Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 26 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Ramagar
Nocturnal Tumescence Fidelas Constans
2
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:20:44 -
[181] - Quote
"The vast majority of nullsec miners will not be negatively impacted."
I don't know where you learned your command of the English language or truly understated the impact here.
but what you really should have stated instead of trying to sugar coat the nerf is.
"Every nullsec miner will be negatively impacted."
What poison pill are you going to try and convince us is a candy next.
|
Zishy Linaris
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:23:15 -
[182] - Quote
Ramagar wrote:"The vast majority of nullsec miners will not be negatively impacted."
I don't know where you learned your command of the English language or truly understated the impact here.
but what you really should have stated instead of trying to sugar coat the nerf is.
"Every nullsec miner will be negatively impacted."
What poison pill are you going to try and convince us is a candy next.
..... |
Zishy Linaris
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:24:18 -
[183] - Quote
Ramagar wrote:"The vast majority of nullsec miners will not be negatively impacted."
I don't know where you learned your command of the English language or truly understated the impact here.
but what you really should have stated instead of trying to sugar coat the nerf is.
"Every nullsec miner will be negatively impacted."
What poison pill are you going to try and convince us is a candy next.
i like your post. amok is recruiting |
Inquisitor Lucious
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:24:28 -
[184] - Quote
Ramagar wrote:"The vast majority of nullsec miners will not be negatively impacted."
I don't know where you learned your command of the English language or truly understated the impact here.
but what you really should have stated instead of trying to sugar coat the nerf is.
"Every nullsec miner will be negatively impacted."
What poison pill are you going to try and convince us is a candy next.
This is a section 4. violation right here friend. |
Ktall Daganael
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:24:32 -
[185] - Quote
CCP... your problem is not the rorqual... your problem is the indecent mutiboxing. When a single RL personne can deploy almost 60 rorquals on field... that's your problem. overall, with this nerf, you'll cut about 12% yield (including speed nerf), what do you think all big-alliance-multiboxer-anom-killer rorq pilots will do ? they just gonna add some more rorq. until you nerf it to the point where sp/isk cost vs yield ratio will be so dumb we all mine in exhumer again.
you want to fix this amount of ore we goons mine every month ? find a way to limit (not prevent) multiboxing and then play with that lmit until you're happy with the ecomony and player don't want to kill you too much. |
joecuster
Adversity. Pandemic Legion
119
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:24:39 -
[186] - Quote
ISD Max Trix wrote:XveNos wrote:ISD Max Trix wrote:Post and those quoting them where removed for one or more the above reasons. You mean "Were"? Fixed it thanks.
ISD can you implement the vulnerability for this thread again the toxicity is too high! |
Big Alz
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:33:56 -
[187] - Quote
Cucked[ |
Nothing Personnel
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:34:29 -
[188] - Quote
Just how much does this cut into the profits of people who have so many multiboxed Rorquals? |
Amber Hurtini
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:38:22 -
[189] - Quote
Hello Fozzie.
I am not sure what coolaid you have been drinking but i am considering i may need to drink the other coolaid.
With the changes you are proposing are those that affect mostly the small players or mining corps that are in nullsec with only a few Rorqs and this will kill them unless they are part of some huge CCPL alliance where they are not affected by the changes.
You look to solve an issue that is not an issue where the true issue issue is with those that are multiboxing and using ISBoxer still to this date.
Imagine that these changes take place and the indy Guys demand a balance to the Ratting sites where a Sanctum is an hour and the lowest rat site is 10 minutes.
as with those changes you are proposing there is no reduction in the use of heavy water on the Rorquals. there is no buff to tank and drone bonus damage. and the T2 mining drones will eventually start out mining the Excavator drones.
I would not be surprised if there are riots and protesting in Jita, Dodixie, Amarr, and Hek.
I am willing to play as a GM and work for CCP and start randomly poking miners with the army of Rorquals and find out who is using IS boxer. CCP get your act together and start facing the real issue you keep turning a blind eye to. |
Sir Marksalot
Hole Violence Goonswarm Federation
540
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:39:24 -
[190] - Quote
you don't need isboxer to mine in a rorq lol, windows 10 is enough
Nothing Personnel wrote:Just how much does this cut into the profits of people who have so many multiboxed Rorquals?
If they have more than 3 rorquals then about 100m/rorq. Otherwise they'll just buy a super and use that until CCP nerfs anoms. |
|
Inquisitor Lucious
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:40:07 -
[191] - Quote
Sir Marksalot wrote:At least injector and plex prices should go down now.
Er, no? you know what will kill the constant price inflation on PLEX and injectors? reversing the the micro transaction changes. they split PLEX into 500 pieces > PLEX prices sky rocket they split injectors into 5 pieces > Injector and PLEX prices rocket even further |
kuldar skjiem
Salvge Corner
16
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:40:14 -
[192] - Quote
damn those goon tears,,,,no more iskie for ya!!! :)
|
Nothing Personnel
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:40:18 -
[193] - Quote
Sir Marksalot wrote:Nothing Personnel wrote:Just how much does this cut into the profits of people who have so many multiboxed Rorquals? If they have more than 3 rorquals then about 100m/rorq. Otherwise they'll just buy a super and use that until CCP nerfs anoms. Is that with or without the bottleneck caused by the collosal sites being depleted by all the rorquals? |
Sir Marksalot
Hole Violence Goonswarm Federation
540
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:41:51 -
[194] - Quote
Nothing Personnel wrote:Sir Marksalot wrote:Nothing Personnel wrote:Just how much does this cut into the profits of people who have so many multiboxed Rorquals? If they have more than 3 rorquals then about 100m/rorq. Otherwise they'll just buy a super and use that until CCP nerfs anoms. Is that with or without the bottleneck caused by the collosal sites being depleted by all the rorquals?
don't tell anyone but the joke is that everyone is going to just buy a hel :shh: |
bioreactor kendons
Absolute Massive Destruction Initiative Mercenaries
2
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:47:18 -
[195] - Quote
so i have an issue with this, it is kinda punishing to mining barge or orca pilots |
Ktall Daganael
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:48:19 -
[196] - Quote
kuldar skjiem wrote:damn those goon tears,,,,no more iskie for ya!!! :)
Not real tears for us.... 'cause for us it's not gonna be that bad. Delve is still the best place to be space rich and we have so many rorqs... but for the small guys... ouch. |
Urist Mcflyship
Zebra Corp Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:59:26 -
[197] - Quote
kuldar skjiem wrote:damn those goon tears,,,,no more iskie for ya!!! :)
You manage to play the role of a semi-literate caveman really well. Not only with your post but with your corp name. |
BigCrusher
FUITA The Bastard Cartel
3
|
Posted - 2017.06.01 23:59:54 -
[198] - Quote
I have never posted on a Dev blog but dude this is pretty dumb. The cost of what's being put out on the field justifies what it pull in. If the ship fully fit didn't cost 12b I could see the amount of ore the rorqual would pull in after the Nerf. ITS NOT THE SHIP CCP, ITS THE PEOPLE! please don't Nerf the rorqual again. It will go back into the realm of a never use ship again. |
Jim Bravura Melkan
Lusitani Invictum Tactical Narcotics Team
1
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 00:02:57 -
[199] - Quote
SaRAhi RA wrote:Sharnhorst von Deathwish wrote:Table" Guys.. guys.. guys... isk is flowing too freely into the game. How can we get people to make less money, so they need to buy more of our newly broken down mobile game style PLEX?
Fozzie "We could nerf mining income again"
Table "Nah, that won't fly. We've done that like 5 times in the last year."
Fozzie "We could nerf mining income again and after they complain, nerf ratting income - so they argue"
Table "I like it, just don't touch the 8b in 10 minute incursions - because our alts use those"
Fozzie "K, let's do it" All I am just as mad as the next person, this personally kills my income. But stop attacking devs for real...stay classy even in anger.
"Stop attacking devs for real"!!!!! You're joking right???
MY GOD, open your eyes ppl. This thing is the most ridiculous upgrade notifcation i ever see. If everything talked to this point is true, in my view, CCP only do this because some remember to cry and spank on table to say "is that and only that i want, nothing more else". I hope to be wrong but at moment, many players will see this notification, the numbers will get lower and lower ever we see, not today, but the next days and months ahead we see the efect and noone go like. |
Eerikki Toov
Casual Capsuleers
1
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 00:04:40 -
[200] - Quote
the amount of salt in this thread is glorious |
|
Cali Sazabi
Stronghelm Corporation Solyaris Chtonium
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 00:05:18 -
[201] - Quote
if Rorquals are getting nerfed again how about making siege only 1-2 min then.....even then this is bull **** my max skills rorqual is only alittle bit better then 2 max skills Hulks with inplants.... stop taking the fun from the game |
Noobshot Elongur
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 00:05:54 -
[202] - Quote
My "Force people to go into the actual mining belts and hurt the small guy miner" sense is tingling...... I just hope that at least this will kill the value of the mining drones. |
ISD Max Trix
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1889
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 00:16:04 -
[203] - Quote
3. Ranting is prohibited.
A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.
Removed a post.
ISD Max Trix
Lieutenant
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department
|
SurrenderMonkey
Space Llama Industries
3138
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 00:16:06 -
[204] - Quote
Francisco Belaqua wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Hey folks. Firstly, we are adding a respawn cooldown to all Asteroid Cluster anomalies. This cooldown scales based on the size of the anomaly: - 20 minutes for the Small Asteroid Cluster
- 1 hour for the Medium Asteroid Cluster
- 2 hours for the Large Asteroid Cluster variants
- 4 hours for the Enormous Asteroid Cluster variants
- 5 hours for the Colossal Asteroid Cluster variants
Is this cool down timer from the time the anomaly last respawned or from the time that it was finished? Because the phrasing of "only affecting the tiny percentage of busiest systems" makes it sound like it only affects those colossal's that are mined out in 5 hours. If the timer is from the time it's finished, that affects every system in Null.
Yep, this is an important point to clarify.
"Help, I'm bored with missions!"
http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/
|
alizter01
Shadow State Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 00:19:16 -
[205] - Quote
#962 - 2014-10-11 06:56:44 UTC |
dam my rorq has no resale value :( |
ISD Max Trix
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1889
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 00:21:52 -
[206] - Quote
12. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.
The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a support ticket under the Community & Forums Category.
Post removed.
ISD Max Trix
Lieutenant
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department
|
Stvndog
Hole Violence Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 00:22:44 -
[207] - Quote
WTB new impartial CCP member |
Dirk MacGirk
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
175
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 00:23:31 -
[208] - Quote
The MacGirk-Ayrania Make Depletion Great Again ORE Anomaly Act of YC 119 - Sorry, but we've been calling for this long enough that it deserves a proper name.
The idea of respawn timers for the anoms is completely sensible and adds a sense of depletion, which is sorely missing from this game in most areas of ISK and resource faucets. Anoms were never designed for a time with mining rorquals in mind and definitely needed to be changed. Not just in terms of material content, but in terms of respawn rates. You clear cut your forest and it takes some time to grow back. So stop whining and be better stewards of the land.
However, that change was in and of itself sufficient. The addition of a third nerf to excavators is overkill, and makes it harder to determine the outcome from the anomaly change. Why not see where that goes before dumping on excavators and Rorqual once again? |
Antal Marius
The Walking Deads DARKNESS.
36
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 00:24:28 -
[209] - Quote
Stvndog wrote:WTB new impartial CCP member
WTB indy CCP team-member for CCP Fozzie. |
TigerXtrm
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1934
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 00:24:52 -
[210] - Quote
Antal Marius wrote:Sir Marksalot wrote:Ktall Daganael wrote:CCP... your problem is not the rorqual... your problem is the indecent mutiboxing. When a single RL personne can deploy almost 60 rorquals on field... that's your problem. overall, with this nerf, you'll cut about 12% yield (including speed nerf), what do you think all big-alliance-multiboxer-anom-killer rorq pilots will do ? they just gonna add some more rorq. until you nerf it to the point where sp/isk cost vs yield ratio will be so dumb we all mine in exhumer again.
you want to fix this amount of ore we goons mine every month ? find a way to limit (not prevent) multiboxing and then play with that lmit until you're happy with the ecomony and player don't want to kill you too much. Except that extremely long anom respawns are just going to kill 0.0 mining entirely. You can't add another rorqual to mine an anom that isn't there. We're just going to see large fleets of rorquals moving from system to system
And thus have more risk of getting caught somehow, and thus introducing more content, thus making EVE a better place for everyone.
Meanwhile my fellow Goons are a little over represented in the crying department. Goons push game mechanics until the absolute limit until CCP sees reason. It's been this way for years, it will be for years to come. Delve has and still will be a liquid ISK printer. The amount of ore being mined since the Rorqual buff is stupid. The amount of caps being built since the Rorqual buff is stupid. Fun, yes. But stupid for the overall health of the game. There's a reason the Thukker array lost its ME bonus as well.
Going out on a limb here, but I'm going to say that CCP has a better top down view of the economy and a much clearer vision of how they think it should be working than any of us ever will. So if they say something needs a nerf to save the economy I'm inclined to believe them.
Also stop shooting the messenger. Just because Fozzie posts these things doesn't mean he's the sole person coming up with this stuff.
My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!
My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 26 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |