp driven, well, defensive alts ensure that all system sieges are pvp driven, this is the impact they are having. In the current iteration there is very little alt Oplexing as illustrated in the 2/3 drop in vp. Defensive alts maintain a status quo in occupancy, something that will crumble should a determined force of 4 or more people come to take a system...
Example is that caldari will have retaken nearly 10% of the warzone by this coming downtime. I can understand you misconceptions since you havent logged in since huola, i cant understand why you feel you have a good perspective on these things.
Maybe one day you will read a post from someone closer to the issues and regard it as something other than material to spin a convoluted or obtuse argument from.
Cant wait for you to tell me i agree with you again lol. |

Clive Stratton
Quantum Cats Syndicate
4
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 02:01:00 -
[283] - Quote
JAF Anders wrote:Yun Kuai wrote:See I told them that name was bad. Damn it now no one is going to take us even remotely seriously  It really is awful, though -- almost as bad as Samurai Pizza Cats. But hey, at least you didn't put any numbers in it.
Shadowolves.net
That is all. |

Epikurus
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
35
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 02:37:00 -
[284] - Quote
Lots of people on both sides of this argument ignoring the fact that there is a category of 'significant but limited' contribution between 'decisive' and 'irrelevant'. |

Yuri Antollare
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
99
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 03:02:00 -
[285] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Yuri Antollare wrote:I like the summation of your argument there, it's exactly what it was 12 pages ago.
You argue, wall of text and talk past almost everyone individually in Galmill for 13 pages, and your argument is verbatim what it was at the start...
Thats an incredible amount of close mindedness and arrogance even for you.
The fact that XGs alt had over captured over 100 plexes in 2 weeks leading up to taking all caldari systems is pretty much a summation of faction war. I realize there are some in the galmilitia that don't like that fact. So you come on the forums and rage against me for bringing it up. If you mean argument as in bickering/namecalling yes there has been that. (see your post above you in no way address the fact regarding XGs alt, you just express your anger with me. ) This is pretty much the model: 1)Cearain posts a fact and some argument based on the fact. 2)Gallente players come in and shout "you're stubborn" or "you're opinion doesn't matter" Or "you're arrogant" or "you are just mad" or "you're a crybaby," or "go play wow" One guy says he doesn't have the attention span to finish a newspaper article, so there is no way he can handle my 5 paragraph response etc etc. This isn't really "argument" in the logical sense of the word. If you mean argument as in actually engaging the facts I raise there really hasn't been much. There has a been a little bit though. One galmilitia argued that vp and plexes are irrelevant to the occupancy war. But between his claims versus ccps dev blogs and my own eyes I will believe the latter. Do you think vp are irrelevant? Do you think the alts rabbit plexing everywhere are irrelevant to the occupancy war? I said if gallente had no rabbit plexing alts they would be lucky to be at tier 2. Do you disagree? You need the alt plexers to deal with the enemy alt plexers. That is how the game works. I don't blame anyone. I and many others just don't care for it. Crosi makes a completely different argument. He argues that it is fine that most plexes are captured with alts. He is entitled to his opinion. I just think paying for alts to rabbit plex is no fun. It's unclear that crosi and I even disagree about anything that actually happens in the game. We just disagree on whether playing the current game is worth a persons time or not. That's really a summation of the threads here.
Plenty of people have written lengthy, point by point rebuttals to your "arguments," you simply talk past them. Many people brought up cogent critiques to your "But one guy capped 100 plexes so FW = broken", yet you continue to talk past them and stick to your original point with no variation.
No we don't think deplexing alts are "irrelevant" or conversely "the be all and end all," I know the vast majority of Gallente would accept they have "an" impact. However, where we remain open minded and assign varying weights to different causal explanations, we have you, who assigns 100% to one causal explanation and 0% to anything else and does so from a greater distance between your self and FW and "us" and FW. Completely aside from EvE thats just a poor way to conduct robust rational inquiry.
As others have said, and you glossed over, deplexing alts are a symptom of Caldari weakness, not a cause. You say XG's alt ran 100 plexes in two weeks (which tbh, somedays I do about 8 my self, so 100 is pretty small,) but in which systems? If the systems didn't matter to occupancy or the Caldari then who cares, if they did matter to the Caldari, how did one gunless frigate manage to stave off their defenders/attackers? What you fail to dispute is the fact that if Caldari defended the system, defensive plex alts would have 0 effect. So, hopefully, you can see it's really strange to say the alt is the issue when in reality who held the system came down to whether Caldari defended or not. Someone actually has to open the box to see if the Cat has guns or not.
Again both you and now Phaade use a lot of terms like "hunch," "for some reason", "I don't know why but" when it gets down to the actual details of how your theory works. No one seems to know why the plex alts are always favoring Gallente, iteration after iteration, or why the WZ inevitably starts to change as soon as they say its dead. Or more curiously why ,when all they offer is system level causal explanations, Galmill is the only militia to take 100% control twice. These are hints, some subtle some that should be fairly obvious, that your theory lacks explanatory power.
Note I didn't say it was wrong, just that it has a myopic focus on numbers shorn of context and as such remains relatively useless if someone wanted to explain the actual course of events in the WZ. Galmill in this thread have had plenty to say about VP and the role of alts in the WZ, you are the one that has gone 13 pages without once mentioning anything about the Caldari themselves (how they chose to defend, doctrines used, level of cooperation, tactical or strategic.) I haven't seen you look at whether or not, if the Caldari changed something here or there, they could have won a siege or been able to plex up one of the backwaters, yet if they had, WZ control would never have happened.
Anytime you want some backgrounding on any of the above, ask me, I was moving ships from siege to siege and soloing in systems like Mantenault, Sarenemi and Hasama. My opinion is many of both the offensive sieges and the defensive efforts were extremely close run events. There was no point Calmill was out of the game unti the point they gave up.
But thats just my opinion from actually being there, where were you when formulating your opinion? |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2516
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 04:06:00 -
[286] - Quote
Clive Stratton wrote:Shadowolves.net. To be fair, it is probably pretty honorable to be defeated by a Shadow Wolf. It is, however, extremely embarrassing to be beaten by a Bebop. And that is our goal - to embarrass our enemies into submission.
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1117
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 07:45:00 -
[287] - Quote
Yuri Antollare wrote:So, hopefully, you [Cearain] can see
Hahahaha
Yuri Antollare wrote:But thats just my opinion from actually being there, where were you [Cearain] when formulating your opinion?
He formed his opinion literally 2 years ago so i doubt he can remember. He was correct that alts were THE problem during inferno, and has got progressively less correct as FW has changed. Irony is that he considers the inferno mechanics to be the best ones and that we should all go back to bashing 60-80 systems in 3-4 days (something he never participated in, pretty much like everything else he talks about). |

Moglarr
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
16
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 13:37:00 -
[288] - Quote
I would like to point out there were attempts to take back end systems during the final system caps. What would happen is we'd plex a system up, log off and log back on to the see the system plexed down. Alts established for dplexing were blamed, we use to call them farmers because they were farming to easy LP dplexing a Gallente system offered. We redeployed to hit systems in our time zone that were also being attacked in opposite time zones, it happened that this was around the time the Gallente had 100% control. I honestly don't know how long the Gallente had 100% of the warzone, before Hedieles, Hysera and then Prism and Tama returned to Caldari control but I don't think it was that long.
The moral of my story is that between characters assumed to be alts (their behaviour when we were in the same system together occasionally implied it, as did the few unfit ships I caught) dplexing systems in our off times we could not flip a system fast enough. When that was realized some groups readjusted. That being said, I am not expressly against the idea of people using their alts however they want to. What I am against is people refusing to accept that they do have an impact, and some of the retorts I've been reading seem to imply that.
The next thing I am wondering about is; does capturing the war zone mean anything if one completely fails to hold it? I ask, because it was interesting to see the war zone fall. It has been frustrating watching GalMil stroke themselves over taking the entire war zone, and confusing why whenever their lack of control of the war zone come us it has been brushed off with a "Oh we are letting you in" that is just insulting to everyone reading that. Especially given the discussions people had been having over pulling punches when the enemy is down. |

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Spaceship Bebop
315
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 13:43:00 -
[289] - Quote
Moglarr wrote:I would like to point out there were attempts to take back end systems during the final system caps. What would happen is we'd plex a system up, log off and log back on to the see the system plexed down. Alts established for dplexing were blamed, we use to call them farmers because they were farming to easy LP dplexing a Gallente system offered. We redeployed to hit systems in our time zone that were also being attacked in opposite time zones, it happened that this was around the time the Gallente had 100% control. I honestly don't know how long the Gallente had 100% of the warzone, before Hedieles, Hysera and then Prism and Tama returned to Caldari control but I don't think it was that long.
The moral of my story is that between characters assumed to be alts (their behaviour when we were in the same system together occasionally implied it, as did the few unfit ships I caught) dplexing systems in our off times we could not flip a system fast enough. When that was realized some groups readjusted. That being said, I am not expressly against the idea of people using their alts however they want to. What I am against is people refusing to accept that they do have an impact, and some of the retorts I've been reading seem to imply that.
The next thing I am wondering about is; does capturing the war zone mean anything if one completely fails to hold it? I ask, because it was interesting to see the war zone fall. It has been frustrating watching GalMil stroke themselves over taking the entire war zone, and confusing why whenever their lack of control of the war zone come us it has been brushed off with a "Oh we are letting you in" that is just insulting to everyone reading that. Especially given the discussions people had been having over pulling punches when the enemy is down.
1. Deplexing alts don't take systems with current mechanics, at best they help hold them against non-determined aggressors 2. Timezone Coverage 3. Taking the war zone wasn't super easy, don't believe people that say it was. And why would you want us to hold it forever?!? Thats crazy talk right there. 4. It gets brushed off cuz you haven't taken a home system. 5. Please take more systems faster. BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1119
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 13:51:00 -
[290] - Quote
Moglar, as one of a group of people who help coordinate defences of outlying systems i can assure you we were not trusting that important job to deplexing alts. |
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2516
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 14:46:00 -
[291] - Quote
Moglarr wrote: The next thing I am wondering about is; does capturing the war zone mean anything if one completely fails to hold it? I ask, because it was interesting to see the war zone fall. It has been frustrating watching GalMil stroke themselves over taking the entire war zone, and confusing why whenever their lack of control of the war zone come us it has been brushed off with a "Oh we are letting you in" that is just insulting to everyone reading that. Especially given the discussions people had been having over pulling punches when the enemy is down. In taking the warzone we also took all the Caldari home systems - and that's the key.
Vacating your home systems like Athens did in the movie "300: Rise of Empire" is a valid tactic. The Spartans would probably think you were a bunch of pussies, but Loenidas thought you were a bunch of "boy lovers" in the first movie anyways. So it's not like your reputation can get any worse. |

Princess Nexxala
Quantum Cats Syndicate
774
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 14:52:00 -
[292] - Quote
Na, the whole .net thing made it far more embarrassing. Curious was the name inspired by jazz music fans within your ranks or Anime fans?
X Gallentius wrote:Clive Stratton wrote:Shadowolves.net. To be fair, it is probably pretty honorable to be defeated by a Shadow Wolf. It is, however, extremely embarrassing to be beaten by a Bebop. And that is our goal - to embarrass our enemies into submission.
nom nom
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2516
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 14:57:00 -
[293] - Quote
Lots of our guys are into Jazzercise. And yes, there's also "Cowboy Bebop", which fits the cowboy theme of JUSTK.
Princess Nexxala wrote:Na, the whole .net thing made it far more embarrassing. Curious was the name inspired by jazz music fans within your ranks or Anime fans? X Gallentius wrote:Clive Stratton wrote:Shadowolves.net. To be fair, it is probably pretty honorable to be defeated by a Shadow Wolf. It is, however, extremely embarrassing to be beaten by a Bebop. And that is our goal - to embarrass our enemies into submission.
|

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
382
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 17:23:00 -
[294] - Quote
Thanatos Marathon wrote:Moglarr wrote:I would like to point out there were attempts to take back end systems during the final system caps. What would happen is we'd plex a system up, log off and log back on to the see the system plexed down. Alts established for dplexing were blamed, we use to call them farmers because they were farming to easy LP dplexing a Gallente system offered. We redeployed to hit systems in our time zone that were also being attacked in opposite time zones, it happened that this was around the time the Gallente had 100% control. I honestly don't know how long the Gallente had 100% of the warzone, before Hedieles, Hysera and then Prism and Tama returned to Caldari control but I don't think it was that long.
The moral of my story is that between characters assumed to be alts (their behaviour when we were in the same system together occasionally implied it, as did the few unfit ships I caught) dplexing systems in our off times we could not flip a system fast enough. When that was realized some groups readjusted. That being said, I am not expressly against the idea of people using their alts however they want to. What I am against is people refusing to accept that they do have an impact, and some of the retorts I've been reading seem to imply that.
The next thing I am wondering about is; does capturing the war zone mean anything if one completely fails to hold it? I ask, because it was interesting to see the war zone fall. It has been frustrating watching GalMil stroke themselves over taking the entire war zone, and confusing why whenever their lack of control of the war zone come us it has been brushed off with a "Oh we are letting you in" that is just insulting to everyone reading that. Especially given the discussions people had been having over pulling punches when the enemy is down. 1. Deplexing alts don't take systems with current mechanics, at best they help hold them against non-determined aggressors 2. Timezone Coverage 3. Taking the war zone wasn't super easy, don't believe people that say it was. And why would you want us to hold it forever?!? Thats crazy talk right there. 4. It gets brushed off cuz you haven't taken a home system. 5. Please take more systems faster. I would add the following to Thanatos' points: 1. Oplexing alts/farmers can take systems that no one lives in or really cares about. They cannot take home systems or systems that a militia actually cares about and actively deplexes (they can however keep the pressure on such systems and make the deplexing a real pain in the ass. Deplexing alts similarly are not going to save a home system from capture. You have to fight to keep such systems (but they can make the task easier to a minor extent).
2. Yep timezone coverage. Don't complain that your AU and Russian farmers didn't know what you needed.
3. The warzone was held for 26 hours iirc the first time we took it (over one down time as well) and for about 4 days this time. What happened was once it was taken the incentive to pump lp back into hubs to keep tier 4 dropped off, we went into tier 3 and those that run farmer alts in our militia probably took this as a sign of **** it and logged in their Calmil farming alts instead. That this is happening is perfectly reflected in the vp totals for the last few days. Calmil running 14-16k per day lately and Galmil 9-11k per day (almost the reverse of the leadup to our taking of the warzone). So remember that if you are tempted to change your tune about farming alts as they start to benefit your side more.
4. The not holding the warzone for an extended period of time brush off is simply a function of fatigue. It was a pvp venture to siege home systems fight around the clock with whatever spare time you had or could clear from wife aggro, and then to bust the hubs under pirate hotdrop threat. The mechanics are radically different from when Damar held the warzone for Caldari for months with his after downtime advantage.
5. If you ever get to where we were you will know that this endeavor was not easy and was not a pve victory despite what Cearain and others would like to believe. Yes it would be nice if CCP would find a way to take the lp grinding farmers out of the equation. Whether that can be done, or to what extent, we all have suggestions.
Anyway, yes farmers have had a part to play in any of the past takings of the warzone. However, this last time they probably had the least impact of any of the three times. But I know you'll probably choose to believe what makes you feel less bad about losing it. Whatever vOv CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, please give us a persisting-áoff button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals. |

Soldarius
Deadman W0nderland Test Alliance Please Ignore
774
|
Posted - 2014.09.09 18:24:00 -
[295] - Quote
TEST left CalMil. Calmil collapses. gg GÇ£I personally refuse to help AAA take space from itself so it can become an even shittier version of itselfGÇ¥ -Grath Telkin, 2014.
Free PASTA! |

Yun Kuai
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
187
|
Posted - 2014.09.10 06:07:00 -
[296] - Quote
Soldarius wrote:TEST left CalMil. Calmil collapses. gg
Trust me, you didn't add any extra value. We call that a failed investment in the real world --------------------------------------------------------::::::::::::--:::-----:::---::::::::::::--------------:::----------:::----:::---:::----------------------:::::::-------:::---:::----::::::-------------------:::-----------:::--:::----:::---------------------::::::::::::----:::::::----:::::::::::::------- |

Super Chair
Project Cerberus Templis CALSF
665
|
Posted - 2014.09.10 07:11:00 -
[297] - Quote
Test made better targets than allies  |

