Funny. Here I thought that Andski was a Goon. Oh well

Mother of all Gods:

You are an utter ******* imbecile.

Get it straight fuckbag:

I don't have to justify myself to the likes of a used-up 2-penny insignifi-c-u-n-t like you, but suppose, in your awesome wisdom, that you tell me how my support of my chosen candidate stated explicitly in my sig is "passive-aggressive?" Seems pretty open to me. Do you even know what that term actually means?

Once again, where is Mittens? I want to hear him speak here, not some piece of **** useful idiot forum-cliche like you.

And yes, I'm openly campaigning for my chosen candidates. I'll even do so now:

A) Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM...Chairman.
B) Re-elect TwoStep!

(Why these would both be good things for EVE doesn't need explaining to anyone non-bloc who has enough working brain-cells to form a coherent critical thought, though I realise that that precludes most Goons.)

Next!

My friend, we have offered you the hand of friendship many times and offered you the information you needed to verify our claims, yet you have ignored them and when proven wrong completely (on the "better tech moons" issue for example) merely resorted to unsupported attacks on our character. Such attacks must be responded to in kind.

I'd say its a pretty obvious conclusion that the Mittani is a **** poor choice for the CSM.

Edit: and btw. I think I have expressed my opionon in a coherent and readable manner in this thread.

I'd say it suggests more about your deductive reasoning skills (Hint: not good bro)

You have offered me nothing. You proved that I dont know much abouth the technical side of moon mining. Fine. It doesnt mean I cant count. And as far as this thread is concerned, you admitted to having less techmoons than your opponents so its a pretty moot point.

The fact remains however, that the CSM is supposed to be neutral, and that the Mittani has consistently pushed for changes to the benefit of Goons during his term. Given the Goon creedo of ******* everone not a goon I'd say its a pretty obvious conclusion that the Mittani is a **** poor choice for the CSM.

I don't think you really 'get' how the CSM works. I mean, Hans is running on a lowsec platform, and will likely get on the CSM. He's campaigning on a platform of things that will benefit him. And he's not the only one who's ever done this.

You are really bad at this.

Nice. So you admit to metagaming the CSM then?

u mad?

Have you stopped beating your wife yet?

no you see, the mittani would only be an honest candidate if he supported nerfing anoms, removing jump/titan bridges, buffing supercaps and removing suicide ganking from the game

Nice. So you admit to metagaming the CSM then?

But yes, it would seem Hans is metagaming it.

The Mittani, King of Space, is the best-known advocate for a technetium nerf. Technetium, for those who are unaware, currently produces approximately 718 billion isk per month for goonswarm, yet The Mittani has advocated for its nerf at every turn due to the poor effect it has had on game balance. The Mittani has had the chance to advocate for Goonswarm's financial interests at the expense of the game, and has not taken it. The Mittani is the only candidate who has passed such a test.

But The Mittani does not want Tech nerfed because "it has a poor effect it on game balance". Thats laughable.
He wants it nerfed because his in-game enemies has even more tech income.

we don't give a **** if "Team Tech" holds more moons

My main issue with all this is that you take credit for it, using it for propaganda purposes to show how the Goons "care for the game", while in reality, you only care for yourself.

Quotes from The Mittani:
"Every CSM represents their own constituents. Some have delusions about 'representing everyone'. I do not."



Full document: http://www.eveonline.com/download/devblog/CSM.pdf

with specific quote:

"The key question that council members must consider before casting their vote is whether or not the issue at hand has the potential to improve or otherwise benefit the entire EVE society, and not just a select group within the community that was successful in bringing attention to their unique case. Seeing the big pictureGÇöin this case, the needs of a society with over 300.000 individualsGÇöis the primary responsibility of a CSM Representative, and reconciling that view with the interests that won them the election is the greatest challenge they will facein this implementation.

... and ...

CCP is unable to accommodate any issue considered detrimental to the collective interests of EVE , particularly if the issue(s) touch upon meta-level concerns."

Fact: The CSM is supposed to be a neutral body. Your sorry ass attempts to cloud this fact is at best misinformed, at worst blantant propaganda.

Fact: The Goons have consistenly pushed for changes that benefits them in game during their term in CSM 6, while largely ignoring issues that dont affect them during the same term. there are exceptions, but pretty few and more importantly, insignificant.

Add the Goons history in EVE, their meta gaming traddition the last 6 years, and I think that my opinion is not entirely without merit. You can try to convice people that my arguments have been totally destructed, but I think you will find quite a lot of people with a diffrent opinion.

Nice. So you admit to metagaming the CSM then?

As we discussed, my friend, you have pegged "team tech", a moronic name that only people who have had their brains rotted by riverini use, at 90 tech moons. Goonswarm itself holds 67, a number you have admitted is likely correct. The CFC holds Pure Blind, and parts of Branch: both rich in technetium. It is highly likely based on public data (since I do not intend to release information about the exact numbers of tech moons our allies hold) that the CFC holds an additional 23 at least. So, by your own figures, taking your poor view of 0.0 politics as gospel, you have still failed to prove your point.

We need not mention, of course, that "team tech", a moronic name that only people who have had their brains rotted by riverini use, is hardly Goonswarm's Eternal Enemy and every second tech is not nerfed, Goonswarm gains an indescribably huge advantage over every non-technetium alliance in the game. One of two powerblocs with an indescribably huge advantage over all other alliances is a much better place to be than the post-tech world will be.

It seems like Riverini has touched you in a bad place. He does seem to make a lot of nullsec pubbies very angry, doesnt he? Good qualities in a journalist, I think. He is obviously doing somthing right.

as for my numbers, 67 would assume theta Goons holds the entire moon poulation of Deklein, Bure Blind and Branch-. + about 10 elsewhenre. Id estimate that the CFC as a whole holds a maximum of 70 moons.

I need not mention, of course, the poor posting of merely repeating previous badposts you have made as if their progression is relevant.