EVE Search - Incoming titan adjustments

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Incoming titan adjustments

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 91 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 14 post(s)
Andski GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2530	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:46:00 - [451] - Quote FawKa wrote: Can I have a graph showing how many subs you've lost today CCP? You like graphs so much these days :) Titan pilots pay more for their accounts than everyone else apparently "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012
Sentinel Eeex Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation 35	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:46:00 - [452] - Quote FawKa wrote: Can I have a graph showing how many subs you've lost today CCP? You like graphs so much these days :) Since number is 0, graph would be pretty boring v0v
Promiscuous Female GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation 27	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:46:00 - [453] - Quote also I'm reporting you to raidenDOT high command for posting on a main
Innominate GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 96	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:46:00 - [454] - Quote Ra Death wrote: Dreads are mainly antistructure. Yes, they certainly are. The change to the tracking in siege will be a welcomed change as they can actually defend themselves. Got this far and just have to ask, What is it you think they're doing to change sieged dreads?
Machine Delta GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 28	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:48:00 - [455] - Quote FawKa wrote: Can I have a graph showing how many subs you've lost today CCP? You like graphs so much these days :) Just keep an eye out here: http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/Raiden.
Grath Telkin Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 432	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:49:00 - [456] - Quote Innominate wrote: Ra Death wrote: Dreads are mainly antistructure. Yes, they certainly are. The change to the tracking in siege will be a welcomed change as they can actually defend themselves. Got this far and just have to ask, What is it you think they're doing to change sieged dreads? They've removed the tracking penalty while in Siege, glad to see you're following along.
Nao Oikawasan Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 5	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:49:00 - [457] - Quote FawKa wrote: Can I have a graph showing how many subs you've lost today CCP? You like graphs so much these days :) I'm guessing zero. Seriously, if you want to quit, then quit. You won't be missed, and the loss will have zero impact on the game. After making threats like that, you really only have one option. To stay in the game would be to admit that you don't have the bollocks.
Takashi Kaeda Perkone Caldari State 22	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:50:00 - [458] - Quote Iniquita wrote: Lets break the game as it stands now so titans dont continue breaking the game in the future, I like the part where this completely fucks over people with a significant titan presence in their fleets. This is a rash decision making titans effectively useless until you have time to address rebalancing titans. So mothball your titans, let goons take over the north and wait because we promise we'll make them good again in the future? I really hope you will consider holding off on this rash change until you have to properly address the titan role in fleets. -A Titan Owner
malet FinFleet Raiden. 13	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:50:00 - [459] - Quote Typical Welcome to goons online
Mhyn Teregone Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation 1	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:50:00 - [460] - Quote Lelob wrote: Well this seems slightly short sighted. It would have been interesting to see if titans are truly imbalanced or if people were just unwilling to commit fleets to counter them (dreads and supers). I guess we'll never really know though as this nerf seems like it could be a huge game changer, especially for an alliance like Raiden dot. Lets see if it works as intended. I tentatively support these changes, and although would have preferred something with actual coding effort, can understand why a simple static data hack is all they have been prepared to invest in. And yes, I'm a titan pilot too. Now to tackle the next legacy game design embarrassment - technetium.
Andski GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2536	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:51:00 - [461] - Quote Grath Telkin wrote: Innominate wrote: Ra Death wrote: Dreads are mainly antistructure. Yes, they certainly are. The change to the tracking in siege will be a welcomed change as they can actually defend themselves. Got this far and just have to ask, What is it you think they're doing to change sieged dreads? They've removed the tracking penalty while in Siege, glad to see you're following along. oh look grath is posting now, this thread can only go downhill what do you think they did to the guns that tend to be fitted on dreads???? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012
Marlona Sky Caldari Provisions Caldari State 577	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:51:00 - [462] - Quote Barking Dragon wrote: I don't really care about Titans...But for the love of all that is holy will you please stop changing the names of all the mods?! I can't find anything anymore. Thanks. There is several tools available to find what you need if you don't have every module name memorized. Use them. Flight of a Thousand Rifters II: A Player Event
Mage Khour x13 Raiden. 0	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:51:00 - [463] - Quote Sadly but true. But i dont see myself fit into EVE ONLINE anymore, CCP keeps nurfing, nurfing and nurfing. 4 accounts now canceled... CCP wins, gl with destroying the game ! Perpetuum here i come
Marlona Sky Caldari Provisions Caldari State 577	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:52:00 - [464] - Quote Mage Khour wrote: Sadly but true. But i dont see myself fit into EVE ONLINE anymore, CCP keeps nurfing, nurfing and nurfing. 4 accounts now canceled... CCP wins, gl with destroying the game ! Perpetuum here i come lol Flight of a Thousand Rifters II: A Player Event
Krios Ahzek GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 721	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:52:00 - [465] - Quote malet wrote: CCP YOU SHORT SIGHTED F*KWITTS Its no wonder with mittani on the CSM, Lets make the FG game name Goons Online Way to go to shaft the old players yet again. First you screw super carriers, now ttians yet again. Poke you poxy game where the sun doesnt shine,. you dont give a flying fk about your old player base anyomre. Avada Kedavra -áThough All Men Do Despise Us
Andski GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2536	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:53:00 - [466] - Quote Mage Khour wrote: Sadly but true. But i dont see myself fit into EVE ONLINE anymore, CCP keeps nurfing, nurfing and nurfing. 4 accounts now canceled... CCP wins, gl with destroying the game ! Perpetuum here i come ahahahaha get owned "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012
Lili Lu 189	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:53:00 - [467] - Quote Pheusia wrote: Lili Lu wrote: Ok. You've performed an amputation and bandaged one class of problem ships. Would be nice if you had been more surgical about it. And your field remedy as you admit will cause some more damage necessitating later surgery. However, the Drake, Tengu, and heavy missile and large arty alpha problems are still there in game. Why the relatively impulsive hack saw for titans and still no fix the later? Where, particularly for the Drake, the problem has festered so long past the original injury it no longer just smells bad but now is toxic to the entire body. Please saw away at the Drake. Come on CCP you know you want to see the veritable ocean of tears. I do Complaining about drakes is so 2010. There are plenty of viable counters to every subcap doctrine, even tengu fleets, and its dishonest to pretend otherwise. This Titan rebalance is long overdue and will make sov null a better place. Malc, where did I not agree that the titan nerf is good? Also, you know I've been singing death to all supercaps along with goons for quite a while. But you also know I've been bitching about the Drake just as long if not longer. Are you so sure that nerfing one and not the other is ok for the game? As for 2010, here is a link of which I'm sure you are aware, http://eve-kill.net/?a=top20 And that is March of 2012- #1 Drake 165k, #2 Maelstrom 75k, #3 Hurricane 51k, Abaddon 43k, Tornado 32k, Tengu 31k Heavy Missile Launcher II 75k, 425mm AutoCannon II 20k, 1400mm Howitzer Artillery II 15k This pattern has remained very consistent over the last few years. And it's not just because goons fly those ships. It seems that Drakes and heavy missiles are not just 2010 and that viable counters are not a deterrent to their remarkable majority use for pvp. Btw, I do miss the INIT ship fittings and fleet discussions. But then, Euro tz, and probably not wanting me back lest I politely at first call someone a **** for suggesting smartbombing Logis to combat heavy missiles. It's not easy finding a US tz alliance and corp where chat is not filled with rabid ignorant racist Obama hating Andski wrote:** we literally would not shed a tear if alpha was nerfed I personally have no love for alpha doctrines - they're mind-numbingly boring and uninteresting. Thank you. Yes let us all join hands together and sign like the chorus in whoville for CCP to not just stop at nerfing Titans. If something is getting overused, chances are it needs a trim. CCP is so bad at this though - trimming. They move glacially. As in no perceivable movement until next thing you know they've calved a monster berg that thunderously crashes into the formerly undisturbed bay of ship balancing. Smaller more frequent calving would be a better strategy. But until then, CCP I'm waiting for a huge heavy Ice shelf to land on Drakes and heavy missiles. It will be just as glorious as the one you are letting loose on titans.
Promiscuous Female GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation 32	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:54:00 - [468] - Quote malet wrote: CCP YOU SHORT SIGHTED F*KWITTS Its no wonder with mittani on the CSM, Lets make the FG game name Goons Online Way to go to shaft the old players yet again. First you screw super carriers, now ttians yet again. Poke you poxy game where the sun doesnt shine,. you dont give a flying fk about your old player base anyomre. why so flustered -- you guys should be in no danger as you have hired the elite players of The InitiativeDOT to be your meat shield, surely with their presence you can bring well-rounded support fleets and handle this change in stride http://badops.com/?a=kill_related&kll_id=9770 ... oh these guys sure are worth the whole one technetium moon you're paying them
Archer Slate the united Negative Ten. 0	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:54:00 - [469] - Quote Love this nerf!! Give them 10 scanres or something.
FawKa x13 Raiden. 5	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:55:00 - [470] - Quote FawKa wrote: Can I have a graph showing how many subs you've lost today CCP? You like graphs so much these days :) Wooow, people wen't crazy over that one.. Fyi: I am buying a titan since people are going firesale crazy haha aaand, Raiden. was never ment to have space (some just forgot), so I'm good ^^
Kynaz Furia BioStar Technologies 0	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:55:00 - [471] - Quote That's a lot of changes. Maybe too much. A "simple" nerf would have been to remove the ability to fit tracking/optimal modules on a titan. No more tracking computers/enhancers, titans are still powerful machines against capitals, all races are now almost equal (shield tanking being not compatible with tracking computers), and no change is needed for the scan res, as titans can no longer hit moving subcapitals, or so few that they are no longer relevant. AllowTrackingMod=0 AllowOptimalMod=0 "Due to the size of the ship, all modules that modify tracking and/or optimal are inneficient, and cannot be fitted"
Innominate GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 96	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:55:00 - [472] - Quote Grath Telkin wrote: Innominate wrote: Ra Death wrote: Dreads are mainly antistructure. Yes, they certainly are. The change to the tracking in siege will be a welcomed change as they can actually defend themselves. Got this far and just have to ask, What is it you think they're doing to change sieged dreads? They've removed the tracking penalty while in Siege, glad to see you're following along. Really? You're getting this mad about a chance you don't even understand?
Barking Dragon Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation 3	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:56:00 - [473] - Quote Marlona Sky wrote: Barking Dragon wrote: I don't really care about Titans...But for the love of all that is holy will you please stop changing the names of all the mods?! I can't find anything anymore. Thanks. There is several tools available to find what you need if you don't have every module name memorized. Use them. Ugh...effort. Why did they need changed again?
BioZvin The Ankou Raiden. 1	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:56:00 - [474] - Quote Please add no sub cap can damage a Titan in any way. Only fair they have to bring something we can shoot ?
Weaselior GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2591	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:56:00 - [475] - Quote Grath Telkin wrote: Innominate wrote: Ra Death wrote: Dreads are mainly antistructure. Yes, they certainly are. The change to the tracking in siege will be a welcomed change as they can actually defend themselves. Got this far and just have to ask, What is it you think they're doing to change sieged dreads? They've removed the tracking penalty while in Siege, glad to see you're following along. oh grath, have you learned nothing about posting since our last encounter
Travis Wells Amok. Goonswarm Federation 223	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:57:00 - [476] - Quote Mage Khour wrote: Sadly but true. But i dont see myself fit into EVE ONLINE anymore, CCP keeps nurfing, nurfing and nurfing. 4 accounts now canceled... CCP wins, gl with destroying the game ! Perpetuum here i come c u l8r m8 hf o7
Grath Telkin Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 432	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:57:00 - [477] - Quote Andski wrote: what do you think they did to the guns that tend to be fitted on dreads???? I'm going to assume that you haven't looked at what the actual numbers mean when applied in game then. Remember when Mynas started his countdown in September with the whole "Winter is Coming" thing? Yea, this is kinda like that, only its this time certain other alliances are going to mass quit for what they see this as (and yes, they actually are). Some people just don't want to play the game now that its obvious that Soundwave is backing his old alliance in any in game changes that are made. Others of us don't care so much.
Mhyn Teregone Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation 2	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:57:00 - [478] - Quote Grath Telkin wrote: Second, you're saying that isk shouldn't matter, and then making a balance pass that assumes every titan in the game has 30 billion isk in sensor bossters on their titans. Thats a hypocritical statement in the extreme sense of the word. Taking 40 seconds to lock a capital ship is simply ********, 15 seconds to lock another titan. Really, 15 seconds to lock another titan? Why would forty seconds to lock a capital ship matter? Its tackled .. its not going anywhere.
Jack Haydn Valar Morghulis. Gentlemen's Agreement 12	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:57:00 - [479] - Quote FawKa wrote: aaand, Raiden. was never ment to have space (some just forgot), so I'm good ^^ Didn't want that sov anyway.
Machine Delta GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 29	Posted - 2012.03.13 18:57:00 - [480] - Quote Mage Khour wrote: Sadly but true. But i dont see myself fit into EVE ONLINE anymore, CCP keeps nurfing, nurfing and nurfing. 4 accounts now canceled... CCP wins, gl with destroying the game ! Perpetuum here i come 4 accounts you are giving up. Sad to see. This is what I'm talking about. The nerf is no good. However many people are for it it still reeks of coercion. Today I dropped roles from this "alliance" Really it's nothing but a cult of personality for a hubris filled leader now. Instead of running the group he's just using us for votes for CSM. Maybe the other directors will overthrow mittens but I think the tech money is too good. Each one of them is getting Plex and god knows what else under the table. Sadly CCP does nothing about this but will nerf whatever they cry about. Titans are one of many things to go, next will probably be mothership changes. Erebus pilots are already selling like mad, why bother, no one will buy them. Right now lots of people are mad, this is worse than anything BoB/T20 did.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 91 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.