Fourteen Maken
House of Shire The Ditanian Alliance
139
|
Posted - 2014.09.10 10:13:00 -
[298] - Quote
I see somebody is already upgrading caldari systems, even though they don't have enough systems to get T2 yet.
no point wasting lp like that: better to save it until you're ready to do a push for T2, or just let players cash it in. This is the same thing happened when test joined, wasted lp at the start of the push, then when we had more than enough systems for T4 nobody wanted to donate so we spent about a month in T2 when we could have been T4. |

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
425
|
Posted - 2014.09.10 11:56:00 -
[299] - Quote
Fourteen Maken wrote:I see somebody is already upgrading caldari systems, even though they don't have enough systems to get T2 yet.
no point wasting lp like that: better to save it until you're ready to do a push for T2, or just let players cash it in. This is the same thing happened when test joined, wasted lp at the start of the push, then when we had more than enough systems for T4 nobody wanted to donate so we spent about a month in T2 when we could have been T4. Right. Because the most important thing to focus on is getting LP and Tiers in the most efficient manner possible. No reason to upgrade systems for pride, or for manufacturing / research bonuses, or anything like that. We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

Fourteen Maken
House of Shire The Ditanian Alliance
139
|
Posted - 2014.09.10 22:07:00 -
[300] - Quote
Veskrashen wrote: Right. Because the most important thing to focus on is getting LP and Tiers in the most efficient manner possible. No reason to upgrade systems for pride, or for manufacturing / research bonuses, or anything like that.
No, the most important thing is winning and keeping players interested. Caldari only have a few systems right now so every Galmil pilot in the warzone will be flocking there to plex, that LP will evaporate and the systems will be degraded long before they get enough to push for T2 as you know well. At current prices that's billions worth of LP wasted in hubs which could be spent on ships to fight the war, or saved for a tier push later = more LP and more ships to fight the war. I'm not criticizing, i'm just stating a fact. |
|

GavinGoodrich
The Great Harmon Institute Of Technology Enemy Spotted.
76
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 16:31:00 -
[301] - Quote
All I'm seeing in this whole thread are both sides going "no, it's like this," with every other counter argument being "no, not like that, like this."
There's hardly any reason to even debate if everybody's so dead-set on "how things are." Haaaaaalp my head's on fire |

flakeys
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
2432
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 18:22:00 -
[302] - Quote
GavinGoodrich wrote:All I'm seeing in this whole thread are both sides going "no, it's like this," with every other counter argument being "no, not like that, like this."
There's hardly any reason to even debate if everybody's so dead-set on "how things are."
Welcome to eve discussions in general 
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

JAF Anders
Quantum Cats Syndicate
316
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 19:20:00 -
[303] - Quote
GavinGoodrich wrote:All I'm seeing in this whole thread are both sides going "no, it's like this," with every other counter argument being "no, not like that, like this."
There's hardly any reason to even debate if everybody's so dead-set on "how things are."
Gavin, they don't think it be like it is, but it do. The pursuit of excellence and stabbed plexing alts. |

Myth Oceanas
Chancellor's of Anarchy
2
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 13:29:00 -
[304] - Quote
GavinGoodrich wrote:All I'm seeing in this whole thread are both sides going "no, it's like this," with every other counter argument being "no, not like that, like this."
There's hardly any reason to even debate if everybody's so dead-set on "how things are."
History is written by the winners. So I'd listen to the GalMil, because its apparent they did something right. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2519
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 15:28:00 -
[305] - Quote
Myth Oceanas wrote:History is written by the winners. So I'd listen to the GalMil, because its apparent they did something right. You would think that's true, but I wrote an extremely detailed account of how we took the warzone the first time and nobody believed me.
|

Val Erian
Azure Horizon Federate Militia
24
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:56:00 -
[306] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Myth Oceanas wrote:History is written by the winners. So I'd listen to the GalMil, because its apparent they did something right. You would think that's true, but I wrote an extremely detailed account of how we took the warzone the first time and nobody believed me.
They can't handle the truth. |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
817
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 01:54:00 -
[307] - Quote
Val Erian wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Myth Oceanas wrote:History is written by the winners. So I'd listen to the GalMil, because its apparent they did something right. You would think that's true, but I wrote an extremely detailed account of how we took the warzone the first time and nobody believed me. They can't handle the truth.
truth? there is no single truth, only as many different versions about the truth as there is people in the world.
|

Catherine Laartii
Providence Guard Templis CALSF
272
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 02:33:00 -
[308] - Quote
Deen Wispa wrote:I'm going to say some stuff that will probably make some of my militia pilots and corpmates irate, but it needs to be said.
There is simply no need to continue beating up on an opponent that is not as coordinated and experienced as we are. Everyone around here already knows that Gallente is superior in virtually every facet of FW. We are overachievers, in fact.
I'm just coming back into the game. I no longer have the sort of time that I used to have for this game. When I log on, I just want to create fun content or be a part of it. Logging on and seeing 30-50 pilots plexing a system with no competition. Moaning on comms about why the enemy hasn't shown up. That's not fun. Being a cog in the machine. Trying to get a word in with 5 other people talking over each other. Not fun. Being in a large group where I can't get to know my fellow gamers. Where I can't teach and/or learn from my fellow pilots. Sucks.
The ethos of FW was always about a place where you can have an impact. Where you're not just a number. Where multiple groups of pilots can have an impact. A place where our personal actions truly matter and will have a ripple effect throughout the warzone.
Man. Things have truly changed over the last two years I've been here. Nowadays, people are more interested in trying to get 500 kills a month rather than find meaning and impact in some of their battles.
We blame CCP for the current mechanics without taking any responsibility. We grief the competition and constantly kick them out of their space because we can. We tell them that it's not our fault we're highly organized and that they need to step up their game. But to accept personal responsibility for the current ecosystem we've created. Never.
An interesting narrative that we tell and convince ourself of nowadays.
This narrative sounds familiar to another large group of pilots in another region of space....
After being in calmil on and off for roughly 5-6 years, I can say with a decent degree of certainty that you are right in regards to the overall personality of each of the factions, and it has been astounding to me how overly complex politically calmil alliances try to make things. I joined FW more or less towards the tail end of dominion and the beginning of tyrannis, and hopped on board with DCE and we fought the good fight. When WZ came out as a feature, some sharp divisions on the nature of what it was, how we were supposed to work it etc., people started bickering about it and unlike you guys, quite a few monolithic blocs fragmented and haven't come together since just over the simple fact that, yes, while we're all calmil, nobody can agree on what that means or what "direction the militia is going" with alliance head meetings and such.
Look; I'm sure you know just as well that I do that while there are a number of excellent alliances in calmil that drive a hard game and put up a good fight, Templis and Heiian conglomerate chiefly among them, there isn't a larger coordinated between them all that you guys have. What I can say though is this: Either approach doesn't really matter in the long run if we're talking about who "wins" and who "loses" as the de facto notion of an endless war means that despite territory gained there is never a victor or a loser. There is no end date or path to victory, there are only the trenches of plexes and the flocks of fleets to fight in. So the notion that one side is inherently better at the job they have to do is moot, since neither side can actually complete it.
So the question then becomes, "What's the point of fighting if we can't win or lose?" I've wrestled with that question on and off over the years and it has sometimes become agonizing considering the twin motivations of loyalty and insatiable curiosity I have for this game; specifically where those two have taken me over the years. The point in the end for both of us is that we're pitted against each other in a vast gladiatorial arena, full of vicious rabid dogs, pirates, and drunk russians. The floor shifts beneath us, the waters of flux and chaos swirl and wash over us daily, and those of us who have invested time, blood, sweat and tears into it all come up from all of that and realize that glory is found in the fight itself; and for us in calmil who have awoken to that fact in one form or another find that the philosophy behind it is a distinctly caldari one: That strength and meaning in life are found in the swirling chaos; where all things are in flux and evolving to adapt to become something new and different, and finding common bonds in the storm we are thrust into.
I think that the question should never be "Is X side better than Y side for Z situation", it's "How much fun is Y side having throwing together a fleet and fighting against X side who has been investing their time in Z activity." We all lose ships, we all make money; the real game comes from the enjoyment derived from content. How that content works, how the items within it are balanced, and where that content is going is where my mind always is in this game, not necessarily the next system bash or the next plex capped. It's why after coming back to the game after several weeks when I log on and fly a cruiser into low, my hand shakes from excitement, my heart pounds when I fight someone, and I feel a massive rush when I survive. I love every detail of this game; every minute spent on a plex or bit of lore picked up. I live and breathe it and no matter how the war goes or what form it takes, I will always be motivated by the simple fact that it is FUN.
|

Catherine Laartii
Providence Guard Templis CALSF
272
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 03:13:00 -
[309] - Quote
Baron' Soontir Fel wrote:A lot of people's arguments here fall flat when you realize GalMIl level 4 missions require a HAC or T3 to run. And we can run a good chunk of caldari fw lvl 4s in merlins. MERLINS. |

Catherine Laartii
Providence Guard Templis CALSF
272
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 03:17:00 -
[310] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Rahelis wrote:There is nothing in FW that is worth fighting for .. There is nothing in this game worth fighting for - unless you decide it's worth it. Rahelis just needs a girl worth fighting for: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiqmZLOaD8o You should post this in your fleets when people start getting bored, and have a sing-along. |
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1358
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 12:15:00 -
[311] - Quote
Yuri Antollare wrote:Cearain wrote:
The fact that XGs alt had over captured over 100 plexes in 2 weeks leading up to taking all caldari systems is pretty much a summation of faction war.
Plenty of people have written lengthy, point by point rebuttals to your "arguments," you simply talk past them. Many people brought up cogent critiques to your "But one guy capped 100 plexes so FW = broken", yet you continue to talk past them and stick to your original point with no variation.
It wasn't "one guy" it was one alt. That alt captured more plexes than his main. That is the problem. No matter how people want to try to obfuscate net vp for your side is how you make systems vulnerable.
Yuri Antollare wrote: No we don't think deplexing alts are "irrelevant" or conversely "the be all and end all," I know the vast majority of Gallente would accept they have "an" impact. However, where we remain open minded and assign varying weights to different causal explanations, we have you, who assigns 100% to one causal explanation and 0% to anything else and does so from a greater distance between your self and FW and "us" and FW. Completely aside from EvE thats just a poor way to conduct robust rational inquiry.
I didn't say it was 100%. I also indicated that after the recent changes you have to blob to take a system. This is the null sec junior part. You blob to take a system and then have your alts in there to deplex systems you hold.
For me I'm not going to spend my time having alts rabbit plex. So the fact that the fw occupancy game relies that much on it makes it uninteresting to me. There are a few people who like but to me its not surprising that in a game with 500,000 accounts there are so few who both with it. Reduce the influence by rabbit plexing alts by rollbacks and better intel tools, and many more pvpers would find the game worth their time. Right now IMO the game sucks.
Yuri Antollare wrote:
As others have said, and you glossed over, deplexing alts are a symptom of Caldari weakness, not a cause. You say XG's alt ran 100 plexes in two weeks (which tbh, somedays I do about 8 my self, so 100 is pretty small,) but in which systems? If the systems didn't matter to occupancy or the Caldari then who cares, if they did matter to the Caldari, how did one gunless frigate manage to stave off their defenders/attackers?
No one cares about most systems. I agree. That is my point. The occupancy war and the tier system is all about gaining systems. Every gallente militia who claimed they "won" the war by gaining all the sytems implicitly agrees with that. Its not home systems its all the systems. Yet no one cares.
You ask why don't people fight against defensless alts. This has been answered again and again.
No one wants to chase alts around when those alts will just go next door. The alt will just go to the next system over and plex. Then what are you going to keep chasing them? They will eventually just jump far enough away to start plexing a new system or cloak until you finish wasting your time with them. Or are you going to start running thier plex timer down? Thats not much fun either when likely no one even knows thier. You will have a very boring night. Again rollbacks will reduce the influence of these rabbit alts as will real time intel about where plexes are being run. The latter will help ensure that pvp is inolved in captuing plexes.
Yuri Antollare wrote:
What you fail to dispute is the fact that if Caldari defended the system, defensive plex alts would have 0 effect. So, hopefully, you can see it's really strange to say the alt is the issue when in reality who held the system came down to whether Caldari defended or not. Someone actually has to open the box to see if the Cat has guns or not.
Yeah have fun chasing the plexing alts. It's not for me or the vast majority of players.
That was all the actual substance about the mechanics in your post. I hope you understand why so few people bother with the occupancy war.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1358
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 12:35:00 -
[312] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Phaade wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote: Do you think vp are irrelevant? Do you think the alts rabbit plexing everywhere are irrelevant to the occupancy war? I said if gallente had no rabbit plexing alts they would be lucky to be at tier 2. Do you disagree?
I disagree. Your entire argument rests on "rabbit" plexing alts when in fact my alt stood her ground in every plex. Unfortunately she died 99% of the time because her ships were unfit. (1% of the time the guy raiding the plex loses point - pro pvp) So you post to rebut his point....then concede his point...? What? This thread has gotten even worse. Hard to believe. I can actually fit my alt's ship with pvp mods to get the same exact result. In that case I guess it's OK and we won FW fair and square. Anyways, haters gonna hate. If it were all about deplexing alts, then why hasn't anybody else taken the entire warzone over the past couple years? Don't tell me your side didn't try to do it because I was there defending my home systems when you did.
You don't get it. Pve ships often fit mods on their ships. Having that happen doesn't give incentive to pvp. Timer rollbacks and making it easier for pvpers to fight for plexes is how you do it.
Why don't lots of people get defensive plexing alts? Because most people find that a poor way to spend their time. Every militia has their players who do it. Minmatar had sasawong. Amarr has Cynthia Nezmor, Gallente has you and several others in the militia who have said they have plexing alts out with no intent to fight. So this is not just a problem with gallente alone. Its a problem with the whole mechanic. I even set up alt account to plex. I made great progress but after a while it got really boring, and I decided there were better things to do with my time.
If you think about it you might understand why Crosi says this:
Crosi Wesdo wrote: Last time i was on i could only raise 11 people to go fight a 60 man squid force + potentially 40 squid friendly russian pies. Perhaps an element of burnout along side some fracturing of unified comms with the gallente in the eastern warzone contributed. ...
If faction war occupancy was really great fun I don't think that would happen. Hell I could play eve every night for years if it involved great pvp. People get burned out because its not all that.
11 guys for your side? 60 guys for the enemy? Do you think this is enough interest? I think those numbers are pathetic for a game that has 500,000 subscriptions and can often get over 1,000 players involved in fights. Forget about the posts on the forums. Just open your eyes and you can see the apathy for this game yourself.
You can keep denying that the heavy role alts have in plexing is the cause of this extreme apathy. We can disagree because I think it is. But then I ask you what causes this apathy? Even when gallente were taking all the systems the numbers were not great.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1121
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 13:14:00 -
[313] - Quote
Cearain wrote:It wasn't "one guy" it was one alt. That alt captured more plexes than his main. That is the problem. No matter how people want to try to obfuscate net vp for your side is how you make systems vulnerable.
My cyno alts lit more cynos than my main, doesnt make cynos broken.
Incidentally, the cyno alts had a larger roll in us taking the warzone than deplexing alts. We could have had a million alts deplxing but that would not have achieved the clean sweep.
And thats as much of cearains post i can bring myself to address. Perspectives from 18 jumps away from inside a station are about as useful as they sound. |

Fourteen Maken
House of Shire
139
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 14:52:00 -
[314] - Quote
Interesting how people in faction war make up rules that don't exist then expect others to play by them. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1358
|
Posted - 2014.09.15 18:52:00 -
[315] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:It wasn't "one guy" it was one alt. That alt captured more plexes than his main. That is the problem. No matter how people want to try to obfuscate net vp for your side is how you make systems vulnerable. My cyno alts lit more cynos than my main, doesnt make cynos broken.
If you think lighting cynos is something you should do with your main then it would be broken. I think winning fw occupancy (and in particular taking plexes) is something that should be done on a main/pvp account and not so dependant on alts.
This is where we fundamentally disagree. You say well throw away alts are most often used to light cynos, so why not have throw away alts capture most plexes. I see the latter as something that should involve pvp.
Crosi Wesdo wrote: Incidentally, the cyno alts had a larger roll in us taking the warzone than deplexing alts. We could have had a million alts deplxing but that would not have achieved the clean sweep.
I agree with the person who said too many people speak in terms of absolutes. I am not saying main pvp characters did nothing. But if gallente had no alts plexing for them they would be lucky to hit tier 2 and probably would be wiped out. The game is way too dependant on alt plexing.
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
So you want timer roll backs and intel, which, in your own words will do nothing to fix the problem described above. Finally we DO agree on something.
OPlexing is almost dead THIS is what timer rollbacks was intended to be useful against but CCP opted for a much more effective change. Dplexing alts prevent a slow pendulum of unfocussed contestation and encourages group effort. Im sorry fella, perhaps in an MMO a single person shouldnt expect be able to influence eve type occupancy.
I never said intel or adding rollbacks would do nothing to change the current game of rabbit plexing for the win. I gave plenty of reasons how it would help tip the scales against that behavior. You just ignore those reasons.
I also disagree that faction war should be like null sec. Which means basically if you can't get a big enough blob in a single system long enough to take a system then there is pretty much nothing you can do.
That is the key flaw in null sec. There is no need to duplicate the problem in fw because you have a flawed idea of what an mmo should be. IMO Every player should be able to influence occupancy in a fun and engaging way regardless of whether their militia currently has the largest blob. Of course, more players of equal pvp ability/resources should have more influence. But there is no need to make fw revolve around the blob as much as null sec.
For the above reason I disagree that that oplexing is so different than dplexing.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2523
|
Posted - 2014.09.15 19:11:00 -
[316] - Quote
Cearain wrote: I agree with the person who said too many people speak in terms of absolutes. I am not saying main pvp characters did nothing. But if gallente had no alts plexing for them they would be lucky to hit tier 2 and probably would be wiped out. The game is way too dependant on alt plexing.
Really? Based on what? You think Caldari without plexing alts would be roflstomping Gallente?
|

Moglarr
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
16
|
Posted - 2014.09.15 20:16:00 -
[317] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:But if gallente had no alts plexing for them they would be lucky to hit tier 2 and probably would be wiped out.
Really? Based on what? You think Caldari without plexing alts would be roflstomping Gallente?
Serious question, because I think I don't understand the plexing alts. How are we using them to "roflstomp?" I thought they were only mediocre at running dplexes. |

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
426
|
Posted - 2014.09.15 20:54:00 -
[318] - Quote
Moglarr wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:But if gallente had no alts plexing for them they would be lucky to hit tier 2 and probably would be wiped out.
Really? Based on what? You think Caldari without plexing alts would be roflstomping Gallente? Serious question, because I think I don't understand the plexing alts. How are we using them to "roflstomp?" I thought they were only mediocre at running dplexes. Oh, we agree. It's just that Cerain feels they're the usnstoppable PWN button of FW for some reason.
They used to be a much bigger factor than they are now, certainly, but not even then were they a win button.
We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..." |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1121
|
Posted - 2014.09.15 22:39:00 -
[319] - Quote
Cearain wrote:If you think lighting cynos is something you should do with your main then it would be broken. I think winning fw occupancy (and in particular taking plexes) is something that should be done on a main/pvp account and not so dependant on alts.
This is where we fundamentally disagree. You say well throw away alts are most often used to light cynos, so why not have throw away alts capture most plexes. I see the latter as something that should involve pvp.
I dont light cynos with my main characters because they can fly carriers. I dont dplex with them because they can pvp.
If my deplexing alts are running plexes where there is no player opposition why on earth would i take a 100m+ SP toon there instead, when there are other places he can actually pvp? If the enemy cannot commit enough resources to counter a 90k SP alt then they dont deserve the system.
Horses for courses my troll friend. No one is forcing anyone to do anything with alts, but i would ask that you stop whining about the people who put most effort in, winning. |

May Arethusa
PillowBrigade Inc Heiian Conglomerate
15
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 00:25:00 -
[320] - Quote
FW became null-sec lite because we allowed it to. It wasn't the changes in plex mechanics, it was our inability to think outside the box when confronted with insurmountable odds. When the Gallente were pulling 100+ pilots into a system siege, the inevitable response from CalMil was "how do we get more people here?" rather than "how do we get them out of the system?" This only fed the vicious cycle that drew more and more pilots into a single system as the number of kills increased. CCP isn't to blame for this, we are. We collectively decided that blobbing was the best answer to the recent changes in plex mechanics, stopped trying to be clever, and simply threw ships at each other until one side won. It really doesn't matter what changes are made to FW, it's how we react to them that counts. Until we begin to discourage this kind of mob mentality, the blob will rule FW.
The same can be said for defensive plexing alts/farmers, whatever you choose you call them. They're only as effective as you allow them to be, and the reason they played any role at all in the push is because we allowed them to. We barricaded the doors and ignored the rest of the warzone while the Gallente pounded on the windows and trampled our gardens. A minority saw the futility of this and attempted to do the sensible thing, but it was too little, too late, and there were negligible attempts to co-ordinate these efforts. That's why we lost. It has little to do with their numbers, or their alts, or CCP's meddling, it's because we decided to play the game on their terms rather than our own. Until this changes, expect GalMil to remain dominant. |
|

Fenris Orion
Rapid Withdrawal
12
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 00:37:00 -
[321] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:But if gallente had no alts plexing for them they would be lucky to hit tier 2 and probably would be wiped out.
Really? Based on what? You think Caldari without plexing alts would be roflstomping Gallente?
Seriously, this thread is so much better with Cearain blocked.
Stop feeding the trolls.
No, really. |

Fenris Orion
Rapid Withdrawal
12
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 01:07:00 -
[322] - Quote
May Arethusa wrote:FW became null-sec lite because we allowed it to. It wasn't the changes in plex mechanics, it was our inability to think outside the box when confronted with insurmountable odds. When the Gallente were pulling 100+ pilots into a system siege, the inevitable response from CalMil was "how do we get more people here?" rather than "how do we get them out of the system?" This only fed the vicious cycle that drew more and more pilots into a single system as the number of kills increased. CCP isn't to blame for this, we are. We collectively decided that blobbing was the best answer to the recent changes in plex mechanics, stopped trying to be clever, and simply threw ships at each other until one side won. It really doesn't matter what changes are made to FW, it's how we react to them that counts. Until we begin to discourage this kind of mob mentality, the blob will rule FW.
The same can be said for defensive plexing alts/farmers, whatever you choose you call them. They're only as effective as you allow them to be, and the reason they played any role at all in the push is because we allowed them to. We barricaded the doors and ignored the rest of the warzone while the Gallente pounded on the windows and trampled our gardens. A minority saw the futility of this and attempted to do the sensible thing, but it was too little, too late, and there were negligible attempts to co-ordinate these efforts. That's why we lost. It has little to do with their numbers, or their alts, or CCP's meddling, it's because we decided to play the game on their terms rather than our own. Until this changes, expect GalMil to remain dominant.
I agree with most of this. If we field 8 assault frigates, you could easily field 4 rapid-light Caracals and take on 2 to 1 odds and win the day. The biggest difference between the factions seems to be coordination and cooperation within the Gallente, which Caldari seem to lack.
I also agree that afk-plexing alts are only as effective as you allow them to be.... Mostly. When TEST was still around, we saw hordes of stabbed-up farmers threatening the sovereignty of our home systems. To deal with them, my corpmates started holding competitions to see who could farm the most warp-core-stabs in killmails. Prizes were even given out. The triple-scram kestrel became a thing, alongside sebo'd arty thrashers and railgun catalysts. And it worked, and was kinda fun. Not nearly as entertaining as fleet action, but good competition all the same.
However, the changes in o-plexing dynamics did make a huge difference IMO. Npcs that respawn and tank some decent dps means that you can't o-plex while afk nearly as easily, and theres no taking a small or medium outpost in a Condor. Anyone else notice a severe decline in the presence of those pesky bastards since the FW changes? Light-missile kiters are at a big disadvantage due to the low dps output, and CalMil lost a great number of the plexing alts. Subsequently, as GalMil pulled ahead inTier, a great number showed up to get in on easy and profitable d-plexing.
I think this is already starting to even out, as all Gallente systems neared zero-contested and the alts moved on. Now the Caldari are pushing back, and it is good hunting again. |

Dread Operative
Snuff Box
372
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 01:10:00 -
[323] - Quote
Fenris Orion wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:But if gallente had no alts plexing for them they would be lucky to hit tier 2 and probably would be wiped out.
Really? Based on what? You think Caldari without plexing alts would be roflstomping Gallente? Seriously, this thread is so much better with Cearain blocked. Stop feeding the trolls. No, really.
I've had him blocked for years, very liberating. |

Fenris Orion
Rapid Withdrawal
13
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 01:12:00 -
[324] - Quote
Dread Operative wrote:Fenris Orion wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:But if gallente had no alts plexing for them they would be lucky to hit tier 2 and probably would be wiped out.
Really? Based on what? You think Caldari without plexing alts would be roflstomping Gallente? Seriously, this thread is so much better with Cearain blocked. Stop feeding the trolls. No, really. I've had him blocked for years, very liberating.
Glad to see we're on the same side of something for a change... :-P |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1358
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 13:17:00 -
[325] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:But if gallente had no alts plexing for them they would be lucky to hit tier 2 and probably would be wiped out.
Really? Based on what? You think Caldari without plexing alts would be roflstomping Gallente?
XG
Look at what I wrote and then look at what you wrote. It was only one sentence but you still got it wrong. Really? Right back at you.
The question is what effect did the gallente alts have on your taking all systems. (Its not a childish game of "the caldari are worse!" "No the gallente are worse!") Crosi and others claim they had very little effect. And others have said we are using too many absolutes. I agree. Its not all plexing alts. But I think its pretty clear that without them instead of capturing all systems gallente would be lucky to hit tier 2.
Do you dispute that if Gallente had no plexing alts they would have been lucky to hit tier 2? Yes of course Gallente would be overrun by the plexing alts of Caldari and Amarr if they don't get plexing alts of their own. That is why I don't blame the players I blame the mechanics that make plexing alts so influential.
BTW: I love reading those who went along with your 180 degree misrepresentation of what I wrote and whine about it. Reading skills are apparently scarce. 
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Spaceship Bebop
315
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 13:41:00 -
[326] - Quote
Cearain,
Without plexing alts the Caldari would be completely crushed constantly. Not only would we be tier2, we would probably be Tier3 almost constantly. BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1358
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 14:19:00 -
[327] - Quote
Thanatos Marathon wrote:Cearain,
Without plexing alts the Caldari would be completely crushed constantly. Not only would we be tier2, we would probably be Tier3 almost constantly.
Where did I say otherwise? I never said anything about what would happen if Caldari had no plexing alts.
It will help if you read what I wrote, and not what XG claims I wrote. I said "if gallente had no alts plexing for them they would be lucky to hit tier 2 and probably would be wiped out." I never said anything about what would happen if Caldari alts were removed.
Again the issue is how important were the gallente alts in this last campaign. A few posters said they weren't that important. They were.
You and XG and a few others just reinterpret what I wrote to be the typical bickering we see on the forums where each militia blames the other for having alts or farmers or whatever. Thats not what I said, and is not my point. The problem is all the militias are forced to have alts rabbit plexing if they want to win the occupancy war. This is boring game play and its why so few people care who wins the occupancy war.
The problem is the mechanics that make these rabbit alts so effective. (timer rolbacks and better intel is the solution) The problem is not one militia or the other. The players are just playing according to the mechanics. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Spaceship Bebop
315
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 14:24:00 -
[328] - Quote
I see, you are talking about removing alts from one side while keeping them for the other :p BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1358
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 14:44:00 -
[329] - Quote
Thanatos Marathon wrote:I see, you are talking about removing alts from one side while keeping them for the other :p
Yes I am saying that rabbit plexing is key to the occupancy war. If you try to fight without them you are doomed to failure. The other side will use them and the current mechanics are such that they have a huge impact on the war.
Some people said the gallente plexing alts were not that important during their last push. In order to determine how important something is, consider what would happen if it were removed. I think they were very important and without the gallente plexing alts you would be lucky to hit tier 2. Now that you understand what I wrote, do you agree?
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Spaceship Bebop
315
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 14:51:00 -
[330] - Quote
Nope, I still disagree. The Caldari took too long to actively attack backwater systems and then were not persistent enough when they ran into active resistance. BLFOX is currently recruiting |
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1358
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 15:04:00 -
[331] - Quote
Thanatos Marathon wrote:Nope, I still disagree. The Caldari took too long to actively attack backwater systems and then were not persistent enough when they ran into active resistance.
Ok we disagree. I am confident that if the gallente had no alts plexing they would be sitting at tier 1 - at least most of the time. The alts from the amarr and caldari would overwhelm them. (I should clarify that I mean if gallente had no alts plexing for them in the caldari/gallente front. That is, no minmatar plexing for them either.)
I think the Caldari would have been more persistent in the back waters if they did not find that their plexing work was undone by defensive plexing alts as soon as they leave. Gallente pvpers would not be willing or able to put up enough active resistance to cover the warzone.
But anyway how much do we disagree?
Do you think Gallente would have taken all the systems without any alts? What tier do you think Gallente would be sitting at if they had no alts plexing for them? Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Spaceship Bebop
315
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 15:31:00 -
[332] - Quote
We still would have taken the entire warzone. However, you would be seeing systems get flipped back faster.
The changes that were made to rat tanks/respawn made a huge difference in how much rabbit plexers can affect systems that are already under your control. The shaping of the warzone that was done right before the change hit seems to have worked out well.
BLFOX is currently recruiting |

wilgotna
Rubtech Equity Research Group
37
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 15:35:00 -
[333] - Quote
i told you nerds this was gonna happen  |

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
384
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 15:40:00 -
[334] - Quote
wilgotna wrote:i told you nerds this was gonna happen  And no ***** were given. CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, please give us a persisting-áoff button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2524
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 16:00:00 -
[335] - Quote
Cearain wrote: The question is what effect did the gallente alts have on your taking all systems.
I thought this question was already asked and answered: BOTH plexing alts and Gallente militia were responsible for taking the warzone.
Specifically: For the offensive plexing alts at higher tiers: It made it easier to take undefended systems and systems where Caldari did not have TZ coverage. Sped up the process, and probably demoralized our opponents into not trying to defend. One example is Dei-Telum in the Valerian constellation who decided to take a break from FW even though half the constellation was in their hands.
Defensive plexing alts: Honestly don't know about this one. There weren't really any offensive Caldari plexing alts out and about - still aren't. I would say they helped keep the fringe systems (Sarenemi and Hyera for example) in Gallente control - but in both of those cases we were ready to send some of our troops out there to secure them when needed.
As for "lucky to hold Tier 2" comment. We had 60 systems without the massive influx of plexing alts which only came when we decided to upgrade systems to Tier 3.
The Gallente militia was responsible for taking heavily defended systems and busting bunkers, and providing support to our plexing alts when there was stiffer resistance from Caldari in those backwater systems.
At the end of the campaign we had PLENTY of spare pilots to project power to any part of the map we desired. We could have had lots of guys with mains actively defensive plexing all corners of the map while 30+ guys sat in the main systems running plexes and BS'ing with each other on comms.
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2524
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 16:03:00 -
[336] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Do you think Gallente would have taken all the systems without any alts? What tier do you think Gallente would be sitting at if they had no alts plexing for them? Whenever the effect of alts are minimized we take the entire warzone. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1358
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 16:20:00 -
[337] - Quote
Thanatos Marathon wrote:We still would have taken the entire warzone. However, you would be seeing systems get flipped back faster.
The changes that were made to rat tanks/respawn made a huge difference in how much rabbit plexers can affect systems that are already under your control. The shaping of the warzone that was done right before the change hit seems to have worked out well.
Are you saying you think gallente could have gained and held the entire warzone for at least one downtime without any plexing alts helping you?
So it would only be pvp mains that would d-plex and o-plex all the gains the other alts and mains made?
Certainly we saw a lower amount of offensive plexing after Kronos. But even now we see caldari getting 100,000 vp per weak. And that does not even include the amarr alts that would be plexing in that area at tier 2! Given that one of XGs alts had more vp than he did(and we don't know how many dplexing alts he has) its likely that most of a militias vp is coming from alts. So we can see that gallente probably would have been getting about half the vp. (if we include amarr plexers whatever that value is we would see they were getting considerably less than half.) Even to say half the vp is due to fw mains is overly generous since many of the plexing alts are players who don't even have their main in faction war.
If one side is getting half the vp over time they won't take all the systems. If you want to say well we already had a large percent of the systems, thanks to our alts before kronos ok. But that is still relying on the alts.
Bottom line is that (barring some huge null sec alliance coming in) in the long term no militia can hope to fight and win the occupancy war unless they resort to alts for rabbit plexing. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2524
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 16:42:00 -
[338] - Quote
Cearain wrote:
Are you saying you think gallente could have gained and held the entire warzone for at least one downtime without any plexing alts helping you?
If the other side didn't have any plexing alts... Yes.
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1358
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 21:38:00 -
[339] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Do you think Gallente would have taken all the systems without any alts? What tier do you think Gallente would be sitting at if they had no alts plexing for them? Whenever the effect of alts are minimized we take the entire warzone.
You didn't answer the question. The reason you didn't answer the question is because you are too wrapped up in silly arguments about your militia being better than the other militia. 
The issue to what extent rabbits alts have on the occupancy war - not quibbling about which militia has more alts.
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:
Are you saying you think gallente could have gained and held the entire warzone for at least one downtime without any plexing alts helping you?
If the other side didn't have any plexing alts... Yes.
Again you keep wanting to point fingers at the other side instead of answering the question.
The question is: under the current mechanics if Gallente did not have plexing alts would they be able to take all the systems? Of course the other side would have plexing alts like they do now. Certain players have been trying to claim the gallente alts were not that important for the gallente victory etc.
I am putting that in perspective and saying what should not be controversial to anyone familiar with the occupancy war. That is if Gallente did not have plexing alts (or minmatar alts) in thier front they would be sitting at tier one and lucky to hit tier 2 on occasion.
Do you agree? Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders Spaceship Bebop
1922
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 21:54:00 -
[340] - Quote
Cerain, I'll make this as simple as possible.
If VPs are tied to just running timers --> you can get VP while AFK, if nobody shows up to disrupt your efforts.
If VPs are also tied to doing something (such as, for example, killing a pretty tanky and re-spawning rat) --> you basically can't get VP AFK.
I think that, yes, we all agree that AFK gameplay is uncool and should be discouraged.
Under the old system, you could get both offensive and defensive VPs while AFK.
Under the new system, you can only gain defensive VPs while AFK. Big improvement, in almost everyone's opinion.
Next step to make you happy: add rats also to de-plex (I'll let you come up with a mechanic for that).
But the real point is: whatever the mechanics, the militia that adapts more and whines less will always win, even against superior numbers.
Hint: that would be us Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter! |
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1122
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 22:14:00 -
[341] - Quote
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:Cerain, I'll make this as simple as possible. If VPs are tied to just running timers --> you can get VP while AFK, if nobody shows up to disrupt your efforts. If VPs are also tied to doing something (such as, for example, killing a pretty tanky and re-spawning rat) --> you basically can't get VP AFK. I think that, yes, we all agree that AFK gameplay is uncool and should be discouraged. Under the old system, you could get both offensive and defensive VPs while AFK. Under the new system, you can only gain defensive VPs while AFK. Big improvement, in almost everyone's opinion. Next step to make you happy: add rats also to de-plex (I'll let you come up with a mechanic for that). But the real point is: whatever the mechanics, the militia that adapts more and whines less will always win, even against superior numbers. Hint: that would be us
It did cross my mind to have a friendly and hostile rat in ALL plexes. They fight each other but can easily tank, all you have to do is pass the dps check by killing the rat hostile to you. Rat strength remains the same, rat dps is a non factor since they are always shooting each other with like 1 dps. This removes rats from solo pvp equation too.
Anyone see any problem with that? Is there much of a tank check factor in the current rats that would be missed in this kind of change?
My general rule is that rats are never the answer, cant deny they were a crude fix, but a fix non the less.
As for cearains posting of late, i am left with no doubt he is simply a concern troll. What a load of garbage posting. Hes here to just score points and has no interest in improving FW. Im going to try to ignore his posts again unless he posts something really dumn. That is not a challenge cearain. What i mean by that is not that im not challenging you to post something dumb, just that it doesnt seem to be a challenge for you to do so. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2524
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 22:19:00 -
[342] - Quote
Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Do you think Gallente would have taken all the systems without any alts? What tier do you think Gallente would be sitting at if they had no alts plexing for them? Whenever the effect of alts are minimized we take the entire warzone. You didn't answer the question. The reason you didn't answer the question is because you are too wrapped up in silly arguments about your militia being better than the other militia.  The issue to what extent rabbits alts have on the occupancy war - not quibbling about which militia has more alts. X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:
Are you saying you think gallente could have gained and held the entire warzone for at least one downtime without any plexing alts helping you?
If the other side didn't have any plexing alts... Yes. Again you keep wanting to point fingers at the other side instead of answering the question. The question is: under the current mechanics if Gallente did not have plexing alts would they be able to take all the systems? Of course the other side would have plexing alts like they do now. Certain players have been trying to claim the gallente alts were not that important for the gallente victory etc. I am putting that in perspective and saying what should not be controversial to anyone familiar with the occupancy war. That is if Gallente did not have plexing alts (or minmatar alts) in thier front they would be sitting at tier one and lucky to hit tier 2 on occasion. Do you agree? Pointing fingers how? You want an honest answer about effect of plexing alts on the system then you need to consider having them on both sides or on no side. But, since you asked:
Gallente vs. Caldari + Plexing Alts = Gallente holding about 25 systems when times are tough.
Let's do a "system count" Alparena, Mercomesier, Athounon, Reschard (BEBIG) Eha, Oicx, Vlillirier, Renarelle, Eugales, Aldranette, Frarie (BEBOP, GMVA, old school TPLUS guys, 1Gank1) Nennamaila, Enaluri, Hallanen, Immuri (Core Gallente Groups) Onatoh, Tannolen (RDRAW) Fliet, Old Man Star (AIDER, Total Eclipse) Nisuwa, Notoras (Crosi)
That's 21 systems, many recently "colonized" by 300+ man corps/alliances, and many that haven't been flipped in about a year because of dedicated PLAYERS deplexing them.
There are other systems that are stable such as Onatoh, southern Placid (Covryn, Dastryns, etc...) that aren't stable because of LP whores (you don't get enough LP deplexing 0.67% systems to 0%) that are not on this list. I simply don't have eyes on those systems so I don't know exactly who is taking the time to make those systems stable. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2524
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 22:29:00 -
[343] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:It did cross my mind to have a friendly and hostile rat in ALL plexes. The hilarious thing is that Cearain is the guy who championed NO rats in plexes. What a travesty it was for the entire FW community to not have adequate dps checks on rats.
I think everybody in FW would welcome dps checks on defensive plexes as well. |

May Arethusa
PillowBrigade Inc Heiian Conglomerate
17
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 23:34:00 -
[344] - Quote
Quote:However, the changes in o-plexing dynamics did make a huge difference IMO. Npcs that respawn and tank some decent dps means that you can't o-plex while afk nearly as easily, and theres no taking a small or medium outpost in a Condor. Anyone else notice a severe decline in the presence of those pesky bastards since the FW changes? Light-missile kiters are at a big disadvantage due to the low dps output, and CalMil lost a great number of the plexing alts. Subsequently, as GalMil pulled ahead inTier, a great number showed up to get in on easy and profitable d-plexing.
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
It did cross my mind to have a friendly and hostile rat in ALL plexes. They fight each other but can easily tank, all you have to do is pass the dps check by killing the rat hostile to you. Rat strength remains the same, rat dps is a non factor since they are always shooting each other with like 1 dps. This removes rats from solo pvp equation too.
Anyone see any problem with that? Is there much of a tank check factor in the current rats that would be missed in this kind of change?
My general rule is that rats are never the answer, cant deny they were a crude fix, but a fix non the less.
I'll deal with these at the same time as they're related to a single issue.
Uniformity between offensive and defensive plexing is really what FW needs, as it's from the differences that many of our current complaints arise. The need to kill a rat while offensive plexing is a rather crude attempt to simulate the difficulties in besieging a hostile stronghold, one that really isn't needed. Why artificially inflate the effort required to assault a system when the onus is already on the attacking side to initiate an often lengthy process. Relocating assets, establishing supply chains, and getting pilots in system is more than enough of a ball ache without worrying about a rat respawning every minute.
As far as the recent changes to offensive plexing go, I wasn't attempting to play down the impact they've had. Spread across 150 plexes, the time spent dealing with rats soon adds up, meaning it takes longer to plex up a system than it does to plex down. Add in enemy resistance and the defender has a clear advantage, not just in time spent plexing, but also cost and ship choice. I don't really think the increased tank was the cause of CalMil losing its plexing power though, it's an area we've always struggled with, and the chances just happened to take place when the Gallente push was building momentum. Too long at Tier 1 and the increasing profitability of switching sides is more to blame here.
I'm all for having a friendly and hostile rat in every plex. Under the current system, any change tips the balance in favour of the attacker or the defender. All allegiances aside, we should be aiming for a level playing field where the players dictate how the war is fought, not the mechanics. On paper, an unfit T1 frigate currently has a greater impact upon occupancy than a competently fit PVP ship. This fact is often missed in all the action, but it points out the flaws in FW perfectly. There's no reason why someone defending a system shouldn't be subjected to the same checks and balances as their opponents. It cuts down on the unfit, unaffiliated pilots looking to make a quick buck, and gives those of us who care about system control a greater chance of encountering these almost mythical "good fights" I keep hearing about.
Finally, Condors... I was pretty sad when I realised I couldn't go out and solo plex in one. I quickly got over it when I found out that actually bringing people along with me tended to result in more entertaining fights. You still see them around, and a solitary Condor on short at a small or medium almost always results in combat. I'm actually okay with that. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2524
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 00:52:00 -
[345] - Quote
May Arethusa wrote: The need to kill a rat while offensive plexing is a rather crude attempt to simulate the difficulties in besieging a hostile stronghold, one that really isn't needed. Why artificially inflate the effort required to assault a system when the onus is already on the attacking side to initiate an often lengthy process.
Without dps check, farmers run out smaller corporations from their homesystems. That's why. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1358
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 01:35:00 -
[346] - Quote
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:Cerain, I'll make this as simple as possible. If VPs are tied to just running timers --> you can get VP while AFK, if nobody shows up to disrupt your efforts. If VPs are also tied to doing something (such as, for example, killing a pretty tanky and re-spawning rat) --> you basically can't get VP AFK. I think that, yes, we all agree that AFK gameplay is uncool and should be discouraged. Under the old system, you could get both offensive and defensive VPs while AFK. Under the new system, you can only gain defensive VPs while AFK. Big improvement, in almost everyone's opinion. Next step to make you happy: add rats also to de-plex (I'll let you come up with a mechanic for that). But the real point is: whatever the mechanics, the militia that adapts more and whines less will always win, even against superior numbers. Hint: that would be us
Just making plexing that is not done afk is not where I am setting the bar. Just because you have to be in a chair staring at the screen does not mean it's fun game play. The faction war occupancy game can easily be more fun and exciting than that, and ccp has indicated they will do the things to make it that way.
Ideally there should not be a need to have any npcs. Faction war should not be a carebear race to see who can kill the most red crosses. The players should defend the plexes. CCP is likely thinking the same way as they have greatly reduced the influence of npcs over the years. I think they would love it if there was pvp fighting in every plex so there would be no more need for npcs there.
The problem is players do not have sufficient intel tools to defend against people who want to rabbit plex. Chase them out and they will just go a system or 2 over and start another plex. Also without timer rollbacks even if we could easilly find exactly where people are plexing they would still potentially make gains.
CCP has indicated they intend to address both issues by giving us better intel tools and timer rollbacks . However these sorts of fixes are not as easy as giving a rat more tank or having it deliver fewer dps. So I think we received Kronos not as some thought that fw is going to be fixed but rather as a sort of easy to do stop gap. I do think players need to continue to give ccp input that these changes are still needed or it is easy for them to put it off. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

May Arethusa
PillowBrigade Inc Heiian Conglomerate
17
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 02:08:00 -
[347] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:May Arethusa wrote: The need to kill a rat while offensive plexing is a rather crude attempt to simulate the difficulties in besieging a hostile stronghold, one that really isn't needed. Why artificially inflate the effort required to assault a system when the onus is already on the attacking side to initiate an often lengthy process.
Without dps check, farmers run out smaller corporations from their homesystems. That's why.
I understand that, though I'd dispute the accuracy of your statement to some degree. It really depends upon how you define small, and whether you actually mean less active.
The comment was largely to highlight the discrepancies between offensive and defensive plexing and the effort required for each. I'm certainly not against a DPS check, I just think that in its current form it creates more problems than it solves. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1123
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 03:21:00 -
[348] - Quote
May Arethusa wrote:X Gallentius wrote:May Arethusa wrote: The need to kill a rat while offensive plexing is a rather crude attempt to simulate the difficulties in besieging a hostile stronghold, one that really isn't needed. Why artificially inflate the effort required to assault a system when the onus is already on the attacking side to initiate an often lengthy process.
Without dps check, farmers run out smaller corporations from their homesystems. That's why. I understand that, though I'd dispute the accuracy of your statement to some degree. It really depends upon how you define small, and whether you actually mean less active. The comment was largely to highlight the discrepancies between offensive and defensive plexing and the effort required for each. I'm certainly not against a DPS check, I just think that in its current form it creates more problems than it solves.
Not it doesnt, it solved the greatest problem FW had ever seen. 50-100k VP per day + unrecorded diagonal plexing achieved almost exclusively by 2 day-2 week old alts causing an almost complete swing of the gallente/caldari warzone each month (or quicker with regard to swings in caldaris favor). Various iterations of plex rats have got us to where we are now, a system that seems robust enough to allow good fights while denying 2 day old evasion alts to yield 500+mil per hour.
I personally think that a defensive plex DPS check would put FW in a good place. Its a horrible fix, but the problem is its not aimed at fixing the game, its aimed at fixing the players. |

Clive Stratton
Quantum Cats Syndicate
8
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 04:27:00 -
[349] - Quote
Nisuwa, Notoras (Crosi)
Crosi is my Brosi, but I beg to disagree. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1123
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 04:37:00 -
[350] - Quote
Clive Stratton wrote:
Nisuwa, Notoras (Crosi)
Crosi is my Brosi, but I beg to disagree.
Yep, ive not been on. Computer is rebuilt as of now though so ill muck in :) |
|

Clive Stratton
Quantum Cats Syndicate
8
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 05:09:00 -
[351] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Yep, ive not been on. Computer is rebuilt as of now though so ill muck in :)
Eh, it's been quiet. Killed the few Pastas that showed up, other squids seem content to farm closer to Nourv.
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2524
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 10:02:00 -
[352] - Quote
Clive Stratton wrote:
Nisuwa, Notoras (Crosi)
Crosi is my Brosi, but I beg to disagree.
My bad. didn't know that covert cats corp was on the job. :) |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2524
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 10:06:00 -
[353] - Quote
Cearain wrote: Just making plexing that is not done afk is not where I am setting the bar. Just because you have to be in a chair staring at the screen does not mean it's fun game play. The faction war occupancy game can easily be more fun and exciting than that, and ccp has indicated they will do the things to make it that way.
If you want fun gameplay then run your plex where people are living and spam local like that french dude in Monty Python.
|

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
381
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 21:04:00 -
[354] - Quote
Yes...
Good idea 2 npcs in perpetual fights, so while deplexing you get aggro by the enemy npcs, and the ennemi npc can permanent the other npc +the actual tanking rate CCP it's time to remove Off Grid Boost and to Put Them on Killmail TOO, same for Logi....Open that damn door !! |

GavinGoodrich
The Great Harmon Institute Of Technology Enemy Spotted.
80
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 02:29:00 -
[355] - Quote
Myth Oceanas wrote:GavinGoodrich wrote:All I'm seeing in this whole thread are both sides going "no, it's like this," with every other counter argument being "no, not like that, like this."
There's hardly any reason to even debate if everybody's so dead-set on "how things are." History is written by the winners. So I'd listen to the GalMil, because its apparent they did something right.
Eh, doesn't work that way when the war continues. There is no "winning" in a perpetual war game mechanic like this one. CCP doesn't burn the forum posts of whichever team loses. The pendulum will keep on swingin. Long live the war. Haaaaaalp my head's on fire |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1124
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 15:24:00 -
[356] - Quote
Logged on, OTO is vulnerable. 15 kills in 2 hours and squids retreated to let us stabilise the system a little.
If only i had intel tools to let me know where the enemies were.
FW is totally broken!
IB4 YOU BLOBBED THEM OUT OF SYSTEM - you would be correct if 7 people could blob 15. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos Spaceship Bebop
2525
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 15:33:00 -
[357] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Logged on, OTO is vulnerable. 15 kills in 2 hours and squids retreated to let us stabilise the system a little.
You should have 40 kills in two hours. EVE PVP IS SO BROKEN!
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: [one page] |