Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 26 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
JonasML
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:20:40 -
[361] - Quote
Please provide the name of Fozzie's bos IRL, so I know who to mail to get him and his whole s**t team fired. Provide the boss' boss also, since it seems his team has little to no supervision.
Yet ANOTHER Rorqual nerf.... why did you change it to start with, you idiots? Why not just make the hulk a capital ship now and get it over with?
More importantly, and one of the most disturbing things.... why is this post not shown on the launcher? You post dev blogs there, skin sale crap, etc etc, why is this "for the good of all..." change hidden. I'm not a forum troll, I don't spend my days seeing what new stupidity you guys come up with. Not putting posts like this front and center, especially when you decide to nerf or change things (claiming it's for our own good no less) makes my paranoia crank up to 10. How about releasing to everyone the number that suggest to you that this is a good move? Our number crunchers are better than yours.
What exactly is it you are trying to change, improve, or stop? Explain it in small words, use at least 2000 of them. This will not affect large alliances significantly (or at all), we can upgrade every system lol. Forcing small alliances to fight over limited resources, that's your idea of "market stimulation"? Why don't you roll back the capital jump range and delay timer crap (also known as Fozzie's Space Aids) and let capital fleets duke it out? That would be REAL market stimulation.
If I had injected into my rorq, I'd be demanding my money back right now. |
Helena Mink
Aliastra Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:24:43 -
[362] - Quote
Good Job......again!!!
Still waiting for an update that for once is going to be in advantage of the player.
When i make mistakes on my job and customers would keep complaining about changes i make over and over again they would have fired me years ago
|
Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
642
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:26:01 -
[363] - Quote
elise densi wrote:and yet highsec incursions still untouched and riskfree Try multiboxing 30 incursion toons at once (now there's no ISbotter)
but what would I know, I'm just a salvager
|
JonasML
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:27:16 -
[364] - Quote
Blaad Booyashaka wrote:So there were two main issues with Rorquals anybody who can see beyond their "OMG MY ISK BACK-BONE" admits.
1. You could stack nearly infinite number of them in one system removing any limit of how much profit you can suck from one system/region/whole Eden. It's not the case of super ratting, sleeper sites farming, DED running or incursions, so comparing those 1:1 makes no sense.
2. They gave very good ISK/h and scaled linearly with number of accounts as you can semi-afk them. Again it's not the case of super ratting, sleeper sites farming, DED running or incursions, so comparing those 1:1 makes no sense.
CCP tries to address both problems and everybody with a clue knew it is coming sooner or later. Yeah, sucks to be you. But how about HTFU, adapt, extract the SP if you wish and move on instead of throwing tantrums on forums?
PS: I don't rat in super (and at all) but I do have 3 miner chars that are training towards Rorqual. Sucks to be me too.
No worries, back to the hulk fleets. Some people never even switched. just means more upgrades is all. Load the hulks into a rorq (or have enough in every system to not need to use gates) and you're set.
Both of those items you mentioned were problems that should have been foreseen by any reasonably competent design team. Either they didn't, in which case fire the lot of them, of they thought it wouldn't be a problem, see the previous solution. CCP knows damn well at this point that if they introduce something it will be maxed out by the players. Did they forget the lesson of jet can mining? I bet they didn't foresee the use of jump drives to move drones either, and likely there will be other novel ways people make use of the mechanics. But when it comes to repeated nerfs in under a year, CCP claiming ignorance is not an acceptable excuse. LET THE FREE MARKET BE FREE AND KEEP YOUR GODDAMNED FINGERS OFF! What part of that is so hard for them to understand? |
Logan Jakal
Blue Sun. DARKNESS.
21
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:30:40 -
[365] - Quote
-Guys ! Guys ! We lack players ! What do ?! -Alpha clones ? -Cool ! -What about the damn Trillions miners are extracting ? -Let's nerf excavators for the third time ! -Yeah but what about the multiboxing Rorquals that are going to cut their subscription ? -Oups...
Next time you guys at CCP will come crying because you are losing players, instead of supporting you, I will just point at you and laugh, because it's all you deserve with that kind of deepshit.
|
Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
643
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:33:21 -
[366] - Quote
Logan Jakal wrote:-Guys ! Guys ! We lack players ! What do ?! -Alpha clones ? -Cool ! -What about the damn Trillions miners are extracting ? -Let's nerf excavators for the third time ! -Yeah but what about the multiboxing Rorquals that are going to cut their subscription ? -Oups...
Next time you guys at CCP will come crying because you are losing players, instead of supporting you, I will just point at you and laugh, because it's all you deserve with that kind of deepshit.
It's funny that miners are arguing both that "the multiboxers are a minority, dont nerf it for the rest of us, this doesn't affect the multiboxers anyways" to "CCP is relying on multiboxing miners to keep afloat, don't nerf their gamestyle"
I mean which is it?!?!?
but what would I know, I'm just a salvager
|
Logan Jakal
Blue Sun. DARKNESS.
21
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:38:05 -
[367] - Quote
Eli Apol wrote:Logan Jakal wrote:-Guys ! Guys ! We lack players ! What do ?! -Alpha clones ? -Cool ! -What about the damn Trillions miners are extracting ? -Let's nerf excavators for the third time ! -Yeah but what about the multiboxing Rorquals that are going to cut their subscription ? -Oups...
Next time you guys at CCP will come crying because you are losing players, instead of supporting you, I will just point at you and laugh, because it's all you deserve with that kind of deepshit.
It's funny that miners are arguing both that "the multiboxers are a minority, dont nerf it for the rest of us, this doesn't affect the multiboxers anyways" to "CCP is relying on multiboxing miners to keep afloat, don't nerf their gamestyle" I mean which is it?!?!?
I'm not really a miner, I just used to get Rorquals on my two chars since it's a relax way to do ISKs when I don't want to rat, for exemple after work, but since CCP just finished training Asshat V, I'm just gonna extract them and go back to ratting. It's just fun to me to see CCP whining about the lack of players 6 month ago and now totally ruin a game mechanics because they just realized that their stupid changes were unbalanced since the start.
|
Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
643
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:39:32 -
[368] - Quote
Logan Jakal wrote:Eli Apol wrote:Logan Jakal wrote:-Guys ! Guys ! We lack players ! What do ?! -Alpha clones ? -Cool ! -What about the damn Trillions miners are extracting ? -Let's nerf excavators for the third time ! -Yeah but what about the multiboxing Rorquals that are going to cut their subscription ? -Oups...
Next time you guys at CCP will come crying because you are losing players, instead of supporting you, I will just point at you and laugh, because it's all you deserve with that kind of deepshit.
It's funny that miners are arguing both that "the multiboxers are a minority, dont nerf it for the rest of us, this doesn't affect the multiboxers anyways" to "CCP is relying on multiboxing miners to keep afloat, don't nerf their gamestyle" I mean which is it?!?!? I'm not really a miner, I just used to get Rorquals on my two chars since it's a relax way to do ISKs when I don't want to rat, for exemple after work, but since CCP just finished training Asshat V, I'm just gonna extract them and go back to ratting. It's just fun to me to see CCP whining about the lack of players 6 month ago and now totally ruin a game mechanics because they just realized that their stupid changes were unbalanced since the start. So your point was that you were going to cut your sub to hurt CCP....when in fact you're going back to carrier ratting. Way to stick it to 'em.
but what would I know, I'm just a salvager
|
FT Diomedes
The Graduates
2894
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:39:42 -
[369] - Quote
Eli Apol wrote:Logan Jakal wrote:-Guys ! Guys ! We lack players ! What do ?! -Alpha clones ? -Cool ! -What about the damn Trillions miners are extracting ? -Let's nerf excavators for the third time ! -Yeah but what about the multiboxing Rorquals that are going to cut their subscription ? -Oups...
Next time you guys at CCP will come crying because you are losing players, instead of supporting you, I will just point at you and laugh, because it's all you deserve with that kind of deepshit.
It's funny that miners are arguing both that "the multiboxers are a minority, dont nerf it for the rest of us, this doesn't affect the multiboxers anyways" to "CCP is relying on multiboxing miners to keep afloat, don't nerf their gamestyle" I mean which is it?!?!?
If they actually wanted to fix the multiboxing, they would make Excavator drones into Excavator Fighters.
CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.
|
Logan Jakal
Blue Sun. DARKNESS.
21
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:41:40 -
[370] - Quote
Eli Apol wrote:Logan Jakal wrote:Eli Apol wrote:Logan Jakal wrote:-Guys ! Guys ! We lack players ! What do ?! -Alpha clones ? -Cool ! -What about the damn Trillions miners are extracting ? -Let's nerf excavators for the third time ! -Yeah but what about the multiboxing Rorquals that are going to cut their subscription ? -Oups...
Next time you guys at CCP will come crying because you are losing players, instead of supporting you, I will just point at you and laugh, because it's all you deserve with that kind of deepshit.
It's funny that miners are arguing both that "the multiboxers are a minority, dont nerf it for the rest of us, this doesn't affect the multiboxers anyways" to "CCP is relying on multiboxing miners to keep afloat, don't nerf their gamestyle" I mean which is it?!?!? I'm not really a miner, I just used to get Rorquals on my two chars since it's a relax way to do ISKs when I don't want to rat, for exemple after work, but since CCP just finished training Asshat V, I'm just gonna extract them and go back to ratting. It's just fun to me to see CCP whining about the lack of players 6 month ago and now totally ruin a game mechanics because they just realized that their stupid changes were unbalanced since the start. So your point was that you were going to cut your sub to hurt CCP....when in fact you're going back to carrier ratting. Way to stick it to 'em.
Oh okay, you actually just didn't understand what I was talking about, well, read again and come back once your brain is fixed.
|
|
JonasML
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:41:55 -
[371] - Quote
Eli Apol wrote:Logan Jakal wrote:-Guys ! Guys ! We lack players ! What do ?! -Alpha clones ? -Cool ! -What about the damn Trillions miners are extracting ? -Let's nerf excavators for the third time ! -Yeah but what about the multiboxing Rorquals that are going to cut their subscription ? -Oups...
Next time you guys at CCP will come crying because you are losing players, instead of supporting you, I will just point at you and laugh, because it's all you deserve with that kind of deepshit.
It's funny that miners are arguing both that "the multiboxers are a minority, dont nerf it for the rest of us, this doesn't affect the multiboxers anyways" to "CCP is relying on multiboxing miners to keep afloat, don't nerf their gamestyle" I mean which is it?!?!?
They claim it's a hit to the multiboxers.... but it's not. The multiboxers will go system to system anyway. What they're actually trying to do is force small alliances to fight over space, because they'll have to expand the number of systems they have upgraded.
I wonder if you've been looking at the numbers from when Gaara lost his rorqs to a dread bomb, and hoping it can be repeated? I find it highly unusual that this comes so soon after Gaara found a system to mine in that is out of range from that PL fleet.
Everyone mail Fozzie's boss, insist that he be replaced. I'm not usually a vindictive ass, but sorry Fozzie, enough is enough. |
Naomi Shaishi
Brand Newbros Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:41:59 -
[372] - Quote
Lol, judging by all the salt over here as well as claims of unsubbing - CCP might actually reach part of their goal - increase the mineral prices a bit which for most are like all time low...
The big miners won't add more rorquals because of the new timers - good!
You decrease the yield and make it harder to strip mine with huge rorqual fleets - individual ore prices might actually go up. |
Roci Nantes
Brand Newbros Test Alliance Please Ignore
69
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:42:05 -
[373] - Quote
Blaad Booyashaka wrote:So there were two main issues with Rorquals anybody who can see beyond their "OMG MY ISK BACK-BONE" admits.
1. You could stack nearly infinite number of them in one system removing any limit of how much profit you can suck from one system/region/whole Eden. It's not the case of super ratting, sleeper sites farming, DED running or incursions, so comparing those 1:1 makes no sense.
2. They gave very good ISK/h and scaled linearly with number of accounts as you can semi-afk them. Again it's not the case of super ratting, sleeper sites farming, DED running or incursions, so comparing those 1:1 makes no sense.
CCP tries to address both problems and everybody with a clue knew it is coming sooner or later. Yeah, sucks to be you. But how about HTFU, adapt, extract the SP if you wish and move on instead of throwing tantrums on forums?
PS: I don't rat in super (and at all) but I do have 3 miner chars that are training towards Rorqual. Sucks to be me too.
Because no one cares about you or most people in this game. It is human nature to only value that which directly impacts you.
I like mining, I assume I am one of the few. I did it in highsec to pay for my incursion ships and high end mission runners. I didn't do it in null, as it wasn't as profitable, till I could rorq.. and as soon as it no longer makes me more isk than another method I'll be stopping.
This is "My Eve"... I have to do as much as possible in the short play windows I get. So when they make changes that impact that time frame, yeah it makes me sad. |
Logan Jakal
Blue Sun. DARKNESS.
21
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:43:01 -
[374] - Quote
FT Diomedes wrote:Eli Apol wrote:Logan Jakal wrote:-Guys ! Guys ! We lack players ! What do ?! -Alpha clones ? -Cool ! -What about the damn Trillions miners are extracting ? -Let's nerf excavators for the third time ! -Yeah but what about the multiboxing Rorquals that are going to cut their subscription ? -Oups...
Next time you guys at CCP will come crying because you are losing players, instead of supporting you, I will just point at you and laugh, because it's all you deserve with that kind of deepshit.
It's funny that miners are arguing both that "the multiboxers are a minority, dont nerf it for the rest of us, this doesn't affect the multiboxers anyways" to "CCP is relying on multiboxing miners to keep afloat, don't nerf their gamestyle" I mean which is it?!?!? If they actually wanted to fix the multiboxing, they would make Excavator drones into Excavator Fighters.
True that. But still, what is going to happen with people multiboxing between 6 and 20 Rorquals ? They are just going to extract and cut the subscription, that's what I would do. |
Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
643
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:43:50 -
[375] - Quote
FT Diomedes wrote:If they actually wanted to fix the multiboxing, they would make Excavator drones into Excavator Fighters. I'm not sure how much that would change unless they made all of the rocks absolutely tiny so you have to change target every <10s like you do when carrier ratting...but yeah it's obviously a nerf to mining overall and an attempt to stop people farming the same singular systems en masse rather than directed at multiboxers or soloers specifically.
but what would I know, I'm just a salvager
|
Alice Soulscourer
Grey Toxic Sword Kids With Guns Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:47:18 -
[376] - Quote
Maybe its time to change mining drons to be ... like a sentry with optimal +/- 10 km
that speed change is !@#$% just dont do it, reduce mining (if you have to) but not speeed ><'
end if rorqual will minie like a hulk .... maybe its time to do somethink with core ? |
Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
643
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:49:16 -
[377] - Quote
Logan Jakal wrote:FT Diomedes wrote:If they actually wanted to fix the multiboxing, they would make Excavator drones into Excavator Fighters. True that. But still, what is going to happen with people multiboxing between 6 and 20 Rorquals ? They are just going to extract and cut the subscription, that's what I would do. Assuming they actually sub...rather than PLEX...and if they PLEX (because they're earning 200m/hr almost afk) then someone else will use those PLEX anyways....so all I'm hearing is cheap injectors and cheaper PLEX coming?
but what would I know, I'm just a salvager
|
Logan Jakal
Blue Sun. DARKNESS.
21
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:55:40 -
[378] - Quote
Eli Apol wrote:Logan Jakal wrote:FT Diomedes wrote:If they actually wanted to fix the multiboxing, they would make Excavator drones into Excavator Fighters. True that. But still, what is going to happen with people multiboxing between 6 and 20 Rorquals ? They are just going to extract and cut the subscription, that's what I would do. Assuming they actually sub...rather than PLEX...and if they PLEX (because they're earning 200m/hr almost afk) then someone else will use those PLEX anyways....so all I'm hearing is cheap injectors and cheaper PLEX coming?
I only have two accounts and two Rorquals, I PLEX both and I will (probably) maintain my subscription since I can find other ways to make ISKs. The fact is, if I actually was boxing 10+ Rorquals, I would clearly not maintain my subscription with the current bullshit this change looks to be. I'll rather invest in a Super with approx 300 mils per hour rather than sitting at a ****** 100 mills per hour with a Rorqual. |
Dusty Meg
Echelon Research Goonswarm Federation
103
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 13:58:13 -
[379] - Quote
The fact is that this will not actually hurt the larger fleets of rorqs. So we will need to move more but ah well, that is easy enough done with jump drives. Its the new players that the rorqs boost for that will have to move more without jump drives and hope they do not get caught along the way.
The risk vs reward value on rorqs just got soo much worse hurts a lot.
Rorqs were supposed to be a mining fleet booster and have the ability to make some isk itself, yes the original numbers were crazy but its now got to a point the drones are worth sooo much more then they really should be for what they can actually mine. That or get ride of the movement lock with the core as it now just does not make sense to lock a ship down that can only just mine better then a hulk now.
Naomi Shaishi wrote:Lol, judging by all the salt over here as well as claims of unsubbing - CCP might actually reach part of their goal - increase the mineral prices a bit which for most are like all time low...
The big miners won't add more rorquals because of the new timers - good!
You decrease the yield and make it harder to strip mine with huge rorqual fleets - individual ore prices might actually go up.
You do realise that we are still well above all time lows for minerals, you obviously do not remember gun-mining and trit being sub 1 isk.
Creater of the EVE animated influence map http://www.youtube.com/user/DustMityEVE
|
FT Diomedes
The Graduates
2894
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:00:57 -
[380] - Quote
Logan Jakal wrote:FT Diomedes wrote:Eli Apol wrote:Logan Jakal wrote:-Guys ! Guys ! We lack players ! What do ?! -Alpha clones ? -Cool ! -What about the damn Trillions miners are extracting ? -Let's nerf excavators for the third time ! -Yeah but what about the multiboxing Rorquals that are going to cut their subscription ? -Oups...
Next time you guys at CCP will come crying because you are losing players, instead of supporting you, I will just point at you and laugh, because it's all you deserve with that kind of deepshit.
It's funny that miners are arguing both that "the multiboxers are a minority, dont nerf it for the rest of us, this doesn't affect the multiboxers anyways" to "CCP is relying on multiboxing miners to keep afloat, don't nerf their gamestyle" I mean which is it?!?!? If they actually wanted to fix the multiboxing, they would make Excavator drones into Excavator Fighters. True that. But still, what is going to happen with people multiboxing between 6 and 20 Rorquals ? They are just going to extract and cut the subscription, that's what I would do.
Possibly, but since this change actually does not affect them that much, I don't see that happening. This change dos not really hurt someone with the right amount of Rorquals in a system. They can run through the Enormous and Colossal all day without any real effect.
The people who are screwed are the off time zone people. Who get the joy of finishing a cherry-picked belt and then don't get the respawn.
It also screws any miner who does not have access to an entire region in which to mine, since heavy mining activity will force them into other activities.
In short, this change helps huge coalitions and multiboxers.
CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.
|
|
JonasML
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:01:31 -
[381] - Quote
Eli Apol wrote:Logan Jakal wrote:FT Diomedes wrote:If they actually wanted to fix the multiboxing, they would make Excavator drones into Excavator Fighters. True that. But still, what is going to happen with people multiboxing between 6 and 20 Rorquals ? They are just going to extract and cut the subscription, that's what I would do. Assuming they actually sub...rather than PLEX...and if they PLEX (because they're earning 200m/hr almost afk) then someone else will use those PLEX anyways....so all I'm hearing is cheap injectors and cheaper PLEX coming? PLEX is no differnet then sub. Just because a different person pays for it doesn't change it. If PLEX start to sit on the market and drop lower and lower, fewer people will buy them (lower return for their $20), either way CCP will be losing money. |
Tobias Frank
43
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:02:41 -
[382] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote: These changes will only have a significant impact on the absolute busiest nullsec mining systems. The vast majority of nullsec miners will not be negatively impacted. The pilots mining in those few extremely busy systems will have the option of staggering when they mine, or simply spreading out to a few extra systems.
If only really a few miners are affected by this, why introduce this respawn cooldown at all? Do this tiny group of people have that big economical impact? |
HORAE Deteis
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:05:37 -
[383] - Quote
BUT Fozzy We Are Greedy Buggers - Seroisly no more Hopping from Colossal to another in 5 minutes? Daarn !! |
Blaad Booyashaka
Hotline K162 The Clown Car
22
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:06:48 -
[384] - Quote
Tobias Frank wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote: These changes will only have a significant impact on the absolute busiest nullsec mining systems. The vast majority of nullsec miners will not be negatively impacted. The pilots mining in those few extremely busy systems will have the option of staggering when they mine, or simply spreading out to a few extra systems.
If only really a few miners are affected by this, why introduce this respawn cooldown at all? Do this tiny group of people have that big economical impact? Have you been to Delve recently? |
Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
645
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:08:46 -
[385] - Quote
Logan Jakal wrote:I only have two accounts and two Rorquals, I PLEX both and I will (probably) maintain my subscription since I can find other ways to make ISKs. The fact is, if I actually was boxing 10+ Rorquals, I would clearly not maintain my subscription with the current bullshit this change looks to be. I'll rather invest in a Super with approx 300 mils per hour rather than sitting at a ****** 100 mills per hour with a Rorqual.
So you're now gonna be flying 20b hulls that can't fit PANIC modules?
Also you're aware how different the APM between super ratting and rorq mining is right?
but what would I know, I'm just a salvager
|
Karreg AnTan
Capital Fusion. Circle-Of-Two
1
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:10:22 -
[386] - Quote
Don't cry, for the next Nerf CCP will trade your Rorqual for a Hulk Hull. |
Curant Thanger
Kontained Chaos Blades of Grass
2
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:12:56 -
[387] - Quote
If you're gonna keep nerfing Rorquals and Excavators, can you make them cheaper? Increase drop rates of those drone AI's, or maybe just nix excavators entirely and turn them into capital strip miners or something, cause lets be honest, no one wants to undock a ship that costs 10bn isk and makes less money than a 3bn isk ratting carrier... Sure the rorqual requires less clicking, but it requires the same level of attentiveness to your screen and intel or it's dead, so what's the difference really.
You're destroying risk vs reward outcomes for rorquals. |
JonasML
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:17:19 -
[388] - Quote
Blaad Booyashaka wrote:Tobias Frank wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote: These changes will only have a significant impact on the absolute busiest nullsec mining systems. The vast majority of nullsec miners will not be negatively impacted. The pilots mining in those few extremely busy systems will have the option of staggering when they mine, or simply spreading out to a few extra systems.
If only really a few miners are affected by this, why introduce this respawn cooldown at all? Do this tiny group of people have that big economical impact? Have you been to Delve recently?
As someone who only recently came to Goons.... yes, we metagame the f**k out of EVE. But that's not going to change. And we are far from being the only alliance doing it. Looking at the economic reports, there are several runners up. This won't actually cause Delve to make any less. |
F3d41k1n
CBC Interstellar Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:18:25 -
[389] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Hey folks. We continue to keep a close eye on the impacts of the changes to mining ships that have been made over the past six months. After this observation we have decided that we need to make another intervention to keep the economy healthy. This isn't the first of such changes, and once again it is unlikely to be the last. In the June release we are making a few targeted changes to Nullsec Asteroid Clusters (the ore anomalies created by the Ore Prospecting Array upgrade) and Excavator drones. Firstly, we are adding a respawn cooldown to all Asteroid Cluster anomalies. This cooldown scales based on the size of the anomaly: - 20 minutes for the Small Asteroid Cluster
- 1 hour for the Medium Asteroid Cluster
- 2 hours for the Large Asteroid Cluster variants
- 4 hours for the Enormous Asteroid Cluster variants
- 5 hours for the Colossal Asteroid Cluster variants
These changes will only have a significant impact on the absolute busiest nullsec mining systems. The vast majority of nullsec miners will not be negatively impacted. The pilots mining in those few extremely busy systems will have the option of staggering when they mine, or simply spreading out to a few extra systems. We are also making some more small adjustments to the Excavator drones themselves. In June the changes are: - About 9% less yield for Ore Excavators
- 12.5% lower speed for Ore Excavators
- About 11% longer cycle time for Ice Excavators
- 10% lower speed for Ice Excavators
We will continue observing the economy after these changes and making adjustments as necessary to keep it healthy for all our players.
Fozzie you already proved that you are incompetent with your concept of FOZZIE SOV. You ****** up game balance when you made frigates and destroyers stronger than cruisers. Now you trying to **** up rorquals cuz you can't see that GOOD RORQUALS gives capital fights (and a lot of fun). Stop this bullshit policy or you will have much players who will shoot amarr statue again and finally quit the game
|
Blaad Booyashaka
Hotline K162 The Clown Car
22
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 14:23:27 -
[390] - Quote
JonasML wrote:Blaad Booyashaka wrote:Tobias Frank wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote: These changes will only have a significant impact on the absolute busiest nullsec mining systems. The vast majority of nullsec miners will not be negatively impacted. The pilots mining in those few extremely busy systems will have the option of staggering when they mine, or simply spreading out to a few extra systems.
If only really a few miners are affected by this, why introduce this respawn cooldown at all? Do this tiny group of people have that big economical impact? Have you been to Delve recently? As someone who only recently came to Goons.... yes, we metagame the f**k out of EVE. But that's not going to change. And we are far from being the only alliance doing it. Looking at the economic reports, there are several runners up. This won't actually cause Delve to make any less. To be clear: I have nothing against Goons abusing the **** out of CCP mistakes. Actually I admire it. And I know you will just spread a bit more (which I consider a plus) and still mine a **** ton. I was just responding to a guy wondering why a few miners as he put it have that big economical impact. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 26 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |