Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

anotleam
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 01:55:00 -
[31]
Edited by: anotleam on 31/07/2006 01:55:00
|

Leam
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 01:56:00 -
[32]
Edited by: Leam on 31/07/2006 01:57:12 Sorry, anotleam is my alt, i think i'll delete it tonigth lol.
Originally by: Jago X
Originally by: bldyannoyed Leam, it is clearly ypu that has never flown a Blasterthron.
The drawbacks u speak of are called BALANCE. I fly 1 and will take it 1 v 1 with any BS in the gang, cept mebbe a nos dom.
Nor is there anything wrong with blasters. Since the fix it is possible to set up a devastatingly effective Neutron fit. People say they should have more damage and stuff and they are clearly mental. The damage with neutrons and void is so extreme it renders any tank a waste of slots, NOTHING can survive it.
The idea of making a ship which is better at blasting than the mega is frankly sickening.
And as for the mega still having a place in the game.
The Rokh will exceed it as a sniper and ( if the devs *****pot plan works) the hype will exceed it as a blaster boat.
Mega therefore will be redundant.
You can compare a b-thron to a non-nossing, non-ewar ship in a 1v1 and think its overpowered. What the reality of the matter is is that in 80-90% of cases a tempest, or any other close range ship (which would often lose to a thron in a direct 1v1) is miles better.
Essentially the thron was never fast enough, never versatile enough (blaster boats need mids, the thron has none to spare) and never had enough cap. so yes we do need a proper blasterboat.
Also comparing the gallente/caldari bss and saying one will make the other redindant for fleet is complete rubbish, and not only because most people wont bother to train an extra race just for an extra 10% range .. the mega will also still outdamage the rohk at some ranges and has room for an anti frig launcher 
I was writing my own post but you've put it very well ^^
Quote: Ontop of that the "blaster" boat doesn't even get a good drone bay although the "sniper" battleship aka Megathron gets a fat dronebay....
Yeah, that i agree, is quite weird. I guess they've done it only to give the mega some advantage over hyperion. Let's see how small is "smaller drone bay"

|

twit brent
Dark Centuri Inc. Firmus Ixion
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 04:38:00 -
[33]
I find it funny that the megathron or the "long range ship" is the one with the tracking bonus and larger drone bay while the hyperion has bad tracking and small drone bay.
I think the MWD cap peanlty bonus is useless as most blaster pilots use cap injectors to run their ships. Also it does nothing for people that dont use MWD's on their ships.
I know alot of caldari pilots that are going to fit blasters on their tier 3 caldari BS because of the optimal bonus + null ammo. I will be hugely dissapointed if it ends up like the eagle and the deimos, where the eagle wins because of its versitility.
Im not great at calculating damage but im prety sure the megathron + its drones will still out damage the hyperion expecially with its tracking bonus. The only way I can see the hyperion outperforming the megathron is if it had the grid + CPU to fit a full rack of neutrons and a full tank and even them i wouldnt be too sure.
CCP is giving the gallente a blastership, but the problem is we already have one. Whats worse is that this new ship is dedicatated to blasters and cant doo too much else but is no better at it than the blasterthron.
Th new caldari tier 3 gives caldari BS so much more versitility and the gallente one none at all.
Caldari get:
1) A sniping battleship that is as good if not better than megathron.
2) A blaster ship that is not as good as the megathron/hyperion but gives caldari alot more options when fitting a BS. With null ammo it can hit out prety far and can shield tank + gank or ECM+gank.
Gallente get
A ship with a bonus that is restricted to 1 role that it doesnt realy do any better at than the megathron.
|

anotleam
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 05:24:00 -
[34]
Edited by: anotleam on 31/07/2006 05:23:58
|

Leam
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 05:24:00 -
[35]
Naughty boy did this chart. if his calcs are right hyperion pretty much outdamages megathron as long as it has some dronebay at least.
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b182/Naughty654/crbs07.png
This one takes into accoutn movement and web
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b182/Naughty654/crbs08.png
and this one with no dmg mods (cept for rohk that has 3).
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b182/Naughty654/crbs09.png
Thanks to naughty boy btw :)
|

Glarion Garnier
Solar Wind
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 06:43:00 -
[36]
my personal favorite for Hyperion is 8/6/6
5% to Large hybrid dmg per skill lvl 5% to Large Blaster dmg per skill lvl
or
5% to Large hybrid dmg per skill lvl 20% reduced mwd cap penaly per skill lvl + 15% reduction to mwd siq penalty per skill lvl
or
5% to Large Hybrid dmg per skill lvl 10% to web range per skill lvl
|

Deathbarrage
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 09:51:00 -
[37]
Edited by: Deathbarrage on 31/07/2006 09:51:55
Originally by: Leam
Originally by: Levin Cavil
Anyone that says Gallente need a specialized blaster boat has no clue what they are talking about. The Megathron is the best blaster ship you could ask for, hands down.
If you say that, i guess that a) You've never flown a thron, b) You're the most awesome pilot ever and dont realice of the multiple drawbacks compared with the rest of ships/fittings combos c) You fly it, and *think* it's perfect cause you can kill things in 6vs1 ganks.
BLATERS themselves have issues, probably if they fixed em megathron would work much better. Still, there is the crappy grid/cpu it has considering that you need to fit mwd and cap injector for it to work properly, plus the **** cap you have left after fitting the mwd.
1st of all Levin knows how to fly a B-thron
2nd of all step out of your ideal world where every pvp is clean 1v1 pvp cuz most pvp in eve is the ''6v1'' combat you just talked about and if you ever pvp you do it aswell.
btw I'd like 5% hybrid dmg 7,5% armor repairer effectiveness
|

Masochist
Shinra
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 11:18:00 -
[38]
Ashame they will give it a very small dronebay. The ship would be so much greater with than without. Especially because drones are mainly short range too.
 |

fkingfurious
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 11:56:00 -
[39]
And another thing. Whats all this talk about versatility.
A Mega can snipe, blast, fight mid range with Dual 250's and an armour tank, people seem to think the fact that it cant use ECM means it ain't versitile. Which is rubbish.
It doesnt need to be faster. It takes me about 25 secs to cover 20 - 25 km to get in range, which isnt exactly a long time. If ur fighting at ranges greater than that u have to accept that you are IN THE WRONG SHIP.
To be a better blaster boat than the mega the Hype needs to have noticeably greater damage, and the only way i can think that i could improve my neutron fit wouold be fot it to have 8 lows.
With an 8/6/6 layout id be sticking to the megathron. It would still annihilate most things it finds and if ne silly sod in a Hype tries it on i'll just wait for him to do the MWDing before i shoot him to bits.
|

Levin Cavil
Lucid Ambition
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 19:56:00 -
[40]
Edited by: Levin Cavil on 31/07/2006 20:00:53
Originally by: fkingfurious And another thing. Whats all this talk about versatility.
A Mega can snipe, blast, fight mid range with Dual 250's and an armour tank, people seem to think the fact that it cant use ECM means it ain't versitile. Which is rubbish.
It doesnt need to be faster. It takes me about 25 secs to cover 20 - 25 km to get in range, which isnt exactly a long time. If ur fighting at ranges greater than that u have to accept that you are IN THE WRONG SHIP.
To be a better blaster boat than the mega the Hype needs to have noticeably greater damage, and the only way i can think that i could improve my neutron fit wouold be fot it to have 8 lows.
With an 8/6/6 layout id be sticking to the megathron. It would still annihilate most things it finds and if ne silly sod in a Hype tries it on i'll just wait for him to do the MWDing before i shoot him to bits.
Youre right, the Megathron is versatile, and thats exactly the point. The Hyperion's bonus make it a very limited ship and not only limited but in many cases inferior to the Megathron. With an armor rep bonus it is a unique and versatile Gallente BS. (Much like the 3 distinctly different Caldari BS...) With a rep bonus it would still help a Blaster ship because you would have to use less cap to repair the same amount of HP and yet it could also be fit as a mid range rail ship with a tank.
As it stands now the Hyperion will just do what the Megathron does and with some luck it will do it as well as the Mega. Instead of making a new ship to fill the megathron's role (which is basically and admission by Tux that the blasterthron is broken) wouldn't it be better to just fix blasters properly? Then give gallente an actual ship they can use like the other 3 races are getting. ---------- <Kayosoni> I'm actually normal |

Laughlyn Vaughns
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 20:08:00 -
[41]
Edited by: Laughlyn Vaughns on 31/07/2006 20:10:35 from lookign at the ine of things the tier 3 BS are bigger tier 1 battlecruisers with slightly changed bonii on sum of them but the other 3 races getting the Tanking bonii. i think the MWD bonus shud get scrapped and summat more usefull put in, and i aint even much of a gallente pilot but even when i am i dotn use MWD's on any ship, unelss travelling long distances.
if the mega is supposed to be the long range Railboat then give have it as a damage and range bonii, maybe +5% to both so as not to tread on the Rokh toes, reduce the mega's drone bay as its a sniper and give that to the hyperion.
that way give the Hyperion the tracking bonus or the repper bonus plus say 125m3 drone bay to turn it into a proper blaster boat. Summat that can fit 8 Neuts II's and 5 heavy drones so that it is the deadliest ship ever upclose and personal, drawback beign it takes a while to get upclose and it can be scrambled/webbed ect despite the fact it may kill u in seconds if it gets the chance
|

Levin Cavil
Lucid Ambition
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 20:15:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Laughlyn Vaughns Edited by: Laughlyn Vaughns on 31/07/2006 20:10:35 from lookign at the ine of things the tier 3 BS are bigger tier 1 battlecruisers with slightly changed bonii on sum of them but the other 3 races getting the Tanking bonii. i think the MWD bonus shud get scrapped and summat more usefull put in, and i aint even much of a gallente pilot but even when i am i dotn use MWD's on any ship, unelss travelling long distances.
if the mega is supposed to be the long range Railboat then give have it as a damage and range bonii, maybe +5% to both so as not to tread on the Rokh toes, reduce the mega's drone bay as its a sniper and give that to the hyperion.
that way give the Hyperion the tracking bonus or the repper bonus plus say 125m3 drone bay to turn it into a proper blaster boat. Summat that can fit 8 Neuts II's and 5 heavy drones so that it is the deadliest ship ever upclose and personal, drawback beign it takes a while to get upclose and it can be scrambled/webbed ect despite the fact it may kill u in seconds if it gets the chance
Or how about instead of changing the mgathron's baseic role (the one its had for close to 3 years) you just make the hyperion a rail ship? With Damage and rep amount and 6 mids and 8 turrets it would outdamage the Mega at range easily and have more room for trakcing mods and such. Also, it could still be fit for close range but would be better suited to medium or long range. Both ships would remain versatile but best suited for different roles. ---------- <Kayosoni> I'm actually normal |

Ithildin
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 20:21:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Glarion Garnier my personal favorite for Hyperion is 8/6/6
5% to Large hybrid dmg per skill lvl 5% to Large Blaster dmg per skill lvl
or
5% to Large hybrid dmg per skill lvl 20% reduced mwd cap penaly per skill lvl + 15% reduction to mwd siq penalty per skill lvl
or
5% to Large Hybrid dmg per skill lvl 10% to web range per skill lvl
For your information, the way the devs do it is to apply a bonus after the nerfs have been applied. This would mean that they'd need a really awkward boost of 6.6666---% per level. I do feel and agree that a removal of signature penalty from MWD boost is the least we would expect from a ship like this. At the very least it'd mean there's a tiny shred of hope in MWDing across the battlefield, even if it isn't very recommendable.
Regarding first suggestion, I think turret sub-category bonuses fell out of fashion for the devs 3 years ago.
Regarding third suggestion, while it would fit in with blasters in a sense, there's a few problems. First of all is that it's already been put down as a Minmatar (and Blood Raider) sort of bonus. Additionally, it wouldn't be very helpful considering that it's only with Null L that you really reach the ranges where a webbifier bonus would be lethal. Even further, 15km webbifiers aren't very much better than 10km webbifiers, at the very least not to merit a battleship bonus.
Should be said, there's plenty of wishful thinking below. I'm only half serious
What would be interesting is if the Gallente ships were all converted into some sort of drone carriers. Distributing the following bonuses among the three Gallente BShips evenly and according to concept: ¦ +10% damage (damage drones) and hit points ¦ +10% utility drone efficiency (web, TP, and rep drones) and drone MWD speed ¦ +10% electronic drone efficiency (ECM, Neut, and damp drones) and control range
Perhaps: ¦ Dominix. Duh. ¦ Hyperion. Up to 45% web drones, for example. ¦ Megathron. Up to strength 3 ECM drones (not sure, this might be a bit powerful - 12.5% chance of jam on unhardened Scorp per heavy ECM drone). Would also mean sentry drones would be more useful/able - enhancing it's railgun-ish role.
Well... it'd add flavour ^^ Dark skies torn apart Heavens open before me I, the light of death |

Laughlyn Vaughns
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 20:32:00 -
[44]
Originally by: Levin Cavil Edited by: Levin Cavil on 31/07/2006 20:20:21
Originally by: Laughlyn Vaughns Edited by: Laughlyn Vaughns on 31/07/2006 20:10:35 from lookign at the ine of things the tier 3 BS are bigger tier 1 battlecruisers with slightly changed bonii on sum of them but the other 3 races getting the Tanking bonii. i think the MWD bonus shud get scrapped and summat more usefull put in, and i aint even much of a gallente pilot but even when i am i dotn use MWD's on any ship, unelss travelling long distances.
if the mega is supposed to be the long range Railboat then give have it as a damage and range bonii, maybe +5% to both so as not to tread on the Rokh toes, reduce the mega's drone bay as its a sniper and give that to the hyperion.
that way give the Hyperion the tracking bonus or the repper bonus plus say 125m3 drone bay to turn it into a proper blaster boat. Summat that can fit 8 Neuts II's and 5 heavy drones so that it is the deadliest ship ever upclose and personal, drawback beign it takes a while to get upclose and it can be scrambled/webbed ect despite the fact it may kill u in seconds if it gets the chance
Or how about instead of changing the mgathron's basic role (the one it's had for close to 3 years) you just make the hyperion a rail ship? With Damage and rep amount and 6 mids and 8 turrets it would outdamage the Mega at range easily and have more room for trakcing mods and such. Also, it could still be fit for close range but would be better suited to medium or long range. Both ships would remain versatile but best suited for different roles.
yer, either/or really but ships get bonii changed that they had for several years (Phoon for example along with some others) so that wouldnt be summat new for the devs, but yeah give the Hyerion the rails bonus and repper bonus especially sinc eits not ingame yet and it has less dronebay. only hting would reduce Mega locking range if its a shortrange ship
|

Earthan
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 20:45:00 -
[45]
Yep all bs tier 3 bonuses looks good except for the gallente hyperion wich , understandbly given my rqace, annoys me a lot.
The mwd bonus is tottal crap.Any balster boat has to use cap injectors/charges and then cap recahrge stops to matter at all.
Pzl Pl zPl change that second bonus to something useful.The main problem of balster boats is a ) guns but thats nother topic b) getting to target in one piece.An armour resistance or hp bonus?Or if you want to be very so[histicated a big bonus to armour resistance when the bs goes over 800m/s.That would allow it to approach/try to run with more chances, making it a interesting ship with interesting bonus - Grey Council military officer. Grey Council forums Norad charta |

dalman
Rampage Eternal
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 20:46:00 -
[46]
Well, I said my opinion in the 'blog 20'-thread.
The Hyperion looks like a good rail ship. And not better than mega and certainly not domi at short range.
Except for the lock range. And then for some reason the tier 3s has been given an extra slot (to make all faction ships useless)
Oh well, perhaps I'll get to fly a shieldtanked blastership... errr, no I won't, since ECM > all. 
Am I forced to have any regret? I've become the lie, beautiful and free In my righteous own mind I adore and preach the insanity you gave to me |

anotleam
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 20:54:00 -
[47]
Edited by: anotleam on 31/07/2006 20:54:42 EDIT: sigh, this is leam lol
Originally by: Deathbarrage Edited by: Deathbarrage on 31/07/2006 09:51:55
Originally by: Leam
Originally by: Levin Cavil
Anyone that says Gallente need a specialized blaster boat has no clue what they are talking about. The Megathron is the best blaster ship you could ask for, hands down.
If you say that, i guess that a) You've never flown a thron, b) You're the most awesome pilot ever and dont realice of the multiple drawbacks compared with the rest of ships/fittings combos c) You fly it, and *think* it's perfect cause you can kill things in 6vs1 ganks.
BLATERS themselves have issues, probably if they fixed em megathron would work much better. Still, there is the crappy grid/cpu it has considering that you need to fit mwd and cap injector for it to work properly, plus the **** cap you have left after fitting the mwd.
1st of all Levin knows how to fly a B-thron
2nd of all step out of your ideal world where every pvp is clean 1v1 pvp cuz most pvp in eve is the ''6v1'' combat you just talked about and if you ever pvp you do it aswell.
btw I'd like 5% hybrid dmg 7,5% armor repairer effectiveness
erm, i know how pvp works, thanks for the advice, now i'll enlight you with a most incredible fact, you cant use "real fights" to balance ships, cause real fights as you said, are not fair. A ship being able to kill stuff or not dying in a 6vs1 fight doesnt mean it is "good" or "balanced". You have to balance things in 1vs1 with ships of the same class (taking into account the situation of course, long range ships would win at long range against a close range one), and thron loses there hands down. Most of gallente pilots know it (even the ones that still use it and get good results with hard work and l33t skillz), and the devs know it, reason why they're kicking the megathron out of the role and releasing the hyperion.
|

Leam
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 20:57:00 -
[48]
Originally by: Deathbarrage Edited by: Deathbarrage on 31/07/2006 09:51:55
Originally by: Leam
Originally by: Levin Cavil
Anyone that says Gallente need a specialized blaster boat has no clue what they are talking about. The Megathron is the best blaster ship you could ask for, hands down.
If you say that, i guess that a) You've never flown a thron, b) You're the most awesome pilot ever and dont realice of the multiple drawbacks compared with the rest of ships/fittings combos c) You fly it, and *think* it's perfect cause you can kill things in 6vs1 ganks.
BLATERS themselves have issues, probably if they fixed em megathron would work much better. Still, there is the crappy grid/cpu it has considering that you need to fit mwd and cap injector for it to work properly, plus the **** cap you have left after fitting the mwd.
1st of all Levin knows how to fly a B-thron
2nd of all step out of your ideal world where every pvp is clean 1v1 pvp cuz most pvp in eve is the ''6v1'' combat you just talked about and if you ever pvp you do it aswell.
btw I'd like 5% hybrid dmg 7,5% armor repairer effectiveness
erm, i know how pvp works, thanks for the advice, now i'll enlight you with a most incredible fact, you cant use "real fights" to balance ships, cause real fights as you said, are not fair. A ship being able to kill stuff or not dying in a 6vs1 fight doesnt mean it is "good" or "balanced". You have to balance things in 1vs1 with ships of the same class (taking into account the situation of course, long range ships would win at long range against a close range one), and thron loses there hands down. Most of gallente pilots know it (even the ones that still use it and get good results with hard work and l33t skillz), and the devs know it, reason why they're kicking the megathron out of the role and releasing the hyperion.
|

Sadist
SWIFTS
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 22:15:00 -
[49]
Edited by: Sadist on 31/07/2006 22:24:19 Edited by: Sadist on 31/07/2006 22:16:37
Originally by: Levin Cavil Edited by: Levin Cavil on 31/07/2006 20:20:21
Originally by: Laughlyn Vaughns Edited by: Laughlyn Vaughns on 31/07/2006 20:10:35 from lookign at the ine of things the tier 3 BS are bigger tier 1 battlecruisers with slightly changed bonii on sum of them but the other 3 races getting the Tanking bonii. i think the MWD bonus shud get scrapped and summat more usefull put in, and i aint even much of a gallente pilot but even when i am i dotn use MWD's on any ship, unelss travelling long distances.
if the mega is supposed to be the long range Railboat then give have it as a damage and range bonii, maybe +5% to both so as not to tread on the Rokh toes, reduce the mega's drone bay as its a sniper and give that to the hyperion.
that way give the Hyperion the tracking bonus or the repper bonus plus say 125m3 drone bay to turn it into a proper blaster boat. Summat that can fit 8 Neuts II's and 5 heavy drones so that it is the deadliest ship ever upclose and personal, drawback beign it takes a while to get upclose and it can be scrambled/webbed ect despite the fact it may kill u in seconds if it gets the chance
Or how about instead of changing the mgathron's basic role (the one it's had for close to 3 years) you just make the hyperion a rail ship? With Damage and rep amount and 6 mids and 8 turrets it would outdamage the Mega at range easily and have more room for trakcing mods and such. Also, it could still be fit for close range but would be better suited to medium or long range. Both ships would remain versatile but best suited for different roles.
Levin, dear, you know how much I'd love that but alas, it seems it's not meant to be. Would you like me to buy you a ticket to iceland and set the record straight with Tux?  òòòòòòòòòòòò VIP member of the [23]
Quote: - Numbers alone do not win a battle - No, but I bet they help.
|

Sadist empirealt
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 22:16:00 -
[50]
Edited by: Sadist empirealt on 31/07/2006 22:16:09 wtf stupid forum
|

Levin Cavil
Lucid Ambition
|
Posted - 2006.07.31 23:03:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Sadist Levin, dear, you know how much I'd love that but alas, it seems it's not meant to be. Would you like me to buy you a ticket to iceland and set the record straight with Tux? 
At least we still have eachother  ---------- <Kayosoni> I'm actually normal |

Mihae
|
Posted - 2006.08.01 19:45:00 -
[52]
Personally I can't wait untill I get my dirty little female hands on the Hyperion. 
|

Centurin
Sturmgrenadier Inc
|
Posted - 2006.08.01 20:01:00 -
[53]
I wouldn't get my hopes up if I were you.
|

Adamantium Beams
|
Posted - 2006.08.01 20:45:00 -
[54]
7500 capacitor, 500 sec regen, mwd and tank problems solved 
|

Levin Cavil
Lucid Ambition
|
Posted - 2006.08.01 21:18:00 -
[55]
Originally by: Adamantium Beams 7500 capacitor, 500 sec regen, mwd and tank problems solved 
How is it going to have 7500 cap? And even if it does youll still have to use like 6 slots for cap mods. ---------- <Kayosoni> I'm actually normal |
|

Tuxford

|
Posted - 2006.08.01 21:33:00 -
[56]
I wrote something about this bonus in my next blog which should come out soon, and basically I agree, the cap bonus isn't very sweet bonus and of the 4 tier 3 battleship Hyperion is probably the worst in its current form on the development server. Don't assume that we're blissfully ignorant about that though, in fact I've already changed the bonus to,... drumroll please,... mass addition reduction bonus. Was mostly a mad idea but I guess its worth a look at. Still I think when the other get a tanking bonus they will win over this one.
Anyway I'll be on and off vacation for about two weeks so if there comes fresh static on SISI don't be surprised if some of it is a bit funky  _______________ |
|

Blind Man
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.08.01 21:36:00 -
[57]
Originally by: Tuxford I wrote something about this bonus in my next blog which should come out soon, and basically I agree, the cap bonus isn't very sweet bonus and of the 4 tier 3 battleship Hyperion is probably the worst in its current form on the development server. Don't assume that we're blissfully ignorant about that though, in fact I've already changed the bonus to,... drumroll please,... mass addition reduction bonus. Was mostly a mad idea but I guess its worth a look at. Still I think when the other get a tanking bonus they will win over this one.
Anyway I'll be on and off vacation for about two weeks so if there comes fresh static on SISI don't be surprised if some of it is a bit funky 
what a joker 
WTS Estamel's Modified X-Large Shield Booster
|
|

Tuxford

|
Posted - 2006.08.01 21:41:00 -
[58]
Originally by: KilROCK
I wouldn't even be surprised if you thought about that Mass addition reduction bonus idea and thought it was good, then realised it was a horrible..
Like I said it was a silly idea, although it did go 1800m/s with one MWD which was fun for a little while. Like I also said it probably won't stay for long, except I'm on vacation and I guess nobody will change it then. All I can tell you know is that the bonus isn't sexeh enough. _______________ |
|

KilROCK
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.08.01 21:43:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Tuxford
Originally by: KilROCK
I wouldn't even be surprised if you thought about that Mass addition reduction bonus idea and thought it was good, then realised it was a horrible..
Like I said it was a silly idea, although it did go 1800m/s with one MWD which was fun for a little while. Like I also said it probably won't stay for long, except I'm on vacation and I guess nobody will change it then. All I can tell you know is that the bonus isn't sexeh enough.
Who cares if it goes 1800m/s in 2 seconds. The ship won't last against anything 'While' and 'when' it gets in optimal.
|
|

Tuxford

|
Posted - 2006.08.01 21:43:00 -
[60]
Originally by: murder one Is it me or did Tux just imply that Sisi might be getting mirrored in the next few weeks, and that the new ships might be on that new mirror?
To be honest I'll be surprised if the static has changed before I get back, but hopefully shortly after. _______________ |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |