Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] .. 21 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
885
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 01:11:00 -
[571] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:It's quite easy to see when the prices started rising, just look what got implemented at that patch and changed the EvE economy.
This requires Logic V witch obviously some people at CCP haven't already found the book.
Missions and lvl4's/Lp's in high sec bring too much isk/minerals to the game? -let me laugh k?
High sec pvp for a real reason and meaning in the game/community? -I'm still laughing
Mining/hauling, ganking, high sec mining/hauling mechanics/ships ok? -omg by belly, please stop.
Bots mining/rating/anoms/make your sister have fun
Multiboxing
incursions
Drones alloys
Trading
Sucks
|

JitaPriceChecker2
State War Academy Caldari State
58
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 14:10:00 -
[572] - Quote
Skex Relbore wrote:Zircon Dasher wrote:Skex Relbore wrote: The same people crying today about inflation are, many times, the same people crying about how about how everyone is too rich and losses do not mean anything in PVP. This is silly, people being more "rich" just means people are flying more expensive stuff and will be less risk adverse.
Which is exactly symptom of "losses do not mean anything in PVP."
|

Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
81
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 16:00:00 -
[573] - Quote
JitaPriceChecker2 wrote:Hakaru Ishiwara wrote:
You can't be serious / wtf are you smoking?
Unless you are botting, a human being barely breaks even living off belt-based, null-sec bounties when taking into consideration PvP expenditures, infrastructure upgrades (POSs, Sov Structures, etc.), time invested and the very real risk of losing those assets.
As a long-time null-sec resident, I gladly accept those risks. But I do not find it acceptable that null-sec inhabitants are yet again the target of CCP and their attempts to remove ISK from the game.
Let us not forget CCP Greyscale's underhanded nerf to anomalies one year ago, post-Fan Fest. That was the start of a very bad couple of quarters for CCP. Is that something that CCP wishes to repeat this year with their release of DUST?
Stop making sense. I just abandoned null in favor of hi sec incursions. Hi sec players are new breed of overlords that wins game by whining, deal with it. Rarely fails that the squeaky wheel gets the grease. If nobody speaks up for null-sec residents, then we are guaranteed to be under-served by CCP's crack group of game designers.
That said, I have an alt all skilled up for high-sec incursion running when I can be arsed to put time into it. 
284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284286 |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1045
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 02:34:00 -
[574] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Have to re-iterate: THE MINERAL SITUATION IS MUCH,MUCH MORE WORRYING THEN INCURSIONS,level 4-5 bounties, bott bans & tech moon faucets BY A LONG SHOT replace drones pooping alloys with bounties IN 1 SWITFT BLOW(PATCH?) AND YOU'LL SEE HYPER INFLATION WHICH WILL make your HEADS SPIN IMHO
Hyper inflation of Nocxium and Zydrine. Tritanium will trend downwards as more people mine Pyrox in an attempt to fill the Nocxium demand. Meanwhile there will be miners coming to blows over Jaspet/Hemorphite/Hedbergite sites in hisec. Profitability of nullsec mining will skyrocket. Losing ships will once again hurt
What is worrying about that situation? Price inflation is a non-issue to industrialists as long as prices are affected over a broad spectrum. When price inflation is occurring because of a small population of extremely rich spenders, the situation becomes pretty bad for everyone. The people hurt most by price inflation are people who earn their ISK from faucets. The faucets don't improve as ISK becomes worth less
This still doesn't change my preference for drones to drop items which can be used to build drone-related modules, rigs and implants. A new PI industry for implant manufacture, combined with Invention/Reverse Engineering should see many more industrialists head out to lowsec
Neither does the price inflation issue change my thoughts on Incursions being too large an ISK faucet. It used to be that folks looking for ISK would head to L4 missions if they didn't have the patience to play the market. Now the go-to activity is hisec vanguards. Everything else is a fallback plan
Viewing ISK faucets only as abstract collections is a dangerous path to follow. My own opinion is that most bounties and loot drops should be substantially or entirely replaced with "blue book", "decryptor" or similar items which must be collected and redeemed into the NPC or player-driven economy. The Drone region economy worked this way with minerals, there is no reason other regions would not work on a similar means. Incursions could be run almost entirely on LP, with CONCORD providing useful items for all industry |

Cpt Kupo
Zeon Federation
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 02:55:00 -
[575] - Quote
As a casual player that has recently started to play again, the new prices is slowly making me regret playing again. Who thought Incursions would have such a great impact...  |

Skex Relbore
The Dominion of Light
129
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 04:15:00 -
[576] - Quote
Cpt Kupo wrote:As a casual player that has recently started to play again, the new prices is slowly making me regret playing again. Who thought Incursions would have such a great impact... 
Incursions are not the cause of the current pricing. If incursions were the problem we would have seen a steady increase in prices over time not a sudden jump. and it was sudden there was 0 ramp up on day the market index was around 130 the next it was 200 that's not inflation due to incursions that's a major market adjustment to a shortage in materials (namely the removal of all the drone poo when the Russians decided to have their civil war). |

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
86
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 05:04:00 -
[577] - Quote
Tenebrae Syrennis wrote:Troof!
Myrmidons (to name just one item) are ca.ISK 48mn in Jita as of about 3 hours ago (just before I logged). They were ca. ISK 27-29mn just about 5-6 months ago.
CCP, you need to stop listening to the over-entitled whingebabies and just nerfbat Incursion-income, hard.
Just stupid.
- Poeple who fly incursions might buy stuff they need for incursions if they lose something. - Incursions HATE drones. - So WHY should they buy drone ships at all?
Sure, they might use them for other stuff. But then they would buy them even without incursions.
This said I might go with you, when this price increase would just be for ships and items this incursion runners use. Legion, Faction BS, Suprts and all the needed fitting.
There are other factors like highsec miner ganking: - Miners lose ships much more frequently. - To compensate this loses they don't sell their Ore that low anymore. - With a rise in Ore price production cost went up.
Or: - the eastern is in War atm (XXX v Sol v AAA (?) v RED v Goons) - as they can't rat all day and loot the drone-region-ore this ore is missing on the market - production cost rise
And there are more factors. To blame Incursions for all this is just stupid! Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Farang Lo
State War Academy Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 08:01:00 -
[578] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Tenebrae Syrennis wrote:Troof!
Myrmidons (to name just one item) are ca.ISK 48mn in Jita as of about 3 hours ago (just before I logged). They were ca. ISK 27-29mn just about 5-6 months ago.
CCP, you need to stop listening to the over-entitled whingebabies and just nerfbat Incursion-income, hard. Just stupid. - Poeple who fly incursions might buy stuff they need for incursions if they lose something. - Incursions HATE drones. - So WHY should they buy drone ships at all? Sure, they might use them for other stuff. But then they would buy them even without incursions. This said I might go with you, when this price increase would just be for ships and items this incursion runners use. Legion, Faction BS, Suprts and all the needed fitting. There are other factors like highsec miner ganking: - Miners lose ships much more frequently. - To compensate this loses they don't sell their Ore that low anymore. - With a rise in Ore price production cost went up. Or: - the eastern is in War atm (XXX v Sol v AAA (?) v RED v Goons) - as they can't rat all day and loot the drone-region-ore this ore is missing on the market - production cost rise And there are more factors. To blame Incursions for all this is just stupid! statement from a carebear that never pvp |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1047
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 08:03:00 -
[579] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Just stupid.
- Poeple who fly incursions might buy stuff they need for incursions if they lose something. - Incursions HATE drones. - So WHY should they buy drone ships at all?
Because the Myrmidon is popular with small fleet/solo PvPers, who make their ISK either directly through Incursions or profit from people who run Incursions. "Incursion runner" is not mutually exclusive with "low sec roamer". The money to lose all those myrmidons has to come from somewhere.
Jojo Jackson wrote:To blame Incursions for all this is just stupid!
To simply exclude Incursions from consideration is equally ill advised.
|

Theodemir
Nemesis Holdings Corp Luna Sanguinem
20
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 10:44:00 -
[580] - Quote
I find it interesting [or a lack of reading skill] to find how 'x' amount of ISK genereated through various means is distributed. I'd have thought there are far fewer incursion runners than there are genuine & botting lvl IV mission runners // ratters. So despite Incursions generating less ISK in a month than NPC bounties, that generated wealth going into far fewer hands[also varied corps & alliances] would have a more profound effect on inflation, especially concerning PLEX
What I'd also like to know, if it at all possible, the demographic trend of incursion runners. Do they hoard ISK generated, invest, PvP or buy up all the PLEX so they play for 'free'. How many players now pay for their accounts using plex I wonder, probably too many!
Ways to curb inflation (or slow it down at least)
-Hard cap on the amount of lvl4 missions a single agent will dish out in a day/timeframe.
- Make all missions worth it/fun as a result.
- More 'mobility' in corps/agents/systems used. Enabling the creation of more local trade hubs
 - Less time being spent clicking and f1 red crosses means less ISK poured into the universe in a short time period.
- Enables the more casual gamer to play EvE without the resounding fear of simply being priced out of PVP compared to those who only live to play EvE.
- Possibly curb mission/lp botting to a limited extent?
-A tax on ISK earned in a month/ 'x' timeperiod within highsec empire systems
- The more you earn in a given timeframe, the more you pay to the Empire/State/Cuddlestate/S**thole. [CCP can alter tax brackets according to the latest economic statistics]
- Affects incursion runners, mission runners, ratters and botters[lol] equally and fairly.
- Gives the game some regulation in ISK flow and a hard counter to the ISK fountains currently overflowing!
- Could make racial choice less aesthetic, if you're Khanid in Amarr space you pay less tax than some Minmatar pilot
- Allows more influence in said racial space if you pay more tax (perhaps better/fun missions!/ Fly out with the navy and collect tags!)
- Why should your chosen racial state create you and not expect anything in return, especially if you fly about for free in their space!
TL:DR [for all your console gamers]
-Curb amount of missions given per agent -Tax brackets on income earned in high sec empire(s) space -More immersion, less grind/crap and more fun
|
|

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
110
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 10:49:00 -
[581] - Quote
Cpt Kupo wrote:As a casual player that has recently started to play again, the new prices is slowly making me regret playing again. Who thought Incursions would have such a great impact... 
Prices arent related to Incursions.
Technecium was at 60K a year ago, it's at 130K now and unlike most everything else, technecium is under strict monopoly. |

Skex Relbore
The Dominion of Light
132
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 14:49:00 -
[582] - Quote
Theodemir wrote:I find it interesting [or a lack of reading skill] to find how 'x' amount of ISK genereated through various means is distributed. I'd have thought there are far fewer incursion runners than there are genuine & botting lvl IV mission runners // ratters. So despite Incursions generating less ISK in a month than NPC bounties, that generated wealth going into far fewer hands[also varied corps & alliances] would have a more profound effect on inflation, especially concerning PLEX
Inflation has absolutely nothing to do with income distribution because currency is a fungible asset thus even if 10 people are responsible for that 25% of the isk entering the economy as long as they are spending it, it's exactly the same as if 10000 were generating that isk. And if they are hoarding it then it most certainly won't be inflationary because it's not being spent.
There is of course something amusing about someone who starts off his post complaining about stupidity only to follow that up by saying something stupid.
|

Barakkus
1520
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 17:25:00 -
[583] - Quote
Tippia wrote: Yes, but that doesn't mean that incursions aren't problematic, since they are doing that with relatively few players doing them GÇö the scaling effect of more people doing incursions are quite shocking.
You won't see a giant influx of people running incursions. From watching various population samples of incursion runners, lots of people just stop running them eventually and more people come in, the number of people running them remains relatively stable in comparison. http://youtu.be/yytbDZrw1jc |

Zircon Dasher
Zirconia Trade Group
83
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 19:04:00 -
[584] - Quote
Skex and Barakkus have really important points to keep in mind in all of this. I would add two things:
1) Relative to population, the ISK injected into the economy is not linear. As more people pile into incursions the total ISK injection increases at a decreasing rate until the theoretical max is reached. The closer you get to that theoretical point, the ISK merely starts getting distributed over a larger group of characters. Conversely, as population decreases the ISK injection decreases at an increasing rate.
2) There are also mechanics in place that can further limit probable ISK injection. The ironic part is that the mechanic is dependent upon players, and, so far, players have generally preffered to build thier own sandcastles to ruining the sandcastles of others. It would be interesting to see if the efforts of some people in the community to end an incursion ASAP had a significant effect upon the total ISK generated from an entire incursion. |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1082
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 19:12:00 -
[585] - Quote
Skex Relbore wrote: Go look at the graph Liang posted. That' ain't monetary inflation that's price volatility due to fluctuations in supply and demand of goods. Those big spikes those are most likely speculative bubbles. The price increases that everyone is pointing to now are sudden and coincide with two huge null sec conflicts that affect two of most influential supply inputs in the economy
Hard to believe they're speculative "bubbles" because they never came down. The market permanently readjusted upwards - which is what I was getting at.
Quote: But what about CCPs 13 fold increase in the money supply
Until CCP gives us a value on the increase in raw materials entering the market all the rest is just groundless rationalizing.
To really have a measure on inflation we'd need to be able to compare money supply to the rate at which production inputs are injected into the economy. Show me the volume of minerals, moon goo, and PI entering/leaving the economy relative to the injection of isk and then we can have a real conversation about whether or not their is monetary inflation
Or we can just ask CCP if there's inflation... to which they say yes. And they do have those numbers.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Degren
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
75
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 21:56:00 -
[586] - Quote
Are there any numbers anywhere that suggest how much of the bounty payouts are from ratting, how much are from complexes and how much are from missioning?
Since all those activities have bounty rewards, I'm curious about what percentage of total ISK is generated by each individual activity.
Until we have those numbers, it seems that as a single activity that takes place in a relatively risk free environment providing roughly 20% of all ISK is a problem.
If we could maybe see just how much money those bounties provide, particularly by region/sec status...well, that'd be something.
Edit: Oh, and it'd also be interesting to see the % of population participating in these activities |

Qvar Dar'Zanar
EVE University Ivy League
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 00:58:00 -
[587] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Skex Relbore wrote: Go look at the graph Liang posted. That' ain't monetary inflation that's price volatility due to fluctuations in supply and demand of goods. Those big spikes those are most likely speculative bubbles. The price increases that everyone is pointing to now are sudden and coincide with two huge null sec conflicts that affect two of most influential supply inputs in the economy
Hard to believe they're speculative "bubbles" because they never came down. The market permanently readjusted upwards - which is what I was getting at. Or we can just ask CCP if there's inflation... to which they say yes. And they do have those numbers. -Liang
We are clearly not looking at the same items. Yes, they're not at the same prices they were a year ago, but they've come down since 1 month ago. T3 cruisers, to say some.
And how is some inflation bad? Are you aware who are the only people hurt by the inflation? Yes... The ones who have fixed rewards: Mission runners and incursioners. Everybody else will win more money (total amount) because everything is worth more ISK (while the real value stays the same). |

Skex Relbore
The Dominion of Light
135
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 02:14:00 -
[588] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Skex Relbore wrote: Go look at the graph Liang posted. That' ain't monetary inflation that's price volatility due to fluctuations in supply and demand of goods. Those big spikes those are most likely speculative bubbles. The price increases that everyone is pointing to now are sudden and coincide with two huge null sec conflicts that affect two of most influential supply inputs in the economy
Hard to believe they're speculative "bubbles" because they never came down. The market permanently readjusted upwards - which is what I was getting at.
I'm talking about the really big spikes around PI's release. As far as the upward readjustment goes that was a result in a significant change in the production inputs brought about by the introduction of PI and doesn't represent a sign of inflation.
Quote:Quote: But what about CCPs 13 fold increase in the money supply
Until CCP gives us a value on the increase in raw materials entering the market all the rest is just groundless rationalizing.
To really have a measure on inflation we'd need to be able to compare money supply to the rate at which production inputs are injected into the economy. Show me the volume of minerals, moon goo, and PI entering/leaving the economy relative to the injection of isk and then we can have a real conversation about whether or not their is monetary inflation
Or we can just ask CCP if there's inflation... to which they say yes. And they do have those numbers. -Liang
They may have the numbers to figure it out but they haven't provided the information to us. We'd need a good measure of the total goods in the economy (including contracts tbh) in order to know whether there is any inflation or not. Not all price increases are a sign of inflation and not all increases in the money supply is equal inflation either. there are too many variables to account for to count on those two factors alone.
Monetary inflation caused by an over supply of isk would have manifested in a steady rise in prices as more and more isk accumulated not in sudden extreme shifts that correspond with major in game events that causeed adverse effects on the supply of raw materials.
|

Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
372
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 06:16:00 -
[589] - Quote
Skex Relbore wrote: Monetary inflation caused by an over supply of isk would have manifested in a steady rise in prices as more and more isk accumulated not in sudden extreme shifts that correspond with major in game events that causeed adverse effects on the supply of raw materials.
Partly true and partly false. Monetary inflation may not cause a rise in all prices leading to the classically stated "general rise in prices" that is commonly labeled 'inflation'. Monetary inflation can however manifest in markets that are rising and falling due to other factors and intensify those price swings.
Earlier you had also said this a day or two ago,
Skex Relbore wrote: Hell we can't reach a universal understanding of what inflation is how the hell do you think perceptions are going to have a greater increase on prices than supply?
Monetary Inflation - Increase in the money supply. That's all it means, it has no other meaning. The amount of money inflates, gets bigger. That's it.
Price Inflation - Increase in prices. This is the commonly used although highly misleading use of the word. It is the classic Econ 101 usage, "general price increase". Its misleading nature is revealed by the way it is measured, with a basket of goods.
They can't pick just one good or service as there can be other factors that influence price - supply, demand, regulations, impact of substitutes and complimentary goods, etc. They have to pick a basket in an attempt to even out, to mitigate, all those other possible influences upon the price of the individual goods in the basket. The basket attempts to create an average of market behaviors so that the impact of monetary inflation can be isolated.
The purpose of an inflation measure (e.g. CPI) is not to gauge the value of the goods, but the value of the money. (And to put a finer point on it, the money in circulation, which is a point made in the devblog by way of "velocity". A correlation with the CPI that looks pretty good until recently. A correlation that should not be ignored.)
Does Eve have Monetary inflation - Sure does, by 1300% in the period expressed in the blog. Does Eve have price inflation - no, not when measured with the basket.
We have to recognize that, just because the basket doesn't move, does not mean that monetary inflation isn't having an impact. Inflation of the money supply does not always manifest across an entire economy in the same way or at the same time.
My intent is not to go into politics, so any political comments by others for this following paragraph are silly trolls.
Take the US housing situation for example. A lot of money, credit, was directed towards the housing market by regulation. The money supply, for that sector, went up significantly. Within the span of a few years, since credit was easy, a lot of new buyers with "almost free money" went into that market. This drove up demand of housing by people who had the credit to demand the housing. Had that credit not existed or had been more expensive, the demand for housing would not have been able to come about in the first place.
A lack of an increase in general prices does not mean that an inflated money supply is with out impact. Just because basket prices are not going up, doesn't mean some prices are not being influenced by monetary inflation. When there is a supply or demand disruption or change in factors that contribute to price of an individual good, there is more money available to go into that market and consequently, more money that can be pulled out of that market, increasing volitility. It allows that market to support higher prices than it would have other wise and also allows it to fall much further, in absolute number terms, than it could have otherwise.
It is important to recognize the difference between monetary inflation and price inflation and use them correctly. I think the more interesting question is, why isn't the basket going up.
|

Degren
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
77
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 06:58:00 -
[590] - Quote
Adunh Slavy wrote: a lot of awesome stuff
I like you. |
|

MacLuven
EL Bernays School of Strategic Communication
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 14:20:00 -
[591] - Quote
Monthly Eve Inflation Rate Graph (CPI, Lifetime to Feb2012)
|

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1105
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 15:31:00 -
[592] - Quote
I wonder what the correlation is between people who started playing the game (or started paying attention to price metrics) in the less inflationary periods (say mid 2007) vs those who started in a more inflationary period (late 2008-early 2009)? Looks like quite the swing from mid 2007 to now!
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

DarthNefarius
Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen
87
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 15:49:00 -
[593] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:I wonder what the correlation is between people who started playing the game (or started paying attention to price metrics) in the less inflationary periods (say mid 2007) vs those who started in a more inflationary period (late 2008-early 2009)? Looks like quite the swing from mid 2007 to now! -Liang
I wonder what the correlation of NULL SEC trolls in the forums whining about Hi Sec ISK earning ( level 5 missions , Incursions, etc ) is versus the actual implementation of Nerfs to them. |

DarthNefarius
Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen
87
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 16:54:00 -
[594] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:I wonder what the correlation is between people who started playing the game (or started paying attention to price metrics) in the less inflationary periods (say mid 2007) vs those who started in a more inflationary period (late 2008-early 2009)? Looks like quite the swing from mid 2007 to now! -Liang
Interesting graph if it was not for that first few HUGE blips before 2005 you'd see more deflation then inflation (area under the line is larger ). It looks like there were longer periods of deflation then inflation but I may have to break out a ruler to confirm. |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1105
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 17:24:00 -
[595] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:I wonder what the correlation is between people who started playing the game (or started paying attention to price metrics) in the less inflationary periods (say mid 2007) vs those who started in a more inflationary period (late 2008-early 2009)? Looks like quite the swing from mid 2007 to now! -Liang I wonder what the correlation of NULL SEC trolls in the forums whining about Hi Sec ISK earning ( level 5 missions , Incursions, etc ) is versus the actual implementation of Nerfs to them. Then on top of that the correlation of NULL Sec isk faucet nerfs to increases in PLEX prices.
I would hesitate to say that anyone who claims that a high income in extremely safe high sec space is a troll. The Risk vs Reward balance IS very ****** up when you compare it to low sec and ****** 0.0. Furthermore, wouldn't nerfing 0.0 ISK faucets result in a reduced PLEX price because there's less ISK flowing into the economy?
On the subject of QQ about Incursions ******* up the economy vs L5 whining - Incursions are a relatively massive ISK faucet (coming in right behind Wormholes in January, IIRC). OTOH L5s pay out almost entirely in LP and are a MASSIVE ISK sink if you actually run them. And a final note - from everything I'm able to gather, high sec Incursions pay out more ISK per member than L5s pay out total (never mind per member!).
Totally neglecting all economic doublespeak, the risk vs reward for running Incursions is totally ****** up compared to other activities I've seen.
-Liang
Ed: Damn, the forums did a number on my post. No, I'm not mad. I just talk this way. Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1105
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 17:32:00 -
[596] - Quote
Also, if you're going to call me a "raging nullsec troll" for stating what appears to be a pretty unequivocal fact... please also inform me why you believe that group based high sec content should be more lucrative than group based content in low sec, null sec, and WH space.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Kaivar Lancer
General Exports
95
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 19:50:00 -
[597] - Quote
Thanks for that graph. Doesn't look like anything to be too concerned about. |

DarthNefarius
Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 19:53:00 -
[598] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Also, if you're going to call me a "raging nullsec troll" for stating what appears to be a pretty unequivocal fact... please also inform me why you believe that group based high sec content should be more lucrative than group based content in low sec, null sec, and WH space.
-Liang
Actually I was trolling for any trolls not just you &you bit hook line & sinker... U mad bro? |

DarthNefarius
Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 19:56:00 -
[599] - Quote
Kaivar Lancer wrote:Thanks for that graph. Doesn't look like anything to be too concerned about.
To by honest the graph does show a downward trend I hope never to see any deflation again but in a free market economy you do expext to see periods of overheating & cooling. The worst swings looked to be at the beginning of the game & a deflationary period in 2007 IMHO. Looking at the graph I expect to see deflation during the summer of 2012 of the northern hemispere |

Therese Ishihara
New Eden Defense Systems
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 20:05:00 -
[600] - Quote
Just going off of Jita prices, I expect JF's to cost around 8b in the coming months! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] .. 21 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |