Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:36:00 -
[1]
I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
|

Samuel Freedom
Minmatar Ramdon Industries corporation
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:38:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Samuel Freedom on 26/05/2007 01:37:53 If its alot of ISK to you then don't AFK haul, people will you for fun in this game. 
EDIT added a coma and it made so much difference 
|

Phil Carter
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:40:00 -
[3]
Can i have you stuff aswell as all other stuff ingame from ppl who don't want to play anymore and start of a "i hate CCP" thread in the forums?
|

Mr Mirage
AWE Corporation Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:40:00 -
[4]
it's a harsh reality. I bet they had their BSs insured so they didnt lose money from it.
you live and you learn ;)
|

Leonardo Sabrioski
Caldari Leviathan Enterprises
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:41:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Leonardo Sabrioski on 26/05/2007 01:39:56 sorry for your loss m8
although.... they necessarily did not lose 100 million each...
3x bships = 3((108 million insurance - (90 something buy price) +(30 million insurance)) price) So its around 12 million loss for each bship so they only around 36 loss without mods.
Also, why were you autopiloting... this game teaches you not to use a flimsy autopilot system when carrying large amounts of valuable goods. Its no one else's fault but your own. 
Sorry but thats the truth (sorry for your loss )
Edit: Gosh darnit you guys post too fast - I was gonna be first  ----------------------------------------------
|

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:41:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Phil Carter Can i have you stuff aswell as all other stuff ingame from ppl who don't want to play anymore and start of a "i hate CCP" thread in the forums?
What stuff? there is no stuff left, because of game design some guy can lose 2% of his money and cause you to lose 99% of yours. Ya gee, wonder why only 20,000 people online still even after all these years.
|

DubanFP
Caldari Four Rings D-L
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:42:00 -
[7]
also note that after insurance that's more like 20 mil loss for each of them if it was a tier 2 BS. More like 10-15 if they were Tier 1. Obviously they decided your loot was worth taking. Next time fit a tank and WCS. ____________
DubanFP > where ever there is a player that's getting too rich, wherever there's an industrial with too much loot, wherever there is a noob with too much smack we'll be there... |

Leonardo Sabrioski
Caldari Leviathan Enterprises
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:43:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Speedy Banana I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Wait are you in Trial or are you Trial + 2 weeks?
Oh by the way I just wanted to reafirm this previous statement:
IT WAS YOUR FAULT
kthxbye ----------------------------------------------
|

Phil Carter
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:44:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Phil Carter on 26/05/2007 01:42:48
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Phil Carter Can i have you stuff aswell as all other stuff ingame from ppl who don't want to play anymore and start of a "i hate CCP" thread in the forums?
What stuff? there is no stuff left, because of game design some guy can lose 2% of his money and cause you to lose 99% of yours. Ya gee, wonder why only 20,000 people online still even after all these years.
You said that you have 4m ISK left, give them to me including the insurance rookie ship :) i want it all
|

Emsee
S.Y.N.D.R.O.M.E.
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:44:00 -
[10]
And I clicked on this thread thinking it was another developer misconduct whine 
|

LaLida Fraunt
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:45:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Leonardo Sabrioski
Originally by: Speedy Banana I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Wait are you in Trial or are you Trial + 2 weeks?
Oh by the way I just wanted to reafirm this previous statement:
IT WAS YOUR FAULT
kthxbye
/signed
|

Marquis Dean
Demise and Vestige 9th Fleet
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:51:00 -
[12]
Originally by: LaLida Fraunt
Originally by: Leonardo Sabrioski
Originally by: Speedy Banana I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Wait are you in Trial or are you Trial + 2 weeks?
Oh by the way I just wanted to reafirm this previous statement:
IT WAS YOUR FAULT
kthxbye
/signed
Also /signed.
You fried, you died, you cried, we don't care.
---
Originally by: Blacklight To be honest
|

Gojyu
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:51:00 -
[13]
No offence, but I've learnt two lessons in eve that might help in future 1) Never fly anything you can't afford to lose (that includes cargo) 2) High sec space isn't invulnerable, if you have every isk you own wrapped up in a ship, if it's undocked you need to be at your computer
|

Sorum Daemoth
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:51:00 -
[14]
actually, there are about 180,000 players not including trial accounts ( dont count those like WoW does) and not including eve china. and boo hoo to your ship sorry to say, suck it up and make back the money.
|

Haleuth
Amarr EndlessCycle
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:53:00 -
[15]
Quote: You said that you have 4m ISK left, give them to me including the insurance rookie ship :)
Talk about picking a carcass clean  Haleuth |

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:54:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Sorum Daemoth actually, there are about 180,000 players not including trial accounts ( dont count those like WoW does) and not including eve china. and boo hoo to your ship sorry to say, suck it up and make back the money.
No I think I'll just find another game to pay my monthly subscription to that is not built from the ground up on the concept of griefing people.
|

Necrosmith
Gallente Eth3real 3asy Company
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:56:00 -
[17]
Edited by: Necrosmith on 26/05/2007 02:00:52 Edited by: Necrosmith on 26/05/2007 01:55:35 Wow, that's tough. (sorry about the stupid comment, after thinking about it, I realize not everyone has tons of experience in the game).
Your mistake was in not using the right tool for the job. An industrial is not the tool to use when hauling precious cargo through high-sec.
Myself, I use a freighter or a transport ship for that.
But, but, but I don't have the skills for those ships you say? Well, there are people like me who offer freighter service for very reasonable rates.
One never need be in your situation if one takes advantage of the tools available to him or her.
Oh, I won't be paying for next month's subscription either. I'll be paying someone else with ISK to do it for me.
Best Regards,
--Necro
------------- "Isk is cheap. Life is cheaper. This week, they're having a sale on both." |

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 01:58:00 -
[18]
Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 02:02:00 Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 01:57:43
Originally by: Necrosmith Wow, you're stupid.
You don't carry $100,000 in cash around the bad part of town do you?
Ohh you wan't realistic comprisons? Ok ill give you a realistic one. I'm walking down the street with 150 million in my pocket, with police officers right beside me. Somebody shoots me, and the cops shoot him. We're both dead. Now his friend comes and picks up the 75 million that's left on my corpse, which happens to be 2 feet away from the police, but they don't do anything.
All CCP would have to do is make concord destroy anyone who touches that wreck. This would completely eliminate the stupidity of suacide ganking. But hey.. then again, this game was built from the very start to **** people off more then entertain. Hence the reason why there about as many people playing runescape as there are playing EVE.
|

Sorum Daemoth
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:01:00 -
[19]
if i were the police, i would shoot you first
|

Blind Man
Kemono.
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:01:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Sorum Daemoth actually, there are about 180,000 players not including trial accounts ( dont count those like WoW does) and not including eve china. and boo hoo to your ship sorry to say, suck it up and make back the money.
No I think I'll just find another game to pay my monthly subscription to that is not built from the ground up on the concept of griefing people.
no, the game concept is as such that stupid people die to stupid things, and people that use their brains don't (often)
|

Cammulos
Magnetar Ltd Dark Synergy
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:02:00 -
[21]
Ummmm, could we revisit the 14day trial+2weeks sub=150m?
How did you do this as a nub (excluding GTC sales, which is prob what it was otherwise)? 
|

Haleuth
Amarr EndlessCycle
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:03:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 01:57:43
Originally by: Necrosmith Wow, you're stupid.
You don't carry $100,000 in cash around the bad part of town do you?
Ohh you wan't realistic comprisons? Ok ill give you a realistic one. I'm walking down the street with 150 million in my pocket, with police officers right beside me. Somebody shoots me, and the cops shoot him. We're both dead. Now his friend comes and picks up the 75 million that's left on my corpse, which happens to be 2 feet away from the police, but they don't do anything.
Cops these days would take your 75 mill and fly into the sunset  Haleuth |

Necrosmith
Gallente Eth3real 3asy Company
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:03:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 01:57:43
Originally by: Necrosmith Wow, you're stupid.
You don't carry $100,000 in cash around the bad part of town do you?
Ohh you wan't realistic comprisons? Ok ill give you a realistic one. I'm walking down the street with 150 million in my pocket, with police officers right beside me. Somebody shoots me, and the cops shoot him. We're both dead. Now his friend comes and picks up the 75 million that's left on my corpse, which happens to be 2 feet away from the police, but they don't do anything.
Yes, that is lame. What's worse is the criminals insurance company filling their claim.
Best Regards,
--Necro
------------- "Isk is cheap. Life is cheaper. This week, they're having a sale on both." |

Donald Rumsfeld
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:04:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 02:02:00 Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 01:57:43
Originally by: Necrosmith Wow, you're stupid.
You don't carry $100,000 in cash around the bad part of town do you?
Ohh you wan't realistic comprisons? Ok ill give you a realistic one. I'm walking down the street with 150 million in my pocket, with police officers right beside me. Somebody shoots me, and the cops shoot him. We're both dead. Now his friend comes and picks up the 75 million that's left on my corpse, which happens to be 2 feet away from the police, but they don't do anything.
All CCP would have to do is make concord destroy anyone who touches that wreck. This would completely eliminate the stupidity of suacide ganking. But hey.. then again, this game was built from the very start to **** people off more then entertain. Hence the reason why there about as many people playing runescape as there are playing EVE.
I think some cheese would go nicely with the whining, but I do like the logic and reasoning with your above analogy.
|

Redpants
Gallente Dead Eagle North Star Confederation
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:05:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Speedy Banana I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
2 weeks?! Oh no! When I lay down to go to sleep tonight, I'll think of this and cry for you. I think there's games more appropriate for you on the Wii, check those out.
"My once immaculate white pants are now stained from the weak and innocent. I don't wear red." |

Stakhanov
kleptomaniacs
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:08:00 -
[26]
Phew , the OP got me worried there... sounded like it'd be due to the dev conspiracy thing. 
|

ArtemisEntreri
Art of War Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:09:00 -
[27]
I lol at the gankers needing 3 BATTLESHIPS to kill 1 hauler 
|

Cammulos
Magnetar Ltd Dark Synergy
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:11:00 -
[28]
Highsec does not guarantee the immortality of your ship, just the eventuality that anyone who attacks you in highsec will lose theirs. Its a PvP game after-all, so... don't be daft mmmk. 
|

Sorum Daemoth
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:11:00 -
[29]
if you kept playing insted of *****ing on the forums, in another month you will be making that in a day
|

Necrosmith
Gallente Eth3real 3asy Company
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:11:00 -
[30]
Actually, in this game, it's the getting, not the having.
It's easy to make money once you know how. Have the fun is figuring it out.
But you have to realize Eve is a very unforgiving place, and people like it that way. This isn't Candyland Island adventure. Nobody is going to hold your hand here, and that's why the fanbase is as rabid about the game as it is.
Best Regards,
--Necro
------------- "Isk is cheap. Life is cheaper. This week, they're having a sale on both." |

Driven
Caldari Mass Produced Venturi Starea
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:12:00 -
[31]
May I please be the 1475th player to say:
"Can I have ur stuff?"
Seriously don't quit. You'll regret it!
I remember once, I lost an ibis loaded with trit, flying AFK to 4C-B7X. Boy was I mad!
But I got over it. Now, I am gainfully employed and can cheerfully repeat "You wanna biggie-size that?" over 500 times in a row without lisping.
Part of the evil Tech 2 BPO cartel |

The Pointless
Gallente Lacks a Point Ltd
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:13:00 -
[32]
Edited by: The Pointless on 26/05/2007 02:14:02
Originally by: Cammulos Highsec does not guarantee the immortality of your ship, just the eventuality that anyone who attacks you in highsec will lose theirs. Its a PvP game after-all, so... don't be daft mmmk. 
So tell me this: when I go into low-sec, I get warned that CONCORD cannot guarantee my safety there. Kinda gives you the impression that your safety is guaranteed in high-sec, don't you think.
I think CONCORD needs to spank harder. And make insurance void when spanked by CONCORD. 
-----------------------------------------------
"And I scream in a thousand voices!" |

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:14:00 -
[33]
2007.05.26 01:20
Victim: Undercover Palmtree Alliance: W A S T E L A N D Corp: Death Grip Industries Destroyed: Iteron Mark III System: Niarja Security: 0.5
Involved parties:
Name: SamtheDog (laid the final blow) Security: 4.3 Alliance: The Cartel. Corp: Singularity. Ship: Brutix Weapon: Regulated Neutron Phase Cannon I
Destroyed items:
Mark I Modified SS Expanded Cargo (Cargo) Overdrive Injector System I Overdrive Injector System I Warp Disruptor II, Qty: 5 (Cargo) Stasis Webifier II, Qty: 7 (Cargo) Prototype Cloaking Device I, Qty: 3 (Cargo) Power Diagnostic System II, Qty: 8 (Cargo) Cap Recharger II, Qty: 2 (Cargo) Capacitor Power Relay II, Qty: 2 (Cargo) 350mm Railgun II, Qty: 2 (Cargo) Cruise Missile Launcher II, Qty: 2 (Cargo) Large Armor Repairer II, Qty: 2 (Cargo) 800mm Repeating Artillery II (Cargo) Siege Missile Launcher II, Qty: 2 (Cargo) Overdrive Injector System II, Qty: 2 (Cargo) 100MN Afterburner II (Cargo)
No see my problem is not that high sec is not secure, it's that thanks to insurance losing a battleship to concord costs almost nothing. Infact, carrying anything over 20 mil in my cargo means somebody can turn a profit from losing a 100+ mil battleship. That's great game design right there. A system that rewards people who grief other people... such a strong foundation.
|

Ixianus
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:14:00 -
[34]
Everyone always has some smart "Ohh I cry for you" response, and always without fail its ohh so entertaining.
What everyone fails to realize apparently is that each person who posts a grievance is in fact representing a percentage of eve's current, past, and future population. If one person has quit over it, then its quite easy to assume another has or will, thus adding up to a certain percentage of the overall population.
Devote a little bit of thought to your post before you copy paste the usual "lolz noob" into everything.
|

Fayn Trak
Gallente Myridian Trading Systems
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:15:00 -
[35]
Wait what, 150 million inside your first two weeks, you'r well out ahead of the curve on making isk, yet you're quitting becasue of lost isk?
Is there that much more money washing around than when I started or are you doing something outside of the box?
A herd of cattle A flock of geese A lot of isk remember when sigs were text? |

IonHammer
Minmatar Black Avatar Firmus Ixion
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:18:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Driven May I please be the 1475th player to say:
"Can I have ur stuff?"
Seriously don't quit. You'll regret it!
I remember once, I lost an ibis loaded with trit, flying AFK to 4C-B7X. Boy was I mad!
But I got over it. Now, I am gainfully employed and can cheerfully repeat "You wanna biggie-size that?" over 500 times in a row without lisping.
now driven when u leave please let me have your stuff, cause i am sure by now its quite a lot.
RE the noob you made a mistake bud get over yourself, and stop blaming people for your own dumb mistake.
If thats your real life i'm very jealous - Petwraith |

Sorum Daemoth
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:20:00 -
[37]
go play world of warcraft where you dont lose anything when you die, now thats excitement
|

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:20:00 -
[38]
The problem is you need isk to make isk. I need 100 million to make 20-30 mil profit. with 4 mil ill make 800k-1.2mil profit. Which is basically like starting all over again. And for what really? To run into another expliot down that line, where a bunch of idiots will just tell me "ohh ya you should have (somehow) known about that and not done this or that" ?
|

hellhathnofury
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:21:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Speedy Banana 2007.05.26 01:20 Destroyed items:
Mark I Modified SS Expanded Cargo (Cargo) Overdrive Injector System I Overdrive Injector System I Warp Disruptor II, Qty: 5 (Cargo) Stasis Webifier II, Qty: 7 (Cargo) Prototype Cloaking Device I, Qty: 3 (Cargo) Power Diagnostic System II, Qty: 8 (Cargo) Cap Recharger II, Qty: 2 (Cargo) Capacitor Power Relay II, Qty: 2 (Cargo) 350mm Railgun II, Qty: 2 (Cargo) Cruise Missile Launcher II, Qty: 2 (Cargo) Large Armor Repairer II, Qty: 2 (Cargo) 800mm Repeating Artillery II (Cargo) Siege Missile Launcher II, Qty: 2 (Cargo) Overdrive Injector System II, Qty: 2 (Cargo) 100MN Afterburner II (Cargo)
Well, he's quite clearly reselling T2 equipment. If he had any sense he'd realise that this is just one of those rubbish things that you only find out about when it's too late, dust himself off and get back to earning 10 times more than what most people earn at that game age. You never know...
|

Sorum Daemoth
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:21:00 -
[40]
umm, missions?
|

Barbarellas Daughter
Lonely Barbarella
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:22:00 -
[41]
Edited by: Barbarellas Daughter on 26/05/2007 02:21:59
Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 02:02:00 Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 01:57:43
Originally by: Necrosmith Wow, you're stupid.
You don't carry $100,000 in cash around the bad part of town do you?
Ohh you wan't realistic comprisons? Ok ill give you a realistic one. I'm walking down the street with 150 million in my pocket, with police officers right beside me. Somebody shoots me, and the cops shoot him. We're both dead. Now his friend comes and picks up the 75 million that's left on my corpse, which happens to be 2 feet away from the police, but they don't do anything.
All CCP would have to do is make concord destroy anyone who touches that wreck. This would completely eliminate the stupidity of suacide ganking. But hey.. then again, this game was built from the very start to **** people off more then entertain. Hence the reason why there about as many people playing runescape as there are playing EVE.
well, concord isnt the police. they wont act just for stealing, only for shooting. how else could you steal from jet cans? (almost) perfect system imo. get used to it.
edit: also listen to aurora carefully!
|

Jikx Everproud
ANZAC ALLIANCE Southern Cross Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:22:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Cammulos
I think CONCORD needs to spank harder. And make insurance void when spanked by CONCORD. 
Yes, this is the solution, but make insurance void ONLY if the target is destroyed. --- I'm doing my part too! |

Driven
Caldari Mass Produced Venturi Starea
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:30:00 -
[43]
I'm not leaving. You can't make me.
Besides, I already bought my tickets and airfare to fanfest and everything.
I wanna meet Oveur and give him a big ole kiss!!
Part of the evil Tech 2 BPO cartel |

Aramendel
Amarr Queens of the Stone Age Anarchy Empire
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:42:00 -
[44]
Originally by: Jikx Everproud Why? Simply because theere is virtually -NOTHING- you can do about triple BS suiciding on a hauler. Nothing.
You can transport not enough stuff to make it an attractive suicidiegank target. Or use a tanked deep space transport.
You might as well complain that a Rifter can do -NOTHING- against a domi.
|

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:49:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Aramendel
Originally by: Jikx Everproud Why? Simply because theere is virtually -NOTHING- you can do about triple BS suiciding on a hauler. Nothing.
You can transport not enough stuff to make it an attractive suicidiegank target. Or use a tanked deep space transport.
You might as well complain that a Rifter can do -NOTHING- against a domi.
I think we already established here that thanks to insurance, if I carry anything over 20 mil, somebody can make a profit by suacide ganking. Tanked transport or not, I highly doubt you are going to stand up to 3 battleships fitted with close range weapons. Especially since concord takes so long to arrive that you're dead before any help arives.
|

JitaCitizen 72395
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 02:53:00 -
[46]
When I have some spare ISK, I like to grief the griefers by sending along a NPC-corp alt in a frigate to escort my paper-thin hauler. They suicide-pop my hauler, I suicide-pop the can. It's great fun knowing that after waiting so long for the right target, they need to fit out new gear and eat that loss for nothing.
But when I'm transporting seriously important cargo nothing beats a Prorator with 4 WCS.
|

SULAN BARHIR
United League of Independents
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:06:00 -
[47]
I feel for you man... Eve-mail me ingame. |

Magnum III
Journey On Squad
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:08:00 -
[48]
You made 150 mil of stuff in the 1st two weeks?
That is good playing IMO.
You just need to protect your self better and you could be a great player in EVE.
It took me much longer and I play alot. And I'm not bad either.
|

Cyan Gadarin
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:17:00 -
[49]
Seriously, the only thing you can do against high sec gankers is to have another alt with another industrial right behind the first one, so you just pick up the remaining loot when the BS'es are destroyed >.< ●████▅▅▄▄▄▄▄▄▄....▄▄▄ ▄▄▅██████▅π |

Aaron
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:21:00 -
[50]
LOL, sorry dude its just the sarcastic tone in your typing thats really makin me laugh..
I find it funny that players go to the trouble of getting 3 BS just to gank a hauler and then get ganked themselves, lol.
Dude, keep doing what ur doing, and never spend lots on a hauler, use alts to check out the systems ahead of you.
Some of you are being hard on the developers, being a database programmer myself I understand that sometimes there are problems on large databases, and its not just a straight forward thing to sort out.
In my opinion this is one of the best games ever, and im happy to pay for it.
Unfortunatley there will always be a small group of people that annoy the hell out of reasonable folk like us.
|

Sgt Blade
Save Yourself Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:25:00 -
[51]
transport stuff in secure containers... putting a Pass Word on them would simply mean yes tehy ca suicide gank your ship buy they cant pick up your loot,
Hypnotic Pelvic Thrusting Level 5 |

Aramendel
Amarr Queens of the Stone Age Anarchy Empire
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:26:00 -
[52]
Edited by: Aramendel on 26/05/2007 03:29:05
Originally by: Speedy Banana I think we already established here that thanks to insurance, if I carry anything over 20 mil, somebody can make a profit by suacide ganking. Tanked transport or not, I highly doubt you are going to stand up to 3 battleships fitted with close range weapons. Especially since concord takes so long to arrive that you're dead before any help arives.
Half the stuff usually pops, so you need around twice that. Then you want also actually get some profit for this (no, people do not do that "just to grief"), so I would say 50 mil cargo worth at the very minimum.
Oh, and the tanked Impel of my alt has 7266 armor and passive resistances between 75% and 87%. Transported cargo worth more than 1 bil multiple times already into jita with it. Never was attacked, but I am prety sure it can survive 5 BS ganging on it till concord kills them.
Originally by: Sgt Blade transport stuff in secure containers... putting a Pass Word on them would simply mean yes tehy ca suicide gank your ship buy they cant pick up your loot,
Wrong.
They cannot open the cans in space, but they CAN put the whole can in their cargo (yes, even if the have a password). And they also can simply repackage them in a station (yes, when they have a password, too) which puts their contents into your staion hangar.
|

Capt Tripps
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:27:00 -
[53]
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Phil Carter Can i have you stuff aswell as all other stuff ingame from ppl who don't want to play anymore and start of a "i hate CCP" thread in the forums?
What stuff? there is no stuff left, because of game design some guy can lose 2% of his money and cause you to lose 99% of yours. Ya gee, wonder why only 20,000 people online still even after all these years.
Well because we like a game thats real like that, you can lose all your marbles if you play like a fool. |

Gee Lok
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:29:00 -
[54]
Dude if you can make 150m in your first two weeks, then you are heading for great things in this game.
|

Capt Tripps
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:29:00 -
[55]
Originally by: Sgt Blade transport stuff in secure containers... putting a Pass Word on them would simply mean yes tehy ca suicide gank your ship buy they cant pick up your loot,
Wow lets all learn how to play eve ok? lol totally false, wrong and ...can't say it here.
WRONG. Start again. |

Sentient Void
Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:39:00 -
[56]
Seriously dude, I highly recommend you not quit. You'll regret it. All the other MMO's out there are all carbon copies of eachother... EVE Online is the most unique and rewarding MMO experience you'll find, and one of the cheapest ones as well. You don't have the buy the game, or expansions... it will forever expand, just a monthly subscription and you're set. However, as I have always said, People really do want something beautiful but unforgiving... EVE is that place. I lvoe the brutality of it all.. I love how rabid everyone is... in the industries... the economics... the piracy... it's about as real as you could possibly get IMO. It's player driven like no other MMO... stick with it man.
**Oh and trust me... losing 150 million is not THAT big of a deal. Yah it sucks - but you get over it and move on, and you don't make that mistake again. Consider it a 150 million isk lesson... that's what I do. I've made some DUMB-ASS mistakes in EVE... I've probably lost... legitimately... 800 - 900 million isk worth of assets (battleships, t2 mods, an old quafe run et cetera)...
And guess what? it sucked and I was ****in ****ed as hell... but it all made me a much better player.
Just consider it an expensive mistake you'll never let happen again. Trust me, you won't regret it.
Regarding EVE Online... People really do seem to want something beautiful but unforgiving.
|

HuHu Waverider
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:39:00 -
[57]
Wait a minute! Wasteland. Weren't you the guys who set up a pos in Querious to gank people comming into the system down the a2 pipe? Then mouth offed to the owners of said region? Then lost you POS? So your corporation was ganking people at an entrance to 0.0, and you have the balls to come here and complain about getting ganked in empire? Puhlease.
surfs up.
HuHu |

Ben Booley
Mutually Assured Distraction
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:46:00 -
[58]
So where are you getting these "3 battleships" from. I see that you were killed, according to the killmail you posted, by a single battlecruiser. Even just a couple shield extenders is plenty to protect you from a BC long enough for concord to get there.
|

WhitePhantom
Gallente Edenists
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:46:00 -
[59]
Edited by: WhitePhantom on 26/05/2007 03:48:44
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
How is it the fault of CCP that you didn't know about the risk of flying around on AP?
Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 02:08:34
Originally by: Cammulos Ummmm, could we revisit the 14day trial+2weeks sub=150m?
How did you do this as a nub (excluding GTC sales, which is prob what it was otherwise)? 
It's called mathematics and common sense. Being suacide ganked does not imply that I'm stupid, especially since I didn't even know stuff like that happens. Maybe if something like that was mentioned in the new player guide it would have helped. Sorry, I was kind of under the impression that SECURE space, was actually secure.
Would have been nice if getting killed by concord because you are an ahole would invalidate your insurance, but hey, I guess trying to eliminate exploits and griefing that makes people unsubscribe is not on CCP's priority list.
You could have ask other players...
|

Profhet
Murder of Crows E N I G M A
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:49:00 -
[60]
Originally by: Mr Mirage it's a harsh reality. I bet they had their BSs insured so they didnt lose money from it.
you live and you learn ;)
I think thats the key part, which needs to be changed, which people have been asking for constantly since, what forever? ____________________________
FEED ON THE DYING |

Summer River
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:51:00 -
[61]
Originally by: Speedy Banana
It's called mathematics and common sense.
The problem with common sense is that sense never ain't common - Lazarus Long
Thankyou for admiably demonstrating that for us.
Quote:
Being suacide ganked does not imply that I'm stupid, especially since I didn't even know stuff like that happens.
No, that does not indicate you are stupid. Assuming that any area of space is safe and flying an indy using the autopilot indicate you are stupid.
Haven't you noticed those peeps flying round with that funny orange background in the overview? That means they have bad little peeps and have a negative security rating. You cannot get a negative security by killing NPC which means?...... yes, they gank people. Maybe in empire, maybe not.
Quote:
Maybe if something like that was mentioned in the new player guide it would have helped. Sorry, I was kind of under the impression that SECURE space, was actually secure.
CONCORD does it's best. and I believe the "security" ranking relates to 1, the number of station and sentry guns, the rats one may encounter and location of said rats and 3 whether concord actually comes at all.
It has no relationship at all as to what players will attempt to do.
Quote:
Would have been nice if getting killed by concord because you are an ahole would invalidate your insurance, but hey, I guess trying to eliminate exploits and griefing that makes people unsubscribe is not on CCP's priority list.
What exploit? You flew a indy filled with all your worldly posessions using autopilot. They suicide ganked you. If you had actually been playing the game correct by using the "Warp to 0" you would not have lost or your shiny little doodads and thingamebobs.
Did you not read the forums when you firsdt signed up? First thing I did and I saw straight away that high security does not mean no-one will attack you.
Oh, and by the way, don't let the doorknob hit you in the ass on the way out the door.
|

SiJira
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 03:51:00 -
[62]
please dont quit we need guys like you   ____ __ ________ _sig below_ the jet cans are made so that people that dont mine can get free ore
miners ritually donate the ore to anyone wishing to take some |

Dufas
Amarr Dark-Rising Fallen Souls
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 04:40:00 -
[63]
Edited by: Dufas on 26/05/2007 04:40:05 Getting hit in hi sec is a fact of life..it happened to me twice carrying 3 bill in capital bp's...same guy same system ... and as long as ccp says its part of the game cause he lost his ship to concord and his buddy picked up the free billions in loot it will continue..u just have to fly smart..dont quit just learn from your mistakes and how the game is played...soon as i fiqure it out i'll let u know 
|

Korizan
Oort Cloud Industries
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 04:48:00 -
[64]
Edited by: Korizan on 26/05/2007 04:47:42
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
4 Weeks of play and 150 Mil + a hauling ship you did good. Hauler are the most paper shelled thing out there even in high sec. I am not sure why they bothered with 3 BS's I think that was even overkill.
As other have said. No AFK hauling. Don't run during peak hours. Don't pack you hauler full of goods. And if you want to continue to just haul goods get out of the T1 haulers and get a T2 hauler they are much harder to take down.
Don't give up though, as this will not be the last ship you lose. And gankers don't always make a profit some of them do it just because they are bored. THat is the unfortunite side of a PVP game.
|

Roue
Rush Industries
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 04:53:00 -
[65]
Every time I've left an alliance or large group in EVE I've pretty much started over with noob ships and 5mil ISK or less. Only one exception.
Better luck next time
|

Letheeth Kayl
Amarr Chosen Path FATAL Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 05:07:00 -
[66]
Edited by: Letheeth Kayl on 26/05/2007 05:08:36 2 weeks ago I lost my rl job, I lost my other RL job, then I lost my armageddon (the insurance thingy lapsed on it the day before), then I lost my apocalypse. In a boneheaded move, I tried to move through a known gate camp with a flimsly frigate with about 50mil worth of crap in it. AND my corp and allaince moved while I was distracted, leaving me stranded . . . All in all I'd say I lost about 300milion and 75% of my personal fleet's firepower. I think my week was worse than yours. :-P I rebuilt my armageddon, borrowed the money to buy a new apocalypse, and scrapped the bottom of my loot barrel to buy a pilgrim. I got a new job as a clerk at Savemart, and I'm picking up this crazy gig as a door to door sales person {begin shameless plug} (buy Cutco (tm) knives, they is awesome){/end shameless plug} You get over it or you don't, happens in real life, and it happens in game. Are you sure you're not one of those whiney people who always ask 'why does this always happen to me?'
Just remember, "No matter how stupendous, or fantastic your failures or success, there are approximately 1 billion people in India that really don't give a {insert 4 letter word beginning with F and ending with UK plus a C}!" Those are good words to live by. :-D
Edit: I'm more afraid of secure space than I am of low sec or null sec. (1) concord doesn't like me, and (2) my guards always down as I have a tendancy to fly around in an interceptor or shuttle
Put down the mirror and return to live With pain With sin With despair Live with penance in God's glory Lesson of Tobias and the Mirror Scriptures Verses26-29 |

Buyerr
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 05:14:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Phil Carter Can i have you stuff aswell as all other stuff ingame from ppl who don't want to play anymore and start of a "i hate CCP" thread in the forums?
well i will give you a free kick in the head with metal boots for such a freaking PIIIP PIPPIP comment, YOUR A WASTED OF AIR GO LAY DOWN AND DON'T BREATH!
|

CrestoftheStars
Perkone
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 05:15:00 -
[68]
hmm well it's stupid because it IS an exsploit that people use, so i really don't see why it is a problem to ban all parties that was helping with this?!
long life the intellect of ccp ;D ___________________________________________ Humans take everything that is beautiful and sweet and turn it into something horrifying and ugly.
|

Dal Thrax
Caldari Multiverse Corporation The Core Collective
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 05:16:00 -
[69]
Originally by: Cammulos Highsec does not guarantee the immortality of your ship, just the eventuality that anyone who attacks you in highsec will lose theirs. Its a PvP game after-all, so... don't be daft mmmk. 
I think the OP pointed out that the possibility of suicide ganking wasn't mentioned in the intro guide. So how's the op to know? Unless he reads the forum's he dosn't. I've played games in the past where the guards magically appeared at your location and 1 hit the aggressor BEFORE the first hit on the character was prossessed. It says it's safe. If the OP got ganked in 1.0 there's no reason he shouldn't have though that it was.
Dal
Do not mention "releasing the magic smoke" in relation to the TQ hardware. Trust me on this... |

Shakuul
Caldari The Imperial Commonwealth The Sundering
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 05:42:00 -
[70]
Things like this should be added to the new player experience. As soon as you purchase a hauler, CCP could have a warning window pop up explaining the dangers of hauling in high sec.
|

Mr Friendly
That it Should Come to This
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 05:55:00 -
[71]
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
wait... you made 150 mill in 2 weeks, and you're going to quit the game because you 'lost it all'?  I don't know how long it took me to make my first 100 mill, but it sure wasn't in only a couple of weeks. Not very patient, are you?
bye bye
Originally by: Ductoris
In any case I fully support the need for large diameter projectiles for Rodent disposal. Those little buggers are crafty.
|

Nickhastapee
Maelstrom Crew
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 05:58:00 -
[72]
wait wait, you have been playing two weeks and accumulated 150 mil....I have been playing more than a year and dont really have that much, sounds like you got something going for you.
|

papamikeforthewin
Amarr
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 06:13:00 -
[73]
Originally by: Letheeth Kayl Edited by: Letheeth Kayl on 26/05/2007 05:08:36 2 weeks ago I lost my rl job, I lost my other RL job, then I lost my armageddon (the insurance thingy lapsed on it the day before), then I lost my apocalypse. In a boneheaded move, I tried to move through a known gate camp with a flimsly frigate with about 50mil worth of crap in it. AND my corp and allaince moved while I was distracted, leaving me stranded . . . All in all I'd say I lost about 300milion and 75% of my personal fleet's firepower. I think my week was worse than yours. :-P I rebuilt my armageddon, borrowed the money to buy a new apocalypse, and scrapped the bottom of my loot barrel to buy a pilgrim. I got a new job as a clerk at Savemart, and I'm picking up this crazy gig as a door to door sales person {begin shameless plug} (buy Cutco (tm) knives, they is awesome){/end shameless plug} You get over it or you don't, happens in real life, and it happens in game. Are you sure you're not one of those whiney people who always ask 'why does this always happen to me?'
Just remember, "No matter how stupendous, or fantastic your failures or success, there are approximately 1 billion people in India that really don't give a {insert 4 letter word beginning with F and ending with UK plus a C}!" Those are good words to live by. :-D
Edit: I'm more afraid of secure space than I am of low sec or null sec. (1) concord doesn't like me, and (2) my guards always down as I have a tendancy to fly around in an interceptor or shuttle
I can top it, tho I will loose all epeen in doing so  Apart from RL gig of course.
Last week I wandered into empire for the first time in about 3mths to do some cosmos missions. I lost the following...
1 T2 fitted, rigged Drake when I popped a can that wasnt mine (the dude gave me some free mission loot he didnt need- stupidly I popped the can out of habit)- CONCORDED!
1 T2 fitted, rigged Raven caught up on environment and couldnt warp out on a L4 mission
1 T2 fitted, rigged Drake to a low sec gatecamp within 15min of loosing above raven.
1 T2 fitted, rigged Raven when I decided Id had enough of empire- so I left for home in sweet 0.0. Again, jump into another gang that was in warp when my scout went through.
1 T2 fitted Helios w/cloak that I lost to lag while trying to load a gate grid- was in my clone vat before it loaded.
2 sets of +4 implants as well
All told well over 700mil in the last week alone. Its been a rough week lol.
|

Horus Isis
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 06:40:00 -
[74]
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Sorum Daemoth actually, there are about 180,000 players not including trial accounts ( dont count those like WoW does) and not including eve china. and boo hoo to your ship sorry to say, suck it up and make back the money.
No I think I'll just find another game to pay my monthly subscription to that is not built from the ground up on the concept of griefing people.
go play WOW, you wont be missed
|

Sergeant Spot
Black Eclipse Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 06:47:00 -
[75]
In response to the opening post:
Eve is a HARSH game. While it might seem strange at first, it is Eves harshness that sets it appart and makes it, in a strange way, attractive.
Once you learn the ropes of the game, you can move high value stuff through some very hostile space. I've moved some extreme cargos (in value, in size, and even both value and size) through some VERY hostile space.
But as stated, when moving high value stuff, use the right ship, and dont be afk. Evn in empire 0.5+, use warp to 0km for every warp, even for 50 jump trips.
My specialty in this game is getting in and out of dangerous space without dying, even if I am moving cargo. I have lost ships doing it, but rarely (and I've NEVER lost a ship when carrying a contracted cargo)
It can be done, but you need to have a solid understanding of the threats you face, your own strengths and weaknesses, and above all, patience (unless you have a huge escort that can kill everything).
But to succeed in Eve, you need to be able to die for STUPID reasons, and still get back up and continue working on the challenge you are facing (which includes the self honesty to know when to back off and try latter when you have more skill, or more friends, etc....)
The reason I stress the need to be able to face "stupid" death with a smile is that much of the death in this game, even for hardened veterans, can be called stupid death. Assaulting an enemy through a gate, and dying before your screen loads happens. Some whine that it is a serious and stupid flaw that they die before their screen even loads (and they are right, but they are still whining). Others get a new ship and continue the fight.
|

Ares Lightfeather
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 07:00:00 -
[76]
Edited by: Ares Lightfeather on 26/05/2007 07:00:28
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Ya gee, wonder why only 20,000 people online still even after all these years.
Because they would have a lot mroe subscribers if only they dropped the griefer community, and created real consensual pvp. Other games of this quality have proven it. However, they do want to be a niche game, and it's basically one of the rare good space MMOG around. Therefore non-griefer people live with it waiting for another game to go out, or play another game. The forum is filled with stories about guys that got expelled from other MMORPG because they didn't understand the tolerance for griefing in eve is exceptionnally high.
PS : I don't care about mass people though, I've have no problem playing a niche game, and actually enjoy the risks in eve.
|

Soulja
Caldari Magnetar Ltd Dark Synergy
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 07:07:00 -
[77]
I am starting to question the mentality of people that just shout, 'don't AFK haul', 'use an alt to X' ...etc.. The problem with high sec suicide ganking is that its just plain wrong.
Does anyone else see a similarity here.
Those that... In eve: Hauler warps to a hi sec gate at 15km.. Hauler is scanned, popped by n of combat ship y, Hauler points out the injustice and the whole forum shouts abuse at the Hauler.
must also be the ones that in real life follow the 'she deserved it' or the 'she was asking for it' for it mentality in stories of r/ape where the woman was wearing revealing clothes or were to drunk to resist.
So there are two morals: Just because you can Doesn't mean you should!! When someone posts a 'OMG i been ganked thread' please don't reply in such r/etarded manner. (see any number of the 'its your fault' threads for examples of r/etarded responses)
Thanks for your time.
|

Iron McFly
CHAF tech
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 07:20:00 -
[78]
9 Month char with no agent work ? How can a guy be in this game 9 months think AFK anything is safe ? Could have had Mercs gank himself just for attention and pity.
Looks like a sad story for a hand-out. Anybody else get that feeling ?
If Not: Post's above correct - If you want another 'Resurect for Free' game - go.
|

Scouteye
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 07:21:00 -
[79]
Some where on the hints and tips page , in the main player guide on eve-o it says quite clearly that "EVE Online is not an AFK game"
being ganked in high sec is a REAL pain, i hate it, but yet, if i chose too, i could do excatly that to someone else as well.
you got ganked, cool, go buy a BS and go gank someone else for even more ISK.
you'll either feel better and justified for your moraly corupt actions or you'll feel all dirty but at the same time happy cos you now have even more ISK than you lost in the first place.
thats the beauty of eve, no matter what someone does to you, you can, if you chose, do the same or worse back to them or someone else
dont quit, have fun, make isk, go kill, go trade, go rip someone one off in a confidence scam, anything
just dont fly afk 
|

Plutoinum
German Cyberdome Corp
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 07:21:00 -
[80]
Edited by: Plutoinum on 26/05/2007 07:21:38 The newbie-with-too-many-isk effect, it makes mistakes quite expensive. In the other hand, he knows how to make isk, so he's able to earn back the 100mil faster, than some other newbies, who are still in mission grinding or mining. Just because someone got rich faster than usual and became a prey for a suicider by that, before he was ready, doesn't mean that the game is broken.
Remove the insurance payouts, if you get killed by concord and give newbies their warning message or tutorial lesson that high-sec isn't 100% safe and be done with it.
|

Kazuo Ishiguro
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 07:27:00 -
[81]
Edited by: Kazuo Ishiguro on 26/05/2007 07:26:38
Originally by: WhitePhantom How is it the fault of CCP that you didn't know about the risk of flying around on AP?
I can sympathise with the OP. I think the tutorial does mention 'don't fly what you can't afford to lose' at least once, but a clarification along these lines would be very helpful to many new players:
'This rule applies even in high security space. By insuring their ships, other players can make a profit from a suicide attack on you, even when the total value of their ships & equipment is three times the value of your cargo.'
------ Spreadsheets: Top speed calculation - Halo Implant tanking |

Jim McGregor
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 07:41:00 -
[82]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/05/2007 07:44:46
Originally by: Ben Booley So where are you getting these "3 battleships" from. I see that you were killed, according to the killmail you posted, by a single battlecruiser. Even just a couple shield extenders is plenty to protect you from a BC long enough for concord to get there.
QFT.
Involved parties:
Quote: Name: SamtheDog (laid the final blow) Security: 4.3 Alliance: The Cartel. Corp: Singularity. Ship: Brutix Weapon: Regulated Neutron Phase Cannon I
Brutix with tech 1 guns did it. His loss was probably only a few millions. Pretty good profit.
To the OP: You didnt know this could happen, now you know. Eve is difficult. So you either are careful and prepare to get attacked as soon as you leave the station, or you go play some other game where the game protects you from harm.
By the way...want to get some money back? Do the same thing to someone else.  --- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune |

Brigitte
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 08:00:00 -
[83]
i wish more people would quit it may improve the lag
|

Cypherous
Minmatar Liberty Rogues
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 08:06:00 -
[84]
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Sorum Daemoth actually, there are about 180,000 players not including trial accounts ( dont count those like WoW does) and not including eve china. and boo hoo to your ship sorry to say, suck it up and make back the money.
No I think I'll just find another game to pay my monthly subscription to that is not built from the ground up on the concept of griefing people.
Guess you'll be going to WoW then, enjoy your meaningless WoW existence where you can run around safe in your epic gear that everyone has killing goblins like there is no tomorrow, when you want to play a real MMO you know where to find us :) ---------
|

Laboratus
Gallente BGG League of Abnormal Gentlemen
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 08:07:00 -
[85]
Eggs one Basket
bad idea.
Anyways, your really valuable assets are your skills and standings. They make it possible to make isk fast. I suggest instead you join a corp that has 0.0 access. You can make the isk you lost back in a week in 0.0 by ratting or doing 0.0 missions.
___ P.S. Post with your main. Mind control and tin hats |

warpod
Amarr Pact Of Honour United Legion
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 08:14:00 -
[86]
It was totally your fault. Never haul afk valuable cargo, because you cannot be safe anywhere.
|

Miki Fin
Gallente Independant Union of Rangers
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 08:15:00 -
[87]
Sounds like ebayed account to be honest. Speedy Banana = 8 months old but claims to be playing two weeks? Pilot in kill mail = same age.
Either ebayed account or flamebait so yes please quit.
kthxbai
|

Ilirra
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 08:18:00 -
[88]
Welcome to Eve.
|

Stealthiest
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 08:27:00 -
[89]
Get into an interceptor, Put 4 local hulls in lows and then go afk. At 800-900 m/s second your on the gate before they scanyou and decidde your worth killing and then lock you.
:)
btw put your **** in a can, they may risk it for a can but they usually don't. In high sec at least.
|

fire 59
Destructive Influence Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 08:33:00 -
[90]
Serves you right mate. Sorry but if you just afk with all your goods in a t1 hauler, you deserve to die.
And fyi, no apace is totally safe, this isn't wow with safe zones and all that crap, you can die anytime and anywhere, although they get blown up in empire
BoB vs the coalition of family values |

Sergeant Spot
Black Eclipse Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 08:33:00 -
[91]
Originally by: Stealthiest Get into an interceptor, Put 4 local hulls in lows and then go afk. At 800-900 m/s second your on the gate before they scanyou and decidde your worth killing and then lock you.
:)
btw put your **** in a can, they may risk it for a can but they usually don't. In high sec at least.
I did several tests using cans and escrow wrap a few months ago.
Cargo Scanners WILL still see the cargo.
|

justcheckingthemarket
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 08:34:00 -
[92]
congratulations Speedy Banana, you are granted the "whine of the day award"!
keep up the good work and make me laugh!
|

Saraen
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 08:35:00 -
[93]
Originally by: warpod It was totally your fault. Never haul afk valuable cargo, because you cannot be safe anywhere.
As a fairly new player, I suprised how so many respondents to the opening post replying in such a childish manner - surely they belong playing WoW not a more mature game like Eve.
There are some excellent replies to the post but people how are just maligning the guy for saying how he feels and explaining what happened, grow up and get a life. Act like adults and as though you were face to face with them; don't hide behind your computer monitor and take like a kid.
|

Malcanis
High4Life Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 08:40:00 -
[94]
"I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space"
You're leaving Eve because you're too lazy to look after your stuff and too arrogant to believe that "Don't fly what you can't afford to lose" applies to you as well. Check.
"Warning"? You did the training, right?
You know you could learn from this lesson, make another pile of ISK (150M in 2 weeks as a start character? Impressive! I thought me getting to 40M was pretty good) and become a better player.
Or you could quit.
|

Malcanis
High4Life Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 08:45:00 -
[95]
Originally by: Speedy Banana The problem is you need isk to make isk. I need 100 million to make 20-30 mil profit. with 4 mil ill make 800k-1.2mil profit. Which is basically like starting all over again. And for what really? To run into another expliot down that line, where a bunch of idiots will just tell me "ohh ya you should have (somehow) known about that and not done this or that" ?
Not true. You need a kestrel and a few thousand bloodclaws. 350k will do it. That's enough to get you into a Caracal in a day or two (you have 4M left right?), which is enough to get you in to a Drake in a few more days, which is enough to get you running level 3 missions or 4/10 plexes.
|

Glassback
M. Corp M. PIRE
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 08:45:00 -
[96]
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
This is exactly the reason I KEEP paying each month.
G.
If Eve was just a game, it would have a pause button.
|

Fswd
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 09:24:00 -
[97]
1) You suck 2) Afk hauling is bad, mkay 3) You suck 4) Dont buy isk with RL money 5) You suck
--- So I flame and troll when the occasion calls for it. So what are you gonna do about it? |

CaosSpinner
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 09:46:00 -
[98]
Sigh... I can remember when I first stared playing, there was no Autopilot.
Autopilot was added to the game for the exact reasion to allow moving and hauling from point a to point b AFK becuase traveling was such a mind numbing experince.
The a few of the BOD err make that Prats complained and the Pratwelfare program was created thus removing resposibility for ones actions. Thus all the lamers were drawn to EVE like moths to a flame but they were not burned but rewarded. (most seem to have posted here)
The problem is not that you can be attacked in highsec, the problem is that the gankers can make a profit by breaking the laws of the game. You get a sec hit for breaking any law in EVE, if you bothered to read the EULA then you would see that by haveing a partner grab the loot after a suacide gank you are circumventing the the rules and laws of the game IE: exploiting the game mechanics and that is the real problem.
But what the OP fails to relize is that he expects players to be held accountable for their actions (as the rules dictate) and for fair play as well as non-expoitation of the game mechanics.,,, he expects this from CCP
Right..... 
|

Ralara
Caldari Exanimo Inc Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 09:54:00 -
[99]
Originally by: Speedy Banana 150 mil isk hauler auto pilot ganked
That is your problem.
Real men CORPSE-TANK. |

Adaris
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 10:05:00 -
[100]
Edited by: Adaris on 26/05/2007 10:04:55
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked
THERE IS NO SECURE SPACE in this game. High sec is NOT SECURE. Sorry for your loss, but don't be a rotton banana and quit, it happens to loads of people and they have the willpower to work up their wealth again and make sure it never happens to them again.
Its how you learn in this game. Please Help me, YOU could be next!
|

Anna Grahm
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 10:09:00 -
[101]
Originally by: Leonardo Sabrioski
Originally by: Speedy Banana I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Wait are you in Trial or are you Trial + 2 weeks?
Oh by the way I just wanted to reafirm this previous statement:
IT WAS YOUR FAULT
kthxbye
You should like the kind of tool that would blame a *****victim whilst absolving the rapist of any wrongdoing. I am NOT an alt! |

Snake Jankins
Minmatar Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 10:09:00 -
[102]
Edited by: Snake Jankins on 26/05/2007 10:09:02
Originally by: CaosSpinner if you bothered to read the EULA then you would see that by haveing a partner grab the loot after a suacide gank you are circumventing the the rules and laws of the game IE: exploiting the game mechanics and that is the real problem.
But what the OP fails to relize is that he expects players to be held accountable for their actions (as the rules dictate) and for fair play as well as non-expoitation of the game mechanics.,,, he expects this from CCP
Right..... 
Concord don't care about theft. They don't come to protect the stuff in your cargohold. They come to punish the guy, who is aggressing in high-sec and try to prevent your ship from being destroyed. So it can't be an exploit to get a mate to pick up the loot.
E.g. ore in your can is seen as your property, otherwise can-flagging wouldn't exist. So if someone else takes ore out of it, it's theft. Concord doesn't intervene, ergo they don't care about theft.  ___________ 'Only ships can be assembled, this is a Frigate.' |

ToranagaSama
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 10:31:00 -
[103]
Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 02:02:00 Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 01:57:43
Originally by: Necrosmith Wow, you're stupid.
You don't carry $100,000 in cash around the bad part of town do you?
Ohh you wan't realistic comprisons? Ok ill give you a realistic one. I'm walking down the street with 150 million in my pocket, with police officers right beside me. Somebody shoots me, and the cops shoot him. We're both dead. Now his friend comes and picks up the 75 million that's left on my corpse, which happens to be 2 feet away from the police, but they don't do anything.
All CCP would have to do is make concord destroy anyone who touches that wreck. This would completely eliminate the stupidity of suacide ganking. But hey.. then again, this game was built from the very start to **** people off more then entertain. Hence the reason why there about as many people playing runescape as there are playing EVE.
First, as a relative newb myself (and only a partial Eve fan), I fully sympathize with and feel your pain.
Yet, before you leave the game, let's acknowledge a few things:
1) This game isn't perfect, and unfortunately, a LOT of people (Devs included!!) appear to like it that way. It's unfortunate, but so is life.
2) You are a newb. Does this sort of thing happen to more experienced players? If not why not?
3) With your new and painful knowledge and experience, a) would you do the same thing precisely the same way? b) What could I have done differently?
4) I dunno know, 2 weeks and you made 150 million plus!??? I've been playing more than 2 months and only have 100 mil in the bank----though I've probably spent 3 times that much! But, then, I'm not a Miner!
BTW, I took 4 mill and made it into 100 mil in about a month. My point is yeah, maybe you're starting over, but this time you're starting with FOUR MILLION!!! Things should go a LOT faster! Try to look at the upside.
5) Admit your own failures. Yes, *griefing* exists in this game. Nothing to be done, except learn to deal---that is make yourself LESS of a target for griefers.
If you can do this, then you must admit:
a) Putting ALL your money into one ship run was the SECOND WORSE thing to do playing Eve; and
b) The FIRST WORST thing was using *Auto-pilot* with everything at risk.
d) Less than two weeks worth of forum reading would have taught me the cardinal rule of Eve:
DON'T fly what you can't afford to lose; and, probably the second cardinal rule (maybe third or fourth!):
Don't use Auto-pilot!
BTW, you're analogy isn't realistic, because what you did was to run down the street carrying 150 million---buck naked! screaming ROB ME, ROB ME! Sh*t, in my town, NYC, the Police would have robbed you!!! :)))
From, one noob to another noob, suck it up and keep playing....
[Is Speedy Banana you're real in-game name? If you decide to stay in the game, maybe a little charity might be arranged. I'll pledge 500k and a module or two--what do you need? Anyone else?]
Oh, and look up the corp, Eve University, they help newbs like yourself learn the game. Probably get a bit more sympathy there.
Luck!
|

Haks'he Lirky
8th
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 10:35:00 -
[104]
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
so you lost 2 weeks worth of work and your whining?
|

Leeluvv
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 11:04:00 -
[105]
I don't know or care whether the OP was ebayed or what, but some of the responses are worrying.
A quick message to the 'hard core' players in the game. A game lives or dies by the number of subscribers. Hard core players are the minority, so it is the casual noobs that provide most of the money that keeps the game alive.
I am not asking for carebear world, but if you insist on making the game an elitist, hard-core venture, then it will slowly die. You need to welcome novices and help them grow and understand the game, but make them aware of where the dangers are and how to avoid them or face them.
Lee == Sig to follow |

Damares
Flying While Intoxicated The Threshold
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 11:12:00 -
[106]
your fault....
afk haul through high sec with valuable cargo, prepare to die.... dont whine at the game for something you asked for....
|

Kassandra Tillman
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 11:16:00 -
[107]
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
I would make the obligitory can I have your stuff post but it seems somebody already has your stuff
|

Achaiah
Black Bag Ops
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 11:18:00 -
[108]
It sucks to be ganked and lose most of what you have, it happened to me way back when I got my first BC. However, **** happens in Eve. That your losses can be painful is a big part of what Eve is about. Nothing is really safe. That is one of the main reasons why I play this game.
You don't seem to be that kind of guy that will learn to appreciate this aspect of the game. My advice is that you leave for another game because it is quite likely that you will be ganked in the future as well if you stay. Eve isn't for everyone to like.
|

APT BANK
Amarr Alpha Production Technologies Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 11:31:00 -
[109]
Originally by: Fayn Trak Wait what, 150 million inside your first two weeks, you'r well out ahead of the curve on making isk, yet you're quitting becasue of lost isk?
Is there that much more money washing around than when I started or are you doing something outside of the box?
I have to agree with this statement, Even after 3 years of playing i would be hard pressed to make that kind of isk, although i dont farm. However, if you can make that much after 2 weeks, then stay and be a billionaire in a month ^_^
|

Soto ShinDo
Gallente Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 11:43:00 -
[110]
Originally by: Soulja must also be the ones that in real life follow the 'she deserved it' or the 'she was asking for it' for it mentality in stories of r/ape where the woman was wearing revealing clothes or were to drunk to resist.
.
[off topic] And I'm starting to question the mentality of people bringing up such id....c comparisons. If a woman is too drunk to resist it cannot be more far away from r/ape. You insult every woman with a bit of brains as that would mean they cannot decide for themselves - how much they drink and whom they spend the night with or if at all. If I would've cried 'r/ape' on all the mornings I woke up beneath somebody I could hardly imagine the name of because of too much beer and vodka the night before ..... Just one more question - you think it's also r/ape if a man is too drunk to resist? [/off topic]
|

Krigg
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 11:45:00 -
[111]
Edited by: Krigg on 26/05/2007 11:45:58
Originally by: Speedy Banana ...this game was built from the very start to **** people off more then entertain. Hence the reason why there about as many people playing runescape as there are playing EVE.
No, its built to weed out the weak minded, the over sensitive, and the whiners. Unfortunatley the whiners don't go quietly... they whine first.
Eve isn't another clone of every other MMORPG out there. Its uniquie in the fact that its a bloody tough game to succeed in at times. Its merciless on the stupid, punishes the brain-dead, and weeds out the unworthy.
If you want a cuddly fluffy game that wraps you up in cotton wool, where loss is meaningless, where there are no consequences, and where there are "safe" places to play without ever having to worry about what the other guy is up to, then Eve Online is not for you my friend. 
|

pipvac
Sacred Templars DeStInY.
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 11:47:00 -
[112]
Originally by: Sergeant Spot In response to the opening post:
Eve is a HARSH game. While it might seem strange at first, it is Eves harshness that sets it appart and makes it, in a strange way, attractive.
Once you learn the ropes of the game, you can move high value stuff through some very hostile space. I've moved some extreme cargos (in value, in size, and even both value and size) through some VERY hostile space.
But as stated, when moving high value stuff, use the right ship, and dont be afk. Evn in empire 0.5+, use warp to 0km for every warp, even for 50 jump trips.
My specialty in this game is getting in and out of dangerous space without dying, even if I am moving cargo. I have lost ships doing it, but rarely (and I've NEVER lost a ship when carrying a contracted cargo)
It can be done, but you need to have a solid understanding of the threats you face, your own strengths and weaknesses, and above all, patience (unless you have a huge escort that can kill everything).
But to succeed in Eve, you need to be able to die for STUPID reasons, and still get back up and continue working on the challenge you are facing (which includes the self honesty to know when to back off and try latter when you have more skill, or more friends, etc....)
The reason I stress the need to be able to face "stupid" death with a smile is that much of the death in this game, even for hardened veterans, can be called stupid death. Assaulting an enemy through a gate, and dying before your screen loads happens. Some whine that it is a serious and stupid flaw that they die before their screen even loads (and they are right, but they are still whining). Others get a new ship and continue the fight.
Given how much I loathe BoB, I have to say, that is probably the single most constructive reply I've read today. I need a shower...and I shall be playing the music to 'Crying Game'. 
|

Eyphix
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 12:14:00 -
[113]
I'm 8 days into my trial. Things I know:
1. If you need to transport expensive stuff, don't if you can't afford to lose it. If you must then do it in several trips. 2. Never use auto-pilot. Set waypoints and manually do jump-to-zero from gate to gate. Sure you can't just afk and end up at your destination but you will get there and it will be 3+ times faster depending on the size of your ship. 3. In any MMO if you die and come crying to a forum trying to find attention you fail in epic fashion. If you want to make a serious suggestion about the behavior of NPC ships in EVE then do that, don't cry about a valid play style to the community.
|

Ponderous Thunderstroke
Republic War Machine Industries
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 12:17:00 -
[114]
So sorry for your loss, Speedy. May I suggest Hello Kitty World Online as a suitable alternative after you quit?
|

Happster
Polaris Project
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 12:20:00 -
[115]
Edited by: Happster on 26/05/2007 12:28:35 Actually OP has a point. High sec has become a joke.
If he autopilot or not doesnt really matter. He can just as easilly be ganked in his hauler if he sits by his computer. If the will to kill is in place, theres nothing anyone can do to stop it.
As an industrialist you have to start somewhere to start gaining isk. You haul stuff from a to b to gain isk. To keep gaining more isk, you have to put your wallet in the cargo to keep increasing your income. It takes a while to get a Freighter. And even a Freighter isnt safe to be killed if ppl want it dead.
In my eyes EVE has become a lot harder to new industrialists that want to make a living that way.
Edit: When all your work the last months get lost because of something you cant even prevent- It do get kind of silly to pay for such a game. Where is the fun? I sure dont see it. Industrial in high sec for new ppl really has become a joke... It's almost as CCP wants all to go to 0.0 and shoot eachother. If everyone did, the economy would break down :\ I need some ppl to haul stuff for me 
|

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 16:19:00 -
[116]
Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 16:26:16
Originally by: Miki Fin Sounds like ebayed account to be honest. Speedy Banana = 8 months old but claims to be playing two weeks? Pilot in kill mail = same age.
Either ebayed account or flamebait so yes please quit.
kthxbai
I played the trial 8 months ago and quit when my corp went out to 0.0 and got destroyed and I was left with no ships and no money, so I quit. I came back 2 weeks ago and subscribed. This is not my main character, Undercover Palmtree is, read the kill mail that I posted..
This is why the char has been in a noob corp for 7 and a half months.
|

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 16:41:00 -
[117]
Ohh and as an update. Thanks to the generosity of some of the people on this forum and my corp, I was able to raise 80 million isk last night. This morning all my stuff has sold and I have 120 million. By tomorrow I should be able to do the same thing and get to 160-170 million. Few days after that I should have more then enough to pay everybody back.
Now I'm flying in a Myrmidon with 5 shield expanders and a 1600mm plate. AFK / Autopilot or not, nobody is getting through 15,000 shields and 10,000 armor before concord gets them. Thanks for all the positive comments that made me reconsider leaving and try to rebuild my losses. In the end it's nice to know that not everyone out there in this sh*tstorm is ahole.To the negative people... well I don't read those posts anyways... those are the people that belong in world of warcraft, because those are the kind of kids that game is known for attracting.
|

Marquis Dean
Demise and Vestige 9th Fleet
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 16:44:00 -
[118]
Edited by: Marquis Dean on 26/05/2007 16:43:02
Originally by: Speedy Banana Now I'm flying in a Myrmidon with 5 shield expanders and a 1600mm plate.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

edited cause my mirth broke the forums. ---
Originally by: Blacklight To be honest
|

Neothas
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 16:52:00 -
[119]
Originally by: Speedy Banana Now I'm flying in a Myrmidon with 5 shield expanders and a 1600mm plate. AFK / Autopilot or not, nobody is getting through 15,000 shields and 10,000 armor before concord gets them.
I believe the freighter crowd thought the same thing 
This game is all about risk / reward.
|

Sergeant Spot
Black Eclipse Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 16:58:00 -
[120]
Originally by: Speedy Banana Ohh and as an update. Thanks to the generosity of some of the people on this forum and my corp, I was able to raise 80 million isk last night. This morning all my stuff has sold and I have 120 million. By tomorrow I should be able to do the same thing and get to 160-170 million. Few days after that I should have more then enough to pay everybody back.
Now I'm flying in a Myrmidon with 5 shield expanders and a 1600mm plate. AFK / Autopilot or not, nobody is getting through 15,000 shields and 10,000 armor before concord gets them. Thanks for all the positive comments that made me reconsider leaving and try to rebuild my losses. In the end it's nice to know that not everyone out there in this sh*tstorm is ahole.To the negative people... well I don't read those posts anyways... those are the people that belong in world of warcraft, because those are the kind of kids that game is known for attracting.
Um, actually, that can still be killed before concord gets them. Much bigger and badder stuff has been killed in 0.5+ before concord can kill attackers.
However
The extra armor and shields means that attackers will need more firepower to make the kill before dying, thus meaning they lose more ships to concord and have a higher expense. A higher expense means that killing your ships "might" not be worth it (depends how much value you are carrying).
For the record, I've long supported making 0.5+ safer. However, I'm rabidly against making things safer in 0.4 and below. Best idea I've heard to date is that there should be no insurance pay out if you die to Concord in 0.5+. Removing the insurance in such situations would amke suicide ganks MUCH more expensive for an attacker (thus meaning the required "break even" cargo value would be much higher), but would still leave the decision to attack in the hands of players. Others disagree.
|

r2dtwo
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 16:58:00 -
[121]
Originally by: Speedy Banana To the negative people... well I don't read those posts anyways... those are the people that belong in world of warcraft, because those are the kind of kids that game is known for attracting.
The only person who belongs to WOW is you.. from the moment you started this thread you sounded like the perfect cast member of WOW. This game is for hardcore players, if you aren't used to it then you shouldn't play it. play something easier..... like WOW? If you want to avoid future lost from traveling, spend the time manual warp 0km, no matter how much shield or armor you got never use Auto pilot flying near 0.0-.5 even higher sec.
|

Ninjja
Minmatar Mortis Angelus
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 17:03:00 -
[122]
Edited by: Ninjja on 26/05/2007 17:02:37
Originally by: Necrosmith
What's worse is the criminals insurance company filling their claim.
Thats an interesting point. A small fix to the insurance issue for low standing pirates might be a workable tradeoff to risk v rewards on hi-sec ganking.
And yes, i AM in a pirate corp. yarrr
To the OP: Sorry about your loss. And im sorry about the harsh responses you are getting. Truth is EVE is harsh, you werent very smart, and this isnt a game for crybabies (despite how the forums portray EVE).
Good luck with whatever game you choose.
|

Jarna
Amarr Eve University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 17:27:00 -
[123]
Edited by: Jarna on 26/05/2007 17:31:01 unpost
|

Valan
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 17:31:00 -
[124]
First off the negative posters aren't best suited to WoW because I agree with them. I'm coming upto my 4th Birthday and have never touched WoW.
You've spat the dummy out of the pram because for some reason you've ignored all the advice on this website from CCP and players.
You've already quit once because you didn't get things your own way in 0.0.
Now you've begged isk off these people which isn't really allowed on the forums and all of a sudden you're not leaving. Wasted isk as far as I'm concerned you're only going to quit again at some point.
What happens when your war decced or lose your ship again? More begging? In my view you're the worst kind of player there is and people like you are dragging this fine game into the gutter with you.
You don't have the minerals to post with your main. Which is because you were afraid of repercussions. Why when you were leaving? You had no intention of leaving, you came on here for a whine and hand outs. You made out to be a 2 week old player and it turns out you've played once already.
One final thing it says in the FAQ and player guide that empire isn't safe so by your own logic your're stupid.
/start sig I love old characters that post 'I've beeen playing the game three years' when I know their account has been sold on. /end sig |

Raane Thyandar
Amarr PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 17:46:00 -
[125]
Next time use GSCs in your cargo. Then when they scan they won't know what's in there. Plus you get more cargo space as you are just carrying modules.
|

Barbarellas Daughter
Lonely Barbarella
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 18:28:00 -
[126]
Originally by: Raane Thyandar Next time use GSCs in your cargo. Then when they scan they won't know what's in there. Plus you get more cargo space as you are just carrying modules.
wrong. they will know. you can jet the sec conts and they wont get your cargo though.
Originally by: Valan First off the negative posters aren't best suited to WoW because I agree with them. I'm coming upto my 4th Birthday and have never touched WoW.
You've spat the dummy out of the pram because for some reason you've ignored all the advice on this website from CCP and players.
You've already quit once because you didn't get things your own way in 0.0.
Now you've begged isk off these people which isn't really allowed on the forums and all of a sudden you're not leaving. Wasted isk as far as I'm concerned you're only going to quit again at some point.
What happens when your war decced or lose your ship again? More begging? In my view you're the worst kind of player there is and people like you are dragging this fine game into the gutter with you.
You don't have the minerals to post with your main. Which is because you were afraid of repercussions. Why when you were leaving? You had no intention of leaving, you came on here for a whine and hand outs. You made out to be a 2 week old player and it turns out you've played once already.
One final thing it says in the FAQ and player guide that empire isn't safe so by your own logic your're stupid.
This man speaks the truth! Expect the worst and you will stay. If my alliance gets expelled from 0.0 and all my assets there are lost i still will continue, stay with the alliance, try to recapture the lost space or relocate, using my ships stored in empire.
Expect to get killed and lose your stuff again. With this thread you have some new pirates hunting you, trying to suicide gank you just for fun.
Fly safe and have fun as long as you stay!
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 18:30:00 -
[127]
They key difference here is that the guy wasnt hauling much, and this is actually the key to my arguement about empire suicide ganking, at some point people will start doing it just because they have alot of money they are bored and they want to ruin someone elses time (aka grief people). what happens when they start popping navy issue BS decked out for mission running.....because they are bored and dont mine losing 10 million for an insured BS if they are costing some other player 1 billion......
|

Heisenburg Principle
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 18:33:00 -
[128]
I've een playing since early 2004, i never really have anything over 10m isk, doesn't bother me.
This exactly why i'm happy you were killed, whineing carebears should quit eve.
Go away and don't come back.
I'd ask for your stuff but i don't want anyhting with tears and snot on it.
|

Jim McGregor
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 18:46:00 -
[129]
Originally by: Speedy Banana Now I'm flying in a Myrmidon with 5 shield expanders and a 1600mm plate.
      --- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune |

Mediocrity
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 19:05:00 -
[130]
Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 02:08:34
Originally by: Cammulos Ummmm, could we revisit the 14day trial+2weeks sub=150m?
How did you do this as a nub (excluding GTC sales, which is prob what it was otherwise)? 
It's called mathematics and common sense. Being suacide ganked does not imply that I'm stupid, especially since I didn't even know stuff like that happens. Maybe if something like that was mentioned in the new player guide it would have helped. Sorry, I was kind of under the impression that SECURE space, was actually secure.
Would have been nice if getting killed by concord because you are an ahole would invalidate your insurance, but hey, I guess trying to eliminate exploits and griefing that makes people unsubscribe is not on CCP's priority list.
Fine, then quit. There are enough crybabies in this game as it is.
The bottom line is that you did not one, but two stupid things and got burned for it, and now you're trying to dodge the blame.
First, if you could manage to make that much money in that short a time as a new character, it is certainly within your powers to make sure that you understand what the hazards are in the game, even in high-sec space.
Second, if you feel the need to transport all of your worldly possessions, it might be reasonable (a) not to transport them all at once and thus allow any possibility of losing everything you have and (b) to make each shipment in the most secure ship possible, depending on your route.
Evidently your "common sense" didn't tell you that.
The appeal of EvE for many of us is that every action we take here has potential consequences, which encourages us to weigh risks versus benefits and generally think about everything we do. I can guarantee you that even worse things will likely happen to you if you stick around here long enough, so if this is all it took to make you throw a tantrum on the forums, perhaps EvE just isn't the game for you.
|

GreenSurf
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 19:33:00 -
[131]
I must say I'm surprised to hear the tone in this thread - I totally agree with Speedy that there's a problem here. I believe that secure space should be secure - if it isn't a whole dimension of EVE is lost. Most of the people reading this thread may not appreciate the carebear profession, but it has it place in the game. I see this incident as a threat to that profession. I would suggest that the price you pay for ship insurance is increased for every time you are killed - thats how it works in real life (this could be altered in a way so that the price is most affected by concord kills)
GreenSurf
|

Roy Batty68
Caldari Immortal Dead
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 19:46:00 -
[132]
Wow. This is a totally new and unexplored topic! This hasn't happened a million times before. And Eve hasn't gotten more popular over time even in spite of this. There must be a problem!!! </sarcasm>

Eve is about risk management. You put all your eggs in one basket. That wouldn't be good risk management. 1) Learn from mistake 2) Whine on forums and quit What is your choice?> _
------------------- Say What? |

Leonardo Sabrioski
Caldari Leviathan Enterprises
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 19:48:00 -
[133]
Originally by: GreenSurf I must say I'm surprised to hear the tone in this thread - I totally agree with Speedy that there's a problem here. I believe that secure space should be secure - if it isn't a whole dimension of EVE is lost. Most of the people reading this thread may not appreciate the carebear profession, but it has it place in the game. I see this incident as a threat to that profession. I would suggest that the price you pay for ship insurance is increased for every time you are killed - thats how it works in real life (this could be altered in a way so that the price is most affected by concord kills)
GreenSurf
Raising the bar of insurance isn't going to do anything. There will be griefers & pirates out there to take advantage of any profitable scenario.
Speaking as an industrialist, I do not wish to see this imposed. Pirates/pvpers/griefers are necessary in eve inorder to regulate the massive inflation of isk. Think about it - without pirates/griefers/pvpers destroying ships and that occaisional carebear your isk will be worth close to nothing. Also this is NOT a threat to the profession. For every person killed being a carebear one more person is allowed the opportunity that, that person had before.
----------------------------------------------
|

The Pointless
Gallente Lacks a Point Ltd
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 19:52:00 -
[134]
Do what I do, OP. Make an alt, train an Industial ship skill to about L3 or L4, buy hauler at those levels, along with some cans. Relabel the cans to something like "Minerals" or "T2 BPOs", and head into the offending system. Don't forget to insure either. 
If you're 'lucky', you may get a laugh out of it. 
-----------------------------------------------
"And I scream in a thousand voices!" |

Gibbal Slogspit
Buffed Rumpuss Zit Dids
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 19:59:00 -
[135]
Empire ganking as it were, is for noobs.
From the sounds of it, this guy has been playing the game for at least 3 hours a day for the past 2 weeks for that 150M, just to lose it to a bunch of noob griefers trying to make easy isk, knowing they wont lose much.
If you ask me, speedy is more hardcore than that ghey who blew him up.
|

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 21:09:00 -
[136]
Originally by: Heisenburg Principle I've een playing since early 2004, i never really have anything over 10m isk, doesn't bother me.
This exactly why i'm happy you were killed, whineing carebears should quit eve.
Go away and don't come back.
I'd ask for your stuff but i don't want anyhting with tears and snot on it.
ya that's right im carebear.. I guess thats why I managed to get a 800,000 bounty on my head in 2 weeks when my clone only costs 30k.
|

Marquis Dean
Demise and Vestige 9th Fleet
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 21:15:00 -
[137]
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Heisenburg Principle I've een playing since early 2004, i never really have anything over 10m isk, doesn't bother me.
This exactly why i'm happy you were killed, whineing carebears should quit eve.
Go away and don't come back.
I'd ask for your stuff but i don't want anyhting with tears and snot on it.
ya that's right im carebear.. I guess thats why I managed to get a 800,000 bounty on my head in 2 weeks when my clone only costs 30k.
So in two weeks you went pirating, irritated so many people that you got a moderate bounty, and made 130mil?
You're just another eBaying waste of bandwidth who didn't appreciate two things:
1/ Eve is a more serious and mature game that is alot more demanding and unforgiving of it's players than most other games out there. You tried to beat the system, the system balanced itself.
2/ Us vetern forumers can see right through you. Your story doesn't add up, which means somewhere you're lying. You're all kinds of busted little boy.
---
Originally by: Blacklight To be honest
|

Malcanis
High4Life Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 21:18:00 -
[138]
Originally by: Speedy Banana Ohh and as an update. Thanks to the generosity of some of the people on this forum and my corp, I was able to raise 80 million isk last night. This morning all my stuff has sold and I have 120 million. By tomorrow I should be able to do the same thing and get to 160-170 million. Few days after that I should have more then enough to pay everybody back.
Now I'm flying in a Myrmidon with 5 shield expanders and a 1600mm plate. AFK / Autopilot or not, nobody is getting through 15,000 shields and 10,000 armor before concord gets them. Thanks for all the positive comments that made me reconsider leaving and try to rebuild my losses. In the end it's nice to know that not everyone out there in this sh*tstorm is ahole.To the negative people... well I don't read those posts anyways... those are the people that belong in world of warcraft, because those are the kind of kids that game is known for attracting.
Oh. My. God. I'd comment further, but you're clearly not here for advice.
Well, please do keep us posted.
TIA.
|

Hajyt
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 21:22:00 -
[139]
Not to be a jerk, but dont blame the game for your stupidity.
Don't fly, use, or carry **** you can't afford to lose.
Its very basic common sense.
|

Malcanis
High4Life Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 21:23:00 -
[140]
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Heisenburg Principle I've een playing since early 2004, i never really have anything over 10m isk, doesn't bother me.
This exactly why i'm happy you were killed, whineing carebears should quit eve.
Go away and don't come back.
I'd ask for your stuff but i don't want anyhting with tears and snot on it.
ya that's right im carebear.. I guess thats why I managed to get a 800,000 bounty on my head in 2 weeks when my clone only costs 30k.
So you ****ed off other players enough to get a bounty on your head, then complained when you in turn were ganked..?
Well, I suppose at least you're consistent.
|

Roy Batty68
Caldari Immortal Dead
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 21:25:00 -
[141]
Originally by: Gibbal Slogspit Empire ganking as it were, is for noobs.
From the sounds of it, this guy has been playing the game for at least 3 hours a day for the past 2 weeks for that 150M, just to lose it to a bunch of noob griefers trying to make easy isk, knowing they wont lose much.
If you ask me, speedy is more hardcore than that ghey who blew him up.
I don't care if he's Muhammed Ali "I'm Hard" Bruce Lee. He's still whining about empire ganking after he made a bad decision.
How this warrants 5 pages is beyond me.
------------------- Say What? |

Majestik
Gallente Freelancing Corp Confederation of Independent Corporations
|
Posted - 2007.05.26 21:55:00 -
[142]
When he comes back whining just link this thread.
|

FuzzBuzz
Caldari Templars of Space CORE.
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 00:56:00 -
[143]
somethings are ****** in eve, and this is one of them, not suicide ganking but noobs not knowing how the game is played, the tutorial should say, read the forum like its the guide since the rule havent been written by ccp.
also why the **** doesnt concord insta pop ships in highsec, ive wondered this for a while now, what does having the flagged ship staying alive for how ever long it takes to pop it? its jammed, it cant do ****, it will die, so just insta pop them so the drones dont work, pretty simple :)
|

Frug
Zenithal Harvest
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 01:04:00 -
[144]
The only thing wrong here is that people who can't handle the game whine about it.
You got PWNED. Stop crying.
No, concord should not instapop anybody. You should stop being a careless, whiny fool or find a better game. The OP admits he didn't know stuff like this happens. Who's fault is that? 'nuff said.
- - - - - - - - - Do not use dotted lines - - - - - - - If you think I'm awesome, say BOOO BOOO!! - Ductoris Neat look what I found - Kreul Hey, my marbles |

Mr Friendly
That it Should Come to This
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 01:06:00 -
[145]
Originally by: Soulja I am starting to question the mentality of people that just shout, 'don't AFK haul', 'use an alt to X' ...etc.. The problem with high sec suicide ganking is that its just plain wrong.
Does anyone else see a similarity here.
Those that... In eve: Hauler warps to a hi sec gate at 15km.. Hauler is scanned, popped by n of combat ship y, Hauler points out the injustice and the whole forum shouts abuse at the Hauler.
must also be the ones that in real life follow the 'she deserved it' or the 'she was asking for it' for it mentality in stories of r/ape where the woman was wearing revealing clothes or were to drunk to resist.
So there are two morals: Just because you can Doesn't mean you should!! When someone posts a 'OMG i been ganked thread' please don't reply in such r/etarded manner. (see any number of the 'its your fault' threads for examples of r/etarded responses)
even *comparing* *****to losing a ship in an internet spaceship game is ********, dude. Grow up. Thanks for your time.
Originally by: Dark Shikari Edited by: Dark Shikari on 09/02/2007 23:20:58 But come on, at least give the devs a chance to fire t20. 
Hmm, still waiting. |

Felysta Sandorn
Caldari Murder of Crows E N I G M A
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 01:10:00 -
[146]
150mil in your first 2 weeks?
I've been playing for years now, and I make about 100mil a month, and lose about 300mil in ships a month...
I'm glad you got suicide ganked, you sound like you deserved it. To be honest the risk versus reward system in this game is screwed up beyond belief. If you can make 150mil in your first 2 weeks of playing with no risk, just for being some carebear reseller, whereas I risk my ship every day in PvP and get a fraction of that even after years... Something's up there...
If I ever see your character, I'll try to gank you, suicide or not. If you want to whine about how messed up this game is, go play Runescape since you seem to like it so much!
I get bugger all cash, and I may complain a lot, but ask anyone in my alliance, I love to complain for no reason. You on the other hand need a swift backhand back to Jita.
Latest Video, Click Here!
|

Mr Friendly
That it Should Come to This
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 01:12:00 -
[147]
Originally by: Soulja I am starting to question the mentality of people that just shout, 'don't AFK haul', 'use an alt to X' ...etc.. The problem with high sec suicide ganking is that its just plain wrong.
Does anyone else see a similarity here.
Those that... In eve: Hauler warps to a hi sec gate at 15km.. Hauler is scanned, popped by n of combat ship y, Hauler points out the injustice and the whole forum shouts abuse at the Hauler.
must also be the ones that in real life follow the 'she deserved it' or the 'she was asking for it' for it mentality in stories of r/ape where the woman was wearing revealing clothes or were to drunk to resist.
So there are two morals: Just because you can Doesn't mean you should!! When someone posts a 'OMG i been ganked thread' please don't reply in such r/etarded manner. (see any number of the 'its your fault' threads for examples of r/etarded responses)
Your first error was even *comparing* *****to losing a ship in an internet spaceship game, dude. Grow up. Thanks for your time.
The reason people laugh at stupid people for putting all their stuff into one basket is... it's vulnerable.
Suicide ganks are a different problem, logically speaking.
Use the tools available, don't haul afk, wtz, arrive safe (most likely). If you still get ganked, well, I understand the frustration, and maybe we need to see if their are not enough tools for the smart player to avoid being blown up in high-sec, regardless of intelligent effort being applied to ensure safety.
However, don't EVER compare *****or murder or prison-raping to Eve again, mkay?
Originally by: Dark Shikari Edited by: Dark Shikari on 09/02/2007 23:20:58 But come on, at least give the devs a chance to fire t20. 
Hmm, still waiting. |

Cor'len
Inquest
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 01:29:00 -
[148]
I'd ask if I could have your stuff... but you already lost all your stuff to being n00bish. Tsk, tsk. Now you've ruined my day too. -Cor There'd be a graphical sig here if I wasn't so lazy. |

Felysta Sandorn
Caldari Murder of Crows E N I G M A
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 01:41:00 -
[149]
Originally by: Soulja I am starting to question the mentality of people that just shout, 'don't AFK haul', 'use an alt to X' ...etc.. The problem with high sec suicide ganking is that its just plain wrong.
Does anyone else see a similarity here.
Those that... In eve: Hauler warps to a hi sec gate at 15km.. Hauler is scanned, popped by n of combat ship y, Hauler points out the injustice and the whole forum shouts abuse at the Hauler.
must also be the ones that in real life follow the 'she deserved it' or the 'she was asking for it' for it mentality in stories of r/ape where the woman was wearing revealing clothes or were to drunk to resist.
So there are two morals: Just because you can Doesn't mean you should!! When someone posts a 'OMG i been ganked thread' please don't reply in such r/etarded manner. (see any number of the 'its your fault' threads for examples of r/etarded responses)
Thanks for your time.
If I point out that this person is calling me a rapist on account of my opinion, will this thread then get locked?
IBTL
Latest Video, Click Here!
|

Sergeant Spot
Black Eclipse Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 02:24:00 -
[150]
In reply to the original post:
One other thing about Eve (something I dont like about it), is that not only do many newbies take a hard beating learning the game (normal and not really a problem), but many players verbally abuse the newbs if they show even the slightest weakness.
I dont approve of the abuse heaped on many newbs at the drop of hat. I "DO" approve of telling newbs that Eve is harsh game and that in most cases they have only themselves to blame for those early loses, but that can be done with a touch of diplomacy.
For example, in RL, I really dont give a damn if I hurt folk's feelings when I point out cold truth, but I (usually) try not to be an jerk. A number of Eve players go out of their way to be a jerk when pointing out cold truth in such cases.
|

Knerf
Celestial Apocalypse Insurgency
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 03:52:00 -
[151]
i just read 6 pages of CRAP, i cant believe how this community has gone to total **** after it started as such a good group, all these people saying "your an idiot, the gankers rox" art tools in the worst way. man how i miss the days of eve-i and how the forums werent full of such a complete morons. i know everybody is entitled to their own opinion and all that but there is such a thing as deicency and understanding, maybe even helping the guy out...
yes the OP made a mistake, the forums are filled with people saying the EXACT thing almost every few hours, then the same people calling them idiots and telling them to go packing, as i see it there is a problem in the game, high sec ganking needs a change, as it is there is no penalty as there should be for dying, somebody needs to come up with a system to change soon.
that and the community needs to mature a little, this game will never be what it should be with this kind of blatent stupidity running wild, its like all the people doing it have some sort of chip on their shoulder and take it out on people on the internet as they probably lack the gall to do it in real life...
there are several things that need changing soon or the game will be full of mentally unstable IRC kiddies flaming one another all day and all the quality players will be gone looking for a place where people arent complete *******s constantly.
my "2 isk"
|

Anaalys Fluuterby
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 04:19:00 -
[152]
Originally by: Knerf i just read 6 pages of CRAP,
//--------stuff---
my "2 isk"
Agreed.
It isn't like new players are going to learn anything if they get assaulted and abused when they don't understand the mechanics of the game. The attitude and crap that happens on these forums, not to mention in game, has escalated dramatically since I started 8 months ago. I wish CCP ran their forums and game more like Bioware does, the community would actually BE a community...
And no I'm not quiting and you can't have my stuff  <-----------> Factional Warfare:
The LowSec wars which never happened. |

Sergeant Spot
Black Eclipse Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 05:04:00 -
[153]
lol, nice to see that some other folks also dont like to see newbs flamed so harshly. There might be hope>
To all those that flame newbs to Eve that have just had their first lesson in how brutal the game can be, it IS possible to point out reality to them with some tact. You can even be firm without being a jerk.
|

Sadist
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 05:06:00 -
[154]
Originally by: Emsee And I clicked on this thread thinking it was another developer misconduct whine 
If the game allows me to grief people like the OP, developers can misconduct all they want tbh.  òòòòòòòòòòòò
VIP member of the [23]
Quote: - Numbers alone do not win a battle - No, but I bet they help.
|

Mogrin
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 05:20:00 -
[155]
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
People will talk big like 99.9% of the flamers in this thread, but all the dozens of people that get fed up with this game for one reason or another add up.
CCP employees won't care about anything you say though. They'll feel the collective decisions of thousands of dissatisfied customers though. So you win by going and doing what you enjoy, and CCP loses in the end. _______________ Rokh vs. Hyperion |

Evelgrivion
Coreli Corporation Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 05:27:00 -
[156]
Originally by: Mogrin
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
People will talk big like 99.9% of the flamers in this thread, but all the dozens of people that get fed up with this game for one reason or another add up.
CCP employees won't care about anything you say though. They'll feel the collective decisions of thousands of dissatisfied customers though. So you win by going and doing what you enjoy, and CCP loses in the end.
Thousands of dissatisfied customers? Those who are struck to the point of wanting to quit the game forever because the game was too intense for them is the experience that CCP Wanted to create when they invented this game. The CCP Developers are gamers too, they are out to have fun. The drama and realism that comes from making a suicidal stint that you hope will pay off, much like in real life but with the added bonus of it involving internet spaceships, helps make EVE what it is.
Unless CCP loses their minds, they wont water down the experience further because its too intense for you. Go play a gentler game if you can't take it. Eve is for the hardcore.
This isn't the signature you're looking for. |

Mogrin
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 05:41:00 -
[157]
words words words
That doesn't change the reality of it. _______________ Rokh vs. Hyperion |

Mattduk
Gallente Universal Army
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 07:35:00 -
[158]
Originally by: Leonardo Sabrioski Edited by: Leonardo Sabrioski on 26/05/2007 01:39:56 sorry for your loss m8
although.... they necessarily did not lose 100 million each...
3x bships = 3((108 million insurance - (90 something buy price) +(30 million insurance)) price) So its around 12 million loss for each bship so they only around 36 loss without mods.
Also, why were you autopiloting... this game teaches you not to use a flimsy autopilot system when carrying large amounts of valuable goods. Its no one else's fault but your own. 
Sorry but thats the truth (sorry for your loss )
Edit: Gosh darnit you guys post too fast - I was gonna be first 
If it makes you feel any better, it was the first post after the OP worth reading. :)
|

Mattduk
Gallente Universal Army
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 07:44:00 -
[159]
Originally by: Sergeant Spot In reply to the original post:
One other thing about Eve (something I dont like about it), is that not only do many newbies take a hard beating learning the game (normal and not really a problem), but many players verbally abuse the newbs if they show even the slightest weakness.
I dont approve of the abuse heaped on many newbs at the drop of hat. I "DO" approve of telling newbs that Eve is harsh game and that in most cases they have only themselves to blame for those early loses, but that can be done with a touch of diplomacy.
For example, in RL, I really dont give a damn if I hurt folk's feelings when I point out cold truth, but I (usually) try not to be an jerk. A number of Eve players go out of their way to be a jerk when pointing out cold truth in such cases.
Simple rule of thumb for newer players or younger players to follow is that everytime you read any abuse on the forums or in any chat channels, that is directed at you, assume that the offender has a very tiny peni/s. It's the best way to realise that these people are so brave and tough in an online game and can freely hurl abuse at you because they feel safe behind their 2 years or more of skill learning compared to your 2 weeks of learning. Put them in a room with you and they would most likely look at the floor, and hope to god they can't be seen. Kind of like the four year old standing in the middle of the garden with his hands over his face yelling 'You can't see me!'
Ignore them. They are often failures in real life, and overcompensate in an online game.
And to the OP, don't quit the game mate. Take it in your stride, and carry on. You will look back on this in 6 months with a sense of scholarship. Consider it a learning experience. Sure, an expensive one relative to your wallet, but you will bounce back, I guarantee it.
Regards Mattduk
|

Fokhard
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 07:59:00 -
[160]
Speedy... 150 mil in 2 trial weeks and 2 subsc. weeks? That sounds a bit unreal to me.. my bet is that your n00b char is only a hauler char for a much more experienced player and therefor you should have known better.
This whole discussion is silly. Pirating in optima forma i would call hauler killing in high sec.. thats real pirating, not the n00b killing in lowsec stuff, but this. Everytime some players think of something smart, others start moaning and requesting ccp to change it.. This is not an exploit, its merely using the full potential of the game. If CCP starts patching Eve for stuff like this to ban it, then for me the game loses out on playability. IF its too hard for u....go play starfleet command or so 
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 08:18:00 -
[161]
"The only thing wrong here is that people who can't handle the game whine about it.
You got PWNED. Stop crying. "
this is perfect example of why suicide ganking needs to be eliminated. so tough talking weenie kids can be forced out into 0.0 where they THEMSELVES are not safe, so that real pvp'ers like myself can repeatedly prison *****fools like this until they quit eve. Seriously You really got to be a dumb arse to talk like some tough guy pwning people when you yourself are little empire hugging carebear. People who suicide gank in empire are not good players, they are not smart, they are not courageous, they are some of the weakest and fragile people ever to play a game. They sit in empire 100% safe humping gates waiting for haulers to suicide on... Seriously I don't think in my 10 years of playing pvp MMO type games have I ever seen a more pathetic style of gameplay lol. the crazy thing is how they are so blind to how pathetic they are that they actually talk tough /boggle
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 08:28:00 -
[162]
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
Ok Speedy, few things you should keep in mind here.
1) You actually got ganked by an insured brutix t1 fitted. When someone actually suicides themselves in high sec, they only lose about 3mill in total.
2) You understand the importance of 150mil, yet you autopilot your ship to different systems. Eve should not be played AFK ever! The only time where autopilot is worth it is probably when u are travelling without any loot inside you. Lets put this in real life perspectives. If you had 150mill worth of good belonging to you, and you had to get it from A to B, you would pick the safest route wouldnt you. Autopilot is teh equivalent of giving it to a blind person who follows his guide dog, rather than taking it yourself. Just don't do it next time!
3) You transported 150mill worth of good in a t1 hauler. A nice example of this is rl is moving the crown jewels in a ford fiesta rather than a tank. 150mill should never be moved in a t1 hauler, ESPECIALLY ON AUTOPILOT!
4) AFAIK, in the tutorial, the girl does tell you that it is unsafe EVEN IN HIGH SEC. Just because it hasn't happened to you before, it could happen in the future. So LISTEN to the tutorial
Ways of minimizing your chance of getting ganked are as followed:
For expensive loot, move it in a transport ship at least (frieghter preferable)= Not entirely safe still, having seen dominixes pawn a freighter, and about 3 battlecruisers could take out an untanked transport ship
The best way to sa***uard it is not to travel on autopilot. It takes a few seconds to log and scan a hauler. By the time the guy has realised you have omfg lewts in your cargo, you wold be waving bye bye. I can vouch that most empire gankers don't scan people warp to zero, as there are plenty of people already afk travelling in empire
In case you haven't realised, I have done empire ganking before and made lots of money. The potential profit that can be made is ludacris to say the least. You might think i'm stupid for telling you guys how to avoid it, but listen here. There are people who don't read forums... people who would ignore this advice.... Funnily enough these people are the same group that travel afk with billions of lewts in their t1 haulers and frigs. Therefore, the effect is minimal. The fact that you brought this up on the forums actually shows that you may have the braincells to deal with it and change. However, first you have to understand that CCP's empire mechanics are in perfect working order. CCP never intended people who move billions of lewt in paper ships without risk afk.
That said cheer up and be glad that you only lost 150 mill and not billions (i've seen it).
|

Soulja
Caldari Magnetar Ltd Dark Synergy
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 08:32:00 -
[163]
Edited by: Soulja on 27/05/2007 08:34:08 For those that are interested and are still reading this thread, and in particular, those that think i was trying to equate *****to losing an ingame space ship.. i wasnt, i was comparing peoples reactions to the two situations.
I'm not going to go into it but if you would like further explanation please convo me ingame.
But in a nut shell, Doing something provocative does not give people the right to act as encouraged.
|

Gibbal Slogspit
Buffed Rumpuss Zit Dids
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 08:33:00 -
[164]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 "The only thing wrong here is that people who can't handle the game whine about it.
You got PWNED. Stop crying. "
this is perfect example of why suicide ganking needs to be eliminated. so tough talking weenie kids can be forced out into 0.0 where they THEMSELVES are not safe, so that real pvp'ers like myself can repeatedly prison *****fools like this until they quit eve. Seriously You really got to be a dumb arse to talk like some tough guy pwning people when you yourself are little empire hugging carebear. People who suicide gank in empire are not good players, they are not smart, they are not courageous, they are some of the weakest and fragile people ever to play a game. They sit in empire 100% safe humping gates waiting for haulers to suicide on... Seriously I don't think in my 10 years of playing pvp MMO type games have I ever seen a more pathetic style of gameplay lol. the crazy thing is how they are so blind to how pathetic they are that they actually talk tough /boggle
All you empire gankers got pwned. Kudos.
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 08:39:00 -
[165]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 "The only thing wrong here is that people who can't handle the game whine about it.
You got PWNED. Stop crying. "
this is perfect example of why suicide ganking needs to be eliminated. so tough talking weenie kids can be forced out into 0.0 where they THEMSELVES are not safe, so that real pvp'ers like myself can repeatedly prison *****fools like this until they quit eve. Seriously You really got to be a dumb arse to talk like some tough guy pwning people when you yourself are little empire hugging carebear. People who suicide gank in empire are not good players, they are not smart, they are not courageous, they are some of the weakest and fragile people ever to play a game. They sit in empire 100% safe humping gates waiting for haulers to suicide on... Seriously I don't think in my 10 years of playing pvp MMO type games have I ever seen a more pathetic style of gameplay lol. the crazy thing is how they are so blind to how pathetic they are that they actually talk tough /boggle
No offence mate but I don't think you have ever met a suicide ganker in your life so please keep your judgements to yourself. High sec ganking makes me isk to pvp. Its more ludacris than npcing and I only npc to get sec status.
The mechanics are not exploited, the higher sec you are, the quicker concord react. Once you kill the hauler, they have a killright on you. Yesterday I actually saw someone smart enough to use this to kill Samthedog(the person who ganked this guy) whilst he was camping. We can get our just desserts but rather than actually killing us most people just ignore it or throw empty threats. Therefore its not CCP who aren't letting you guys deal with us its you!
AFK hauling in t1 haulers with bills of loot is not to be encouraged. You wouldn't do it in real life so please dont moan when it happens in a near realistic (at least capitalistic) game. Take is as a real life lesson to be learnt.
As for being dumb arse, we are probably making more money than you. My friend made 2bill from this yesterday. Can you do the same?
As for being the weakest and fragile people ever to play the game... rofl, I have never smacked the people I kill, I try to deal wit the people who actually convo me as polite as I can. Surprisingly I haven;t met someone who has wanted to kill me in real life which restores some faith into the game.
|

Mediocrity
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 08:40:00 -
[166]
If the OP had set the tone of the discussion with calm, reasonable posts about re-evaluating the rules that govern ganking in high-sec, or about providing clear resources to warn newer players of the dangers of the game, he would not have generated 1/10 of the backlash that ensued. Instead, he chose to make a spectacle of himself, calling people "idiots" and ranting at CCP over what amounted to his own carelessness.
I had something similar happen to me once, when I was new to the game and thought sentry guns were enough to protect you from harm at gates and stations in low sec. It cost me over half my ISK through losing a hauler full of trade goods to learn how wrong I was. It was frustrating, but somehow I managed to move on without throwing a fit on the forums over it.
It's not a matter of trying to sound like an internet tough guy, but seriously, what do people expect? Either play the game or don't. It's up to you. Constructive criticism is one thing, but this forum isn't your personal therapy group. |

Malcanis
High4Life Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 08:42:00 -
[167]
Originally by: Knerf i just read 6 pages of CRAP, i cant believe how this community has gone to total **** after it started as such a good group, all these people saying "your an idiot, the gankers rox" art tools in the worst way. man how i miss the days of eve-i and how the forums werent full of such a complete morons. i know everybody is entitled to their own opinion and all that but there is such a thing as deicency and understanding, maybe even helping the guy out...
yes the OP made a mistake, the forums are filled with people saying the EXACT thing almost every few hours, then the same people calling them idiots and telling them to go packing, as i see it there is a problem in the game, high sec ganking needs a change, as it is there is no penalty as there should be for dying, somebody needs to come up with a system to change soon.
that and the community needs to mature a little, this game will never be what it should be with this kind of blatent stupidity running wild, its like all the people doing it have some sort of chip on their shoulder and take it out on people on the internet as they probably lack the gall to do it in real life...
there are several things that need changing soon or the game will be full of mentally unstable IRC kiddies flaming one another all day and all the quality players will be gone looking for a place where people arent complete *******s constantly.
my "2 isk"
People aren't flaming him because he made a mistake, but because he made a mistake and came to he forums whining about it like it wasn't his fault.
If he'd just asked for advice - which he seems singularly bad at taking, btw; you read his CargoMyrmiÖ post, right? - then he'd have got lots of good tips. if he'd shown good attitude, then he'd have probably got in-game help. There are people in my corp who have shown up on the forum as n00bs asking for advice and help and who are now valuable corp members.
But this guys just wants free, riskless money and will cry until he gets it.
The game is better off without his kind
|

Valan
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 09:44:00 -
[168]
Originally by: GreenSurf I must say I'm surprised to hear the tone in this thread - I totally agree with Speedy that there's a problem here. I believe that secure space should be secure - if it isn't a whole dimension of EVE is lost. Most of the people reading this thread may not appreciate the carebear profession, but it has it place in the game. I see this incident as a threat to that profession.
It's always been this way in fact its been a lot worse. It's secure space but it says in numerous places that this does not make you safe. The only reason you lot think its safe is because you haven't read the instructions.
An entier profession isn't going to die its always been there, for FOUR years. READ the flaming literatue.
It is there to stop you lot afking through sapce earning billions with no risk so you can buy up resources.
RISK VS REWARD no suicide gankers = NO RISK.
To be honest if you want empire safe withe no risk the following should happen.
Freighters should be boosted and only allowed in low sec. To prevent huge profits being made while afk.
Empire belt respanws should be reduced, mineral and rat.
All level 3 and 4 missions should be moved to low sec.
/start sig I love old characters that post 'I've beeen playing the game three years' when I know their account has been sold on. /end sig |

SamtheDog
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 09:48:00 -
[169]
Edited by: SamtheDog on 27/05/2007 09:49:54 Well...since I'm the one who blew you up...I'll give you a small education on what exactly happened. In a large part, we live almost exclusively in 0.0. However, when we fly in empire on war ops or do sell our loot, we've noticed alot of the foolish things you empire carebears do when you fly around. Flying haulers with tons of nice expensive loot & stuff that you worked very hard for....but I could take if I wanted to. So yesterday was my 1st day, and netted myself around 2.6bn in about 6 hours.
Why did I do it? Because you were able to be killed, so I killed you. No malice, no anger, just pure enjoyment of getting MY stuff that you've collected for weeks or whatnot. Empire is just like 0.0, you can kill & be killed, but in empire you WILL be killed..so take em with you & bank on others greed & stupidity.
In 6 hours..I got
5 gistii 1 pithii 3 dread hardners 9 TS harnders 1 gallente control tower rook harpy X 2 15 X +4 implants 18 X 425 II's a few hundred mechanical datacore thingy's 40 X heavy launcher II's & countless other misc stuff unfortunately one guys navy apoc bpc was destroyed...was a very sad moment for me cause I wanted to fly it 
Total estimated value @ 2.6bn Teh value to see the look at the guy when he smashes his monitor for losing over 2bn in mods in a RIFTER on autopilot...priceless 
You got ganked because you left yourself open to attack & profit. This is space ma boy....don't get caught being weak, or I'll just bank off you.
If you have a problem with that, we're located in stain @ 37S-KO bring friends.
Cheers!
Sammy
 "Never underestimate greed or stupidity...you can always see it emerge in the end" |

Felysta Sandorn
Caldari Murder of Crows E N I G M A
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 10:50:00 -
[170]
Originally by: SamtheDog stuff
You're my new idol...
And as for people whining about the people saying 'tough cookies', it's not the fact that they're a newb at the game, it's their attitude towards it! I've helped a tonne of newbies out in this game who have the right attitude towards it, but going AFK AP in a hauler full of all your assets then whining about it deserves all the flak it can get on these forums...
Latest Video, Click Here!
|

Iyanah
Minmatar Mining Munitions and Mayhem R i s e
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 11:07:00 -
[171]
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Phil Carter Can i have you stuff aswell as all other stuff ingame from ppl who don't want to play anymore and start of a "i hate CCP" thread in the forums?
What stuff? there is no stuff left, because of game design some guy can lose 2% of his money and cause you to lose 99% of yours. Ya gee, wonder why only 20,000 people online still even after all these years.
next time don't carry 99% of your wealth in one go (duh)
you flew on autopilot. you went AFK. you put "more than you can afford to loose" in space.
it's your fault you got screwed here. high sec is NOT total sec, it's been said before.
and the golden rule, one of the first things you are told in the tutorial, is never fly what you can't afford to loose. you did that, thus you are to blame for your situation.
AFK hauling on autopilot is an extremely bad idea, if you'd have warped to zero, it's likely these guys wouldn't have had nearly as much of an opportunity to catch you. indeed they probably wouldn't have bothered. ========================================== Iy
please remember: I AM a sarcastic ******* and nothing i say has ever represented the thoughts or feelings of my corp, alliance, or anyone really. read |

RtoZ
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 11:46:00 -
[172]
Edited by: RtoZ on 27/05/2007 11:52:16 To the OP: Stop whineing and go make money.
|

Cruthensis
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 12:28:00 -
[173]
Originally by: Frug The only thing wrong here is that people who can't handle the game whine about it.
You got PWNED. Stop crying.
He was a month old!
Also, I think 'PWNED' would normally apply to a PVP encounter in which both sides engaged in combat-appropriate ships. To describe suiciding an indy with battleships as 'PWNED'...
"We really PWNED that guy. He had no guns, tank, nothing. Well done us! We F*cken rock." 
I'm in agreement about the insurance point - get blown up by CONCORD = no insurance. That alone should stop most hi-sec suicide ganks. They would only try the most profitable targets then and anyone carrying SERIOUS value around in an Indy would be fair game and, frankly, a bit stupid. 150m is peanuts in the long term view of corps and the like, but that's harsh for a young solo player.
|

SamtheDog
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 12:33:00 -
[174]
We wasn't pwn'd with battleships. READ my killmail, it was ONE brutix vs his ship.
He's exaggerated the circumstance to gain sympathy, & even his own killmail goes against his initial claim.
1v1 I died...he died...my hauler collected his loot.
I left happy, he wasn't.
End of story....move along..nothing to see here (anymore) "Never underestimate greed or stupidity...you can always see it emerge in the end" |

Jim McGregor
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 12:35:00 -
[175]
Originally by: SamtheDog We wasn't pwn'd with battleships. READ my killmail, it was ONE brutix vs his ship.
He's exaggerated the circumstance to gain sympathy, & even his own killmail goes against his initial claim.
1v1 I died...he died...my hauler collected his loot.
I left happy, he wasn't.
End of story....move along..nothing to see here (anymore)
What was the profit?
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune |

Izo Azlion
Veto. Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 12:37:00 -
[176]
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
You flew all your wealth through space without considering any risk. If I walk down the streets of Manchester with all my worldly possessions - who cares about the Police? I'm going to get battered, robbed, and lucky if thats all.
You are, good sir, a fool, and the community is - albeit poorer - better off without such childish assumptions.
Izo Azlion.
---
Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes -Hango ([email protected]) Thanks to Stubnitz for the Sig. |

Felysta Sandorn
Caldari Murder of Crows E N I G M A
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 12:56:00 -
[177]
Originally by: Izo Azlion You flew all your wealth through space without considering any risk. If I walk down the streets of Manchester with all my worldly possessions - who cares about the Police? I'm going to get battered, robbed, and lucky if thats all.
Awesome! I live in Manchester! On my way in to town later to buy Battlestar Gallactica season 2 on DVD... Hope there are no gate camps on the way, I have to go through Rusholme (definately lowsec) to get there in a freighter (read as: bus).
Sorry... I need to get out more...
Latest Video, Click Here!
|

SamtheDog
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 13:18:00 -
[178]
Edited by: SamtheDog on 27/05/2007 13:18:50
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: SamtheDog We wasn't pwn'd with battleships. READ my killmail, it was ONE brutix vs his ship.
He's exaggerated the circumstance to gain sympathy, & even his own killmail goes against his initial claim.
1v1 I died...he died...my hauler collected his loot.
I left happy, he wasn't.
End of story....move along..nothing to see here (anymore)
What was the profit?
Well, let's see. Brutix 22.2M in jita with std tech1 kit (approx 1M total) insured for 27M at a cost of 8.1M for insurance. That means I lose 4M per brutix give or take how many mods are destroyed.
Now I had a 5.0 sec status, & that gives me plenty of chances to gain isk, but I won't blow up a ship for a mere 50M...it has to be around 150M+ or I won't bother. I mean seriously, what's the point of getting a piddly 60M that could go pop? A very aggressive engagement goes only one way...fast lock, check fast & make a fast decision & go for broke. It works nearly 90% of the time with a trusty hauler standing by, you can scoop & drop it off while you travel back to jita to refit in a brutix in your pod while your criminal timer wears off. Get into a new ship...rinse & repeat. There are plenty of fools out there, just choose who's stuff you want & simply take it.
As for his profit..it was a meager 100M or so. One guy I popped today lost a navy apoc BPC + 2 giant containers & ALOT of loot. http://singularity.griefwatch.net/?p=details&kill=2622 The guy even came back at my hauler to shoot at it with a noob ship when I went for his giant container (the std t1 stuff recycled for around 150M in jita). The other stuff I either sold or will stockpile for future empire ganking. Hell, I even got a large tower out of one ship. Was nice to see. But one guy had over FIFTY +4 implants in his ship & he *just* got away in structure.
All in all... 6 hours of ganking netted me 2.6bn in profits. Ruined alot of people's day. I'm sure at least one monitor was smashed & a few keyboards thrown. Heh..one guy threatened me with real life death & called it an exploit. Anyways...these are things you do for a week-end to have some fun. Shooting tactically-challenged individuals in empire & taking their stuff is fun & all...but 0.0 is where the game is really played. Not in the kids sandbox we call "empire".
Good money though.... Like a free dread + fittings in 6 hours.

Cheers!
Sammy
 "Never underestimate greed or stupidity...you can always see it emerge in the end" |

Grunanca
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 13:26:00 -
[179]
Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 02:02:00 Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 01:57:43
Originally by: Necrosmith Wow, you're stupid.
You don't carry $100,000 in cash around the bad part of town do you?
Ohh you wan't realistic comprisons? Ok ill give you a realistic one. I'm walking down the street with 150 million in my pocket, with police officers right beside me. Somebody shoots me, and the cops shoot him. We're both dead. Now his friend comes and picks up the 75 million that's left on my corpse, which happens to be 2 feet away from the police, but they don't do anything.
All CCP would have to do is make concord destroy anyone who touches that wreck. This would completely eliminate the stupidity of suacide ganking. But hey.. then again, this game was built from the very start to **** people off more then entertain. Hence the reason why there about as many people playing runescape as there are playing EVE.
Actually that might have something to do with Runescape being free and a grind game, which is clearly something kids like these days, as wierd as it might seem... Also just the fact that you had 150 mil after 2 weeks shows me how easy this game has become.. Back when I was new it took more than a week to get 10 mil. Losing a BC was something you would remember and regret for a long time. Learn to live with loss or try SWG as even decay is not an issue there...
|

Malcanis
High4Life Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 14:03:00 -
[180]
Originally by: Grunanca
Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 02:02:00 Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 01:57:43
Originally by: Necrosmith Wow, you're stupid.
You don't carry $100,000 in cash around the bad part of town do you?
Ohh you wan't realistic comprisons? Ok ill give you a realistic one. I'm walking down the street with 150 million in my pocket, with police officers right beside me. Somebody shoots me, and the cops shoot him. We're both dead. Now his friend comes and picks up the 75 million that's left on my corpse, which happens to be 2 feet away from the police, but they don't do anything.
All CCP would have to do is make concord destroy anyone who touches that wreck. This would completely eliminate the stupidity of suacide ganking. But hey.. then again, this game was built from the very start to **** people off more then entertain. Hence the reason why there about as many people playing runescape as there are playing EVE.
Actually that might have something to do with Runescape being free and a grind game, which is clearly something kids like these days, as wierd as it might seem... Also just the fact that you had 150 mil after 2 weeks shows me how easy this game has become.. Back when I was new it took more than a week to get 10 mil. Losing a BC was something you would remember and regret for a long time. Learn to live with loss or try SWG as even decay is not an issue there...
And as long as we're talking realistic... why are those cops just strolling along with a guy who's committed enough crimes to get a price on his head? Why are they even protecting him in the first place instead of hauling his ass downtown?
Meanwhile, back in the real world, cops take anything from 3-300 minutes to show up at crime scences. If those who are arguing for realistic treatment of wreck looters and realistic insurance payouts want to accept realistic response time too then I have no argument with that. In fact I think it would be pretty cool.
Also, as long as we're talking realistic, real cops aren't invulnerable, omnipotent and infinite in number, either. So... how about each system has, say it's security rating x 50 in CONCORD ships (normally distributed between BS/Command ships/HACs/AFs in say a 1:1:3:5 ratio), which are only T2 versions of faction police, take normal amounts of time to respond to distress calls by warping in according to normal game mechnics. Determined resistance will bring CONCORD ships in from other systems until numbers force the offenders to surrender or flee.
Actually, i started out by being sarcastic, but the more I think about this, the better it seems.
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 18:40:00 -
[181]
"We wasn't pwn'd with battleships. READ my killmail, it was ONE brutix vs his ship."
So this most likely means you are exploiting concords lack of dealing with drones... 
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 18:45:00 -
[182]
Quote: "Well, let's see. Brutix 22.2M in jita with std tech1 kit (approx 1M total) insured for 27M at a cost of 8.1M for insurance. That means I lose 4M per brutix give or take how many mods are destroyed.
Now I had a 5.0 sec status, & that gives me plenty of chances to gain isk, but I won't blow up a ship for a mere 50M...it has to be around 150M+ or I won't bother. I mean seriously, what's the point of getting a piddly 60M that could go pop? A very aggressive engagement goes only one way...fast lock, check fast & make a fast decision & go for broke. It works nearly 90% of the time with a trusty hauler standing by, you can scoop & drop it off while you travel back to jita to refit in a brutix in your pod while your criminal timer wears off. Get into a new ship...rinse & repeat. There are plenty of fools out there, just choose who's stuff you want & simply take it.
As for his profit..it was a meager 100M or so. One guy I popped today lost a navy apoc BPC + 2 giant containers & ALOT of loot. http://singularity.griefwatch.net/?p=details&kill=2622 The guy even came back at my hauler to shoot at it with a noob ship when I went for his giant container (the std t1 stuff recycled for around 150M in jita). The other stuff I either sold or will stockpile for future empire ganking. Hell, I even got a large tower out of one ship. Was nice to see. But one guy had over FIFTY +4 implants in his ship & he *just* got away in structure.
All in all... 6 hours of ganking netted me 2.6bn in profits. Ruined alot of people's day. I'm sure at least one monitor was smashed & a few keyboards thrown. Heh..one guy threatened me with real life death & called it an exploit. Anyways...these are things you do for a week-end to have some fun. Shooting tactically-challenged individuals in empire & taking their stuff is fun & all...but 0.0 is where the game is really played. Not in the kids sandbox we call "empire".
Good money though.... Like a free dread + fittings in 6 hours."
Have never seen a more succinct description detailing EXACTLY why empire suicide ganking is 100% broken and MUST BE FIXED. Clearly something is SEVERELY broken for people to be able to make over 2.5 billion in 6 hours. CCP where is the risk versus reward? your game is quickly becoming a joke. A person was able to sit in jita for over 6 hours suiciding everyone was helpless to stop him, the faction hit is so minimal he could do it for 6 straight hours.
The crazy thing is you close down complexes because of a bad spawn time allowing people to make to much money to fast with to little risk, bet yet here is the same crap NO RISK, HUGE GAINS..... yes risk vs reward in eve is TRULY BROKEN.
|

Ayumi Kuribayashi
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 19:01:00 -
[183]
We have this feature in EVE that lets you Warp to 0... If you're in High Sec space, this pretty much ensures your safety because a person will generally not be able to put up a Warp Bubble in High Sec... If you're carrying all of the assets you own in game at once, why on earth would you turn on autopilot? This is what I don't understand. You've learned a hard lesson in this game, that's all. It's happened to me plenty of times. You just pick up where you left off and move on. Also, you're complaining that you need money to make money and that's what your problem is. So how did you make that 150mil in 2 weeks? It's not like you start off this game with money... If you did it once, you can do it again.
|

GreenSurf
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 20:51:00 -
[184]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 Have never seen a more succinct description detailing EXACTLY why empire suicide ganking is 100% broken and MUST BE FIXED. Clearly something is SEVERELY broken for people to be able to make over 2.5 billion in 6 hours. CCP where is the risk versus reward? your game is quickly becoming a joke. A person was able to sit in jita for over 6 hours suiciding everyone was helpless to stop him, the faction hit is so minimal he could do it for 6 straight hours.
The crazy thing is you close down complexes because of a bad spawn time allowing people to make to much money to fast with to little risk, bet yet here is the same crap NO RISK, HUGE GAINS..... yes risk vs reward in eve is TRULY BROKEN.
I couldn't agree more
GreenSurf
|

Troxane
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 22:29:00 -
[185]
Originally by: Sergeant Spot
Originally by: Stealthiest Get into an interceptor, Put 4 local hulls in lows and then go afk. At 800-900 m/s second your on the gate before they scanyou and decidde your worth killing and then lock you.
:)
btw put your **** in a can, they may risk it for a can but they usually don't. In high sec at least.
I did several tests using cans and escrow wrap a few months ago.
Cargo Scanners WILL still see the cargo.
Can u scan a cargo without locking the ship ? If yes how ?
I m also new to game and the other day i was scanning people ' s cargo just for fun and see what all those big transporter were actually hauling.
I also tried with the passive targeter but i m not sure i understand how it works because u actually need the target locked before u can activate it.
|

chiefyuk
Amarr Mercenary Forces Exquisite Malevolence
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 22:32:00 -
[186]
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
I wish i had that amount of isk by my second week! Thats still a lot of iskies for me now! Some people really need to learn that eve isnt easy ------------------------------------------------ You can kill the protester but you cant kill the protest ------------------------------------------------ |

Penny Golding
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 22:44:00 -
[187]
Originally by: SamtheDog Edited by: SamtheDog on 27/05/2007 13:18:50
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: SamtheDog We wasn't pwn'd with battleships. READ my killmail, it was ONE brutix vs his ship.
He's exaggerated the circumstance to gain sympathy, & even his own killmail goes against his initial claim.
1v1 I died...he died...my hauler collected his loot.
I left happy, he wasn't.
End of story....move along..nothing to see here (anymore)
What was the profit?
Well, let's see. Brutix 22.2M in jita with std tech1 kit (approx 1M total) insured for 27M at a cost of 8.1M for insurance. That means I lose 4M per brutix give or take how many mods are destroyed.
Now I had a 5.0 sec status, & that gives me plenty of chances to gain isk, but I won't blow up a ship for a mere 50M...it has to be around 150M+ or I won't bother. I mean seriously, what's the point of getting a piddly 60M that could go pop? A very aggressive engagement goes only one way...fast lock, check fast & make a fast decision & go for broke. It works nearly 90% of the time with a trusty hauler standing by, you can scoop & drop it off while you travel back to jita to refit in a brutix in your pod while your criminal timer wears off. Get into a new ship...rinse & repeat. There are plenty of fools out there, just choose who's stuff you want & simply take it.
As for his profit..it was a meager 100M or so. One guy I popped today lost a navy apoc BPC + 2 giant containers & ALOT of loot. http://singularity.griefwatch.net/?p=details&kill=2622 The guy even came back at my hauler to shoot at it with a noob ship when I went for his giant container (the std t1 stuff recycled for around 150M in jita). The other stuff I either sold or will stockpile for future empire ganking. Hell, I even got a large tower out of one ship. Was nice to see. But one guy had over FIFTY +4 implants in his ship & he *just* got away in structure.
All in all... 6 hours of ganking netted me 2.6bn in profits. Ruined alot of people's day. I'm sure at least one monitor was smashed & a few keyboards thrown. Heh..one guy threatened me with real life death & called it an exploit. Anyways...these are things you do for a week-end to have some fun. Shooting tactically-challenged individuals in empire & taking their stuff is fun & all...but 0.0 is where the game is really played. Not in the kids sandbox we call "empire".
Good money though.... Like a free dread + fittings in 6 hours.

Cheers!
Sammy
ROFL, I laughed out loud at the end of this, Sam. 2.6 billion in 6 hours, yowzah!
Damn shame about the guy with the +4 implants. When you say he "got away in structure", you mean concorde showed up and torched you before you could get it in all the way, or did he have warp stabs?
All in all, SamtheDog, much respect. While I'll agree you are definitely not a very nice person, I really admire your audacity and ingenuity :)
|

MushMush
Minmatar Sebiestor tribe
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 22:51:00 -
[188]
Don't you realise its the ebil people in Eve that make it such fun to play? It makes you think, it makes you scared...it makes you wanna get even lol!
It would be impossible for CCP to code complete 'aholes' as you put it 
Go play World of Whatever craft and when you get bored silly some back to Eve!
|

Frug
Zenithal Harvest
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 22:54:00 -
[189]
Originally by: Cruthensis
Originally by: Frug The only thing wrong here is that people who can't handle the game whine about it.
You got PWNED. Stop crying.
He was a month old!
Also, I think 'PWNED' would normally apply to a PVP encounter in which both sides engaged in combat-appropriate ships. To describe suiciding an indy with battleships as 'PWNED'...
"We really PWNED that guy. He had no guns, tank, nothing. Well done us! We F*cken rock." 
Perhaps you haven't noticed, or perhaps you don't view Eve this way, but my objective is to ruin you in this game. I don't care who you are, I don't care how much of a newbie whiny little carebear *****cat you are, I am going to destroy you because you're not my ally.
If you're putting around in a hauler with everything you own, and I suicide you and come out on top, i PWNED you regardless of how much you moan and complain.
- - - - - - - - - Do not use dotted lines - - - - - - - If you think I'm awesome, say BOOO BOOO!! - Ductoris Neat look what I found - Kreul Hey, my marbles |

SamtheDog
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 23:04:00 -
[190]
 Thanks for the replies. As for the guy who thinks that empire sec status is 100% broken. I'd have to disagree.
#1 For those who have reading problems, I did NOT gank a single ship in jita, it was all over empire at various gates. When you gank a ship, concord stays there and you have to find a new spot (knowledge from what we call "observation").
#2 Warp to 0 was put into eve to AVOID this type of scenario as well as remove server lag (which was very well done btw..eve hasn't been smoother in a long time) 
#3 To the guy who asked if you can cargo scan a ship. Yes you can, it's called cargo scanners & was put into the game for a reason which for some reason alot of players dont' seem to fully understand WHY it was there. Then again they dont' understand the concepts of SHIELDS & ARMOR....oh well. 
As for the last guy who asked, the guy was in a fast ship...I locked him saw the implants & engaged him..he mwd'd it to the gate & jumped out in structure. One guy I killed was popped just as my ship was @ 5% structure with my drones on him (tech1 hammerheads are fine for this) in a 0.8 system.....dmg control 1's 4tw!). You dont' always get them. Sometimes a guy puts a shield booster or a plate on his hauler & I can't kill him in time b4 I die..but alot of guys would rather put speed b4 security.
People dont' seem to understand that this is a FIGHTING game. We fight through politics, ships, guns, war decs, piracy, economics & choking supply lines. All is fair game within the mechanics of the game. Alot of people don't like piracy for whatever ethical reasons they have. My response to that is I don't conduct piracy in real life, & that I'm a working professional with several hundred students who learn from my example when I lecture. But in eve....I'm not a happy go lucky let's all carebear kinda guy. We fight for space & possessions. You have stuff & I want it. Some people in Jita will try to scam you for it (accepted in the game), but I prefer to do the direct approach in which I'll scan, blast & scoop.
For those who think it's utterly wrong, try it sometime. If you don't go to sleep with a serious smile of "I've been really good at being bad" on your face...then perhaps you ARE too timid for eve.
Fly safe & keep collecting loot...I'll see you soon
Sammy
 "Never underestimate greed or stupidity...you can always see it emerge in the end" |

Ehranavaar
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 23:38:00 -
[191]
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
i never even got to the bottom of the first page before thinking to myself that eve just isn't the game for you speedy. money comes very easily in eve. either suck it up like a man and go make some more money or just plain go away. in any case this kind of whining is unseemly for a man.
|

Thargat
Caldari S-44 Coalition of Carebear Killers
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 23:53:00 -
[192]
Seriously guys. Can I have your stuff and ISK? Just contract/trade it to this character. I'll make sure it's put to good use.
On topic. EvE is a hardcore game, but if you don't like the current state of things then get yourself some friends, start a good corp and start changing things (make Tm pay with their e-ships and e-isk for harassing you).
If you don't like what I say, just ignore it, or admit I got to you. |

MotoTsume
Gallente Clan Black Scorpion
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 00:11:00 -
[193]
Edited by: MotoTsume on 28/05/2007 00:10:31 i would have to say that anyone that have been posting since oh about page 3 or 4 havent been reading at all - since the Op has stated back about that, that he has made the isk back.
so folk might want to read before posting, since even on this page there are people asking for his stuff lol.
edit:spelling and grammar
It's just a game........Or is it?????
|

SchirmerN
Amarr WKK Inc. United Corporations Against Macros
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 00:20:00 -
[194]
Edited by: SchirmerN on 28/05/2007 00:19:43 nm
|

Dowey
Caldari State War Academy
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 01:09:00 -
[195]
Edited by: Dowey on 28/05/2007 01:09:31
Originally by: Speedy Banana The problem is you need isk to make isk. I need 100 million to make 20-30 mil profit. with 4 mil ill make 800k-1.2mil profit. Which is basically like starting all over again. And for what really? To run into another expliot down that line, where a bunch of idiots will just tell me "ohh ya you should have (somehow) known about that and not done this or that" ?
Suicide?? << Think thats what your aiming to say...
Now to the point, I remember reading somewhere (think it was on the login part), reminding you that once you leave a station you are not safe. Naming it secure space may give a person a false sense of security (if that's the correct term), inwhich it does. But the only place you are protected is when your docked. And take the advice of others, which is don't fly all your assets/earnings at once, unless you have 1 of the 2
A. Freighter (This has also been found to not be safe, but it takes alot more than 3+ BS's to take you out) B. Support
^^ 1 of them should keep you or your cargo safe.
AFK'ing in EVE is a big big no no , especially in a hauler. When your not at a SS (don't afk for too long at an SS though), or docked you should be at your PC at ALL times.
Otherwise you do face the risk of being turned into space dust. So it's no one elses fault but your own, Don't blame CCP as it was your problem you got took out. CCP have made a great game, yeah EVE has some setbacks, but that's mainly related to performance issues. Not actual game mechanics.
That's why EVE is great... it allows you to be/do ANYTHING (within the EULA ofc)
Dowey |

Devious Syn
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 01:33:00 -
[196]
lol this community is just evil. Guy comes on with a valid concern and hes roasted lol. Just goes to show the quality of folks playing now days.
I just canceled my accounts too after playing for 2 years, but that was over Dev cheating/misconduct you know the usual.
No you cant have my multi billions in assets 
|

Ahz
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 01:36:00 -
[197]
Originally by: Speedy Banana Sadness...
The thing that you're lamenting is the main appeal that the game has for most of the people who stick with it. Losses hurt and they can happen at any time for any reason if you're not careful.
That's the main reason that some people are so passionate about the game. There's not really any other well-known MMOG quite like it and it's a matter of personality if it fits you or not.
There is another cruel reality to Eve though that people don't always acknowledge. Newbies are twice hurt by the current dynamic.
It's a sure fact that 150 mil is everything you own, but there's a good chance that it's nothing for the guys who jumped you. Not only are you the least likely to be able to defend yourself, but the losses hurt you far more than it hurts your attackers.
It sucks but that's the way it is. Try to change it and watch the forums freak out.
So consider this your initiation. Welcome to Eve. If you stick it out and keep playing in a year you'll be one of those hard-eyed survivors who smile knowingly at the next newbie that loses everything he owns in one go.
And maybe you'll sympathize, but you'll certainly scream bloody murder when anyone tries to change it.
|

RtoZ
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 03:30:00 -
[198]
The fact that you're getting an insurance payout for losing a ship while ripping off a carebear is indeed proof that the game mechanics aren't totally balanced. Other than that I have little issue with what happened.
Warp to zero and some attention is enough to keep a valuable cargo more or less safe in a hauler. Anything worth more than 100m I tend to transport by itself in a battleship though. Haulers are for low value high volume items. Bulk transport of high value is a risk everyone should be aware of, even in 1.0.
|

SamtheDog
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 03:58:00 -
[199]
Originally by: RtoZ The fact that you're getting an insurance payout for losing a ship while ripping off a carebear is indeed proof that the game mechanics aren't totally balanced. Other than that I have little issue with what happened.
Warp to zero and some attention is enough to keep a valuable cargo more or less safe in a hauler. Anything worth more than 100m I tend to transport by itself in a battleship though. Haulers are for low value high volume items. Bulk transport of high value is a risk everyone should be aware of, even in 1.0.
Actually, 1.0 is pretty much safe more or less. In 0.5 sec, concord takes a few seconds to spawn & *****you. 1.0 space is almost instant, so my brutix wouldn't have a chance. I'd be dead b4 he was. The solution to that would be to insure a dominix and put 6 blasters on it. Combined with drone dmg bonus, add some plates so you get ALOT or armor & lock & blast away. You'll be lucky if you get a 2nd volley in cause concord appears almost instantly & locks you down. It's your drones that are doing the work while you are dying with the dmg bonus of the domi that can make or break you. Keep in mind though, in 1.0 concord is VERY fast at killing you..hence the domi will only give you a few seconds longer at life to do your job.
The good side is alot of people will go autopilot at that point. The downside is you'll get popped alot faster.
Even if I weren't given insurance on concorded ships, I'd still do it cause
#1 It's fun #2 I like watching ships go pop #3 The forums get interesting after your day of fun #4 You can get alot of hate mail & watch them go ballistic in local #5 you can get rich #6 did I mention it's alot of fun? 
Anyways, the guy came on the forums and begged for more isk and he got it + more. So in the end, he learned that if you whine enough, people will give you money. One time I saw this poor sap get blown to bits in jita, I sent him 100M which he quickly spent in 3 days losing ships to rats & bits. He's an alt..he knows better, but he's using his employment history as a crutch for his whine.
No matter though, I'll take it from him again.

Sammy
(see you soon) "Never underestimate greed or stupidity...you can always see it emerge in the end" |

Spider Iarus
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 07:04:00 -
[200]
Here's the funny bit.
You've got pvp'ers expressing incredulity that a month-old noob is earning 150 million isk in four weeks.
Huhwha? You guys ever ... dunno, run missions and salvage? Yeesh. I guess crime is only paying for the guy who pulled the gatecamp, gg to him ;)
And OP; you have seriously got to be joking. Killed while making every mistake you can:
1. Too much value to replace in space... 2. In too little ship... 3. For you to be AFK'ing.
I dink around in lowsec (see you 0.0'ers in 5mil sp or so) and ironically enough have not gotten popped once at a gate. Cloaking in, WTZ out. If you had done the same, you'd have made it through the gate.
No matter how upset you may be, that is the truth and you know it. Everyone complaining about the horrors of being gatecamped, grow up and realize that NOT RUNNING AFK will solve the problem in 99% of situations. The other 1%? Well, **** it, it's EVE and risk = isk.
Selah.
|

Filthy Pierre
Gallente Laughing Fox Enterprises
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 07:32:00 -
[201]
Hmmm..... If that was the case *I'd* be looking around so I could pocket that other 75M that went missing....
Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana
Quote:
Ohh you wan't realistic comprisons? Ok ill give you a realistic one. I'm walking down the street with 150 million in my pocket, with police officers right beside me. Somebody shoots me, and the cops shoot him. We're both dead. Now his friend comes and picks up the 75 million that's left on my corpse, which happens to be 2 feet away from the police, but they don't do anything.
|

Valan
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 09:01:00 -
[202]
Originally by: MotoTsume Edited by: MotoTsume on 28/05/2007 00:10:31 i would have to say that anyone that have been posting since oh about page 3 or 4 havent been reading at all - since the Op has stated back about that, that he has made the isk back.
so folk might want to read before posting, since even on this page there are people asking for his stuff lol.
edit:spelling and grammar
He's not made it back he's begged it back. People have given him hand outs.
/start sig I love old characters that post 'I've beeen playing the game three years' when I know their account has been sold on. /end sig |

Locus Bey
Gallente Qalandar
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 09:14:00 -
[203]
EvE is risk vs. reward, that simple. If you go afk while travelling, then you have to deal with the potential consequences. Everyone knows this We all die in this game, we all make big mistakes. We don't all need to make a post about it. Did I complain at being called primary my first time in 0.0, in my first fleet fight? No. The highs and lows are the best element about EvE, what makes it so real. Imagine how someone feels who loses a faction fitted mship. Do they write a thread about it, no.
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 09:22:00 -
[204]
Quote: Thanks for the replies. As for the guy who thinks that empire sec status is 100% broken. I'd have to disagree.
#1 For those who have reading problems, I did NOT gank a single ship in jita, it was all over empire at various gates. When you gank a ship, concord stays there and you have to find a new spot (knowledge from what we call "observation").
#2 Warp to 0 was put into eve to AVOID this type of scenario as well as remove server lag (which was very well done btw..eve hasn't been smoother in a long time)
#3 To the guy who asked if you can cargo scan a ship. Yes you can, it's called cargo scanners & was put into the game for a reason which for some reason alot of players dont' seem to fully understand WHY it was there. Then again they dont' understand the concepts of SHIELDS & ARMOR....oh well.
As for the last guy who asked, the guy was in a fast ship...I locked him saw the implants & engaged him..he mwd'd it to the gate & jumped out in structure. One guy I killed was popped just as my ship was @ 5% structure with my drones on him (tech1 hammerheads are fine for this) in a 0.8 system.....dmg control 1's 4tw!). You dont' always get them. Sometimes a guy puts a shield booster or a plate on his hauler & I can't kill him in time b4 I die..but alot of guys would rather put speed b4 security.
People dont' seem to understand that this is a FIGHTING game.
a) I am sure you would disagree, I am sure the people who exploited complexes also disagree they should have been fixed also. The reality is you have shown clearly that the risk vs reward for suicisde ganking is compeltely and utter broken.
b) doesnt matter if it was jita or some other empire system the point is IT WAS IN EMPIRE, which 100% protects you while you do this so you have ZERO risk. you are just reinforcing how broke the risk vs reward is for suicide ganking. Not to mention you are essentially exploiting the game, since you must be using an alt in a hauler to loot....but that is actually trivial because it could be a friend and nothing would change 
c) warp to zero wasnt put in to stop this and doesnt stop it if you just camp the other side fo the gate, you might need another ship but lets be real at 4 mill a ship you could use 20 ships and still you would be breaking the risk vs reward aspect of the game. I do agree though warp to 0 was long over due 
d) shield and armour mean jack again like I said you already explained it is a 4mill a pop investment to make hundreds of millions, you are just greedy, if they add shields and armour you add friends, nothing changes.
Lastly it seems you are the one who forget this is a fighting game.... I mean Maybe I missed something but I don;t recall the part of the scenario where you get jumped buy people and loose all your stuff. You are the one immune to fighting and you seem to conveniently forget that is the part of the equation that is broken. You are not at risk, you are safe, and you sir are never attacked by other players...... so you really got nerve to try to suggest for everyone to remember this is a fighting game....
|

n0thing
Northern Intelligence Artificial Intelligence.
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 09:25:00 -
[205]
Edited by: n0thing on 28/05/2007 09:25:18
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
All I can say, dont go afk if your cargo worth more then BS. EVE isnt a game where you can go relax and pick up flowers.
edit: Thats what I like in this game actually, when you loose - you really loose something. You have to actually think few steps ahead and plan your actions/opertaions. ---
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 09:25:00 -
[206]
Quote: "EvE is risk vs. reward, that simple."
Right well said. Now please detail out the risk that the guy who made 2.6 billion in 6 hours has.... I eagerly await this pile of steaming dung of an explaination..
|

Recon Jack
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 09:31:00 -
[207]
If everyone had the same risk I would buy the explanation. Since some people don't seem to have the risk however I think it's not quite fair. CCP not only ignores the new player, they encourage people to prey on them by not documenting their game and not policing the senior players. It's too hard to make the game fair for the players so might as well join in on the cheating.
|

Uchuu
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 10:27:00 -
[208]
Yeah... yeah... Oh well.
I don't know what's worse, having the skills and no money, or vice versa... I am currently in the latter, forget the gankers in high sec, speed up learning CCP! 
|

FarScape III
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 10:28:00 -
[209]
If I see something that is too easy and like punching a kid to get his stuff then I do not do it, because it is a gank. Any one can do a gank at any time, but hey donÆt, if you donÆt know why IÆm not going to tell you, find out some how your self.
This is a game and if something is so easy as to make 2.6 bill in 6 hours then something is wrong.
That is not a game, that is a handout.
Games are supposed to be a challenge.
People who gank easy victims are like a major leag team against little leag, what is the point?
Because it is fun? Ok go ahead have your fun, not fun to me though, but you go ahead.
The only thing is, it is unrealistic for it to be able to happen in the EVE universe, but it happens because the residences of EVE do not have the control they should have.
People should not afk but it is so boring for them not to, so something is wrong when your players are that bored, right?
Go ahead and do the ganking if you want but anyone could do it and it is not a big accomplishment if any at all. But if you think it is then good for you.
Personally I'd rather have boring stuff out of the game and real tactical playing into the game.
A Minmater City... Cool! My Stats :) |

Susan Acid
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 10:36:00 -
[210]
Originally by: Redpants
Originally by: Speedy Banana I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
2 weeks?! Oh no! When I lay down to go to sleep tonight, I'll think of this and cry for you. I think there's games more appropriate for you on the Wii, check those out.
Wow.You're a real tough guy!Too tough for any other games huh?You do realise that Eve is hard for new players right?And that many of the rules of this game are not documented?I hope you lose EVERYTHING you have in game.
|

Thanatosz
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 10:44:00 -
[211]
LAAAAAWWWWWWWWLLLLLLLLLRRRRROFFFFLLLMAAOOO ... Dude slap youreself and face the facts of life.
LIFE'S A *****, STOP WHINING ! seroiusly what dumbass would spend that much money on a hauler.
Rule 1 - never whine about loosing a ship, since 150mil isnt much for a pilot to whine Rule 2 - never fly what you can't afford to loose Rule 3 - 150mil isnt that hard to get back, so don't whine.
My god this thread gets worse...
|

Epicurus
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 10:55:00 -
[212]
Edited by: Epicurus on 28/05/2007 10:56:36 Said this before and will say it again..
Secure space needs to be made a little safer. High sec gankers are basically people that want to ruin this game for others. You as a trader or a guy moving his stuff from A to B shoulder all the risk while the cowardly gankers don't have any risk other than losing a T1 fitted BS which is insured. If you decided to gank people in a 0.5 to 1.0 system then the ganker should have a higher risk involved.. Such as losing insurance or perhaps a greater risk.
If you as a pilot moving your stuff decided to go via low sec (0.4 to 0.0) then you know the risk and cannot really complain, but moving via secure space should be safer. Not saying it should be 100% safe but safer.
High Sec pirates have no risk but all reward and this needs looking at..
CCP are happy to make far other areas of the game for people so why not this..
I know people will moan at this but those people are they type of people that dont really give a stuff about fairness when things are going thier way.
and to the dumb ass that posted above me. 150mil isk is not alot when you have loads, but if thats all you have then its alot..
|

annoing
Amarr MisFunk Inc. Frontline.
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 11:00:00 -
[213]
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had.
1) Secure container FTW!!(loot in secure containers cant be get at) 2) They lost nothing excpet a few modules as they were insured so learn from that lesson -- get insured 3) Making isk in EVE is easy enough so you can recoup quick enough 4) These things are meant to test us and our resolve. Instead of using your anger at this incident to moan about it, direct your anger into positive avenues that mean you stay safe next time and plot revenge! 5) If dying and losing your isk/loot etc within the first few weeks upsets you that much dont try the other MMORPG's as they are pretty all of a sameness. If you dont like dying dont play FPS and if you dont like player interaction go play solitaire. Dying and losing stuff is part of the game. True, if you are new it might not be palatable but you'll get used to it, plan better for such events and learn to defend yourself. Eve is a wonderful game, just keep it up 
|

Roy Batty68
Caldari Immortal Dead
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 11:06:00 -
[214]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
Quote: "EvE is risk vs. reward, that simple."
Right well said. Now please detail out the risk that the guy who made 2.6 billion in 6 hours has.... I eagerly await this pile of steaming dung of an explaination..
And if everyone used WTZ, how would he make any money?
What exactly are you argueing for? The right for everyone to play lazy in hisec?
------------------- Say What? |

Gibbal Slogspit
Buffed Rumpuss Zit Dids
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 11:08:00 -
[215]
Just dont give insurance payouts to people that lose thier ships with a global aggression tag.
|

Neothas
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 12:35:00 -
[216]
Originally by: Gibbal Slogspit
Just dont give insurance payouts to people that lose thier ships with a global aggression tag.
Yeah....because I'm sure he will give up 2+ billion in six hours just because he loses out on insurance. The problem with this game is not the pirates (and incidents like this), it's with people that think they can play the game afk.
|

Roy Batty68
Caldari Immortal Dead
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 12:43:00 -
[217]
Originally by: Neothas
Originally by: Gibbal Slogspit
Just dont give insurance payouts to people that lose thier ships with a global aggression tag.
Yeah....because I'm sure he will give up 2+ billion in six hours just because he loses out on insurance. The problem with this game is not the pirates (and incidents like this), it's with people that think they can play the game afk.
Exactly.
------------------- Say What? |

Penny Golding
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 12:49:00 -
[218]
Originally by: Roy Batty68
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
Quote: "EvE is risk vs. reward, that simple."
Right well said. Now please detail out the risk that the guy who made 2.6 billion in 6 hours has.... I eagerly await this pile of steaming dung of an explaination..
And if everyone used WTZ, how would he make any money?
What exactly are you argueing for? The right for everyone to play lazy in hisec?
Sigh, OK, I'll be the dumbass everybody laughs at.
WTF does WTZ stand for? :)
|

Neothas
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 13:02:00 -
[219]
WTZ = Warp To Zero
|

Penny Golding
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 13:12:00 -
[220]
Neothas, thank you.
|

Hugh Ruka
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 13:14:00 -
[221]
1. Get over it, these things happen. And it will happen to you again if you continue playing. However 150m is not the right reason to quit the game.
2. I lost several battleships on one day and each loss set me back some 17m isk after I got the t2 fiting back (I lost all modules each time).
3. Risk vs. reward is broken. CCP needs to fix the risk in some cases (like this one).
Originally by: JP Beauregard The experience with Exodus playtesting has scarred me for life. Those were bug-reports, not feature requests, you numbskulls.... 
|

Wylker
Caldari Pyrrhus Sicarii Aftermath Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 14:24:00 -
[222]
Originally by: Speedy Banana" stuff
Not speedy enough were ya? 
|

Amarria Black
Clan Anthraxx
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 15:26:00 -
[223]
Originally by: Horus Isis
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Sorum Daemoth actually, there are about 180,000 players not including trial accounts ( dont count those like WoW does) and not including eve china. and boo hoo to your ship sorry to say, suck it up and make back the money.
No I think I'll just find another game to pay my monthly subscription to that is not built from the ground up on the concept of griefing people.
go play WOW, you wont be missed
Doesn't work, you're sending him to a game where griefing is the norm.
I'd suggest a rousing game of Poke The Bunny.
|

Roy Batty68
Caldari Immortal Dead
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 17:10:00 -
[224]
Edited by: Roy Batty68 on 28/05/2007 17:09:00
Originally by: Amarria Black
Originally by: Horus Isis
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Sorum Daemoth actually, there are about 180,000 players not including trial accounts ( dont count those like WoW does) and not including eve china. and boo hoo to your ship sorry to say, suck it up and make back the money.
No I think I'll just find another game to pay my monthly subscription to that is not built from the ground up on the concept of griefing people.
go play WOW, you wont be missed
Doesn't work, you're sending him to a game where griefing is the norm.
I'd suggest a rousing game of Poke The Bunny.
Lil bugger bit me!! Nerf! Nerf teh bunny!! ------------------- Say What? |

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 18:07:00 -
[225]
Quote: Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "EvE is risk vs. reward, that simple." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right well said. Now please detail out the risk that the guy who made 2.6 billion in 6 hours has.... I eagerly await this pile of steaming dung of an explaination.. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And if everyone used WTZ, how would he make any money?
What exactly are you argueing for? The right for everyone to play lazy in hisec?
Wow outstanding job at avoiding ANSWERING THE QUESTION!! The question is where is the risk on the suicide ganker. Eve is risk vs reward right. so please stop being a twit and detail the risk the suicide ganker has in making billions in hours.... PS WTZ doesnt do jack, because haulers are often slow as hell to warp so they can gank you on the other side of the gate thinking FTW!
|

Roy Batty68
Caldari Immortal Dead
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 18:17:00 -
[226]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
Quote: Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "EvE is risk vs. reward, that simple." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right well said. Now please detail out the risk that the guy who made 2.6 billion in 6 hours has.... I eagerly await this pile of steaming dung of an explaination.. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And if everyone used WTZ, how would he make any money?
What exactly are you argueing for? The right for everyone to play lazy in hisec?
Wow outstanding job at avoiding ANSWERING THE QUESTION!! The question is where is the risk on the suicide ganker. Eve is risk vs reward right. so please stop being a twit and detail the risk the suicide ganker has in making billions in hours.... PS WTZ doesnt do jack, because haulers are often slow as hell to warp so they can gank you on the other side of the gate thinking FTW!
Hmm... Feel a little challenged? Why do you feel the need to go into Jackass Forum Warrior mode? Whatever.
I find it doubtful the OP would have been ganked had he used WTZ instead of AFK.
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 PS WTZ doesnt do jack, because haulers are often slow as hell to warp so they can gank you on the other side of the gate thinking FTW!
Put some istabs on your hauler and you align plenty fast. Fast enough that people don't have time to 1) lock 2) cargo scan 3) evaluate if you're worth the CONCORDOKKEN 4) engage
Just admit it, Nanobiter. You're a giant carebear who'd rather "play" the game while watching Jerry Springer or picking your butt, or a thousand other things besides actively playing. "Thinking ftw". That's a laugh. You're campaigning for exactly the opposite.
"CCP!!! Please oh please make it so I don't have to think in hisec!! waaaaaaahahahaaaa"

I see your jackass post, and raise you one.
------------------- Say What? |

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 19:50:00 -
[227]
Quote: "Hmm... Feel a little challenged? Why do you feel the need to go into Jackass Forum Warrior mode? Whatever.
I find it doubtful the OP would have been ganked had he used WTZ instead of AFK.
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PS WTZ doesnt do jack, because haulers are often slow as hell to warp so they can gank you on the other side of the gate thinking FTW! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Put some istabs on your hauler and you align plenty fast. Fast enough that people don't have time to 1) lock 2) cargo scan 3) evaluate if you're worth the CONCORDOKKEN 4) engage
Just admit it, Nanobiter. You're a giant carebear who'd rather "play" the game while watching Jerry Springer or picking your butt, or a thousand other things besides actively playing. "Thinking ftw". That's a laugh. You're campaigning for exactly the opposite.
"CCP!!! Please oh please make it so I don't have to think in hisec!! waaaaaaahahahaaaa"
I see your jackass post, and raise you one.
"
Actually you started the jack assing with your stupid reply. I have never been suicided in empire infact I live out in 0.0, it is ironic that you talk about the carebears being safe in empire, while ignoring the fact the suicide ganker is guilty OF EXACTLY the same thing but you blindly defend them for some reason.....
Here we go again though you just keep avoiding the issue and the question being what risk is that empire hugging carebear suicide ganker having to deal with? Stop talking about everything but what I am discussing if you plan to reply TO ME. Okay So when I ask what the risk is for the suicide ganker, don't reply with a smart arsed comment about how people can use warp to zero.....
|

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 04:51:00 -
[228]
I'll answer the question about risk. There is no risk. As a battlecruiser nobody is going to touch you in high sec. You would need 2 battleships to take out 1 battlecruiser before concord arives which would leave the attackers at a big loss even if insured. So nobody is going to kill the suacide ganker unless they feel like losing 10x more money than the ganker would. I don't know of anything else more carebear really. They sit in high sec knowing nothing can and nothing will attack them, and claim they are really hardcore. Right... high sec protects them more then the haulers.
How do you fix this? Or atleast improve the situation?
1). Killed by CONCORD = No insurance 2). CONCORD STAYS AT ALL THE GOD DAM GATES! What these gankers take advantage of is that as soon as any agression takes place all concord ships warp to where the agression took place, and then they stay there. So the ganker goes to another gate and has more then enough time to kill anyone before concord can warp to the new gate. Concord ships need to be and to stay at every gate. It honestly seems like CCP was just too lazy to properly program the concord AI to begin with. They are trigger with certain actions then they just turn off until another certain action happens. The turrets at the gate also need to be beefed up because they are a complete joke. Put a 1600mm plate on a thorax and you can kill a frigate and warp away before they get into half your armor. Not even going to mention battlecruisers or battleships can do.
|

Vitrael
Stormriders Fimbulwinter
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 05:16:00 -
[229]
Eight pages and the genius who undocked with his life savings in one industrial is still pretending anyone cares.
----------
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 07:29:00 -
[230]
Thread really dies out when you start asking tough questions, those empire suiciders know they need a big nerf bad... Still no risk it seems for the suicide gankers....something stinks....
|

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Minmatar Sicarri Covenant
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 08:11:00 -
[231]
Edited by: Surfin''s PlunderBunny on 29/05/2007 08:11:18 Oh boy, I get to throw in my stupid rant on last night!
Ok, I was out Yarring in my Cyclone... totally hammered (Tequila!) when after a few jumps I come across a lone Ibis. Easy target, right? Lock on and start firing my autocannons and a sobering message pops up... something along the lines of "You about to get ganked by Concord!" This was when I realized that I had stumbled into 0.9 so in my drunken state I panic and desperately try to get to the closest station (why I still can't figure out :P) and of course it wont let me dock and I warped right into concord and my cyclone went pop...
Well, it was funny as hell when it happened but today I discovered that the loss cost a bit :P
So, in your crazy carebear mind does "I was flying drunk off my ass" rate a petition? 
Oh, and the Ibis got away 
Tic Toc Tic Toc , time is ticking (despite him stopping it ... ~Liz Kali
|

Roy Batty68
Caldari Immortal Dead
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 09:19:00 -
[232]
*sigh*
This game is going to be a poor shadow of itself before too long. People keep argueing and calling for nerfs, nibbling at the edges of what defines it. What makes it challenging. It's just a bit here and there, one small thing after another. But it adds up.
What does the ganker risk?
Profit. There is always the chance that whatever makes the gank potentially profitable will get blown up. What doesn't get blown up, might get snatched by someone else before he can get his own hauler to it. Everything else is known before hand.
He will lose the ship. He will take a sec rating hit. He might have enough survive to make a profit as long as he gets to it first.
Sure, pulling insurance payout might increase that risk slightly. Make it a larger number to overcome with what might drop. Will it stop it? No. The potential for profit will still be there even without insurance. So...? Likely still not good enough for the whiners. They won't be happy until the practice is totally gone.
Taking insurance payout away doesn't really change the risk/reward as you're argueing it. It simply changes one of the predetermined numbers. Instead of (for example) 150mil being the minimum, it might raise it to 230mil. Whatever.
So what do you risk by calling for nerfs to this?
You risk Eve empire becoming WoW in space. Where nothing bad is allowed to happen. Where any sense of danger is totally erased.
- Warp to Zero. Pirate nerf. - Don't scan out my missions, boo hoo. - Privateers nerf. - Freighters zomg! Drones lose lock, gate guns buffed. next - No highsec ganking! We want our AFK autopilot!! - ... what after that? Oh, I know! No More Can Flipping!
The simple fact is, if you THINK and play smart, you don't have to worry about getting ganked at all. But let's not ask people to do that. Let's just nerf the bad guys... some more.
But don't worry. There's likely already a nerf incomming due to all the freighter crying. That will likely spill over onto hauler ganking as well. You'll likely get your safe AFK playstyle.
Eve will be so much more fun and challenging after that, won't it?

------------------- Say What? |

Cpt Branko
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 09:34:00 -
[233]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 29/05/2007 09:41:30
Originally by: Soulja I am starting to question the mentality of people that just shout, 'don't AFK haul', 'use an alt to X' ...etc.. The problem with high sec suicide ganking is that its just plain wrong.
Does anyone else see a similarity here.
Those that... In eve: Hauler warps to a hi sec gate at 15km.. Hauler is scanned, popped by n of combat ship y, Hauler points out the injustice and the whole forum shouts abuse at the Hauler.
must also be the ones that in real life follow the 'she deserved it' or the 'she was asking for it' for it mentality in stories of r/ape where the woman was wearing revealing clothes or were to drunk to resist.
So there are two morals: Just because you can Doesn't mean you should!! When someone posts a 'OMG i been ganked thread' please don't reply in such r/etarded manner. (see any number of the 'its your fault' threads for examples of r/etarded responses)
Thanks for your time.
The analogy is both (a) dead wrong (b) sick. First off, Eve has rules. One rule is that if you're ganked in high-sec without aggroing anyone, concord ganks him and reduces his sec status. That's it. There's nothing implied about being safe in high sec. It's not saying it's wrong, forbidden, or anything else to gank people in high sec, or that concord will protect you - CCP has mutliple times in guides asserted that Concord is a retaliative force. Not knowing the law is NO excuse, and that is the law in its present state. That's where your analogy is wrong.
Secondly, comparing real-life pain of that proportion to a loss in a computer game is slightly sick. If being ganked in a computer game is going to leave you scarred for life, then stop playing computer games of any sort. If the analogy was "you leave your drink unattended in a pub and don't find it when you get back, that's downright annoying", then fine. This way, shame on you. Not to mention the analogy is actually *wrong* since we do NOT have laws against ganking people in Empire in EVE! We DONT! Let me say it again, WE DONT HAVE ANY LAWS *PREVENTING* GANKING IN EMPIRE IN EVE! WE JUST HAVE ONE SAYING CONCORD KILLS THE ATTACKER! IT'S *NOT* THE SAME, AS EXPLICITLY STATED BY CCP!
Thirdly, stop trying to make every game into a WoW clone - the day it becomes a no risk, no brains game is the day it looses any appeal to at least half of the population. Does *every* game have to try to be the mainstream? Let us have *one* game which actually has PvP that makes some sense.
Ever since the days I've played Elite, if anyone remembers, I've wanted a multi-player version, and the whiners want to take away all the spirit and uniqueness from it because they, guess what, lost virtual money. Shame on you.
Edit: If you had *just* read the tips and advice in the "player guide", you would've read the following: "Don't play the game in AFK mode. This game is not designed with this kind of playing style in mind and you should NEVER consider your ship and character safe while being away from your computer." "Don't expect CONCORD to keep you immune to attacks or ship losses. Like in the real world, law enforcers often arrive too late at the scene of the crime, and even though they able to punish the criminal, they can't always prevent the crime." Link: http://www.eve-online.com/guide/en/g16.asp
In short, as my sysadmin would say, "RTFM First!" ;)
|

Dajjal
Amarr Rage Academy oooh Shiny
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 11:45:00 -
[234]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 *snip*
Wow outstanding job at avoiding ANSWERING THE QUESTION!! The question is where is the risk on the suicide ganker. Eve is risk vs reward right. so please stop being a twit and detail the risk the suicide ganker has in making billions in hours.... PS WTZ doesnt do jack, because haulers are often slow as hell to warp so they can gank you on the other side of the gate thinking FTW!
The Risk for the Ganker is if the target has the common sense to use the tools available in-game to prevent the gank happening
Warp core and inertia stabs, nano's, shield, armour, MWD's/AB's, cloaks, etc etc are all available. Haulers can fit more than just Cargo Expanders.
instead most victims want the maximum reward for themselves at no-risk
i know i make damn sure i have the best possible chance of getting from A to B in safety when hauling valuables or at worst make sure what i fly/carry i can afford to lose
Engage Brain before you Engage Warp Drive
|

Soobad
Gallente Girls Gone Bad Corp
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 11:55:00 -
[235]
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
A fool and his/her money are soon parted Can I have your stuff 
|

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 11:57:00 -
[236]
Edited by: Speedy Banana on 29/05/2007 12:00:44
Originally by: Roy Batty68 *sigh*
This game is going to be a poor shadow of itself before too long. People keep argueing and calling for nerfs, nibbling at the edges of what defines it. What makes it challenging. It's just a bit here and there, one small thing after another. But it adds up.
What does the ganker risk?
Profit. There is always the chance that whatever makes the gank potentially profitable will get blown up. What doesn't get blown up, might get snatched by someone else before he can get his own hauler to it. Everything else is known before hand.
He will lose the ship. He will take a sec rating hit. He might have enough survive to make a profit as long as he gets to it first.
Sure, pulling insurance payout might increase that risk slightly. Make it a larger number to overcome with what might drop. Will it stop it? No. The potential for profit will still be there even without insurance. So...? Likely still not good enough for the whiners. They won't be happy until the practice is totally gone.
Taking insurance payout away doesn't really change the risk/reward as you're argueing it. It simply changes one of the predetermined numbers. Instead of (for example) 150mil being the minimum, it might raise it to 230mil. Whatever.
So what do you risk by calling for nerfs to this?
You risk Eve empire becoming WoW in space. Where nothing bad is allowed to happen. Where any sense of danger is totally erased.
- Warp to Zero. Pirate nerf. - Don't scan out my missions, boo hoo. - Privateers nerf. - Freighters zomg! Drones lose lock, gate guns buffed. next - No highsec ganking! We want our AFK autopilot!! - ... what after that? Oh, I know! No More Can Flipping!
The simple fact is, if you THINK and play smart, you don't have to worry about getting ganked at all. But let's not ask people to do that. Let's just nerf the bad guys... some more.
But don't worry. There's likely already a nerf incomming due to all the freighter crying. That will likely spill over onto hauler ganking as well. You'll likely get your safe AFK playstyle.
Eve will be so much more fun and challenging after that, won't it?

Roy you are a complete hypocrite.
1). Nobody is going to gank YOUR hauler because by the time you blow up the target and you are looting the wreck CONCORD is already RIGHT BESIDE YOU. So if anybody attacks you then they will blow up instantly. Because you are in empire you can then dump your loot at the closest station for safe keeping. Basically.. 0 risk what so ever.
2). What are the chances somebody else is going to steal your loot when your hauler is right beside the target and you know what's going on? People not afk will warp at 0km. What are the chances they are going to close in say. 10-12 km from the afk hauler's wreck before you can loot it, WHEN YOU ARE RIGHT BESIDE IT?
So ya roy.. you're a real badass. You take SOO many risks.....
The simple fact is, YOU'RE THE CAREBEAR, you're the only person secure space is protecting. You take no risks for the money you can make. You cannot honestly sit here and tell me suacide ganking is more dangerous then 0.0 ratting or 0.0 gate camps or.. ANYTHING 0.0. You are taking less risk then people doing level 1 missions in empire. It's funny that you can even mention challenge. It's pretty obvious how challenging suacide ganking is if a brutix and a hauler managed to make 2.6 billion in 6 hours.
|

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 12:00:00 -
[237]
Edited by: Speedy Banana on 29/05/2007 12:03:59
Originally by: Dajjal
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 *snip*
Wow outstanding job at avoiding ANSWERING THE QUESTION!! The question is where is the risk on the suicide ganker. Eve is risk vs reward right. so please stop being a twit and detail the risk the suicide ganker has in making billions in hours.... PS WTZ doesnt do jack, because haulers are often slow as hell to warp so they can gank you on the other side of the gate thinking FTW!
The Risk for the Ganker is if the target has the common sense to use the tools available in-game to prevent the gank happening
Warp core and inertia stabs, nano's, shield, armour, MWD's/AB's, cloaks, etc etc are all available. Haulers can fit more than just Cargo Expanders.
instead most victims want the maximum reward for themselves at no-risk
i know i make damn sure i have the best possible chance of getting from A to B in safety when hauling valuables or at worst make sure what i fly/carry i can afford to lose
Engage Brain before you Engage Warp Drive
Ohh ok I see.. so basically... no risk. Because having a hauler warp in at 0km and get away isn't risk, because that's just saying you're at risk of not making more money then you already are making (which is ridiculous to being with).
It's like.. gee if that hauler with 500 mil didn't warp in at 0km I could have made 3.1 billion in 6 hours..
Clearely VERY dangerous work
|

Umit Davala
Corpus PCG The State
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 12:03:00 -
[238]
Edited by: Umit Davala on 29/05/2007 12:02:40 I don't want to get involved in all the squabbling between posters here, but putting all your eggs in one basket is not the best idea in the world.
I never transport valuable items in a hauler - use a fast, nano'd cruiser or even frigate if necessary.
While I appreciate this isn't going to bring your items back, perhaps just scratch this to a valuable lesson learned and ensure you take the steps to avaoid it happening again.
Edit: removed wall of text ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This post was brought to you in association with Amateur Dramatics Forum Whoring, and Quafe Ultra: in the heat of the moment. |

Neothas
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 12:09:00 -
[239]
After 9 pages you still just don't get it....
CCP has repeatedly said that they want it this way. The game is not meant to be played AFK. So you can !@#$% all you want, and point fingers at whoever if it makes you feel better. The bottom line is you will either a) adapt and learn the rules of the game or b) quit.
I haul billions of isk worth of goods all across space, and have never been ganked. It's stupid pilots like you that keep the prices high for smart pilots like me.....so I guess I owe you a "thank you" 
|

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 12:28:00 -
[240]
Originally by: Neothas After 9 pages you still just don't get it....
CCP has repeatedly said that they want it this way. The game is not meant to be played AFK. So you can !@#$% all you want, and point fingers at whoever if it makes you feel better. The bottom line is you will either a) adapt and learn the rules of the game or b) quit.
I haul billions of isk worth of goods all across space, and have never been ganked. It's stupid pilots like you that keep the prices high for smart pilots like me.....so I guess I owe you a "thank you" 
No no it's fine. I don't expect them to fix it, because now I'm suacide ganking. I am in a 0.0 corp so it's easy to get sec status back up. I got two haulers full of tech 2 items in about 2 hours of doing this with a brutix and a hauler. There really is no point of doing anything less if you want to make money really.
|

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 12:29:00 -
[241]
Edited by: Speedy Banana on 29/05/2007 12:28:18
Originally by: Neothas After 9 pages you still just don't get it....
CCP has repeatedly said that they want it this way. The game is not meant to be played AFK. So you can !@#$% all you want, and point fingers at whoever if it makes you feel better. The bottom line is you will either a) adapt and learn the rules of the game or b) quit.
I haul billions of isk worth of goods all across space, and have never been ganked. It's stupid pilots like you that keep the prices high for smart pilots like me.....so I guess I owe you a "thank you" 
No no it's fine. I don't expect them to fix it, because now I'm suacide ganking. I am in a 0.0 corp so it's easy to get sec status back up. I got two haulers full of tech 2 items in about 2 hours of doing this with a brutix and a hauler. There really is no point of doing anything less if you want to make money really. And as long as ccp thinks making 2.6 billion in 6 hours with 0 risk is working as intended, I don't see the point of doing anything else.
|

Dajjal
Amarr Rage Academy oooh Shiny
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 12:29:00 -
[242]
Originally by: Speedy Banana *snip* Ohh ok I see.. so basically... no risk. Because having a hauler warp in at 0km and get away isn't risk, because that's just saying you're at risk of not making more money then you already are making (which is ridiculous to being with).
It's like.. gee if that hauler with 500 mil didn't warp in at 0km I could have made 3.1 billion in 6 hours..
Clearely VERY dangerous work
if he enagages and u are fitted to escape or survive - he dies, u dont
sounds like a risk to me - but only if u think about your fit and actually pay attention to what could, and is, happening
and if everyone hauling tried to counter then the Ganker is at risk of being so bored he ends himself 
oh and if you want to get revenge on EVE - join my Corp and learn to spank people back 
http://www.rage-academy.com/
|

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 12:34:00 -
[243]
Edited by: Speedy Banana on 29/05/2007 12:34:08
Originally by: Dajjal
Originally by: Speedy Banana *snip* Ohh ok I see.. so basically... no risk. Because having a hauler warp in at 0km and get away isn't risk, because that's just saying you're at risk of not making more money then you already are making (which is ridiculous to being with).
It's like.. gee if that hauler with 500 mil didn't warp in at 0km I could have made 3.1 billion in 6 hours..
Clearely VERY dangerous work
if he enagages and u are fitted to escape or survive - he dies, u dont
sounds like a risk to me - but only if u think about your fit and actually pay attention to what could, and is, happening
and if everyone hauling tried to counter then the Ganker is at risk of being so bored he ends himself 
oh and if you want to get revenge on EVE - join my Corp and learn to spank people back 
http://www.rage-academy.com/
LOL... ya, because if a hauler warps 0km from the gate is going to try to engage... right
Look at the stats for an iteron or any other hauler. An iteron 3 has 75 power grid. What do armor plates take? TONS of power grid. What do shield expanders take? TONS of power grid. So no, you cannot equip any industrial to survive. 7 blasters and 5 drones will *****it long before concord even knows wtf is going on. So please don't come here with a stupid argument that suacide gankers take any kind of risk. I think after 9 pages, with arguments from both sides, it's pretty clear there is no risk when somebody managed to make 2.6 billion in 6 hours.
|

Cpt Branko
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 12:34:00 -
[244]
Originally by: Neothas After 9 pages you still just don't get it....
CCP has repeatedly said that they want it this way. The game is not meant to be played AFK. So you can !@#$% all you want, and point fingers at whoever if it makes you feel better. The bottom line is you will either a) adapt and learn the rules of the game or b) quit.
I haul billions of isk worth of goods all across space, and have never been ganked. It's stupid pilots like you that keep the prices high for smart pilots like me.....so I guess I owe you a "thank you" 
QFT!
Essentially, Read The F***** Manual, else don't complain about the losses. The "Game is not meant to be played AFK" part is first in the player guide tips&advice section, and if you didn't read the player guide, I don't think you really have any right to complain.
|

Dajjal
Amarr Rage Academy oooh Shiny
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 12:51:00 -
[245]
Originally by: Speedy Banana *snip* LOL... ya, because if a hauler warps 0km from the gate is going to try to engage... right
Look at the stats for an iteron or any other hauler. An iteron 3 has 75 power grid. What do armor plates take? TONS of power grid. What do shield expanders take? TONS of power grid. So no, you cannot equip any industrial to survive. 7 blasters and 5 drones will *****it long before concord even knows wtf is going on. So please don't come here with a stupid argument that suacide gankers take any kind of risk. I think after 9 pages, with arguments from both sides, it's pretty clear there is no risk when somebody managed to make 2.6 billion in 6 hours.
obviously u arent even willing to even try
its odd that in 4 years i have only been ganked once in empire in a hauler - after that gank i realised what i needed to do to avoid it happening again
GL, u need it
|

Steyr Daghan
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 13:25:00 -
[246]
Edited by: Steyr Daghan on 29/05/2007 13:25:12
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships ...
But this is the way you learn how to play EVE, either someone tells you what to do or you find out the hard way.
I disagree with the idea that this makes you an idiot. In fact I believe everyone have made these kind of mistakes (though perhaps not often so costly). The only exception would be those that never dares to do anything on their own and are totally dependent on older corpmates pampering them 24/7.
When i got my first kessy i set the autopilot to shortest route, went afk and came back just in time to see the pirates pod me. Lesson learned. First time i got my ore stolen i fired at the flashing thief with my brand new osprey and got wacked in 15 seconds. Lesson learned. And so on. Trial and error is very much part of the game, i think.
What is a bit stupid however, is that you regard this as a flaw in the game mechanics rather than a learning experience.
Having said that, I do find it absurd that you get insurance payouts even though you lost the ship by committing a crime. Kills by the cops should automatically void the insurance. This would nerf the griefers/gankers a little without making hauling totally secure and it does make perfect sense in every way.
Edited: memory lapse
|

SurrenderMonkey
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 19:40:00 -
[247]
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Phil Carter Can i have you stuff aswell as all other stuff ingame from ppl who don't want to play anymore and start of a "i hate CCP" thread in the forums?
What stuff? there is no stuff left, because of game design some guy can lose 2% of his money and cause you to lose 99% of yours. Ya gee, wonder why only 20,000 people online still even after all these years.
...wow.
Take some responsibility for your own mistake, sir.
They can't cause you to lose 99% of your money unless you sink 99% of your money into a single ship and then stupidly AFK fly it somewhere. YOU made the mistake, they simply capitalized on it, and it's no fault of game design.
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 21:42:00 -
[248]
Quote: "What does the ganker risk?
Profit. There is always the chance that whatever makes the gank potentially profitable will get blown up. What doesn't get blown up, might get snatched by someone else before he can get his own hauler to it. Everything else is known before hand.
He will lose the ship. He will take a sec rating hit. He might have enough survive to make a profit as long as he gets to it first.
Sure, pulling insurance payout might increase that risk slightly. Make it a larger number to overcome with what might drop. Will it stop it? No. The potential for profit will still be there even without insurance. So...? Likely still not good enough for the whiners. They won't be happy until the practice is totally gone.
Taking insurance payout away doesn't really change the risk/reward as you're argueing it. It simply changes one of the predetermined numbers. Instead of (for example) 150mil being the minimum, it might raise it to 230mil. Whatever.
So what do you risk by calling for nerfs to this?
You risk Eve empire becoming WoW in space. Where nothing bad is allowed to happen. Where any sense of danger is totally erased.
- Warp to Zero. Pirate nerf. - Don't scan out my missions, boo hoo. - Privateers nerf. - Freighters zomg! Drones lose lock, gate guns buffed. next - No highsec ganking! We want our AFK autopilot!! - ... what after that? Oh, I know! No More Can Flipping!
a) the ganker doesn;t risk profit, they are'nt do anything to risk anything. The stuff they are hoping to gank is NOT THEIRS to start with.
b) The entire nonsense of they risk their ship is false, there is no real risk. As was shown you can suicide brutix at a loss rate of 4M isk please don;t try to suggest that is some kind of significant risk. You do understand you would have trouble finishing several level 3 missions in a t1 fitted brutix....
c)lmao ya right some random person in a hauler might snatch it up first sure......lolz.
d) Yes eliminating insurance only changes the numbers but by also added real chances the entire argo can explode then you might have some real risk where a suicider might actually loose money, in the end though suicide ganking add NOTHING of value to empire. The people who are there do not WANT excitement and possible death at every corner. IF they did want that they would be in low sec or 0.0
e) Empire is eve is ment to be wow in space get over it, if people want that sense of danger there is plenty fo places in eve to find it. Further more there is already that sense fo no danger in empire for anyone not hauling, so why again is it that only haulers are supposed to feel this sense? Why isnt the ganker supposed to feel some immense sense of danger where 1/4 of his earning might be taken by another player?
Stop trying ot use auto pilot as some scapgoat, if CCP didnt want peopel using auto pilot the feature would not exist it serves a purpose, and again you point might be valid ifEVERYONE was subject to death when on auto pilot or AFK doing nothing, but the truth is they aren;t. The only reason suicide ganking occurs it is exploits the game to make absurds money way to fast.
So in the end you managed to say absolutely nothing to defend it. Try again....
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 21:46:00 -
[249]
Quote: The Risk for the Ganker is if the target has the common sense to use the tools available in-game to prevent the gank happening
Again where is the risk, what is it? you just can;t say something and pretend it is magically true. At what point is the suicide ganker who is trying to make 150 mill profit in 15 minutes risking anything significant? How exactly is that suicide ganker at risk of loosing 1/4 of his fortune? Maybe everything? Oh ya never, they might loose a few million but that isn't remotely balanced rsk reward is it? I mean flying that same ship into a level 3 most likely has more risk....
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 21:52:00 -
[250]
Quote: CCP has repeatedly said that they want it this way.
Well I can assure you you are wrong. I think CCP is unaware of the issue that there is very little to no risk on teh ganker. I think you would be hard pressed to find someone at P who would agree that being able to make 2.6 billion an hour with no risk is what they envisioned.
I am sure they are okay with suicide ganking because the fix is too much work, but I am also sure they are not aware or have not thought out the entire risk vs reward of it either.
I am sure ccp is saying hey if someone want sot blow up 5 BS costing them over 400 million to get cargo worth even more cool beans, what they are not realizing is that people are puttin up not 400 million but as low as 4 million....while being 100% safe themselves...
|

Ezra Pouind
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 22:00:00 -
[251]
I know I'm dating myself a little bit, but I always hated it when I was playing pong, and I missed the little electronic ball with the paddle.
I wonder if I could get the game rewritten so that the paddle is as big as a whole side, then I'd never miss the ball!
I'm sure it was painful to loose all of your nest egg Speedy B, but in the long run you'll make back the isk, and you've learned a realy important lesson (assuming you take the time to think about what you could have done to avoid the situation). Its better that this happened to you now, rather than a year from now when you're moving your BPO's or faction equipment.
|

Neothas
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 22:15:00 -
[252]
Lol.....so now it's up to 2.6 billion AN HOUR....
I'm not arguing that the gankers have little to lose. I'm just pointing out that CCP will never make high security 100% safe. This is a company that thought it was great that someone scammed 10's of billions of isk in an IPO scam. And to be honest I love that attitude. This game is unforgiving. The second CCP changes their game to cater to stupid / lazy people will be the day I quit. So !@#$% and complain all you want. The rest of us will be playing.....
|

Aindrias
Amarr Fomus-Amarr Industrial Novus Ordos Seclorum
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 23:09:00 -
[253]
Pay with a credit card....?
All the weebles who say "High Sec shouldn't be safe" are forgetting that it isn't safe for people, it just shouldn't be profitable for pirates.
See what you can do with Paintbrush? |

Umit Davala
Corpus PCG The State
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 23:13:00 -
[254]
Originally by: Ezra Pouind I know I'm dating myself a little bit, but I always hated it when I was playing pong, and I missed the little electronic ball with the paddle.
I wonder if I could get the game rewritten so that the paddle is as big as a whole side, then I'd never miss the ball!
Win! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This post was brought to you in association with Amateur Dramatics Forum Whoring, and Quafe Ultra: in the heat of the moment. |

AirWalker
Amarr Galactic Response Team
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 00:14:00 -
[255]
Originally by: Umit Davala
Originally by: Ezra Pouind I know I'm dating myself a little bit, but I always hated it when I was playing pong, and I missed the little electronic ball with the paddle.
I wonder if I could get the game rewritten so that the paddle is as big as a whole side, then I'd never miss the ball!
Win!
qft
|

squidgee
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 00:16:00 -
[256]
Welcome to EVE. There's risks involved, especially if you want to AFK haul. Don't like it don't play.
Also just so you know they didn't lose 100mil each since they were likely fully insured and using T1 fittings. If they did it right they only lost 15mil each, tops. ----
|

Cpt Branko
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 02:07:00 -
[257]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 30/05/2007 02:07:01
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
a) the ganker doesn;t risk profit, they are'nt do anything to risk anything. The stuff they are hoping to gank is NOT THEIRS to start with.
b) The entire nonsense of they risk their ship is false, there is no real risk. As was shown you can suicide brutix at a loss rate of 4M isk please don;t try to suggest that is some kind of significant risk. You do understand you would have trouble finishing several level 3 missions in a t1 fitted brutix....
c)lmao ya right some random person in a hauler might snatch it up first sure......lolz.
d) Yes eliminating insurance only changes the numbers but by also added real chances the entire argo can explode then you might have some real risk where a suicider might actually loose money, in the end though suicide ganking add NOTHING of value to empire. The people who are there do not WANT excitement and possible death at every corner. IF they did want that they would be in low sec or 0.0
e) Empire is eve is ment to be wow in space get over it, if people want that sense of danger there is plenty fo places in eve to find it. Further more there is already that sense fo no danger in empire for anyone not hauling, so why again is it that only haulers are supposed to feel this sense? Why isnt the ganker supposed to feel some immense sense of danger where 1/4 of his earning might be taken by another player?
Stop trying ot use auto pilot as some scapgoat, if CCP didnt want peopel using auto pilot the feature would not exist it serves a purpose, and again you point might be valid ifEVERYONE was subject to death when on auto pilot or AFK doing nothing, but the truth is they aren;t. The only reason suicide ganking occurs it is exploits the game to make absurds money way to fast.
So in the end you managed to say absolutely nothing to defend it. Try again....
Regarding risks, the ganker risks the insturance money - some 10ish mil isk. Let's say the insurance will cover the (relatively minor) module price. He also risks not popping the thing, due to it being tanked, and getting the stuff stolen is a possible risk in a busy system.
Regarding "Empire is eve is ment to be wow in space get over it"*, you fail at basic literacy, sir. Read "Player Guide". CCP says different, and it IS their game, you know? Oh, yes, the devs explicitly said EVE isn't meant to be played AFK, and that you cannot in any cirrumstance assume you're safe while AFK. Read the bloody manual or shut the hell up about how it's "meant to be".
*By the way, it's spelled "Empire in EVE is meant to be WoW in space, get over it", "ment" isn't really a legitimate word.
|

SamtheDog
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 05:02:00 -
[258]
After reading NINE ... yes (9) pages of this, I've gone to a few realizations about the original poster.
#1 He is most probably a troll. I cannot believe that anyone with two braincells they can rub together can fully believe in the logic they are suggesting. If not. . .
#2 He's not very bright
#3 He's probably been pampered too long in his life to take any responsibilities for his actions
#4 He's the type of guy who likes to change the rules of the game to suit what he wants (He said he's empire ganking now..the very thing he was whining about)
#5 He deseves to get podded, & I'm very tempted to just have our alliance permanently war dec any corp or alliance that contains his alts or his main to make sure there are no "misunderstandings" about what will happen in empire.
People like this should really be put down...unfortunately we haven't evolved socially enough to grow the balls we need to do it.
Sam
 "Never underestimate greed or stupidity...you can always see it emerge in the end" |

Gort
Rampage Eternal Ka-Tet
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 07:35:00 -
[259]
He may be a troll, but people who hi sec gank are basically just griefbears. They take no risks whatsoever. It's basically a cheesy way to bring shame on the game. They haven't even got the stones to go to low sec, where there might actually be some risk.
All the whines about "get a clue" and so on aren't much better. Everybody's trying to act like they're the smartest guys in the room. It ain't workin', folks.
Regards,
Gort
-- When in doubt, empty the magazine. |

annoing
Amarr MisFunk Inc. Frontline.
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 08:11:00 -
[260]
Edited by: annoing on 30/05/2007 08:13:38 Edited by: annoing on 30/05/2007 08:11:44
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Look at the stats for an iteron or any other hauler. An iteron 3 has 75 power grid. What do armor plates take? TONS of power grid. What do shield expanders take? TONS of power grid. So no, you cannot equip any industrial to survive. 7 blasters and 5 drones will *****it long before concord even knows wtf is going on. So please don't come here with a stupid argument that suacide gankers take any kind of risk. I think after 9 pages, with arguments from both sides, it's pretty clear there is no risk when somebody managed to make 2.6 billion in 6 hours.
In 0.0 space I fit my hauler with enough ECM to fight a couple of fighters. Dampeners, multispectrals etc and a cloak in the high spot for all the safe spots in all the systems im likely to fly through. These take up virtually NO power and haulers have a ton of cpu and cap to spare. My low slots I keep for inertials, stabs and a f-93 so I can't be scrambled so easily and I have more chance to warp out. I can fly ALL race industrials, so each can be used for its own merits in different situations. I agree with those that say afk hauling is for the terminally lazy. I have hauled this way, but only when my stuff is in secure containers that makes it not worth the gankers time and energy.
More cheese with that whine vicar? -----------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------- |

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 19:23:00 -
[261]
Quote: Regarding risks, the ganker risks the insturance money - some 10ish mil isk. Let's say the insurance will cover the (relatively minor) module price. He also risks not popping the thing, due to it being tanked, and getting the stuff stolen is a possible risk in a busy system.
Regarding "Empire is eve is ment to be wow in space get over it"*, you fail at basic literacy, sir. Read "Player Guide". CCP says different, and it IS their game, you know? Oh, yes, the devs explicitly said EVE isn't meant to be played AFK, and that you cannot in any cirrumstance assume you're safe while AFK. Read the bloody manual or shut the hell up about how it's "meant to be".
*By the way, it's spelled "Empire in EVE is meant to be WoW in space, get over it", "ment" isn't really a legitimate word.
Everyone knows that gankers risk is limited to the cost difference of insurance. The point is that turns out to be near ZERO risk, in the scope of the REWARD. I mean serious you can fool yourself but not everyone else. You neatly avoided most everything to post one trivial point that no one disputes? We had a guiy in this thread who uses a brutix ( his supposed risk a paltry 4M isk, tell us how he made over 2.5 billion in 6 hours. Peopel are chalenging the risk vs reward, you seem to be able to offer NOTHING to refute that point that risk vs reward is broken with suicide ganking in empire.
You also need to work on your comprehension skills. The issue brought up isnt so much that players should be 100% safe in empire, so much as the risk vs reward for suicide ganking is wacked out broken. Also unlike what you try to imply by the player guide does NOT say EVE is not meant to be WOW in space. It also does not say do not use hauler to transports goods of value, because people will exploit the game mechanics and suicide on your ship and loot it. Another thing it does not say it that you are not meant to travel in empire AFK, and we are just to lazy to remove auto pilot.... ( gee doesnt having auto pilot mean they expect people to travel afk?)
So the only person here that needs to shut up seems to be yourself. Throughout EVE's existence there have been MANY MANY things put into EVE by the developers who lacked the forethought on the reprocussions and possible exploits of said feature. Originally there was no concord...yet we have concord today why? Because vet players would sit outside the noob stations and slaguhter noobs as they undocked for the first time...you know what your lame arguement would defended that action, yet clearly it wasn't what the developers wanted, or they over estimated the playerbase thinking someone would take up the role of sheriff and sit out side and guard the noobies stations for their entire EVE career... the list goes on and on of things that NEEDED changes.
Many people feel that suicide ganking is another thing that needs changes. I mean let's be honest clearly if it is bannable to smart bomb noobs right now in eve ( even though it is just suicide ganking ), yet they allow suicide ganking IF it is someone hauling there is a some problems with CCP's stance on it.
At anyrate the player base has a right to point out areas of EVE where it seems CCP made a mistake and to ask for changes to be made, Just like people are asking for something done about players who can go afk and cloak for eternity, just like people begged for nano BS's to be altered blah blah blah.
Sorry anyway you slice it, I highly doubt CCP vision includes that balanced gameplay has a guy in a t1 fitted brutix making 2.5 billion ISK every 6 hours. Please feel free to check the player manual and prove me wrong.
You did get one thing right, nice catch on my typo on ment.....you super duper poin dexter you!
|

Neothas
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 23:08:00 -
[262]
What you seem to fail to understand is that CCP has already put in several ways to avoid getting suicide ganked. The fact that people seem to choose to not use any of those tools, and then come here and complain about it is what I have a problem with. Sure, the risk reward is probably a bit flawed. But where do you draw the line? If you make the game easier then all that will happen is the same guy will be back in a few months complaining about how he got his multi billion isk BPO blown up while afk hauling in Empire.
And stop using the 2.6 billion in 6 hours as an example. We both know that's probably a huge exageration. And even if it isn't it's far from the norm.
|

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 23:37:00 -
[263]
Edited by: Speedy Banana on 30/05/2007 23:37:20
Originally by: Gort It's basically a cheesy way to bring shame on the game.
That's what it really comes down to. If you explain the mechanics of suacide ganking to somebody considering trying eve, or put it on the main page of the website... how many people do you honestly think are going to be impressed by the concept? I guarantee you that most people will think it's the dumbest thing they have ever heard and a clear flaw in game mechanics.
|

Neothas
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 23:55:00 -
[264]
Don't forget to mention that there were a dozen different things that you could have done to avoid getting ganked........
|

Tortun Nahme
Minmatar Heimatar Services Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 23:56:00 -
[265]
Like hiring -HsC- to provide security in the Heimatar region
/shameless plug
|

Cipher7
Sebiestor tribe
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 00:08:00 -
[266]
Originally by: Speedy Banana I put 150 mil isk worth of parts on my hauler, and auto pilot it to agil through secure space, only to get ganked in high sec by a few battleships while their friend in a hauler waited to loot my wreck. That was basically all the money I had. The idiots who did this lost more money in battleships then I had on my ship in cargo, but it doesn't matter to them since 100 mil loss each (x3) isn't anything for them. Now I'm left with 4 mil isk, which is like starting over with a trial account. I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
Great way to keep your customers paying CCP. Would have helped if there was a warning somewhere about stupid crap like this happening, as it's not obvious to somebody who just purchased the game.
Tough break kid.
1) Don't ever call yourself "customer" or "client." Real members of this community do not call themselves "customers." We are supporters of a concept called Eve. This concept is not perfect, but it is an awesome concept and there is nothing else like it.
2) Sci-fi is supposed to be harsh, it's part of the theme. Get used to it. The harshness is what makes Eve Eve. If you want a game for little kids, look elsewhere.
3) You lost 150m. Boo hoo. Dry your eye and get over it.
That is all.
C7
|

Durn Loze
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 00:35:00 -
[267]
You can quit EVE or you can get even with them. But getting even is going to require staying with EVE and learning from your mistake. If you are successful enough you hire mercs to make them pay eventually. Or at least succeed in the game as the people that ganked you probably consider it a double victory if you leave EVE.
Oh, and treat everyone as your enemy, even in Hisec, especially when you are carrying everything of worth that you have. I used to haul large amounts of trade goods through hisec, always made me nervous even there, so half the time I haul with a non-hauling ship with cargo expanders. That way I hope I don't look like a likely target even though I have 50-100 million in parts in my hold. It's that feeling of dread and potential doom that exists in EVE in all places that makes the game feel alive.
|

L0ck
Minmatar Reikoku Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 00:49:00 -
[268]
Edited by: L0ck on 31/05/2007 00:50:38 Edited by: L0ck on 31/05/2007 00:50:11 Edited by: L0ck on 31/05/2007 00:48:39
Quote: I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
2 weeks? Your crying to the world over 150 mil? Lose a t2'd out HAC that costs 250 mil and has an insurance payout of 8 mil, then ur meritted to whining in corp chat.
Lose a titan with full officer mods and 20 bil of spare mods in ur corp hangar...THEN...i allow you to make a "quitting eve" post.
Quit ur crying and leave, no one cares about your 1.9mil SP character.
edit: PS. If you want to die and keep your stuff, play WoW with the other 11 year olds.
|

Lord Seth
Amarr Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 01:00:00 -
[269]
Ya`know, I can understand his complaint BUT I don't agree with it. I have been playing eve for a few years now and what happened to you is the best part. That's what makes this game real and alive. Anything can happen anywhere and ppl must be very creative and cunning to make things happen. I hate dirty pirates but with out this kind of stuff in the game I would have not got the same experience I did. I love this game even after all these years. I think CCP are great and I think you ppl should all be appreciative of what the ppl at CCP have given us. This game is like no other and should not conform to the shape of the other gindy none realistic MMOGs. Speedy do you need some isk???? hell man what you lost was nothing. and if it will make you happy ill send you some isk. Just don't think that making this game easy and childish is the answer.
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 01:16:00 -
[270]
Quote: What you seem to fail to understand is that CCP has already put in several ways to avoid getting suicide ganked. The fact that people seem to choose to not use any of those tools, and then come here and complain about it is what I have a problem with. Sure, the risk reward is probably a bit flawed. But where do you draw the line? If you make the game easier then all that will happen is the same guy will be back in a few months complaining about how he got his multi billion isk BPO blown up while afk hauling in Empire.
And stop using the 2.6 billion in 6 hours as an example. We both know that's probably a huge exageration. And even if it isn't it's far from the norm.
You are quite wrong I DO UNDERSTAND what CCP has implmented, and NONE OF IT WORKS, that is the point. Warp to zero doesn't work ( you get ganked on other side of gate ), frieghters don't work ( it is just a math equation on which to blow up.
YOU on the other hand no matter how many times it is stated are in denial of the fact there is little to ZERO defense from suicide ganking beyond not using a hauler as it was ment for hauling...It is like suggesting the fix to a Battleship being poor in combat is to use a battleship to mine, because hey if you are going to use those slots for guns don;t complain you can;t kill stuff! Haulers don;t use those low slots for expanders, i mean what you expect to haul? wacka wacka!!!
I use 2.6b because it is NOT an exxageration there have been times many people have lost a hell of alot more or gained alot more.....The risk vs reward is flawed you admit it so why argue?
I think the line is easily drawn, the line should be drawn like this suicide ganker should expec tto fail xxx number of times per try and those failures should cost them atleast 60 million or what ever based on ship used.
Honestly I don;t think suicide ganking should be allowed AT ALL, it is exploiting a game mechanic being concords abilty to react fast enough, and using an extra character to loot who was not in the combat.
further more suicide ganking adds nothing needed to eve, and no one has said a single thing to contradict that ( ie haulers do not need risk, while at the same time people sitting at gates waiting to gank are NEVER AT RISK themselves so why should haulers be at risk cause it is good for the game but gankers half afk camping a gate should be at zero risk and danger while they wait? ).
All I see is people avoiding the tough questions I present as they defer and start talking about something else like hey they can warp to zero! Or hey that suicider might be at risk AFTER they try to kill someone, where is the risk before while they wait? Is it even really a risk if you are the one who chooses the time and place to for death? Why are haulers supposed to be victims of non-consentual pvp, but suicide gankers are immune to non-consentual pvp? None of that is ever answered.....Just carebear gankers trying to justify safe/easy mode.
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 01:18:00 -
[271]
Quote: You can quit EVE or you can get even with them.
I would love for you to detail how you get even with an anonymous alt suicide ganker most likely in a npc corp who never is in a position to have anything of value lost....
Just another question none of you will be able to answer.
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 01:22:00 -
[272]
Quote: Ya`know, I can understand his complaint BUT I don't agree with it. I have been playing eve for a few years now and what happened to you is the best part. That's what makes this game real and alive.
In what way was that alive or real? The person couldnt even have a gang with him to protect him. It is broken, plain and simple. what is best about eve is different to everyone, who are you to say that is what makes eve great? that is supposed to be the big concept behind eve, the player makes the decisions on what in eve he/she enjoys. If you want danger eve has it, if you don;t eve also has it, minus the fact peopel exploit simplistic game mechanics that should be fixed.
|

Neothas
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 01:27:00 -
[273]
OK...you win......pirates are bad.....and lazy people who can't be bothered to learn the game should be safe in Empire no what they do....
Feel better?
And yes....I once again failed to answer any of your questions becuase I've come to the realization that there will be no answer adequate for you.
|

L0ck
Minmatar Reikoku Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 01:45:00 -
[274]
Winnar
|

Speedy Banana
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 03:50:00 -
[275]
Edited by: Speedy Banana on 31/05/2007 03:50:02 Edited by: Speedy Banana on 31/05/2007 03:49:28
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
Quote: You can quit EVE or you can get even with them.
I would love for you to detail how you get even with an anonymous alt suicide ganker most likely in a npc corp who never is in a position to have anything of value lost....
Just another question none of you will be able to answer.
Most people don't realise that when you can make that much money, it's worth sacraficing one day of training on your main character, and just making a new one and getting enough skills to train for a battlecruiser. When security status gets low with that character... just make a new one. Again why the security status loss is nothing but a joke and why there is nothing to lose from suacide ganking.
|

Steyr Daghan
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 07:31:00 -
[276]
Originally by: squidgee Welcome to EVE. There's risks involved, especially if you want to AFK haul. Don't like it don't play.
This is a dumb argument. You're saying nobody should try to make the game better by suggesting improvements? Why not? Are you saying EVE is created perfect and cannot have flaws unbalanced issues? Evidence to the contrary.
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 07:36:00 -
[277]
Quote: OK...you win......pirates are bad.....and lazy people who can't be bothered to learn the game should be safe in Empire no what they do....
Feel better?
Of course I won that was obvious. Big difference between a pirate and a suicide ganker btw..., also quite odd you call people hauling lazy, but a guy who sits at a gate all day is not? Sorry suicide gankers are about as lazy as it gets in eve, and it is they who clearly can;t be bothered to learn the game....while they are somehow safe in empire....
Sorry the truth makes you feel bad
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 08:30:00 -
[278]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
Quote: OK...you win......pirates are bad.....and lazy people who can't be bothered to learn the game should be safe in Empire no what they do....
Feel better?
Of course I won that was obvious. Big difference between a pirate and a suicide ganker btw..., also quite odd you call people hauling lazy, but a guy who sits at a gate all day is not? Sorry suicide gankers are about as lazy as it gets in eve, and it is they who clearly can;t be bothered to learn the game....while they are somehow safe in empire....
Sorry the truth makes you feel bad
No offence but either you are the ops alt character or someone who equally doesnt have a clue.
first of all: THERE IS A RISK TO SUICIDE GANKING!!!! I myself have about 11 killrights on me, and actually do fly something beside my suiicide ship. I have a nice t2 harbinger in empire that people can hunt down and kill.
CCP HAVE IMPLEMENTED MEASURES TO ASSIST IN GETTING KILLRIGHTS! via search agents, giving people a month to take this on. So go ahead shoot me, some people already have tried.
second of all: THE HAULER CAN PROTECT THEMSELVES!!!! first of all, warp to zero is the best way of doing this. Autopilot was not intended for ferrying goods worth more than the ship itself, period. Somehow, you feel otherwise, and it is this that you need to look into real life, draw a nice analogy and realise how stupid you are for thinking this. Its ok though as long as you do understand in the end.
Another way of protecting yourselves is tanking your ship. Nuff said. Even using an untanked transport ship will deter the lone gate camper.
Third of all: To address your concern that 'ohhhh if i fly a more decent ship with a tank, and fit stabs and wtz, empire pirates will still scan me from the otherside and pop me in time(or any other lame excuse for the what ifs and not 100% safe' You're right....to an extent, maybe this will happen. Maybe people will sit in gangs of 30 and wait for a tanked, stabbed up transport ship to uncloak on the otherside of the gate... However, this is as unlikely as pigs flying. Empire gankers already have enough targets who warp in at autopilot. why would we care about you? again risk vs reward like you said.
And with the bohoo of the 2.6bill in 6 hours nerf haxxx exploit petition... This is not due to ccp... it is due to the stupidity of some of those who play eve. Call it darwanism at its best... idiot autopilots with all his eggs in a paperthin basket, loses it, calls exploit, gets flamed, leaves game = eve a much more safer place.
The fact is though, your concern that the risk vs reward is imbalanced is bull ****. EVE was never meant to be save anywhere! its in the bloody tutorial ffs. If you think otherwise then you do not understand the concept of eve.
|

Peter Powers
Master Miners Aftermath Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 08:57:00 -
[279]
Originally by: Speedy Banana I lost all the money I made since I subscribed to this game (2 weeks).
First of all: congratulations to make that much ISK that fast.
Now some Eve Basics for you
Rule 1) You are never safe, dont go AFK when not docked / at a POS. Rule 2) dont load all your things in ONE Ship
You cant blame CCP for you violating those two very basic rules.
|

E Vile
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 12:59:00 -
[280]
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Phil Carter Can i have you stuff aswell as all other stuff ingame from ppl who don't want to play anymore and start of a "i hate CCP" thread in the forums?
What stuff? there is no stuff left, because of game design some guy can lose 2% of his money and cause you to lose 99% of yours. Ya gee, wonder why only 20,000 people online still even after all these years.
The only one that caused you to loose your stuff was yourself for not being carefull moving valuables. Harsh, but true. Don't afk haul anything you can't afford to loose. "The key to immortality is to first live a life worth remembering."
Shohadaku New York Metal |

Durn Loze
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 13:35:00 -
[281]
Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana on 31/05/2007 03:50:02 Edited by: Speedy Banana on 31/05/2007 03:49:28
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
Quote: You can quit EVE or you can get even with them.
I would love for you to detail how you get even with an anonymous alt suicide ganker most likely in a npc corp who never is in a position to have anything of value lost....
Just another question none of you will be able to answer.
Most people don't realise that when you can make that much money, it's worth sacraficing one day of training on your main character, and just making a new one and getting enough skills to train for a battlecruiser. When security status gets low with that character... just make a new one. Again why the security status loss is nothing but a joke and why there is nothing to lose from suacide ganking.
In my post I pointed out part of getting even is just staying in the game instead of quitting. These gankers were glad to kill you and will be even happier reading this thread and seeing that you are quitting. Honestly though, this game might just be wrong for you and you'd be better of quitting now and leaving. Some of us love the danger in the game and others want something easier. If you like the dangerous aspect and realize that you can learn from mistakes and avoid them next time, then stay and succeed in EVE.
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 13:40:00 -
[282]
Ok, since I have some time on my hands now I'd like to address the issues of said ganker and his alt one by one.
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Phil Carter Can i have you stuff aswell as all other stuff ingame from ppl who don't want to play anymore and start of a "i hate CCP" thread in the forums?
What stuff? there is no stuff left, because of game design some guy can lose 2% of his money and cause you to lose 99% of yours. Ya gee, wonder why only 20,000 people online still even after all these years.
The game did not design for you to put 99% of your wealth into a ship that costs less than 1% of your wealth. Don't blame the game, blame your stupidity.
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Sorum Daemoth actually, there are about 180,000 players not including trial accounts ( dont count those like WoW does) and not including eve china. and boo hoo to your ship sorry to say, suck it up and make back the money.
No I think I'll just find another game to pay my monthly subscription to that is not built from the ground up on the concept of griefing people.
Not neccessarily griefing people, I like to see it as survival of the fittest. Griefing only happens to idiots who don't understand the risk element of eve that makes the game so much greater than other games.
Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 02:02:00 Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 01:57:43
Originally by: Necrosmith Wow, you're stupid.
You don't carry $100,000 in cash around the bad part of town do you?
Ohh you wan't realistic comprisons? Ok ill give you a realistic one. I'm walking down the street with 150 million in my pocket, with police officers right beside me. Somebody shoots me, and the cops shoot him. We're both dead. Now his friend comes and picks up the 75 million that's left on my corpse, which happens to be 2 feet away from the police, but they don't do anything.
All CCP would have to do is make concord destroy anyone who touches that wreck. This would completely eliminate the stupidity of suacide ganking. But hey.. then again, this game was built from the very start to **** people off more then entertain. Hence the reason why there about as many people playing runescape as there are playing EVE.
One word for this... Nope. Remember, eve online never intended eve to be based on real life. I think you are thinking the game Second Life, which is probably suited towards people of your... caliber.
Stealing in eve was never punishable by law, there are no laws in eve other than the fact that if you shoot someone in high-sec then concord will eventually respond.
|

Camilo Cienfuegos
Caldari EP0CH
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 13:40:00 -
[283]
Quote: I'm walking down the street with 150 million in my pocket, with police officers right beside me. Somebody shoots me, and the cops shoot him. We're both dead. Now his friend comes and picks up the 75 million that's left on my corpse, which happens to be 2 feet away from the police, but they don't do anything.
I think the current model is fairly accurate. Concord police would be so tied up in the paperwork from having to fire off rounds at the suicide ships, not to mention witnessing your death, that they wouldn't notice if a titan floated past and scooped your can.
It's tough luck, and you won't get a penny back from CCP for it. However if you have a valid idea on how to prevent suicide ganking in the future, there's always a friendly ear in the Features and Ideas Discussion forum.
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 13:41:00 -
[284]
reserved
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 13:56:00 -
[285]
Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana on 26/05/2007 02:08:34
Originally by: Cammulos Ummmm, could we revisit the 14day trial+2weeks sub=150m?
How did you do this as a nub (excluding GTC sales, which is prob what it was otherwise)? 
It's called mathematics and common sense. Being suacide ganked does not imply that I'm stupid, especially since I didn't even know stuff like that happens. Maybe if something like that was mentioned in the new player guide it would have helped. Sorry, I was kind of under the impression that SECURE space, was actually secure.
Would have been nice if getting killed by concord because you are an ahole would invalidate your insurance, but hey, I guess trying to eliminate exploits and griefing that makes people unsubscribe is not on CCP's priority list.
It is in the player guide, its in the tutorial. Someone brought it up in a previous post with linkage etc. So don't claim that you never knew about it. One read of the player guide will have warned you about this... However, I doubt you would have changed your ways even if you did read it tbh.
As for CCP's priority list, maybe you do not understand. CCP never wanted to create a mainstream game suited for everyone. They wanted to create a niche game, for a niche playerbase. No not neccessarily griefers, but rather players who enjoy having more freedom than the bog standard MMO's. If you don't like this mentality then its not our fault.
Originally by: Speedy Banana 2007.05.26 01:20 No see my problem is not that high sec is not secure, it's that thanks to insurance losing a battleship to concord costs almost nothing. Infact, carrying anything over 20 mil in my cargo means somebody can turn a profit from losing a 100+ mil battleship. That's great game design right there. A system that rewards people who grief other people... such a strong foundation.
Doesn't this contradict your previous posts? Like i said before not griefing, but survival of the fittest. You opened yourself up to the risk, not the CCP system.
Originally by: Speedy Banana The problem is you need isk to make isk. I need 100 million to make 20-30 mil profit. with 4 mil ill make 800k-1.2mil profit. Which is basically like starting all over again. And for what really? To run into another expliot down that line, where a bunch of idiots will just tell me "ohh ya you should have (somehow) known about that and not done this or that" ?
You forget the fact that in eve (which makes it special) sometimes you also need brains to make isk. If you really valued the amount of money you was making, why would you travel afk in order to make it? It just does not sound right. I do make isk sitting afk in a belt so why should hauling be the same?
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Aramendel
Originally by: Jikx Everproud Why? Simply because theere is virtually -NOTHING- you can do about triple BS suiciding on a hauler. Nothing.
You can transport not enough stuff to make it an attractive suicidiegank target. Or use a tanked deep space transport.
You might as well complain that a Rifter can do -NOTHING- against a domi.
I think we already established here that thanks to insurance, if I carry anything over 20 mil, somebody can make a profit by suacide ganking. Tanked transport or not, I highly doubt you are going to stand up to 3 battleships fitted with close range weapons. Especially since concord takes so long to arrive that you're dead before any help arives.
Please stop making excuses for there being no sure way of being safe in empire. Sure high sec is no 100% safe, but I can guarantee you that you can make it 99% safe if you actually use that brain of yours. WTZ being one of the essential methods. So please think before you speak next time.
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 14:20:00 -
[286]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
Quote: "Well, let's see. Brutix 22.2M in jita with std tech1 kit (approx 1M total) insured for 27M at a cost of 8.1M for insurance. That means I lose 4M per brutix give or take how many mods are destroyed.
Now I had a 5.0 sec status, & that gives me plenty of chances to gain isk, but I won't blow up a ship for a mere 50M...it has to be around 150M+ or I won't bother. I mean seriously, what's the point of getting a piddly 60M that could go pop? A very aggressive engagement goes only one way...fast lock, check fast & make a fast decision & go for broke. It works nearly 90% of the time with a trusty hauler standing by, you can scoop & drop it off while you travel back to jita to refit in a brutix in your pod while your criminal timer wears off. Get into a new ship...rinse & repeat. There are plenty of fools out there, just choose who's stuff you want & simply take it.
As for his profit..it was a meager 100M or so. One guy I popped today lost a navy apoc BPC + 2 giant containers & ALOT of loot. http://singularity.griefwatch.net/?p=details&kill=2622 The guy even came back at my hauler to shoot at it with a noob ship when I went for his giant container (the std t1 stuff recycled for around 150M in jita). The other stuff I either sold or will stockpile for future empire ganking. Hell, I even got a large tower out of one ship. Was nice to see. But one guy had over FIFTY +4 implants in his ship & he *just* got away in structure.
All in all... 6 hours of ganking netted me 2.6bn in profits. Ruined alot of people's day. I'm sure at least one monitor was smashed & a few keyboards thrown. Heh..one guy threatened me with real life death & called it an exploit. Anyways...these are things you do for a week-end to have some fun. Shooting tactically-challenged individuals in empire & taking their stuff is fun & all...but 0.0 is where the game is really played. Not in the kids sandbox we call "empire".
Good money though.... Like a free dread + fittings in 6 hours."
Have never seen a more succinct description detailing EXACTLY why empire suicide ganking is 100% broken and MUST BE FIXED. Clearly something is SEVERELY broken for people to be able to make over 2.5 billion in 6 hours. CCP where is the risk versus reward? your game is quickly becoming a joke. A person was able to sit in jita for over 6 hours suiciding everyone was helpless to stop him, the faction hit is so minimal he could do it for 6 straight hours.
The crazy thing is you close down complexes because of a bad spawn time allowing people to make to much money to fast with to little risk, bet yet here is the same crap NO RISK, HUGE GAINS..... yes risk vs reward in eve is TRULY BROKEN.
When a ship starts shooting at a hauler, he starts flashing red. This means that anyone in that proximity can shoot said attacker. So no, you aren't helpless to stop him. Especially if you are in the same corporation. Stealing from wrecks makes you shootable by said victim's corporation. Hence why smart people with expensive haulers travel with a gang. Believe it or not this was what CCP intended, hence the Multiplayer element.
As for people making 2.6bill in 6 hours what do you suggest? that ccp require new members to fill in an IQ test so that stupid people who dont grasp the game will not play? I think this way is better.
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 14:32:00 -
[287]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
a) I am sure you would disagree, I am sure the people who exploited complexes also disagree they should have been fixed also. The reality is you have shown clearly that the risk vs reward for suicisde ganking is compeltely and utter broken.
b) doesnt matter if it was jita or some other empire system the point is IT WAS IN EMPIRE, which 100% protects you while you do this so you have ZERO risk. you are just reinforcing how broke the risk vs reward is for suicide ganking. Not to mention you are essentially exploiting the game, since you must be using an alt in a hauler to loot....but that is actually trivial because it could be a friend and nothing would change 
c) warp to zero wasnt put in to stop this and doesnt stop it if you just camp the other side fo the gate, you might need another ship but lets be real at 4 mill a ship you could use 20 ships and still you would be breaking the risk vs reward aspect of the game. I do agree though warp to 0 was long over due 
d) shield and armour mean jack again like I said you already explained it is a 4mill a pop investment to make hundreds of millions, you are just greedy, if they add shields and armour you add friends, nothing changes.
Lastly it seems you are the one who forget this is a fighting game.... I mean Maybe I missed something but I don;t recall the part of the scenario where you get jumped buy people and loose all your stuff. You are the one immune to fighting and you seem to conveniently forget that is the part of the equation that is broken. You are not at risk, you are safe, and you sir are never attacked by other players...... so you really got nerve to try to suggest for everyone to remember this is a fighting game....
a) empire gate camping is not exploiting. trust me, petition it and see the response from the GM.
b) empire does not 100% protect you, that is why eve is such a great game imo. No where is safe. using an alt to collect loot is not an exploit, petition it, look what the GM says.
c) your right, if 20 people sat at a gate and shot at you before you aligned, you would most likely die. But people don't really do this. WTZ reduces the chances of you being ganked by 99%. Ask any suicide ganker whether they scan ships that wtz - most don't.
d) You can also add a gang to protect the hauler, like I mentioned before, when gankers agress they flash red, this means your gang can shoot at them, and if you are in the same corporation, you can shoot their hauler that they pick up the loot with. This is adequate no?
and last of all just to repeat, when you attack someone, YOU ARE NOT IMMUNE TO OTHER POEPLE IF TTHEY DECIDE TO SHOOT AT YOU! empire gankers are not 100% safe, just like haulers. However, most empire gankers minimize the risk whereas afk hauler people believe it is the responsibility of the game to minimize the risk pathetic eh.
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 14:41:00 -
[288]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
Quote: Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "EvE is risk vs. reward, that simple." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right well said. Now please detail out the risk that the guy who made 2.6 billion in 6 hours has.... I eagerly await this pile of steaming dung of an explaination.. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And if everyone used WTZ, how would he make any money?
What exactly are you argueing for? The right for everyone to play lazy in hisec?
Wow outstanding job at avoiding ANSWERING THE QUESTION!! The question is where is the risk on the suicide ganker. Eve is risk vs reward right. so please stop being a twit and detail the risk the suicide ganker has in making billions in hours.... PS WTZ doesnt do jack, because haulers are often slow as hell to warp so they can gank you on the other side of the gate thinking FTW!
as I said before, WTZ is not 100% safe, but 99% safe. If you think suicide gankers scan people who wtz and hope on the off chance that they can catch them on the other side then you are wrong. So don't say WTZ doesnt do jack. I've already addressed the issue of the risk of suicide ganking so wont mention it again. 
Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana on 29/05/2007 04:59:31 Edited by: Speedy Banana on 29/05/2007 04:58:03 Edited by: Speedy Banana on 29/05/2007 04:57:40 I'll answer the question about risk. There is no risk. As a battlecruiser nobody is going to touch you in high sec. You would need 2 battleships to take out 1 battlecruiser before concord arives which would leave the attackers at a big loss even if insured. So nobody is going to kill the suacide ganker unless they feel like losing 10x more money than the ganker would. I don't know of anything else more carebear really. They sit in high sec knowing nothing can and nothing will attack them, and claim they are really hardcore. Right... high sec protects them more then the haulers.
How do you fix this? Or atleast improve the situation?
1). Killed by CONCORD = No insurance 2). CONCORD STAYS AT ALL THE GOD DAM GATES! What these gankers take advantage of is that as soon as any agression takes place all concord ships warp to where the agression took place, and then they stay there. So the ganker goes to another gate and has more then enough time to kill anyone before concord can warp to the new gate. Concord ships need to be and to stay at every gate. It honestly seems like CCP was just too lazy to properly program the concord AI to begin with. They are trigger with certain actions then they just turn off until another certain action happens. The turrets at the gate also need to be beefed up because they are a complete joke. Put a 1600mm plate on a thorax and you can kill a frigate and warp away before they get into half your armor. Not even going to mention battlecruisers or battleships can do.
Don't give me that Risk vs Reward bs. There is no risk for the ridiculous reward, while at the same time you are griefing people, which is not a good way for CCP to keep or attract new customers. The entire thing is inciredibly stupid as the only people that the game mechanics are keeping "secure" are the suacide gankers. The security status hit is a complete joke too as ratting in 0.0 will raise that up in half the time you spend looking for targets in empire.
CCP never intended concord to be at every gate. That is your intention. This is the exact mentality of some players in eve which drives me mad. CCP make their game, You on the other hand want the game to revolve around you. Sorry but no thank you.
As for there being no risk, read my posts.
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 14:59:00 -
[289]
 Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana on 29/05/2007 12:00:44
Roy you are a complete hypocrite.
1). Nobody is going to gank YOUR hauler because by the time you blow up the target and you are looting the wreck CONCORD is already RIGHT BESIDE YOU. So if anybody attacks you then they will blow up instantly. Because you are in empire you can then dump your loot at the closest station for safe keeping. Basically.. 0 risk what so ever.
2). What are the chances somebody else is going to steal your loot when your hauler is right beside the target and you know what's going on? People not afk will warp at 0km. What are the chances they are going to close in say. 10-12 km from the afk hauler's wreck before you can loot it, WHEN YOU ARE RIGHT BESIDE IT?
So ya roy.. you're a real badass. You take SOO many risks.....
The simple fact is, YOU'RE THE CAREBEAR, you're the only person secure space is protecting. You take no risks for the money you can make. You cannot honestly sit here and tell me suacide ganking is more dangerous then 0.0 ratting or 0.0 gate camps or.. ANYTHING 0.0. You are taking less risk then people doing level 1 missions in empire. It's funny that you can even mention challenge. It's pretty obvious how challenging suacide ganking is if a brutix and a hauler managed to make 2.6 billion in 6 hours.
1) as I said before, corp mates travelling with your hauler, shooty shooty at anyone who shoots at you and tries to steal your can. theres only 0 risk when stupid people like you afk travel, in a paper ship, with all you isk, WITHOUT A GANG. (the your fault not ccp and ccp should not make the game revolve around you deal)
2)I've had my loot stolen before, a cheeky mwding viator scooped a lot of stuff lol. Was annoyed at first but fair game to him for doing it lol. I certainly didnt think it was worth whining about on eve forums.
3) The only reason why empire ganking is considered safer than 0.0 is because of idiots like you, making for easy pickings. see point 1 for details. If you want to make it hard for us you can... this is the greatness of MMO.
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Ohh ok I see.. so basically... no risk. Because having a hauler warp in at 0km and get away isn't risk, because that's just saying you're at risk of not making more money then you already are making (which is ridiculous to being with).
It's like.. gee if that hauler with 500 mil didn't warp in at 0km I could have made 3.1 billion in 6 hours..
Clearely VERY dangerous work
confusing post to say the least. Lemme just point some things out that a suicide ganker thinks when they work. Hauler warps in at 15 without gang = sweet, paycheck time. Hauler warps in at 0 off gate = not even going to scan them. Hauler warps in at 15 with gang from same corp= even if i kill and scoop the loot, they will pop my hauler, so lets not kill this guy.
I must be seeing things that you cannot see lol.
Originally by: Speedy Banana
No no it's fine. I don't expect them to fix it, because now I'm suacide ganking. I am in a 0.0 corp so it's easy to get sec status back up. I got two haulers full of tech 2 items in about 2 hours of doing this with a brutix and a hauler. There really is no point of doing anything less if you want to make money really.
Good for you, I will be waiting for you on your way to jita with your afk hauler full of loot you just suicide ganked for 
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 15:10:00 -
[290]
Originally by: Speedy Banana
LOL... ya, because if a hauler warps 0km from the gate is going to try to engage... right
Look at the stats for an iteron or any other hauler. An iteron 3 has 75 power grid. What do armor plates take? TONS of power grid. What do shield expanders take? TONS of power grid. So no, you cannot equip any industrial to survive. 7 blasters and 5 drones will *****it long before concord even knows wtf is going on. So please don't come here with a stupid argument that suacide gankers take any kind of risk. I think after 9 pages, with arguments from both sides, it's pretty clear there is no risk when somebody managed to make 2.6 billion in 6 hours.
Still dont know that you should use a transport ship? ROFL my days you are a special one arent ya.
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
a) the ganker doesn;t risk profit, they are'nt do anything to risk anything. The stuff they are hoping to gank is NOT THEIRS to start with.
b) The entire nonsense of they risk their ship is false, there is no real risk. As was shown you can suicide brutix at a loss rate of 4M isk please don;t try to suggest that is some kind of significant risk. You do understand you would have trouble finishing several level 3 missions in a t1 fitted brutix....
c)lmao ya right some random person in a hauler might snatch it up first sure......lolz.
d) Yes eliminating insurance only changes the numbers but by also added real chances the entire argo can explode then you might have some real risk where a suicider might actually loose money, in the end though suicide ganking add NOTHING of value to empire. The people who are there do not WANT excitement and possible death at every corner. IF they did want that they would be in low sec or 0.0
e) Empire is eve is ment to be wow in space get over it, if people want that sense of danger there is plenty fo places in eve to find it. Further more there is already that sense fo no danger in empire for anyone not hauling, so why again is it that only haulers are supposed to feel this sense? Why isnt the ganker supposed to feel some immense sense of danger where 1/4 of his earning might be taken by another player?
Stop trying ot use auto pilot as some scapgoat, if CCP didnt want peopel using auto pilot the feature would not exist it serves a purpose, and again you point might be valid ifEVERYONE was subject to death when on auto pilot or AFK doing nothing, but the truth is they aren;t. The only reason suicide ganking occurs it is exploits the game to make absurds money way to fast.
So in the end you managed to say absolutely nothing to defend it. Try again....
a) risk is dictated by the actions of the person flying the hauler.
b) Like i said before, gang in same corp vs hauler that just stole your wreck = dead hauler = no profit
c) has happened to me on one occasion, many people in eve are not as stupid as you btw.
d) Haulers who afk travel dont add any element to eve. We are getting rid of the people who think it is ok to play eve on WOW mode
e) Empire was never meant to be WOW in space. Your ideals are not the same as CCP's get over it. suicide gankers dont kill for thrill, they kill for money. My money goes towards funding my pvp habit. I win. 
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 15:14:00 -
[291]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
Quote: CCP has repeatedly said that they want it this way.
Well I can assure you you are wrong. I think CCP is unaware of the issue that there is very little to no risk on teh ganker. I think you would be hard pressed to find someone at P who would agree that being able to make 2.6 billion an hour with no risk is what they envisioned.
I am sure they are okay with suicide ganking because the fix is too much work, but I am also sure they are not aware or have not thought out the entire risk vs reward of it either.
I am sure ccp is saying hey if someone want sot blow up 5 BS costing them over 400 million to get cargo worth even more cool beans, what they are not realizing is that people are puttin up not 400 million but as low as 4 million....while being 100% safe themselves...
You are not ccp. you are right in the CCP do not want anyone to make ANY amount of isk without there being an element of risk attatched. If you actually look at the mechanisms in place that could potentially be harnessed against suicide gankers then you will see that they have already implemented something. But just because you do not think outside the box, and want the easy way out all the time that you decide to moan.
|

heheheh
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 15:15:00 -
[292]
Did you have more than you could afford to loose in your cargo ? answer: yes Did you put any tank at all on the ship ? Answer: no Were you on autopilot ? Answer: yes Were you paying attention ? Answer: no
Sorry man but you deserved all you got.
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 15:23:00 -
[293]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
Everyone knows that gankers risk is limited to the cost difference of insurance. The point is that turns out to be near ZERO risk, in the scope of the REWARD. I mean serious you can fool yourself but not everyone else. You neatly avoided most everything to post one trivial point that no one disputes? We had a guiy in this thread who uses a brutix ( his supposed risk a paltry 4M isk, tell us how he made over 2.5 billion in 6 hours. Peopel are chalenging the risk vs reward, you seem to be able to offer NOTHING to refute that point that risk vs reward is broken with suicide ganking in empire.
As i keep banging my head over, you are not everyone. Everyone knows how to make things riskier for the suicide ganker, APART FROM YOU! (and a few others). Travel in gangs and see whether you still get popped.
Quote:
You also need to work on your comprehension skills. The issue brought up isnt so much that players should be 100% safe in empire, so much as the risk vs reward for suicide ganking is wacked out broken. Also unlike what you try to imply by the player guide does NOT say EVE is not meant to be WOW in space. It also does not say do not use hauler to transports goods of value, because people will exploit the game mechanics and suicide on your ship and loot it. Another thing it does not say it that you are not meant to travel in empire AFK, and we are just to lazy to remove auto pilot.... ( gee doesnt having auto pilot mean they expect people to travel afk?)
Didn't you just say previously that Empire should be WOW in space? btw with your implications. The player guide does say that no where in space is it 100% safe. Therefore said implications CAN be drawn from that statement. Not our fault you again cannot grasp this concept.
Quote:
So the only person here that needs to shut up seems to be yourself. Throughout EVE's existence there have been MANY MANY things put into EVE by the developers who lacked the forethought on the reprocussions and possible exploits of said feature. Originally there was no concord...yet we have concord today why? Because vet players would sit outside the noob stations and slaguhter noobs as they undocked for the first time...you know what your lame arguement would defended that action, yet clearly it wasn't what the developers wanted, or they over estimated the playerbase thinking someone would take up the role of sheriff and sit out side and guard the noobies stations for their entire EVE career... the list goes on and on of things that NEEDED changes.
high sec ganking has been going on since the dawn of eve, get over it, CCP indirectly allowed this. They do not want people playing afk so here they are letting us kill people who have lots of isk in their haulers and travel afk.
Quote:
Many people feel that suicide ganking is another thing that needs changes. I mean let's be honest clearly if it is bannable to smart bomb noobs right now in eve ( even though it is just suicide ganking ), yet they allow suicide ganking IF it is someone hauling there is a some problems with CCP's stance on it.
Stupidest assumption to make ever. It bannable to kill noobs who just started the game, but people who travel with 100mill in their cargo is no noob.
Quote:
At anyrate the player base has a right to point out areas of EVE where it seems CCP made a mistake and to ask for changes to be made, Just like people are asking for something done about players who can go afk and cloak for eternity, just like people begged for nano BS's to be altered blah blah blah.
and we have a right to laugh at you for thinking its worth the nerf. Lets see which party CCP sides with on this one.
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 15:34:00 -
[294]
Originally by: Speedy Banana Edited by: Speedy Banana on 30/05/2007 23:37:20
Originally by: Gort It's basically a cheesy way to bring shame on the game.
That's what it really comes down to. If you explain the mechanics of suacide ganking to somebody considering trying eve, or put it on the main page of the website... how many people do you honestly think are going to be impressed by the concept? I guarantee you that most people will think it's the dumbest thing they have ever heard and a clear flaw in game mechanics.
I actually brought this up with my friends who have never played eve and they actually thought it was pretty cool. You really do not understand that eve revolves around freedom, and with this comes the ability to evolve the darker aspects of games. Stuff like the GHSC heist (whether orchestrated by ccp or not) brought massive publicity to the game. So no you are wrong there again.
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
You are quite wrong I DO UNDERSTAND what CCP has implmented, and NONE OF IT WORKS, that is the point. Warp to zero doesn't work ( you get ganked on other side of gate ), frieghters don't work ( it is just a math equation on which to blow up. a
Again forgetting to use your brain. Freighters were intended to have gangs travel with them as protection. Getting ganked on the other side NEVER HAPPENS 99% of the time
Quote:
YOU on the other hand no matter how many times it is stated are in denial of the fact there is little to ZERO defense from suicide ganking beyond not using a hauler as it was ment for hauling...It is like suggesting the fix to a Battleship being poor in combat is to use a battleship to mine, because hey if you are going to use those slots for guns don;t complain you can;t kill stuff! Haulers don;t use those low slots for expanders, i mean what you expect to haul? wacka wacka!!!
And you on the other hand are in denial there there is a defence to suicide gankers. please read my posts and say otherwise.
Quote:
I use 2.6b because it is NOT an exxageration there have been times many people have lost a hell of alot more or gained alot more.....The risk vs reward is flawed you admit it so why argue?
It is an exaggeration. I myself have only made 800mill in 2 weeks.
Quote:
I think the line is easily drawn, the line should be drawn like this suicide ganker should expec tto fail xxx number of times per try and those failures should cost them atleast 60 million or what ever based on ship used.
or haulers could travel with gangs. or wtz
Quote:
Honestly I don;t think suicide ganking should be allowed AT ALL, it is exploiting a game mechanic being concords abilty to react fast enough, and using an extra character to loot who was not in the combat.
play wow instead. Most people who haul expensive loot do it with alts as well, should that be an exploit?
Quote:
further more suicide ganking adds nothing needed to eve, and no one has said a single thing to contradict that ( ie haulers do not need risk, while at the same time people sitting at gates waiting to gank are NEVER AT RISK themselves so why should haulers be at risk cause it is good for the game but gankers half afk camping a gate should be at zero risk and danger while they wait? ).
everything in eve needs risk, afk haulers especially
Quote:
All I see is people avoiding the tough questions I present as they defer and start talking about something else like hey they can warp to zero! Or hey that suicider might be at risk AFTER they try to kill someone, where is the risk before while they wait? Is it even really a risk if you are the one who chooses the time and place to for death? Why are haulers supposed to be victims of non-consentual pvp, but suicide gankers are immune to non-consentual pvp? None of that is ever answered.....Just carebear gankers trying to justify safe/easy mode.
I have addressed all of them.
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 15:42:00 -
[295]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
Quote: You can quit EVE or you can get even with them.
I would love for you to detail how you get even with an anonymous alt suicide ganker most likely in a npc corp who never is in a position to have anything of value lost....
Just another question none of you will be able to answer.
Or you could just take measures not to fall into their traps. That is warping to zero, in a tanked transport ship, with a gang for protection. I'd like to see the suicide ganker kill you then.
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
Quote: Ya`know, I can understand his complaint BUT I don't agree with it. I have been playing eve for a few years now and what happened to you is the best part. That's what makes this game real and alive.
In what way was that alive or real? The person couldnt even have a gang with him to protect him. It is broken, plain and simple. what is best about eve is different to everyone, who are you to say that is what makes eve great? that is supposed to be the big concept behind eve, the player makes the decisions on what in eve he/she enjoys. If you want danger eve has it, if you don;t eve also has it, minus the fact peopel exploit simplistic game mechanics that should be fixed.
And its CCP's fault that they implemented the gang system yet people in game do not use it? whine on 
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
Quote: OK...you win......pirates are bad.....and lazy people who can't be bothered to learn the game should be safe in Empire no what they do....
Feel better?
Of course I won that was obvious. Big difference between a pirate and a suicide ganker btw..., also quite odd you call people hauling lazy, but a guy who sits at a gate all day is not? Sorry suicide gankers are about as lazy as it gets in eve, and it is they who clearly can;t be bothered to learn the game....while they are somehow safe in empire....
Sorry the truth makes you feel bad
You just fell into the trap of said poster, now I am sure you are one of the idiots of eve. AFK hauling is lazy, suicide gankers are not. Having to scan each ship coming past on autopilot is tough you know Its idiots like you who make suicide gankers work so easy, if you all didnt travel afk then it would make our job a lot harder. The only thing we are exploiting is the fact that stupid people play eve, not game mechanics.
Hmm nuff ranting for now, time to level up forum warrioring to level 10
|

SiJira
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 19:13:00 -
[296]
Originally by: Kam SingDu'k Having to scan each ship coming past on autopilot is tough you know Its idiots like you who make suicide gankers work so easy, if you all didnt travel afk then it would make our job a lot harder. The only thing we are exploiting is the fact that stupid people play eve, not game mechanics.
QFT ____ __ ________ _sig below_ the jet cans are made so that people that dont mine can get free ore
miners ritually donate the ore to anyone wishing to take some |

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 19:53:00 -
[297]
Kam all of your replies are redundant non sense that has already been shown to be invalid, why do you feel compelled to post the same non sense over and over which has already been shown to be just flat out wrong. I am nto gonna waste all my time re adressing them all yet again but I will use your first just as an example....
Quote: As i keep banging my head over, you are not everyone. Everyone knows how to make things riskier for the suicide ganker, APART FROM YOU! (and a few others). Travel in gangs and see whether you still get popped.
Okay just so we are clear and YOU can have a friggin clue some raondom hauler not getting popped because they have a gang with them IS NOT RISK FOR THE GANKER, it is called simply passing on the target IT IS NOT RISK, so stop posting poorly thought out nonsense.... PS having a gang with you doesn;t pose any risk AT ALL unless you have a second empty hauler with you to scoop up the loot if you die. We already went over this there is NO DEFENSE, you can bring armed escorts along but the only difference is your armed escorts get killed by concord as well as the gankers...
Really isnt very hard to see THERE IS NO DEFENSE beside don't haul value over xxxx which is STUPID.
Come back with well thought out replies if you want to discuss it. Come back when you actually have answers to the questions posed.
Fact is the balance it out of wack, there is no situation you can defend yourself, take the initiative or anything. you can only limit how much you transport which is STUPID. the more you tank your ship the more gankers they use.... There is no situation where the suicider can loose anything of value remotely resembling the reweard they are attempting to gain, it is 100% backwards to EVERYTHING IN EVE. Detail out 1 frigging situation other than ganking that you can expect to make 50 times the value of your ship in 1 kill.... Ratting in 0.0 is immensly more dangerous and the reward is minicule on a per rat basis. The dam ganker is never vulnerable.
IT IS BROKEN end of story. EVERYONE should be at risk in eve not just haulers FFS, you can;t have your cake and eat it.
|

Tarron Sarek
Gallente Cadien Cybernetics
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 19:54:00 -
[298]
Gee, all this childish bashing and chest beating makes me sick..
Come on, if you have to be jerks, at least keep it to yourself. Nobody wants to read all that self-righteous crap.
Yes, sometimes I like to flame flamers and be non constructive.
To the OP: it's right, it kinda was your own fault and the game is indeed very harsh and unforgiving. However it seems you weren't told all this and weren't aware of it. That and some people's asinine attitude is the problem.
_________________________________ - Balance is power, guard it well.. - |

Probeltis
Meridian Dynamics FREGE Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 20:07:00 -
[299]
That is what I wonder aswell. how does bringing a gang along keep you from getting suicide ganked in highsec? I'm sure no suicide gank has ever failed to take place just because he has his buddies there. No offense, but suicide gankers are dead by concord long before your buddies ever get a chance to get in on it. And, with proper hauler technique, I can grab your loot from under your gangs nose and your gang never even fire a shot.
I agree that they should remove the ability to get insurance if you loose your ship in a criminal act/self-destruct. This won't completely stop it, just make it harder to find targets worth ganking.
------------------- blah blah blah, something about my views are mine not my alliance/corp, blah blah blah "There is no such thing as reality, There's only perception" --Don't know, I made it |

Maxpie
Cross Roads
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 20:14:00 -
[300]
To the OP:
I agree with you, what happened is lame and is supported by a flawed system. And yes, the Eve population consists of many griefers. Just looking at the tone of many of the comments in this thread gives ample evidence of this.
But I submit to you that there are also many, many good people in-game. If you join a good corp. you will learn stuff to avoid things like this (and other lamer tactics) and they will help you when you are down.
I also submit to you to examine how this effected you. Not in terms of the game, but in terms of you. You are upset, angry. Perhaps thirst for revenge. Maybe want to prove to yourself that you won't let those asshats beat you down. Now I ask you, how many games evoke such strong reactions? Not too many. This is why you should stick with Eve. It is why I have for more than 2 years now and why I continue to. Ultimately it is extremely fun and rewarding. And yes, the ups are also accompanied by downs the likes of which other games will never provide you. But just as we enjoy going to see a horror movie even though it may scare us, it is ultimately fun and exhilarating.
He put... creatures... in our bodies... to control our minds. He made us... say lies... do things. |

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 20:21:00 -
[301]
Sure I will agree the point seems to be getting lost at times here, as people blindly defend suicide ganking as some important function of eve. I never been ganked couldn't care less if it stays or go, my issue is risk vs reward. I had the same problem when the non of the t2 monopoly bs was going on and some arse could sit docked and log in cue up a few build oders and make 1 billion off selling 4 cerbs....
If we all agree is to be this harsh and unforgiving world that is fine but it needs to be that way for EVERYONE, and loopholes like suicide ganking need to be cleaned up. People talk about imaginary ways to prevent it but the reality is there is really non, besides not transporting things of value which is asinine. People talk about imaginary risk, people talk about non consentual pvp all things that do NOT apply to suicide gankers.
Put some REAL tools in the game and then we can justify suicide ganking I suppose. you know like allowing people to jam people who target them without being concorded, adding a MOD that can disrupt or mislead cargo scanners, you know ACTUAL counters, and things that put suicider in a position where they might be risking something or giving people a viable counter, Insurance for being concorded should be removed as well, because with it people can gank all day long for cheap IE no risk....
I mean lets get real if you could clear level 4 or 5 mission with a couple t1 caracals only having the high slots filled you would be SCREAMING BLOODY MURDER that level 4 missions are to easy and the risk vs reward is bunked, so I am not sure why you are okay with a couple people in insured caracals ganking safely to earn billions....
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 23:03:00 -
[302]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 Kam all of your replies are redundant non sense that has already been shown to be invalid, why do you feel compelled to post the same non sense over and over which has already been shown to be just flat out wrong.
Please tell me where in the thread that my replies have been flat out wrong? I can't seem to see these claims are actually being made. The only ones I hear that vaguely resemble this are you claiming that WTZ does not help (which is a false claim), and game mechanics are being exploited (which they are not).
Quote:
Okay just so we are clear and YOU can have a friggin clue some raondom hauler not getting popped because they have a gang with them IS NOT RISK FOR THE GANKER, it is called simply passing on the target IT IS NOT RISK, so stop posting poorly thought out nonsense....
Yes but use ure brain a little. If everyone travelled in a gang, or took preventative measures when hauling expensive loot (such as warping to zero which you claim does not work (it does btw)). Then suicide gankers would not profit as much, if at all. They would turn back to making money via other means. Smart people already take preventative measures, it is only stupid people who think empire should be 100% safe and making money autopiloting around empire should be safe who disagree (and die as a result). Guess who CCP sides with.
Quote:
PS having a gang with you doesn;t pose any risk AT ALL unless you have a second empty hauler with you to scoop up the loot if you die. We already went over this there is NO DEFENSE, you can bring armed escorts along but the only difference is your armed escorts get killed by concord as well as the gankers...
You did not go over this, I suggested methods with which to prevent suicide ganking as much as possible, yet not only have you not addressed this, but you also tend to repeat your stupid assumptions over and over again, thinking that people will somehow believe you.
Let me introduce you to the system of high sec ganking and armed escorts. 1) If a suicide ganker shoots at a hauler, or any other ship for that matter, gate guns retaliate, and concord start making their way to the scene. Said suicide ganker also flashes red on peoples overviews. 2) When a suicide ganker starts flashing red, people in the vicinity can shoot back at the suicide ganker. Therefore, if you had an armed escort with you at that time, you can pretty much pawn the suicide ganker before he takes down the ship, unless you are in a shuttle, noob ship or other cheap t1 frigate (it is your fault for travelling in this ship btw)
3) Say for the offchance that the ship did blow up before your escort could shoot him down (highly improbable unless you have a suckass escort), When their alt scoops the wreck, a message pops up on their screen. This message outlines that if they steal from this wreck, they become criminally flagged to said victim's corporation for 15 mins. This is where the escort come in. As soon as they steal, your whole escort (assuming they are in the same corporation) can kill this alt. This is one of the other preventative measures put in place by CCP which you claim do not exist. Try it if you do not believe me.
Quote:
Really isnt very hard to see THERE IS NO DEFENSE beside don't haul value over xxxx which is STUPID.
Please type this again after you have read this post so I can laugh at how ignorant you are.
Quote:
Fact is the balance it out of wack, there is no situation you can defend yourself, take the initiative or anything.
Not a fact, merely an opinion. There is a situation to defend yourself (outlined briefly above).
Quote:
the more you tank your ship the more gankers they use...
and the larger your escort could be. ...cont...
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 23:08:00 -
[303]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 Detail out 1 frigging situation other than ganking that you can expect to make 50 times the value of your ship in 1 kill....
I heard scamming was profitable, and involved no risk to ships. Again it preys on the stupid rather than the smart.
Quote:
Ratting in 0.0 is immensly more dangerous and the reward is minicule on a per rat basis. The dam ganker is never vulnerable.
Only because you don't defend yourselves. The guys who travel wtz, with a gang and a nice tank is also near invulnerable, you don't see me complaining. Ganker is vulnerable, to kill-rights, war decs, and armed escorts.
Quote:
IT IS BROKEN end of story. EVERYONE should be at risk in eve not just haulers FFS, you can;t have your cake and eat it.
It is not broken, everyone IS at risk, the world is not safe, TOTALHELLDEATH. Welcome to eve.
Thank you for your pathetic excuse of a post.
Kammy
|

Sicks Stringed
Intentional Negligence
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 23:20:00 -
[304]
Edited by: Sicks Stringed on 31/05/2007 23:19:50
Admin of EVE-Blogger.com "Your number one source for EVE blogs!"
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 23:22:00 -
[305]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 Sure I will agree the point seems to be getting lost at times here, as people blindly defend suicide ganking as some important function of eve.
People are defending the freedom of eve, not suicide gankers. If someone wants to suicide gank withing game mechanics, then it should be allowed, remember folks its only a game!
Quote:
I never been ganked couldn't care less if it stays or go, my issue is risk vs reward. I had the same problem when the non of the t2 monopoly bs was going on and some arse could sit docked and log in cue up a few build oders and make 1 billion off selling 4 cerbs....
This is the exact person I though you were, someone who, rather than looks at how they themselves could adapt to the situation, would rather throw their toys out of the pram and blame the game for their ill-treatment.
Quote:
If we all agree is to be this harsh and unforgiving world that is fine but it needs to be that way for EVERYONE, and loopholes like suicide ganking need to be cleaned up.
There are ways to counter suicide gankers, like I mentioned before
Quote:
People talk about imaginary ways to prevent it but the reality is there is really non, besides not transporting things of value which is asinine.
This is not imaginary, I have actually witnessed people warping to zero in their expensive, tanked up haulers rather than on autopilot with a paper thin ship. If you don't believe me i can provide evidence of this. 
Quote:
People talk about imaginary risk, people talk about non consentual pvp all things that do NOT apply to suicide gankers.
imaginary risk only occurs when the victim does NOTHING to stop a person from killing them and scooping their loot.
Quote:
Put some REAL tools in the game and then we can justify suicide ganking I suppose. you know like allowing people to jam people who target them without being concorded, adding a MOD that can disrupt or mislead cargo scanners, you know ACTUAL counters, and things that put suicider in a position where they might be risking something or giving people a viable counter, Insurance for being concorded should be removed as well, because with it people can gank all day long for cheap IE no risk....
Again, proves my point exactly. You are the type of person who rather than looks at what they could do to reduce the risk of them dying by a suicide ganker (WTZ WTZ WTZ ). You would rather CCP implement something so that the lazy afkers can be even lazier in their approach to empire.
Quote:
I mean lets get real if you could clear level 4 or 5 mission with a couple t1 caracals only having the high slots filled you would be SCREAMING BLOODY MURDER that level 4 missions are to easy and the risk vs reward is bunked, so I am not sure why you are okay with a couple people in insured caracals ganking safely to earn billions....
Like I keep trying to tell you, it is the victims who dictate the risk involved, not the suicide ganker.
Can you post more repetitivly pathetic counter-arguments so I can break them down please. This is actually kinda fun
Kammy
|

DroneBay Diva
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 23:48:00 -
[306]
OMFG.
This has got to be the STUPIDEST reason I've ever seen for someone to bash CCP.
Jesus H. Christ, If you're going to quit the goddamn game, just friggin DO IT already and quit cluttering up the forums with senseless WHINING. You are arguing with people who clearly love the game and are going to defend it for as long as you want to keep attacking it. So please, shut up and go play WoW. Oh, and don't forget to give your stuff to someone.
|

Drizit
Amarr
|
Posted - 2007.06.01 01:01:00 -
[307]
Originally by: Haleuth
Quote: You said that you have 4m ISK left, give them to me including the insurance rookie ship :)
Talk about picking a carcass clean 
Around here, they'll use the bones for toothpicks afterwards as well. --
|

TheGuvna
|
Posted - 2007.06.01 01:19:00 -
[308]
Don't quit....
We all do things at the start we regret later...I once wanted to go through a gate that was full of naughty pilots charging us noobs 5 mill to go though...I was in a shuttle, in a hurry blah blah, and paid the 5 mill.....about 30 seconds later I was podded, less my 5 million.
I chuckle at it now and bear no grudge...
Oh by the way anybody who kills "Ginger Magician" will get 100 mill ;o)
Fry Safe
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.06.01 04:48:00 -
[309]
Quote: People are defending the freedom of eve, not suicide gankers. If someone wants to suicide gank withing game mechanics, then it should be allowed, remember folks its only a game!
They are not defending freedom they are defending an easy exploit of the game. In case you haven't noticed the only application of this is to make money not have freedom... Your argument is terrible because it actually is the opposite of freedom in eve. If you want unlimited ganking there is a place for it called 0.0, where is the freedom for those who prefer not to engange in combat? Opps just anothe rpoorly thought out argument by you. Fact suicide ganking limits freedom not increases it.
Quote: This is the exact person I though you were, someone who, rather than looks at how they themselves could adapt to the situation, would rather throw their toys out of the pram and blame the game for their ill-treatment.
Yawn yet another poorly thought out argument. In some cases there is no adapting. The t2 lottery was over there was nothing to adapt to inorder to deal with game breaking balance that was people making billions for no effort or risk, it has nothing to do with me, next you are going to claim nano Bs and dual MWD Bs people could adapt to also right? Or maybe we can adapt to perma cloaked 100% unlocatable ships....silly me for not using ym x-ray goggles!
Quote: There are ways to counter suicide gankers, like I mentioned before
No there isnt I detailed the folly of your worthless "ways" The only way is not to transport valuable things which is ********. Every other method can be recountered, with more ships.
Quote: This is not imaginary, I have actually witnessed people warping to zero in their expensive, tanked up haulers rather than on autopilot with a paper thin ship. If you don't believe me i can provide evidence of this.
right but all the gankers have to do is get you on the out bound side of the gate where your slow to warp haulers is a lame duck. so your argument is again worthless. To suggest you must use nano's etc to fly a hauler is again stupid. Kinda like suggesting a BS fill their high's with everything but guns to counter something....it is 100% against hte purpose of the ship. It is very obvious CCP was smoking ***** when deciding the HP and armour for indies, as they have no offense and no slots, that type of ship should have good defense.
Quote: imaginary risk only occurs when the victim does NOTHING to stop a person from killing them and scooping their loot.
this is another imaginary risk, like a random person has a better chance to grab loot when you are deciding where and when the victim will die, and with enough ships you just kill the scooper too. either way it is an imaginary risk. Try to provide a tangible way a ganker could loose significant portions of THEIR OWN MONEY.
Quote: Again, proves my point exactly. You are the type of person who rather than looks at what they could do to reduce the risk of them dying by a suicide ganker (WTZ WTZ WTZ ). You would rather CCP implement something so that the lazy afkers can be even lazier in their approach to empire.
Again YOU are exactly the kind of person who is a big phat carebear who will do anything possible to ensure YOU are never the one at risk. What is the matter with a person having a REAL counter? an actual way to prevent or botch a gank job? Why are only haulers the ones who must be passive? More of you just saying nothing to justify the LAZIEST element of gameplay in eve being a suicide ganker. Get off your lazy arse and earn some money, that doesnt involve exploiting the game.
Seriously if you want to debate this you need to sharpen up your logic. I am asking for gankers to have REAL risk, and gankies to have REAL defense, you are arguing for easy risk free status quo. You are the type of weak chicken who is to scared to play in 0.0 where this belongs.

|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.06.01 04:53:00 -
[310]
Quote: The guys who travel wtz, with a gang and a nice tank is also near invulnerable, you don't see me complaining. Ganker is vulnerable, to kill-rights, war decs, and armed escorts.
More poorly thought out drivel from you. We already discussed the fact the gankers can get you on the out bound gate, we already discussed a gang CANNOT HELP YOU so why keep mentioning it, we already discussed these guys use NPC corp characters, there is no war dec, kill rights on some alt that never flies anything of value? what are those worth? they are already suiciding clearly they don;t care about the insured value of their ships... and again armed escorts do bugger all but also end up dying to concord.....seriously W T F can an armed escort do noob? Nothing why even post such poorly thought out ******** answers?
anyrate suicide ganking needs balancing NOT removal ( though removal would be no meaningful loose to eve, infact there is a better arguement EVe would be better not worse without.
|

Ryan Scouse'UK
|
Posted - 2007.06.01 04:59:00 -
[311]
am posting in a EPIC THREAD IT SEEMS ?... Notice my caps
la la la .. Troll lolly lolly,
Really tho.. why does this have over 8pages..with 17k views.. honestly should of been dead on page 1.. are we really that bored with Eve.. we need to drag these threads on ?.. GO play WOW Mr Speedy ! u never lose ur stuff then ;)
|

Nanobotter Mk2
|
Posted - 2007.06.01 05:03:00 -
[312]
I mean if I know you are waiting to suicide gank me shouldn't I have some recourse? Another potential solution should be if you are in a NPC corp which cannot be war dec'd then you cannot perform ANY hostile action on another player. Atleast that way they must be in Pc corsp who can be war dec'd and then ganked back.
Wait no no no the virtual tough guys like Kammy want that fluffy carebear NPC corp for safety heaven forbid they get caught with their pants down one day....
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.06.01 08:08:00 -
[313]
Quote:
More poorly thought out drivel from you. We already discussed the fact the gankers can get you on the out bound gate, we already discussed a gang CANNOT HELP YOU so why keep mentioning it,
We didn;t discuss it, I told you that when the ganker starts shooting at ANY ship, it gives them a criminal countdown so that ANYONE can shoot at the suicide ganker. So when you all jump through, if the hauler couldn't get to warp in time and does get attacked, the rest of the gang can shoot said suicide ganker down. Please quote me and say otherwise because you seem to be avoiding this point.
Quote:
we already discussed these guys use NPC corp characters, there is no war dec, kill rights on some alt that never flies anything of value? what are those worth? they are already suiciding clearly they don;t care about the insured value of their ships...
please provide evidence that all suicide gankers do this on an alt. I do it with my main because I have the sec status to kill. War decs work against main corps, as do killrights ( i told you before I do not empire gank 23/7 but also pvp in a nice shiney harbinger now and again). CCP has clearly given enough freedom for you to kill me if I kill you.
Quote:
and again armed escorts do bugger all but also end up dying to concord.....seriously W T F can an armed escort do noob? Nothing why even post such poorly thought out ******** answers?
Please stop avoiding the point. I keep reiterating this, when a suicide ganker shoots at you, everyone in the vicinity is free to kill that suicide ganker. So how would they all end up dying to concord? please adress this in your next post rather than avoiding the question.
Quote:
anyrate suicide ganking needs balancing NOT removal ( though removal would be no meaningful loose to eve, infact there is a better arguement EVe would be better not worse without.
So you are suggesting, with the removal of suicide ganking in empire (presumably by making concord at every gate) eve will be a better place? Sure i would like to see more players making money whilst hauling afk As i mentioned before. THIS IS NOT THE TYPE OF GAME CCP WANTS. They always wanted risk, they never wanted stupid people who argue that secure space should be 100% secure. Get over it, or play hello kitty world, Where the risk vs reward is probably suited better for you 
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.06.01 08:10:00 -
[314]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2
Wait no no no the virtual tough guys like Kammy want that fluffy carebear NPC corp for safety heaven forbid they get caught with their pants down one day....
Look at my corp ticker, look at my alliance ticker, It does not say SWA or anything like an NPC corp, I suggest you check your eyes again. 
|

Ladyah Liandri
VMF-214 Blacksheep
|
Posted - 2007.06.01 08:17:00 -
[315]
Originally by: Speedy Banana
Originally by: Sorum Daemoth actually, there are about 180,000 players not including trial accounts ( dont count those like WoW does) and not including eve china. and boo hoo to your ship sorry to say, suck it up and make back the money.
No I think I'll just find another game to pay my monthly subscription to that is not built from the ground up on the concept of griefing people.
Yes, please. Find yourself another game that has PAUSE, SAVE and RELOAD buttons for your convenience.
But stop blaming EVE being responsible for your obvious mistake.
It's like "I left my car unlocked and some griefer stole my CD-Player! Wwwaaahhh! I am gonna hang myself!"
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity. The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.06.01 08:20:00 -
[316]
Edited by: Kam SingDu''k on 01/06/2007 08:38:41 Edited by: Kam SingDu''k on 01/06/2007 08:20:27 btw with regards to people getting killed when they jump through and initiate warp, let me just give the a realistic scenario here:
1) hauler warps to zero at gate and jumps through 2) hauler uncloaks and starts aligning for warp 3) suicide ganker is looking for people coming in-bound rather than outbound at 15km, But on the offchance (due to nanobotters OMG RISK) suggestion the suicide ganker does lock the aligning hauler: This takes about 2 seconds: 4) once scanned cargo scanning occurs: between 3-5 seconds: (usually before this finishes, 60% of haulers are already in warp) 5) examines contents of cargo : 1-2 seconds (hauler is in warp before you can shoot 90% of the time)
So lets just estimate, that there is a 10% success rate in successfully scanning down a hauler that is aligning to warp. However, there is a 100% chance that you can successfully scan down a hauler coming AFK at 15km before they get to the gate. Which would you concentrate your efforts on? I know, common sense clears things a lot sometimes Nanobotter, maybe you should use it once in a while 
Kammy carebear who kills stupid people and is in a npc corp and scans people warping out rather than warping in afk, who suicide ganks in HUGGEEE gangs so no one can defend themselves. 
PS. nanobotter... POST WITH YOUR MAIN!!!!! unless you are too scared of us carebears to back up your forum warrioring with a real character 
|

Maxpie
Cross Roads
|
Posted - 2007.06.04 14:58:00 -
[317]
The real solution to this and many other problems is there should be no alts. Real men (and women) don't use alts. Alts make no sense and (for me anyhow) reduce the game's immersion and fun factor. Should be character per account. I thought the point of Eve was that your actions have ramifications, etc.? That you are a denizen of this universe? The game would simply be much, much better without alts.
He put... creatures... in our bodies... to control our minds. He made us... say lies... do things. |

Threv Echandari
Caldari Dark-Rising Fallen Souls
|
Posted - 2007.06.04 15:28:00 -
[318]
what can I say that has not already been said?
Well Why not Repeat the obvious since people have not been listening?
1. AUTOPILOT in Hauler? Bad move (even in hi-sec) Shuttle sure, n00b ship sure but your hauler with 150 million in Cargo? thats asking for trouble sorry
2. If you are truly worried (which you weren't) then you need to use a Scout. Don't have an Trial alt account for scouting (or a PC that can run 2 copies of Eve?
Use your social Skills and befriend a noob (ya know the one in the n00b ships ) Create a Contract (to introduce them to the contract system) and pay them to scout ahead. Tell them what to look for. and let him report back. Or if you want to be less than honest about the risks. Buy your new n00b friend a hauler (and a SB if he needs it), Create a Contract for him to deliver a package (1 trit or something) and convoy with him and have HIM run the gates first. If he gets ganked , well you know whats on the other side.... If all works out well, then you have made a friend and can continue on your business. In any case its Win-Win, the hauler and the SB is cheap (compared to the profit your going to make). and if it gets blown up the n00b has not lost money, (and gained a valuable lesson) and YOU save your stuff.
Isk in this game is not as important as people, Isk will not save you, but your friends can, and that is the MOST important thing you can learn. This is a Massivley Multi-PLAYER game. Its greatest strength (and weakness too) is the players, you can go it alone, you can also try to do level 4 missions in your n00b ship. the results are usually the same. (At least if you have friend and you lose your stuff you can go cry on his shoulder without it your just shaking your fist at your monitor and crying on the forums where your will ridculed (prolly by the same folks who blew your stuff up)
Don't give up, find a friend (or rent one)!
Threv
Caldari Prime > Luminaire
|

VampireDminus
|
Posted - 2007.06.04 20:11:00 -
[319]
The only way he was able to make "2.5 billion in 6 hours" is through the sheer stupidity of the OP and the likes.
I have a way to prevent this sort of ganking from happening:
GET SMARTER NEWBIES..!
Before anyone start playing EVE, ccp should give new players an exam over all the of guides. They pass - they play.
|

Leeluvv
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.06.04 20:59:00 -
[320]
To all those claiming that the OP is a noob and deserved what he got, be careful what you ask for. A lot of 'leet' players in MMORPGs end up killing their own game by trying to enforce their hard core rules. This alienates a large number of players and no matter how cool you are in game or RL, you can't play a game that has collapsed due to too few subscribers to be worth continuing.
Lee == Sig to follow |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: [one page] |