Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 91 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |
|

CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
582

|
Posted - 2012.03.13 11:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hi everyone,
We're not happy with the effectiveness of large groups of titans against subcapital ships, so we're making some adjustments to titans and to XL turrets.
This is a quick, surgical adjustment to solve a specific issue we have identified. It's not a general titan balance pass, and we don't consider titans "done" after this change. Titans will require significant further changes, and probably an overall adjustment in role, before they're in a place where we're really happy with them. This will require a reasonably significant amount of work, which we unfortunately don't have the spare resources for right now. In a similar vein, we're not making more extensive balance changes (or addressing this issue in a more technically complex way) because we're allocating the minimum resources needed to resolve the specific issue (titans performing excessively well against subcaps in certain circumstances) satisfactorily. If you have any further questions about this paragraph, please ask away 
For the immediate future and until such time as we have the resources available to do a comprehensive overhaul, we want to ensure that titans perform decently against other capitals, but do not represent a serious threat to subcaps. We want titans to have clear vulnerabilities, and as much as possible to have them acting in support of the main capital/subcap fleet rather than the other way round. We've already prevented doomsdays from being fired at subcaps, and this adjustment should continue that trend.
We have talked to the CSM about this, and we're comfortable going forward with these changes in light of that discussion. I'm not going to put words in their mouths, though.
Specific changes being made:
XL turret tracking halved, siege module tracking penalty removed
This should generally make titan performance against small targets significantly worse, without seriously impacting their effectiveness against larger targets, or negatively impacting dreadnaughts in their common use-case (ie, in siege mode).
Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5
This should make trying to engage smaller targets very inefficient, due to long lock-times and an inability to queue many targets at once. This reinforces the titan's MO as a slow-acting but hard-hitting platform (in line with the doomsday's huge damage and 10 minute RoF). The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing. Our understanding is that this isn't standard practice right now, but we have to balance for expected behavior after the change, and for worst-case scenarios.
Expected release schedule for these changes
These changes should hit TQ some time in April. If there is a sizable release in April then expect them to turn up then; if not then we'll announce deployment dates for these changes closer to the time.
Changes considered and discarded:
(I'm expecting at least three people to not read the word "discarded" and make angry posts about something in this section. C'est la vie.)
Titans can't lock subcaps at all
Guaranteed effective solution, but we considered it too hacky and restrictive.
Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of tracking
Too big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem.
Changing the lock time formula
As it is, the lock time formula doesn't really scale in a nice way between battleships and capitals (the kink in the curve always happens around cruisers regardless of the scan res and sig radius), but again we decided we could solve the issue without resorting to this sort of technical work.
Changing XL missiles to match
While in a strictly regimented world we ought in principle to nerf XL missiles and remove the penalties from the siege module for them too, in practice they're not actually a problem due to the way missile damage scales against small targets. Leaving them unchanged also serves to differentiate missiles further from turrets, which might make them more useful on capitals under certain circumstances. |
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2394
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 11:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Loving this. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

esc shk
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 11:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ground Floor. incoming Shitstorm |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
99
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 11:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
I predict tears.  |

Darker Domain
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 11:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
Santa has arrived.
I wonder which three alliances will oppose this terrible, terrible balance. |

Simvastatin Montelukast
Irregular Warfare Mean Coalition
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 11:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Yes! |

Meltmind2
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 11:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
Cool stuff.
esc shk wrote:Ground Floor. incoming Shitstorm +1 |

Valearx
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 11:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
uh oh  |

Mike712
BattleClinic
48
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 11:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Regards, Mike712 The BattleClinic Team
|

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 11:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
CCP Greyscale for President. |

hfo df
Ramm's RDI Tactical Narcotics Team
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 11:59:00 -
[11] - Quote
love! |

Gheyna
Rayn Enterprises Test Alliance Please Ignore
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 11:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
scanres to 5, maybe 10-15. it will take like 5 min to lock a pos |

Kismeteer
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
101
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 11:59:00 -
[13] - Quote
Thanks CCP. Now The Mittani will be insufferably smug as **** for the next two months.
I work for a wizard. |

Anela Cistine
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
109
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:01:00 -
[14] - Quote
Good job CCP! |

MontyDon
Fatalix Holdings
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:01:00 -
[15] - Quote
very nice |

testobjekt
Goonswarm Federation Human Resources Goonswarm Federation
106
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:01:00 -
[16] - Quote
To declare your support for this please vote: http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=438 |

shas Ellecon
The Riot Formation Get Off My Lawn
20
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:01:00 -
[17] - Quote
I'm not sure the servers can withstand this much smug. |

Tomytronic
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:01:00 -
[18] - Quote
This is a sad, sad day for elite pvp. If I spent years earning a titan by logging on every month and changing a few skills on an alt and then exploiting drone minerals in order to pay for it, I should be able to kill any other ship in the game with impunity, from capsules to motherships. This is a totally unwarranted and ridiculous change. I'm sad to see that CCP is now catering to casuals.
We pay for our rent by exploiting broken game mechanics to bathe in isk and RMT, and this is how you treat us? I'm sickened CCP, sickened. Titans are endgame earners for some of us and we need to be able to dominate the game single-handedly to feel good about ourselves. You're hurting your most loyal customers here in favour of pubbie casuals. |

Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
51
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:01:00 -
[19] - Quote
Tears and grief ! |

Red Templar
Raging Ducks Goonswarm Federation
166
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:01:00 -
[20] - Quote
Nice! For Love. For Peace. For Honor.
For None of the Above.
For Pony! |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
20
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:01:00 -
[21] - Quote
Supercapital graveyard is the place where all Titans would be happy. |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
816
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:01:00 -
[22] - Quote
You're welcome Eve. |

adopt
Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
279
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:02:00 -
[23] - Quote
I am inb4 the raiden/PL/NCdot whining. Shadoo > Always remember to fit Cynosural Field Generator I, have 450 Liquid Ozone in your cargo and convo a friendly Pandemic Legion member if you have a capital or super capital ship tackled. |

Caneb
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:02:00 -
[24] - Quote
Incoming ~elite pvp~ bawling itt. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2394
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:02:00 -
[25] - Quote
Gheyna wrote:scanres to 5, maybe 10-15. it will take like 5 min to lock a pos
Titans do not fit sensor boosters no siree "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Courthouse
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
118
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:04:00 -
[26] - Quote
Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Counterpoint: You're from battleclinic and thus have zero idea what you're talking about when it comes to PVP in EVE Online. |

Sathras
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:04:00 -
[27] - Quote
Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber....
Your tears, we demand more! |

Chi Ana
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:04:00 -
[28] - Quote
o dear |

Dominionix
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:05:00 -
[29] - Quote
April is coming. Gäó |

Hideki Tsutomi
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:06:00 -
[30] - Quote
Making a bad post in this thread that will undoubtedly be full of bad posts. |

Sikhtar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:06:00 -
[31] - Quote
+1 , good changes. Subcap blapping titans were an anomaly in a game designed to match certain ships as counters to other ships.
Also confirming the ME3 ending could easily be adapted to show Mittanis smugness radiating out over the whole galaxy at this point. |

Mike712
BattleClinic
48
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:06:00 -
[32] - Quote
Courthouse wrote:Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Counterpoint: You're from battleclinic and thus have zero idea what you're talking about when it comes to PVP in EVE Online.
lol, you couldn't be more wrong, all of the battleclinic mods are PvPers. Regards, Mike712 The BattleClinic Team
|

Zakn Tawate
Paxton Industries Gentlemen's Agreement
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:06:00 -
[33] - Quote
CCP Greyscale will not have to pay for a drink during all of Fanfest. |

Dovinian
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
983
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:07:00 -
[34] - Quote
This is a very good change. And I have a Titan. |

Isphirel
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:09:00 -
[35] - Quote
Mike712 wrote:Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber....
Yeah, that's usually how it works in any kind of conflict ever.
Good on CCP for letting their game mechanics reflect that. |

Emmerik
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:09:00 -
[36] - Quote
Seems like a decent nerf \o/ |

Courthouse
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
122
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:09:00 -
[37] - Quote
Mike712 wrote:Courthouse wrote:Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Counterpoint: You're from battleclinic and thus have zero idea what you're talking about when it comes to PVP in EVE Online. lol, you couldn't be more wrong, all of the battleclinic mods are PvPers. I've seen your website. I'm certain that I'm not. |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:10:00 -
[38] - Quote
This is like I said: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=928160#post928160 Really though, I am done with this alliance. Only a smug bastard like mittens could be happy here. Leave the politics out of the actual game before you ruin it goddamnit! Lastly don't complain in this thread if you didn't vote. |

Sardaros
OEG Goonswarm Federation
89
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:10:00 -
[39] - Quote
The CCP is really-really Great! For a goons... |

Ivana Twinkle
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
112
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:13:00 -
[40] - Quote
Titans should be big elevators, nothing more. |

Ivana Twinkle
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
113
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:14:00 -
[41] - Quote
and now they are |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:14:00 -
[42] - Quote
Winter Is Coming~
Also good to see that the supercapital apologists are already in the thread discussing how titan tracking was never a problem, even after it's been shown time and time again in every engagement that they can literally track any ship on the field, including rifters... literally.
Literally. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2397
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:14:00 -
[43] - Quote
Mike712 wrote:Courthouse wrote:Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Counterpoint: You're from battleclinic and thus have zero idea what you're talking about when it comes to PVP in EVE Online. lol, you couldn't be more wrong, all of the battleclinic mods are PvPers.
How many titans do you normally deal with at the Jita 4-4 undock? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Caneb
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:15:00 -
[44] - Quote
This is amazing for anyone who believes that sov warfare should not just be for whoever can bring the most titans to a fight.
Not just us.
|

DelightSucker
Nulli Secunda Holding Nulli Secunda
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:15:00 -
[45] - Quote
Congratz CCP you just made sure that Numbers is all in EVE again.
way to **** up your own game. |

Taiwanistan
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
196
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:16:00 -
[46] - Quote
Mike712 wrote:Courthouse wrote:Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Counterpoint: You're from battleclinic and thus have zero idea what you're talking about when it comes to PVP in EVE Online. lol, you couldn't be more wrong, all of the battleclinic mods are PvPers. hey i am going to post this awesome post crusible 1.5 passive regen drake it's boss One thing is for sure, you and I are not friends, buddies or pals so don't /emote me with DMC. That's DeMichael Crimson to you.            |

Sara Devi
ANZAC ALLIANCE Executive Outcomes
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:16:00 -
[47] - Quote
Great Job CCP.
Can you please nerf POS's , It doesn't make sense that they should be able to defend against a fleet a noob ships and I demand to be able to kill them with any ship in the game.
|

xUnlimitedx
Elite Aeronautic Developer Syndicate Test Alliance Please Ignore
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:16:00 -
[48] - Quote
Hey Testies lets take Vale of the Silent again! |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:17:00 -
[49] - Quote
Literally the only problem with titans was forum whoring Only a few unimaginative FC's are pushing this crusade. Leave it to them to pressure CCP.
@ least there are alliances who will adapt and help fix this.
Please CCP, reconsider the reason you put this nerf in. Like this post if you can't stand the CSM strongarming CCP. |

Li Malak
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:19:00 -
[50] - Quote
death2supercaps |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2397
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:19:00 -
[51] - Quote
DelightSucker wrote:Congratz CCP you just made sure that Numbers is all in EVE again.
way to **** up your own game.
nulli secunda is known for using titans "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

esc shk
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:20:00 -
[52] - Quote
Sara Devi wrote:Great Job CCP.
Can you please nerf POS's , It doesn't make sense that they should be able to defend against a fleet a noob ships and I demand to be able to kill them with any ship in the game.
Get the **** out of my CFC. |

conqueror2006
Eternal Silence Ltd.
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:20:00 -
[53] - Quote
CCP
YOU KEEP DOING WHAT GOONS WANT.
THIS GAME IS REACHING THE END.
FOR ME YOU WILL NEVER RECEIVE ONE MORE PERSON.
AND I THINK IS TIME TO THINKING IN LEAVE THIS GAME, BECAUSE IS NOT A CLEAN GAME.
I HOPE EVEYONE STOP PLAYING THIS GAME, AND YOU CAN KEEP WITH YOUR FRIENDS.
|

Tetania
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:21:00 -
[54] - Quote
Congrats Mittens you won again. Unfortunately I think you were on the wrong side this time.
The problem of Titans vs Subcaps is not what it has been made out to be. This is a great change for the CFC but bad for the game.
This will only happen this once but Grath is right.
A nicely fit BS with AC or Pulses could shred cruisers 5 years ago. A titan shredding Drakes with 2 LSE2s and a MWD is no different. It just requires the correct solution, which we for whatever reason were not prepared to deploy. But we've now done an end run around that pesky game mechanic.
Sorry eve. |

DelightSucker
Nulli Secunda Holding Nulli Secunda
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:22:00 -
[55] - Quote
Andski wrote:DelightSucker wrote:Congratz CCP you just made sure that Numbers is all in EVE again.
way to **** up your own game. nulli secunda is known for using titans
You dont have to own or use a Titan to soo why these changes are made.
and its pretty ******* clear to everyone what is going on, |

Chi Ana
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:22:00 -
[56] - Quote
conqueror2006 wrote:CCP
YOU KEEP DOING WHAT GOONS WANT.
THIS GAME IS REACHING THE END.
FOR ME YOU WILL NEVER RECEIVE ONE MORE PERSON.
AND I THINK IS TIME TO THINKING IN LEAVE THIS GAME, BECAUSE IS NOT A CLEAN GAME.
I HOPE EVEYONE STOP PLAYING THIS GAME, AND YOU CAN KEEP WITH YOUR FRIENDS.
can i haz your titan ? |

Ruby Lionheart
Hiramu Innvations
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:22:00 -
[57] - Quote
CCP 2 years ago : Titans you need to be on grid, CCP NOW: Titans **** off back to the pos
in order to kill the sub caps the titans had to be fitted with 3x tracking links, and dmg mods, making them have less EFHP then a SC to,
|

boredatwork
The New Era C0NVICTED
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:22:00 -
[58] - Quote
o dear |

Ivana Twinkle
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
113
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:23:00 -
[59] - Quote
conqueror2006 wrote:CCP
YOU KEEP DOING WHAT GOONS WANT.
THIS GAME IS REACHING THE END.
FOR ME YOU WILL NEVER RECEIVE ONE MORE PERSON.
AND I THINK IS TIME TO THINKING IN LEAVE THIS GAME, BECAUSE IS NOT A CLEAN GAME.
I HOPE EVEYONE STOP PLAYING THIS GAME, AND YOU CAN KEEP WITH YOUR FRIENDS.
~like~ |

Keen Fallsword
Billionaires Club BLACK-MARK
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:23:00 -
[60] - Quote
Hell yeah !
Titans re-balancing just started. Good job. More ppl will be able to have fun with this game. nice :) |

Mike712
BattleClinic
48
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:25:00 -
[61] - Quote
Courthouse wrote:Mike712 wrote:Courthouse wrote:Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Counterpoint: You're from battleclinic and thus have zero idea what you're talking about when it comes to PVP in EVE Online. lol, you couldn't be more wrong, all of the battleclinic mods are PvPers. I've seen your website. I'm certain that I'm not.
BattleClinic's main aim is to help rookie pilots, just because I devote a large part of my spare time to helping people with their mission fits dose not infer that I know nothing about PvP, it's simply that I enjoy educating people on basic ship fitting and that's where a part of my enjoyment of eve comes from.
Regards, Mike712 The BattleClinic Team
|

Vibesz
Dynamic Horizon
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:25:00 -
[62] - Quote
Ohhh I forgot, capitals were not allowed to kill subcaps.
Silly me. |

Keen Fallsword
Billionaires Club BLACK-MARK
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:25:00 -
[63] - Quote
conqueror2006 wrote:CCP
YOU KEEP DOING WHAT GOONS WANT.
THIS GAME IS REACHING THE END.
FOR ME YOU WILL NEVER RECEIVE ONE MORE PERSON.
AND I THINK IS TIME TO THINKING IN LEAVE THIS GAME, BECAUSE IS NOT A CLEAN GAME.
I HOPE EVEYONE STOP PLAYING THIS GAME, AND YOU CAN KEEP WITH YOUR FRIENDS.
Its called balancing MMORPG game bro. Stick with friends and have some fun with sub-caps battle ! Cheers !
|

Midge Mo'yb
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
93
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:25:00 -
[64] - Quote
Greyscale i forgive you for whatever you did to offend me in the past so that i hated you for being ginger. |

Markus Schulz
OEG Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:27:00 -
[65] - Quote
In a now moment - there's nothing to resist from a "titan's sphere". If u don't have the same "titan's sphere". Good job, love CCP. More good fights with subcaps. No imba's. No more 80 lvl paladins in eve like "titan's sphere". ___ If u wanna fight with subcap blob - call ur friends to fight with u. Everything is simple. <3 peace |

Jannarious White
Jolly Codgers Get Off My Lawn
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:27:00 -
[66] - Quote
DelightSucker wrote:Congratz CCP you just made sure that Numbers is all in EVE again.
way to **** up your own game.
It already was a numbers game: number of tracking Titans vs Subcaps.
|

Aryndel Vyst
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
266
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:28:00 -
[67] - Quote
Tetania wrote:Congrats Mittens you won again. Unfortunately I think you were on the wrong side this time.
The problem of Titans vs Subcaps is not what it has been made out to be. This is a great change for the CFC but bad for the game.
This will only happen this once but Grath is right.
A nicely fit BS with AC or Pulses could shred cruisers 5 years ago. A titan shredding Drakes with 2 LSE2s and a MWD is no different. It just requires the correct solution, which we for whatever reason were not prepared to deploy. But we've now done an end run around that pesky game mechanic.
Sorry eve.
Wildly Inappropriate, lol. |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
449
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:29:00 -
[68] - Quote
Sikhtar wrote:+1 , good changes. Subcap blapping titans were an anomaly in a game designed to match certain ships as counters to other ships.
Also confirming the ME3 ending could easily be adapted to show Mittanis smugness radiating out over the whole galaxy at this point. Spoilers, dude!!!!!
Also, YAY4TITANS!!!!!  Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2399
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:30:00 -
[69] - Quote
Tetania wrote:Grath is right.
the guy who unironically makes WW2 analogies and honestly believes that 200 dreads are easily sourced off the market is right
send us a postcard from Native Freshfood when you're there! "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

xUnlimitedx
Elite Aeronautic Developer Syndicate Test Alliance Please Ignore
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:30:00 -
[70] - Quote
Markus Schulz wrote: No more 80 lvl paladins in eve.
hahahahaha |

conqueror2006
Eternal Silence Ltd.
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:33:00 -
[71] - Quote
Chi Ana wrote:conqueror2006 wrote:CCP
YOU KEEP DOING WHAT GOONS WANT.
THIS GAME IS REACHING THE END.
FOR ME YOU WILL NEVER RECEIVE ONE MORE PERSON.
AND I THINK IS TIME TO THINKING IN LEAVE THIS GAME, BECAUSE IS NOT A CLEAN GAME.
I HOPE EVEYONE STOP PLAYING THIS GAME, AND YOU CAN KEEP WITH YOUR FRIENDS.
can i haz your titan ?
TITAN what is that, maybe a strage word in a dicionary. no drones - can-¦t kill even one simple ship no weapons - yes no weapons, if they can-¦t kill solo one simple dictor, nwo with this nerf, never again
........
CAN CCP EXPLAIN TO PLAYERS WHY
HAD PEOPLE SPENT TOO MUTCH TIME
- skiling ... - spending bilions in skills - spending years of training - if one IBIS CAN KILL and ONE TITAN NO
AND KNOW IS f................ the playerS with all this wish to some guys.
IS BETTER SOME GUYS START AND LEARN HOW TO PLAY A GAME, IF NOT THERE IS OTHER KIND OF GAMES TO THAT PERSONS.
|

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:35:00 -
[72] - Quote
Markus Schulz wrote: No more 80 lvl paladins in eve like "titan's sphere".
What about feral druids? |

SuperBeastie
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:36:00 -
[73] - Quote
Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5
it takes a ship with 11.1 scan res 54 seconds to lock a dread. yep that makes sense! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2399
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:36:00 -
[74] - Quote
conqueror2006 wrote:no weapons - yes no weapons, if they can-¦t kill solo one simple dictor, nwo with this nerf, never again
Let's just get something out of the way here: are you saying that titans should be able to effectively solo one of the only two hulls that can tackle them? Do you have any idea how game balancing works? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

xUnlimitedx
Elite Aeronautic Developer Syndicate Test Alliance Please Ignore
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:36:00 -
[75] - Quote
conqueror2006 wrote:Chi Ana wrote:conqueror2006 wrote:CCP
YOU KEEP DOING WHAT GOONS WANT.
THIS GAME IS REACHING THE END.
FOR ME YOU WILL NEVER RECEIVE ONE MORE PERSON.
AND I THINK IS TIME TO THINKING IN LEAVE THIS GAME, BECAUSE IS NOT A CLEAN GAME.
I HOPE EVEYONE STOP PLAYING THIS GAME, AND YOU CAN KEEP WITH YOUR FRIENDS.
can i haz your titan ? TITAN what is that, maybe a strage word in a dicionary. no drones - can-¦t kill even one simple ship no weapons - yes no weapons, if they can-¦t kill solo one simple dictor, nwo with this nerf, never again ........ CAN CCP EXPLAIN TO PLAYERS WHY HAD PEOPLE SPENT TOO MUTCH TIME - skiling ... - spending bilions in skills - spending years of training - if one IBIS CAN KILL and ONE TITAN NO AND KNOW IS f................ the playerS with all this wish to some guys. IS BETTER SOME GUYS START AND LEARN HOW TO PLAY A GAME, IF NOT THERE IS OTHER KIND OF GAMES TO THAT PERSONS.
Everything ok bro?
|

RaGodofTheSun
Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:37:00 -
[76] - Quote
conqueror2006 wrote:CCP
YOU KEEP DOING WHAT GOONS WANT.
THIS GAME IS REACHING THE END.
FOR ME YOU WILL NEVER RECEIVE ONE MORE PERSON.
AND I THINK IS TIME TO THINKING IN LEAVE THIS GAME, BECAUSE IS NOT A CLEAN GAME.
I HOPE EVEYONE STOP PLAYING THIS GAME, AND YOU CAN KEEP WITH YOUR FRIENDS.
Capslock, because this is super serious!
Can I have your isk on the way out? |

Gertrud ToD
Terrorists of Dimensions Electric Monkey Overlords
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:38:00 -
[77] - Quote
limiting the amount of targets titans can lock, raising the locking time... there is only one counter that supercap heavy alliances can do to that: bring more titans.
the tracking nerf can easy be countered by having more RR (super) carriers arround to deal with the smaller stuff, while the set of a titan blob will stop hostiles from fielding capitals all together.
maybe i just don't get the plan behind this |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2400
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:40:00 -
[78] - Quote
Gertrud ToD wrote:limiting the amount of targets titans can lock, raising the locking time... there is only one counter that supercap heavy alliances can do to that: bring more titans.
the tracking nerf can easy be countered by having more RR (super) carriers arround to deal with the smaller stuff, while the set of a titan blob will stop hostiles from fielding capitals all together.
maybe i just don't get the plan behind this
So you're saying that titans might just need a support fleet? What a strange and alien concept in this EVE Online game~ "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

vikari
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:40:00 -
[79] - Quote
conqueror2006 wrote:
Something, something, something that isn't easily understood without reading it five times.
So what you're saying is it's better for CCP and the Eve community that a group of 20 Titans can destroy a 250 man subcap fleet? I respect those that skilled for the Titan, hell I did it myself. However I know sure as well that the enjoyment of 20 people at the expense of a 250 individuals is not good mechanics. It isn't good business strategy either. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5468
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:41:00 -
[80] - Quote
Excellent.
Based on the incoherence of those who disagree with this change, I can only conclude that it's a good change.  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Gertrud ToD
Terrorists of Dimensions Electric Monkey Overlords
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:42:00 -
[81] - Quote
ccp error page tricked me in posting twice! |

Ikoma Sunblazer
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:43:00 -
[82] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing.
All things aside, this is a pretty hilarious assumption that doesn't make sense in context. With a base sensor strength of 5, you are talking about a few seconds difference between t2 and cormack out of a probable minute+ lock time.
Well worth the 4b+ sensor booster imo 
|

Ra Death
Saevos Aviation Saevos Aviation LLC
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:44:00 -
[83] - Quote
I'm almost at a loss of words here. Almost, therefore I am going to speak my mind.
So now capitals are basically structure grinding machines and you only deploy them if you have something to grind down or if someone else is grinding stuff down and you catch someone else grinding down something. This is not a solution, this is a plaster for a symptom. There is now ZERO reason to deploy supercapitals except to grind down a structure. Do you really want structure grinding to become the motivator for people to build and create supercapitals in EVE? I mean, I don't believe you have thought at all about the consequences of these changes.
EVE is now effectively sectioned off into two tier combat systems. Capital combat and sub-capital combat. The difference is, capitals cannot touch sub-capitals, but sub-capitals can, in the numbers that are brought at the moment, almost 1-3 volley capitals. The titans were a workaround for that because numbers were no longer the only deciding factor, your playing time, your assets and your skillpoints actually played a role. Now we are going back to a time again where the only effective tool, a VERY limited tool might I add, against blobbing is a damn stealth bomber. No more force projection by taking advantage of the many years you have spent in the game and the money you have pooled into a titan, you are better off selling off said titan and joining the nearest Maelstrom fleet.
What am I meant to aspire for in EVE in terms of combat? What is my incentive for actually training all these skills. To fly the next flavour of the month subcapital ship?
EVE is now a numbers game when there is a large effort to remove counters for large fleets. If this is the direction we're going, we're going to see a bipolar political landscape because being a small alliance, you can now only exist if you are a part of the inevitable two powerblocks that will come to dominate EVE. If you can't match the numbers, too bad... join or die.
Let's get a rethink of the roles of supercapitals and not a temporary plaster that will reduce supercapitals to nothing but ihub and station grinders. |

Sethur Blackcoat
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:44:00 -
[84] - Quote
Gertrud ToD wrote:limiting the amount of targets titans can lock, raising the locking time... there is only one counter that supercap heavy alliances can do to that: bring more titans.
the tracking nerf can easy be countered by having more RR (super) carriers arround to deal with the smaller stuff, while the set of a titan blob will stop hostiles from fielding capitals all together.
maybe i just don't get the plan behind this confirming that the only solution to nerfed supercaps is bringing more supercaps
i mean supercaps are the max level ships if everyone in your gang is flying them you should be able to win every fight
after all we're not scrubs who can only fly subcaps, ugh, plebians disgust me |

SuperBeastie
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:44:00 -
[85] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:
The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters
if we are going to balance ships that way now can we do it with all ships because as long as there are people with tons of isk ships will get fit crazy. THIS IS THE MOST HALF ASSED THING CCP HAS EVER CAME UP WITH. I'm saying this know full well that it will give test and goons the upper hand over all entity's smaller than us. |

Gertrud ToD
Terrorists of Dimensions Electric Monkey Overlords
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:45:00 -
[86] - Quote
Andski wrote:Gertrud ToD wrote:limiting the amount of targets titans can lock, raising the locking time... there is only one counter that supercap heavy alliances can do to that: bring more titans.
the tracking nerf can easy be countered by having more RR (super) carriers arround to deal with the smaller stuff, while the set of a titan blob will stop hostiles from fielding capitals all together.
maybe i just don't get the plan behind this So you're saying that titans might just need a support fleet? What a strange and alien concept in this EVE Online game~ usually supercaps are fielded with support, and if you guys would field some, you would know :p |

Tetania
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:45:00 -
[87] - Quote
Andski wrote:Tetania wrote:Grath is right. the guy who unironically makes WW2 analogies and honestly believes that 200 dreads are easily sourced off the market is right send us a postcard from Native Freshfood when you're there!
When we fought BoB dread fleets with BS we didn't source those off the market.
The way eve has always worked is that you can have a small number of people with big expensive toys vs a large number of people with cheaper toys or better logistics and win. Goons have historically done the latter. We should have spent a couple of hundred bil of Tech isk to prove one way or another if Titans actually needed nerfed before pushing it through the CSM.
Our one experiment in this area went better than theory craft predicted and since then we just haven't done it again. |

Rick
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:45:00 -
[88] - Quote
Wow congratulations to CCP for making this GOONSCRYANDGETWHATTHEYWANT:Online
You have to be f**king kidding me right? the fact that a group of people are willing to bring a trillion is of hardware to a fight against a group 4 times thier number with a total worth of 100billion isk cry cos thier lack ogf ability to be able to get the bigger ships crys you go and complete F**K up this game?
I guess you really dont want my money?! and there will be alot of people that will tell you lot to go take a flying leap and start playing other games were crying like babies doesnt get you exactly what you want!...
You talked to the CSM and are happy to go about these changes?! well of course you are he the damn leader of the people who cry the most about it, you already smashed the Supercarriers to becoming nothing more than ihub shooters, and then you took the DD away from the titans (which i actually didnt care about), but no you go and halve the tracking, and make it impossible to lock anything other than a pos in any sort of fight.
Ok i agree that yes titans need balancing a little, but no where near that stupid amount. its nothing more than an expensive bridge now, and thats it. in which case you should just remove them from the game, people have spent hundred of hours saving and getting the stuff they need for thier titans and are proud to be in them, the same as they WERE in the supercarriers. and your gonna take that away from them all for the sake of a bunch of as*hats crying cos thye cant take over all of nullsec.
again congratulations and hope you realise the amount of subscriptions you are about to lose. might wanna have your devolopers start looking for new jobs.
nice way to end a good game. |

Courthouse
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
128
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:46:00 -
[89] - Quote
Mike712 wrote:Courthouse wrote:Mike712 wrote:Courthouse wrote:Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Counterpoint: You're from battleclinic and thus have zero idea what you're talking about when it comes to PVP in EVE Online. lol, you couldn't be more wrong, all of the battleclinic mods are PvPers. I've seen your website. I'm certain that I'm not. BattleClinic's main aim is to help rookie pilots, just because I devote a large part of my spare time to helping people with their mission fits dose not infer that I know nothing about PvP, it's simply that I enjoy educating people on basic ship fitting and that's where a part of my enjoyment of eve comes from. That's nice, honey. Don't talk when the adults are having a conversation. Play with your toy over there for a bit and we'll get you an ice cream when we get home. |

Pallidum Treponema
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:46:00 -
[90] - Quote
This is a typical knee-jerk reaction to the symptoms of a problem rather than finding a solution for the cause.
Let's look at the facts, shall we?
Titans can track subcaps if:
1, the subcaps have high signature (IE, battleships, tanked drakes etc) OR 2, the subcaps have little or no transversal (IE, moving directly towards or away from titans, orbiting an anchor so that they will range from max to zero transversal)
Additionally, most titan kills of subcaps occur once said titans are configured for max tracking. Without tracking mods, IE fully configured for tank, titans have trouble tracking even battleships that perform properly.
It can also be argued that all fleets so far that have engaged titans and lost have done it wrong; IE, fielded high signature ships (maelstroms, drakes) at perfect titan tracking ranges. A fleet based on low-signature fast moving high-DPS ships (aka, armorhacs) would have fared far better, especially if supported by sniping oracles in order to clear away support from the tians.
Either way, let's look at the two mot obvious facts:
Titans kill subcaps with little tracking or high signature (an MWDing battleship or drake has the signature of a carrier) Titans need to be tracking fit in order to reliably score kills on subcaps
The obvious solution here is to make tracking fits still possible, but create a far higher risk for the reward.
Change the refitting mechanics in space as follows:
* Capitals (and subcaps) can freely refit off of gang members in space with refitting capability, no more "configuring" or "max 10 ships in range". This is just annoying and pointless, and will be welcomed by any group that has capitals of any kind. It also resolves the problem of theft from capitals, as you no longer have to give out the keys to your ship maintenance bays in order to let someone refit.
* Ships can NOT refit in space, if they have aggression. This ensures that a titan that has configured for tracking at the expensve of tank is now stuck in this mode. This leaves them very vulnerable to a hotdrop by sniping subcaps, dreadnaughts or other supercapitals. This obviously also affects hit-and-run hotdrops with supercarriers or carriers, as capitals performing said hotdrops will be stuck in their cap-recharge configuration, leaving them vulnerable to traps or counter hotdrops.
* Additionally, a small adjustment to tracking or scan res may be in order. Make the adjustments, see how it plays out. If necessary make additional small adjustments. Knee-jerk reactions are overblown and often far overreaching their desired goals.
|

The reclaiming
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:46:00 -
[91] - Quote
vikari wrote:
So what you're saying is it's better for CCP and the Eve community that a group of 20 Titans can destroy a 250 man subcap fleet? I respect those that skilled for the Titan, hell I did it myself. However I know sure as well that the enjoyment of 20 people at the expense of a 250 individuals is not good mechanics. It isn't good business strategy either.
Using this logic pirate gate camps in low sec should be removed since they are very few people taking enjoyment from the larger number of people they kill. This is Eve, or it used to be. No one cares if you all die, you were probably stupid.
|

Euphorion
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:47:00 -
[92] - Quote
I approve of these changes. |

conqueror2006
Eternal Silence Ltd.
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:48:00 -
[93] - Quote
Andski wrote:conqueror2006 wrote:no weapons - yes no weapons, if they can-¦t kill solo one simple dictor, nwo with this nerf, never again Let's just get something out of the way here: are you saying that titans should be able to effectively solo one of the only two hulls that can tackle them? Do you have any idea how game balancing works?
Balancing for you, is like you usual do ?
400 drakes or more against 20 BS, if you loose 1 drake, is why BS have too mutch dps and are overpower, so you ask ccp to nerf then
400 drakes or more agains 20 TITANS, if you loose 1 drake, is why Titans have too mutch dps and are overpower, so you ask ccp to nerf then
Everytime you loose, is because the others ships are overpower, but you only know to play with high numbers, that is excuses.
You must know how to play this game,, check the level of SP of your members, the age of them, if they know how to fly the ships correct, before asking nerfs to ships.
And yes, one titan need to have the hability to kill one ship and not stay there, for hours and hours if no one come. That is ridiculos, and don-¦t make any sense.
|

Rachael Tyrelll
Dynatech Intergalactical Trading Ltd.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:48:00 -
[94] - Quote
CCP, please read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock-paper-scissors
Thanks
|

SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
379
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:48:00 -
[95] - Quote
CCP, you might want to fix something. You said "base scan resolution reduced to 5"
Didn't you mean "Base scan resolution reduced BY 5" ?
No POS mods or ships can realistically have a scan resolution of 5. |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:48:00 -
[96] - Quote
Ra Death wrote:I'm almost at a loss of words here. Almost, therefore I am going to speak my mind.
So now capitals are basically structure grinding machines and you only deploy them if you have something to grind down or if someone else is grinding stuff down and you catch someone else grinding down something. This is not a solution, this is a plaster for a symptom. There is now ZERO reason to deploy supercapitals except to grind down a structure. Do you really want structure grinding to become the motivator for people to build and create supercapitals in EVE? I mean, I don't believe you have thought at all about the consequences of these changes.
EVE is now effectively sectioned off into two tier combat systems. Capital combat and sub-capital combat. The difference is, capitals cannot touch sub-capitals, but sub-capitals can, in the numbers that are brought at the moment, almost 1-3 volley capitals. The titans were a workaround for that because numbers were no longer the only deciding factor, your playing time, your assets and your skillpoints actually played a role. Now we are going back to a time again where the only effective tool, a VERY limited tool might I add, against blobbing is a damn stealth bomber. No more force projection by taking advantage of the many years you have spent in the game and the money you have pooled into a titan, you are better off selling off said titan and joining the nearest Maelstrom fleet.
What am I meant to aspire for in EVE in terms of combat? What is my incentive for actually training all these skills. To fly the next flavour of the month subcapital ship?
EVE is now a numbers game when there is a large effort to remove counters for large fleets. If this is the direction we're going, we're going to see a bipolar political landscape because being a small alliance, you can now only exist if you are a part of the inevitable two powerblocks that will come to dominate EVE. If you can't match the numbers, too bad... join or die.
Let's get a rethink of the roles of supercapitals and not a temporary plaster that will reduce supercapitals to nothing but ihub and station grinders.
Completely agree with this post. Really this change is over the top and hamfisted. You could have done better and thought this through.
Maybe CCP will implement something else in the end. Only a new CSM is going to help fix this, too bad its not going to change. Rebalancing supercaps is only the start. Every facet of gameplay is now at risk to being exploited by this tyranny. |

Kissapasi
Kissapasi Corporation Paisti Syndicate
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:49:00 -
[97] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:This will require a reasonably significant amount of work, which we unfortunately don't have the spare resources for right now.
Picks from the patch notes:
- An issue with certain lipstick colors not appearing correctly has been fixed.
- Hull Tanking - Elite certificate no longer directly requires Hull Upgrades IV, as this is superseded by the requirement for Core Integrity - Elite.
- The warp in effects on the sun in Uotila system have been fixed and display correctly.
- The boosters on the Dominix, Sin and Dominix Navy Issue have been moved closer to the ships engines.
- Neutron Blaster turret color will adapt to the racial style of the ship they're fitted to.
- We have revamped the rookie ships which are the first ships new players see in the game. You can read, and see, all the changes to the Ibis, Impairor, Reaper and Velator in this blog.
Sounds like CCP is using their resources well to make the game better for us all. Well, the at least newbship models were completely broken for so long time so it is great that they finally fixed them! Good work CCP.
|
|

CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
624

|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:49:00 -
[98] - Quote
Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing. All things aside, this is a pretty hilarious assumption that doesn't make sense in context. With a base sensor strength of 5, you are talking about a few seconds difference between t2 and cormack out of a probable minute+ lock time. Well worth the 4b+ sensor booster imo 
Gains you 25s against frigates (105 to 79, assuming 3 are fitted), 15s against cruisers (64 to 49) and 10s against battleships (44 to 33).
If you see this as a big difference, then it's worth balancing around the officer fit given that dropping 12bn on SBs is not a huge fraction of the outlay for a properly-fit titan. If you don't see this as a big difference, then balancing around the officer fit isn't a big deal because it's not having a major impact. Either way, it's a functional assumption  |
|

Jita Bloodtear
Bloodtear Labs
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:49:00 -
[99] - Quote
Our numbers show that it'll take 30-40 seconds for a sebo'd titan to lock up another titan, and 60 full seconds to lock up a dread. These scan resolution changes are fine, but you need to increase the signature radii on all capitals and structures (POSes) so they can be locked within our lifetimes. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2404
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:51:00 -
[100] - Quote
So which one of those is the titan? Oh yeah, the one that kills rock, paper and scissors "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Dank Man
FinFleet Raiden.
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:52:00 -
[101] - Quote
Wow, ccp you must love goons and blobs. because this nerf make the bigger subcap blob win all fights, congrats mittens and goons, you cried enough on the forums and welped enough fleets into capital weapons that you got what you wanted, a capital weapon shield! gg. |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
444
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:52:00 -
[102] - Quote
Ra Death wrote:There is now ZERO reason to deploy supercapitals except to grind down a structure.
Is that true?
SMT008 wrote:CCP, you might want to fix something. You said "base scan resolution reduced to 5"
Didn't you mean "Base scan resolution reduced BY 5" ?
No POS mods or ships can realistically have a scan resolution of 5.
It's reduced to 5.
That puts a titan with officer sensor boosters in line with the lock time of a sieged dread. |

Euphorion
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:53:00 -
[103] - Quote
Shield titans should have more sig res than armor tanking titans, due to their incredible difficulty of fitting sebos, and sigamps being terrible. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:54:00 -
[104] - Quote
Mike712 wrote:Courthouse wrote:Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Counterpoint: You're from battleclinic and thus have zero idea what you're talking about when it comes to PVP in EVE Online. lol, you couldn't be more wrong, all of the battleclinic mods are PvPers.
He wasn't saying that you are not PvPer.
He was saying that you have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to PvP, so his point is still valid.
|

Anuqet
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:55:00 -
[105] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:
it takes a ship with 11.1 scan res 54 seconds to lock a dread. yep that makes sense!
Haha this cannot possibly be true, since that would mean that titans cant fight dreads seing how the dreads would die before 80% of the titans can even come close to locking them. |

Joran Jackson
The Red Circle Inc.
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:55:00 -
[106] - Quote
Euphorion wrote:Shield titans should have more sig res than armor tanking titans, due to their incredible difficulty of fitting sebos, and sigamps being terrible.
You shield tank your titan? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2404
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:56:00 -
[107] - Quote
Dank Man wrote:Wow, ccp you must love goons and blobs. because this nerf make the bigger subcap blob win all fights, congrats mittens and goons, you cried enough on the forums and welped enough fleets into capital weapons that you got what you wanted, a capital weapon shield! gg.
20 of your members deciding coalition engagements isn't exactly the better alternative either heh! "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Pallidum Treponema
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:56:00 -
[108] - Quote
In addition to my previous post, I've said it over and over again
The solution is not a nerf of supercapitals. A nerf will accomplish nothing - either supercapitals will still be overpowered, OR they will be utterly useless
The solution is rather a COUNTER to supercapitals. An affordable counter, which puts a lot of risk to deploying supercapitals without a proper support fleet, and is very cost effective should said supercapital fleet be without support, or even insufficient support
I once again submit my torpedo boat proposal as a reasonable counter to supercapitals
Torpedo boats (yeah, it's a crap name, but it describes what they are
Small cheap ships, perhaps tier 2 destroyers. Relatively poor tank, relatively low DPS, but with the ability to fit a "torpedo launcher", an item similar to bomb launchers - with a 5-10 minute cycle time, that targets supercaps and possibly normal caps as well. They need to be guided in, requires 15 seconds to detonate, and the firing ships need to be on the field for this duration, WITH the target still locked. This means that they can be jammed, killed, forced off the field etc, to prevent the damage from occurring, but if it isn't, each of these cheap disposable ships dish out 100k alpha on supercaps. Less so on normal capitals. 100k alpha may not be much, but 100 of these ships means 10M potential damage
Game mechanics:
* The "Torpedo Launcher" would be able to fit a single supertorpedo * The supertorpedo requires a lock on the target to fire * The lock must be maintained during the flight/activation time of the supertorpedo * The flight/activation time is 15 seconds * The supertorpedo hits for 100k damage on supercapitals, and is affected by resists as usual * The torpedo boat is immune to the effects of remote ECM burs * It may be possible to reuse code from titan doomsdays to replicate the activation time and effect
Refire delay is 5 to 10 minutes
Pros:
* A dedicated counter to supercapitals, and even normal capitals. It'd give an alliance with numbers a means to significantly damage an opposing supercapital, with relatively cost effective means * A good way to enable new players to strike against the biggest ships in the game
Cons
* High refire delay means that DPS is limited * Requires large numbers to take on supercapitals * Can be shot down during the 15 second activation timer
Counter
The most obvious counter is subcap support for the supercap fleet
This makes it essential to have a force sufficient enough to defend the supercapitals, preventing a pure supercap fleet from dominating the battlefield
|

Shade Millith
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:56:00 -
[109] - Quote
Uh, I wanted titans nerfed, but while I agree that 35-50 is a little much for titans, 5 is WAY too low |

Tuskar
ISKRA-FU-0717 Paisti Syndicate
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:56:00 -
[110] - Quote
Titans should be only for portaling and in supercap fights. Good chance.
solo titan pvp heroes and sanctum whores can diaf |
|

CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
624

|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:56:00 -
[111] - Quote
Kissapasi wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:This will require a reasonably significant amount of work, which we unfortunately don't have the spare resources for right now. Picks from the patch notes: - An issue with certain lipstick colors not appearing correctly has been fixed. - Hull Tanking - Elite certificate no longer directly requires Hull Upgrades IV, as this is superseded by the requirement for Core Integrity - Elite. - The warp in effects on the sun in Uotila system have been fixed and display correctly. - The boosters on the Dominix, Sin and Dominix Navy Issue have been moved closer to the ships engines. - Neutron Blaster turret color will adapt to the racial style of the ship they're fitted to. - We have revamped the rookie ships which are the first ships new players see in the game. You can read, and see, all the changes to the Ibis, Impairor, Reaper and Velator in this blog.Sounds like CCP is using their resources well to make the game better for us all. Well, the at least newbship models were completely broken for so long time so it is great that they finally fixed them! Good work CCP.
The only one of these which was competing for resources with balance changes is the hull tanking cert fix, which I actually did myself. I'd estimate a minute to read the defect, two minutes to verify that it was indeed silly, fifteen seconds to find the cert in our internal tools, five seconds to click the "remove requirement" button, a minute to type up the change notes and thirty seconds to close the defect. Let's say five minutes total, as part of my scheduled "fixing defects" time. This is not the thing that's preventing us from spending a month working on titan balance. |
|

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:56:00 -
[112] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing. All things aside, this is a pretty hilarious assumption that doesn't make sense in context. With a base sensor strength of 5, you are talking about a few seconds difference between t2 and cormack out of a probable minute+ lock time. Well worth the 4b+ sensor booster imo  Gains you 25s against frigates (105 to 79, assuming 3 are fitted), 15s against cruisers (64 to 49) and 10s against battleships (44 to 33). If you see this as a big difference, then it's worth balancing around the officer fit given that dropping 12bn on SBs is not a huge fraction of the outlay for a properly-fit titan. If you don't see this as a big difference, then balancing around the officer fit isn't a big deal because it's not having a major impact. Either way, it's a functional assumption 
4b? Hah, try 10.  |

Doctor Eezee
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
65
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:57:00 -
[113] - Quote
Kissapasi wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:This will require a reasonably significant amount of work, which we unfortunately don't have the spare resources for right now. Picks from the patch notes: - An issue with certain lipstick colors not appearing correctly has been fixed. - Hull Tanking - Elite certificate no longer directly requires Hull Upgrades IV, as this is superseded by the requirement for Core Integrity - Elite. - The warp in effects on the sun in Uotila system have been fixed and display correctly. - The boosters on the Dominix, Sin and Dominix Navy Issue have been moved closer to the ships engines. - Neutron Blaster turret color will adapt to the racial style of the ship they're fitted to. - We have revamped the rookie ships which are the first ships new players see in the game. You can read, and see, all the changes to the Ibis, Impairor, Reaper and Velator in this blog.Sounds like CCP is using their resources well to make the game better for us all. Well, the at least newbship models were completely broken for so long time so it is great that they finally fixed them! Good work CCP.
Yes, because the exact same people that work in the design department also work on balancing the game.
"My rule is: If you meet the weakest vessel, attack; if it is a vessel equal to yours, attack; and if it is stronger than yours, also attack..." - Admiral Stepan O. Makarov |

Ikoma Sunblazer
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:57:00 -
[114] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing. All things aside, this is a pretty hilarious assumption that doesn't make sense in context. With a base sensor strength of 5, you are talking about a few seconds difference between t2 and cormack out of a probable minute+ lock time. Well worth the 4b+ sensor booster imo  Gains you 25s against frigates (105 to 79, assuming 3 are fitted), 15s against cruisers (64 to 49) and 10s against battleships (44 to 33). If you see this as a big difference, then it's worth balancing around the officer fit given that dropping 12bn on SBs is not a huge fraction of the outlay for a properly-fit titan. If you don't see this as a big difference, then balancing around the officer fit isn't a big deal because it's not having a major impact. Either way, it's a functional assumption 
And these numbers are all calculated with TRIPLE cormack sensor boosters? Which are 10b each atm and will surely go up?
(quote=CCP Greyscale]"Not a huge fraction of the outlay for a properly-fit titan"[/quote] So you are saying that 30bil, or about half the build cost of a titan in sensor boosters is a reasonable investment in titans for a 10 second gain in lock time that still comes out to over half a minute, or about triple the warp speed of a maelstrom.
You are a funny dude :) |

Notorius B
D00M. Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:57:00 -
[115] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone,
We're not happy with the effectiveness of large groups of titans against subcapital ships, so we're making some adjustments to titans and to XL turrets.
Basicly means GOONS aint happy
I have to ask why are ccp so influenced bye goons. They blob. People bring titans to counter their massive blops as not all alliances can bring as big of a blop like goons.
CCP loves MITTANI.
|

Ruby Lionheart
Hiramu Innvations
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:58:00 -
[116] - Quote
Andski wrote:So which one of those is the titan? Oh yeah, the one that kills rock, paper and scissors
Not if the rock is dreads or sc's ;)
70 bil ship, > 100mil isk ship, but if you had brouth like 50 dreads you whuld have killed some titans and stil got out on top whould you not? |

Freelancer83
Van Diemen's Demise Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:58:00 -
[117] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing. All things aside, this is a pretty hilarious assumption that doesn't make sense in context. With a base sensor strength of 5, you are talking about a few seconds difference between t2 and cormack out of a probable minute+ lock time. Well worth the 4b+ sensor booster imo  Gains you 25s against frigates (105 to 79, assuming 3 are fitted), 15s against cruisers (64 to 49) and 10s against battleships (44 to 33). If you see this as a big difference, then it's worth balancing around the officer fit given that dropping 12bn on SBs is not a huge fraction of the outlay for a properly-fit titan. If you don't see this as a big difference, then balancing around the officer fit isn't a big deal because it's not having a major impact. Either way, it's a functional assumption 
Is CCP using this logic when Balancing Maelstroms around the fact they will be used in fleets of 150+ Maels and can Alpha Capitals? |

SirNine
The Praxis Initiative Gentlemen's Agreement
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:59:00 -
[118] - Quote
Dank Man wrote:Wow, ccp you must love goons and blobs. because this nerf make the bigger subcap blob win all fights, congrats mittens and goons, you cried enough on the forums and welped enough fleets into capital weapons that you got what you wanted, a capital weapon shield! gg.
Nothing like sweet tasty tears in the morning. |

Rachael Tyrelll
Dynatech Intergalactical Trading Ltd.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:59:00 -
[119] - Quote
Andski wrote:So which one of those is the titan? Oh yeah, the one that kills rock, paper and scissors
Sorry Dude ... u fail
caps are now completely useless instead of the bridge and against structures ... That would be ok if subcaps would do no damage against structures ... but :D
So welcome to World of Goonswarm :) |

Tector
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:00:00 -
[120] - Quote
Dank Man wrote:Wow, ccp you must love goons and blobs. because this nerf make the bigger subcap blob win all fights, congrats mittens and goons, you cried enough on the forums and welped enough fleets into capital weapons that you got what you wanted, a capital weapon shield! gg.
Yeah we're horrible people for getting along well with others. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5469
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:00:00 -
[121] - Quote
Pallidum Treponema wrote:Additionally, most titan kills of subcaps occur once said titans are configured for max tracking. Without tracking mods, IE fully configured for tank, titans have trouble tracking even battleships that perform properly. GǪand now it will have trouble tracking battleships when configured for max tracking, which is pretty much how it should be.
Quote:The solution is rather a COUNTER to supercapitals. An affordable counter, which puts a lot of risk to deploying supercapitals without a proper support fleet, and is very cost effective should said supercapital fleet be without support, or even insufficient support There are counters. The problem is that the titans have a rather easy time of killing them. This kind of change makes those counters more viable. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Iniquita
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:00:00 -
[122] - Quote
My complaint is this: Dont do half assed changes. Devote the resources to properly rebalance titans in one go. You've already done enough to nerf them repeatedly without any positive changes. |

Kardek Stormlord
The Fallen Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:01:00 -
[123] - Quote
Wow I thought the guys who decided all the station walking crap were fired but it seems they made it onto this balance team!
Guess CCP wants it to be just all about the blob.
Drake #682 in Fleet 3 ready! Zzzz |

Neo Agricola
BLACK-MARK
203
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:01:00 -
[124] - Quote
First Thought: Nice Changes!!!
Second thought:
Can please anyone check if, with those new changes, Titans and Supers can still speedtank Dreads in Siege? Because I still think that is a big LOL if you cant hit something perfectly what is 18 km big and moving with 100m/s because you are in siege. Wasn't siege plant as a anti cap / anti supercap weapon or is that thing only a anti-POS / anti Station Weapon?
Thx.
DISSONANCE is recruiting Members: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=706442#post706442 Black-Mark Alliance Recruitment: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=6710 |

Chad VanGaalen
Knights Of Divinity Vera Cruz Alliance
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:02:00 -
[125] - Quote
CCP doesn't seem to be capable of learning from the fact that hastily-made changes to not a balanced game make.
1) Stop ******* around with noobships and other ridiculous changes. 2) Instead of constantly repeating that supers and titans need to be re-tooled, get off your asses and do something about it. 3) Keep catering to the tears of Goons. You're great at it.
Seriously, your entire post of discarded changes reeks of laziness.
Drake, MWD fit with T2 Heavies and 2x LSE: 3.16k signature Archon: 2.92k signature
This game is going to hell. Damage Control Podcast www.realmenhulltank.com |

Emily Heapy
Sinclair Corporation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:02:00 -
[126] - Quote
Dank Man wrote:Wow, ccp you must love goons and blobs. because this nerf make the bigger subcap blob win all fights, congrats mittens and goons, you cried enough on the forums and welped enough fleets into capital weapons that you got what you wanted, a capital weapon shield! gg.
Now wipe those tears Mister. Every cloud and all that, at least now you will learn that PvP is more than just Log on titan > Slam head against keyboard and pwn everything. You may even learn some kills now!!!!
Regards
Emily
p.s. I will buy your titan, 30b isk ready |

Mr Rive
Black Omega Security Pandemic Legion
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:04:00 -
[127] - Quote
A bad tool blames his workers |

Mintrolio
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
415
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:04:00 -
[128] - Quote
CONFRIMIGN GOOSEWAMP MITANI WIL TAKIGN CREDIT OF CORSE.
ALSO REMEMBRE THESE WAS FIRST MIEN IDEA FROM BEFORE I LOSIGN MINE TITANS.
ALSO I NOT FEEL BAD THET IDEA TAKENS BY PEEPOL ABLE TO USIGN IDEA.
ALSO I AM HAPY TO SEEIGN MINE CHANGE RECONMENDS TO BE IMPLEMETT IN GAME.
KEEP UP GOOD POASTIGN! MINTROLIO FUR CSM7 |

Dead All Capitals
Kriegsmarinewerft Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:04:00 -
[129] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5
it takes a ship with 11.1 scan res 54 seconds to lock a dread. yep that makes sense!
Never not using Sensor Booster on Titans! |

Euphorion
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:04:00 -
[130] - Quote
Joran Jackson wrote:Euphorion wrote:Shield titans should have more sig res than armor tanking titans, due to their incredible difficulty of fitting sebos, and sigamps being terrible. You shield tank your titan?
Leviathans and Ragnaroks kind of could use some shield tanking. Putting a sensor booster on those hurts more than armor tanking titans. |

Aryndel Vyst
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
266
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:05:00 -
[131] - Quote
Mike712 wrote:Courthouse wrote:Mike712 wrote:Courthouse wrote:Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Counterpoint: You're from battleclinic and thus have zero idea what you're talking about when it comes to PVP in EVE Online. lol, you couldn't be more wrong, all of the battleclinic mods are PvPers. I've seen your website. I'm certain that I'm not. BattleClinic's main aim is to help rookie pilots, just because I devote a large part of my spare time to helping people with their mission fits dose not infer that I know nothing about PvP, it's simply that I enjoy educating people on basic ship fitting and that's where a part of my enjoyment of eve comes from.
I only use your site to find botting fits. Whoops |

Shade Millith
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:05:00 -
[132] - Quote
[quote]The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing. Our understanding is that this isn't standard practice right now, but we have to balance for expected behavior after the change, and for worst-case scenarios.[/quote
And what about the two shield titans? The two armor titans don't have to lower their tank, but the shield tankers do? |

Magnifikus Erzverwirrer
Endstati0n Raiden.
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:06:00 -
[133] - Quote
CAN YOU PLEASE ATLEAST FIX BRIDGE BUG FOR GOONSWARMONLINE2012? or are all your fuck1ing ressources are bound on painting hello kitty pictures on ibis and reaper? |

Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:07:00 -
[134] - Quote
It's a great patch, because Titans became a role to destroy capitals not subcaps. A Titan pilot now needs a better support fleet. |

Pallidum Treponema
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
48
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:07:00 -
[135] - Quote
Andski wrote:So which one of those is the titan? Oh yeah, the one that kills rock, paper and scissors
This is why a supercap balancing needs to involve a proper counter. Currently, there IS no cost-effective proper counter, which is why supercaps are imbalanced. Instead of nerfing supercaps to oblivion, CCP needs to create a cost-effective, low-sp friendly counter to supercaps. I refer to my previous post about torpedoboats for such a counter. |

Anuqet
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:07:00 -
[136] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing. All things aside, this is a pretty hilarious assumption that doesn't make sense in context. With a base sensor strength of 5, you are talking about a few seconds difference between t2 and cormack out of a probable minute+ lock time. Well worth the 4b+ sensor booster imo  Gains you 25s against frigates (105 to 79, assuming 3 are fitted), 15s against cruisers (64 to 49) and 10s against battleships (44 to 33). If you see this as a big difference, then it's worth balancing around the officer fit given that dropping 12bn on SBs is not a huge fraction of the outlay for a properly-fit titan. If you don't see this as a big difference, then balancing around the officer fit isn't a big deal because it's not having a major impact. Either way, it's a functional assumption 
Just swining by to point out that cormacs are 10b each atm. Pretty sure that will double tonight. So putting 30b (now) or 60b (in 12h) on a fit for a ship costing 63b to build is kinda funny. ))) |

Vissor
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:08:00 -
[137] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing. All things aside, this is a pretty hilarious assumption that doesn't make sense in context. With a base sensor strength of 5, you are talking about a few seconds difference between t2 and cormack out of a probable minute+ lock time. Well worth the 4b+ sensor booster imo  Gains you 25s against frigates (105 to 79, assuming 3 are fitted), 15s against cruisers (64 to 49) and 10s against battleships (44 to 33). If you see this as a big difference, then it's worth balancing around the officer fit given that dropping 12bn on SBs is not a huge fraction of the outlay for a properly-fit titan. If you don't see this as a big difference, then balancing around the officer fit isn't a big deal because it's not having a major impact. Either way, it's a functional assumption 
Are you re.....d? why should i even try to lock frigate or cruiser after all of these changes? if there like 1% chance to hit cruiser? Your assumptions are pretty much invalid and to be honest lack any logical thinking so I am really intrested how you even got this job? I think you are better suited as janitor or something. Take that functional assumption. Bye.
|

Shnejder
The Scope Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:08:00 -
[138] - Quote
Great, now you just need to rebalance Moongo. Oh wait, Mittens pay you to not do it  |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:08:00 -
[139] - Quote
conqueror2006 wrote: CAN CCP EXPLAIN TO PLAYERS WHY
HAD PEOPLE SPENT TOO MUTCH TIME
- skiling ... - spending bilions in skills - spending years of training - if one IBIS CAN KILL and ONE TITAN NO
AND KNOW IS f................ the playerS with all this wish to some guys.
IS BETTER SOME GUYS START AND LEARN HOW TO PLAY A GAME, IF NOT THERE IS OTHER KIND OF GAMES TO THAT PERSONS.
Just imagine how much time and money those industrialists with 10 accounts and 5 T2 BPOs have spent, and how many skills they had to train.
I reckon they should obliterate entire fleets by just showing up on grid in Viators.
|

Martha Hamster
Fabeltjeskrants Industries
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:08:00 -
[140] - Quote
Oww yes, CCP, good job. Goonswarm demands, lets give them exactly what they want for no particular reason.
5 scan res is a joke, it has to be higher. Halved tracking is too much, but not drasticly so. 3 targets locked is too few, too, but it would be ok if the scan res was acceptable. |

Sadron
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
64
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:09:00 -
[141] - Quote
Nice I love it. They will be as they need to be as capital killers. So it is not nerf, but more balancing. Finally something good is happening *thumbs up*. |

Koby Botick
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:09:00 -
[142] - Quote
Winter has come and was awesome. But now spring looks promising too.
|

Bashe Zor
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:09:00 -
[143] - Quote
Anyone who thinks titans don't need a balancing pass has never had his pod headshotted by one, after his moving BC was already destroyed by one. Think it's only drakes? Think again. I have lossmails in canes with titans on top as well.
Once a flock of titans has gone beyond a certain critical mass, it's no longer possible to kill them with numbers that are attainable in this terrible, terrible game. This isn't about 'goons whine till they get what they want and now Raiden will fall' this is about 'titans are currently broken'
(and now Raiden will fall)
|

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1797
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:09:00 -
[144] - Quote
It's a good day to be an Eve Online player. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2420
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:09:00 -
[145] - Quote
Shnejder wrote:Great, now you just need to rebalance Moongo. Oh wait, Mittens pay you to not do it 
Mittens has very publicly stated that he's for a technetium nerf, whoops! "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Jita Bloodtear
Bloodtear Labs
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:10:00 -
[146] - Quote
What is the intended role for titans?
Fleet boosters? Logistical fleet bridging? Anti-capital weapons? Anti-structure weapons? Anti-subcap blapers?
Please clarify what role the titan is meant to serve, and why it's broken.
|

Rick
The Ankou Raiden.
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:10:00 -
[147] - Quote
CCP your early.. april fools isnt for another 17/18 days.... |

HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:11:00 -
[148] - Quote
so does this mean raidens not voting mittens for csm |

Jarnobi
D00M. Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:11:00 -
[149] - Quote
Congatz CCP, you have made yourself look like a fu***** re****, and keep kissing Mittani a**
End off rage... |

Aryndel Vyst
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
267
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:12:00 -
[150] - Quote
Rick wrote:CCP your early.. april fools isnt for another 17/18 days....
you're* |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1797
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:12:00 -
[151] - Quote
My favorite part of the OP is that this is just the first step in fixing SUPERCAPITALS ONLINE. I hope to see many, many more nerfs in the near future.
Thank you, CCP, for not caving in to the tiny minority that is ~elite PvP~. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Dan Massell
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:12:00 -
[152] - Quote
Emily Heapy wrote:Dank Man wrote:Wow, ccp you must love goons and blobs. because this nerf make the bigger subcap blob win all fights, congrats mittens and goons, you cried enough on the forums and welped enough fleets into capital weapons that you got what you wanted, a capital weapon shield! gg. Now wipe those tears Mister. Every cloud and all that, at least now you will learn that PvP is more than just Log on titan > Slam head against keyboard and pwn everything. You may even learn some kills now!!!! Regards Emily p.s. I will buy your titan, 30b isk ready
i know. because you know lots about PVP because zergling 1600 man fleet across entire region is real PVP.
the ONLY thing smaller alliances have against nonsense like this kind of a blob was until now to grow some balls and deploy trillions of ISK on the battlefield and try to even the odds. But that's not real PVP. I know.
CCP Grayscale man... stop embarrassing yourself here saying we don't have time to really deal with this the way it should be. we have no resources for that so we going to deploy the most significant change that will most likely help remove number of alliances from the map without any serious thinking. we will finish this later when goons online is completed. Until then all of you who spent 120bil buying and fitting a tit go and spend 30bil more so you can get your lock time to around 45 sec. Its just disrespectful.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5470
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:12:00 -
[153] - Quote
Vissor wrote:Are you re.....d? why should i even try to lock frigate or cruiser after all of these changes? if there like 1% chance to hit cruiser? Because he's infinipointing your titan buddy 30km away, where the range alleviates the slow tracking and brings that hit chance up to several tens of percentsGǪ GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2420
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:14:00 -
[154] - Quote
Given Raiden's mastery of PvP in EVE Online I am sure that they will adapt to this new envirhahahahahaha "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
453
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:15:00 -
[155] - Quote
Heh |

LeMoose
D00M. Northern Coalition.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:15:00 -
[156] - Quote
i will take a long hard look if i keep playing eve i will most likly unsub all my accounts |

NIJofleyUK
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:15:00 -
[157] - Quote
conqueror2006 wrote:CCP
YOU KEEP DOING WHAT GOONS WANT.
THIS GAME IS REACHING THE END.
FOR ME YOU WILL NEVER RECEIVE ONE MORE PERSON.
AND I THINK IS TIME TO THINKING IN LEAVE THIS GAME, BECAUSE IS NOT A CLEAN GAME.
I HOPE EVEYONE STOP PLAYING THIS GAME, AND YOU CAN KEEP WITH YOUR FRIENDS.
You forgot one thing!!!
EMO... EMO... EMO... EMO... EMO... EMO... EMO... EMO... EMO... EMO... EMO... EMO... EMO... EMO... EMO... EMO...
Did I miss anything ??? I BELIEVE IN THIS ---> (---------) -á:: -áWhat you dont see anything? -áPfft!! |

Rachael Tyrelll
Dynatech Intergalactical Trading Ltd.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:16:00 -
[158] - Quote
No, I was serious ... take subcaps the ability to harm structures and I am fine with the change ...
AND rebalance moongoo
Until then I cannot even imagine what the Mittani is doing to make you give him all he demands ...
And no, I am no raden. alt, AND I do not hava a titan, but this is a slap in the face for all Allliances and corps who worked years to get Supers and titans. these ships do not fall out of the ble sky, you know? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5470
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:16:00 -
[159] - Quote
LeMoose wrote:i will take a long hard look if i keep playing eve i will most likly unsub all my accounts Excellent. Can you contract all your stuff? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2420
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:16:00 -
[160] - Quote
Dan Massell wrote:Emily Heapy wrote:Dank Man wrote:Wow, ccp you must love goons and blobs. because this nerf make the bigger subcap blob win all fights, congrats mittens and goons, you cried enough on the forums and welped enough fleets into capital weapons that you got what you wanted, a capital weapon shield! gg. Now wipe those tears Mister. Every cloud and all that, at least now you will learn that PvP is more than just Log on titan > Slam head against keyboard and pwn everything. You may even learn some kills now!!!! Regards Emily p.s. I will buy your titan, 30b isk ready i know. because you know lots about PVP because zergling 1600 man fleet across entire region is real PVP. the ONLY thing smaller alliances have against nonsense like this kind of a blob was until now to grow some balls and deploy trillions of ISK on the battlefield and try to even the odds. But that's not real PVP. I know. CCP Grayscale man... stop embarrassing yourself here saying we don't have time to really deal with this the way it should be. we have no resources for that so we going to deploy the most significant change that will most likely help remove number of alliances from the map without any serious thinking. we will finish this later when goons online is completed. Until then all of you who spent 120bil buying and fitting a tit go and spend 30bil more so you can get your lock time to around 45 sec. Its just disrespectful.
Tell me all about how Raiden is a small alliance "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
491
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:16:00 -
[161] - Quote
Dan Massell wrote: that will most likely help remove number of alliances from the map without any serious thinking.
LOL who cares. If they can't defend their space properly without titanblobbing the enemy, maybe they deserve to lose it? Vote for The Mittani http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=438 |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5746
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:17:00 -
[162] - Quote
Just gonna lean back here and enjoy this thread, don't mind me folks~ The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Trytus Tycho
Black Lion Brigade Tragedy.
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:17:00 -
[163] - Quote
Chad VanGaalen wrote:CCP doesn't seem to be capable of learning from the fact that hastily-made changes to not a balanced game make.
1) Stop ******* around with noobships and other ridiculous changes. 2) Instead of constantly repeating that supers and titans need to be re-tooled, get off your asses and do something about it. 3) Keep catering to the tears of Goons. You're great at it.
Seriously, your entire post of discarded changes reeks of laziness.
Drake, MWD fit with T2 Heavies and 2x LSE: 3.16k signature Archon: 2.92k signature
This game is going to hell.
Why do people keeping quoting this **** as if it has any meaning? Last I checked, sig radius wasn't the only stat that affected hit chance.
Drake MWD fit with 2 nanos and Claymore links: 1.35 km/s Archon in Siege: 0m/s
Battleship guns can't track frigates burning at 3 km/s even with the sig bloom, why should Titans track subcaps burning at 1.35?
And why is this a shock to anyone? If CCP intended Titans to hit subcaps they would never have removed DD's ability to hit them. WTF is the difference between DD'ing a subcap and blaaping it with XL lasers?
Calm down bittervets, you can still do drive by doomsdays. |

Ivana Twinkle
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
113
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:19:00 -
[164] - Quote
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. |

Iniquita
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
34
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:20:00 -
[165] - Quote
Lets break the game as it stands now so titans dont continue breaking the game in the future, I like the part where this completely fucks over people with a significant titan presence in their fleets. This is a rash decision making titans effectively useless until you have time to address rebalancing titans. So mothball your titans, let goons take over the north and wait because we promise we'll make them good again in the future?
I really hope you will consider holding off on this rash change until you have to properly address the titan role in fleets. |

Pallidum Treponema
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
48
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:20:00 -
[166] - Quote
Bashe Zor wrote:Anyone who thinks titans don't need a balancing pass has never had his pod headshotted by one, after his moving BC was already destroyed by one. Think it's only drakes? Think again. I have lossmails in canes with titans on top as well.
While supercaps do need a balancing pass, specifically regarding proper counters to supercaps, I have to say this: Locking a pod takes me 28 seconds. If you still have a pod on the field after 28 seconds, you are probably not even moving, so you have zero transversal. Zero transversal means that any turret ship will kill you. Stop failing at EVE.
If your moving BC is popped by titans, you're either in a drake (high signature, guess what!) and possibly MWDing (EVEN HIGHER signature!). If you are moving with low transversal, which automatically happens if you orbit an anchor, or if you MWD, you will get killed by titans.
Learn how to fly your ship rather than blindly relying on FCs that also cannot fly their ships. Back when I started playing, all good PVPers knew about how to maximize their transversal so as not to become targets of much larger ships. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2588
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:20:00 -
[167] - Quote
Jarnobi wrote:Congatz CCP, you have made yourself look like a fu***** re****, and keep kissing Mittani a**
End off rage... i dont think this will be the end of the rage |

Chad VanGaalen
Knights Of Divinity Vera Cruz Alliance
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:21:00 -
[168] - Quote
Trytus Tycho wrote:
Why do people keeping quoting this **** as if it has any meaning? Last I checked, sig radius wasn't the only stat that affected hit chance.
Drake MWD fit with 2 nanos and Claymore links: 1.35 km/s Archon in Siege: 0m/s
Battleship guns can't track frigates burning at 3 km/s even with the sig bloom, why should Titans track subcaps burning at 1.35?
And why is this a shock to anyone? If CCP intended Titans to hit subcaps they would never have removed DD's ability to hit them. WTF is the difference between DD'ing a subcap and blaaping it with XL lasers?
Calm down bittervets, you can still do drive by doomsdays.
Archons don't Siege, but nice try I guess.
Damage Control Podcast www.realmenhulltank.com |

Iniquita
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
34
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:21:00 -
[169] - Quote
Lets break the game as it stands now so titans dont continue breaking the game in the future, I like the part where this completely fucks over people with a significant titan presence in their fleets. This is a rash decision making titans effectively useless until you have time to address rebalancing titans. So mothball your titans, let goons take over the north and wait because we promise we'll make them good again in the future?
I really hope you will consider holding off on this rash change until you have to properly address the titan role in fleets. |

Dank Man
FinFleet Raiden.
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:21:00 -
[170] - Quote
Don't own a super, used to want to, now I see less of a point to owning one then ever before, it used to be that you would own one and it was a force multiplier, so it would be like having 20+ BS on your side. You had to spend months owning and defending sov to build and own, not to mention the time training and getting the minerals for building these things. And keeping them secret/defended against everyone who would see this as a target. You nerfed supers less then 1 year ago? So they could not log off, and took away 10% of their tank. Since then you we have seen how many true capital fights and engagements(hint not many), to see how these changes have worked? I can tell you game devs working with goons to make a game more goon (read zerg/blob) friendly is not the right direction. Lol at all the comments saying im tearing, i dont own a titan (or any super), and im sure I will be fine, and im sure raiden will be fine, i dont blame anybody else for talking because of all the goon yelling and harassing that they pull on these forums. LOL at all the comments so far, obvious terrible nerf is obvious terrible nerf. |

Tector
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:22:00 -
[171] - Quote
Fellow Goons we should be kinder to these aggrieved titan pilots. I'd be pretty upset too if I spent several thousand dollars on an internet spaceship or months botting like mad to afford one. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1798
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:22:00 -
[172] - Quote
LeMoose wrote:i will take a long hard look if i keep playing eve i will most likly unsub all my accounts
If everybody who self-identifies as a Titan Pilot were to quit over this the game would improve 1000%. All of the people coming back now that we have Eve Online again instead of Supercaps Online will more than make up for them. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

muhuh Aihaken
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:22:00 -
[173] - Quote
EVE Online more like The Mittani online. |

Innominate
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
90
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:22:00 -
[174] - Quote
I am greatly enjoying all of the "CCP NERFING MAH TITAN" alt posts. Your ship is broken and you know it.
It consistently surprises me how much trouble people have looking at a gameplay mechanic from an objective viewpoint, instead only ever seeing how it affects them. Yes, a titan nerf is bad for the alliances that have built their fleets around the broken titan mechanics, but the titan mechanics are objectively bad from a game design perspective.
|

Engad Tanon
Enterprise Estonia Northern Coalition.
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:23:00 -
[175] - Quote
Mayby some CCp emplyoers have time start find new job. Leave the titans alone. You have been nerfed them enough. Why the F*** i need investmen iks and my time to get big touys when u will come with goon tears and insolvency and just nerf them again without any good long term planning.
|

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:23:00 -
[176] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:needed to resolve the specific issue (titans performing excessively well against subcaps in certain circumstances)
(low transversal at optimal ranges)
CCP Greyscale wrote: XL turret tracking halvedGÇÜ s-û-¦ge module track-ûng penalty removed
You realise what this does to Moros right? And how people use them?
CCP Greyscale wrote: Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5
So just being able to track subcaps isn't enough, you have to make it harder to lock and kill anything at the same time? Why wasn't the halving of tracking enough of a change?
CCP Greyscale wrote: Changes considered and discarded:
(I'm expecting at least three people to not read the word "discarded" and make angry posts about something in this section. C'est la vie.)
Titans can't lock subcaps at all
Guaranteed effective solution, but we considered it too hacky and restrictive.
Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of tracking
Too big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem.
Hahaha. I'll be honest I was expecting the first one to make it.
|

NiM Cal
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:24:00 -
[177] - Quote
Selling early tickets for the "nerf tracking dreads and sentry carriers" bandwagon, get on quick while team goon are too smug to notice.
Fatcats and Slowcats, thy day has come. |

Taiwanistan
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
197
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:24:00 -
[178] - Quote
inb4 evoke nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein One thing is for sure, you and I are not friends, buddies or pals so don't /emote me with DMC. That's DeMichael Crimson to you.            |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:26:00 -
[179] - Quote
Ruby Lionheart wrote:Andski wrote:So which one of those is the titan? Oh yeah, the one that kills rock, paper and scissors Not if the rock is dreads or sc's ;) 70 bil ship, > 100mil isk ship, but if you had brouth like 50 dreads you whuld have killed some titans and stil got out on top whould you not?
Drop 50 dreads on 25 titans.
Tell us how it went. |

Dank Man
FinFleet Raiden.
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:26:00 -
[180] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Dan Massell wrote: that will most likely help remove number of alliances from the map without any serious thinking.
LOL who cares. If they can't defend their space properly without titanblobbing the enemy, maybe they deserve to lose it?
yeah its way better to defend space the goon way, tell everyone they know to come to a cynojammed system in rifters so it lags so bad nobody can get in without dying before they can warp off... i like your strat bro |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
454
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:27:00 -
[181] - Quote
bye bye blapmobile |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1798
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:29:00 -
[182] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Hahaha. I'll be honest I was expecting the first one to make it.
Remember this is just the quick-fix. There's still hope for implementing the Titan final solution.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Dan Massell
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:29:00 -
[183] - Quote
Ivana Twinkle wrote:The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
right again. why should alliance that can bring 200 to fleet have ANY chance for a meaningful confrontation (even at a risk of putting crazy amounts of ISK in stake) against 1600 man blob. You don't have the numbers you die. Seems fair.
balance achieved. congrats to goons. Well played mittens. |

Razzor Death
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
157
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:30:00 -
[184] - Quote
This thread is outstanding. The funniest part about reading the crys of NCdot and Raidendot is that they fail to mention that they bring just as many blues as we do and use the blob back at us, they only drop the supers to ensure the win. Poor NCdot and Raidendot, they just lost there "being buddys with PL" card.
a bloo bloo bloo
hahahaha |

Tector
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:31:00 -
[185] - Quote
Dank Man wrote:Karadion wrote:Dan Massell wrote: that will most likely help remove number of alliances from the map without any serious thinking.
LOL who cares. If they can't defend their space properly without titanblobbing the enemy, maybe they deserve to lose it? yeah its way better to defend space the goon way, tell everyone they know to come to a cynojammed system in rifters so it lags so bad nobody can get in without dying before they can warp off... i like your strat bro
BoB. BoB never changes. |

Michael Harari
The Hatchery Team Liquid
61
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:31:00 -
[186] - Quote
Mittani just outplayed the **** out of CCP.
To be more specific: Permamwd drakes are ****, everyone knows they are ****, including the goonswarm higher ups. (The rank and file cfc think they are super awesome). The entire reason for them is so mittani could point to battle reports showing drakes being massacred by titans, so clearly titans must be OP. |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:32:00 -
[187] - Quote
Titan Advisor wrote:YOU CAN'T CUT BACK ON TRACKING! YOU WILL REGRET THIS! |

Anela Cistine
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
111
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:32:00 -
[188] - Quote
Dan Massell wrote:Ivana Twinkle wrote:The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. right again. why should alliance that can bring 200 to fleet have ANY chance for a meaningful confrontation (even at a risk of putting crazy amounts of ISK in stake) against 1600 man blob. You don't have the numbers you die. Seems fair. balance achieved. congrats to goons. Well played mittens.
Don't worry, once the titan changes go through we wont need 1600 dudes anymore. We'll finally be able to reset test and kick widot. |

Jin Nongmin
Chinese ISK Farmers
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:32:00 -
[189] - Quote
Tector wrote:Fellow Goons we should be kinder to these aggrieved titan pilots. I'd be pretty upset too if I spent several thousand dollars on an internet spaceship or months botting like mad to afford one.
Prease to don't be sirry. Thousand chinese children make titan in one day. Only cost two sack rice. prease to be visit isk4rice.orphanage.notascam.com.cn for titan. onry best rice accept |

Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:32:00 -
[190] - Quote
Razzor Death wrote:This thread is outstanding. The funniest part about reading the crys of NCdot and Raidendot is that they fail to mention that they bring just as many blues as we do and use the blob back at us, they only drop the supers to ensure the win. Poor NCdot and Raidendot, they just lost there "being buddys with PL" card.
a bloo bloo bloo
hahahaha
The best part is now the sales section 
|

EliphasTheBetrayer
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:34:00 -
[191] - Quote
pls dont nerf my titan guys LOLOLOL etc
Sailing on an ocean of tears.
Bout time CCP did something like this to Titans. |

Xolani1990
PonyWaffe Test Alliance Please Ignore
72
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:35:00 -
[192] - Quote
I am enjoying reading through all the posts in here that talk about how numbers (as in, numbers of subcaps) will become the deciding factor for the success of an alliance, as though they are totally oblivious (some of them probably wilfully) to the fact that the current measure of success for an alliance is how many titans and supercarriers they have.
The vast majority of players in eve are subcapital pilots without any capital capability whatsoever, and so subcapitals should be at least as important a determining factor in an alliance's success as their capital fleet. |

muhuh Aihaken
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:35:00 -
[193] - Quote
If you want to make Titans just useful for bridging and useless in combat then you should reduce the cost of them to the same as a super carrier and let them dock .
Or if you want them to server an anti-cap role leave there scan res as it is now and up there dd damage so they can take out super carriers. |

Jin Nongmin
Chinese ISK Farmers
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:36:00 -
[194] - Quote
Tector wrote:Fellow Goons we should be kinder to these aggrieved titan pilots. I'd be pretty upset too if I spent several thousand dollars on an internet spaceship or months botting like mad to afford one.
Prease to don't be sirry. Thousand chinese children make titan in one day. Only cost two sack rice. prease to be visit isk4rice.orphanage.notascam.com.cn for titan. Onry best rice accept preaes |

C'sandre
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:36:00 -
[195] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:needed to resolve the specific issue (titans performing excessively well against subcaps in certain circumstances)
(low transversal at optimal ranges) CCP Greyscale wrote: XL turret tracking halvedGÇÜ s-û-¦ge module track-ûng penalty removed
You realise what this does to Moros right? And how people use them? CCP Greyscale wrote: Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5
So just being able to track subcaps isn't enough, you have to make it harder to lock and kill anything at the same time? Why wasn't the halving of tracking enough of a change? CCP Greyscale wrote: Changes considered and discarded:
(I'm expecting at least three people to not read the word "discarded" and make angry posts about something in this section. C'est la vie.)
Titans can't lock subcaps at all
Guaranteed effective solution, but we considered it too hacky and restrictive.
Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of tracking
Too big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem.
Hahaha. I'll be honest I was expecting the first one to make it.
Nice Sir Bruce. And I can't decide which I love more, how seriously you take your Eve: Online A Bad Game or how bad you are at titans shouldn't kill subcaps even at low transversal and optimal range. |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:38:00 -
[196] - Quote
Can we get the skill points we wasted on titan stuff and the minerals back from hulls +rigs. Something like with the learning skills and social thing.
So let me get this strait, biggest ship in the game can fire its weapon once every 10-50min "TD bonus" is stuck for the same 10-50min. it can't use the guns on anything but caps effectively And now it has a constant siege mod effect locking same amount as dread in siege same lock time as a dread in siege if you buy 3 cormacks sensor boosters.
Mine is for sale, CSM is fine but CCP you have to remember democracy is oppression of 49%.
What is this with cormack boosters... Don't think 1/10 of the Raiden Titans have anything better then Shadow... And we have been lucky our enemy have no clue how to fly ships in eve. |

Marcus Demitri
Genesis Nation Gentlemen's Agreement
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:39:00 -
[197] - Quote
Twas a most welcome surprise for me this morning to hear that titan tracking is being addressed. I say Mr. Greyscale, you are both a gentleman and a humanitarian. |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
840
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:40:00 -
[198] - Quote
We still on page 10? Sup page 10. Just checking in to say,
DEATH TO ALL SUPERCAPS. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2442
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:41:00 -
[199] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Can we get the skill points we wasted on titan stuff and the minerals back from hulls +rigs. Something like with the learning skills and social thing.
So let me get this strait, biggest ship in the game can fire its weapon once every 10-50min "TD bonus" is stuck for the same 10-50min. it can't use the guns on anything but caps effectively And now it has a constant siege mod effect locking same amount as dread in siege same lock time as a dread in siege if you buy 3 cormacks sensor boosters.
Mine is for sale, CSM is fine but CCP you have to remember democracy is oppression of 49%.
What is this with cormack boosters... Don't think 1/10 of the Raiden Titans have anything better then Shadow... And we have been lucky our enemy have no clue how to fly ships in eve.
EVE Online TOS wrote:CCP MAY FIND IT NECESSARY ON OCCASION TO MAKE CHANGES TO OR RESET CERTAIN PARAMETERS OF THE PERSISTENT GAME WORLD MECHANICS, INTERFACE OR FEATURES OF EVE ONLINE IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN GAME BALANCE AND ENHANCE PLAYABILITY OR PERFORMANCE FOR ITS SUBSCRIBERS. THESE CHANGES MAY AFFECT OR CAUSE SETBACKS FOR THE CHARACTERS YOUGÇÖVE CREATED. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Blawrf McTaggart
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
611
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:41:00 -
[200] - Quote
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
CCP-U Should Promote Greyscale |

Anariasis
Gemeinschaft interstellarer Soeldner Ev0ke
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:41:00 -
[201] - Quote
Congratulations CCP, you have finally succeded in making a COMBAT ship worth 1000 drakes (in ISK) utterly useless in COMBAT
With this change u are making fools of anybody investing much time and hard work in getting Titans. Very nice move towards making battle tactics and setup even less important when the side with more guys just has to win
This Game got a another step closer to being WoW in Space today. |

Sanders RUS
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:42:00 -
[202] - Quote
Its a terrible plan, what CCP is doing effectively relegates titans to no clear purpose until they have the time to spend on deciding on a role for them. This takes a game that was moderately broken in favor of titan blobs and breaks it in completely the other direction making titans useless until a rebalance. In effect you're giving subcap heavy alliances carte blanche to expand their holdings until you can get around to giving titans a clear role again.. It may be broken now, but CCP should be investing the time and resources to give titans a clear role rather than kicking those 1200 pilots in the nuts and with promises of 'we'll make your 90b ship useful again someday'. They've nerfed titan EHP, taken away the drone bay, made them unable to DD subcaps, and now making them effectively a sieged dreadnaught w/o the siege module. Titan pilots have a right to be pissed about this, this is pretty 'old ccp' behavior here we dont pay to play a game based on 'good things to come'. |

Blawrf McTaggart
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
615
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:42:00 -
[203] - Quote
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
CCP-U Should Promote Greyscale |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:42:00 -
[204] - Quote
C'sandre wrote: Nice Sir Bruce. And I can't decide which I love more, how seriously you take your Eve: Online A Bad Game or how bad you are at titans shouldn't kill subcaps even at low transversal and optimal range.
I remember when Goons didn't take EVE seriously and then they became infested with pubbie faggots.
|

Lorginir
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:43:00 -
[205] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: Changing XL missiles to match
While in a strictly regimented world we ought in principle to nerf XL missiles and remove the penalties from the siege module for them too, in practice they're not actually a problem due to the way missile damage scales against small targets. Leaving them unchanged also serves to differentiate missiles further from turrets, which might make them more useful on capitals under certain circumstances.
Citadel still sucks. What else could we expected. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:44:00 -
[206] - Quote
Jita Bloodtear wrote:What is the intended role for titans?
Fleet boosters? Logistical fleet bridging? Anti-capital weapons? Anti-structure weapons? Anti-subcap blapers?
Please clarify what role the titan is meant to serve, and why it's broken.
You should start by reading old Titan description (before any were built), then search for threads around the time ASCN built first one, then look at CCP's reaction when there were something like 50 titans in game. Maybe you'll get an idea.
If you couldn't figure out by now that Titan will in the future (most likely) lose all offensive capacity except the doomsday, and that it will act as a mobile fleet support platform, then please bot for a titan.
There is no other possible role for Titans that won't break the game.
I wish they've removed titan turret hardpoints altogether.
Death to all supercapitals. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
456
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:44:00 -
[207] - Quote
BioZvin wrote: And we have been lucky our enemy have no clue how to fly ships in eve. 1) step in titan 2) make sure everyone else in fleet has titan
don't worry though since you guys are so great at flying ships I'm sure this change will effect you minimally |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:45:00 -
[208] - Quote
Dan Massell wrote:Emily Heapy wrote:Dank Man wrote:Wow, ccp you must love goons and blobs. because this nerf make the bigger subcap blob win all fights, congrats mittens and goons, you cried enough on the forums and welped enough fleets into capital weapons that you got what you wanted, a capital weapon shield! gg. Now wipe those tears Mister. Every cloud and all that, at least now you will learn that PvP is more than just Log on titan > Slam head against keyboard and pwn everything. You may even learn some kills now!!!! Regards Emily p.s. I will buy your titan, 30b isk ready i know. because you know lots about PVP because zergling 1600 man fleet across entire region is real PVP. the ONLY thing smaller alliances have against nonsense like this kind of a blob was until now to grow some balls and deploy trillions of ISK on the battlefield and try to even the odds. But that's not real PVP. I know. CCP Grayscale man... stop embarrassing yourself here saying we don't have time to really deal with this the way it should be. we have no resources for that so we going to deploy the most significant change that will most likely help remove number of alliances from the map without any serious thinking. we will finish this later when goons online is completed. Until then all of you who spent 120bil buying and fitting a tit go and spend 30bil more so you can get your lock time to around 45 sec. Its just disrespectful.
Why are you embarrassed to post with your titan pilot char?  |

Forest Hill
WDGAS Holding MPA
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:46:00 -
[209] - Quote
Any change that gets this much Goon love can't be good for Eve Online. I wasn't worried, but now I am. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
99
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:48:00 -
[210] - Quote
NiM Cal wrote:Selling early tickets for the "nerf tracking dreads and sentry carriers" bandwagon, get on quick while team goon are too smug to notice.
Fatcats and Slowcats, thy day has come.
Sentry carriers are fine
annoying but fine
|

Mara Michelle
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:49:00 -
[211] - Quote
Not that you care about my opinion since I don't have a Goon ticker, these changes are literally ********.
These are 100b isk ships that require huge logistical feats to even produce that you want to nerf to be in-line with dreadnoughts with jumpbridges.
You take away all purpose, you appease the drake/maelstrom blob, and you punish your veteran players that have invested enormous amounts of time into acquiring these assets. |

Suzdal
Tormentum Insomniae Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:50:00 -
[212] - Quote
Tomytronic wrote:blablabla goonie saying non goon titan pilots do RMT blablabla
Tell me goonie, where is all the money your alliance has earned in all these years? Our isk has been transformed into the titans we field but what about yours? Oh sorry, I know, you have no clue about what your leadership does with the isk and you are not able of think for yourself... Anyway you can repit that RMT song forever if it makes you happy. 
|

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:50:00 -
[213] - Quote
Onictus wrote:NiM Cal wrote:Selling early tickets for the "nerf tracking dreads and sentry carriers" bandwagon, get on quick while team goon are too smug to notice.
Fatcats and Slowcats, thy day has come. Sentry carriers are fine annoying but fine
Next nurf, drakes are suppose to be able to win |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
456
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:50:00 -
[214] - Quote
npc forum alt; didn't read |

Reppyk
The Black Shell P O D
63
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:52:00 -
[215] - Quote
Caneb wrote:This is amazing for anyone who believes that sov warfare should not just be for whoever can bring the most titans to a fight.
Not just us. It's only about subcaps numbers, baby (and bombers).
The Moros is the new Brutix. Otherwise, this is a bad nerf, and I feel bad for the CCP balance team. |

Ayuna Delnor
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:52:00 -
[216] - Quote
Suzdal wrote:Tell me goonie, where is all the money your alliance has earned in all these years? Our isk has been transformed into the titans we field but what about yours? Oh sorry, I know, you have no clue about what your leadership does with the isk and you are not able of think for yourself... Anyway you can repit that RMT song forever if it makes you happy. 
Goonswarm Financial Info are public if you didn't know this, and I don't think mittens need RMT to earn money in his life |

testobjekt
Goonswarm Federation Human Resources Goonswarm Federation
111
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:53:00 -
[217] - Quote
Suzdal wrote:Tomytronic wrote:blablabla goonie saying non goon titan pilots do RMT blablabla Tell me goonie, where is all the money your alliance has earned in all these years? Our isk has been transformed into the titans we field but what about yours? Oh sorry, I know, you have no clue about what your leadership does with the isk and you are not able of think for yourself... Anyway you can repit that RMT song forever if it makes you happy. 
Confirming DJ aka CCP Sreegs rmt'ed all our money. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2453
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:55:00 -
[218] - Quote
Suzdal wrote:Tomytronic wrote:blablabla goonie saying non goon titan pilots do RMT blablabla Tell me goonie, where is all the money your alliance has earned in all these years? Our isk has been transformed into the titans we field but what about yours? Oh sorry, I know, you have no clue about what your leadership does with the isk and you are not able of think for yourself... Anyway you can repit that RMT song forever if it makes you happy. 
Our technetium income goes into helping the greater part of our members enjoy the game with a comprehensive reimbursement plan. Yours goes into buying titans for directors. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
849
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:55:00 -
[219] - Quote
Suzdal wrote:Tomytronic wrote:blablabla goonie saying non goon titan pilots do RMT blablabla Tell me goonie, where is all the money your alliance has earned in all these years? Our isk has been transformed into the titans we field but what about yours? Oh sorry, I know, you have no clue about what your leadership does with the isk and you are not able of think for yourself... Anyway you can repit that RMT song forever if it makes you happy. 
That's great and all but our finances are audited and published. Are yours? |

Kern Walzky
x13 Raiden.
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:56:00 -
[220] - Quote
Is there a way to filter out goons and pets in this thread? its just full of trolls..
havent seen 1 descent post from any of you....
personally i think this is just another way down the road where BLOBS win... really bad.... i remember last time we had this, you CCP were real proud of that right?? no?
So why do you continue the "nerf" way instead of making the big changes to sov. ??
3 tracking mods against mwd'ing drakes with multiple shield mods increasing sig to almost carrier size. So capitals gets nerfed to use slots for tracking instead of tank or cap etc..... but all other ships can do what ever they want....gratz CCP... you really think about you customers through many many years.... |

Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
647
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:57:00 -
[221] - Quote
allowing goons to kill titans without :effort:  |

testobjekt
Goonswarm Federation Human Resources Goonswarm Federation
111
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:57:00 -
[222] - Quote
analogy time:
Raiden Pl NC. invested in AIG (titans) and Greece (supercarrier)
GSF/CFC invested in Apple (line members) |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1803
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:58:00 -
[223] - Quote
Suzdal wrote:Tomytronic wrote:blablabla goonie saying non goon titan pilots do RMT blablabla Tell me goonie, where is all the money your alliance has earned in all these years? Our isk has been transformed into the titans we field but what about yours? Oh sorry, I know, you have no clue about what your leadership does with the isk and you are not able of think for yourself... Anyway you can repit that RMT song forever if it makes you happy. 
According to our publicly available financial information most of our income is being paid out in ship reimbursements to alliance members. Instead of focusing our entire financial infrastructure into building massively overpowered ships that only a few can fly we make sure that all of our members have fun flying internet spaceships.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Ayuna Delnor
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:58:00 -
[224] - Quote
Kern Walzky wrote:Is there a way to filter out goons and pets in this thread? its just full of trolls..
there is a keyboard combinaison called Alt-F4, or just close this tab |

Gabba Cyno
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 14:00:00 -
[225] - Quote
CCP fails. I wonder how many subscriptions they will lose to this?
Goons have yet another reason to act like 3rd graders, just what they needed. . |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
849
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 14:00:00 -
[226] - Quote
Kern Walzky wrote:Is there a way to filter out goons and pets in this thread? its just full of trolls..
havent seen 1 descent post from any of you....
personally i think this is just another way down the road where BLOBS win... really bad.... i remember last time we had this, you CCP were real proud of that right?? no?
So why do you continue the "nerf" way instead of making the big changes to sov. ??
3 tracking mods against mwd'ing drakes with multiple shield mods increasing sig to almost carrier size. So capitals gets nerfed to use slots for tracking instead of tank or cap etc..... but all other ships can do what ever they want....gratz CCP... you really think about you customers through many many years....
You see this is the issue. You think titans are meant to blap the crap out of subcaps but this was never their role. There's a reason they removed area effect weapons from them and gave them direct damage attacks. There's a reason the DD was adjusted so it can't hit subcaps anymore. There's a reason this change is being made. It's not a subtle nudge, this is CCP flat out telling you that you are using these ships in a way they weren't designed for and they are adjusting to compensate.
I dunno, take the hint I guess! |

FlameGlow
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 14:03:00 -
[227] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Suzdal wrote:Tomytronic wrote:blablabla goonie saying non goon titan pilots do RMT blablabla Tell me goonie, where is all the money your alliance has earned in all these years? Our isk has been transformed into the titans we field but what about yours? Oh sorry, I know, you have no clue about what your leadership does with the isk and you are not able of think for yourself... Anyway you can repit that RMT song forever if it makes you happy.  According to our publicly available financial information most of our income is being paid out in ship reimbursements to alliance members. Instead of focusing our entire financial infrastructure into building massively overpowered ships that only a few can fly we make sure that all of our members have fun flying internet spaceships. Actually it shows we're terrible at eve and lose a whole lot of internet spaceships, which is hardly surprising |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 14:13:00 -
[228] - Quote
Pallidum Treponema wrote: While supercaps do need a balancing pass, specifically regarding proper counters to supercaps, I have to say this: Locking a pod takes me 28 seconds. If you still have a pod on the field after 28 seconds, you are probably not even moving, so you have zero transversal. Zero transversal means that any turret ship will kill you. Stop failing at EVE.
When ships, bubbled to hell, explode - all pilot pods magically appear 250km away, and not inside bubbles.
Furthermore, if pods remain on grid after 28 seconds, that is because they "fail at EVE", not because they are bubbled to hell and are trying to get out of bubbles.
You are the smart one. |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 14:14:00 -
[229] - Quote
So the hole, get them on grid thing was a mistake ?
Titans will not shoot subcaps if there are caps on field ! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5475
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:09:00 -
[230] - Quote
Kern Walzky wrote:So capitals gets nerfed to use slots for tracking instead of tank or cap etc. GǪor you could use those slots for tank or cap etc. and let the support fleet deal with all the small stuff. You know, like how it's supposed to be? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

David Magnus
108
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:13:00 -
[231] - Quote
The wait is over, just as The Mittani promised so many months ago, the supercap nerf is complete: http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/supercaps http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/winterupdate http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/supercaps http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/pandemiclegion |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2453
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:14:00 -
[232] - Quote
Tippia wrote:and let the support fleet deal with all the small stuff.
I think that's where they fall short "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:15:00 -
[233] - Quote
There is clearly no problem currently with titans in a blob being able to lock, track, and wipe out, every type of ship in the game instantly. None whatsoever.
https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/623314 Oh wait. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/623239 Oh... Oh no. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/621694 Titans can't hit small ships. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/625987 That looks like a drake. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/625956 Clearly a dual LSE large sigged drake. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/625985 :ohdear: https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/625893 Oh oh god. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/629988 Look at all the LSE's on that drake. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/629987 Another one of those drakes. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/623437 No Problem At All.
|

Temmu Guerra
Genco Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:17:00 -
[234] - Quote
So who wants to place bets on how long it is before goons wipe out raiden. since numbers are everything in this game now. |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:17:00 -
[235] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:There is clearly no problem currently with titans in a blob being able to lock, track, and wipe out, every type of ship in the game instantly. None whatsoever.
Post the killmails where titans couldn't track a subcap because they know what transversal velocity is. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2456
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:18:00 -
[236] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:There is clearly no problem currently with titans in a blob being able to lock, track, and wipe out, every type of ship in the game instantly. None whatsoever.
Post the killmails where titans couldn't track a subcap because they know what transversal velocity is.
because clearly all 30 of the titans are in the exact same spot on the grid right lmao "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
648
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:18:00 -
[237] - Quote
so you have no problem with titans hiting drake and alfa fleets |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
856
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:19:00 -
[238] - Quote
Temmu Guerra wrote:So who wants to place bets on how long it is before goons wipe out raiden. since numbers are everything in this game now.
We are not invading Tenal. |

Suzdal
Tormentum Insomniae Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:19:00 -
[239] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Suzdal wrote:Tomytronic wrote:blablabla goonie saying non goon titan pilots do RMT blablabla Tell me goonie, where is all the money your alliance has earned in all these years? Our isk has been transformed into the titans we field but what about yours? Oh sorry, I know, you have no clue about what your leadership does with the isk and you are not able of think for yourself... Anyway you can repit that RMT song forever if it makes you happy.  According to our publicly available financial information most of our income is being paid out in ship reimbursements to alliance members. Instead of focusing our entire financial infrastructure into building massively overpowered ships that only a few can fly we make sure that all of our members have fun flying internet spaceships.
omfg so you want us to believe that the fuckton of B isk you generate per month with the tech is entirely spent in drakes for the pilots?   you should know that all major alliances have reinbursement programs. for instance all our fleet ships are for free and still we have the isk to build a huge supercap fleet.
i remember a few years ago you had the biggest titan fleet. we got into a system and all our fleet was doomsdayed by just one of your titan pilots. we lost everything while you were doing a titan conga and we did not moan. we just adapted to the new situation. now one question for you: what have you done with all those titans? |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
285
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:19:00 -
[240] - Quote
Man, you weren't paying attention, were you? Re-read the op, this is not over. There are still nerfs inbound.
Complete, he says. Hah. Adorable pubbie. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2456
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:20:00 -
[241] - Quote
Akrasjel Lanate wrote:so you have no problem with titans hiting drake and alfa fleets
hisec roleplayer whining about nerfs to a ship he will never own "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2456
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:21:00 -
[242] - Quote
Suzdal wrote:omfg so you want us to believe that the fuckton of B isk you generate per month with the tech is entirely spent in drakes for the pilots?   you should know that all major alliances have reinbursement programs. for instance all our fleet ships are for free and still we have the isk to build a huge supercap fleet. i remember a few years ago you had the biggest titan fleet. we got into a system and all our fleet was doomsdayed by just one of your titan pilots. we lost everything while you were doing a titan conga and we did not moan. we just adapted to the new situation. now one question for you: what have you done with all those titans?
You mean the PL titan fleet with a few Goonfleet titans here and there? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

pmchem
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
200
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:22:00 -
[243] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5
Has CCP considered the effect that scanres change will have on Titans attempting to lock POS, carriers, and dreads? Totally ignoring the anti-subcap changes (I am ok with not blapping subs), the game just became significantly less fun to play for someone in a Titan. You've made them as fun as dreads, which are terrible unfun ships that people in Titans have paid 75b to stop flying.
I predict there will soon be character bazaar sale threads for Titan pilots who only have Jump Portal Generation -- and no gun or DD skills.
Quote: Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of tracking
Too big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem.
This would have been the correct fix, which I lobbied for in private and which xttz asked for in public. Your tracking changes do NOT address the fact that if someone is at zero transversal on a gun-armed ship, tracking is totally irrelevant. With enough ships, there will always be a capital at near-zero transversal to given target. Your scanres changes just make life miserable for a titan doing anything other than bridging. It's a terrible "fix".
Just remove titans from the game until you can take the time to do it right. (insert obligatory "forever" joke here) |

florin2001ro
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:23:00 -
[244] - Quote
YAYYYYYY greath job CCP us allways , this is not a issue in game because some alliances dont have balls to fight [ to use them at least] why u just dont remove them from game and we know something , u just do what goons want in game and btw goons have more caps in game so...........u cant nerf ******** or maybe 10 rifters will kill m super after next patch or a crusader will bump a huge ship , u should fix first time your brain and RMT in this game u should start play eve a little , a lot of u know just way to bank , so try to fix this game or go towards and destroy it ..................anyway who cares now is to obvios ...is going down ....and at least remeber something [ U EAT CCP BECAUSE WE PLAY] |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5752
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:23:00 -
[245] - Quote
Titan pilots make up .002% of the player population, if we assume 350k players and ~730 titans according to Diagoras' tweets. The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Ishihiro tanaka
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:24:00 -
[246] - Quote
Psst, we lost them, don't tell anyone because of all the SPIES in this forum ok? |

gfldex
374
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:25:00 -
[247] - Quote
Faction painters are gonna get pricy! The game has a tutorial that gives you a mining laser and a railgun and tells you to go shoot rocks and red crosses. It teaches you nothing else. It's been that way for 8 years, so are you really surprised that there are people who aren't aware that this is a pvp game? --Jafit McJafitson |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
856
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:25:00 -
[248] - Quote
Suzdal wrote:omfg so you want us to believe that the fuckton of B isk you generate per month with the tech is entirely spent in drakes for the pilots?   you should know that all major alliances have reinbursement programs. for instance all our fleet ships are for free and still we have the isk to build a huge supercap fleet. i remember a few years ago you had the biggest titan fleet. we got into a system and all our fleet was doomsdayed by just one of your titan pilots. we lost everything while you were doing a titan conga and we did not moan. we just adapted to the new situation. now one question for you: what have you done with all those titans?
No, we provide peacetime (not in fleet) reimbursements as well. You wanna just roam around doing whatever? Sure, why not use our tech money to help. We invest in our people down to the little dude in a rifter, we don't just cater to the veteran so he can never log in again. |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5756
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:25:00 -
[249] - Quote
florin2001ro wrote:YAYYYYYY greath job CCP us allways , this is not a issue in game because some alliances dont have balls to fight [ to use them at least] why u just dont remove them from game and we know something , u just do what goons want in game and btw goons have more caps in game so...........u cant nerf ******** or maybe 10 rifters will kill m super after next patch or a crusader will bump a huge ship , u should fix first time your brain and RMT in this game u should start play eve a little , a lot of u know just way to bank , so try to fix this game or go towards and destroy it ..................anyway who cares now is to obvios ...is going down ....and at least remeber something [ U EAT CCP BECAUSE WE PLAY]
A compelling case for the cause of Titanhavers. The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Ikoma Sunblazer
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:26:00 -
[250] - Quote
@ CCP Greyscale.
Did you intend to nerf shield titans even more?
A fully shield tanked titan without sensor boosters takes 64 seconds to lock another titan, god knows how long to lock a capital. Add in TiDi and, well you get the picture. Does that seem reasonable to you? |

Tector
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:26:00 -
[251] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:C'sandre wrote: Nice Sir Bruce. And I can't decide which I love more, how seriously you take your Eve: Online A Bad Game or how bad you are at titans shouldn't kill subcaps even at low transversal and optimal range.
I remember when Goons didn't take EVE seriously and then they became infested with pubbie faggots.
Yes but Elitist Ops left us for PL eventually so you're only telling half the story. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5476
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:29:00 -
[252] - Quote
Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:Did you intend to nerf shield titans even more?
A fully shield tanked titan without sensor boosters takes 64 seconds to lock another titan, god knows how long to lock a capital. Add in TiDi and, well you get the picture. Does that seem reasonable to you? GǪso use signal amplifiers if your midslots are that important? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Ikoma Sunblazer
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:32:00 -
[253] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:Did you intend to nerf shield titans even more?
A fully shield tanked titan without sensor boosters takes 64 seconds to lock another titan, god knows how long to lock a capital. Add in TiDi and, well you get the picture. Does that seem reasonable to you? GǪso use signal amplifiers if your midslots are that important?
Dunno if troll but for a proper shield tank you need the use of mid and lowslots. |

Gerdan BloodELF
Invictus Australis Northern Coalition.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:32:00 -
[254] - Quote
Id like to hear from other CSM members and their opinion of these changes other than the goon representatives.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5476
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:33:00 -
[255] - Quote
Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:Dunno if troll but for a proper shield tank you need the use of mid and lowslots. Then the lack of a sensor booster isn't really your problem, is it?
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

testobjekt
Goonswarm Federation Human Resources Goonswarm Federation
111
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:33:00 -
[256] - Quote
Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:@ CCP Greyscale.
Did you intend to nerf shield titans even more?
A fully shield tanked titan without sensor boosters takes 64 seconds to lock another titan, god knows how long to lock a capital. Add in TiDi and, well you get the picture. Does that seem reasonable to you?
Please explain why TiDi influences the situation outside of player perception. |

Sardaros
OEG Goonswarm Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:34:00 -
[257] - Quote
End of Tech Team or BoB Mk whatever |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:35:00 -
[258] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Titan pilots make up .002% of the player population, if we assume 350k players and ~730 titans according to Diagoras' tweets.
So titan pilots don't have more accounts, and btw titans do not shoot sub caps if there are caps on field FYI.
I understand why you want this to happen, but don't tell me just because you will not commit that you can not. 92D.
|

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:35:00 -
[259] - Quote
Man CCP you really do know hot to stir **** up, isn't the tracking nerf all that is necessary? i mean tracking titans have poor tank already, the signture is fail nerf and so is the locking 3 foes,.
And to the goons saying that tracking titans can hit titans well , learn to tengu bros, it might help. |

Engad Tanon
Enterprise Estonia Northern Coalition.
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:36:00 -
[260] - Quote
Mayby some CCp emplyoers have time start find new job. Leave the titans alone. You have been nerfed them enough. Why the hek i need investmen my isk and my time to get big touys when u will come with goon tears and insolvency and just nerf them again without any good long term planning.
Please think twice, then come back. |

Xantor Bludberry
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:38:00 -
[261] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone, These changes should hit TQ some time in April. Not 1st April, I hope? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2464
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:39:00 -
[262] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:The Mittani wrote:Titan pilots make up .002% of the player population, if we assume 350k players and ~730 titans according to Diagoras' tweets. So titan pilots don't have more accounts, and btw titans do not shoot sub caps if there are caps on field FYI. I understand why you want this to happen, but don't tell me just because you will not commit that you can not. 92D.
let's be generous and assume that every titan pilot has 4 accounts, that's still insignificant "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

AetomHaert Mother
Star Frontiers Ignore This.
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:39:00 -
[263] - Quote
So another case of "Goons don't have it, CCP needs to nerf it"
Goiod job mittens, keep up the good work. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2464
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:39:00 -
[264] - Quote
AetomHaert Mother wrote:So another case of "Goons don't have it, CCP needs to nerf it"
Goiod job mittens, keep up the good work.
Pretty sure our supercapital fleet far outnumbers that of the prestigious Ignore This. alliance. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Cedo Nulli
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
74
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:40:00 -
[265] - Quote
Is it just me who thinks its moronic in terms of logic to have massive supership that gets laughed at by subcaps.
Tbh the whole logic behind EVEs "ship has only 1 sized weapons" concept is ******** as hell
Sure its game balance but damn its still stupid as hell.
Its like Deathstar rolling around with only its main planetdestroying weapon and nothing else. |

Kigar
Senators of Eridan Red Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:40:00 -
[266] - Quote
I think CCP should remove explosion velocity penalty in Siege too. Tracking: Titan = Dreadnought Expl. velocity: Leviathan > Pheonix/Nagl. (Anyway Dreadnoughts cant use capital launchers versus subcaps, even with bonus 50% expl. velocity) |

Ikoma Sunblazer
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:41:00 -
[267] - Quote
testobjekt wrote:Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:@ CCP Greyscale.
Did you intend to nerf shield titans even more?
A fully shield tanked titan without sensor boosters takes 64 seconds to lock another titan, god knows how long to lock a capital. Add in TiDi and, well you get the picture. Does that seem reasonable to you? Please explain why TiDi influences the situation outside of player perception.
It doesn't, I was using it as an example of a possible situation that would make the problem even more aggravating. The fact remains that it takes a titan more than a minute to lock another titan. Does that seem normal to you? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2464
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:42:00 -
[268] - Quote
Cedo Nulli wrote:Is it just me who thinks its moronic in terms of logic to have massive supership that gets laughed at by subcaps.
Tbh the whole logic behind EVEs "ship has only 1 sized weapons" concept is ******** as hell
Sure its game balance but damn its still stupid as hell.
Its like Deathstar rolling around with only its main planetdestroying weapon and nothing else.
Balance is sort of about not having anything that can effectively solo anything and everything in the game. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Prideof USA
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:42:00 -
[269] - Quote
Here to collect PL kids' tear. |

Hitokiri Battoesai
Black Aces Against ALL Authorities
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:42:00 -
[270] - Quote
Well I guess I was right to worry that CCP would over nerf the titan.... |

Innominate
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:43:00 -
[271] - Quote
Cedo Nulli wrote:Is it just me who thinks its moronic in terms of logic to have massive supership that gets laughed at by subcaps.
Tbh the whole logic behind EVEs "ship has only 1 sized weapons" concept is ******** as hell
Sure its game balance but damn its still stupid as hell.
Its like Deathstar rolling around with only its main planetdestroying weapon and nothing else.
I support the death star analogy. A lone rifter should be able to destroy a titan. |

Suzdal
Tormentum Insomniae Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:43:00 -
[272] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Suzdal wrote:omfg so you want us to believe that the fuckton of B isk you generate per month with the tech is entirely spent in drakes for the pilots?   you should know that all major alliances have reinbursement programs. for instance all our fleet ships are for free and still we have the isk to build a huge supercap fleet. i remember a few years ago you had the biggest titan fleet. we got into a system and all our fleet was doomsdayed by just one of your titan pilots. we lost everything while you were doing a titan conga and we did not moan. we just adapted to the new situation. now one question for you: what have you done with all those titans? No, we provide peacetime (not in fleet) reimbursements as well. You wanna just roam around doing whatever? Sure, why not use our tech money to help. We invest in our people down to the little dude in a rifter, we don't just cater to the veteran so he can never log in again.
of course my corp also reinburses roam ships to some extent. how much that reimbursement is depends on what each corp chooses to do with their isk. the point here is that with the fuckton of tech moons you have, there is enough money for that and for building a huge supercap fleet.
so, we are back at the beginning. what do you do will the hundreds B isks you make each month out of the tech moons you have? and what has happened with the dozens of titans you had in 2010? |

Anita1
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:45:00 -
[273] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone,
We're not happy with the effectiveness of large groups of titans against subcapital ships, so we're making some adjustments to titans and to XL turrets.
This is a quick, surgical adjustment to solve a specific issue we have identified.
WE or do you mean goons are not happy and let me guess the issue is goons crying too much cause they are too scared to use their own titans
great work ccp |

Valearx
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:45:00 -
[274] - Quote
I get the feeling that some people are extremely mad. |

David Magnus
108
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:46:00 -
[275] - Quote
Xython wrote:Man, you weren't paying attention, were you? Re-read the op, this is not over. There are still nerfs inbound.Complete, he says. Hah. Adorable pubbie.
You are welcome to re-read the op as well. No Titans are not "done" and there will probably be an adjustment in role and a complete overhaul in the future.
As far as "nerfs" go, this is pretty much a complete nerf to Titans vs all but the most ******** of subcaps. Short of not being able to lock subcaps at all, there isn't anywhere left to go. http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/winterupdate http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/supercaps http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/pandemiclegion |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2472
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:46:00 -
[276] - Quote
Anita1 wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone,
We're not happy with the effectiveness of large groups of titans against subcapital ships, so we're making some adjustments to titans and to XL turrets.
This is a quick, surgical adjustment to solve a specific issue we have identified. WE or do you mean goons are not happy and let me guess the issue is goons crying too much cause they are too scared to use their own titans  great work ccp
so you're saying that the only counter to titans is more titans? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Spc One
The Chodak Void Alliance
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:47:00 -
[277] - Quote
Chad VanGaalen wrote: Drake, MWD fit with T2 Heavies and 2x LSE: 3.16k signature Archon: 2.92k signature
This game is going to hell.
Maybe CCP needs to improve MWDs, no sig radius bonus when used ?
|

Ikoma Sunblazer
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:47:00 -
[278] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:Dunno if troll but for a proper shield tank you need the use of mid and lowslots. Then the lack of a sensor booster isn't really your problem, is it?
Which is why I asked CCP Greyscale about this problematic concerning shield titans in particular. You done with your useless commentary yet? |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:48:00 -
[279] - Quote
Many posts here by my (soon to be) former alliance lauding this change. Yet none of them see the issue with what we've become.
Too bad that Raiden. (BoB) is going to fall apart with this nerf.  I can only imagine the frustration they must have with this irony. Truly disgusting that CCP has caved (again) to the CSM. Alas, this system was designed to prevent corruption, not enable it. Now we just have to sit back and watch what happens to those who cannot adapt. |

Hahn Super Dry
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:51:00 -
[280] - Quote
Jita Bloodtear wrote:What is the intended role for titans?
Fleet boosters? Logistical fleet bridging? Anti-capital weapons? Anti-structure weapons? Anti-subcap blapers?
Please clarify what role the titan is meant to serve, and why it's broken.
[Eos] Cormack's Modified Magnetic Field Stabilizer Cormack's Modified Magnetic Field Stabilizer Cormack's Modified Magnetic Field Stabilizer Corpum A-Type Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane Corpum A-Type Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane Damage Control II
Cormack's Modified Tracking Computer, Tracking Speed Cormack's Modified Tracking Computer, Tracking Speed Cormack's Modified Sensor Booster, Scan Resolution Cormack's Modified Sensor Booster, Scan Resolution
Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Armored Warfare Link - Passive Defense II [empty high slot]
Medium Trimark Armor Pump II Medium Trimark Armor Pump II
PLEASE ALSO NERF THE EOS BECAUSE IT FORFILLS ALL THOSE ROLES AS WELL!!!!
|

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:51:00 -
[281] - Quote
Andski wrote:BioZvin wrote:The Mittani wrote:Titan pilots make up .002% of the player population, if we assume 350k players and ~730 titans according to Diagoras' tweets. So titan pilots don't have more accounts, and btw titans do not shoot sub caps if there are caps on field FYI. I understand why you want this to happen, but don't tell me just because you will not commit that you can not. 92D. let's be generous and assume that every titan pilot has 4 accounts, that's still insignificant
Might be insignificant, but how many the players in eve have the titans as their goal in EVE. I know I did.
Well I made it, so hope you get a lot of subscriptions out of pissing on some of your oldest supporters..
"change the mechanics of the game don't nurf anything a drake can't kill"
"why not make the titan/supers untouchable by sub caps no damage from sub cap guns" |

Gerdan BloodELF
Invictus Australis Northern Coalition.
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:53:00 -
[282] - Quote
Valearx wrote:I get the feeling that some people are extremely mad.
Everybody is mad. Im a titan pilot (come at me bro's) and all sides have valid points. What i want is CCP is not to do a half ass'd job and leave it unfinished for 5 years like so many other things. I'm quite happy with nerfing titans to a certain extent but this feels like a sledgehammer jerk reaction to a group of people yelling loudly when a more balanced and less short sited approach is required.
I don't have an answer but i don't believe this set of changes is it, well at least not in its current form. Is this even on Sisi for testing and feedback yet? or is this a done deal? I believe these changes are too big and have a wider impact than people realize yet.
|

Mr2 Escobar
RGSU Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:54:00 -
[283] - Quote
I love this game! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2472
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:55:00 -
[284] - Quote
Hahn Super Dry wrote:[Eos] Cormack's Modified Magnetic Field Stabilizer Cormack's Modified Magnetic Field Stabilizer Cormack's Modified Magnetic Field Stabilizer Corpum A-Type Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane Corpum A-Type Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane Damage Control II
Cormack's Modified Tracking Computer, Tracking Speed Cormack's Modified Tracking Computer, Tracking Speed Cormack's Modified Sensor Booster, Scan Resolution Cormack's Modified Sensor Booster, Scan Resolution
Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Armored Warfare Link - Passive Defense II [empty high slot]
Medium Trimark Armor Pump II Medium Trimark Armor Pump II
PLEASE ALSO NERF THE EOS BECAUSE IT FORFILLS ALL THOSE ROLES AS WELL!!!!
a fine lossmail indeed "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5478
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:55:00 -
[285] - Quote
Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:Which is why I asked CCP Greyscale about this problematic concerning shield titans in particular. You done with your useless commentary yet? No. It's just that you brought up sensor boosters as a particularly sore spot. It's only sore if you make it sore (as with all things in EVE). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Tector
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:56:00 -
[286] - Quote
Engad Tanon wrote:Mayby some CCp emplyoers have time start find new job. Leave the titans alone. You have been nerfed them enough. Why the hek i need investmen my isk and my time to get big touys when u will come with goon tears and insolvency and just nerf them again without any good long term planning.
Please think twice, then come back.
I'd advise the same before you post again. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2472
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:56:00 -
[287] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Might be insignificant, but how many the players in eve have the titans as their goal in EVE. I know I did.
"Titans should stay overpowered so that pubbies can dream about them as they mine veldspar in highsec" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Revii Lagoon
The Foreign Legion Test Alliance Please Ignore
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:59:00 -
[288] - Quote
Pesadel0 wrote:Man CCP you really do know hot to stir **** up, isn't the tracking nerf all that is necessary? i mean tracking titans have poor tank already, the signture is fail nerf and so is the locking 3 foes,.
And to the goons saying that tracking titans can hit titans well , learn to tengu bros, it might help.
Obviously you haven't seen 30 tracking titans vs tengus. PL did that in an earlier battle over C-J6MT and, well obliterated the -A- tengu fleet. |

Anita1
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:59:00 -
[289] - Quote
Ra Death wrote:
EVE is now a numbers game when there is a large effort to remove counters for large fleets.
numbers? ffs try to play the game with this stupid tidi ****,
funny thing that they make supers more ****, but in the same time they are going to change skill so that you can use them even faster, do you really know what you are doing ccp? |

Wukulo
Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:00:00 -
[290] - Quote
Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Congratulations you're the first QQ in this thread!
Your tears are delicious. |

Rain Tian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:00:00 -
[291] - Quote
Holy crap. Christmas came a little early this year, huh lads? |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:00:00 -
[292] - Quote
Andski wrote:BioZvin wrote:The Mittani wrote:Titan pilots make up .002% of the player population, if we assume 350k players and ~730 titans according to Diagoras' tweets. So titan pilots don't have more accounts, and btw titans do not shoot sub caps if there are caps on field FYI. I understand why you want this to happen, but don't tell me just because you will not commit that you can not. 92D. let's be generous and assume that every titan pilot has 4 accounts, that's still insignificant
Goons have 0.02% of player population. You are insignificant yet MITANNI CONTROLS MY GAME.
|

Ayeson
Hard Knocks Inc.
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:00:00 -
[293] - Quote
What's going on in this thread? |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:02:00 -
[294] - Quote
Andski wrote:BioZvin wrote:Might be insignificant, but how many the players in eve have the titans as their goal in EVE. I know I did. "Titans should stay overpowered so that pubbies can dream about them as they mine veldspar in highsec"
Otherwise make it cost the same as a drake, it is about 60bil to build and 6 weeks in a POS building time. But I guess you didn't know. |

PAPULA
The Dark Tribe Against ALL Authorities
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:03:00 -
[295] - Quote
Spc One wrote:Chad VanGaalen wrote: Drake, MWD fit with T2 Heavies and 2x LSE: 3.16k signature Archon: 2.92k signature
This game is going to hell.
Maybe CCP needs to improve MWDs, no sig radius bonus when used ? This should be interesting. |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5767
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:03:00 -
[296] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:
Goons have 0.02% of player population. You are insignificant yet MITANNI CONTROLS MY GAME.
what i got from this post is that i'm a baller
i'm content with it~ The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Zilero
The Suicide Kings Test Alliance Please Ignore
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:04:00 -
[297] - Quote
Prideof USA wrote:Here to collect PL kids' tear.
^^ This. |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
574
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:04:00 -
[298] - Quote
Ayeson wrote:What's going on in this thread?
'I Win Button' tears, Goon smug and CSM attempting to claim it was their idea for the nerf and not the actual players on the forums for the last 2+ years.
Did I cover everything?
|

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:05:00 -
[299] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Dez Affinity wrote:
Goons have 0.02% of player population. You are insignificant yet MITANNI CONTROLS MY GAME.
what i got from this post is that i'm a baller i'm content with it~
I'm pretty sure no matter what words you see, you read it as "Mittani you're so cool, that soul patch looks GREAT on you"
|

Ikoma Sunblazer
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:05:00 -
[300] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:Which is why I asked CCP Greyscale about this problematic concerning shield titans in particular. You done with your useless commentary yet? No. It's just that you brought up sensor boosters as a particularly sore spot. It's only sore if you make it sore (as with all things in EVE).
You don't get it. I would like to discuss CCP Greyscale's argument about sensor boosters here. I am questioning his argument, while proving that you know nothing about titans. How hard is that to understand? (Very hard apparently, as with all things in EVE) |

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:06:00 -
[301] - Quote
Revii Lagoon wrote:Pesadel0 wrote:Man CCP you really do know hot to stir **** up, isn't the tracking nerf all that is necessary? i mean tracking titans have poor tank already, the signture is fail nerf and so is the locking 3 foes,.
And to the goons saying that tracking titans can hit titans well , learn to tengu bros, it might help. Obviously you haven't seen 30 tracking titans vs tengus. PL did that in an earlier battle over C-J6MT and, well obliterated the -A- tengu fleet.
>Link fleet please , because i was there and i dint saw 1 single titan i only saw the slowcats on grid and i was in a tengu .
What i remember was you(goons) coming in in drakes and getting rapped by bombs then got raped again by tengus , so \0/ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2481
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:07:00 -
[302] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Andski wrote:BioZvin wrote:Might be insignificant, but how many the players in eve have the titans as their goal in EVE. I know I did. "Titans should stay overpowered so that pubbies can dream about them as they mine veldspar in highsec" Otherwise make it cost the same as a drake, it is about 60bil to build and 6 weeks in a POS building time. But I guess you didn't know.
yes because drakes are just as useful as titans
get over yourself, your alliance continued the BoB policy of herding as many high-skillpoint players as possible instead of providing content for new players, and it's coming back to bite you in the ass (again, again and again) "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Dr Ngo
JESUS CHRIST IT'S A LION GET IN THE CAR WE FORM VOLTRON
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:10:00 -
[303] - Quote
The metamorphasis is complete: Mittani is the new Molle
Enjoy your new fuzzy pink hat. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2481
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:10:00 -
[304] - Quote
Pesadel0 wrote:Revii Lagoon wrote:Pesadel0 wrote:Man CCP you really do know hot to stir **** up, isn't the tracking nerf all that is necessary? i mean tracking titans have poor tank already, the signture is fail nerf and so is the locking 3 foes,.
And to the goons saying that tracking titans can hit titans well , learn to tengu bros, it might help. Obviously you haven't seen 30 tracking titans vs tengus. PL did that in an earlier battle over C-J6MT and, well obliterated the -A- tengu fleet. >Link fleet please , because i was there and i dint saw 1 single titan i only saw the slowcats on grid and i was in a tengu . What i remember was you(goons) coming in in drakes and getting rapped by bombs then got raped again by tengus , so \0/
yes, it was a very fun fight indeed "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Gicer
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:11:00 -
[305] - Quote
After this stunning display of wizardy and because of the lightning shooting from mittens fingers.
All Bat Country members are now required to wear goggles for eye protection. |

BooooooBeeeeeer
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:12:00 -
[306] - Quote
Why do not you show a little more than fantasy? Increase the energy requirements for the system with DD and capital guns? Reduce damage from the guns of capital? Why not make sure that DD could destroy any capital ship with a single salvo, including the Titan, or Motherships? And just to make the Titans, a special module of two types: 1) The first module allows you to install DD. BUT, with him is impossible to establish a capital gun / missile. Only the big guns. Protection systems of Titan, set the mode: the resistance of massaging damage (from the capital of guns and fighter bombers). That is, large ships such as the other Titans, motherships, dreadnoughts, will cause very little damage on Titan equipped with such a module. But! Subcapital ships will be able to destroy it, if they will be sufficient. Titan himself, with such a module and equipped with only the DD and the big guns will not be effective against subcapital ships. But, could destroy any capital ship.
2) The second module, do not indicate a DD, but allows you to set capital gun with good tracking and damage of subcapital ships. Brings the system of protection of the Titan, to the almost complete protection against attacks subcapital ships. But! Almost no protection against damage to the big guns / rocket attacks by fighter-bombers. That is, a Titan will be able to cope with a lot of subcapital ships, but will be killed, even a few dreadnoughts, or one Motherships / Titan.
Any large fleet of Titans, in any case, even if it has ships equipped with both types of module. Incur losses if their opponent is not afraid to use their capital and subcapital ships together.
|

Doddy
Excidium. Executive Outcomes
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:13:00 -
[307] - Quote
While i applaud the tracking nerf absolutely (tracking titans were broken whatever anyone claims) the max targets/scan res nerf seems very stupid. If the tracking nerf is a success then titans can barely hurt subcaps anyway so why break them against standard capitals (and structures). That part of it makes absolutely no sense. Goodbye driveby doomsdays. |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
286
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:14:00 -
[308] - Quote
BooooooBeeeeeer wrote:Any large fleet of Titans, in any case, even if it has ships equipped with both types of module. Incur losses if their opponent is not afraid to use their capital and subcapital ships together.
Do you actually see a lot of Titans in the newbie corp? |

Razzor Death
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
158
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:17:00 -
[309] - Quote
Gicer wrote:After this stunning display of wizardy and because of the lightning shooting from mittens fingers.
All Bat Country members are now required to wear goggles for eye protection.
I like to think of them as our "Deal wiz it" glasses |

Nao Oikawasan
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:17:00 -
[310] - Quote
Hate to say I told you so, but I did.
Raiden. NC. and PL blobbed the hell out of Branch with their titans, still managed to lose all of the tech, and proved nothing but that the Goons were right all along.
If the titans had been used for actual combat, instead of simply stopping fights because you were losing the battle, the problems with titan tracking would not have been so obvious that CCP had to act immediately.
Titans are supposed to be for cap suppression, not PVP suppression.
Now maybe PL will have to field actual fleets and make some effort to support the alliances that they demand tech moons from, rather than simply freeload off of fail alliances that need them to bring their titans. |

bonder's
Knights of the Reclaimed Origin
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:21:00 -
[311] - Quote
ccp grey scale obvious goon
Y U NO NERF DRAKES/TENGU/ALPHA and everything else that is crap that is blobbed together to make things work |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5483
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:24:00 -
[312] - Quote
Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:You don't get it. I would like to discuss CCP Greyscale's argument about sensor boosters here. GǪand the armour titans have to give up slots (or not) for them just like the shield titans do. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:25:00 -
[313] - Quote
Ra Death wrote:I'm almost at a loss of words here. Almost, therefore I am going to speak my mind.
So now capitals are basically structure grinding machines and you only deploy them if you have something to grind down or if someone else is grinding stuff down and you catch someone else grinding down something. This is not a solution, this is a plaster for a symptom. There is now ZERO reason to deploy supercapitals except to grind down a structure. Do you really want structure grinding to become the motivator for people to build and create supercapitals in EVE? I mean, I don't believe you have thought at all about the consequences of these changes.
EVE is now effectively sectioned off into two tier combat systems. Capital combat and sub-capital combat. The difference is, capitals cannot touch sub-capitals, but sub-capitals can, in the numbers that are brought at the moment, almost 1-3 volley capitals. The titans were a workaround for that because numbers were no longer the only deciding factor, your playing time, your assets and your skillpoints actually played a role. Now we are going back to a time again where the only effective tool, a VERY limited tool might I add, against blobbing is a damn stealth bomber. No more force projection by taking advantage of the many years you have spent in the game and the money you have pooled into a titan, you are better off selling off said titan and joining the nearest Maelstrom fleet.
What am I meant to aspire for in EVE in terms of combat? What is my incentive for actually training all these skills. To fly the next flavour of the month subcapital ship?
EVE is now a numbers game when there is a large effort to remove counters for large fleets. If this is the direction we're going, we're going to see a bipolar political landscape because being a small alliance, you can now only exist if you are a part of the inevitable two powerblocks that will come to dominate EVE. If you can't match the numbers, too bad... join or die.
Let's get a rethink of the roles of supercapitals and not a temporary plaster that will reduce supercapitals to nothing but ihub and station grinders. THIS! THIS! THIS!
Could Greyscale comment this post please? |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
451
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:33:00 -
[314] - Quote
To the people complaining about the various blobbing fleets(omg 150 maels can alpha stuff) you do know those fleets need more than 1 ship type to work, right? Alphafleet calls for more than maels and scimis, for instance, and dies horribly without that support. Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:34:00 -
[315] - Quote
The fact that 95% of the people against the nerf are dribbling retards really rams home that this was the right move.
My only sympathy is that I agree they should have never let it become a problem that needed to be hammered down like this in the first place, but that doesn't change the fact that it had to be done.
May the blessings of the Great Worm, God Emperor Mittani, be upon you all. |

Charles Case
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:36:00 -
[316] - Quote
What a beauty this thread is |

Charles Case
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:37:00 -
[317] - Quote
Seriously, i've read the whole thing twice already |

Dramaticus
Goonswarm Federation
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:37:00 -
[318] - Quote
we're great and you all suck |

TruthState
Blood Covenant Pandemic Legion
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:39:00 -
[319] - Quote
Eve Online |

Killerhound
Free-Space-Ranger Ev0ke
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:42:00 -
[320] - Quote
Since I have not read the consequences of those changes so far, let me introduce some details to you:
Using the formula T = 40000/(X*(arcsinh(y)) for the Time to lock a target and the planified changes the current Locking time of Titan vs Titan:
(no skills added, using ragnarok as reference)
TITAN locks TITAN: 73 Seconds
For a heavy Fight situation, with 10x Timedilation this means:
TITAN locks TITAN: 730 Seconds / 12 mins 10 sec
Same situation to lock a carrier:
TITAN locks TITAN: 106 Seconds
For a heavy Fight situation, with 10x Timedilation this means:
TITAN locks TITAN: 1060 Seconds / 17 Min 40 Sec
Add a Cormacks sensor booster and you can remove around 1/3. Adding more of those sensor booster well its not linear but you see where its going.
Just my 2 cents feel free to think about those numbers what you want. |

Lili Lu
189
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:43:00 -
[321] - Quote
Ok. You've performed an amputation and bandaged one class of problem ships. Would be nice if you had been more surgical about it. And your field remedy as you admit will cause some more damage necessitating later surgery.
However, the Drake, Tengu, and heavy missile and large arty alpha problems are still there in game.
Why the relatively impulsive hack saw for titans and still no fix the later? Where, particularly for the Drake, the problem has festered so long past the original injury it no longer just smells bad but now is toxic to the entire body. Please saw away at the Drake. Come on CCP you know you want to see the veritable ocean of tears. I do  |

Preeeeemo
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:48:00 -
[322] - Quote
hahahahaha |

Arkon Hjallian
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:55:00 -
[323] - Quote
Damn, I need a bigger jar, this one is already full of delicious titan pilot tears. |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:58:00 -
[324] - Quote
Nomad I wrote:It's a great patch, because Titans became a role to destroy capitals not subcaps. A Titan pilot now needs a better support fleet.
Nope, since a Titan does not need any support inside pos shields. |

Lord Fargo
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:59:00 -
[325] - Quote
Another cultural victory :smug: |

Venus Vermillion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
412
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:59:00 -
[326] - Quote
ABLOOBLOOBLOO!1!!111!
I spent thousands of real dollars to buy a titan and a character to fly it and I can't win the game! THIS IS NOT FAIR!
EVE SHOULD NOT BE A NUMBERS GAME!111!!!
(Dollars aren't numbers) |

Carmen de Mairena
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 16:59:00 -
[327] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Titan pilots make up .2% of the player population, if we assume 350k players and ~730 titans according to Diagoras' tweets.
According to the last CSM results you were elected CSM Chairman thanks to the votes of 5,365 people, which is 1.53% of the EVE population.
Such an overwhelming majority should indeed allow you to mold the game into whatever you want.
The CSM should be a tool to improve the game for all of us. At the moment it's just a political aberration used by a selected few (who have been appointed to the positions they hold by less than 10% of the subscribers) against their traditional enemies. Anyone with a minimal perception would notice that, although it's not like you're hiding it at all. If it was a fair and reliable system, only because of that public chest beating you should never be allowed to run again for such a determinant position.
All the big recent changes have targeted the same entities. Things like the Technetium rebalancing are being set aside as now the only ones that could have changed that (the corrupt CSM) hold dozens and dozens of those moons and, after this last Titan rebalancing, they are certain they can achieve Technetium monopoly.
The real question would be: why are the developers so biased? There's only two options. Either they are extremely easily manipulable and therefore they will do whatever somoene they like tells them to do even if his intentions are absolutely evident, which is bad, or they are just being fooled by this person or group of persons, which is worse. Truth is CSM doesn't represent any relevant majority in the game, yet they get to change its core whenever they see fit to benefit the same coalition always.
It's quite disgusting and even more difficult to fix. Good luck CCP. |

Ezekiel Sulastin
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:01:00 -
[328] - Quote
Arkon Hjallian wrote:Damn, I need a bigger jar, this one is already full of delicious titan pilot tears.
I think I've seen a much larger quantity of Goon :smug: than tears in my quick perusal of the thread. |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:03:00 -
[329] - Quote
Nao Oikawasan wrote:Hate to say I told you so, but I did.
Raiden. NC. and PL blobbed the hell out of Branch with their titans, still managed to lose all of the tech, and proved nothing but that the Goons were right all along.
If the titans had been used for actual combat, instead of simply stopping fights because you were losing the battle, the problems with titan tracking would not have been so obvious that CCP had to act immediately.
Titans are supposed to be for cap suppression, not PVP suppression.
Now maybe PL will have to field actual fleets and make some effort to support the alliances that they demand tech moons from, rather than simply freeload off of fail alliances that need them to bring their titans.
What is cap supression? Cap supression is useless in eve. Caps are only good for structure grinding and you don't need supercaps in order to stop them from doing that because they are completely helpless against subcaps. In fact a bunch of dreads is more threat to a titan than it is to a drake. |

Temmu Guerra
Genco Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:05:00 -
[330] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:Ra Death wrote:I'm almost at a loss of words here. Almost, therefore I am going to speak my mind.
So now capitals are basically structure grinding machines and you only deploy them if you have something to grind down or if someone else is grinding stuff down and you catch someone else grinding down something. This is not a solution, this is a plaster for a symptom. There is now ZERO reason to deploy supercapitals except to grind down a structure. Do you really want structure grinding to become the motivator for people to build and create supercapitals in EVE? I mean, I don't believe you have thought at all about the consequences of these changes.
EVE is now effectively sectioned off into two tier combat systems. Capital combat and sub-capital combat. The difference is, capitals cannot touch sub-capitals, but sub-capitals can, in the numbers that are brought at the moment, almost 1-3 volley capitals. The titans were a workaround for that because numbers were no longer the only deciding factor, your playing time, your assets and your skillpoints actually played a role. Now we are going back to a time again where the only effective tool, a VERY limited tool might I add, against blobbing is a damn stealth bomber. No more force projection by taking advantage of the many years you have spent in the game and the money you have pooled into a titan, you are better off selling off said titan and joining the nearest Maelstrom fleet.
What am I meant to aspire for in EVE in terms of combat? What is my incentive for actually training all these skills. To fly the next flavour of the month subcapital ship?
EVE is now a numbers game when there is a large effort to remove counters for large fleets. If this is the direction we're going, we're going to see a bipolar political landscape because being a small alliance, you can now only exist if you are a part of the inevitable two powerblocks that will come to dominate EVE. If you can't match the numbers, too bad... join or die.
Let's get a rethink of the roles of supercapitals and not a temporary plaster that will reduce supercapitals to nothing but ihub and station grinders. THIS! THIS! THIS! Could Greyscale comment this post please?
Quoting again for CCP to see this. Btw does anyone notice that about 95% of the people cheering on this nerf are part of CFC?
|

Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:06:00 -
[331] - Quote
Lili Lu wrote:Ok. You've performed an amputation and bandaged one class of problem ships. Would be nice if you had been more surgical about it. And your field remedy as you admit will cause some more damage necessitating later surgery. However, the Drake, Tengu, and heavy missile and large arty alpha problems are still there in game. Why the relatively impulsive hack saw for titans and still no fix the later? Where, particularly for the Drake, the problem has festered so long past the original injury it no longer just smells bad but now is toxic to the entire body. Please saw away at the Drake. Come on CCP you know you want to see the veritable ocean of tears. I do 

Complaining about drakes is so 2010. There are plenty of viable counters to every subcap doctrine, even tengu fleets, and its dishonest to pretend otherwise.
This Titan rebalance is long overdue and will make sov null a better place. |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
451
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:06:00 -
[332] - Quote
Carmen de Mairena wrote:The Mittani wrote:Titan pilots make up .2% of the player population, if we assume 350k players and ~730 titans according to Diagoras' tweets. According to the last CSM results you were elected CSM Chairman thanks to the votes of 5,365 people, which is 1.53% of the EVE population. Such an overwhelming majority should indeed allow you to mold the game into whatever you want. The CSM should be a tool to improve the game for all of us. At the moment it's just a political aberration used by a selected few (who have been appointed to the positions they hold by less than 10% of the subscribers) against their traditional enemies. Anyone with a minimal perception would notice that, although it's not like you're hiding it at all. If it was a fair and reliable system, only because of that public chest beating you should never be allowed to run again for such a determinant position. All the big recent changes have targeted the same entities. Things like the Technetium rebalancing are being set aside as now the only ones that could have changed that (the corrupt CSM) hold dozens and dozens of those moons and, after this last Titan rebalancing, they are certain they can achieve Technetium monopoly. The real question would be: why are the developers so biased? There's only two options. Either they are extremely easily manipulable and therefore they will do whatever somoene they like tells them to do even if his intentions are absolutely evident, which is bad, or they are just being fooled by this person or group of persons, which is worse. Truth is CSM doesn't represent any relevant majority in the game, yet they get to change its core whenever they see fit to benefit the same coalition always. It's quite disgusting and even more difficult to fix. Good luck CCP. Then vote.
Also, current CSM have all come out as being pro-technerf, so I imagine they can't force CCP to prioritize whatever they want. Imagine that. Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

Tolmar
Capital Industries Research And Development Fidelas Constans
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:07:00 -
[333] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Vissor wrote:Are you re.....d? why should i even try to lock frigate or cruiser after all of these changes? if there like 1% chance to hit cruiser? Because he's infinipointing your titan buddy 30km away, where the range alleviates the slow tracking and brings that hit chance up to several tens of percentsGǪ
That is just all sorts of fail... if you do not know why read up on titans before posting please.... |

Shodana
Sacred Templars RED.OverLord
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:08:00 -
[334] - Quote
Let me see............Titans are going to be nerfed..........so now we can't have 50 plus titans hot dropped into a fight.........so here comes the firesale on titans...........and Super Carriers basically the same thing...........hmmmmm. Guess now we gotta go hide because the next thing will be 400 plus CARRIERS being hot dropped into systems..........and then they will be nerfed too..........all this instead of FIXING something............. FIX where Capitals of any sort require SUPPORT..........as in frigates, cruisers, battleships..........without support THEN Capitals receive a nerf due to not having the required SUPPORT..............This would go a long long way to fixing combat as it stands at the moment. |

FHM
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:09:00 -
[335] - Quote
This is the most stupid change possible. I am against super capitals and their blobs but at the moment a super capital blob is only effective counter to the high alfa fleets that Goonswarm and Co have been pulling off. This changed has been pushed for by a ******** idiot that does not have the balls so commit his pathetic alliance to a fight with super capitals vs super capitals so he pushes for a Titan nerf.
This so called balance does nothing but favor Goonswarm and no one else. You have proposed no balance or nerf for the alfa fleet therefore this whole change is useless. In the end this will not solve any problems but create more. |

eidenjunior
Nor-rigs
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:09:00 -
[336] - Quote
why nerfe the Scan res so much ? can't you just start with redusing it to half(20 ish.) |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2495
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:10:00 -
[337] - Quote
Pheusia wrote: Complaining about drakes is so 2010. There are plenty of viable counters to every subcap doctrine, even tengu fleets, and its dishonest to pretend otherwise. This Titan rebalance is long overdue and will make sov null a better place. Isn't Malcanis the good posting face of Initdot? Why isn't he around? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

CorryBasler
The Maverick Navy Against ALL Authorities
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:11:00 -
[338] - Quote
Finally, thanks CCP |

Ting Mei
Pulsar Inc. Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:12:00 -
[339] - Quote
Wow !
Bot harassing/hunting/bannishing and now titan get first nerf ...
Some has been doomdayed :)
Nice Job CCP :) |

Organa
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:12:00 -
[340] - Quote
Does ccp not seem to realize that there are only currently 2 ways to counter a vastly numerically Superior force? 1 bombers which die in droves but have some chance but generally arnt that effective in killing 1000 dudes with 200. and the titan blob.
If this patch goes through it will basically make titans logistics platforms and only rarly will they be used to do anything else bc whats the point of using a 90b isk ship when you can use a 1b isk dread and do the same thing?
if your going to nerf them fine but do so in a manner which also addresses the reason they are used they allow a group of players that are willing to field 100x the isk of a massively numerical force and have a chance to win. dont half ass the nerf take the time to truly balance the game. instead of working on things like silly new launchers maybe take the time and actually balance the internet spaceships we all log into play. |

Chaos Shadoww
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:15:00 -
[341] - Quote
dunno why all goons are cheering you have just ensured nobody will fight you  |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5779
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:15:00 -
[342] - Quote
You'll have to excuse all the NPC alts everyone, Raidendot gave a command to their troops to only post on alts instead of mains so 'goons wouldn't enjoy tears'.
(we can tell you're all from Raidendot, f y i) The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2495
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:15:00 -
[343] - Quote
Organa wrote:Does ccp not seem to realize that there are only currently 2 ways to counter a vastly numerically Superior force? 1 bombers which die in droves but have some chance but generally arnt that effective in killing 1000 dudes with 200. and the titan blob.
If this patch goes through it will basically make titans logistics platforms and only rarly will they be used to do anything else bc whats the point of using a 90b isk ship when you can use a 1b isk dread and do the same thing?
if your going to nerf them fine but do so in a manner which also addresses the reason they are used they allow a group of players that are willing to field 100x the isk of a massively numerical force and have a chance to win. dont half ass the nerf take the time to truly balance the game. instead of working on things like silly new launchers maybe take the time and actually balance the internet spaceships we all log into play.
let's see the primary differences between dreads and titans:
doomsdays
siege mode "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Death2all Supercaps
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:16:00 -
[344] - Quote
weren't getting fights anyways  |

Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:19:00 -
[345] - Quote
Andski wrote:Pheusia wrote: Complaining about drakes is so 2010. There are plenty of viable counters to every subcap doctrine, even tengu fleets, and its dishonest to pretend otherwise. This Titan rebalance is long overdue and will make sov null a better place. Isn't Malcanis the good posting face of Initdot? Why isn't he around?
Malcs account is unsubbed atm so I am posting on pheu for the now |

Organa
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:22:00 -
[346] - Quote
Andski wrote:Organa wrote:Does ccp not seem to realize that there are only currently 2 ways to counter a vastly numerically Superior force? 1 bombers which die in droves but have some chance but generally arnt that effective in killing 1000 dudes with 200. and the titan blob.
If this patch goes through it will basically make titans logistics platforms and only rarly will they be used to do anything else bc whats the point of using a 90b isk ship when you can use a 1b isk dread and do the same thing?
if your going to nerf them fine but do so in a manner which also addresses the reason they are used they allow a group of players that are willing to field 100x the isk of a massively numerical force and have a chance to win. dont half ass the nerf take the time to truly balance the game. instead of working on things like silly new launchers maybe take the time and actually balance the internet spaceships we all log into play. let's see the primary differences between dreads and titans: doomsdays siege mode
and about 89b isk but as i said i don't really mind the nerf but they need to address the cause not the symptom. not just half ass the nerf |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2498
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:23:00 -
[347] - Quote
Organa wrote:and about 89b isk but as i said i don't really mind the nerf but they need to address the cause not the symptom. not just half ass the nerf
ahahaha you pay pubbie prices for your titans ahahahaha "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Angel HUN
Spricer Raiden.
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:24:00 -
[348] - Quote
Every time you've balanced supers (i.e. things that cannot be docked or even partially refunded through reprocessing) you have been incredibly heavy handed. Once again, this is an over the top reaction to a partisan issue (and we all know who the chief complaints are coming from).
Stop encouraging blobs > all. |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
873
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:24:00 -
[349] - Quote
Organa wrote:Does ccp not seem to realize that there are only currently 2 ways to counter a vastly numerically Superior force? 1 bombers which die in droves but have some chance but generally arnt that effective in killing 1000 dudes with 200. and the titan blob.
If this patch goes through it will basically make titans logistics platforms and only rarly will they be used to do anything else bc whats the point of using a 90b isk ship when you can use a 1b isk dread and do the same thing?
if your going to nerf them fine but do so in a manner which also addresses the reason they are used they allow a group of players that are willing to field 100x the isk of a massively numerical force and have a chance to win. dont half ass the nerf take the time to truly balance the game. instead of working on things like silly new launchers maybe take the time and actually balance the internet spaceships we all log into play.
Every single modification they've done to titans has been to reduce or remove their ability to impact subcap fleets. AOE DD? gone. DD's no longer work on subcaps? done. Tracking nerfed? Now that's done too.
The whole point everybody is missing is that you need to stop using these broken hulls as crutches because they were never meant for this role. They were never supposed to be doing what you've used them for and my biggest regret is they let it go this long so people felt like they had to have them in order to be successful. That said it was made clear this is a temporary stopgap fix because they see, like we've been screaming about for ages, that the hull is broken and being used in a role it wasn't meant for. They are going to design a new role for the hull then figure out mechanics to support the hull instead of what we have now which is some dumbo's idea to have a big honkin ship in the game without considering what would happen once you have a thousand big honkin ships.
So stop trying to come up with cute ways to somehow recapture the old glory. Titans weren't meant for subcap warfare, they are capital killers. If you are 300 dudes with multiple accounts crying that you won't be able to punch way above your station to take on 50,000 dudes maybe you should select objectives more appropriate for your size or maybe you can make some friends.
|

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:24:00 -
[350] - Quote
Carmen de Mairena wrote:The Mittani wrote:Titan pilots make up .2% of the player population, if we assume 350k players and ~730 titans according to Diagoras' tweets. According to the last CSM results you were elected CSM Chairman thanks to the votes of 5,365 people, which is 1.53% of the EVE population. Such an overwhelming majority should indeed allow you to mold the game into whatever you want.
Hahaha, there are still people who think that The Mittani has any power over CCP and their game.
Sweet.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2498
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:26:00 -
[351] - Quote
Angel HUN wrote:Every time you've balanced supers (i.e. things that cannot be docked or even partially refunded through reprocessing) you have been incredibly heavy handed. Once again, this is an over the top reaction to a partisan issue (and we all know who the chief complaints are coming from).
Stop encouraging blobs > all.
Yeah CCP should stop encouraging the idea of multiple players working together in a multiplayer game "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Tolmar
Capital Industries Research And Development Fidelas Constans
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:28:00 -
[352] - Quote
muhuh Aihaken wrote:If you want to make Titans just useful for bridging and useless in combat then you should reduce the cost of them to the same as a super carrier and let them dock .
Or if you want them to server an anti-cap role leave there scan res as it is now and up there dd damage so they can take out super carriers.
I agree with the reduction in effectiveness vs. subcaps, titans and supers should be able to dock so that supercap alliances can be more dynamic with their gameplay... |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:29:00 -
[353] - Quote
Sentinel Eeex wrote:Carmen de Mairena wrote:The Mittani wrote:Titan pilots make up .2% of the player population, if we assume 350k players and ~730 titans according to Diagoras' tweets. According to the last CSM results you were elected CSM Chairman thanks to the votes of 5,365 people, which is 1.53% of the EVE population. Such an overwhelming majority should indeed allow you to mold the game into whatever you want. Hahaha, there are still people who think that The Mittani has any power over CCP and their game. Sweet.
I kinda remember someone saying that about BOB / Sir Molle...
You have become your enemy... |

Tamplarul
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:31:00 -
[354] - Quote
as someone said at so much arse kissing from Mittani, he's getting everything hr wants. Is simplier to nurf than to build something new. I hope to give us our SP and the time we invested in titans. All this thread is a big bullsheat. why dont you just say: WHAT MITTANI WANTS MITTANI GETS. Well done Mittani! |

Charles Case
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:31:00 -
[355] - Quote
Carmen de Mairena wrote:The Mittani wrote:Titan pilots make up .2% of the player population, if we assume 350k players and ~730 titans according to Diagoras' tweets. According to the last CSM results you were elected CSM Chairman thanks to the votes of 5,365 people, which is 1.53% of the EVE population. Such an overwhelming majority should indeed allow you to mold the game into whatever you want. The CSM should be a tool to improve the game for all of us. At the moment it's just a political aberration used by a selected few (who have been appointed to the positions they hold by less than 10% of the subscribers) against their traditional enemies. Anyone with a minimal perception would notice that, although it's not like you're hiding it at all. If it was a fair and reliable system, only because of that public chest beating you should never be allowed to run again for such a determinant position. All the big recent changes have targeted the same entities. Things like the Technetium rebalancing are being set aside as now the only ones that could have changed that (the corrupt CSM) hold dozens and dozens of those moons and, after this last Titan rebalancing, they are certain they can achieve Technetium monopoly. The real question would be: why are the developers so biased? There's only two options. Either they are extremely easily manipulable and therefore they will do whatever somoene they like tells them to do even if his intentions are absolutely evident, which is bad, or they are just being fooled by this person or group of persons, which is worse. Truth is CSM doesn't represent any relevant majority in the game, yet they get to change its core whenever they see fit to benefit the same coalition always. It's quite disgusting and even more difficult to fix. Good luck CCP.
hahaha your first post is a gallon full of tears.
|

Organa
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:32:00 -
[356] - Quote
Vile rat wrote: Every single modification they've done to titans has been to reduce or remove their ability to impact subcap fleets. AOE DD? gone. DD's no longer work on subcaps? done. Tracking nerfed? Now that's done too.
The whole point everybody is missing is that you need to stop using these broken hulls as crutches because they were never meant for this role. They were never supposed to be doing what you've used them for and my biggest regret is they let it go this long so people felt like they had to have them in order to be successful. That said it was made clear this is a temporary stopgap fix because they see, like we've been screaming about for ages, that the hull is broken and being used in a role it wasn't meant for. They are going to design a new role for the hull then figure out mechanics to support the hull instead of what we have now which is some dumbo's idea to have a big honkin ship in the game without considering what would happen once you have a thousand big honkin ships.
So stop trying to come up with cute ways to somehow recapture the old glory. Titans weren't meant for subcap warfare, they are capital killers. If you are 300 dudes with multiple accounts crying that you won't be able to punch way above your station to take on 50,000 dudes maybe you should select objectives more appropriate for your size or maybe you can make some friends.
i don't have the issue with the titan nerf itself and am looking forward to see that they do with the new role, but i think if they are going to do that they need to do it not just nerf them. also your hyperbole dosnt address my point of if one side is willing to field 10 to 100 times the isk of the other side they should have the potential to win(not garented to win bc numbers are an important factor just the potential). in doing a stop gap rushed patch like this they make quantity everything and quality mostly useless. that is my issue with it. |

Nao Oikawasan
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:33:00 -
[357] - Quote
Why, exactly are Drakes, Tengus and Alpha fits a problem in the game?
Once again most of you are missing the point. Goons are hell to deal with because they have huge numbers. Are they supposed to announce ops and tell their members that only a few can go because you don't want to fight fleets larger than yours?
Take a look at the battle reports. Most of the time, even when greatly outnumbered, Goons still engage and win. That definitely does not look good for all of you "l33t PVPers".
After all, Goons are terrible at this game!
Get more members. Field actual fleets. Spread your ungodly amounts of free ISK from the tech moons you're sucking dry around to players you want to support you. Give them fights they can have fun with. Replace the ships they may loose protecting your assets.
Works for Goons. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2504
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:34:00 -
[358] - Quote
Organa wrote:i don't have the issue with the titan nerf itself and am looking forward to see that they do with the new role, but i think if they are going to do that they need to do it not just nerf them. also your hyperbole dosnt address my point of if one side is willing to field 10 to 100 times the isk of the other side they should have the potential to win(not garented to win bc numbers are an important factor just the potential). in doing a stop gap rushed patch like this they make quantity everything and quality mostly useless. that is my issue with it.
"victory to the most ISK fielded" is bad game design "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Feawin
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:35:00 -
[359] - Quote
Is it just me or is the proper way to use titans vs subcaps after this nerf to just field a support fleet with huginns / lokis ? |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:35:00 -
[360] - Quote
Organa wrote:Does ccp not seem to realize that there are only currently 2 ways to counter a vastly numerically Superior force? 1 bombers which die in droves but have some chance but generally arnt that effective in killing 1000 dudes with 200. and the titan blob.
Tell me, how would you kill 25 titans?
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2508
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:36:00 -
[361] - Quote
Nao Oikawasan wrote:Why, exactly are Drakes, Tengus and Alpha fits a problem in the game?
we literally would not shed a tear if alpha was nerfed
I personally have no love for alpha doctrines - they're mind-numbingly boring and uninteresting. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
877
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:36:00 -
[362] - Quote
Organa wrote:Vile rat wrote: Every single modification they've done to titans has been to reduce or remove their ability to impact subcap fleets. AOE DD? gone. DD's no longer work on subcaps? done. Tracking nerfed? Now that's done too.
The whole point everybody is missing is that you need to stop using these broken hulls as crutches because they were never meant for this role. They were never supposed to be doing what you've used them for and my biggest regret is they let it go this long so people felt like they had to have them in order to be successful. That said it was made clear this is a temporary stopgap fix because they see, like we've been screaming about for ages, that the hull is broken and being used in a role it wasn't meant for. They are going to design a new role for the hull then figure out mechanics to support the hull instead of what we have now which is some dumbo's idea to have a big honkin ship in the game without considering what would happen once you have a thousand big honkin ships.
So stop trying to come up with cute ways to somehow recapture the old glory. Titans weren't meant for subcap warfare, they are capital killers. If you are 300 dudes with multiple accounts crying that you won't be able to punch way above your station to take on 50,000 dudes maybe you should select objectives more appropriate for your size or maybe you can make some friends.
i don't have the issue with the titan nerf itself and am looking forward to see that they do with the new role, but i think if they are going to do that they need to do it not just nerf them. also your hyperbole dosnt address my point of if one side is willing to field 10 to 100 times the isk of the other side they should have the potential to win(not garented to win bc numbers are an important factor just the potential). in doing a stop gap rushed patch like this they make quantity everything and quality mostly useless. that is my issue with it.
I risked more isk than you is a poor argument. Being able to throw more spacebux around should only have a modest increase in your chances of winning, not be the decider.
|

Vibesz
Dynamic Horizon
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:37:00 -
[363] - Quote
Sentinel Eeex wrote:Organa wrote:Does ccp not seem to realize that there are only currently 2 ways to counter a vastly numerically Superior force? 1 bombers which die in droves but have some chance but generally arnt that effective in killing 1000 dudes with 200. and the titan blob.
Tell me, how would you kill 25 titans?
one at a time |

Temmu Guerra
Genco Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:37:00 -
[364] - Quote
Andski wrote:Organa wrote:i don't have the issue with the titan nerf itself and am looking forward to see that they do with the new role, but i think if they are going to do that they need to do it not just nerf them. also your hyperbole dosnt address my point of if one side is willing to field 10 to 100 times the isk of the other side they should have the potential to win(not garented to win bc numbers are an important factor just the potential). in doing a stop gap rushed patch like this they make quantity everything and quality mostly useless. that is my issue with it. "victory to the most ISK fielded" is bad game design
And victory to the biggest blue list is also bad game design.
its just funny how not to long ago you guys were bitching about the blue list the DRF had. Now you are doing it, it is completely okay!
Apparently Mittens has perfected the brainwashing to a tee since no goons can freely think |

Gina Aivoras
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:38:00 -
[365] - Quote
Sentinel Eeex wrote:Organa wrote:Does ccp not seem to realize that there are only currently 2 ways to counter a vastly numerically Superior force? 1 bombers which die in droves but have some chance but generally arnt that effective in killing 1000 dudes with 200. and the titan blob.
Tell me, how would you kill 25 titans? use 50 titans |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2508
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:39:00 -
[366] - Quote
Gina Aivoras wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:Organa wrote:Does ccp not seem to realize that there are only currently 2 ways to counter a vastly numerically Superior force? 1 bombers which die in droves but have some chance but generally arnt that effective in killing 1000 dudes with 200. and the titan blob.
Tell me, how would you kill 25 titans? use 50 titans
Raiden mouthbreather missing the point news at 11 "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
|

CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
700

|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:39:00 -
[367] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:Ra Death wrote:I'm almost at a loss of words here. Almost, therefore I am going to speak my mind.
So now capitals are basically structure grinding machines and you only deploy them if you have something to grind down or if someone else is grinding stuff down and you catch someone else grinding down something. This is not a solution, this is a plaster for a symptom. There is now ZERO reason to deploy supercapitals except to grind down a structure. Do you really want structure grinding to become the motivator for people to build and create supercapitals in EVE? I mean, I don't believe you have thought at all about the consequences of these changes.
EVE is now effectively sectioned off into two tier combat systems. Capital combat and sub-capital combat. The difference is, capitals cannot touch sub-capitals, but sub-capitals can, in the numbers that are brought at the moment, almost 1-3 volley capitals. The titans were a workaround for that because numbers were no longer the only deciding factor, your playing time, your assets and your skillpoints actually played a role. Now we are going back to a time again where the only effective tool, a VERY limited tool might I add, against blobbing is a damn stealth bomber. No more force projection by taking advantage of the many years you have spent in the game and the money you have pooled into a titan, you are better off selling off said titan and joining the nearest Maelstrom fleet.
What am I meant to aspire for in EVE in terms of combat? What is my incentive for actually training all these skills. To fly the next flavour of the month subcapital ship?
EVE is now a numbers game when there is a large effort to remove counters for large fleets. If this is the direction we're going, we're going to see a bipolar political landscape because being a small alliance, you can now only exist if you are a part of the inevitable two powerblocks that will come to dominate EVE. If you can't match the numbers, too bad... join or die.
Let's get a rethink of the roles of supercapitals and not a temporary plaster that will reduce supercapitals to nothing but ihub and station grinders. THIS! THIS! THIS! Could Greyscale comment this post please?
Dreads are mainly antistructure, with a bit of anti-cap. Carriers still do pretty decent damage against subcaps AFAIK. Supers can switch between anti-cap and anti-subcap depending on their choice of fighter drone. Titans are pure anti-cap.
With regard to the cost and effort of getting into a super, the general design intent of EVE is that you get diminishing returns for progressively higher investments. If you look at module progression, from T1 up to high officer, you'll see that how it generally pans out is that you get a roughly linear increase in power for a roughly exponential increase in cost. Similarly with ships, a T1 cruiser is not equivalent to ten T1 frigates, and a T1 battleship is not equivalent to twenty T1 cruisers. This makes stepping into a larger more powerful ship an interesting cost-benefit decision rather than an obvious no-brainer. Supercaps should continue this trend. |
|

Skye Aurorae
No Bull Ships
207
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:40:00 -
[368] - Quote
I have to say the changes are better than I expected, better thought out than the simple tracking changes.
I've maintained that single titans as part of a fleet are not OP in their current from, it's only when multiple titans end up spread out around grid that it becomes impractical to speed tank all of them. Nerfs needed to be made with the goal of hurting titan blobs more than individual titans. (for example, disabling DDD when there's more than one titan on grid?)
Anyway, the proposed changes are fine, I suspect we've seen the end to the anom running titan, but I'm not sure this kills the titan blob just yet.
Skye Aurora is a 7 year old Girl Who Wants to be on the CSM! Unfortunately, the Lawyers say you have to be 21, so.. Vote for Scott Manley / Skye Aurorae for CSM 7 An Expert in Dealing with Childish Arguments Over Toys. http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=458 |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:41:00 -
[369] - Quote
Honestly, this probably had nothing to do with goons and everything to do with PL hotdropping titans on the CCP subcap fleet. |

Mfume Apocal
Origin.
341
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:41:00 -
[370] - Quote
DelightSucker wrote:Congratz CCP you just made sure that Numbers is all in EVE again.
way to **** up your own game.
"oh noez, i might actually have to be good at subcaps"
otoh, i can see how this would fill you with fear and dread, being in the powerhouse of nulli secunda. |

Kari Trace
Advanced Tactics and Manufacturing Fidelas Constans
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:42:00 -
[371] - Quote
Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you. If you don't agree with constant play balancing you're bad for the game. If your crying over your Titans inability to blap everything with your guns: welcome back to the game. AVTM Comms / PvP Officer Kari Trace |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5488
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:42:00 -
[372] - Quote
Tolmar wrote:That is just all sorts of fail... if you do not know why read up on titans before posting please.... GǪand yet, none of what I said had anything in it that was specific to titans, so how about you go and read up on the tracking formula instead?
Sentinel Eeex wrote:Carmen de Mairena wrote:[quote=The Mittani]Titan pilots make up .2% of the player population, if we assume 350k players and ~730 titans according to Diagoras' tweets. According to the last CSM results you were elected CSM Chairman thanks to the votes of 5,365 people, which is 1.53% of the EVE population. GǪso you agree, then, that Mittens' opinion matters about 30+ù more than that of the titan pilots (especially since a fair amount of titan pilots belong to his 1.5%). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Temmu Guerra
Genco Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:42:00 -
[373] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:
Dreads are mainly antistructure, with a bit of anti-cap. Carriers still do pretty decent damage against subcaps AFAIK. Supers can switch between anti-cap and anti-subcap depending on their choice of fighter drone. Titans are pure anti-cap.
With regard to the cost and effort of getting into a super, the general design intent of EVE is that you get diminishing returns for progressively higher investments. If you look at module progression, from T1 up to high officer, you'll see that how it generally pans out is that you get a roughly linear increase in power for a roughly exponential increase in cost. Similarly with ships, a T1 cruiser is not equivalent to ten T1 frigates, and a T1 battleship is not equivalent to twenty T1 cruisers. This makes stepping into a larger more powerful ship an interesting cost-benefit decision rather than an obvious no-brainer. Supercaps should continue this trend.
So we can expect some radical changes coming with sov warefare to prevent numbers being the only factor because as of right now with this nerf that is all they count for. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:43:00 -
[374] - Quote
Gina Aivoras wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:Organa wrote:Does ccp not seem to realize that there are only currently 2 ways to counter a vastly numerically Superior force? 1 bombers which die in droves but have some chance but generally arnt that effective in killing 1000 dudes with 200. and the titan blob.
Tell me, how would you kill 25 titans? use 50 titans
So, you could say that one would need to use vastly numerically Superior force to achieve that, right?
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2508
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:44:00 -
[375] - Quote
Temmu Guerra wrote:So we can expect some radical changes coming with sov warefare to prevent numbers being the only factor because as of right now with this nerf that is all they count for.
CCP totally didn't announce a war-focused expansion for this summer. Nope, not at all. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

progodlegend
101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:45:00 -
[376] - Quote
I like the nerf, requires people to do some thinking to get the tracking titan fits to work again, but they still work, though it is slightly more risky than before. |

Hulemand
x13 Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:46:00 -
[377] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:
Dreads are mainly antistructure, with a bit of anti-cap. Carriers still do pretty decent damage against subcaps AFAIK. Supers can switch between anti-cap and anti-subcap depending on their choice of fighter drone. Titans are pure anti-cap.
With regard to the cost and effort of getting into a super, the general design intent of EVE is that you get diminishing returns for progressively higher investments. If you look at module progression, from T1 up to high officer, you'll see that how it generally pans out is that you get a roughly linear increase in power for a roughly exponential increase in cost. Similarly with ships, a T1 cruiser is not equivalent to ten T1 frigates, and a T1 battleship is not equivalent to twenty T1 cruisers. This makes stepping into a larger more powerful ship an interesting cost-benefit decision rather than an obvious no-brainer. Supercaps should continue this trend.
I suppose you are right in making this change if you want titans to be unable to kill subcaps, but...
How are super carriers able to kill subcaps besides battleships?
Cost-benefit as in logistics, having safe posses, cynoes, moving fuel and more **** like that.
This is indeed an interesting change to the game, good luck with keeping your job once the amount of accounts drop because of boredom and what follows when you allow for one big power block to control all of EVE.
|

George Holden
The Shadow Plague BLACK-MARK
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:46:00 -
[378] - Quote
Right now I'm only reading: "BOOHOOBOOHOO my titan is not able to blap any other ship in EVE anymore BOOHOOBOOHOO"
I might be pretty stupid but from what I've learned so far it seems that Titans we're not really intended to engage subcapitals but to support them, engage structures and engage other capitals.
I'm going to earn a lot of rage for that which I'm going to enjoy it a lot:
The Leviathan to be honest seems to be the only Titan working at least half way as intended. Citadels don't hurt anything below the size of a capital that seems okay for me. |

Organa
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:47:00 -
[379] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Organa wrote:Vile rat wrote: Every single modification they've done to titans has been to reduce or remove their ability to impact subcap fleets. AOE DD? gone. DD's no longer work on subcaps? done. Tracking nerfed? Now that's done too.
The whole point everybody is missing is that you need to stop using these broken hulls as crutches because they were never meant for this role. They were never supposed to be doing what you've used them for and my biggest regret is they let it go this long so people felt like they had to have them in order to be successful. That said it was made clear this is a temporary stopgap fix because they see, like we've been screaming about for ages, that the hull is broken and being used in a role it wasn't meant for. They are going to design a new role for the hull then figure out mechanics to support the hull instead of what we have now which is some dumbo's idea to have a big honkin ship in the game without considering what would happen once you have a thousand big honkin ships.
So stop trying to come up with cute ways to somehow recapture the old glory. Titans weren't meant for subcap warfare, they are capital killers. If you are 300 dudes with multiple accounts crying that you won't be able to punch way above your station to take on 50,000 dudes maybe you should select objectives more appropriate for your size or maybe you can make some friends.
i don't have the issue with the titan nerf itself and am looking forward to see that they do with the new role, but i think if they are going to do that they need to do it not just nerf them. also your hyperbole dosnt address my point of if one side is willing to field 10 to 100 times the isk of the other side they should have the potential to win(not garented to win bc numbers are an important factor just the potential). in doing a stop gap rushed patch like this they make quantity everything and quality mostly useless. that is my issue with it. I risked more isk than you is a poor argument. Being able to throw more spacebux around should only have a modest increase in your chances of winning, not be the decider.
which is more or less what i said. if these changes go through without some other changes there is no "effective" way to counter numbers other than more numbers which for you as a goon fc is a good thing
as to seleen killing 25 titans that are fit to kill sub caps isnt all that hard (bc they have crap recharge rate and little tank) you just have to have tackle and either a super fleet of your own that you are willing to commit or lots of dreads
|

fugazii
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:48:00 -
[380] - Quote
Caneb wrote:This is amazing for anyone who believes that sov warfare should not just be for whoever can bring the most titans to a fight.
Not just us.
It should be about who can bring the most numbers.
and now it is.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2508
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:50:00 -
[381] - Quote
Hulemand wrote:This is indeed an interesting change to the game, good luck with keeping your job once the amount of accounts drop because of boredom and what follows when you allow for one big power block to control all of EVE.
i love it when the sad lil raiden pubbies say that "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Death2all Supercaps
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:50:00 -
[382] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:
Dreads are mainly antistructure, with a bit of anti-cap. Carriers still do pretty decent damage against subcaps AFAIK. Supers can switch between anti-cap and anti-subcap depending on their choice of fighter drone. Titans are pure anti-cap.
With regard to the cost and effort of getting into a super, the general design intent of EVE is that you get diminishing returns for progressively higher investments. If you look at module progression, from T1 up to high officer, you'll see that how it generally pans out is that you get a roughly linear increase in power for a roughly exponential increase in cost. Similarly with ships, a T1 cruiser is not equivalent to ten T1 frigates, and a T1 battleship is not equivalent to twenty T1 cruisers. This makes stepping into a larger more powerful ship an interesting cost-benefit decision rather than an obvious no-brainer. Supercaps should continue this trend.
aka
DEATH2ALL SUPERCAPS
a blooo blooo bloooooo  |

Killerhound
Free-Space-Ranger Ev0ke
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:51:00 -
[383] - Quote
Sentinel Eeex wrote: Tell me, how would you kill 25 titans?
I would like at this point again to deliver some mathematical basis for any discussion. With current DPS and fast projection of force you can easily imagine around 100-150 dreads deploy to gank your 25 Titans.
150 Dreads cost around 400 Mio each or 60b in total due to insurance, easy production, low-sec construction etc etc ...
25 Titans cost around well 1250 B isk taking the current price of 50b at which some believe they will stop and a large amount of chars bound to the ships, extensive complicated production etc etc ...
Even if in a hypothetical fight 150 dreads all 25 DD where pointed at different targets, you would simply lose around 10b of isk with the shots from the dd's which is actually not such a big deal.
What matters in such a scenario is the fact that with your dreads you only need to take down 2 Titans and you are on the plus side of the equation. Every Titan blowing is additonally a moral factor, bringing more people to the fight.
By changing XL Turrets it becomes hard to hit even a dread, thats not such a big deal since they are in siege. But on the other side hitting a Titan becomes much easier since there is no more Malus from Siege module.
The scan resolution change adds additional help for the dread in that scenario. While the titans will need around 106 Seconds to lock up the dreads, they on the other side can already fire from 30 secs on. Thats about 70 Secs fire without defence on the titan side.
|

Elena Melkan
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:52:00 -
[384] - Quote
Like in everything, best tactics and biggest numbers ensure the victory. It should be that way in EVE too. In my eyes, Titans should play the support role - they should give a significant help, but should not be EVERYTHING.
So it should be Quality > Quantity? Yeah, it's so stupidly easy to get many players to work together effectively and maintain the numbers of active PvP'ers in a coalition - and hold all that stuff together, keep everyone satisfied and their morale up. It's so much easier than go passively grind some skills on an alt and get some ISK from botting or whatsoever and guarantee an epic win.
Quit whining, work on your diplo and get more people in your fleets. |

Travis Wells
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
222
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:52:00 -
[385] - Quote
Andski wrote:Hulemand wrote:This is indeed an interesting change to the game, good luck with keeping your job once the amount of accounts drop because of boredom and what follows when you allow for one big power block to control all of EVE.
i love it when the sad lil raiden pubbies say that
me too  |

Jonathan Jax
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:52:00 -
[386] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:
Dreads are mainly antistructure, with a bit of anti-cap. Carriers still do pretty decent damage against subcaps AFAIK. Supers can switch between anti-cap and anti-subcap depending on their choice of fighter drone. Titans are pure anti-cap.
With regard to the cost and effort of getting into a super, the general design intent of EVE is that you get diminishing returns for progressively higher investments. If you look at module progression, from T1 up to high officer, you'll see that how it generally pans out is that you get a roughly linear increase in power for a roughly exponential increase in cost. Similarly with ships, a T1 cruiser is not equivalent to ten T1 frigates, and a T1 battleship is not equivalent to twenty T1 cruisers. This makes stepping into a larger more powerful ship an interesting cost-benefit decision rather than an obvious no-brainer. Supercaps should continue this trend.
Quoted For Truth 
/clap CCP
Message to the whiners: HTFU |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:53:00 -
[387] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:Ra Death wrote:I'm almost at a loss of words here. Almost, therefore I am going to speak my mind.
So now capitals are basically structure grinding machines and you only deploy them if you have something to grind down or if someone else is grinding stuff down and you catch someone else grinding down something. This is not a solution, this is a plaster for a symptom. There is now ZERO reason to deploy supercapitals except to grind down a structure. Do you really want structure grinding to become the motivator for people to build and create supercapitals in EVE? I mean, I don't believe you have thought at all about the consequences of these changes.
EVE is now effectively sectioned off into two tier combat systems. Capital combat and sub-capital combat. The difference is, capitals cannot touch sub-capitals, but sub-capitals can, in the numbers that are brought at the moment, almost 1-3 volley capitals. The titans were a workaround for that because numbers were no longer the only deciding factor, your playing time, your assets and your skillpoints actually played a role. Now we are going back to a time again where the only effective tool, a VERY limited tool might I add, against blobbing is a damn stealth bomber. No more force projection by taking advantage of the many years you have spent in the game and the money you have pooled into a titan, you are better off selling off said titan and joining the nearest Maelstrom fleet.
What am I meant to aspire for in EVE in terms of combat? What is my incentive for actually training all these skills. To fly the next flavour of the month subcapital ship?
EVE is now a numbers game when there is a large effort to remove counters for large fleets. If this is the direction we're going, we're going to see a bipolar political landscape because being a small alliance, you can now only exist if you are a part of the inevitable two powerblocks that will come to dominate EVE. If you can't match the numbers, too bad... join or die.
Let's get a rethink of the roles of supercapitals and not a temporary plaster that will reduce supercapitals to nothing but ihub and station grinders. THIS! THIS! THIS! Could Greyscale comment this post please? Dreads are mainly antistructure, with a bit of anti-cap. Carriers still do pretty decent damage against subcaps AFAIK. Supers can switch between anti-cap and anti-subcap depending on their choice of fighter drone. Titans are pure anti-cap. With regard to the cost and effort of getting into a super, the general design intent of EVE is that you get diminishing returns for progressively higher investments. If you look at module progression, from T1 up to high officer, you'll see that how it generally pans out is that you get a roughly linear increase in power for a roughly exponential increase in cost. Similarly with ships, a T1 cruiser is not equivalent to ten T1 frigates, and a T1 battleship is not equivalent to twenty T1 cruisers. This makes stepping into a larger more powerful ship an interesting cost-benefit decision rather than an obvious no-brainer. Supercaps should continue this trend.
But you do realize that capitals (carriers and dreads) are completely useless against subcaps and don't need a counter? Obviously, making supercaps a dedicated anti capital weapon makes them simply useless.
There is also another question CCP should think about: Should Eve be all about spamming drakes or should the entitiy with the better and forwardthinking strategy be rewarded?
|

Yasuhiro Shoe
The Praxis Initiative Gentlemen's Agreement
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:53:00 -
[388] - Quote
I am astounded by the voice of reason belonging to CCP so very often. The future of Eve looks ever brighter. Cheers!
Also, I expected tears and tinfoil in this thread. I was not disappointed.
|

Sevani
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:55:00 -
[389] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: Supers can switch between anti-cap and anti-subcap depending on their choice of fighter drone. .
Lies.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2508
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:56:00 -
[390] - Quote
here's a fun fact:
even with this nerf, we'll still use our supercaps to support hundreds of real pilots while you play other games and moan about how EVE is so bad now that you can't blap lol goonies with your one perfectly balanced titans "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

JeffTheChef
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:56:00 -
[391] - Quote
Kari Trace wrote:Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you. If you don't agree with constant play balancing you're bad for the game. If your crying over your Titans inability to blap everything with your guns: welcome back to the game.
good post goonpet/pvp officer
lol |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2515
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:57:00 -
[392] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:There is also another question CCP should think about: Should Eve be all about spamming drakes or should the entitiy with the better and forwardthinking strategy be rewarded?
the better strategy is clearly "get me a cyno, everyone jump, configure configure configure, sort by transversal and lock everything in sight" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
884
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:57:00 -
[393] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:[
There is also another question CCP should think about: Should Eve be all about spamming drakes or should the entitiy with the better and forwardthinking strategy be rewarded?
I like this question. This is a good question and hopefully it will become the basis for a complete redesign of fleet combat. This absolutely needs to happen but it shouldn't be confused with how broken titans are. |

Kari Trace
Advanced Tactics and Manufacturing Fidelas Constans
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:58:00 -
[394] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Honestly, this probably had nothing to do with goons and everything to do with PL hotdropping titans on the CCP subcap fleet.
Would CCP Greyscale confirm or deny this plz? AVTM Comms / PvP Officer Kari Trace |

Liana Carvian
Temporal Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 17:59:00 -
[395] - Quote
Everyone brings forward the how do you beat X Titans argument, or X supers.
I think honestly a better question is how do you actually functionally beat the pure alpha doctrine which is currently the state of much of EvE large scale combat. How there are sub capitals ( drake cough cough ) which fill a much wider role than a single ship should.
There are complaints about Titans which is understandable they have reached a point in EvE which CCP didn't have the ability to plan for which honestly is kind of stupid considering they want this game to last how long?
Now how about instead of constantly swinging the nerf bat vs supers you use those "creative people" who work for you and actually Develop a counter. A HIC type ECM platform which can affect supers. The anti super dictor.
You have this story of a war going on in your game, and your method to fix it is to swing the nerf bat not actually invent something which has the ability to create real change in the game. How sick would it be to hear the comms of a Titan fleet which is having the specific ships to counter it fielded.
Stop swinging the nerf bat over and over again, and do what actually happens in the real world. **** is unbalanced until someone comes up with something which counters it. Now since you CCP have the ability to GIVE your players the tools to fix the issue, why don't you? Why resort to the simple swing of supers are too good over and over again.
How about as a creative development company you use all those resources in coming up with a creative way to bring supers down instead of just nerfing them until they become log offed prisons for unsubbed accounts.
|

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:00:00 -
[396] - Quote
Guys,
It's easy to solve this problem : Open a new server for goons. Goonity. Stupidity. The name is up to ze mittani. Will be his server after all. |

Indeterminacy
THORN Syndicate Initiative Mercenaries
49
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:00:00 -
[397] - Quote
Curious, all these CFC duders being so smug about the titan nerf. Tell me about JTAU guys? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2515
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:01:00 -
[398] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Guys,
It's easy to solve this problem : Open a new server for goons. Goonity. Stupidity. The name is up to ze mittani. Will be his server after all.
you no longer have any supercaps to worry about, though "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

mkd0815
GK inc. Pandemic Legion
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:02:00 -
[399] - Quote
worst fix ever. |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:02:00 -
[400] - Quote
Hulemand wrote:good luck with keeping your job once the amount of accounts drop because of boredom and what follows when you allow for one big power block to control all of EVE
Ya, Supercaps Online has really been tearing it up subscription-wise. Idiot.
The result will be a more accessible, dynamic, and fluid nullsec populated and controlled by people who actually use space and log in more than once every two weeks to blap 500 subcaps and log back off.
|

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:03:00 -
[401] - Quote
Killerhound wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote: Tell me, how would you kill 25 titans?
I would like at this point again to deliver some mathematical basis for any discussion. With current DPS and fast projection of force you can easily imagine around 100-150 dreads deploy to gank your 25 Titans. 150 Dreads cost around 400 Mio each or 60b in total due to insurance, easy production, low-sec construction etc etc ... 25 Titans cost around well 1250 B isk taking the current price of 50b at which some believe they will stop and a large amount of chars bound to the ships, extensive complicated production etc etc ... Even if in a hypothetical fight 150 dreads all 25 DD where pointed at different targets, you would simply lose around 10b of isk with the shots from the dd's which is actually not such a big deal. What matters in such a scenario is the fact that with your dreads you only need to take down 2 Titans and you are on the plus side of the equation. Every Titan blowing is additonally a moral factor, bringing more people to the fight. By changing XL Turrets it becomes hard to hit even a dread, thats not such a big deal since they are in siege. But on the other side hitting a Titan becomes much easier since there is no more Malus from Siege module. The scan resolution change adds additional help for the dread in that scenario. While the titans will need around 106 Seconds to lock up the dreads, they on the other side can already fire from 30 secs on. Thats about 70 Secs fire without defence on the titan side.
Assuming an average dread skill training takes a year, and titan skill training takes 2 years (**** knows what real numbers are, I don't really care), one needs to drop 150 years of skill training to potentially kill 50 years of skill training.
Why is ****** ISK worth more than peoples' skill training time?
|

Johan Krieger
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
101
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:03:00 -
[402] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Guys,
It's easy to solve this problem : Open a new server for goons. Goonity. Stupidity. The name is up to ze mittani. Will be his server after all.
But TQ is already his server and we like it here.
|

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:03:00 -
[403] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Guys,
It's easy to solve this problem : Open a new server for goons. Goonity. Stupidity. The name is up to ze mittani. Will be his server after all.
It's already been named Tranquility |

Johan Krieger
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
101
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:04:00 -
[404] - Quote
Kick thunderwaffe for ******* up my snipe |

Cutter John
Tr0pa de elite. G00DFELLAS
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:07:00 -
[405] - Quote
Ra Death wrote:I'm almost at a loss of words here. Almost, therefore I am going to speak my mind.
So now capitals are basically structure grinding machines and you only deploy them if you have something to grind down or if someone else is grinding stuff down and you catch someone else grinding down something. This is not a solution, this is a plaster for a symptom. There is now ZERO reason to deploy supercapitals except to grind down a structure. Do you really want structure grinding to become the motivator for people to build and create supercapitals in EVE? I mean, I don't believe you have thought at all about the consequences of these changes.
EVE is now effectively sectioned off into two tier combat systems. Capital combat and sub-capital combat. The difference is, capitals cannot touch sub-capitals, but sub-capitals can, in the numbers that are brought at the moment, almost 1-3 volley capitals. The titans were a workaround for that because numbers were no longer the only deciding factor, your playing time, your assets and your skillpoints actually played a role. Now we are going back to a time again where the only effective tool, a VERY limited tool might I add, against blobbing is a damn stealth bomber. No more force projection by taking advantage of the many years you have spent in the game and the money you have pooled into a titan, you are better off selling off said titan and joining the nearest Maelstrom fleet.
What am I meant to aspire for in EVE in terms of combat? What is my incentive for actually training all these skills. To fly the next flavour of the month subcapital ship?
EVE is now a numbers game when there is a large effort to remove counters for large fleets. If this is the direction we're going, we're going to see a bipolar political landscape because being a small alliance, you can now only exist if you are a part of the inevitable two powerblocks that will come to dominate EVE. If you can't match the numbers, too bad... join or die.
Let's get a rethink of the roles of supercapitals and not a temporary plaster that will reduce supercapitals to nothing but ihub and station grinders.
|

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:08:00 -
[406] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote: The result will be a more accessible, dynamic, and fluid nullsec populated and controlled by people who actually use space and log in more than once every two weeks to blap 500 subcaps and log back off.
LOL |

Lelob
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:08:00 -
[407] - Quote
Well this seems slightly short sighted. It would have been interesting to see if titans are truly imbalanced or if people were just unwilling to commit fleets to counter them (dreads and supers). I guess we'll never really know though as this nerf seems like it could be a huge game changer, especially for an alliance like Raiden dot. |

penifSMASH
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
51
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:08:00 -
[408] - Quote
Can't beat something? Whine until they change the game about it    |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2518
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:10:00 -
[409] - Quote
Lelob wrote:Well this seems slightly short sighted. It would have been interesting to see if titans are truly imbalanced or if people were just unwilling to commit fleets to counter them (dreads and supers). I guess we'll never really know though as this nerf seems like it could be a huge game changer, especially for an alliance like Raiden dot.
who cares about raiden "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Anela Cistine
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
117
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:12:00 -
[410] - Quote
Temmu Guerra wrote: Btw does anyone notice that about 95% of the people cheering on this nerf are part of CFC?
Most players don't care about the exact abilities of Titans at all. Not at all. Highsec players will never see titans (except Chibba's). Wormhole players don't deal with titans.
The only people who care about titans are 0.0 groups who have titans, and those who fight those groups. For the rest of Eve this is a non-issue. |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:12:00 -
[411] - Quote
Andski wrote:
who cares about raiden
Seemingly every member of GOONSWARM FEDERATION who just can't stop posting about them.
|

Kazanir
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
357
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:12:00 -
[412] - Quote
Heh. |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:14:00 -
[413] - Quote
gentlemen
i, along with all the fine members of GBS LOGISTICS AND FIVES SUPPORT [MY 5S], stand in solidarity with the poor titanhavers in eve
as a titanhaver i am appalled at the changes to titans being proposed in this thread
halving my tracking and reducing my scan res will cause me to have to count even more zeroes on my transversal column as I wait for the jaguar I am targeting to lock and blap (and I have dyslexia so it's hard to count transversal zeroes)
my :10bux: is way more important than your :10bux:
i have drafted a banner to herald the plight of my fellow titanhavers
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/47651019/no_more_tears.png
please, think of the titans |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:15:00 -
[414] - Quote
Andski wrote:Lelob wrote:Well this seems slightly short sighted. It would have been interesting to see if titans are truly imbalanced or if people were just unwilling to commit fleets to counter them (dreads and supers). I guess we'll never really know though as this nerf seems like it could be a huge game changer, especially for an alliance like Raiden dot. who cares about raiden
George Bush doesn't care about Raiden. |

FeralShadow
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:16:00 -
[415] - Quote
TL;DR: Everybody should just give up and join goonswarm now. Successful "carebear" attitudes:-áhttps://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=37279 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2521
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:20:00 -
[416] - Quote
FeralShadow wrote:TL;DR: Everybody should just give up and join goonswarm now.
I'm glad that the RvB titan fleet is nerfed that's always been a threat to us "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Organa
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:22:00 -
[417] - Quote
CCP if you havnt gathered it by now from this thread yes titans have issues, but so does the game as a whole. What you are seeing is that older players do like there investments made usless and newer players want to get around older players happens in every game. The question is do you want to change the only effective check on shear numbers and make this game only about who brings more. Bc atm it dosnt really matter what you bring subcap wise as long as you bring more than the other guy. so if you are significantly outnumbered and you want to contest the field your options are bombers and supercaps. bombers either need to be buffed along with this patch or some other mechanics to nerf shear numbers or we will be back to the dark years of eve where it only mattered how many you brought not what they where in or how you used them.
the reason you see so many goon and co posting yea about this patch is you are removing the only effective counter to there doctrine with this patch. which is why these changes in isolation will have a rather detrimental effect on older players. |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:22:00 -
[418] - Quote
U are right of course
Much of the motivation for these changes is hubris. All the Mittani needed was CSM6 to push around to make this happen. Don't think for a second that there won't be more nerfs that hurt PL soon. |

Endeavour Starfleet
695
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:23:00 -
[419] - Quote
Glad to see the change. I would go even further and say supers ought to be removed from game but this will atleast help to empower subcap pilots.
Next step. Change moon mining to drops. |

Reza Najafi
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:23:00 -
[420] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Dreads are mainly antistructure, with a bit of anti-cap. Carriers still do pretty decent damage against subcaps AFAIK. Supers can switch between anti-cap and anti-subcap depending on their choice of fighter drone. Titans are pure anti-cap.
With regard to the cost and effort of getting into a super, the general design intent of EVE is that you get diminishing returns for progressively higher investments. If you look at module progression, from T1 up to high officer, you'll see that how it generally pans out is that you get a roughly linear increase in power for a roughly exponential increase in cost. Similarly with ships, a T1 cruiser is not equivalent to ten T1 frigates, and a T1 battleship is not equivalent to twenty T1 cruisers. This makes stepping into a larger more powerful ship an interesting cost-benefit decision rather than an obvious no-brainer. Supercaps should continue this trend.
Quoted for future use so it doesn't get edited. |

Fa lC0n
BattleFools
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:23:00 -
[421] - Quote
They should have kept the old DD 
1. tech nerf = even value of all R64 moon materials, so small alliance can fight each other over Goo aswell 2. blob nerf = make small gangs more attractive, make huge blobbin less attractive (like server perf atm) 3. bot nerf = realy, when r u guys gonna fix this
Top 3 on my list, i dont care about the titans. If u adress these 3 first, in time, titans will die anyways. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
431
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:24:00 -
[422] - Quote
So is this CCP's signal that they're ready to admit that numbers are thing that matters now in a fight?
I mean, historically, you've gone out of your way to nerf any and everything that gives a smaller force any form of an advantage over the years, so can we get you to make the actual statement that the way to win in EVE is to attract numbers, doesn't matter if they can play or not, if they're 'good' at eve or not, just so long as they have a LOT of dudes.
Second, you're saying that isk shouldn't matter, and then making a balance pass that assumes every titan in the game has 30 billion isk in sensor bossters on their titans. Thats a hypocritical statement in the extreme sense of the word. Taking 40 seconds to lock a capital ship is simply ********, 15 seconds to lock another titan.
Really, 15 seconds to lock another titan?
But hey, none of that matters, the only thing that really matters is how close to 1000 dudes you can get in fleet. |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
451
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:26:00 -
[423] - Quote
Organa wrote:CCP if you havnt gathered it by now from this thread yes titans have issues, but so does the game as a whole. What you are seeing is that older players do like there investments made usless and newer players want to get around older players happens in every game. The question is do you want to change the only effective check on shear numbers and make this game only about who brings more. Bc atm it dosnt really matter what you bring subcap wise as long as you bring more than the other guy. so if you are significantly outnumbered and you want to contest the field your options are bombers and supercaps. bombers either need to be buffed along with this patch or some other mechanics to nerf shear numbers or we will be back to the dark years of eve where it only mattered how many you brought not what they where in or how you used them.
the reason you see so many goon and co posting yea about this patch is you are removing the only effective counter to there doctrine with this patch. which is why these changes in isolation will have a rather detrimental effect on older players. Cuz PL never wiped out a 200 man welpfleet with 100 tengus?
There are plenty of people out there who can and will beat 2x their own numbers by playing smart and knowing what their enemies fly, and how their doctrines work.
Not to give away any secrets, but the true linchpin of alphafleet is not the maelstrom, or the 1400mm arty, so its pretty easy to neuter if you understand game mechanics. Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

Endeavour Starfleet
695
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:26:00 -
[424] - Quote
Organa wrote:CCP if you havnt gathered it by now from this thread yes titans have issues, but so does the game as a whole. What you are seeing is that older players do like there investments made usless and newer players want to get around older players happens in every game. The question is do you want to change the only effective check on shear numbers and make this game only about who brings more. Bc atm it dosnt really matter what you bring subcap wise as long as you bring more than the other guy. so if you are significantly outnumbered and you want to contest the field your options are bombers and supercaps. bombers either need to be buffed along with this patch or some other mechanics to nerf shear numbers or we will be back to the dark years of eve where it only mattered how many you brought not what they where in or how you used them.
the reason you see so many goon and co posting yea about this patch is you are removing the only effective counter to there doctrine with this patch. which is why these changes in isolation will have a rather detrimental effect on older players.
Sorry but no. A few players should not be able to dominate a field. especially now that we have Tidi. |

Mathicluanna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:27:00 -
[425] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:how close to 1000 dudes you can get in fleet.
Go ahead and try this, let me know how it goes. |

Vellamo Lyr
Shitty Gimmick Test Alliance Please Ignore
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:27:00 -
[426] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:the general design intent of EVE is that you get diminishing returns for progressively higher investments.
We always turn away the 3rd and 4th fleet of drakes because of diminishing returns.
LMAO. |

unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Narwhals Ate My Duck
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:28:00 -
[427] - Quote
So dreads become useless more then titans are nerfed. So no more dreads to kill when we cach em pve'ing , because they won't be used in pve because they won't be able to kill pve batleships... . So basicly we will only see caps used for logistics and structure shooting? |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:28:00 -
[428] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:So is this CCP's signal that they're ready to admit that numbers are thing that matters now in a fight?
I mean, historically, you've gone out of your way to nerf any and everything that gives a smaller force any form of an advantage over the years, so can we get you to make the actual statement that the way to win in EVE is to attract numbers, doesn't matter if they can play or not, if they're 'good' at eve or not, just so long as they have a LOT of dudes.
Second, you're saying that isk shouldn't matter, and then making a balance pass that assumes every titan in the game has 30 billion isk in sensor bossters on their titans. Thats a hypocritical statement in the extreme sense of the word. Taking 40 seconds to lock a capital ship is simply ********, 15 seconds to lock another titan.
Really, 15 seconds to lock another titan?
But hey, none of that matters, the only thing that really matters is how close to 1000 dudes you can get in fleet. yeah i know, where was the pl csm reps when this was going on
oh yeah, uaxdeath was busy getting him so drunk that he slept through the supercap panel
whoops~ |

Win Sui
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:28:00 -
[429] - Quote
Pallidum Treponema wrote:Bashe Zor wrote:Anyone who thinks titans don't need a balancing pass has never had his pod headshotted by one, after his moving BC was already destroyed by one. Think it's only drakes? Think again. I have lossmails in canes with titans on top as well.
While supercaps do need a balancing pass, specifically regarding proper counters to supercaps, I have to say this: Locking a pod takes me 28 seconds. If you still have a pod on the field after 28 seconds, you are probably not even moving, so you have zero transversal. Zero transversal means that any turret ship will kill you. Stop failing at EVE. If your moving BC is popped by titans, you're either in a drake (high signature, guess what!) and possibly MWDing (EVEN HIGHER signature!). If you are moving with low transversal, which automatically happens if you orbit an anchor, or if you MWD, you will get killed by titans. Learn how to fly your ship rather than blindly relying on FCs that also cannot fly their ships. Back when I started playing, all good PVPers knew about how to maximize their transversal so as not to become targets of much larger ships.
When there's 75+ titans on field your transversal is going to be near 0 to some of them no matter how good a pilot you are, which you know. You cannot keep transversal up against every titan, and 1 shot is all it takes.
So, yeah. |

Ra Death
Saevos Aviation Saevos Aviation LLC
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:28:00 -
[430] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:
Dreads are mainly antistructure, with a bit of anti-cap. Carriers still do pretty decent damage against subcaps AFAIK. Supers can switch between anti-cap and anti-subcap depending on their choice of fighter drone. Titans are pure anti-cap.
With regard to the cost and effort of getting into a super, the general design intent of EVE is that you get diminishing returns for progressively higher investments. If you look at module progression, from T1 up to high officer, you'll see that how it generally pans out is that you get a roughly linear increase in power for a roughly exponential increase in cost. Similarly with ships, a T1 cruiser is not equivalent to ten T1 frigates, and a T1 battleship is not equivalent to twenty T1 cruisers. This makes stepping into a larger more powerful ship an interesting cost-benefit decision rather than an obvious no-brainer. Supercaps should continue this trend.
Let me touch on a few points here.
Dreads are mainly antistructure. Yes, they certainly are. The change to the tracking in siege will be a welcomed change as they can actually defend themselves.
Carriers can do decent damage but they are very exposed and can only be used in certain scenarios. With the fleets that are fielded these days, you can almost get 1 volleyed. Fighters are terrible to use in fleet combat, once they are released the enemy targets them insanely quickly and if the enemy fleet has a decent logistics fleet, you are not killing anything as the fighters are so slow to move and vulnerable while in light (massive sig due to mwd). Carrier dps is therefore mainly normal drones in fleet combat. (I am assuming we are talking fleet combat scenarios).
The fighter argument carries over to supercarrier. Any supercarrier with a brain has a 20/15 or 20/10 distribution of FB vs. Fighter and your fighters move so slow and become so big that if you attempt to take on subcap fleets, you need a massive coordination of focused fire and for the enemy to be within close proximity to kill something. Even then, going up against the sizes of subcap fleets that exist in EVE currently, those fighters will be gone rapidly and you will at max get 10 targets or so (assuming a very large supercapital fleet where everyone functions together perfectly).
Your entire diminishing returns argument on supercapitals doesn't really work because flying at that level makes the game incredibly complex. The big difference between your 10x argument is that with the current changes, the titan won't even be able to kill a single hictor that plays his cards right, not even mentioning a dictor (if they keep up transversal). At least the cruiser can take down a frig or two when he goes down against their 8-9 friends. You are leaving supercapitals in the state where they are defenseless against enemy fleets, in a state where they cannot even deal with tackle.
But I fundamentally agree that you should not be able to supercapitals to be a default 'I win' button, but leaving them with no role other than killing other capitals is what is the result of the current changes. The supercarriers (as I explained above) have already been reduced to hotdropping tools and structure grinding machines. With this nerf, you are effectively removing titans from normal combat because they are only worth using against other capitals or against supercarriers. The end-ships of EVE become part of a little game in EVE... "watch out for anyone deploying capitals and destroy them if they do, unless they have a sizeable subcap fleet, because we are defenseless against it". Supercapitals without the ability to deal with subcaps means that subcap fights alone will dictate who wins the fight, because the supercapitals cannot make a difference unless you are shooting at that POS over there. At least admit that you can see this is broken.
The proposed changes here could certainly be changed to make them more realistic and in line with REALITY in EVE.
- Tracking nerf remains as it is, 50% is decent and fair tbh. You can still track battleships and large shield extended battlecruisers that do dumb ****. - Scan resolution of 5 is incredibly beyond the realm of reasonable. Push cut it 50% down to 20 or something and it is more realistic. - Max 3 targets, interesting approach, maybe buff it up to 4. 3 targets is not a lot, 4 is more realistic and when you consider their use. Else it just doesn't fit with the entire class being "an awesome titan". - Dread tracking boost in siege is awesome. Brings these bad boys into fun aspects again. Go for it.
If titans get nerfed to the extent proposed, you remove all incentive for doing something worthwhile with these supercapitals. They are just exactly that, 'super' capitals... and with the proposed changes, we'd have to switch around 'super' and apply it to the carrier and the dreadnought. The carrier is already much more versatile than the supercarrier, something that just doesn't make sense.
Thanks for taking the time to respond to my original post, I really hope you will listen to reason to this one. |

JuGGeR
Phantom Squad Nulli Secunda
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:29:00 -
[431] - Quote
i for one welcome blob-online and await the server nodes not being abel to handel the numbers and we back 2 square one and have to find another way to screw over players that invested in titans , bpos to build em , and ofc waisted sp into flying em ..
you offcially made 90% of all titans into stargates ...
|

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:29:00 -
[432] - Quote
Organa wrote:What you are seeing is that older players do like there investments made usless and newer players want to get around older players happens in every game.
No, problem is that 150 years of skill training time is required to eventually kill 4 years of skill training time.
But hey, ISK-wise they could be ahead, so it must be ok.
|

Sanders RUS
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:30:00 -
[433] - Quote
Vellamo Lyr wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:the general design intent of EVE is that you get diminishing returns for progressively higher investments. We always turn away the 3rd and 4th fleet of drakes because of diminishing returns. LMAO.
Eventually you run out of racial slurs for fleet names, its more an issue with creativity than numbers man |

Tolmar
Capital Industries Research And Development Fidelas Constans
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:33:00 -
[434] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Tolmar wrote:That is just all sorts of fail... if you do not know why read up on titans before posting please.... GǪand yet, none of what I said had anything in it that was specific to titans, so how about you go and read up on the tracking formula instead?
was in response to
Tippia wrote:Vissor wrote:Are you re.....d? why should i even try to lock frigate or cruiser after all of these changes? if there like 1% chance to hit cruiser? Because he's infinipointing your titan buddy 30km away, where the range alleviates the slow tracking and brings that hit chance up to several tens of percentsGǪ
<---loves to point titans with Frigs!
Brief search turned up: http://skilltrainingcomplete.com/questions/what-prevents-super-capitals-from-escaping |

Wirox Crotikus
Resilience. Pandemic Legion
34
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:33:00 -
[435] - Quote
First off, ill start by stating out this is a very bad fix/nerf whatever you wanna call it. And, i have done multiple Titan trades, and just in the last couple of months this has just gone up alot. Seeing that people have been switching from Supercarrier to a Ttian.
You are making a ship that cost atm. 50billion +/- 10-15billion useless. There have always been counters for Titans and Supercarriers. The problem is not that the Titan can kill subcaps. The problem is, that an alliance with little numbers but big supercap fleet, will ofc use the force they have. And an alliance with loads of members, but little to non supercap force will use there own force, beeing numbers they can bring.
Everyone will use the force they have at disposable. But seeing that you are removing peoples force from them. You are litterly removing there defence/offence. And alliance that can bring 1500 people vs. and alliance that can bring 300 people, whos is going to win?
Stating that the bigger an alliance are, the bigger the chance for survival an conquer of new space is.
Your basicly removing the fact that you stated a while back that, even the smallest alliance in eve will have fun. This fact has hearby been removed.
A friendly ev0ke guy, stated that Dreads can be used against Titans and Supercarriers. 1 Titan = 34 Dreads 1 Supercarrier = 9,5 Dreads
Those numbers, are the price of the minerals, and remember dreads are still easier to build, Subcaps are easier to build. All of this can kill supercapitals.
I do have a Titan myself, and ofc i knew a fix would come soon. But simply making the ship useless EVEN in cap fights is not really that great. The fact is this big that, you cant Hotdrop ANYTHING and Doomsday it before it is safe/warped away. Simply the fact that it takes and INSANE amount of time to lock the actual ship...
I really hope CCP, will reconsider there ideas. And if they dont, that they will in a timly manner FIX the role for Titans. Considering people have paid LARGE sums of isk for these ships. Both in training time and isk wise.
-Wirox
|

Meno Theaetetus
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:34:00 -
[436] - Quote
Let's weigh this up in realistic terms that are actually relevant to CCP and the wider player base. Scaled down to an average 0.0 fleet.
PRE NERF
100 happy players in supers 1000 unhappy players in subcaps
customer satisfaction = 100/1100 = 9% happy
POST NERF
100 unhappy players in supers 1000 happy players in subcaps
customer satisfaction = 1000/1100 = 91% happy
Do things make a little more sense now?
If you think CCP are out to appease the minority at the expense of the majority you have a pretty messed up view of how to conduct a business. |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:35:00 -
[437] - Quote
Johan Krieger wrote:Acwron wrote:Guys,
It's easy to solve this problem : Open a new server for goons. Goonity. Stupidity. The name is up to ze mittani. Will be his server after all. But TQ is already his server and we like it here.
Here's some more changes to balance this **** : Fleets can have no more than 2 members. Those 2 members are not allowed to be in the same system. No. Same constellation. Will counter goon fleets. |

Taurus Aldebaran
Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:36:00 -
[438] - Quote
Dovinian wrote:This is a very good change. And I have an Erebus.
Now that I'm more awake, I'm going to elaborate on this a bit.
While I would have liked to see CCP spend more time into an intelligent fix/solid counter this is going to have to do for now.
Yes, Titans are very expensive. This does not mean that they should be an instant win button and a hard counter to every fleet except Armor Hacs.
I also think that Titans are too easy to acquire. Mineral compression is a joke (I do a lot of it) and getting 65 freighter loads of minerals into 12 jump freighter trips (the necessary numbers to build a titan) with 100% lossless compression is broken.
Give Titans a new role, make them harder to build (fix/adjust mineral compression) and I'll be a happy boy.
BEEP BEEP Dovibus Best Bus
Dovi for CSM
|

Puristaako
Monkey Attack Squad Goonswarm Federation
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:38:00 -
[439] - Quote
Best patch ever :bee: :bee: :bee: |

Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:39:00 -
[440] - Quote
Wirox Crotikus wrote: Considering people have paid LARGE sums of isk for these ships. Both in training time and isk wise.
-Wirox
A Vagabond costs as much as 40 Stabbers, therefore it ought to be 40 times more powerful than a Stabber, right?
|

Lelob
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:39:00 -
[441] - Quote
Fa lC0n wrote:They should have kept the old DD  1. tech nerf = even value of all R64 moon materials, so small alliance can fight each other over Goo aswell 2. blob nerf = make small gangs more attractive, make huge blobbin less attractive (like server perf atm) 3. bot nerf = realy, when r u guys gonna fix this Top 3 on my list, i dont care about the titans. If u adress these 3 first, in time, titans will die anyways.
1. They tried this with sanctums. It turned out people weren't interested in fighting for space/assets when they had no incentive to do so. All that came out of this was a stagnant map. 2. They've tried this too with no discernible success. Only place this has worked is WH's and even so it's only been a limited success. 3. They have been killing bots. They're just undermanned, and quite frankly having bots in the drf, or as miners isn't such a bad thing. (Cheaper minerals > cheaper pvp > less risk aversive pvp) They need a different approach to killing bots, because as strange as it might seem, the only bots that really have a negative impact on the game are bots farming bounties. |

Krios Ahzek
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
721
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:39:00 -
[442] - Quote
Please
-áThough All Men Do Despise Us |

Endeavour Starfleet
695
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:41:00 -
[443] - Quote
JuGGeR wrote:i for one welcome blob-online and await the server nodes not being abel to handel the numbers and we back 2 square one and have to find another way to screw over players that invested in titans , bpos to build em , and ofc waisted sp into flying em ..
you offcially made 90% of all titans into stargates ...
Correction you mean you welcome more Tidi fights and welcome subcap pilots having more leeway in their alliances now right?
Because all I see is a bunch of l33t pvp claiming good ole boys watching their system of I win reduced to normal. |

Barking Dragon
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:41:00 -
[444] - Quote
I don't really care about Titans...But for the love of all that is holy will you please stop changing the names of all the mods?! I can't find anything anymore. Thanks. |

Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises Test Alliance Please Ignore
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:42:00 -
[445] - Quote
I really don't like supers, in general, in the game. That said, this nerf was rather heavy handed. Not quite as over-the-top as the dread nerf that led to most dreads collecting dust, but it is bordering on that. Tracking really wasn't as big of a problem as a 50% nerf (either in the form of siege module or on the guns themselves). Scan res, on the other hand, did need to a look. But, seriously, 5? Sieged dreads have twice that, and that's saying something. Locking multiple targets, yeah, I can see why titans are getting a max of 3 targets.
Had hoped for a better thought out solution. The tears really amuse me, but with a nerf like this, they have a right to be upset. |

FawKa
x13 Raiden.
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:43:00 -
[446] - Quote
Can I have a graph showing how many subs you've lost today CCP? You like graphs so much these days :) |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:45:00 -
[447] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote: There are plenty of people out there who can and will beat 2x their own numbers by playing smart and knowing what their enemies fly, and how their doctrines work.
Not to give away any secrets, but the true linchpin of alphafleet is not the maelstrom, or the 1400mm arty, so its pretty easy to neuter if you understand game mechanics.
You heard it here first folks.
Fatal Ascension, Tactical PvP Geniuses. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2530
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:45:00 -
[448] - Quote
Vellamo Lyr wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:the general design intent of EVE is that you get diminishing returns for progressively higher investments. We always turn away the 3rd and 4th fleet of drakes because of diminishing returns. LMAO.
TEST does not blob they fight honourably lmao get the **** out "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:46:00 -
[449] - Quote
FawKa wrote:Can I have a graph showing how many subs you've lost today CCP? You like graphs so much these days :) fyi
none of you are actually canceling your subs
you're just as addicted as the next fat guy |

Endeavour Starfleet
695
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:46:00 -
[450] - Quote
FawKa wrote:Can I have a graph showing how many subs you've lost today CCP? You like graphs so much these days :)
Whatever they lost today will be replaced with either new players more able to get into corps or lower PLEX prices meaning more alts. Especially now that subcaps mean something.
So I expect a net plus from this. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2530
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:46:00 -
[451] - Quote
FawKa wrote:Can I have a graph showing how many subs you've lost today CCP? You like graphs so much these days :)
Titan pilots pay more for their accounts than everyone else apparently "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:46:00 -
[452] - Quote
FawKa wrote:Can I have a graph showing how many subs you've lost today CCP? You like graphs so much these days :)
Since number is 0, graph would be pretty boring v0v |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:46:00 -
[453] - Quote
also I'm reporting you to raidenDOT high command for posting on a main |

Innominate
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
96
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:46:00 -
[454] - Quote
Ra Death wrote: Dreads are mainly antistructure. Yes, they certainly are. The change to the tracking in siege will be a welcomed change as they can actually defend themselves.
Got this far and just have to ask, What is it you think they're doing to change sieged dreads?
|

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:48:00 -
[455] - Quote
FawKa wrote:Can I have a graph showing how many subs you've lost today CCP? You like graphs so much these days :)
Just keep an eye out here: http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/Raiden.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
432
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:49:00 -
[456] - Quote
Innominate wrote:Ra Death wrote: Dreads are mainly antistructure. Yes, they certainly are. The change to the tracking in siege will be a welcomed change as they can actually defend themselves.
Got this far and just have to ask, What is it you think they're doing to change sieged dreads?
They've removed the tracking penalty while in Siege, glad to see you're following along.
|

Nao Oikawasan
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:49:00 -
[457] - Quote
FawKa wrote:Can I have a graph showing how many subs you've lost today CCP? You like graphs so much these days :)
I'm guessing zero.
Seriously, if you want to quit, then quit. You won't be missed, and the loss will have zero impact on the game. After making threats like that, you really only have one option. To stay in the game would be to admit that you don't have the bollocks. |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:50:00 -
[458] - Quote
Iniquita wrote:Lets break the game as it stands now so titans dont continue breaking the game in the future, I like the part where this completely fucks over people with a significant titan presence in their fleets. This is a rash decision making titans effectively useless until you have time to address rebalancing titans. So mothball your titans, let goons take over the north and wait because we promise we'll make them good again in the future?
I really hope you will consider holding off on this rash change until you have to properly address the titan role in fleets.
-A Titan Owner |

malet
FinFleet Raiden.
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:50:00 -
[459] - Quote
Typical
Welcome to goons online |

Mhyn Teregone
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:50:00 -
[460] - Quote
Lelob wrote:Well this seems slightly short sighted. It would have been interesting to see if titans are truly imbalanced or if people were just unwilling to commit fleets to counter them (dreads and supers). I guess we'll never really know though as this nerf seems like it could be a huge game changer, especially for an alliance like Raiden dot.
Lets see if it works as intended. I tentatively support these changes, and although would have preferred something with actual coding effort, can understand why a simple static data hack is all they have been prepared to invest in. And yes, I'm a titan pilot too.
Now to tackle the next legacy game design embarrassment - technetium. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2536
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:51:00 -
[461] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Innominate wrote:Ra Death wrote: Dreads are mainly antistructure. Yes, they certainly are. The change to the tracking in siege will be a welcomed change as they can actually defend themselves.
Got this far and just have to ask, What is it you think they're doing to change sieged dreads? They've removed the tracking penalty while in Siege, glad to see you're following along.
oh look grath is posting now, this thread can only go downhill
what do you think they did to the guns that tend to be fitted on dreads???? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
577
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:51:00 -
[462] - Quote
Barking Dragon wrote:I don't really care about Titans...But for the love of all that is holy will you please stop changing the names of all the mods?! I can't find anything anymore. Thanks.
There is several tools available to find what you need if you don't have every module name memorized. Use them.
|

Mage Khour
x13 Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:51:00 -
[463] - Quote
Sadly but true. But i dont see myself fit into EVE ONLINE anymore, CCP keeps nurfing, nurfing and nurfing.
4 accounts now canceled...
CCP wins, gl with destroying the game !
Perpetuum here i come
|

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
577
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:52:00 -
[464] - Quote
Mage Khour wrote:Sadly but true. But i dont see myself fit into EVE ONLINE anymore, CCP keeps nurfing, nurfing and nurfing.
4 accounts now canceled...
CCP wins, gl with destroying the game !
Perpetuum here i come
lol
|

Krios Ahzek
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
721
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:52:00 -
[465] - Quote
malet wrote:CCP YOU SHORT SIGHTED F***KWITTS
Its no wonder with mittani on the CSM, Lets make the F****G game name Goons Online
Way to go to shaft the old players yet again. First you screw super carriers, now ttians yet again.
Poke you poxy game where the sun doesnt shine,. you dont give a flying f**k about your old player base anyomre.
Avada Kedavra
-áThough All Men Do Despise Us |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2536
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:53:00 -
[466] - Quote
Mage Khour wrote:Sadly but true. But i dont see myself fit into EVE ONLINE anymore, CCP keeps nurfing, nurfing and nurfing.
4 accounts now canceled...
CCP wins, gl with destroying the game !
Perpetuum here i come
ahahahaha get owned "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Lili Lu
189
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:53:00 -
[467] - Quote
Pheusia wrote:Lili Lu wrote:Ok. You've performed an amputation and bandaged one class of problem ships. Would be nice if you had been more surgical about it. And your field remedy as you admit will cause some more damage necessitating later surgery. However, the Drake, Tengu, and heavy missile and large arty alpha problems are still there in game. Why the relatively impulsive hack saw for titans and still no fix the later? Where, particularly for the Drake, the problem has festered so long past the original injury it no longer just smells bad but now is toxic to the entire body. Please saw away at the Drake. Come on CCP you know you want to see the veritable ocean of tears. I do   Complaining about drakes is so 2010. There are plenty of viable counters to every subcap doctrine, even tengu fleets, and its dishonest to pretend otherwise. This Titan rebalance is long overdue and will make sov null a better place. Malc, where did I not agree that the titan nerf is good? Also, you know I've been singing death to all supercaps along with goons for quite a while. But you also know I've been bitching about the Drake just as long if not longer. Are you so sure that nerfing one and not the other is ok for the game?
As for 2010, here is a link of which I'm sure you are aware, http://eve-kill.net/?a=top20 And that is March of 2012- #1 Drake 165k, #2 Maelstrom 75k, #3 Hurricane 51k, Abaddon 43k, Tornado 32k, Tengu 31k Heavy Missile Launcher II 75k, 425mm AutoCannon II 20k, 1400mm Howitzer Artillery II 15k
This pattern has remained very consistent over the last few years. And it's not just because goons fly those ships. It seems that Drakes and heavy missiles are not just 2010 and that viable counters are not a deterrent to their remarkable majority use for pvp.
Btw, I do miss the INIT ship fittings and fleet discussions. But then, Euro tz, and probably not wanting me back lest I politely at first call someone a ****** for suggesting smartbombing Logis to combat heavy missiles. It's not easy finding a US tz alliance and corp where chat is not filled with rabid ignorant racist Obama hating 
Andski wrote: we literally would not shed a tear if alpha was nerfed
I personally have no love for alpha doctrines - they're mind-numbingly boring and uninteresting. Thank you. Yes let us all join hands together and sign like the chorus in whoville for CCP to not just stop at nerfing Titans. If something is getting overused, chances are it needs a trim.
CCP is so bad at this though - trimming. They move glacially. As in no perceivable movement until next thing you know they've calved a monster berg that thunderously crashes into the formerly undisturbed bay of ship balancing. Smaller more frequent calving would be a better strategy. But until then, CCP I'm waiting for a huge heavy Ice shelf to land on Drakes and heavy missiles. It will be just as glorious as the one you are letting loose on titans. |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:54:00 -
[468] - Quote
malet wrote:CCP YOU SHORT SIGHTED F***KWITTS
Its no wonder with mittani on the CSM, Lets make the F****G game name Goons Online
Way to go to shaft the old players yet again. First you screw super carriers, now ttians yet again.
Poke you poxy game where the sun doesnt shine,. you dont give a flying f**k about your old player base anyomre.
why so flustered -- you guys should be in no danger as you have hired the elite players of The InitiativeDOT to be your meat shield, surely with their presence you can bring well-rounded support fleets and handle this change in stride
http://badops.com/?a=kill_related&kll_id=9770
... oh
these guys sure are worth the whole one technetium moon you're paying them |

Archer Slate
the united Negative Ten.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:54:00 -
[469] - Quote
Love this nerf!!
Give them 10 scanres or something. |

FawKa
x13 Raiden.
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:55:00 -
[470] - Quote
FawKa wrote:Can I have a graph showing how many subs you've lost today CCP? You like graphs so much these days :)
Wooow, people wen't crazy over that one..
Fyi: I am buying a titan since people are going firesale crazy haha
aaand, Raiden. was never ment to have space (some just forgot), so I'm good ^^ |

Kynaz Furia
BioStar Technologies
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:55:00 -
[471] - Quote
That's a lot of changes. Maybe too much.
A "simple" nerf would have been to remove the ability to fit tracking/optimal modules on a titan.
No more tracking computers/enhancers, titans are still powerful machines against capitals, all races are now almost equal (shield tanking being not compatible with tracking computers), and no change is needed for the scan res, as titans can no longer hit moving subcapitals, or so few that they are no longer relevant.
AllowTrackingMod=0 AllowOptimalMod=0
"Due to the size of the ship, all modules that modify tracking and/or optimal are inneficient, and cannot be fitted" |

Innominate
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
96
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:55:00 -
[472] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Innominate wrote:Ra Death wrote: Dreads are mainly antistructure. Yes, they certainly are. The change to the tracking in siege will be a welcomed change as they can actually defend themselves.
Got this far and just have to ask, What is it you think they're doing to change sieged dreads? They've removed the tracking penalty while in Siege, glad to see you're following along.
Really? You're getting this mad about a chance you don't even understand? |

Barking Dragon
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:56:00 -
[473] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Barking Dragon wrote:I don't really care about Titans...But for the love of all that is holy will you please stop changing the names of all the mods?! I can't find anything anymore. Thanks. There is several tools available to find what you need if you don't have every module name memorized. Use them.
Ugh...effort. Why did they need changed again? |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:56:00 -
[474] - Quote
Please add no sub cap can damage a Titan in any way. Only fair they have to bring something we can shoot ? |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2591
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:56:00 -
[475] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Innominate wrote:Ra Death wrote: Dreads are mainly antistructure. Yes, they certainly are. The change to the tracking in siege will be a welcomed change as they can actually defend themselves.
Got this far and just have to ask, What is it you think they're doing to change sieged dreads? They've removed the tracking penalty while in Siege, glad to see you're following along. oh grath, have you learned nothing about posting since our last encounter |

Travis Wells
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
223
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:57:00 -
[476] - Quote
Mage Khour wrote:Sadly but true. But i dont see myself fit into EVE ONLINE anymore, CCP keeps nurfing, nurfing and nurfing.
4 accounts now canceled...
CCP wins, gl with destroying the game !
Perpetuum here i come
c u l8r m8 hf o7 |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
432
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:57:00 -
[477] - Quote
Andski wrote:
what do you think they did to the guns that tend to be fitted on dreads????
I'm going to assume that you haven't looked at what the actual numbers mean when applied in game then.
Remember when Mynas started his countdown in September with the whole "Winter is Coming" thing? Yea, this is kinda like that, only its this time certain other alliances are going to mass quit for what they see this as (and yes, they actually are).
Some people just don't want to play the game now that its obvious that Soundwave is backing his old alliance in any in game changes that are made. Others of us don't care so much.
|

Mhyn Teregone
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:57:00 -
[478] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Second, you're saying that isk shouldn't matter, and then making a balance pass that assumes every titan in the game has 30 billion isk in sensor bossters on their titans. Thats a hypocritical statement in the extreme sense of the word. Taking 40 seconds to lock a capital ship is simply ********, 15 seconds to lock another titan.
Really, 15 seconds to lock another titan? Why would forty seconds to lock a capital ship matter? Its tackled .. its not going anywhere. |

Jack Haydn
Valar Morghulis. Gentlemen's Agreement
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:57:00 -
[479] - Quote
FawKa wrote:
aaand, Raiden. was never ment to have space (some just forgot), so I'm good ^^
Didn't want that sov anyway. |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:57:00 -
[480] - Quote
Mage Khour wrote:Sadly but true. But i dont see myself fit into EVE ONLINE anymore, CCP keeps nurfing, nurfing and nurfing.
4 accounts now canceled...
CCP wins, gl with destroying the game !
Perpetuum here i come
4 accounts you are giving up. Sad to see. This is what I'm talking about. The nerf is no good. However many people are for it it still reeks of coercion.
Today I dropped roles from this "alliance" Really it's nothing but a cult of personality for a hubris filled leader now. Instead of running the group he's just using us for votes for CSM. Maybe the other directors will overthrow mittens but I think the tech money is too good. Each one of them is getting Plex and god knows what else under the table. Sadly CCP does nothing about this but will nerf whatever they cry about. Titans are one of many things to go, next will probably be mothership changes. Erebus pilots are already selling like mad, why bother, no one will buy them. Right now lots of people are mad, this is worse than anything BoB/T20 did.
|

Travis Wells
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
223
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:58:00 -
[481] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Please add no sub cap can damage a Titan in any way. Only fair they have to bring something we can shoot ?
a bloooooo bloooooo bloooooooo
something, not fair, in my eve? woah |

Sardaros
OEG Goonswarm Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:58:00 -
[482] - Quote
Mage Khour wrote:Sadly but true. But i dont see myself fit into EVE ONLINE anymore, CCP keeps nurfing, nurfing and nurfing.
4 accounts now canceled...
CCP wins, gl with destroying the game !
Perpetuum here i come
-1 Who's next? |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:58:00 -
[483] - Quote
malet wrote:CCP YOU SHORT SIGHTED F***KWITTS
Its no wonder with mittani on the CSM, Lets make the F****G game name Goons Online
Way to go to shaft the old players yet again. First you screw super carriers, now ttians yet again.
Poke you poxy game where the sun doesnt shine,. you dont give a flying f**k about your old player base anyomre.
Ok look, you've edited your ****** post.
Let's make sure it doesn't get lost.
I mean, old players are so much more important than new players. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2540
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:58:00 -
[484] - Quote
Mhyn Teregone wrote:Why would forty seconds to lock a capital ship matter? Its tackled .. its not going anywhere.
Because driveby doomsdays are the pinnacle of elite PvP "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Wirbin
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:58:00 -
[485] - Quote
Mage Khour wrote:Sadly but true. But i dont see myself fit into EVE ONLINE anymore, CCP keeps nurfing, nurfing and nurfing.
4 accounts now canceled...
CCP wins, gl with destroying the game !
Perpetuum here i come
good riddance, pubbie |

casama
Tormentum Insomniae Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:58:00 -
[486] - Quote
Well, if caps cant kill subcaps, why you fix the game and make that subcaps cant kill caps?. Just make something that ONLY caps will be able to kill caps |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:59:00 -
[487] - Quote
Mage Khour wrote:Sadly but true. But i dont see myself fit into EVE ONLINE anymore, CCP keeps nurfing, nurfing and nurfing.
4 accounts now canceled...
CCP wins, gl with destroying the game !
Perpetuum here i come
Could you tell me your character names, so that I can add them to address book?
I have this strange fetish, you know... |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5493
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:00:00 -
[488] - Quote
Tolmar wrote:<---loves to point titans with Frigs! So you completely failed to read the question I was answering, I take it?
I'll repeat it here, just for you:
Q: GÇ£why should i even try to lock frigate or cruiser after all of these changes? if there like 1% chance to hit cruiser?GÇ¥ A: GÇ£Because he's infinipointing your titan buddy 30km away, where the range alleviates the slow tracking and brings that hit chance up to several tens of percentsGÇ¥
Now, read the link you posted where it says that what holds a titan down is GÇ£warp disruption bubbles of all sorts. It is mobile warp disruptors of all sizes, warp disruption probes from interdictors, and HIC bubble. Scripted HIC warp disruption field generator will work too.GÇ¥ Since you linked this page, which showed how wrong you are, one can only conclude that you do not know what a HIC is.
So the only fail here is you not understanding the question or the answer, not understanding how the two match up, not understanding how tracking works, not understanding what an infinipoint is, and not understanding what a cruiser is. It's only this chain of failure on your part that would make you come to the conclusion that the answer is GÇ£all kinds of failGÇ¥.
Now, read up on the mechanics and shush until you've learned how the game works. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Luminocity
Filthy Thirteen
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:00:00 -
[489] - Quote
LOL got to page 9 then realized last page is now 25 
Anyway.. I Endorse This Product And/Or Service ...however strongly emphasize that a betterGäó solution needs to be implemented not in the too far future.. |

Dovinian
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
993
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:00:00 -
[490] - Quote
casama wrote:Well, if caps cant kill subcaps, why you fix the game and make that subcaps cant kill caps?. Just make something that ONLY caps will be able to kill caps This guy clearly is a genius. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2540
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:01:00 -
[491] - Quote
casama wrote:Well, if caps cant kill subcaps, why you fix the game and make that subcaps cant kill caps?. Just make something that ONLY caps will be able to kill caps
that's the dumbest idea ever
oh wait raidenpost "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Sakurako Kimino
Eternal Darkness. G00DFELLAS
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:02:00 -
[492] - Quote
Kynaz Furia wrote:That's a lot of changes. Maybe too much.
A "simple" nerf would have been to remove the ability to fit tracking/optimal modules on a titan.
No more tracking computers/enhancers, titans are still powerful machines against capitals, all races are now almost equal (shield tanking being not compatible with tracking computers), and no change is needed for the scan res, as titans can no longer hit moving subcapitals, or so few that they are no longer relevant.
AllowTrackingMod=0 AllowOptimalMod=0
"Due to the size of the ship, all modules that modify tracking and/or optimal are inneficient, and cannot be fitted"
this would have worked but ccp just wants to **** over it older players that or ccp soundwave is helping his old alliance
eve is about sin |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
577
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:03:00 -
[493] - Quote
Barking Dragon wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Barking Dragon wrote:I don't really care about Titans...But for the love of all that is holy will you please stop changing the names of all the mods?! I can't find anything anymore. Thanks. There is several tools available to find what you need if you don't have every module name memorized. Use them. Ugh...effort. Why did they need changed again?
And that, is why you fail.
|

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
451
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:04:00 -
[494] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote: There are plenty of people out there who can and will beat 2x their own numbers by playing smart and knowing what their enemies fly, and how their doctrines work.
Not to give away any secrets, but the true linchpin of alphafleet is not the maelstrom, or the 1400mm arty, so its pretty easy to neuter if you understand game mechanics.
You heard it here first folks. Fatal Ascension, Tactical PvP Geniuses. Second only to the people who realized that beating a titan blob was almost impossible and started the first one  Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

Kerdrak
D00M. Northern Coalition.
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:04:00 -
[495] - Quote
Now that super capitals are vanity items, will they be sold in the NeX store via Aurums? |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
624
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:04:00 -
[496] - Quote
Organa wrote:which is more or less what i said. if these changes go through without some other changes there is no "effective" way to counter numbers other than more numbers which for you as a goon fc is a good thing Bombers? |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
893
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:05:00 -
[497] - Quote
Dear page 25:
I'll always love you. I've loved other pages but I feel a real thing for this one. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
81
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:05:00 -
[498] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDDEpnjgTyw |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
419
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:05:00 -
[499] - Quote
Not empty quoting.
I also heart you page 25.
|

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
81
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:06:00 -
[500] - Quote
Is the Clusterfuck really the only power ploc in the game that uses Titans for their true purpose? I would be perfectly content with Titans being replaced outright with a Mobile Jump Bridge ship. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2543
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:07:00 -
[501] - Quote
Kerdrak wrote:Now that super capitals are vanity items, will they be sold in the NeX store via Aurums?
Titans have only ever been useful for shooting subcaps. You are correct. They do not have the capability to bridge fleets, they do not have the capability to apply 3 million racial damage to any capital-sized target, and they certainly can't shoot towers without the ability to receive remote reps. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Krios Ahzek
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
723
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:07:00 -
[502] - Quote
BUT There is ONE they FEAR They are told he is Mittani SMUGBORN
-áThough All Men Do Despise Us |

Richter Enderas
Coronal Core Research Inc Elite Space Guild
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:07:00 -
[503] - Quote
never before have 0.0 kids acted like such publords
keep crying about your space coffins. your autismal stammering is so entertaining
never not stop being typical bob ~elite pvp warlords of space~ |

LokeeAlfa
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:07:00 -
[504] - Quote
2x acounts cancel
with the titan nerf you have just made this game a numbers game. your nerf on titans shows clearlig that you dont have a feling with the game. becuse a big ally complane about titans are imba amd they time on time field wrong shiptypes agaist titans. they never try other ships then drakes and mals. they bring cheep ships and wants to fight min. 3 to 1 there wil no longer be a counter for that. it wil be a numbers game and in my imo that is where you fail ccp. eve have allways been about taktics and use better ships if you are outnumber. like goons never tryed like armor Ahac's / tech 3 / tengus all ships that have a small signatur i dont belive titans wil stand a chance ageinst a signatur fleet. you as ccp need more feling with the game and not just agree on what csm tells you.
and yes i am mad ! and yes i cant spell so dont commen on that look @ what i meen not on the mistake
haha and goons are so bad they need alest 3 to 1 to win a fight
congradz goons you did what you said you made the game yours even that you suks @ it LOL |

Tolmar
Capital Industries Research And Development Fidelas Constans
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:08:00 -
[505] - Quote
All I have to say, It is about time you got rid of the "I Win!" button... Would be good riddance to get rid of Super Caps all together and expand the tier of capitals so that you may have different functions for different ships rather than put them all in a titan...
Expand tiers more before making another tier.... |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:10:00 -
[506] - Quote
LokeeAlfa wrote:2x acounts cancel
with the titan nerf you have just made this game a numbers game. your nerf on titans shows clearlig that you dont have a feling with the game. becuse a big ally complane about titans are imba amd they time on time field wrong shiptypes agaist titans. they never try other ships then drakes and mals. they bring cheep ships and wants to fight min. 3 to 1 there wil no longer be a counter for that. it wil be a numbers game and in my imo that is where you fail ccp. eve have allways been about taktics and use better ships if you are outnumber. like goons never tryed like armor Ahac's / tech 3 / tengus all ships that have a small signatur i dont belive titans wil stand a chance ageinst a signatur fleet. you as ccp need more feling with the game and not just agree on what csm tells you.
and yes i am mad ! and yes i cant spell so dont commen on that look @ what i meen not on the mistake
haha and goons are so bad they need alest 3 to 1 to win a fight
congradz goons you did what you said you made the game yours even that you suks @ it LOL
Kinda surprising to see a titan pilot in an NPC corp isn't it? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5494
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:10:00 -
[507] - Quote
LokeeAlfa wrote:2x acounts cancel Contract stuff please. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

B DeLeon
DeLeon Industries
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:12:00 -
[508] - Quote
Shepard did this!!! |

Charles Case
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:13:00 -
[509] - Quote
-5 accounts! i've had enough of this!
Ok, i'll keep one account
BUT THAT"S IT |

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:13:00 -
[510] - Quote
Machine Delta wrote:Mage Khour wrote:Sadly but true. But i dont see myself fit into EVE ONLINE anymore, CCP keeps nurfing, nurfing and nurfing.
4 accounts now canceled...
CCP wins, gl with destroying the game !
Perpetuum here i come
4 accounts you are giving up. Sad to see. This is what I'm talking about. The nerf is no good. However many people are for it it still reeks of coercion. Today I dropped roles from this "alliance" Really it's nothing but a cult of personality for a hubris filled leader now. Instead of running the group he's just using us for votes for CSM. Maybe the other directors will overthrow mittens but I think the tech money is too good. Each one of them is getting Plex and god knows what else under the table. Sadly CCP does nothing about this but will nerf whatever they cry about. Titans are one of many things to go, next will probably be mothership changes. Erebus pilots are already selling like mad, why bother, no one will buy them. Right now lots of people are mad, this is worse than anything BoB/T20 did.
One spai down,Next!! |

Nao Oikawasan
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:13:00 -
[511] - Quote
Ok, this thread is getting pretty big. Here is a brief summary of the discussion so far.
Titans get nerfed
|

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
81
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:13:00 -
[512] - Quote
LokeeAlfa wrote:2x acounts cancel
with the titan nerf you have just made this game a numbers game. your nerf on titans shows clearlig that you dont have a feling with the game. becuse a big ally complane about titans are imba amd they time on time field wrong shiptypes agaist titans. they never try other ships then drakes and mals. they bring cheep ships and wants to fight min. 3 to 1 there wil no longer be a counter for that. it wil be a numbers game and in my imo that is where you fail ccp. eve have allways been about taktics and use better ships if you are outnumber. like goons never tryed like armor Ahac's / tech 3 / tengus all ships that have a small signatur i dont belive titans wil stand a chance ageinst a signatur fleet. you as ccp need more feling with the game and not just agree on what csm tells you.
and yes i am mad ! and yes i cant spell so dont commen on that look @ what i meen not on the mistake
haha and goons are so bad they need alest 3 to 1 to win a fight
congradz goons you did what you said you made the game yours even that you suks @ it LOL
I wasn't aware that the Republic Military School allowed illiterates to join. |

Wirbin
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:13:00 -
[513] - Quote
LokeeAlfa wrote:2x acounts cancel
with the titan nerf you have just made this game a numbers game. your nerf on titans shows clearlig that you dont have a feling with the game. becuse a big ally complane about titans are imba amd they time on time field wrong shiptypes agaist titans. they never try other ships then drakes and mals. they bring cheep ships and wants to fight min. 3 to 1 there wil no longer be a counter for that. it wil be a numbers game and in my imo that is where you fail ccp. eve have allways been about taktics and use better ships if you are outnumber. like goons never tryed like armor Ahac's / tech 3 / tengus all ships that have a small signatur i dont belive titans wil stand a chance ageinst a signatur fleet. you as ccp need more feling with the game and not just agree on what csm tells you.
and yes i am mad ! and yes i cant spell so dont commen on that look @ what i meen not on the mistake
haha and goons are so bad they need alest 3 to 1 to win a fight
congradz goons you did what you said you made the game yours even that you suks @ it LOL
Not English, didn't read. |

Valearx
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:14:00 -
[514] - Quote
Elitepvp get reamed by Team Flying-In-Space? |

Warren Westfall
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:15:00 -
[515] - Quote
You are not quitting because of the titan nerf, you are quitting because the bots you used to get the isk for your titan got banned. Admit it. |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
201
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:15:00 -
[516] - Quote
conqueror2006 wrote:CCP
YOU KEEP DOING WHAT GOONS WANT.
THIS GAME IS REACHING THE END.
FOR ME YOU WILL NEVER RECEIVE ONE MORE PERSON.
AND I THINK IS TIME TO THINKING IN LEAVE THIS GAME, BECAUSE IS NOT A CLEAN GAME.
I HOPE EVEYONE STOP PLAYING THIS GAME, AND YOU CAN KEEP WITH YOUR FRIENDS.
???? o.0 |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
577
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:15:00 -
[517] - Quote
So was this balance change directed at a ship or a coalition?
|

Richter Enderas
Coronal Core Research Inc Elite Space Guild
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:17:00 -
[518] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:So was this balance change directed at a ship or a coalition?
when is the last time you saw raidendot use a subcap fleet?
now, ask yourself this question again |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
433
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:18:00 -
[519] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:So was this balance change directed at a ship or a coalition?
Obviously this is Soundwave trying to milk what he can out of a dying old game for his old allaince and nothing more, but guys, guys, it was bad when it was T20 that was doing this for his alliance.
Richter Enderas wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:So was this balance change directed at a ship or a coalition? when is the last time you saw raidendot use a subcap fleet? now, ask yourself this question again
They use them every day, idgi. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2548
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:20:00 -
[520] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:So was this balance change directed at a ship or a coalition? Obviously this is Soundwave trying to milk what he can out of a dying old game for his old allaince and nothing more, but guys, guys, it was bad when it was T20 that was doing this for his alliance.
Congrats, you've descended to the level of tinfoil hat wearing pubbies "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
201
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:20:00 -
[521] - Quote
casama wrote:Well, if caps cant kill subcaps, why you fix the game and make that subcaps cant kill caps?. Just make something that ONLY caps will be able to kill caps
Ahh yes makes perfect sense.
Ok lets keep the titans how they are... But to be FAIR, lets make sure a small gang of battleships can alpha a Titan in a single volley.
Of course, with the help of tracking... To be fair. |

Mfume Apocal
Origin.
341
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:21:00 -
[522] - Quote
I'd just like a direct a "Can I have your stuff?" at everyone talking about quitting.
Plz contract in any lowsec or NPC null system, two week contract, tia. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
433
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:21:00 -
[523] - Quote
Oh and CCP be sure to change the message for new players:
Join a coalition that can field 1000 dudes or more or don't bother trying to play at all. |

Travis Wells
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
223
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:22:00 -
[524] - Quote
LokeeAlfa wrote:2x acounts cancel
with the titan nerf you have just made this game a numbers game. your nerf on titans shows clearlig that you dont have a feling with the game. becuse a big ally complane about titans are imba amd they time on time field wrong shiptypes agaist titans. they never try other ships then drakes and mals. they bring cheep ships and wants to fight min. 3 to 1 there wil no longer be a counter for that. it wil be a numbers game and in my imo that is where you fail ccp. eve have allways been about taktics and use better ships if you are outnumber. like goons never tryed like armor Ahac's / tech 3 / tengus all ships that have a small signatur i dont belive titans wil stand a chance ageinst a signatur fleet. you as ccp need more feling with the game and not just agree on what csm tells you.
and yes i am mad ! and yes i cant spell so dont commen on that look @ what i meen not on the mistake
haha and goons are so bad they need alest 3 to 1 to win a fight
congradz goons you did what you said you made the game yours even that you suks @ it LOL
I wish i knew what this said, but all i got is 2x acounts cancel which i can presume means i won't need to read another post from you again anyways. Ta ta. |

God-Emperor of Amarr
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:22:00 -
[525] - Quote
Abloo-abloobloo Tears. |

GreGh Rakrot
Rionnag Alba Northern Coalition.
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:23:00 -
[526] - Quote
Heh, if this change would come with acctual balance to sov warfare that would split massive fleets to multiple objectives and make game less blobby it would be perfect change but this change isnt balancing its just nerfing one part and boosting the other (blob, which is already powerful as it is).
The fact that there are members of alliances disagreeing with the change that benefit most from it should tell you enough about it and devs saying they dont have time to fix titans cos they are working on reworking noob ships is just hilarious. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
433
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:23:00 -
[527] - Quote
Andski wrote:
Congrats, you've descended to the level of tinfoil hat wearing pubbies
Hey, the truth sucks, but its still the truth, you have an ex alliance member as one of the head design guys for the game.
Sounds totally legit.
|

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
1998
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:23:00 -
[528] - Quote
A bit blunt of a solution for my taste, but good changes on the whole nonetheless.
PS. The tears in this thread pleases me.  |

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:24:00 -
[529] - Quote
Well thank god we wont have to field that 500 man dread fleet now! |

Molly Argonaut
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:24:00 -
[530] - Quote
Thanks CCP THe Biggest Unbalance of the game are coming...
Welcome to GOON ONLINE Next Expansion name = Mittanation |

Durr Hurrr Durr
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:24:00 -
[531] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Oh and CCP be sure to change the message for new players:
Join a coalition that can field 1000 dudes or more or don't bother trying to play at all.
Oh hi Grath!! You mad? 
|

Valearx
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:24:00 -
[532] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:So was this balance change directed at a ship or a coalition? Obviously this is Soundwave trying to milk what he can out of a dying old game for his old allaince and nothing more, but guys, guys, it was bad when it was T20 that was doing this for his alliance.
I smell pulverised rectum  |

Travis Wells
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
223
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:24:00 -
[533] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Oh and CCP be sure to change the message for new players:
Join a coalition that can field 1000 dudes or more or don't bother trying to play at all.
Why, i'm sure new players can just chill out in high sec and run missions or something? |

trueblue1872
Burning Napalm Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:26:00 -
[534] - Quote
CCP you are Cunts.
The blob wins every time. |

Travis Wells
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
223
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:26:00 -
[535] - Quote
Molly Argonaut wrote:Thanks CCP THe Biggest Unbalance of the game are coming...
Welcome to GOON ONLINE Next Expansion name = Mittanation
Sounds like fun, where do i sign up? |

Warr Akini
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:26:00 -
[536] - Quote
Gicer wrote:After this stunning display of wizardy and because of the lightning shooting from mittens fingers.
All Bat Country members are now required to wear goggles for eye protection.
Brothers in fashionable eyewear checking in. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5495
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:26:00 -
[537] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Hey, the truth sucks, but its still the truth, you have an ex alliance member as one of the head design guys for the game. Oh, don't worryGǪ they have much more than that. 
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
433
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:26:00 -
[538] - Quote
Durr Hurrr Durr wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Oh and CCP be sure to change the message for new players:
Join a coalition that can field 1000 dudes or more or don't bother trying to play at all. Oh hi Grath!! You mad? 
Why should I be mad that an alliance is getting developer help?
|

Krios Ahzek
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
724
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:27:00 -
[539] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:
Congrats, you've descended to the level of tinfoil hat wearing pubbies
Hey, the truth sucks, but its still the truth, you have an ex alliance member as one of the head design guys for the game. Sounds totally legit.
Either we're right and nerfing titans is good for the game OR all ex-goons are implanted with GARPA indoctrination devices that use a combination of infrasound and EM radiation to turn every dev into a subservient entity in awe of the majesty of Goonswarm.
-áThough All Men Do Despise Us |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2550
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:27:00 -
[540] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Oh and CCP be sure to change the message for new players:
Join a coalition that can field 1000 dudes or more or don't bother trying to play at all.
Better than telling them "don't bother going to 0.0 until you can fly a titan" tbh "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Supersnowprs
Hedion University Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:29:00 -
[541] - Quote
First the obvious: A titan is a ship that is a lot harder to make (Time, materials, training). -A blap fit titan does the same if not less damage than a dread. (Depending on its fit.) -What titans have going for them is they can do it mobile while having better tracking, ehp, lock times.
As of right now titans have a little too much tracking and could even do with a few less sensor strength. But ccp, these changes are too much. Lets forgot all the blob Quantity over Quality and all that stuff for now.
"Realistically" (As per lore and the proposed changes)
So say you empire has finally built its largest ship ever, a titan. Its role is Anti-caps as ccp has stated. Lets say its taken your team a decade, (You had to do R&D to come-up with BPs ect.) -Only problem is that even with sensor boosters it still takes forever to even lock a titan nether mind other capitals. (See the other posts.) So now you have a 13km long spaceship that you wasted 10 years of the empires time and money on. -That locks slower than a sieged dread. -Does the same or less damage than a sieged dread -Can lock as many targets as that dread -Tracks as well as that dread. -And that cost as much as 50 sieged dreads (roughly).
Im fairly certain that the people who hired you will be quite pissed off that all you built was a much more expensive armored dread that can fire a Doomsday. (Unless you told them you were making that) And were too lazy to add decent electronics that you could of easily fit.
Point here -5 scan rez is too slow -only 3 targets at five scan rez is stupid -The Caldari team got assassinated for being too stupid with money.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2550
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:31:00 -
[542] - Quote
Supersnowprs wrote:First the obvious: A titan is a ship that is a lot harder to make (Time, materials, training). -A blap fit titan does the same if not less damage than a dread. (Depending on its fit.) -What titans have going for them is they can do it mobile while having better tracking, ehp, lock times.
As of right now titans have a little too much tracking and could even do with a few less sensor strength. But ccp, these changes are too much. Lets forgot all the blob Quantity over Quality and all that stuff for now.
"Realistically" (As per lore and the proposed changes)
So say you empire has finally built its largest ship ever, a titan. Its role is Anti-caps as ccp has stated. Lets say its taken your team a decade, (You had to do R&D to come-up with BPs ect.) -Only problem is that even with sensor boosters it still takes forever to even lock a titan nether mind other capitals. (See the other posts.) So now you have a 13km long spaceship that you wasted 10 years of the empires time and money on. -That locks slower than a sieged dread. -Does the same or less damage than a sieged dread -Can lock as many targets as that dread -Tracks as well as that dread. -And that cost as much as 50 sieged dreads (roughly).
Im fairly certain that the people who hired you will be quite pissed off that all you built was a much more expensive armored dread that can fire a Doomsday. (Unless you told them you were making that) And were too lazy to add decent electronics that you could of easily fit.
Point here -5 scan rez is too slow -only 3 targets at five scan rez is stupid -The Caldari team got assassinated for being too stupid with money.
I bet you think that 50 escorted freighters have to be run from Jita to your CSAA every time a titan is built "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Charles Case
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:31:00 -
[543] - Quote
I've had an erection for 28 pages now |

Nao Oikawasan
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:31:00 -
[544] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:
Congrats, you've descended to the level of tinfoil hat wearing pubbies
Hey, the truth sucks, but its still the truth, you have an ex alliance member as one of the head design guys for the game. Sounds totally legit.
You must forgive Grath. After all, his famous opening quote from the Mintchiplol Series Collection is "Hi, hi, I'm Grath, kill whitey, I hate the government". He may be predisposed to fantasies of vast right wing conspiracies. |

Krystal Flores
Missions Mining and Mayhem Northern Coalition.
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:31:00 -
[545] - Quote
Andski wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Oh and CCP be sure to change the message for new players:
Join a coalition that can field 1000 dudes or more or don't bother trying to play at all. Better than telling them "don't bother going to 0.0 until you can fly a titan" tbh I can't fly a titan yet i am useful in all fleets, cause you know, Our TItans use support fleets. |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:32:00 -
[546] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Durr Hurrr Durr wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Oh and CCP be sure to change the message for new players:
Join a coalition that can field 1000 dudes or more or don't bother trying to play at all. Oh hi Grath!! You mad?  Why should I be mad that an alliance is getting developer help?
But is that even true? U are saying this but how does this specifically help one side? There are lots of people in my alliance building / training for supercaps. They are going to be hurt by this as well.
Have you considered that this nerf might be good for all sides? Unless you just think its a conspiracy between goons and CCP. Really though I am starting to think that may actually be true. Then again I just don't know if we can take you seriously. |

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:32:00 -
[547] - Quote
Supersnowprs wrote:First the obvious: A titan is a ship that is a lot harder to make (Time, materials, training). -A blap fit titan does the same if not less damage than a dread. (Depending on its fit.) -What titans have going for them is they can do it mobile while having better tracking, ehp, lock times.
As of right now titans have a little too much tracking and could even do with a few less sensor strength. But ccp, these changes are too much. Lets forgot all the blob Quantity over Quality and all that stuff for now.
"Realistically" (As per lore and the proposed changes)
So say you empire has finally built its largest ship ever, a titan. Its role is Anti-caps as ccp has stated. Lets say its taken your team a decade, (You had to do R&D to come-up with BPs ect.) -Only problem is that even with sensor boosters it still takes forever to even lock a titan nether mind other capitals. (See the other posts.) So now you have a 13km long spaceship that you wasted 10 years of the empires time and money on. -That locks slower than a sieged dread. -Does the same or less damage than a sieged dread -Can lock as many targets as that dread -Tracks as well as that dread. -And that cost as much as 50 sieged dreads (roughly).
Im fairly certain that the people who hired you will be quite pissed off that all you built was a much more expensive armored dread that can fire a Doomsday. (Unless you told them you were making that) And were too lazy to add decent electronics that you could of easily fit.
Point here -5 scan rez is too slow -only 3 targets at five scan rez is stupid -The Caldari team got assassinated for being too stupid with money.
OOoo the roll player angle.I like it! |

Venus Vermillion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
413
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:32:00 -
[548] - Quote
For all those poor widdwe "X accounts canceled" pubbies...
You're not very convincing. We'll believe you when we see the screenshots of you step by step self-destructing your space coffins and destroying your stuff - giving it away isn't even proof because your other account will just give it back.
If yer gunna quit? Make it real. Otherwise, just keep paying your :tenbux: like everyone else. |

Travis Wells
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
223
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:34:00 -
[549] - Quote
Supersnowprs wrote:First the obvious: A titan is a ship that is a lot harder to make (Time, materials, training). -A blap fit titan does the same if not less damage than a dread. (Depending on its fit.) -What titans have going for them is they can do it mobile while having better tracking, ehp, lock times.
As of right now titans have a little too much tracking and could even do with a few less sensor strength. But ccp, these changes are too much. Lets forgot all the blob Quantity over Quality and all that stuff for now.
"Realistically" (As per lore and the proposed changes)
So say you empire has finally built its largest ship ever, a titan. Its role is Anti-caps as ccp has stated. Lets say its taken your team a decade, (You had to do R&D to come-up with BPs ect.) -Only problem is that even with sensor boosters it still takes forever to even lock a titan nether mind other capitals. (See the other posts.) So now you have a 13km long spaceship that you wasted 10 years of the empires time and money on. -That locks slower than a sieged dread. -Does the same or less damage than a sieged dread -Can lock as many targets as that dread -Tracks as well as that dread. -And that cost as much as 50 sieged dreads (roughly).
Im fairly certain that the people who hired you will be quite pissed off that all you built was a much more expensive armored dread that can fire a Doomsday. (Unless you told them you were making that) And were too lazy to add decent electronics that you could of easily fit.
Point here -5 scan rez is too slow -only 3 targets at five scan rez is stupid -The Caldari team got assassinated for being too stupid with money.
You couldn't even bother using an npc alt with an avatar? |

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:34:00 -
[550] - Quote
Venus Vermillion wrote:For all those poor widdwe "X accounts canceled" pubbies...
You're not very convincing. We'll believe you when we see the screenshots of you step by step self-destructing your space coffins and destroying your stuff - giving it away isn't even proof because your other account will just give it back.
If yer gunna quit? Make it real. Otherwise, just keep paying your :tenbux: like everyone else.
Ya biomass or STFU. :) |

Mhyn Teregone
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:34:00 -
[551] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Why should I be mad that an alliance is getting developer help?
Your alliance has two members on CSM6 who have been party to every single conversation on this subject .. you should really bring this allegation up with them. |

Lord Thorin
Viziam Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:35:00 -
[552] - Quote
Incredible that CCP just play into Goon hands!
Lets just call the game "Goons Online" and be done with it. I don't know how goons and others can cry nerf when it's the only way some alliances can counter the huge numbers that can be thrown into one system at any time. They gimp the titan tank by fitting mods to kill subcaps, so therefore take a huge risk to field them in the first place.
TIDI was introduced to deal with large numbers of people therefore making alpha more prevalent, this helped certain alpha fleets and reduced the effectiveness of others....
Just because some alliances have the balls to drop Titans and Supers onto other fleets, why can't the other alliances escalate like the game is intended?
Unbelievable response by CCP and just another move that proves they don't understand how eve works anymore. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2550
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:35:00 -
[553] - Quote
better yet, give me your "useless" titan and so I can use it uselessly "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Rydis
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:35:00 -
[554] - Quote
Charles Case wrote:I've had an erection for 28 pages now
I too, have had an erection at least as long except these balls, they hurt.
|

Terranid Meester
Tactical Assault and Recon Unit
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:35:00 -
[555] - Quote
Cedo Nulli wrote: Its like Deathstar rolling around with only its main planetdestroying weapon and nothing else.
Wasn't the first deathstar destroyed by the star wars equivalent of rifters with torpedos? The second deathstar had a giant hole right through to the middile of it [it took 2 ships and a bunch of small furry teddybears on a technium moon to blow that one up]. And both took years to build and multiple people to crew and staff. |

Carl Albanit
Ponto Final
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:36:00 -
[556] - Quote
CCP is making a 100b Ship worst than a 3b Ship....
Seems Legit
*tactical facepalm* |

Achaiah7
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:36:00 -
[557] - Quote
The tears, they precious. I can haz your stuffs? |

Richter Enderas
Coronal Core Research Inc Elite Space Guild
24
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:36:00 -
[558] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:
Obviously this is Soundwave trying to milk what he can out of a dying old game for his old allaince and nothing more, but guys, guys, it was bad when it was T20 that was doing this for his alliance.
THIS IS WHAT PUBBIES ACTUALLY BELIEVE |

Wirbin
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:37:00 -
[559] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:
Why should I be mad that an alliance is getting developer help?
lmbo they are nerfing the heck out of the big basket your dumb alliance put all of its eggs into! http://i.imgur.com/Zjwo4.gif |

mama guru
Evolution
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:37:00 -
[560] - Quote
Stop whining.
I did not **** and moan when I could no longer fit 7 Heatsinks on my Geddon and get away with it.
CCP has a history of nerfing stuff that is hillariously gamebreaking. ______
EVE online is the fishermans friend of MMO's. If it's too hard you are too weak. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2559
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:38:00 -
[561] - Quote
Carl Albanit wrote:CCP is making a 100b Ship worst than a 3b Ship....
Seems Legit
*tactical facepalm*
No, it's better by a margin. A supercarrier can't field 150 fighters simply because it costs 15 times as much as a carrier. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Krzdr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:38:00 -
[562] - Quote
death2supercaps |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2559
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:39:00 -
[563] - Quote
mama guru wrote:Stop whining.
I did not **** and moan when I could no longer fit 7 Heatsinks on my Geddon and get away with it.
CCP has a history of nerfing stuff that is hillariously gamebreaking.
EVOL guy telling his ex alliance mates to suck it up
this thread gets better and better "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Khadmos
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:40:00 -
[564] - Quote
Best change ever!
I was pretty excited when they removed AOE DD, going 20 jumps in a 250+ BS fleet only to instantly die because 3 titans logged in at the target system was SUPER DUPER FUN AND BALANCED.
Unfortunately, nothing changed all that much. Still doesn't matter what ships you bring or how many people, the only real difference is it's 40 titans instead of 3 and it takes a bit longer for everyone to die.
When they get around to the full revamp I'm sure they'll reduce the cost a bit so you can stop crying that the cost justifies being unbalanced. |

Mhyn Teregone
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:40:00 -
[565] - Quote
Carl Albanit wrote:CCP is making a 100b Ship worst than a 3b Ship....
Seems Legit
*tactical facepalm* I'll happily take on your three billion isk ship in my 100 billion isk ship, hell, bring ten of your friends.
|

mama guru
Evolution
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:40:00 -
[566] - Quote
Andski wrote:Carl Albanit wrote:CCP is making a 100b Ship worst than a 3b Ship....
Seems Legit
*tactical facepalm* No, it's better by a margin. A supercarrier can't field 150 fighters simply because it costs 15 times as much as a carrier.
I for one would love for my megathron to do 10k DPS and one volley anything just like 15 thoraxes can. ______
EVE online is the fishermans friend of MMO's. If it's too hard you are too weak. |

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:40:00 -
[567] - Quote
I dont know why, but in the back of my mind I keep hearing munchkins singing "Ding Dong the witch is dead". |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:40:00 -
[568] - Quote
Lord Thorin wrote:Incredible that CCP just play into Goon hands!
Lets just call the game "Goons Online" and be done with it. I don't know how goons and others can cry nerf when it's the only way some alliances can counter the huge numbers that can be thrown into one system at any time. They gimp the titan tank by fitting mods to kill subcaps, so therefore take a huge risk to field them in the first place.
TIDI was introduced to deal with large numbers of people therefore making alpha more prevalent, this helped certain alpha fleets and reduced the effectiveness of others....
Just because some alliances have the balls to drop Titans and Supers onto other fleets, why can't the other alliances escalate like the game is intended?
Unbelievable response by CCP and just another move that proves they don't understand how eve works anymore.
Because some alliances... Yours mainly, end up doing this with all the titans and supers on one side. Ever wonder why you lose every fight under a cynojammer?
|

Krios Ahzek
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
724
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:41:00 -
[569] - Quote
Carl Albanit wrote:CCP is making a 100b Ship worst than a 3b Ship....
Seems Legit
*tactical facepalm*
Having 20 times the EHP is clearly worst.
-áThough All Men Do Despise Us |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:41:00 -
[570] - Quote
Hey Grath can I sell you some tinfoil?
Better yet, I will just trade you the tinfoil for your worthless Titan(s). |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:42:00 -
[571] - Quote
Achaiah7 wrote:The tears, they precious. I can haz your stuffs?
You can't. Cos you can't fly it. Now go back into your drake. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5497
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:42:00 -
[572] - Quote
Carl Albanit wrote:CCP is making a 100b Ship worst than a 3b Ship....
Seems Legit It's just their latest campaign to hurt players who misuse superlatives. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Khadmos
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:43:00 -
[573] - Quote
Carl Albanit wrote:CCP is making a 100b Ship worst than a 3b Ship....
Seems Legit
*tactical facepalm*
hahahahaha, I would LOVE to see your dread solo a titan. You should read about these http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Item_Database:Ship_Equipment:Turrets_&_Bays:Doomsday_Devices |

Lord Fargo
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:43:00 -
[574] - Quote
Mage Khour wrote:Sadly but true. But i dont see myself fit into EVE ONLINE anymore, CCP keeps nurfing, nurfing and nurfing.
4 accounts now canceled...
CCP wins, gl with destroying the game !
Perpetuum here i come
bye bye rage quitting neck beard guy |

Widemouth Deepthroat
Pink Sockers
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:44:00 -
[575] - Quote
Machine Delta wrote:Lord Thorin wrote:Incredible that CCP just play into Goon hands!
Lets just call the game "Goons Online" and be done with it. I don't know how goons and others can cry nerf when it's the only way some alliances can counter the huge numbers that can be thrown into one system at any time. They gimp the titan tank by fitting mods to kill subcaps, so therefore take a huge risk to field them in the first place.
TIDI was introduced to deal with large numbers of people therefore making alpha more prevalent, this helped certain alpha fleets and reduced the effectiveness of others....
Just because some alliances have the balls to drop Titans and Supers onto other fleets, why can't the other alliances escalate like the game is intended?
Unbelievable response by CCP and just another move that proves they don't understand how eve works anymore. Because some alliances... Yours mainly, end up doing this with all the titans and supers on one side. Ever wonder why you lose every fight under a cynojammer?
because you have like 20k dudes in CFC?
|

Travis Wells
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
223
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:44:00 -
[576] - Quote
Hey man what the F*ck titans are completely useless and do absolutely nothing as of right now this very moment. |

Capitain Dayverson
the muppets RED.OverLord
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:45:00 -
[577] - Quote
Fine CCP, also enjoy bending armor and Shild and triple the damage of DD, what use would a titan now? We are adding four years to invest anything, congratulations! |

SidneyB
Chaos Mercenaries BLACK-MARK
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:46:00 -
[578] - Quote
BrokenBC wrote:I dont know why, but in the back of my mind I keep hearing munchkins singing "Ding Dong the witch is dead".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ngZFRisurU Much better.
Also, Oh the delicious tears. |

Lelob
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:46:00 -
[579] - Quote
Mhyn Teregone wrote:Lelob wrote:Well this seems slightly short sighted. It would have been interesting to see if titans are truly imbalanced or if people were just unwilling to commit fleets to counter them (dreads and supers). I guess we'll never really know though as this nerf seems like it could be a huge game changer, especially for an alliance like Raiden dot. Lets see if it works as intended. I tentatively support these changes, and although would have preferred something with actual coding effort, can understand why a simple static data hack is all they have been prepared to invest in. And yes, I'm a titan pilot too. Now to tackle the next legacy game design embarrassment - technetium.
In truth I'm not really sure what CCP is trying to accomplish here.
Titans being purely anti-cap weapons seems somewhat useless outside of ganks, given the incredible rarity of capital fights in EVE right now. Especially when the side fielding caps and titans has traditionally been facing a blob of subcaps and not caps. At its core it not only shows CCP's ignorance of the metagame right now, but also of the fact that no serious attempts have been made to actively kill titans outside of ganks. Saying titans are imbalanced and need a nerf simply does not make sense, given the context in which the argument is being made. |

Lord Thorin
Viziam Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:46:00 -
[580] - Quote
Machine Delta wrote:Lord Thorin wrote:Incredible that CCP just play into Goon hands!
Lets just call the game "Goons Online" and be done with it. I don't know how goons and others can cry nerf when it's the only way some alliances can counter the huge numbers that can be thrown into one system at any time. They gimp the titan tank by fitting mods to kill subcaps, so therefore take a huge risk to field them in the first place.
TIDI was introduced to deal with large numbers of people therefore making alpha more prevalent, this helped certain alpha fleets and reduced the effectiveness of others....
Just because some alliances have the balls to drop Titans and Supers onto other fleets, why can't the other alliances escalate like the game is intended?
Unbelievable response by CCP and just another move that proves they don't understand how eve works anymore. Because some alliances... Yours mainly, end up doing this with all the titans and supers on one side. Ever wonder why you lose every fight under a cynojammer?
Very poor response that lacks alacrity, however something one would expect from you.
FIghting under a cyno jammer puts the defensive alliance in a good position to field huge numbers + caps/supers. Considering that Goons still have one of the largest super fleet in EVE yet cry nerf is hilarious.
You have to admit, lots of the changes recently have been of benefit to goons. I'm waiting for the 1400 howitzer nerf and then we will seriously see some crying! |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2592
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:48:00 -
[581] - Quote
Lord Thorin wrote: You have to admit, lots of the changes recently have been of benefit to goons. I'm waiting for the 1400 howitzer nerf and then we will seriously see some crying!
ahh yes, goonswarm will truly be helpless when we need to switch to a different battleship doctrine |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2565
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:49:00 -
[582] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Achaiah7 wrote:The tears, they precious. I can haz your stuffs? You can't. Cos you can't fly it. Now go back into your drake.
If I recall right, we relieved you of the burden of Nyx ownership. You replaced it, and lost a Nyx and Ragnarok shortly thereafter. HEH "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Myacese
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:50:00 -
[583] - Quote
casama wrote:Well, if caps cant kill subcaps, why you fix the game and make that subcaps cant kill caps?. Just make something that ONLY caps will be able to kill caps
seconded. a logical argument here, what i was about to state as well. hey CCp, i guess you have no comment on this as well.
|

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:51:00 -
[584] - Quote
Lord Thorin wrote:Machine Delta wrote:Lord Thorin wrote:Incredible that CCP just play into Goon hands!
Lets just call the game "Goons Online" and be done with it. I don't know how goons and others can cry nerf when it's the only way some alliances can counter the huge numbers that can be thrown into one system at any time. They gimp the titan tank by fitting mods to kill subcaps, so therefore take a huge risk to field them in the first place.
TIDI was introduced to deal with large numbers of people therefore making alpha more prevalent, this helped certain alpha fleets and reduced the effectiveness of others....
Just because some alliances have the balls to drop Titans and Supers onto other fleets, why can't the other alliances escalate like the game is intended?
Unbelievable response by CCP and just another move that proves they don't understand how eve works anymore. Because some alliances... Yours mainly, end up doing this with all the titans and supers on one side. Ever wonder why you lose every fight under a cynojammer? Very poor response that lacks alacrity, however something one would expect from you. FIghting under a cyno jammer puts the defensive alliance in a good position to field huge numbers + caps/supers. Considering that Goons still have one of the largest super fleet in EVE yet cry nerf is hilarious. You have to admit, lots of the changes recently have been of benefit to goons. I'm waiting for the 1400 howitzer nerf and then we will seriously see some crying!
How is CCP Greyscale part of the CFC? U should take a look at your own alliance history and issues. Really if you had the eagerness to develop and recruit subcap pilots instead of supers Rebuttal here would be the least of your flaws.
|

Ghostnite24
Ghostly Avengers
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:51:00 -
[585] - Quote
LMAO so as long as we are nerfing titans can we nerf drakes and T3 cruisers too? they are sooo way over powered and as long as we do that can we nerf all of them as well? becuz obviously they hurt ppl and can shoot things. if this keeps up i may as well join world of warcraft again becuz this is all i am beginning to see here... |

Caneb
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:51:00 -
[586] - Quote
Weaselior wrote: ahh yes, goonswarm will truly be helpless when we need to switch to a different battleship doctrine
I'm pretty sure we already did. |

Lord Fargo
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:51:00 -
[587] - Quote
Carl Albanit wrote:CCP is making a 100b Ship worst than a 3b Ship....
Seems Legit
*tactical facepalm*
The change can't be as "worst" than your grammar. |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
458
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:52:00 -
[588] - Quote
Lelob wrote: Titans being purely anti-cap weapons seems somewhat useless outside of ganks, given the incredible rarity of capital fights in EVE right now. Especially when the side fielding caps and titans has traditionally been facing a blob of subcaps and not caps. At its core it not only shows CCP's ignorance of the metagame right now, but also of the fact that no serious attempts have been made to actively kill titans outside of ganks. Saying titans are imbalanced and need a nerf simply does not make sense, given the context in which the argument is being made.
Attempts to kill titans are made everyday. They usually conclude in a fashion similar to this, or this.
I find it astonishing that you none of you realise that behaviour like this is what got your toys nerfed. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
434
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:52:00 -
[589] - Quote
Mhyn Teregone wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Why should I be mad that an alliance is getting developer help?
Your alliance has two members on CSM6 who have been party to every single conversation on this subject .. you should really bring this allegation up with them.
"What could we do about it if he is?"
Thats the response I get.
But its ok, we've learned well from Mittani when it comes using the media to vent our concerns, why ask CCP when i can ask other groups that will put it publicly in print and smear it all over CCP's face, you know, like you guys do when you don't get your way?
Soundwave and Screegs both were part of goonswarm, giving them as much power as they've attained was bound to lead to one thing and one thing only since they still associate with Goons, and today, we can see it in print, in the most ham handed useless gesture ever recorded.
15 seconds to lock your own hull class, and sub caps that can still be hit by the Titan guns.
Sounds about how a Goon would get the change done.
|

Drago Palermus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:52:00 -
[590] - Quote
posting really late in an epic thread |

Tamplarul
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:53:00 -
[591] - Quote
Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:Achaiah7 wrote:The tears, they precious. I can haz your stuffs? You can't. Cos you can't fly it. Now go back into your drake. If I recall right, we relieved you of the burden of Nyx ownership. You replaced it, and lost a Nyx and Ragnarok shortly thereafter. HEH
he lost a Nyx but not a Titan |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:54:00 -
[592] - Quote
Holy ****, grath went tinfoil.
On this day the forces of Light and Justice truly have won Eve. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2565
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:55:00 -
[593] - Quote
Lelob wrote:In truth I'm not really sure what CCP is trying to accomplish here.
Titans being purely anti-cap weapons seems somewhat useless outside of ganks, given the incredible rarity of capital fights in EVE right now. Especially when the side fielding caps and titans has traditionally been facing a blob of subcaps and not caps. At its core it not only shows CCP's ignorance of the metagame right now, but also of the fact that no serious attempts have been made to actively kill titans outside of ganks. Saying titans are imbalanced and need a nerf simply does not make sense, given the context in which the argument is being made.
Why, exactly, do titans rarely get killed outside of ganks? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Lord Thorin
Viziam Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:55:00 -
[594] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Mhyn Teregone wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Why should I be mad that an alliance is getting developer help?
Your alliance has two members on CSM6 who have been party to every single conversation on this subject .. you should really bring this allegation up with them. "What could we do about it if he is?" Thats the response I get. But its ok, we've learned well from Mittani when it comes using the media to vent our concerns, why ask CCP when i can ask other groups that will put it publicly in print and smear it all over CCP's face, you know, like you guys do when you don't get your way? Soundwave and Screegs both were part of goonswarm, giving them as much power as they've attained was bound to lead to one thing and one thing only since they still associate with Goons, and today, we can see it in print, in the most ham handed useless gesture ever recorded. 15 seconds to lock your own hull class, and sub caps that can still be hit by the Titan guns. Sounds about how a Goon would get the change done.
Couldn't agree more Grath.
|

Lord Thorin
Viziam Amarr Empire
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:56:00 -
[595] - Quote
NERF WHALES, THEY ARE THE LARGEST CREATURE ON EARTH AND THEY CAN TRACK REALLY SMALL CREATURES CALLED KRILL |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2580
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:56:00 -
[596] - Quote
Tamplarul wrote:Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:Achaiah7 wrote:The tears, they precious. I can haz your stuffs? You can't. Cos you can't fly it. Now go back into your drake. If I recall right, we relieved you of the burden of Nyx ownership. You replaced it, and lost a Nyx and Ragnarok shortly thereafter. HEH he lost a Nyx but not a Titan
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&kll_id=11888158
hmmmmm "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Mirmedon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:57:00 -
[597] - Quote
I don't usually post on the EVE forums, but when I do its in threads full of tears. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2593
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:58:00 -
[598] - Quote
its hilarious raiden. got ordered to ***** on neutral alts in this thread because we were having too much fun laughing at their pain |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
201
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:58:00 -
[599] - Quote
Ghostnite24 wrote:LMAO so as long as we are nerfing titans can we nerf drakes and T3 cruisers too? they are sooo way over powered and as long as we do that can we nerf all of them as well? becuz obviously they hurt ppl and can shoot things. if this keeps up i may as well join world of warcraft again becuz this is all i am beginning to see here...
Theyve already pretty much said they are nerfing drakes in the most recent CSM minutes. |

Tamplarul
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:58:00 -
[600] - Quote
Andski wrote:Tamplarul wrote:Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:Achaiah7 wrote:The tears, they precious. I can haz your stuffs? You can't. Cos you can't fly it. Now go back into your drake. If I recall right, we relieved you of the burden of Nyx ownership. You replaced it, and lost a Nyx and Ragnarok shortly thereafter. HEH he lost a Nyx but not a Titan http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&kll_id=11888158hmmmmm
was another guy on titan |

Skrypt
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:00:00 -
[601] - Quote
Sounds like a good idea. Let me dedicate my 120m SP character to a spacecoffin that opens bridges and can shoot non-existent capital fleets.
Oh well, at least this means there's one less account for me to sub. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
84
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:00:00 -
[602] - Quote
Lord Thorin wrote: You have to admit, lots of the changes recently have been of benefit to goons. I'm waiting for the 1400 howitzer nerf and then we will seriously see some crying!
Your spies are a little out of date mate. We don't use those anymore. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2580
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:01:00 -
[603] - Quote
Tamplarul wrote:was another guy on titan
The point is that he's awful at this game and lost two supercarriers faster than anybody I know
The Mittani, for all your supercapital trading needs~~~~~~~ "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Crakachunky
Stargate SG-1 Fatal Ascension
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:01:00 -
[604] - Quote
okay so now fleet fights will work like this:
600 dudes meet 600 dudes, one side starts loosing and brings in carriers for reps, other side deploys dreads and carriers, other side now brings in supers to kill the caps, other side brings in supers and titans, everyone dies untill theres 1 dude in a rifter left
how fights work currently:
600 dudes meets 600 dues, one side brings in titans and wins
after this change escalation mechanics will actually work (titans are meant to be giant support ships and a last card play) |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2593
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:01:00 -
[605] - Quote
Tamplarul wrote: was another guy on titan
petitioned for account sharing |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
84
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:01:00 -
[606] - Quote
Skrypt wrote:Sounds like a good idea. Let me dedicate my 120m SP character to a spacecoffin that opens bridges and can shoot non-existent capital fleets.
Oh well, at least this means there's one less account for me to sub.
You know you'll still be able to blap other caps just as well as you always have right? You didn't just read the blog post and immediately have a stroke? |

Death2all Supercaps
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:04:00 -
[607] - Quote
Skrypt wrote:Sounds like a good idea. Let me dedicate my 120m SP character to a spacecoffin that opens bridges and can shoot non-existent capital fleets.
Oh well, at least this means there's one less account for me to sub.
I have 2 mil sp and am a threat to you now  |

Michael Harari
The Hatchery
65
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:04:00 -
[608] - Quote
JC Anderson wrote:Ghostnite24 wrote:LMAO so as long as we are nerfing titans can we nerf drakes and T3 cruisers too? they are sooo way over powered and as long as we do that can we nerf all of them as well? becuz obviously they hurt ppl and can shoot things. if this keeps up i may as well join world of warcraft again becuz this is all i am beginning to see here... Theyve already pretty much said they are nerfing drakes in the most recent CSM minutes.
Its not a nerf |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
201
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:04:00 -
[609] - Quote
To be completely honesty, I don't understand why these announced changes are a surprise to anybody. |

supr3m3justic3
Imperium Technologies F0RCEFUL ENTRY
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:05:00 -
[610] - Quote
Crakachunky wrote:okay so now fleet fights will work like this:
600 dudes meet 600 dudes, one side starts loosing and brings in carriers for reps, other side deploys dreads and carriers, other side now brings in supers to kill the caps, other side brings in supers and titans, everyone dies untill theres 1 dude in a rifter left
how fights work currently:
600 dudes meets 600 dues, one side brings in titans and wins
after this change escalation mechanics will actually work (titans are meant to be giant support ships and a last card play)
To bad CCP's ****** server's cant handle the fight's they want to happen...welcome to the next version of Lag-Online. |

Lord Fargo
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:05:00 -
[611] - Quote
Death2all Supercaps wrote:Skrypt wrote:Sounds like a good idea. Let me dedicate my 120m SP character to a spacecoffin that opens bridges and can shoot non-existent capital fleets.
Oh well, at least this means there's one less account for me to sub. I have 2 mil sp and am a threat to you now 
:shobon: |

Tamplarul
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:06:00 -
[612] - Quote
Andski wrote:Tamplarul wrote:was another guy on titan The point is that he's awful at this game and lost two supercarriers faster than anybody I know The Mittani, for all your supercapital trading needs~~~~~~~
o yes The Mittani is a F*** scammer and CCP help him... but it is another story |

Widemouth Deepthroat
Pink Sockers
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:06:00 -
[613] - Quote
This is part of the EVE Veterans/Loyalty program discussed in recent CSM meating. |

Lord Fargo
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:07:00 -
[614] - Quote
Tamplarul wrote:Andski wrote:Tamplarul wrote:was another guy on titan The point is that he's awful at this game and lost two supercarriers faster than anybody I know The Mittani, for all your supercapital trading needs~~~~~~~ o yes The Mittani is a F*** scammer and CCP help him... but i is another story
post with your NCDOT main |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2590
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:07:00 -
[615] - Quote
Tamplarul wrote:o yes The Mittani is a F*** scammer and CCP help him... but it is another story
The Mittani is not a scammer. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Drago Palermus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:08:00 -
[616] - Quote
Crakachunky wrote:everyone dies untill theres 1 dude in a rifter left as it was written |

Skrypt
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:08:00 -
[617] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Skrypt wrote:Sounds like a good idea. Let me dedicate my 120m SP character to a spacecoffin that opens bridges and can shoot non-existent capital fleets.
Oh well, at least this means there's one less account for me to sub. You know you'll still be able to blap other caps just as well as you always have right? You didn't just read the blog post and immediately have a stroke? lol, reading comprehension fail. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
84
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:08:00 -
[618] - Quote
Widemouth Deepthroat wrote:This is part of the EVE Veterans/Loyalty program discussed in recent CSM meating.
I really want to meat The Mittani. |

Lord Aliventi
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:09:00 -
[619] - Quote
These are terrible changes. Nerfs almost never fix anythings. And even worse we get "I don't really have the time to do this right, so I am going to do this terribly and hope it fixes things". Bravo CCP. You really should delay this until you can do it right.
If the issue is them showing up on field, then swapping fit to kill subcaps, then make it so they can't refit in space or refit when they have an aggression timer. Problem solved. Titans can either tank, or shoot subcaps. Your choice. Choose wrong and another supercap dies for the good of Eve.
What role does CCP want for titans? Looks to me that it's noobship replacement. Oh wait... The noobship can still do stuff. For the sheer amount of SP, time, and isk involved, titan pilots should be able to drop their titans and destroy opposing fleets. TItans should bring fear to the battlefield. After this I doubt you will see many of them even on the battlefield.
And btw Goonies: A drake with a sig radius of 2.5+KMs should be able to be hit by titans. I mean no s***. Your the effective side of a skyscraper. If a titan misses you I would be complaining for a titan tracking buff. Go figure y'all would be the ones dumb (or should I say clever enough?) enough to repeatedly do this to prove that titans are "broken". Well played. And well played Mittens. |

Skrypt
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:09:00 -
[620] - Quote
Death2all Supercaps wrote:Skrypt wrote:Sounds like a good idea. Let me dedicate my 120m SP character to a spacecoffin that opens bridges and can shoot non-existent capital fleets.
Oh well, at least this means there's one less account for me to sub. I have 2 mil sp and am a threat to you now  Hey, no joke. Your 2m SP char will be more useful than my unsubbed (or even subbed but in a titan) 120m SP char. :hifive: |

Lelob
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:10:00 -
[621] - Quote
CynoNet Two wrote:Lelob wrote: Titans being purely anti-cap weapons seems somewhat useless outside of ganks, given the incredible rarity of capital fights in EVE right now. Especially when the side fielding caps and titans has traditionally been facing a blob of subcaps and not caps. At its core it not only shows CCP's ignorance of the metagame right now, but also of the fact that no serious attempts have been made to actively kill titans outside of ganks. Saying titans are imbalanced and need a nerf simply does not make sense, given the context in which the argument is being made.
Attempts to kill titans are made everyday. They usually conclude in a fashion similar to this, or this. I find it astonishing that you none of you realise that behaviour like this is what got your toys nerfed.
Throwing a bunch of subcaps at titans and expecting to win is not even close to being a serious attempt. Fielding a fleet of 200 dreads with carrier and super support would be a serious attempt, and is well within the capabilities of the CFC. I understand well enough why CCP thinks titans must be nerfed, but it is not because of any game-breaking aspects of the titan itself, but of the unwillingness of both actors to engage in a potentially costly capital fight when the results remain uncertain. As I said before, nobody will really know for certain if titans truly are imbalanced until a serious, concerted effort has been made to kill them. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2590
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:11:00 -
[622] - Quote
Lord Aliventi wrote:These are terrible changes. Nerfs almost never fix anythings. And even worse we get "I don't really have the time to do this right, so I am going to do this terribly and hope it fixes things". Bravo CCP. You really should delay this until you can do it right.
If the issue is them showing up on field, then swapping fit to kill subcaps, then make it so they can't refit in space or refit when they have an aggression timer. Problem solved. Titans can either tank, or shoot subcaps. Your choice. Choose wrong and another supercap dies for the good of Eve.
What role does CCP want for titans? Looks to me that it's noobship replacement. Oh wait... The noobship can still do stuff. For the sheer amount of SP, time, and isk involved, titan pilots should be able to drop their titans and destroy opposing fleets. TItans should bring fear to the battlefield. After this I doubt you will see many of them even on the battlefield.
And btw Goonies: A drake with a sig radius of 2.5+KMs should be able to be hit by titans. I mean no s***. Your the effective side of a skyscraper. If a titan misses you I would be complaining for a titan tracking buff. Go figure y'all would be the ones dumb (or should I say clever enough?) enough to repeatedly do this to prove that titans are "broken". Well played. And well played Mittens.
Give me your titan so I can show you how useless it is "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Krios Ahzek
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
724
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:11:00 -
[623] - Quote
Lord Aliventi wrote:These are terrible changes. Nerfs almost never fix anythings. A
Except when they do (all the time)
-áThough All Men Do Despise Us |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2590
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:11:00 -
[624] - Quote
Lelob wrote:Throwing a bunch of subcaps at titans and expecting to win is not even close to being a serious attempt. Fielding a fleet of 200 dreads with carrier and super support would be a serious attempt, and is well within the capabilities of the CFC. I understand well enough why CCP thinks titans must be nerfed, but it is not because of any game-breaking aspects of the titan itself, but of the unwillingness of both actors to engage in a potentially costly capital fight when the results remain uncertain. As I said before, nobody will really know for certain if titans truly are imbalanced until a serious, concerted effort has been made to kill them.
feel free to source 200 dreads off the market meight
also did you not see the shiptype that was killed by titans? it was an interdictor. what other methods are available for tackling titans? neuting, bumping battleships? lmao "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
316
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:11:00 -
[625] - Quote
Blawrf McTaggart wrote:hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2595
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:12:00 -
[626] - Quote
lelob which eo guy are you i can't remember |

Sapegu
the muppets RED.OverLord
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:12:00 -
[627] - Quote
So,
How can a small alliance overpower a bigger alliance? If Biggest guns are nerfed... 1000 men Alliance cannot overpower 7000 men alliance... never!!
This game is not evoluting but being nerfed for goons pleasures...
Goons... you have the path clear to conquer EVE SOV...
CCP... WAKE UP!!! |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:12:00 -
[628] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:its hilarious raiden. got ordered to ***** on neutral alts in this thread because we were having too much fun laughing at their pain
I am no neutral alt, and I still think this is the most dirrect help CCP have given any one alliance in a conflict in eve's history. Not one but 2 nurfs to help you against titans and supercarrier in this war.
If you are going to fix something CCP. Then fix it make it great and awesome in its own right, not a shell of a ship. |

Kazanir
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
357
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:12:00 -
[629] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Why should I be mad that an alliance is getting developer help?
Get real there buddy. This kind of a change wouldn't be happening to EVE if it didn't have a large majority of both the dev team and the CSM on board with it.
However, I know that this is just your attack line du jour for this month and that you don't actually believe your own bullshit, so I'm asking myself why I bother responding seriously. After all, if I thought that 75% of the game's design team were part of a conspiracy to favor an alliance I hated, I'd probably quit -- but I bet you aren't doing that, are you?
Anyway, it is too bad that you and others have been riding the monster truck so long and now you have to look for other options. But for the other 345,000 players of EVE, Seleene-powered supercaps will be one of many things about Dominion that we won't miss. And if you do decide to quit the game because you no longer have a god-ship to train for...well, we probably won't miss you either, and we'll still enjoy our space battles for quite a long time, I think.
|

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1826
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:13:00 -
[630] - Quote
Lord Aliventi wrote:Well played. And well played Mittens.
Don't forget to vote for him.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5499
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:13:00 -
[631] - Quote
Lord Aliventi wrote:These are terrible changes. Nerfs almost never fix anythings. Sure they do, especially compared to the alternatives.
You can either do nothing, thus not solving anything, or buffing everything, causing power-creep and even more balance issues, or you can nerf the one thing that's causing the problem. Of the three, the nerf is almost always the right thing to do.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Death2all Supercaps
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:13:00 -
[632] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:lelob which eo guy are you i can't remember
does it matter? All QQ look alike |

Lelob
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:14:00 -
[633] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:lelob which eo guy are you i can't remember
Posting with my main~ |

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:14:00 -
[634] - Quote
I do like the unable to refit with aggression thing. It should really be a thing.
Also, someone give me their 'useless' Ragnarok pilot and the ship too, ok thanks~ Don't worry, I promise it'll die. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
84
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:15:00 -
[635] - Quote
Lord Aliventi wrote: What role does CCP want for titans?
Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest. |

Michael Harari
The Hatchery
65
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:17:00 -
[636] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Lord Aliventi wrote: What role does CCP want for titans?
Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest.
If only people actually deployed caps in any meaningful number.
|

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
84
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:17:00 -
[637] - Quote
CynoNet Two wrote:Lelob wrote: Titans being purely anti-cap weapons seems somewhat useless outside of ganks, given the incredible rarity of capital fights in EVE right now. Especially when the side fielding caps and titans has traditionally been facing a blob of subcaps and not caps. At its core it not only shows CCP's ignorance of the metagame right now, but also of the fact that no serious attempts have been made to actively kill titans outside of ganks. Saying titans are imbalanced and need a nerf simply does not make sense, given the context in which the argument is being made.
Attempts to kill titans are made everyday. They usually conclude in a fashion similar to this, or this. I find it astonishing that you none of you realise that behaviour like this is what got your toys nerfed.
Please don't try to point out their cognitive dissonance to them, they are unable to comprehend it. Its cruel of you to do this. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
84
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:18:00 -
[638] - Quote
Michael Harari wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Lord Aliventi wrote: What role does CCP want for titans?
Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest. If only people actually deployed caps in any meaningful number.
We can now that our support fleets aren't just going to be free killmails. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2597
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:19:00 -
[639] - Quote
Michael Harari wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Lord Aliventi wrote: What role does CCP want for titans?
Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest. If only people actually deployed caps in any meaningful number.
Dominion's fighterbombers and capital popping doomsdays ensured that carriers are relegated into suicide triage platforms and dreads are, uh, docked. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
435
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:20:00 -
[640] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:
Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest.
Wait, will these be the titans that need 30 billion in sensor boosters to lock a cap before it can de agro and dock?
|

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:20:00 -
[641] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Michael Harari wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Lord Aliventi wrote: What role does CCP want for titans?
Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest. If only people actually deployed caps in any meaningful number. We can now that our support fleets aren't just going to be free killmails.
You don't have support fleets you have fleets, nothing to support cause then our Titans wouldn't be shooting at the support. Would be killing other caps..... |

Skrypt
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:21:00 -
[642] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Lord Aliventi wrote: What role does CCP want for titans?
Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest. Unless this titan nerf has the unintended side effect of increasing capital usage, there isn't going to be very much blappage as dread fleets are pretty rare these days.
But keep sperging at your keyboard about it, because if you say it enough it'll be true. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:21:00 -
[643] - Quote
Lelob wrote:CynoNet Two wrote:Lelob wrote: Titans being purely anti-cap weapons seems somewhat useless outside of ganks, given the incredible rarity of capital fights in EVE right now. Especially when the side fielding caps and titans has traditionally been facing a blob of subcaps and not caps. At its core it not only shows CCP's ignorance of the metagame right now, but also of the fact that no serious attempts have been made to actively kill titans outside of ganks. Saying titans are imbalanced and need a nerf simply does not make sense, given the context in which the argument is being made.
Attempts to kill titans are made everyday. They usually conclude in a fashion similar to this, or this. I find it astonishing that you none of you realise that behaviour like this is what got your toys nerfed. Throwing a bunch of subcaps at titans and expecting to win is not even close to being a serious attempt. Fielding a fleet of 200 dreads with carrier and super support would be a serious attempt, and is well within the capabilities of the CFC. I understand well enough why CCP thinks titans must be nerfed, but it is not because of any game-breaking aspects of the titan itself, but of the unwillingness of both actors to engage in a potentially costly capital fight when the results remain uncertain. As I said before, nobody will really know for certain if titans truly are imbalanced until a serious, concerted effort has been made to kill them.
Hahahaha.
So, what you are saying is that one side has to throw 200 years of skill training onto 50 years of skill training in order to be competitive?
You also realize that if anyone would organize anything like 200 dreads, other side would never show up?
******** theory crafting.
|

Michael Harari
The Hatchery
65
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:21:00 -
[644] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:CynoNet Two wrote:Lelob wrote: Titans being purely anti-cap weapons seems somewhat useless outside of ganks, given the incredible rarity of capital fights in EVE right now. Especially when the side fielding caps and titans has traditionally been facing a blob of subcaps and not caps. At its core it not only shows CCP's ignorance of the metagame right now, but also of the fact that no serious attempts have been made to actively kill titans outside of ganks. Saying titans are imbalanced and need a nerf simply does not make sense, given the context in which the argument is being made.
Attempts to kill titans are made everyday. They usually conclude in a fashion similar to this, or this. I find it astonishing that you none of you realise that behaviour like this is what got your toys nerfed. Please don't try to point out their cognitive dissonance to them, they are unable to comprehend it. Its cruel of you to do this.
The killmails mean nothing. A haloed linked interceptor can be hit by titans. You have to actually be moving with some angular velocity for to mitigate damage. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2595
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:21:00 -
[645] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Weaselior wrote:its hilarious raiden. got ordered to ***** on neutral alts in this thread because we were having too much fun laughing at their pain I am no neutral alt, and I still think this is the most dirrect help CCP have given any one alliance in a conflict in eve's history. Not one but 2 nurfs to help you against titans and supercarrier in this war. If you are going to fix something CCP. Then fix it make it great and awesome in its own right, not a shell of a ship. like when bob v1 suddenly lost its invulnerable posbowling titans and got crushed
maybe if you stopped basing your alliance around broken mechanics in obvious need of a nerf this wouldn't keep happening to you |

Krios Ahzek
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
724
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:21:00 -
[646] - Quote
Sapegu wrote:So,
How can a small alliance overpower a bigger alliance? If Biggest guns are nerfed... 1000 men Alliance cannot overpower 7000 men alliance... never!!
This game is not evoluting but being nerfed for goons pleasures...
Goons... you have the path clear to conquer EVE SOV...
CCP... WAKE UP!!!
CCP wants 1000 subscriptions, not 7000
-áThough All Men Do Despise Us |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2597
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:22:00 -
[647] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest. Wait, will these be the titans that need 30 billion in sensor boosters to lock a cap before it can de agro and dock?
I doubt you'll have any problems locking carriers in triage and DDing them? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:22:00 -
[648] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Weaselior wrote:its hilarious raiden. got ordered to ***** on neutral alts in this thread because we were having too much fun laughing at their pain I am no neutral alt, and I still think this is the most dirrect help CCP have given any one alliance in a conflict in eve's history. Not one but 2 nurfs to help you against titans and supercarrier in this war. If you are going to fix something CCP. Then fix it make it great and awesome in its own right, not a shell of a ship.
So, what you are saying is - there is nothing wrong with Titans?
Right?
|

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
84
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:22:00 -
[649] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Michael Harari wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Lord Aliventi wrote: What role does CCP want for titans?
Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest. If only people actually deployed caps in any meaningful number. We can now that our support fleets aren't just going to be free killmails. You don't have support fleets you have fleets, nothing to support cause then our Titans wouldn't be shooting at the support. Would be killing other caps.....
That would be the ideal sure, if only it were reality. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
84
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:23:00 -
[650] - Quote
Oh wait it will be come April, ahaha. |

Organa
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:23:00 -
[651] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Lord Aliventi wrote: What role does CCP want for titans?
Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest.
wrong the scan res part alone means that a capital can deagress and dock before a titan could lock it unless its using 4 officer sebos which severely impact its fit (4 non officer sebos wont cut it) |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:23:00 -
[652] - Quote
just for the record The Ankou was never in bob, we have been in razor thou in an early incarnation |

Skrypt
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:24:00 -
[653] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:BioZvin wrote:Weaselior wrote:its hilarious raiden. got ordered to ***** on neutral alts in this thread because we were having too much fun laughing at their pain I am no neutral alt, and I still think this is the most dirrect help CCP have given any one alliance in a conflict in eve's history. Not one but 2 nurfs to help you against titans and supercarrier in this war. If you are going to fix something CCP. Then fix it make it great and awesome in its own right, not a shell of a ship. like when bob v1 suddenly lost its invulnerable posbowling titans and got crushed maybe if you stopped basing your alliance around broken mechanics in obvious need of a nerf this wouldn't keep happening to you Yeah, I agree. Anything that isn't a cookie-cutter fleet composition relying heavily on sheer numbers is terrible. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
84
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:24:00 -
[654] - Quote
Organa wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Lord Aliventi wrote: What role does CCP want for titans?
Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest. wrong the scan res part alone means that a capital can deagress and dock before a titan could lock it unless its using 4 officer sebos which severely impact its fit (4 non officer sebos wont cut it)
Deaggress and dock? Why is your capital humping a station instead of attacking/defending a TCU or SBU or sitting in a POS? If you mean in lowsec, he he heheh ahah hahahahaha. |

Jin Nongmin
Chinese ISK Farmers
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:24:00 -
[655] - Quote
prease to be rethink cccp! This terribre nerf!
before nef many chinese chirdren make mine 4 titan
buy many sack for rice
after nerf no mine 4 titan
sad orphan starve
preaes to not nerf titan chinese chirdren need eat 4 rice
prease to be buy titan 4 rice still after not nerf |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
435
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:25:00 -
[656] - Quote
Kazanir wrote: I think you would be surprised how many people on the "anti-supercap" side, including in Goonswarm, actually agree with this. Lots of "us" would love to see supercarriers and titans have well-defined and useful roles on the battlefield. It just can't be a role where the number of supercapitals you have ends up defining who wins the war every single time -- and so far, that has been the case ever since Dominion launched.
Right, but having the most sub caps is somehow a better way.
Right now both ways work, CCP are effectively removing any strategy that doesn't involve more numbers.
|

warp to station
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:25:00 -
[657] - Quote
PLRAIDENNCDOT tears best tear                       
April Is Coming            |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:25:00 -
[658] - Quote
Crakachunky wrote:okay so now fleet fights will work like this:
600 dudes meet 600 dudes, one side starts loosing and brings in carriers for reps, other side deploys dreads and carriers, other side now brings in supers to kill the caps, other side brings in supers and titans, everyone dies untill theres 1 dude in a rifter left
how fights work currently:
600 dudes meets 600 dues, one side brings in titans and wins
after this change escalation mechanics will actually work (titans are meant to be giant support ships and a last card play)
What game do you play? No one would every deploy dreads when theres 600 enemy support on the field and they certainly would not do it to kill triage carriers. Triage carriers get alpha'd in that fight. Whoever brings them is basically suiciding carriers (which is fine but it's not an effective use of a carrier).
Also in all my time playing EVE I've never seen a 'fair fight'. 600 vs 600 is mythical, someone will have 800 the other 400. If even numbers do occur, one of them will stand down because "it's just not worth it, we might lose".
EVE has always been about making the other guy commit thinking he will win.
I dunno, maybe I'm wrong, maybe Colonel O'Neill of STARGATE SG-1 knows more about PvP than me.
|

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
86
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:26:00 -
[659] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:just for the record The Ankou was never in bob, we have been in razor thou in an early incarnation
This won't put you in higher standing when we finish with your alliance; in April, heheh |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2600
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:26:00 -
[660] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:
Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest.
Wait, will these be the titans that need 30 billion in sensor boosters to lock a cap before it can de agro and dock? its cute you think you're getting enough cormack's at any price |

Valearx
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:27:00 -
[661] - Quote
Never before have squeals of indignation been so so so good...
edit: ************ missed the snipe |

Organa
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:28:00 -
[662] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Organa wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Lord Aliventi wrote: What role does CCP want for titans?
Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest. wrong the scan res part alone means that a capital can deagress and dock before a titan could lock it unless its using 4 officer sebos which severely impact its fit (4 non officer sebos wont cut it) Deaggress and dock? Why is your capital humping a station instead of attacking/defending a TCU or SBU or sitting in a POS? If you mean in lowsec, he he heheh ahah hahahahaha.
you mean like reaping there station that just came out of rf or there services |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:29:00 -
[663] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:
Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest.
Wait, will these be the titans that need 30 billion in sensor boosters to lock a cap before it can de agro and dock? its cute you think you're getting enough cormack's at any price
That's kind of the point...
Way to read between the lines genius. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2606
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:30:00 -
[664] - Quote
Organa wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Organa wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Lord Aliventi wrote: What role does CCP want for titans?
Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest. wrong the scan res part alone means that a capital can deagress and dock before a titan could lock it unless its using 4 officer sebos which severely impact its fit (4 non officer sebos wont cut it) Deaggress and dock? Why is your capital humping a station instead of attacking/defending a TCU or SBU or sitting in a POS? If you mean in lowsec, he he heheh ahah hahahahaha. you mean like reaping there station that just came out of rf or there services
tell me all about how repping a station gets you aggressed "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:31:00 -
[665] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Crakachunky wrote:okay so now fleet fights will work like this:
600 dudes meet 600 dudes, one side starts loosing and brings in carriers for reps, other side deploys dreads and carriers, other side now brings in supers to kill the caps, other side brings in supers and titans, everyone dies untill theres 1 dude in a rifter left
how fights work currently:
600 dudes meets 600 dues, one side brings in titans and wins
after this change escalation mechanics will actually work (titans are meant to be giant support ships and a last card play) What game do you play? No one would every deploy dreads when theres 600 enemy support on the field and they certainly would not do it to kill triage carriers. Triage carriers get alpha'd in that fight. Whoever brings them is basically suiciding carriers (which is fine but it's not an effective use of a carrier). Also in all my time playing EVE I've never seen a 'fair fight'. 600 vs 600 is mythical, someone will have 800 the other 400. If even numbers do occur, one of them will stand down because "it's just not worth it, we might lose". EVE has always been about making the other guy commit thinking he will win. I dunno, maybe I'm wrong, maybe Colonel O'Neill of STARGATE SG-1 knows more about PvP than me.
Judging by the nonsense you are spewing, it would appear that he actually does know more about PvP than you.
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2600
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:31:00 -
[666] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:
That's kind of the point...
Way to read between the lines genius.
you mean the lines of my pile of officer sensor boosters
because the things it's saying there are dirty |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:33:00 -
[667] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Dez Affinity wrote:
That's kind of the point...
Way to read between the lines genius.
you mean the lines of my pile of officer sensor boosters because the things it's saying there are dirty
Hey goonswarm this guy is in your alliance lma0 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2606
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:33:00 -
[668] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:you mean the lines of my pile of officer sensor boosters
because the things it's saying there are dirty
the forces of elite pvp could not beat a goonNOOB to jita contracts "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
86
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:34:00 -
[669] - Quote
Andski wrote: tell me all about how repping a station gets you aggressed
Be gentle, its an Empire pubbie, they don't know these things.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2606
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:34:00 -
[670] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Weaselior wrote:Dez Affinity wrote:
That's kind of the point...
Way to read between the lines genius.
you mean the lines of my pile of officer sensor boosters because the things it's saying there are dirty Hey goonswarm this guy is in your alliance lma0
yes he is our CFO
you guys have penifsmash and ordo garr lma0 "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2606
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:34:00 -
[671] - Quote
pandemic legion, the dumping ground for goonswarm's worst posters "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:35:00 -
[672] - Quote
Just looking forward to seeing what you will get nurfed next, when we start beating you with something els... if people are not to mad at CCP to keep subscribing. Honestly I am not far from it myself, think this is a very poor and ill advised "temp" nurf.
Can you atleast make us able to dock our useless ships so we can get in others ? |

Kazanir
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
360
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:35:00 -
[673] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Kazanir wrote: I think you would be surprised how many people on the "anti-supercap" side, including in Goonswarm, actually agree with this. Lots of "us" would love to see supercarriers and titans have well-defined and useful roles on the battlefield. It just can't be a role where the number of supercapitals you have ends up defining who wins the war every single time -- and so far, that has been the case ever since Dominion launched. Right, but having the most sub caps is somehow a better way. Right now both ways work, CCP are effectively removing any strategy that doesn't involve more numbers.
You don't actually believe this either, and I know it. You know that different fleets wildly vary in effectiveness and that there is a huge and ever-changing metagame between Maelstroms, Drakes, Tengus, Abaddons, sniping T3/HACs, bombers, carriers, and on and on and on. The subcapital and capital fleet war is most certainly NOT dominated by raw numbers in the way that almost every war for the past 2 years* has been dominated by who has more supercaps.
Supercaps suffer from the "he who has more, wins!" problem in a way that subcaps and caps actually never have.
* I am excluding the wars where the defending alliance was already dead and rotting on the inside and merely needed to be eviscerated and have all its structures shot. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2619
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:36:00 -
[674] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Just looking forward to seeing what you will get nurfed next, when we start beating you with something els... if people are not to mad at CCP to keep subscribing. Honestly I am not far from it myself, think this is a very poor and ill advised "temp" nurf.
Can you atleast make us able to dock our useless ships so we can get in others ?
are you implying that your alliance knows how to fly anything without PL teaching you how "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Lelob
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
24
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:37:00 -
[675] - Quote
Sentinel Eeex wrote: So, what you are saying is that one side has to throw 200 years of skill training onto 50 years of skill training in order to be competitive?
You also realize that if anyone would organize anything like 200 dreads, other side would never show up?
******** theory crafting.
People also said that nobody is going to deploy all their supers/titans to save a tech tower and yet they did. Betting on cowardice does not really pay dividends unless its a bet on goons or the NC.
edit: cleared up quote pyramid. Also goons were able to form these dread fleets in Cloud Ring iirc and about the only thing that seems to be stopping goons from rolling over Raiden dot is their use of turret titans against goon subcaps. The answer shouldn't be too difficult. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2619
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:37:00 -
[676] - Quote
hey PL remember how your ~slowcats~ died in a fire in C-J to -A- tengus
oh wait they didn't "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:38:00 -
[677] - Quote
Sentinel Eeex wrote:
Judging by the nonsense you are spewing, it would appear that he actually does know more about PvP than you.
Go ahead and refute what I said.
No one is dropping dreads in a support fight to kill triage carriers outside of low sec (where the numbers total in the fight are around the hundred mark) |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2619
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:39:00 -
[678] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:
Judging by the nonsense you are spewing, it would appear that he actually does know more about PvP than you.
Go ahead and refute what I said. No one is dropping dreads in a support fight to kill triage carriers outside of low sec (where the numbers total in the fight are around the hundred mark)
hey I wonder why dreads are fielded so often in low-sec
what has effectively been out of the game there? bombs, it's obviously bombs "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Centra Spike
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
106
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:39:00 -
[679] - Quote
I'll be brief. The issue here is not whether we broke the game with our use of supercapitals, or took a few liberties with our enemies - we did. But you can't hold a whole shiptype responsible for the behavior of a few, sick twisted individuals. For if you do, then shouldn't we blame the whole game? And if the whole game is guilty, then isn't this an indictment of our video game industry in general? I put it to you, CCP Greyscale - isn't this an indictment of our entire American society? Well you can do whatever you want to us, but we're not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America! |

Crakachunky
Stargate SG-1 Fatal Ascension
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:40:00 -
[680] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Crakachunky wrote:okay so now fleet fights will work like this:
600 dudes meet 600 dudes, one side starts loosing and brings in carriers for reps, other side deploys dreads and carriers, other side now brings in supers to kill the caps, other side brings in supers and titans, everyone dies untill theres 1 dude in a rifter left
how fights work currently:
600 dudes meets 600 dues, one side brings in titans and wins
after this change escalation mechanics will actually work (titans are meant to be giant support ships and a last card play) What game do you play? No one would every deploy dreads when theres 600 enemy support on the field and they certainly would not do it to kill triage carriers. Triage carriers get alpha'd in that fight. Whoever brings them is basically suiciding carriers (which is fine but it's not an effective use of a carrier). Also in all my time playing EVE I've never seen a 'fair fight'. 600 vs 600 is mythical, someone will have 800 the other 400. If even numbers do occur, one of them will stand down because "it's just not worth it, we might lose". EVE has always been about making the other guy commit thinking he will win. I dunno, maybe I'm wrong, maybe Colonel O'Neill of STARGATE SG-1 knows more about PvP than me.
the numbers we're not worked out to the T, maybe 20 carriers would be needed, and thats certainly do-able, the rest of the fight then scales upward, risk vs. reward style. If one side put there b*lls on the line and risked alot more than was needed***, and the other side backs out, well thats there fault and they deserve to loose whatever it is they were fighting over
and yh even fights do happen, a smart FC will cap his fleet to actually make a fight happen (seen it done plenty of times) and like i said the fight will escalate risk vs. reward, again a smart FC will only delpoy just enough to keep him in the game, baiting the other side to deploy more for more strategic kills
***before you say "dropping titans isnt a risk then ey !! RAWR" well no its not when 40+ are dropped at once and they blap all subcaps on field, then you add all the supers that are sent in with them anyway and that fleet is at no risk what-so-ever. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:40:00 -
[681] - Quote
Do we really need to descent to the level of personal attacks? Dear god men have pity, they can no longer one shot subcaps with impunity! They'll have to actually have a support fleet now. |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:40:00 -
[682] - Quote
Andski wrote:BioZvin wrote:Just looking forward to seeing what you will get nurfed next, when we start beating you with something els... if people are not to mad at CCP to keep subscribing. Honestly I am not far from it myself, think this is a very poor and ill advised "temp" nurf.
Can you atleast make us able to dock our useless ships so we can get in others ? are you implying that your alliance knows how to fly anything without PL teaching you how
Cause you come up with so many fleet combo's, that just funny :) I have seen no change in setup from you, would have thought you might want to try and counter what your against.
Question still stands can we dock Supers soon ? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2619
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:40:00 -
[683] - Quote
here's a video of our titans dying in a fire to Raiden dreads: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6pmYYVBMmU "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Koby Botick
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:41:00 -
[684] - Quote
My mom always told me: Titan are like a box of chocolate; you never know when they are going to get a tracking nerf. |

supr3m3justic3
Imperium Technologies F0RCEFUL ENTRY
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:41:00 -
[685] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:
Judging by the nonsense you are spewing, it would appear that he actually does know more about PvP than you.
Go ahead and refute what I said. No one is dropping dreads in a support fight to kill triage carriers outside of low sec (where the numbers total in the fight are around the hundred mark)
Lol, no one will be dropping dreads anyways...they are getting nerfed too, since its the XL guns thats taking the hit...lol |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2619
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:41:00 -
[686] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Andski wrote:BioZvin wrote:Just looking forward to seeing what you will get nurfed next, when we start beating you with something els... if people are not to mad at CCP to keep subscribing. Honestly I am not far from it myself, think this is a very poor and ill advised "temp" nurf.
Can you atleast make us able to dock our useless ships so we can get in others ? are you implying that your alliance knows how to fly anything without PL teaching you how Cause you come up with so many fleet combo's, that just funny :) I have seen no change in setup from you, would have thought you might want to try and counter what your against. Question still stands can we dock Supers soon ?
counter-point: raiden flies all the same cookie cutter fleet compositions as everyone else "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Szilardis
Phoibe Enterprises
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:43:00 -
[687] - Quote
Mike712 wrote:Courthouse wrote:Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Counterpoint: You're from battleclinic and thus have zero idea what you're talking about when it comes to PVP in EVE Online. lol, you couldn't be more wrong, all of the battleclinic mods are PvPers. Confirming we do lots of pvp like things, but not as l33t as non-BC mods. I mean, the fact we voluntarily moderate one of the largest EVE fansites MUST mean we're terrible, right? |

evereplicant
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:43:00 -
[688] - Quote
damn what is PL going to do now? I mean no more super blobs for them, how will they survive? How are they going to cope not whoring on pod and noobship killmails?
+1 CCP
|

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:43:00 -
[689] - Quote
Andski wrote:BioZvin wrote: Cause you come up with so many fleet combo's, that just funny :) I have seen no change in setup from you, would have thought you might want to try and counter what your against.
Question still stands can we dock Supers soon ?
counter-point: raiden flies all the same cookie cutter fleet compositions as everyone else
Major alliances have formulated fleet doctrines? I for one am shocked. |

Nao Oikawasan
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:45:00 -
[690] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Just looking forward to seeing what you will get nurfed next, when we start beating you with something els... if people are not to mad at CCP to keep subscribing. Honestly I am not far from it myself, think this is a very poor and ill advised "temp" nurf.
Can you atleast make us able to dock our useless ships so we can get in others ?
When did you start "beating them"? Might want to take a look at the map before you speak again on this subject.
|

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
94
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:45:00 -
[691] - Quote
evereplicant wrote:damn what is PL going to do now? I mean no more super blobs for them, how will they survive? How are they going to cope not whoring on pod and noobship killmails?
+1 CCP
Yes how will PL live with being able to kill other capital ships with the same efficiency they do currently. The sky has fallen now that PL will forced to keep killing capital ships left right and center! Oh the humanity! |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:46:00 -
[692] - Quote
Kazanir wrote:
You don't actually believe this either, and I know it. You know that different fleets wildly vary in effectiveness and that there is a huge and ever-changing metagame between Maelstroms, Drakes, Tengus, Abaddons, sniping T3/HACs, bombers, carriers, and on and on and on. The subcapital and capital fleet war is most certainly NOT dominated by raw numbers in the way that almost every war for the past 2 years* has been dominated by who has more supercaps.
Supercaps suffer from the "he who has more, wins!" problem in a way that subcaps and caps actually never have.
* I am excluding the wars where the defending alliance was already dead and rotting on the inside and merely needed to be eviscerated and have all its structures shot.
When it comes to support fights there's a bottleneck in fleet doctrines and it mostly comes down to what you can tank, because if you can't counter by raw dps you need to keep the dps you do have alive.
No matter what doctrine you bring, there comesa point where you're getting alpha'd because there's just so many dudes shooting you, it's pretty simple.
Andski wrote:Dez Affinity wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:
Judging by the nonsense you are spewing, it would appear that he actually does know more about PvP than you.
Go ahead and refute what I said. No one is dropping dreads in a support fight to kill triage carriers outside of low sec (where the numbers total in the fight are around the hundred mark) hey I wonder why dreads are fielded so often in low-sec what has effectively been out of the game there? bombs, it's obviously bombs
brilliant, fatal acension will be contacting you shortly.
(p.s it's nothing to do with titans, it's the low cost, high dps and ability to track BS, basically a sc post patch) |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
435
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:46:00 -
[693] - Quote
Kazanir wrote: Supercaps suffer from the "he who has more, wins!" problem in a way that subcaps and caps actually never have.
This is a lie, flat out, subcaps and caps also suffer from the same problem, you're just choosing to ignore that for the sake of your argument.
What beats a 1200 man support fleet? (I'm waiting for one of you retards to say bombers, please say bombers). |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2608
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:46:00 -
[694] - Quote
Centra Spike wrote:I'll be brief. The issue here is not whether we broke the game with our use of supercapitals, or took a few liberties with our enemies - we did. But you can't hold a whole shiptype responsible for the behavior of a few, sick twisted individuals. For if you do, then shouldn't we blame the whole game? And if the whole game is guilty, then isn't this an indictment of our video game industry in general? I put it to you, CCP Greyscale - isn't this an indictment of our entire American society? Well you can do whatever you want to us, but we're not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America! what the
a good pl post in a titan nerf thread?
my eyes must deceive me |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
94
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:47:00 -
[695] - Quote
BioZvin wrote: Can you atleast make us able to dock our useless ships so we can get in others ?
Look at this guy that didn't actually read the dev blog. You can still kill capital ships just fine with your titan, that ability hasn't been nerfed at all. |

Makalu Zarya
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:47:00 -
[696] - Quote
As you all know AAA doesn't use titans or for that matter supers very much. We've found ways to counter enemy super blobs or in the very least make them ineffective. So here are my two cents on the titan nerf.
Tracking speed nerf is completely fine and was much needed, titans will still be able to hit bs fairly well however, especially if they are webbed, however hitting anything smaller will now be a major pain in the ass.
The scan res nerf is rather ridiculous. If you don't want titans locking subcaps, then simply implement a function where titans can't lock subcaps, that is really rather simple. As people know I like to throw my titan around and DD people who rep poses or aggro on stations. For that sort of warfare this is now completely useless. It will take 20+ seconds to lock a carrier with 3 sensor boosters. Stacking penalty makes it useless to fit any more than 3 really. So honestly any carebear who is not completely asleep at the wheel will be able to make it into the shields 10 times over in his carrier by the time he is even locked.
Another note is that a bs with mwd turned on has the same sig radius as a carrier, so honestly you can lock a bs just as fast if you want to. Lets actually look at some numbers here to further prove this nerf is fairly stupid.
Taking a titan with base scan res 5, putting in 3 federation navy sensor boosters (and yes i'd put officer if it actually mattered a damn). Perfect skill bonus gives u 1.25 multiplier, fleet 1.1 and sebos further 4.34. Put all these together and you get 5.97...lets call it 6/ This means your scan res is 30. It will take 17.7s to lock a carrier, approximately as long as it will take to lock a bs with mwd on. Going down one step further bc with mwd on (much more likely scenario) will have a sig radius of around 1400-2000 (assuming no bonuses). This puts the lock time between 19 and 21s. So loking at it the difference in lock time of a mwding bc and a carrier is at most 4 seconds. Putting sig radius a lot lower at 400 for non-mwd bc such as drake lock time goes up to only 30s.
So in essence a titan will be able to lock any ship that it can actually hit in between 17 and 30s. Granted this is much slower than before but at the end of the day it should be able to lock capitals SIGNIFICANTLY faster than subcaps and this nerf does not fix it in any shape way or form. All it does it make shield hugging carriers nearly immune to DD while bss and bcs on grid will still go pop...maybe not bcs so much, but bs still stand no chance against titans, they will be locked and hit rather will.
20s lock time...7s cycle time on guns, that means even with 3 locked targets any titan will have 3 bs perma-locked.
gg ccp...you didn't fix anything...you just made titans more useless against other caps as far as i'm concerned. |

Tithi
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:47:00 -
[697] - Quote
Hey guise. I'm not a cap pilot or anything so forgive my ignorance. I can totally understand the logic of this nerf (from an outsiders perspective, I mean), but I have one real question.
What is the capitol ship that cap-heavy alliances should be using to combat subcaps after this change? Carriers?
I think its obviously silly that Titans would be able to hit subcaps, but I think it seems fair that there should be some capital ship that is designed to fight downward.
I wouldn't want these big fleet battles to just change from "Who has the most supers" to "Who has the most Maelstroms."
Any thoughts? |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
94
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:47:00 -
[698] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Centra Spike wrote:I'll be brief. The issue here is not whether we broke the game with our use of supercapitals, or took a few liberties with our enemies - we did. But you can't hold a whole shiptype responsible for the behavior of a few, sick twisted individuals. For if you do, then shouldn't we blame the whole game? And if the whole game is guilty, then isn't this an indictment of our video game industry in general? I put it to you, CCP Greyscale - isn't this an indictment of our entire American society? Well you can do whatever you want to us, but we're not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America! what the a good pl post in a titan nerf thread? my eyes must deceive me
That bro is in the wrong alliance. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2608
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:48:00 -
[699] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Kazanir wrote: Supercaps suffer from the "he who has more, wins!" problem in a way that subcaps and caps actually never have.
This is a lie, flat out, subcaps and caps also suffer from the same problem, you're just choosing to ignore that for the sake of your argument. What beats a 1200 man support fleet? (I'm waiting for one of you retards to say bombers, please say bombers). a better run and better composed fleet |

supr3m3justic3
Imperium Technologies F0RCEFUL ENTRY
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:48:00 -
[700] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Kazanir wrote: Supercaps suffer from the "he who has more, wins!" problem in a way that subcaps and caps actually never have.
This is a lie, flat out, subcaps and caps also suffer from the same problem, you're just choosing to ignore that for the sake of your argument. What beats a 1200 man support fleet? (I'm waiting for one of you retards to say bombers, please say bombers).
Wheatgerm |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:48:00 -
[701] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote: What beats a 1200 man support fleet? (I'm waiting for one of you retards to say bombers, please say bombers).
Mister Vee. |

Richter Enderas
Coronal Core Research Inc Elite Space Guild
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:49:00 -
[702] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Kazanir wrote: Supercaps suffer from the "he who has more, wins!" problem in a way that subcaps and caps actually never have.
This is a lie, flat out, subcaps and caps also suffer from the same problem, you're just choosing to ignore that for the sake of your argument. What beats a 1200 man support fleet? (I'm waiting for one of you retards to say bombers, please say bombers).
obviously not you
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2630
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:49:00 -
[703] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:brilliant, fatal acension will be contacting you shortly.
(p.s it's nothing to do with titans, it's the low cost, high dps and ability to track BS, basically a sc post patch)
ahahaha sure why not "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
94
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:50:00 -
[704] - Quote
Tithi wrote:Hey guise. I'm not a cap pilot or anything so forgive my ignorance. I can totally understand the logic of this nerf (from an outsiders perspective, I mean), but I have one real question.
What is the capitol ship that cap-heavy alliances should be using to combat subcaps after this change? Carriers?
I think its obviously silly that Titans would be able to hit subcaps, but I think it seems fair that there should be some capital ship that is designed to fight downward.
I wouldn't want these big fleet battles to just change from "Who has the most supers" to "Who has the most Maelstroms."
Any thoughts?
Hopefully they will start using another fleet to combat a fleet. Carriers are currently used quite heavily in regular plain old dust ups and will continue to be used so. I doubt most heavy hitting alliances consider carriers to be a huge deal anymore, they're so fragile they can be alpha'd like any battleship. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2630
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:52:00 -
[705] - Quote
tengu fleets don't kill larger fleets of maelstroms
abaddon fleets don't kill larger fleets of drakes
nope "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Courthouse
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
159
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:53:00 -
[706] - Quote
Szilardis wrote:Mike712 wrote:Courthouse wrote:Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Counterpoint: You're from battleclinic and thus have zero idea what you're talking about when it comes to PVP in EVE Online. lol, you couldn't be more wrong, all of the battleclinic mods are PvPers. Confirming we do lots of pvp like things, but not as l33t as non-BC mods. I mean, the fact we voluntarily moderate one of the largest EVE fansites MUST mean we're terrible, right? So does Riverini. You're not making compelling arguments out of this. |

Pallidum Treponema
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
66
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:55:00 -
[707] - Quote
Makalu Zarya wrote:As you all know AAA doesn't use titans or for that matter supers very much. We've found ways to counter enemy super blobs or in the very least make them ineffective. So here are my two cents on the titan nerf.
Tracking speed nerf is completely fine and was much needed, titans will still be able to hit bs fairly well however, especially if they are webbed, however hitting anything smaller will now be a major pain in the ass.
The scan res nerf is rather ridiculous. If you don't want titans locking subcaps, then simply implement a function where titans can't lock subcaps, that is really rather simple. As people know I like to throw my titan around and DD people who rep poses or aggro on stations. For that sort of warfare this is now completely useless. It will take 20+ seconds to lock a carrier with 3 sensor boosters. Stacking penalty makes it useless to fit any more than 3 really. So honestly any carebear who is not completely asleep at the wheel will be able to make it into the shields 10 times over in his carrier by the time he is even locked.
Another note is that a bs with mwd turned on has the same sig radius as a carrier, so honestly you can lock a bs just as fast if you want to. Lets actually look at some numbers here to further prove this nerf is fairly stupid.
Taking a titan with base scan res 5, putting in 3 federation navy sensor boosters (and yes i'd put officer if it actually mattered a damn). Perfect skill bonus gives u 1.25 multiplier, fleet 1.1 and sebos further 4.34. Put all these together and you get 5.97...lets call it 6/ This means your scan res is 30. It will take 17.7s to lock a carrier, approximately as long as it will take to lock a bs with mwd on. Going down one step further bc with mwd on (much more likely scenario) will have a sig radius of around 1400-2000 (assuming no bonuses). This puts the lock time between 19 and 21s. So loking at it the difference in lock time of a mwding bc and a carrier is at most 4 seconds. Putting sig radius a lot lower at 400 for non-mwd bc such as drake lock time goes up to only 30s.
So in essence a titan will be able to lock any ship that it can actually hit in between 17 and 30s. Granted this is much slower than before but at the end of the day it should be able to lock capitals SIGNIFICANTLY faster than subcaps and this nerf does not fix it in any shape way or form. All it does it make shield hugging carriers nearly immune to DD while bss and bcs on grid will still go pop...maybe not bcs so much, but bs still stand no chance against titans, they will be locked and hit rather will.
20s lock time...7s cycle time on guns, that means even with 3 locked targets any titan will have 3 bs perma-locked.
gg ccp...you didn't fix anything...you just made titans more useless against other caps as far as i'm concerned.
Darn you, Makalu. You're making me sad by forcing me to agree with you. :( |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
435
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:55:00 -
[708] - Quote
Andski wrote:tengu fleets don't kill larger fleets of maelstroms
abaddon fleets don't kill larger fleets of drakes
nope
Within reason yes they will, but that wasn't what I asked, so while you're deflecting nicely, neither you nor weaselior answered the question.
What beats the current CFC 1000-1200 man fleet that has become your constant?
Its a pretty easy question to answer, all of your "everything has a counter" guys should literally be leaping off the page right now.
What beats a 1200 man fleet?
|

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:56:00 -
[709] - Quote
I remember when the NC was literally losing subcap brawls when they had 5 and 6 times the numbers. So what beats 1200 man subcap fleets? 200 man subcap fleets. |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:56:00 -
[710] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:tengu fleets don't kill larger fleets of maelstroms
abaddon fleets don't kill larger fleets of drakes
nope Within reason yes they will, but that wasn't what I asked, so while you're deflecting nicely, neither you nor weaselior answered the question. What beats the current CFC 1000-1200 man fleet that has become your constant? Its a pretty easy question to answer, all of your "everything has a counter" guys should literally be leaping off the page right now. What beats a 1200 man fleet?
1300 ? |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
496
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:56:00 -
[711] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:What beats a 1200 man fleet?
Titan blob.. Oh wait.. LOL don't have that anymore. Maybe you guys should recruit? Vote for The Mittani http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=438 |

Mynas Atoch
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:57:00 -
[712] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:tengu fleets don't kill larger fleets of maelstroms
abaddon fleets don't kill larger fleets of drakes
nope Within reason yes they will, but that wasn't what I asked, so while you're deflecting nicely, neither you nor weaselior answered the question. What beats the current CFC 1000-1200 man fleet that has become your constant? Its a pretty easy question to answer, all of your "everything has a counter" guys should literally be leaping off the page right now. What beats a 1200 man fleet? A charismatic leader with a good diplomatic team. EVE is full of them. They'd just rather blap frigates on gates in low sec in their invulnerable space donges. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
94
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:57:00 -
[713] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:tengu fleets don't kill larger fleets of maelstroms
abaddon fleets don't kill larger fleets of drakes
nope Within reason yes they will, but that wasn't what I asked, so while you're deflecting nicely, neither you nor weaselior answered the question. What beats the current CFC 1000-1200 man fleet that has become your constant? Its a pretty easy question to answer, all of your "everything has a counter" guys should literally be leaping off the page right now. What beats a 1200 man fleet?
A competent enemy. Its not our fault that none of those exist in Eve Online at this time. What that guy above me said as well. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2608
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:58:00 -
[714] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:tengu fleets don't kill larger fleets of maelstroms
abaddon fleets don't kill larger fleets of drakes
nope Within reason yes they will, but that wasn't what I asked, so while you're deflecting nicely, neither you nor weaselior answered the question. What beats the current CFC 1000-1200 man fleet that has become your constant? Its a pretty easy question to answer, all of your "everything has a counter" guys should literally be leaping off the page right now. What beats a 1200 man fleet? a better flown and composed fleet
problem is all of our enemies are somehow worse at this game than we are |

Crakachunky
Stargate SG-1 Fatal Ascension
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:58:00 -
[715] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:tengu fleets don't kill larger fleets of maelstroms
abaddon fleets don't kill larger fleets of drakes
nope Within reason yes they will, but that wasn't what I asked, so while you're deflecting nicely, neither you nor weaselior answered the question. What beats the current CFC 1000-1200 man fleet that has become your constant? Its a pretty easy question to answer, all of your "everything has a counter" guys should literally be leaping off the page right now. What beats a 1200 man fleet?
1200 is not a constant by any means, try 600 a counter to 600 would be:
cheap option, good bubbles with bombers and sniping bc's + competent FC
expensive option, LOTS OF TITANS RAWRRR |

Richter Enderas
Coronal Core Research Inc Elite Space Guild
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:59:00 -
[716] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:tengu fleets don't kill larger fleets of maelstroms
abaddon fleets don't kill larger fleets of drakes
nope Within reason yes they will, but that wasn't what I asked, so while you're deflecting nicely, neither you nor weaselior answered the question. What beats the current CFC 1000-1200 man fleet that has become your constant? Its a pretty easy question to answer, all of your "everything has a counter" guys should literally be leaping off the page right now. What beats a 1200 man fleet?
obviously not you, nerd |

Tithi
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:00:00 -
[717] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Tithi wrote:Hey guise. I'm not a cap pilot or anything so forgive my ignorance. I can totally understand the logic of this nerf (from an outsiders perspective, I mean), but I have one real question.
What is the capitol ship that cap-heavy alliances should be using to combat subcaps after this change? Carriers?
I think its obviously silly that Titans would be able to hit subcaps, but I think it seems fair that there should be some capital ship that is designed to fight downward.
I wouldn't want these big fleet battles to just change from "Who has the most supers" to "Who has the most Maelstroms."
Any thoughts? Hopefully they will start using another fleet to combat a fleet. Carriers are currently used quite heavily in regular plain old dust ups and will continue to be used so. I doubt most heavy hitting alliances consider carriers to be a huge deal anymore, they're so fragile they can be alpha'd like any battleship.
Well now you've just traded "who has the most X" for "who has the most Y".
You saying "Well they should bring a matching subcap fleet" is no different from them saying "Well they should bring a matching supercap fleet."
I agree with this nerf, but I think some tweaking to carriers and dreads might be necessary to make them more useful against subcaps in fleet battles. Just a thought. |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
462
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:01:00 -
[718] - Quote
Lelob wrote:CynoNet Two wrote:Attempts to kill titans are made everyday. They usually conclude in a fashion similar to this, or this. I find it astonishing that you none of you realise that behaviour like this is what got your toys nerfed. Throwing a bunch of subcaps at titans and expecting to win is not even close to being a serious attempt. Fielding a fleet of 200 dreads with carrier and super support would be a serious attempt, and is well within the capabilities of the CFC. I understand well enough why CCP thinks titans must be nerfed, but it is not because of any game-breaking aspects of the titan itself, but of the unwillingness of both actors to engage in a potentially costly capital fight when the results remain uncertain. As I said before, nobody will really know for certain if titans truly are imbalanced until a serious, concerted effort has been made to kill them. And you don't see it as an issue that titans can (currently) kill any ship attempting to tackle them, without subcap support, before this 'serious attempt' can even organise and form up?
Michael Harari wrote:The killmails mean nothing. A haloed linked interceptor can be hit by titans. You have to actually be moving with some angular velocity for to mitigate damage. Sure, maintaining transversal against one titan is easy. Please explain how you maintain constantly high transversal against every single titan in a group of 50+, spread out over 60km, while flying close enough to bubble them, before one of them lands the single lucky shot required to kill the ship tackling them. Bonus marks
|

Wanten
Fusion Enterprises Ltd Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:05:00 -
[719] - Quote
Seems like CCP have again alienated their veteran players, please remind me why i should continue to play when all i need to train for is a drake.
You had made some steps forward with your recent changes by consulting and listening to players, now you have taken two steps back towards blob warfare and super coalitions grinding the servers to a halt. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:06:00 -
[720] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:
Judging by the nonsense you are spewing, it would appear that he actually does know more about PvP than you.
Go ahead and refute what I said. No one is dropping dreads in a support fight to kill triage carriers outside of low sec (where the numbers total in the fight are around the hundred mark)
You are right.
We only did it last time 2 (or 3) days ago.
Why are you so dumb?
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2632
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:07:00 -
[721] - Quote
Tithi wrote:Well now you've just traded "who has the most X" for "who has the most Y".
You saying "Well they should bring a matching subcap fleet" is no different from them saying "Well they should bring a matching supercap fleet."
I agree with this nerf, but I think some tweaking to carriers and dreads might be necessary to make them more useful against subcaps in fleet battles. Just a thought.
perhaps you should try PvP other than nopod matches in hisec before you comment in discussions about 0.0 warfare between alliances that matter "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:07:00 -
[722] - Quote
Mynas Atoch wrote: A charismatic leader with a good diplomatic team. EVE is full of them. They'd just rather blap frigates on gates in low sec in their invulnerable space donges.
This is not a game mechanic, and is in relative terms, no different than calling beating a supercap fleet through morale an effective counter.
What counters the 1200 dudes.
Weaselior wrote:
a better flown and composed fleet
This is also a lie, as you well know that even the best fleet comp can be swamped through sheer numbers, even when perfectly flown, especially with the state of Artillery alpha.
So again, what beats 1200 dudes (and to the guy that said 600, you can get 600 dudes on a tuesday night with no effort, lets be realistic and think about your saturday 'timer' fleets). |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2632
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:07:00 -
[723] - Quote
Wanten wrote:Seems like CCP have again alienated their veteran players, please remind me why i should continue to play when all i need to train for is a drake.
You had made some steps forward with your recent changes by consulting and listening to players, now you have taken two steps back towards blob warfare and super coalitions grinding the servers to a halt.
Don't worry Fusen guy PL will teach you a new way to fight larger fleets "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Berserkeren
x13 Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:08:00 -
[724] - Quote
Machine Delta wrote:Lord Thorin wrote:Incredible that CCP just play into Goon hands!
Lets just call the game "Goons Online" and be done with it. I don't know how goons and others can cry nerf when it's the only way some alliances can counter the huge numbers that can be thrown into one system at any time. They gimp the titan tank by fitting mods to kill subcaps, so therefore take a huge risk to field them in the first place.
TIDI was introduced to deal with large numbers of people therefore making alpha more prevalent, this helped certain alpha fleets and reduced the effectiveness of others....
Just because some alliances have the balls to drop Titans and Supers onto other fleets, why can't the other alliances escalate like the game is intended?
Unbelievable response by CCP and just another move that proves they don't understand how eve works anymore. Because some alliances... Yours mainly, end up doing this with all the titans and supers on one side. Ever wonder why you lose every fight under a cynojammer?
Why do you think that we loose a fight under a cynojammer?
OH WAIT then it comes back to be the biggest alliance to win. :) Nicely done, This have just turned the game into Blob vs Tactics > Blob win. |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:09:00 -
[725] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:
What beats a 1200 man fleet?
Bombers. I think also a strong network of forming good alliance relationships. Titans could do it but theres no counter to them at present that more supercaps can't counter. Condescending "old guard" alliances who snivel at low SP players then cry on the forums aren't working for you. Hope that helps. |

Kismeteer
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
120
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:09:00 -
[726] - Quote
There are many things that beat a larger fleet than you. A tight fleet composition with superior positioning skills backed up by competent bombers. A BS fleet with carrier reps. Tier 3s sometimes can, but sometimes lose 87 strat cruisers in a single battle against hurricanes.
Dealing with a large fleet is the on-going problem. However, what is impossible is a ship that is 1. in an unkillable ship with enough carriers repping him 2. and able to kill anyone. The proposed nerf only slows down the second point. I have no doubt that Titans will be able to kill HICs, but maybe not dictors. And at least dictors will always be able to bubble unsupported titans.
So maybe don't engage with inferior forces and you won't lose all your ships. With time dilation, you can generally reinforce your fleets constantly as well. |

Richter Enderas
Coronal Core Research Inc Elite Space Guild
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:09:00 -
[727] - Quote
Wanten wrote:Seems like CCP have again alienated their veteran players, please remind me why i should continue to play when all i need to train for is a drake.
You had made some steps forward with your recent changes by consulting and listening to players, now you have taken two steps back towards blob warfare and super coalitions grinding the servers to a halt.
here's an idea
how about you get off the eve-o forums, stop your pubbie whining, and actually try to do something instead of crying about your coalition's 80bil isk coffins are now just that - coffins
-a- dumpstered the DRF through the floor directly into the ownzone, and we all know the russians have massive hardons for supercaps.
take a page out of their book and stop relying on your isk to win wars for you, you nerds. |

Richter Enderas
Coronal Core Research Inc Elite Space Guild
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:10:00 -
[728] - Quote
Berserkeren wrote:Machine Delta wrote:Lord Thorin wrote:Incredible that CCP just play into Goon hands!
Lets just call the game "Goons Online" and be done with it. I don't know how goons and others can cry nerf when it's the only way some alliances can counter the huge numbers that can be thrown into one system at any time. They gimp the titan tank by fitting mods to kill subcaps, so therefore take a huge risk to field them in the first place.
TIDI was introduced to deal with large numbers of people therefore making alpha more prevalent, this helped certain alpha fleets and reduced the effectiveness of others....
Just because some alliances have the balls to drop Titans and Supers onto other fleets, why can't the other alliances escalate like the game is intended?
Unbelievable response by CCP and just another move that proves they don't understand how eve works anymore. Because some alliances... Yours mainly, end up doing this with all the titans and supers on one side. Ever wonder why you lose every fight under a cynojammer? Why do you think that we loose a fight under a cynojammer? OH WAIT then it comes back to be the biggest alliance to win. :) Nicely done, This have just turned the game into Blob vs Tactics > Blob win.
yeah blob tactics sure do win how are those 50+ titan blobs working for you m8 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2632
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:10:00 -
[729] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:This is also a lie, as you well know that even the best fleet comp can be swamped through sheer numbers, even when perfectly flown, especially with the state of Artillery alpha.
So again, what beats 1200 dudes (and to the guy that said 600, you can get 600 dudes on a tuesday night with no effort, lets be realistic and think about your saturday 'timer' fleets).
i've said this before - i literally do not care if artillery alpha is nerfed. alpha-centered doctrines like maelstroms and artillery abaddons are just boring, and I wait for the day we hop into something more interesting. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
464
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:10:00 -
[730] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:So again, what beats 1200 dudes
The Mittani just beat 1580 dudes solo.
Perhaps you should be more like him. |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:11:00 -
[731] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Just looking forward to seeing what you will get nurfed next, when we start beating you with something els... if people are not to mad at CCP to keep subscribing. Honestly I am not far from it myself, think this is a very poor and ill advised "temp" nurf.
Can you atleast make us able to dock our useless ships so we can get in others ?
Well, if you consider that waving around epeen supercap fleets while losing tech moons to us hand over fist was beating us then maybe this nerf will help you guys with a new strategy that actually IS successful. |

Richter Enderas
Coronal Core Research Inc Elite Space Guild
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:11:00 -
[732] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote: This is also a lie, as you well know that even the best fleet comp can be swamped through sheer numbers, even when perfectly flown, especially with the state of Artillery alpha.
So again, what beats 1200 dudes (and to the guy that said 600, you can get 600 dudes on a tuesday night with no effort, lets be realistic and think about your saturday 'timer' fleets).
i think that you are literally the most asspained poster in the history of eve-o
your 80bil isk coffins can no longer carry you to supreme victory. adapt or go play world of tanks/tribes. |

Powers Sa
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:12:00 -
[733] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:tengu fleets don't kill larger fleets of maelstroms
abaddon fleets don't kill larger fleets of drakes
nope Within reason yes they will, but that wasn't what I asked, so while you're deflecting nicely, neither you nor weaselior answered the question. What beats the current CFC 1000-1200 man fleet that has become your constant? Its a pretty easy question to answer, all of your "everything has a counter" guys should literally be leaping off the page right now. What beats a 1200 man fleet? Please cite the last time we brought over 600 people to a fight? The last time was the Day1 invasion of branch, well over 4 months ago. The next time after that was when there was an East VS West in Defense of that Red Alliance station that we all lost, PL made up part of that number. That is a special case, because we only brought about 400-500.
Go play some L4D with mintchip, you aren't great at rebuttals. |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
464
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:12:00 -
[734] - Quote
CynoNet Two wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:So again, what beats 1200 dudes
The Mittani just beat 1580 dudes solo. Perhaps you should be more like him.
Sorry make that 2064 dudes. |

Venus Vermillion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
415
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:12:00 -
[735] - Quote
Wanten wrote:Seems like CCP have again alienated their veteran players, please remind me why i should continue to play when all i need to train for is a drake.
You could, I dunno, maybe try having fun? This isn't "Training Online" its a game about spaceships.
Rifters are fun. Drakes are fun. Titans are space coffins. |

Kazanir
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
362
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:13:00 -
[736] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Kazanir wrote: Supercaps suffer from the "he who has more, wins!" problem in a way that subcaps and caps actually never have.
This is a lie, flat out, subcaps and caps also suffer from the same problem, you're just choosing to ignore that for the sake of your argument. What beats a 1200 man support fleet? (I'm waiting for one of you retards to say bombers, please say bombers).
Well, sure not 100 dudes! But I think letting 100 dudes completely counter 1200 dudes in a game like this is probably really bad design.
(This is especially when the 100 dudes in question are virtually guaranteed to take minimal losses thanks to easy peeling of tackle and massive supercap EHP.)
So, you're right, 100 or 200 dudes aren't gonna do much against 1200, no. There is no "counter" to 1200 dudes in a single engagement, but given proper FCing, fleet doctrines (not bombers lol although bombers do own), and tactical choices, 200 or 300 dudes can do a lot of damage to 1200, and 600 or 700 might even win, or be able to accomplish their strategic objectives in some way. (Especially since you ***** about how ****** our drake fleets are, you'd think taking them out in a 2:1 ratio wouldn't be so hard!) I would wholeheartedly support more ways to wage asymmetric warfare in this game -- decoupling strategic victory from raw numbers isn't a bad goal. But supercaps were a pretty ****** up way of "accomplishing" that goal and they were one of the worst things wrong with Dominion.
Furthermore, I think that building a coalition that can field 1200 dudes and supply them with ships, training, fleet commanders, resources, objectives, and then keep them from being bored -- these are all important parts of EVE. And it's not actually that easy to do! I'm aware that PL has chosen to not participate in a lot of those parts, but you're blue to people who regularly fielded 800-900 dudes against us in the opening weeks of the Tenal war. Let's not play pretend games where PL is hard-capped at having 200 dudes in fleet and NO BLUES NO MASTERS or something. :P |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
464
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:14:00 -
[737] - Quote
CynoNet Two wrote:CynoNet Two wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:So again, what beats 1200 dudes
The Mittani just beat 1580 dudes solo. Perhaps you should be more like him. Sorry make that 2064 dudes.
Oh yeah I missed these other 1488 dudes too. That's alot of dudes he just beat! |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
465
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:15:00 -
[738] - Quote
CynoNet Two wrote:CynoNet Two wrote:CynoNet Two wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:So again, what beats 1200 dudes
The Mittani just beat 1580 dudes solo. Perhaps you should be more like him. Sorry make that 2064 dudes. Oh yeah I missed these other 1488 dudes too. That's alot of dudes he just beat!
With all these dudes Mittani keeps beating off it's a wonder he has time to get things nerfed. |

Nao Oikawasan
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:16:00 -
[739] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Kazanir wrote: Supercaps suffer from the "he who has more, wins!" problem in a way that subcaps and caps actually never have.
This is a lie, flat out, subcaps and caps also suffer from the same problem, you're just choosing to ignore that for the sake of your argument. What beats a 1200 man support fleet? (I'm waiting for one of you retards to say bombers, please say bombers).
Grath, this will be hard for you to read, but it must be said. The reason you have so few members when compared to Goons is because you are greedy snobs. Your members are the worst kind of self important nerds this game has ever seen. You take tech moons from alliances whose space you inhabit without any thought of compensating them for their costs. You refuse to educate new players to join in the fun because they will get killed and you may have to waste your valuable time and monstrous pile of ISK on them. The few new(er) players that find themselves in your alliance soon quit because of the unending snobbery and obnoxious attitude displayed by your l33t PVP gods. You ***** yourselves out to BOB. The second most ridiculous alliance ever.
Goons, like it or not, are better for all players. They bring in the new guys, throw them directly into the fight, and teach them to make their own ISK. This makes for more PVP and far more loyalty. If you acted more like RvB, you'd get a lot more respect in game from Goon and pubbie alike.
I'm not saying that everyone should join Goons. They need an alliance to play with. So get to it. Or quit. I don't care which. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:16:00 -
[740] - Quote
Powers Sa wrote: The last time was the Day1 invasion of branch, well over 4 months ago.
Try again, I can name at least 2 times since then that you've brought more than that (and thats from memory alone, not even digging up BR's), 2 weeks ago you had 750 drakes alone, but please, please carry on.
Just because you're not participating with the rest of your alliance doesn't mean they aren't carrying on without them.
|

Valearx
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:16:00 -
[741] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote: What counters the 1200 dudes.
Obviously no longer your titan blob 
EDIT: ************ 2nd missed snipe in a row jesus **** |

Aryndel Vyst
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
281
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:16:00 -
[742] - Quote
CynoNet Two wrote:CynoNet Two wrote:CynoNet Two wrote:CynoNet Two wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:So again, what beats 1200 dudes
The Mittani just beat 1580 dudes solo. Perhaps you should be more like him. Sorry make that 2064 dudes. Oh yeah I missed these other 1488 dudes too. That's alot of dudes he just beat! With all these dudes Mittani keeps beating off it's a wonder he has time to get things nerfed.
Beating dudes off is a good change of pace from the pegging. |

Richter Enderas
Coronal Core Research Inc Elite Space Guild
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:18:00 -
[743] - Quote
man grath is so buttfrustrated it's embarassing
just unsub dude and go play wot
at least you can pay to win there |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2613
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:19:00 -
[744] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Weaselior wrote:
a better flown and composed fleet
This is also a lie, as you well know that even the best fleet comp can be swamped through sheer numbers, even when perfectly flown, especially with the state of Artillery alpha. So again, what beats 1200 dudes (and to the guy that said 600, you can get 600 dudes on a tuesday night with no effort, lets be realistic and think about your saturday 'timer' fleets). maybe if you guys had better fcs and better theorycrafters you wouldn't need me to answer this question |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
96
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:19:00 -
[745] - Quote
Wanten wrote:Seems like CCP have again alienated their veteran players, please remind me why i should continue to play when all i need to train for is a drake.
You had made some steps forward with your recent changes by consulting and listening to players, now you have taken two steps back towards blob warfare and super coalitions grinding the servers to a halt.
That's a lovely catchall given I'm a veteran player and think this is the best change ever. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2613
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:20:00 -
[746] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Powers Sa wrote: The last time was the Day1 invasion of branch, well over 4 months ago.
Try again, I can name at least 2 times since then that you've brought more than that (and thats from memory alone, not even digging up BR's), 2 weeks ago you had 750 drakes alone, but please, please carry on. Just because you're not participating with the rest of your alliance doesn't mean they aren't carrying on without them. you can't figure out how to beat 750 drakes?
don't think the blob is your problem |

Powers Sa
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:20:00 -
[747] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Powers Sa wrote: The last time was the Day1 invasion of branch, well over 4 months ago.
Try again, I can name at least 2 times since then that you've brought more than that (and thats from memory alone, not even digging up BR's), 2 weeks ago you had 750 drakes alone, but please, please carry on. Just because you're not participating with the rest of your alliance doesn't mean they aren't carrying on without them. You mean when we lose half a fleet and they reship? I'm pretty sure everyone reships, we just make it a point to keep at least 3 fitted and ready to go into battle. It helps when we stage effectively. Our opponents don't seem to be that smart, but goons are dumb :V
The same people appear on those battle reports multiple times. |

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:20:00 -
[748] - Quote
Makalu Zarya wrote:The scan res nerf is rather ridiculous. If you don't want titans locking subcaps, then simply implement a function where titans can't lock subcaps, that is really rather simple. As people know I like to throw my titan around and DD people who rep poses or aggro on stations. For that sort of warfare this is now completely useless. It will take 20+ seconds to lock a carrier with 3 sensor boosters. Stacking penalty makes it useless to fit any more than 3 really. So honestly any carebear who is not completely asleep at the wheel will be able to make it into the shields 10 times over in his carrier by the time he is even locked.
Another note is that a bs with mwd turned on has the same sig radius as a carrier, so honestly you can lock a bs just as fast if you want to. Lets actually look at some numbers here to further prove this nerf is fairly stupid.
Taking a titan with base scan res 5, putting in 3 federation navy sensor boosters (and yes i'd put officer if it actually mattered a damn). Perfect skill bonus gives u 1.25 multiplier, fleet 1.1 and sebos further 4.34. Put all these together and you get 5.97...lets call it 6/ This means your scan res is 30. It will take 17.7s to lock a carrier, approximately as long as it will take to lock a bs with mwd on. Going down one step further bc with mwd on (much more likely scenario) will have a sig radius of around 1400-2000 (assuming no bonuses). This puts the lock time between 19 and 21s. So loking at it the difference in lock time of a mwding bc and a carrier is at most 4 seconds. Putting sig radius a lot lower at 400 for non-mwd bc such as drake lock time goes up to only 30s.
So in essence a titan will be able to lock any ship that it can actually hit in between 17 and 30s. Granted this is much slower than before but at the end of the day it should be able to lock capitals SIGNIFICANTLY faster than subcaps and this nerf does not fix it in any shape way or form. All it does it make shield hugging carriers nearly immune to DD while bss and bcs on grid will still go pop...maybe not bcs so much, but bs still stand no chance against titans, they will be locked and hit rather will.
20s lock time...7s cycle time on guns, that means even with 3 locked targets any titan will have 3 bs perma-locked.
gg ccp...you didn't fix anything...you just made titans more useless against other caps as far as i'm concerned.
QFT (and I only fly carriers, not even SCs)
I know that it's hard for the Goonswarm posting crew to actually read and comprehend, but try, would you?
If a Titan is supposed to have an anti-capital role, signature radii on all capitals (including Titans) need an x10 boost to offset the x10 reduction in scan resolution. That needs to happen at the exact same time as the Titan changes. CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises Test Alliance Please Ignore
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:20:00 -
[749] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Mynas Atoch wrote: A charismatic leader with a good diplomatic team. EVE is full of them. They'd just rather blap frigates on gates in low sec in their invulnerable space donges.
This is not a game mechanic, and is in relative terms, no different than calling beating a supercap fleet through morale an effective counter. What counters the 1200 dudes. Weaselior wrote:
a better flown and composed fleet
This is also a lie, as you well know that even the best fleet comp can be swamped through sheer numbers, even when perfectly flown, especially with the state of Artillery alpha. So again, what beats 1200 dudes (and to the guy that said 600, you can get 600 dudes on a tuesday night with no effort, lets be realistic and think about your saturday 'timer' fleets).
A fleet comprised of one size up ships should be able to handle a larger fleet of smaller ships. Shoot frigates with cruisers. Shoot cruisers with BCs. Shoot BCs with BSs. Shoot BSs with carriers. Shoot carriers with dreads or supers. Drop a few ship sizes, and throw more numbers, and you should again be able to beat them. aHACs against BSs, etc. |

Krios Ahzek
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
728
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:21:00 -
[750] - Quote
EVE Online - Bad World
-áThough All Men Do Despise Us |

Sun Zue
Hell's Revenge Fidelas Constans
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:21:00 -
[751] - Quote
I like this  |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
80
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:22:00 -
[752] - Quote
Pardon my ignorance as I know next to nothing of null, but does GSF not have a sizable cap/supercap fleet? How is this inherently beneficial to them? |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:23:00 -
[753] - Quote
alright i got it
so titans are getting nerfed to within an inch of their life by, when, April?
this means that you have 2 weeks where titans are a unilateral iwin button
you know what this means right?
vfk by april |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:23:00 -
[754] - Quote
Kazanir wrote: There is no "counter" to 1200 dudes in a single engagement
Thanks, thats what i wanted to see.
But Titans were obviously what needed fixing most since they had no ...oh wait, dreads, slowcats (which can in fact tank titans, but thanks for thinking you understand eve mechanics) cyno jammers other supercap fleets and even sub caps that can kill them off.
Meanwhile, having 1200 dudes under one command is still totally uncounterable, but thats supposed to be ok.
To be entirely clear, the nerf changes nothing, an Erebus tracking fit will still volley a Maelstrom or a drake with no problem at all, even a 75% nerf to tracking wouldn't stop this from happening.
The 5 scan res is dumb, as it allows even regular caps to escape titans now, they can easily either warp off, jump out or dock up, its absurd that any ship class in eve would take 15 seconds to lock itself.
The single most bothering thing about the nerf is the idea it represents. It is essentially CCP's way of saying you either get your own fleet of 1200 dudes or you can't compete, end of discussion.
|

Pyztof
Pyztof Corporation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:24:00 -
[755] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Pardon my ignorance as I know next to nothing of null, but does GSF not have a sizable cap/supercap fleet? How is this inherently beneficial to them?
Because:
1. They never use it except when all of eve is asleep 2. They can't beat RDN otherwise 3. They cry when they can't beat someone through zerging |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:25:00 -
[756] - Quote
Powers Sa wrote: You mean when we lose half a fleet and they reship?
No i mean when you filled 4 fleets full of drakes and then charged into the waiting guns of 34 titans.
|

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
99
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:25:00 -
[757] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Pardon my ignorance as I know next to nothing of null, but does GSF not have a sizable cap/supercap fleet? How is this inherently beneficial to them?
We aren't entirely reliant on our massive blob of Titans to make any gains in nullsec warfare. Our current enemies are incompetent at conventional warfare. That's why they're whining so much.
We do have one of the largest stables of Titans in the game and this nerf effects us just as much in relation to our Titans. |

Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises Test Alliance Please Ignore
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:25:00 -
[758] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Pardon my ignorance as I know next to nothing of null, but does GSF not have a sizable cap/supercap fleet? How is this inherently beneficial to them?
Goons have a large supercap fleet. But the CFC doesn't have enough supers to combat Raiden/NC or AAA/SOLAR or any combination of those with PL added into the mix. It is one thing to have one alliance with a lot of supers and another to have two-three alliances with a lot of supers working together. |

Innominate
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
101
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:26:00 -
[759] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:So again, what beats 1200 dudes
A better question is, why should 100 dudes be able to beat those 1200 dudes without any serious risk to themselves?
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:26:00 -
[760] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote: We aren't entirely reliant on our massive blob
Hahahahahahah, as if.
|

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:27:00 -
[761] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Kazanir wrote: There is no "counter" to 1200 dudes in a single engagement Thanks, thats what i wanted to see. But Titans were obviously what needed fixing most since they had no ...oh wait, dreads, slowcats (which can in fact tank titans, but thanks for thinking you understand eve mechanics) cyno jammers other supercap fleets and even sub caps that can kill them off. Meanwhile, having 1200 dudes under one command is still totally uncounterable, but thats supposed to be ok. To be entirely clear, the nerf changes nothing, an Erebus tracking fit will still volley a Maelstrom or a drake with no problem at all, even a 75% nerf to tracking wouldn't stop this from happening. The 5 scan res is dumb, as it allows even regular caps to escape titans now, they can easily either warp off, jump out or dock up, its absurd that any ship class in eve would take 15 seconds to lock itself. The single most bothering thing about the nerf is the idea it represents. It is essentially CCP's way of saying you either get your own fleet of 1200 dudes or you can't compete, end of discussion.
We already said bombers but you just ignored it until you got the answer you were fishing for you big crybaby. |

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:28:00 -
[762] - Quote
Bagehi wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:So again, what beats 1200 dudes (and to the guy that said 600, you can get 600 dudes on a tuesday night with no effort, lets be realistic and think about your saturday 'timer' fleets). A fleet comprised of one size up ships should be able to handle a larger fleet of smaller ships. Shoot frigates with cruisers. Shoot cruisers with BCs. Shoot BCs with BSs. Shoot BSs with carriers. Shoot carriers with dreads or supers. Drop a few ship sizes, and throw more numbers, and you should again be able to beat them. aHACs against BSs, etc.
Um, Carriers? Sorry Bagehi - even with the new cool Sentry Cat thing PL used last week, Carriers aren't a realistic counter to BS. And Dreads have tracking issues (whether in Siege or not).
1200 dudes can be beaten by 1300 dudes.
And 1300 dudes by 1400, and so on, until TiDi wins, and the servers melt.
There is no counter to the blob - except a larger blob. That's the game CCP is implementing. I don't like Supercaps online, but this isn't a solution to the problem. It just makes Titan accounts buy/train/play other characters on those accounts while the Titans sit dormant in a tower somewhere. CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

Delegado Cero
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:28:00 -
[763] - Quote
CynoNet Two wrote:CynoNet Two wrote:CynoNet Two wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:So again, what beats 1200 dudes
The Mittani just beat 1580 dudes solo. Perhaps you should be more like him. Sorry make that 2064 dudes. Oh yeah I missed these other 1488 dudes too. That's alot of dudes he just beat!
PL are literally ev0ke. We must secure the existence of our titans and a future for elite pvp. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
99
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:28:00 -
[764] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote: We aren't entirely reliant on our massive blob
Hahahahahahah, as if.
Your illiteracy caused you to miss the rest of that sentence. Give it another try. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2614
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:29:00 -
[765] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Kazanir wrote: There is no "counter" to 1200 dudes in a single engagement Thanks, thats what i wanted to see. ...i...m...g...a...y... thats what i wanted to see and all i saw when you posted |

Monthly Monique
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:30:00 -
[766] - Quote
Nao Oikawasan wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Kazanir wrote: Supercaps suffer from the "he who has more, wins!" problem in a way that subcaps and caps actually never have.
This is a lie, flat out, subcaps and caps also suffer from the same problem, you're just choosing to ignore that for the sake of your argument. What beats a 1200 man support fleet? (I'm waiting for one of you retards to say bombers, please say bombers). Grath, this will be hard for you to read, but it must be said. The reason you have so few members when compared to Goons is because you are greedy snobs. Your members are the worst kind of self important nerds this game has ever seen. You take tech moons from alliances whose space you inhabit without any thought of compensating them for their costs. You refuse to educate new players to join in the fun because they will get killed and you may have to waste your valuable time and monstrous pile of ISK on them. The few new(er) players that find themselves in your alliance soon quit because of the unending snobbery and obnoxious attitude displayed by your l33t PVP gods. You ***** yourselves out to BOB. The second most ridiculous alliance ever. Goons, like it or not, are better for all players. They bring in the new guys, throw them directly into the fight, and teach them to make their own ISK. This makes for more PVP and far more loyalty. If you acted more like RvB, you'd get a lot more respect in game from Goon and pubbie alike. I'm not saying that everyone should join Goons. They need an alliance to play with. So get to it. Or quit. I don't care which.
Out of curiosity; How is this true what you say about Goons and new players? You speak as if it's any new player and that is not at all true. One has to be an SA member/subscriber for a certain time period. Then if applying their activity on SA is scrutinized and/or the "new" player must be sponsored. It's stated right in the Goon wiki page that recruitment drives are scams.
I wouldn't be all about tooting your (Goons) horn as it pertains to elitism with requirements such as Goons have. Just because you take in all the fat neck beard cheeto smelling pizza faced nerds doesn't make you any more better or any less elitist in attitude than PL or any one else ftm. |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:31:00 -
[767] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Powers Sa wrote: The last time was the Day1 invasion of branch, well over 4 months ago.
Try again, I can name at least 2 times since then that you've brought more than that (and thats from memory alone, not even digging up BR's), 2 weeks ago you had 750 drakes alone, but please, please carry on. Just because you're not participating with the rest of your alliance doesn't mean they aren't carrying on without them. Sweet cream of Jesus on cold toast-points, this is the most moronic ongoing line of cold gopher crap I've seen smeared across this thread, and that's saying something.
So you lost a crutch. Adapt and deal with it. Maybe dropping your "Too Cool for School" attitude and mending some fences might be a good start.
Also, did it occur to any of you soon-to-be-ex titan blobbers that maybe the reason you've been seeing these large subcap fleets is because titans are hilariously broken? No. It doesn't. Such entrenched cognitive dissonance cannot be overcome because to do so would require an admission from the Forces of Elite PvP that they've been using crutches in the first place.
And now you've been leaning on them for so long that some effort to restore balance was finally made. You've got no one to blame but yourselves.
Keep crying, I guess. You're more desperately in need of a dose of Preparation H than anyone else in this thread. |

Lelob
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
24
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:31:00 -
[768] - Quote
Innominate wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:So again, what beats 1200 dudes A better question is, why should 100 dudes be able to beat those 1200 dudes without any serious risk to themselves?
Why can't out of 1200 dudes, 200 can't get into dreads and pwn 100 dudes?
c wut i did thar |

Drago Palermus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:32:00 -
[769] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:
Are you illiterate? It says right there in the blog post. Titans are there to blap other capital ships. Something they are already very good at and have not had that ability nerfed in the slightest.
Wait, will these be the titans that need 30 billion in sensor boosters to lock a cap before it can de agro and dock? you're p. bad at math, bro |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:32:00 -
[770] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote: We aren't entirely reliant on our massive blob
Hahahahahahah, as if. Your illiteracy caused you to miss the rest of that sentence. Give it another try.
Hey you said it not me, unless you're insinuating that any single member of the CFC can stand on its own two feet.
|

Khadmos
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
34
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:32:00 -
[771] - Quote
Lelob wrote:Innominate wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:So again, what beats 1200 dudes A better question is, why should 100 dudes be able to beat those 1200 dudes without any serious risk to themselves? Why can't out of 1200 dudes, 200 can't get into dreads and pwn 100 dudes? c wut i did thar
Because you are ******** and don't know what a doomsday is. |

Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises Test Alliance Please Ignore
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:33:00 -
[772] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:To be entirely clear, the nerf changes nothing, an Erebus tracking fit will still volley a Maelstrom or a drake with no problem at all, even a 75% nerf to tracking wouldn't stop this from happening.
This. The nerf hurts titans v caps more than titans v subcaps. With how long CCP has been hinting about this nerf, I expected more finesse than nerf hammer. This was a misguided nerf hammer that smashed a finger rather than the nail it was aimed at.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:34:00 -
[773] - Quote
Khadmos wrote:Lelob wrote:Innominate wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:So again, what beats 1200 dudes A better question is, why should 100 dudes be able to beat those 1200 dudes without any serious risk to themselves? Why can't out of 1200 dudes, 200 can't get into dreads and pwn 100 dudes? c wut i did thar Because you are ******** and don't know what a doomsday is.
It only takes 2 tank mods to stand up to a DD, but please, go on calling other people names when you don't understand the game mechanics
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2614
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:35:00 -
[774] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote: Hey ...d...o...n...g...s...o...o...o
|

Khadmos
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
34
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:35:00 -
[775] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Khadmos wrote:Lelob wrote:Innominate wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:So again, what beats 1200 dudes A better question is, why should 100 dudes be able to beat those 1200 dudes without any serious risk to themselves? Why can't out of 1200 dudes, 200 can't get into dreads and pwn 100 dudes? c wut i did thar Because you are ******** and don't know what a doomsday is. It only takes 2 tank mods to stand up to a DD, but please, go on calling other people names when you don't understand the game mechanics
Good to know that PL only fits 1 titan with a DD per fleet. |

Kismeteer
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
120
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:36:00 -
[776] - Quote
Delegado Cero wrote: PL are literally ev0ke. We must secure the existence of our titans and a future for elite pvp.
No way. Ev0ke are way better than PL. Ev0ek shows up and fights in subcaps on a regular basis, and do very well. They are a very honoUrable enemy for us to fight. I have enjoyed many of our ev0ke fights. And when ev0ke doesn't have the numbers, they get allies and friends and get stuff done.
I respect the hell out of ev0ke, and have definitely improved Goons combat abilities by constantly giving us fights. |

Anela Cistine
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
122
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:38:00 -
[777] - Quote
Tithi wrote:
Well now you've just traded "who has the most X" for "who has the most Y".
You saying "Well they should bring a matching subcap fleet" is no different from them saying "Well they should bring a matching supercap fleet."
The difference is that a day one newbie can be in a nicely fit drake in 2-3 months. Less than 6 months for a pro maelstrom. The scimitars and huggins and whatnot take longer, but bulk of the fleet can relative newbies. Any 0.0 alliance that wanted to could "lower their standards" to recruit newbies, and train them up into a competent subcap fleet in just a few months.
I'm Goonswarm's Director of Rifters, so this is a subject close to my heart. We get our newbees out into 0.0 as soon as they finish the tutorial. We give them as many frigates and thrashers as they can blow up. I've seen a guy go through 11 rifters in one battle and just keep going back for more. :3 We set up a wiki, a squad system, classes, and various mentorship programs so that newbees can learn the way that is best for them, be it from reading, asking questions, or having a more experienced player hold their hands. It doesn't take long at all to make them moderately competent PVPers. Their skill point totals may be low, but none of those SP have been wasted on mining or mission running skills. And honestly they are delightful to be around. They don't know how things work, but they are excited to learn and excited about internet spaceships. It makes a nice change from the bittervets.
Plenty of elite PVP corps are smug about not even considering you until 10 million skill points, 20 million skill points, or more. Dooming many would-be PVPers to a year of highsec mining before they get to try the fun stuff. Then by the time they do get out of highsec they have developed all sorts of bad habits that will get them killed in expensive ships in nulsec. Surely getting more newbies that want the massive space battles they see in the advertisements involved in pew pew earlier would be good for the game? Most highsec mission runners that have been playing the game for 3 months can already fly a drake, and are getting pretty bored of PvE. There is nothing stopping alliances like PL and Raiden. from simply recruiting the low-skill backbone of a subcap fleet tomorrow. |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:38:00 -
[778] - Quote
Khadmos wrote:Lelob wrote:Innominate wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:So again, what beats 1200 dudes A better question is, why should 100 dudes be able to beat those 1200 dudes without any serious risk to themselves? Why can't out of 1200 dudes, 200 can't get into dreads and pwn 100 dudes? c wut i did thar Because you are ******** and don't know what a doomsday is.
Look at this Fatal Acension guy thinking that losing dreads to kill super(s) is the worst thing ever.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:38:00 -
[779] - Quote
Sirhan Blixt wrote:
Also, did it occur to any of you soon-to-be-ex titan blobbers that maybe the reason you've been seeing these large subcap fleets is because titans are hilariously broken? No. It doesn't. .
Mabye because I've been watching Goons use the "More must be better" approach for 5 years now.
If you removed all supercaps from the game would the CFC suddenly dissipate into the ether?
No, no it wouldn't, you've banded together because you lack the means to stand alone, and that horde mentality was threatened by something, so you've reacted to it by crying until that stop was removed from the game.
Now you're free in April to rule the universe (unless our Smear Soundwave campaign works).
|

Koby Botick
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:39:00 -
[780] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote: What counters the 1200 dudes.
Right now? About 40 Titans and 20 moms. Throw in a few dictors or you can't blap enough of the 1200 before they warp off. |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:40:00 -
[781] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote: Hey you said it not me, unless you're insinuating that any single member of the CFC can stand on its own two feet.
Against your anti-blue, anti-blobbing coalition? Not so much.
edit: now it's my turn to kick myself for missing the snipe. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2615
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:41:00 -
[782] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote: Mabye because I've been watching Goons use the "More must be better" approach for 5 years now.
grath telkin: literally digitalcommunist
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:41:00 -
[783] - Quote
Anela Cistine wrote: There is nothing stopping alliances like PL and Raiden. from simply recruiting the low-skill backbone of a subcap fleet tomorrow.
EXACTLY, thank you, numbers are all that matter now.
Numbers Online, the internet spaceship game.
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2615
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:42:00 -
[784] - Quote
A GAME I CANNOT BLAP NEWBIES IN RIFTERS WITH MY TITAN IS A GAME I WILL NOT PLAY, SIR |

Khadmos
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
34
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:42:00 -
[785] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Khadmos wrote:Lelob wrote:Innominate wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:So again, what beats 1200 dudes A better question is, why should 100 dudes be able to beat those 1200 dudes without any serious risk to themselves? Why can't out of 1200 dudes, 200 can't get into dreads and pwn 100 dudes? c wut i did thar Because you are ******** and don't know what a doomsday is. Look at this Fatal Acension guy thinking that losing dreads to kill super(s) is the worst thing ever.
Look at this PL guy thinking that dreads can kill a single titan in a titan fleet. How cute. |

SuperBeastie
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
53
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:43:00 -
[786] - Quote
when balancing a ship you don't base it on the extremes of whats possible you base it on whats realistic with that said go through all the titan lose mails in eves history and tell me what percentage of them are nothing but meta 14. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2636
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:43:00 -
[787] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Anela Cistine wrote: There is nothing stopping alliances like PL and Raiden. from simply recruiting the low-skill backbone of a subcap fleet tomorrow. EXACTLY, thank you, numbers are all that matter now. Numbers Online, the internet spaceship game.
hey grath why don't you come on test jabber and sperg there a bit "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:43:00 -
[788] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:A GAME I CANNOT BLAP 20 MILLION SP CARRIER PILOTS WITH MY TITAN IS A GAME I WILL NOT PLAY, SIR
CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:43:00 -
[789] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Anela Cistine wrote: There is nothing stopping alliances like PL and Raiden. from simply recruiting the low-skill backbone of a subcap fleet tomorrow. EXACTLY, thank you, numbers are all that matter now. Numbers Online, the internet spaceship game. As opposed to just numbers of supercapitals.
I'd call that an improvement. But maybe that's because I'm not so heavily invested in them at the expense of the rest of the game. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2636
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:44:00 -
[790] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:when balancing a ship you don't base it on the extremes of whats possible you base it on whats realistic with that said go through all the titan lose mails in eves history and tell me what percentage of them are nothing but meta 14.
sorry that you drank the PL kool-aid and decided to get a titan so you can blap subcaps with the cool kids "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:44:00 -
[791] - Quote
Khadmos wrote:
Look at this PL guy thinking that dreads can kill a single titan in a titan fleet. How cute.
You do realize that it was a CFC dread fleet that actually killed a titan in a titan fleet about a month ago right?
|

Khadmos
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
34
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:44:00 -
[792] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote: No, no it wouldn't, you've banded together because you lack the means to stand alone, and that horde mentality was threatened by something, so you've reacted to it by crying until that stop was removed from the game.
Truly, I hope to one day be in a mighty alliance like PL that stands on it's own and never fights along side anyone (except whoever they are currently fighting along side, they don't count). |

Charles Case
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:45:00 -
[793] - Quote
TELL ME HOW YOU CAN BEAT A 2000 BLOB END OF DISCUSSION |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2636
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:45:00 -
[794] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Khadmos wrote:
Look at this PL guy thinking that dreads can kill a single titan in a titan fleet. How cute.
You do realize that it was a CFC dread fleet that actually killed a titan in a titan fleet about a month ago right?
look guys the CFC dropped dreads and killed ONE TITAN out of an entire fleet while getting waxed by doomsdays left and right "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:47:00 -
[795] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Khadmos wrote:
Look at this PL guy thinking that dreads can kill a single titan in a titan fleet. How cute.
You do realize that it was a CFC dread fleet that actually killed a titan in a titan fleet about a month ago right? a single titan that had bounced hilariously out of the range of the titan blob combined with pro bubbling to cut off the dishounourable supercap blob from waddling in to save their buddy
dreads hardly made a difference there |

Koby Botick
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:47:00 -
[796] - Quote
It's funny, because for a moment there I thought that Seleene of PL was in CSM 6 too, and Elise Randolph also of PL too. Grath, are you trying to destroy their candidacy by saying they did nothing and Mittani "caused" this Titan nerf? Are you?
|

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:47:00 -
[797] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote: What beats a 1200 man fleet?
Meaningful recruiting, training your recruits and making sure you're not allying yourself with utter limp****s. Ok, so even the goons are faltering on that last one.
Reset TEST. |

Death2all Supercaps
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:47:00 -
[798] - Quote
Charles Case wrote:TELL ME HOW YOU CAN BEAT A 2000 BLOB END OF DISCUSSION 1)DDOS them 2)Use cheetah to crash eve 3)Run away and claim victory 4) Let them beat themselves to death after listening too much to dabigredboat |

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:47:00 -
[799] - Quote
I just wanted a good excuse for a reset TEST post. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1833
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:47:00 -
[800] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Anela Cistine wrote: There is nothing stopping alliances like PL and Raiden. from simply recruiting the low-skill backbone of a subcap fleet tomorrow. EXACTLY, thank you, numbers are all that matter now. Numbers Online, the internet spaceship game.
And how many people are in PL's blue list atm?
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:48:00 -
[801] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Anela Cistine wrote: There is nothing stopping alliances like PL and Raiden. from simply recruiting the low-skill backbone of a subcap fleet tomorrow. EXACTLY, thank you, numbers are all that matter now. Numbers Online, the internet spaceship game. And how many people are in PL's blue list atm? more than the CFC that's for damn sure |

hoggar
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:49:00 -
[802] - Quote
Restrict Jump bridges and Station use to alliance owners only. Also structures like Poses/ihub etc should only be repped by alliance owners.
Make alliance more independent o/\o |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:49:00 -
[803] - Quote
Promiscuous Female wrote: dreads hardly made a difference there
Yea except for the part where all your FCs admitted that if it weren't for the bad bounce you'd have killed way more since the first titan was dead before the first DD hit the dreads.
Feel free to rewrite the history of the fight if you want, but when your own leaders admit that it worked great you just look dumb
|

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:49:00 -
[804] - Quote
Charles Case wrote:TELL ME HOW YOU CAN BEAT A 2000 BLOB END OF DISCUSSION
Turn off the servers and go home.
If you would stop and think (I know, sometimes it's hard when you are in madposting mode), you would realize that half of this Titan nerf is beyond stupid. If Titans are supposed to shoot capitals, great. But after the update with the scan resolution change, Titans won't even be able to do that unless you spend an additional 30-40 BILLION ISK to fit stupid Officer Sensor Boosters. And in doing so, it won't change their ability to shoot MWD Drakes or MWD Maelstroms.
So what does this achieve, other than having the Titan pilots not log in at all?
Because I didn't think CCPs goals was fewer folks on the cluster. CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:49:00 -
[805] - Quote
except they're not really blues
they're more like "wahhh the evil goonies want our tech let's band up and defend each other but backstab each other at the drop of a hat because there is no unifying culture to actually keep us together gotta get dem goonies" |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:50:00 -
[806] - Quote
Promiscuous Female wrote: more than the CFC that's for damn sure
I'd take that bet
|

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:50:00 -
[807] - Quote
see: raidenDOT bouncing their grapecaged supers out of the poses in vfk without telling their buds that they were leaving |

hoggar
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:50:00 -
[808] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Anela Cistine wrote: There is nothing stopping alliances like PL and Raiden. from simply recruiting the low-skill backbone of a subcap fleet tomorrow. EXACTLY, thank you, numbers are all that matter now. Numbers Online, the internet spaceship game. And how many people are in PL's blue list atm?
Less your alliance size |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:51:00 -
[809] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Anela Cistine wrote: There is nothing stopping alliances like PL and Raiden. from simply recruiting the low-skill backbone of a subcap fleet tomorrow. EXACTLY, thank you, numbers are all that matter now. Numbers Online, the internet spaceship game.
Hey, we said bombers. Keep moving the goalposts bro. |

Charles Case
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:51:00 -
[810] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote:Charles Case wrote:TELL ME HOW YOU CAN BEAT A 2000 BLOB END OF DISCUSSION Turn off the servers and go home. If you would stop and think (I know, sometimes it's hard when you are in madposting mode), you would realize that half of this Titan nerf is beyond stupid. If Titans are supposed to shoot capitals, great. But after the update with the scan resolution change, Titans won't even be able to do that unless you spend an additional 30-40 BILLION ISK to fit stupid Officer Sensor Boosters. And in doing so, it won't change their ability to shoot MWD Drakes or MWD Maelstroms. So what does this achieve, other than having the Titan pilots not log in at all? Because I didn't think CCPs goals was fewer folks on the cluster.
That's some pretty dumb reasoning there ok |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2639
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:51:00 -
[811] - Quote
hoggar wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Anela Cistine wrote: There is nothing stopping alliances like PL and Raiden. from simply recruiting the low-skill backbone of a subcap fleet tomorrow. EXACTLY, thank you, numbers are all that matter now. Numbers Online, the internet spaceship game. And how many people are in PL's blue list atm? Less your alliance size
shut up npc alt "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

hoggar
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:53:00 -
[812] - Quote
Supercap online
BLOB OR DIE ONLINE |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:54:00 -
[813] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: dreads hardly made a difference there
Yea except for the part where all your FCs admitted that if it weren't for the bad bounce you'd have killed way more since the first titan was dead before the first DD hit the dreads.
what would have dreads added that a long legged, pissed off welp fleet would not have
it's not like you guys use support fleets |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2621
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:54:00 -
[814] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: more than the CFC that's for damn sure
I'd take that dong grath still gaypostin it up |

Kitfox Mikakka
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:54:00 -
[815] - Quote
This thread's pretty cool, can't wait for April thanks CCP. |

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:54:00 -
[816] - Quote
Charles Case wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:Charles Case wrote:TELL ME HOW YOU CAN BEAT A 2000 BLOB END OF DISCUSSION Turn off the servers and go home. If you would stop and think (I know, sometimes it's hard when you are in madposting mode), you would realize that half of this Titan nerf is beyond stupid. If Titans are supposed to shoot capitals, great. But after the update with the scan resolution change, Titans won't even be able to do that unless you spend an additional 30-40 BILLION ISK to fit stupid Officer Sensor Boosters. And in doing so, it won't change their ability to shoot MWD Drakes or MWD Maelstroms. So what does this achieve, other than having the Titan pilots not log in at all? Because I didn't think CCPs goals was fewer folks on the cluster. That's some pretty dumb reasoning there ok
Math is hard.
An MWD Drake (or MWD Maelstrom) has the signature of a Carrier. Ergo, the MWD Maelstrom or MWD Drake can be hit by a turret Titan. The proposed Titan changes don't change that fact. CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2639
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:55:00 -
[817] - Quote
hoggar wrote:Supercap online
BLOB OR DIE ONLINE
i think the latter is a lot better "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Shadoo
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
51
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:55:00 -
[818] - Quote
I don't think anyone who has flown a titan in combat can argue that the ship is not currently overpowered in combat when used in great numbers, just like no one could seriously argue about AOD DDs when they started to be used in 3+3 scale every 10 minutes
Of course, same goes for every ship in eve -- when used in great numbers, but Supercapitals certainly show this curve more often on the field
So I'm extremely happy that you state that the ship needs a role change - last time we were campaigning for AOD DD change -- this was exactly what a lot of us were asking for
But that was 3 years ago
I am therefore rather dissapointed that what we, the community at large, have been asking for a very long time is rather haphazardly brushed off as something that "will be looked at long term" with a surgical change that SCREAMS of a kneejerk reaction without really providing us with much to go on here to see your vision or have comfort you are going to do something in the long term for the "end game" ship in EVE
And forgive me for saying this -- but you have not always had a great track record of revisiting changes you've made in the past as surgical adjustments. Thus I feel like pressing a bit harder on the high level thoughts that have lead you to make this current fix
What is your intended role for Titan with this change on TQ today?
How will you evaluate if your changes implemented will match up with that role on the TQ combat field in this release? For example -- as far as I can see -- a large group of titans will still obliterate a large group of battleships/drakes -- all you've delayed is the first hit and require more micromanagement in making sure the lock queue is evenly spaced out
Given how large fights today unfold on TQ -- how do you see this ship fulfilling your intended role on heavily TiDi systems with the sig change
What is your future vision, even at high level, for the Titan ship class? Will it remain a combat asset or are you looking and overhauling it for something else (personally btw I've argued for the last 4 years that titans should NOT be a combat ship at all, but rather a massive alliance level asset for logistics/cloning/staging/etc)
What assurances can you offer us this change will not remain a permanent fixture for the long term?
With the combat ability of this ship being "surgically adjusted", would you be even willing to look at for example increasing the jump range of the ship to balance the change
And lastly -- are you going to allow those pilots who wish to wait for your stated longer term role adjustments to GM-dock their ship until such a time that this change is no longer a surgical measure in order to still utilize the account/character for combat in EVE? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2641
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:56:00 -
[819] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote:Charles Case wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:Charles Case wrote:TELL ME HOW YOU CAN BEAT A 2000 BLOB END OF DISCUSSION Turn off the servers and go home. If you would stop and think (I know, sometimes it's hard when you are in madposting mode), you would realize that half of this Titan nerf is beyond stupid. If Titans are supposed to shoot capitals, great. But after the update with the scan resolution change, Titans won't even be able to do that unless you spend an additional 30-40 BILLION ISK to fit stupid Officer Sensor Boosters. And in doing so, it won't change their ability to shoot MWD Drakes or MWD Maelstroms. So what does this achieve, other than having the Titan pilots not log in at all? Because I didn't think CCPs goals was fewer folks on the cluster. That's some pretty dumb reasoning there ok Math is hard. An MWD Drake (or MWD Maelstrom) has the signature of a Carrier. Ergo, the MWD Maelstrom or MWD Drake can be hit by a turret Titan. The proposed Titan changes don't change that fact.
yeah we tend to run our MWDs for fun and just sit still "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Variable1
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:57:00 -
[820] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing. All things aside, this is a pretty hilarious assumption that doesn't make sense in context. With a base sensor strength of 5, you are talking about a few seconds difference between t2 and cormack out of a probable minute+ lock time. Well worth the 4b+ sensor booster imo  Gains you 25s against frigates (105 to 79, assuming 3 are fitted), 15s against cruisers (64 to 49) and 10s against battleships (44 to 33). If you see this as a big difference, then it's worth balancing around the officer fit given that dropping 12bn on SBs is not a huge fraction of the outlay for a properly-fit titan. If you don't see this as a big difference, then balancing around the officer fit isn't a big deal because it's not having a major impact. Either way, it's a functional assumption 
1. lol'ing at 'assumptions' instead of actual in game data being used to make HUGE changes in game.
2. lol'ing at all Titan pilots being 'rich'. Titan pilots are probably botters. Titan pilots are RMT'ers. Titan pilots all fit Officer everything. Titan pilots standard fit can pop bs/cruisers/frigs. Do you even have the slightest clue?
3. lol'ing at the 2 types of people in this thread agreeing - goons and friends of goons (ie no clue)
4. lol'ing at the lack of work done on countering 700+ maels...
5. lol'ing at the welcome to BLOB land.
6. lol'ing that my tears are not as much for the nerf, but for the shear stupidity of the arguments used to create this nerf and the disbelief that CCP cannot see you for what you have become.
Sad days ahead perhaps, but most will try to keep up the honest fight against goonswarmonline, and continue to have their counters nerfed until quitting time. I will donate my stuff to anyone who can change the goon ethos of 'destroy eve whatever the cost'.
Onwards on upwards. :-) Tinfoil off. |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:57:00 -
[821] - Quote
As usual Shadoo comes by and makes sense for everyone.
Can lock thread now.
Should have posted 45 pages ago.
|

Styrling
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:57:00 -
[822] - Quote
EVERY MORNING I WAKE UP AND OPEN PALM SLAM A VHS INTO THE SLOT. ITS CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK AND RIGHT THEN AND THERE I START DOING THE MOVES ALONGSIDE WITH THE MAIN CHARACTER, RIDDICK. I DO EVERY MOVE AND I DO EVERY MOVE HARD. MAKIN WHOOSHING SOUNDS WHEN I SLAM DOWN SOME NECRO BASTARDS OR EVEN WHEN I MESS UP TECHNIQUE. NOT MANY CAN SAY THEY ESCAPED THE GALAXYGÇÖS MOST DANGEROUS PRISON. I CAN. I SAY IT AND I SAY IT OUTLOUD EVERYDAY TO PEOPLE IN MY COLLEGE CLASS AND ALL THEY DO IS PROVE PEOPLE IN COLLEGE CLASS CAN STILL BE IMMATURE JERKS. AND IVE LEARNED ALL THE LINES AND IVE LEARNED HOW TO MAKE MYSELF AND MY APARTMENT LESS LONELY BY SHOUTING EM ALL. 2 HOURS INCLUDING WIND DOWN EVERY MORNING. THEN I POST ABOUT TITANS ON FORUMS.EVEONLINE.COM |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2641
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:58:00 -
[823] - Quote
Variable1 wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing. All things aside, this is a pretty hilarious assumption that doesn't make sense in context. With a base sensor strength of 5, you are talking about a few seconds difference between t2 and cormack out of a probable minute+ lock time. Well worth the 4b+ sensor booster imo  Gains you 25s against frigates (105 to 79, assuming 3 are fitted), 15s against cruisers (64 to 49) and 10s against battleships (44 to 33). If you see this as a big difference, then it's worth balancing around the officer fit given that dropping 12bn on SBs is not a huge fraction of the outlay for a properly-fit titan. If you don't see this as a big difference, then balancing around the officer fit isn't a big deal because it's not having a major impact. Either way, it's a functional assumption  1. lol'ing at 'assumptions' instead of actual in game data being used to make HUGE changes in game. 2. lol'ing at all Titan pilots being 'rich'. Titan pilots are probably botters. Titan pilots are RMT'ers. Titan pilots all fit Officer everything. Titan pilots standard fit can pop bs/cruisers/frigs. Do you even have the slightest clue? 3. lol'ing at the 2 types of people in this thread agreeing - goons and friends of goons (ie no clue) 4. lol'ing at the lack of work done on countering 700+ maels... 5. lol'ing at the welcome to BLOB land. 6. lol'ing that my tears are not as much for the nerf, but for the shear stupidity of the arguments used to create this nerf and the disbelief that CCP cannot see you for what you have become. Sad days ahead perhaps, but most will try to keep up the honest fight against goonswarmonline, and continue to have their counters nerfed until quitting time. I will donate my stuff to anyone who can change the goon ethos of 'destroy eve whatever the cost'. Onwards on upwards. :-) Tinfoil off.
it's well-known that -A- and Goonswarm are long-time friends "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Aqriue
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
491
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:58:00 -
[824] - Quote
Not going to bother reading nearly 40 pages of Goons giving knob gratification to get their way (obviously how they wanted it to turn out ), but can I ask this
Can we please get a PVP flag? 
Solves the whole issue of losers (like the guys getting stomped by titans cause they obviously failed to bring them to counter thin tank glass cannon Titans) no longer feeling like losers. Wander into a gate camp, its ok. AFK to jita in a Kestrel full of PLEX, its ok. AFK in a Hulk fit for cargo letting a damn destroyer take it out, its ok. No fear of getting your Officer fit CNR ganked cause its worth 5 billion in a 1/5 the cost hull, its ok. Cause you can no longer lose it, by completely avoiding the actions you used to take that made you a loser and a ******* idiot in the first place that you deserve to lose it.
/sarcasmn off
Can't dumb down the game anymore (Oh wait, we can. Lets request that PVP flag everyone!), just have to scream and whine loud enough to get your way. No one can find an obvious solution (like bringing their own massive Titan fleets instead of battleships and T3 cruisers) to meta game better then the guys who found a way to meta game better then the whiners; Titan pilots continued to use a Titan after it lost AoE doomsday, after it lost the ability to hit sub cap ships with DD, after it lost its drones, after it lost 20% of its hitpoints, they still found a way....but you couldn't find a solution but to whine because you were unwilling, unable, or refused to fly / bring a cap ship of your own. Yes, now the Titan pilots are the losers because you couldn't nut the **** up and put out (you could only take it like an internet **** queen and moaned loud enough, CCP had to metaphorically install sound proofing so they don't have to hear your loud screams )
To the CCP staff, really think how you are dumbing down the game because a portion of your player base can't handle getting their ass handed to them. Then think of the other portion and would you really make such a change, that it offends the other portion (like making Highsec and Carebears totally safe because one side wanted it, but the other doesn't and it totally offends them but you go ahead with it anyway because they scream about it) |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:58:00 -
[825] - Quote
Machine Delta wrote:
Hey, we said bombers. Keep moving the goalposts bro.
Right, so say the average alliance can field 200 guys, how are those 200 guys supposed to keep the 1200 man fleet on the field long enough to let the bombers make a single run, and how much is left of that 200 man alliance after they engage the 1200 man fleet.
Scale that if you want to 400, or even 600 guys.
The counter only works if you can get them to stay in one place long enough for each bombing run, and if you were to say, whittle numbers while they formed, well, if you kill enough to matter, the 1200 man fleet won't see the field (thats morale winning, not a fleet comp beating 1200 guys) and if you don't then you're stuck in the same situation.
So tell me again how an average alliance that could normally field a 200 man fleet is to counter 1200 dudes with bombers.
Tell me how a small coalition that could scrape up 600 dudes is going to compete with 1200 guys.
The scaling mechanic is so out of whack that its simply not possible. Over 150 maels and carriers start getting vollied, once you reach the full alpha fleet, backed by 400 drakes, 100 collected scimmies, a small bomber group, and however many rifters you are left with a thing that is literally only currently countered by one thing in game: Titans.
The answer to what beats 1200 dudes is your own 1200 dudes, as there isn't much else thats going to matter.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2641
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:59:00 -
[826] - Quote
Aqriue wrote:Not going to bother reading nearly 40 pages of Goons giving knob gratification to get their way (obviously how they wanted it to turn out  ), but can I ask this Can we please get a PVP flag?  Solves the whole issue of losers (like the guys getting stomped by titans cause they obviously failed to bring them to counter thin tank glass cannon Titans) no longer feeling like losers. Wander into a gate camp, its ok. AFK to jita in a Kestrel full of PLEX, its ok. AFK in a Hulk fit for cargo letting a damn destroyer take it out, its ok. No fear of getting your Officer fit CNR ganked cause its worth 5 billion in a 1/5 the cost hull, its ok. Cause you can no longer lose it, by completely avoiding the actions you used to take that made you a loser and a ******* idiot in the first place that you deserve to lose it. /sarcasmn off Can't dumb down the game anymore (Oh wait, we can. Lets request that PVP flag everyone!), just have to scream and whine loud enough to get your way. No one can find an obvious solution (like bringing their own massive Titan fleets instead of battleships and T3 cruisers) to meta game better then the guys who found a way to meta game better then the whiners; Titan pilots continued to use a Titan after it lost AoE doomsday, after it lost the ability to hit sub cap ships with DD, after it lost its drones, after it lost 20% of its hitpoints, they still found a way.... but you couldn't find a solution but to whine because you were unwilling, unable, or refused to fly / bring a cap ship of your own. Yes, now the Titan pilots are the losers because you couldn't nut the **** up and put out (you could only take it like an internet **** queen and moaned loud enough, CCP had to metaphorically install sound proofing so they don't have to hear your loud screams  ) To the CCP staff, really think how you are dumbing down the game because a portion of your player base can't handle getting their ass handed to them. Then think of the other portion and would you really make such a change, that it offends the other portion (like making Highsec and Carebears totally safe because one side wanted it, but the other doesn't and it totally offends them but you go ahead with it anyway because they scream about it)
you are stupid "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2641
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:01:00 -
[827] - Quote
titans should be exempt from any changes and balancing because they are expensive ~end-game ships~ "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Le Cardinal
Spricer Raiden.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:01:00 -
[828] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone,
Goons are not happy with the effectiveness of large groups of titans against subcapital ships, so we have to make some adjustments.
Nice to see those ccp connections are working out for you. Well played goons. Putting Soundwave in charge of this is pretty hilarious considering his past history. |

Tithi
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:01:00 -
[829] - Quote
Andski wrote:Tithi wrote:Well now you've just traded "who has the most X" for "who has the most Y".
You saying "Well they should bring a matching subcap fleet" is no different from them saying "Well they should bring a matching supercap fleet."
I agree with this nerf, but I think some tweaking to carriers and dreads might be necessary to make them more useful against subcaps in fleet battles. Just a thought. perhaps you should try PvP other than nopod matches in hisec before you comment in discussions about 0.0 warfare between alliances that matter
Perhaps you should not act like a douche for no reason. I agree with everything else you've said in this thread, tho. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Ignore This.
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:01:00 -
[830] - Quote
+1
|

Charles Case
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:01:00 -
[831] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote:
Math is hard.
An MWD Drake (or MWD Maelstrom) has the signature of a Carrier. Ergo, the MWD Maelstrom or MWD Drake can be hit by a turret Titan. The proposed Titan changes don't change that fact.
I meant the idiotic conclusion of your post: "Because I didn't think CCPs goals was fewer folks on the cluster."
What do you think affects the number of folks on the cluster more having titans nerfed or not?
I'm sure the number of people connected will just plummet from now until April! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2641
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:02:00 -
[832] - Quote
Le Cardinal wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone,
Goons are not happy with the effectiveness of large groups of titans against subcapital ships, so we have to make some adjustments.
Nice to see those ccp connections are working out for you. Well played goons. Putting Soundwave in charge of this is pretty hilarious considering his past history.
ahahaha CCP connections get real "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Koby Botick
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:02:00 -
[833] - Quote
Shadoo wrote: (wrote a lot of words)
And there should nobody be able to say, that a goon cannot appreciate a very well written post of an "enemy", at least in the context of the epic Grath whine and opposition in here. Well said. +1. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2624
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:02:00 -
[834] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Machine Delta wrote:
Hey, we said bombers. Keep moving the goalposts bro.
R...a...m..a...d...i...c...k...i...n...m...y...a...s...s...m...m..m
again, all i can see, can't respond to anything i don't see |

BlueMajere
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:05:00 -
[835] - Quote
In true middle school style
I DARE CCP to respond to Shadoo's post.
I TRIPLE DOG DARE YOU (you can't back down from that)
Yeah. Good luck getting away with not answering after this callout. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:05:00 -
[836] - Quote
Weaselior, demonstrating his latent homosexual tendencies for the world to see. |

Courthouse
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
162
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:05:00 -
[837] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Machine Delta wrote:
Hey, we said bombers. Keep moving the goalposts bro.
Right, so say the average alliance can field 200 guys, how are those 200 guys supposed to keep the 1200 man fleet on the field long enough to let the bombers make a single run, and how much is left of that 200 man alliance after they engage the 1200 man fleet. Scale that if you want to 400, or even 600 guys. The counter only works if you can get them to stay in one place long enough for each bombing run, and if you were to say, whittle numbers while they formed, well, if you kill enough to matter, the 1200 man fleet won't see the field (thats morale winning, not a fleet comp beating 1200 guys) and if you don't then you're stuck in the same situation. So tell me again how an average alliance that could normally field a 200 man fleet is to counter 1200 dudes with bombers. Tell me how a small coalition that could scrape up 600 dudes is going to compete with 1200 guys. The scaling mechanic is so out of whack that its simply not possible. Over 150 maels and carriers start getting vollied, once you reach the full alpha fleet, backed by 400 drakes, 100 collected scimmies, a small bomber group, and however many rifters you are left with a thing that is literally only currently countered by one thing in game: Titans. The answer to what beats 1200 dudes is your own 1200 dudes, as there isn't much else thats going to matter. armor hacs Armor Hacs ARMOR HACS |

Mirmedon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:05:00 -
[838] - Quote
Variable1 wrote:[quote=CCP Greyscale][quote=Ikoma Sunblazer][quote=CCP Greyscale] I will donate my stuff to anyone who can change the goon ethos of 'destroy eve whatever the cost'.
Onwards on upwards. :-) Tinfoil off.
I will do this thing, donate your stuff to me tia.
|

Win Sui
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:06:00 -
[839] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Sirhan Blixt wrote:
Also, did it occur to any of you soon-to-be-ex titan blobbers that maybe the reason you've been seeing these large subcap fleets is because titans are hilariously broken? No. It doesn't. .
Mabye because I've been watching Goons use the "More must be better" approach for 5 years now. If you removed all supercaps from the game would the CFC suddenly dissipate into the ether? No, no it wouldn't, you've banded together because you lack the means to stand alone, and that horde mentality was threatened by something, so you've reacted to it by crying until that stop was removed from the game. Now you're free in April to rule the universe (unless our Smear Soundwave campaign works).
Maybe switch to a game where your elite skills are rewarded? I bet you could run a mean WoW raiding guild. Or SWTOR?
Dunno. Or make some friends and stop being such an elitist prick. That might work too. |

Le Cardinal
Spricer Raiden.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:07:00 -
[840] - Quote
Andski wrote:Le Cardinal wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone,
Goons are not happy with the effectiveness of large groups of titans against subcapital ships, so we have to make some adjustments.
Nice to see those ccp connections are working out for you. Well played goons. Putting Soundwave in charge of this is pretty hilarious considering his past history. ahahaha CCP connections get real
Now that was a fast reply. Sadly, with this heavy handed nerf, things are quite real.
|

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:08:00 -
[841] - Quote
Le Cardinal wrote:Andski wrote:Le Cardinal wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone,
Goons are not happy with the effectiveness of large groups of titans against subcapital ships, so we have to make some adjustments.
Nice to see those ccp connections are working out for you. Well played goons. Putting Soundwave in charge of this is pretty hilarious considering his past history. ahahaha CCP connections get real Now that was a fast reply. Sadly, with this heavy handed nerf, things are quite real. eve is real meight
maybe if your csm rep wasn't so busy drinking he could have stopped this |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2625
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:08:00 -
[842] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Weaselior, demonstrating his latent homosexual tendencies for the world to see. latent? |

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:08:00 -
[843] - Quote
Shadoo comes in and makes what I think may be a good post that I want to like but it is Shadoo.  |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
438
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:08:00 -
[844] - Quote
Win Sui wrote:
Dunno. Or make some friends and stop being such an elitist prick. That might work too.
Man, its like you all want to say it without saying it.
Just admit that you think numbers should win no matter what.
|

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:08:00 -
[845] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Machine Delta wrote:
Hey, we said bombers. Keep moving the goalposts bro.
Right, so say the average alliance can field 200 guys, how are those 200 guys supposed to keep the 1200 man fleet on the field long enough to let the bombers make a single run, and how much is left of that 200 man alliance after they engage the 1200 man fleet. Scale that if you want to 400, or even 600 guys. The counter only works if you can get them to stay in one place long enough for each bombing run, and if you were to say, whittle numbers while they formed, well, if you kill enough to matter, the 1200 man fleet won't see the field (thats morale winning, not a fleet comp beating 1200 guys) and if you don't then you're stuck in the same situation. So tell me again how an average alliance that could normally field a 200 man fleet is to counter 1200 dudes with bombers. Tell me how a small coalition that could scrape up 600 dudes is going to compete with 1200 guys. The scaling mechanic is so out of whack that its simply not possible. Over 150 maels and carriers start getting vollied, once you reach the full alpha fleet, backed by 400 drakes, 100 collected scimmies, a small bomber group, and however many rifters you are left with a thing that is literally only currently countered by one thing in game: Titans. The answer to what beats 1200 dudes is your own 1200 dudes, as there isn't much else thats going to matter.
You might not be keen on the idea of using more than one ship type in a fleet but there are things called covops, interdictors, and a thing called probing. If you use those with 200 bombers then yeah you could whittle down a 1200 man fleet or marginalize it from its strategic objectives fairly easily. It's painful to see you try so hard here. You should really step away from the keyboard before you admit to wanting to RMT your titan on these forums in addition to the ones you already have cried on.
|

Meltmind2
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:08:00 -
[846] - Quote
Shadoo wrote:I don't think anyone who has flown a titan in combat can argue that the ship is not currently overpowered in combat when used in great numbers, just like no one could seriously argue about AOD DDs when they started to be used in 3+3 scale every 10 minutes
Of course, same goes for every ship in eve -- when used in great numbers, but Supercapitals certainly show this curve more often on the field
So I'm extremely happy that you state that the ship needs a role change - last time we were campaigning for AOD DD change -- this was exactly what a lot of us were asking for
But that was 3 years ago
I am therefore rather dissapointed that what we, the community at large, have been asking for a very long time is rather haphazardly brushed off as something that "will be looked at long term" with a surgical change that SCREAMS of a kneejerk reaction without really providing us with much to go on here to see your vision or have comfort you are going to do something in the long term for the "end game" ship in EVE
And forgive me for saying this -- but you have not always had a great track record of revisiting changes you've made in the past as surgical adjustments. Thus I feel like pressing a bit harder on the high level thoughts that have lead you to make this current fix
What is your intended role for Titan with this change on TQ today?
How will you evaluate if your changes implemented will match up with that role on the TQ combat field in this release? For example -- as far as I can see -- a large group of titans will still obliterate a large group of battleships/drakes -- all you've delayed is the first hit and require more micromanagement in making sure the lock queue is evenly spaced out
Given how large fights today unfold on TQ -- how do you see this ship fulfilling your intended role on heavily TiDi systems with the sig change
What is your future vision, even at high level, for the Titan ship class? Will it remain a combat asset or are you looking and overhauling it for something else (personally btw I've argued for the last 4 years that titans should NOT be a combat ship at all, but rather a massive alliance level asset for logistics/cloning/staging/etc)
What assurances can you offer us this change will not remain a permanent fixture for the long term?
With the combat ability of this ship being "surgically adjusted", would you be even willing to look at for example increasing the jump range of the ship to balance the change
And lastly -- are you going to allow those pilots who wish to wait for your stated longer term role adjustments to GM-dock their ship until such a time that this change is no longer a surgical measure in order to still utilize the account/character for combat in EVE? This is literally the best post in this thread. |

960ApofiS069
hirr Against ALL Authorities
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:09:00 -
[847] - Quote
+1
My opion is titans shoulndt be able to lock subcaps at all, its not too hacky and restrictive if u (ccp) find something what could be added to titans, maybe add to em a cyno, which will not affect their speed or anything (like invuly and not like normal cynofield gen which lock yo ship to point, and if u ccp are worried about moving cyno-speed of titan or bumped titan then make it like tit will create that shining effect which will remain in space for some short time like covps cyno 30s and in that space will be ships able to lock/jump), a new button for titans pilots, add some nice effect to titans that everyone could see that tittans lighted cyno maybe that cyno could be lighted also in cynojamed system (like a bonus titans are also much more bigger than cyno jamers so why not?), and cyno would go down as titan pilot push warp button/jump/under pos ff. Its the easiest way how to solve this, u take and u give, no need for res nerf or guns tracking. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
438
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:09:00 -
[848] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Weaselior, demonstrating his latent homosexual tendencies for the world to see. latent?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_homosexuality
|

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:09:00 -
[849] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:evil goonies metagame meight meight meight
|

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:10:00 -
[850] - Quote
Andski wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:Charles Case wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:Charles Case wrote:TELL ME HOW YOU CAN BEAT A 2000 BLOB END OF DISCUSSION Turn off the servers and go home. If you would stop and think (I know, sometimes it's hard when you are in madposting mode), you would realize that half of this Titan nerf is beyond stupid. If Titans are supposed to shoot capitals, great. But after the update with the scan resolution change, Titans won't even be able to do that unless you spend an additional 30-40 BILLION ISK to fit stupid Officer Sensor Boosters. And in doing so, it won't change their ability to shoot MWD Drakes or MWD Maelstroms. So what does this achieve, other than having the Titan pilots not log in at all? Because I didn't think CCPs goals was fewer folks on the cluster. That's some pretty dumb reasoning there ok Math is hard. An MWD Drake (or MWD Maelstrom) has the signature of a Carrier. Ergo, the MWD Maelstrom or MWD Drake can be hit by a turret Titan. The proposed Titan changes don't change that fact. yeah we tend to run our MWDs for fun and just sit still
Ok, so geometry is hard. But when you orbit your anchor, there are at least two points in your orbit where your transversal is ZERO and you will be hit. And yeah, your current drake doctorine is a perma-MWD drake. Unless it changed this week. CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:10:00 -
[851] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Win Sui wrote:
Dunno. Or make some friends and stop being such an elitist prick. That might work too.
Man, its like you all want to say it without saying it. Just admit that you think numbers should win no matter what.
You're the one saying that. Shadoo has so articulately and clearly demonstrated how best to address the issue your white noise posts are really no longer necessary. Maybe you should try out things under Raiden. leadership? |

Durr Hurrr Durr
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:11:00 -
[852] - Quote
There sure is a lot of pl tears in a titan nerf thread. Who'd a thunk it huh........ |

Gypsio III
Dirty Filthy Perverts
218
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:11:00 -
[853] - Quote
Why do supercaps still have their built-in, penalty-free WCS? They're not haulers or miners like the Mastodon or Skiff.
There is no place for WCS on combat ships. Although I can see why their pilots appreciate the elite nature of stabbed PVP.  |

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:11:00 -
[854] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Win Sui wrote:
Dunno. Or make some friends and stop being such an elitist prick. That might work too.
Man, its like you all want to say it without saying it. Just admit that you think numbers should win no matter what.
All I'm hearing is 'I am a lone wolf who is better than you all and I should be able to Rambo your entire alliance on a whim if I so choose' |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
438
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:11:00 -
[855] - Quote
Machine Delta wrote: You might not be keen on the idea of using more than one ship type in a fleet but there are things called covops, interdictors, and a thing called probing. If you use those with 200 bombers then yeah you could whittle down a 1200 man fleet or marginalize it from its strategic objectives fairly easily. It's painful to see you try so hard here. You should really step away from the keyboard before you admit to wanting to RMT your titan on these forums in addition to the ones you already have cried on.
1) Ive said my titan will be fine and will function the same as it does now, with a slight delay before the damage hits. Can you identify me saying that I'm RMTing MY titan?
2) If you had 200 bombers, and were facing 1200 guys, how do you propose you talk those 1200 guys into being somewhere bombable??
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2642
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:12:00 -
[856] - Quote
glad it's mutual "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2625
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:12:00 -
[857] - Quote
man you badpost even about being gay |

Charles Case
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:13:00 -
[858] - Quote
Hey Grath maybe you didn't read my post back there
THE DISCUSSION IS OVER |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
438
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:13:00 -
[859] - Quote
Machine Delta wrote: Shadoo has so articulately and clearly demonstrated how best to address the issue
Really im pretty sure our posts have said nearly the same thing, I can even go back 4 pages and quote nearly word for word identical posting points if you'd like, but please feel free to call my posts white noise in a sea of 2000 goon posts.
|

Rommel Rottweil
Thundercats Initiative Mercenaries
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:13:00 -
[860] - Quote
I think that the reduction of Tracking is ok, but a bit harsh on the target & res nerf.
Btw, while you guys are at it, can you boost Capital Turret and Bay DPS a bit.
I suggest giving maybe 20-25% boost for Capital Weapons or a small boost to Siege Damage multiplier  |

Mik kyo
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:14:00 -
[861] - Quote
Win Sui wrote:Dunno. Or make some friends and stop being such an elitist prick. That might work too.
The only thing worse than a titan nerf, is having to play this game with the retar ded masses. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
438
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:14:00 -
[862] - Quote
Charles Case wrote:Hey Grath maybe you didn't read my post back there
THE DISCUSSION IS OVER
Its not over until the patch goes live
|

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:14:00 -
[863] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote: 2) If you had 200 bombers, and were facing 1200 guys, how do you propose you talk those 1200 guys into being somewhere bombable??
http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/item.php?type_id=22778 |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
80
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:15:00 -
[864] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote: Ok, so geometry is hard. But when you orbit your anchor, there are at least two points in your orbit where your transversal is ZERO and you will be hit. And yeah, your current drake doctorine is a perma-MWD drake. Unless it changed this week.
1 thing. If you orbit in a circle that maintains distance from your target that doesn't happen. |

Kazanir
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
365
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:15:00 -
[865] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:2) If you had 200 bombers, and were facing 1200 guys, how do you propose you talk those 1200 guys into being somewhere bombable??
I dunno but it sure seems to happen to your 150 guys pretty ******* often  |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
462
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:15:00 -
[866] - Quote
i dunno, I've seen PL drop titans on small cruiser/sub-BC fleet fights they were losing (against cascade imminent lol), i'm not sure what grath's old stupid ass is babbling on about titans being used as a 'anti-blob tactic', because that's not what they're used for |

Charles Case
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:16:00 -
[867] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Charles Case wrote:Hey Grath maybe you didn't read my post back there
THE DISCUSSION IS OVER Its not over until the patch goes live
Nah man i'm just making fun of you cause that's how you finish your posts
HUrf . . . . . dUrF
End of discussion! |

Charles Case
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:16:00 -
[868] - Quote
you're pretty angry you see |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
438
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:16:00 -
[869] - Quote
Promiscuous Female wrote:
Thats nice, why would they ever be somewhere to get bubbled?
Theres literally no need to, they come in, sit in staging tower, then cynoing in their own supers to do any heavy lifting in the system.
But hey, at least you had 200 bombers.
|

Death2all Supercaps
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:17:00 -
[870] - Quote
Lesson learned guys:
Dont drop titan blob on a roaming LARPing CCP gang
Or they hit you with 'da bat' |

Win Sui
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:17:00 -
[871] - Quote
Shadoo wrote:I don't think anyone who has flown a titan in combat can argue that the ship is not currently overpowered in combat when used in great numbers, just like no one could seriously argue about AOD DDs when they started to be used in 3+3 scale every 10 minutes
Of course, same goes for every ship in eve -- when used in great numbers, but Supercapitals certainly show this curve more often on the field
So I'm extremely happy that you state that the ship needs a role change - last time we were campaigning for AOD DD change -- this was exactly what a lot of us were asking for
But that was 3 years ago
I am therefore rather dissapointed that what we, the community at large, have been asking for a very long time is rather haphazardly brushed off as something that "will be looked at long term" with a surgical change that SCREAMS of a kneejerk reaction without really providing us with much to go on here to see your vision or have comfort you are going to do something in the long term for the "end game" ship in EVE
And forgive me for saying this -- but you have not always had a great track record of revisiting changes you've made in the past as surgical adjustments. Thus I feel like pressing a bit harder on the high level thoughts that have lead you to make this current fix
What is your intended role for Titan with this change on TQ today?
How will you evaluate if your changes implemented will match up with that role on the TQ combat field in this release? For example -- as far as I can see -- a large group of titans will still obliterate a large group of battleships/drakes -- all you've delayed is the first hit and require more micromanagement in making sure the lock queue is evenly spaced out
Given how large fights today unfold on TQ -- how do you see this ship fulfilling your intended role on heavily TiDi systems with the sig change
What is your future vision, even at high level, for the Titan ship class? Will it remain a combat asset or are you looking and overhauling it for something else (personally btw I've argued for the last 4 years that titans should NOT be a combat ship at all, but rather a massive alliance level asset for logistics/cloning/staging/etc)
What assurances can you offer us this change will not remain a permanent fixture for the long term?
With the combat ability of this ship being "surgically adjusted", would you be even willing to look at for example increasing the jump range of the ship to balance the change
And lastly -- are you going to allow those pilots who wish to wait for your stated longer term role adjustments to GM-dock their ship until such a time that this change is no longer a surgical measure in order to still utilize the account/character for combat in EVE?
Now this is a pretty ******* good post. Not too far from what CFC wanted afaik. |

SuperBeastie
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
53
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:18:00 -
[872] - Quote
Shadoo wrote:I don't think anyone who has flown a titan in combat can argue that the ship is not currently overpowered in combat when used in great numbers, just like no one could seriously argue about AOD DDs when they started to be used in 3+3 scale every 10 minutes
Of course, same goes for every ship in eve -- when used in great numbers, but Supercapitals certainly show this curve more often on the field
So I'm extremely happy that you state that the ship needs a role change - last time we were campaigning for AOD DD change -- this was exactly what a lot of us were asking for
But that was 3 years ago
I am therefore rather dissapointed that what we, the community at large, have been asking for a very long time is rather haphazardly brushed off as something that "will be looked at long term" with a surgical change that SCREAMS of a kneejerk reaction without really providing us with much to go on here to see your vision or have comfort you are going to do something in the long term for the "end game" ship in EVE
And forgive me for saying this -- but you have not always had a great track record of revisiting changes you've made in the past as surgical adjustments. Thus I feel like pressing a bit harder on the high level thoughts that have lead you to make this current fix
What is your intended role for Titan with this change on TQ today?
How will you evaluate if your changes implemented will match up with that role on the TQ combat field in this release? For example -- as far as I can see -- a large group of titans will still obliterate a large group of battleships/drakes -- all you've delayed is the first hit and require more micromanagement in making sure the lock queue is evenly spaced out
Given how large fights today unfold on TQ -- how do you see this ship fulfilling your intended role on heavily TiDi systems with the sig change
What is your future vision, even at high level, for the Titan ship class? Will it remain a combat asset or are you looking and overhauling it for something else (personally btw I've argued for the last 4 years that titans should NOT be a combat ship at all, but rather a massive alliance level asset for logistics/cloning/staging/etc)
What assurances can you offer us this change will not remain a permanent fixture for the long term?
With the combat ability of this ship being "surgically adjusted", would you be even willing to look at for example increasing the jump range of the ship to balance the change
And lastly -- are you going to allow those pilots who wish to wait for your stated longer term role adjustments to GM-dock their ship until such a time that this change is no longer a surgical measure in order to still utilize the account/character for combat in EVE?
This is a great point.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2648
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:18:00 -
[873] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: Thats nice, why would they ever be somewhere to get bubbled? Theres literally no need to, they come in, sit in staging tower, then cynoing in their own supers to do any heavy lifting in the system. But hey, at least you had 200 bombers.
hmm how do you get a subcap fleet out of a staging POS when they have friendly supers operating in the system "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:18:00 -
[874] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Machine Delta wrote: You might not be keen on the idea of using more than one ship type in a fleet but there are things called covops, interdictors, and a thing called probing. If you use those with 200 bombers then yeah you could whittle down a 1200 man fleet or marginalize it from its strategic objectives fairly easily. It's painful to see you try so hard here. You should really step away from the keyboard before you admit to wanting to RMT your titan on these forums in addition to the ones you already have cried on.
1) Ive said my titan will be fine and will function the same as it does now, with a slight delay before the damage hits. Can you identify me saying that I'm RMTing MY titan? 2) If you had 200 bombers, and were facing 1200 guys, how do you propose you talk those 1200 guys into being somewhere bombable??
We both know if I link to a post from kugu it will get deleted. You know what you've said and so have most of the people here. It's been really humorous on this side.
If a fleet of 1200 ships are never in a position to be bombed then they aren't a threat to anything. That would have to be 1200 ships either docked or sitting in their own POS. Neither of which is a concern for 200.
|

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:18:00 -
[875] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote: Thats nice, why would they ever be somewhere to get bubbled?
Theres literally no need to, they come in, sit in staging tower, then cynoing in their own supers to do any heavy lifting in the system.
But hey, at least you had 200 bombers.
sometimes people have to fight where there are no towers to hide in meight
also drag bubbles |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:20:00 -
[876] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: Thats nice, why would they ever be somewhere to get bubbled? Theres literally no need to, they come in, sit in staging tower, then cynoing in their own supers to do any heavy lifting in the system. But hey, at least you had 200 bombers.
Hey wait, are you saying that a few hundred subcaps can't do anything against a big group of supercaps?    |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1837
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:23:00 -
[877] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Its not over until the patch goes live
:shobon:
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Durr Hurrr Durr
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:24:00 -
[878] - Quote
I'm not saying thes nerf is perfict, im not even saying its good. All im saying is
TROLOLOLOLOLOLOLO |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2633
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:27:00 -
[879] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: Thats nice, why would they ever be somewhere to get bubbled? Theres literally no need to, they come in, sit in staging tower, then cynoing in their own supers to do any heavy lifting in the system. But hey, at least you had 200 bombers.
so you drop on the supercaps
suddenly, the 1200 guys have to leave the pos and you can then bubble them
i hope this helped you in your quest to become average at eve online |

Doris Dents
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
170
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:28:00 -
[880] - Quote
Thank you for these much needed fixes. I'm interested in EVE again. |

Solinuas
Beyond Evil and Good
86
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:29:00 -
[881] - Quote
Confirming this nerf came about because PL dropped titans on the first CCP fleet.
So PL this is YOUR FAULT... get out... just get out
(Sarcastic post, since i have no doubt that some idiots will think i am serious) |

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:29:00 -
[882] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote: Ok, so geometry is hard. But when you orbit your anchor, there are at least two points in your orbit where your transversal is ZERO and you will be hit. And yeah, your current drake doctorine is a perma-MWD drake. Unless it changed this week.
1 thing. If you orbit in a circle that maintains distance from your target that doesn't happen.
Oh, god. Go back to school. Yes, it does. TWICE in every rotation. Draw a line from your target through your anchor. Now draw a circle around your anchor. See the circle bisected by the line. TWICE. CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

Ganthrithor
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
138
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:30:00 -
[883] - Quote
Not that I don't adore all these tears, but isn't this a little heavy-handed? I would have preferred to see a small tracking nerf (so tracking titans can't blap hictors) and the elimination of combat-refitting rather than a straight up "titans are now as horrible as dreads" hell-nerf.
I mean seriously, dropping in tracking titans and then refitting on the fly to a 50m ehp tank when you get primaried is pretty ********, but so are Titans that can't hit speed-tanking carriers and take fifteen minutes to lock a POS.
I also don't see "minor tracking nerf plus removal of in-fight re-fitting" on your list of "things we considered but opted not to do," so maybe you'd like to consider it now?
Alternatively, since Titans are now just dreads that move around, let them dock so their pilots can do things other than shoot structures on occasion. |

Ganthrithor
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
138
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:32:00 -
[884] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote: Ok, so geometry is hard. But when you orbit your anchor, there are at least two points in your orbit where your transversal is ZERO and you will be hit. And yeah, your current drake doctorine is a perma-MWD drake. Unless it changed this week.
1 thing. If you orbit in a circle that maintains distance from your target that doesn't happen. Oh, god. Go back to school. Yes, it does. TWICE in every rotation. Draw a line from your target through your anchor. Now draw a circle around your anchor. See the circle bisected by the line. TWICE.
You're dumb as hell, just saying. |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:32:00 -
[885] - Quote
Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:Achaiah7 wrote:The tears, they precious. I can haz your stuffs? You can't. Cos you can't fly it. Now go back into your drake. If I recall right, we relieved you of the burden of Nyx ownership. You replaced it, and lost a Nyx and Ragnarok shortly thereafter. HEH
Your spies are dead and burried long time ago prolly.
1. I do post with my main 2. I never lost a titan. 3. I lost a Nyx cos mittani is a jerk and is using his CSM chairman position ( which is outside the game ) in the game to scam people. 3. I lost another Nyx trying to save my friend's titan. 3. I did replace one Nyx and bought 1 more titan and was aiming to get another 2. If they really nerf the titans, I won't buy another, of course. I will also stop most of my accounts and keep only 3-4. I have 12 now. CCP will be happy I suppose. 4. No, you can't have my stuff cos you simply don't have the skills to use most of my ships.
Regarding the Titan nerf : If it gets to that, I think would be fair for us to have the skill points back to reallocate them into something useful and the isk spent on the titans as well ( market price not production price ). |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
80
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:32:00 -
[886] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote: Ok, so geometry is hard. But when you orbit your anchor, there are at least two points in your orbit where your transversal is ZERO and you will be hit. And yeah, your current drake doctorine is a perma-MWD drake. Unless it changed this week.
1 thing. If you orbit in a circle that maintains distance from your target that doesn't happen. Oh, god. Go back to school. Yes, it does. TWICE in every rotation. Draw a line from your target through your anchor. Now draw a circle around your anchor. See the circle bisected by the line. TWICE. Rotate the circle 90 degrees |

Uggs386
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:33:00 -
[887] - Quote
Ok so now that you have "balanced" titans, can you start working on scale issues in eve.
For example one possible idea: The larger the fleet the more difficult it is to organize and control the fleet.
I feel like one of the reasons huge blobs are so powerful atm is because you only need 1 person for every 250 players who actually know how to play eve. So you can mass recruit a bunch of people who know basic eve mechanics and go own zone everything because you have a few dudes who actually know how to pvp.
So maybe change up the fleet interface controls. Make it so fleet commanders can no longer fleet warp, regroup, broadcast targets etc. Make it so that only wing commanders and squad commanders can execute those orders. This would force 5 people per a fleet of 250 actually have to know how to pvp. Anyways just am idea on how to improve the game. |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
317
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:33:00 -
[888] - Quote
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****. - CCP Oveur, 2006 ~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |

Charles Case
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:34:00 -
[889] - Quote
Ganthrithor wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote: Ok, so geometry is hard. But when you orbit your anchor, there are at least two points in your orbit where your transversal is ZERO and you will be hit. And yeah, your current drake doctorine is a perma-MWD drake. Unless it changed this week.
1 thing. If you orbit in a circle that maintains distance from your target that doesn't happen. Oh, god. Go back to school. Yes, it does. TWICE in every rotation. Draw a line from your target through your anchor. Now draw a circle around your anchor. See the circle bisected by the line. TWICE. You're dumb as hell, just saying.
has to be said |

Woo Glin
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
435
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:34:00 -
[890] - Quote
3d is hard |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
578
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:34:00 -
[891] - Quote
Can we have this thread moved to COAD now?
|

Powers Sa
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:34:00 -
[892] - Quote
Great thing PL is bros with test:
Quote: (4:24:39 PM) goons.pleaseignore.com: Attention test and test pets, all officer Sebo's must sold to the alliance. Pricing structure to follow, anyone found selling officer Sebo's outside of test will kicked for test f**king.
Test Officer Sensor Booster Interdiction begins today. |

kdsjfjhiskhfs
University of Caille Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:35:00 -
[893] - Quote
great job ccp, finally no more "i win button" in eve
also "elyte" pvp ally tears are best tears.
pl and raiden cry more please. it's delicious. |

Heathkit
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:35:00 -
[894] - Quote
I actually really like the meta-game that overpowered titans creates. We have to tightly control super production and maintain an arms race with our enemies. During an invasion, taking out a titan in production is really useful. I'm glad titans can no longer blap subcap fleets, but making them pointless reduces this extra driver of conflict.
What I'd really like to see is titans essentially become nuclear bombs. You care that you have more than your enemy, you race to build them, but actually using them is almost as harmful to you as to your enemy.
Titans should get back their AoE doomsdays. But instead of just taking 50k racial isotopes to activate, they should destroy the ship, and probably pod the pilot as well. I would have no problem getting my fleet welped by a titan if I knew it was costing the other guy something, and if they could only use that ability as often as they can build a new titan. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
438
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:35:00 -
[895] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: Thats nice, why would they ever be somewhere to get bubbled? Theres literally no need to, they come in, sit in staging tower, then cynoing in their own supers to do any heavy lifting in the system. But hey, at least you had 200 bombers. so you drop on the supercaps suddenly, the 1200 guys have to leave the pos and you can then bubble them i hope this helped you in your quest to become average at eve online
What am i dropping on them with, I can only field 200 guys and we've already had another goon suggest all 200 guys should be in bombers to hope to kill the 1200 man sub cap fleet?
I'm ok with admitting EVE is strictly about numbers now, it seems to be the CFC that has a problem with admitting thats what they want (and have achieved)
|

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
462
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:38:00 -
[896] - Quote
hey CCP can you make it so when you're in a titan the size of the 'self destruct ship' command is increased to size 64pt font? also reduce self destruct timer to 1sec kthx |

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:38:00 -
[897] - Quote
Ganthrithor wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote: Ok, so geometry is hard. But when you orbit your anchor, there are at least two points in your orbit where your transversal is ZERO and you will be hit. And yeah, your current drake doctorine is a perma-MWD drake. Unless it changed this week.
1 thing. If you orbit in a circle that maintains distance from your target that doesn't happen. Oh, god. Go back to school. Yes, it does. TWICE in every rotation. Draw a line from your target through your anchor. Now draw a circle around your anchor. See the circle bisected by the line. TWICE. You're dumb as hell, just saying.
So Titans can't hit MWD drakes with the signature of carriers flying in a ball (orbiting an anchor) that is keeping range when their transversal hits zero, because geometry failed me, but your enlightening post has cleared it all up.
Thanks! CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:40:00 -
[898] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone,
We're not happy with......
LOL You just started so very wrong ! You are not happy ?! ?!? You are supposed to be happy only if WE are happy ! Because we pay you, not the other way around ! Jesus, fire this guy, fast ! CCP Greyscale, no disrespect but please, go find a job where you could be useful. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
80
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:40:00 -
[899] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote:Ganthrithor wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote: Ok, so geometry is hard. But when you orbit your anchor, there are at least two points in your orbit where your transversal is ZERO and you will be hit. And yeah, your current drake doctorine is a perma-MWD drake. Unless it changed this week.
1 thing. If you orbit in a circle that maintains distance from your target that doesn't happen. Oh, god. Go back to school. Yes, it does. TWICE in every rotation. Draw a line from your target through your anchor. Now draw a circle around your anchor. See the circle bisected by the line. TWICE. You're dumb as hell, just saying. So Titans can't hit MWD drakes with the signature of carriers flying in a ball (orbiting an anchor) that is keeping range when their transversal hits zero, because geometry failed me, but your enlightening post has cleared it all up. Thanks! If your range from your target is maintained throughout your orbit of the anchor, your trans never hits 0. |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
578
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:41:00 -
[900] - Quote
Uggs386 wrote:Ok so now that you have "balanced" titans, can you start working on scale issues in eve.
For example one possible idea: The larger the fleet the more difficult it is to organize and control the fleet.
I feel like one of the reasons huge blobs are so powerful atm is because you only need 1 person for every 250 players who actually know how to play eve. So you can mass recruit a bunch of people who know basic eve mechanics and go own zone everything because you have a few dudes who actually know how to pvp.
So maybe change up the fleet interface controls. Make it so fleet commanders can no longer fleet warp, regroup, broadcast targets etc. Make it so that only wing commanders and squad commanders can execute those orders. This would force 5 people per a fleet of 250 actually have to know how to pvp. Anyways just am idea on how to improve the game.
You know I suggested locking speed penalties as more and more ships lock/start locking in order to simulate a LoS mechanic so smaller groups can actually do something against blobs like, two years ago. It would be a game changed for sure and the mindless blob would have to actually think and go after several targets at once instead of the 500 shoot the same guy.
Pretty sure all null power blocks wanted nothing to do with it. My question to you and anyone else: What alliances would do well in this situation and which ones would flounder?
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2652
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:41:00 -
[901] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:Achaiah7 wrote:The tears, they precious. I can haz your stuffs? You can't. Cos you can't fly it. Now go back into your drake. If I recall right, we relieved you of the burden of Nyx ownership. You replaced it, and lost a Nyx and Ragnarok shortly thereafter. HEH Your spies are dead and burried long time ago prolly. 1. I do post with my main 2. I never lost a titan. 3. I lost a Nyx cos mittani is a jerk and is using his CSM chairman position ( which is outside the game ) in the game to scam people. 3. I lost another Nyx trying to save my friend's titan. 3. I did replace one Nyx and bought 1 more titan and was aiming to get another 2. If they really nerf the titans, I won't buy another, of course. I will also stop most of my accounts and keep only 3-4. I have 12 now. CCP will be happy I suppose. 4. No, you can't have my stuff cos you simply don't have the skills to use most of my ships. Regarding the Titan nerf : If it gets to that, I think would be fair for us to have the skill points back to reallocate them into something useful and the isk spent on the titans as well ( market price not production price ).
You lost the first Nyx because you're an idiot. You lost the other Nyx because you're an idiot who never realized that a triage carrier is a cheaper and more effective way to save a supercapital that is being attacked. You're an eBay moron - fyi, i can fly literally any ship you own, this is not my only character ;p "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Khadmos
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
34
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:41:00 -
[902] - Quote
Acwron wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone,
We're not happy with...... LOL You just started so very wrong ! You are not happy ?! ?!? You are supposed to be happy only if WE are happy ! Because we pay you, not the other way around ! Jesus, fire this guy, fast ! CCP Greyscale, no disrespect but please, go find a job where you could be useful.
You are so right. They should give every player a titan, that would make us all happy. Stupid CCP, has no idea how to make a game and keep player interest. |

Charles Case
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:43:00 -
[903] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:
So Titans can't hit MWD drakes with the signature of carriers flying in a ball (orbiting an anchor) that is keeping range when their transversal hits zero, because geometry failed me, but your enlightening post has cleared it all up.
Thanks!
If your range from your target is maintained throughout your orbit of the anchor, your trans never hits 0.
i don't think you'll be able to get through to this one
|

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:43:00 -
[904] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Weaselior wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: Thats nice, why would they ever be somewhere to get bubbled? Theres literally no need to, they come in, sit in staging tower, then cynoing in their own supers to do any heavy lifting in the system. But hey, at least you had 200 bombers. so you drop on the supercaps suddenly, the 1200 guys have to leave the pos and you can then bubble them i hope this helped you in your quest to become average at eve online What am i dropping on them with, I can only field 200 guys and we've already had another goon suggest all 200 guys should be in bombers to hope to kill the 1200 man sub cap fleet? I'm ok with admitting EVE is strictly about numbers now, it seems to be the CFC that has a problem with admitting thats what they want (and have achieved)
So you're saying a fleet of subcaps can't drop on a group of supercaps?
|

GreGh Rakrot
Rionnag Alba Northern Coalition.
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:43:00 -
[905] - Quote
Ganthrithor wrote:Not that I don't adore all these tears, but isn't this a little heavy-handed? I would have preferred to see a small tracking nerf (so tracking titans can't blap hictors) and the elimination of combat-refitting rather than a straight up "titans are now as horrible as dreads" hell-nerf.
I mean seriously, dropping in tracking titans and then refitting on the fly to a 50m ehp tank when you get primaried is pretty ********, but so are Titans that can't hit speed-tanking carriers and take fifteen minutes to lock a POS.
I also don't see "minor tracking nerf plus removal of in-fight re-fitting" on your list of "things we considered but opted not to do," so maybe you'd like to consider it now?
Alternatively, since Titans are now just dreads that move around, let them dock so their pilots can do things other than shoot structures on occasion.
I remember quoting Ganthrithor in the thread where they announced supercarrier changes and he was one of the few voices of reason and not the black-and-white crowd thats yelling "Burn the witch". Well here we go again quoting him again cos CCP should listen to him.
Changes to titans ? Ofc, but do it in proper way (preferably with drastic sov change mechanics).
|

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:44:00 -
[906] - Quote
guys guys
the transversal never hits absolute 0
what is an asymptotic function and what is an approximation |

Enochia Starr
DarK IntenTionZ Stop Exploding You Cowards
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:44:00 -
[907] - Quote
If you remove tracking, bring back AOE Doomsday. |

Rer Eirikr
Stargazer Exploration Company Transmission Lost
75
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:44:00 -
[908] - Quote
Acwron wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone,
We're not happy with...... LOL You just started so very wrong ! You are not happy ?! ?!? You are supposed to be happy only if WE are happy ! Because we pay you, not the other way around ! Jesus, fire this guy, fast ! CCP Greyscale, no disrespect but please, go find a job where you could be useful.
Does me good to see Vera Cruz hasn't changed one bit. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2652
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:45:00 -
[909] - Quote
Enochia Starr wrote:If you remove tracking, bring back AOE Doomsday.
Stay in highsec "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Ganthrithor
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
142
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:46:00 -
[910] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote: Ok, so geometry is hard. But when you orbit your anchor, there are at least two points in your orbit where your transversal is ZERO and you will be hit. And yeah, your current drake doctorine is a perma-MWD drake. Unless it changed this week.
1 thing. If you orbit in a circle that maintains distance from your target that doesn't happen. Oh, god. Go back to school. Yes, it does. TWICE in every rotation. Draw a line from your target through your anchor. Now draw a circle around your anchor. See the circle bisected by the line. TWICE. Rotate the circle 90 degrees on the z axis so the line no longer intersects the circle. Remember, 3 dimensions. Also the 0 trans points should be close to the points farthest from where the line intersects the circle even if you do orbit in this direction. The points where the line intersects are where your trans is HIGHEST.
This thread moves so fast! I did make a handy picture for you though!
http://i.imgur.com/YGJa6.jpg |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
439
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:47:00 -
[911] - Quote
Machine Delta wrote:
So you're saying a fleet of subcaps can't drop on a group of 1200 subcaps?
|

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
463
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:48:00 -
[912] - Quote
as a side bonus this'll also kill the 'ratting titan' trend that has been shitting up the south for some time |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
330
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:49:00 -
[913] - Quote
Enochia Starr wrote:If you remove tracking, bring back AOE Doomsday.
lol |

Uggs386
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:49:00 -
[914] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Uggs386 wrote:Ok so now that you have "balanced" titans, can you start working on scale issues in eve.
For example one possible idea: The larger the fleet the more difficult it is to organize and control the fleet.
I feel like one of the reasons huge blobs are so powerful atm is because you only need 1 person for every 250 players who actually know how to play eve. So you can mass recruit a bunch of people who know basic eve mechanics and go own zone everything because you have a few dudes who actually know how to pvp.
So maybe change up the fleet interface controls. Make it so fleet commanders can no longer fleet warp, regroup, broadcast targets etc. Make it so that only wing commanders and squad commanders can execute those orders. This would force 5 people per a fleet of 250 actually have to know how to pvp. Anyways just am idea on how to improve the game. You know I suggested locking speed penalties as more and more ships lock/start locking in order to simulate a LoS mechanic so smaller groups can actually do something against blobs like, two years ago. It would be a game changed for sure and the mindless blob would have to actually think and go after several targets at once instead of the 500 shoot the same guy. Pretty sure all null power blocks wanted nothing to do with it. My question to you and anyone else: What alliances would do well in this situation and which ones would flounder?
Tbh I don't think any sov holding 0.0 alliances would do well. This includes PL even though we don't hold sov we are diluted much like those who live in 0.0. I think the ones who would do best would be smaller low sec/npc 0.0 alliances. Possibly even wh alliances, I haven't come into contact with too many wh people so don't know for sure. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1838
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:50:00 -
[915] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:What am i dropping on them with, I can only field 200 guys
You might have to open your recruitment beyond "anybody with a supercap". The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Enochia Starr
DarK IntenTionZ Stop Exploding You Cowards
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:50:00 -
[916] - Quote
Andski wrote:Enochia Starr wrote:If you remove tracking, bring back AOE Doomsday. Stay in highsec
LOL, look at my corp history? And I own a titan so really this doesn't effect you at all, which you probably don't even have a titan?
"oh i got killed by an avatar in my maelstrom oh noo, NERF TITANS!!!"
Only way to really counter maelstroms was the titans, good bye nullsec warfare. |

Koby Botick
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:51:00 -
[917] - Quote
GreGh Rakrot wrote: Changes to titans ? Ofc, but do it in proper way (preferably with drastic sov change mechanics).
If you actually read the OP from Greyscale you will find that he said that they want to do a big overhaul, but they can't do it now.
If you read between the lines, you can read that they have to step in now with a quick fix, because abuse of tracking titans has become too widespread and can no longer be ignored.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
439
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:52:00 -
[918] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:What am i dropping on them with, I can only field 200 guys
You might have to open your recruitment beyond "anybody with a supercap".
Like I've been saying, this will be the "Numbers are all that matter" patch
|

Akelorian
FinFleet Raiden.
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:52:00 -
[919] - Quote
Koby Botick wrote:GreGh Rakrot wrote: Changes to titans ? Ofc, but do it in proper way (preferably with drastic sov change mechanics).
If you actually read the OP from Greyscale you will find that he said that they want to do a big overhaul, but they can't do it now. If you read between the lines, you can read that they have to step in now with a quick fix, because abuse of tracking titans has become too widespread and can no longer be ignored.
Then I expect them to step in now with a quick fix for alpha maelstroms :) and a quick fix for sov mechanics |

Powers Sa
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:53:00 -
[920] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Weaselior wrote:
Thats nice, why would they ever be somewhere to get bubbled?
Theres literally no need to, they come in, sit in staging tower, then cynoing in their own supers to do any heavy lifting in the system.
But hey, at least you had 200 bombers.
so you drop on the supercaps suddenly, the 1200 guys have to leave the pos and you can then bubble them i hope this helped you in your quest to become average at eve online
What am i dropping on them with, I can only field 200 guys and we've already had another goon suggest all 200 guys should be in bombers to hope to kill the 1200 man sub cap fleet?
I'm ok with admitting EVE is strictly about numbers now, it seems to be the CFC that has a problem with admitting thats what they want (and have achieved) [/quote] Your whole reality is based around the fantasy that PL is a bunch of space spartans. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2654
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:53:00 -
[921] - Quote
Enochia Starr wrote:Andski wrote:Enochia Starr wrote:If you remove tracking, bring back AOE Doomsday. Stay in highsec LOL, look at my corp history? And I own a titan so really this doesn't effect you at all, which you probably don't even have a titan? "oh i got killed by an avatar in my maelstrom oh noo, NERF TITANS!!!" Only way to really counter maelstroms was the titans, good bye nullsec warfare.
no intelligent, rational person would look at EvE and say that AoE doomsdays are needed again
how would you propose that cynojammers be destroyed? hmm?
have fun getting multiple doomsdayed "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:53:00 -
[922] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Machine Delta wrote:
So you're saying a fleet of subcaps can't drop on a group of 1200 subcaps?
Dodging the question. I see how it is. Can't come up with a response so you make a non-answer. Keep stayin mad Grath. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
80
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:53:00 -
[923] - Quote
Ganthrithor wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote: Ok, so geometry is hard. But when you orbit your anchor, there are at least two points in your orbit where your transversal is ZERO and you will be hit. And yeah, your current drake doctorine is a perma-MWD drake. Unless it changed this week.
1 thing. If you orbit in a circle that maintains distance from your target that doesn't happen. Oh, god. Go back to school. Yes, it does. TWICE in every rotation. Draw a line from your target through your anchor. Now draw a circle around your anchor. See the circle bisected by the line. TWICE. Rotate the circle 90 degrees on the z axis so the line no longer intersects the circle. Remember, 3 dimensions. Also the 0 trans points should be close to the points farthest from where the line intersects the circle even if you do orbit in this direction. The points where the line intersects are where your trans is HIGHEST. This thread moves so fast! I did make a handy picture for you though! http://i.imgur.com/YGJa6.jpg Truly amazing. |

Pharon Reichter
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:54:00 -
[924] - Quote
I'm not going to get into an argument weather titans need fixing or not. All i'm gonna say is that anyone with half brain will notice that this move is a rushed out nerf that breaks more than it fixes.
This isnt something that really needs urgent attention but rather careful thought. Oh wait yes there IS a group of people that is crying about it ;) And loud. But getting from an extreme ( not listening to comunity) to the other - ( listening mindless to what some vocal group is crying ) is not the way to go. As people get from pube status to maturity they learn that best way to deal with things is to set them right from the first time.
In the last couple of years there have been several changes to supercaps and none was - as it's shown now - very well thought. This isn't going to fix anything neither in the short term nor in the long term. It will only make a certain group of people happy. CCP knows that and they have even admitted it. So yeah well have fun with it ;)
That being said and knowing this will never happen i also propose something else along with this change -
make only capitals being able to shot structures ;) make subcaps only be able to shoot pos mods. This will bring back the rock/paper/scissors in this game since.
- dreads will be back in action - supercaps/titans will be usefull - subcaps will have the role of support fleet and/or skirmish/harassment
none of the single composition fleets will be able to accomplish something alone , you will have noob players happy and vets happy. true smaller alliances aren't really going to be able to compete ... but let's be honest are they now ? |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
319
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:54:00 -
[925] - Quote
mid-long term, expect supercaps to be moved back to support roles where they belong rather than direct front-line combat.
This is a hotfix. ~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever.
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006 |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:55:00 -
[926] - Quote
hey ccp
you should let supercaps dock
and then implement a twitter feed that announces when supercaps get reprocessed |

Ganthrithor
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
142
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:57:00 -
[927] - Quote
Pharon Reichter wrote: make subcaps only be able to shoot pos mods
This sounds pretty fun. I love fleet fights vs anchored opponents. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
443
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:57:00 -
[928] - Quote
Machine Delta wrote:
Dodging the question. I see how it is.
Hey, your alliance ignores whole classes of ship, I can ignore your question that ignores what I've said if i want to.
|

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1840
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:57:00 -
[929] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:What am i dropping on them with, I can only field 200 guys
You might have to open your recruitment beyond "anybody with a supercap". Like I've been saying, this will be the "Numbers are all that matter" patch
It's not but because you refuse to consider any other solution we're trying to help out.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Koby Botick
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:58:00 -
[930] - Quote
Akelorian wrote:Then I expect them to step in now with a quick fix for alpha maelstroms :) and a quick fix for sov mechanics, and base the fix on maelstroms with officer mods that titans don't use :)
I am sure if alpha maelstroms are capable of doing stuff they are not intended to, they will receive treatment. Given CCPs average response time that would be somewhere between May and July. In 2014.
But why not, I always wanted to fly Amarr ships you know. They still look the best. |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
20
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:59:00 -
[931] - Quote
https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/623314 Oh wait. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/623239 Oh... Oh no. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/621694 Titans can't hit small ships. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/625987 That looks like a drake. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/625956 Clearly a dual LSE large sigged drake. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/625985 :ohdear: https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/625893 Oh oh god. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/629988 Look at all the LSE's on that drake. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/629987 Another one of those drakes. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/623437 No Problem At All.
Reposting these killmails for the titan thread. Anybody who cares enough can also hit the battles button for those kills, and see where fleets of hundreds were wiped out by 40 titans, while the titan group took generally 0 losses.
Anybody in this thread who thinks there wasn't a problem with titans has never spent a week having every single fight end with a titan blob being cyno'd in on your head the second you burn all the way over to wherever you're fighting, and hit grid. And being told to immediately turn around and go home, because there is nothing a subcap fleet can do to a titan blob but die as fast as the titans can cycle their guns.
Remember when they decided to park a small group of titans on a gate and just camp it with them, killing anything that came through? Yeah, no problem at all with titans. |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
479
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:00:00 -
[932] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Powers Sa wrote: You mean when we lose half a fleet and they reship?
No i mean when you filled 4 fleets full of drakes and then charged into the waiting guns of 34 titans. And yet here we are, several weeks later with titan guns being nerfed. Odd coincidence isn't that?
Grath Telkin wrote: The 5 scan res is dumb, as it allows even regular caps to escape titans now, they can easily either warp off, jump out or dock up, its absurd that any ship class in eve would take 15 seconds to lock itself.
Hi my name is Moros. When I fit 2 sensor boosters and enter siege mode it takes me approximately 14 seconds to lock myself.
Being a Moros, I use that time to suck myself off, because Morososoeses are just that good.
Grath Telkin wrote: The single most bothering thing about the nerf is the idea it represents. It is essentially CCP's way of saying you either get your own fleet of 1200 dudes or you can't compete, end of discussion.
1200 dudes aren't a single ship class. You don't nerf 1200 dudes by tweaking their tracking or fiddling their scan res. If you'd have said 1200 Maelstroms, 1200 tengus, or 1200 lolcats (whatever your FOTM fit is) you may have had a point here in that a certain class of ship was overpowered. Instead you're comparing motivations of players to the effectiveness of expensive ships. You're comparing apples to oranges. The tools already exist ingame to counter different groups of players in the form of spying, politics, attacks on morale, market manipulation and other metagaming.
Do me this little favour. Go stand in front of a mirror and read these words alound, just once: "If 1200 people want to shoot me, personally... what could I have possibly done to **** them off and motivate them that much?"
(hint: it's to do with titans) |

Pharon Reichter
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:00:00 -
[933] - Quote
Ganthrithor wrote:Pharon Reichter wrote: make subcaps only be able to shoot pos mods This sounds pretty fun. I love fleet fights vs anchored opponents.
You'd have to bring down that cyno-jammer to bring the caps in. And dreads would really get thir role back - shooting structures. And no - subcap role wouldnt be to shoot structures just like you say supercaps role isn't to shoot subcaps. |

Akelorian
FinFleet Raiden.
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:00:00 -
[934] - Quote
Dear CCP Peligro, What was that you said? I told you so |

Powers Sa
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:01:00 -
[935] - Quote
Pharon Reichter wrote: As people get from pube status to maturity they learn that best way to deal with things is to set them right from the first time.
Goonswarm Federation will proudly display pube status in this thread. I can't say that CCP won't ban us all though. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2656
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:02:00 -
[936] - Quote
Pharon Reichter wrote:Ganthrithor wrote:Pharon Reichter wrote: make subcaps only be able to shoot pos mods This sounds pretty fun. I love fleet fights vs anchored opponents. You'd have to bring down that cyno-jammer to bring the caps in.
Not if you're in Ev0ke! "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
330
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:03:00 -
[937] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:What am i dropping on them with, I can only field 200 guys
You might have to open your recruitment beyond "anybody with a supercap". Like I've been saying, this will be the "Numbers are all that matter" patch
Damn goons are their low-end SP recruitment from the Something Awful Dot Com forums.
You shouldn't be allowed to live in nullsec unless your alliance has a 70million SP average! |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
330
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:03:00 -
[938] - Quote
Also, Grath, you need to calm down dude. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
330
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:03:00 -
[939] - Quote
I know you're always mad, but really we do love you. |

SuperBeastie
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
53
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:03:00 -
[940] - Quote
Charles Case wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:
So Titans can't hit MWD drakes with the signature of carriers flying in a ball (orbiting an anchor) that is keeping range when their transversal hits zero, because geometry failed me, but your enlightening post has cleared it all up.
Thanks!
If your range from your target is maintained throughout your orbit of the anchor, your trans never hits 0. i don't think you'll be able to get through to this one
you guys are both ******* idiots learn to read if you are anchored on someone other than the guy shooting at you there are 2 points in the orbit where you have 0 trans.
By making this change you are actually hurting the alliances who actually have the balls to field their 100b isk ships. The cfc has at least 2 times the super capital numbers as raiden. The problem is we don't have the balls to lose some killing all of theirs. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
443
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:04:00 -
[941] - Quote
CynoNet Two wrote: The tools already exist ingame to counter different groups of players in the form of spying, politics, attacks on morale, market manipulation and other metagaming.
Odd, are you suggesting somehow those same counters aren't effective against supercaps?? What makes those tactics work better against sub caps.
While Im staring at a mirror, are you asking yourself what you did to make 100 titans want to shoot you?
(hint: its the blob)
|

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:04:00 -
[942] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Machine Delta wrote:
Dodging the question. I see how it is.
Hey, your alliance ignores whole classes of ship, I can ignore your question that ignores what I've said if i want to.
Show us where we've done so?
We've offered viable counters besides "BRING MORE PEOPLE" which are the words you're forcing into our mouths.
When we've offered this counter your reply is "Yeah but what would you do if that 1200 man support fleet was sitting in a pos while supers did the work".
That's not really a tactic we've had to worry about. We haven't gone around bluing up half the galaxy to get super fleets to do heavy lifting for us unlike some entities.
|

Thodoros
Roving Guns Inc. RAZOR Alliance
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:05:00 -
[943] - Quote
Hell, its about time! Now i am certain i be able to buy a Titan with my ISK!
|

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
332
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:06:00 -
[944] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:Charles Case wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:
So Titans can't hit MWD drakes with the signature of carriers flying in a ball (orbiting an anchor) that is keeping range when their transversal hits zero, because geometry failed me, but your enlightening post has cleared it all up.
Thanks!
If your range from your target is maintained throughout your orbit of the anchor, your trans never hits 0. i don't think you'll be able to get through to this one you guys are both ******* idiots learn to read if you are anchored on someone other than the guy shooting at you there are 2 points in the orbit where you have 0 trans. By making this change you are actually hurting the alliances who actually have the balls to field their 100b isk ships. The cfc has at least 2 times the super capital numbers as raiden. The problem is we don't have the balls to lose some killing all of theirs.
Hello Bad Poster of Test Alliance Please Ignore.
The door is over there. Please excuse yourself.
Good day. |

Powers Sa
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:06:00 -
[945] - Quote
This should be empty quoted for about 10 pages. |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
48
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:06:00 -
[946] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:CynoNet Two wrote: The tools already exist ingame to counter different groups of players in the form of spying, politics, attacks on morale, market manipulation and other metagaming.
Odd, are you suggesting somehow those same counters aren't effective against supercaps?? What makes those tactics work better against sub caps. While Im staring at a mirror, are you asking yourself what you did to make 100 titans want to shoot you? ( hint: its the fact that we blued literally everyone else in the universe and you're the only people left to shoot) fyp |

XxTheKmanxX
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:07:00 -
[947] - Quote
Powers Sa wrote:This should be empty quoted for about 10 pages.
no **** then people would finally get a clue what the argument should be about.
|

baltec1
807
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:08:00 -
[948] - Quote
If this keeps up I will have to convert my megathron for underwater use! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2658
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:09:00 -
[949] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:By making this change you are actually hurting the alliances who actually have the balls to field their 100b isk ships. The cfc has at least 2 times the super capital numbers as raiden. The problem is we don't have the balls to lose some killing all of theirs.
someone doesn't understand timezone dominance! "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
332
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:09:00 -
[950] - Quote
But guys my pixels cost more than your pixels so I should win!!!!!! |

Largo Coronet
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
157
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:09:00 -
[951] - Quote
So many tears, so much pain. So delicious.
For all of you who think "THIS NERF AM HOORIBLE, NOW WE NEED MORE PEOPLE!" don't get it.
This is what we've always wanted in the GSF. This is what CCP sold us on all these years. Have you all forgotten this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDVEHE10nHc&list=PLF614A7A6461E61E1
Look at it. Look at it, you damned morons. Thousands of ships engaged in a massive fight for a system. Thousands. Capital ships by the dozens with supercaps in support, in space filled with so many subcapitals that you can't see through them. Working together in coordinated fleets. Smaller ships combining their power to take on larger ones. Destruction and death in epic scale.
This is the game we were promised when we subscribed!
What part of the word massively in the term "massively multiplayer online game" don't you get?
We were not told we would have a game where a handful of risk-averse "1337" jerks who botted their way into giant e-peens would be able to blow up anything and everything with impunity, used by players who hypocritically claim to be about "good fites" when it only means to fight when you have more powerful ships than everyone else. Blathering about "honour" while treating new players with contempt and using all their resources to get even more giant space wangs instead of actually helping them to make the more tedious aspects of the game (and they are legion) unnecessary.
You whine and moan and call us griefers when we're playing the game CCP wants us to play, hold your breath until you turn blue, then stamp your feet and threaten to take your ball away and go home. Feel free. Be my guest and don't let the door hit you on the gluteals on the way out.
I'm going to stick around and play the game I was offered in the first place. This is my signature. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.
Someday, this signature may save my life. |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
479
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:11:00 -
[952] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:CynoNet Two wrote: The tools already exist ingame to counter different groups of players in the form of spying, politics, attacks on morale, market manipulation and other metagaming.
Odd, are you suggesting somehow those same counters aren't effective against supercaps?? What makes those tactics work better against sub caps. While Im staring at a mirror, are you asking yourself what you did to make 100 titans want to shoot you? ( hint: its the blob) Similar answer to both questions:
We've been meta-gaming to get titans nerfed since forever, and We successfully meta-gamed to get titans nerfed, thus countering them.
You seriously didn't think something was up with us feeding the elite PVP crowd constant drake kills for a month? Silly t1 goonies lololollol
|

GreGh Rakrot
Rionnag Alba Northern Coalition.
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:11:00 -
[953] - Quote
Koby Botick wrote:GreGh Rakrot wrote: Changes to titans ? Ofc, but do it in proper way (preferably with drastic sov change mechanics).
If you actually read the OP from Greyscale you will find that he said that they want to do a big overhaul, but they can't do it now. If you read between the lines, you can read that they have to step in now with a quick fix, because abuse of tracking titans has become too widespread and can no longer be ignored.
If you would acctualy read what I said you would see I am talking about greater picture here where titans wouldnt be needed to counter massive fleets since they wouldnt exist. What the dev in OP is talking about is greater overhaul of titans only. The thing is titan fleets are a response to what existed before, huge fleets that can only be countered with better hardware by those that dont have same numbers. Thats why I quoted your alliance member who seems to understand the issue. Hotfix would be what he suggested, what CCP is doing is plain out nerf bat without much thought of the consequences.
Yes, titans and supercaps in general are in some sort of limbo because CCP doesnt know what role to give them, but making them POS ornaments isnt a solution. To be honest this whole game would need massive overhaul because CCP has been applying mostly "hotfixes" for years rather then properly re-doing the whole 0.0 concept of the game. |

Joker Deville
Accenture Corp
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:12:00 -
[954] - Quote
This is amazing. I have finally resubbed with ALL my accounts (4 accounts) and will immediately get all my pilots into drakes to blob it up because PL can't **** with me anymore with their e-dicks.
I hope this nerf comes sooner than later or I will be tempted to unsub once again for 7-8 months. I hear there is a firesale in the SO section. Holy **** all those titans, I want one!
CCP: Making sure one ship fits one role, never letting one ship rule them all! |

Courthouse
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
165
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:14:00 -
[955] - Quote
GreGh Rakrot wrote: Yes, titans and supercaps in general are in some sort of limbo because CCP doesnt know what role to give them, but making them POS ornaments isnt a solution. To be honest this whole game would need massive overhaul because CCP has been applying mostly "hotfixes" for years rather then properly re-doing the whole 0.0 concept of the game.
Yeah, and Raidendot's answer for that is to back Elise Randolph for CSM. Think on that for a bit. |

Xayder
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
94
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:15:00 -
[956] - Quote
I don't always post, But when i post I do it with my main |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2664
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:15:00 -
[957] - Quote
GreGh Rakrot wrote:Koby Botick wrote:GreGh Rakrot wrote: Changes to titans ? Ofc, but do it in proper way (preferably with drastic sov change mechanics).
If you actually read the OP from Greyscale you will find that he said that they want to do a big overhaul, but they can't do it now. If you read between the lines, you can read that they have to step in now with a quick fix, because abuse of tracking titans has become too widespread and can no longer be ignored. If you would acctualy read what I said you would see I am talking about greater picture here where titans wouldnt be needed to counter massive fleets since they wouldnt exist. What the dev in OP is talking about is greater overhaul of titans only. The thing is titan fleets are a response to what existed before, huge fleets that can only be countered with better hardware by those that dont have same numbers. Thats why I quoted your alliance member who seems to understand the issue. Hotfix would be what he suggested, what CCP is doing is plain out nerf bat without much thought of the consequences. Yes, titans and supercaps in general are in some sort of limbo because CCP doesnt know what role to give them, but making them POS ornaments isnt a solution. To be honest this whole game would need massive overhaul because CCP has been applying mostly "hotfixes" for years rather then properly re-doing the whole 0.0 concept of the game.
Nobody wants titans to be POS ornaments, not even the CFC.
Did you not pay attention to the fact that there is an entire EXPANSION coming up focused on warfare? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Joker Deville
Accenture Corp
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:16:00 -
[958] - Quote
Joker Deville wrote:This is amazing. I have finally resubbed with ALL my accounts (4 accounts) and will immediately get all my pilots into drakes to blob it up because PL can't **** with me anymore with their e-dicks.
I hope this nerf comes sooner than later or I will be tempted to unsub once again for 7-8 months. I hear there is a firesale in the SO section. Holy **** all those titans, I want one!
CCP: Making sure one ship fits one role, never letting one ship rule them all!
Okay, I admit I have no idea what is going on but I hear that the glorious GoonSwarm Federation have succesfully made CCP understand how titans should really work and both the alliance and the company have collaborated towards achieving a mutual vision for how it should be as of now and acted accordingly.
Cheers
Joker Deville |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
443
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:16:00 -
[959] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:
Damn goons are their low-end SP recruitment from the Something Awful Dot Com forums.
You shouldn't be allowed to live in nullsec unless your alliance has a 70million SP average!
This is the problem:
Right now, either side can win, as Goons have shown in Tenal.
Raiden is done, they're literally losing space and moons in the EU tz, despite outnumbering your supercap fleet.
You beat them, admittedly Mittens hit the brakes hard on the campaign so it wouldn't look so obvious, but they're done effectively.
What this means is that in the current game environment, people who spend a ton of money on hardware can compete with people whos main resource are warm bodies.
This change won't change that, and thats why its infuriating. Its literally a change just for the sake of change, its ham handed, it physically fixes nothing at all.
Thats what the retards in the thread seem not to grasp, all they see is somebody posting against the nerf and assume they're mad about the nerf because it gimps their toy. Thats not whats upsetting those of us with any form of game knowledge.
Post change, Titans will still track BC's, BS, and shield tanked cruisers (poor onyx and broadswords) just like they do now, they'll hit just as hard, the only thing the change accomplishes is that the initial barrage comes about 20 seconds later than it comes now.
The main point of argument here is that many of us see this as CCP trying to push the game towards numbers, the CFC of course cries that this isn't the case, though they would, as numbers are their primary arsenal. They in turn attack our primary arsenal against their blob calling it 'unfair' that we hold so much power. But when questioned about why having more people should be the deciding factor over more money, they don't really have an answer. They call the titans invincible and are shown active counters that work just fine, and when you ask them what the counter is to massive numbers they have fantastical stories about 1200 man fleets that sit around waiting to get hit by 200 bombers.
The infuriating part is simply that this nerf doesn't DO anything to the titans against sub caps, it acutally HURTS them against caps, something the dev blog says at the outset they want the titans to be good against.
Why change them at all until you're ready to roll out the complete package in a revamp? I mean hell, make it one of the primary concerns of the June expansion, fixing titans into a new complete role. Not nerfing uselessly for the sake of a nerf just to show people you you're doing something that you won't come back to for 2 years.
This is effectively akin to CCP going "We don't like blobs, fleets are now limited to 50 members only, but we'll iterate on it later so that you can have our new vision of fleets, we don't know when, but we'll do it, we promise". You see, nothing would change really, its a bit more of a pain in the ass to basically achieve the same thing you have now.
|

SuperBeastie
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
53
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:17:00 -
[960] - Quote
Powers Sa wrote:This should be empty quoted for about 10 pages.
0 Trans = Dead. These changes do nothing to fix peoples stupidity |

XxTheKmanxX
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:18:00 -
[961] - Quote
Joker Deville wrote:Joker Deville wrote:This is amazing. I have finally resubbed with ALL my accounts (4 accounts) and will immediately get all my pilots into drakes to blob it up because PL can't **** with me anymore with their e-dicks.
I hope this nerf comes sooner than later or I will be tempted to unsub once again for 7-8 months. I hear there is a firesale in the SO section. Holy **** all those titans, I want one!
CCP: Making sure one ship fits one role, never letting one ship rule them all! Okay, I admit I have no idea what is going on but I hear that the glorious GoonSwarm Federation have succesfully made CCP understand how titans should really work and both the alliance and the company have collaborated towards achieving a mutual vision for how it should be as of now and acted accordingly. Cheers Joker Deville
Joker Deville for CSM |

Joker Deville
Accenture Corp
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:19:00 -
[962] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:EnderCapitalG wrote:
Damn goons are their low-end SP recruitment from the Something Awful Dot Com forums.
You shouldn't be allowed to live in nullsec unless your alliance has a 70million SP average!
This is the problem: :words:
|

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:20:00 -
[963] - Quote
Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:Achaiah7 wrote:The tears, they precious. I can haz your stuffs? You can't. Cos you can't fly it. Now go back into your drake. If I recall right, we relieved you of the burden of Nyx ownership. You replaced it, and lost a Nyx and Ragnarok shortly thereafter. HEH Your spies are dead and burried long time ago prolly. 1. I do post with my main 2. I never lost a titan. 3. I lost a Nyx cos mittani is a jerk and is using his CSM chairman position ( which is outside the game ) in the game to scam people. 3. I lost another Nyx trying to save my friend's titan. 3. I did replace one Nyx and bought 1 more titan and was aiming to get another 2. If they really nerf the titans, I won't buy another, of course. I will also stop most of my accounts and keep only 3-4. I have 12 now. CCP will be happy I suppose. 4. No, you can't have my stuff cos you simply don't have the skills to use most of my ships. Regarding the Titan nerf : If it gets to that, I think would be fair for us to have the skill points back to reallocate them into something useful and the isk spent on the titans as well ( market price not production price ). You lost the first Nyx because you're an idiot. You lost the other Nyx because you're an idiot who never realized that a triage carrier is a cheaper and more effective way to save a supercapital that is being attacked. You're an eBay moron - fyi, i can fly literally any ship you own, this is not my only character ;p
You have no clue what happened but you speak like you actually know. Idiot? You're stupid enough to think you're smart. That wouldn't bother me but it seems you wanna show it to everybody. Congratz, now we all know you're just a pathetic loser. You're the only one who doesn't and will never know it. Cos you're too dumb. Fight titans and get the loss kill mail like a man.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2664
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:20:00 -
[964] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:0 Trans = Dead. These changes do nothing to fix peoples stupidity
why don't you join PL about it lmao "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:20:00 -
[965] - Quote
I'm not going to say titan tracking isn't/wasn't too good when fit specifically for tracking, because it is but posting killmails to make your point is just stupid. Killmails don't prove anything.
I can guarantee that if that Buzzard didn't mess up he wouldn't have died to a titan. All you need to maintain in a frigate sized ship vs a titan is 100-150m/s tranversal and you're golden up to ridiculous ranges where transversal is less of a factor.
But killmails don't show what transversal, what distance or if the buzzard was even moving at all. (I mean it was decloaked and locked by a titan for one thing, so he ****** up pretty hard)
Then you have the 'orbit the anchor at 5k' tactic, which will never work against multiple titans because depending on how many titans there are, you're going to have low transversal to them at some point and you're dead for sure. Or there's the "BURN AWAY/BURN OUT OF BUBBLES" tactic which gives you huge sig or worse yet almost 0m/s transversal depending on the direction you burn/move.
As with any size guns, you have to get UNDER their tracking, bringing in tengus or drakes at 50 orbiting an anchor is just a dumb idea anyway,.
I guess I should repeat that, yeah tracking is kind of great right now, but it really is the only consistent counter to vastly large amounts of subcaps right now so 'fixing it' creates problems too. |

Joker Deville
Accenture Corp
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:21:00 -
[966] - Quote
|

XxTheKmanxX
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:21:00 -
[967] - Quote
Acwron wrote:
You have no clue what happened but you speak like you actually know. Idiot? You're stupid enough to think you're smart. That wouldn't bother me but it seems you wanna show it to everybody. Congratz, now we all know you're just a pathetic loser. You're the only one who doesn't and will never know it. Cos you're too dumb. Fight titans and get the loss kill mail like a man.
you sound mad |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2664
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:21:00 -
[968] - Quote
Acwron wrote:You have no clue what happened but you speak like you actually know. Idiot? You're stupid enough to think you're smart. That wouldn't bother me but it seems you wanna show it to everybody. Congratz, now we all know you're just a pathetic loser. You're the only one who doesn't and will never know it. Cos you're too dumb. Fight titans and get the loss kill mail like a man.
I know that you lost a Nyx to a scam like a moron, and I know that you lost another Nyx trying to save a titan that was helplessly screwed. Poor eBay warrior. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
335
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:23:00 -
[969] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:EnderCapitalG wrote:
Damn goons are their low-end SP recruitment from the Something Awful Dot Com forums.
You shouldn't be allowed to live in nullsec unless your alliance has a 70million SP average!
This is the problem: Right now, either side can win, as Goons have shown in Tenal.
Goons can win when Raidendot doesn't drop 70 Titans.
Grath, guy, really.
Stop.
Come on. |

Machine Delta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:23:00 -
[970] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:EnderCapitalG wrote:
Damn goons are their low-end SP recruitment from the Something Awful Dot Com forums.
You shouldn't be allowed to live in nullsec unless your alliance has a 70million SP average!
This is the problem: Right now, either side can win, as Goons have shown in Tenal. Raiden is done, they're literally losing space and moons in the EU tz, despite outnumbering your supercap fleet. You beat them, admittedly Mittens hit the brakes hard on the campaign so it wouldn't look so obvious, but they're done effectively. What this means is that in the current game environment, people who spend a ton of money on hardware can compete with people whos main resource are warm bodies. This change won't change that, and thats why its infuriating. Its literally a change just for the sake of change, its ham handed, it physically fixes nothing at all. Thats what the retards in the thread seem not to grasp, all they see is somebody posting against the nerf and assume they're mad about the nerf because it gimps their toy. Thats not whats upsetting those of us with any form of game knowledge. Post change, Titans will still track BC's, BS, and shield tanked cruisers (poor onyx and broadswords) just like they do now, they'll hit just as hard, the only thing the change accomplishes is that the initial barrage comes about 20 seconds later than it comes now. The main point of argument here is that many of us see this as CCP trying to push the game towards numbers, the CFC of course cries that this isn't the case, though they would, as numbers are their primary arsenal. They in turn attack our primary arsenal against their blob calling it 'unfair' that we hold so much power. But when questioned about why having more people should be the deciding factor over more money, they don't really have an answer. They call the titans invincible and are shown active counters that work just fine, and when you ask them what the counter is to massive numbers they have fantastical stories about 1200 man fleets that sit around waiting to get hit by 200 bombers. The infuriating part is simply that this nerf doesn't DO anything to the titans against sub caps, it acutally HURTS them against caps, something the dev blog says at the outset they want the titans to be good against. Why change them at all until you're ready to roll out the complete package in a revamp? I mean hell, make it one of the primary concerns of the June expansion, fixing titans into a new complete role. Not nerfing uselessly for the sake of a nerf just to show people you you're doing something that you won't come back to for 2 years. This is effectively akin to CCP going "We don't like blobs, fleets are now limited to 50 members only, but we'll iterate on it later so that you can have our new vision of fleets, we don't know when, but we'll do it, we promise". You see, nothing would change really, its a bit more of a pain in the ass to basically achieve the same thing you have now.
Yeah but we get these GREAT crying effortposts from you out of this so I really am not seeing a downside here. |

Win Sui
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:24:00 -
[971] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:EnderCapitalG wrote:
Damn goons are their low-end SP recruitment from the Something Awful Dot Com forums.
You shouldn't be allowed to live in nullsec unless your alliance has a 70million SP average!
This is the problem: Right now, either side can win, as Goons have shown in Tenal. Raiden is done, they're literally losing space and moons in the EU tz, despite outnumbering your supercap fleet. You beat them, admittedly Mittens hit the brakes hard on the campaign so it wouldn't look so obvious, but they're done effectively. What this means is that in the current game environment, people who spend a ton of money on hardware can compete with people whos main resource are warm bodies. This change won't change that, and thats why its infuriating. Its literally a change just for the sake of change, its ham handed, it physically fixes nothing at all. Thats what the retards in the thread seem not to grasp, all they see is somebody posting against the nerf and assume they're mad about the nerf because it gimps their toy. Thats not whats upsetting those of us with any form of game knowledge. Post change, Titans will still track BC's, BS, and shield tanked cruisers (poor onyx and broadswords) just like they do now, they'll hit just as hard, the only thing the change accomplishes is that the initial barrage comes about 20 seconds later than it comes now. The main point of argument here is that many of us see this as CCP trying to push the game towards numbers, the CFC of course cries that this isn't the case, though they would, as numbers are their primary arsenal. They in turn attack our primary arsenal against their blob calling it 'unfair' that we hold so much power. But when questioned about why having more people should be the deciding factor over more money, they don't really have an answer. They call the titans invincible and are shown active counters that work just fine, and when you ask them what the counter is to massive numbers they have fantastical stories about 1200 man fleets that sit around waiting to get hit by 200 bombers. The infuriating part is simply that this nerf doesn't DO anything to the titans against sub caps, it acutally HURTS them against caps, something the dev blog says at the outset they want the titans to be good against. Why change them at all until you're ready to roll out the complete package in a revamp? I mean hell, make it one of the primary concerns of the June expansion, fixing titans into a new complete role. Not nerfing uselessly for the sake of a nerf just to show people you you're doing something that you won't come back to for 2 years. This is effectively akin to CCP going "We don't like blobs, fleets are now limited to 50 members only, but we'll iterate on it later so that you can have our new vision of fleets, we don't know when, but we'll do it, we promise". You see, nothing would change really, its a bit more of a pain in the ass to basically achieve the same thing you have now.
As far as it goes the real problem here is the whole moon and SOV system. Sov should act like terrain, providing tactical options to accomplish strategic goals, much like a river or mountain pass does. Instead it's currently a pre-notified winner takes all fight that rewards getting there "Firstest with the mostest". Titans DID need changing, GeneralDisturbed's KB post clearly shows why, but until the underlying Sov problems are fixed it's all kind of waffling. Titans were the counter to blobs, now blobs are going to have an edge - it's all due to a badly thought out and badly implemented territory model.
That said, Titan tracking needed changing - blapping blackbirds and rifters is stupid.
|

SuperBeastie
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
53
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:25:00 -
[972] - Quote
Andski wrote:SuperBeastie wrote:0 Trans = Dead. These changes do nothing to fix peoples stupidity why don't you join PL about it lmao
you're a idiot changing the game to who ever brings more subcaps wins is not any better than who bring more super caps. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2664
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:25:00 -
[973] - Quote
Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:You have no clue what happened but you speak like you actually know. Idiot? You're stupid enough to think you're smart. That wouldn't bother me but it seems you wanna show it to everybody. Congratz, now we all know you're just a pathetic loser. You're the only one who doesn't and will never know it. Cos you're too dumb. Fight titans and get the loss kill mail like a man.
I know that you lost a Nyx to a scam like a moron, and I know that you lost another Nyx trying to save a titan that was helplessly screwed. Poor eBay warrior.
it's not like vera cruz is known for their supercapital dominance anywhere "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2676
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:26:00 -
[974] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:Andski wrote:SuperBeastie wrote:0 Trans = Dead. These changes do nothing to fix peoples stupidity why don't you join PL about it lmao you're a idiot changing the game to who ever brings more subcaps wins is not any better than who bring more super caps.
look at the sad test publord crying about his shiny new titan getting a temporary nerfbat (( "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Courthouse
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
167
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:26:00 -
[975] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote: I guess I should repeat that, yeah tracking is kind of great right now, but it really is the only consistent counter to vastly large amounts of subcaps right now so 'fixing it' creates problems too.
The CFC didn't exist in the form it exists in now until you guys decided to follow Billymerc in a hare-brained supercap heavy assault on VFK. Throwing 2000 people at that problem was the escalation counter. You adapted your titan fits to counter 2000 people.
Maybe next time don't force the issue and cause us to have to make lots of friends, because we're quite good at it. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
336
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:27:00 -
[976] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:Andski wrote:SuperBeastie wrote:0 Trans = Dead. These changes do nothing to fix peoples stupidity why don't you join PL about it lmao you're a idiot changing the game to who ever brings more subcaps wins is not any better than who bring more super caps.
You seem really mad about this.
Should I get into jabber at work and troll you and your kin about it some more?
I mean, I spent 3 hours doing it today, including widotters and even other goons who are mentally ******** and think that their space pixels are more important than our subcap fleets.
Just say the word~ |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
336
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:28:00 -
[977] - Quote
Guys, they have more friends than me |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
336
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:28:00 -
[978] - Quote
Nerf friends |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2676
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:29:00 -
[979] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:Andski wrote:SuperBeastie wrote:0 Trans = Dead. These changes do nothing to fix peoples stupidity why don't you join PL about it lmao you're a idiot changing the game to who ever brings more subcaps wins is not any better than who bring more super caps.
TEST is known far and wide for never using numbers to their advantage anywhere ever "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

XxTheKmanxX
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:30:00 -
[980] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:Nerf friends nerf life :( |

GreGh Rakrot
Rionnag Alba Northern Coalition.
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:30:00 -
[981] - Quote
Andski wrote:
Nobody wants titans to be POS ornaments, not even the CFC.
Did you not pay attention to the fact that there is an entire EXPANSION coming up focused on warfare?
Awesome, so you agree this nerfbat is not needed and that everything will be sorted out in this next expansion, titans and subcaps blobs being unstopable and sov mechanics being ****.
Its kind of funny that Im arguing for the balancing of titan tracking (in a reasonable manner, till the Warfare patch hits where we all count on CCP to make things right again) the way Goonswarm member suggested but other members keep trying to argue against it.
If you would really be against titans being useless you would want hotfix that doesnt makes them completely terrible while we wait for that next expansion, sadly this hotfix isnt that and many members of your alliance and powerblock acknowledged that in this thread but you and others like you just seem to see stuff in black and white. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
336
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:31:00 -
[982] - Quote
GreGh Rakrot wrote:Andski wrote:
Nobody wants titans to be POS ornaments, not even the CFC.
Did you not pay attention to the fact that there is an entire EXPANSION coming up focused on warfare?
Awesome, so you agree this nerfbat is not needed and that everything will be sorted out in this next expansion, titans and subcaps blobs being unstopable and sov mechanics being ****. Its kind of funny that Im arguing for the balancing of titan tracking (in a reasonable manner, till the Warfare patch hits where we all count on CCP to make things right again) the way Goonswarm member suggested but other members keep trying to argue against it. If you would really be against titans being useless you would want hotfix that doesnt makes them completely terrible while we wait for that next expansion, sadly this hotfix isnt that and many members of your alliance and powerblock acknowledged that in this thread but you and others like you just seem to see stuff in black and white.
lmbo |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:32:00 -
[983] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:Guys, they have more friends than me
u have frends l0l |

Ishen Villone
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:33:00 -
[984] - Quote
Eve shouldn't just be about having a bigger blob! The only counter to titans should be having more titans! |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
443
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:34:00 -
[985] - Quote
Win Sui wrote:
That said, Titan tracking needed changing - blapping blackbirds and rifters is stupid.
Blackbirds will still get blapped after this change.
Courthouse wrote:Dez Affinity wrote: I guess I should repeat that, yeah tracking is kind of great right now, but it really is the only consistent counter to vastly large amounts of subcaps right now so 'fixing it' creates problems too.
The CFC didn't exist in the form it exists in now until you guys decided to follow Billymerc in a hare-brained supercap heavy assault on VFK. Throwing 2000 people at that problem was the escalation counter. You adapted your titan fits to counter 2000 people. Maybe next time don't force the issue and cause us to have to make lots of friends, because we're quite good at it.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAH.
Yea, goons never blobbed before we attacked VFK guys, you heard it here first.
You must be new around here.
|

baltec1
807
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:38:00 -
[986] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:
AHAHAHAHAHAHAH.
Yea, goons never blobbed before we attacked VFK guys, you heard it here first.
You must be new around here.
You talk like blobs have never happened before and are some sort of unstoppable wave of doom. |

Ninevite
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:38:00 -
[987] - Quote
CCP said a long time ago that they planned to nerf supercaps\titans and they were disappointed by seeing how many of these ships were out there already. Don't get why people are surprised this happened
Goons (while I dislike them) have played it smart and aligned themselves with CCP's vision. You idiots are bitching that Mittani controls CCP just because he is the CSM Chair; how naive are you? Seriously? It's more like Goon leadership actually listened to CCP talk about the future of this game, and have positioned their alliance to take advance of changing game mechanics. |

Durr Hurrr Durr
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:41:00 -
[988] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Win Sui wrote:
That said, Titan tracking needed changing - blapping blackbirds and rifters is stupid.
Blackbirds will still get blapped after this change.
Then why the **** have you been crying all here and kugu for the last 4 hours. |

Innominate
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
101
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:42:00 -
[989] - Quote
Ishen Villone wrote:Eve shouldn't just be about having a bigger blob! The only counter to titans should be having more titans!
Aren't you paying attention? The counter to titans is to feed them 200 dread kills to kill a couple of titans. |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:42:00 -
[990] - Quote
Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:You have no clue what happened but you speak like you actually know. Idiot? You're stupid enough to think you're smart. That wouldn't bother me but it seems you wanna show it to everybody. Congratz, now we all know you're just a pathetic loser. You're the only one who doesn't and will never know it. Cos you're too dumb. Fight titans and get the loss kill mail like a man.
I know that you lost a Nyx to a scam like a moron, and I know that you lost another Nyx trying to save a titan that was helplessly screwed. Poor eBay warrior.
Oh Lord, EBay warrior...I'm not banned yet ! You know why? I'll let you do the research, wise ass....
Eve is not real...if it was real, mitanni would be in jail, having a girlfriend named John the Butcher 2m and 120kg black guy whooping his ass daily.
Eve is not real. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2681
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:43:00 -
[991] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Oh Lord, EBay warrior...I'm not banned yet ! You know why? I'll let you do the research, wise ass....
Eve is not real...if it was real, mitanni would be in jail, having a girlfriend named John the Butcher 2m and 120kg black guy whooping his ass daily.
Eve is not real.
that's why you're bawwwwing over changes to a ship that your scrub alliance never uses strategically "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Travis Wells
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
228
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:44:00 -
[992] - Quote
Hi i fell asleep for a few hours, in another news...
A BLOOOOO BLOOO BLOOOOOO
Honey, where's my jar i got tears to collect. |

Courthouse
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
168
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:45:00 -
[993] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote: AHAHAHAHAHAHAH.
Yea, goons never blobbed before we attacked VFK guys, you heard it here first.
You must be new around here.
Point to the battle reports of massive CFC fleets flying to save the NC before you dropped 200 supers in VFK.
If you'd like to go back further than that you can join DBP and AJ Regard complaining about goonieblobs taking Detorid. Numbers have always been a factor.
|

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:47:00 -
[994] - Quote
Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:Oh Lord, EBay warrior...I'm not banned yet ! You know why? I'll let you do the research, wise ass....
Eve is not real...if it was real, mitanni would be in jail, having a girlfriend named John the Butcher 2m and 120kg black guy whooping his ass daily.
Eve is not real. that's why you're bawwwwing over changes to a ship that your scrub alliance never uses strategically
Look who's talking LOL |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
445
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:47:00 -
[995] - Quote
Courthouse wrote:Point to the battle reports of massive CFC fleets flying to save the NC before you dropped 200 supers in VFK.
Would posts about the line in the sand that shall not be crossed and fortress tribute suit you better?
|

Cloora
APEX Unlimited APEX Conglomerate
65
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:47:00 -
[996] - Quote
My little alliance doesn't own one Titan but this change is drastic and too much. Changing the tracking is ok but I dont like how it nerfed my Moros also. IMO dreads should be buffed. Let them be RRed while in siege. Because right now dreads are too useless out of siege with too little damage and can't tank enough with its local reps in siege. CEO and Major ShareholderAPEX ConglomerateMaker of Starsi softdrinks and Torped-Os! Cereal http://www.altaholics.blogspot.com
|

God-Emperor of Amarr
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:48:00 -
[997] - Quote
Someone is crying. Teardrops glisten on your cheeks. Internet Spaceships. |

Heathkit
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:49:00 -
[998] - Quote
Also, just wanted to say that I've been unsubbed for the past two years. Changes like this make me happy to be back. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
445
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:49:00 -
[999] - Quote
Durr Hurrr Durr wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Win Sui wrote:
That said, Titan tracking needed changing - blapping blackbirds and rifters is stupid.
Blackbirds will still get blapped after this change. Then why the **** have you been crying all here and kugu for the last 4 hours.
Because
Grath Telkin wrote: This is effectively akin to CCP going "We don't like blobs, fleets are now limited to 50 members only, but we'll iterate on it later so that you can have our new vision of fleets, we don't know when, but we'll do it, we promise". You see, nothing would change really, its a bit more of a pain in the ass to basically achieve the same thing you have now.
It doesn't do anything but lower their scan res to 5 and make it nigh impossible to kill caps with them, their now stated intended role |

Ninevite
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:50:00 -
[1000] - Quote
God-Emperor of Amarr wrote:Someone is crying. Teardrops glisten on your cheeks. Internet Spaceships.
*standing ovation* |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
337
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:50:00 -
[1001] - Quote
God-Emperor of Amarr wrote:Someone is crying. Teardrops glisten on your cheeks. Internet Spaceships.
Like Like Like Like Like Like Like Like Like Like Like Like Like Like Like Like Like |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:50:00 -
[1002] - Quote
What-- somebody said they were all presenting zero transversal? How can one tell?? |

Bozl1n
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:51:00 -
[1003] - Quote
Sentinel Eeex wrote:Organa wrote:Does ccp not seem to realize that there are only currently 2 ways to counter a vastly numerically Superior force? 1 bombers which die in droves but have some chance but generally arnt that effective in killing 1000 dudes with 200. and the titan blob.
Tell me, how would you kill 25 titans?
You guys need to put 150 odd of your 1600 man blob into dreads. And stop implying you have NO WAY to win WITHOUT bringing 50 titans yourself |

Durr Hurrr Durr
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:51:00 -
[1004] - Quote
Cloora wrote: but I dont like how it nerfed my Moros
It didn't you dumbshit, learn to read.
Quote: XL turret tracking halved, siege module tracking penalty removed
This should generally make titan performance against small targets significantly worse, without seriously impacting their effectiveness against larger targets, or negatively impacting dreadnaughts in their common use-case (ie, in siege mode). |

Courthouse
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
169
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:52:00 -
[1005] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Courthouse wrote:Point to the battle reports of massive CFC fleets flying to save the NC before you dropped 200 supers in VFK.
Would posts about the line in the sand that shall not be crossed and fortress tribute suit you better? If all it took was posting to defeat the mighty Pandemic Legion then we won this game years ago. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
337
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:53:00 -
[1006] - Quote
Bozl1n wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:Organa wrote:Does ccp not seem to realize that there are only currently 2 ways to counter a vastly numerically Superior force? 1 bombers which die in droves but have some chance but generally arnt that effective in killing 1000 dudes with 200. and the titan blob.
Tell me, how would you kill 25 titans? You guys need to put 150 odd of your 1600 man blob into dreads. And stop implying you have NO WAY to win WITHOUT bringing 50 titans yourself
Because you should have to bring 3x the numbers to counter the same amount of other people, right?
And the lose nearly every ship to kill 2-3 targets if you are lucky. |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:54:00 -
[1007] - Quote
Bozl1n wrote:You guys need to put 150 odd of your 1600 man blob into dreads retype the Manhattan yellow pages, invent shoes that allow you to fly, and repaint Guam. And stop implying you have NO WAY to win WITHOUT bringing 50 titans yourself
|

SuperBeastie
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
54
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:55:00 -
[1008] - Quote
Grath do me a favor go through and list out the numbers of supers and titan the cfc has by alliance. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2688
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:58:00 -
[1009] - Quote
Bozl1n wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:Organa wrote:Does ccp not seem to realize that there are only currently 2 ways to counter a vastly numerically Superior force? 1 bombers which die in droves but have some chance but generally arnt that effective in killing 1000 dudes with 200. and the titan blob.
Tell me, how would you kill 25 titans? You guys need to put 150 odd of your 1600 man blob into dreads. And stop implying you have NO WAY to win WITHOUT bringing 50 titans yourself
92 dread hulls on the market, hmm "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Bozl1n
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 23:58:00 -
[1010] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:Bozl1n wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:Organa wrote:Does ccp not seem to realize that there are only currently 2 ways to counter a vastly numerically Superior force? 1 bombers which die in droves but have some chance but generally arnt that effective in killing 1000 dudes with 200. and the titan blob.
Tell me, how would you kill 25 titans? You guys need to put 150 odd of your 1600 man blob into dreads. And stop implying you have NO WAY to win WITHOUT bringing 50 titans yourself Because you should have to bring 3x the numbers to counter the same amount of other people, right? And the lose nearly every ship to kill 2-3 targets if you are lucky.
Well compared to bringing 10x + the number you are now to kill no targets?
Drop likly 4 titans and you would still be up on isk
|

Bozl1n
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:00:00 -
[1011] - Quote
Andski wrote:Bozl1n wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:Organa wrote:Does ccp not seem to realize that there are only currently 2 ways to counter a vastly numerically Superior force? 1 bombers which die in droves but have some chance but generally arnt that effective in killing 1000 dudes with 200. and the titan blob.
Tell me, how would you kill 25 titans? You guys need to put 150 odd of your 1600 man blob into dreads. And stop implying you have NO WAY to win WITHOUT bringing 50 titans yourself 92 dread hulls on the market, hmm
Then build some?
I mean what kinda excuse is "i cant buy it off the market" |

School Nickname Worldmonkey
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:00:00 -
[1012] - Quote
I truly apologise PL, but it looks as though you're going to have to accept the fact that dropping Titans on subcaps with utter impunity might no longer be an option available to you. We had a really nice fight in Dek a few days ago where our fleets were fighting OH and NC. (I think) and it had really nice escalation. We fought their lokis with our battlecruisers, enemy battleships arrive and we continued to fight. Enemy dreads were dropped in. We dropped in dreads. Losses on all sides. Everyone is happy, including wormhole producers! That's the type of fight most EVE players want to experience.
The very concept of your alliance and those like yours aims to prevent this experience. You merely hotdrop whom you please denying any escalation whatsoever. In a sense you act like what I hope players in CCP's future WoD MMO will act, denying new arrivals major progression to protect your own interests. Or you could just be completely drunk from the smell of your own preseminal fluid when you hotdrop frigates, because no one else with a brain is willing to put up with your ****. Smaller players aren't really willing to lose what they perceive to be expensive ships without significant reimbursement and they sure as hell aren't going to fight when there is literally zero chance of winning. I really don't know how you can have fun popping ships which would never have beaten you anyway.
Also, the argument that an alliance could simply haul up 200 dread pilots to annihilate your titans is spurious. You know full well that were anyone to scratch together that number of dreads, your knowledge of such ships on the field (through good scouting, or otherwise) would send you screaming to the hills. Like your performance in C-J6, you balk at commiting Titans whenever there is even the slightest chance of losing them. If you really weren't willing to lose these hugely expensive ships, you shouldn't have bought them in the first place. You could have had a lot more fun constantly losing less expensive ships that people were willing to fight against.
In my opinion theses changes will allow true battle progression (Small ships -> Bigger ships -> The Worst ships) in the future. Maybe you'll be able to join us with machariel/dread fleets or something, since your coffers will be so full from getting those 500 hours of your life back in cold hard ISK. I've only ever felt that Titans were space taxis used to increase an alliance's force projection anyway
tl;dr Sorry Grath that your e-peen was circumcised, looks mutilated and is now not very pleasurable to use. At least you can acquire your fun in other ways. :heh: |

Win Sui
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:00:00 -
[1013] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Win Sui wrote:
That said, Titan tracking needed changing - blapping blackbirds and rifters is stupid.
Blackbirds will still get blapped after this change.
Not with the accompanying scan res change they won't. |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:03:00 -
[1014] - Quote
Bozl1n wrote:Andski wrote:92 dread hulls on the market, hmm Then build some? Your lack of self-awareness is breathtaking. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2688
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:04:00 -
[1015] - Quote
Bozl1n wrote:Andski wrote:Bozl1n wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:Organa wrote:Does ccp not seem to realize that there are only currently 2 ways to counter a vastly numerically Superior force? 1 bombers which die in droves but have some chance but generally arnt that effective in killing 1000 dudes with 200. and the titan blob.
Tell me, how would you kill 25 titans? You guys need to put 150 odd of your 1600 man blob into dreads. And stop implying you have NO WAY to win WITHOUT bringing 50 titans yourself 92 dread hulls on the market, hmm Then build some?
that's obviously feasible and not an industrial feat that no alliance can expect to keep up on a regular basis "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
338
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:04:00 -
[1016] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:Grath do me a favor go through and list out the numbers of supers and titan the cfc has by alliance.
(8:01:50 PM) Ender "Capital" G: superbeastie: Dude, give up |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
242
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:05:00 -
[1017] - Quote
blobby goons are ruining this game |

Bozl1n
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:07:00 -
[1018] - Quote
Sirhan Blixt wrote:Bozl1n wrote:Andski wrote:92 dread hulls on the market, hmm Then build some? Your lack of self-awareness is breathtaking.
You really think not being able to simply buy them from the market is a valid argument?
Really?
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2693
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:09:00 -
[1019] - Quote
Bozl1n wrote:Sirhan Blixt wrote:Bozl1n wrote:Andski wrote:92 dread hulls on the market, hmm Then build some? Your lack of self-awareness is breathtaking. You really think not being able to simply buy them from the market is a valid argument? Really?
yes, it's a valid argument because no alliance in the game can pop out 150 dreads every other day "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
242
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:11:00 -
[1020] - Quote
soon goons are going to become an indestructible force that will sweep across eve leaving nothing but destruction in its wake
just like the nc
just like the drf
|

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
338
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:11:00 -
[1021] - Quote
Bozl1n wrote:Sirhan Blixt wrote:Bozl1n wrote:Andski wrote:92 dread hulls on the market, hmm Then build some? Your lack of self-awareness is breathtaking. You really think not being able to simply buy them from the market is a valid argument? Really?
Jesus wept. |

Natsumi Moritso
La Isla del Mono
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:12:00 -
[1022] - Quote
Make subcaps unable to target structures -> problem solved.
Supers shoulndt kill subcaps because its not their role. Subcaps shoulnd kill structures cause ITS NOT THEIR ROLE. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2693
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:12:00 -
[1023] - Quote
let's not forget that even if we could keep that up and pop 150 dreads out of the oven every other day, it'd tie up valuable component BPOs in the process that could instead be used for supercapital production "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
242
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:13:00 -
[1024] - Quote
Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolution. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2693
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:13:00 -
[1025] - Quote
Natsumi Moritso wrote:Make subcaps unable to target structures -> problem solved.
Supers shoulndt kill subcaps because its not their role. Subcaps shoulnd kill structures cause ITS NOT THEIR ROLE.
alright genius how do you suggest that high-sec/low-class WH pos shots take place "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
445
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:15:00 -
[1026] - Quote
Andski wrote:Natsumi Moritso wrote:Make subcaps unable to target structures -> problem solved.
Supers shoulndt kill subcaps because its not their role. Subcaps shoulnd kill structures cause ITS NOT THEIR ROLE. alright genius how do you suggest that high-sec/low-class WH pos shots take place
Lets focus on whats important here: What the CFC wants to be able to play.
|

Bozl1n
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:15:00 -
[1027] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:Bozl1n wrote:Sirhan Blixt wrote:Bozl1n wrote:Andski wrote:92 dread hulls on the market, hmm Then build some? Your lack of self-awareness is breathtaking. You really think not being able to simply buy them from the market is a valid argument? Really? Jesus wept.
@ how little class your post has
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2693
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:16:00 -
[1028] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:Natsumi Moritso wrote:Make subcaps unable to target structures -> problem solved.
Supers shoulndt kill subcaps because its not their role. Subcaps shoulnd kill structures cause ITS NOT THEIR ROLE. alright genius how do you suggest that high-sec/low-class WH pos shots take place Lets focus on whats important here: What the CFC wants to be able to play.
Let's also focus on the total unfeasibility of your proposed "hurr drop 200 dreads erryday, titans die no pr0b" crap "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Bozl1n
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:20:00 -
[1029] - Quote
Andski wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:Natsumi Moritso wrote:Make subcaps unable to target structures -> problem solved.
Supers shoulndt kill subcaps because its not their role. Subcaps shoulnd kill structures cause ITS NOT THEIR ROLE. alright genius how do you suggest that high-sec/low-class WH pos shots take place Lets focus on whats important here: What the CFC wants to be able to play. Let's also focus on the total unfeasibility of your proposed "hurr drop 200 dreads erryday, titans die no pr0b" crap
What ships are you guys going to kill?
Titans
What ships role ingame is to kill other caps?
Drakes?
Your NOT taking the right ships to fight?
|

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
338
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:20:00 -
[1030] - Quote
Bozl1n wrote:@ how little class your post has
Calling me a low class poster lmbo |

M1k3y Koontz
Taxes Suck Inc.
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:22:00 -
[1031] - Quote
Its this 52 pages of CFC trolling or are there actual posts too... I breezed through and it was more tha 50% Goonswarm/TEST
Anyway... I think 5mm scan res is a LITTLE too low, thats below the Primae, seriously? How much herp could a herp derp herp if a herp derp could herp derp. |

Bozl1n
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:22:00 -
[1032] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:Bozl1n wrote:@ how little class your post has
Calling me a low class poster lmbo
That post sucked it contributed nothing at all apart to flame = no class |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
578
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:23:00 -
[1033] - Quote
Would this change be happening if CFC were the ones with the super capitals?
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2696
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:23:00 -
[1034] - Quote
Bozl1n wrote:Andski wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:Natsumi Moritso wrote:Make subcaps unable to target structures -> problem solved.
Supers shoulndt kill subcaps because its not their role. Subcaps shoulnd kill structures cause ITS NOT THEIR ROLE. alright genius how do you suggest that high-sec/low-class WH pos shots take place Lets focus on whats important here: What the CFC wants to be able to play. Let's also focus on the total unfeasibility of your proposed "hurr drop 200 dreads erryday, titans die no pr0b" crap What ships are you guys going to kill? Titans What ships role ingame is to kill other caps? Drakes? Your NOT taking the right ships to fight?
hey take some time to consider the logistics of shitting out 150 dreads on a regular basis before posting dumb ideas!!!
here's a start: it's like building 19 supercarriers every other day
"WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2696
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:24:00 -
[1035] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Would this change be happening if CFC were the ones with the super capitals?
According to PL, Raiden and NCdot they'd suck it up and take it in stride!
(ahahaha not really it'd have been nerfed long ago) "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
496
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:26:00 -
[1036] - Quote
M1k3y Koontz wrote:Its this 52 pages of CFC trolling or are there actual posts too... I breezed through and it was more tha 50% Goonswarm/TEST
Anyway... I think 5mm scan res is a LITTLE too low, thats below the Primae, seriously? Nah it's more like 50% Grath whining about how he's so oppressed. Vote for The Mittani http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=438 |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
338
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:26:00 -
[1037] - Quote
Bozl1n wrote:EnderCapitalG wrote:Bozl1n wrote:@ how little class your post has
Calling me a low class poster lmbo That post sucked it contributed nothing at all apart to flame = no class
So report it and move along.
PS You're one to talk~ |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
450
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:27:00 -
[1038] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:Grath do me a favor go through and list out the numbers of supers and titan the cfc has by alliance.
Top 5 supercap alliances in EVE:
PL (Nearly 400)
NCdot (281 on file)
AAA (280 on file)
RAIDEN (260 on file)
Goonswarm Federation (200 even on file but growing daily)
FA adds 40, RAZOR adds about 80, TEST adds 70, and those are just the major super cap holders for the CFC, the rest are 20-30 additions from their camp, with Eovke adding another 60 to Raidens team. |

Bilaz
Fremen Sietch DarkSide.
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:27:00 -
[1039] - Quote
5 is too low imo. I dont have problem with a few titans having tons of officer sensor boosters - that would deny them webs, painters and track comps. it still should be possible to shoot from titans to subcaps - but propper support should be on titan side for it to be effective. And i would give titans 4 targets - since unlike dread titan can vapourize one in an instant - so more targets in lock would be a good idea.
And you give us your word that this would be temp solution? becouse i would definatly like to see some extensive work done on all caps after all subcaps (and more importantly 0/0 space) would get some love. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
496
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:28:00 -
[1040] - Quote
Grath is just mad that Goons have lower recruiting standards and turns morons into effective kamikaze pilots. He's also mad that the CFC managed to build themselves into an effective alliance in order to focus on shared goals.
PL just advertises themselves as a hit-n-run alliance and the nerf basically puts them out of commission. Off to World of Tanks or whatever is the next MMO fad they go. Don't let the door hit you in the a... on the way out. Vote for The Mittani http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=438 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2696
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:29:00 -
[1041] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:SuperBeastie wrote:Grath do me a favor go through and list out the numbers of supers and titan the cfc has by alliance. Top 5 supercap alliances in EVE: PL (Nearly 400) NCdot (281 on file) AAA (280 on file) RAIDEN (260 on file) Goonswarm Federation (200 even on file but growing daily) FA adds 40, RAZOR adds about 80, TEST adds 70, and those are just the major super cap holders for the CFC, the rest are 20-30 additions from their camp, with Eovke adding another 60 to Raidens team.
hey uh have you considered the fact that whenever Raiden's supercapital fleet is out doing things the better part of our super pilots are at work or at school, because lol US TZ? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
449
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:30:00 -
[1042] - Quote
Andski wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Would this change be happening if CFC were the ones with the super capitals? According to PL, Raiden and NCdot they'd suck it up and take it in stride! (ahahaha not really it'd have been nerfed long ago)
Hey there buddy, perhaps you'd like to refute actual history but we've fought those fights, without crying about it getting nerfed, you should ask the other people you play games with, you look pretty dumb right here.
Andski wrote:
hey take some time to consider the logistics of shitting out 150 dreads on a regular basis before posting dumb ideas!!!
We used 1 single build team, and it took us 10 days to **** out 140 dreads once the line was up and running.
Ten whole days.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2696
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:34:00 -
[1043] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:
hey take some time to consider the logistics of shitting out 150 dreads on a regular basis before posting dumb ideas!!!
We used 1 single build team, and it took us 10 days to **** out 140 dreads once the line was up and running. Ten whole days.
capital builders won't burn out from sustaining that for months, nope "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
338
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:34:00 -
[1044] - Quote
There goes Grath, madposting again. |

Mioelnir
Cataclysm Enterprises Ev0ke
56
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:35:00 -
[1045] - Quote
Kazanir wrote:There is no "counter" to 1200 dudes in a single engagement Bolded the important part. And since Sov warefare revolves ENTIRELY around single engagements against static objectives that scale linearly with the number of attackers, this is the only scenario that matters.
Quote:but given proper FCing, fleet doctrines (not bombers lol although bombers do own), and tactical choices, 200 or 300 dudes can do a lot of damage to 1200, and 600 or 700 might even win, or be able to accomplish their strategic objectives in some way. If "annoy the **** out of them" or "general harassment" are strategic objectives, yes. But you can not defend a timer under any of the circumstances you listed (you can theoretically rep the target before the other fleet arrives, but they can just "preload" the system to capacity 3 days in advance), nor can you take down a timer known to all involved parties.
Also, Greyscale, it is established doctrine from CCP over the last 5+ years to nerf any problematic ship into uselessness and having it stay that way for a couple of years until it can be "fixed". The usual way about this is that players simply stop flying the ship. How are titan pilots supposed to do that?
Is it really so problematic, for the two shipclasses that sacrifice character versatility and lock themselves into single roles like in theme-park MMOs, to not separate the removal of all current ship-roles (except pinata) and the defining of the new ship roles, by several months/years?
Also, nice half-truth about the target selection versatility of supercarriers, considering their dronebays were intentionally capped so low as they currently are to prevent them from fielding a single, full flight of both types. Nice propaganda spin.
PS: I will laugh so hard when in a couple of months people realize that supers will still be dropped, just by different people, who can then by weight of their then uncounterable numbers then field ANYTHING in immunity, again, like they did in the past. Then I will come along and repo all your tear jars, having the best laughs ever had. |

Sara Devi
ANZAC ALLIANCE Executive Outcomes
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:35:00 -
[1046] - Quote
Andski wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:SuperBeastie wrote:Grath do me a favor go through and list out the numbers of supers and titan the cfc has by alliance. Top 5 supercap alliances in EVE: PL (Nearly 400) NCdot (281 on file) AAA (280 on file) RAIDEN (260 on file) Goonswarm Federation (200 even on file but growing daily) FA adds 40, RAZOR adds about 80, TEST adds 70, and those are just the major super cap holders for the CFC, the rest are 20-30 additions from their camp, with Eovke adding another 60 to Raidens team. hey uh have you considered the fact that whenever Raiden's supercapital fleet is out doing things the better part of our super pilots are at work or at school, because lol US TZ?
That's a lie. We both know it.
To bring down supers you should have to engage them with some kind of force. I'm all for subcaps being able to tackle and hold down a fleet of supers and titans not being able to blap them. However, to kill them should require a capital fleet and an actual fight. |

School Nickname Worldmonkey
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:35:00 -
[1047] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:SuperBeastie wrote:Grath do me a favor go through and list out the numbers of supers and titan the cfc has by alliance. Top 5 supercap alliances in EVE: PL (Nearly 400) NCdot (281 on file) AAA (280 on file) RAIDEN (260 on file) Goonswarm Federation (200 even on file but growing daily because I desperately want to paint mean goonies as the badguys stealing my poor win button away... and and a bloo bloo bloo) FA adds 40, RAZOR adds about 80, TEST adds 70, and those are just the major super cap holders for the CFC, the rest are 20-30 additions from their camp, with Eovke adding another 60 to Raidens team.
Do you literally believe that goon supercapitals will not be affected by these changes? You people literally have to grow up, make a decision and move on over the loss of your k:d ratios. At least raiden have (kinda) shut up about the whole thing and have begun firesales.Your titans are still a very important ship for force projection and capital ship destruction. If push comes to shove your titans could go down a blaze of glorious violence against your perceived goon oppressors. |

Bozl1n
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:37:00 -
[1048] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:Bozl1n wrote:EnderCapitalG wrote:Bozl1n wrote:@ how little class your post has
Calling me a low class poster lmbo That post sucked it contributed nothing at all apart to flame = no class So report it and move along. PS You're one to talk~
No need to report it - dont think it bothers me
Sorry am i spoiling the smugathon? |

baltec1
807
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:38:00 -
[1049] - Quote
Mioelnir wrote:Kazanir wrote:There is no "counter" to 1200 dudes in a single engagement Bolded the important part. And since Sov warefare revolves ENTIRELY around single engagements against static objectives that scale linearly with the number of attackers, this is the only scenario that matters.
Because blobs of that size has never happened before in the history of EVE and been beaten time after time. |

SuperBeastie
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:38:00 -
[1050] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:SuperBeastie wrote:Grath do me a favor go through and list out the numbers of supers and titan the cfc has by alliance. Top 5 supercap alliances in EVE: PL (Nearly 400) NCdot (281 on file) AAA (280 on file) RAIDEN (260 on file) Goonswarm Federation (200 even on file but growing daily) FA adds 40, RAZOR adds about 80, TEST adds 70, and those are just the major super cap holders for the CFC, the rest are 20-30 additions from their camp, with Eovke adding another 60 to Raidens team.
so the cfc has 390 before you start bothering with the smaller alliances in the cfc. so if this sleeping ever grew the balls to actually get in a slugfest we would out number raiden and have full control of tidi and our subcap numbers would spike like mad when we broadcasted titan tackled get in fleet. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
338
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:39:00 -
[1051] - Quote
Bozl1n wrote:EnderCapitalG wrote:Bozl1n wrote:EnderCapitalG wrote:Bozl1n wrote:@ how little class your post has
Calling me a low class poster lmbo That post sucked it contributed nothing at all apart to flame = no class So report it and move along. PS You're one to talk~ No need to report it - dont think it bothers me Sorry am i spoiling the smugathon?
heh, no |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
463
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:40:00 -
[1052] - Quote
bu-bu-how will we counter the under 90 BC blob without our titans? |

Bozl1n
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:42:00 -
[1053] - Quote
Andski wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:
hey take some time to consider the logistics of shitting out 150 dreads on a regular basis before posting dumb ideas!!!
We used 1 single build team, and it took us 10 days to **** out 140 dreads once the line was up and running. Ten whole days. capital builders won't burn out from sustaining that for months, nope
You wouldnt have to dude - you can sure as hell kill them faster than they can replace titans and who is to say your gonna lose all the dreads? ofc those dreads needs to be fully supported by an appropriate fleet |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2697
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:42:00 -
[1054] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:so the cfc has 390 before you start bothering with the smaller alliances in the cfc. so if this sleeping ever grew the balls to actually get in a slugfest we would out number raiden and have full control of tidi and our subcap numbers would spike like mad when we broadcasted titan tackled get in fleet.
and die in a fire when 300 PL/NCdot supercaps arrive to bail Raiden out "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
338
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:43:00 -
[1055] - Quote
Keep fuckin that chicken. |

Cloora
APEX Unlimited APEX Conglomerate
65
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:43:00 -
[1056] - Quote
Durr Hurrr Durr wrote:Cloora wrote: but I dont like how it nerfed my Moros It didn't you dumbshit, learn to read. Quote: XL turret tracking halved, siege module tracking penalty removed
This should generally make titan performance against small targets significantly worse, without seriously impacting their effectiveness against larger targets, or negatively impacting dreadnaughts in their common use-case (ie, in siege mode).
You fail at critical thinking dont you?
Tell me my Moros doesn't have half the tracking when not in siege? So if a ship is worse then it was before that's called a nerf right?
Whose the dumbshit?
CEO and Major ShareholderAPEX ConglomerateMaker of Starsi softdrinks and Torped-Os! Cereal http://www.altaholics.blogspot.com
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
450
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:44:00 -
[1057] - Quote
School Nickname Worldmonkey wrote:.Your titans are still a very important ship for force projection and capital ship destruction. If push comes to shove your titans could go down a blaze of glorious violence against your perceived goon oppressors.
Have you not seen me post these exact words?
Thats the worst part about the change, it doesn't DO ANYTHING AT ALL.
The changes are simple lip service to you, they do nothing, big deal titans can't hit frigates and destroyers anymore, thats literally all this change does. Every other ship type that was on the menu before is still on the menu now, with one exception:
Captial ships are now safer from titans because they'll simply warp out while the titan waits for a lock with his Ray Charles style scan res.
The point herein, is that if you're going to change the ships, CHANGE THE SHIPS, at the same time as you overhaul the sov system to get rid of the all or nothing fights that promote the need for 1200 people to be on one side. Change the ship completely instead of just trying to satisfy a group of players who largely don't understand game mechanics.
Half of you are happy that the thread has "Titan Nerf" in it without even realizing what the patch does or doesn't do.
Here's a hint, if Mittens isn't tearing down the CSAA's building titans theres an obvious reason why, and that reason, is that this patch, is a joke.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2698
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:45:00 -
[1058] - Quote
Bozl1n wrote:Andski wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:
hey take some time to consider the logistics of shitting out 150 dreads on a regular basis before posting dumb ideas!!!
We used 1 single build team, and it took us 10 days to **** out 140 dreads once the line was up and running. Ten whole days. capital builders won't burn out from sustaining that for months, nope You wouldnt have to dude - you can sure as hell kill them faster than they can replace titans and who is to say your gonna lose all the dreads? ofc those dreads needs to be fully supported by an appropriate fleet
sorry to screw up your logic but dreads have to siege and lock to do any real damage to titans
during that process, we'll lose a sizeable number of them to doomsdays
oh and their guns are chewing through them individually while the fighterbombers from the accompanying supercarriers fly in
we'd probably kill a couple of titans, 3-4 optimistically, but the vast, vast majority of those dreads - if not all of them - would be lost
fyi the last titan we killed was replaced in the same day "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2698
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:47:00 -
[1059] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Here's a hint, if Mittens isn't tearing down the CSAA's building titans theres an obvious reason why, and that reason, is that this patch, is a joke.
I'm glad that you're perfectly fine with titans being nerfed into oblivion to the point where our CSAAs would simply be torn down. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Tithi
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:50:00 -
[1060] - Quote
Anela Cistine wrote:Tithi wrote:
Well now you've just traded "who has the most X" for "who has the most Y".
You saying "Well they should bring a matching subcap fleet" is no different from them saying "Well they should bring a matching supercap fleet."
The difference is that a day one newbie can be in a nicely fit drake in 2-3 months. Less than 6 months for a pro maelstrom. The scimitars and huggins and whatnot take longer, but bulk of the fleet can relative newbies. Any 0.0 alliance that wanted to could "lower their standards" to recruit newbies, and train them up into a competent subcap fleet in just a few months. I'm Goonswarm's Director of Rifters, so this is a subject close to my heart. We get our newbees out into 0.0 as soon as they finish the tutorial. We give them as many frigates and thrashers as they can blow up. I've seen a guy go through 11 rifters in one battle and just keep going back for more. :3 We set up a wiki, a squad system, classes, and various mentorship programs so that newbees can learn the way that is best for them, be it from reading, asking questions, or having a more experienced player hold their hands. It doesn't take long at all to make them moderately competent PVPers. Their skill point totals may be low, but none of those SP have been wasted on mining or mission running skills. And honestly they are delightful to be around. They don't know how things work, but they are excited to learn and excited about internet spaceships. It makes a nice change from the bittervets. Plenty of elite PVP corps are smug about not even considering you until 10 million skill points, 20 million skill points, or more. Dooming many would-be PVPers to a year of highsec mining before they get to try the fun stuff. Then by the time they do get out of highsec they have developed all sorts of bad habits that will get them killed in expensive ships in nulsec. Surely getting more newbies that want the massive space battles they see in the advertisements involved in pew pew earlier would be good for the game? Most highsec mission runners that have been playing the game for 3 months can already fly a drake, and are getting pretty bored of PvE. There is nothing stopping alliances like PL and Raiden. from simply recruiting the low-skill backbone of a subcap fleet tomorrow.
Honestly I think it is great what you guys do for the game. I am totally in agreement with 99% of the Goons in this thread, I just think that we should be careful that we don't change Eve from "50 Supercaps Online" to "1200 Maelstroms Online." CCP's goal seems to be for alliances to have to field balanced heterogeneous fleets with no single class of ship being the IWIN button. I love this and I hope they someday get it right.
My original question was, "What capital ship is good for killing subcaps?" Two people answered, one said "bring subcaps" and the other just called me an idiot for being in RvB. Neither of these really answers my question. I may be alone here, but I think there should be a capitol ship designed for fighting downward so that we don't have to counter X maelstroms with X+1 maelstroms and we're back where we started.
You guys see what I mean, though, right? I think both sides when they aren't slinging internet insults at each other have some decent points and we should actually have a discussion instead of just calling everyone "pubbies" and ****. |

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:51:00 -
[1061] - Quote
Got to love grath posting owning noobs like there isn't no tomorrow. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
338
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:51:00 -
[1062] - Quote
Andski wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Here's a hint, if Mittens isn't tearing down the CSAA's building titans theres an obvious reason why, and that reason, is that this patch, is a joke.
I'm glad that you're perfectly fine with titans being nerfed into oblivion to the point where our CSAAs would simply be torn down.
He's in denial.
Sleep softly, sweet Grath. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2698
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:52:00 -
[1063] - Quote
Andski wrote:sorry to screw up your logic but dreads have to siege and lock to do any real damage to titans
during that process, we'll lose a sizeable number of them to doomsdays
on that note, this change actually means that the dreads might actually get a volley or two on titans before being doomsdayed! "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2698
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:53:00 -
[1064] - Quote
Pesadel0 wrote:Got to love grath posting owning noobs like there isn't no tomorrow.
if your pubbie self was able to read you'd realize that grath is actually getting hazed itt "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
496
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:54:00 -
[1065] - Quote
Pesadel0 wrote:Got to love grath posting owning noobs like there isn't no tomorrow. Wearing the wrong goggles, are you? Vote for The Mittani http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=438 |

Bozl1n
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:54:00 -
[1066] - Quote
Andski wrote:Bozl1n wrote:Andski wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:
hey take some time to consider the logistics of shitting out 150 dreads on a regular basis before posting dumb ideas!!!
We used 1 single build team, and it took us 10 days to **** out 140 dreads once the line was up and running. Ten whole days. capital builders won't burn out from sustaining that for months, nope You wouldnt have to dude - you can sure as hell kill them faster than they can replace titans and who is to say your gonna lose all the dreads? ofc those dreads needs to be fully supported by an appropriate fleet sorry to screw up your logic but dreads have to siege and lock to do any real damage to titans during that process, we'll lose a sizeable number of them to doomsdays oh and their guns are chewing through them individually while the fighterbombers from the accompanying supercarriers fly in we'd probably kill a couple of titans, 3-4 optimistically, but the vast, vast majority of those dreads - if not all of them - would be lost fyi the last titan we killed was replaced in the same day
Under this system the dreads will get a good 30 secs before the titans even lock target - assumeing all 25 titans shot at different targets ud lose 25 odd to doomsday? You have an age before they are ready to fire again
And yea it might have been replaced straight away - but kill ennuf of them and they wouldnt be replaced so easy.
I AGREE that titans should not be able to pwn subcaps wholesale - but at the same time you should be in the correct ships for the job urself, which it seems you havnt been?
|

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
51
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:55:00 -
[1067] - Quote
School Nickname Worldmonkey wrote:...words...
You don't get it. Grath isn't upset about his Titan. He is upset about what this type of change says about what CCP is and isn't willing to do about the problem.
I am really, really sorry that years of posting on SA makes you stupid.
But put it this way.
CCP Gayscale wrote:We don't like what we are seeing with Drakes, but we aren't ready to tackle them as a whole. So we are going to reduce their powergrid and CPU by 50%. We'll get back to fixing them later
The point is that CCP is doing this in a stupid, meaningless way that isn't actually going to change the game for titans in any significant way, except to specifically nerf them in the role that CCP themselves wants them in (anti-capital weapon).
Believe it or not, most of the people in PL think Titans need to be changed. But hey, don't let facts and 3 years of posting and complaining get in the way of your mindless flocking. CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
450
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:56:00 -
[1068] - Quote
Andski wrote:
if your pubbie self was able to read you'd realize that grath is actually getting hazed itt
Not really, I've been hit on, flirted with, and basically told I was mad.
Later, after this patch, I'm going to be smug as hell, but right now, we'll let you think you're owning somebody, because the number of titans you're pumping out says that I'm not really getting hazed.
Also, if you don't think trading 60 dreads for fit titans is worth the effort or time, then I think you don't really get how this game works.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2705
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:57:00 -
[1069] - Quote
Bozl1n wrote:Under this system the dreads will get a good 30 secs before the titans even lock target - assumeing all 25 titans shot at different targets ud lose 25 odd to doomsday? You have an age before they are ready to fire again
And yea it might have been replaced straight away - but kill ennuf of them and they wouldnt be replaced so easy.
I AGREE that titans should not be able to pwn subcaps wholesale - but at the same time you should be in the correct ships for the job urself, which it seems you havnt been?
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12203172
yep wrong ships "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Wukulo
Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:59:00 -
[1070] - Quote
Mike712 wrote:Courthouse wrote:Mike712 wrote:Courthouse wrote:Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Counterpoint: You're from battleclinic and thus have zero idea what you're talking about when it comes to PVP in EVE Online. lol, you couldn't be more wrong, all of the battleclinic mods are PvPers. I've seen your website. I'm certain that I'm not. BattleClinic's main aim is to help rookie pilots, just because I devote a large part of my spare time to helping people with their mission fits dose not infer that I know nothing about PvP, it's simply that I enjoy educating people on basic ship fitting and that's where a part of my enjoyment of eve comes from.
That sounds really awesome. When is battleclinic going to start doing this? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2705
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:59:00 -
[1071] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Andski wrote:
if your pubbie self was able to read you'd realize that grath is actually getting hazed itt
Not really, I've been hit on, flirted with, and basically told I was mad. Later, after this patch, I'm going to be smug as hell, but right now, we'll let you think you're owning somebody, because the number of titans you're pumping out says that I'm not really getting hazed. Also, if you don't think trading 60 dreads for fit titans is worth the effort or time, then I think you don't really get how this game works.
yes we get it you're the puppetmaster "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

epsilonion
CLOVEN SKY Nem's Nation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:59:00 -
[1072] - Quote
A thought to all those with titans..
What's the point in putting all that isk into a ship unless you can do anom's in it? to regain some of that hard earned isk that you have been saving up for the best part of a year. Its going to be offline on your spare alt for most time...
Maybe alliances should pay for them and give them out if they want you to fly them to defend there space or to help take space for the alliance.
Damed if I am training for one now... useless ship now...
on the other side of the fence... It is all about who brought the most to who has sov..
CCP want more people in 0.0 think of a way to get small alliances into 0.0 without having to join a power block...
Status Shuffle Click Here |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2705
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:00:00 -
[1073] - Quote
also the fact that we're building titans is relevant in this discussion "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2705
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:01:00 -
[1074] - Quote
epsilonion wrote:CCP want more people in 0.0 think of a way to get small alliances into 0.0 without having to join a power block...
yes this is clearly not a start "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:02:00 -
[1075] - Quote
Andski wrote:Bozl1n wrote:Under this system the dreads will get a good 30 secs before the titans even lock target - assumeing all 25 titans shot at different targets ud lose 25 odd to doomsday? You have an age before they are ready to fire again
And yea it might have been replaced straight away - but kill ennuf of them and they wouldnt be replaced so easy.
I AGREE that titans should not be able to pwn subcaps wholesale - but at the same time you should be in the correct ships for the job urself, which it seems you havnt been?
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12203172yep wrong ships
Look at that. Out of all the fights in the last few months where the titan blobbing group has instantly won by dropping titans. They managed to lose ONE TITAN. In months. Despite dropping them on fleets of hundreds of battleships every other day, and forcing them to run away because they cannot hurt any of the titans onfield, no matter their numbers. Clearly nothing is wrong here.
|

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:06:00 -
[1076] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Pesadel0 wrote:Got to love grath posting owning noobs like there isn't no tomorrow. Wearing the wrong goggles, are you?
The posts above yours and your "mad" and the andski noob posting like a uzi say otherwise. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2706
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:10:00 -
[1077] - Quote
Pesadel0 wrote:Karadion wrote:Pesadel0 wrote:Got to love grath posting owning noobs like there isn't no tomorrow. Wearing the wrong goggles, are you? The posts above yours and your "mad" and the andski noob posting like a uzi say otherwise.
look at the ex-bob trash not getting it
such a shame "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:10:00 -
[1078] - Quote
Pesadel0 wrote: I'm rubber and you're glue and whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you.
Um ... whatever, dude. |

Bozl1n
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:11:00 -
[1079] - Quote
Andski wrote:Bozl1n wrote:Under this system the dreads will get a good 30 secs before the titans even lock target - assumeing all 25 titans shot at different targets ud lose 25 odd to doomsday? You have an age before they are ready to fire again
And yea it might have been replaced straight away - but kill ennuf of them and they wouldnt be replaced so easy.
I AGREE that titans should not be able to pwn subcaps wholesale - but at the same time you should be in the correct ships for the job urself, which it seems you havnt been?
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12203172yep wrong ships
What ships killed the titan in that mail?
Dreads..... Supers.....
How many u lose while killing it?
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2706
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:12:00 -
[1080] - Quote
i don't need skillpoints or years of playing this game to 0wn you with my overpowered posting "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2706
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:13:00 -
[1081] - Quote
Bozl1n wrote:Andski wrote:Bozl1n wrote:Under this system the dreads will get a good 30 secs before the titans even lock target - assumeing all 25 titans shot at different targets ud lose 25 odd to doomsday? You have an age before they are ready to fire again
And yea it might have been replaced straight away - but kill ennuf of them and they wouldnt be replaced so easy.
I AGREE that titans should not be able to pwn subcaps wholesale - but at the same time you should be in the correct ships for the job urself, which it seems you havnt been?
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12203172yep wrong ships What ships killed the titan in that mail? Dreads..... Supers..... How many u lose while killing it?
I wish EVE Kill had a way to view all of the kills in a particular system that took place around the same timeframe. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

SuperBeastie
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
56
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:13:00 -
[1082] - Quote
Auto Targeting System II is now a standard titan mod wolololol +3 locked targets
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2706
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:14:00 -
[1083] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:Auto Targeting System II is now a standard titan mod wolololol +3 locked targets
look at the test publord continuing his whining
pets gonna pet~~~ "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

SuperBeastie
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
56
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:17:00 -
[1084] - Quote
Andski wrote:SuperBeastie wrote:Auto Targeting System II is now a standard titan mod wolololol +3 locked targets
look at the test publord continuing his whining pets gonna pet~~~
actually i'm not whining anymore I have finally got past my rage and figured out how to counter the nerf completely |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:18:00 -
[1085] - Quote
this andski guy still going hard in this thread
        |

Bozl1n
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:18:00 -
[1086] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:Auto Targeting System II is now a standard titan mod wolololol +3 locked targets
I bet my gran it suddenly wont apply to titans |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2708
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:23:00 -
[1087] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:Andski wrote:SuperBeastie wrote:Auto Targeting System II is now a standard titan mod wolololol +3 locked targets
look at the test publord continuing his whining pets gonna pet~~~ actually i'm not whining anymore I have finally got past my rage and figured out how to counter the nerf completely
not like it matters because you'll never use your titan except to kill godfathers in npc fountain lmao
it's a good thing you played some BF3 with PL and did a few ops with them, now you get to stand on their shoulders and call yourself tall! "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:23:00 -
[1088] - Quote
Bozl1n wrote:I bet my gran it suddenly wont apply to titans  Dude-- pimping out your grandmother is no way to indicate that you have no rebuttal or further contribution to the discussion.
And besides, it's just gross. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
342
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:24:00 -
[1089] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:Andski wrote:Bozl1n wrote:Under this system the dreads will get a good 30 secs before the titans even lock target - assumeing all 25 titans shot at different targets ud lose 25 odd to doomsday? You have an age before they are ready to fire again
And yea it might have been replaced straight away - but kill ennuf of them and they wouldnt be replaced so easy.
I AGREE that titans should not be able to pwn subcaps wholesale - but at the same time you should be in the correct ships for the job urself, which it seems you havnt been?
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12203172yep wrong ships Look at that. Out of all the fights in the last few months where the titan blobbing group has instantly won by dropping titans. They managed to lose ONE TITAN. In months. Despite dropping them on fleets of hundreds of battleships every other day, and forcing them to run away because they cannot hurt any of the titans onfield, no matter their numbers. Clearly nothing is wrong here.
And if it wasn't for Time Dilation (thank Goons for this as well), we wouldn't have killed it.
Also, I helped kill it in MY REVELATION :3 |

School Nickname Worldmonkey
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:32:00 -
[1090] - Quote
Because he speaks the truth. Even if you aren't completely rectally distraught over losing the Titan's ability to pad your k:d ratios with frig/destroyers KMs, the argument that you'll be ~completely helpless~ against dreads (assuming you even choose to fight them), whose only option of killing you is entering siege for 5mins and being helpless if you have a support fleet (Oh wait, you don't even use them ) falls flat on its face after any significant analysis.
Besides, we won't know if CCP actually decides to pay their employess in Canadian Dollars to motivate them to turn Titans into anti-captial ships. We've only seen a possible (albeit likely) path Titans can take. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2710
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:34:00 -
[1091] - Quote
PL 2012: whines about hardly being able to muster 200 dudes, brags about having 400 supers "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Tithi
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:35:00 -
[1092] - Quote
School Nickname Worldmonkey wrote:Because he speaks the truth. Even if you aren't completely rectally distraught over losing the Titan's ability to pad your k:d ratios with frig/destroyers KMs, the argument that you'll be ~completely helpless~ against dreads (assuming you even choose to fight them), whose only option of killing you is entering siege for 5mins and being helpless if you have a support fleet (Oh wait, you don't even use them  ) falls flat on its face after any significant analysis. Besides, we won't know if CCP actually decides to pay their employess in Canadian Dollars to motivate them to turn Titans into anti-captial ships. We've only seen a possible (albeit likely) path Titans can take.
"Rectally distraught" is my new favorite phrase. Especially because I have a colonoscopy tomorrow and I'm having to drink this propylene glycol stuff that makes me **** all over the place. |

Bozl1n
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:35:00 -
[1093] - Quote
Sirhan Blixt wrote:Bozl1n wrote:I bet my gran it suddenly wont apply to titans  Dude-- pimping out your grandmother is no way to indicate that you have no rebuttal or further contribution to the discussion. And besides, it's just gross.
 |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:44:00 -
[1094] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Kern Walzky wrote:Is there a way to filter out goons and pets in this thread? its just full of trolls..
havent seen 1 descent post from any of you....
personally i think this is just another way down the road where BLOBS win... really bad.... i remember last time we had this, you CCP were real proud of that right?? no?
So why do you continue the "nerf" way instead of making the big changes to sov. ??
3 tracking mods against mwd'ing drakes with multiple shield mods increasing sig to almost carrier size. So capitals gets nerfed to use slots for tracking instead of tank or cap etc..... but all other ships can do what ever they want....gratz CCP... you really think about you customers through many many years.... You see this is the issue. You think titans are meant to blap the crap out of subcaps but this was never their role. There's a reason they removed area effect weapons from them and gave them direct damage attacks. There's a reason the DD was adjusted so it can't hit subcaps anymore. There's a reason this change is being made. It's not a subtle nudge, this is CCP flat out telling you that you are using these ships in a way they weren't designed for and they are adjusting to compensate. I dunno, take the hint I guess!
Probably because your filthy kind whined and moaned about it like a bunch of little school girls instead of adapting to the situation at hand. This whole "re balancing" crap reeks of favoritism. Eve is going to hell, there's no doubt about that and it's all thanks to your kind. It's too bad too, I came to this game trying to get away from WoW bullshit, but it turns out management in this game wants to go in that direction. |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:44:00 -
[1095] - Quote
Th best part of this entire day was seeing a buttfrustrated Grath and Jeff Raider literally cry on forums for several hours.
A+++ would read again. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2729
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:46:00 -
[1096] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:I came to this game trying to get away from WoW bullshit, but it turns out management in this game wants to go in that direction.
EVE is turning into a game where the lvl85 vets with the best gear effortlessly farm lower-levels with impunity, yeap "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
581
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:47:00 -
[1097] - Quote
And to think all of this, everything, can be traced years back to a single thing. Someone creating a gif animated image for his forum signature. The gif depicting a person being hit by a car.
Now that's a butterfly effect.
|

FalconX Blast
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:48:00 -
[1098] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote: Go ahead and refute what I said.
No one is dropping dreads in a support fight to kill triage carriers outside of low sec (where the numbers total in the fight are around the hundred mark)
Erryday http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&kll_id=12735000
|

Joba Korako
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:49:00 -
[1099] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:
Judging by the nonsense you are spewing, it would appear that he actually does know more about PvP than you.
Go ahead and refute what I said. No one is dropping dreads in a support fight to kill triage carriers outside of low sec (where the numbers total in the fight are around the hundred mark)
So, some PL dude is all like and we're all like "No one is dropping dreads in a support fight to kill triage carriers outside of low sec" and the CFC is all like http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&adjacent&kll_id=12735034 |

Powers Sa
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:51:00 -
[1100] - Quote
If only Eve-O had legitimate D&D Moderators. Terrible rebuttals and flaming would not be tolerated at all. Instead you have to sift through terrible posts.
The best part about this thread? Two of the greatest Debate and Discussion moderators from a fabulously policed forum are in this thread are trolling and flaming, because they can. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:51:00 -
[1101] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I came to this game trying to get away from WoW bullshit, but it turns out management in this game wants to go in that direction. EVE is turning into a game where the lvl85 vets with the best gear effortlessly farm lower-levels with impunity, yeap
You missed my imply completely bird brain. WoW changes their game to allow scrubs and losers like you a chance at being a winner and this change is one step in that direction. Sorry you have some psychological issue where you grow sentiment of subcap space pixels and want to have wins spoon fed to you, but this change is simply wrong silly bee/ |

Ganthrithor
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
143
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:51:00 -
[1102] - Quote
Wasn't it a truck?
|

Durr Hurrr Durr
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:53:00 -
[1103] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:
Judging by the nonsense you are spewing, it would appear that he actually does know more about PvP than you.
Go ahead and refute what I said. No one is dropping dreads in a support fight to kill triage carriers outside of low sec (where the numbers total in the fight are around the hundred mark)
Ahhhhh what was that? |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:55:00 -
[1104] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I came to this game trying to get away from WoW bullshit, but it turns out management in this game wants to go in that direction. EVE is turning into a game where the lvl85 vets with the best gear effortlessly farm lower-levels with impunity, yeap You missed my imply completely bird brain. WoW changes their game to allow scrubs and losers like you a chance at being a winner and this change is one step in that direction. Sorry you have some psychological issue where you grow sentiment of subcap space pixels and want to have wins spoon fed to you, but this change is simply wrong silly bee/
Listen ******.
This is a sandbox pvp game. Having a do-all-end-all ship in that kind of game is ******* ********.
That you're comparing this at all to welfare epics etc shows that you fail to understand eve at a fundamental level.
|

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:55:00 -
[1105] - Quote
Joba Korako wrote:Dez Affinity wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:
Judging by the nonsense you are spewing, it would appear that he actually does know more about PvP than you.
Go ahead and refute what I said. No one is dropping dreads in a support fight to kill triage carriers outside of low sec (where the numbers total in the fight are around the hundred mark) So, some PL dude is all like and we're all like "No one is dropping dreads in a support fight to kill triage carriers outside of low sec" and the CFC is all like http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&adjacent&kll_id=12735034
Quoting me after I watered down what I said in my following post, I was referring the the 600 vs 600 scenario. BUT OK. |

Charles Case
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:56:00 -
[1106] - Quote
Hey Grath you gotta pace yourself, there's no way i will be enjoying your anger by Friday if you keep this up.
Please rest elite space pilot. |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:56:00 -
[1107] - Quote
Haha what did someone link my post in jabber and you all got an instant erection? |

Simi Kusoni
The Synergy Cascade Imminent
323
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:57:00 -
[1108] - Quote
Internet spaceships. Serious ******* business. -áhttp://i.imgur.com/aWNfM.jpg |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2750
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 01:59:00 -
[1109] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:And to think all of this, everything, can be traced years back to a single thing. An old man deciding that killing newbies in Syndicate would be fun.
Now that's a butterfly effect. ftfy "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2750
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:01:00 -
[1110] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I came to this game trying to get away from WoW bullshit, but it turns out management in this game wants to go in that direction. EVE is turning into a game where the lvl85 vets with the best gear effortlessly farm lower-levels with impunity, yeap You missed my imply completely bird brain. WoW changes their game to allow scrubs and losers like you a chance at being a winner and this change is one step in that direction. Sorry you have some psychological issue where you grow sentiment of subcap space pixels and want to have wins spoon fed to you, but this change is simply wrong silly bee/
says pubbie no. 91416177 in the noob corp "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Meno Theaetetus
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:01:00 -
[1111] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Would this change be happening if CFC were the ones with the super capitals?
Let's think that one through, if the CFC were the ones with the super majority, based on the size and participation of the coalition, no other group in the game would have stood a chance. So I'm fairly sure the answer to your question is yes, and it would probably have happened sooner.
If people are so genuinely mad that this change is going through, perhaps they should have considered that before they forced CCP's hand by grossly and blatantly exploiting an unbalanced ship class. Would we have done the same? Absolutely, but we would have not been so indignant went the inevitable happened.
|

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
65
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:03:00 -
[1112] - Quote
Hi thread, how are you doing? Are the pubbies still crying? |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1034
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:04:00 -
[1113] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of tracking
Too big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem.
All turrets already have sig resolution attribute. This is already used in the damage calculation, you just need to double it for XL weapons. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:08:00 -
[1114] - Quote
Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I came to this game trying to get away from WoW bullshit, but it turns out management in this game wants to go in that direction. EVE is turning into a game where the lvl85 vets with the best gear effortlessly farm lower-levels with impunity, yeap You missed my imply completely bird brain. WoW changes their game to allow scrubs and losers like you a chance at being a winner and this change is one step in that direction. Sorry you have some psychological issue where you grow sentiment of subcap space pixels and want to have wins spoon fed to you, but this change is simply wrong silly bee/ Listen ******. This is a sandbox pvp game. Having a do-all-end-all ship in that kind of game is ******* ********. That you're comparing this at all to welfare epics etc shows that you fail to understand eve at a fundamental level.
Guess what scrub! The titans are part of the sand box. What you guys want is the equivalent of welfare epics where everyone wins instead of committing the same amount of effort and skill it takes to win. |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:11:00 -
[1115] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I came to this game trying to get away from WoW bullshit, but it turns out management in this game wants to go in that direction. EVE is turning into a game where the lvl85 vets with the best gear effortlessly farm lower-levels with impunity, yeap You missed my imply completely bird brain. WoW changes their game to allow scrubs and losers like you a chance at being a winner and this change is one step in that direction. Sorry you have some psychological issue where you grow sentiment of subcap space pixels and want to have wins spoon fed to you, but this change is simply wrong silly bee/ Listen ******. This is a sandbox pvp game. Having a do-all-end-all ship in that kind of game is ******* ********. That you're comparing this at all to welfare epics etc shows that you fail to understand eve at a fundamental level. Guess what scrub! The titans are part of the sand box. What you guys want is the equivalent of welfare epics where everyone wins instead of committing the same amount of effort and skill it takes to win.
Titans Online: Where You Have No Reason Not to Fly a Titan
sounds awesome bro |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:11:00 -
[1116] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I came to this game trying to get away from WoW bullshit, but it turns out management in this game wants to go in that direction. EVE is turning into a game where the lvl85 vets with the best gear effortlessly farm lower-levels with impunity, yeap You missed my imply completely bird brain. WoW changes their game to allow scrubs and losers like you a chance at being a winner and this change is one step in that direction. Sorry you have some psychological issue where you grow sentiment of subcap space pixels and want to have wins spoon fed to you, but this change is simply wrong silly bee/ says pubbie no. 91416177 in the noob corp
Don't be mad that I'm stylin' all over you little bee no. 2,567. Besides, don't you have some autist with assburgers to listen to on vent shout your primaries while spamming f1? Now go serve your queen little bee. |

Krios Ahzek
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
730
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:12:00 -
[1117] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I came to this game trying to get away from WoW bullshit, but it turns out management in this game wants to go in that direction. EVE is turning into a game where the lvl85 vets with the best gear effortlessly farm lower-levels with impunity, yeap You missed my imply completely bird brain. WoW changes their game to allow scrubs and losers like you a chance at being a winner and this change is one step in that direction. Sorry you have some psychological issue where you grow sentiment of subcap space pixels and want to have wins spoon fed to you, but this change is simply wrong silly bee/ Listen ******. This is a sandbox pvp game. Having a do-all-end-all ship in that kind of game is ******* ********. That you're comparing this at all to welfare epics etc shows that you fail to understand eve at a fundamental level. Guess what scrub! The titans are part of the sand box. What you guys want is the equivalent of welfare epics where everyone wins instead of committing the same amount of effort and skill it takes to win.
Fear the ''Center for Advanced Studies'' titan fleet.
-áThough All Men Do Despise Us |

Krystal Flores
Missions Mining and Mayhem Northern Coalition.
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:13:00 -
[1118] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of tracking
Too big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem.
All turrets already have sig resolution attribute. This is already used in the damage calculation, you just need to double it for XL weapons. Would be too much work for them to do that apparently. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2764
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:13:00 -
[1119] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I came to this game trying to get away from WoW bullshit, but it turns out management in this game wants to go in that direction. EVE is turning into a game where the lvl85 vets with the best gear effortlessly farm lower-levels with impunity, yeap You missed my imply completely bird brain. WoW changes their game to allow scrubs and losers like you a chance at being a winner and this change is one step in that direction. Sorry you have some psychological issue where you grow sentiment of subcap space pixels and want to have wins spoon fed to you, but this change is simply wrong silly bee/ Listen ******. This is a sandbox pvp game. Having a do-all-end-all ship in that kind of game is ******* ********. That you're comparing this at all to welfare epics etc shows that you fail to understand eve at a fundamental level. Guess what scrub! The titans are part of the sand box. What you guys want is the equivalent of welfare epics where everyone wins instead of committing the same amount of effort and skill it takes to win.
quiet trash "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:13:00 -
[1120] - Quote
Takashi Kaeda wrote:Boo hoo, why won't you believe I'm cool and edgy like naruto.
World of Warcraft online: where whining like a prepubescent boy gets you what you want. AKA: welfare epics |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2770
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:14:00 -
[1121] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Don't be mad that I'm stylin' all over you little bee no. 2,567. Besides, don't you have some autist with assburgers to listen to on vent shout your primaries while spamming f1? Now go serve your queen little bee.
look at the publord trying to talk down to his betters "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

esc shk
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
93
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:14:00 -
[1122] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I came to this game trying to get away from WoW bullshit, but it turns out management in this game wants to go in that direction. EVE is turning into a game where the lvl85 vets with the best gear effortlessly farm lower-levels with impunity, yeap You missed my imply completely bird brain. WoW changes their game to allow scrubs and losers like you a chance at being a winner and this change is one step in that direction. Sorry you have some psychological issue where you grow sentiment of subcap space pixels and want to have wins spoon fed to you, but this change is simply wrong silly bee/ Listen ******. This is a sandbox pvp game. Having a do-all-end-all ship in that kind of game is ******* ********. That you're comparing this at all to welfare epics etc shows that you fail to understand eve at a fundamental level. Guess what scrub! The titans are part of the sand box. What you guys want is the equivalent of welfare epics where everyone wins instead of committing the same amount of effort and skill it takes to win.
NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:15:00 -
[1123] - Quote
Andski wrote:I'm so mad, I'm going to express my anger!
Don't be mad that I'm right. Face it bro, using carrier signature sized vessels will get hit by titans.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2770
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:16:00 -
[1124] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Don't be mad that I'm right. Face it bro, using carrier signature sized vessels will get hit by titans.
easy to say that when you fear entering nullsec due to the wall of death :shobon: "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:16:00 -
[1125] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Don't be mad that I'm stylin' all over you little bee no. 2,567. Besides, don't you have some autist with assburgers to listen to on vent shout your primaries while spamming f1? Now go serve your queen little bee. look at the publord trying to talk down to his betters
More like watching you get butt flustered over being wrong. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:17:00 -
[1126] - Quote
esc shk wrote:
NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD
I must of shook the bee's nest because the sperglords are comming out in full force. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:17:00 -
[1127] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Don't be mad that I'm right. Face it bro, using carrier signature sized vessels will get hit by titans.
easy to say that when you fear entering nullsec due to the wall of death :shobon:
With the way you losers fight, I may go to your part of nullsec to farm kills. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2770
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:18:00 -
[1128] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:With the way you losers fight, I may go to your part of nullsec to get hopelessly murdered and whine about blobs on the forums later
"WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2770
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:19:00 -
[1129] - Quote
just to help you get started
mission fits don't work in pvp "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Sir Marksalot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:20:00 -
[1130] - Quote
Andski wrote:just to help you get started
mission fits don't work in pvp
but my deadspace cnr can out tank ur dps n00b |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:20:00 -
[1131] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:With the way you losers fight, I may go to your part of nullsec to get hopelessly murdered and whine about blobs on the forums later
|

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:20:00 -
[1132] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:With the way you losers fight, I may go to your part of nullsec to get insane kills mails only to find that you're now complaining about what I used to get nerfed. Boo hoo!
|

Truce Billis
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:20:00 -
[1133] - Quote
Andski wrote:just to help you get started
mission fits don't work in pvp
dont listen to this, fit as many damage controls as you can |

Truce Billis
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:20:00 -
[1134] - Quote
Truce Billis wrote:Andski wrote:just to help you get started
mission fits don't work in pvp dont listen to this, fit as many damage controls as you can
my bad, you already have them all activated |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:21:00 -
[1135] - Quote
Andski wrote:just to help you get started
mission fits don't work in pvp
I've got some news for your ****** drake fleets... |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2770
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:21:00 -
[1136] - Quote
feel free to come by deklein to farm kills
maybe you'll kill a few ratters and smug about it on the forums lmao "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Venus Vermillion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
416
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:21:00 -
[1137] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote: With the way you losers fight, I may go to your part of nullsec to farm kills.
Our greatest fears... RaidenDot alts in pubbie corps coming into Deklein to sit cloaked for endless hours.
As long as you don't actually make us deal with more of your hilarious internet memes like "you mad bro" and such in local. That would just be going too far, sir. Too far. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2770
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:22:00 -
[1138] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:just to help you get started
mission fits don't work in pvp I've got some news for your ****** drake fleets...
drake fleets are support for maelstroms, fyi
also buffer fits work well in PvE I hear "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

School Nickname Worldmonkey
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:22:00 -
[1139] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:I'm so mad, I'm going to express my anger! Don't be mad that I'm right. Face it bro, using carrier signature sized vessels will get hit by titans.
Of course they'll be hit by titans, we simply don't care. Our issue is that you can just throw down unsupported titans and devastate entire fleets with utter impunity. This has been covered enough over the course of this thread that you should be able to contain your rage when confronted with the truth.
You can continue to desperately assault our valiant forum warriors for all the good that it will do. It won't change the facts. :heh: |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:22:00 -
[1140] - Quote
Truce Billis wrote:Truce Billis wrote:[quote=Andski]just to help you get started
mission fits don't work in pvp Intelligible response
Yea huh, okay. Whatever you say bro.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2776
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:23:00 -
[1141] - Quote
we're losers with 800bn monthly tech income and the ability to throw 1600 angry assholes at anybody we wish at the blink of a tilde "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Truce Billis
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:24:00 -
[1142] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:just to help you get started
mission fits don't work in pvp I've got some news for your ****** drake fleets... don't diss the drake fleets, they just killed all the titans in eve |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2651
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:24:00 -
[1143] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Don't be mad that I'm stylin' all over you little bee no. 2,567. Besides, don't you have some autist with assburgers to listen to on vent shout your primaries while spamming f1? Now go serve your queen little bee. look at the publord trying to talk down to his betters More like watching you get butt flustered over being wrong. dealing with people like you is always annoying because you're literally too dumb to realize when you've been humiliated
sort of takes the fun out of it |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:24:00 -
[1144] - Quote
School Nickname Worldmonkey wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:I'm so mad, I'm going to express my anger! Don't be mad that I'm right. Face it bro, using carrier signature sized vessels will get hit by titans. Of course they'll be hit by titans, we simply don't care. Our issue is that you can just throw down unsupported titans and devastate entire fleets with utter impunity. This has been covered enough over the course of this thread that you should be able to contain your rage when confronted with the truth. You can continue to desperately assault our valiant forum warriors for all the good that it will do. It won't change the facts. :heh:
Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either. |

Sir Marksalot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:25:00 -
[1145] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Truce Billis wrote:Truce Billis wrote:[quote=Andski]just to help you get started
mission fits don't work in pvp Intelligible response Yea huh, okay. Whatever you say bro. what the **** does this even mean |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2776
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:25:00 -
[1146] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either.
because every engagement has been against a lone titan lmao
look how clueless and disconnected you are from reality! "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:26:00 -
[1147] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Don't be mad that I'm stylin' all over you little bee no. 2,567. Besides, don't you have some autist with assburgers to listen to on vent shout your primaries while spamming f1? Now go serve your queen little bee. look at the publord trying to talk down to his betters More like watching you get butt flustered over being wrong. dealing with people like you is always annoying because you're literally too dumb to realize when you've been humiliated sort of takes the fun out of it
You need to stop projecting bro. If anyone is dealing with anything here is eve as a whole against you something awful guys. But I suppose having to pay to use a forum wtih up tight rules would make any of you have a high horse about anything and everything |

Sir Marksalot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:26:00 -
[1148] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:School Nickname Worldmonkey wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:I'm so mad, I'm going to express my anger! Don't be mad that I'm right. Face it bro, using carrier signature sized vessels will get hit by titans. Of course they'll be hit by titans, we simply don't care. Our issue is that you can just throw down unsupported titans and devastate entire fleets with utter impunity. This has been covered enough over the course of this thread that you should be able to contain your rage when confronted with the truth. You can continue to desperately assault our valiant forum warriors for all the good that it will do. It won't change the facts. :heh: Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either.
as does afterburning rifters, preach on brother badposter! |

Ishen Villone
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:26:00 -
[1149] - Quote
I should be able to beat 1200 people with my 200 what the hell this is totally not fair |

Sir Marksalot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:27:00 -
[1150] - Quote
seriously what the hell is forums badposter Surge Roth even saying |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:28:00 -
[1151] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either. because every engagement has been against a lone titan lmao look how clueless and disconnected you are from reality!
With the way you guys fight, may as well be |

School Nickname Worldmonkey
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:29:00 -
[1152] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote: Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either.
Maybe you need more XXbn officer sebos to feel good about yourselves and whine some more about you can't hit jack without them. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:30:00 -
[1153] - Quote
Sir Marksalot wrote:Surge Roth wrote:School Nickname Worldmonkey wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:I'm so mad, I'm going to express my anger! Don't be mad that I'm right. Face it bro, using carrier signature sized vessels will get hit by titans. Of course they'll be hit by titans, we simply don't care. Our issue is that you can just throw down unsupported titans and devastate entire fleets with utter impunity. This has been covered enough over the course of this thread that you should be able to contain your rage when confronted with the truth. You can continue to desperately assault our valiant forum warriors for all the good that it will do. It won't change the facts. :heh: Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either. as does afterburning rifters, preach on brother badposter!
Maybe they should have maintained a transversal that was greater than those XL turrets. |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:30:00 -
[1154] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Boo hoo, why won't you believe I'm cool and edgy like naruto. World of Warcraft online: where whining like a prepubescent boy gets you what you want. AKA: welfare epics
kill yourself. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:31:00 -
[1155] - Quote
Ishen Villone wrote:I should be able to beat 1200 people with my 200 what the hell this is totally not fair But nerfing other's play style to get a spoon fed win is fair, right. By the way, that sounds like hypocrisy to me. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:32:00 -
[1156] - Quote
Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Boo hoo, why won't you believe I'm cool and edgy like naruto. World of Warcraft online: where whining like a prepubescent boy gets you what you want. AKA: welfare epics kill yourself.
Is that a threat? I take threats very seriously. |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:32:00 -
[1157] - Quote
Yes I threatened you to kill yourself.
Good one.
But please, kill yourself. |

Krutoj
xSPECNAZx
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:33:00 -
[1158] - Quote
Lets summirise this patch with nerfing of the biggest End game item, most expenssive and now most useless. Well done at rolling this game back by 7 years. I will address some of the things that Greyscale thinks are true or were "discussed"
Quote:We have talked to the CSM about this, and we're comfortable going forward with these changes in light of that discussion. I'm not going to put words in their mouths, though.
While this is true and we did discuss this, the major consensus was that nerfing titans is just trying to use a quick fix on a problem that is larger than a titan. Its the problem of 0.0 warfare, ship balance and how the end game currently built around those. Fixing titans as opposed to trying to come up with a better sov mechanics and better ship balance (between tech3 ships and titans), seemed to CCP like an easier way out that would buy them some more affection from the majority of players who cant comprehend this.
Quote: XL turret tracking halved, siege module tracking penalty removed Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5
So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place? Why nerf scan resolution, which together with cloak is non existent? I will tell you why, because CCP thinks that if some wanker managed to buy the most rarest fucken items in the game and killed with that titan 10 people, its a cause for concern for entire player base. That said, taking a look at statics, were a titan normaly an alliance asset, not many can afford to outfit their titan like a christmas tree of officer modules and yet, this became the major factor for this nerf. Funny that, tech 3 officer/deadspace ships (yes with deadspace/officer 100mn afterburners) dont get treated as such and yet there are more of them and they pose more balancing issues.
Btw mr "our assumption"Greyscale, assumptions are the mother of all fukups. I hope you will remember this saying next time you draft a patch.
|

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1848
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:33:00 -
[1159] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members
And this is where you show your ignorance. Lone titans are not the problem.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:33:00 -
[1160] - Quote
Takashi Kaeda wrote:Yes I threatened you to kill yourself.
Good one.
But please, kill yourself.
Threatening someone over the forums is a bannable offense. I sincerely hope you're joking. |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:36:00 -
[1161] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Yes I threatened you to kill yourself.
Good one.
But please, kill yourself. Threatening someone over the forums is a bannable offense. I sincerely hope you're joking.
Good thing I 'threatened' you then. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1848
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:37:00 -
[1162] - Quote
Krutoj wrote:So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place?
Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:38:00 -
[1163] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members And this is where you show your ignorance. Lone titans are not the problem.
You show your ignorance on a daily basis and I have to deal with the garbage you and the likes of you spit out. i simply read missed the s behind titan in that one post. But it doesn't change the fact that this nerf is unjustified and is there to support failswarm. |

Aryndel Vyst
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
285
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:39:00 -
[1164] - Quote
I demand Grath Telkin change his eve portrait |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:39:00 -
[1165] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Krutoj wrote:So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place? Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life.
You guys could of done the same without crying for nerfs. But here we are. |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:41:00 -
[1166] - Quote
I too like posting out of my ass about things I can barely comprehend. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:43:00 -
[1167] - Quote
Takashi Kaeda wrote:I too like posting out of my ass about things I can barely comprehend.
good for you. Maybe the rest of goonswarm will admit to this |

bamason
Dragon's Rage
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:45:00 -
[1168] - Quote
how about give the titan a tracking nerf and leave xl turrets alone, some of us like tracking dreads. |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:46:00 -
[1169] - Quote
The fact that you unironically think Titans are balanced and good for the game in their current iteration is kind of funny though.
Tell me, when the CFC have more Titans than you what would you cry about then? |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1848
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:52:00 -
[1170] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Krutoj wrote:So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place? Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life. You guys could of done the same without crying for nerfs. But here we are.
It's impossible to kill a blob of titans once it reaches a critical mass. There's no way to adapt to it.
Nothing in Eve should be unkillable.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2783
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:53:00 -
[1171] - Quote
pubbies whining about ships they will never afford :shobon: "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Sir Marksalot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:53:00 -
[1172] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Yes I threatened you to kill yourself.
Good one.
But please, kill yourself. Threatening someone over the forums is a bannable offense. I sincerely hope you're joking.
im literallt threatening you with your own suicide
if you do not stop trolling terribly you will end up looking at your posting and decide to end it all by hitting a tree at 130mph |

Tobruk
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:53:00 -
[1173] - Quote
Glad to see the spirit of T20 is alive and well at CCP.
|

Sir Marksalot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:54:00 -
[1174] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:I too like posting out of my ass about things I can barely comprehend. good for you. Maybe the rest of goonswarm will admit to this
welcome to goonwaffeswarmfleet |

Krutoj
xSPECNAZx
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:54:00 -
[1175] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Krutoj wrote:So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place? Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life. You guys could of done the same without crying for nerfs. But here we are.
Apperently 100 titans in game are ungodly more strong than any alliance or CCP in this game. Since the previous nerf, titans have no impact on the large scale fights and very rarely on small gangs, so I dont even know where the above statement about "impact" is coming from. And yes, lets nerf minority more, because majority has no brains to fight them. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:55:00 -
[1176] - Quote
Takashi Kaeda wrote:The fact that you unironically think Titans are balanced and good for the game in their current iteration is kind of funny though.
Tell me, when the CFC have more Titans than you what would you cry about then?
I wouldn't cry. In fact, I'd say it would be working as intended. What isn't good for the game is changing things mindlessly for the sake of changing it or for a group of people. |

Tobruk
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:56:00 -
[1177] - Quote
When your done with the titan nerfing can you pass me a SABER BPO
thanks CCP D A R I U S J O H N S O N |

Sir Marksalot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:57:00 -
[1178] - Quote
Krutoj wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Krutoj wrote:So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place? Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life. You guys could of done the same without crying for nerfs. But here we are. Apperently 100 titans in game are ungodly more strong than any alliance or CCP in this game. Since the previous nerf, titans have no impact on the large scale fights and very rarely on small gangs, so I dont even know where the above statement about "impact" is coming from. And yes, lets nerf minority more, because majority has no brains to fight them. who is this and why does this person have a csmflag |

Sir Marksalot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:58:00 -
[1179] - Quote
Tobruk wrote:When your done with the titan nerfing can you pass me a SABER BPO
thanks CCP D A R I U S J O H N S O N CCP D A R I U S J O H N S O N literally gave me a golem, cnr, and tornado bpo as well as the isk to start production on them |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:59:00 -
[1180] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:The fact that you unironically think Titans are balanced and good for the game in their current iteration is kind of funny though.
Tell me, when the CFC have more Titans than you what would you cry about then? I wouldn't cry. In fact, I'd say it would be working as intended. What isn't good for the game is changing things mindlessly for the sake of changing it or for a group of people.
Because reducing a sandbox to who can bring more of single ship type would be a really fun game. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2783
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:00:00 -
[1181] - Quote
Krutoj wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Krutoj wrote:So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place? Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life. You guys could of done the same without crying for nerfs. But here we are. Apperently 100 titans in game are ungodly more strong than any alliance or CCP in this game. Since the previous nerf, titans have no impact on the large scale fights and very rarely on small gangs, so I dont even know where the above statement about "impact" is coming from. And yes, lets nerf minority more, because majority has no brains to fight them.
specnaz aren't supposed to give a ****
specnaz are supposed to snap necks and slit throats "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:01:00 -
[1182] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Krutoj wrote:So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place? Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life. You guys could of done the same without crying for nerfs. But here we are. It's impossible to kill a blob of titans once it reaches a critical mass. There's no way to adapt to it. Nothing in Eve should be unkillable.
You could take the easy road and just bring more caps. Oh wait, you guys refuse to actually do that lol. Instead, you guys continue to deploy the same doctrines that lose to these things expecting a different result. |

Ruthless Erection
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:02:00 -
[1183] - Quote
[quote=Andski]Loving this.[/quote
You would because you're a ****** Goon. Your sole purpose in EVE is to destroy it
CCP, this is a terrible idea. There are so many other ways you could balance titans
But if you insist upon this ******** "balancing", bring AoE Doomsday back then
We have TiDi, AoE doomsday won't be nearly as bad as it used to be
But I'm beginning to think that CCP no longer runs this game, and that Goons dictate what they want to happen, and it does. -A- cried about Doomsdaying of sub-capitals, BAM. No more doomsdaying sub-caps. Goons are crying about titans, and their "OPness", BAM. Titans get "nerfed"
First observation, Goons have more titans/supers than all of Raiden, PL, NCdot, and other alliances, put together. They CHOOSE to not use them, so why must you punish those who do use them
You've removed drone bays, you've removed sub-cap doomsday'ing, a |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2783
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:02:00 -
[1184] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:You could take the easy road and just bring more caps. Oh wait, you guys refuse to actually do that lol. Instead, you guys continue to deploy the same doctrines that lose to these things expecting a different result.
look at the clueless pubbie act like he's not )) "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2783
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:02:00 -
[1185] - Quote
Ruthless Erection wrote:[quote=Andski]Loving this.[/quote
You would because you're a ****** Goon. Your sole purpose in EVE is to destroy it
CCP, this is a terrible idea. There are so many other ways you could balance titans
But if you insist upon this ******** "balancing", bring AoE Doomsday back then
We have TiDi, AoE doomsday won't be nearly as bad as it used to be
But I'm beginning to think that CCP no longer runs this game, and that Goons dictate what they want to happen, and it does. -A- cried about Doomsdaying of sub-capitals, BAM. No more doomsdaying sub-caps. Goons are crying about titans, and their "OPness", BAM. Titans get "nerfed"
First observation, Goons have more titans/supers than all of Raiden, PL, NCdot, and other alliances, put together. They CHOOSE to not use them, so why must you punish those who do use them
You've removed drone bays, you've removed sub-cap doomsday'ing, a deal wiz it
"WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2783
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:03:00 -
[1186] - Quote
please keep suggesting AoE doomsdays as a good idea, we'll immediately cynojam every system we own and multiple doomsday every cynojammer sieging fleet "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Ruthless Erection
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:05:00 -
[1187] - Quote
Andski wrote:please keep suggesting AoE doomsdays as a good idea, we'll immediately cynojam every system we own and multiple doomsday every cynojammer sieging fleet
But you're Goons, the people who ***** and moan about capitals, but keep deploying sub-caps.
Oh btw dumbass, can't doomsday sub-capitals. But i like your thinking, shows that 99.99%, i mean 100% of Goons are flat out ********. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:06:00 -
[1188] - Quote
Ruthless Erection wrote:Andski wrote:please keep suggesting AoE doomsdays as a good idea, we'll immediately cynojam every system we own and multiple doomsday every cynojammer sieging fleet But you're Goons, the people who ***** and moan about capitals, but keep deploying sub-caps. Oh btw dumbass, can't doomsday sub-capitals. But i like your thinking, shows that 99.99%, i mean 100% of Goons are flat out ********.
reading is hard "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:06:00 -
[1189] - Quote
unless you're saying that they should bring back AoE doomsdays and restrict them to doing damage to capitals ahahahahaha "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

esc shk
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
94
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:06:00 -
[1190] - Quote
Ruthless Erection wrote:Andski wrote:please keep suggesting AoE doomsdays as a good idea, we'll immediately cynojam every system we own and multiple doomsday every cynojammer sieging fleet But you're Goons, the people who ***** and moan about capitals, but keep deploying sub-caps. Oh btw dumbass, can't doomsday sub-capitals. But i like your thinking, shows that 99.99%, i mean 100% of Goons are flat out ********.
I think you're Rectally Unhappy sir. |

Ruthless Erection
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:07:00 -
[1191] - Quote
Andski wrote:Ruthless Erection wrote:Andski wrote:please keep suggesting AoE doomsdays as a good idea, we'll immediately cynojam every system we own and multiple doomsday every cynojammer sieging fleet But you're Goons, the people who ***** and moan about capitals, but keep deploying sub-caps. Oh btw dumbass, can't doomsday sub-capitals. But i like your thinking, shows that 99.99%, i mean 100% of Goons are flat out ********. reading is hard
/wrist then. I'll supply the razor :) |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:07:00 -
[1192] - Quote
Ruthless Erection wrote:can't doomsday sub-capitals
yep and guess why? owned "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Tobruk
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:08:00 -
[1193] - Quote
List of more intelligent solutions to super-cap balancing:
1) Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 2) Nerf Fighter Bombers and Improve Dread EHP, then Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 3) Reduce Titan tracking by 25%, making them dependent on T3 support to hit sub-caps, sub-caps that could be killed by 600 drakes 4) Reduce Tracking by 50% 5) Reduce tracking by 50% and lock time by 20%
List of changes most beneficial to GSF:
1) Reduce tracking by 50% and lock time by 20% 2) Reduce Tracking by 50% 3) Reduce Titan tracking by 25%, making them dependent on T3 support to hit sub-caps, sub-caps that could be killed by 600 drakes 4) Nerf Fighter Bombers and Improve Dread EHP, then Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 5) Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes
List of Pandemic Legion Employees of CCP:
List of GSF employees of CCP: CCP DARIUS JOHNSON CCP SOUNDWAVE
List of Pandemic Legion CSM Delegates:
List of GSF CSM Delegates: Vile Rat
List of Pandemic Legion CSM Chairmen:
List of GSF CSM Chairmen: The Mittani
Something smells like rotten shark. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:08:00 -
[1194] - Quote
Ruthless Erection wrote:Andski wrote:Ruthless Erection wrote:Andski wrote:please keep suggesting AoE doomsdays as a good idea, we'll immediately cynojam every system we own and multiple doomsday every cynojammer sieging fleet But you're Goons, the people who ***** and moan about capitals, but keep deploying sub-caps. Oh btw dumbass, can't doomsday sub-capitals. But i like your thinking, shows that 99.99%, i mean 100% of Goons are flat out ********. reading is hard /wrist then. I'll supply the razor :)
yes, proceed to cut yourself "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:08:00 -
[1195] - Quote
Tobruk wrote:List of more intelligent solutions to super-cap balancing:
1) Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 2) Nerf Fighter Bombers and Improve Dread EHP, then Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 3) Reduce Titan tracking by 25%, making them dependent on T3 support to hit sub-caps, sub-caps that could be killed by 600 drakes 4) Reduce Tracking by 50% 5) Reduce tracking by 50% and lock time by 20%
List of changes most beneficial to GSF:
1) Reduce tracking by 50% and lock time by 20% 2) Reduce Tracking by 50% 3) Reduce Titan tracking by 25%, making them dependent on T3 support to hit sub-caps, sub-caps that could be killed by 600 drakes 4) Nerf Fighter Bombers and Improve Dread EHP, then Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 5) Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes
List of Pandemic Legion Employees of CCP:
List of GSF employees of CCP: CCP DARIUS JOHNSON
List of Pandemic Legion CSM Delegates:
List of GSF CSM Delegates: Vile Rat
List of Pandemic Legion CSM Chairmen:
List of GSF CSM Chairmen: The Mittani
Something smells like rotten shark.
You forgot CCP Soundwave, he's ex-goonswarm
didn't you know???? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:10:00 -
[1196] - Quote
point out how fighterbombers were nerfed because they still work fine? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Krios Ahzek
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
730
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:10:00 -
[1197] - Quote
Also Darius JOHNSON is CCP Sreegs, the man in charge of banning bots.
-áThough All Men Do Despise Us |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:11:00 -
[1198] - Quote
Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:The fact that you unironically think Titans are balanced and good for the game in their current iteration is kind of funny though.
Tell me, when the CFC have more Titans than you what would you cry about then? I wouldn't cry. In fact, I'd say it would be working as intended. What isn't good for the game is changing things mindlessly for the sake of changing it or for a group of people. Because reducing a sandbox to who can bring more of single ship type would be a really fun game.
The game is fun, but you guys openly say it's terrible and boring. I don't see how this would change your opinion anyway. I forget you just want to casualize EvE into WoW in space. |

Ruthless Erection
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:11:00 -
[1199] - Quote
Tobruk wrote:List of more intelligent solutions to super-cap balancing:
1) Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 2) Nerf Fighter Bombers and Improve Dread EHP, then Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 3) Reduce Titan tracking by 25%, making them dependent on T3 support to hit sub-caps, sub-caps that could be killed by 600 drakes 4) Reduce Tracking by 50% 5) Reduce tracking by 50% and lock time by 20%
List of changes most beneficial to GSF:
1) Reduce tracking by 50% and lock time by 20% 2) Reduce Tracking by 50% 3) Reduce Titan tracking by 25%, making them dependent on T3 support to hit sub-caps, sub-caps that could be killed by 600 drakes 4) Nerf Fighter Bombers and Improve Dread EHP, then Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 5) Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes
List of Pandemic Legion Employees of CCP:
List of GSF employees of CCP: CCP DARIUS JOHNSON
List of Pandemic Legion CSM Delegates:
List of GSF CSM Delegates: Vile Rat
List of Pandemic Legion CSM Chairmen:
List of GSF CSM Chairmen: The Mittani
Something smells like rotten shark.
Thus why the game is on a downhill path to having nothing. I think it's time to re-open Project PewPew... |

Tobruk
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:12:00 -
[1200] - Quote
Andski wrote:Tobruk wrote:List of more intelligent solutions to super-cap balancing:
1) Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 2) Nerf Fighter Bombers and Improve Dread EHP, then Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 3) Reduce Titan tracking by 25%, making them dependent on T3 support to hit sub-caps, sub-caps that could be killed by 600 drakes 4) Reduce Tracking by 50% 5) Reduce tracking by 50% and lock time by 20%
List of changes most beneficial to GSF:
1) Reduce tracking by 50% and lock time by 20% 2) Reduce Tracking by 50% 3) Reduce Titan tracking by 25%, making them dependent on T3 support to hit sub-caps, sub-caps that could be killed by 600 drakes 4) Nerf Fighter Bombers and Improve Dread EHP, then Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 5) Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes
List of Pandemic Legion Employees of CCP:
List of GSF employees of CCP: CCP DARIUS JOHNSON
List of Pandemic Legion CSM Delegates:
List of GSF CSM Delegates: Vile Rat
List of Pandemic Legion CSM Chairmen:
List of GSF CSM Chairmen: The Mittani
Something smells like rotten shark.
You forgot CCP Soundwave, he's ex-goonswarm didn't you know????
Ask executive outcomes if they are happy about being back in BOB.
|

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:12:00 -
[1201] - Quote
Tobruk wrote:List of more intelligent solutions to super-cap balancing:
1) Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 2) Nerf Fighter Bombers and Improve Dread EHP, then Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 3) Reduce Titan tracking by 25%, making them dependent on T3 support to hit sub-caps, sub-caps that could be killed by 600 drakes 4) Reduce Tracking by 50% 5) Reduce tracking by 50% and lock time by 20%
List of changes most beneficial to GSF:
1) Reduce tracking by 50% and lock time by 20% 2) Reduce Tracking by 50% 3) Reduce Titan tracking by 25%, making them dependent on T3 support to hit sub-caps, sub-caps that could be killed by 600 drakes 4) Nerf Fighter Bombers and Improve Dread EHP, then Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 5) Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes
List of Pandemic Legion Employees of CCP:
List of GSF employees of CCP: CCP DARIUS JOHNSON
List of Pandemic Legion CSM Delegates:
List of GSF CSM Delegates: Vile Rat
List of Pandemic Legion CSM Chairmen:
List of GSF CSM Chairmen: The Mittani
Something smells like rotten shark.
Right Elise is totally not in PL. Right. Also confirming Soundwave and Screegs value internet spaceship honour over their own personal welfare.
jesus christ get out. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:12:00 -
[1202] - Quote
Andski wrote:boo hoo, I got nothing good to say.
Your mad is starting to make your face red.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:13:00 -
[1203] - Quote
Takashi Kaeda wrote:Right Elise is totally not in PL. Right. Also confirming Soundwave and Screegs value internet spaceship honour over their own personal welfare.
jesus christ get out.
you're thinking "Seleene" aka CCP Abathur aka I CREATED DOMINION LOL "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:13:00 -
[1204] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:boo hoo, I got nothing good to say. Your mad is starting to make your face red.
All the egg *** on your face is starting to make you look like the dumbest poster itt. |

esc shk
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
94
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:13:00 -
[1205] - Quote
Tobruk wrote:
Ask executive outcomes if they are happy about being back in BOB.
I knew Elitist Ops were the bitterest faggots around but you take the cake sweet cheeks |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:13:00 -
[1206] - Quote
Tobruk wrote:List of more intelligent solutions to super-cap balancing:
1) Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 2) Nerf Fighter Bombers and Improve Dread EHP, then Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 3) Reduce Titan tracking by 25%, making them dependent on T3 support to hit sub-caps, sub-caps that could be killed by 600 drakes 4) Reduce Tracking by 50% 5) Reduce tracking by 50% and lock time by 20%
List of changes most beneficial to GSF:
1) Reduce tracking by 50% and lock time by 20% 2) Reduce Tracking by 50% 3) Reduce Titan tracking by 25%, making them dependent on T3 support to hit sub-caps, sub-caps that could be killed by 600 drakes 4) Nerf Fighter Bombers and Improve Dread EHP, then Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 5) Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes
List of Pandemic Legion Employees of CCP:
List of GSF employees of CCP: CCP DARIUS JOHNSON CCP SOUNDWAVE
List of Pandemic Legion CSM Delegates:
List of GSF CSM Delegates: Vile Rat
List of Pandemic Legion CSM Chairmen:
List of GSF CSM Chairmen: The Mittani
Something smells like rotten shark.
Isn't Seleene in PL these days? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:14:00 -
[1207] - Quote
i too can change words in quotes like a 12 year old "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Tobruk
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:14:00 -
[1208] - Quote
Takashi Kaeda wrote:Tobruk wrote:List of more intelligent solutions to super-cap balancing:
1) Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 2) Nerf Fighter Bombers and Improve Dread EHP, then Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 3) Reduce Titan tracking by 25%, making them dependent on T3 support to hit sub-caps, sub-caps that could be killed by 600 drakes 4) Reduce Tracking by 50% 5) Reduce tracking by 50% and lock time by 20%
List of changes most beneficial to GSF:
1) Reduce tracking by 50% and lock time by 20% 2) Reduce Tracking by 50% 3) Reduce Titan tracking by 25%, making them dependent on T3 support to hit sub-caps, sub-caps that could be killed by 600 drakes 4) Nerf Fighter Bombers and Improve Dread EHP, then Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes 5) Tell goon-swarm to field 300 dreads instead of 600 drakes
List of Pandemic Legion Employees of CCP:
List of GSF employees of CCP: CCP DARIUS JOHNSON
List of Pandemic Legion CSM Delegates:
List of GSF CSM Delegates: Vile Rat
List of Pandemic Legion CSM Chairmen:
List of GSF CSM Chairmen: The Mittani
Something smells like rotten shark.
Right Elise is totally not in PL. Right. Also confirming Soundwave and Screegs value internet spaceship honour over their own personal welfare. jesus christ get out.
since when is Elise on the CSM? what an idiot, get out. |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:14:00 -
[1209] - Quote
Goddamnit people, stop posting so fast. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:16:00 -
[1210] - Quote
Triskian wrote:Goddamnit people, stop posting so fast.
bad posters can't keep pace with me "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:16:00 -
[1211] - Quote
Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:boo hoo, I got nothing good to say. Your mad is starting to make your face red. All the egg *** on your face is starting to make you look like the dumbest poster itt.
I'm simply voicing an opposite opinion from what all of goon swarm, coincidently, agree on. Just because you disagree with me doesn't mean make me you any more right. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:17:00 -
[1212] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:I'm simply voicing an opposite opinion from what all of goon swarm, coincidently, agree on. Just because you disagree with me doesn't mean make me you any more right.
posting like an autistic manchild doesn't make you right either lmao "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:17:00 -
[1213] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:boo hoo, I got nothing good to say. Your mad is starting to make your face red. All the egg *** on your face is starting to make you look like the dumbest poster itt. I'm simply voicing an opposite opinion from what all of goon swarm, coincidently, agree on. Just because you disagree with me doesn't mean make me you any more right.
Except for the fact that you have a demonstrable lack of understanding of the issue. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:17:00 -
[1214] - Quote
full spectrum spergin "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:18:00 -
[1215] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I'm happy i wish I could be happy 
Now only if you could figure out a way to win fights without having to cry on CCP's shoulder |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:18:00 -
[1216] - Quote
Andski wrote:Triskian wrote:Goddamnit people, stop posting so fast. bad posters can't keep pace with me
YOU WOUND ME SIR. MY POSTING BACKBONE IS BROKEN. |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:18:00 -
[1217] - Quote
Even Grath, although ********, has some semblance of an idea of what he's ranting about. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:19:00 -
[1218] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I'm simply voicing an opposite opinion from what all of goon swarm, coincidently, agree on. Just because you disagree with me doesn't mean make me you any more right. posting like an autistic manchild doesn't make you right either lmao
I'm not posting like an autistic manchild. I'm simply observing how you guys can claim that such a terrible change is 'balance' while stlying all over you.
|

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:20:00 -
[1219] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I'm simply voicing an opposite opinion from what all of goon swarm, coincidently, agree on. Just because you disagree with me doesn't mean make me you any more right. posting like an autistic manchild doesn't make you right either lmao I'm not posting like an autistic manchild. I'm simply observing how you guys can claim that such a terrible change is 'balance' while stlying all over you.
lol |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:21:00 -
[1220] - Quote
Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:boo hoo, I got nothing good to say. Your mad is starting to make your face red. All the egg *** on your face is starting to make you look like the dumbest poster itt. I'm simply voicing an opposite opinion from what all of goon swarm, coincidently, agree on. Just because you disagree with me doesn't mean make me you any more right. Except for the fact that you have a demonstrable lack of understanding of the issue.
I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:21:00 -
[1221] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:simply observing
Hi Xenuria. |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:22:00 -
[1222] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:
I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making
Even Shadoo has chimed in agreeing that Titans are ******. |

Zonja Vjeter
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:23:00 -
[1223] - Quote
well done CCP for doing what the GOONS wanted how u just handed EVE over to GOONS i call this total BS...... |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:23:00 -
[1224] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making I understand that a bunch of pubbies are opposed to any changes to hulls that they will never afford "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:23:00 -
[1225] - Quote
Zonja Vjeter wrote:well done CCP for doing what the GOONS wanted how u just handed EVE over to GOONS i call this total BS......
you're only making us stronger~~ "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:24:00 -
[1226] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making I understand that a bunch of pubbies are opposed to any changes to hulls that they will never afford Showing your ignorance once again? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:25:00 -
[1227] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Showing your ignorance once again?
why are you worried about ships you'll never have??? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:25:00 -
[1228] - Quote
Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:
I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making
Even Shadoo has chimed in agreeing that Titans are ******.
Still doesn't change the fact that this change is unjustified. |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:26:00 -
[1229] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making I understand that a bunch of pubbies are opposed to any changes to hulls that they will never afford Showing your ignorance once again?
All I see is a NPC Corp Alt, perhaps if you posted with your main we could tailor the insults more to your liking. |

Tobruk
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:26:00 -
[1230] - Quote
Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:
I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making
Even Shadoo has chimed in agreeing that Titans are ******.
Shadoo is an idiot who will say anything to gain anti-pl brownie points.
The truth is Instead of encouraging Capital and Super-capital expansion, your CEO decided to fly battleships. Instead of fixing his mistake he decided it would be easier to game the system.
guess he was right. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:27:00 -
[1231] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:
I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making
Even Shadoo has chimed in agreeing that Titans are ******. Still doesn't change the fact that this change is unjustified.
yes you are clearly much more knowledgeable about titans than Shadoo, one of the best FCs in the game (if not the best) "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:27:00 -
[1232] - Quote
Triskian wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making I understand that a bunch of pubbies are opposed to any changes to hulls that they will never afford Showing your ignorance once again? All I see is a NPC Corp Alt, perhaps if you posted with your main we could tailor the insults more to your liking.
All I see is another drone ready to spew the same non sense all the other bees are spoon fed. Sorry, but some of us are smarter than that. |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:28:00 -
[1233] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:
I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making
Even Shadoo has chimed in agreeing that Titans are ******. Still doesn't change the fact that this change is unjustified. yes you are clearly much more knowledgeable about titans than Shadoo, one of the best FCs in the game (if not the best)
I always knew DBRB and Shadoo were the same person. |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:28:00 -
[1234] - Quote
Tobruk wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:
I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making
Even Shadoo has chimed in agreeing that Titans are ******. Shadoo is an idiot who will say anything to gain anti-pl brownie points. The truth is Instead of encouraging Capital and Super-capital expansion, your CEO decided to fly battleships. Instead of fixing his mistake he decided it would be easier to game the system. guess he was right.
Q: How ******* stupid would EVE be if progression was linear and Supercaps > caps > subcaps?
A: Pretty ******* stupid. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:28:00 -
[1235] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:
I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making
Even Shadoo has chimed in agreeing that Titans are ******. Still doesn't change the fact that this change is unjustified. yes you are clearly much more knowledgeable about titans than Shadoo, one of the best FCs in the game (if not the best)
The guy who cries like a man child over vent when things go hay wire? |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:28:00 -
[1236] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Triskian wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making I understand that a bunch of pubbies are opposed to any changes to hulls that they will never afford Showing your ignorance once again? All I see is a NPC Corp Alt, perhaps if you posted with your main we could tailor the insults more to your liking. All I see is another drone ready to spew the same non sense all the other bees are spoon fed. Sorry, but some of us are smarter than that.
Wom. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:29:00 -
[1237] - Quote
Tobruk wrote:Shadoo is an idiot who will say anything to gain anti-pl brownie points.
The truth is Instead of encouraging Capital and Super-capital expansion, your CEO decided to fly battleships. Instead of fixing his mistake he decided it would be easier to game the system.
guess he was right.
looks like your spies suck because Mittens has encouraged goons to get into supercaps
shame that we can't compete with three alliances that scoop up literally every warm body that can fly a supercap (i lawled at the dudes who lost supercap clones with +3s and no hardwirings) "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:30:00 -
[1238] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:The guy who cries like a man child over vent when things go hay wire?
I'm sure you're a much more talented FC than he is but you should probably post with your main so we can believe you!!!! "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:31:00 -
[1239] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:
I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making
Even Shadoo has chimed in agreeing that Titans are ******. Still doesn't change the fact that this change is unjustified. yes you are clearly much more knowledgeable about titans than Shadoo, one of the best FCs in the game (if not the best) The guy who cries like a man child over vent when things go hay wire?
wololol |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:31:00 -
[1240] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:
I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making
Even Shadoo has chimed in agreeing that Titans are ******. Still doesn't change the fact that this change is unjustified. yes you are clearly much more knowledgeable about titans than Shadoo, one of the best FCs in the game (if not the best) The guy who cries like a man child over vent when things go hay wire?
Now I get it. You're posting with an NPC alt to avoid getting kicked from PL from dissenting with your leadership.
Grow Some Balls. |

Tobruk
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:32:00 -
[1241] - Quote
Takashi Kaeda wrote:
Q: How ******* stupid would EVE be if progression was linear and Supercaps > caps > subcaps?
A: Pretty ******* stupid.
Right now its just :
800>600>400>200>100>20
|

SuperBeastie
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
56
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:34:00 -
[1242] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:
I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making
Even Shadoo has chimed in agreeing that Titans are ******. Still doesn't change the fact that this change is unjustified. yes you are clearly much more knowledgeable about titans than Shadoo, one of the best FCs in the game (if not the best)
Shadoo owns a leviathan. anyone who owns a levi has no creditability when speaking about super caps. Also when he started hanging out on test jabber he chilled with the pony people. |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:35:00 -
[1243] - Quote
Tobruk wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:
Q: How ******* stupid would EVE be if progression was linear and Supercaps > caps > subcaps?
A: Pretty ******* stupid.
Right now its just : 800>600>400>200>100>20
How would that be any different than once everyone gets into Titans because there is no reason to fly anything else? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:36:00 -
[1244] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:
I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making
Even Shadoo has chimed in agreeing that Titans are ******. Still doesn't change the fact that this change is unjustified. yes you are clearly much more knowledgeable about titans than Shadoo, one of the best FCs in the game (if not the best) Shadoo owns a leviathan he has not creditability when speaking about super caps.
Shadoo's leviathan dates back to the days of AoE doomsdays when nobody tanked kinetic damage and they'd get 0wnzoned
you got a titan a week ago or whatever and you're whining about spending isk on a hull you knew was going to be nerfed (( "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:36:00 -
[1245] - Quote
Posting with mains doesn't give anyone more credibility. Especially in a video game. I prefer to keep my "main" out of these activities because I know the kind of sociopaths that play this game. Never mind the fact my peers may think I might be giving them a bad rep. Keep assuming things though. It brings a smile to my face when you guys are wrong. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:36:00 -
[1246] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Posting with mains doesn't give anyone more credibility. Especially in a video game. I prefer to keep my "main" out of these activities because I know the kind of sociopaths that play this game. Never mind the fact my peers may think I might be giving them a bad rep. Keep assuming things though. It brings a smile to my face when you guys are wrong.
"I make bad posts, I don't want my scrubcorp to realize that I'm an awful poster" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Takashi Kaeda
Perkone Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:36:00 -
[1247] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:Surge Roth wrote:
I understand that a bunch of bees want to change the game to their favor in the name of balance when nothing was broken to begin with except for their poor decision making
Even Shadoo has chimed in agreeing that Titans are ******. Still doesn't change the fact that this change is unjustified. yes you are clearly much more knowledgeable about titans than Shadoo, one of the best FCs in the game (if not the best) Shadoo owns a leviathan he has not creditability when speaking about super caps. Also when he started hanging out on test jabber he chilled with the pony people.
Which titan do you own and why haven't you joined ncdot yet?
|

SuperBeastie
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
56
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:38:00 -
[1248] - Quote
Andski wrote:SuperBeastie wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Takashi Kaeda wrote:
Even Shadoo has chimed in agreeing that Titans are ******.
Still doesn't change the fact that this change is unjustified. yes you are clearly much more knowledgeable about titans than Shadoo, one of the best FCs in the game (if not the best) Shadoo owns a leviathan he has not creditability when speaking about super caps. Shadoo's leviathan dates back to the days of AoE doomsdays when nobody tanked kinetic damage and they'd get 0wnzoned you got a titan a week ago or whatever and you're whining about spending isk on a hull you knew was going to be nerfed ((
m8 i'm aware that the only reason he still has a levi is because its one of the oldest in the game. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:38:00 -
[1249] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Posting with mains doesn't give anyone more credibility. Especially in a video game. I prefer to keep my "main" out of these activities because I know the kind of sociopaths that play this game. Never mind the fact my peers may think I might be giving them a bad rep. Keep assuming things though. It brings a smile to my face when you guys are wrong. "I make bad posts, I don't want my scrubcorp to realize that I'm an awful poster"
I'm not a bad poster. Talking about controversial topics always makes people uncomfortable. Fortunately for you, you don't have to worry about such things because goonswarm is filled with scrublord hooligans who don't care about anything. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:40:00 -
[1250] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Posting with mains doesn't give anyone more credibility. Especially in a video game. I prefer to keep my "main" out of these activities because I know the kind of sociopaths that play this game. Never mind the fact my peers may think I might be giving them a bad rep. Keep assuming things though. It brings a smile to my face when you guys are wrong. "I make bad posts, I don't want my scrubcorp to realize that I'm an awful poster" I'm not a bad poster. Talking about controversial topics always makes people uncomfortable. Fortunately for you, you don't have to worry about such things because goonswarm is filled with scrublord hooligans who don't care about anything.
did you get recruitment scammed or did your mackinaw get blown up?
j/w "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:40:00 -
[1251] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Posting with mains doesn't give anyone more credibility. Especially in a video game. I prefer to keep my "main" out of these activities because I know the kind of sociopaths that play this game. Never mind the fact my peers may think I might be giving them a bad rep. Keep assuming things though. It brings a smile to my face when you guys are wrong. "I make bad posts, I don't want my scrubcorp to realize that I'm an awful poster" I'm not a bad poster. Talking about controversial topics always makes people uncomfortable. Fortunately for you, you don't have to worry about such things because goonswarm is filled with scrublord hooligans who don't care about anything. did you get recruitment scammed or did your mackinaw get blown up? j/w
Want to know the truth? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:41:00 -
[1252] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Want to know the truth?
Enlighten me. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
70
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:42:00 -
[1253] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Want to know the truth? Enlighten me.
He's penif's gay lover. |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:42:00 -
[1254] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Want to know the truth? Enlighten me.
I'll only tell you, in game personally, if you can show me you're a trust worthy person. The only way I can think of is by sending me 900 million isk. I'll give it back. I promise! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:44:00 -
[1255] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Want to know the truth? Enlighten me. I'll only tell you, in game personally, if you can show me you're a trust worthy person. The only way I can think of is by sending me 900 million isk. I'll give it back. I promise!
Send me 450m and I'll double it. No troll. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:45:00 -
[1256] - Quote
Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Want to know the truth? Enlighten me. I'll only tell you, in game personally, if you can show me you're a trust worthy person. The only way I can think of is by sending me 900 million isk. I'll give it back. I promise! Send me 450m and I'll double it. No troll.
Only if you send me 900 mil first to prove you're not lying |

Thea Siirian
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:45:00 -
[1257] - Quote
Sry but 2 titans, 1 rifter was a bit much for me... but I am crazy. Every nerf towards 'endgame gear' doesn't really hurt the super-big. It does hurt the 'trying to be big'. But in this case... I would like to have seen an intelligent way to deal with the issue, and yes IMO there is an issue. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2784
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:46:00 -
[1258] - Quote
I'll pay you 1.8b through The Mittani then "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:48:00 -
[1259] - Quote
Andski wrote:I'll pay you 1.8b through The Mittani then
I'll be waiting |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
70
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:52:00 -
[1260] - Quote
This just in: I owned The Mittani in elite jabber pvp. |

Roffle Lawler
Elitist Oops
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 04:06:00 -
[1261] - Quote
Andski wrote:PL 2012: whines about hardly being able to muster 200 dudes, brags about having 400 supers
 
i think this sums up this thread well. |

Truce Billis
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 04:07:00 -
[1262] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:Andski wrote:Surge Roth wrote:Posting with mains doesn't give anyone more credibility. Especially in a video game. I prefer to keep my "main" out of these activities because I know the kind of sociopaths that play this game. Never mind the fact my peers may think I might be giving them a bad rep. Keep assuming things though. It brings a smile to my face when you guys are wrong. "I make bad posts, I don't want my scrubcorp to realize that I'm an awful poster" I'm not a bad poster. Talking about controversial topics always makes people uncomfortable. Fortunately for you, you don't have to worry about such things because goonswarm is filled with scrublord hooligans who don't care about anything. lol |

Courthouse
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
178
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 04:12:00 -
[1263] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:[I'm not a bad poster.
Remember the first episode of Sherlock where the cops are holding the news conference and they state a fact and all the press guys in the room get a text at the same time that says "wrong".
Imagine that's happening right now because that's what the rest of us are seeing. |

Anela Cistine
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
130
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 04:13:00 -
[1264] - Quote
Tithi wrote:
Honestly I think it is great what you guys do for the game. I am totally in agreement with 99% of the Goons in this thread, I just think that we should be careful that we don't change Eve from "50 Supercaps Online" to "1200 Maelstroms Online." CCP's goal seems to be for alliances to have to field balanced heterogeneous fleets with no single class of ship being the IWIN button. I love this and I hope they someday get it right.
My original question was, "What capital ship is good for killing subcaps?" Two people answered, one said "bring subcaps" and the other just called me an idiot for being in RvB. Neither of these really answers my question. I may be alone here, but I think there should be a capitol ship designed for fighting downward so that we don't have to counter X maelstroms with X+1 maelstroms and we're back where we started.
You guys see what I mean, though, right? I think both sides when they aren't slinging internet insults at each other have some decent points and we should actually have a discussion instead of just calling everyone "pubbies" and ****.
Yeah, I can see that.
Something to remember is that in 0.0 shooting structures is both vital and horrible. So horrible. Caps are the best thing ever for shooting (or repping) structures. Shooting structures, even just towers, with drakes is terrible. Maelstroms are not much better. The only subcaps not completely terrible for structure shoots are lasers with t1 crystals, so you can just press f1 and then tab out until the FC shouts out new orders, but allowing you to ignore the game you are supposedly playing isn't really a point in their favour.
A handful of supercarriers can defang a death star in a few minutes. A fairly small group of dreads can kill most structures in a single seige cycle. Likewise, trying to repair your own tower is infinitely faster with carriers than with a similar number of logistics ships. Without capitals the Dominion sov system would be completely unplayable rather than merely awful.
Aside from structures, dreads ought to be able to hurt BS and huge-sig drakes. They shouldn't hurt smaller subcaps, but it would be completely reasonable for them to be a BS counter. I'm not sure if they can do this right now, I don't fly them and I haven't seen them on the field shooting anything but undefended structures in a long time. Carriers can certainly contribute to subcap battle by assigning fighters, I love it when carriers assign fighters. They aren't solo pwnmobiles, but carriers have a nice combination of skills that makes them really useful in all sorts of situations. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2788
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 04:14:00 -
[1265] - Quote
this thread has been my plaything for 64 pages
alas, friends, i cannot continue as I must catch some sleep
(dance, puppets) "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Roffle Lawler
Elitist Oops
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 04:25:00 -
[1266] - Quote
Roffle Lawler wrote:Andski wrote:PL 2012: whines about hardly being able to muster 200 dudes, brags about having 400 supers   i think this sums up this thread well.
And i ****** up the snipe too, shameful. It has taken me literally all day to get ahead of this thread and, quite frankly, I want my time back. |

Spurty
D00M. Northern Coalition.
225
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 04:47:00 -
[1267] - Quote
Titans no longer FOTM shocker.
New FOTM, bring x 3 to x 5 the number of ships to every fight.
Can we please get hit points on ALL ships 1/2'ed or even dropped to 1/3 now (don't change anything else!)
Feel free to balance this by increasing structure hitpoints.
Happy days :-0 ---- CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2811
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 04:50:00 -
[1268] - Quote
Spurty wrote:Titans no longer FOTM shocker.
New FOTM, bring x 3 to x 5 the number of ships to every fight.
Can we please get hit points on ALL ships 1/2'ed or even dropped to 1/3 now (don't change anything else!)
Feel free to balance this by increasing structure hitpoints.
Happy days :-0
nah the new FOTM is "join ncdot and moan about your titan being nerfed"
i mean you wouldn't have to worry about that, you're definitely not an FOTM chaser, right? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Powers Sa
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 04:50:00 -
[1269] - Quote
Ruthless Erection wrote:Andski wrote:Loving this. You would because you're a ****** Goon. Your sole purpose in EVE is to destroy it CCP, this is a terrible idea. There are so many other ways you could balance titans But if you insist upon this ******** "balancing", bring AoE Doomsday back then We have TiDi, AoE doomsday won't be nearly as bad as it used to be But I'm beginning to think that CCP no longer runs this game, and that Goons dictate what they want to happen, and it does. -A- cried about Doomsdaying of sub-capitals, BAM. No more doomsdaying sub-caps. Goons are crying about titans, and their "OPness", BAM. Titans get "nerfed" First observation, Goons have more titans/supers than all of Raiden, PL, NCdot, and other alliances, put together. They CHOOSE to not use them, so why must you punish those who do use them You've removed drone bays, you've removed sub-cap doomsday'ing, and now you're removing their ONLY line of defense. Think hard before you reply CCP, we're beginning to think you're incompetent in developing & balancing this game further. sup riverini |

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 04:51:00 -
[1270] - Quote
holy F*ck.Im sick of hearing about this mythical number 1200.BR or it didn't happen. Especially 1200 maelstroms. The cfc may pull 1200 for a mad all out HD fleet,or possibly the opening night of an invasion that also happened to coincide with a holiday.Other than That I call bullsh*t.So again battle reports or it isn't happening! |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1853
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 04:53:00 -
[1271] - Quote
Powers Sa wrote:Ruthless Erection wrote:Andski wrote:Loving this. You would because you're a ****** Goon. Your sole purpose in EVE is to destroy it CCP, this is a terrible idea. There are so many other ways you could balance titans But if you insist upon this ******** "balancing", bring AoE Doomsday back then We have TiDi, AoE doomsday won't be nearly as bad as it used to be But I'm beginning to think that CCP no longer runs this game, and that Goons dictate what they want to happen, and it does. -A- cried about Doomsdaying of sub-capitals, BAM. No more doomsdaying sub-caps. Goons are crying about titans, and their "OPness", BAM. Titans get "nerfed" First observation, Goons have more titans/supers than all of Raiden, PL, NCdot, and other alliances, put together. They CHOOSE to not use them, so why must you punish those who do use them You've removed drone bays, you've removed sub-cap doomsday'ing, and now you're removing their ONLY line of defense. Think hard before you reply CCP, we're beginning to think you're incompetent in developing & balancing this game further. sup riverini
That post was way, way too well written to be from Riverini.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1853
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 04:55:00 -
[1272] - Quote
BrokenBC wrote:holy F*ck.Im sick of hearing about this mythical number 1200.BR or it didn't happen. Especially 1200 maelstroms. The cfc may pull 1200 for a mad all out HD fleet,or possibly the opening night of an invasion that also happened to coincide with a holiday.Other than That I call bullsh*t.So again battle reports or it isn't happening!
I've been in Goonwaffe for two years. I can count on one hand the times we've (the CFC) had 1200 people in subcaps. People talking like we do that on a regular basis are dumb. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Aloe Cloveris
The Greater Goon Clockwork Pineapple
86
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 04:55:00 -
[1273] - Quote
Oh man all these posts ... it's like blowjobs but for my retinas |

Sir Marksalot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:00:00 -
[1274] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Powers Sa wrote:Ruthless Erection wrote:Andski wrote:Loving this. You would because you're a ****** Goon. Your sole purpose in EVE is to destroy it CCP, this is a terrible idea. There are so many other ways you could balance titans But if you insist upon this ******** "balancing", bring AoE Doomsday back then We have TiDi, AoE doomsday won't be nearly as bad as it used to be But I'm beginning to think that CCP no longer runs this game, and that Goons dictate what they want to happen, and it does. -A- cried about Doomsdaying of sub-capitals, BAM. No more doomsdaying sub-caps. Goons are crying about titans, and their "OPness", BAM. Titans get "nerfed" First observation, Goons have more titans/supers than all of Raiden, PL, NCdot, and other alliances, put together. They CHOOSE to not use them, so why must you punish those who do use them You've removed drone bays, you've removed sub-cap doomsday'ing, and now you're removing their ONLY line of defense. Think hard before you reply CCP, we're beginning to think you're incompetent in developing & balancing this game further. sup riverini That post was way, way too well written to be from Riverini.
maybe some other absolutely terrible csm wannabie |

Crystal Wolf
Invision Hosting Invision Group
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:01:00 -
[1275] - Quote
I think the opportunity to even post intelligent stuff in this thread is gone but here goes
With regards to the nerf i agree with the tracking nerf something did need to be done there even if it was just a temporary measure. However the targeting nerf is ridiculous
As a person who has been on both sides of a titan fight i can understand why people are whining however this nerf appears to be incredibly short sighted
CCP have thought about how to balance titans to what they believe is an acceptable level but they have failed to take into account how this affects the game as a whole. Titans do need a clearly defined role however CCP have just nuked titans because they claim they don't have the resources to do an overhaul so they slapped something together and just put it in a forum post
Titans will loose their place as an endgame piece of equipment because dreads will be just as effective and cheaper to field what alliance is going to waste time expanding their titan fleet when all they become is a massive jump bridge with a DD
For those who say titan pilots are complaining too much you have to understand that titans don't just grow on trees for some people. For those who aren't in larger alliances or those who don't have tech money it actually does take time and effort to build a titan
From a political standpoint CCP are effectively changing the balance of power towards alliances who can just field hundreds of subcaps. The alliances who rely on supers to augment their fleet strength have been forgotten and just pushed aside. This change definitely needs to go back to the drawing board and CCP need to take factors like this into account. Invision Hosting - Providing Quality service solutions Forum Topic: Here |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
225
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:04:00 -
[1276] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:BrokenBC wrote:holy F*ck.Im sick of hearing about this mythical number 1200.BR or it didn't happen. Especially 1200 maelstroms. The cfc may pull 1200 for a mad all out HD fleet,or possibly the opening night of an invasion that also happened to coincide with a holiday.Other than That I call bullsh*t.So again battle reports or it isn't happening! I've been in Goonwaffe for two years. I can count on one hand the times we've (the CFC) had 1200 people in subcaps. People talking like we do that on a regular basis are dumb. No, I think it was the time we had like 300 people and we died and reshipped 3 times so we lost like 1200 ships, if it was maels, it would be like the start of the recent war before we started drakes?
I think the idea of people taking out their fourth ship and jumping in to probably die is offensive to more k/d or isk efficiency minded people. Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:08:00 -
[1277] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Machine Delta wrote: You might not be keen on the idea of using more than one ship type in a fleet but there are things called covops, interdictors, and a thing called probing. If you use those with 200 bombers then yeah you could whittle down a 1200 man fleet or marginalize it from its strategic objectives fairly easily. It's painful to see you try so hard here. You should really step away from the keyboard before you admit to wanting to RMT your titan on these forums in addition to the ones you already have cried on.
1) Ive said my titan will be fine and will function the same as it does now, with a slight delay before the damage hits. Can you identify me saying that I'm RMTing MY titan? 2) If you had 200 bombers, and were facing 1200 guys, how do you propose you talk those 1200 guys into being somewhere bombable??
then why all the cryng? the titan will still be you personal blap machine and all is well. |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:12:00 -
[1278] - Quote
Surge Roth wrote:I'm not posting like an autistic manchild. I'm simply observing how you guys can claim that such a terrible change is 'balance' while stlying all over you.
"Pay no attention to Surge Roth, he is an idiot. We trained him wrong as a joke." |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:12:00 -
[1279] - Quote
Aloe Cloveris wrote:Oh man all these posts ... it's like blowjobs but for my retinas
Awww hell. Who invited Groon to the party? That guy always double-dips and eats all the little weiners. |

Clyde ElectraGlide
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
60
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:16:00 -
[1280] - Quote
So...
Titan's aren't able to blap subcaps anymore, relieving the need for people to get the notion that you need to have a character skilled in some kind of capship combat to help your alliance in null-sec fights. Thereby helping and encouraging newbies to get out into nullsec and actually make a difference despite the fact that a drake or a maelstrom may be the best ship they can fly at that point.
I don't see a problem with this change. It helps newbies get out there and make a difference. How is that a bad thing? Fix incursions today! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=60460 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2821
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:16:00 -
[1281] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:MY titan
"WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:20:00 -
[1282] - Quote
Clyde ElectraGlide wrote:So...
Titan's aren't able to blap subcaps anymore, relieving the need for people to get the notion that you need to have a character skilled in some kind of capship combat to help your alliance in null-sec fights. Thereby helping and encouraging newbies to get out into nullsec and actually make a difference despite the fact that a drake or a maelstrom may be the best ship they can fly at that point.
I don't see a problem with this change. It helps newbies get out there and make a difference. How is that a bad thing?
In a world where 70m skillpoints aren't required, anyone can shoot a goon. I think I'll go shoot some right now.
|

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
74
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:21:00 -
[1283] - Quote
Kerensky White wrote:Clyde ElectraGlide wrote:So...
Titan's aren't able to blap subcaps anymore, relieving the need for people to get the notion that you need to have a character skilled in some kind of capship combat to help your alliance in null-sec fights. Thereby helping and encouraging newbies to get out into nullsec and actually make a difference despite the fact that a drake or a maelstrom may be the best ship they can fly at that point.
I don't see a problem with this change. It helps newbies get out there and make a difference. How is that a bad thing? In a world where 70m skillpoints aren't required, anyone can shoot a goon. I think I'll go shoot some right now.
I shall join you in this quest to shoot goons. |

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:22:00 -
[1284] - Quote
Triskian wrote:Kerensky White wrote:Clyde ElectraGlide wrote:So...
Titan's aren't able to blap subcaps anymore, relieving the need for people to get the notion that you need to have a character skilled in some kind of capship combat to help your alliance in null-sec fights. Thereby helping and encouraging newbies to get out into nullsec and actually make a difference despite the fact that a drake or a maelstrom may be the best ship they can fly at that point.
I don't see a problem with this change. It helps newbies get out there and make a difference. How is that a bad thing? In a world where 70m skillpoints aren't required, anyone can shoot a goon. I think I'll go shoot some right now. I shall join you in this quest to shoot goons.
FA shot first! |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:29:00 -
[1285] - Quote
I see a quick solution :
All should ally against goons and wipe them off Eve map. We have 1 month, maybe less. Titan blob them until we hear mittani and his sheep crying for mercy. |

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:34:00 -
[1286] - Quote
Acwron wrote:sheep crying for mercy.
Is that you outside my bedroom door? 
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2821
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:35:00 -
[1287] - Quote
Acwron wrote:I see a quick solution :
All should ally against goons and wipe them off Eve map. We have 1 month, maybe less. Titan blob them until we hear mittani and his sheep crying for mercy.
I think you're going to have your hands full soon heh "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
582
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:39:00 -
[1288] - Quote
Christ this thread is still going? It is the same 3-5 **** posters for the last 20 pages. CCP please moderate this thread already.
|

Hotaru Yamato
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
24
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:39:00 -
[1289] - Quote
I like these changes. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2824
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:40:00 -
[1290] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Christ this thread is still going? It is the same 3-5 **** posters for the last 20 pages. CCP please moderate this thread already.
Why? They'll remove a lot of the titan pilot tears which deserve preservation. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:43:00 -
[1291] - Quote
Andski wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Christ this thread is still going? It is the same 3-5 **** posters for the last 20 pages. CCP please moderate this thread already. Why? They'll remove a lot of the titan pilot tears which deserve preservation.
I seriously hope someone has archived this thread. |

Roffle Lawler
Elitist Oops
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:48:00 -
[1292] - Quote
If someone is really mad about these changes, imma looking for an Erebus. PM or evemail me. |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:48:00 -
[1293] - Quote
Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:I see a quick solution :
All should ally against goons and wipe them off Eve map. We have 1 month, maybe less. Titan blob them until we hear mittani and his sheep crying for mercy. I think you're going to have your hands full soon heh have fun losing nyxes to roaming gangs scrub huehuehue
I wonder if you play the game or read forums all day. My wild guess is that you only read forums. Fine by me. Then let us play the game and drop dead. We don't need you anyway. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2825
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:52:00 -
[1294] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:I see a quick solution :
All should ally against goons and wipe them off Eve map. We have 1 month, maybe less. Titan blob them until we hear mittani and his sheep crying for mercy. I think you're going to have your hands full soon heh have fun losing nyxes to roaming gangs scrub huehuehue I wonder if you play the game or read forums all day. My wild guess is that you only read forums. Fine by me. Then let us play the game and drop dead. We don't need you anyway.
dual monitors son
maybe you'd have them if you didn't spend all your $$ ebaying supers "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
582
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:56:00 -
[1295] - Quote
Just did a little experiment. I blocked Andski (no offense bro, but you have been spurging all day in this thread) and all the pages in this thread load a hundred times faster with only having to scroll a little bit to read all the posts. lol
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2826
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:00:00 -
[1296] - Quote
Turns out that failheap badposters see owning everyone like a boss as "spurging" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Powers Sa
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:01:00 -
[1297] - Quote
Crystal Wolf wrote: From a political standpoint CCP are effectively changing the balance of power towards alliances who can just field hundreds of subcaps. The alliances who rely on supers to augment their fleet strength have been forgotten and just pushed aside. This change definitely needs to go back to the drawing board and CCP need to take factors like this into account.
The CFC has roughly 28180 characters ( source ). We are able to organize our opinions and express them through CSM votes. The CFC has a generally organized set of opinions due to our culture. We are able to mobilize effectively in the CSM.
If I'm just eyeballing the dotlan numbers on the 0.0 sov holding (therefore titan-having) player base, then the CFC has the majority opinion when it comes to how Titan roles should work. Who do you think CCP is going to listen to? Surely not you unorganized crying publords. |

Roffle Lawler
Elitist Oops
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:05:00 -
[1298] - Quote
Powers Sa wrote:Crystal Wolf wrote: From a political standpoint CCP are effectively changing the balance of power towards alliances who can just field hundreds of subcaps. The alliances who rely on supers to augment their fleet strength have been forgotten and just pushed aside. This change definitely needs to go back to the drawing board and CCP need to take factors like this into account.
The CFC has roughly 28180 characters ( source ). We are able to organize our opinions and express them through CSM votes. The CFC has a generally organized set of opinions due to our culture. We are able to mobilize effectively in the CSM. If I'm just eyeballing the dotlan numbers on the 0.0 sov holding (therefore titan-having) player base, then the CFC has the majority opinion when it comes to how Titan roles should work. Who do you think CCP is going to listen to? Surely not you unorganized crying publords.
What is the effective counter to 28180 votes? How do we keep Goonies from controlling the CSM, running the DEVs and ruining our game?
Why does this game have to be about numbers? How do we get rid of the Goons IWIN button when they can just out-vote everyone? |

Roffle Lawler
Elitist Oops
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:08:00 -
[1299] - Quote
Andski wrote:Turns out that failheap badposters see owning everyone like a boss as "spurging"
Maybe if you spent more time playing eve and less time shittrolling on eve-o you'd realize just how broken it is that CFC can bring more people in a more organized and better fleet doctrine and now a few guys in Titans can't blapblap them off the field. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2827
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:09:00 -
[1300] - Quote
Roffle Lawler wrote:Andski wrote:Turns out that failheap badposters see owning everyone like a boss as "spurging" Maybe if you spent more time playing eve and less time shittrolling on eve-o you'd realize just how broken it is that CFC can bring more people in a more organized and better fleet doctrine and now a few guys in Titans can't blapblap them off the field.
What can I say? The metagame keeps me subbed ;p "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

FT Diomedes
Factio Paucorum
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:12:00 -
[1301] - Quote
Roffle Lawler wrote:
What is the effective counter to 28180 votes? How do we keep Goonies from controlling the CSM, running the DEVs and ruining our game?
Why does this game have to be about numbers? How do we get rid of the Goons IWIN button when they can just out-vote everyone?
I for one, welcome our new Goon overlords...
It's called a sandbox. Apparently, our sandbox is just as dysfunctional as the United States' political system. At least when we get frustrated in Eve we can legally shoot each other. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:13:00 -
[1302] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Anela Cistine wrote: There is nothing stopping alliances like PL and Raiden. from simply recruiting the low-skill backbone of a subcap fleet tomorrow. EXACTLY, thank you, numbers are all that matter now. Numbers Online, the internet spaceship game.
"Guys, guys, they are blobbers who care about numbers only"
"Yeah, you can easily kill few titans, by dropping 150 dreads on 25 titans. Well, drop 300 dreads if there are 20 supercarriers with titans."
"******* blobbers, only numbers matter to them."
|

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:14:00 -
[1303] - Quote
Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:I see a quick solution :
All should ally against goons and wipe them off Eve map. We have 1 month, maybe less. Titan blob them until we hear mittani and his sheep crying for mercy. I think you're going to have your hands full soon heh have fun losing nyxes to roaming gangs scrub huehuehue I wonder if you play the game or read forums all day. My wild guess is that you only read forums. Fine by me. Then let us play the game and drop dead. We don't need you anyway. dual monitors son maybe you'd have them if you didn't spend all your $$ ebaying supers
I got 3 monitors...GOTCHA ! LOL
it's a SANDBOX, no rules in EVE ! Scams all around ! But hey, wait ! What's that big thing in front of me? ****, killed me ! What is it? Titan? Freaking hell, now I want rules ! I don't want that big thing to kill me ! I don't care if he trained for years and spend alot of isk to fly it ! I want it nerfed now ! TEARS, TEARS and MORE TEARS !
Switch to tetris noob, no one will kill you there. Hopefully. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2829
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:16:00 -
[1304] - Quote
Acwron wrote:I got 3 monitors...GOTCHA ! LOL
it's a SANDBOX, no rules in EVE ! Scams all around ! But hey, wait ! What's that big thing in front of me? ****, killed me ! What is it? Titan? Freaking hell, now I want rules ! I don't want that big thing to kill me ! I don't care if he trained for years and spend alot of isk to fly it ! I want it nerfed now ! TEARS, TEARS and MORE TEARS !
Switch to tetris noob, no one will kill you there. Hopefully.
Coming from the nub who got scammed by the CEO of Goonswarm and proceeded to petition it and create a whine thread to get laughed at in, this is hilarious. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Roffle Lawler
Elitist Oops
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:19:00 -
[1305] - Quote
Acwron wrote:
I got 3 monitors...GOTCHA ! LOL
it's a SANDBOX, no rules in EVE ! Scams all around ! But hey, wait ! What's that big thing in front of me? ****, killed me ! What is it? Titan? Freaking hell, now I want rules ! I don't want that big thing to kill me ! I don't care if he trained for years and spend alot of isk to fly it ! I want it nerfed now ! TEARS, TEARS and MORE TEARS !
Switch to tetris noob, no one will kill you there. Hopefully.
Again with the numbers, how am I supposed to compete with someone who has three monitors? Buy 4? |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:19:00 -
[1306] - Quote
Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:I got 3 monitors...GOTCHA ! LOL
it's a SANDBOX, no rules in EVE ! Scams all around ! But hey, wait ! What's that big thing in front of me? ****, killed me ! What is it? Titan? Freaking hell, now I want rules ! I don't want that big thing to kill me ! I don't care if he trained for years and spend alot of isk to fly it ! I want it nerfed now ! TEARS, TEARS and MORE TEARS !
Switch to tetris noob, no one will kill you there. Hopefully. Coming from the nub who got scammed by the CEO of Goonswarm and proceeded to petition it and create a whine thread to get laughed at in, this is hilarious.
Funny but the bad guy ain't me. Guess who is then. |

Johan Krieger
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
107
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:22:00 -
[1307] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:I got 3 monitors...GOTCHA ! LOL
it's a SANDBOX, no rules in EVE ! Scams all around ! But hey, wait ! What's that big thing in front of me? ****, killed me ! What is it? Titan? Freaking hell, now I want rules ! I don't want that big thing to kill me ! I don't care if he trained for years and spend alot of isk to fly it ! I want it nerfed now ! TEARS, TEARS and MORE TEARS !
Switch to tetris noob, no one will kill you there. Hopefully. Coming from the nub who got scammed by the CEO of Goonswarm and proceeded to petition it and create a whine thread to get laughed at in, this is hilarious. Funny but the bad guy ain't me. Guess who is then.
I don't see where him being the bad guy makes you any less of a babby. |

Roffle Lawler
Elitist Oops
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:22:00 -
[1308] - Quote
"Bad guy"? Or "Idiot".
Think about it for a bit. |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
77
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:22:00 -
[1309] - Quote
I have 3 1600p monitors. Dell U3011s. :smuggo: |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2834
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:29:00 -
[1310] - Quote
Triskian wrote:I have 3 1600p monitors. Dell U3011s. :smuggo:
~the one percent~ "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:31:00 -
[1311] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:I got 3 monitors...GOTCHA ! LOL
it's a SANDBOX, no rules in EVE ! Scams all around ! But hey, wait ! What's that big thing in front of me? ****, killed me ! What is it? Titan? Freaking hell, now I want rules ! I don't want that big thing to kill me ! I don't care if he trained for years and spend alot of isk to fly it ! I want it nerfed now ! TEARS, TEARS and MORE TEARS !
Switch to tetris noob, no one will kill you there. Hopefully. Coming from the nub who got scammed by the CEO of Goonswarm and proceeded to petition it and create a whine thread to get laughed at in, this is hilarious. Funny but the bad guy ain't me. Guess who is then.
It's you, you really are bad. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2834
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:32:00 -
[1312] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Andski wrote:Acwron wrote:I got 3 monitors...GOTCHA ! LOL
it's a SANDBOX, no rules in EVE ! Scams all around ! But hey, wait ! What's that big thing in front of me? ****, killed me ! What is it? Titan? Freaking hell, now I want rules ! I don't want that big thing to kill me ! I don't care if he trained for years and spend alot of isk to fly it ! I want it nerfed now ! TEARS, TEARS and MORE TEARS !
Switch to tetris noob, no one will kill you there. Hopefully. Coming from the nub who got scammed by the CEO of Goonswarm and proceeded to petition it and create a whine thread to get laughed at in, this is hilarious. Funny but the bad guy ain't me. Guess who is then.
So I take it that the scammer logged into your account and ejected from the Nyx? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Pudgy McFudge
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:38:00 -
[1313] - Quote
Look how gay I am. |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:43:00 -
[1314] - Quote
Pudgy McFudge wrote:Look how gay I am.
Gayswarm. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2837
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:44:00 -
[1315] - Quote
Hey Acwron I guess I'm giving you a bit of a hard time since it looks like you actually use your Ragnarok to support subcaps rather than in the middle of the nonexistent Vera Cruz titan blob, but you should blame the guys who used their titans in the most risk-averse fashion imaginable rather than the players who advocated for reductions in their capabilities.
also stop blaming the mittani because you fell for a scam, i'm sure you've botted that isk right back up anyway "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Truce Billis
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:45:00 -
[1316] - Quote
Pudgy McFudge wrote:Look how gay I am. I too am gay. |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:47:00 -
[1317] - Quote
Andski wrote:Hey Acwron I guess I'm giving you a bit of a hard time since it looks like you actually use your Ragnarok to support subcaps rather than in the middle of the nonexistent Vera Cruz titan blob, but you should blame the guys who used their titans in the most risk-averse fashion imaginable rather than the players who advocated for reductions in their capabilities.
also stop blaming the mittani because you fell for a scam, i'm sure you've botted that isk right back up anyway
Would you bet all your isk on it? CCP is the 3rd party, ok ? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2838
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:48:00 -
[1318] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Andski wrote:Hey Acwron I guess I'm giving you a bit of a hard time since it looks like you actually use your Ragnarok to support subcaps rather than in the middle of the nonexistent Vera Cruz titan blob, but you should blame the guys who used their titans in the most risk-averse fashion imaginable rather than the players who advocated for reductions in their capabilities.
also stop blaming the mittani because you fell for a scam, i'm sure you've botted that isk right back up anyway Would you bet all your isk on it? CCP is the 3rd party, ok ?
I put my deposit in "CCP Engineering Alliance" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
465
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:50:00 -
[1319] - Quote
Spurty wrote:Titans no longer FOTM shocker.
New FOTM, bring x 3 to x 5 the number of ships to every fight.
Can we please get hit points on ALL ships 1/2'ed or even dropped to 1/3 now (don't change anything else!)
Feel free to balance this by increasing structure hitpoints.
Happy days :-0 hey ncdot guy no more hotdropping lone BCs in provi with your supercrap fleet (NCdot at it's prime)
were titans/supers the only viable counter for lone BCs too? |

Roffle Lawler
Elitist Oops
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 07:00:00 -
[1320] - Quote
And now this thread is back going places. |

knobber Jobbler
Seniors Clan Get Off My Lawn
54
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 07:00:00 -
[1321] - Quote
DelightSucker wrote:Congratz CCP you just made sure that Numbers is all in EVE again.
way to **** up your own game.
So being blobbed by 50 Titans was OK? Isn't that the numbers game? |

knobber Jobbler
Seniors Clan Get Off My Lawn
54
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 07:05:00 -
[1322] - Quote
Spurty wrote:Titans no longer FOTM shocker.
New FOTM, bring x 3 to x 5 the number of ships to every fight.
Can we please get hit points on ALL ships 1/2'ed or even dropped to 1/3 now (don't change anything else!)
Feel free to balance this by increasing structure hitpoints.
Happy days :-0
This is coming from the guys who blob supercaps and call themselves elite.
Titans have ruined EVE for long enough, time to suck it up and do things like everyone else.
|

Titan Keeper 22
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 07:06:00 -
[1323] - Quote
You 90% of Goonswarm/pets that are arguing against the people opposing the titan nerf are just talking about the same thing over and over.
Maybe it's time to stop the useless arguments and stop the trolling. You can always use your own/other alliance forum to troll; I bet there are plenty of space to do so. Trolling will not help with anything. But feeding them, will obviously make things worse.
and here are couple of my thoughts;
- CCP employee's and the CSMs aren't all geniuses; you think they are all from IVY League and with 150IQ+? If so, then we'd be glad to have your decison about this. They should not think of themselves nor listen only to those people wanting the nerf. As a titan pilot myself, I am not against the nerf entirely, but surely am disagreing about the fact that this is all going one-sided for the moment. You people can't be making decisions like communists. Wherever the idea came out from, balance it out evenly. Due to so many opposition on this adjustment fix, I am pretty sure that there are other better ways to improove this current situation.(should look back at what you did/ when you were working on supercarrier nerf and the shield carrier fix; you listened to everyone, made a great desicion/patch, and the feedback/result came back positive)
p.s. this one's to help those trolls talking about posting in alts out; most of Goonswarm and their pets' titan pilots are obviously posting with their alts to argue about the nerf then come back to troll about it. this is common sense.(PL Raiden NC. have no reason to post with their alts; why would they bother protecting their opposing side? oh unless they're planning to join the other side later on that is.) |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
466
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 07:10:00 -
[1324] - Quote
hey look words by an npc corp member
*dumps post in trash bin*
*roleplays* |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2842
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 07:10:00 -
[1325] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:p.s. this one's to help those trolls talking about posting in alts out; most of Goonswarm and their pets' titan pilots are obviously posting with their alts to argue about the nerf then come back to troll about it. this is common sense.(PL Raiden NC. have no reason to post with their alts; why would they bother protecting their opposing side? oh unless they're planning to join the other side later on that is.)
Raiden guy wrote:Also stop crying in the EVEo forums, its exactly what the goons are craving for. If you need to go mental, do it with out of alliance alt "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Ivana Twinkle
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
120
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 07:11:00 -
[1326] - Quote
ITT BOB lost to metagaming, for who knows which time. |

Crystal Wolf
Invision Hosting Invision Group
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 07:13:00 -
[1327] - Quote
Roffle Lawler wrote:Powers Sa wrote:Crystal Wolf wrote: From a political standpoint CCP are effectively changing the balance of power towards alliances who can just field hundreds of subcaps. The alliances who rely on supers to augment their fleet strength have been forgotten and just pushed aside. This change definitely needs to go back to the drawing board and CCP need to take factors like this into account.
The CFC has roughly 28180 characters ( source ). We are able to organize our opinions and express them through CSM votes. The CFC has a generally organized set of opinions due to our culture. We are able to mobilize effectively in the CSM. If I'm just eyeballing the dotlan numbers on the 0.0 sov holding (therefore titan-having) player base, then the CFC has the majority opinion when it comes to how Titan roles should work. Who do you think CCP is going to listen to? Surely not you unorganized crying publords. What is the effective counter to 28180 votes? How do we keep Goonies from controlling the CSM, running the DEVs and ruining our game? Why does this game have to be about numbers? How do we get rid of the Goons IWIN button when they can just out-vote everyone?
Listening to the "majority" usually does make sense however all CCP are doing is hurting one group of the playerbase by aiding another. Granted it would be almost impossible to create a solution that both groups are happy with but they can do better than this. Invision Hosting - Providing Quality service solutions Forum Topic: Here |

Pharon Reichter
FinFleet Raiden.
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 07:16:00 -
[1328] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:Andski wrote:Bozl1n wrote:Under this system the dreads will get a good 30 secs before the titans even lock target - assumeing all 25 titans shot at different targets ud lose 25 odd to doomsday? You have an age before they are ready to fire again
And yea it might have been replaced straight away - but kill ennuf of them and they wouldnt be replaced so easy.
I AGREE that titans should not be able to pwn subcaps wholesale - but at the same time you should be in the correct ships for the job urself, which it seems you havnt been?
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12203172yep wrong ships Look at that. Out of all the fights in the last few months where the titan blobbing group has instantly won by dropping titans. They managed to lose ONE TITAN. In months. Despite dropping them on fleets of hundreds of battleships every other day, and forcing them to run away because they cannot hurt any of the titans onfield, no matter their numbers. Clearly nothing is wrong here.
LOL none of the titans have even been targeted in any of the fights. How do you expect to kill something without locking it up ? In the only fight you actually brought dreads you killed a titan. But don't let that stand in your thinking that titans are invulnerable ;) |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2842
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 07:17:00 -
[1329] - Quote
Crystal Wolf wrote:Listening to the "majority" usually does make sense however all CCP are doing is hurting one group of the playerbase by aiding another. Granted it would be almost impossible to create a solution that both groups are happy with but they can do better than this. only one ship class should be relevant in eve online "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 07:32:00 -
[1330] - Quote
Guy's we are misunderstood grath!!! He is concerned they didn't nerf titans enough.Acording to him they will still do exactly what CCP says they shouldn't be able to do.I suppose they should get nerfed a bit more then.:) Nuke them from orbit,it's the only way to be sure.Personally I hope they continue to be sub cap blaping machines after this nerf, So the summer patch will see them unable to lock a sub cap at all. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5516
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 07:52:00 -
[1331] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of tracking
Too big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem. All turrets already have sig resolution attribute. This is already used in the damage calculation, you just need to double it for XL weapons. That doesn't do what Greyscale is talking about.
The sigres is just a divisor for tracking. Doubling it has the exact same effect as halving the tracking.
On that topic, I just want to inject a very delayed facepalm at those who previously in the thread tried to claim that orbiting an achor wouldn't create two points per revolution where transversal was zero. What is it with people and maths these days?  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Sardaros
OEG Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:09:00 -
[1332] - Quote
NC. comment in local: [08:06:04] Soho Torres > coward in your carriers lololo |

Powers Sa
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:09:00 -
[1333] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote: - CCP employee's and the CSMs aren't all geniuses; you think they are all from IVY League and with 150IQ+? If so, then we'd be glad to have your decision about this. They should not think of themselves nor listen only to those people wanting the nerf. As a titan pilot myself, I am not against the nerf entirely, but surely am disagreeing about the fact that this is all going one-sided for the moment. You people can't be making decisions like communists. Wherever the idea came out from, balance it out evenly. Due to so many opposition on this adjustment fix, I am pretty sure that there are other better ways to improve this current situation.(should look back at what you did/ when you were working on supercarrier nerf and the shield carrier fix; you listened to everyone, made a great desicion/patch, and the feedback/result came back positive)
Most of the large alliance leadership happen to be extremely smart and successful in real life. Shadoo (leader of PL): Architect-ed HP's Sharepoint deployment. Also a published expert on Microsoft Sharepoint. While incredibly smug, but he's earned it. He just so happens to be smarter than you. He posted a well structured rebuttal that voices the frustration that most of you terrible pubbies have. If you'd take a page out of his book and intelligently structure your rebuttals then CCP would actually give a crap about what you have to say. Trebor (CSM) - Conceived Wizardry . He's a large reason you have RPG video games. He's on the CSM and smarter than you. The Mittani (Chairman for life) - Retired high priced Washington, D.C. hot shot lawyer. motherf***ing king of space. Has been the most intelligently vocal mouthpiece of the largest player bloc (28,000 strong). Just going out on a limb here, but I'd venture to guess he's smarter than you. Grath Teklien - I don't know what grath does in real life, but I hope he's a federal judge, because that would be amazing and utterly priceless. He may be wrong, but at least he commits to defend his position through multiple pages of dribble. He's smarter than you. CCP Soundwave - Funnier, wittier, and smarter than you. Unfortunately he says UHHHHHHHH a lot, but I won't hold it against him, because he's probably thinking in viking and translating it to English. Seleene didn't cut it at CCP, but he's probably smarter than you.
I don't really care enough to keep going, but I guess my point is: Post on your main, or get out.
P.S. I just spellchecked and fixed your post for you. I guess I'm smarter than you too.
|

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:21:00 -
[1334] - Quote
Andski wrote:Crystal Wolf wrote:Listening to the "majority" usually does make sense however all CCP are doing is hurting one group of the playerbase by aiding another. Granted it would be almost impossible to create a solution that both groups are happy with but they can do better than this. only one ship class should be relevant in eve online
Go to sleep brah i'am starting to worry you will get ill, and we will lose one of the best goon posters. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
456
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:23:00 -
[1335] - Quote
Im in construction, but thanks, I like it. |

Sidus Isaacs
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:30:00 -
[1336] - Quote
Some nice changes. |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
89
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:38:00 -
[1337] - Quote
There was an issue with parsing this post's BBCode |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
89
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:39:00 -
[1338] - Quote
Ok honestly guys i keep hearing people say that titans were only a problem when attacking stupid drake pilots who were double shield extended and shield rigged while running their MWD and heading straight at the titans, but otherwise they were fine, so, being a geek, i decided to do the math,
and its true, an MWDing drake with shield rigs and and a single LSE has a really good chance of being hit at 90km (53.78%) even with perfect transversal, but i considered that this was kinda ridiculous and anyone that stupid deserves to be killed; then I found something crazy a harbinger, naked, not running an MWD or having a plate/armor rigs to slow it down still has an 44.95% chance to be hit at 90km
Then I thought about a cruiser, and it turns out a naked devoter has a 11.41% chance to be hit at 90 km even if it has perfect transversal
The scariest thing was that this is using 2 T2 tracking enhancers, 2 T2 tracking computers, 6x2500mm Repeting artillery I, and Titanium Sabot XL ammo, no officer/deadspace or even faction mods
Why 90km you ask? well because its really easy to warp your two groups of titans 100 km from eachother |

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:54:00 -
[1339] - Quote
Sigras wrote:Ok honestly guys i keep hearing people say that titans were only a problem when attacking stupid drake pilots who were double shield extended and shield rigged while running their MWD and heading straight at the titans, but otherwise they were fine, so, being a geek, i decided to do the math,
and its true, an MWDing drake with shield rigs and and a single LSE has a really good chance of being hit at 90km (53.78%) even with perfect transversal, but i considered that this was kinda ridiculous and anyone that stupid deserves to be killed; then I found something crazy a harbinger, naked, not running an MWD or having a plate/armor rigs to slow it down still has an 44.95% chance to be hit at 90km
Then I thought about a cruiser, and it turns out a naked devoter has a 11.41% chance to be hit at 90 km even if it has perfect transversal
The scariest thing was that this is using 2 T2 tracking enhancers, 2 T2 tracking computers, 6x2500mm Repeting artillery I, and Titanium Sabot XL ammo, no officer/deadspace or even faction mods
Why 90km you ask? well because its really easy to warp your two groups of titans 100 km from eachother
what would be a harbringer doing 90Km of a tracking titan doing anyway? |

Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:56:00 -
[1340] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:You 90% of Goonswarm/pets that are arguing against the people opposing the titan nerf are just talking about the same thing over and over.
Maybe it's time to stop the useless arguments and stop the trolling. You can always use your own/other alliance forum to troll; I bet there are plenty of space to do so. Trolling will not help with anything. But feeding them, will obviously make things worse.
and here are couple of my thoughts;
- CCP employee's and the CSMs aren't all geniuses; you think they are all from IVY League and with 150IQ+? If so, then we'd be glad to have your decison about this. They should not think of themselves nor listen only to those people wanting the nerf. As a titan pilot myself, I am not against the nerf entirely, but surely am disagreing about the fact that this is all going one-sided for the moment. You people can't be making decisions like communists. Wherever the idea came out from, balance it out evenly. Due to so many opposition on this adjustment fix, I am pretty sure that there are other better ways to improove this current situation.(should look back at what you did/ when you were working on supercarrier nerf and the shield carrier fix; you listened to everyone, made a great desicion/patch, and the feedback/result came back positive)
p.s. this one's to help those trolls talking about posting in alts out; most of Goonswarm and their pets' titan pilots are obviously posting with their alts to argue about the nerf then come back to troll about it. this is common sense.(PL Raiden NC. have no reason to post with their alts; why would they bother protecting their opposing side? oh unless they're planning to join the other side later on that is.)
I for one think we can trust the opinion of a guy called "titankeeper 22" to be objective in this debate. |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:56:00 -
[1341] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing. All things aside, this is a pretty hilarious assumption that doesn't make sense in context. With a base sensor strength of 5, you are talking about a few seconds difference between t2 and cormack out of a probable minute+ lock time. Well worth the 4b+ sensor booster imo  Gains you 25s against frigates (105 to 79, assuming 3 are fitted), 15s against cruisers (64 to 49) and 10s against battleships (44 to 33). If you see this as a big difference, then it's worth balancing around the officer fit given that dropping 12bn on SBs is not a huge fraction of the outlay for a properly-fit titan. If you don't see this as a big difference, then balancing around the officer fit isn't a big deal because it's not having a major impact. Either way, it's a functional assumption 
So you assume and now require us to fit officer on titans for the ship to work , you need to change quite a few ships then.... |

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:59:00 -
[1342] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing. All things aside, this is a pretty hilarious assumption that doesn't make sense in context. With a base sensor strength of 5, you are talking about a few seconds difference between t2 and cormack out of a probable minute+ lock time. Well worth the 4b+ sensor booster imo  Gains you 25s against frigates (105 to 79, assuming 3 are fitted), 15s against cruisers (64 to 49) and 10s against battleships (44 to 33). If you see this as a big difference, then it's worth balancing around the officer fit given that dropping 12bn on SBs is not a huge fraction of the outlay for a properly-fit titan. If you don't see this as a big difference, then balancing around the officer fit isn't a big deal because it's not having a major impact. Either way, it's a functional assumption  So you assume and now require us to fit officer on titans for the ship to work , you need to change quite a few ships then....
MK3 coming next , rifters with officer fitted as a base for PVP. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5517
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 09:03:00 -
[1343] - Quote
Sigras wrote:and its true, an MWDing drake with shield rigs and and a single LSE has a really good chance of being hit at 90km (53.78%) even with perfect transversal, but i considered that this was kinda ridiculous and anyone that stupid deserves to be killed; then I found something crazy a harbinger, naked, not running an MWD or having a plate/armor rigs to slow it down still has an 44.95% chance to be hit at 90km Well, this is the thing people forget about MWDs: they don't make much difference for tracking.
Yes, they bloom your sig, but they also increase your speed, so that larger, easier-to-hit target is now moving faster, making it harder to hit. Conversely, yes, they increase your speed, but they also bloom your sig. Either way, the end result is that and MWDing target is roughly as easy to hit as a non-mwd:ing target. Depending on the meta of the MWD, it's a matter of a few percent here or there GÇö not enough to make any drastic difference unless we're talking about something that gets a speed or a sig bonus.
GǪso any kind of argument along the lines of GÇ£but he was MWDing, of course he's easy to hitGÇ¥ only shows a lack of understanding of how tracking works. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

evereplicant
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 09:11:00 -
[1344] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:evereplicant wrote:damn what is PL going to do now? I mean no more super blobs for them, how will they survive? How are they going to cope not whoring on pod and noobship killmails?
+1 CCP
Yes how will PL live with being able to kill other capital ships with the same efficiency they do currently. The sky has fallen now that PL will forced to keep killing capital ships left right and center! Oh the humanity!
You really are a dumb goon. Maybe if you read into the message properly you would understand it was meant about subcaps. I thought the noob ships and pods might have given it away. But you are too stupid to realise that |

Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 09:21:00 -
[1345] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Im in construction, but thanks, I like it.
Tell us more about your intention to make extra cash by RMTing your Titans now you can't use them to hotdrop BC gangs
Grath wrote:Selling off all the titans, RMTing the isk, mass purchasing ISboxer and buying up all the accounts because what matters now in EVE:
Nothing but numbers.... |

Tsubutai
The Tuskers
74
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 09:27:00 -
[1346] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Sigras wrote:and its true, an MWDing drake with shield rigs and and a single LSE has a really good chance of being hit at 90km (53.78%) even with perfect transversal, but i considered that this was kinda ridiculous and anyone that stupid deserves to be killed; then I found something crazy a harbinger, naked, not running an MWD or having a plate/armor rigs to slow it down still has an 44.95% chance to be hit at 90km Well, this is the thing people forget about MWDs: they don't make much difference for tracking. Yes, they bloom your sig, but they also increase your speed, so that larger, easier-to-hit target is now moving faster, making it harder to hit. Conversely, yes, they increase your speed, but they also bloom your sig. Either way, the end result is that and MWDing target is roughly as easy to hit as a non-mwd:ing target. Depending on the meta of the MWD, it's a matter of a few percent here or there GÇö not enough to make any drastic difference unless we're talking about something that gets a speed or a sig bonus. GǪso any kind of argument along the lines of GÇ£but he was MWDing, of course he's easy to hitGÇ¥ only shows a lack of understanding of how tracking works. You get the full sig bloom for as long as the MWD is on but only move at maximum speed for some of that time. In general, MWDing will absolutely make you get harder and more often, especially if you're in a relatively tight orbit in a ship with poor agility. |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
701
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 09:27:00 -
[1347] - Quote
knobber Jobbler wrote:Spurty wrote:Titans no longer FOTM shocker.
New FOTM, bring x 3 to x 5 the number of ships to every fight.
Can we please get hit points on ALL ships 1/2'ed or even dropped to 1/3 now (don't change anything else!)
Feel free to balance this by increasing structure hitpoints.
Happy days :-0 This is coming from the guys who blob Maels and call themselves normal players. Maels have ruined EVE for long enough, time to suck it up and do things like everyone else.
Playing devils advocate here. The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

Titan Keeper 22
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 09:29:00 -
[1348] - Quote
Powers Sa wrote:Titan Keeper 22 wrote: - CCP employee's and the CSMs aren't all geniuses; you think they are all from IVY League and with 150IQ+? If so, then we'd be glad to have your decision about this. They should not think of themselves nor listen only to those people wanting the nerf. As a titan pilot myself, I am not against the nerf entirely, but surely am disagreeing about the fact that this is all going one-sided for the moment. You people can't be making decisions like communists. Wherever the idea came out from, balance it out evenly. Due to so many opposition on this adjustment fix, I am pretty sure that there are other better ways to improve this current situation.(should look back at what you did/ when you were working on supercarrier nerf and the shield carrier fix; you listened to everyone, made a great desicion/patch, and the feedback/result came back positive)
Most of the large alliance leadership happen to be extremely smart and successful in real life. Shadoo (leader of PL): Architect-ed HP's Sharepoint deployment. Also a published expert on Microsoft Sharepoint. While incredibly smug, but he's earned it. He just so happens to be smarter than you. He posted a well structured rebuttal that voices the frustration that most of you terrible pubbies have. If you'd take a page out of his book and intelligently structure your rebuttals then CCP would actually give a crap about what you have to say. Trebor (CSM) - Conceived Wizardry . He's a large reason you have RPG video games. He's on the CSM and smarter than you. The Mittani (Chairman for life) - Retired high priced Washington, D.C. hot shot lawyer. motherf***ing king of space. Has been the most intelligently vocal mouthpiece of the largest player bloc (28,000 strong). Just going out on a limb here, but I'd venture to guess he's smarter than you. Grath Teklien - I don't know what grath does in real life, but I hope he's a federal judge, because that would be amazing and utterly priceless. He may be wrong, but at least he commits to defend his position through multiple pages of dribble. He's smarter than you. CCP Soundwave - Funnier, wittier, and smarter than you. Unfortunately he says UHHHHHHHH a lot, but I won't hold it against him, because he's probably thinking in viking and translating it to English. Seleene didn't cut it at CCP, but he's probably smarter than you. I don't really care enough to keep going, but I guess my point is: Post on your main, or get out. P.S. I just spellchecked and fixed your post for you. I guess I'm smarter than you too.
i mean no offence to any of those people above,
but out of all those people you have listed, which one of them have actually had influence on the comming changes of the titan? and their jobs may indicate the fact of their smartness, but in what criteria? i've only mentioned 'genius', 'IVY League', and 'IQ' as reference and none of them seem to match. though they could partially be matched in your way of thinking, you've clearly did not understand what i was trying to say; obviously those three references were just metaphorical words to state the fact that those influencing people, just by working themselves, can not lead and design the game properly such in a way that may satisfy vast majority of the players equally.
and do you think you can give me a single name of a game copy that had not failed, made by a company which has employees' that had favourited one particular thought or a group of people but then didn't give a damn of the majority(that includes people)?
I hear that a lot, maybe all, of the most successful games - League of Legends/Starcraft II/WoW/BattleField 3/Warcraft III/Counter Strike/COD:ModernWarfare/ balance out game mechanic based on people's thoughts and inputs but not on their(employee could include beta testers as well.) own. they surely could've made a success without majority of the players input and thoughts but with communist like group of people only.
here's the short version -
the game designer/ balancing team/ CSM/ whomever that gives influence need to be listening to everyone voice, not just goonswarm/cfc
obviously you're mad at somthing, because i'm guessing you have no life but only on the internet, you have to be somthing. get e-peen out of this. or else you have no way of getting dophamine. am i right?
so you're telling me to get out? you think you own this place? this forum? this company? just because you're from Goonswarm?
i think you've stayed in communist-like environment for too long.
i dont think anyone's curious about my identity other than you or the GS; becaues you see, have i insulted anyone with this character? have i said anything about what should be changed of the april titan fix?
wasting hell of a time to do a research and do background checks on people that dont give a damn about you just to prove nothing which has nothing to do with this topic..comparing my smartness to other people and then using it for insulting..telling me to get out because i do not post in my main..
you just really suck at trolling |

Kern Walzky
x13 Raiden.
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 09:33:00 -
[1349] - Quote
The problem is the current mechanics of shooting structures. You DONT need capitals or supers..... So now we have a range of capital killing & Structure killing ships that will never be used.
If your so into easy changes CCP nerf subcaps to NOT be able to shoot any kind of structures except custom offices.
This will force capitals out and the use for the multi nerfed expensive Supers will atleast be there somewhere.
Otherwise i just wasted so many many months of training, i used all my isk on an mercedes(titan) and got a Fiat(Space elevator). All this with no refund, no nothing.
CCP you really must start making those big changes to game mechanics instead of nerf's all over the place....
last thing.. a question.
to the simple pilot. what do you think you want to train to when you reach 100+mill Skillpoints??? i guess supers is not on your plan right...but what then...when you fly everything else....but hey perhaps you can walk in stations? hey or play another game perhaps???
Naaah CCP, all players are going to be so happy with this change in the long run im sure.... |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5518
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 09:34:00 -
[1350] - Quote
Tsubutai wrote:You get the full sig bloom for as long as the MWD is on but only move at maximum speed for some of that time. In general, MWDing will absolutely make you get harder and more often, especially if you're in a relatively tight orbit in a ship with poor agility. Sure, but that is a function of relative movement (which is already what screws you over in tracking situations), and has less to do with the MWD itself. It's the kind of categorical statements that MWD = huge = easy to hit that I'm pointing to, because it's simply not true as stated GÇö tracking doesn't work that way. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
72
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 09:40:00 -
[1351] - Quote
While this comment is going to get buried in trolling in the QQ and trolling, shield Scaps should have a slightly higher base sensor resolution, being they cant really afford to fill there mids with Cormacks Sebos, because you know, tanking.
Please +1 this, or just continue to QQ, I dont own one, its just something to be considered. |

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 09:43:00 -
[1352] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:While this comment is going to get buried in trolling in the QQ and trolling, shield Scaps should have a slightly higher base sensor resolution, being they cant really afford to fill there mids with Cormacks Sebos, because you know, tanking.
Please +1 this, or just continue to QQ, I dont own one, its just something to be considered.
Having a shield super for like 6 months , i really think CCP doesnt give a rats *** for shield supers, no implants for more shield etc. |
|

CCP Soundwave
C C P C C P Alliance
746

|
Posted - 2012.03.14 09:47:00 -
[1353] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:Powers Sa wrote:Titan Keeper 22 wrote: - CCP employee's and the CSMs aren't all geniuses; you think they are all from IVY League and with 150IQ+? If so, then we'd be glad to have your decision about this. They should not think of themselves nor listen only to those people wanting the nerf. As a titan pilot myself, I am not against the nerf entirely, but surely am disagreeing about the fact that this is all going one-sided for the moment. You people can't be making decisions like communists. Wherever the idea came out from, balance it out evenly. Due to so many opposition on this adjustment fix, I am pretty sure that there are other better ways to improve this current situation.(should look back at what you did/ when you were working on supercarrier nerf and the shield carrier fix; you listened to everyone, made a great desicion/patch, and the feedback/result came back positive)
Most of the large alliance leadership happen to be extremely smart and successful in real life. Shadoo (leader of PL): Architect-ed HP's Sharepoint deployment. Also a published expert on Microsoft Sharepoint. While incredibly smug, but he's earned it. He just so happens to be smarter than you. He posted a well structured rebuttal that voices the frustration that most of you terrible pubbies have. If you'd take a page out of his book and intelligently structure your rebuttals then CCP would actually give a crap about what you have to say. Trebor (CSM) - Conceived Wizardry . He's a large reason you have RPG video games. He's on the CSM and smarter than you. The Mittani (Chairman for life) - Retired high priced Washington, D.C. hot shot lawyer. motherf***ing king of space. Has been the most intelligently vocal mouthpiece of the largest player bloc (28,000 strong). Just going out on a limb here, but I'd venture to guess he's smarter than you. Grath Teklien - I don't know what grath does in real life, but I hope he's a federal judge, because that would be amazing and utterly priceless. He may be wrong, but at least he commits to defend his position through multiple pages of dribble. He's smarter than you. CCP Soundwave - Funnier, wittier, and smarter than you. Unfortunately he says UHHHHHHHH a lot, but I won't hold it against him, because he's probably thinking in viking and translating it to English. Seleene didn't cut it at CCP, but he's probably smarter than you. I don't really care enough to keep going, but I guess my point is: Post on your main, or get out. P.S. I just spellchecked and fixed your post for you. I guess I'm smarter than you too. i mean no offence to any of those people above, but out of all those people you have listed, which one of them have actually had influence on the comming changes of the titan? and their jobs may indicate the fact of their smartness, but in what criteria? i've only mentioned 'genius', 'IVY League', and 'IQ' as reference and none of them seem to match. though they could partially be matched in your way of thinking, you've clearly did not understand what i was trying to say; obviously those three references were just metaphorical words to state the fact that those influencing people, just by working themselves, can not lead and design the game properly such in a way that may satisfy vast majority of the players equally. and do you think you can give me a single name of a game copy that had not failed, made by a company which has employees' that had favourited one particular thought or a group of people but then didn't give a damn of the majority(that includes people)? I hear that a lot, maybe all, of the most successful games - League of Legends/Starcraft II/WoW/BattleField 3/Warcraft III/Counter Strike/COD:ModernWarfare/ balance out game mechanic based on people's thoughts and inputs but not on their(employee could include beta testers as well.) own. they surely could've made a success without majority of the players input and thoughts but with communist like group of people only. here's the short version - the game designer/ balancing team/ CSM/ whomever that gives influence need to be listening to everyone voice, not just goonswarm/cfc obviously you're mad at somthing, because i'm guessing you have no life but only on the internet, you have to be somthing. get e-peen out of this. or else you have no way of getting dophamine. am i right? so you're telling me to get out? you think you own this place? this forum? this company? just because you're from Goonswarm? i think you've stayed in communist-like environment for too long. i dont think anyone's curious about my identity other than you or the GS; becaues you see, have i insulted anyone with this character? have i said anything about what should be changed of the april titan fix? wasting hell of a time to do a research and do background checks on people that dont give a damn about you just to prove nothing which has nothing to do with this topic..comparing my smartness to other people and then using it for insulting..telling me to get out because i do not post in my main.. you just really suck at trolling
Actually, Greyscale went to Cambridge, and while we haven't IQ tested him yet, I'm pretty sure he'd score high 
|
|

Sade Onyx
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:00:00 -
[1354] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:Actually, Greyscale went to Cambridge, and while we haven't IQ tested him yet, I'm pretty sure he'd score high 
Unlike every single test or exam that has ever been devised, the standard IQ test has never changed since it was first made hundreds of years ago, when the internet didnt exist, TV was black & White and the Space invaders was the best computer game. Its inadequate, inaccurate and isnt much of an indicator about anything.
|

Ganthrithor
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
145
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:00:00 -
[1355] - Quote
Tippia wrote:MWDing will absolutely make you get harder and more often
This just needed quoting. |

baltec1
807
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:01:00 -
[1356] - Quote
Kern Walzky wrote:The problem is the current mechanics of shooting structures. You DONT need capitals or supers..... So now we have a range of capital killing & Structure killing ships that will never be used. If your so into easy changes CCP nerf subcaps to NOT be able to shoot any kind of structures except custom offices. This will force capitals out and the use for the multi nerfed expensive Supers will atleast be there somewhere. Otherwise i just wasted so many many months of training, i used all my isk on an mercedes(titan) and got a Fiat(Space elevator). All this with no refund, no nothing. CCP you really must start making those big changes to game mechanics instead of nerf's all over the place.... last thing.. a question. to the simple pilot. what do you think you want to train to when you reach 100+mill Skillpoints??? i guess supers is not on your plan right...but what then...when you fly everything else....but hey perhaps you can walk in stations? hey or play another game perhaps??? Naaah CCP, all players are going to be so happy with this change in the long run im sure.... 
So how would you kill a POS in high sec or wormholes? |

Palander
FinFleet Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:03:00 -
[1357] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:Titan Keeper 22 wrote:Powers Sa wrote:Titan Keeper 22 wrote: - CCP employee's and the CSMs aren't all geniuses; you think they are all from IVY League and with 150IQ+? If so, then we'd be glad to have your decision about this. They should not think of themselves nor listen only to those people wanting the nerf. As a titan pilot myself, I am not against the nerf entirely, but surely am disagreeing about the fact that this is all going one-sided for the moment. You people can't be making decisions like communists. Wherever the idea came out from, balance it out evenly. Due to so many opposition on this adjustment fix, I am pretty sure that there are other better ways to improve this current situation.(should look back at what you did/ when you were working on supercarrier nerf and the shield carrier fix; you listened to everyone, made a great desicion/patch, and the feedback/result came back positive)
Most of the large alliance leadership happen to be extremely smart and successful in real life. Shadoo (leader of PL): Architect-ed HP's Sharepoint deployment. Also a published expert on Microsoft Sharepoint. While incredibly smug, but he's earned it. He just so happens to be smarter than you. He posted a well structured rebuttal that voices the frustration that most of you terrible pubbies have. If you'd take a page out of his book and intelligently structure your rebuttals then CCP would actually give a crap about what you have to say. Trebor (CSM) - Conceived Wizardry . He's a large reason you have RPG video games. He's on the CSM and smarter than you. The Mittani (Chairman for life) - Retired high priced Washington, D.C. hot shot lawyer. motherf***ing king of space. Has been the most intelligently vocal mouthpiece of the largest player bloc (28,000 strong). Just going out on a limb here, but I'd venture to guess he's smarter than you. Grath Teklien - I don't know what grath does in real life, but I hope he's a federal judge, because that would be amazing and utterly priceless. He may be wrong, but at least he commits to defend his position through multiple pages of dribble. He's smarter than you. CCP Soundwave - Funnier, wittier, and smarter than you. Unfortunately he says UHHHHHHHH a lot, but I won't hold it against him, because he's probably thinking in viking and translating it to English. Seleene didn't cut it at CCP, but he's probably smarter than you. I don't really care enough to keep going, but I guess my point is: Post on your main, or get out. P.S. I just spellchecked and fixed your post for you. I guess I'm smarter than you too. i mean no offence to any of those people above, but out of all those people you have listed, which one of them have actually had influence on the comming changes of the titan? and their jobs may indicate the fact of their smartness, but in what criteria? i've only mentioned 'genius', 'IVY League', and 'IQ' as reference and none of them seem to match. though they could partially be matched in your way of thinking, you've clearly did not understand what i was trying to say; obviously those three references were just metaphorical words to state the fact that those influencing people, just by working themselves, can not lead and design the game properly such in a way that may satisfy vast majority of the players equally. and do you think you can give me a single name of a game copy that had not failed, made by a company which has employees' that had favourited one particular thought or a group of people but then didn't give a damn of the majority(that includes people)? I hear that a lot, maybe all, of the most successful games - League of Legends/Starcraft II/WoW/BattleField 3/Warcraft III/Counter Strike/COD:ModernWarfare/ balance out game mechanic based on people's thoughts and inputs but not on their(employee could include beta testers as well.) own. they surely could've made a success without majority of the players input and thoughts but with communist like group of people only. here's the short version - the game designer/ balancing team/ CSM/ whomever that gives influence need to be listening to everyone voice, not just goonswarm/cfc obviously you're mad at somthing, because i'm guessing you have no life but only on the internet, you have to be somthing. get e-peen out of this. or else you have no way of getting dophamine. am i right? so you're telling me to get out? you think you own this place? this forum? this company? just because you're from Goonswarm? i think you've stayed in communist-like environment for too long. i dont think anyone's curious about my identity other than you or the GS; becaues you see, have i insulted anyone with this character? have i said anything about what should be changed of the april titan fix? wasting hell of a time to do a research and do background checks on people that dont give a damn about you just to prove nothing which has nothing to do with this topic..comparing my smartness to other people and then using it for insulting..telling me to get out because i do not post in my main.. you just really suck at trolling Actually, Greyscale went to Cambridge, and while we haven't IQ tested him yet, I'm pretty sure he'd score high 
And George W. Bush went to Harvard... |

Ganthrithor
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
145
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:04:00 -
[1358] - Quote
Palander wrote:
And George W. Bush went to Harvard...
Some ****** American school? What's your point? |

Thor of Viking
Viking Forge Viking Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:05:00 -
[1359] - Quote
Palander wrote:CCP Soundwave wrote:Titan Keeper 22 wrote:Powers Sa wrote:Titan Keeper 22 wrote: - CCP employee's and the CSMs aren't all geniuses; you think they are all from IVY League and with 150IQ+? If so, then we'd be glad to have your decision about this. They should not think of themselves nor listen only to those people wanting the nerf. As a titan pilot myself, I am not against the nerf entirely, but surely am disagreeing about the fact that this is all going one-sided for the moment. You people can't be making decisions like communists. Wherever the idea came out from, balance it out evenly. Due to so many opposition on this adjustment fix, I am pretty sure that there are other better ways to improve this current situation.(should look back at what you did/ when you were working on supercarrier nerf and the shield carrier fix; you listened to everyone, made a great desicion/patch, and the feedback/result came back positive)
Most of the large alliance leadership happen to be extremely smart and successful in real life. Shadoo (leader of PL): Architect-ed HP's Sharepoint deployment. Also a published expert on Microsoft Sharepoint. While incredibly smug, but he's earned it. He just so happens to be smarter than you. He posted a well structured rebuttal that voices the frustration that most of you terrible pubbies have. If you'd take a page out of his book and intelligently structure your rebuttals then CCP would actually give a crap about what you have to say. Trebor (CSM) - Conceived Wizardry . He's a large reason you have RPG video games. He's on the CSM and smarter than you. The Mittani (Chairman for life) - Retired high priced Washington, D.C. hot shot lawyer. motherf***ing king of space. Has been the most intelligently vocal mouthpiece of the largest player bloc (28,000 strong). Just going out on a limb here, but I'd venture to guess he's smarter than you. Grath Teklien - I don't know what grath does in real life, but I hope he's a federal judge, because that would be amazing and utterly priceless. He may be wrong, but at least he commits to defend his position through multiple pages of dribble. He's smarter than you. CCP Soundwave - Funnier, wittier, and smarter than you. Unfortunately he says UHHHHHHHH a lot, but I won't hold it against him, because he's probably thinking in viking and translating it to English. Seleene didn't cut it at CCP, but he's probably smarter than you. I don't really care enough to keep going, but I guess my point is: Post on your main, or get out. P.S. I just spellchecked and fixed your post for you. I guess I'm smarter than you too. i mean no offence to any of those people above, but out of all those people you have listed, which one of them have actually had influence on the comming changes of the titan? and their jobs may indicate the fact of their smartness, but in what criteria? i've only mentioned 'genius', 'IVY League', and 'IQ' as reference and none of them seem to match. though they could partially be matched in your way of thinking, you've clearly did not understand what i was trying to say; obviously those three references were just metaphorical words to state the fact that those influencing people, just by working themselves, can not lead and design the game properly such in a way that may satisfy vast majority of the players equally. and do you think you can give me a single name of a game copy that had not failed, made by a company which has employees' that had favourited one particular thought or a group of people but then didn't give a damn of the majority(that includes people)? I hear that a lot, maybe all, of the most successful games - League of Legends/Starcraft II/WoW/BattleField 3/Warcraft III/Counter Strike/COD:ModernWarfare/ balance out game mechanic based on people's thoughts and inputs but not on their(employee could include beta testers as well.) own. they surely could've made a success without majority of the players input and thoughts but with communist like group of people only. here's the short version - the game designer/ balancing team/ CSM/ whomever that gives influence need to be listening to everyone voice, not just goonswarm/cfc obviously you're mad at somthing, because i'm guessing you have no life but only on the internet, you have to be somthing. get e-peen out of this. or else you have no way of getting dophamine. am i right? so you're telling me to get out? you think you own this place? this forum? this company? just because you're from Goonswarm? i think you've stayed in communist-like environment for too long. i dont think anyone's curious about my identity other than you or the GS; becaues you see, have i insulted anyone with this character? have i said anything about what should be changed of the april titan fix? wasting hell of a time to do a research and do background checks on people that dont give a damn about you just to prove nothing which has nothing to do with this topic..comparing my smartness to other people and then using it for insulting..telling me to get out because i do not post in my main.. you just really suck at trolling Actually, Greyscale went to Cambridge, and while we haven't IQ tested him yet, I'm pretty sure he'd score high  And George W. Bush went to Harvard...
Pls don't compare Cambridge with Harvard its embarrassing and kind of offensive as well. There is quit a difference between the two. |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:07:00 -
[1360] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:Actually, Greyscale went to Cambridge, and while we haven't IQ tested him yet, I'm pretty sure he'd score high 
I am sorry in advance here, but could we get some indication from CCP that we are being heard here. Put a lot of time into this game and really would ratter not be forced to leave because I feel like CCP only listens to Goons. I know they say we are less people then they are, but they don't number 345000 like they would have us believe. |
|

CCP Soundwave
C C P C C P Alliance
746

|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:12:00 -
[1361] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:CCP Soundwave wrote:Actually, Greyscale went to Cambridge, and while we haven't IQ tested him yet, I'm pretty sure he'd score high  I am sorry in advance here, but could we get some indication from CCP that we are being heard here. Put a lot of time into this game and really would ratter not be forced to leave because I feel like CCP only listens to Goons. I know they say we are less people then they are, but they don't number 345000 like they would have us believe.
We're absolutely listening.
Titans are an anti-cap/supercap ship and we need to limit their ability to kill subcaps. That's a change that's happening and is unlikely to change. The practical details on how that happens we'd love as much feedback on as possible. We've been talking about the lock timers this morning based on feedback from the playerbase, looking at what adjustments we can possibly make. The changes in the OP are still subject to change if we get feedback on how to achieve our goal better. |
|

baltec1
807
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:15:00 -
[1362] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:
We're absolutely listening.
Titans are an anti-cap/supercap ship and we need to limit their ability to kill subcaps. That's a change that's happening and is unlikely to change. The practical details on how that happens we'd love as much feedback on as possible. We've been talking about the lock timers this morning based on feedback from the playerbase, looking at what adjustments we can possibly make. The changes in the OP are still subject to change if we get feedback on how to achieve our goal better.
When can we expect this to hit sisi? |

baltec1
807
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:16:00 -
[1363] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:
I am sorry in advance here, but could we get some indication from CCP that we are being heard here. Put a lot of time into this game and really would ratter not be forced to leave because I feel like CCP only listens to Goons. I know they say we are less people then they are, but they don't number 345000 like they would have us believe.
I heard this exact same argument when CCP nerfed AOE titans, nano, ECM, drones ect ect. |

Dasdraperma
ReUnion Inc. SOLAR WING
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:33:00 -
[1364] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:
We're absolutely listening.
Titans are an anti-cap/supercap ship and we need to limit their ability to kill subcaps. That's a change that's happening and is unlikely to change. The practical details on how that happens we'd love as much feedback on as possible. We've been talking about the lock timers this morning based on feedback from the playerbase, looking at what adjustments we can possibly make. The changes in the OP are still subject to change if we get feedback on how to achieve our goal better.
Its really amazing how you change ships that costs months or even years to train, and billions of isks to buy. And I'm really impressed on your explanations on how "needed" are theese changes.
The only thing bothers me now - what should i do as supercap pilot, if i'm, f...ng tired with f...ng structures, and all your game designers offer to capitals is to "logoff and keep paying for account". Should i sit to drake much as like Goon-style? Or stay logged off at pos, untill one more structure should be taken down?
What should i do, if i'm not interested in subcapitals? Just leave, and make Goons and other blobs happy?
Dont reply for me, just answer yourself.
|

Thor of Viking
Viking Forge Viking Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:34:00 -
[1365] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:BioZvin wrote:CCP Soundwave wrote:Actually, Greyscale went to Cambridge, and while we haven't IQ tested him yet, I'm pretty sure he'd score high  I am sorry in advance here, but could we get some indication from CCP that we are being heard here. Put a lot of time into this game and really would ratter not be forced to leave because I feel like CCP only listens to Goons. I know they say we are less people then they are, but they don't number 345000 like they would have us believe. We're absolutely listening. Titans are an anti-cap/supercap ship and we need to limit their ability to kill subcaps. That's a change that's happening and is unlikely to change. The practical details on how that happens we'd love as much feedback on as possible. We've been talking about the lock timers this morning based on feedback from the playerbase, looking at what adjustments we can possibly make. The changes in the OP are still subject to change if we get feedback on how to achieve our goal better.
Okay then here are a few.. These changes will not change much Titans will still hit sub-caps rather well titan pilots will just have more micromanagement on their hands and that's about it.
If you want them to not impact sub-caps all that much not you should chance the signature of the weapon right now it is 1000 meter push it up to something like 2500 meter and sub-caps that use transversal and low signature will not be impacted by titans.
I think the Tracking reduction is fine and should stay as is. But max targets 3 coupled with scan res. 5 is crippling titans even in capital fights. Titan without Sensor boosters will need almost one minute to lock up a dread. I think that's not well though out. For armor titans it is an option to fit sensor boosters yes but not for shield titans please think about that! Also once they do not impact sub-caps anymore their Capital Weapon output should be boosted considerably. I'm not talking about the doomsday I'm talking about the Capital Weapons because right now even dreads out DPS titans. If you give them 25-30% more DPS in exchange for their inability to effect sub-caps I'm fairly sure they will start fitting their role as anti-capital/super-capital weapon. As to scan res. 5 I think that it should be 15 or at least 10. Max targets 3 you might want to consider 4 but otherwise okay.
Thanks for your time. |

baltec1
807
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:36:00 -
[1366] - Quote
Dasdraperma wrote:
Its really amazing how you change ships that costs months or even years to train, and billions of isks to buy. And I'm really impressed on your explanations on how "needed" are theese changes.
The only thing bothers me now - what should i do as supercap pilot, if i'm, f...ng tired with f...ng structures, and all your game designers offer to capitals is to "logoff and keep paying for account". Should i sit to drake much as like Goon-style? Or stay logged off at pos, untill one more structure should be taken down?
What should i do, if i'm not interested in subcapitals? Just leave, and make Goons and other blobs happy?
Dont reply for me, just answer yourself.
Its your own fault if you ignore 99% of the ships out there. |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:38:00 -
[1367] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:BioZvin wrote:CCP Soundwave wrote:Actually, Greyscale went to Cambridge, and while we haven't IQ tested him yet, I'm pretty sure he'd score high  I am sorry in advance here, but could we get some indication from CCP that we are being heard here. Put a lot of time into this game and really would ratter not be forced to leave because I feel like CCP only listens to Goons. I know they say we are less people then they are, but they don't number 345000 like they would have us believe. We're absolutely listening. Titans are an anti-cap/supercap ship and we need to limit their ability to kill subcaps. That's a change that's happening and is unlikely to change. The practical details on how that happens we'd love as much feedback on as possible. We've been talking about the lock timers this morning based on feedback from the playerbase, looking at what adjustments we can possibly make. The changes in the OP are still subject to change if we get feedback on how to achieve our goal better.
Then take your time and develop a decent concept that doesn't hurt only one side and gives every ship an viable role. If you think that supercaps should be only good at killing dreads and carriers, than make dreads and carriers a viable weapon against BS (+50% Tracking bonus to dreads in siege mode would help). Right now they are only used for ratting and structure shooting. Thus, there is simply no need for a anti-capital pownage machine. --> Supercaps become useless!!! (ok you can still bridge stuff with titans)
Honestly, it would be fairer to simply remove all supercaps and to reimburse the players than this one-sided nerf into oblivion. Right now titans are the only weapon against huge blobs only one alliance is able to field. You basically force us now to do the same. Not sure if having only two huge powerblocks is good for eve.
Oh, and maybe you should take a closer look at the alpha damage of artillery. (High-Sec people would love you for that and they comprise the majority of players.)
P.S: Please start to play your own game. The reason why titans are so good at killing subcaps atm is not because titans have such great tracking but rather because a MWD Drake and a Maelstorm have a signature of a carrier.
|

Dr 0wnage
The Dark Tribe Against ALL Authorities
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:40:00 -
[1368] - Quote
First off... ITS ABOUT TIME!
Secondly... its not quite right...
Tracking changes are exactly what we need. The scan res and locked target changes however are not needed. A tracking penalty alone will prevent titans from effectively engaging sub cap fleets. The changes to their scan res will only hinder them in their anti-capital role.
My suggestions are as follows...
1. Nerf XL tracking a bit more. Reason being is that a tracking moros hits BS with relative ease currently (same tracking titans will have with this change). As you said, we have to assume faction / officer tracking computers will be used if it means they'll hit BS / BC.
2. Increase Titan damage bonus (up to 200% at least). As it is currently, titans can be out damaged by dreads. If there role is an anti-capital one, then they need the best at it.
3. Give the dread siege module a tracking bonus. If dreads can fill the role that people were using titans for before (killing BS and BC), then we have a perfect formula for capital escalation. subs < dreads < supers < subs |

baltec1
807
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:42:00 -
[1369] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:
Then take your time and develop a decent concept that doesn't hurt only one side and gives every ship an viable role. If you think that supercaps should be only good at killing dreads and carriers, than make dreads and carriers a viable weapon against BS (+50% Tracking bonus to dreads in siege mode would help). Right now they are only used for ratting and structure shooting. Thus, there is simply no need for a anti-capital pownage machine. --> Supercaps become useless!!! (ok you can still bridge stuff with titans)
Honestly, it would be fairer to simply remove all supercaps and to reimburse the players than this one-sided nerf into oblivion. Right now titans are the only weapon against huge blobs only one alliance is able to field. You basically force us now to do the same. Not sure if having only two huge powerblocks is good for eve.
Oh, and maybe you should take a closer look at the alpha damage of artillery. (High-Sec people would love you for that and they comprise the majority of players.)
P.S: Please start to play your own game. The reason why titans are so good at killing subcaps atm is not because titans have such great tracking but rather because a MWD Drake and a Maelstorm have a signature of a carrier.
There are 3 blocks that can field the same number and carriers are still good for large fights as are the dreads. Also, if the blob is unbeatable why did the NC, BoB, Goons, DRF, Red Alliance, Tri, ASCN ect ect never manage to take over all of 0.0 in the past? |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
701
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:43:00 -
[1370] - Quote
CCP Soundwave, with the critical changes applied to all ships and SCs in particular in regards to log off timers and drone bay nerfs, i believe that with the new changes applying to titans should have some of those older changes revised.
I believe the push to get smaller ships Vs smaller ships only is a pretty bad move.
The sum of all of these changes happening could be thus: how can a smaller sov holding alliance hope to defend or even take new space when they are forced onto the battlefield in similar ships but are outnumbered? Are there plans to ballance out ship quantity? I could give a more fleshed out post but i am dead tired. The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

Killerhound
Free-Space-Ranger Ev0ke
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:45:00 -
[1371] - Quote
With those changes incoming and the most used tactics currently on TQ what we will see in future what already happened on chinese server.
Most of the fleets will be composed of cheap T1 Ships with T1/T2/named equipment (Drake) and with mostly reimbursement. This creates uninteresting combats since only numbers counts nothing else.
It is also a problem because most players loose ther intensive to even use Super Caps since they have no use. That on the other end means that you will reach endgame within 2 months of play.
I have a clear statement:
- Dont punish long term player who had a lot of work to get titans / Scs
Reward player for their investment. I think CCP Greyscale is right about investment and gain. In economics marginal utility should be linear not dropping again like with titans now.
|

Smoking Blunts
ZC Industries Dark Stripes
215
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:54:00 -
[1372] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:
Then take your time and develop a decent concept that doesn't hurt only one side and gives every ship an viable role. If you think that supercaps should be only good at killing dreads and carriers, than make dreads and carriers a viable weapon against BS (+50% Tracking bonus to dreads in siege mode would help). Right now they are only used for ratting and structure shooting. Thus, there is simply no need for a anti-capital pownage machine. --> Supercaps become useless!!! (ok you can still bridge stuff with titans)
Honestly, it would be fairer to simply remove all supercaps and to reimburse the players than this one-sided nerf into oblivion. Right now titans are the only weapon against huge blobs only one alliance is able to field. You basically force us now to do the same. Not sure if having only two huge powerblocks is good for eve.
Oh, and maybe you should take a closer look at the alpha damage of artillery. (High-Sec people would love you for that and they comprise the majority of players.)
P.S: Please start to play your own game. The reason why titans are so good at killing subcaps atm is not because titans have such great tracking but rather because a MWD Drake and a Maelstorm have a signature of a carrier.
There are 3 blocks that can field the same number and carriers are still good for large fights as are the dreads. Also, if the blob is unbeatable why did the NC, BoB, Goons, DRF, Red Alliance, Tri, ASCN ect ect never manage to take over all of 0.0 in the past?
they were beaten by a bigger blob after making dumb choices. CCP-áare full of words and no action. We will watch what they are doing, for now
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5520
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:56:00 -
[1373] - Quote
Sade Onyx wrote:Unlike every single test or exam that has ever been devised, the standard IQ test has never changed since it was first made hundreds of years ago, when the internet didnt exist, TV was black & White and the Space invaders was the best computer game. GǪaside from there being no standard IQ test since so many variations of it have been created over the last century, each with its own advantages, quirks, and problems. So I suppose you're right in a way: something that doesn't exist can't really change, after all.
Ganthrithor wrote:Tsubutai wrote:MWDing will absolutely make you get harder and more often This just needed quoting. It also needs to be attributed correctly. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:03:00 -
[1374] - Quote
It's funny to see that pretty much the only people in this topic who complain about numbers counting for something are the people who stand to lose the ability to just instantly win a fight with titans. The same people who consistently manage to match our numbers when we fight them, and then drop titans when we start to win the fight based on strategy. They're not mad because they're being blobbed, or at risk to being blobbed, -they're not-. They're mad because their ability to instantly win a strategic battle with no effort is being taken away from them. Now they -will- have to be elite pvp.
I've seen time and time again that numbers are only a small part of what matters in a fight. Especially now with things like Time Dilation and the lack of lag. In the old eve, jumping a large fleet into a larger fleet was suicide, or a roll of the dice on who loaded first. And most of the fight was just hoping your guns would fire once in 15 minutes, before the node crashed. Now every action is accepted, everyone loads, everyone has a fair shot.
People ***** about drakes, but goons have tons of fleet doctrines, and I've seen 2 or 3 separate doctrines used in the same fight. Bombers, drakes, sniper t3's, sniper hurricanes, autocannons neuting canes, maelstroms, armor hacs, sniper hacs. All of these supposed cookie-cutter FOTM doctrines require coordination and a ton of support to survive. Dictors in the right place dropping bubbles at the right time, and knowing how to survive. Logistics knowing how to keep themselves alive and in position to rep. Interceptors and fast ships screening tackle and getting warpins. FC's that know how to probe, how to fight, when to run. When to bounce the fleet. Bombers knowing when to strike, who to strike, recons running scrams and webs on the people who need to be hit by... etc
The point of all this is, all these fleets require coordination and precision to win, and ALL OF THEM HAVE A CHANCE. You drop 300 ships on 200 ships, both sides can still win. You drop 50 titans on 300 ships, 400 ships, 500 ships, 800 ships... the titans just won. Hands down, no contest. No subcap fleet can stand on the field, and do the damage required to break reps, when they're losing a ship every single time the titans guns cycle. This is not the way eve is meant to be played, CCP has been nerfing titans since they came out, because they DO NOT FIT WITH EVE and never have. Every ship matters in eve, in every fleet, regardless of size. Until you bring titans in, and then the only ship that matters onfield is how many titans you have. That's not eve, and it's never going to be eve. So they're getting nerfed again, and will get nerfed more... get over it. |
|

CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
790

|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:09:00 -
[1375] - Quote
Shadoo wrote:I don't think anyone who has flown a titan in combat can argue that the ship is not currently overpowered in combat when used in great numbers, just like no one could seriously argue about AOD DDs when they started to be used in 3+3 scale every 10 minutes
Of course, same goes for every ship in eve -- when used in great numbers, but Supercapitals certainly show this curve more often on the field
So I'm extremely happy that you state that the ship needs a role change - last time we were campaigning for AOD DD change -- this was exactly what a lot of us were asking for
But that was 3 years ago
I am therefore rather dissapointed that what we, the community at large, have been asking for a very long time is rather haphazardly brushed off as something that "will be looked at long term" with a surgical change that SCREAMS of a kneejerk reaction without really providing us with much to go on here to see your vision or have comfort you are going to do something in the long term for the "end game" ship in EVE
And forgive me for saying this -- but you have not always had a great track record of revisiting changes you've made in the past as surgical adjustments. Thus I feel like pressing a bit harder on the high level thoughts that have lead you to make this current fix
What is your intended role for Titan with this change on TQ today?
How will you evaluate if your changes implemented will match up with that role on the TQ combat field in this release? For example -- as far as I can see -- a large group of titans will still obliterate a large group of battleships/drakes -- all you've delayed is the first hit and require more micromanagement in making sure the lock queue is evenly spaced out
Given how large fights today unfold on TQ -- how do you see this ship fulfilling your intended role on heavily TiDi systems with the sig change
What is your future vision, even at high level, for the Titan ship class? Will it remain a combat asset or are you looking and overhauling it for something else (personally btw I've argued for the last 4 years that titans should NOT be a combat ship at all, but rather a massive alliance level asset for logistics/cloning/staging/etc)
What assurances can you offer us this change will not remain a permanent fixture for the long term?
With the combat ability of this ship being "surgically adjusted", would you be even willing to look at for example increasing the jump range of the ship to balance the change
And lastly -- are you going to allow those pilots who wish to wait for your stated longer term role adjustments to GM-dock their ship until such a time that this change is no longer a surgical measure in order to still utilize the account/character for combat in EVE?
The intended role for titans is a) jump bridging, b) doomsdaying things, c) fleet boosting and d) doing a decent job of killing capitals with their main guns.
We'll be assessing the success of this change based in the first instance on whether or not players are still telling us they're having problems with this sort of thing, and then if they are, looking at the situation objectively and seeing if it merits further work.
On systems under Time Dilation, we're expecting this to work mechanically identically but subjectively slower. Time Dilation is a technical fix to prevent performance issues on heavily loaded systems; it's not a game mechanic and we're not currently considering it for balancing purposes.
We don't currently have a clear future vision for titans, as mentioned in the first post. We've repeatedly tried and failed to find a role for them that we're happy with in the past, and we don't want to spend significant balance resources on revisiting this right now because we have other priorities.
We can't offer any assurances about our future plans. Every release (~6 months) we sit down and look at what our priorities are for the various different resources we have available (balancers, general designers, UI designers, various breeds of programmer, artists etc) and then allocate accordingly. These priorities change based on the current state of the game, the resources available and so on. Spending significant resources on a major titan rework is not currently on our short-term plan, and beyond that we don't have any reliable way of offering guarantees on what we will and won't be working on. This approach means that we're always delivering maximum possible value, but at the cost of not having rock-solid long-term plans. I would also note here that we're doing this "quick fix" precisely because we don't know when we're going to have a comprehensive solution - we regard the current situation as broken, and we don't want to leave it broken indefinitely while we wait for a "proper fix" with no clear timetable. This is the best way to deal with this general sort of problem in our opinion.
We're considering additional changes to balance out this adjustment; we'll do it if we feel it's necessary, but we'd prefer to make as few changes as possible at this time.
We're also considering ways of letting people "park up", but we can't make any commitments about that this morning. |
|

baltec1
807
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:11:00 -
[1376] - Quote
Smoking Blunts wrote:
they were beaten by a bigger blob after making dumb choices.
The only flaw in that statement is that they all had the largest blob at the time. Many of the fights back then were decided by the blob bringing down the node. This no longer happens so the blobs main weapon is gone which means skill > numbers will win most fights now that CCP is removing the I-win buttanz. |

Razzor Death
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
166
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:12:00 -
[1377] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:It's funny to see that pretty much the only people in this topic who complain about numbers counting for something are the people who stand to lose the ability to just instantly win a fight with titans. The same people who consistently manage to match our numbers when we fight them, and then drop titans when we start to win the fight based on strategy. They're not mad because they're being blobbed, or at risk to being blobbed, -they're not-. They're mad because their ability to instantly win a strategic battle with no effort is being taken away from them. Now they -will- have to be elite pvp.
I've seen time and time again that numbers are only a small part of what matters in a fight. Especially now with things like Time Dilation and the lack of lag. In the old eve, jumping a large fleet into a larger fleet was suicide, or a roll of the dice on who loaded first. And most of the fight was just hoping your guns would fire once in 15 minutes, before the node crashed. Now every action is accepted, everyone loads, everyone has a fair shot.
People ***** about drakes, but goons have tons of fleet doctrines, and I've seen 2 or 3 separate doctrines used in the same fight. Bombers, drakes, sniper t3's, sniper hurricanes, autocannons neuting canes, maelstroms, armor hacs, sniper hacs. All of these supposed cookie-cutter FOTM doctrines require coordination and a ton of support to survive. Dictors in the right place dropping bubbles at the right time, and knowing how to survive. Logistics knowing how to keep themselves alive and in position to rep. Interceptors and fast ships screening tackle and getting warpins. FC's that know how to probe, how to fight, when to run. When to bounce the fleet. Bombers knowing when to strike, who to strike, recons running scrams and webs on the people who need to be hit by... etc
The point of all this is, all these fleets require coordination and precision to win, and ALL OF THEM HAVE A CHANCE. You drop 300 ships on 200 ships, both sides can still win. You drop 50 titans on 300 ships, 400 ships, 500 ships, 800 ships... the titans just won. Hands down, no contest. No subcap fleet can stand on the field, and do the damage required to break reps, when they're losing a ship every single time the titans guns cycle. This is not the way eve is meant to be played, CCP has been nerfing titans since they came out, because they DO NOT FIT WITH EVE and never have. Every ship matters in eve, in every fleet, regardless of size. Until you bring titans in, and then the only ship that matters onfield is how many titans you have. That's not eve, and it's never going to be eve. So they're getting nerfed again, and will get nerfed more... get over it.
This is the most factual post you will read in this thread. All of my 5s |

Cyaron wars
D00M. Northern Coalition.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:13:00 -
[1378] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:BioZvin wrote:CCP Soundwave wrote:Actually, Greyscale went to Cambridge, and while we haven't IQ tested him yet, I'm pretty sure he'd score high  I am sorry in advance here, but could we get some indication from CCP that we are being heard here. Put a lot of time into this game and really would ratter not be forced to leave because I feel like CCP only listens to Goons. I know they say we are less people then they are, but they don't number 345000 like they would have us believe. We're absolutely listening. Titans are an anti-cap/supercap ship and we need to limit their ability to kill subcaps. That's a change that's happening and is unlikely to change. The practical details on how that happens we'd love as much feedback on as possible. We've been talking about the lock timers this morning based on feedback from the playerbase, looking at what adjustments we can possibly make. The changes in the OP are still subject to change if we get feedback on how to achieve our goal better.
According to your logic Battleships are BC killers and they should be unable to pop anything smaller and so on. Now while u are doing your math please also pay attention to targets that titans kill, their signature radius, fit of "blap" titan. As far as I remember game mechanics recognizes ship as sphere of specific size. Size of this sphere = signature radius and is affected by mods fitted on ship. Size of MWD Maelstrom with shield rigs and LSE = Carrier (Capital ship) size. Since there is no difference between mwding BS and carrier according to EVE game mechanics, Titan does what it should do - kill capital.
Why don't u just balance signature radius of ships instead of nerfig something that takes 668 days to train from scratch, twice time to get ISK for it?
Sort your stuff out guys, you are about to have an issue with subscribers. 1 titan pilot = running at least 3 accounts. |

Bob Random
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:14:00 -
[1379] - Quote
I can't believe this thread is only on page 69.
I expected there to be more complaiing than this. |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:14:00 -
[1380] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:
Then take your time and develop a decent concept that doesn't hurt only one side and gives every ship an viable role. If you think that supercaps should be only good at killing dreads and carriers, than make dreads and carriers a viable weapon against BS (+50% Tracking bonus to dreads in siege mode would help). Right now they are only used for ratting and structure shooting. Thus, there is simply no need for a anti-capital pownage machine. --> Supercaps become useless!!! (ok you can still bridge stuff with titans)
Honestly, it would be fairer to simply remove all supercaps and to reimburse the players than this one-sided nerf into oblivion. Right now titans are the only weapon against huge blobs only one alliance is able to field. You basically force us now to do the same. Not sure if having only two huge powerblocks is good for eve.
Oh, and maybe you should take a closer look at the alpha damage of artillery. (High-Sec people would love you for that and they comprise the majority of players.)
P.S: Please start to play your own game. The reason why titans are so good at killing subcaps atm is not because titans have such great tracking but rather because a MWD Drake and a Maelstorm have a signature of a carrier.
There are 3 blocks that can field the same number and carriers are still good for large fights as are the dreads. Also, if the blob is unbeatable why did the NC, BoB, Goons, DRF, Red Alliance, Tri, ASCN ect ect never manage to take over all of 0.0 in the past? Ok I know it is pointless to argue with you. As always you will ignore arguments and facts and say your opinions is the only right one simply because it is your opinion.
For other people who might read this: Would you please show me a huge fight where dreads were fielded for other reason than stucture shooting or against supercaps? Yes, carriers are sometimes used in such fights but they can't be RR- repped in triage so that a mael fleet can easily alpha them (no need to field expensive titans).
Not sure what numbers the AAA/Solar block can field, but team dot usually has 300 less players in fleet than goons do. And obviously, having only 3 powerblocks isn't much better than having 2 powerblocks.
Old NC and CFC actually did hold the entire north in the past. The other half was held by DRF.
|
|

CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
797

|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:15:00 -
[1381] - Quote
Crystal Wolf wrote:I think the opportunity to even post intelligent stuff in this thread is gone but here goes
With regards to the nerf i agree with the tracking nerf something did need to be done there even if it was just a temporary measure. However the targeting nerf is ridiculous
As a person who has been on both sides of a titan fight i can understand why people are whining however this nerf appears to be incredibly short sighted
CCP have thought about how to balance titans to what they believe is an acceptable level but they have failed to take into account how this affects the game as a whole. Titans do need a clearly defined role however CCP have just nuked titans because they claim they don't have the resources to do an overhaul so they slapped something together and just put it in a forum post
Titans will loose their place as an endgame piece of equipment because dreads will be just as effective and cheaper to field what alliance is going to waste time expanding their titan fleet when all they become is a massive jump bridge with a DD
For those who say titan pilots are complaining too much you have to understand that titans don't just grow on trees for some people. For those who aren't in larger alliances or those who don't have tech money it actually does take time and effort to build a titan
From a political standpoint CCP are effectively changing the balance of power towards alliances who can just field hundreds of subcaps. The alliances who rely on supers to augment their fleet strength have been forgotten and just pushed aside. This change definitely needs to go back to the drawing board and CCP need to take factors like this into account.
We would be totally happy with an outcome where people stop expanding their titan fleet. It shouldn't be coming as a huge surprise to anyone that, all other things being equal, we would prefer a situation where there were fewer titans in EVE.
People who're augmenting their fleet strength with supers we're OK with, and they should continue to be OK after this change. We're not happy with situations where supercaps are making up the bulk of the fleet strength. If that's becoming less viable, then this is a desirable outcome for us. |
|
|

CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
797

|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:16:00 -
[1382] - Quote
Krutoj wrote:Lets summirise this patch with nerfing of the biggest End game item, most expenssive and now most useless. Well done at rolling this game back by 7 years. I will address some of the things that Greyscale thinks are true or were "discussed" Quote:We have talked to the CSM about this, and we're comfortable going forward with these changes in light of that discussion. I'm not going to put words in their mouths, though. While this is true and we did discuss this, the major consensus was that nerfing titans is just trying to use a quick fix on a problem that is larger than a titan. Its the problem of 0.0 warfare, ship balance and how the end game currently built around those. Fixing titans as opposed to trying to come up with a better sov mechanics and better ship balance (between tech3 ships and titans), seemed to CCP like an easier way out that would buy them some more affection from the majority of players who cant comprehend this. Quote: XL turret tracking halved, siege module tracking penalty removed Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5
So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place? Why nerf scan resolution, which together with cloak is non existent? I will tell you why, because CCP thinks that if some wanker managed to buy the most rarest fucken items in the game and killed with that titan 10 people, its a cause for concern for entire player base. That said, taking a look at statistics, were a titan normaly an alliance asset, not many can afford to outfit their titan like a christmas tree of officer modules and yet, this became the major factor for this nerf. Funny that, tech 3 officer/deadspace ships (yes with deadspace/officer 100mn afterburners) dont get treated as such and yet there are more of them and they pose more balancing issues. Btw mr "our assumption"Greyscale, assumptions are the mother of all fukups. I hope you will remember this saying next time you draft a patch.
We had a three-page discussion over the course of a week and you didn't post in it once. It's hard to have a discussion with people who don't participate. |
|
|

CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
797

|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:18:00 -
[1383] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of tracking
Too big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem.
All turrets already have sig resolution attribute. This is already used in the damage calculation, you just need to double it for XL weapons.
This doesn't scale the damage, it scales the hit chance. Part of the problem we're having is that titans aren't hitting subcaps all that often, but when they do hit they do full anti-capital damage and frequently one-hit things as a result. |
|

baltec1
807
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:19:00 -
[1384] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:
Sort your stuff out guys, you are about to have an issue with subscribers. 1 titan pilot = running at least 3 accounts.
Im willing to lose 300 titan pilots to make tens of thousands happy. |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
494
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:19:00 -
[1385] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:It's funny to see that pretty much the only people in this topic who complain about numbers counting for something are the people who stand to lose the ability to just instantly win a fight with titans. The same people who consistently manage to match our numbers when we fight them, and then drop titans when we start to win the fight based on strategy. They're not mad because they're being blobbed, or at risk to being blobbed, -they're not-. They're mad because their ability to instantly win a strategic battle with no effort is being taken away from them. Now they -will- have to be elite pvp.
I've seen time and time again that numbers are only a small part of what matters in a fight. Especially now with things like Time Dilation and the lack of lag. In the old eve, jumping a large fleet into a larger fleet was suicide, or a roll of the dice on who loaded first. And most of the fight was just hoping your guns would fire once in 15 minutes, before the node crashed. Now every action is accepted, everyone loads, everyone has a fair shot.
People ***** about drakes, but goons have tons of fleet doctrines, and I've seen 2 or 3 separate doctrines used in the same fight. Bombers, drakes, sniper t3's, sniper hurricanes, autocannons neuting canes, maelstroms, armor hacs, sniper hacs. All of these supposed cookie-cutter FOTM doctrines require coordination and a ton of support to survive. Dictors in the right place dropping bubbles at the right time, and knowing how to survive. Logistics knowing how to keep themselves alive and in position to rep. Interceptors and fast ships screening tackle and getting warpins. FC's that know how to probe, how to fight, when to run. When to bounce the fleet. Bombers knowing when to strike, who to strike, recons running scrams and webs on the people who need to be hit by... etc
The point of all this is, all these fleets require coordination and precision to win, and ALL OF THEM HAVE A CHANCE. You drop 300 ships on 200 ships, both sides can still win. You drop 50 titans on 300 ships, 400 ships, 500 ships, 800 ships... the titans just won. Hands down, no contest. No subcap fleet can stand on the field, and do the damage required to break reps, when they're losing a ship every single time the titans guns cycle. This is not the way eve is meant to be played, CCP has been nerfing titans since they came out, because they DO NOT FIT WITH EVE and never have. Every ship matters in eve, in every fleet, regardless of size. Until you bring titans in, and then the only ship that matters onfield is how many titans you have. That's not eve, and it's never going to be eve. So they're getting nerfed again, and will get nerfed more... get over it. bump |

Smoking Blunts
ZC Industries Dark Stripes
215
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:20:00 -
[1386] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Smoking Blunts wrote:
they were beaten by a bigger blob after making dumb choices.
The only flaw in that statement is that they all had the largest blob at the time. Many of the fights back then were decided by the blob bringing down the node. This no longer happens so the blobs main weapon is gone which means skill > numbers will win most fights now that CCP is removing the I-win buttanz.
they had the largest single blob, but when the other blobs teamed up with other blobs, they out blobed the blob.
was there for the fall of delve, the north and now the east. the biggest blob wins most times. while ive been on both sides of a titan blob and agree they need fixing, i dont think this change will alter much on the battlefields. they need to have there role defined before chnages are made, but as greyscale just stated they havnt a clue what they want them to be able to do so are just making a 'quick fix' . CCP-áare full of words and no action. We will watch what they are doing, for now
|

Dan Massell
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:29:00 -
[1387] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: We had a three-page discussion over the course of a week and you didn't post in it once. It's hard to have a discussion with people who don't participate.
oh no! 3 pages and one week!!! That seems like WAY too long to give everyone from CSM chance to have a say. Please cut it down. Such a small change deserves max 1-2 days. or more like half a day. in US TZ would be the best.
You managed to fly everyone to Iceland because of the monocle tho.
Its good to see CCCP being back where they are most comfortable. Telling you how its going to be or you can go. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5520
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:30:00 -
[1388] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:According to your logic Battleships are BC killers and they should be unable to pop anything smaller and so on. No, that is not his logic. You're extrapolating one role from something completely different and unrelated, so your conclusion winds out up in the ditchGǪ unsurprisingly.
His logic is that their ability to kill subcaps lies too far outside of the role intended for them. This tells us absolutely squat about how BSes should perform compared to BCs and sub-BCs.
Quote:As far as I remember game mechanics recognizes ship as sphere of specific size. Size of this sphere = signature radius and is affected by mods fitted on ship. Size of MWD Maelstrom with shield rigs and LSE = Carrier (Capital ship) size. Since there is no difference between mwding BS and carrier according to EVE game mechanics, Titan does what it should do - kill capital. GǪexcept that there is a massive difference between an MWDing BS and a carrier GÇö one that anyone with even just a basic grasp of the mechanics will understand. In fact, the MWD makes very little difference when it comes to tracking the target. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:31:00 -
[1389] - Quote
Dr 0wnage wrote:First off... ITS ABOUT TIME!
Secondly... its not quite right...
Tracking changes are exactly what we need. The scan res and locked target changes however are not needed. A tracking penalty alone will prevent titans from effectively engaging sub cap fleets. The changes to their scan res will only hinder them in their anti-capital role.
My suggestions are as follows...
1. Nerf XL tracking a bit more. Reason being is that a tracking moros hits BS with relative ease currently (same tracking titans will have with this change). As you said, we have to assume faction / officer tracking computers will be used if it means they'll hit BS / BC.
2. Increase Titan damage bonus (up to 200% at least). As it is currently, titans can be out damaged by dreads. If there role is an anti-capital one, then they need the best at it.
3. Give the dread siege module a tracking bonus. If dreads can fill the role that people were using titans for before (killing BS and BC), then we have a perfect formula for capital escalation. subs < dreads < supers < subs
Bump! |

Freelancer83
Van Diemen's Demise Northern Coalition.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:32:00 -
[1390] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of tracking
Too big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem.
All turrets already have sig resolution attribute. This is already used in the damage calculation, you just need to double it for XL weapons. This doesn't scale the damage, it scales the hit chance. Part of the problem we're having is that titans aren't hitting subcaps all that often, but when they do hit they do full anti-capital damage and frequently one-hit things as a result.
Just wanted to grab that little gem, so tracking not being the issue why the reduction in tracking? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5520
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:37:00 -
[1391] - Quote
Freelancer83 wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:This doesn't scale the damage, it scales the hit chance. Part of the problem we're having is that titans aren't hitting subcaps all that often, but when they do hit they do full anti-capital damage and frequently one-hit things as a result. Just wanted to grab that little gem, so tracking not being the issue why the reduction in tracking? Because it's the next best thing do introducing the kind of mechanic that would allow for the other option (i.e. introducing a sig-dependent damage modifier).
Mara Rinn was suggesting that this was possible with the current mechanics, and Greyscale is pointing out that it wouldn't do what Mara thinks it would GÇö it would, in fact, do exactly the same thing as they're already doing. He's not saying that this change will solve the problem they're having; quite the opposite: he's saying that it's a problem that currently cannot be solved. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Kazanir
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
367
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:38:00 -
[1392] - Quote
Freelancer83 wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of tracking
Too big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem.
All turrets already have sig resolution attribute. This is already used in the damage calculation, you just need to double it for XL weapons. This doesn't scale the damage, it scales the hit chance. Part of the problem we're having is that titans aren't hitting subcaps all that often, but when they do hit they do full anti-capital damage and frequently one-hit things as a result. Just wanted to grab that little gem, so tracking not being the issue why the reduction in tracking?
There must be some misunderstanding here. If I understand the math correctly, doubling the signature radius of a gun would have exactly the same effect as halving the gun's tracking, since the two factors end up being multiplied together anyway. This combined factor (of the tracking-to-angular-velocity ratio and the gun-sig-to-ship-sig) gets entered into the chance-to-hit equation which determines both how often you hit, and (indirectly) the damage multiplier which affects your bullet. |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
494
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:39:00 -
[1393] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: This doesn't scale the damage, it scales the hit chance. Part of the problem we're having is that titans aren't hitting subcaps all that often, but when they do hit they do full anti-capital damage and frequently one-hit things as a result.
This is the underlying issue, in that the mechanics behind all tracking and signature radius are fundamentally broken. It's why we have to resort to this quick fix in the first place. The best example is to just compare an MWDing Drake to a Carrier and see that they have the nearly the same sig radius. This makes it next to impossible to balance ships that shoot at one but not the other. The same applies to targeting, in that it takes the same time to lock an MWDing subcap as a capital ship.
Obviously the quick-fix to that is to re-factor the base sig radius of all capital ships (and probably structures), letting Titans lock large targets much more quickly while preventing them from picking on sub-caps as effectively. But I'm guessing that kind of work is outside your scope for now. It would negate the need for such a dramatic scan res nerf.
I also have to ask - did you consider revisting the Doomsday as an indirect solution to this? For example:
Reduce DD cycle time to 1 minute (90% reduction) Reduce cap and fuel use by 90% too, so they're effectively the same. Reduce base damage from 2mil to ~300k (DPS buff).
The net effect is that the overall DPS from a Doomsday is increased against capital targets (as compensation to titan pilots), but it also acts as a 'mini siege-mode', because as long as the module is active the titan is subject to being unable to align. This stops 'hit and run' titan attacks as they have to hang around longer to apply their damage. The 10min jump countdown would begin from the end of the last activation. The net effect would be that once deployed, Titans would be more commited to a fight and would take longer to extract should things go wrong. Owners would have to choose more carefully about when they deploy titans rather than relying on them as the backbone of their damage.
|

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:43:00 -
[1394] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Krutoj wrote:Lets summirise this patch with nerfing of the biggest End game item, most expenssive and now most useless. Well done at rolling this game back by 7 years. I will address some of the things that Greyscale thinks are true or were "discussed" Quote:We have talked to the CSM about this, and we're comfortable going forward with these changes in light of that discussion. I'm not going to put words in their mouths, though. While this is true and we did discuss this, the major consensus was that nerfing titans is just trying to use a quick fix on a problem that is larger than a titan. Its the problem of 0.0 warfare, ship balance and how the end game currently built around those. Fixing titans as opposed to trying to come up with a better sov mechanics and better ship balance (between tech3 ships and titans), seemed to CCP like an easier way out that would buy them some more affection from the majority of players who cant comprehend this. Quote: XL turret tracking halved, siege module tracking penalty removed Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5
So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place? Why nerf scan resolution, which together with cloak is non existent? I will tell you why, because CCP thinks that if some wanker managed to buy the most rarest fucken items in the game and killed with that titan 10 people, its a cause for concern for entire player base. That said, taking a look at statistics, were a titan normaly an alliance asset, not many can afford to outfit their titan like a christmas tree of officer modules and yet, this became the major factor for this nerf. Funny that, tech 3 officer/deadspace ships (yes with deadspace/officer 100mn afterburners) dont get treated as such and yet there are more of them and they pose more balancing issues. Btw mr "our assumption"Greyscale, assumptions are the mother of all fukups. I hope you will remember this saying next time you draft a patch. We had a three-page discussion over the course of a week and you didn't post in it once. It's hard to have a discussion with people who don't participate.
Dear Greyscale,
you do remember how we told you that your surgical adjustments to anomalies will kill 0.0 and you didn't listen so that you had to apologize afterwards? Please don't do this again. Yes supercaps need a proper role and balancing but making them useless simply because you don't have the ressources to do it properly is not the solution. Do at least the following: Frigs < Cruisers < BC < BS < capitals < supercapitals Cruisers can easily kill frigs --> BC can easily kill cruisers < BS can easily kill BCs (and here is the problem) capitals are almost useless against BS < Supercapitals can easily kill capitals.
Make Dreads good against BS and don't nerf the sensor strength of titans.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5520
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:43:00 -
[1395] - Quote
Kazanir wrote:There must be some misunderstanding here. If I understand the math correctly, doubling the signature radius of a gun would have exactly the same effect as halving the gun's tracking, since the two factors end up being multiplied together anyway. This combined factor (of the tracking-to-angular-velocity ratio and the gun-sig-to-ship-sig) gets entered into the chance-to-hit equation which determines both how often you hit, and (indirectly) the damage multiplier which affects your bullet. Yes, but it only affects the damage so far.
The damage multiplier you can get from any given hit is strictly limited to a rather narrow band: from 50% damage (the worst possible hit, available at the smallest possible hit chance), to 150% damage (the best possible hit, available at the best possible hit chance)GǪ well, next best aside from the 300% multiplier you get from a critical hit.
This means that, no matter what, a weapon that delivers 40k raw damage will never do less than 20k damage GÇö the only way to do less is to not hit at all. Changing the hit chance by fiddling with the tracking factors doesn't change how much damage a weapon delivers as an absolute minimum. It just changes what range of damage multipliers are available to you out of the range +ù0.5 GÇô +ù1.5. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Artyom Hunter
Battlestars S E D I T I O N
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:43:00 -
[1396] - Quote
Dovinian wrote:This is a very good change. And I have an Erebus.
Now that I'm more awake, I'm going to elaborate on this a bit.
While I would have liked to see CCP spend more time into an intelligent fix/solid counter this is going to have to do for now.
Yes, Titans are very expensive. This does not mean that they should be an instant win button and a hard counter to every fleet except Armor Hacs.
I also think that Titans are too easy to acquire. Mineral compression is a joke (I do a lot of it) and getting 65 freighter loads of minerals into 12 jump freighter trips (the necessary numbers to build a titan) with 100% lossless compression is broken.
Give Titans a new role, make them harder to build (fix/adjust mineral compression) and I'll be a happy boy.
I like this guy, he is a Titan pilot and doesn't say "Derp I've played this game for x years and am in x alliance, therefore I am entitled by international space law or something to dominate the game with my 12km imaginary e-peen. I can't possibly live if I don't have an instant win button against everything" +1 to you sir.
Good show.
Jolly Good show... |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:45:00 -
[1397] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:BioZvin wrote:CCP Soundwave wrote:Actually, Greyscale went to Cambridge, and while we haven't IQ tested him yet, I'm pretty sure he'd score high  I am sorry in advance here, but could we get some indication from CCP that we are being heard here. Put a lot of time into this game and really would ratter not be forced to leave because I feel like CCP only listens to Goons. I know they say we are less people then they are, but they don't number 345000 like they would have us believe. We're absolutely listening. Titans are an anti-cap/supercap ship and we need to limit their ability to kill subcaps. That's a change that's happening and is unlikely to change. The practical details on how that happens we'd love as much feedback on as possible. We've been talking about the lock timers this morning based on feedback from the playerbase, looking at what adjustments we can possibly make. The changes in the OP are still subject to change if we get feedback on how to achieve our goal better.
Since when a Titan is limited to shoot only capital ships and structures? It's a Titan, has advanced technology, it's 100 bill isk, that's why blasts everything ! If I wanna hit capital ships and structures I'll get a freaking dread, a bit cheaper, don't you think?
Titan is the mother of all ships, it's big as well ( my Avatar fits perfectly in the CSMA, no space left at all) It's big ! It's OP ! That's the way it should be ! That's why I spent lot of time to train for it, that's why I did grind the isk. Not for you to come and scratch everything cos you want it so. Or mittani wants so.
Now really, fit a titan for tank and tell me what you can hit. I forgot to fit tracking and damage mods once and shooted. I barely scratched a single target out of 6...In several rounds of fire. Get serious, Titans can hit only capital ships tank fitted. Go on SiSi, check for yourself...Did you ever try?
If you really change it, reimburse us for all the time and effort. ISK and SP.
|

Cyaron wars
D00M. Northern Coalition.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:47:00 -
[1398] - Quote
There's something CCP should nuderstand. Titans are only tactical advantage against massive subcapital blob. Removing will leave no choice but to blob more. So there will be game of blobs and not skills and isk fielded. Would be reasonable to replace this solution with dread buff. make capitals as counter to subcaps and supers to counter capitals. CCP has this on paper but it dosn't work in game. this is the biggest issue here.
In any other case you are making a blob of battleships only weapon in large scale fight. I find this stupid since humanity always tried to have some Tactical advantage on battlefield rather fielding numbers. |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
494
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:50:00 -
[1399] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:There's something CCP should nuderstand. Titans are only tactical advantage against massive subcapital blob. Removing will leave no choice but to blob more. So there will be game of blobs and not skills and isk fielded. Would be reasonable to replace this solution with dread buff. make capitals as counter to subcaps and supers to counter capitals. CCP has this on paper but it dosn't work in game. this is the biggest issue here.
In any other case you are making a blob of battleships only weapon in large scale fight. I find this stupid since humanity always tried to have some Tactical advantage on battlefield rather fielding numbers.
you missed this:
GeneralDisturbed wrote:It's funny to see that pretty much the only people in this topic who complain about numbers counting for something are the people who stand to lose the ability to just instantly win a fight with titans. The same people who consistently manage to match our numbers when we fight them, and then drop titans when we start to win the fight based on strategy. They're not mad because they're being blobbed, or at risk to being blobbed, -they're not-. They're mad because their ability to instantly win a strategic battle with no effort is being taken away from them. Now they -will- have to be elite pvp.
I've seen time and time again that numbers are only a small part of what matters in a fight. Especially now with things like Time Dilation and the lack of lag. In the old eve, jumping a large fleet into a larger fleet was suicide, or a roll of the dice on who loaded first. And most of the fight was just hoping your guns would fire once in 15 minutes, before the node crashed. Now every action is accepted, everyone loads, everyone has a fair shot.
People ***** about drakes, but goons have tons of fleet doctrines, and I've seen 2 or 3 separate doctrines used in the same fight. Bombers, drakes, sniper t3's, sniper hurricanes, autocannons neuting canes, maelstroms, armor hacs, sniper hacs. All of these supposed cookie-cutter FOTM doctrines require coordination and a ton of support to survive. Dictors in the right place dropping bubbles at the right time, and knowing how to survive. Logistics knowing how to keep themselves alive and in position to rep. Interceptors and fast ships screening tackle and getting warpins. FC's that know how to probe, how to fight, when to run. When to bounce the fleet. Bombers knowing when to strike, who to strike, recons running scrams and webs on the people who need to be hit by... etc
The point of all this is, all these fleets require coordination and precision to win, and ALL OF THEM HAVE A CHANCE. You drop 300 ships on 200 ships, both sides can still win. You drop 50 titans on 300 ships, 400 ships, 500 ships, 800 ships... the titans just won. Hands down, no contest. No subcap fleet can stand on the field, and do the damage required to break reps, when they're losing a ship every single time the titans guns cycle. This is not the way eve is meant to be played, CCP has been nerfing titans since they came out, because they DO NOT FIT WITH EVE and never have. Every ship matters in eve, in every fleet, regardless of size. Until you bring titans in, and then the only ship that matters onfield is how many titans you have. That's not eve, and it's never going to be eve. So they're getting nerfed again, and will get nerfed more... get over it.
|

Freelancer83
Van Diemen's Demise Northern Coalition.
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:55:00 -
[1400] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:There's something CCP should nuderstand. Titans are only tactical advantage against massive subcapital blob. Removing will leave no choice but to blob more. So there will be game of blobs and not skills and isk fielded. Would be reasonable to replace this solution with dread buff. make capitals as counter to subcaps and supers to counter capitals. CCP has this on paper but it dosn't work in game. this is the biggest issue here.
Agree Buff Dreads a bit so they are a viable option vs Subcaps so we can see some Dread/carrier fleets, which then gives the Super/Titans something to shoot at.
Smaller alliances needs to have higher risk options available to them for when they are outnumbered heavily.
|

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:55:00 -
[1401] - Quote
I find it funny that the folks crying about the "BLOB" have matched or exceeded the CFC numbers over and over.The real problem is you put all your eggs in one basket.OOP's.
As for the nerf it's self, it's not going to be enough. PL are already bragging that a blaster fit erebus will still track better than a maelstrom.So they will continue to use them to happily blap subcaps.Leave the sensor strength as it is, and remove their ability to lock any sub cap at all and be done with it. |

Rick
The Ankou Raiden.
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:58:00 -
[1402] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of tracking
Too big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem.
All turrets already have sig resolution attribute. This is already used in the damage calculation, you just need to double it for XL weapons. This doesn't scale the damage, it scales the hit chance. Part of the problem we're having is that titans aren't hitting subcaps all that often, but when they do hit they do full anti-capital damage and frequently one-hit things as a result.
I always thought when u effectively hit a ship, with a bullet the size of said ship it would instantly destroy it? no? |

Kazanir
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
367
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:02:00 -
[1403] - Quote
Rick wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of tracking
Too big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem.
All turrets already have sig resolution attribute. This is already used in the damage calculation, you just need to double it for XL weapons. This doesn't scale the damage, it scales the hit chance. Part of the problem we're having is that titans aren't hitting subcaps all that often, but when they do hit they do full anti-capital damage and frequently one-hit things as a result. I always thought when u effectively hit a ship, with a bullet the size of said ship it would instantly destroy it? no?
Yeah, and this hasn't changed really because a tracking nerf doesn't directly affect it. Even with a 10% hit chance, when that titan DOES hit, it is hitting for between 50% and 60% of its "full" damage...which is a lot. Apparently Greyscale wants to change that, but it is going to require more fundamental changes to the bullet damage equation and the tracking nerf doesn't accomplish that, at least not directly. |
|

CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
806

|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:03:00 -
[1404] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:Dear Greyscale,
you do remember how we told you that your surgical adjustments to anomalies will kill 0.0 and you didn't listen so that you had to apologize afterwards? Please don't do this again. Yes supercaps need a proper role and balancing but making them useless simply because you don't have the ressources to do it properly is not the solution. Do at least the following: Frigs < Cruisers < BC < BS < capitals < supercapitals Cruisers can easily kill frigs --> BC can easily kill cruisers < BS can easily kill BCs (and here is the problem) capitals are almost useless against BS < Supercapitals can easily kill capitals.
Make Dreads good against BS and don't nerf the sensor strength of titans.
Dreadnaughts are primarily anti-structure tools, with anti-capital as a secondary role. The capital ships you're looking for to deal with battleships are carriers. |
|

Kusanagi Kasuga
Ferocious Felines
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:05:00 -
[1405] - Quote
Krutoj wrote:So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place? Why nerf scan resolution, which together with cloak is non existent? I will tell you why, because CCP thinks that if some wanker managed to buy the most rarest fucken items in the game and killed with that titan 10 people, its a cause for concern for entire player base.
So, what you're saying is that Black Ops battle ships (significantly rarer than titans) need a proper buff, so they can kill everything, including titans? I'm down with that. Who's with me?
Also, EA Ships (also rarer than titans) should probably be in receipt of a similar buff, but let's not be boring and just give them massive DPS, huge tanks and an epeen big enough to dock a battleship in. Let's give them a grid-wide EWar effect, possibly for the sake of interest, one that only affects caps and supercaps. Sounds pretty interesting to me. |

Dan Massell
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:07:00 -
[1406] - Quote
Kusanagi Kasuga wrote: So, what you're saying is that Black Ops battle ships (significantly rarer than titans) need a proper buff, so they can kill everything, including titans?
you don't get out of jita much do you |

Crystal Wolf
Invision Hosting Invision Group
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:10:00 -
[1407] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:[quote=Crystal Wolf]I think the opportunity to even post intelligent stuff in this thread is gone but here goes
With regards to the nerf i agree with the tracking nerf something did need to be done there even if it was just a temporary measure. However the targeting nerf is ridiculou
As a person who has been on both sides of a titan fight i can understand why people are whining however this nerf appears to be incredibly short sighte
CCP have thought about how to balance titans to what they believe is an acceptable level but they have failed to take into account how this affects the game as a whole. Titans do need a clearly defined role however CCP have just nuked titans because they claim they don't have the resources to do an overhaul so they slapped something together and just put it in a forum pos
Titans will loose their place as an endgame piece of equipment because dreads will be just as effective and cheaper to field what alliance is going to waste time expanding their titan fleet when all they become is a massive jump bridge with a D
For those who say titan pilots are complaining too much you have to understand that titans don't just grow on trees for some people. For those who aren't in larger alliances or those who don't have tech money it actually does take time and effort to build a tita
From a political standpoint CCP are effectively changing the balance of power towards alliances who can just field hundreds of subcaps. The alliances who rely on supers to augment their fleet strength have been forgotten and just pushed aside. This change definitely needs to go back to the drawing board and CCP need to take factors like this into account.[/quote
We would be totally happy with an outcome where people stop expanding their titan fleet. It shouldn't be coming as a huge surprise to anyone that, all other things being equal, we would prefer a situation where there were fewer titans in EVE
People who're augmenting their fleet strength with supers we're OK with, and they should continue to be OK after this change. We're not happy with situations where supercaps are making up the bulk of the fleet strength. If that's becoming less viable, then this is a desirable outcome for us.
Firstly its good to see responses from CCP on this matter as that should allay any concerns that people had that you might not be listening
Secondly the only issue i see generated by the nerf is the ill feelings it will create for titan pilots who didn't just have their titans "handed" to them and had to work hard for them investing several months into the game if not longer. But as Shadoo mentioned earlier it would be a good idea to grant titans the ability to to either dock or be GM docked otherwise what will happen is those accounts will just unsub when they could be used for better things until you have a definite timetable for the overhauling of titans
All up i admit titans are currently broken and the tracking nerf is needed just remove the targeting nerf and that should reduce a fair amount of the complaining
Also out of curiosity will these changes be available on SISI before deployment on Tranquility? Invision Hosting - Providing Quality service solutions Forum Topic: Here |

Titan Keeper 22
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:11:00 -
[1408] - Quote
ok fine nerf the hell out of it but instead,
make it immune to everything(including capital logistics;titans how many times bigger than normal capital ships? it should repair itself after each battle) but gun/misslie/drone damage that way with 5 scan res, max 3 targets and half tracking, it may inflict as little damage as you all wished but make them semi indestructible by making them immune to interdiction including focused hic bubble. then i'd say we have a deal.
to opposing people -
so usually how many titans are being built every months? and how man titans get destroyed every months?
i really doubt making them immune to interdiction is going to make 'there are too many titans' problem any worse
and it wont be totally indestructible; if the titan uses DD, then it wont be able to jump out for 10min; there, give him some bumps bring your dreads/supers and you can kill it then. without any logistics support, i pretty much think the titan wont survive.
well, if the titan doesn't use its DD..consider it a worthless giant moving structure(well i guess a tad bit better than a faction battleship if used for killing siged dreads) |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:12:00 -
[1409] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:Dear Greyscale,
you do remember how we told you that your surgical adjustments to anomalies will kill 0.0 and you didn't listen so that you had to apologize afterwards? Please don't do this again. Yes supercaps need a proper role and balancing but making them useless simply because you don't have the ressources to do it properly is not the solution. Do at least the following: Frigs < Cruisers < BC < BS < capitals < supercapitals Cruisers can easily kill frigs --> BC can easily kill cruisers < BS can easily kill BCs (and here is the problem) capitals are almost useless against BS < Supercapitals can easily kill capitals.
Make Dreads good against BS and don't nerf the sensor strength of titans.
Dreadnaughts are primarily anti-structure tools, with anti-capital as a secondary role. The capital ships you're looking for to deal with battleships are carriers.
Wrong. I was looking for Titan. Cos I trained for it. And it's working good. Since when you tell us what we are looking for? It's the other way around. We tell you what we're looking for. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5522
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:13:00 -
[1410] - Quote
Dan Massell wrote:Kusanagi Kasuga wrote:So, what you're saying is that Black Ops battle ships (significantly rarer than titans) need a proper buff, so they can kill everything, including titans? you don't get out of jita much do you The fact remains: blops and ewar frigates are rarer ships than Titans and have been for years.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Kusanagi Kasuga
Ferocious Felines
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:18:00 -
[1411] - Quote
Dan Massell wrote:Kusanagi Kasuga wrote: So, what you're saying is that Black Ops battle ships (significantly rarer than titans) need a proper buff, so they can kill everything, including titans?
you don't get out of jita much do you You missed the memo, but the text you bolded isn't a disputed fact by anyone, perhaps not including you. But that only makes you misinformed and unintentionally hilarious. |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
494
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:18:00 -
[1412] - Quote
Acwron wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: Dreadnaughts are primarily anti-structure tools, with anti-capital as a secondary role. The capital ships you're looking for to deal with battleships are carriers.
Wrong. I was looking for Titan. Cos I trained for it. And it's working good. Since when you tell us what we are looking for? It's the other way around. We tell you what we're looking for. You're absolutely correct. We (the majority of the players) told CCP what we're looking for. And this is CCP implementing it. I'm sorry that you're very much in the minority here. You are the 0.2%. |

Wishdokkta CEO
The Riot Formation Get Off My Lawn
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:23:00 -
[1413] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:It's funny to see that pretty much the only people in this topic who complain about numbers counting for something are the people who stand to lose the ability to just instantly win a fight with titans. The same people who consistently manage to match our numbers when we fight them, and then drop titans when we start to win the fight based on strategy. They're not mad because they're being blobbed, or at risk to being blobbed, -they're not-. They're mad because their ability to instantly win a strategic battle with no effort is being taken away from them. Now they -will- have to be elite pvp.
I've seen time and time again that numbers are only a small part of what matters in a fight. Especially now with things like Time Dilation and the lack of lag. In the old eve, jumping a large fleet into a larger fleet was suicide, or a roll of the dice on who loaded first. And most of the fight was just hoping your guns would fire once in 15 minutes, before the node crashed. Now every action is accepted, everyone loads, everyone has a fair shot.
People ***** about drakes, but goons have tons of fleet doctrines, and I've seen 2 or 3 separate doctrines used in the same fight. Bombers, drakes, sniper t3's, sniper hurricanes, autocannons neuting canes, maelstroms, armor hacs, sniper hacs. All of these supposed cookie-cutter FOTM doctrines require coordination and a ton of support to survive. Dictors in the right place dropping bubbles at the right time, and knowing how to survive. Logistics knowing how to keep themselves alive and in position to rep. Interceptors and fast ships screening tackle and getting warpins. FC's that know how to probe, how to fight, when to run. When to bounce the fleet. Bombers knowing when to strike, who to strike, recons running scrams and webs on the people who need to be hit by... etc
The point of all this is, all these fleets require coordination and precision to win, and ALL OF THEM HAVE A CHANCE. You drop 300 ships on 200 ships, both sides can still win. You drop 50 titans on 300 ships, 400 ships, 500 ships, 800 ships... the titans just won. Hands down, no contest. No subcap fleet can stand on the field, and do the damage required to break reps, when they're losing a ship every single time the titans guns cycle. This is not the way eve is meant to be played, CCP has been nerfing titans since they came out, because they DO NOT FIT WITH EVE and never have. Every ship matters in eve, in every fleet, regardless of size. Until you bring titans in, and then the only ship that matters onfield is how many titans you have. That's not eve, and it's never going to be eve. So they're getting nerfed again, and will get nerfed more... get over it.
This.
|

Doctor Eezee
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:26:00 -
[1414] - Quote
Dan Massell wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: We had a three-page discussion over the course of a week and you didn't post in it once. It's hard to have a discussion with people who don't participate.
oh no! 3 pages and one week!!! That seems like WAY too long to give everyone from CSM chance to have a say. Please cut it down. Such a small change deserves max 1-2 days. or more like half a day. in US TZ would be the best. You managed to fly everyone to Iceland because of the monocle tho. Its good to see CCCP being back where they are most comfortable. Telling you how its going to be or you can go.
Well, if it was only 3 pages there couldn't have been much disagreement by the CSM members or the ones disagreeing don't seem to check the forums nearly enough. "My rule is: If you meet the weakest vessel, attack; if it is a vessel equal to yours, attack; and if it is stronger than yours, also attack..." - Admiral Stepan O. Makarov |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1867
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:27:00 -
[1415] - Quote
Acwron wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:Dear Greyscale,
you do remember how we told you that your surgical adjustments to anomalies will kill 0.0 and you didn't listen so that you had to apologize afterwards? Please don't do this again. Yes supercaps need a proper role and balancing but making them useless simply because you don't have the ressources to do it properly is not the solution. Do at least the following: Frigs < Cruisers < BC < BS < capitals < supercapitals Cruisers can easily kill frigs --> BC can easily kill cruisers < BS can easily kill BCs (and here is the problem) capitals are almost useless against BS < Supercapitals can easily kill capitals.
Make Dreads good against BS and don't nerf the sensor strength of titans.
Dreadnaughts are primarily anti-structure tools, with anti-capital as a secondary role. The capital ships you're looking for to deal with battleships are carriers. Wrong. I was looking for Titan. Cos I trained for it. And it's working good. Since when you tell us what we are looking for? It's the other way around. We tell you what we're looking for.
Every nerf CCP has done to Titans has been to reduce their ability in combating subcaps. They are trying to tell you something (hint: it's that training for a titan to blap battleships is wrong). CCP gets to tell you what you are looking for because they develop the game.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Scrapyard Bob
EVE University Ivy League
749
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:32:00 -
[1416] - Quote
Jita Bloodtear wrote:What is the intended role for titans?
Fleet boosters? Logistical fleet bridging? Anti-capital weapons? Anti-structure weapons? Anti-subcap blapers?
Please clarify what role the titan is meant to serve, and why it's broken.
Well that's half the problem with some of the larger ship classes. They're too much "do everything" rather then having specialized hull types for specific applications. That "do everything" approach, also makes them extremely difficult to balance until you break their functionality out into multiple hulls - or require that sub-systems be fitted to support a specific role.
|

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:34:00 -
[1417] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Acwron wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:Dear Greyscale,
you do remember how we told you that your surgical adjustments to anomalies will kill 0.0 and you didn't listen so that you had to apologize afterwards? Please don't do this again. Yes supercaps need a proper role and balancing but making them useless simply because you don't have the ressources to do it properly is not the solution. Do at least the following: Frigs < Cruisers < BC < BS < capitals < supercapitals Cruisers can easily kill frigs --> BC can easily kill cruisers < BS can easily kill BCs (and here is the problem) capitals are almost useless against BS < Supercapitals can easily kill capitals.
Make Dreads good against BS and don't nerf the sensor strength of titans.
Dreadnaughts are primarily anti-structure tools, with anti-capital as a secondary role. The capital ships you're looking for to deal with battleships are carriers. Wrong. I was looking for Titan. Cos I trained for it. And it's working good. Since when you tell us what we are looking for? It's the other way around. We tell you what we're looking for. Every nerf CCP has done to Titans has been to reduce their ability in combating subcaps. They are trying to tell you something (hint: it's that training for a titan to blap battleships is wrong). CCP gets to tell you what you are looking for because they develop the game.
You failed to target nothing.
They develop what we want cos we pay for the game. If it's to be as you want, will be if you have the majority. And probably you have. Still doesn't mean you're right. You are just more than us. |

Rick
The Ankou Raiden.
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:37:00 -
[1418] - Quote
71 pages and all i got really from this is
1. Goons cry and get what they wan 2. Greyscale appears to be a moron, and they still let him make changes like this to the gam 3. This change is going to happen this way and no other, CCP say they are listening to alternitives but wont actually make any changes to the idea that they have pulled out of somewher 5. I think Greyscale is a moro 6. After this patch there will probably be a STOG, where thier leader/CSM will annouce he has manage to get CCP to destroy the use of titans and they can now take over EVE, after which they will must a few thousand toons and do so 7. there is more but im tired and can no longer be bothered to try have an idea changed when its known that CCP generally dont give a rats ass about anything other than goons want and will conform to thier needs and only that
Thanks again CCP. Next attempt at a game you should probably employ
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2676
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:37:00 -
[1419] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote: you do remember how we told you
who is this "we" worthless npc alt |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
956
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:39:00 -
[1420] - Quote
Rick wrote:71 pages and all i got really from this is
1. Goons cry and get what they wan 2. Greyscale appears to be a moron, and they still let him make changes like this to the gam 3. This change is going to happen this way and no other, CCP say they are listening to alternitives but wont actually make any changes to the idea that they have pulled out of somewher 5. I think Greyscale is a moro 6. After this patch there will probably be a STOG, where thier leader/CSM will annouce he has manage to get CCP to destroy the use of titans and they can now take over EVE, after which they will must a few thousand toons and do so 7. there is more but im tired and can no longer be bothered to try have an idea changed when its known that CCP generally dont give a rats ass about anything other than goons want and will conform to thier needs and only that
Thanks again CCP. Next attempt at a game you should probably employ
Have you considered nobody listens to your arguments because you fail to make any and act like a petulant child? |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
496
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:39:00 -
[1421] - Quote
Rick wrote:71 pages and all i got really from this is
1. Goons cry and get what they wan 2. Greyscale appears to be a moron, and they still let him make changes like this to the gam 3. This change is going to happen this way and no other, CCP say they are listening to alternitives but wont actually make any changes to the idea that they have pulled out of somewher 5. I think Greyscale is a moro 6. After this patch there will probably be a STOG, where thier leader/CSM will annouce he has manage to get CCP to destroy the use of titans and they can now take over EVE, after which they will must a few thousand toons and do so 7. there is more but im tired and can no longer be bothered to try have an idea changed when its known that CCP generally dont give a rats ass about anything other than goons want and will conform to thier needs and only that
Thanks again CCP. Next attempt at a game you should probably employ
With posting of that quality you're not helping your cause even the tiniest bit. |
|

CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
814

|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:44:00 -
[1422] - Quote
Crystal Wolf wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Crystal Wolf wrote:I think the opportunity to even post intelligent stuff in this thread is gone but here goes
With regards to the nerf i agree with the tracking nerf something did need to be done there even if it was just a temporary measure. However the targeting nerf is ridiculou
As a person who has been on both sides of a titan fight i can understand why people are whining however this nerf appears to be incredibly short sighte
CCP have thought about how to balance titans to what they believe is an acceptable level but they have failed to take into account how this affects the game as a whole. Titans do need a clearly defined role however CCP have just nuked titans because they claim they don't have the resources to do an overhaul so they slapped something together and just put it in a forum pos
Titans will loose their place as an endgame piece of equipment because dreads will be just as effective and cheaper to field what alliance is going to waste time expanding their titan fleet when all they become is a massive jump bridge with a D
For those who say titan pilots are complaining too much you have to understand that titans don't just grow on trees for some people. For those who aren't in larger alliances or those who don't have tech money it actually does take time and effort to build a tita
From a political standpoint CCP are effectively changing the balance of power towards alliances who can just field hundreds of subcaps. The alliances who rely on supers to augment their fleet strength have been forgotten and just pushed aside. This change definitely needs to go back to the drawing board and CCP need to take factors like this into account. We would be totally happy with an outcome where people stop expanding their titan fleet. It shouldn't be coming as a huge surprise to anyone that, all other things being equal, we would prefer a situation where there were fewer titans in EVE People who're augmenting their fleet strength with supers we're OK with, and they should continue to be OK after this change. We're not happy with situations where supercaps are making up the bulk of the fleet strength. If that's becoming less viable, then this is a desirable outcome for us. Firstly its good to see responses from CCP on this matter as that should allay any concerns that people had that you might not be listening Secondly the only issue i see generated by the nerf is the ill feelings it will create for titan pilots who didn't just have their titans "handed" to them and had to work hard for them investing several months into the game if not longer. But as Shadoo mentioned earlier it would be a good idea to grant titans the ability to to either dock or be GM docked otherwise what will happen is those accounts will just unsub when they could be used for better things until you have a definite timetable for the overhauling of titans All up i admit titans are currently broken and the tracking nerf is needed just remove the targeting nerf and that should reduce a fair amount of the complaining Also out of curiosity will these changes be available on SISI before deployment on Tranquility?
We're investigating whether it's possible to add some easy way for people to "park" sensibly; CSMAs are supposed to offer this function, but their total lack of security obviously makes them fairly non-viable.
These changes should be on singularity prior to deployment, but I don't have an actual schedule available for that. |
|

gfldex
375
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:45:00 -
[1423] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:This doesn't scale the damage, it scales the hit chance. Part of the problem we're having is that titans aren't hitting subcaps all that often, but when they do hit they do full anti-capital damage and frequently one-hit things as a result.
Indeed. And the reason why folk are forced to one volley targets are excessive RR tanks. But don't worry, the proposed change wont be a problem. It's fairly easy to lift the sig radius of any non supcap (ohh the irony) by a factor of 5.5 with a single Rapier. All you need to do is to read and understand the bonus of said ship.
The tracking of Titans was never a problem. The problem with titans and moms are the massive HP they got now. Before that boost nobody had a problem to fight Titans because you could actually destroy them without taking massive losses. A blob of supcaps will always win the hitpoint race that is PvP in EVE. The massive buffer is scaling any RR done to Titans up to a point where it gets unfeasible to primary them. As a result a Titan blob has all the time in the world to kill as many subcaps as they please. The chance to hit anything is fairly slim for a Titan, even without nerfing tracking. Arm chair game designers only see the killmails. They don't see how often hitting stuff fails. But if you have fights that last for hours there is plenty of time to lock and kill stuff. Tracking nerf or not.
If you want to help with titan tracking you have to ignore titan tracking and make it risky to field them - as it used to be.
I hope you understand the side effect of that tracking nerf. Gang links and the minmatar titans gang bonus fully stack. As a result a carrier with transversal - even while being webbed - will become a problem to hit (as it is already is for loldreads). If you force players to bring painty rapiers they will do so. The whining of subcap pilots will be ENDLESS.
The game has a tutorial that gives you a mining laser and a railgun and tells you to go shoot rocks and red crosses. It teaches you nothing else. It's been that way for 8 years, so are you really surprised that there are people who aren't aware that this is a pvp game? --Jafit McJafitson |

Doctor Eezee
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:45:00 -
[1424] - Quote
Rick wrote:71 pages and all i got really from this is
1. Goons cry and get what they wan 2. Greyscale appears to be a moron, and they still let him make changes like this to the gam 3. This change is going to happen this way and no other, CCP say they are listening to alternitives but wont actually make any changes to the idea that they have pulled out of somewher 5. I think Greyscale is a moro 6. After this patch there will probably be a STOG, where thier leader/CSM will annouce he has manage to get CCP to destroy the use of titans and they can now take over EVE, after which they will must a few thousand toons and do so 7. there is more but im tired and can no longer be bothered to try have an idea changed when its known that CCP generally dont give a rats ass about anything other than goons want and will conform to thier needs and only that
Thanks again CCP. Next attempt at a game you should probably employ
"Also stop crying in the EVEo forums, its exactly what the goons are craving for. If you need to go mental, do it with out of alliance alt"
Maybe you should listen to the other members of your alliance. I'm still baffled that people find this surprising. Introducing Titans into the game was a huge fuckup, so whoever didn't see this nerf coming is just blind.
Also I bid 25b for your now useless titan, if you want to get rid of it. "My rule is: If you meet the weakest vessel, attack; if it is a vessel equal to yours, attack; and if it is stronger than yours, also attack..." - Admiral Stepan O. Makarov |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1867
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:47:00 -
[1425] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Every nerf CCP has done to Titans has been to reduce their ability in combating subcaps. They are trying to tell you something (hint: it's that training for a titan to blap battleships is wrong). CCP gets to tell you what you are looking for because they develop the game.
You failed to target nothing. They develop what we want cos we pay for the game.
Way more people paying for the game think Titans are overpowered.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Crystal Wolf
Invision Hosting Invision Group
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:48:00 -
[1426] - Quote
CynoNet Two wrote:Rick wrote:71 pages and all i got really from this is
1. Goons cry and get what they wan 2. Greyscale appears to be a moron, and they still let him make changes like this to the gam 3. This change is going to happen this way and no other, CCP say they are listening to alternitives but wont actually make any changes to the idea that they have pulled out of somewher 5. I think Greyscale is a moro 6. After this patch there will probably be a STOG, where thier leader/CSM will annouce he has manage to get CCP to destroy the use of titans and they can now take over EVE, after which they will must a few thousand toons and do so 7. there is more but im tired and can no longer be bothered to try have an idea changed when its known that CCP generally dont give a rats ass about anything other than goons want and will conform to thier needs and only that
Thanks again CCP. Next attempt at a game you should probably employ
With posting of that quality you're not helping your cause even the tiniest bit.
agreeing with Vile and CynoNet you are simply just posting for the sake of posting and calling CCP devs morons is not the way to press an argument. If you can no longer be bothered to constructively contribute to the thread then please do not bother posting anymore. Invision Hosting - Providing Quality service solutions Forum Topic: Here |

Variable1
FinFleet Raiden.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:49:00 -
[1427] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:
The intended role for titans is a) jump bridging, b) doomsdaying things, c) fleet boosting and d) doing a decent job of killing capitals with their main guns.
We'll be assessing the success of this change based in the first instance on whether or not players are still telling us they're having problems with this sort of thing, and then if they are, looking at the situation objectively and seeing if it merits further work.
I'd like to know who is having problems just now?
CCP Greyscale wrote: We don't currently have a clear future vision for titans, as mentioned in the first post. We've repeatedly tried and failed to find a role for them that we're happy with in the past, and we don't want to spend significant balance resources on revisiting this right now because we have other priorities.
If you have other priorities, then leave them alone please. Why make a change because of whines and no actual data, based on an extreme character profile and titan fitting that doesn't match 99% of Titan pilots?
CCP Greyscale wrote: I would also note here that we're doing this "quick fix" precisely because we don't know when we're going to have a comprehensive solution - we regard the current situation as broken, and we don't want to leave it broken indefinitely while we wait for a "proper fix" with no clear timetable. This is the best way to deal with this general sort of problem in our opinion.
Please note. NO ONE wants an ill thought out 'quick fix'. If you think Titans are an issue, spell out all scenarios where this might be true, back it up with data and actual fleet fights. Then make a change based on facts, not hearsay of certain player elements in game. If you don't have time to do it properly, why do it all? This is what gets CCP the bad rep :(
CCP Greyscale wrote: We're also considering ways of letting people "park up", but we can't make any commitments about that this morning.
Why would you want to make a change that would make pilots that (in my case) spent 3 years saving for a super, want to dock it up and unsub the char?
These decisions really do go against any EVE Fan's sense of gameplay. There is zero objectivity being displayed here.
Sadface |

Bubanni
SniggWaffe EVE Corporation 123566322353
132
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:49:00 -
[1428] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of tracking
Too big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem.
CCP Greyscale, I was wondering... what if a new formula was added to turrets?... one that I know will require alot of work and balance, but would also make the rest of the game get even more interresting
Now hear me out here.... Signature res. of turrets vs signature of target effecting the damage the target receives
as an example lets look at a Tachyon Beam laser II which has 400 Signature resolution... what I had in mind was saying if the target this tachyon beam shoots at is only 200meter signature, it would effectively reduce the dmg by 50% (400/200)=0.5
right now the signature only effects the tracking if the target is smaller than the signature of the guns, I realize that would be a huge reduction under current stats of turrets, but that could be adjusted?
But what this would do is... reduce the instapopping of frigates by battlecruisers and battleships (making smaller ships even more useful, specially in large fleets, then the frigates woud have to kill the hostile frigates)
This would indeed be a huge nerf to turrets as we know them, when fightning things smaller than yourself. But I see it as a huge buff to frigates which is very much needed if you ask me.
as I said the Signature resolutions of all turrets could be adjusted to make such a change more balanced, but overall it would be worth it (just like missiles dmg smaller ships less) |

testobjekt
Goonswarm Federation Human Resources Goonswarm Federation
132
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:49:00 -
[1429] - Quote
I would encourage people to clasify their criticism by giving their stance on 3 issues
A) Do you agree with the fact that Titans are not supposed to do meaningful damage to subcaps.
B) The changes CCP proposes will accomplish this goal.
All comment who disagree with A can be safely ignored, because the decission is made. |

Dasdraperma
ReUnion Inc. SOLAR WING
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:50:00 -
[1430] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Acwron wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:Dear Greyscale,
you do remember how we told you that your surgical adjustments to anomalies will kill 0.0 and you didn't listen so that you had to apologize afterwards? Please don't do this again. Yes supercaps need a proper role and balancing but making them useless simply because you don't have the ressources to do it properly is not the solution. Do at least the following: Frigs < Cruisers < BC < BS < capitals < supercapitals Cruisers can easily kill frigs --> BC can easily kill cruisers < BS can easily kill BCs (and here is the problem) capitals are almost useless against BS < Supercapitals can easily kill capitals.
Make Dreads good against BS and don't nerf the sensor strength of titans.
Dreadnaughts are primarily anti-structure tools, with anti-capital as a secondary role. The capital ships you're looking for to deal with battleships are carriers. Wrong. I was looking for Titan. Cos I trained for it. And it's working good. Since when you tell us what we are looking for? It's the other way around. We tell you what we're looking for. Every nerf CCP has done to Titans has been to reduce their ability in combating subcaps. They are trying to tell you something (hint: it's that training for a titan to blap battleships is wrong). CCP gets to tell you what you are looking for because they develop the game.
You fail.
CCP doesn't develop this game as their private hobby. They do it for money of their customers. And my money as well. Every time they forget it - they loose players and this leads to money loss. Remember monoclegate?
Now, about theese changes. For few latest patches CCP favors "some unnamed alliance", and balances game around them. It starts to smell like few years ago, when CCP favored "another unnamed alliance". But well, who cares.
As for me, i dont like game trends for last few patches, and i've cancelled today subscription on 12 (yes, twelve) of my accounts. I hope one day i will read about supercaps viable not only for structures hitting, but for actual pvp, so i will be able to get back into game with spaceships not a structures.
But untill that time, all i can say: farewell o/
|

Sven Hammerstorm
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:50:00 -
[1431] - Quote
oh my god you are now forced to web and target paint the subcaps so your titans can hit them!!!! why do titans require support fleet with them? they cost many isk
also forgot, you cant do lolsanctums in your titan no more ( |

dooplex
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:55:00 -
[1432] - Quote
Funny how EVE Online has turned into CFC Online
I can't believe how gullible a company can actually be. The Mittani is like Gr+¡ma Wormtongue in LotR, only there is no Gandalf around to save the day
First few pages full of Goons being smug as they just won EVE, through the famed META-Gaming nontheless
Congrats CCP, you just handed the CFC an all-access VIP ticket for the entire north of nullsec Titans will now be used for bridging and nothing else. I guess the most expensive, most skill intensive ship in EVE shouldn't actually be used for anything else, right?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Titans were supposed to be very expensive but also very effective strategic force multipliers and as such were working as intended. Smaller entities in nullsec could defend their space by relying on a larger supercaptial fleet. However, after this nerf, numbers will again be everything. A short look at http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/memberCount should give us a general idea of who will be the sole beneficary of this "adjustment"..
In essence: You don't bring a knife to a gunfight and you don't bring subcaps to a capital fight, end of story. If the CFC can't figure out how to use their own caps and throw subcap fleet after subcap fleet at Titans, clearly it's Titans that are not working and need to be nerfed
You'll reap what you sow CCP, let's see how nullsec looks in a couple of months If anyone actually still bothers to live there..
Well played Mittens
|

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
959
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:56:00 -
[1433] - Quote
Dasdraperma wrote:
You fail.
CCP doesn't develop this game as their private hobby. They do it for money of their customers. And my money as well. Every time they forget it - they loose players and this leads to money loss. Remember monoclegate?
Now, about theese changes. For few latest patches CCP favors "some unnamed alliance", and balances game around them. It starts to smell like few years ago, when CCP favored "another unnamed alliance". But well, who cares.
As for me, i dont like game trends for last few patches, and i've cancelled today subscription on 12 (yes, twelve) of my accounts. I hope one day i will read about supercaps viable not only for structures hitting, but for actual pvp, so i will be able to get back into game with spaceships not a structures.
But untill that time, all i can say: farewell o/
This is an emotional response that attempts to blackmail CCP with the threat of losing 12 accounts. What specifically don't you agree with on the change? Do you think that titans needed adjusting or do you just disagree with how they went about doing it? If you want to be taken seriously then get involved, don't throw temper tantrums. |

Gypsio III
Dirty Filthy Perverts
221
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:58:00 -
[1434] - Quote
gfldex wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:This doesn't scale the damage, it scales the hit chance. Part of the problem we're having is that titans aren't hitting subcaps all that often, but when they do hit they do full anti-capital damage and frequently one-hit things as a result. Indeed. And the reason why folk are forced to one volley targets are excessive RR tanks. But don't worry, the proposed change wont be a problem. It's fairly easy to lift the sig radius of any non supcap (ohh the irony) by a factor of 5.5 with a single Rapier. All you need to do is to read and understand the bonus of said ship.
Well, you can still shoot or jam the Rapier. Although RR and R-ECCM exist for a reason. But when this does start becoming a problem, the obvious next step will be to remove supercaps' ewar immunity. A few TDs applied to each Titan should remind them of their proper role. And that'll fix their absurd status of having penalty-free WCS on combat ships, too.
|

Terrorfrodo
Deep Space Darwinian Law Enforcement Agency
20
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:58:00 -
[1435] - Quote
I approve of the changes as far as they go.
However, I see still a major balancing issue: Normal, affordable capitals are still in a uniquely vulnerable position. Triage carriers and dreads are still guaranteed to die if a single titan pilot decides to show up. At the same time, they are vulnerable to subcaps. So regular capitals are very vulnerable from above and below.
Large alliances seem to use regular capitals only as expendable suicide-repairers anyway, but for aspiring smaller groups of players who would like to get a taste of capital ship warfare without investing tens of billions into supercaps it should be viable to field single carriers or dreads in smaller-scale engagements. And risk losing them of course, but not just based on the ill luck of encountering just anyone with a cyno who can call in a titan.
I know there are many, many players who skilled for carrier or dread and would like to use it in pvp because it's cool, but just don't see why they should because there is hardly any benefit over logistics and so many drawbacks. |

Vheroki
FinFleet Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:59:00 -
[1436] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Crystal Wolf wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Crystal Wolf wrote:I think the opportunity to even post intelligent stuff in this thread is gone but here goes
With regards to the nerf i agree with the tracking nerf something did need to be done there even if it was just a temporary measure. However the targeting nerf is ridiculou
As a person who has been on both sides of a titan fight i can understand why people are whining however this nerf appears to be incredibly short sighte
CCP have thought about how to balance titans to what they believe is an acceptable level but they have failed to take into account how this affects the game as a whole. Titans do need a clearly defined role however CCP have just nuked titans because they claim they don't have the resources to do an overhaul so they slapped something together and just put it in a forum pos
Titans will loose their place as an endgame piece of equipment because dreads will be just as effective and cheaper to field what alliance is going to waste time expanding their titan fleet when all they become is a massive jump bridge with a D
For those who say titan pilots are complaining too much you have to understand that titans don't just grow on trees for some people. For those who aren't in larger alliances or those who don't have tech money it actually does take time and effort to build a tita
From a political standpoint CCP are effectively changing the balance of power towards alliances who can just field hundreds of subcaps. The alliances who rely on supers to augment their fleet strength have been forgotten and just pushed aside. This change definitely needs to go back to the drawing board and CCP need to take factors like this into account. We would be totally happy with an outcome where people stop expanding their titan fleet. It shouldn't be coming as a huge surprise to anyone that, all other things being equal, we would prefer a situation where there were fewer titans in EVE People who're augmenting their fleet strength with supers we're OK with, and they should continue to be OK after this change. We're not happy with situations where supercaps are making up the bulk of the fleet strength. If that's becoming less viable, then this is a desirable outcome for us. Firstly its good to see responses from CCP on this matter as that should allay any concerns that people had that you might not be listening Secondly the only issue i see generated by the nerf is the ill feelings it will create for titan pilots who didn't just have their titans "handed" to them and had to work hard for them investing several months into the game if not longer. But as Shadoo mentioned earlier it would be a good idea to grant titans the ability to to either dock or be GM docked otherwise what will happen is those accounts will just unsub when they could be used for better things until you have a definite timetable for the overhauling of titans All up i admit titans are currently broken and the tracking nerf is needed just remove the targeting nerf and that should reduce a fair amount of the complaining Also out of curiosity will these changes be available on SISI before deployment on Tranquility? We're investigating whether it's possible to add some easy way for people to "park" sensibly; CSMAs are supposed to offer this function, but their total lack of security obviously makes them fairly non-viable. These changes should be on singularity prior to deployment, but I don't have an actual schedule available for that.
Like most things in this game dmg and hit rate is based on sig radius. How can you not give the same dmg on to a bs that has the radius of a carrier and with extenders and mwd running and same goes for battlecruisers so in terms of sig radius the so called bs is the same as a carrier(even bigger) so to a carrier you can keep doing good dmg and a bs that has the same sig radius as a carrier ( that is the choice of the player after all) ? can you explain your game concept based on that ? Solve the sov system, solve bugs leave the hello kitty **** for some who cares resources you spent how much for revamping some noob ships ships taht get used how much ? in the first week you get of it. So i can say you have a bad management of alocating resources. But if you start contradicting the concepts that this game was forged on i have nothing more to tell you. To bad you can see it clearly.
As a fix i would suggest the lowering of sigradius of shield extenders and mwd by at least 25 %.
If you do apply your so called fix i demand the 20 % ehp reduction back on titans. Increase in jump range.
So i demand and explanation from physical point of view and not the usual explanation of TItans were not made to blad subcaps well if the subcaps are so stupid to get a sig radius more then a carrier i would gladly say they do deserve it.
I am waiting for an explanation. |

so3ke
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:00:00 -
[1437] - Quote
Variable1 wrote: Why would you want to make a change that would make pilots that (in my case) spent 3 years saving for a super, want to dock it up and unsub the char?
These decisions really do go against any EVE Fan's sense of gameplay. There is zero objectivity being displayed here. Sadface
I am afraid you trained for and saved up three years for a ship you misunderstand the role for. Better dock that titan and find something else in the game that's fun and you are not so misguided about. |
|

CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
815

|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:04:00 -
[1438] - Quote
Bubanni wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of tracking
Too big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem.
CCP Greyscale, I was wondering... what if a new formula was added to turrets?... one that I know will require alot of work and balance, but would also make the rest of the game get even more interresting Now hear me out here.... Signature res. of turrets vs signature of target effecting the damage the target receives as an example lets look at a Tachyon Beam laser II which has 400 Signature resolution... what I had in mind was saying if the target this tachyon beam shoots at is only 200meter signature, it would effectively reduce the dmg by 50% (400/200)=0.5 right now the signature only effects the tracking if the target is smaller than the signature of the guns, I realize that would be a huge reduction under current stats of turrets, but that could be adjusted? But what this would do is... reduce the instapopping of frigates by battlecruisers and battleships (making smaller ships even more useful, specially in large fleets, then the frigates woud have to kill the hostile frigates) This would indeed be a huge nerf to turrets as we know them, when fightning things smaller than yourself. But I see it as a huge buff to frigates which is very much needed if you ask me. as I said the Signature resolutions of all turrets could be adjusted to make such a change more balanced, but overall it would be worth it (just like missiles dmg smaller ships less)
This is pretty much what I'm talking about in that quote, but it's not something we have the time to seriously look into right now.
dooplex wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but Titans were supposed to be very expensive but also very effective strategic force multipliers and as such were working as intended. Smaller entities in nullsec could defend their space by relying on a larger supercaptial fleet. However, after this nerf, numbers will again be everything. A short look at http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/memberCount should give us a general idea of who will be the sole beneficary of this "adjustment"..
This has never been a stated balance goal in any discussion I've been party to. In particular, predicating "can survive as a small alliance in nullsec" on "can afford a large supercap fleet" would be extremely silly, because it excludes exactly the type of players who we're most keen on being able to maintain small holdings in nullsec, ie newer, poorer players. |
|

Doctor Eezee
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:04:00 -
[1439] - Quote
dooplex wrote:Funny how EVE Online has turned into CFC Online I can't believe how gullible a company can actually be. The Mittani is like Gr+¡ma Wormtongue in LotR, only there is no Gandalf around to save the day First few pages full of Goons being smug as they just won EVE, through the famed META-Gaming nontheless Congrats CCP, you just handed the CFC an all-access VIP ticket for the entire north of nullsec Titans will now be used for bridging and nothing else. I guess the most expensive, most skill intensive ship in EVE shouldn't actually be used for anything else, right? Correct me if I'm wrong, but Titans were supposed to be very expensive but also very effective strategic force multipliers and as such were working as intended. Smaller entities in nullsec could defend their space by relying on a larger supercaptial fleet. However, after this nerf, numbers will again be everything. A short look at http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/memberCount should give us a general idea of who will be the sole beneficary of this "adjustment".. In essence: You don't bring a knife to a gunfight and you don't bring subcaps to a capital fight, end of story. If the CFC can't figure out how to use their own caps and throw subcap fleet after subcap fleet at Titans, clearly it's Titans that are not working and need to be nerfed You'll reap what you sow CCP, let's see how nullsec looks in a couple of months If anyone actually still bothers to live there.. Well played Mittens
Thank god you are in the mighty alliance Minmatar Republic, which definitely has more members than CFC. So I guess you will own all of Eve in a few months.
"My rule is: If you meet the weakest vessel, attack; if it is a vessel equal to yours, attack; and if it is stronger than yours, also attack..." - Admiral Stepan O. Makarov |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5524
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:07:00 -
[1440] - Quote
Rick wrote:71 pages and all i got really from this is
1. Goons cry and get what they wan 2. Greyscale appears to be a moron, and they still let him make changes like this to the gam 3. This change is going to happen this way and no other, CCP say they are listening to alternitives but wont actually make any changes to the idea that they have pulled out of somewher 5. I think Greyscale is a moro 6. After this patch there will probably be a STOG, where thier leader/CSM will annouce he has manage to get CCP to destroy the use of titans and they can now take over EVE, after which they will must a few thousand toons and do so 7. there is more but im tired and can no longer be bothered to try have an idea changed when its known that CCP generally dont give a rats ass about anything other than goons want and will conform to thier needs and only that
Thanks again CCP. Next attempt at a game you should probably employ GǪand this is why you're not getting what you want.
Dasdraperma wrote:CCP doesn't develop this game as their private hobby. They do it for money of their customers. And my money as well. Every time they forget it - they loose players and this leads to money loss. Remember monoclegate? GǪand between your (very minute) monetary contribution and everyone else's (very large) contribution, they choose the latter. If it was just their hobby, maybe they'd go with what an insignificant minority is crying for, but as luck would have it, they won't.
Quote:As for me, i dont like game trends for last few patches, and i've cancelled today subscription on 12 (yes, twelve) of my accounts. I hope one day i will read about supercaps viable not only for structures hitting, but for actual pvp, so i will be able to get back into game with spaceships not a structures.
But untill that time, all i can say: farewell o/ Contract stuff, please. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Bubanni
SniggWaffe EVE Corporation 123566322353
132
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:08:00 -
[1441] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: This is pretty much what I'm talking about in that quote, but it's not something we have the time to seriously look into right now.
I had a feeling it was what you were talking about, but I love that you considered it
Perhaps sometime in the future then :) |

Dan Massell
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:11:00 -
[1442] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: . In particular, predicating "can survive as a small alliance in nullsec" on "can afford a large supercap fleet" would be extremely silly, because it excludes exactly the type of players who we're most keen on being able to maintain small holdings in nullsec, ie newer, poorer players.
vOv how do you still not get it. no matter if its alliance full of 8 year old bittervets or bunch of rifter flying noobs. you will NOT survive with small alliance in 0.0 where ONLY numbers matter. |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
496
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:13:00 -
[1443] - Quote
dooplex wrote:Congrats CCP, you just handed the CFC an all-access VIP ticket for the entire north of nullsec Titans will now be used for bridging and nothing else. I guess the most expensive, most skill intensive ship in EVE shouldn't actually be used for anything else, right? You're right, this is completely useless
dooplex wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, but Titans were supposed to be very expensive but also very effective strategic force multipliers and as such were working as intended. Smaller entities in nullsec could defend their space by relying on a larger supercaptial fleet. .
You're wrong. CCP have stated repeatedly that titans were not intended to kill subcaps, and that their role was unintentionally blurred. Let me repeat that. The developers of this game are telling you what they originally intended a ship to be capable of. This change is a result of CCP recently being made aware of just how effective titans were at doing what they weren't supposed to. Last year's change to only allow DD's to hit capital ships should have been a rather strong clue for you that titans weren't doing their intended job.
As for the comments on numbers, that's not a ship balance issue. Ingame mechanics already exist for damaging a larger force - the primary one being bombs. If a force is massively, significantly larger, why should you be able to win by just throwing ISK at the problem? Address the reasons for such a fight to happen in the first place. Hopefully CCP will also address the underlying game mechanics that cause people to pile larger numbers into the same place at the same time, but that is not a matter for ship balance, it's an issue of game balance.
|

dooplex
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:14:00 -
[1444] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:dooplex wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but Titans were supposed to be very expensive but also very effective strategic force multipliers and as such were working as intended. Smaller entities in nullsec could defend their space by relying on a larger supercaptial fleet. However, after this nerf, numbers will again be everything. A short look at http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/memberCount should give us a general idea of who will be the sole beneficary of this "adjustment".. This has never been a stated balance goal in any discussion I've been party to. In particular, predicating "can survive as a small alliance in nullsec" on "can afford a large supercap fleet" would be extremely silly, because it excludes exactly the type of players who we're most keen on being able to maintain small holdings in nullsec, ie newer, poorer players.
You completely missed the point, smaller does not mean "small as in tiny and new". I am talking about well establsihed alliances with 1,000-2,000 members facing a blobs of alliances with 8,000+ members or whole coalitions with more than 16,000 members.
You can't seriously be that ignorant about your own game... |

Mutafakaz
Russian Thunder Squad Against ALL Authorities
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:16:00 -
[1445] - Quote
This patch makes titans useless at all
Tracking nerf is okay - no more hitting dictors and stuff with XL guns, but scanres nerf and limiting amount of targets is ridiculous.
Firstly, that nerfs shieldsupers to **** again - am I supposed to have 3 cormack's SB's on my ragnarok instead of shield tank? Secondly, with 1 minute to lock a carrier not speaking about anything else - why ever field titans to the field? Why pay 80bil for useless ship? When you can get 4 supercarriers for its price and alpha caps without doomsday with fighterbombers while having insane remote repairing power.
Thirdly, the problem lies not in the titans itself, but in ******** remote repairing. Make remote repairs stacking like 10 reps per ship. And it will solve problems of blobbing and supercapital blobbing. You can field 50 titans, but if you get dropped by 80 dreads be ready to lose some ****. Also it will easy life of subcap fleets which are either about getting critical amount of dps ships to break RR or switching to alpha. Both ways leading to blobbing. |

testobjekt
Goonswarm Federation Human Resources Goonswarm Federation
132
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:18:00 -
[1446] - Quote
dooplex wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:dooplex wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but Titans were supposed to be very expensive but also very effective strategic force multipliers and as such were working as intended. Smaller entities in nullsec could defend their space by relying on a larger supercaptial fleet. However, after this nerf, numbers will again be everything. A short look at http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/memberCount should give us a general idea of who will be the sole beneficary of this "adjustment".. This has never been a stated balance goal in any discussion I've been party to. In particular, predicating "can survive as a small alliance in nullsec" on "can afford a large supercap fleet" would be extremely silly, because it excludes exactly the type of players who we're most keen on being able to maintain small holdings in nullsec, ie newer, poorer players. You completely missed the point, smaller does not mean "small as in tiny and new". I am talking about well establsihed alliances with 1,000-2,000 members facing a blobs of alliances with 8,000+ members or whole coalitions with more than 16,000 members. You can't seriously be that ignorant about your own game...
Because CCPs marketing for EvE is all about 1000 dudes who played since 2004 controlling large parts of the universe, and you as new player have the CHANCE(!) to become their serf.
If you are a small well established alliance you can hold a small portion of space (say one constellation) or not very valuable space.
EvE is not just about the battlefield on the grid but its about diplomacy, making allies, building a community. |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:20:00 -
[1447] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:BioZvin wrote:CCP Soundwave wrote:Actually, Greyscale went to Cambridge, and while we haven't IQ tested him yet, I'm pretty sure he'd score high  I am sorry in advance here, but could we get some indication from CCP that we are being heard here. Put a lot of time into this game and really would ratter not be forced to leave because I feel like CCP only listens to Goons. I know they say we are less people then they are, but they don't number 345000 like they would have us believe. We're absolutely listening. Titans are an anti-cap/supercap ship and we need to limit their ability to kill subcaps. That's a change that's happening and is unlikely to change. The practical details on how that happens we'd love as much feedback on as possible. We've been talking about the lock timers this morning based on feedback from the playerbase, looking at what adjustments we can possibly make. The changes in the OP are still subject to change if we get feedback on how to achieve our goal better.
If it really is for one thing only, witch it in my prospective was never made for... even thou you are very happy to say this all the time. Make us able to dock the things so we can wait out this horrible nurf in stations. Would you have us stuck in ships that can be used 1 time every month if we are very lucky ? Pretty sure someone said this with Supercarriers also...
|

Tobiaz
Spacerats
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:23:00 -
[1448] - Quote
First: I'm no expert to the whole Titan-debat
But it seems to me the whole problem is that the titan is just another BIGGER hammer for people to smack other ships with. And EVE-players will always look for the biggest hammer they can wield and eventually the numbers and powercreep will spiral out of control
What was the intended role for Titans? Killing caps, supercaps? As long as it's meant for killing other ships, it will remain impossible to balance, both in power as in numbers, because of it's massive investment inevitably forcing it to a higher level on the foodchain in order to have any reason to be used
Personally I think Titans shouldn't be part of the actual 'fighting force' in the first place, but serve as the ultimate expression of logistic support (and I mean that in the sense of moving stuff around, not playing a WoW-priest. Someone at CCP really deserves a smack with a dictionary.)
The Titan-bridge is a good example. But why stop there? Make it really dockable like station, where people can log on and off. Numerable station services efficient to a certain degree, and enough hangar space to handle the replacment of lost battleships and support in a protracted fleet-operation. Make it serve as a front-line commandpost for big alliance warfare and a mobile HQ for alliances that can't support a player owned station
I know this is a step beyond 'balancing' titans, but it'll grant them a much better role and balance then trying to fit in a unwieldy hammer into a game of rock-papers-scissors
|

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
959
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:25:00 -
[1449] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:
If it really is for one thing only, I was never told this. DD to kill all sub caps was first incarnation.. even thou you are very happy to say this all the time. Make us able to dock the things so we can wait out this horrible nurf in stations. Would you have us stuck in ships that can be used 1 time every month if we are very lucky ? Pretty sure someone said this with Supercarriers also...
Ever consider we wouldn't be at this place if some titan pilots didn't rub everybody's nose so into the problem that they were forced to act? Titans one shotting dictors isn't a titan playing a role, it's a titan playing EVERY role.
https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/625985 https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/625987
See? It's you. You are the problem. You caused this. |

Hans Roaming
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:26:00 -
[1450] - Quote
Thanks for confirming my decision not to train for supercaps was a good one CCP.
Why shouldn't Titans be able to hit MWD'ng drakes with sig's the size of moons?
Technology advantage has always been a counter to pure numbers throughout history. Bringing numbers to a fight in Eve has always been a problem compounded by the fact that ships fire magically pass through any non targets in the way without causing damage.
If fleets in large numbers had to actually manoeuvre in order to bring DPS onto a target then the blob would be less advantageous than it would be now. |

dooplex
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:27:00 -
[1451] - Quote
testobjekt wrote:
Because CCPs marketing for EvE is all about 1000 dudes who played since 2004 controlling large parts of the universe, and you as new player have the CHANCE(!) to become their serf.
If you are a small well established alliance you can hold a small portion of space (say one constellation) or not very valuable space.
EvE is not just about the battlefield on the grid but its about diplomacy, making allies, building a community.
You're right.
EVE is about being an F1 drone in 20,000 man blob conquering half of nullsec by piling bodies on top of everyone else. Clearly everything is working as intended... |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
85
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:28:00 -
[1452] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone, We're not happy with the effectiveness of large groups of titans against subcapital ships, so we're making some adjustments to titans and to XL turrets. This is a quick, surgical adjustment to solve a specific issue we have identified. It's not a general titan balance pass, and we don't consider titans "done" after this change. Titans will require significant further changes, and probably an overall adjustment in role, before they're in a place where we're really happy with them. This will require a reasonably significant amount of work, which we unfortunately don't have the spare resources for right now. In a similar vein, we're not making more extensive balance changes (or addressing this issue in a more technically complex way) because we're allocating the minimum resources needed to resolve the specific issue (titans performing excessively well against subcaps in certain circumstances) satisfactorily. If you have any further questions about this paragraph, please ask away  For the immediate future and until such time as we have the resources available to do a comprehensive overhaul, we want to ensure that titans perform decently against other capitals, but do not represent a serious threat to subcaps. We want titans to have clear vulnerabilities, and as much as possible to have them acting in support of the main capital/subcap fleet rather than the other way round. We've already prevented doomsdays from being fired at subcaps, and this adjustment should continue that trend. We have talked to the CSM about this, and we're comfortable going forward with these changes in light of that discussion. I'm not going to put words in their mouths, though. Specific changes being made:XL turret tracking halved, siege module tracking penalty removedThis should generally make titan performance against small targets significantly worse, without seriously impacting their effectiveness against larger targets, or negatively impacting dreadnaughts in their common use-case (ie, in siege mode). Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5This should make trying to engage smaller targets very inefficient, due to long lock-times and an inability to queue many targets at once. This reinforces the titan's MO as a slow-acting but hard-hitting platform (in line with the doomsday's huge damage and 10 minute RoF). The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing. Our understanding is that this isn't standard practice right now, but we have to balance for expected behavior after the change, and for worst-case scenarios. Expected release schedule for these changesThese changes should hit TQ some time in April. If there is a sizable release in April then expect them to turn up then; if not then we'll announce deployment dates for these changes closer to the time. Changes considered and discarded:(I'm expecting at least three people to not read the word "discarded" and make angry posts about something in this section. C'est la vie.)Titans can't lock subcaps at allGuaranteed effective solution, but we considered it too hacky and restrictive. Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of trackingToo big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem. Changing the lock time formulaAs it is, the lock time formula doesn't really scale in a nice way between battleships and capitals (the kink in the curve always happens around cruisers regardless of the scan res and sig radius), but again we decided we could solve the issue without resorting to this sort of technical work. Changing XL missiles to matchWhile in a strictly regimented world we ought in principle to nerf XL missiles and remove the penalties from the siege module for them too, in practice they're not actually a problem due to the way missile damage scales against small targets. Leaving them unchanged also serves to differentiate missiles further from turrets, which might make them more useful on capitals under certain circumstances.
A+ troll. |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:28:00 -
[1453] - Quote
testobjekt wrote:[quote=dooplex]
Because CCPs marketing for EvE is all about 1000 dudes who played since 2004 controlling large parts of the universe, and you as new player have the CHANCE(!) to become their serf.
If you are a small well established alliance you can hold a small portion of space (say one constellation) or not very valuable space.
EvE is not just about the battlefield on the grid but its about diplomacy, making allies, building a community.
Very funny how is a 1000 people going to hold a constellation, new or not that goons have their eye on ?, so what you are saying is that 10x1000 people can ban together and hold it against you, and that should be the only way
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2678
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:30:00 -
[1454] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:testobjekt wrote:[quote=dooplex]
Because CCPs marketing for EvE is all about 1000 dudes who played since 2004 controlling large parts of the universe, and you as new player have the CHANCE(!) to become their serf.
If you are a small well established alliance you can hold a small portion of space (say one constellation) or not very valuable space.
EvE is not just about the battlefield on the grid but its about diplomacy, making allies, building a community. Very funny how is a 1000 people going to hold a constellation, new or not that goons have their eye on ?, so what you are saying is that 10x1000 people can ban together and hold it against you, and that should be the only way by not being an alliance so terrible we've murdered them four times running now |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5524
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:32:00 -
[1455] - Quote
Hans Roaming wrote:Why shouldn't Titans be able to hit MWD'ng drakes with sig's the size of moons? Top tip: learn how tracking works before making this argumentGǪ
Quote:If fleets in large numbers had to actually manoeuvre in order to bring DPS onto a target then the blob would be less advantageous than it would be now. GǪespecially if you add this button to your post.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
53
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:35:00 -
[1456] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:This has never been a stated balance goal in any discussion I've been party to. In particular, predicating "can survive as a small alliance in nullsec" on "can afford a large supercap fleet" would be extremely silly, because it excludes exactly the type of players who we're most keen on being able to maintain small holdings in nullsec, ie newer, poorer players.
Now I'm not trying to be a total jerk, but you have never succeeded in this. In addition, if you are actually reading the comments in this thread, you should realize that you are not going to succeed in your newly stated role change for Titans
CCP Greyscale wrote:For the immediate future and until such time as we have the resources available to do a comprehensive overhaul, we want to ensure that titans perform decently against other capitals, but do not represent a serious threat to sub caps.
Nothing you are doing makes this happen consistently. Signature radius on an MWD Drake or an MWD Maelstrom (the current FOTM fleet ships for the big nullsec alliances fighting Titans right now) is virtually identical to Signature Radius on a Carrier, and the lock time on that ship with your new system is 30+ seconds (not including TiDi). So how is the Titan an anti-Captial ship when a capital can dock/warp/enter shields before a Titan can lock it? Seriously, look at what you are doing and realize that this change does not perform your intended action.
I'm not a game designer. I don't know what the answer is. But your actions do not support what you say you want Titans to be doing. CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
86
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:36:00 -
[1457] - Quote
Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:
A+ troll.
This just proves that CCP and Goons have a suspicious relationship.
Dear pubbies,
Did you know that former Goonfleet CEO Darius Johnson is now the head of security (CCP Sreegs) and in charge of banning botters? According to their forums, not a single goon was banned during the last banwave. Did you know that CCP Sreegs named his son Alexander after The Mittani and that The MIttani is his child's god father? Can you expect fairness in this situation?? CCP needs to answer about how many goons receive a CCP pay check.
Recently the Eve-O site was redesigned. In completely unrelated news (I SWEAR) Solo Drakban is the goonfleet webmaster and does freelance design work and was recently very busy with a contract.
There is a huge scandal coming that is going to blow T20 out of the water. Look for emails, chatlogs, etc. that prove that CCP devs have been directly helping goons to get anything they want.
When is the last time you asked CCP to change something and got a quick response? Andski of Goonfleet demanded that CCP change their rules about *SCAMMING* using the recruitment channel. One of the only safe places in which people could find a corp. A CCP dev and community moderator responded within 2 hours with a change to the rules. People have been asking for ways to stop non-mutual PVP for years with no response.
All of this is out there and obvious. If you take off your blinders and take a step back you will see the gigantic writing on the wall. |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
960
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:40:00 -
[1458] - Quote
Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:
A+ troll.
This just proves that CCP and Goons have a suspicious relationship. Dear pubbies, Did you know that former Goonfleet CEO Darius Johnson is now the head of security (CCP Sreegs) and in charge of banning botters? According to their forums, not a single goon was banned during the last banwave. Did you know that CCP Sreegs named his son Alexander after The Mittani and that The MIttani is his child's god father? Can you expect fairness in this situation?? CCP needs to answer about how many goons receive a CCP pay check. Recently the Eve-O site was redesigned. In completely unrelated news (I SWEAR) Solo Drakban is the goonfleet webmaster and does freelance design work and was recently very busy with a contract. There is a huge scandal coming that is going to blow T20 out of the water. Look for emails, chatlogs, etc. that prove that CCP devs have been directly helping goons to get anything they want. When is the last time you asked CCP to change something and got a quick response? Andski of Goonfleet demanded that CCP change their rules about *SCAMMING* using the recruitment channel. One of the only safe places in which people could find a corp. A CCP dev and community moderator responded within 2 hours with a change to the rules. People have been asking for ways to stop non-mutual PVP for years with no response. All of this is out there and obvious. If you take off your blinders and take a step back you will see the gigantic writing on the wall.
Franklin Roosevelt you can't post, you're dead! |

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
53
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:42:00 -
[1459] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Hans Roaming wrote:Why shouldn't Titans be able to hit MWD'ng drakes with sig's the size of moons? Top tip: learn how tracking works before making this argumentGǪ Quote:If fleets in large numbers had to actually manoeuvre in order to bring DPS onto a target then the blob would be less advantageous than it would be now. GǪespecially if you add this button to your post.
Um Tippia, learn how fleet fights work in nullsec before making this argument. Board ship (PermaMWD Drake or MWD Maelstrom). Bridge/Jump into system. Orbit anchor at X range. Based on simple geometry, at some point in your orbit of the anchor you will have a transversal of ZERO (or close enough to call it zero) and the signature radius of a carrier. Therefore you should be hittable by XL Turrets for full damage at those two moments in your orbit. We went over this 30-odd pages ago.
Ignoring small bomber squads and other snowflake ships, fleets in null operate on the easy-to-follow instructions "Orbit Anchor and press F1-F8" That's the truth for easily 1100 of the 1200 pilots in big null fights. CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
86
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:42:00 -
[1460] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:
A+ troll.
This just proves that CCP and Goons have a suspicious relationship. Dear pubbies, Did you know that former Goonfleet CEO Darius Johnson is now the head of security (CCP Sreegs) and in charge of banning botters? According to their forums, not a single goon was banned during the last banwave. Did you know that CCP Sreegs named his son Alexander after The Mittani and that The MIttani is his child's god father? Can you expect fairness in this situation?? CCP needs to answer about how many goons receive a CCP pay check. Recently the Eve-O site was redesigned. In completely unrelated news (I SWEAR) Solo Drakban is the goonfleet webmaster and does freelance design work and was recently very busy with a contract. There is a huge scandal coming that is going to blow T20 out of the water. Look for emails, chatlogs, etc. that prove that CCP devs have been directly helping goons to get anything they want. When is the last time you asked CCP to change something and got a quick response? Andski of Goonfleet demanded that CCP change their rules about *SCAMMING* using the recruitment channel. One of the only safe places in which people could find a corp. A CCP dev and community moderator responded within 2 hours with a change to the rules. People have been asking for ways to stop non-mutual PVP for years with no response. All of this is out there and obvious. If you take off your blinders and take a step back you will see the gigantic writing on the wall. Franklin Roosevelt you can't post, you're dead! You can't threaten me. I am reporting you for making threats and even though you are in CSM I will see you banned. |

Titan Keeper 22
State War Academy Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:44:00 -
[1461] - Quote
Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:
A+ troll.
This just proves that CCP and Goons have a suspicious relationship. Dear pubbies, Did you know that former Goonfleet CEO Darius Johnson is now the head of security (CCP Sreegs) and in charge of banning botters? According to their forums, not a single goon was banned during the last banwave. Did you know that CCP Sreegs named his son Alexander after The Mittani and that The MIttani is his child's god father? Can you expect fairness in this situation?? CCP needs to answer about how many goons receive a CCP pay check. Recently the Eve-O site was redesigned. In completely unrelated news (I SWEAR) Solo Drakban is the goonfleet webmaster and does freelance design work and was recently very busy with a contract. There is a huge scandal coming that is going to blow T20 out of the water. Look for emails, chatlogs, etc. that prove that CCP devs have been directly helping goons to get anything they want. When is the last time you asked CCP to change something and got a quick response? Andski of Goonfleet demanded that CCP change their rules about *SCAMMING* using the recruitment channel. One of the only safe places in which people could find a corp. A CCP dev and community moderator responded within 2 hours with a change to the rules. People have been asking for ways to stop non-mutual PVP for years with no response. All of this is out there and obvious. If you take off your blinders and take a step back you will see the gigantic writing on the wall.
i have never +1'd in any post in my life, but here it is.
+1
you deserve it respectfully. |

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:45:00 -
[1462] - Quote
Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Vile rat wrote:Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:
A+ troll.
This just proves that CCP and Goons have a suspicious relationship. Dear pubbies, Did you know that former Goonfleet CEO Darius Johnson is now the head of security (CCP Sreegs) and in charge of banning botters? According to their forums, not a single goon was banned during the last banwave. Did you know that CCP Sreegs named his son Alexander after The Mittani and that The MIttani is his child's god father? Can you expect fairness in this situation?? CCP needs to answer about how many goons receive a CCP pay check. Recently the Eve-O site was redesigned. In completely unrelated news (I SWEAR) Solo Drakban is the goonfleet webmaster and does freelance design work and was recently very busy with a contract. There is a huge scandal coming that is going to blow T20 out of the water. Look for emails, chatlogs, etc. that prove that CCP devs have been directly helping goons to get anything they want. When is the last time you asked CCP to change something and got a quick response? Andski of Goonfleet demanded that CCP change their rules about *SCAMMING* using the recruitment channel. One of the only safe places in which people could find a corp. A CCP dev and community moderator responded within 2 hours with a change to the rules. People have been asking for ways to stop non-mutual PVP for years with no response. All of this is out there and obvious. If you take off your blinders and take a step back you will see the gigantic writing on the wall. Franklin Roosevelt you can't post, you're dead! You can't threaten me. I am reporting you for making threats and even though you are in CSM I will see you banned.
More tin foil on isle 1 please!!
|

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
962
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:46:00 -
[1463] - Quote
Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Vile rat wrote:Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:
A+ troll.
This just proves that CCP and Goons have a suspicious relationship. Dear pubbies, Did you know that former Goonfleet CEO Darius Johnson is now the head of security (CCP Sreegs) and in charge of banning botters? According to their forums, not a single goon was banned during the last banwave. Did you know that CCP Sreegs named his son Alexander after The Mittani and that The MIttani is his child's god father? Can you expect fairness in this situation?? CCP needs to answer about how many goons receive a CCP pay check. Recently the Eve-O site was redesigned. In completely unrelated news (I SWEAR) Solo Drakban is the goonfleet webmaster and does freelance design work and was recently very busy with a contract. There is a huge scandal coming that is going to blow T20 out of the water. Look for emails, chatlogs, etc. that prove that CCP devs have been directly helping goons to get anything they want. When is the last time you asked CCP to change something and got a quick response? Andski of Goonfleet demanded that CCP change their rules about *SCAMMING* using the recruitment channel. One of the only safe places in which people could find a corp. A CCP dev and community moderator responded within 2 hours with a change to the rules. People have been asking for ways to stop non-mutual PVP for years with no response. All of this is out there and obvious. If you take off your blinders and take a step back you will see the gigantic writing on the wall. Franklin Roosevelt you can't post, you're dead! You can't threaten me. I am reporting you for making threats and even though you are in CSM I will see you banned.
Interesting concept, threatening a former president who's been dead since the 1940's. Take that dead guy! |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
86
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:47:00 -
[1464] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Vile rat wrote:Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:
A+ troll.
This just proves that CCP and Goons have a suspicious relationship. Dear pubbies, Did you know that former Goonfleet CEO Darius Johnson is now the head of security (CCP Sreegs) and in charge of banning botters? According to their forums, not a single goon was banned during the last banwave. Did you know that CCP Sreegs named his son Alexander after The Mittani and that The MIttani is his child's god father? Can you expect fairness in this situation?? CCP needs to answer about how many goons receive a CCP pay check. Recently the Eve-O site was redesigned. In completely unrelated news (I SWEAR) Solo Drakban is the goonfleet webmaster and does freelance design work and was recently very busy with a contract. There is a huge scandal coming that is going to blow T20 out of the water. Look for emails, chatlogs, etc. that prove that CCP devs have been directly helping goons to get anything they want. When is the last time you asked CCP to change something and got a quick response? Andski of Goonfleet demanded that CCP change their rules about *SCAMMING* using the recruitment channel. One of the only safe places in which people could find a corp. A CCP dev and community moderator responded within 2 hours with a change to the rules. People have been asking for ways to stop non-mutual PVP for years with no response. All of this is out there and obvious. If you take off your blinders and take a step back you will see the gigantic writing on the wall. Franklin Roosevelt you can't post, you're dead! You can't threaten me. I am reporting you for making threats and even though you are in CSM I will see you banned. Interesting concept, threatening a former president who's been dead since the 1940's. Take that dead guy! Vile rat. It is you. It is you who is the worst GoonFleet poster. |
|

CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
818

|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:48:00 -
[1465] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:This has never been a stated balance goal in any discussion I've been party to. In particular, predicating "can survive as a small alliance in nullsec" on "can afford a large supercap fleet" would be extremely silly, because it excludes exactly the type of players who we're most keen on being able to maintain small holdings in nullsec, ie newer, poorer players. Now I'm not trying to be a total jerk, but you have never succeeded in this. In addition, if you are actually reading the comments in this thread, you should realize that you are not going to succeed in your newly stated role change for Titans CCP Greyscale wrote:For the immediate future and until such time as we have the resources available to do a comprehensive overhaul, we want to ensure that titans perform decently against other capitals, but do not represent a serious threat to sub caps. Nothing you are doing makes this happen consistently. Signature radius on an MWD Drake or an MWD Maelstrom (the current FOTM fleet ships for the big nullsec alliances fighting Titans right now) is virtually identical to Signature Radius on a Carrier, and the lock time on that ship with your new system is 30+ seconds (not including TiDi). So how is the Titan an anti-Captial ship when a capital can dock/warp/enter shields before a Titan can lock it? Seriously, look at what you are doing and realize that this change does not perform your intended action. I'm not a game designer. I don't know what the answer is. But your actions do not support what you say you want Titans to be doing.
All that first quote is saying is that it's never been our intention that you need supers to survive as a small alliance in nullsec. There's a lot of people reading into it a lot of things that aren't actually there.
WRT the second point, I would suggest webs (where applicable), dictors/hictors, and not using titans to play docking games. |
|

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
962
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:48:00 -
[1466] - Quote
Franklin D Roosevelt wrote: Vile rat. It is you. It is you who is the worst GoonFleet poster.
Sir I am not in GoonFleet.
|

Ong
Born-2-Kill 0ccupational Hazzard
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:49:00 -
[1467] - Quote
GF ccp, blobs just won eve  |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
86
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:50:00 -
[1468] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:This has never been a stated balance goal in any discussion I've been party to. In particular, predicating "can survive as a small alliance in nullsec" on "can afford a large supercap fleet" would be extremely silly, because it excludes exactly the type of players who we're most keen on being able to maintain small holdings in nullsec, ie newer, poorer players. Now I'm not trying to be a total jerk, but you have never succeeded in this. In addition, if you are actually reading the comments in this thread, you should realize that you are not going to succeed in your newly stated role change for Titans CCP Greyscale wrote:For the immediate future and until such time as we have the resources available to do a comprehensive overhaul, we want to ensure that titans perform decently against other capitals, but do not represent a serious threat to sub caps. Nothing you are doing makes this happen consistently. Signature radius on an MWD Drake or an MWD Maelstrom (the current FOTM fleet ships for the big nullsec alliances fighting Titans right now) is virtually identical to Signature Radius on a Carrier, and the lock time on that ship with your new system is 30+ seconds (not including TiDi). So how is the Titan an anti-Captial ship when a capital can dock/warp/enter shields before a Titan can lock it? Seriously, look at what you are doing and realize that this change does not perform your intended action. I'm not a game designer. I don't know what the answer is. But your actions do not support what you say you want Titans to be doing. All that first quote is saying is that it's never been our intention that you need supers to survive as a small alliance in nullsec. There's a lot of people reading into it a lot of things that aren't actually there. WRT the second point, I would suggest webs (where applicable), dictors/hictors, and not using titans to play docking games. CCP Greyscale.
How much conversation around this change was with the Goon dominated CSM? Did you have any private conversations with Alexander Gianturco about this matter that were not recorded in any CSM minutes?
Have you had drinks with Alexander? Do you socialize with him like many of the CCP devs? Is it unreasonable to ask for a log of all interaction that CSM members have with the devs regarding game mechanics? Social calls? Gifts? I know that Alexander is very generous in his gift givings around Christmas. |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:51:00 -
[1469] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Acwron wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Every nerf CCP has done to Titans has been to reduce their ability in combating subcaps. They are trying to tell you something (hint: it's that training for a titan to blap battleships is wrong). CCP gets to tell you what you are looking for because they develop the game.
You failed to target nothing. They develop what we want cos we pay for the game. Way more people paying for the game think Titans are overpowered.
Especially drake and maelstrom pilots by any chance ? |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:53:00 -
[1470] - Quote
testobjekt wrote:dooplex wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:dooplex wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but Titans were supposed to be very expensive but also very effective strategic force multipliers and as such were working as intended. Smaller entities in nullsec could defend their space by relying on a larger supercaptial fleet. However, after this nerf, numbers will again be everything. A short look at http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/memberCount should give us a general idea of who will be the sole beneficary of this "adjustment".. This has never been a stated balance goal in any discussion I've been party to. In particular, predicating "can survive as a small alliance in nullsec" on "can afford a large supercap fleet" would be extremely silly, because it excludes exactly the type of players who we're most keen on being able to maintain small holdings in nullsec, ie newer, poorer players. You completely missed the point, smaller does not mean "small as in tiny and new". I am talking about well establsihed alliances with 1,000-2,000 members facing a blobs of alliances with 8,000+ members or whole coalitions with more than 16,000 members. You can't seriously be that ignorant about your own game... Because CCPs marketing for EvE is all about 1000 dudes who played since 2004 controlling large parts of the universe, and you as new player have the CHANCE(!) to become their serf. If you are a small well established alliance you can hold a small portion of space (say one constellation) or not very valuable space. EvE is not just about the battlefield on the grid but its about diplomacy, making allies, building a community. Thank you sir for you kindness, that you allow us to hold some worthless space. You are really to kind.
|

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
442
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:54:00 -
[1471] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: Dreads are mainly antistructure, with a bit of anti-cap. Carriers still do pretty decent damage against subcaps AFAIK. Supers can switch between anti-cap and anti-subcap depending on their choice of fighter drone. Titans are pure anti-cap.
Up until now Greyscale, Titans were never "pure anti-cap". Indeed, pre-dominion their primary function was to mass murder subcap fleets with their AOE Doomsdays. In Dominion you replaced the AOE with a directed weapon, capable of hitting any ship, and in addition you enhanced the regular XL weapon bonuses "so that the turret locators actually might get used [to]enable a Titan to make its presence felt on the battalefield" " to quote your own devblog.
Now however, they are suddenly "pure anti-cap" as if they were never intended for anything else. |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:56:00 -
[1472] - Quote
It's amusing the pile of people in this thread who ignore all the well-worded arguments to the contrary, and just immediately yell 'CCP just let blobbers win eve" when it's not the case at all. If you can't hold your space without using a group of overpowered ships with no effective counter in the game, something that is against everything eve has ever been about... maybe you shouldn't be holding any space. Has that thought occurred to you?
As for the people who keep posting "Lol blobbers use drake fleet, just orbit the anchor lol" they show their ignorance on the matter of how real large-scale battles in eve are fought. The amount of planning, logistics, strategy, espionage, and luck that goes into winning a battle, shows that numbers are only a small part of any of this. Anybody in this thread posting about how goons have somehow just won eve, because one overpowered ship is getting a nerf it desperately needs... just ignore their posts. Because they have no idea at all about eve, how fights are won, or what really matters to win them. |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:58:00 -
[1473] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:It's amusing the pile of people in this thread who ignore all the well-worded arguments to the contrary, and just immediately yell 'CCP just let blobbers win eve" when it's not the case at all. If you can't hold your space without using a group of overpowered ships with no effective counter in the game, something that is against everything eve has ever been about... maybe you shouldn't be holding any space. Has that thought occurred to you?
As for the people who keep posting "Lol blobbers use drake fleet, just orbit the anchor lol" they show their ignorance on the matter of how real large-scale battles in eve are fought. The amount of planning, logistics, strategy, espionage, and luck that goes into winning a battle, shows that numbers are only a small part of any of this. Anybody in this thread posting about how goons have somehow just won eve, because one overpowered ships is getting a nerf it desparetely needs... jusg ignore their posts. Because they have no idea at all about eve, how fights are won, or what really matters to win them.
Yeah nice effort post about Eve-Online. |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
964
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:58:00 -
[1474] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: Dreads are mainly antistructure, with a bit of anti-cap. Carriers still do pretty decent damage against subcaps AFAIK. Supers can switch between anti-cap and anti-subcap depending on their choice of fighter drone. Titans are pure anti-cap.
Up until now Greyscale, Titans were never "pure anti-cap". Indeed, pre-dominion their primary function was to mass murder subcap fleets with their AOE Doomsdays. In Dominion you replaced the AOE with a directed weapon, capable of hitting any ship, and in addition you enhanced the regular XL weapon bonuses "so that the turret locators actually might get used [to]enable a Titan to make its presence felt on the battalefield" " to quote your own devblog. Now however, they are suddenly "pure anti-cap" as if they were never intended for anything else.
Realtalk:
Every single titan nerf has been to reduce their effectiveness towards subcaps. Titans on paper are actually not designed to hit subcaps for ****, it's only when you get a bunch that it's nearly impossible to maintain transversal from them all. **** they have dread guns on them and their drones were taken away, what about these things suggest they were designed as anti subcap platforms? I just don't understand this reasoning. Sure you've been taking advantage of their inability to balance these things vs subcaps properly but being an anti blob weapon clearly wasn't their intent by design and now we have them on record confirming this is the case.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2869
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:58:00 -
[1475] - Quote
Acwron wrote:They develop what we want cos we pay for the game. If it's to be as you want, will be if you have the majority. And probably you have. Still doesn't mean you're right. You are just more than us.
Deal with it. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Gertrud ToD
Terrorists of Dimensions Electric Monkey Overlords
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:59:00 -
[1476] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:dooplex wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but Titans were supposed to be very expensive but also very effective strategic force multipliers and as such were working as intended. Smaller entities in nullsec could defend their space by relying on a larger supercaptial fleet. However, after this nerf, numbers will again be everything. A short look at http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/memberCount should give us a general idea of who will be the sole beneficary of this "adjustment".. This has never been a stated balance goal in any discussion I've been party to. In particular, predicating "can survive as a small alliance in nullsec" on "can afford a large supercap fleet" would be extremely silly, because it excludes exactly the type of players who we're most keen on being able to maintain small holdings in nullsec, ie newer, poorer players.
wait, what? you say your goal is to allow smaller alliance survival?
the people who will be hit by this the most are alliances like PL, Raiden. etc. who themselves arent that large of alliances, but banded together to kill the NC which had 1.4 times the numbers that the coalition against them could field. The same people that are currently, because they did their long term planning, because they gathered the wealth todo so and because they invested alot in it, able to stand against the largest alliance of them all, goonswarm.
take a simple look at the numbers, goonswarm has 4 times as many members as raiden. (who they are currently actively fighting), lets not even look at how many members both sides if you count the whole clusterfuck together. (it looks even worse for raidens side, with wn gone etc.)
the only thing that keeps small alliances like Raiden. alive is their ability to field supercapitals, and you are destroying that sole defense.
what you are doing is destroying those that you claim to protect! WAKE UP.
|

Dan Massell
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:59:00 -
[1477] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:It's amusing the pile of people in this thread who ignore all the well-worded arguments to the contrary, and just immediately yell 'CCP just let blobbers win eve" when it's not the case at all. If you can't hold your space without using a group of overpowered ships with no effective counter in the game, something that is against everything eve has ever been about... maybe you shouldn't be holding any space. Has that thought occurred to you?.
If you can't hold your space without using a group of 1600 zerglings with no effective counter in the game, something that is against everything eve has ever been about... maybe you shouldn't be holding any space. Has that thought occurred to you? |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:00:00 -
[1478] - Quote
Dan Massell wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:It's amusing the pile of people in this thread who ignore all the well-worded arguments to the contrary, and just immediately yell 'CCP just let blobbers win eve" when it's not the case at all. If you can't hold your space without using a group of overpowered ships with no effective counter in the game, something that is against everything eve has ever been about... maybe you shouldn't be holding any space. Has that thought occurred to you?. If you can't hold your space without using a group of 1600 zerglings with no effective counter in the game, something that is against everything eve has ever been about... maybe you shouldn't be holding any space. Has that thought occurred to you?
Ignorance is bliss.
|

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:04:00 -
[1479] - Quote
Dan Massell wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:It's amusing the pile of people in this thread who ignore all the well-worded arguments to the contrary, and just immediately yell 'CCP just let blobbers win eve" when it's not the case at all. If you can't hold your space without using a group of overpowered ships with no effective counter in the game, something that is against everything eve has ever been about... maybe you shouldn't be holding any space. Has that thought occurred to you?. If you can't hold your space without using a group of 1600 zerglings with no effective counter in the game, something that is against everything eve has ever been about... maybe you shouldn't be holding any space. Has that thought occurred to you? actually it was the chance for massive battles and the grand strategy of taking and holding entire solar systems that got me into eve in the first place.What part of MMORPG "Massively multiplayer online role-playing game" Dont you get? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2869
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:04:00 -
[1480] - Quote
Hans Roaming wrote:Thanks for confirming my decision not to train for supercaps was a good one CCP.
Why shouldn't Titans be able to hit MWD'ng drakes with sig's the size of moons?
Technology advantage has always been a counter to pure numbers throughout history. Bringing numbers to a fight in Eve has always been a problem compounded by the fact that ships fire magically pass through any non targets in the way without causing damage.
If fleets in large numbers had to actually manoeuvre in order to bring DPS onto a target then the blob would be less advantageous than it would be now.
Game balance. Maybe you'd understand the need for it if your PvP experience consisted of something other than nopod ~honour~ matches in hisec. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:05:00 -
[1481] - Quote
Andski wrote:Hans Roaming wrote:Thanks for confirming my decision not to train for supercaps was a good one CCP.
Why shouldn't Titans be able to hit MWD'ng drakes with sig's the size of moons?
Technology advantage has always been a counter to pure numbers throughout history. Bringing numbers to a fight in Eve has always been a problem compounded by the fact that ships fire magically pass through any non targets in the way without causing damage.
If fleets in large numbers had to actually manoeuvre in order to bring DPS onto a target then the blob would be less advantageous than it would be now. Game balance. Maybe you'd understand the need for it if your PvP experience consisted of something other than nopod ~honour~ matches in hisec.
Andski, have you had social time with Eve devs? Is this why you got the recruitment channel rules changed almost immediately after you demanded it? What is your relationship with CCP beyond just playing the game? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2869
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:06:00 -
[1482] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Especially drake and maelstrom pilots by any chance ?
and cynabal pilots who die to titans that solocamp gates "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:06:00 -
[1483] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:This has never been a stated balance goal in any discussion I've been party to. In particular, predicating "can survive as a small alliance in nullsec" on "can afford a large supercap fleet" would be extremely silly, because it excludes exactly the type of players who we're most keen on being able to maintain small holdings in nullsec, ie newer, poorer players. Now I'm not trying to be a total jerk, but you have never succeeded in this. In addition, if you are actually reading the comments in this thread, you should realize that you are not going to succeed in your newly stated role change for Titans CCP Greyscale wrote:For the immediate future and until such time as we have the resources available to do a comprehensive overhaul, we want to ensure that titans perform decently against other capitals, but do not represent a serious threat to sub caps. Nothing you are doing makes this happen consistently. Signature radius on an MWD Drake or an MWD Maelstrom (the current FOTM fleet ships for the big nullsec alliances fighting Titans right now) is virtually identical to Signature Radius on a Carrier, and the lock time on that ship with your new system is 30+ seconds (not including TiDi). So how is the Titan an anti-Captial ship when a capital can dock/warp/enter shields before a Titan can lock it? Seriously, look at what you are doing and realize that this change does not perform your intended action. I'm not a game designer. I don't know what the answer is. But your actions do not support what you say you want Titans to be doing. All that first quote is saying is that it's never been our intention that you need supers to survive as a small alliance in nullsec. There's a lot of people reading into it a lot of things that aren't actually there. WRT the second point, I would suggest webs (where applicable), dictors/hictors, and not using titans to play docking games.
Sorry, docking games? If I'm repping shields/armor at a POS in my carrier, I can warp and dock in 31 seconds. That's 2 seconds faster than a Titan on grid can target me.
So what you are really saying (and I'm putting words in your mouth) - is that you don't want smaller groups with more ISK and SP than numbers to be able to have a meaningful impact on the battlefield anymore. Because let's look at this in reality.
Alliance X can get, oh, 200-300 folks in fleet, and they want to attack or defend a massive HP structure (Hi failed Dominion). The optimal way for them to do that is to have a significant number of supers and titans, along with a reasonable number of support. Let's play fun and say 50 super carriers and Titans and 150 support. They are attempting to take (or defend) assets from Alliance Y, which can get up to 1200 folks in fleet, but on a bad night it's only 400. If Alliance Y forms up in any form of alpha fleet, once they reach 150+ doctrine ships they can alpha strike a carrier (oh, and these are sub caps, so they can hit basically anything from a frigate on up). So let's take a bad night for alliance Y with only 150-200 alpha ships, 20-30 capitals and supers, and 200 drakes/rifters/whatever. Care to take odds on how long those amazing dictors/hictors and webs will survive for Alliance X? And, of course, you have to have "control" or at least the possibility of control on the battlefield before you commit your heavy weapons, otherwise you might as well just self destruct them and be done.
What you are doing is you are taking the smaller group with more ISK and SP and telling them they can't take or have strategic objectives in nullsec. Now I will say this once more - just so you understand where I'm coming from. Titans aren't balanced now. They aren't working well now. But what you are doing isn't a solution - but come April, when you roll it out, you are giving the largest powerblocs in EVE free reign, because there will be no counter to 1200 ships, except 1300 ships.
You damn well better be fixing how sov works in the summer, if you are going to give it all to them in the spring. CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2869
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:09:00 -
[1484] - Quote
Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Andski, have you had social time with Eve devs? Is this why you got the recruitment channel rules changed almost immediately after you demanded it? What is your relationship with CCP beyond just playing the game?
I had a beer with Soundwave and Greyscale several months back, interestingly enough "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Mathicluanna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:09:00 -
[1485] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote: Sorry, docking games? If I'm repping shields/armor at a POS in my carrier, I can warp and dock in 31 seconds. That's 2 seconds faster than a Titan on grid can target me.
God forbid the titan has a single interceptor with a point and a web to back it up. |

Tobruk
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:10:00 -
[1486] - Quote
Quote:CSM Hijinks The CSM matters. Seleene and Elise fought like lions, but were brought down in the end. Vote, motherfuckers - every vote we get is a tear in the eyes of our enemies. Here's the link: http://www.eveonline.../Vote.asp?c=438 We shot past 10k on the exit poll, but the poll is only a guideline; we cannot assume we have won. Continue to fight to get people to the polls. God forbid we get 20%+ of all votes cast, the howling from the masses will be unforgettable - and it will be a howling we can enjoy for an entire year.
Tell me about Being Objective CCP Grayscale you tool.
I can wait for your next announcement showing us all the brilliantly thought out counter to 800 maelstroms.
|

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:12:00 -
[1487] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: Dreads are mainly antistructure, with a bit of anti-cap. Carriers still do pretty decent damage against subcaps AFAIK. Supers can switch between anti-cap and anti-subcap depending on their choice of fighter drone. Titans are pure anti-cap.
Up until now Greyscale, Titans were never "pure anti-cap". Indeed, pre-dominion their primary function was to mass murder subcap fleets with their AOE Doomsdays. In Dominion you replaced the AOE with a directed weapon, capable of hitting any ship, and in addition you enhanced the regular XL weapon bonuses "so that the turret locators actually might get used [to]enable a Titan to make its presence felt on the battalefield" " to quote your own devblog. Now however, they are suddenly "pure anti-cap" as if they were never intended for anything else. Realtalk: Every single titan nerf has been to reduce their effectiveness towards subcaps. Titans on paper are actually not designed to hit subcaps for ****, it's only when you get a bunch that it's nearly impossible to maintain transversal from them all. **** they have dread guns on them and their drones were taken away, what about these things suggest they were designed as anti subcap platforms? I just don't understand this reasoning. Sure you've been taking advantage of their inability to balance these things vs subcaps properly but being an anti blob weapon clearly wasn't their intent by design and now we have them on record confirming this is the case.
Dear very important space ship personality,
the main purpose of AE DD was obviously to kill subcaps in large numbers. The main purpose of focused DD was clearly to be able to kill every ship with one shot (including subcaps).
So as you can see the idea that supercaps should be a pure anti-capital weapon is rather new.
However, I do like that this was changed and do think that supercaps still need balancing. Making them useless is not the solution though.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2869
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:14:00 -
[1488] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:Dear very important space ship personality,
the main purpose of AE DD was obviously to kill subcaps in large numbers. The main purpose of focused DD was clearly to be able to kill every ship with one shot (including subcaps).
So as you can see the idea that supercaps should be a pure anti-capital weapon is rather new.
However, I do like that this was changed and do think that supercaps still need balancing. Making them useless is not the solution though.
Yes they should revert titans to the way they were originally added, AoE doomsdays coming through a kestrel cyno
sad lil pubbie "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:15:00 -
[1489] - Quote
Andski wrote:Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Andski, have you had social time with Eve devs? Is this why you got the recruitment channel rules changed almost immediately after you demanded it? What is your relationship with CCP beyond just playing the game? I had a beer with Soundwave and Greyscale several months back, interestingly enough
...
When has the average pubby that has NO access to the devs gotten a response to their requests. This game has two classes. Goons and everyone else. |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
964
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:15:00 -
[1490] - Quote
Tobruk wrote:
Tell me about Being Objective CCP Grayscale you tool.
I can wait for your next announcement showing us all the brilliantly thought out counter to 800 maelstroms.
A calculator. So you can count the numbers of our enemies and realize this is a red herring since they bring as many on the field as we do. |

Sanders RUS
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:16:00 -
[1491] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:BioZvin wrote:CCP Soundwave wrote:Actually, Greyscale went to Cambridge, and while we haven't IQ tested him yet, I'm pretty sure he'd score high  I am sorry in advance here, but could we get some indication from CCP that we are being heard here. Put a lot of time into this game and really would ratter not be forced to leave because I feel like CCP only listens to Goons. I know they say we are less people then they are, but they don't number 345000 like they would have us believe. We're absolutely listening. Titans are an anti-cap/supercap ship and we need to limit their ability to kill subcaps. That's a change that's happening and is unlikely to change. The practical details on how that happens we'd love as much feedback on as possible. We've been talking about the lock timers this morning based on feedback from the playerbase, looking at what adjustments we can possibly make. The changes in the OP are still subject to change if we get feedback on how to achieve our goal better.
So dreads and supercaps are anti structure ships within the current nullsec warring. So titans are just supposed to sit around and wait for someone to shoot structures?
I feel that nerfing supers to uselessness is rather myopic will only lead to less dynamic gameplay. There needs to be an ability to counter titans, but fights should not be reduced to who can field the most subcaps. I think that is a poor direction especially for pilots who have spent years training into these ships and want them to be used. However, CCP seems ok with saying to the 800 or so titan pilots that they would much rather keep their subcap customers happy (even though must of them have no clue about capital combat or why a titan could blap a MWDing drake).
To me this general direction is bad for eve online, tracking probably needed a nerf, but now it'll take 18 seconds to even lock another titan with three cormack sebos's (Who the hell balances around 3 meta 14 sebos?). Base Titan scanres will be a third of a sieged dreadnaught. I feel that taken together with the previous nerfs CCP is driving titan pilots to mothball their ships. Theres really no significant reason to fly a titan and the only thing they have to look forward to is some vague promise of changes down the road. Well Ive seen how long it takes CCP to get back to things like gallente ship balancing or faction warfare and Im not to keen on waiting around that long for titans to be useful again.
This wasnt something so critical that it needed to be addressed outside of a thoughtful look at the ship and its role in fleets. |

Magnifikus Erzverwirrer
Endstati0n Raiden.
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:17:00 -
[1492] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Tobruk wrote:
Tell me about Being Objective CCP Grayscale you tool.
I can wait for your next announcement showing us all the brilliantly thought out counter to 800 maelstroms.
A calculator. So you can count the numbers of our enemies and realize this is a red herring since they bring as many on the field as we do.
think your awesome idea would also work for supers right, owait you have none because you like to rmt your iskies
i hope next patch is maelstroms cannot hit mwding cruisers... |

so3ke
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:17:00 -
[1493] - Quote
Dan Massell wrote:
If you can't hold your space without using a group of 1600 zerglings with no effective counter in the game, something that is against everything eve has ever been about... maybe you shouldn't be holding any space. Has that thought occurred to you?
The question is if 'making friends' is something that should be encouraged by the games mechanics or 'sitting in large ships that **** on everything without taking any real risk'.
I'd personally go for the 'making friends' thing but if you rather look down on everyone else in the game cause you saved up enough ISK to sit in a giant internet space phallus that's fine as well. just don't wack it in my face while I'm just trying to make friends here .. if you know what I mean. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2869
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:17:00 -
[1494] - Quote
Sanders RUS wrote:So dreads and supercaps are anti structure ships within the current nullsec warring. So titans are just supposed to sit around and wait for someone to shoot structures?
I feel that nerfing supers to uselessness is rather myopic will only lead to less dynamic gameplay. There needs to be an ability to counter titans, but fights should not be reduced to who can field the most subcaps. I think that is a poor direction especially for pilots who have spent years training into these ships and want them to be used. However, CCP seems ok with saying to the 800 or so titan pilots that they would much rather keep their subcap customers happy (even though must of them have no clue about capital combat or why a titan could blap a MWDing drake).
To me this general direction is bad for eve online, tracking probably needed a nerf, but now it'll take 18 seconds to even lock another titan with three cormack sebos's (Who the hell balances around 3 meta 14 sebos?). Base Titan scanres will be a third of a sieged dreadnaught. I feel that taken together with the previous nerfs CCP is driving titan pilots to mothball their ships. Theres really no significant reason to fly a titan and the only thing they have to look forward to is some vague promise of changes down the road. Well Ive seen how long it takes CCP to get back to things like gallente ship balancing or faction warfare and Im not to keen on waiting around that long for titans to be useful again.
This wasnt something so critical that it needed to be addressed outside of a thoughtful look at the ship and its role in fleets.
we both know you bought your character with enthusiastically ratted ISK "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
965
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:18:00 -
[1495] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote: Dear very important space ship personality,
the main purpose of AE DD was obviously to kill subcaps in large numbers.
And they realized it was bullshit.
Quote: The main purpose of focused DD was clearly to be able to kill every ship with one shot (including subcaps).
And they realized it was bullshit.
Quote: So as you can see the idea that supercaps should be a pure anti-capital weapon is rather new.
Not really, every move has been in this direction. It would have been better had they flat out said what the purpose was ages ago but it's not like we've been quiet about the subject.
Quote:However, I do like that this was changed and do think that supercaps still need balancing. Making them useless is not the solution though.
Right there in the beginning of Greyscales post he mentions this is a stopgap cause it is too disruptive and not what they intended at all. They will be redesigning the hull to actually be good at its stated role instead of leaving it broken so it can do everything. |

Markus Schulz
OEG Goonswarm Federation
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:18:00 -
[1496] - Quote
Ong wrote:GF ccp, blobs just won eve  We're playing in different 'EVEs'?! How 'bout "techno-league" supercapital blobs, which does not control? Subcaps can be simpe controlled. Just find a friends or turn ur brain to "position on". :) |

Le Cardinal
Spricer Raiden.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:20:00 -
[1497] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:Dear Greyscale,
you do remember how we told you that your surgical adjustments to anomalies will kill 0.0 and you didn't listen so that you had to apologize afterwards? Please don't do this again. Yes supercaps need a proper role and balancing but making them useless simply because you don't have the ressources to do it properly is not the solution. Do at least the following: Frigs < Cruisers < BC < BS < capitals < supercapitals Cruisers can easily kill frigs --> BC can easily kill cruisers < BS can easily kill BCs (and here is the problem) capitals are almost useless against BS < Supercapitals can easily kill capitals.
Make Dreads good against BS and don't nerf the sensor strength of titans.
Dreadnaughts are primarily anti-structure tools, with anti-capital as a secondary role. The capital ships you're looking for to deal with battleships are carriers.
Cut the crap will you. This adjustment is a shortterm solution to stagger the whining of all the goons whom are unable to think outside the Alphadoctrine box. PL and RDN have given them easy solutions on how to kill titans. And yet they keep throwing drakes and maelstroms at the titans. So they go to devs and ask for help. And how surprising is it that CCP yet again does a half-assed hotifx that gimps the titans ability to work properly against anything. By the time you manage to clean your brown nose, goons will infact reach many of their objectives through sheer numbers. Nothing else will matter.
And again you prove that your "humble" attitude last year is worth nothing to those whom can actually fly supercaps as long as the voices from those who cant be arsed to get one is heard. RDN does not give out supercaps to its members. Losses are reimbursed however.
So basically you are shafting the people who has been working their arses off to achieve these ships. Yes im a bit pissed. Not because this patch affect us quite much, but because devs let goons control their game. |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:20:00 -
[1498] - Quote
Vile rat wrote: Right there in the beginning of Greyscales post he mentions this is a stopgap cause it is too disruptive and not what they intended at all. They will be redesigning the hull to actually be good at its stated role instead of leaving it broken so it can do everything.
It must be broken completely before it can be fixed. You heard it hear first folks. Straight from the Goon Illuminati's mouth. |

Sade Onyx
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:21:00 -
[1499] - Quote
Shouldnt Titans be renamed to Ultra-capitals? or Mega Capitals
The Word 'titan' isnt really an accurate description of what they are. |

Sanders RUS
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:22:00 -
[1500] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: We would be totally happy with an outcome where people stop expanding their titan fleet. It shouldn't be coming as a huge surprise to anyone that, all other things being equal, we would prefer a situation where there were fewer titans in EVE.
People who're augmenting their fleet strength with supers we're OK with, and they should continue to be OK after this change. We're not happy with situations where supercaps are making up the bulk of the fleet strength. If that's becoming less viable, then this is a desirable outcome for us.
In other words your totally fine with titan pilots unsubscribing their accounts because you've made their ships not fun for them to fly. You're not throwing them any bones here to keep them flying the big ships that they are locked into so they should either sell it or moth ball it until you can devote development time. It saddens me that you're writing off your veteran players as acceptable losses. |

Veinnail
FinFleet Raiden.
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:23:00 -
[1501] - Quote
dearest CCP.
it is quite obvious over the past years that you've developed quite the gap in your capital ship trees. we need new capital ship classes. fill the void between dread-titan. I personally agree that titans are imbalanced, this is quite the heavy handed correction though.
make XXL turrets. and these XXL turrets will have the anti-capital attributes that you require without affecting the functionality of dreads. this will leave you plenty of breathing room for expansion in the capital ship trees, and even maybe the introduction of the XL control tower. |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:23:00 -
[1502] - Quote
Sade Onyx wrote:Shouldnt Titans be renamed to Ultra-capitals? or Mega Capitals
The Word 'titan' isnt really an accurate description of what they are.
They should be renamed to space coffins because CCP just made sure that any good PVP alliance will die in them regardless because some goons whined. |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
965
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:24:00 -
[1503] - Quote
Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Vile rat wrote: Right there in the beginning of Greyscales post he mentions this is a stopgap cause it is too disruptive and not what they intended at all. They will be redesigning the hull to actually be good at its stated role instead of leaving it broken so it can do everything.
It must be broken completely before it can be fixed. You heard it hear first folks. Straight from the Goon Illuminati's mouth.
Look at the cute lil' newbie corp alt. Just wanna pat your head son. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2869
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:25:00 -
[1504] - Quote
Le Cardinal wrote:Cut the crap will you. This adjustment is a shortterm solution to stagger the whining of all the goons whom are unable to think outside the Alphadoctrine box. PL and RDN have given them easy solutions on how to kill titans. And yet they keep throwing drakes and maelstroms at the titans. So they go to devs and ask for help. And how surprising is it that CCP yet again does a half-assed hotifx that gimps the titans ability to work properly against anything. By the time you manage to clean your brown nose, goons will infact reach many of their objectives through sheer numbers. Nothing else will matter.
And again you prove that your "humble" attitude last year is worth nothing to those whom can actually fly supercaps as long as the voices from those who cant be arsed to get one is heard. RDN does not give out supercaps to its members. Losses are reimbursed however.
So basically you are shafting the people who has been working their arses off to achieve these ships. Yes im a bit pissed. Not because this patch affect us quite much, but because devs let goons control their game.
it's not like this change should come at a surprise
/maybe/ basing your entire alliance around the concept of dogpiling all the high-skillpoint bittervets you can hoover up and ushering them into titans wasn't the most optimal plan
also - your alliance doesn't get its members into titans? yet you criticize GSF for not doing the same, while we heavily subsidize members who buy them? tell me all about how it's our tech income that gets RMTed. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:25:00 -
[1505] - Quote
Veinnail wrote:dearest CCP.
it is quite obvious over the past years that you've developed quite the gap in your capital ship trees. we need new capital ship classes. fill the void between dread-titan. I personally agree that titans are imbalanced, this is quite the heavy handed correction though.
make XXL turrets. and these XXL turrets will have the anti-capital attributes that you require without affecting the functionality of dreads. this will leave you plenty of breathing room for expansion in the capital ship trees, and even maybe the introduction of the XL control tower.
I have been giving a lot of thought to the EVE ONLINE game mechanics and I agree 100% with this man. There should be a T2 titan class as well that is able to fit even larger turrets. It also seems like there should be a titan equivalent carrier that fields BS ship sized drones. Also a mining titan. |

Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:26:00 -
[1506] - Quote
This is bullsh!t and you all know it. A titan should be able to track all ships. It's biggest, therefore it has to be best.
-- Sincerely, Death Star. |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:26:00 -
[1507] - Quote
The amount of neutral PL/Raiden alts in this thread, desperately clinging to the entitled notion that they should be allowed to fly around in unkillable ships because they paid a little more isk, is amazing. When every other ship in the game can be killed by subcaps, but you drop titans and suddenly subcaps are meaningless. If 1600 people show up to take someone's space, and they can only field 200 guys, then THEY DO NOT DESERVE THAT SPACE. This is how the world works. You should not magically be allowed to pick space and control it because you can stick 50 guys into a super ship, and stand it up to 1600 people. |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:27:00 -
[1508] - Quote
just came to check if andski was still sperging
exciting life you lead br0 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2869
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:27:00 -
[1509] - Quote
Hannott Thanos wrote:This is bullsh!t and you all know it. A titan should be able to track all ships. It's biggest, therefore it has to be best.
-- Sincerely, Death Star.
nope
sincerely, me "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5526
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:28:00 -
[1510] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote:Based on simple geometry, at some point in your orbit of the anchor you will have a transversal of ZERO (or close enough to call it zero) and the signature radius of a carrier. GǪwhich can be avoided with a bit more involved flying. The situation you describe has next to nothing to do with the presence of an MWD, and turning an MWD on does not simply make a target as easy to hit as a carrier. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Tobruk
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:28:00 -
[1511] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Tobruk wrote:
Tell me about Being Objective CCP Grayscale you tool.
I can wait for your next announcement showing us all the brilliantly thought out counter to 800 maelstroms.
A calculator. So you can count the numbers of our enemies and realize this is a red herring since they bring as many on the field as we do.
maybe you should grab one and calculate how many dreads it takes to kill our titans and how long that would take given your current tech income.
but no you should just ignore the best and most viable counter to titans then expect CCP Sound-wave, and CCP Screegs to slobber your rod. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2869
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:28:00 -
[1512] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:just came to check if andski was still sperging
exciting life you lead br0
watching your blues melt down in this thread has made my day ;p
keep spergin ;p "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:29:00 -
[1513] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Vile rat wrote: Right there in the beginning of Greyscales post he mentions this is a stopgap cause it is too disruptive and not what they intended at all. They will be redesigning the hull to actually be good at its stated role instead of leaving it broken so it can do everything.
It must be broken completely before it can be fixed. You heard it hear first folks. Straight from the Goon Illuminati's mouth. Look at the cute lil' newbie corp alt. Just wanna pat your head son.
Just because I never paid 10 dollars to post in a forum in order to fly internet spaceships doesn't make me less of a subscriber to Eve. I don't need to join a corp in order to enjoy this game. I have seen your dumb tattoo so you have no grounds making fun of me. |

Tobruk
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:29:00 -
[1514] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:The amount of neutral PL/Raiden alts in this thread, desperately clinging to the entitled notion that they should be allowed to fly around in unkillable ships because they paid a little more isk, is amazing. When every other ship in the game can be killed by subcaps, but you drop titans and suddenly subcaps are meaningless. If 1600 people show up to take someone's space, and they can only field 200 guys, then THEY DO NOT DESERVE THAT SPACE. This is how the world works. You should not magically be allowed to pick space and control it because you can stick 50 guys into a super ship, and stand it up to 1600 people.
we should just get rid of all spaceship classes and have pods. whoever brings more wins. |

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:29:00 -
[1515] - Quote
Tobruk wrote:Vile rat wrote:Tobruk wrote:
Tell me about Being Objective CCP Grayscale you tool.
I can wait for your next announcement showing us all the brilliantly thought out counter to 800 maelstroms.
A calculator. So you can count the numbers of our enemies and realize this is a red herring since they bring as many on the field as we do. maybe you should grab one and calculate how many dreads it takes to kill our titans and how long that would take given your current tech income. but no you should just ignore the best and most viable counter to titans then expect CCP Sound-wave, and CCP Screegs to slobber your rod.
OOoo you sound mad. |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
965
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:30:00 -
[1516] - Quote
Tobruk wrote:
maybe you should grab one and calculate how many dreads it takes to kill our titans and how long that would take given your current tech income.
Are you really going to make me detail the many holes in this plan? Is this something you're seriously suggesting or are you just trolling me?
No way, you gotta just be trolling me. |

Flores Negras
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:30:00 -
[1517] - Quote
So I should start out by saying I'm not a titan pilot, though it has always been my wish to one day get into a super and then a titan. With that being said, it is called a "Super Carrier" and as CCP Grayscale mentioned earlier refuting another post, CARRIERS are supposed to be the ones that kill the battleships not the dreads, supers or titans. If you look at the name "Super Carrier" It has carrier in it, and means that they should be able to do both intended purposes for both a carrier and a super, which is kill battleships and destroy structures.
After the last Super Carrier Nerf, supers became no more than giant logistics and structure grinders that people had wasted millions of SP and months of training into Drone skills to fly properly, but it was an accepted change as now supers are used as the logistics for the Titans who can kill alpha fleets that would otherwise be to strong. Now Super carriers are one role either grind structures or kill battleships (ineffectively) and titans will have one role to grind structures. Super carriers need a larger drone bay if they are going to have to take on both roles, which previously the Titans could have played, but that was also done away with by the same CSMs because they were losing BCs to supers. Which is stupid and a waste of SP and isk for Titan and Super pilots as they trained Guns/Drones and wasted isk on those skill books.
With the last nerf all supers saw new roles as they could no longer be fielded alone and they still cant be. Without a support fleet a super/titan fleet alone can not live as a few well piloted dictors can keep them locked down for any length of time and have reinforcements brought in, so it is the fact people still need a support fleet and that's why the changes to Super Carriers were made.
If you are going to take an absolute bat to all Supers/Titans and continue in doing so, some sort of compensation should be given to those who fly them as of now, and in the future. In addition prices should be lowered and build time as well for both titans and supers to make them a more viable weapon for all alliances/corporations which will in turn result in more being fielded, more mixed fights (Capitals and Sub caps), and will result in more destruction of all types of ships. If a Dread is to kill structures and costs 2b, and a Super is to kill dreads and Capitals should be about 5b, and a Titan to kill Capitals and Structures is about a combination of the two, but we'll say 10-15b... In terms of prices a frigate costs 200k > Cruiser 3m > BC 35m > BS 155m > Carrier 1.2b > Dread 2b > Super 20b > Titan 105b For the prices Supers/Titans have the same roles as Carrier/Dread so they should be MUCH closer in price.
Lastly a point about this thread is Goons you keep crapping in it, and have yet to make a valid point besides posting a few killboards of you getting owned because you wouldn't field your capitals or supers. The ONLY CSMs that have posted in this thread have also been Goons and 90% of people in this thread FOR the changes are goons as well. The same CSMs that changed Supers to be useless against sup caps (when carriers should be useful according to CCP Grayscale) are also the same ones now changing titans, for the same reason, they lose. |

Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:32:00 -
[1518] - Quote
Andski wrote:Hannott Thanos wrote:This is bullsh!t and you all know it. A titan should be able to track all ships. It's biggest, therefore it has to be best.
-- Sincerely, Death Star. nope sincerely, me
Someone did not get the joke? :) |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
287
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:33:00 -
[1519] - Quote
As a general note an adjustment that benefits a single entity over others isn't probably a "balancing" adjustment at all.
Why only Goonswarm members are gloating happy about this change, and everyone else in null seems to be butthurt as hell?
Maybe needs some more thinking, imo, just by looking at the reactions.
Quote:If 1600 people show up to take someone's space, and they can only field 200 guys, then THEY DO NOT DESERVE THAT SPACE. This is how the world works. You should not magically be allowed to pick space and control it because you can stick 50 guys into a super ship, and stand it up to 1600 people.
Why should 1600 be the magic win button?
It would be cool to play a game where the better pilots win, you know, a bit like it is in small gang combat.
|

Valearx
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:33:00 -
[1520] - Quote
Tobruk wrote:
we should just get rid of all spaceship classes and have pods. whoever brings more wins.
Please continue, your high-pitched squeals of indignation are ******* musical. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2870
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:34:00 -
[1521] - Quote
Hannott Thanos wrote:Andski wrote:Hannott Thanos wrote:This is bullsh!t and you all know it. A titan should be able to track all ships. It's biggest, therefore it has to be best.
-- Sincerely, Death Star. nope sincerely, me Someone did not get the joke? :)
i have a hangover so yeah i kinda missed it "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
444
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:34:00 -
[1522] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:
Realtalk:
Every single titan nerf has been to reduce their effectiveness towards subcaps. Titans on paper are actually not designed to hit subcaps for ****, it's only when you get a bunch that it's nearly impossible to maintain transversal from them all. **** they have dread guns on them and their drones were taken away, what about these things suggest they were designed as anti subcap platforms? I just don't understand this reasoning. Sure you've been taking advantage of their inability to balance these things vs subcaps properly but being an anti blob weapon clearly wasn't their intent by design and now we have them on record confirming this is the case.
They were originally designed as the ultimate anti-blob weapon. Dont even try that god damn Goon proaganda with me you god damn useless piece of sh*t.
Current Titan and supercarrier capabilities against subcaps have existed since Dominion. They werent important enough to nerf even when playing an instrumental role in toppling the Northern Coalition, a conglomerate of tens of thousands of players. But it became top priority once the Goons themselves were under threat. So in two passes, first back in december and now in April they get nerfed into oblivion. Wonder why? Oh scratch that. I dont really wonder why. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5526
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:34:00 -
[1523] - Quote
Hannott Thanos wrote:Someone did not get the joke? :) Granted, it would be nice of capital ships had thermal exhaust vents, but they've talked about adding that for longer than they've talked about WiS, so good luckGǪ 
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
497
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:35:00 -
[1524] - Quote
Roime wrote:
Why should 1600 be the magic win button?
It would be cool to play a game where the better pilots win, you know, a bit like it is in small gang combat.
Someone has never fought IRC |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2870
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:35:00 -
[1525] - Quote
Roime wrote:As a general note an adjustment that benefits a single entity over others isn't probably a "balancing" adjustment at all. Why only Goonswarm members are gloating happy about this change, and everyone else in null seems to be butthurt as hell? Maybe needs some more thinking, imo, just by looking at the reactions. Quote:If 1600 people show up to take someone's space, and they can only field 200 guys, then THEY DO NOT DESERVE THAT SPACE. This is how the world works. You should not magically be allowed to pick space and control it because you can stick 50 guys into a super ship, and stand it up to 1600 people. Why should 1600 be the magic win button? It would be cool to play a game where the better pilots win, you know, a bit like it is in small gang combat.
I'd say it's more indicative of the current state of nullsec - it's dominated by three powerblocs. Two of them, the CFC and Awagon, despise tracking titans. The other loves them. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:35:00 -
[1526] - Quote
Valearx wrote:Tobruk wrote:
we should just get rid of all spaceship classes and have pods. whoever brings more wins.
Please continue, your high-pitched squeals of indignation are ******* musical.
Goons have no class. They are like kindergarteners that get a chance to be cruel to other nicer little kids just because the other kid peed himself by accident in front of the class. |

Tobruk
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:36:00 -
[1527] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Tobruk wrote:
maybe you should grab one and calculate how many dreads it takes to kill our titans and how long that would take given your current tech income.
Are you really going to make me detail the many holes in this plan? Is this something you're seriously suggesting or are you just trolling me? No way, you gotta just be trolling me.
im not trolling Vile rat.
you made a choice to invest your income and time in a specific fleet doctrine, one that vee invented to counter armor hacs and abandons. It was the wrong choice.
Had you been able to field 300 or more dreads there is no FC in his right mind who would have opposed you with titans. Those same dreads can work unsieged like titans and do the same volly damage at the same range as maelstroms.
but this discussion is an academic one as CCP is playing favorites, your CEO has said as much. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2870
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:36:00 -
[1528] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:They were originally designed as the ultimate anti-blob weapon. Dont even try that god damn Goon proaganda with me you god damn useless piece of sh*t.
Current Titan and supercarrier capabilities against subcaps have existed since Dominion. They werent important enough to nerf even when playing an instrumental role in toppling the Northern Coalition, a conglomerate of tens of thousands of players. But it became top priority once the Goons themselves were under threat. So in two passes, first back in december and now in April they get nerfed into oblivion. Wonder why? Oh scratch that. I dont really wonder why.
don't talk down to your betters, please.
also why do you think the ability to doomsday through a cyno was removed? good god "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:36:00 -
[1529] - Quote
Andski wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:Dear very important space ship personality,
the main purpose of AE DD was obviously to kill subcaps in large numbers. The main purpose of focused DD was clearly to be able to kill every ship with one shot (including subcaps).
So as you can see the idea that supercaps should be a pure anti-capital weapon is rather new.
However, I do like that this was changed and do think that supercaps still need balancing. Making them useless is not the solution though.
Yes they should revert titans to the way they were originally added, AoE doomsdays coming through a kestrel cyno sad lil pubbie
You can read reight? Made it bold for you...
Andski wrote:[quote=John Maynard Keynes] However, I do like that this was changed and do think that supercaps still need balancing. Making them useless is not the solution though.
|

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:36:00 -
[1530] - Quote
Roime wrote:As a general note an adjustment that benefits a single entity over others isn't probably a "balancing" adjustment at all. Why only Goonswarm members are gloating happy about this change, and everyone else in null seems to be butthurt as hell? Maybe needs some more thinking, imo, just by looking at the reactions. Quote:If 1600 people show up to take someone's space, and they can only field 200 guys, then THEY DO NOT DESERVE THAT SPACE. This is how the world works. You should not magically be allowed to pick space and control it because you can stick 50 guys into a super ship, and stand it up to 1600 people. Why should 1600 be the magic win button? It would be cool to play a game where the better pilots win, you know, a bit like it is in small gang combat.
If you want small gang combat go get it!! No one is stopping you, there is plenty of it out there.But dont go thinking you are going to go take and hold entire regions of space without building a coalition or having a large alliance,it.just isnt going to happen.Live with it.
|

Le Cardinal
Spricer Raiden.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:37:00 -
[1531] - Quote
Andski wrote:Le Cardinal wrote:Cut the crap will you. This adjustment is a shortterm solution to stagger the whining of all the goons whom are unable to think outside the Alphadoctrine box. PL and RDN have given them easy solutions on how to kill titans. And yet they keep throwing drakes and maelstroms at the titans. So they go to devs and ask for help. And how surprising is it that CCP yet again does a half-assed hotifx that gimps the titans ability to work properly against anything. By the time you manage to clean your brown nose, goons will infact reach many of their objectives through sheer numbers. Nothing else will matter.
And again you prove that your "humble" attitude last year is worth nothing to those whom can actually fly supercaps as long as the voices from those who cant be arsed to get one is heard. RDN does not give out supercaps to its members. Losses are reimbursed however.
So basically you are shafting the people who has been working their arses off to achieve these ships. Yes im a bit pissed. Not because this patch affect us quite much, but because devs let goons control their game. it's not like this change should come at a surprise /maybe/ basing your entire alliance around the concept of dogpiling all the high-skillpoint bittervets you can hoover up and ushering them into titans wasn't the most optimal plan also - your alliance doesn't get its members into titans? yet you criticize GSF for not doing the same, while we heavily subsidize members who buy them? tell me all about how it's our tech income that gets RMTed.
A change is needed indeed, but this is as i said, an half arsed attempt to stagger your whining until they manage to think out a new function for them. And we all know CCPs ability to fix things properly. My alliances members get themselves into titans by working for it. Your alliance dont encourage your members to be competitive in anything else than drakes and maelstroms. You have the funds, and ability to reimburse losses, if you just used them. Instead you turn to the devs and cry.
Fyi, you dont need to be so highskilled in order to fly a titan. Training for maelstroms and drakes goes pretty fast. How about training a second account for supercaps, or even use an alt on same account. After all you have "bittervets" in goons as well, and since your recruiting everyone and their mother you should be able to muster a decent supportfleet along with supercaps. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2870
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:38:00 -
[1532] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:Andski wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:Dear very important space ship personality,
the main purpose of AE DD was obviously to kill subcaps in large numbers. The main purpose of focused DD was clearly to be able to kill every ship with one shot (including subcaps).
So as you can see the idea that supercaps should be a pure anti-capital weapon is rather new.
However, I do like that this was changed and do think that supercaps still need balancing. Making them useless is not the solution though.
Yes they should revert titans to the way they were originally added, AoE doomsdays coming through a kestrel cyno sad lil pubbie You can read reight? Made it bold for you... John Maynard Keynes wrote: However, I do like that this was changed and do think that supercaps still need balancing. Making them useless is not the solution though.
You're insisting that the way to balance supers is to make sure they can blap subcaps with impunity because that was their original intent, in 2005, when it was assumed they'd be rare. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2870
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:40:00 -
[1533] - Quote
Le Cardinal wrote:A change is needed indeed, but this is as i said, an half arsed attempt to stagger your whining until they manage to think out a new function for them. And we all know CCPs ability to fix things properly. My alliances members get themselves into titans by working for it. Your alliance dont encourage your members to be competitive in anything else than drakes and maelstroms. You have the funds, and ability to reimburse losses, if you just used them. Instead you turn to the devs and cry.
Fyi, you dont need to be so highskilled in order to fly a titan. Training for maelstroms and drakes goes pretty fast. How about training a second account for supercaps, or even use an alt on same account. After all you have "bittervets" in goons as well, and since your recruiting everyone and their mother you should be able to muster a decent supportfleet along with supercaps.
we actually do reimburse titans and supercarriers, oops
get better spies bro, should be easy since we recruit everyone and their mother right??? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:41:00 -
[1534] - Quote
Roime wrote:As a general note an adjustment that benefits a single entity over others isn't probably a "balancing" adjustment at all. Why only Goonswarm members are gloating happy about this change, and everyone else in null seems to be butthurt as hell? Maybe needs some more thinking, imo, just by looking at the reactions. Quote:If 1600 people show up to take someone's space, and they can only field 200 guys, then THEY DO NOT DESERVE THAT SPACE. This is how the world works. You should not magically be allowed to pick space and control it because you can stick 50 guys into a super ship, and stand it up to 1600 people. Why should 1600 be the magic win button? It would be cool to play a game where the better pilots win, you know, a bit like it is in small gang combat.
Better pilots already win. As it's already been stated -and ignored- by Pl/raiden in this topic again and again, numbers aren't the issue here they are desperately trying to make it out to be. Those 1600 people don't exist. The people fighting goons consistently bring the same number of pilots as us. The only difference is when that doesn't work, they drop invincible ships to win the battle. This is not world of warcraft. Paying a little more for a ship, or having a few more skillpoints than a guy, should not make you invincible. A small gang of well flown ships can wipe out larger battleship gangs. I've seen it happen in blackops. A small fleet of well flown battleships can wipe out a larger fleet. You know what wipes out a titan fleet? MORE TITANS. You know what a small alliance wanting to move into 0.0 space to hold a small area can bring to fight those titans? NOTHING. So you either join a titan heavy alliance, or you just don't live in 0.0.
|

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:41:00 -
[1535] - Quote
Andski wrote:Hannott Thanos wrote:Andski wrote:Hannott Thanos wrote:This is bullsh!t and you all know it. A titan should be able to track all ships. It's biggest, therefore it has to be best.
-- Sincerely, Death Star. nope sincerely, me Someone did not get the joke? :) i have a hangover so yeah i kinda missed it
Sat on eve-o drinkin' beer, posting on forums
we got a badass over here
|

Castelo Selva
Forcas armadas Moon Warriors
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:41:00 -
[1536] - Quote
Shadoo wrote: ... I personally btw I've argued for the last 4 years that titans should NOT be a combat ship at all, but rather a massive alliance level asset for logistics/cloning/staging/etc ...
^^^^ THIS!!
Please CCP listem this man. Please CSM listem this man. Please CSM make CCP listem this man.
Really this is the big solution to titans. That are the way it should be at fist. Just thik about a litle bit and you will see it. Of course that will be a OMG ragequit reaction, but this is the right thing to do to make the game better.
|

Red Templar
Raging Ducks Goonswarm Federation
169
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:42:00 -
[1537] - Quote
Roime wrote:As a general note an adjustment that benefits a single entity over others isn't probably a "balancing" adjustment at all.
Why only Goonswarm members are gloating happy about this change, and everyone else in null seems to be butthurt as hell?
Maybe needs some more thinking, imo, just by looking at the reactions.
Why are you ignoring other people opinions? I have seen plenty of people in this thread who support this change and who is not in goonswarm. Both from null-sec alliances and not. Even some players who are affected by this change (raiden/pl/whatever) agree that titans are unbalanced and need changes, though they disagree with this specific solution.
If you choose to ignore everyone else and only see goons... well, its your choice, but no amount of thinking will help you in that case. For Love. For Peace. For Honor.
For None of the Above.
For Pony! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2870
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:43:00 -
[1538] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Sat on eve-o drinkin' beer, posting on forums
we got a badass over here
hey which titan do you have and how do you feel about being hazed with a pos ornament?????
lmao "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:44:00 -
[1539] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:[quote=John Maynard Keynes]
Right there in the beginning of Greyscales post he mentions this is a stopgap cause it is too disruptive and not what they intended at all. They will be redesigning the hull to actually be good at its stated role instead of leaving it broken so it can do everything.
Please be honest,
many people consider artillery to be broken (especially people who get ganked in high-sec). What would be your reaction if CCP says: "We think artillery doesn't work the way it should, we will thus reduce its falloff by 50% as well as its alpha. This is not the final solution and we don't like it but atm the moment we don't have the ressources to fix it properly. And until we find ressources to deal with it --> go and **** yourselfes"
|

Valearx
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:44:00 -
[1540] - Quote
Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Valearx wrote:Tobruk wrote:
we should just get rid of all spaceship classes and have pods. whoever brings more wins.
Please continue, your high-pitched squeals of indignation are ******* musical. Goons have no class. They are like kindergarteners that get a chance to be cruel to other nicer little kids just because the other kid peed himself by accident in front of the class.
Hey, I just call them as I see them vOv
And what I see here are some quite clearly very grounded folks getting extremely mad because someone's changing their internet spaceships   |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5901
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:44:00 -
[1541] - Quote
Strange bedfellows. I was among the most vocal in criticizing Greyscale for not consulting with the CSM about the anomaly nerf, and yet here I see him slandered by a legion of altposters from RDN and NCdot for 'not consulting' when he actually did.
In this case, the CSM was consulted and the solutions were discussed at length; it just happens that the non-PL representatives who participated in the discussion (most of the CSM) supported these changes to a man. I'm delighted to have all of you point your fingers at me and Vile Rat and howl about ~goon conspiracies~, though.
The hard fact is that Titan pilots are .3% of player population, Titans shouldn't be able to impact subcaps, and everyone - except for PL's reps on the council - agrees that this needs to happen.
Anyway, Greyscale has clearly learned from the Anomaly nerf; not only did Anoms get un-nerfed a bit later in response to criticism, he's consulted fully and at length with the CSM on this issue. The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Veinnail
FinFleet Raiden.
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:44:00 -
[1542] - Quote
Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Veinnail wrote:dearest CCP.
it is quite obvious over the past years that you've developed quite the gap in your capital ship trees. we need new capital ship classes. fill the void between dread-titan. I personally agree that titans are imbalanced, this is quite the heavy handed correction though.
make XXL turrets. and these XXL turrets will have the anti-capital attributes that you require without affecting the functionality of dreads. this will leave you plenty of breathing room for expansion in the capital ship trees, and even maybe the introduction of the XL control tower. I have been giving a lot of thought to the EVE ONLINE game mechanics and I agree 100% with this man. There should be a T2 titan class as well that is able to fit even larger turrets. It also seems like there should be a titan equivalent carrier that fields BS ship sized drones. Also a mining titan.
no, the Current titans would be upped to XXL turrets, with proper specs for the role. and signature resolution to match |

Le Cardinal
Spricer Raiden.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:45:00 -
[1543] - Quote
Andski wrote:Dez Affinity wrote:Sat on eve-o drinkin' beer, posting on forums
we got a badass over here
hey which titan do you have and how do you feel about being hazed with a pos ornament????? lmao
Seriously. half of the posts in this thread is yours. Do you even have a life? |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2680
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:45:00 -
[1544] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:Vile rat wrote:[quote=John Maynard Keynes]
Right there in the beginning of Greyscales post he mentions this is a stopgap cause it is too disruptive and not what they intended at all. They will be redesigning the hull to actually be good at its stated role instead of leaving it broken so it can do everything. Please be honest, many people consider artillery to be broken (especially people who get ganked in high-sec). What would be your reaction if CCP says: "We think artillery doesn't work the way it should, we will thus reduce its falloff by 50% as well as its alpha. This is not the final solution and we don't like it but atm the moment we don't have the ressources to fix it properly. And until we find ressources to deal with it --> go and **** yourselfes" we'd deal because we're not cripples who rely on a broken game mechanic for relevance |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2872
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:45:00 -
[1545] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:Please be honest,
many people consider artillery to be broken (especially people who get ganked in high-sec). What would be your reaction if CCP says: "We think artillery doesn't work the way it should, we will thus reduce its falloff by 50% as well as its alpha. This is not the final solution and we don't like it but atm the moment we don't have the ressources to fix it properly. And until we find ressources to deal with it --> go and **** yourselfes"
oh no our battleships got nerfed we might have to fly one of the other 30 hulls that can take their place "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:46:00 -
[1546] - Quote
Andski wrote:Dez Affinity wrote:Sat on eve-o drinkin' beer, posting on forums
we got a badass over here
hey which titan do you have and how do you feel about being hazed with a pos ornament????? lmao
none
lmao |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2872
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:47:00 -
[1547] - Quote
Le Cardinal wrote:Seriously. half of the posts in this thread is yours. Do you even have a life?
look at you going all ad hominem because you totally have a life mister "i spent months ratting to buy my titan" lmao "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
966
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:49:00 -
[1548] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:
Please be honest,
many people consider artillery to be broken (especially people who get ganked in high-sec). What would be your reaction if CCP says: "We think artillery doesn't work the way it should, we will thus reduce its falloff by 50% as well as its alpha. This is not the final solution and we don't like it but atm the moment we don't have the ressources to fix it properly. And until we find ressources to deal with it --> go and **** yourselfes"
I'd say simply "Ok, we'll adapt".
We're not wed to one hull class to be successful in this game.
|

Le Cardinal
Spricer Raiden.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:51:00 -
[1549] - Quote
Andski wrote:Le Cardinal wrote:Seriously. half of the posts in this thread is yours. Do you even have a life? look at you going all ad hominem because you totally have a life mister "i spent months ratting to buy my titan" lmao
I dont have a titan  |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:51:00 -
[1550] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Strange bedfellows. I was among the most vocal in criticizing Greyscale for not consulting with the CSM about the anomaly nerf, and yet here I see him slandered by a legion of altposters from RDN and NCdot for 'not consulting' when he actually did.
In this case, the CSM was consulted and the solutions were discussed at length; it just happens that the non-PL representatives who participated in the discussion (most of the CSM) supported these changes to a man. I'm delighted to have all of you point your fingers at me and Vile Rat and howl about ~goon conspiracies~, though.
The hard fact is that Titan pilots are .3% of player population, Titans shouldn't be able to impact subcaps, and everyone - except for PL's reps on the council - agrees that this needs to happen.
Anyway, Greyscale has clearly learned from the Anomaly nerf; not only did Anoms get un-nerfed a bit later in response to criticism, he's consulted fully and at length with the CSM on this issue.
Can you please explain to the Eve-O community why you have such a close relationship with so many CCP devs? Do you socialize with them outside of your CSM role? Do you have drinks with them? How many CCP devs personal phone numbers do you have?
Do you receive any compensation from CCP?
Any comment as to why goons have a secret convention planned immediately after the Las Vegas event that has a large number of CCP devs coming to be wined and dined? |

Rachael Tyrelll
Dynatech Intergalactical Trading Ltd.
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:52:00 -
[1551] - Quote
Okok, guys I see what you did there ...
You are just winning eve by successfully infiltrating CCP ... good job goons
So I guess it will get boring soon in the donut :)
|

Variable1
FinFleet Raiden.
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:52:00 -
[1552] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:
We're absolutely listening. The changes in the OP are still subject to change if we get feedback on how to achieve our goal better.
Ok. Listen please.
If you want to change the Titan role from subcap blob equaliser to structure bashing cap killers then fine. I can support this. But only if you make other changes that would mean Titans would get to be used in this way.
For example. There is no point in being cap killers if no enemy uses caps. At this time, a 700 bs blob > all, including current Titans and their supposed leetness.
This subcap force can be used against everything, including pos/stations/ihubs - all sov related structure bashing. Why would they use caps in this situation?
My solution would be, sure Titans can't target subcaps at all ! BUT. Subcaps should not be able to target SOV structures. This way people have to balance between subs and caps/supers, and Titans are assured of a place in game.
That seems pretty fair to all?
Tho, I just read that part of your objective is to stop the proliferation of Titans further. If you don't like Titans that much, please just remove them from the game. Give me a break.....
|

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
966
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:52:00 -
[1553] - Quote
Le Cardinal wrote:Andski wrote:Le Cardinal wrote:Seriously. half of the posts in this thread is yours. Do you even have a life? look at you going all ad hominem because you totally have a life mister "i spent months ratting to buy my titan" lmao I dont have a titan 
Check the sell forum, there's some great deals there! |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
82
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:52:00 -
[1554] - Quote
Good morning thread. I see some of you have been busy overnight.
Can someone recap the last 11 pages for me please? |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:54:00 -
[1555] - Quote
Andski wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:Andski wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:Dear very important space ship personality,
the main purpose of AE DD was obviously to kill subcaps in large numbers. The main purpose of focused DD was clearly to be able to kill every ship with one shot (including subcaps).
So as you can see the idea that supercaps should be a pure anti-capital weapon is rather new.
However, I do like that this was changed and do think that supercaps still need balancing. Making them useless is not the solution though.
Yes they should revert titans to the way they were originally added, AoE doomsdays coming through a kestrel cyno sad lil pubbie You can read reight? Made it bold for you... John Maynard Keynes wrote: However, I do like that this was changed and do think that supercaps still need balancing. Making them useless is not the solution though.
You're insisting that the way to balance supers is to make sure they can blap subcaps with impunity because that was their original intent, in 2005, when it was assumed they'd be rare.
Nope, Vile Rat said that supercaps were never intended to be effective against subcaps. I said that this is obviously not true. Not more and not less...
|

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:54:00 -
[1556] - Quote
Triskian wrote:Good morning thread. I see some of you have been busy overnight.
Can someone recap the last 11 pages for me please?
PL/Raiden continue to ignore all arguments to the contrary, and keep pretending that they're a battered alliance of 200 desperate people fighting 1600 goons, and the only thing saving them is their not-overpowred titan "equalizers".
|

Valearx
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:54:00 -
[1557] - Quote
Triskian wrote:Good morning thread. I see some of you have been busy overnight.
Can someone recap the last 11 pages for me please?
rage |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
190
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:55:00 -
[1558] - Quote
honestly Titans should be like battlestars... give them Air Superiorty Fighters... max 10 that are designed to kill other fighters/FB...
|

Atrum Veneficus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:57:00 -
[1559] - Quote
Triskian wrote:Good morning thread. I see some of you have been busy overnight.
Can someone recap the last 11 pages for me please?
It's like your typical Friday morning at the fraternity house. Goonswarm Federation is laying back in bed, arms behind his head in a post-coitus smug, all of his pubbie bros are in the hall outside just waiting for the latest conquest to come out, and NCDOT/RAIDENDOT are in the bedroom putting on last night's soiled party clothes, trying to fix the smeared mascara and tearfully contemplating the forthcoming walk of shame back to empire.
|

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:58:00 -
[1560] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:The amount of neutral PL/Raiden alts in this thread, desperately clinging to the entitled notion that they should be allowed to fly around in unkillable ships because they paid a little more isk, is amazing. When every other ship in the game can be killed by subcaps, but you drop titans and suddenly subcaps are meaningless. If 1600 people show up to take someone's space, and they can only field 200 guys, then THEY DO NOT DESERVE THAT SPACE. This is how the world works. You should not magically be allowed to pick space and control it because you can stick 50 guys into a super ship, and stand it up to 1600 people.
OMG, really? You are really, really disturbed son. So we paid a little more iskie...just a little. A LITTLE ? You come with 1600 maels and wanna kill 50 titans?
Man, I'd like to have what this guy smoked, seems to be good shite.
|

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:58:00 -
[1561] - Quote
Triskian wrote:Good morning thread. I see some of you have been busy overnight.
Can someone recap the last 11 pages for me please?
Oh my god they are nerfing my titan!!! MY TITAN!!!!!!!!!!! oh and the ever present Goons are winning eve!OMG they will take all of 0.0!!! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2872
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:59:00 -
[1562] - Quote
Acwron wrote:OMG, really? You are really, really disturbed son. So we paid a little more iskie...just a little. A LITTLE ? You come with 1600 maels and wanna kill 50 titans?
Man, I'd like to have what this guy smoked, seems to be good shite.
tbh there's easier ways of relieving you of a titan than killing it "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Slapnuts McGee
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:00:00 -
[1563] - Quote
i think everyone can agree that titans need to be revised, however doing a knee jerk fix because people don't want to properly counter titans is not the way to go about it. Rather then messing with the scan res and locked targets etc, why not just keep the nerf to tracking until you are actually able to sit down and define a role for this shipclass.
CCP Greyscale wrote:The intended role for titans is a) jump bridging, b) doomsdaying things, c) fleet boosting and d) doing a decent job of killing capitals with their main guns.
ok, it's clear the titan needs to be removed as a primary fleet weapon so a) bridging is fine as is, would be nice to increase jump range for titans though if you want them to have more of a support role. b) define "doomsdaying things", because as is it can only DD caps (which is fine at the moment) There's been a lot of talk about bringing back AOE DD but make it sig based and for only 50% of the damage they used to do. c) They're doing their job with this role at the moment d) they need to be more then "decent" at killing capitals with their main guns. If you want titans and supercariers to be anti-cap ships then they need to be highly effective at this.
CCP Greyscale wrote:We'll be assessing the success of this change based in the first instance on whether or not players are still telling us they're having problems with this sort of thing, and then if they are, looking at the situation objectively and seeing if it merits further work.
We're telling you right now, these changes will not stop blapping and people will still cry about it. All that will happen at the moment is it will delay how long it takes titans to start shooting stuff.
CCP Greyscale wrote:We don't currently have a clear future vision for titans, as mentioned in the first post. We've repeatedly tried and failed to find a role for them that we're happy with in the past, and we don't want to spend significant balance resources on revisiting this right now because we have other priorities.
Ok that's understood, but instead of breaking the ship even more why not wait until you have a clear vision on what you want the titan to be before making surgical adjustments? There's several ways you could go with this,
a) remove titans from the battlefield and make them dedicated support ships - keep fleet boosting, buff jump range/bridge range, increase ship bay and remove turrets from the ship completely and give it AOE DD sig based (keep in mind though, this ship still needs to be able to defend itself against subcaps, just like any other ship in EVE that has the ability to defend themselves) you can scream "support fleet or stay home" all you want, but with all things equal it's only fair. With that said, the bump mechanic really needs to be fixed. Anytime you move a large number of capitals you will eventually get the delayed bump and send caps flying sometimes several hundred km out from fleet.
b) Dedicate the titan as only anti-cap ship (of course still able to bridge, fleetboost etc) and make the titan only able to target caps/supercaps, in turn, subcaps can no longer lock titans either. People will argue that "hey that's not right, subcaps should still be able to kill titans!" However, they also at the same time scream that to deal with a subcap fleet you must bring the proper counter to them ie other subcaps, well same thing here, if you want to deal with the titans on the field you need to bring your own caps/supercaps to deal with them. Also heard an idea that you could remove the heavy interdictors ability to tackle supers and reassing that role to carriers with the same scripted module.
CCP Greyscale wrote:We can't offer any assurances about our future plans. Every release (~6 months) we sit down and look at what our priorities are. I would also note here that we're doing this "quick fix" precisely because we don't know when we're going to have a comprehensive solution - we regard the current situation as broken, and we don't want to leave it broken indefinitely while we wait for a "proper fix" with no clear timetable. This is the best way to deal with this general sort of problem in our opinion.
As I said earlier, why not sit down and find a actual role for the ship and not "punish" the people who have dedicated time and isk to fly these ships with a half a***** solution to the problem. Sure, nerf tracking 50% for now but leave everything else with the ship alone until you can dedicate the time it deserves. As your changes stand right now, it will still be broken and you still have people complain about getting blapped. You'll only be catering to certain entities with your changes right now and the general feeling is that you are trying to make EVE more about a numbers game, is that your vision of EVE? Not trolling this is a serious question and if it's not about numbers then CCP needs to come up with a better way for smaller entities to take on much larger fleets.
CCP Greyscale wrote:We're considering additional changes to balance out this adjustment; we'll do it if we feel it's necessary, but we'd prefer to make as few changes as possible at this time.
We're also considering ways of letting people "park up", but we can't make any commitments about that this morning.
As long as youre not set on the changes you've proposed and take actual constructive feedback other then "hahaha death 2 all supercaps!" and make reasonable changes that's great |

Innominate
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
110
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:02:00 -
[1564] - Quote
[quote=Variable1 If you want to change the Titan role from subcap blob equaliser to structure bashing cap killers then fine. I can support this. But only if you make other changes that would mean Titans would get to be used in this way.
For example. There is no point in being cap killers if no enemy uses caps. [/quote]
Do you really not realize that these two problems are related?
|

Roime
Shiva Furnace
287
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:02:00 -
[1565] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote: Better pilots already win. As it's already been stated -and ignored- by Pl/raiden in this topic again and again, numbers aren't the issue here they are desperately trying to make it out to be. Those 1600 people don't exist. The people fighting goons consistently bring the same number of pilots as us. The only difference is when that doesn't work, they drop invincible ships to win the battle. This is not world of warcraft. Paying a little more for a ship, or having a few more skillpoints than a guy, should not make you invincible. A small gang of well flown ships can wipe out larger battleship gangs. I've seen it happen in blackops. A small fleet of well flown battleships can wipe out a larger fleet. You know what wipes out a titan fleet? MORE TITANS. You know what a small alliance wanting to move into 0.0 space to hold a small area can bring to fight those titans? NOTHING. So you either join a titan heavy alliance, or you just don't live in 0.0.
Cheers, that makes sense. Also I know that the losing side always cries "BLOB!11!!" in EVE, the actual numbers are not really relevant :D
What about the claim I've seen that dreads can also counter titans?
And about titan tracking (current version) - can they track for example BCs that are in close orbit?
My Talos one-shots moving frigates at 40km, but can't touch them if they get close- this is balanced. How is it with titan guns? |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
967
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:03:00 -
[1566] - Quote
Slapnuts McGee wrote: We're telling you right now, these changes will not stop blapping and people will still cry about it. All that will happen at the moment is it will delay how long it takes titans to start shooting stuff.
This is actually somewhat true. Strong drop does adjust things back to a broken state. |

Signal11th
436
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:04:00 -
[1567] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Strange bedfellows. I was among the most vocal in criticizing Greyscale for not consulting with the CSM about the anomaly nerf, and yet here I see him slandered by a legion of altposters from RDN and NCdot for 'not consulting' when he actually did.
The hard fact is that Titan pilots are .3% of player population, Titans shouldn't be able to impact subcaps, and everyone - except for PL's reps on the council - agrees that this needs to happen.
As usual I'll post with my main, and yes I'm in Raiden but most people on here know I'm fairly level headed/fair
A titan should be able impact subcaps, an aircraft carrier can put a sizeable hole in a fishing boat can it not? Really if someone bothers to field 25 titans (your guys as well) you really should be able to wipe out a sizeable subcap fleet. This is the payback for the time and money invested in these ships.
If you follow this logic basically when you get people complaining that 50 battleships take out 100 frigates they should be nerfed?
I can only applaud your socialising skills whilst in Iceland, as usual CCP seem to take the path of least resistance when it comes to nerfing.... sorry rebalancing.
I just find it strange that "people" were complaining in local (during a fight) about "Tracking Titans" months ago, and lol and behold a few months later .."rebalance"
Poor show CCP God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |

Shadoo
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
83
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:05:00 -
[1568] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Shadoo wrote:I don't think anyone who has flown a titan in combat can argue that the ship is not currently overpowered in combat when used in great numbers, just like no one could seriously argue about AOD DDs when they started to be used in 3+3 scale every 10 minutes
Of course, same goes for every ship in eve -- when used in great numbers, but Supercapitals certainly show this curve more often on the field
So I'm extremely happy that you state that the ship needs a role change - last time we were campaigning for AOD DD change -- this was exactly what a lot of us were asking for
But that was 3 years ago
I am therefore rather dissapointed that what we, the community at large, have been asking for a very long time is rather haphazardly brushed off as something that "will be looked at long term" with a surgical change that SCREAMS of a kneejerk reaction without really providing us with much to go on here to see your vision or have comfort you are going to do something in the long term for the "end game" ship in EVE
And forgive me for saying this -- but you have not always had a great track record of revisiting changes you've made in the past as surgical adjustments. Thus I feel like pressing a bit harder on the high level thoughts that have lead you to make this current fix
What is your intended role for Titan with this change on TQ today?
How will you evaluate if your changes implemented will match up with that role on the TQ combat field in this release? For example -- as far as I can see -- a large group of titans will still obliterate a large group of battleships/drakes -- all you've delayed is the first hit and require more micromanagement in making sure the lock queue is evenly spaced out
Given how large fights today unfold on TQ -- how do you see this ship fulfilling your intended role on heavily TiDi systems with the sig change
What is your future vision, even at high level, for the Titan ship class? Will it remain a combat asset or are you looking and overhauling it for something else (personally btw I've argued for the last 4 years that titans should NOT be a combat ship at all, but rather a massive alliance level asset for logistics/cloning/staging/etc)
What assurances can you offer us this change will not remain a permanent fixture for the long term?
With the combat ability of this ship being "surgically adjusted", would you be even willing to look at for example increasing the jump range of the ship to balance the change
And lastly -- are you going to allow those pilots who wish to wait for your stated longer term role adjustments to GM-dock their ship until such a time that this change is no longer a surgical measure in order to still utilize the account/character for combat in EVE? The intended role for titans is a) jump bridging, b) doomsdaying things, c) fleet boosting and d) doing a decent job of killing capitals with their main guns. We'll be assessing the success of this change based in the first instance on whether or not players are still telling us they're having problems with this sort of thing, and then if they are, looking at the situation objectively and seeing if it merits further work. On systems under Time Dilation, we're expecting this to work mechanically identically but subjectively slower. Time Dilation is a technical fix to prevent performance issues on heavily loaded systems; it's not a game mechanic and we're not currently considering it for balancing purposes. We don't currently have a clear future vision for titans, as mentioned in the first post. We've repeatedly tried and failed to find a role for them that we're happy with in the past, and we don't want to spend significant balance resources on revisiting this right now because we have other priorities. We can't offer any assurances about our future plans. Every release (~6 months) we sit down and look at what our priorities are for the various different resources we have available (balancers, general designers, UI designers, various breeds of programmer, artists etc) and then allocate accordingly. These priorities change based on the current state of the game, the resources available and so on. Spending significant resources on a major titan rework is not currently on our short-term plan, and beyond that we don't have any reliable way of offering guarantees on what we will and won't be working on. This approach means that we're always delivering maximum possible value, but at the cost of not having rock-solid long-term plans. I would also note here that we're doing this "quick fix" precisely because we don't know when we're going to have a comprehensive solution - we regard the current situation as broken, and we don't want to leave it broken indefinitely while we wait for a "proper fix" with no clear timetable. This is the best way to deal with this general sort of problem in our opinion. We're considering additional changes to balance out this adjustment; we'll do it if we feel it's necessary, but we'd prefer to make as few changes as possible at this time. We're also considering ways of letting people "park up", but we can't make any commitments about that this morning.
|

Valearx
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:06:00 -
[1569] - Quote
Acwron wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:The amount of neutral PL/Raiden alts in this thread, desperately clinging to the entitled notion that they should be allowed to fly around in unkillable ships because they paid a little more isk, is amazing. When every other ship in the game can be killed by subcaps, but you drop titans and suddenly subcaps are meaningless. If 1600 people show up to take someone's space, and they can only field 200 guys, then THEY DO NOT DESERVE THAT SPACE. This is how the world works. You should not magically be allowed to pick space and control it because you can stick 50 guys into a super ship, and stand it up to 1600 people. OMG, really? You are really, really disturbed son. So we paid a little more iskie...just a little. A LITTLE ? You come with 1600 maels and wanna kill 50 titans? Man, I'd like to have what this guy smoked, seems to be good shite.
Sorry about your iskies bro Guess you'll have to go back to flying subcaps like 99.98% of the rest of EVE  |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:06:00 -
[1570] - Quote
Andski wrote:Hannott Thanos wrote:Andski wrote:Hannott Thanos wrote:This is bullsh!t and you all know it. A titan should be able to track all ships. It's biggest, therefore it has to be best.
-- Sincerely, Death Star. nope sincerely, me Someone did not get the joke? :) i have a hangover so yeah i kinda missed it
You seem to have a perpetuum hangover, just like every other goon. |

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:06:00 -
[1571] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:Based on simple geometry, at some point in your orbit of the anchor you will have a transversal of ZERO (or close enough to call it zero) and the signature radius of a carrier. GǪwhich can be avoided with a bit more involved flying. The situation you describe has next to nothing to do with the presence of an MWD, and turning an MWD on does not simply make a target as easy to hit as a carrier.
Do a lot of "involved flying" in large fleet fights, do you? I supposed if you are with a good anchor who is doing more than "keep at range" you might get a bit more transversal up to a single opponent. The issue that Vile Rat has (and I don't disagree with the issue) is that when you have a lot of turret Titans on grid, at some point you are going to have a really low transversal to some of them. The problem isn't a single Titan (although that is a separate problem), the problem is a fleet of them. So what CCP has tried to do is to ensure that even if you have the SP and ISK to field a fleet of Titans, you can't hit subcaps. But they missed the target. A fleet of Titans will still be able to hit sub caps, it will only take them longer to lock the target, and they will still do the same amount of damage as today, it will only take a bit longer (a lot longer in TiDi).
Think about it: Bridge onto field. (0 seconds) Call targets and start locking (2 seconds) Finish Locking 3 targets (35 seconds) Fire at Target 1 (35 seconds) Start Locking next target (36 seconds) Fire at Target 2 (50 seconds) Start locking next target (51 seconds) Fire at Target 3 (65 seconds) Lock Target 4 (68 seconds) Start locking next target (69 seconds) Fire at Target 4 (82 seconds) ...
and the cycle goes on. Even with 3 targets and a stupid scan resolution.
So what does CCP fix with this change? CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

Shadoo
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
85
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:07:00 -
[1572] - Quote
.... and continuing from previous post
CCP Greyscale wrote:On systems under Time Dilation, we're expecting this to work mechanically identically but subjectively slower. Time Dilation is a technical fix to prevent performance issues on heavily loaded systems; it's not a game mechanic and we're not currently considering it for balancing purposes.
I'm a little sad to hear this. Mainly because you obviously ARE considering the number of these ships for the purpose of balancing, but you will not consider the wider system numbers for same in regards to TiDi.
For example --I don't think you will tell me that 1 titan today is not balanced for combat, while I will agree strongly with you that 20 of them are. So if we are now (and rightly so) considering non-game mechanics (the number of them you bring) for balancing purposes, we surely must also consider the situations they are likely to be utilized?
The reality is that TiDi changes the game mechanics, and allows certain tactics to function effectively more efficiently given the additional time pilots have to react. In terms of Titans following are going to be the case:
1. Doomsdays will be much more easily spotted, and therefore the pilot of the targeted capital will have time to react and a) overload hardeners in order to tank the DD or b) if aligned warp out.
2. Missile based Titans will have their damage effectively mitigated by the 10 minute travel time to target.
3. Locking will take exponentially longer, thus allowing the locked pilots to react to time to damage by calling for reps prior to damage being applied.
I could go on, but essentially TiDi does change the game mechanics as we have seen already on TiDi. Don't get me wrong -- I think it's great, but since you are already taking into account how many of these ships people bring for game balancing -- all I'd ask is that you extend the same envelope to include the numbers people bring to field where these ships are typically used and the effect TiDi has on things such as Locking Speed, DD evasion and Capital Torpedoes/Cruise Missiles.
CCP Greyscale wrote:We don't currently have a clear future vision for titans, as mentioned in the first post. We've repeatedly tried and failed to find a role for them that we're happy with in the past, and we don't want to spend significant balance resources on revisiting this right now because we have other priorities.
I appriciate this, but given the combat role of these ships -- I think you will find that without more significant changes to the ship you will either not go far enough with the change or you will effectively make them useless in the currently stated anti-capital combat role.
I really wish you will take the time to consider how to move these ships OUT of the current combat role, given the fact just how hard it has been to balance these ships in that role as you yourself state -- and give them an exciting new role that benefits the collective that owns them and gives the new subscribers to this game something to work towards in the long term.
Short term fixes have a nasty habit of turning into long term features, which simply serve as a time-delay for the problem at hand. And I think you will find there are too many of these things today in active use or in active build to be able to deal with this in any "quick fix" capacity without simply making the problem worse to solve in the long term. |

Slapnuts McGee
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:08:00 -
[1573] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Slapnuts McGee wrote: We're telling you right now, these changes will not stop blapping and people will still cry about it. All that will happen at the moment is it will delay how long it takes titans to start shooting stuff.
This is actually somewhat true. Strong drop does adjust things back to a broken state.
Then you must agree that these changes will still leave us with a broken ship, I don't see the point in making changes until CCP defines the role they want this ship to fill. |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
969
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:11:00 -
[1574] - Quote
Slapnuts McGee wrote:Vile rat wrote:Slapnuts McGee wrote: We're telling you right now, these changes will not stop blapping and people will still cry about it. All that will happen at the moment is it will delay how long it takes titans to start shooting stuff.
This is actually somewhat true. Strong drop does adjust things back to a broken state. Then you must agree that these changes will still leave us with a broken ship, I don't see the point in making changes until CCP defines the role they want this ship to fill.
Would you be happier with -75% instead of -50%? |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2681
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:12:00 -
[1575] - Quote
Slapnuts McGee wrote:Vile rat wrote:Slapnuts McGee wrote: We're telling you right now, these changes will not stop blapping and people will still cry about it. All that will happen at the moment is it will delay how long it takes titans to start shooting stuff.
This is actually somewhat true. Strong drop does adjust things back to a broken state. Then you must agree that these changes will still leave us with a broken ship, I don't see the point in making changes until CCP defines the role they want this ship to fill. less broken is an improvement |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:12:00 -
[1576] - Quote
Ok lets talk fair, why should a sub cap even be able to damage a Titan... if you NEEDED to field capitals to hurt titans this might not be so bad. But you want to be able to kill them and hold them down. Without ever risking anything yourself, like your own cap fleet.... |

baltec1
810
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:13:00 -
[1577] - Quote
Slapnuts McGee wrote:
Then you must agree that these changes will still leave us with a broken ship, I don't see the point in making changes until CCP defines the role they want this ship to fill.
I'll take a bandaid over what we have now. |

baltec1
810
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:15:00 -
[1578] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Ok lets talk fair, why should a sub cap even be able to damage a Titan... if you NEEDED to field capitals to hurt titans this might not be so bad. But you want to be able to kill them and hold them down. Without ever risking anything yourself, like your own cap fleet....
The irony of this is that titans risk nothing while subcaps get torn apart. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2873
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:15:00 -
[1579] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Ok lets talk fair, why should a sub cap even be able to damage a Titan... if you NEEDED to field capitals to hurt titans this might not be so bad. But you want to be able to kill them and hold them down. Without ever risking anything yourself, like your own cap fleet....
you also need to use dictors, which tend to get oneshotted "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Zarnak Wulf
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
267
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:17:00 -
[1580] - Quote
79 pages! 79 pages of wonderful tears! Ah! Ah! Ah! |

Slapnuts McGee
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:17:00 -
[1581] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Slapnuts McGee wrote:Vile rat wrote:Slapnuts McGee wrote: We're telling you right now, these changes will not stop blapping and people will still cry about it. All that will happen at the moment is it will delay how long it takes titans to start shooting stuff.
This is actually somewhat true. Strong drop does adjust things back to a broken state. Then you must agree that these changes will still leave us with a broken ship, I don't see the point in making changes until CCP defines the role they want this ship to fill. Would you be happier with -75% instead of -50%?
It's still only a short term fix, I think it would make everyone happy if CCP would actually figure out what they want this ship to do and make it enjoyable to fly wheather it serve a non combat or combat role. These "fixes" aren't going to do any good and have the possibility to turn these back into a nonused pos princess which gives no incentive to people to train up it. |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
48
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:18:00 -
[1582] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:BioZvin wrote:Ok lets talk fair, why should a sub cap even be able to damage a Titan... if you NEEDED to field capitals to hurt titans this might not be so bad. But you want to be able to kill them and hold them down. Without ever risking anything yourself, like your own cap fleet.... The irony of this is that titans risk nothing while subcaps get torn apart.
The true irony is that they just ignore the fact that Titans are completely invincible when in a blob, unless you bring enough supercapitals to outnumber them. So literally the 'blobbing' these guys whine so much about is THEM. Any battleship fleet of any size can be countered and killed by better pilots, better tactics, a better fleet composition. As it stands, the only thing that can fight titans is a bigger blob of titans. It's them. They are the real blobbers. |

Slapnuts McGee
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:19:00 -
[1583] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Slapnuts McGee wrote:
Then you must agree that these changes will still leave us with a broken ship, I don't see the point in making changes until CCP defines the role they want this ship to fill.
I'll take a bandaid over what we have now.
no, because people will still cry when their mwd'ing drake gets blapped by a titan. Bandaid doesn't do any good, I agree there needs to be a complete overhaul of the ship but this isn't the way to go about it putting "duct tape" over the problem and hoping it goes away. |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:20:00 -
[1584] - Quote
Valearx wrote:Acwron wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:The amount of neutral PL/Raiden alts in this thread, desperately clinging to the entitled notion that they should be allowed to fly around in unkillable ships because they paid a little more isk, is amazing. When every other ship in the game can be killed by subcaps, but you drop titans and suddenly subcaps are meaningless. If 1600 people show up to take someone's space, and they can only field 200 guys, then THEY DO NOT DESERVE THAT SPACE. This is how the world works. You should not magically be allowed to pick space and control it because you can stick 50 guys into a super ship, and stand it up to 1600 people. OMG, really? You are really, really disturbed son. So we paid a little more iskie...just a little. A LITTLE ? You come with 1600 maels and wanna kill 50 titans? Man, I'd like to have what this guy smoked, seems to be good shite. Sorry about your iskies bro  Guess you'll have to go back to flying subcaps like 99.98% of the rest of EVE 
You have a communist approach bro. If you can't fly it, why can I...You're so cool. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:20:00 -
[1585] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:Vile rat wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: Dreads are mainly antistructure, with a bit of anti-cap. Carriers still do pretty decent damage against subcaps AFAIK. Supers can switch between anti-cap and anti-subcap depending on their choice of fighter drone. Titans are pure anti-cap.
Up until now Greyscale, Titans were never "pure anti-cap". Indeed, pre-dominion their primary function was to mass murder subcap fleets with their AOE Doomsdays. In Dominion you replaced the AOE with a directed weapon, capable of hitting any ship, and in addition you enhanced the regular XL weapon bonuses "so that the turret locators actually might get used [to]enable a Titan to make its presence felt on the battalefield" " to quote your own devblog. Now however, they are suddenly "pure anti-cap" as if they were never intended for anything else. Realtalk: Every single titan nerf has been to reduce their effectiveness towards subcaps. Titans on paper are actually not designed to hit subcaps for ****, it's only when you get a bunch that it's nearly impossible to maintain transversal from them all. **** they have dread guns on them and their drones were taken away, what about these things suggest they were designed as anti subcap platforms? I just don't understand this reasoning. Sure you've been taking advantage of their inability to balance these things vs subcaps properly but being an anti blob weapon clearly wasn't their intent by design and now we have them on record confirming this is the case. Dear very important space ship personality, the main purpose of AE DD was obviously to kill subcaps in large numbers. The main purpose of focused DD was clearly to be able to kill every ship with one shot (including subcaps). So as you can see the idea that supercaps should be a pure anti-capital weapon is rather new. However, I do like that this was changed and do think that supercaps still need balancing. Making them useless is not the solution though.
Holy crap, you are dumb.
CCP originally though few of these ships would ever get built. It had no ******* ROLE, it was a **** in space, as already said by Hilmar years ago.
They were able to kill everything on grid. Without ever being on a grid. Are you completely ******** and think that was a part of CCP's grand long-term plan for titans?
I can only laugh at all the idiots training/botting for titans thinking titans would not get nerfed into oblivion at some point.
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2681
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:20:00 -
[1586] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Ok lets talk fair, why should a sub cap even be able to damage a Titan... if you NEEDED to field capitals to hurt titans this might not be so bad. But you want to be able to kill them and hold them down. Without ever risking anything yourself, like your own cap fleet....
"by spending 60b i should be invulnerable to the little people" is the antithisis of EVE
no surprise it comes from bob mk4 |

baltec1
810
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:22:00 -
[1587] - Quote
Slapnuts McGee wrote:baltec1 wrote:Slapnuts McGee wrote:
Then you must agree that these changes will still leave us with a broken ship, I don't see the point in making changes until CCP defines the role they want this ship to fill.
I'll take a bandaid over what we have now. no, because people will still cry when their mwd'ing drake gets blapped by a titan. Bandaid doesn't do any good, I agree there needs to be a complete overhaul of the ship but this isn't the way to go about it putting "duct tape" over the problem and hoping it goes away.
Still better than what we have now, plus CCP are going to keep an eye on it and make adjustments as needed. |

Valearx
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:24:00 -
[1588] - Quote
Acwron wrote:
You have a communist approach bro. If you can't fly it, why can I...You're so cool.
Its p. tough being on the winning side m8  |

Gertrud ToD
Terrorists of Dimensions Electric Monkey Overlords
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:26:00 -
[1589] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Strange bedfellows. I was among the most vocal in criticizing Greyscale for not consulting with the CSM about the anomaly nerf, and yet here I see him slandered by a legion of altposters from RDN and NCdot for 'not consulting' when he actually did.
In this case, the CSM was consulted and the solutions were discussed at length; it just happens that the non-PL representatives who participated in the discussion (most of the CSM) supported these changes to a man. I'm delighted to have all of you point your fingers at me and Vile Rat and howl about ~goon conspiracies~, though.
The hard fact is that Titan pilots are .3% of player population, Titans shouldn't be able to impact subcaps, and everyone - except for PL's reps on the council - agrees that this needs to happen.
Anyway, Greyscale has clearly learned from the Anomaly nerf; not only did Anoms get un-nerfed a bit later in response to criticism, he's consulted fully and at length with the CSM on this issue. funny how one of your co-csm's allready disagreed with that *before* your post. btw, hes not in PL, have fun searching the post. |

Gertrud ToD
Terrorists of Dimensions Electric Monkey Overlords
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:27:00 -
[1590] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:Triskian wrote:Good morning thread. I see some of you have been busy overnight.
Can someone recap the last 11 pages for me please? PL/Raiden continue to ignore all arguments to the contrary, and keep pretending that they're a battered alliance of 200 desperate people fighting 1600 goons, and the only thing saving them is their not-overpowred titan "equalizers". the numbers are 2000 raiden vs 8000 goons. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2681
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:27:00 -
[1591] - Quote
Gertrud ToD wrote: funny how one of your co-csm's allready disagreed with that *before* your post. btw, hes not in PL, have fun searching the post.
the one who didn't participate at all? |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
82
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:29:00 -
[1592] - Quote
Gertrud ToD wrote: funny how one of your co-csm's allready disagreed with that *before* your post. btw, hes not in PL, have fun searching the post.
Funny how you ignored CCP Greyscale calling said co-csm out for refusing to actually participate in the discussion the Devs had with the CSM. |

Razzor Death
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
166
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:29:00 -
[1593] - Quote
The greatest part about this thread is reading how PL encourage the change but express fear in how they go about the change and what new role they will have ( understandable ) and then reading Raiden and NCdot crying like big babbis about how unfair this is and its all a Goon conspiracy and Goon's getting their way and we are the horrible blobbers.
Fun fact Raiden and NCdot, every big fight we had ( every single big fight ) CCP was in local with us. They could see damn well you was NOT being blobbed and that the numbers where even and that the Titans where dropped to simply win your objectives with out contest.
But please keep this up its ******* hilarious but the only people you are fooling are the pubbies and not CCP. |

Khadmos
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:29:00 -
[1594] - Quote
Roime wrote:
What about the claim I've seen that dreads can also counter titans?
That's theory crafting BS. Look at it this way, one DD and a dread is almost dead, regular guns will finish it off fast. A dread fleet going up against titans is a suicide fleet. The CFC tried it, lost something like 36 dreads to kill 1 titan and I think the titan only died because it was bumped or something. In the end lost over 250bil in ships and destroyed 80-90bil. Oh and I'm pretty sure failed to defend/destroy their objective.
Roime wrote:
And about titan tracking (current version) - can they track for example BCs that are in close orbit?
My Talos one-shots moving frigates at 40km, but can't touch them if they get close- this is balanced. How is it with titan guns?
You orbit one titan at 20km and his buddy sitting 60km away blaps you when you have 0 traversal. A titan is not imbalanced, one titan is not a problem. The problem is titans, 20+ in a fleet all spread out with 20 DD's to nearly instagib the first 20 dreads that land on the field. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5527
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:30:00 -
[1595] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote:I supposed if you are with a good anchor who is doing more than "keep at range" you might get a bit more transversal up to a single opponent. The issue that Vile Rat has (and I don't disagree with the issue) is that when you have a lot of turret Titans on grid, at some point you are going to have a really low transversal to some of them. The problem isn't a single Titan (although that is a separate problem), the problem is a fleet of them. So what CCP has tried to do is to ensure that even if you have the SP and ISK to field a fleet of Titans, you can't hit subcaps. But they missed the target. GǪand I understand this. I'm merely pointing out the fallacy of the categorical GÇ£MWD GåÆ carrier sigGÇ¥ claim, which completely ignores why people fit MWDs to begin with and the effect it has. I'm also pointing out that the effect the MWD has is pretty much irrelvant since they're balanced in such a way that (subject to meta differences in the penalties, of course) the compound effect of bloom and speed means you're pretty much just as easy or hard to hit as if you had the MWD off. The MWD isn't a factor in hitting the target.
Hell, I even made the same argument you did at the very start of the page when someone asked why on earth a Titan would even want to lock on to a cruiserGǪ (and was called silly and ignorant for doing so).
What you describe is an issue with or without MWD GÇö it's an effect of zero angular velocity, and no amount of sig bloom (or sig reduction) changes that effect. That's my entire point: that the whole MWD argument is a red herring from people who seemingly don't understand what affects tracking. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
48
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:30:00 -
[1596] - Quote
Gertrud ToD wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:Triskian wrote:Good morning thread. I see some of you have been busy overnight.
Can someone recap the last 11 pages for me please? PL/Raiden continue to ignore all arguments to the contrary, and keep pretending that they're a battered alliance of 200 desperate people fighting 1600 goons, and the only thing saving them is their not-overpowred titan "equalizers". the numbers are 2000 raiden vs 8000 goons.
That's very interesting, considering the largest fight I've been present in, in eve, was the recent fight over our old homeland with the russians. And that involved most every major alliance in the game sending fleets. And local barely hit 2000. Considering goons were only a small part of that fight, I'm not sure where our other 7500 are hiding, but I'd love to know.
|

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:32:00 -
[1597] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:baltec1 wrote:BioZvin wrote:Ok lets talk fair, why should a sub cap even be able to damage a Titan... if you NEEDED to field capitals to hurt titans this might not be so bad. But you want to be able to kill them and hold them down. Without ever risking anything yourself, like your own cap fleet.... The irony of this is that titans risk nothing while subcaps get torn apart. The true irony is that they just ignore the fact that Titans are completely invincible when in a blob, unless you bring enough supercapitals to outnumber them. So literally the 'blobbing' these guys whine so much about is THEM. Any battleship fleet of any size can be countered and killed by better pilots, better tactics, a better fleet composition. As it stands, the only thing that can fight titans is a bigger blob of titans. It's them. They are the real blobbers.
you know you have as big a cap fleet as us right ? |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:33:00 -
[1598] - Quote
Tobruk wrote:Vile rat wrote:Tobruk wrote:
Tell me about Being Objective CCP Grayscale you tool.
I can wait for your next announcement showing us all the brilliantly thought out counter to 800 maelstroms.
A calculator. So you can count the numbers of our enemies and realize this is a red herring since they bring as many on the field as we do. maybe you should grab one and calculate how many dreads it takes to kill our titans and how long that would take given your current tech income. but no you should just ignore the best and most viable counter to titans then expect CCP Sound-wave, and CCP Screegs to slobber your rod.
Hey, let me drop 300 years of skill training on your 50 years of skill training, hoping that we might kill 4 years of skill training because you blapped all the dictors.
I don't see any flaws there.
|

Razzor Death
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
166
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:33:00 -
[1599] - Quote
If we could get 8000 people in fleet I assure this game would be dead as all of High sec would be burnt to the ground. |

Gertrud ToD
Terrorists of Dimensions Electric Monkey Overlords
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:35:00 -
[1600] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote: That's very interesting, considering the largest fight I've been present in, in eve, was the recent fight over our old homeland with the russians. And that involved most every major alliance in the game sending fleets. And local barely hit 2000. Considering goons were only a small part of that fight, I'm not sure where our other 7500 are hiding, but I'd love to know.
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/memberCount |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
82
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:36:00 -
[1601] - Quote
Razzor Death wrote:If we could get 8000 people in fleet I assure this game would be dead as all of High sec would be burnt to the ground.
The thought of 8000 Brutixes and Tornados sweeping through empire leading nothing in their wake unmolested makes me hard. |

Razzor Death
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
166
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:36:00 -
[1602] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:baltec1 wrote:BioZvin wrote:Ok lets talk fair, why should a sub cap even be able to damage a Titan... if you NEEDED to field capitals to hurt titans this might not be so bad. But you want to be able to kill them and hold them down. Without ever risking anything yourself, like your own cap fleet.... The irony of this is that titans risk nothing while subcaps get torn apart. The true irony is that they just ignore the fact that Titans are completely invincible when in a blob, unless you bring enough supercapitals to outnumber them. So literally the 'blobbing' these guys whine so much about is THEM. Any battleship fleet of any size can be countered and killed by better pilots, better tactics, a better fleet composition. As it stands, the only thing that can fight titans is a bigger blob of titans. It's them. They are the real blobbers. you know you have as big a cap fleet as us right ?
hahaha you are so dumb, I mean just look at you. Sorry princess CCP know we are not just fighting you and you know this as well. Lets see ima pick another Alliance in our 2 coalitions and just use them as an example so I can be as dumb as you.
You have more supers than FA.
Yeah, that's how dumb you look. |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:37:00 -
[1603] - Quote
Gertrud ToD wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote: That's very interesting, considering the largest fight I've been present in, in eve, was the recent fight over our old homeland with the russians. And that involved most every major alliance in the game sending fleets. And local barely hit 2000. Considering goons were only a small part of that fight, I'm not sure where our other 7500 are hiding, but I'd love to know.
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/memberCount I am pretty sure that most of those numbers are from a concerted effort to scam the CSM election this time around. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2876
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:37:00 -
[1604] - Quote
Gertrud ToD wrote:http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/memberCount
confirming that every single character in our alliance is an individual account belonging to an individual player and is capable of fielding a maelstrom "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:38:00 -
[1605] - Quote
Tobruk wrote:Vile rat wrote:Tobruk wrote:
maybe you should grab one and calculate how many dreads it takes to kill our titans and how long that would take given your current tech income.
Are you really going to make me detail the many holes in this plan? Is this something you're seriously suggesting or are you just trolling me? No way, you gotta just be trolling me. im not trolling Vile rat. you made a choice to invest your income and time in a specific fleet doctrine, one that vee invented to counter armor hacs and abandons. It was the wrong choice. Had you been able to field 300 or more dreads there is no FC in his right mind who would have opposed you with titans. Those same dreads can work unsieged like titans and do the same volly damage at the same range as maelstroms. but this discussion is an academic one as CCP is playing favorites, your CEO has said as much.
Haha, you are actually really stupid, you are not trolling.
"Dear Titans, please stay on grid while we assemble and login our 300 dreads fleet".
|

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:40:00 -
[1606] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:BioZvin wrote:Ok lets talk fair, why should a sub cap even be able to damage a Titan... if you NEEDED to field capitals to hurt titans this might not be so bad. But you want to be able to kill them and hold them down. Without ever risking anything yourself, like your own cap fleet.... "by spending 60b i should be invulnerable to the little people" is the antithisis of EVE no surprise it comes from bob mk4
i have no problem with the way it is or was, or even an change to tracking. I have a problem with my ship being effectively the only ship that can do nothing at all to a ship of another class. A battleship can hit a ceptor, most even have drones to defend it self. And lets be honest here a titan on its own atm can't even defend itself vs one dictor/HIC.
in original post i assumed that titans will be useless against all sub caps, witch I personalty think this nuff will do. But if it doesn't wait a month... |

baltec1
810
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:43:00 -
[1607] - Quote
BioZvin wrote: i have no problem with the way it is or was, or even an change to tracking. I have a problem with my ship being effectively the only ship that can do nothing at all to a ship of another class. A battleship can hit a ceptor, most even have drones to defend it self. And lets be honest here a titan on its own atm can't even defend itself vs one dictor/HIC.
in original post i assumed that titans will be useless against all sub caps, witch I personalty think this nuff will do. But if it doesn't wait a month...
You dont want your ship to be nerfed to be useless without support yet defend the right to invalidate 99% of ships in EVE... |

Dasdraperma
ReUnion Inc. SOLAR WING
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:43:00 -
[1608] - Quote
Looks like Goons have forum CTA today, defending this nerf? :) |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2876
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:44:00 -
[1609] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:And lets be honest here a titan on its own atm can't even defend itself vs one dictor/HIC.
I think it's /fairly/ reasonable that a solo titan should be extremely vulnerable against a dictor or HIC, don't you agree? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2876
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:44:00 -
[1610] - Quote
Dasdraperma wrote:Looks like Goons have forum CTA today, defending this nerf? :)
goons, a bunch of dudes coming from a forum, are posting
what a shock "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:46:00 -
[1611] - Quote
Andski wrote:BioZvin wrote:And lets be honest here a titan on its own atm can't even defend itself vs one dictor/HIC. I think it's /fairly/ reasonable that a solo titan should be extremely vulnerable against a dictor or HIC, don't you agree?
Why should it be more than a BS vs a interceptor.
|

baltec1
811
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:46:00 -
[1612] - Quote
Dasdraperma wrote:Looks like Goons have forum CTA today, defending this nerf? :)
Who needs a CTA. You dont often get a much needed nerf that causes tears of this magnitude. Why I haven't seen bawwing like this since the last time titans got changed. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:48:00 -
[1613] - Quote
Acwron wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:The amount of neutral PL/Raiden alts in this thread, desperately clinging to the entitled notion that they should be allowed to fly around in unkillable ships because they paid a little more isk, is amazing. When every other ship in the game can be killed by subcaps, but you drop titans and suddenly subcaps are meaningless. If 1600 people show up to take someone's space, and they can only field 200 guys, then THEY DO NOT DESERVE THAT SPACE. This is how the world works. You should not magically be allowed to pick space and control it because you can stick 50 guys into a super ship, and stand it up to 1600 people. OMG, really? You are really, really disturbed son. So we paid a little more iskie...just a little. A LITTLE ? You come with 1600 maels and wanna kill 50 titans? Man, I'd like to have what this guy smoked, seems to be good shite.
Yeah, that'd be approximately 1000 years of skill training wanting to kill your 100 years of skill training.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2876
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:49:00 -
[1614] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Andski wrote:BioZvin wrote:And lets be honest here a titan on its own atm can't even defend itself vs one dictor/HIC. I think it's /fairly/ reasonable that a solo titan should be extremely vulnerable against a dictor or HIC, don't you agree? Why should it be more than a BS vs a interceptor.
Anything that can fit a point/scram can tackle a battleship. Only a dictor/hictor can tackle a titan. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Crystal Wolf
Invision Hosting Invision Group
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:50:00 -
[1615] - Quote
Andski wrote:BioZvin wrote:And lets be honest here a titan on its own atm can't even defend itself vs one dictor/HIC. I think it's /fairly/ reasonable that a solo titan should be extremely vulnerable against a dictor or HIC, don't you agree?
This is agreeable a titan on its own should vulnerable it shouldn't be a case of a Dicotr/HIC just being a splattered fly on the titan's windshield as it were.
But the use of singular titans isn't what this discussion should be focusing on as it has been established that a singular titan doesn't pose a huge problem. The main focus here is titan blobs and attempting to produce an effective solution. Invision Hosting - Providing Quality service solutions Forum Topic: Here |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:51:00 -
[1616] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:BioZvin wrote: i have no problem with the way it is or was, or even an change to tracking. I have a problem with my ship being effectively the only ship that can do nothing at all to a ship of another class. A battleship can hit a ceptor, most even have drones to defend it self. And lets be honest here a titan on its own atm can't even defend itself vs one dictor/HIC.
in original post i assumed that titans will be useless against all sub caps, witch I personalty think this nuff will do. But if it doesn't wait a month...
You dont want your ship to be nerfed to be useless without support yet defend the right to invalidate 99% of ships in EVE...
So wait a ship is invalidated when it cannot do anything against another one ? |

baltec1
811
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:52:00 -
[1617] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:
So wait a ship is invalidated when it cannot do anything against another one ?
Welcome to all subcaps and carriers/dreads lives over the last year. |

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:54:00 -
[1618] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:BioZvin wrote:
So wait a ship is invalidated when it cannot do anything against another one ?
Welcome to all subcaps and carriers/dreads lives over the last year.
I will laugh real hard when pl deploys 250 carriers with sentrys , then you will say the carriers are overpowered ?
|

Handsome Ben Cheese
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:55:00 -
[1619] - Quote
Gertrud ToD wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote: That's very interesting, considering the largest fight I've been present in, in eve, was the recent fight over our old homeland with the russians. And that involved most every major alliance in the game sending fleets. And local barely hit 2000. Considering goons were only a small part of that fight, I'm not sure where our other 7500 are hiding, but I'd love to know.
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/memberCount My Rifter will bring death to the infidels! |

Gertrud ToD
Terrorists of Dimensions Electric Monkey Overlords
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:57:00 -
[1620] - Quote
Crystal Wolf wrote: But the use of singular titans isn't what this discussion should be focusing on as it has been established that a singular titan doesn't pose a huge problem. The main focus here is titan blobs and attempting to produce an effective solution.
well this nerf only focuses on the aspect of a titan "blob" of say 50 titans.
this nerf will mean two things - a) a huge bc/bs blob (many more ships than 50, lets say 600) like goons field them will now be the new winning-blob variant. b) point a) will be invalid as soon as the ones who are currently fielding 50 titans will field 100 titans
so actually all the nerf does is shift the power from the current "winners" to the current "losers" of a specific conflict, at a time that is very inconveniant for those having titans now, but in the long run will allow them to simply up the numbers and swing the pendulum back.
and thats actually what most people have been critizising, its not fixing the problem at all, just doing a power shift in the current situation.
|

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
82
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:57:00 -
[1621] - Quote
Handsome Ben Cheese wrote:Gertrud ToD wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote: That's very interesting, considering the largest fight I've been present in, in eve, was the recent fight over our old homeland with the russians. And that involved most every major alliance in the game sending fleets. And local barely hit 2000. Considering goons were only a small part of that fight, I'm not sure where our other 7500 are hiding, but I'd love to know.
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/memberCount My Rifter will bring death to the infidels!
ALLAHU ACKBAR! |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:57:00 -
[1622] - Quote
Sentinel Eeex wrote:Acwron wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:The amount of neutral PL/Raiden alts in this thread, desperately clinging to the entitled notion that they should be allowed to fly around in unkillable ships because they paid a little more isk, is amazing. When every other ship in the game can be killed by subcaps, but you drop titans and suddenly subcaps are meaningless. If 1600 people show up to take someone's space, and they can only field 200 guys, then THEY DO NOT DESERVE THAT SPACE. This is how the world works. You should not magically be allowed to pick space and control it because you can stick 50 guys into a super ship, and stand it up to 1600 people. OMG, really? You are really, really disturbed son. So we paid a little more iskie...just a little. A LITTLE ? You come with 1600 maels and wanna kill 50 titans? Man, I'd like to have what this guy smoked, seems to be good shite. Yeah, that'd be approximately 1000 years of skill training wanting to kill your 100 years of skill training.
Funny way to see it. Well, not funny. Plain stupid. Nothing new. Go back scamming in Jita. Ah, forgot about it, you run a bot for that. |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 15:57:00 -
[1623] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:BioZvin wrote:
So wait a ship is invalidated when it cannot do anything against another one ?
Welcome to all subcaps and carriers/dreads lives over the last year.
I have seen more then one Titan go down to sub caps, you are right you cannot take down a big group of supers without bringing some firepower yourself.. But as the NC war showed us NC took down quite a few titans with sub caps alone. A few WN ones comes to mind, and at the time we had more titans in the coalition then RDN has now. POST last nerf |

Khadmos
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:00:00 -
[1624] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:baltec1 wrote:BioZvin wrote:
So wait a ship is invalidated when it cannot do anything against another one ?
Welcome to all subcaps and carriers/dreads lives over the last year. I have seen more then one Titan go down to sub caps, you are right you cannot take down a big group of supers without bringing some firepower yourself.. But as the NC war showed us NC took down quite a few titans with sub caps alone. A few WN ones comes to mind, and at the time we had more titans in the coalition then RDN has now. POST last nerf
I'm sure those titans were in a fleet of 20+ other titans as well? |

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:04:00 -
[1625] - Quote
Khadmos wrote:BioZvin wrote:baltec1 wrote:BioZvin wrote:
So wait a ship is invalidated when it cannot do anything against another one ?
Welcome to all subcaps and carriers/dreads lives over the last year. I have seen more then one Titan go down to sub caps, you are right you cannot take down a big group of supers without bringing some firepower yourself.. But as the NC war showed us NC took down quite a few titans with sub caps alone. A few WN ones comes to mind, and at the time we had more titans in the coalition then RDN has now. POST last nerf I'm sure those titans were in a fleet of 20+ other titans as well?
Nop they were in a fleet full of drakes and maelstroms fighting the god fight :) |

Gertrud ToD
Terrorists of Dimensions Electric Monkey Overlords
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:05:00 -
[1626] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Andski wrote:BioZvin wrote:And lets be honest here a titan on its own atm can't even defend itself vs one dictor/HIC. I think it's /fairly/ reasonable that a solo titan should be extremely vulnerable against a dictor or HIC, don't you agree? Why should it be more than a BS vs a interceptor. you should explain that a bit: a bs with a skilled pilot can do several maneuvers when fighting against an interceptor (depending on the intercetors fit), either putting the interceptor to a eliptical orbit, which allows for tracking, slowing down the interceptor, use the drones..
the titan vs the interdictor however is pretty much dead in the water. |

Slapnuts McGee
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:08:00 -
[1627] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Slapnuts McGee wrote:baltec1 wrote:Slapnuts McGee wrote:
Then you must agree that these changes will still leave us with a broken ship, I don't see the point in making changes until CCP defines the role they want this ship to fill.
I'll take a bandaid over what we have now. no, because people will still cry when their mwd'ing drake gets blapped by a titan. Bandaid doesn't do any good, I agree there needs to be a complete overhaul of the ship but this isn't the way to go about it putting "duct tape" over the problem and hoping it goes away. Still better than what we have now, plus CCP are going to keep an eye on it and make adjustments as needed.
not trying to troll you, but CCP have a bad record of not revisiting these "adjustments" and leaving it broken for several years. yes it's needs change but let's do it right. |

Crystal Wolf
Invision Hosting Invision Group
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:08:00 -
[1628] - Quote
Gertrud ToD wrote:Crystal Wolf wrote: But the use of singular titans isn't what this discussion should be focusing on as it has been established that a singular titan doesn't pose a huge problem. The main focus here is titan blobs and attempting to produce an effective solution.
well this nerf only focuses on the aspect of a titan "blob" of say 50 titans. this nerf will mean two things - a) a huge bc/bs blob (many more ships than 50, lets say 600) like goons field them will now be the new winning-blob variant. b) point a) will be invalid as soon as the ones who are currently fielding 50 titans will field 100 titans so actually all the nerf does is shift the power from the current "winners" to the current "losers" of a specific conflict, at a time that is very inconveniant for those having titans now, but in the long run will allow them to simply up the numbers and swing the pendulum back. and thats actually what most people have been critizising, its not fixing the problem at all, just doing a power shift in the current situation.
This is true however CCP in response to one of my earlier posts said that almost anything that reduces titan numbers and titan blobbing is considered a desirable outcome. So yes you may be right but if alliances start fielding more titans to combat the nerf then CCP will just try something else which may generate more tears than we have at the moment.
The biggest problem with this thread is a lack of solid direction you just have people posting god knows what by page 80. Don't get me wrong there have been many intelligent responses to this thread but things like some of the goon conspiracy posts i have been seeing don't help things at all. Invision Hosting - Providing Quality service solutions Forum Topic: Here |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:15:00 -
[1629] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:Acwron wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:The amount of neutral PL/Raiden alts in this thread, desperately clinging to the entitled notion that they should be allowed to fly around in unkillable ships because they paid a little more isk, is amazing. When every other ship in the game can be killed by subcaps, but you drop titans and suddenly subcaps are meaningless. If 1600 people show up to take someone's space, and they can only field 200 guys, then THEY DO NOT DESERVE THAT SPACE. This is how the world works. You should not magically be allowed to pick space and control it because you can stick 50 guys into a super ship, and stand it up to 1600 people. OMG, really? You are really, really disturbed son. So we paid a little more iskie...just a little. A LITTLE ? You come with 1600 maels and wanna kill 50 titans? Man, I'd like to have what this guy smoked, seems to be good shite. Yeah, that'd be approximately 1000 years of skill training wanting to kill your 100 years of skill training. Funny way to see it. Well, not funny. Plain stupid. Nothing new. Go back scamming in Jita. Ah, forgot about it, you run a bot for that.
ISK numbers are, of course, more important than any other numbers.
Tell me, if logic is that 10bil ISK shouldn't be able to kill 100bil ISK, why is it then ok that 2.5bil SP should kill 25bil SP?
A mystery.
|

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:15:00 -
[1630] - Quote
Slapnuts McGee wrote:Vile rat wrote:Slapnuts McGee wrote:Vile rat wrote:Slapnuts McGee wrote: We're telling you right now, these changes will not stop blapping and people will still cry about it. All that will happen at the moment is it will delay how long it takes titans to start shooting stuff.
This is actually somewhat true. Strong drop does adjust things back to a broken state. Then you must agree that these changes will still leave us with a broken ship, I don't see the point in making changes until CCP defines the role they want this ship to fill. Would you be happier with -75% instead of -50%? It's still only a short term fix, I think it would make everyone happy if CCP would actually figure out what they want this ship to do and make it enjoyable to fly wheather it serve a non combat or combat role. These "fixes" aren't going to do any good and have the possibility to turn these back into a nonused pos princess which gives no incentive to people to train up it.
"Cmon CCP, we only want to be able to blap frigates with Titans for a wee bit longer... pretty please?"
|

Styrling
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:17:00 -
[1631] - Quote
Seriouspost, it seems like you lowballed the tracking nerf required.
I was playing around with my Ragnarok to see some tracking numbers I can come to within nearly 90% of the tracking of a 1400mm Maelstrom without going full pimp fit.
3x Meta 13 Tracking Comps 3x Meta 13 Tracking Enhancers 2x Meta 13 Sensor Boosters - Lock time gonna blow :frogcawg: Strong Drop and an ax-2.5 or Ogdin's
With all this the Titan still has ~16m EHP
Tracking is around 0.0133 compared to around 0.015 for a normal 1400 Mael.
Maybe you should aim for 75-85%?
|

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:18:00 -
[1632] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:I supposed if you are with a good anchor who is doing more than "keep at range" you might get a bit more transversal up to a single opponent. The issue that Vile Rat has (and I don't disagree with the issue) is that when you have a lot of turret Titans on grid, at some point you are going to have a really low transversal to some of them. The problem isn't a single Titan (although that is a separate problem), the problem is a fleet of them. So what CCP has tried to do is to ensure that even if you have the SP and ISK to field a fleet of Titans, you can't hit subcaps. But they missed the target. GǪand I understand this. I'm merely pointing out the fallacy of the categorical GÇ£MWD GåÆ carrier sigGÇ¥ claim, which completely ignores why people fit MWDs to begin with and the effect it has. I'm also pointing out that the effect the MWD has is pretty much irrelvant since they're balanced in such a way that (subject to meta differences in the penalties, of course) the compound effect of bloom and speed means you're pretty much just as easy or hard to hit as if you had the MWD off. The MWD isn't a factor in hitting the target. Hell, I even made the same argument you did at the very start of the page when someone asked why on earth a Titan would even want to lock on to a cruiserGǪ (and was called silly and ignorant for doing so). What you describe is an issue with or without MWD GÇö it's an effect of zero angular velocity, and no amount of sig bloom (or sig reduction) changes that effect. That's my entire point: that the whole MWD argument is a red herring from people who seemingly don't understand what affects tracking.
Sorry I'm covering two birds with one stone. The targeting to hit won't matter, and the scan res nerd won't matter. One is affected by the MWD bloom (the Scan Res nerf) and one is affected by the tracking change (50% reduction). Sadly, they are still irrelevant to the respective issues on the battlefield. CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
356
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:18:00 -
[1633] - Quote
Guys my ship costs a lot and I have more SP than you so I should win! |

Slapnuts McGee
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:24:00 -
[1634] - Quote
Sentinel Eeex wrote: "Cmon CCP, we only want to be able to blap frigates with Titans for a wee bit longer... pretty please?"
hey nerd, read my earlier post where I said go ahead and nerf tracking 50% or whatever where we won't hit frigates. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5527
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:24:00 -
[1635] - Quote
Styrling wrote:3x Meta 13 Tracking Comps 3x Meta 13 Tracking Enhancers 2x Meta 13 Sensor Boosters - Lock time gonna blow :frogcawg: Strong Drop and an ax-2.5 or Ogdin's
With all this the Titan still has ~16m EHP
Tracking is around 0.0133 compared to around 0.015 for a normal 1400 Mael. GǪdivided by four due to the signature resolution, so around 0.0033 compared to around 0.015. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Styrling
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:25:00 -
[1636] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Styrling wrote:3x Meta 13 Tracking Comps 3x Meta 13 Tracking Enhancers 2x Meta 13 Sensor Boosters - Lock time gonna blow :frogcawg: Strong Drop and an ax-2.5 or Ogdin's
With all this the Titan still has ~16m EHP
Tracking is around 0.0133 compared to around 0.015 for a normal 1400 Mael. GǪdivided by four due to the signature resolution, so around 0.0033 compared to around 0.015.
No Logic this is an eve-o thread. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5527
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:27:00 -
[1637] - Quote
Styrling wrote:No Logic this is an eve-o thread. That's ok, I got the divisor wrong at first anywayGǪ fixed now. 
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Styrling
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:29:00 -
[1638] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Styrling wrote:No Logic this is an eve-o thread. That's ok, I got the divisor wrong at first anywayGǪ fixed now. 
NO worries bro, Here are some sick numbers
7x Cormack's Tracking Comps - Scripted 5x Tobias' Modified TE's Strong Drop Ogdin's Eye DC II Tank
0.01515 Tracking
75% tracking nerf or bust |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
583
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:34:00 -
[1639] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:The point of all this is, all these fleets require coordination and precision to win, and ALL OF THEM HAVE A CHANCE. You drop 300 ships on 200 ships, both sides can still win. You drop 50 titans on 300 ships, 400 ships, 500 ships, 800 ships... the titans just won. Hands down, no contest. No subcap fleet can stand on the field, and do the damage required to break reps, when they're losing a ship every single time the titans guns cycle. This is not the way eve is meant to be played, CCP has been nerfing titans since they came out, because they DO NOT FIT WITH EVE and never have. Every ship matters in eve, in every fleet, regardless of size. Until you bring titans in, and then the only ship that matters onfield is how many titans you have. That's not eve, and it's never going to be eve. So they're getting nerfed again, and will get nerfed more... get over it.
I bolded the parts where you are wrong. Also numbers are the biggest factor in almost every fight. Sure what ship they are in is important too, but by all means. Please come fight my fleet of 2000 Thorax's with your 3 Ravens.
I do like your heart as far as where you think the game is. Unfortunately, it is not where you think it is as far as numbers not mattering. It would be nice if it did not matter as much, but it is king of space right now. You also have to remember the game mechanics that amplify why numbers matter. The biggest offender is the super effort free and incredibly accurate intelligence gathering tool that has a minor role for communication. The local channel. Toss in a splash of alliance assets that have damage notifications and structure timers and presto, the blob... she be coming and she does not care if it is just you and your two friends in battlecruisers. She will bring everyone for many regions to curb stomp you so hard for disturbing them so you don't bother to set foot in their space ever again. Yet somehow the blob goes to the forums and complains about, "How come null space is so empty?"
The point of all of this is, the game needs a big change how intelligence is gathered, how entities claim territory and how it is fought. Even if it means changing how we play the game.
|

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:35:00 -
[1640] - Quote
Styrling wrote:Tippia wrote:Styrling wrote:No Logic this is an eve-o thread. That's ok, I got the divisor wrong at first anywayGǪ fixed now.  NO worries bro, Here are some sick numbers 7x Cormack's Tracking Comps - Scripted 5x Tobias' Modified TE's Strong Drop Ogdin's Eye DC II Tank 0.01515 Tracking 75% tracking nerf or bust
Let theory craft all ships, you are up against what you saw on Hunted Lifeforms killmaill. Not Cormack's *7. Like saying all you maelstroms are really mach's. |

Styrling
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:39:00 -
[1641] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:Styrling wrote:Tippia wrote:Styrling wrote:No Logic this is an eve-o thread. That's ok, I got the divisor wrong at first anywayGǪ fixed now.  NO worries bro, Here are some sick numbers 7x Cormack's Tracking Comps - Scripted 5x Tobias' Modified TE's Strong Drop Ogdin's Eye DC II Tank 0.01515 Tracking 75% tracking nerf or bust Let theory craft all ships, you are up against what you saw on Hunted Lifeforms killmaill. Not Cormack's *7. Like saying all you maelstroms are really mach's.
Bro I don't care about your **** Raidendot fit I am saying what I fit on my titan that you dropped your dreads on a few weeks ago. |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
84
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:40:00 -
[1642] - Quote
Raiden., NC., and PL. We might not agree on the titan nerf, but I think I have found something we can all agree on and that is penguins are adorable. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
227
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:41:00 -
[1643] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Toss in a splash of alliance assets that have damage notifications and structure timers and presto, the blob... she be coming and she does not care if it is just you and your two friends in battlecruisers. She will bring everyone for many regions to curb stomp you so hard for disturbing them so you don't bother to set foot in their space ever again. Yet somehow the blob goes to the forums and complains about, "How come null space is so empty?" Do you really think shooting a few bullets at a POS elicits such a response? If you reinforce it, sure. If three people are reinforcing a POS they are pretty hardcore. Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
356
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:43:00 -
[1644] - Quote
Triskian wrote:Raiden., NC., and PL. We might not agree on the titan nerf, but I think I have found something we can all agree on and that is penguins are adorable.
Everyone in Theta Squad has been watching these guys for like.. a week
:3: |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:44:00 -
[1645] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Toss in a splash of alliance assets that have damage notifications and structure timers and presto, the blob... she be coming and she does not care if it is just you and your two friends in battlecruisers. She will bring everyone for many regions to curb stomp you so hard for disturbing them so you don't bother to set foot in their space ever again. Yet somehow the blob goes to the forums and complains about, "How come null space is so empty?" Do you really think shooting a few bullets at a POS elicits such a response? If you reinforce it, sure. If three people are reinforcing a POS they are pretty hardcore.
Another NPC corp person discussing how numbers are the only thing that matters in combat. What a surprise let me tell you.
|

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:46:00 -
[1646] - Quote
Styrling wrote:Bro I don't care about your **** Raidendot fit I am saying what I fit on my titan that you dropped your dreads on a few weeks ago.
Ohh wait didn't you have titans and supers there, bring them with your 1500 man sub caps and you could win....
Please keep that fit on :P |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
498
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:49:00 -
[1647] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:I bolded the parts where you are wrong. Also numbers are the biggest factor in almost every fight. Sure what ship they are in is important too, but by all means. Please come fight my fleet of 2000 Thorax's with your 3 Ravens.
I do like your heart as far as where you think the game is. Unfortunately, it is not where you think it is as far as numbers not mattering. It would be nice if it did not matter as much, but it is king of space right now. You also have to remember the game mechanics that amplify why numbers matter. The biggest offender is the super effort free and incredibly accurate intelligence gathering tool that has a minor role for communication. The local channel. Toss in a splash of alliance assets that have damage notifications and structure timers and presto, the blob... she be coming and she does not care if it is just you and your two friends in battlecruisers. She will bring everyone for many regions to curb stomp you so hard for disturbing them so you don't bother to set foot in their space ever again. Yet somehow the blob goes to the forums and complains about, "How come null space is so empty?"
The point of all of this is, the game needs a big change how intelligence is gathered, how entities claim territory and how it is fought. Even if it means changing how we play the game.
Two points to this: a) Numbers don't matter in the sense that a small fleet can beat a larger one with closer margins. 250 beating 400 with good skill, use of tactics and coordination is realistic (see: forces of Elite PVP versus old NC). However no one yet has come up with a good reason why absolutely crazy excessive numbers shouldn't win single fights. 1600 versus 200 absolutely should be winning - EVE doesn't cater to that degree of superior skill or resources. The counter that sort of force is not done via ships, but by politics, timezones and an eventual review of the underlying game mechanics that cause fights to happen.
b) As an addendum to the intelligence point - every major power knows where every others supercap forces (and to an extent, cap forces) are at all times. This severely limits the scope for real traps and ambushes. Thanks to a combination of spying, watchlists and locator agents it's virtually impossible to catch someone out with anything other than a minor gank. This is part of the reason for why titans are so survivable - they don't get caught out with their pants down all that often, most losses are from poor FC judgement rather than genuine surprise.
|

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
179
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:50:00 -
[1648] - Quote
83 pages?
Raiden./PL and friends must be really butthurt over these changes.  |

Wilson Yu
Masters of Ownage
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:53:00 -
[1649] - Quote
I am truly disappointed with how ccp is carrying out with the titan nerf. Now the only thing titans are useful for is super cap rights, structure grinding, and mobile stargate, all for a 70 billion isk ship. even than in super cap fights no one would use them cause it takes ******* long to lock on anything. so now what i am seeing is mins will drop in price ( yea cheap ships) and two titans will no longer be used at all other than cynoing in fleets of sub caps. who would ******* use a 70 billion ship to structure grind and risk it to sub caps who can easily scram it and wtfpwn it. lol good fight titans and super caps pilots you just got ****** in the ass by ccp. might as well just sell your titan or just self destruct. sell all your offcier mods and stuff. cause your titan will be worth the same level as a drake, quite literally. |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:55:00 -
[1650] - Quote
CynoNet Two wrote:
Two points to this: a) Numbers don't matter in the sense that a small fleet can beat a larger one with closer margins. 250 beating 400 with good skill, use of tactics and coordination is realistic (see: forces of Elite PVP versus old NC). However no one yet has come up with a good reason why absolutely crazy excessive numbers shouldn't win single fights. 1600 versus 200 absolutely should be winning - EVE doesn't cater to that degree of superior skill or resources. The counter that sort of force is not done via ships, but by politics, timezones and an eventual review of the underlying game mechanics that cause fights to happen.
Keeping in mind that those 1600 don't exist, and have never existed. This is just some magical number these neutral alts keep throwing around like it's fact. A 'large' fight currently would be 500+ vs 500+. A major fight with everybody and their brother coming never breaks 1600... IN ALL. This idea that numbers win everything, and people are being dishonoureably blobbed out of their space is nothing more than a made up lie to try to distract from the fact that Titans are not some desperate last stand for honoureable people wanting to avoid losing their space to a blob. Titans are an i-win button for people who brought equal numbers and lost the real fight already. Or who don't want to bother forming up to defend their space, so they just drop 50 titans on a pos and laugh as nobody can attack it.
|

Bliswonowon
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:02:00 -
[1651] - Quote
Pesadel0 wrote:baltec1 wrote:BioZvin wrote:
So wait a ship is invalidated when it cannot do anything against another one ?
Welcome to all subcaps and carriers/dreads lives over the last year. I will laugh real hard when pl deploys 250 carriers with sentrys , then you will say the carriers are overpowered
I see you have no idea why large groups of titans have been in need of rebalancing
Speaking of PL, I think it's a safe bet that they will remain as strong as ever, because they aren't dumb enough to rely on one broken doctrine as their only means of achieving anything in EVE (unlike the assorted members of a failcascading alliance who whine here with their NPC alts)
To those wailing that titans are the only way to counter "the blob": try bombers? Too plebeian? |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:04:00 -
[1652] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:CynoNet Two wrote:
Two points to this: a) Numbers don't matter in the sense that a small fleet can beat a larger one with closer margins. 250 beating 400 with good skill, use of tactics and coordination is realistic (see: forces of Elite PVP versus old NC). However no one yet has come up with a good reason why absolutely crazy excessive numbers shouldn't win single fights. 1600 versus 200 absolutely should be winning - EVE doesn't cater to that degree of superior skill or resources. The counter that sort of force is not done via ships, but by politics, timezones and an eventual review of the underlying game mechanics that cause fights to happen.
Keeping in mind that those 1600 don't exist, and have never existed. This is just some magical number these neutral alts keep throwing around like it's fact. A 'large' fight currently would be 500+ vs 500+. A major fight with everybody and their brother coming never breaks 1600... IN ALL. This idea that numbers win everything, and people are being dishonoureably blobbed out of their space is nothing more than a made up lie to try to distract from the fact that Titans are not some desperate last stand for honoureable people wanting to avoid losing their space to a blob. Titans are an i-win button for people who brought equal numbers and lost the real fight already. Or who don't want to bother forming up to defend their space, so they just drop 50 titans on a pos and laugh as nobody can attack it.
biggest fight we had up here we had what 37 titans, so your 50 is just as bad as their 1600, more realistic would be just above or below 20. And might I add I cant remember we dropped Titans alone, without support there or very close. |

Wilson Yu
Masters of Ownage
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:05:00 -
[1653] - Quote
well idc about titans being nerf to hell, no one gives a **** about them anyways except well, titan pilots. i am just going to be disappointed that titans will not be use anymore ... quite literally. i can imagine people whelping titans cause they are now worth piece of ****. |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:07:00 -
[1654] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:
biggest fight we had up here we had what 37 titans, so your 50 is just as bad as their 1600, more realistic would be just above or below 20. And might I add I cant remember we dropped Titans alone, without support there or very close.
Guys we only drop 37 unkillable ships that kill a ship everytime they fire, not 50 of them. DON'T NERF MY TITAN BRO!
|

Gertrud ToD
Terrorists of Dimensions Electric Monkey Overlords
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:07:00 -
[1655] - Quote
Crystal Wolf wrote: This is true however CCP in response to one of my earlier posts said that almost anything that reduces titan numbers and titan blobbing is considered a desirable outcome.
and thats a pretty dangerous way of thinking, looking at how many people own titans nowadays - you cannot just take them away or make them "useless" without reimbursting owners in some sort of acceptable way
and you cant do a short-term-"solution" like the one here proposed either, because it does not solve the problem.
the right way to go about this, would be finding the root of the problem, and find a way to modify the current state to a level where players can solve that root-problem themselves by giving them the right tools.
|

asdf ghyj
Zorg Solutions
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:12:00 -
[1656] - Quote
Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR
|

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
499
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:14:00 -
[1657] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:biggest fight we had up here we had what 37 titans, so your 50 is just as bad as their 1600, more realistic would be just above or below 20. And might I add I cant remember we dropped Titans alone, without support there or very close.
You dropped 37 ships without support and none of them died?
Might want to keep repeating that to yourself so you get the issue here. |

Enochia Starr
DarK IntenTionZ Stop Exploding You Cowards
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:15:00 -
[1658] - Quote
Might aswell take away damage bonus to turrets, since they cannot hit sh*t now. Oh and take away the doomsday too, because by the time anything is locked it would be logged off.
And I have 20m in my wallet, guess I can just afford 7x Cormack's Sensorboosters for my 5x midslot titan. |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:19:00 -
[1659] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:BioZvin wrote:
biggest fight we had up here we had what 37 titans, so your 50 is just as bad as their 1600, more realistic would be just above or below 20. And might I add I cant remember we dropped Titans alone, without support there or very close.
Guys we only drop 37 unkillable ships that kill a ship everytime they fire, not 50 of them. DON'T NERF MY TITAN BRO!
What fantasy world do you live in every time you fire is bullshit. the group will kill at least one every time they fire just like your maelstroms do, difference is ?
Your FC's sacrifice you to titan. Titans can not dictate range or hold you on a field. Only place they are good are on, wait for it, structures that need taken down or defended...
It is not unkillable you killed one in 92D and could have gotten more if you had not run away with all caps after. |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:20:00 -
[1660] - Quote
Triskian wrote:Raiden., NC., and PL. We might not agree on the titan nerf, but I think I have found something we can all agree on and that is penguins are adorable. Awwwwwwww
|

Tsubutai
The Tuskers
74
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:27:00 -
[1661] - Quote
CynoNet Two wrote:BioZvin wrote:biggest fight we had up here we had what 37 titans, so your 50 is just as bad as their 1600, more realistic would be just above or below 20. And might I add I cant remember we dropped Titans alone, without support there or very close. You dropped 37 ships without support and none of them died? Might want to keep repeating that to yourself so you get the issue here. If they were dropping 37 ships onto a fight in progress, wouldn't that mean that their subcap support fleet was already on grid and engaged? |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
499
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:28:00 -
[1662] - Quote
BioZvin wrote:It is not unkillable you killed one in 92D and could have gotten more if you had not run away with all caps after. You mean the time PL and NCDOT moved 100 supercaps over 10 jumps in under 5 TiDi'd minutes to kill us? Yeah sure let us stick around and kill a couple more what could go wrong? |

Uzuki Shootmenow
Grid-Lock Talocan Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:38:00 -
[1663] - Quote
say hello to cheap effective carrier fleets, which CCP will nerf next after goonies cry some more when Drakes keep exploding. Well done CCP grayscale, you a game balancing proGäó |

BioZvin
The Ankou Raiden.
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:38:00 -
[1664] - Quote
CynoNet Two wrote:BioZvin wrote:It is not unkillable you killed one in 92D and could have gotten more if you had not run away with all caps after. You mean the time PL and NCDOT moved 100 supercaps over 10 jumps in under 5 TiDi'd minutes to kill us? Yeah sure let us stick around and kill a couple more what could go wrong?
You don't like being outnumbered ? Not sure but think they where coming in subs mainly, never heard about them making it half way. (where on contract)
Tsubutai wrote:CynoNet Two wrote:BioZvin wrote:biggest fight we had up here we had what 37 titans, so your 50 is just as bad as their 1600, more realistic would be just above or below 20. And might I add I cant remember we dropped Titans alone, without support there or very close. You dropped 37 ships without support and none of them died? Might want to keep repeating that to yourself so you get the issue here. If they were dropping 37 ships onto a fight in progress, wouldn't that mean that their subcap support fleet was already on grid and engaged?
So you can't disengage now, chances are you might lose what half of what it cost in fuel to jump the titans in there, but in most cases, goons have total control of field "numbers" when we jump in. Cause we kinda like fighting without titans if it is a good fight.. you might have noticed this if you where looking.
I have to sign off from this tread. Think most have been said.
If you do this CCP, please make sure I have docking rights before. No unsafe parking stuff has to be NPC safe please. |

Elise Randolph
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
746
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:41:00 -
[1665] - Quote
CynoNet Two wrote:BioZvin wrote:It is not unkillable you killed one in 92D and could have gotten more if you had not run away with all caps after. You mean the time PL and NCDOT moved 100 supercaps over 10 jumps in under 5 TiDi'd minutes to kill us? Yeah sure let us stick around and kill a couple more what could go wrong?
That never actually happened. We logged our supers on to see if you would be scaaarrrrrreeeeeddd and you were :3 The most active in-game of any CSM, ever! Vote Elise Randolph for CSM 7, there is no substitute for activity! |

baltec1
813
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:42:00 -
[1666] - Quote
Uzuki Shootmenow wrote:say hello to cheap effective carrier fleets, which CCP will nerf next after goonies cry some more when Drakes keep exploding. Well done CCP grayscale, you a game balancing proGäó
Or we could just bomb them... |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5902
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:43:00 -
[1667] - Quote
asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes
I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy.
The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened.
They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement.
Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests. The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
357
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:46:00 -
[1668] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy. The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened. They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement. Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
|

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
501
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:46:00 -
[1669] - Quote
Elise Randolph wrote:CynoNet Two wrote:BioZvin wrote:It is not unkillable you killed one in 92D and could have gotten more if you had not run away with all caps after. You mean the time PL and NCDOT moved 100 supercaps over 10 jumps in under 5 TiDi'd minutes to kill us? Yeah sure let us stick around and kill a couple more what could go wrong? That never actually happened. We logged our supers on to see if you would be scaaarrrrrreeeeeddd and you were :3 In that case can you tell me how to hack over half a dozen locator agents to return false locations for supecaps around Tribute? Because that's a cool trick. |

Audix
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:47:00 -
[1670] - Quote
I sense Mad in this Thread, Although i dont understand why |

Kcolor
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:48:00 -
[1671] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:i hide behind alts wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy. The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened. They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement. Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
|

Tector
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:48:00 -
[1672] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy. The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened. They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement. Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
I dunno Mittens, that is an awfully complex thought process for simple bullies overwrought with grief to understand... |

Doctor Eezee
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
70
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:48:00 -
[1673] - Quote
asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes
This may literally be the worst post in the history of this forum. If you ever want to switch corps, you should apply to WI, they are always on the lookout for bad posters. "My rule is: If you meet the weakest vessel, attack; if it is a vessel equal to yours, attack; and if it is stronger than yours, also attack..." - Admiral Stepan O. Makarov |

Dimirti
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:49:00 -
[1674] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy. The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened. They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement. Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.

|

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1877
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:49:00 -
[1675] - Quote
I love how the proponents of unkillable titan blobs are crying about "playing fair". The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Tector
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:49:00 -
[1676] - Quote
Doctor Eezee wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes This may literally be the worst post in the history of this forum. If you ever want to switch corps, you should apply to WI, they are always on the lookout for bad posters.
Yeah, but not THAT bad. That guy is so dumb and blinded by rage that it's a wonder he could fly a titan in the first place. |

Archinquisitor
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:50:00 -
[1677] - Quote
Remember the bombing of the Amarr monument? Again, it is time to show CCP that too much is too much! Every unhappy titan owner gather tomorrow at 20:00 eve time in VFK. Public fleets will be open, cynos will be provided, support not needed. Officer fittings allowed, but due to large interest please not more than 10 titans at a time in system. We will prove to CCP how underpowered they are right now. |

Doctor Eezee
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
70
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:50:00 -
[1678] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy. The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened. They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement. Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
QFT "My rule is: If you meet the weakest vessel, attack; if it is a vessel equal to yours, attack; and if it is stronger than yours, also attack..." - Admiral Stepan O. Makarov |

Venus Vermillion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
420
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:50:00 -
[1679] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy. The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened. They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement. Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
|

The Groundskeeper
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
62
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:51:00 -
[1680] - Quote
I see the concern of those who complain about titans being "anti-blob" weapons but the problem you have is that of course CCP will favour the larger group in the long run. Whether through subs or through the proxy of plexes, every player pays them money to play. You're asking them to provide tools with which less subscribers can make more subscribers unhappy.
Goons go out there and actively sell the game of Eve Online to their friends on the SA boards. We are CCP's willing and adoring shills. Since my last recruitment post went up on the SA forums we have gone from 2,500 to 3,500 Goonwaffe members, with old people returning as we tell them how the game is on the right path, and new ones being drawn in by the enthusiastic commentary of people posting in the thread in the downtimes between bouts of pointing and laughing at Ordo Garr. That's already the equivalent of 1/3 of all titan pilots cancelling their subs and walking away by itself. Allowing for churn, it's probably just over a hundred grand a year from extra subs (of which I see exactly zip :D)
According to Turbefield's stats a far smaller 10% increase across the CFC alone would replace the subscriptions of every titan pilot, both subbed and unsubbed, should they walk away and unsub forever. According to the figures cited by Jogyn then that same 10% increase across the CFC would pay for the cancelled subs of every single member of PL and NCdot put together. Woops!
The days when Eve was a hobby or a social experiment of its devs, or that they would change the game consciously to favour their playstyle or that of their friends, are gone. They want the person with 3 million skillpoints to be able to be hooked on the nullsec Great Game that keeps people playing for years, to get dragged into the storyline. And they know that that is virtually impossible when those players discover that their ship matters zilch as soon as 40 titans cyno in with a bunch of supercarriers to rep them.
PL, NcDot and a few others don't want newbies, and that's cool. But it means you're not speaking to those two-week-old new players and you're not exposed to the Naked Lunch moment when they work out that they can do everything right, orbit the primary at the right range, stay out of smartbomb range on the primary, watch for yellow-boxing, broadcast for reps as soon as a lock is applied, and yet still absolutely inevitably die as soon as one single person just presses one button.
But we do talk to those people and we bring in a tidal flood of them to enliven the game and provide content and fund the development of new features and CCP are finally working out that if four or five hundred dudes, most of whom will in any case be burned out within 15 months, want to bleat about large "blobs" of paying customers having more fun than them then it's still going to be sayonara titans in the long run. |

Bashe Zor
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:51:00 -
[1681] - Quote
I-win buttons are horrible game-design. Glad this one will be gone.
|

Audix
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:53:00 -
[1682] - Quote
Archinquisitor wrote:Remember the bombing of the Amarr monument? Again, it is time to show CCP that too much is too much! Every unhappy titan owner gather tomorrow at 20:00 eve time in VFK. Public fleets will be open, cynos will be provided, support not needed. Officer fittings allowed, but due to large interest please not more than 10 titans at a time in system. We will prove to CCP how underpowered they are right now.
Get over it, Titans needed a nerf for reason, stop crying and sell your titan |

Frothgar
V0LTA 0ccupational Hazzard
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:53:00 -
[1683] - Quote
I have to say, CCP seems to be really clever when looking at this. Everyone would agree it was beyond question that the XL guns/Siege/tracking mechanic was rather borked. I have to admit, I'm surprised at the reduction in lockable targets and scan res.
It was rather creative, and I'm somewhat surprised that CCP seems to have thought of it first before the player base proposed it en mass ;)
I'm really pleased with our spaceships focused CCP.
For people saying it will just promote blobbing, honestly I doubt it. Titans basically killed the battleship fleet, as well as the mixed capital fleet, and the dreadnaught fleet. It needed to happen.
Also BS are probably the best balanced ship class in the game with respect to roles and how they interact with other ship types. They're highly vulnerable to bombers as well as support ships. I'm not really worried about a 1000man BS gang taking over all of eve, when a 20 man bomber gang can make their life a living hell. |

Dabigredboat
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:54:00 -
[1684] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:
I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy.
The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened.
They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement.
Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
I am Dabigredboat and I fly a leviathan. I agree with the mittani :3: |

Doctor Eezee
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
70
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:54:00 -
[1685] - Quote
Audix wrote:Archinquisitor wrote:Remember the bombing of the Amarr monument? Again, it is time to show CCP that too much is too much! Every unhappy titan owner gather tomorrow at 20:00 eve time in VFK. Public fleets will be open, cynos will be provided, support not needed. Officer fittings allowed, but due to large interest please not more than 10 titans at a time in system. We will prove to CCP how underpowered they are right now. Get over it, Titans needed a nerf for reason, stop crying and sell your titan
Read that post again. "My rule is: If you meet the weakest vessel, attack; if it is a vessel equal to yours, attack; and if it is stronger than yours, also attack..." - Admiral Stepan O. Makarov |

Kcolor
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:54:00 -
[1686] - Quote
How can there ever be a drought in any country after all these tears? |

Crias Taylor
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
110
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:55:00 -
[1687] - Quote
Tector wrote:Doctor Eezee wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan-á
MR MITANI -ágo play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans-á
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes This may literally be the worst post in the history of this forum. -áIf you ever want to switch corps, you should apply to WI, they are always on the lookout for bad posters. Yeah, but not THAT bad. That guy is so dumb and blinded by rage that it's a wonder he could fly a titan in the first place. It is almost like if you piled enough retards in a Titan blob any idiot is untouchable in said Titan.-á |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:56:00 -
[1688] - Quote
Audix wrote:Archinquisitor wrote:Remember the bombing of the Amarr monument? Again, it is time to show CCP that too much is too much! Every unhappy titan owner gather tomorrow at 20:00 eve time in VFK. Public fleets will be open, cynos will be provided, support not needed. Officer fittings allowed, but due to large interest please not more than 10 titans at a time in system. We will prove to CCP how underpowered they are right now. Get over it, Titans needed a nerf for reason, stop crying and sell your titan
The fail in your answer, it is huge. A lot you have to learn, young padawan. |

Tector
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:57:00 -
[1689] - Quote
Titans aren't the only anti-blob weapons out there, though to listen to the shrill cries of titan pilots deprived of their shiny toys you'd never know it. Skillfully deployed bombers can do terrible things to a massed fleet, particularly one grouped to allow for logi support.
Though abstract concepts like "skill" may be beyond the comprehension of a class of people who felt that sitting in a fleet composed of near-unkillable ships was ultimate expression of PVP in the game. |

Nalha Saldana
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
167
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:57:00 -
[1690] - Quote
Dabigredboat wrote:The Mittani wrote:
I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy.
The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened.
They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement.
Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
I am Dabigredboat and I fly a leviathan. I agree with the mittani :3:
How that thing can stay alive for more then a few weeks in your hands is beyond me. |

Jathan
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:57:00 -
[1691] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy. The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened. They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement. Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
|

deyaneira
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:58:00 -
[1692] - Quote
TO ALL:
An here i had the imprssion that i AM the drama queen. This is much fun keep it coming.
PS.. Stop the nerf and fixes to how big words are and fix the damm game already.
I aprove this thread! |

Calmoto
Magellanic Itg Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:58:00 -
[1693] - Quote
I love how our dear chairman keeps reminding these people thats its their own fault
priceless |

Audix
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:58:00 -
[1694] - Quote
QQ titan nerf QQ  |

Blawrf McTaggart
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
622
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:59:00 -
[1695] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy. The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened. They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement. Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
|

Tector
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:59:00 -
[1696] - Quote
Kcolor wrote:How can there ever be a drought in any country after all these tears?
Much as the Romans at Carthage, NC. and Raiden have salted the lands of their empires with rivers of their own tears! |

Count Spectacula
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:59:00 -
[1697] - Quote
Once upon a time, armageddons had super powers and owned everything. They were fun, but retardedly broken and got nerfed, Later dominixes could go a bazillion m/s and owned everything. As fun as nano ships were, we knew they were retardedly broken, and they too got nerfed. Now, it is the titan's turn. They are retardedly broken and are getting nerfed. There have been tears before over ship nerfs, your tears are no different aside from their level of deliciousness. |

Steelshine
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
63
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:59:00 -
[1698] - Quote
Do you hear that? It's the sound of a twisting knife |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5938
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:00:00 -
[1699] - Quote
Who dares oppose the truth in my post? None so far.
Look upon my words, ye badposters, and despair! The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

korjac
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:01:00 -
[1700] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Who dares oppose the truth in my post? None so far.
Look upon my words, ye badposters, and despair!
We Love you ! no homo |

Tector
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:03:00 -
[1701] - Quote
Count Spectacula wrote:Once upon a time, armageddons had super powers and owned everything. They were fun, but retardedly broken and got nerfed, Later dominixes could go a bazillion m/s and owned everything. As fun as nano ships were, we knew they were retardedly broken, and they too got nerfed. Now, it is the titan's turn. They are retardedly broken and are getting nerfed. There have been tears before over ship nerfs, your tears are no different aside from their level of deliciousness.
NERF RIFTERS |

Robrian
Mercurialis Inc. RAZOR Alliance
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:03:00 -
[1702] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy. The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened. They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement. Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
+1
|

The Economist
Logically Consistent
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:05:00 -
[1703] - Quote
What an amazing pile of steaming **** based on lies, misconceptions and endless exagerration. The situation presented as being responded to simply doesn't represent reality, but rather the deluded and deliberately misleading view of a vocal minority and those who don't know any better.
You, however, should know better CCP.
I can only hope this is laying the groundwork for an epic early April fools joke as opposed to being a concerted effort to bore all titan pilots into never logging in again (except for those wierdos who genuinely enjoy doing nothing but bridging).
Wow, just wow. |

Venus Vermillion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
422
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:07:00 -
[1704] - Quote
The Economist wrote:What an amazing pile of steaming **** based on lies, misconceptions and endless exagerration. The situation presented as being responded to simply doesn't represent reality, but rather the deluded and deliberately misleading view of a vocal minority and those who don't know any better.
You, however, should know better CCP.
I can only hope this is laying the groundwork for an epic early April fools joke as opposed to being a concerted effort to bore all titan pilots into never logging in again (except for those wierdos who genuinely enjoy doing nothing but bridging).
Wow, just wow.
Abloobloobloo...
Abloobloobloo... |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5529
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:08:00 -
[1705] - Quote
The Economist wrote:What an amazing pile of steaming **** based on lies, misconceptions and endless exagerration. The situation presented as being responded to simply doesn't represent reality, but rather the deluded and deliberately misleading view of a vocal minority and those who don't know any better. Well yes. That's why no-one is really listening to what the save-the-titan crowd is crying about. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Griznatch
Xicron Syndicate Tus Network
71
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:09:00 -
[1706] - Quote
The Economist wrote:What an amazing pile of steaming **** based on lies, misconceptions and endless exagerration. The situation presented as being responded to simply doesn't represent reality, but rather the deluded and deliberately misleading view of a vocal minority and those who don't know any better.
You, however, should know better CCP.
I can only hope this is laying the groundwork for an epic early April fools joke as opposed to being a concerted effort to bore all titan pilots into never logging in again (except for those wierdos who genuinely enjoy doing nothing but bridging).
Wow, just wow.
If not a single titan pilot ever logs into this game again, the quality of this game will improve by several orders of magnitude. I used to have a clever sig but I lost it. |

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:10:00 -
[1707] - Quote
Dabigredboat wrote:The Mittani wrote:
I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy.
The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened.
They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement.
Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
I am Dabigredboat and I fly a leviathan. I agree with the mittani :3:
I am a nobody that doesn't fly a Titan, on any of my accounts.
What's sad to me is how when Mittens posts about his Errorbus and Titan fleet, and all the goon sheep repost with no content, they generate a good amount of noise in a thread already full of it.
The proposed changes aren't going to have the desired effects. It's that simple. People who know a decent amount about game mechanics have said so, but CCP will again ignore them (hello Technetium buff... hello SuperCarrier buff...) thinking they know what they are doing, and throw the requisite "we will evaluate and iterate" line to quiet down those who are easily silenced.
This supposed change will do little to the nullsec battlefield. It will do little to skilled players with Titans who understand game mechanics. It will do nothing to Titan proliferation (743 as of this morning's capital tweet). The smart thing to do is to actually fix them, give them a place or pull them from the game, refund Titan-related skill points and the ship's mineral value in ISK to the pilots. CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

korjac
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:10:00 -
[1708] - Quote
The Economist wrote:What an amazing pile of steaming **** based on lies, misconceptions and endless exagerration. The situation presented as being responded to simply doesn't represent reality, but rather the deluded and deliberately misleading view of a vocal minority and those who don't know any better.
You, however, should know better CCP.
I can only hope this is laying the groundwork for an epic early April fools joke as opposed to being a concerted effort to bore all titan pilots into never logging in again (except for those wierdos who genuinely enjoy doing nothing but bridging).
Wow, just wow.
I sense mad in this one |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2684
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:12:00 -
[1709] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote: or pull them from the game, refund Titan-related skill points and the ship's mineral value in ISK to the pilots.
you're preaching to the choir here buddy |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:12:00 -
[1710] - Quote
Griznatch wrote:The Economist wrote:What an amazing pile of steaming **** based on lies, misconceptions and endless exagerration. The situation presented as being responded to simply doesn't represent reality, but rather the deluded and deliberately misleading view of a vocal minority and those who don't know any better.
You, however, should know better CCP.
I can only hope this is laying the groundwork for an epic early April fools joke as opposed to being a concerted effort to bore all titan pilots into never logging in again (except for those wierdos who genuinely enjoy doing nothing but bridging).
Wow, just wow. If not a single titan pilot ever logs into this game again, the quality of this game will improve by several orders of magnitude.
Better to restart the server, would that be fair enough for you.
Risk / Reward anyone ever heard this concept, thought it was what this game was suppose to be based on.
|

Count Spectacula
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:13:00 -
[1711] - Quote
The Economist wrote:What an amazing pile of steaming **** based on lies, misconceptions and endless exagerration. The situation presented as being responded to simply doesn't represent reality, but rather the deluded and deliberately misleading view of a vocal minority and those who don't know any better.
You, however, should know better CCP.
I can only hope this is laying the groundwork for an epic early April fools joke as opposed to being a concerted effort to bore all titan pilots into never logging in again (except for those wierdos who genuinely enjoy doing nothing but bridging).
Wow, just wow.
Yes yes, the majority of players and their titans are certainly more important than the remaining minority of lowly titanless pilots. Maybe titan pilots should start an Occupy Eve movement being the 99% and all. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2887
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:13:00 -
[1712] - Quote
The Economist wrote:What an amazing pile of steaming **** based on lies, misconceptions and endless exagerration. The situation presented as being responded to simply doesn't represent reality, but rather the deluded and deliberately misleading view of a vocal minority and those who don't know any better.
You, however, should know better CCP.
I can only hope this is laying the groundwork for an epic early April fools joke as opposed to being a concerted effort to bore all titan pilots into never logging in again (except for those wierdos who genuinely enjoy doing nothing but bridging).
Wow, just wow.
I'm glad the vocal majority is well aware of the capabilities of tracking-fit titans and finds their ability to bring 0.0 combat to a halt perfectly balanced ;p "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2887
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:14:00 -
[1713] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Better to restart the server, would that be fair enough for you.
Risk / Reward anyone ever heard this concept, thought it was what this game was suppose to be based on.
Yes you risk all of your titans when you drop them en masse ahahah "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:14:00 -
[1714] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Griznatch wrote:The Economist wrote:What an amazing pile of steaming **** based on lies, misconceptions and endless exagerration. The situation presented as being responded to simply doesn't represent reality, but rather the deluded and deliberately misleading view of a vocal minority and those who don't know any better.
You, however, should know better CCP.
I can only hope this is laying the groundwork for an epic early April fools joke as opposed to being a concerted effort to bore all titan pilots into never logging in again (except for those wierdos who genuinely enjoy doing nothing but bridging).
Wow, just wow. If not a single titan pilot ever logs into this game again, the quality of this game will improve by several orders of magnitude. Better to restart the server, would that be fair enough for you. Risk / Reward anyone ever heard this concept, thought it was what this game was suppose to be based on.
It's a shame that everytime your group deploys their Iwin button, they take absoutely no risk. Being in a massive blob of invincible ships.
|

Doctor Eezee
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
72
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:14:00 -
[1715] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote:[quote=Dabigredboat][quote=The Mittani] This supposed change will do little to the nullsec battlefield. It will do little to skilled players with Titans who understand game mechanics. It will do nothing to Titan proliferation (743 as of this morning's capital tweet). The smart thing to do is to actually fix them, give them a place or pull them from the game, refund Titan-related skill points and the ship's mineral value in ISK to the pilots.
This man should be on the CSM! "My rule is: If you meet the weakest vessel, attack; if it is a vessel equal to yours, attack; and if it is stronger than yours, also attack..." - Admiral Stepan O. Makarov |

Tector
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:15:00 -
[1716] - Quote
The Economist wrote:What an amazing pile of steaming **** based on lies, misconceptions and endless exagerration. The situation presented as being responded to simply doesn't represent reality, but rather the deluded and deliberately misleading view of a vocal minority and those who don't know any better.
You, however, should know better CCP.
I can only hope this is laying the groundwork for an epic early April fools joke as opposed to being a concerted effort to bore all titan pilots into never logging in again (except for those wierdos who genuinely enjoy doing nothing but bridging).
Wow, just wow.
Yes clearly titan pilots outnumber the people in subcaps they blast with impunity. |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5948
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:15:00 -
[1717] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote:The smart thing to do is to actually fix them, give them a place or pull them from the game, refund Titan-related skill points and the ship's mineral value in ISK to the pilots.
I think 'remove all supercaps from Eve, refund bpos and isk cost' is something all of us can get behind. I'm glad you see it my way. The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Thora82
Kriegsmarinewerft Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:16:00 -
[1718] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy. The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened. They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement. Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
what he said
|

Griznatch
Xicron Syndicate Tus Network
72
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:16:00 -
[1719] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Griznatch wrote:The Economist wrote:What an amazing pile of steaming **** based on lies, misconceptions and endless exagerration. The situation presented as being responded to simply doesn't represent reality, but rather the deluded and deliberately misleading view of a vocal minority and those who don't know any better.
You, however, should know better CCP.
I can only hope this is laying the groundwork for an epic early April fools joke as opposed to being a concerted effort to bore all titan pilots into never logging in again (except for those wierdos who genuinely enjoy doing nothing but bridging).
Wow, just wow. If not a single titan pilot ever logs into this game again, the quality of this game will improve by several orders of magnitude. Better to restart the server, would that be fair enough for you. Risk / Reward anyone ever heard this concept, thought it was what this game was suppose to be based on.
Did someone from raiden(dot) really just pull the risk/reward card? Tell me more about the risk involved in dropping 50 titans on a battlecruiser fleet. I used to have a clever sig but I lost it. |

Ser Berus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:16:00 -
[1720] - Quote
The Economist wrote:What an amazing pile of steaming **** based on lies, misconceptions and endless exagerration. The situation presented as being responded to simply doesn't represent reality, but rather the deluded and deliberately misleading view of a vocal minority and those who don't know any better.
You, however, should know better CCP.
I can only hope this is laying the groundwork for an epic early April fools joke as opposed to being a concerted effort to bore all titan pilots into never logging in again (except for those wierdos who genuinely enjoy doing nothing but bridging).
Wow, just wow.
It's consistently hilarious to me how people who devoted their time and energy to a ship whose main use is strategic, get all butthurt when the grotesquely overpowered tactical mechanics get nerfed. It's almost as though the majority of titan pilots in the game have absolutely no idea what value titans bring to the table, and believe that all of eve's game mechanics should boil down to "HURRR BIG SHIP ME MAKE LITTLE SHIP GO BOOM AHAHAHAHA".
Here's a hint: the things which make a titan useful, haven't been nerfed and aren't going to be. The actual "endgame" in eve does not involve parking your fat ass into a single, expensive ship. Hope this helps! |

mackluver
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:18:00 -
[1721] - Quote
Epic win by CCP, end the Supercap blob!
If all these sad titan pilots cancel their accounts, i hope they at least suicide it into a blob of Drakes first. Maybe then we would get an accurate count on how many are tripple sensor boosted as we watch killmails scroll. |

Bashe Zor
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:18:00 -
[1722] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:
Risk / Reward anyone ever heard this concept, thought it was what this game was suppose to be based on.
And what risk do these titan pilots take exactly? They're nigh-invincible when fielded in flocks. |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
54
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:20:00 -
[1723] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Who dares oppose the truth in my post? None so far.
Look upon my words, ye badposters, and despair!
I will take exception.
I think CRYING about it in shocked indignation after the fact is the issue.
In holding with your analogy, I would drink myself into a blind, vomiting rage, I just wouldn't complain when I wasn't invited the next time a cousin of mine got married. |

Dmitry Sychev
Raging Ducks Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:21:00 -
[1724] - Quote
asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes
60k players? How many titans in Game? - Titan's pilots will leave game, no changes to online.
|

Mathicluanna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:22:00 -
[1725] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote: In holding with your analogy, I would drink myself into a blind, vomiting rage, I just wouldn't complain when I wasn't invited the next time a cousin of mine got married.
So you're saying CCP should ban all the current titan pilots? |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:24:00 -
[1726] - Quote
Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Better to restart the server, would that be fair enough for you.
Risk / Reward anyone ever heard this concept, thought it was what this game was suppose to be based on.
Yes you risk all of your titans when you drop them en masse ahahah
Every time we drop them we risk -Counter drop (trap) -One bumped titan (thanks for that one CCP) -Disconnect
And yes we risk all of them, it only takes one very bad day and we lose them all in one go ask RA.
You might not think this, but there are times that we don't use them because the risks involved.
|

whaynethepain
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:24:00 -
[1727] - Quote
As the Titan numbers mount up, they may have to be brought down a notch or two to balance.
I think the real issue is, we are missing an Alliance HQ structure, with jump-drive and activatable Re-inforce.
Titans do have there role, they jump my fleet ship into the battle. They Project force well, some of them look the part too, they could use some adjustments to the ship lighting effects, and the jump effect doesn't seem to stretch far enough into the distance.
Could every Alliance have a single, moveable super-structure, A standard of power and notoriety, A rally point held with pride.
Didn't wan't a Titan anyway, there is nowhere to park them. Getting you on your feet.
So you've further to fall. |

Razzor Death
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
166
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:24:00 -
[1728] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:
Better to restart the server, would that be fair enough for you.
Risk / Reward anyone ever heard this concept, thought it was what this game was suppose to be based on.
hahahahaha well don't worry little fella your no risk toys are getting there balls removed so turn that thrown upside down. |

Crias Taylor
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
110
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:24:00 -
[1729] - Quote
The Economist wrote:What an amazing pile of steaming **** based on lies, misconceptions and endless exagerration. -áThe situation presented as being responded to simply doesn't represent reality, but rather the deluded and deliberately misleading view of a vocal minority and those who don't know any better. -á
You, however, should know better CCP.
I can only hope this is laying the groundwork for an epic early April fools joke as opposed to being a concerted effort to bore all titan pilots into never logging in again (except for those wierdos who genuinely enjoy doing nothing but bridging).
Wow, just wow.
I don't think you know what minority actually means.-á |

Nao Oikawasan
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:25:00 -
[1730] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote:Dabigredboat wrote:The Mittani wrote:
I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy.
The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened.
They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement.
Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
I am Dabigredboat and I fly a leviathan. I agree with the mittani :3: I am a nobody that doesn't fly a Titan, on any of my accounts. What's sad to me is how when Mittens posts about his Errorbus and Titan fleet, and all the goon sheep repost with no content, they generate a good amount of noise in a thread already full of it. The proposed changes aren't going to have the desired effects. It's that simple. People who know a decent amount about game mechanics have said so, but CCP will again ignore them (hello Technetium buff... hello SuperCarrier buff...) thinking they know what they are doing, and throw the requisite "we will evaluate and iterate" line to quiet down those who are easily silenced. This supposed change will do little to the nullsec battlefield. It will do little to skilled players with Titans who understand game mechanics. It will do nothing to Titan proliferation (743 as of this morning's capital tweet). The smart thing to do is to actually fix them, give them a place or pull them from the game, refund Titan-related skill points and the ship's mineral value in ISK to the pilots.
Why, in god's name, do you people believe that anyone deserves skillpoints and ISK because the faulty game mechanic, that you've been abusing for so long, has been fixed? You've had a good old time wrecking dramiels and rifters. We've all laughed on comms about these killmails and how absolutely ridiculous they are! You've plopped your fat asses into the systems with 2000 actual pilots duking it out and whored untold numbers of killmails without a single worry as to being killed. I think you've been given enough. No need for refunds. |

Carl Hinken
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:26:00 -
[1731] - Quote
So wait....
You've made it impossible for dreads to hit a slightly moving carrier out of siege (they couldn't in siege already), you've made it impossible for a titan not fitting the apparently pre-requisite 3+ Cormack SBs to hit the same thing (despite supposedly being anti-cap, and you're calling it good.
**** you. |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:27:00 -
[1732] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:
Every time we drop them we risk -Counter drop (trap) -One bumped titan (thanks for that one CCP) -Disconnect
And yes we risk all of them, it only takes one very bad day and we lose them all in one go ask RA.
You might not think this, but there are times that we don't use them because the risks involved.
[Tell] me more about dropping a blob of titans with supercarrier support onto a fleet of battlecruisers. Something about risk/reward I believe you were saying.
|

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5954
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:28:00 -
[1733] - Quote
Carl Hinken wrote: You've made it impossible for dreads to hit a slightly moving carrier out of siege (they couldn't in siege already), you've made it impossible for a titan not fitting the apparently pre-requisite 3+ Cormack SBs to hit the same thing (despite supposedly being anti-cap, and you're calling it good.
Apparently, ladies and gentlemen of eve-o, NPC altposters think that sensor boosters have something to do with tracking.
Why don't you all give up and admit your own culpability in this. Not only is this nerf your fault, but it is what you deserve. The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Tector
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:29:00 -
[1734] - Quote
Crias Taylor wrote:The Economist wrote:What an amazing pile of steaming **** based on lies, misconceptions and endless exagerration. -áThe situation presented as being responded to simply doesn't represent reality, but rather the deluded and deliberately misleading view of a vocal minority and those who don't know any better. -á
You, however, should know better CCP.
I can only hope this is laying the groundwork for an epic early April fools joke as opposed to being a concerted effort to bore all titan pilots into never logging in again (except for those wierdos who genuinely enjoy doing nothing but bridging).
Wow, just wow. I don't think you know what minority actually means.-á
Imagine that, an Economist that can't count! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5534
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:30:00 -
[1735] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Risk / Reward anyone ever heard this concept, thought it was what this game was suppose to be based on. It is. That's why the titans are getting adjusted (not just now with the change presented in this thread, but further in the near future as well): because the risk is minimal and the reward is quite large. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
446
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:32:00 -
[1736] - Quote
Why bother. Vote with your vallets. |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
502
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:34:00 -
[1737] - Quote
Tippia wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Risk / Reward anyone ever heard this concept, thought it was what this game was suppose to be based on. It is. That's why the titans are getting adjusted (not just now with the change presented in this thread, but further in the near future as well): because the risk is minimal and the reward is quite large. I'd love to see some new stats from mister Turbefield showing:
The average ratio of Drakes that die, compared to the number that are built in one month. The average ratio of Maelstroms that die, compared to the number that are built in one month. The average ratio of Dreads/Carriers that die, compared to the number that are built in one month. The average ratio of Titans that die, compared to the number that are built in one month. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2890
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:34:00 -
[1738] - Quote
I agree. If you disagree with this nerf, unsub now!
and don't come back "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Kismeteer
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
133
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:36:00 -
[1739] - Quote
The critical change here is simple: Titans cannot kill normal interdictors as easily. These interdictors now have plenty of time to warp in, burn, drop bubble, burn out, and cloak/warp. Before, they would get targeted on the burn in, and die on the burn out if they did manage to bubble.
There is a simple solution to this, a support fleet. Field a support fleet to deal with the dictors, your titans deal with the hictors still, and everything is fine. But to have 30 dudes in titans to do everything under the sun just by themselves is a game without balance. Tier 3's can easily deal with dictors (assuming they don't get hit by a bomb or two), or sniper hacs if you're bad at being aligned. |

Juul Kamikazaa
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:39:00 -
[1740] - Quote
I'm a complete failure IRL, with insufferably low physical strength and endurance to boot. I play EVE to feel good about myself, and in order to do that I NEED to sit in a hulking ship and blast countless smaller ships with impunity! WHY U NERF MY CONFIDENCE CCP?! A-bloo-bloo-bloo-bloo |

Ser Berus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:39:00 -
[1741] - Quote
Kismeteer wrote:The critical change here is simple: Titans cannot kill normal interdictors as easily. These interdictors now have plenty of time to warp in, burn, drop bubble, burn out, and cloak/warp. Before, they would get targeted on the burn in, and die on the burn out if they did manage to bubble.
There is a simple solution to this, a support fleet. Field a support fleet to deal with the dictors, your titans deal with the hictors still, and everything is fine. But to have 30 dudes in titans to do everything under the sun just by themselves is a game without balance. Tier 3's can easily deal with dictors (assuming they don't get hit by a bomb or two), or sniper hacs if you're bad at being aligned.
No no you don't understand, if I spend all this isk on a titan it magically turns eve into a single player game
~~endgame~~ |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5963
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:39:00 -
[1742] - Quote
The sort of person who gorges themselves on imbalance, congratulates themselves for it, and then blames everyone around them for their own misbehavior isn't someone I will miss when they ragequit in a tantrum.
Toodles.
And remember - this is your own fault. The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Scooter McCabe
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:39:00 -
[1743] - Quote
Sir Paul McCartney said it best:
Quote:When you were young and your heart was an open skillbook You used to say Titans For The Win (You know you did, you know you, you know did) But in this ever changing game we live in, Makes you log in your Titan and cry
Time To Unsub and Don't Fly (Unsub and Don't Fly) Unsub and Don't Fly (Unsub and Don't Fly)
What does it matter to ya When you got sub caps that will do You gotta fly'em well Fighting fair is hell
Time To Unsub and Don't Fly (Unsub and Don't Fly) Unsub and Don't Fly (Unsub and Don't Fly)
You used to say Titans For The Win (You know you did, you know you, you know did) But in this ever changing game we live, Makes you log in your Titan and cry
You have only yourselves to blame. Squeaky wheels get the grease, and you did a lot of squeaking by showing a Titan could kill a destroyer without support. Howitzers are not meant for killing butterflies and had you not done it so often CCP would not be forced to ask the question "Just how broken are Titans?" Really isn't dropping 24 titans to clear a field full of sup cabs just intellectually lazy? I thought elite PVP meant you understood how to vary up fleet roles to counter a multiple threat encounter? Lets be honest elite PVP means RMTing for an endgame toy that was never meant to be an automatic trump card to any fleet engagement. It could have been, but again you were way to obvious with it and CCP had to fix such a broken game mechanic. Thanks for your beta Titan testing efforts! |

Isonda
The Candiru None Of The Above
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:39:00 -
[1744] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy. The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened. They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement. Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
|

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:40:00 -
[1745] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:FeLiZk wrote:
Every time we drop them we risk -Counter drop (trap) -One bumped titan (thanks for that one CCP) -Disconnect
And yes we risk all of them, it only takes one very bad day and we lose them all in one go ask RA.
You might not think this, but there are times that we don't use them because the risks involved.
[Tell] me more about dropping a blob of titans with supercarrier support onto a fleet of battlecruisers. Something about risk/reward I believe you were saying.
So we risk 20 titan, just by fielding them. The drakes are not the issue here we escalated the fight, your move. Just so far you are not taking that move NC did and we lost titan's I think as many as they did.
So you would have only one way to escalate a fight, and that is more people in drakes? |

Griznatch
Xicron Syndicate Tus Network
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:40:00 -
[1746] - Quote
CynoNet Two wrote:Tippia wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Risk / Reward anyone ever heard this concept, thought it was what this game was suppose to be based on. It is. That's why the titans are getting adjusted (not just now with the change presented in this thread, but further in the near future as well): because the risk is minimal and the reward is quite large. I'd love to see some new stats from mister Turbefield showing: The average ratio of Drakes that die, compared to the number that are built in one month. The average ratio of Maelstroms that die, compared to the number that are built in one month. The average ratio of Dreads/Carriers that die, compared to the number that are built in one month. The average ratio of Titans that die, compared to the number that are built in one month.
I will literally fellate anyone who can accurately quantify this. I used to have a clever sig but I lost it. |

Implying Implications
Broski Enterprises
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:40:00 -
[1747] - Quote
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2893
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:41:00 -
[1748] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:So we risk 20 titan, just by fielding them.
Your post fell apart here. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:42:00 -
[1749] - Quote
Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:So we risk 20 titan, just by fielding them. Your post fell apart here.
Tell me why, say it was PL we where against, they use their caps. Would we risk them then ?
|

Gossamer DT
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:42:00 -
[1750] - Quote
Andski wrote:I agree. If you disagree with this nerf, unsub now! and don't come back
can I haz your titan when you unsub? |

Ser Berus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:43:00 -
[1751] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:FeLiZk wrote:
Every time we drop them we risk -Counter drop (trap) -One bumped titan (thanks for that one CCP) -Disconnect
And yes we risk all of them, it only takes one very bad day and we lose them all in one go ask RA.
You might not think this, but there are times that we don't use them because the risks involved.
[Tell] me more about dropping a blob of titans with supercarrier support onto a fleet of battlecruisers. Something about risk/reward I believe you were saying. So we risk 20 titan, just by fielding them. The drakes are not the issue here we escalated the fight, your move. Just so far you are not taking that move NC did and we lost titan's I think as many as they did. So you would have only one way to escalate a fight, and that is more people in drakes?
a bloo bloo bloo we actually have to field a balanced fleet
|

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
502
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:43:00 -
[1752] - Quote
The Economist wrote: (except for those wierdos who genuinely enjoy doing nothing but bridging).
Wow, just wow. Our weirdos like doing this because it's power projection. They're moving hundreds of pilots over short distance to beat our enemies down. Well worth the investment.
Vote for The Mittani http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=438 |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
446
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:43:00 -
[1753] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:The sort of person who gorges themselves on imbalance, congratulates themselves for it, and then blames everyone around them for their own misbehavior isn't someone I will miss when they ragequit in a tantrum. Toodles. And remember - this is your own fault.
For your information. I have posted repeatedly on this forums that the titan blob needs a fix. What I dont like is HOW it is fixed. So why dont you shut the f*ck up you useless piece of sh*t. I'm sure Stoffer are eagerly awaiting the blowjob you promised him. You dont want to disappoint. Have a good fanfest. |

Quest Liem
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:44:00 -
[1754] - Quote
I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. |

Griznatch
Xicron Syndicate Tus Network
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:44:00 -
[1755] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:So we risk 20 titan, just by fielding them. Your post fell apart here. Tell me why, say it was PL we where against, they use their caps. Would we risk them then ?
So what youre saying is the only real risk to your big ass wad-o-titans is an equally ******** big ass wad-o-titans? I used to have a clever sig but I lost it. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2893
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:45:00 -
[1756] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:For your information. I have posted repeatedly on this forums that the titan blob needs a fix. What I dont like is HOW it is fixed. So why dont you shut the f*ck up you useless piece of sh*t. I'm sure Stoffer are eagerly awaiting the blowjob you promised him. You dont want to disappoint. Have a good fanfest.
fyi this guy thinks i'm getting inside information from CCP because I interpreted this post as an incoming titan tracking nerf. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
502
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:45:00 -
[1757] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:The Mittani wrote:The sort of person who gorges themselves on imbalance, congratulates themselves for it, and then blames everyone around them for their own misbehavior isn't someone I will miss when they ragequit in a tantrum. Toodles. And remember - this is your own fault. For your information. I have posted repeatedly on this forums that the titan blob needs a fix. What I dont like is HOW it is fixed. So why dont you shut the f*ck up you useless piece of sh*t. I'm sure Stoffer are eagerly awaiting the blowjob you promised him. You dont want to disappoint. Have a good fanfest. Not empty quoting. Vote for The Mittani http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=438 |

Mioelnir
Cataclysm Enterprises Ev0ke
56
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:45:00 -
[1758] - Quote
I'd like CCP to be consequent about the changes they are currently making. Vulnerability from below, immunity from above. An intriguing enough concept, and such a clearly defined balancing directive should not be limited to the few supercapital pilots, but should be enjoyable by everyone.
Want to field battleships? Bring battlecruiser, cruiser, destroyer and frigate support. Want to fly vanguard incursion against cruisers/frigates with a battleship fleet loaded to the brim with tracking mods, webs and painters? Too bad for you, bring cruisers/frigates yourself.
Guess for a first start we would need turret/launcher hardpoints with size information to deny the ability to use undersized guns. Then we need a "minimum bandwith per drone" stat to deny launching undersized drones. And EW modules with size attributes as well, that only work on their own class and larger. This would be a REALLY interesting New Eden to fly around in, full of diverse fleet compositions that require actual teamwork. |

Scooter McCabe
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:46:00 -
[1759] - Quote
Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance.
So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5537
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:46:00 -
[1760] - Quote
Griznatch wrote:CynoNet Two wrote:I'd love to see some new stats from mister Turbefield showing:
The average ratio of Drakes that die, compared to the number that are built in one month. The average ratio of Maelstroms that die, compared to the number that are built in one month. The average ratio of Dreads/Carriers that die, compared to the number that are built in one month. The average ratio of Titans that die, compared to the number that are built in one month. I will literally fellate anyone who can accurately quantify this. You know, I was going to ask him tomorrow, but now I think I won't botherGǪ GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:46:00 -
[1761] - Quote
Ser Berus wrote:
a bloo bloo bloo we actually have to field a balanced fleet
LOL
Balanced is lots of one ship type, drakes or maelstroms ? |

Chia Mulholland
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:47:00 -
[1762] - Quote
Maybe dropping titans on a CCP fleet back in november wasen't such a bright idea after all |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2688
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:50:00 -
[1763] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Ser Berus wrote:
a bloo bloo bloo we actually have to field a balanced fleet
LOL Balanced is lots of one ship type, drakes or maelstroms ?
if i were raiden. i would probably not be making it so abundantly clear that nobody in raiden knows the first thing about a subcap
it might imply they were a worthless shell of an alliance propped up only through exploiting titans, you see |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2897
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:50:00 -
[1764] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Ser Berus wrote:
a bloo bloo bloo we actually have to field a balanced fleet
LOL Balanced is lots of one ship type, drakes or maelstroms ?
a fleet of maelstroms (or drakes), scimitars, huginns, lachesis, dictors, hictors, and interceptors is just one big blob of maelstroms "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Gossamer DT
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:50:00 -
[1765] - Quote
Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance.
what? even sided fights? is your sandbox full of catnip by chance? |

Ser Berus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:51:00 -
[1766] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:The Mittani wrote:The sort of person who gorges themselves on imbalance, congratulates themselves for it, and then blames everyone around them for their own misbehavior isn't someone I will miss when they ragequit in a tantrum. Toodles. And remember - this is your own fault. For your information. I have posted repeatedly on this forums that the titan blob needs a fix. What I dont like is HOW it is fixed. So why dont you shut the f*ck up you useless piece of sh*t. I'm sure Stoffer are eagerly awaiting the blowjob you promised him. You dont want to disappoint. Have a good fanfest.
Hey, here's a thought: maybe if you didn't use your titans like they were f***ing battlecruisers in every fight, CCP might have been a bit more receptive to your concerns over the need for an iterative approach. You abuse broken game mechanics, broken game mechanics get nerfed, you bloo about it, mittens is smug. Thus it ever was.
For christ's sake, people use titans for ratting. And you seriously believe they didn't need a drastic nerf, and damn fast? |

Quest Liem
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:53:00 -
[1767] - Quote
Scooter McCabe wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality.
How is that penalizing any alliance? We are making the game more enjoyable for both. You enjoy the game by out numbering your opponent? Is not that not an I win button? I am bring issues that would make the game more fair to everyone who pays to play the game. A 30 on 30 fight is a lot more enjoyable then something like 300 on 50. Do you not agree? |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:54:00 -
[1768] - Quote
Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Ser Berus wrote:
a bloo bloo bloo we actually have to field a balanced fleet
LOL Balanced is lots of one ship type, drakes or maelstroms ? a fleet of maelstroms (or drakes), scimitars, huginns, lachesis, dictors, hictors, and interceptors is just one big blob of maelstroms
So we are keeping you on the field with our warp scramblers fitted to every titan. Jesus we have a more mixed fleet then you, we have all you do and titans -> just in less numbers ill give you that. |

Ser Berus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:55:00 -
[1769] - Quote
Quest Liem wrote:Scooter McCabe wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality. How is that penalizing any alliance? We are making the game more enjoyable for both. You enjoy the game by out numbering your opponent? Is not that not an I win button? I am bring issues that would make the game more fair to everyone who pays to play the game. A 30 on 30 fight is a lot more enjoyable then something like 300 on 50. Do you not agree?
Yes, because you see I signed up to play WOW and furthermore, |

Quest Liem
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:55:00 -
[1770] - Quote
Gossamer DT wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. what? even sided fights? is your sandbox full of catnip by chance?
Image that? even sided fights who in the world would enjoy that? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2900
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:56:00 -
[1771] - Quote
nerf blocs that can form full fleets at the drop of a hat because they're dishonourable and keep their members engaged in the game "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Quest Liem
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:57:00 -
[1772] - Quote
Ser Berus wrote:Quest Liem wrote:Scooter McCabe wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality. How is that penalizing any alliance? We are making the game more enjoyable for both. You enjoy the game by out numbering your opponent? Is not that not an I win button? I am bring issues that would make the game more fair to everyone who pays to play the game. A 30 on 30 fight is a lot more enjoyable then something like 300 on 50. Do you not agree? Yes, because you see I signed up to play WOW and furthermore,
Yes a very intelligent reply, we are here trying to fix this game and make in more enjoyable and yet you reply with this, that has nothing to do with EVE. Next time please don't hit the reply button unless you have something to say |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:57:00 -
[1773] - Quote
On a side note I think it is so funny Goons are complaining about being blobbed, what is not funny is CCP is listening.
Change Titans by all means but don't do it for them. And don't rush it for them. |

Gossamer DT
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:58:00 -
[1774] - Quote
Quest Liem wrote:Scooter McCabe wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality. How is that penalizing any alliance? We are making the game more enjoyable for both. You enjoy the game by out numbering your opponent? Is not that not an I win button? I am bring issues that would make the game more fair to everyone who pays to play the game. A 30 on 30 fight is a lot more enjoyable then something like 300 on 50. Do you not agree?
I think you are looking for hi sec and war dec's we are tearing about titans in this thread, can you go find a lets be even sided fights thread some where else? TIA |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2900
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:58:00 -
[1775] - Quote
this is a callout for the mittani
how dare you run a coalition that provides game content for thousands of real players! "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:59:00 -
[1776] - Quote
It is refreshing to see at least one titan blobber willing to come in and admit that they saw a pretty good subcap fight in progress and thought "Man we should just drop supers all over that". You know, risk/reward or whatever. |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5974
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:01:00 -
[1777] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:On a side note I think it is so funny Goons are complaining about being blobbed, what is not funny is CCP is listening.
Change Titans by all means but don't do it for them. And don't rush it for them.
You yourself are to blame; you and your fellows refuse to accept responsibility for your own misbehavior. Typical. The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Quest Liem
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:01:00 -
[1778] - Quote
Gossamer DT wrote:Quest Liem wrote:Scooter McCabe wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality. How is that penalizing any alliance? We are making the game more enjoyable for both. You enjoy the game by out numbering your opponent? Is not that not an I win button? I am bring issues that would make the game more fair to everyone who pays to play the game. A 30 on 30 fight is a lot more enjoyable then something like 300 on 50. Do you not agree? I think you are looking for hi sec and war dec's we are tearing about titans in this thread, can you go find a lets be even sided fights thread some where else? TIA
Oh im sorry, the other 80 plus pages of worth while post were all about titans. But thank you for proving my point, in your lack of a decent reply. it seems that other people can blob titans and its not fair but its ok if we blob sub capitals in EVE. Nice one side argument |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:04:00 -
[1779] - Quote
Considering most of the people posting in this thread about "blobbing" and those "1600 goons they are going to use to take over everything" and our "Fleets of nothing but maelstroms/drakes" I'm inclined to believe most of you don't have a clue what you're talking about. Especially when it comes to blobbing. Considering the Pl/Raiden group have consistently matched our numbers during big fights. They just like to drop supers onto those fights when they're losing, so they win. That's why we call them "IWin"buttons. Because you hit the cyno, YOU WIN. |

Gossamer DT
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:05:00 -
[1780] - Quote
Quest Liem wrote:Gossamer DT wrote:Quest Liem wrote:Scooter McCabe wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality. How is that penalizing any alliance? We are making the game more enjoyable for both. You enjoy the game by out numbering your opponent? Is not that not an I win button? I am bring issues that would make the game more fair to everyone who pays to play the game. A 30 on 30 fight is a lot more enjoyable then something like 300 on 50. Do you not agree? I think you are looking for hi sec and war dec's we are tearing about titans in this thread, can you go find a lets be even sided fights thread some where else? TIA Oh im sorry, the other 80 plus pages of worth while post were all about titans. But thank you for proving my point, in your lack of a decent reply. it seems that other people can blob titans and its not fair but its ok if we blob sub capitals in EVE. Nice one side argument
Who is your main, and what does he do? |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:05:00 -
[1781] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:It is refreshing to see at least one titan blobber willing to come in and admit that they saw a pretty good subcap fight in progress and thought "Man we should just drop supers all over that". You know, risk/reward or whatever.
If there is a tactical structure we are in defending or attacking, and it looks like there is a chance we will lose it off cause we have. Just like you bring another full fleet.
I don't recall off hand a time where we have not been outnumbered, where we have brought Titans to a straight up fight. |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:07:00 -
[1782] - Quote
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11666499
Just gonna... leave this here. |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
161
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:07:00 -
[1783] - Quote
The talk of logistical hassle in this thread is interesting, as it only presents half of the story. This is what we're comparing:
-The difficulty of acquiring super caps, either by building them or buying them, for 25-100 pilots, with the rare loss replacement.
-The difficulty of having a spread of cynos for these super caps to move 5-10 jumps to reach a given fight
-The difficulty of getting 25-100 pilots to log in to form a proper super cap fleett.
Now, for the other side of the coin, you have:
-The difficulty of acquiring hulls for upwards of 200 battleships, or 1000+ battlecruisers, repeatedly, easily once per month
-The difficulty in maintaining a large jump bridge network so that fleets can burn 20 jumps to a battle, or working out routes so fleets can go 30+ jumps to battle without stragglers and reinforcements getting picked off:
-The difficulty of being able to to coordinate, rally, and provide content for 250 - 1500 pilots
So, when it's discussed that acquiring and fielding super capitals involves a lot of logistical effort, it's intellectually dishonest to suggest by omission that fielding a large sub capital fleet able to potentially deter such a fleet is any less difficult. |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:08:00 -
[1784] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:It is refreshing to see at least one titan blobber willing to come in and admit that they saw a pretty good subcap fight in progress and thought "Man we should just drop supers all over that". You know, risk/reward or whatever. If there is a tactical structure we are in defending or attacking, and it looks like there is a chance we will lose it off cause we have. Just like you bring another full fleet. I don't recall off hand a time where we have not been outnumbered, where we have brought Titans to a straight up fight.
So what you're saying is, if there's a chance you'll lose a strategic objective, you drop titans. So you win. Sort of like an "Iwin" button you might say. Huh.
|

Daiony
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:09:00 -
[1785] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:FeLiZk wrote:On a side note I think it is so funny Goons are complaining about being blobbed, what is not funny is CCP is listening.
Change Titans by all means but don't do it for them. And don't rush it for them. You yourself are to blame; you and your fellows refuse to accept responsibility for your own misbehavior. Typical.
So you are saying that using titans against subcaps was an exploit then? Otherwise your post makes no sense. Everything that was done was well within the rules CCP implemented. You chose not to use your supercapitals in a scenario where they would be at risk. Thats your choice. It doesn't mean that it was the only right thing to do. Why didn't you use all the tools available to you? Instead you chose not to use them and vote for a nerf so the other evil guys can't use them against you.
People do want titans to be changed, but not like this. This is a half assed ****** patchjob that looks rushed and tailored towards goons playstyle. That is the problem people have with it. Why rush a "surgical fix" (lol) like this out now? It's not like it couldn't wait till CCP thought out a proper solution to the WHOLE problem that are supercaps and sov warfare.
To me it looks like CCP is panicking here for no apparent reason.
CCP should take their time and act like professionals. Do a fix, but do it right, and not some piece of **** rushjob. |

Ke'Daar
Mindstar Technology Executive Outcomes
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:10:00 -
[1786] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:
They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement.
Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
I woul like to add to what The Mittani has said:
The ability to project overwhelming force with Titans in their current state, has the ugly ability to breed Arrogance, and when you look at the definition of that word...
arrogant - having or showing feelings of unwarranted importance out of overbearing pride.
adjective conceited, lordly, assuming, proud, swaggering, pompous, pretentious, stuck up (informal), cocky, contemptuous, blustering, imperious, overbearing, haughty, scornful, puffed up, egotistical, disdainful, self-important, presumptuous, high-handed, insolent, supercilious, high and mighty (informal), overweening, immodest, swollen-headed, bigheaded.
Thus because of these whining Titan owners own Arrogance, they are now faced with this nerf |

Hungry Ghost
War Tactical Groups SOLAR FLEET
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:10:00 -
[1787] - Quote
CCP before going forward with that decision - did you actually consider that atm there is 2 major conflicts going on in 0.0. First one is CFC Vs Raiden&Co, second is southern alliances Vs Legion of Death&friends. In both cases one side heavily relied on titans, while the other used them rarely, if at all. As far as i can tell both conflicts currently going in favor of the side, that do not use titans, but can field more ppl. You are proposing balance change that will further shift balance of power in favor of the winning side. Did you notice, what majority of people praising you for this change got goonswarm or aligned ticker? Must look really strange to someone without interest in 0.0 politics
What even worse, imho, is you really saying something like that: "There is a problem with some ship class. But we dont want to actually deal with it, so we will just make this ship less and less useful, until ppl stop actually fielding it". I dont know, does this sound like a commitment to "spaceships as a focus of EVE" to you?. If the problem is really that pressing - find the resources to address it.
It would be really interesintg to hear CSM representatives opinions on proposed changes.
|

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:11:00 -
[1788] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:FeLiZk wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:It is refreshing to see at least one titan blobber willing to come in and admit that they saw a pretty good subcap fight in progress and thought "Man we should just drop supers all over that". You know, risk/reward or whatever. If there is a tactical structure we are in defending or attacking, and it looks like there is a chance we will lose it off cause we have. Just like you bring another full fleet. I don't recall off hand a time where we have not been outnumbered, where we have brought Titans to a straight up fight. So what you're saying is, if there's a chance you'll lose a strategic objective, you drop titans. So you win. Sort of like an "Iwin" button you might say. Huh.
No more then 250 fleet on top would be.
And no one is preventing you from doing the same, as mittanie stated you have one of the biggest ones. |

Blawrf McTaggart
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
624
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:11:00 -
[1789] - Quote
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11666499
GUYS WHY IS THIS HAPPENING OH DEAR ME YOU ARE RUINING EVE THERE IS NO JUSTIFIABLE REASON WHY TITANS SHOULD BE NERFED THEY ARE FINE HAVEN'T YOU HEARD OF RISK VS REWARD I WANT TO GO TO FANFEST TO SHOOT THE MITTANI AND PUKE ON HIM AND THIS IS GOONS ONLINE NOW CCP DO YOU WANT 7K GOON PLAYERS OR 60K NORMAL PLAYERS CCP HOW MANY BLOWJOBS DID THE MITTANI GIVE YOU FOR THIS TITAN NERF CCP WE WANT A LIST OF ALL CONTACTS MADE BY THE MITTANI AND VILE RAT BETWEEN CCP MEMBERS WE KNOW THAT THE MITTANI IS VERY GENEROUS COME CHRISTMAS TIME AND YOU KNOW WHAT CCP YOU ARE JUST COMPLETELY RUINING THIS GAME YOU ARE RUINING THE ENDGAME BECAUSE WE WORKED REALLY REALLY REALLY HARD FOR OUR TITANS AND NOW YOU ARE JUST RUINING THEM WHY ARE YOU DOING THIS CCP I REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND CAN YOU STOP MAKING THIS GOONS ONLINE AND PLEASE LISTEN TO YOUR PLAYERBASE BECAUSE YOU ARE MAKING A BIG MISTAKE FIRE STOFFER AND SREEGS BECAUSE THEY ARE GOON UNDERCOVER AGENTS AND THEY ARE TRYING THEIR HARDEST TO SUBVERT YOUR COMPANY AND YOUR GAME AND THEY RECEIVE REGULAR ORAL SEX FROM GOON CSM MEMBERS AND WE JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY YOU ARE DOING THIS I MEAN WHY ARE YOU PENALIZING OUR ALLIANCE FOR WORKING HARD ON OUR MILITARY MIGHT YOU HAVE TO STOP THE MITTANI FROM RUNNING FROM CSM HE IS A BLIGHT ON THIS GAME AND IS JUST REALLY BAD AND IS TURNING THIS INTO GOONS ONLINE PLEASE STOP DOING THIS CCP YOU SHOULDN'T CHANGE TITANS LIKE THIS THEY ARE FINE AS THEY ARE AND IF YOU REALLY WANT TO CHANGE TITANS MAYBE YOU SHOULD REALLY TAKE A LOOK AT THEM FIRST RATHER THAN JUST CONFINING THEM TO POSES IN SPACE BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT YOU ARE DOING CCP DO YOU REALLY WANT TO SEE A UNIVERSE RULED BY THE DESPOTIC FIST OF THE MITTANI JUST BECAUSE I MEAN IS IT WORTH LOSING 600,000 PLAYERS BECAUSE YOU ARE PANDERING TO GOONS AND THE MITTANI AND I HOPE RABBLERABBLERABBLERABBLERABBLERABBLERABBLERABBLERABBLERABBLERABBLERABBLERABBLERABBLE |

Gossamer DT
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:11:00 -
[1790] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:FeLiZk wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:It is refreshing to see at least one titan blobber willing to come in and admit that they saw a pretty good subcap fight in progress and thought "Man we should just drop supers all over that". You know, risk/reward or whatever. If there is a tactical structure we are in defending or attacking, and it looks like there is a chance we will lose it off cause we have. Just like you bring another full fleet. I don't recall off hand a time where we have not been outnumbered, where we have brought Titans to a straight up fight. So what you're saying is, if there's a chance you'll lose a strategic objective, you drop titans. So you win. Sort of like an "Iwin" button you might say. Huh.
I think they are getting confused becase of the I, try this "iWin" instead of "Iwin", makes apple look pretty sharp. |

Ser Berus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:13:00 -
[1791] - Quote
Quest Liem wrote:Ser Berus wrote:Quest Liem wrote:Scooter McCabe wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality. How is that penalizing any alliance? We are making the game more enjoyable for both. You enjoy the game by out numbering your opponent? Is not that not an I win button? I am bring issues that would make the game more fair to everyone who pays to play the game. A 30 on 30 fight is a lot more enjoyable then something like 300 on 50. Do you not agree? Yes, because you see I signed up to play WOW and furthermore, Yes a very intelligent reply, we are here trying to fix this game and make in more enjoyable and yet you reply with this, that has nothing to do with EVE. Next time please don't hit the reply button unless you have something to say
only so many ways to point out that this isn't a multiplayer game, and there are fabulous opportunities for cancelling your account and playing something that's better suited for your obsessive need of goodfites. |

Mathicluanna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:16:00 -
[1792] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:On a side note I think it is so funny Goons are complaining about being blobbed, what is not funny is CCP is listening.
Change Titans by all means but don't do it for them. And don't rush it for them.
So this is the right thing to do but CCP should knowingly do the wrong thing because waaaa goons? |

Zeerover
Wolfsbrigade
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:16:00 -
[1793] - Quote
Short term: A decisive win for an alliance unable to take what they want under current game mechanics.
Long term: After 1-+-2 years of eve being solely a numbers game (unlike the current combined wealth driven mechanics) we'll get another nerf to the blobs - like we did in December 2009 - i.e. the roots to "wtf why do you want introduce instanced pvp" will be found in this thread. You be smug now I'll be smug then  [img]http://i.imgur.com/Qrwa2.png[/img] |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
473
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:18:00 -
[1794] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11666499
Just gonna... leave this here. hey man how else were they supposed to counter the CCP blob? nerf titans and there's no way for alliances to have a defense against CCP roaming gangs |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
59
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:18:00 -
[1795] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:
Better to restart the server, would that be fair enough for you.
Risk / Reward anyone ever heard this concept, thought it was what this game was suppose to be based on.
Of course.
Problem is that you're not risking anything. |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
51
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:20:00 -
[1796] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11666499
Just gonna... leave this here. hey man how else were they supposed to counter the CCP blob? nerf titans and there's no way for alliances to have a defense against CCP roaming gangs
I am curious what CCP thought about it. Going out on a roam to have some fun with the playerbase, when suddenly a supercap fleet is dropped on their heads to blap them all. Clearly that dishonoureable blobbing CCP fleet was about to blob PL out of some space or something strategic like that.
|

Sybaun
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:20:00 -
[1797] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:FeLiZk wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:It is refreshing to see at least one titan blobber willing to come in and admit that they saw a pretty good subcap fight in progress and thought "Man we should just drop supers all over that". You know, risk/reward or whatever. If there is a tactical structure we are in defending or attacking, and it looks like there is a chance we will lose it off cause we have. Just like you bring another full fleet. I don't recall off hand a time where we have not been outnumbered, where we have brought Titans to a straight up fight. So what you're saying is, if there's a chance you'll lose a strategic objective, you drop titans. So you win. Sort of like an "Iwin" button you might say. Huh. No more then 250 fleet on top would be. And no one is preventing you from doing the same, as mittanie stated you have one of the biggest ones.
Please stop posting and watch this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=aR62HsSBggs#t=23s |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5977
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:21:00 -
[1798] - Quote
Daiony wrote:The Mittani wrote:FeLiZk wrote:On a side note I think it is so funny Goons are complaining about being blobbed, what is not funny is CCP is listening.
Change Titans by all means but don't do it for them. And don't rush it for them. You yourself are to blame; you and your fellows refuse to accept responsibility for your own misbehavior. Typical. So you are saying that using titans against subcaps was an exploit then? Otherwise your post makes no sense. Everything that was done was well within the rules CCP implemented. You chose not to use your supercapitals in a scenario where they would be at risk. Thats your choice. It doesn't mean that it was the only right thing to do. Why didn't you use all the tools available to you? Instead you chose not to use them and vote for a nerf so the other evil guys can't use them against you. People do want titans to be changed, but not like this. This is a half assed ****** patchjob that looks rushed and tailored towards goons playstyle. That is the problem people have with it. Why rush a "surgical fix" (lol) like this out now? It's not like it couldn't wait till CCP thought out a proper solution to the WHOLE problem that are supercaps and sov warfare. To me it looks like CCP is panicking here for no apparent reason. CCP should take their time and act like professionals. Do a fix, but do it right, and not some piece of **** rushjob.
The nerfs happen now because you - hiding behind a NPC alt - couldn't control yourselves, like a glutton at an all-you-can-eat Vegas buffet, even going so far as to blap CCP's own subcaps.
You can make all the excuses you want, but that just goes to show your own lack of restraint - the very inability to accept responsibility that has brought about this situation.
You ask why this has happened? The answer is written all over your own post.
The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Quest Liem
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:21:00 -
[1799] - Quote
Ser Berus wrote:
only so many ways to point out that this isn't how a multiplayer sandbox game works, and there are fabulous opportunities for cancelling your account and playing something that's better suited for your obsessive need of goodfites.
Like wise to you to sir, You wined and CCP is adjusting the Titans, you could have just unsubscribed and found a better game to get you good fights as well. Instead you did not and complained to CCP about it. |

Scooter McCabe
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:21:00 -
[1800] - Quote
Quest Liem wrote:Scooter McCabe wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality. How is that penalizing any alliance? We are making the game more enjoyable for both. You enjoy the game by out numbering your opponent? Is not that not an I win button? I am bring issues that would make the game more fair to everyone who pays to play the game. A 30 on 30 fight is a lot more enjoyable then something like 300 on 50. Do you not agree?
I absolutely disagree if a fleet of 50 decided to take on a fleet of 300 either roaming around or headed to a fleet fight, that's just poor fcing. If its a corp of 50 that found itself in a war with a corp of 300, that's poor diplomacy and planning. Now if a fleet of 50 can perform hit and run tactics on the field and that 300 loses heart, hides in station or doesn't log, that is just delicious tears. Now if a group of 50 has essentially half its players in Titans able to do the job of 20 ships per titan then that group of 300 is in the unfair position by your standard.
If you are so worried for smaller groups looking to get a chance in null sec why don't you ask CCP to double the size of null sec? It promises to break some power blocs and at the very least these power blocs can't hold all that space. Hey do you think that if there was more space people in Hi Sec think they might have a chance out in Null and that might make the game exciting and attractive to new players. Really what do you think is better a broken kill anything ship that makes a few RMTing Emo space nerds happy or more null sec systems to allow new blood to come in and help drive game content? |

Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises Test Alliance Please Ignore
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:22:00 -
[1801] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy. The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened. They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement. Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
|

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
56
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:23:00 -
[1802] - Quote
The absolute best part of all this:
Who the **** do you think is going to have the unstoppable titan fleet in approximately 6 months under current mechanics, in addition to their current subcap superiority?
So dumb...so gd dumb.
|

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:23:00 -
[1803] - Quote
Nao Oikawasan wrote:Swearte Widfarend wrote:This supposed change will do little to the nullsec battlefield. It will do little to skilled players with Titans who understand game mechanics. It will do nothing to Titan proliferation (743 as of this morning's capital tweet). The smart thing to do is to actually fix them, give them a place or pull them from the game, refund Titan-related skill points and the ship's mineral value in ISK to the pilots. Why, in god's name, do you people believe that anyone deserves skillpoints and ISK because the faulty game mechanic, that you've been abusing for so long, has been fixed? You've had a good old time wrecking dramiels and rifters. We've all laughed on comms about these killmails and how absolutely ridiculous they are! You've plopped your fat asses into the systems with 2000 actual pilots duking it out and whored untold numbers of killmails without a single worry as to being killed. I think you've been given enough. No need for refunds.
I'm just going to try using logic instead of rage, I know that's hard for some people.
CCP has historically refunded skillpoints, and/or ISK value of skill books, when removing them from the game. Historically this has been an accepted practice (see Learning Skills or Connections Skills).
If the ship is to be removed, the modules should be put in the nearest NPC station, and the equivalent of the raw materials to build the ship in the same station. BPOs should be refunded at market prices. I know balance means nothing to you, but someone actually did something to acquire the ISK and/or minerals for the ship and/or blueprints. I don't think it's wise to give ISK value of the ship, because that's subject to crazy market manipulation. Of course, mineral value is as well, but in the volume we are talking about (750 titans worth of minerals at least) I think it is the best course. The former Titan pilot could then utilize those materials for acquiring ships that are still in game and can be flown, and still have all the modules that are useable on other ships.
Mind you, I'm not saying this is the right solution. But if CCP can't be bothered to fix a broken ship for FOUR YEARS maybe the should just admit they were wrong rather than pretend to put a bandaid on a sucking chest wound. If they can't figure out what role a Titan should have in this game, get rid of them. CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:24:00 -
[1804] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:FeLiZk wrote:On a side note I think it is so funny Goons are complaining about being blobbed, what is not funny is CCP is listening.
Change Titans by all means but don't do it for them. And don't rush it for them. You yourself are to blame; you and your fellows refuse to accept responsibility for your own misbehavior. Typical. Would also please tell Greyscale to balance the blob when you are having beers with him next time? |

mkd0815
GK inc. Pandemic Legion
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:26:00 -
[1805] - Quote
i can only say this is a bad fix.
i have no clue how a fix that wrong happened to get online . where is your QA department ? |

Scooter McCabe
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:29:00 -
[1806] - Quote
mkd0815 wrote:i can only say this is a bad fix.
i have no clue how a fix that wrong happened to get online . where is your QA department ?
Okay why was it a bad fix? Let's hear some good analytic reasons. |

Blawrf McTaggart
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
626
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:29:00 -
[1807] - Quote
mkd0815 wrote:i can only say this is a bad fix.
i have no clue how a fix that wrong happened to get online . where is your QA department ?
You've only yourselves to blame for it. |

Audax Rarnikwar
Overplayed Associates Ltd. Fatal Ascension
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:31:00 -
[1808] - Quote
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12512955
Yes, my moving pod got hit and killed by a titan. I probably ****** up my transversal, my own fault. |

Dovinian
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1008
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:31:00 -
[1809] - Quote
When TEST grows up we might have some Titans someday.
Then when we have superior subcap numbers AND more Titans, suddenly it'd just be more complaints from the other side. Fix Titans now, make a better EVE for everyone.
I am Dovinian, and this is my stance on the matter. Dovinian for CSM7 because I have no idea what the **** I'm doing. |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5978
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:31:00 -
[1810] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:The Mittani wrote:FeLiZk wrote:On a side note I think it is so funny Goons are complaining about being blobbed, what is not funny is CCP is listening.
Change Titans by all means but don't do it for them. And don't rush it for them. You yourself are to blame; you and your fellows refuse to accept responsibility for your own misbehavior. Typical. Would also please tell Greyscale to balance the blob when you are having beers with him next time?
Greyscale and I can't stand each other. And he doesn't drink.
I'm sorry that you - hiding, ashamed, behind the anonymity of an npc alt - are unwilling to face up to your own comeuppance.
This is happening because of your misdeeds, your obvious culpability. And you're hiding behind straw men and trying - desperately so! - to deflect the consequences of your actions.
You blapped, and now you got blapped. Perhaps if you hadn't misused Titans in the first place, this nerf wouldn't have had to happen. The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
473
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:32:00 -
[1811] - Quote
it was a bad fix as it does not implement the Final Solution to the supercap question |

deyaneira
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:32:00 -
[1812] - Quote
To all:
This change makes well balance of game mechanics and engagements. I think this is the start of what a real fight space is. Titans will still be UBER ships, but their role wil now be used more properly. Get over it. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
59
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:34:00 -
[1813] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Better to restart the server, would that be fair enough for you.
Risk / Reward anyone ever heard this concept, thought it was what this game was suppose to be based on.
Yes you risk all of your titans when you drop them en masse ahahah Every time we drop them we risk -Counter drop (trap) -One bumped titan (thanks for that one CCP) -Disconnect And yes we risk all of them, it only takes one very bad day and we lose them all in one go ask RA. You might not think this, but there are times that we don't use them because the risks involved.
Hahahahahahahahaha. |

Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises Test Alliance Please Ignore
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:35:00 -
[1814] - Quote
mkd0815 wrote:i can only say this is a bad fix.
i have no clue how a fix that wrong happened to get online . where is your QA department ?
The problem is the scan res / weapon sig / sig radius thing isn't properly weighted. It is made all the more obvious by changing titan scan res to 5. The difference in lock time for a cruiser and a dread isn't remotely enough. The same can be said for the guns as the lock times. The underlying mechanics need to be worked on.
That said, titans needed a nerf. In the tradition of CCP nerfs, this one was a bit over the top and off the mark. |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5991
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:35:00 -
[1815] - Quote
They hide these behind NPC alts because they don't dare show their faces; they know they have abused a broken mechanic and are unwilling to own up to their misdeeds. Their altposting is a scarlet letter of their shame, an admission of guilt.
They can't accept adult responsibility; they threw their toys around, misbehaved, and now their toys are being taken away. Alas! The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Daiony
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:36:00 -
[1816] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Daiony wrote:The Mittani wrote:FeLiZk wrote:On a side note I think it is so funny Goons are complaining about being blobbed, what is not funny is CCP is listening.
Change Titans by all means but don't do it for them. And don't rush it for them. You yourself are to blame; you and your fellows refuse to accept responsibility for your own misbehavior. Typical. So you are saying that using titans against subcaps was an exploit then? Otherwise your post makes no sense. Everything that was done was well within the rules CCP implemented. You chose not to use your supercapitals in a scenario where they would be at risk. Thats your choice. It doesn't mean that it was the only right thing to do. Why didn't you use all the tools available to you? Instead you chose not to use them and vote for a nerf so the other evil guys can't use them against you. People do want titans to be changed, but not like this. This is a half assed ****** patchjob that looks rushed and tailored towards goons playstyle. That is the problem people have with it. Why rush a "surgical fix" (lol) like this out now? It's not like it couldn't wait till CCP thought out a proper solution to the WHOLE problem that are supercaps and sov warfare. To me it looks like CCP is panicking here for no apparent reason. CCP should take their time and act like professionals. Do a fix, but do it right, and not some piece of **** rushjob. The nerfs happen now because you - hiding behind a NPC alt - couldn't control yourselves, like a glutton at an all-you-can-eat Vegas buffet, even going so far as to blap CCP's own subcaps. You can make all the excuses you want, but that just goes to show your own lack of restraint - the very inability to accept responsibility that has brought about this situation. You ask why this has happened? The answer is written all over your own post.
Because the honorable mittani and the goons are a role model for moral integrity and aloofness. Please, get over yourself. Look at the whole picture from a non biased standpoint and even you will have to acknowledge that this "fix" is ****, halfassed. It doesn't matter where anyone touched your subcapitals. The very concept of this adjustment is wrong. They should do it right the first time, not rush some crap out and alienate one part of the playerbase.
Try to be objective for once. |

Mynas Atoch
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:38:00 -
[1817] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:On a side note I think it is so funny Goons are complaining about being blobbed, what is not funny is CCP is listening.
Change Titans by all means but don't do it for them. And don't rush it for them. They are doing it for you, you fool.
We already have one of the largest supercapital fleets in the game and would be blapping the merry hell out of you were you not in one TIDi'd siege cycle range of the largest and fourth largest supercap fleets in GëívGëí. Try to understand that your inability to restrain yourselves from slaughtering little ships is but a raindrop in the sea of despair that Goonswarm will drown the game in when WE can do it with no risk. You think you are griefers; as usual we were late to the party, but by god you have no conception of the grief we will create with our power unchecked.
Thank CCP for saving you.
From us.
|

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5991
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:38:00 -
[1818] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:BioZvin wrote:
If it really is for one thing only, I was never told this. DD to kill all sub caps was first incarnation.. even thou you are very happy to say this all the time. Make us able to dock the things so we can wait out this horrible nurf in stations. Would you have us stuck in ships that can be used 1 time every month if we are very lucky ? Pretty sure someone said this with Supercarriers also...
Ever consider we wouldn't be at this place if some titan pilots didn't rub everybody's nose so into the problem that they were forced to act? Titans one shotting dictors isn't a titan playing a role, it's a titan playing EVERY role. https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/625985https://killboard.goonfleet.com/km/625987See? It's you. You are the problem. You caused this.
I'm just going to go ahead and bring this back to the current page. It's a good post.
Don't forget who's really at fault here. It's these people, blapping dictors and frigates and gloating about it, then trying to play the innocent when they're finally called on the carpet for their misbehavior.
Oh, sure, the Titan pilots are the victims. The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Yasuhiro Shoe
The Praxis Initiative Gentlemen's Agreement
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:40:00 -
[1819] - Quote
Hungry Ghost wrote:CCP before going forward with that decision - did you actually consider that atm there is 2 major conflicts going on in 0.0. First one is CFC Vs Raiden&Co, second is southern alliances Vs Legion of Death&friends. In both cases one side heavily relied on titans, while the other used them rarely, if at all. As far as i can tell both conflicts currently going in favor of the side, that do not use titans, but can field more ppl. You are proposing balance change that will further shift balance of power in favor of the winning side. Did you notice, what majority of people praising you for this change got goonswarm or aligned ticker? Must look really strange to someone without interest in 0.0 politics
Making changes with the intention of messing with specific in-game conflicts would be a break of trust. So CCP literally has to disregard this political perspective, and focus on the game mechanics themselves.
I do not think the impact of this nerf will be as large as you imply. Tracking titans will still own subcaps, hopefully their impact will be lessened. Everyone should assume more drastic changes will come in time, further nudging alliances into a model where Titans are the strategic cornerstone of a composite fleet and not the main ship of the line. Do not be surprised when those changes happen, just like you shouldn't be surprised by the current proposal, everyone knew it was coming.
Fixing broken mechanics in the sandbox helps everyone have more fun in the long run. Short term, I suppose it might hurt a few entities that rely solely on supercap deployment, but I rest easy in the knowledge it's well deserved considering how much supers have been exploited until now.
|

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
162
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:43:00 -
[1820] - Quote
Another worthwhile point to make in this discussion is the concept that there is no counter to large numbers of sub caps, and that dropping Titans to destroy the sub capital fleet is the only way to deal with superior numbers. This argument ignores a few points, mainly the concept of bombers, counter-compositions, and reinforcements. CFC uses at least 5 major fleet compositions, which are often mixed depending on the scenario. Each of these contains a few main ship types, as well as a significant number of support ships to add robust roles to the fleet, and each doctrine is countered by a different sub capital doctrine which we have seen our enemies field.
Every single one of these doctrines does not have an answer for 20+ titans being dropped on it. These dropped titans don't act as support for fleets when dropped, they simply kill everything on the field which is present where they are dropped. These titans can only held down by dictors and hictors, or in the case of a low sec engagement, only scripted hictors. Once these ships, which titans are perfectly able to kill, are dead, there is no risk left to the engagement.
This has been seen repeatedly, over and over. This is why super caps are being changed. |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5996
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:44:00 -
[1821] - Quote
Daiony wrote: Because the honorable mittani and the goons are a role model for moral integrity and aloofness. Please, get over yourself.
There are Titan pilots who misbehaved and brought this on themselves, but had the guts to post with their mains. Then there are the Titan pilots like you, who also helped bring this about, yet are so ashamed that they hide behind NPC alts.
Either way, it's your fault this has happened, but the Titan pilots who post with their mains at least have some pride. And a spine. The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

CaldariCitizen 20111026
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:45:00 -
[1822] - Quote
The mechanics were broken and obviously abused. Starting (but not yet) to be fixed.
What happened was the same with smokers who just couldn't manage to be educated enough to NOT smoke when other people were eating or didn't want their crap. They got nerfed. Then its tears "oh we is so oppressed!"
But hey, this is good for you guys. Now you get to prove you're really good, if you can. |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:47:00 -
[1823] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:They hide these behind NPC alts because they don't dare show their faces; they know they have abused a broken mechanic and are unwilling to own up to their misdeeds. Their altposting is a scarlet letter of their shame, an admission of guilt.
They can't accept adult responsibility; they threw their toys around, misbehaved, and now their toys are being taken away. Alas!
Who is this you are saying is hiding, I see quite a few people posting with their mains, and can't you have an opinion if your not part of 0.0. Then remove a big portion of your 350000, and then Titans are no longer 0.02% or whatever you said they where.
As far as I am informed, you have more then once said you where going to use your position to destroy your enemy's so I give next to nothing for you opinion. And the timing and manner of this proves it congrats. Would almost say well played. |

Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises Test Alliance Please Ignore
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:47:00 -
[1824] - Quote
Kyle Myr wrote:Another worthwhile point to make in this discussion is the concept that there is no counter to large numbers of sub caps, and that dropping Titans to destroy the sub capital fleet is the only way to deal with superior numbers. This argument ignores a few points, mainly the concept of bombers, counter-compositions, and reinforcements. CFC uses at least 5 major fleet compositions, which are often mixed depending on the scenario. Each of these contains a few main ship types, as well as a significant number of support ships to add robust roles to the fleet, and each doctrine is countered by a different sub capital doctrine which we have seen our enemies field.
Every single one of these doctrines does not have an answer for 20+ titans being dropped on it. These dropped titans don't act as support for fleets when dropped, they simply kill everything on the field which is present where they are dropped. These titans can only held down by dictors and hictors, or in the case of a low sec engagement, only scripted hictors. Once these ships, which titans are perfectly able to kill, are dead, there is no risk left to the engagement.
This has been seen repeatedly, over and over. This is why super caps are being changed.
The good old fashion game of rock, paper, scissors, dynamite. |

Daiony
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:49:00 -
[1825] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Daiony wrote: Because the honorable mittani and the goons are a role model for moral integrity and aloofness. Please, get over yourself.
There are Titan pilots who misbehaved and brought this on themselves, but had the guts to post with their mains. Then there are the Titan pilots like you, who also helped bring this about, yet are so ashamed that they hide behind NPC alts. Either way, it's your fault this has happened, but the Titan pilots who post with their mains at least have some pride. And a spine.
Yeah, you said that a few times now, doesn't make it any more right tho. Why don't you stick to the points i made and comment on them instead of repeating the same thing over and over. You appear to be very one dimensional in this regard. I am not even opposed to a nerf and still you push me into the "guilty evil titan pilot drawer". I expected more of you. I am dissapoint. |

hioshi IV
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:50:00 -
[1826] - Quote
@CCP: Your drawing your own death.
Look at this topic, more and more people are starting to see your connection/favoritism towards goons.
Soon, your corruption will be exposed, you will die, and i wont feel sorry for you.
@goons: Well played, another victory thru the crybaby's you are, once more, ccp came to your rescue.
@Titan owners: I feel sorry for you, skilling for years, griding isk and get ass raped by goons like this
@everyone else: Stop eating goon propaganda. Vote for someone besides goons to cut their csm power, and plz, open your eyes. Read this topic, the corruption is exposed right here. Just read it
NEXT: goons trying to ridicule my post, to make it disappear into the pages darkness .. |

FOl2TY8
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:50:00 -
[1827] - Quote
Daiony wrote:The Mittani wrote:Daiony wrote: Because the honorable mittani and the goons are a role model for moral integrity and aloofness. Please, get over yourself.
There are Titan pilots who misbehaved and brought this on themselves, but had the guts to post with their mains. Then there are the Titan pilots like you, who also helped bring this about, yet are so ashamed that they hide behind NPC alts. Either way, it's your fault this has happened, but the Titan pilots who post with their mains at least have some pride. And a spine. Yeah, you said that a few times now, doesn't make it any more right tho. Why don't you stick to the points i made and comment on them instead of repeating the same thing over and over. You appear to be very one dimensional in this regard. I am not even opposed to a nerf and still you push me into the "guilty evil titan pilot drawer". I expected more of you. I am dissapoint.
Your points have literally nothing to do with game mechanics that are broken. |

asdf ghyj
Zorg Solutions
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:50:00 -
[1828] - Quote
Dmitry Sychev wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes 60k players? How many titans in Game? - Titan's pilots will leave game, no changes to online.
I dont care how many titans pilot are in game, but i dont wasting my time 3+ month for perfect titan and a lot time to make isk to buy skill and titan and now ????? we all pay to play this game not only GOONS or MItani CCP must listen all players not only 5-6k |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
190
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:53:00 -
[1829] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Daiony wrote: Because the honorable mittani and the goons are a role model for moral integrity and aloofness. Please, get over yourself.
There are Titan pilots who misbehaved and brought this on themselves, but had the guts to post with their mains. Then there are the Titan pilots like you, who also helped bring this about, yet are so ashamed that they hide behind NPC alts. Either way, it's your fault this has happened, but the Titan pilots who post with their mains at least have some pride. And a spine.
you do know that eventually this is going to bite you in the tuchus too eh?
i cant wait for stackable RR and damage applied penilties... the goon tears are going to be epic! |

Khadmos
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:54:00 -
[1830] - Quote
If this is such a horrible nerf, why isn't PL selling their titans?
I see a **** load of buyers in the buy/sell forum but no confirmed sales yet.
Either PL isn't actually selling their titans because they know they are still over powered or they are idiots and actually selling them to droves of people who know they are still over powered.
It's pretty obvious that all this whining is just an attempt to keep them as ridiculous as they are now. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5539
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:55:00 -
[1831] - Quote
Daiony wrote:They should do it right the first time, not rush some crap out and alienate one part of the playerbase. The part alienated by this change is so small that it's statistically insignificant GÇö as in: any single change they implement any time they patch the game has a random chance + margin of error that includes more people being alienated than the what this change will have. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Daiony
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:56:00 -
[1832] - Quote
FOl2TY8 wrote:Daiony wrote:The Mittani wrote:Daiony wrote: Because the honorable mittani and the goons are a role model for moral integrity and aloofness. Please, get over yourself.
There are Titan pilots who misbehaved and brought this on themselves, but had the guts to post with their mains. Then there are the Titan pilots like you, who also helped bring this about, yet are so ashamed that they hide behind NPC alts. Either way, it's your fault this has happened, but the Titan pilots who post with their mains at least have some pride. And a spine. Yeah, you said that a few times now, doesn't make it any more right tho. Why don't you stick to the points i made and comment on them instead of repeating the same thing over and over. You appear to be very one dimensional in this regard. I am not even opposed to a nerf and still you push me into the "guilty evil titan pilot drawer". I expected more of you. I am dissapoint. Your points have literally nothing to do with game mechanics that are broken.
- nerf tailored around meta14 items (seriously wtf?) - nerf applied without adjusting scan res/ sig radius of supercaps, thereby hintering titan ability to fight other supercaps - ignoring the mechanic that leads to titans being used at all, i.e. give alliances a reason to field supercaps / caps in the first place. - rushed out at a time where this will help cfc leaves a bad taste, why not take their time and do it right the first time?
has nothing to do with game mechanics? Please stfu. |

Scooter McCabe
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:56:00 -
[1833] - Quote
Quote:Because the honorable mittani and the goons are a role model for moral integrity and aloofness. Please, get over yourself. Look at the whole picture from a non biased standpoint and even you will have to acknowledge that this "fix" is ****, halfassed. It doesn't matter where anyone touched your subcapitals. The very concept of this adjustment is wrong. They should do it right the first time, not rush some crap out and alienate one part of the playerbase.
Try to be objective for once.
Okay let's be objective:
The utilitarian argument: Fewer players actually use Titans, more players fly sub caps so lets make sure they enjoy the game.
The pragmatic argument: Titan's are supposed to be powerful and a threat to a number of ships, just not all ships.
The rational argument: Cannons aren't used for swatting flies.
The selfish argument: The few should be able to have a powerful ship that can be a threat to all ships and despite being a cannon it should be able to pluck the wings off a fly and by fly I mean Rifter.
So class 3 of these arguments are based on logic and not emotion. 1 of these arguments sums up what a coward hiding behind an alt is essentially saying. Which argument do you think that coward is using? |

CaldariCitizen 20111026
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:56:00 -
[1834] - Quote
BAGEHI - "The good old fashion game of rock, paper, scissors, dynamite."
True, and dynamite is the dominant strategy. |

Delegado Cero
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
93
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:57:00 -
[1835] - Quote
I think 5 scan resolution is too much, there's not that much difference in a sieged dreadnought locking a titan and vice versa. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5539
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:59:00 -
[1836] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:i cant wait for stackable RR and damage applied penilties... the goon tears are going to be epic! You mean those things that have already been hinted at, and which most sane people will already be planning for?
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:59:00 -
[1837] - Quote
Khadmos wrote:If this is such a horrible nerf, why isn't PL selling their titans?
I see a **** load of buyers in the buy/sell forum but no confirmed sales yet.
Either PL isn't actually selling their titans because they know they are still over powered or they are idiots and actually selling them to droves of people who know they are still over powered.
It's pretty obvious that all this whining is just an attempt to keep them as ridiculous as they are now.
Or people have used a lot of time on getting them, and want to see if CCP really does this. And then get them to dock them so they can reprocess. Almost 60 bil in minerals now I think.
|

Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder Thundering Herd
368
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:59:00 -
[1838] - Quote
The Mittani wrote: - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests.
Heed your own advice here ! OMG He Spent His Free-áAURUM ! God is simply-áthe very extraordinary power of the Universe to organize Itself as percieved. -á-á- Lee Smolin "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity" |

Venus Vermillion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
424
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:59:00 -
[1839] - Quote
hioshi IV wrote:NEXT: goons trying to ridicule my post, to make it disappear into the pages darkness ..
The puppetmaster defense.
Dance, goons. DANCE.
|

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
979
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:00:00 -
[1840] - Quote
Delegado Cero wrote:I think 5 scan resolution is too much, there's not that much difference in a sieged dreadnought locking a titan and vice versa.
Best av in the game right here. |

Heathkit
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:01:00 -
[1841] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy. The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened. They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement. Ultimately, the nemesis of titans was the poor impulse control of their own pilots - the inability, when faced with what amounted to a free bar, not to drink themselves into blundering violence and to assault the other guests. Actually, I think asdf makes a good point. CCP, please think before do wrong changes. |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
449
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:01:00 -
[1842] - Quote
If we in this thread had both sides scream bloody murder at CCP, they would have known they had found a solution that wasnt horribly favouring one side. Instead we have the Goons acting like they f*cking saved EVE. That tells me all I need to know. |

Daiony
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:02:00 -
[1843] - Quote
Scooter McCabe wrote:Quote:Because the honorable mittani and the goons are a role model for moral integrity and aloofness. Please, get over yourself. Look at the whole picture from a non biased standpoint and even you will have to acknowledge that this "fix" is ****, halfassed. It doesn't matter where anyone touched your subcapitals. The very concept of this adjustment is wrong. They should do it right the first time, not rush some crap out and alienate one part of the playerbase.
Try to be objective for once. Okay let's be objective: The utilitarian argument: Fewer players actually use Titans, more players fly sub caps so lets make sure they enjoy the game. The pragmatic argument: Titan's are supposed to be powerful and a threat to a number of ships, just not all ships. The rational argument: Cannons aren't used for swatting flies. The selfish argument: The few should be able to have a powerful ship that can be a threat to all ships and despite being a cannon it should be able to pluck the wings off a fly and by fly I mean Rifter. So class 3 of these arguments are based on logic and not emotion. 1 of these arguments sums up what a coward hiding behind an alt is essentially saying. Which argument do you think that coward is using?
I am not opposed to a titan nerf. I am opposed to this "fix" because of its diletantic and amateuristic execution. I can differentiate. |

Dovinian
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1010
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:04:00 -
[1844] - Quote
Daiony wrote: I am not opposed to a titan nerf. I am opposed to this "fix" because of its diletantic and amateuristic execution. I can differentiate.
I too can use a dictionary to post, I'm just too lazy. |

Sotar Armana
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:04:00 -
[1845] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Delegado Cero wrote:I think 5 scan resolution is too much, there's not that much difference in a sieged dreadnought locking a titan and vice versa. Best av in the game right here.
I dunno, the AV that looks like Walter from The Big Lebowski is pretty great.
Anyway, in an unrelated note, if you don't like it, what would you have done to fix Titans? |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
89
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:05:00 -
[1846] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:This doesn't scale the damage, it scales the hit chance. Part of the problem we're having is that titans aren't hitting subcaps all that often, but when they do hit they do full anti-capital damage and frequently one-hit things as a result.
Could gun grouping be the culprit in this?
I know that the statistics are the same over 1,000,000 shots, a 6 gun group will put out the same amount of damage as 6 individual guns, but as per my understanding of how gun grouping works, when the group fires, its like all the guns hitting or all of them missing.
again, the damage is going to be conserved given the same number of rounds, but the gun group is going to do massive burst damage because the chance for all of the guns to hit is: n instead of n^6 |

Scooter McCabe
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:07:00 -
[1847] - Quote
Daiony wrote:Scooter McCabe wrote:Quote:Because the honorable mittani and the goons are a role model for moral integrity and aloofness. Please, get over yourself. Look at the whole picture from a non biased standpoint and even you will have to acknowledge that this "fix" is ****, halfassed. It doesn't matter where anyone touched your subcapitals. The very concept of this adjustment is wrong. They should do it right the first time, not rush some crap out and alienate one part of the playerbase.
Try to be objective for once. Okay let's be objective: The utilitarian argument: Fewer players actually use Titans, more players fly sub caps so lets make sure they enjoy the game. The pragmatic argument: Titan's are supposed to be powerful and a threat to a number of ships, just not all ships. The rational argument: Cannons aren't used for swatting flies. The selfish argument: The few should be able to have a powerful ship that can be a threat to all ships and despite being a cannon it should be able to pluck the wings off a fly and by fly I mean Rifter. So class 3 of these arguments are based on logic and not emotion. 1 of these arguments sums up what a coward hiding behind an alt is essentially saying. Which argument do you think that coward is using? I am not opposed to a titan nerf. I am opposed to this "fix" because of its diletantic and amateuristic execution. I can differentiate.
I have a better idea why don't you explain exactly why its diletantic and amateuristic instead of being shallow and pedantic with your rebuttals. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2907
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:08:00 -
[1848] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:If we in this thread had both sides scream bloody murder at CCP, they would have known they had found a solution that wasnt horribly favouring one side. Instead we have the Goons acting like they f*cking saved EVE. That tells me all I need to know.
lmao this dumb pubbie honestly believes that CCP gives a **** about the "balance of power" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Delegado Cero
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
93
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:09:00 -
[1849] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:If we in this thread had both sides scream bloody murder at CCP, they would have known they had found a solution that wasnt horribly favouring one side. Instead we have the Goons acting like they f*cking saved EVE. That tells me all I need to know.
There's no pleasing NPC alts who think titans should remain retardedly overpowered. We didn't really do anything to save EVE, this was entirely brought on by the titan pilots themselves. |

Vatek
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:10:00 -
[1850] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Delegado Cero wrote:I think 5 scan resolution is too much, there's not that much difference in a sieged dreadnought locking a titan and vice versa. Best av in the game right here.
Every time I see it I start humming Village People songs. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
190
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:12:00 -
[1851] - Quote
Tippia wrote:MeBiatch wrote:i cant wait for stackable RR and damage applied penilties... the goon tears are going to be epic! You mean those things that have already been hinted at, and which most sane people will already be planning for? ah and that is where your logic fails you asume that goons are sane... |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:12:00 -
[1852] - Quote
hioshi IV wrote:@CCP: Your drawing your own death.
Look at this topic, more and more people are starting to see your connection/favoritism towards goons.
Soon, your corruption will be exposed, you will die, and i wont feel sorry for you.
.. This is still just a game! Nobody will die... |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2907
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:13:00 -
[1853] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Tippia wrote:MeBiatch wrote:i cant wait for stackable RR and damage applied penilties... the goon tears are going to be epic! You mean those things that have already been hinted at, and which most sane people will already be planning for? ah and that is where your logic fails you asume that goons are sane...
we do know that you have an extra chromosome because of your blatant abuse of ellipses, pubbie "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Khadmos
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:13:00 -
[1854] - Quote
Dear Rainden. and NC alts,
You do realize that CCP knows what your main accounts are, right?
Trying to make it look like the high sec masses have a problem with titans being nerfed isn't going to work.
CCP isn't blind, they know how big the fleets are when there are fleet fights and they know how many are on each side. Your attempts to claim that goons are the only ones who want this, because of there numbers, aren't going to fool anybody.
FA is about the same size as raiden and we have fielded more ships than the goons on several ops now. We've also been out numbered by raiden, NC and co. and then only lost when 40 titans were dropped on the field because we were winning.
You aren't going to fool anybody. You abused titans, you bragged about it and now they are being nerfed.
I really hope you aren't surprised when nobody takes pity on you. |

Sotar Armana
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:14:00 -
[1855] - Quote
How many pubbies here won't ever even see a titan and yet are against this for some dumb reason? |

Death2all Supercaps
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
48
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:14:00 -
[1856] - Quote
Oh Hey, check my name C C P put you in pain No more low sec games
|

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
162
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:15:00 -
[1857] - Quote
hioshi IV wrote:@ @Titan owners: I feel sorry for you, skilling for years, griding isk and get ass raped by goons like this
I didn't see much else to your post resembling a point worth addressing, but this is an argument that you present that warrants a response, because people frequently suggest variants of this idea without seeing what I feel is the obvious counterpoint.
Specifically, that this concept that high SP characters are an entitled class worth catering to as the expense of the fun of large numbers of low SP new characters.
Goonswarm has been against this idea since our inception. Preserving existing, long term players at the expense of sharing EVE with a new audience is terrible for the health of the game, and with the advent of legitimate character transfer, arguments that high-SP characters are always long term loyal customers ring false. All titan pilots are are old characters specifically skilled into a hull that they will sit in until biomass, unless there is a holding alt. For them to completely trivialize the ability to participate in significant EVE brawls for sub capital pilots who have anywhere from weeks to years of skill points is something which they are doing to the detriment of the entire game.
EVE is a game where every pilot, even those in a meager, tech 1 frigate, should be able to contribute to the battlefield. The fact that titans have been murdering full fleets of everything from after burning Rifters to interdictors to battleships shows how mechanically, these ships remove gameplay for sub caps when they arrive on the field.
This is the return of balance to EVE, so everyone can play.
|

Krystal Flores
Missions Mining and Mayhem Northern Coalition.
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:15:00 -
[1858] - Quote
Why is this so hard for you guys to understand.
As it stands a lot of titan pilots and us think tracking on titans is too good im pretty sure most pilots would be ok with that change.
You guys kinda ignore that shouting "you use then wrong."
What the problem is you don't seem to remember how fast a capital dies when shot by a subcap fleet. Having a lone titan be anti-capital even in a small fleet with 5 scan rez would mean that it would take a very long time to lock capitals, if it even gets to lock at all. I don't really have any experience with the max 3 targets so ill leave that to other people. |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:18:00 -
[1859] - Quote
btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? |

FalconX Blast
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:18:00 -
[1860] - Quote
Can we get 2 JBs in every system please? The proliferation of titans in-game increased when we needed to make more alternatives to stationary jump bridges. That in turn led to more titan pilots, which increased the number of dishonorable titan pilots and then more incredulous blapping of frigates from the titans. If we had just left JBs alone, this probably wouldn't have escalated as quickly into an issue needing attention.
Oh well, probably too late to untangle the mess titan pilots created for themselves this time. If titan pilots had only kept their elephant guns off the rifters... reap what you sow. |

Scooter McCabe
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:18:00 -
[1861] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:hioshi IV wrote:@CCP: Your drawing your own death.
Look at this topic, more and more people are starting to see your connection/favoritism towards goons.
Soon, your corruption will be exposed, you will die, and i wont feel sorry for you.
.. This is still just a game! Nobody will die...
*Beep* *Beep* I'm A Nerf. |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:19:00 -
[1862] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:The Mittani wrote:FeLiZk wrote:On a side note I think it is so funny Goons are complaining about being blobbed, what is not funny is CCP is listening.
Change Titans by all means but don't do it for them. And don't rush it for them. You yourself are to blame; you and your fellows refuse to accept responsibility for your own misbehavior. Typical. Would also please tell Greyscale to balance the blob when you are having beers with him next time? Greyscale and I can't stand each other. And he doesn't drink. I'm sorry that you - hiding, ashamed, behind the anonymity of an npc alt - are unwilling to face up to your own comeuppance. This is happening because of your misdeeds, your obvious culpability. And you're hiding behind straw men and trying - desperately so! - to deflect the consequences of your actions. You blapped, and now you got blapped. Perhaps if you hadn't misused Titans in the first place, this nerf wouldn't have had to happen. For god's sake, could someone plz translate this? English is not my first language and this guy speaks like a law professor from Harvard. |

Daiony
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:19:00 -
[1863] - Quote
Krystal Flores wrote:Why is this so hard for you guys to understand.
As it stands a lot of titan pilots and us think tracking on titans is too good im pretty sure most pilots would be ok with that change.
You guys kinda ignore that shouting "you use then wrong."
What the problem is you don't seem to remember how fast a capital dies when shot by a supcap fleet. Having a lone titan be anti-capital even in a small fleet with 5 scan rez would mean that it would take a very long time to lock capitals, if it even gets to lock at all. I don't really have any experience with the max 3 targets so ill leave that to other people.
Forget it, arguments are lost on this mob. They simply do not understand that this is not an outrage against a titan fix, but against THIS titan fix in its current planned form. The bigger the mob, the lower the IQ. Sad but true.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5540
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:20:00 -
[1864] - Quote
Sotar Armana wrote:How many pubbies here won't ever even see a titan and yet are against this for some dumb reason? Now, now. There's a titan in Luminaire that anyone can go and experience first-hand, after all. 
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Sotar Armana
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:21:00 -
[1865] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Sotar Armana wrote:How many pubbies here won't ever even see a titan and yet are against this for some dumb reason? Now, now. There's a titan in Luminaire that anyone can go and experience first-hand, after all. 
he should charge a million isk to see it. He would make a fortune. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2910
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:21:00 -
[1866] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:The Mittani wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:The Mittani wrote:FeLiZk wrote:On a side note I think it is so funny Goons are complaining about being blobbed, what is not funny is CCP is listening.
Change Titans by all means but don't do it for them. And don't rush it for them. You yourself are to blame; you and your fellows refuse to accept responsibility for your own misbehavior. Typical. Would also please tell Greyscale to balance the blob when you are having beers with him next time? Greyscale and I can't stand each other. And he doesn't drink. I'm sorry that you - hiding, ashamed, behind the anonymity of an npc alt - are unwilling to face up to your own comeuppance. This is happening because of your misdeeds, your obvious culpability. And you're hiding behind straw men and trying - desperately so! - to deflect the consequences of your actions. You blapped, and now you got blapped. Perhaps if you hadn't misused Titans in the first place, this nerf wouldn't have had to happen. For god's sake, could someone plz translate this? English is not my first language and this guy speaks like a law professor from Harvard.
"Post with your main" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
452
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:22:00 -
[1867] - Quote
Delegado Cero wrote: There's no pleasing NPC alts who think titans should remain retardedly overpowered. We didn't really do anything to save EVE, this was entirely brought on by the titan pilots themselves.
Oh dear. Firstly, learn NPC names. Secondly, you should really try to make a post withouth autorepeating what your master says. But then again, beeing a parrot is probably all that you are capable of. |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
57
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:23:00 -
[1868] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ?
Please, nerf the **** out of tech. |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
163
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:25:00 -
[1869] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ?
As you, too, are in an alliance that holds technetium, I think we can both agree with the Mittani and CCP that this is an issue that desperately needs rebalancing and has no relevance to the discussion at hand in this thread. |

Daiony
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:26:00 -
[1870] - Quote
Please rotate moonmining materials monthly, galaxywide. Resourcevaults get depleted and new ones get discovered. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2914
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:26:00 -
[1871] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? tech doesn't have a "quick fix" or "stop-gap measure" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2914
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:27:00 -
[1872] - Quote
Daiony wrote:Please rotate moonmining materials monthly, galaxywide. Resourcevaults get depleted and new ones get discovered.
this is an idea held by horrible people who have never scanned a single constellation full of moons
:condi: "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Utemetsu
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:28:00 -
[1873] - Quote
Please redistribute all wealth in the game. It's clearly unfair that other players have more isk than me! How am I ever going to out trade the 1% of New Eden? Eve Morning Report - Daily Economic News of New Eden www.evemorningreport.themumm.com "I almost pooped my pants." ~ Lord Jita
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2691
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:30:00 -
[1874] - Quote
Utemetsu wrote:Please redistribute all wealth in the game. It's clearly unfair that other players have more isk than me! How am I ever going to out trade the 1% of New Eden? wait for an economic patch, find what ccp messed up, boom you're in the 1% |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:30:00 -
[1875] - Quote
Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? tech doesn't have a "quick fix" or "stop-gap measure"
off cause it does. your kidding me right, you just have to not care what happens if you do it... you make 500 ish of the moons in empire/low sec tech that was gas before. Done
|

Wirbin
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:31:00 -
[1876] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ?
I don't know what you mean by "out of context" but I agree that tech does need something done to it. Titan pilots were way too noisy and boisterous about abusing their imbalance so they get fixed (in the testicle removal sense) first, though. If only you had been the slightest bit humble this wouldn't be happening! |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
163
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:31:00 -
[1877] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:The Mittani wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:The Mittani wrote:FeLiZk wrote:On a side note I think it is so funny Goons are complaining about being blobbed, what is not funny is CCP is listening.
Change Titans by all means but don't do it for them. And don't rush it for them. You yourself are to blame; you and your fellows refuse to accept responsibility for your own misbehavior. Typical. Would also please tell Greyscale to balance the blob when you are having beers with him next time? Greyscale and I can't stand each other. And he doesn't drink. I'm sorry that you - hiding, ashamed, behind the anonymity of an npc alt - are unwilling to face up to your own comeuppance. This is happening because of your misdeeds, your obvious culpability. And you're hiding behind straw men and trying - desperately so! - to deflect the consequences of your actions. You blapped, and now you got blapped. Perhaps if you hadn't misused Titans in the first place, this nerf wouldn't have had to happen. For god's sake, could someone plz translate this? English is not my first language and this guy speaks like a law professor from Harvard.
Given this alt's choice of name, I find this quote amusing, but sure, I'll do my best to simplify this elegant statement:
'I do not get along with CCP Greyscale. I cannot bond with this man over alcohol in a casual place.'
'I am sad that you choose to use an alternate character that does not reveal who you are when you complain about this nerf which was entirely demanded by your own behavior.'
'This has come because you have done things which are bad for EVE and make it a worse game, and which are obviously your fault. You hide behind bad arguments against false figures, and try to change the subject from your own guilt.'
'You killed everyone, and now you are being killed. If you had not used Titans to kill everything, this would not be a necessary nerd to their use.'
I believe this should be clear. |

niishke
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:31:00 -
[1878] - Quote
ITT: People who know nothing about anybody's official stance on anything.
Also discussing a nerf only tangentially related to ships and/or mods. |

Daiony
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:31:00 -
[1879] - Quote
Andski wrote:Daiony wrote:Please rotate moonmining materials monthly, galaxywide. Resourcevaults get depleted and new ones get discovered. this is an idea held by horrible people who have never scanned a single constellation full of moons :condi:
Work for your wealth, kid. Or get your Dev friends to change the scan mechanics for moons. Whats the problem? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2914
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:32:00 -
[1880] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? tech doesn't have a "quick fix" or "stop-gap measure" off cause it does. your kidding me right, you just have to not care what happens if you do it... you make 500 ish of the moons in empire/low sec tech that was gas before. Done
you mean increasing the abundance of technetium? I dunno, that's a pretty silly approach, and it'd just boost neo to hell "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:33:00 -
[1881] - Quote
Wirbin wrote:FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? I don't know what you mean by "out of context" but I agree that tech does need something done to it. Titan pilots were way too noisy and boisterous about abusing their imbalance so they get fixed (in the testicle removal sense) first, though. If only you had been the slightest bit humble this wouldn't be happening!
Not out of context when the nurf = monopoly for one of the involved partys
|

Daiony
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:33:00 -
[1882] - Quote
Kyle Myr wrote:
'You killed everyone, and now you are being killed. If you had not used Titans to kill everything, this would not be a necessary nerd to their use.'
Freudian slip?
|

Khadmos
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:33:00 -
[1883] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ?
Pretty much the entire CFC is calling for nerfs to tech and income generated by actually having people use systems. I believe this is something mittens mentioned in his current CSM campaign. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2914
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:34:00 -
[1884] - Quote
Daiony wrote:Work for your wealth, kid. Or get your Dev friends to change the scan mechanics for moons. Whats the problem?
hey maybe you should stop being a clueless pubbie and realize the economic effects of a moon rotation
let me simplify it for you: t2 market goes to hell every n weeks "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:37:00 -
[1885] - Quote
Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? tech doesn't have a "quick fix" or "stop-gap measure" off cause it does. your kidding me right, you just have to not care what happens if you do it... you make 500 ish of the moons in empire/low sec tech that was gas before. Done you mean increasing the abundance of technetium? I dunno, that's a pretty silly approach, and it'd just boost neo to hell
Same approach till you get the balance you want. Don't tell me you can't do it, and this titan nurf is also a stated hot fix.
|

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
86
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:37:00 -
[1886] - Quote
I went outside for an hour to collect Maple Sap and say hi to my honeybees and come back to 20 more pages of whining and Andski owning.
All of you, get lives/jobs/something other than eve, please. If you won't do it for yourselves, think about your mothers and their sanity that you are slowly destroying. |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
164
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:38:00 -
[1887] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? tech doesn't have a "quick fix" or "stop-gap measure" off cause it does. your kidding me right, you just have to not care what happens if you do it... you make 500 ish of the moons in empire/low sec tech that was gas before. Done
Beyond the simple fact that the T2 production system guarantees there will be a bottleneck and the trick to wealth is figuring out what that is, this would not necessarily drive conflict in EVE in 0.0. Moons are still not tied to Sov as a source of wealth beyond that, in low sec, super caps are even more hilariously unkillable, as only scripted hictors are able to hold points on single super caps . Highsec moons need to deal with the idiotic warded system. The imbalance in Moon Distribution throughout 0.0, and the fact that alliance level wealth is tied to moons and not sovereignty driver of this problem, not the lack of tech moons in low sec and high sec.
Any fix to this that doesn't create another, potentially worse problem is going to be complex. I can't wait for it to come, but again, this is a separate issue, which you're using to drive the topic off from the central fact: Titans being able to quickly murder all ships in EVE was detrimental to EVE as a game, and their use this way created this change. |

Lyron-Baktos
Selective Pressure Rote Kapelle
56
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:39:00 -
[1888] - Quote
Should have changed nothing except Titans being able to track sub-caps. That's all On holiday. -áIn some other world. Where the music of the radio was a labyrinth of sonorous colours. To a bright centre of absolute convicton. -áWhere the dripping patchouli was more than scent. -á It was a sun |

Wirbin
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:39:00 -
[1889] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Wirbin wrote:FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? I don't know what you mean by "out of context" but I agree that tech does need something done to it. Titan pilots were way too noisy and boisterous about abusing their imbalance so they get fixed (in the testicle removal sense) first, though. If only you had been the slightest bit humble this wouldn't be happening! Not out of context when the nurf = monopoly for one of the involved partys
Why are you arguing on the same side as me about tech in the titan thread? I'll use smaller words and try to put this to bed:
Both need nerf.
You were dumb.
You get nerf first.
Good game. |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6027
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:39:00 -
[1890] - Quote
Watch as the Titan apologist tries to deflect blame away from himself. Nerf tech, he says - yet we all agree. Anything, anything to get the topic away from how the Titan pilots brought this nerf on themselves through their own blatant misbehavior.
I have always supported a tech rebalance. This is not news. The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
227
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:39:00 -
[1891] - Quote
Khadmos wrote:FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? Pretty much the entire CFC is calling for nerfs to tech and income generated by actually having people use systems. I believe this is something mittens mentioned in his current CSM campaign. Yeah. Guess now we can spend our tech money on more drakes, blackbirds and rifters until then.
Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
164
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:41:00 -
[1892] - Quote
Daiony wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:
'You killed everyone, and now you are being killed. If you had not used Titans to kill everything, this would not be a necessary nerd to their use.'
Freudian slip?
Autocorrect. :cripes:. Then again, this is EVE, I think that word applies to anyone in this game. |

Variable1
FinFleet Raiden.
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:44:00 -
[1893] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:
I fly an Erebus, and have one of the largest Titan fleets in the galaxy.
The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened.
They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement.
lol same old Mittani, the more he says 'stuff' the more CCP and newbs believe it :( Let me break your paragraphs down a little...
1. You give no hard facts, just loose collections of your own opinions.
2. Ships are in game. People buy ships. People like ships. People use ships. **Gasp**.
3. There is no broken mechanic, no abuse, no illegal activity, and nothing is obvious bar your sh**posting.
4. It's not about old guard, elite players, justification blah blah, it's simply about pew. You shoot, you kill, you enjoy.
5. I don't see any mega threads about abuse of fleets by having 3-4 of them (250 in each).
6. I don't see any mega threads about abuse of Apha Maels, and how having 400-700 of them in one mega fleet is somehow 'ok', but fielding 20 titans is not..
No I take it back. Mittens must be right, after all, the goon way is the best way. I see it now.
Sorry, nothing to see here. |

vasanizome
Kokoblockers
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:45:00 -
[1894] - Quote
those you can not fight at field fight and cry for nerf at forums |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:47:00 -
[1895] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Watch as the Titan apologist tries to deflect blame away from himself. Nerf tech, he says - yet we all agree. Anything, anything to get the topic away from how the Titan pilots brought this nerf on themselves through their own blatant misbehavior.
I have always supported a tech rebalance. This is not news.
Then push it at the same time, king Mittani.
Show some ******* impartiality.
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
227
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:48:00 -
[1896] - Quote
Variable1 wrote:6. I don't see any mega threads about abuse of Apha Maels, and how having 400-700 of them in one mega fleet is somehow 'ok', but fielding 20 titans is not.. We had only a few times of fielding 400-700 maels. After that it was changed to the general no-more-than-one fleet & tons of drakes which you see today (as evidenced by killboards).
Any newbie that can use a scorpion knows to keep some blackbirds or drakes handy because the maelstrom fleet fills up pretty fast as it's usually the first one created if called for. Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |

Lord Helghast
Intergalactic Syndicate Nulli Secunda
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:48:00 -
[1897] - Quote
Ruby Lionheart wrote:CCP 2 years ago : Titans you need to be on grid, CCP NOW: Titans **** off back to the pos
in order to kill the sub caps the titans had to be fitted with 3x tracking links, and dmg mods, making them have less EFHP then a SC to,
yes except just about every titan has a carrier within earshot for a nice fast refit to a EHP fit if **** hits the fan, and most tracking titans could take out even with a tracking fit a nice 50 man battlecruiser gang solo even if they were nano fit
This change makes sense, in the real world you don't see us shooting 50 cal sniper rifles to kill f*cking ants and hitting 99% of the time. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2918
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:49:00 -
[1898] - Quote
Variable1 wrote:I don't see any mega threads about abuse of Apha Maels, and how having 400-700 of them in one mega fleet is somehow 'ok', but fielding 20 titans is not..
get the people in your alliance who can assemble coherent sentences to start a thread about it then "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Count Spectacula
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:49:00 -
[1899] - Quote
vasanizome wrote:those you can not fight at field fight and cry because of nerf at forums
I fixed that for you.
|

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:52:00 -
[1900] - Quote
Well we are taking a tech moon back atm. with our massive 50 titans |

SuperBeastie
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
58
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:53:00 -
[1901] - Quote
this is not even a effective nerf stop freaking out guys and throw two auto targeting system II in the high and lock up 9 people and blap away. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
227
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:54:00 -
[1902] - Quote
Lord Helghast wrote:yes except just about every titan has a carrier within earshot for a nice fast refit to a EHP fit if **** hits the fan, and most tracking titans could take out even with a tracking fit a nice 50 man battlecruiser gang solo even if they were nano fit
Oh, that's how they do it.
Wonder how a small carrier can refit a huge titan, some to think of it.
Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2918
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:54:00 -
[1903] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Well we are taking a tech moon back atm. with our massive 50 titans
digging your own grave "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Wirbin
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:54:00 -
[1904] - Quote
Variable1 wrote: 4. It's not about old guard, elite players, justification blah blah, it's simply about pew. You shoot, you kill, you enjoy.
5. I don't see any mega threads about abuse of fleets by having 3-4 of them (250 in each).
6. I don't see any mega threads about abuse of Apha Maels, and how having 400-700 of them in one mega fleet is somehow 'ok', but fielding 20 titans is not..
Sounds like your terrible posting is at fault more than CSM. |

Sofia Wolf
Ubuntu Inc. Lonely Maple Conglomeration
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:54:00 -
[1905] - Quote
Is CCP willing to reimburse titan owners for years of SP and ISK lost, or will just let them quit game in frustration? I know it is not that many accounts but I don't think CCP at this moment can afford to lose any. |

niishke
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:55:00 -
[1906] - Quote
Reasoning these things out for myself is super hard. That's why I let mittens do it for me. |

lroh
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:56:00 -
[1907] - Quote
Thank you CCP, now i don't have to play for 4 years to eventualy get the skills to fly a SC/Titan and get to the "end game" stage. Now i only have to train for Carrier and be done quicker to go play the next mmo |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:56:00 -
[1908] - Quote
Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Well we are taking a tech moon back atm. with our massive 50 titans digging your own grave
Well in your world 10=50
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2919
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:56:00 -
[1909] - Quote
lroh wrote:Thank you CCP, now i don't have to play for 4 years to eventualy get the skills to fly a SC/Titan and get to the "end game" stage. Now i only have to train for Carrier and be done quicker to go play the next mmo
you have nothing to worry about, not like you can camp the jita 4-4 undock with a titan "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

supr3m3justic3
Imperium Technologies F0RCEFUL ENTRY
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:58:00 -
[1910] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Watch as the Titan apologist tries to deflect blame away from himself. Nerf tech, he says - yet we all agree. Anything, anything to get the topic away from how the Titan pilots brought this nerf on themselves through their own blatant misbehavior.
I have always supported a tech rebalance. This is not news.
Maybe we should limit the amount of pilots than can be involed in a fleet fight, then watch as the cries shift from Cap pilots to bloated alliances. |

Doctor Eezee
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:58:00 -
[1911] - Quote
lroh wrote:Thank you CCP, now i don't have to play for 4 years to eventualy get the skills to fly a SC/Titan and get to the "end game" stage. Now i only have to train for Carrier and be done quicker to go play the next mmo
Believing that titans are endgame is pretty sad :( "My rule is: If you meet the weakest vessel, attack; if it is a vessel equal to yours, attack; and if it is stronger than yours, also attack..." - Admiral Stepan O. Makarov |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
227
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:01:00 -
[1912] - Quote
supr3m3justic3 wrote:The Mittani wrote:Watch as the Titan apologist tries to deflect blame away from himself. Nerf tech, he says - yet we all agree. Anything, anything to get the topic away from how the Titan pilots brought this nerf on themselves through their own blatant misbehavior.
I have always supported a tech rebalance. This is not news. Maybe we should limit the amount of pilots than can be involed in a fleet fight, then watch as the cries shift from Cap pilots to bloated alliances. that's silly, because a large alliance will split up into many fleets and shoot pos everywhere.
Though I admit if you only had a few ships in a groyp shooing pos, they'd probably be dreads or titans (that can still shot structures a-ok)
Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |

niishke
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:04:00 -
[1913] - Quote
supr3m3justic3 wrote:The Mittani wrote:Watch as the Titan apologist tries to deflect blame away from himself. Nerf tech, he says - yet we all agree. Anything, anything to get the topic away from how the Titan pilots brought this nerf on themselves through their own blatant misbehavior.
I have always supported a tech rebalance. This is not news. Maybe we should limit the amount of pilots than can be involed in a fleet fight, then watch as the cries shift from Cap pilots to bloated alliances. You mean that thing where a fleet is capped at 256 members? Yeah I think they should implement that too. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2919
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:05:00 -
[1914] - Quote
SuperBeastie wrote:this is not even a effective nerf stop freaking out guys and throw two auto targeting system II in the high and lock up 9 people and blap away.
great, go play BF3 with your ncdot buddies and complain about eve being a bad game where titans are no longer the only relevant ships "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
165
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:06:00 -
[1915] - Quote
I've snipped this post down to points which aren't just direct attacks on other people's character. Plenty of us enjoy flinging that sort of thing around, but I wouldn't want to annoy the moderators, so I'll address your relevant points.
Variable1 wrote:The Mittani wrote: The hard fact is that the fault lies with the people who used Titans to annihilate subcaps en masse, and then had the poor judgement to laugh about it, congratulate themselves, and keep doing it. If RDN, NCdot and PL hadn't gone whole-hog abusing an obviously broken mechanic, this nerf would have never happened.
They may tell themselves that the inarguable imbalance of blapping titans was a sign of their 'skill' or 'superiority' - the same excuses offered forth throughout the history of the Titan, justifying Remote Doomsdays, AoE Doomsdays, etc etc. The same old guard players, the same old guard excuses, the same old-guard entitlement.
1. You give no hard facts, just loose collections of your own opinions. Have you missed the killmails of CCP Abaddons with nothing but Titans on them? Or lists elsewhere of dictors and frigates killed by single titan shots? These are hard facts. There are multiple battle reports which show this kind of engagement.
Variable1 wrote: 4. It's not about old guard, elite players, justification blah blah, it's simply about pew. You shoot, you kill, you enjoy.
I wasn't around for the great war: I subscribed a little under a year ago, but I've read up on history, and the conflict between players with established capital fleets in 0.0 (once lead by the vanguard of Band of Brothers, which is an alliance your own corporation was part of) versus the presence of new entities in frigates (in 2006, Goonfleet. In 2010, the re-remake of Band of Brothers, IT Alliance, versus TEST) has dated back at least 5 years. From the era of remote AOE doomsdays to the modern era of rapidly tracking high-EHP titans able to kill all tackle, there has always been an element of the old rich exploiting whatever they can about Titans to drive newer players from 0.0.
Variable1 wrote: 5. I don't see any mega threads about abuse of fleets by having 3-4 of them (250 in each).
6. I don't see any mega threads about abuse of Apha Maels, and how having 400-700 of them in one mega fleet is somehow 'ok', but fielding 20 titans is not..
I'll address these together, as I feel they're attacking the same point: that numbers and not doctrine are the only thing that matter in sub capital engagements. There are a few points against this: -First, that turning players away from a fleet is bad policy, as it suggests that EVE is a game where conflict should arbitrarily cap participation, when its huge space brawls with hundreds on both sides of the fight are one of its major draws -Second, that the CFC's doctrine is impossible to defeat, or to imitate (it is neither, but I'm not going to suggest how to defeat my own side) -Finally, that the idea that a small group of wealthy individuals should be to create a bigger effect than large, carefully coordinated groups of hundreds. Single volleys killing a ship is easily achieved by 20 titans, which are invulnerable due to reps from 20+ super carriers. Even when 200+ maelstroms can instantly kill a target much less frequently, their numbers can be whittled down, even with the present of support ships. 40+ bombers cannot create an effect remotely on the level of an old AOE doomsday, and they do it at much, much greater risk than that old AOE doomsday (to say nothing about the complete lack of risk present in the Remote AOE doomsday).
|

supr3m3justic3
Imperium Technologies F0RCEFUL ENTRY
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:06:00 -
[1916] - Quote
niishke wrote:supr3m3justic3 wrote:The Mittani wrote:Watch as the Titan apologist tries to deflect blame away from himself. Nerf tech, he says - yet we all agree. Anything, anything to get the topic away from how the Titan pilots brought this nerf on themselves through their own blatant misbehavior.
I have always supported a tech rebalance. This is not news. Maybe we should limit the amount of pilots than can be involed in a fleet fight, then watch as the cries shift from Cap pilots to bloated alliances. You mean that thing where a fleet is capped at 256 members? Yeah I think they should implement that too.
No i mean , make it to where some one cant bring 600 drakes to a fight intended for 50 cap ships.
|

Count Spectacula
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:10:00 -
[1917] - Quote
Sofia Wolf wrote:Is CCP willing to reimburse titan owners for years of SP and ISK lost, or will just let them quit game in frustration? I know it is not that many accounts but I don't think CCP at this moment can afford to lose any.
Why should they reimburse anything? The ship is still there, the skills are still useful, you can still target and shoot things. no one is stopping you from flying your titan. I didnt get heavy drone skills back when they removed them from myrmadons, I didnt get cruise missile skills back when they removed them from stealth bombers. I didnt get drone skills or isk for drones back when they removed them from supercarriers...
On another note, they just banned, what was it 2000 accounts for botting? how do you think 800 or so titan accounts would make a difference? Maybe if titan pilots had been more responsible with their power, they would still be able to hit the tiny things they shoot at. |

FOl2TY8
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:13:00 -
[1918] - Quote
supr3m3justic3 wrote:niishke wrote:supr3m3justic3 wrote:The Mittani wrote:Watch as the Titan apologist tries to deflect blame away from himself. Nerf tech, he says - yet we all agree. Anything, anything to get the topic away from how the Titan pilots brought this nerf on themselves through their own blatant misbehavior.
I have always supported a tech rebalance. This is not news. Maybe we should limit the amount of pilots than can be involed in a fleet fight, then watch as the cries shift from Cap pilots to bloated alliances. You mean that thing where a fleet is capped at 256 members? Yeah I think they should implement that too. No i mean , make it to where some one cant bring 600 drakes to a fight intended for 50 cap ships.
Like an instanced server? |

Histocomp
BSC LEGION Tactical Narcotics Team
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:15:00 -
[1919] - Quote
Adjusting titans isn't something CCP has decided to do out of the blue. First CCP chose to address Supercarriers (i.e. drone changes, etc) and the logoffski mechanic. Dreads were also boosted at the same time to try and provide better mechanics of taking these monsters down. Now, CCP has done what every always asks them to do: check back in on what they change. Titans are now being adjusted, which is just another iteration to fix a problem which CCP clearly has their eye on, supercapital proliferation and blobbing. This change seems like a great start to me, and helps put the emphasis back onto subcaps.
Oh, and cry some more about getting your SP and ISK reimbursed .
|

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:17:00 -
[1920] - Quote
Believe it or not, ultimately, what we want, is every single ship to count. Every single ship should count. From the lowliest frigate to the loftiest supercap. It has a place. It has a chance to shine. Artillery platforms, blaster boats, drone ships and missle siege, all useful for their roles. Cloakers, tacklers, electronics warfare and logistics, crucial to your success. Carriers both super and non, dreadnaughts and titans, all have a role to fill.
No pilot is left behind. No skillpoint is ever wasted. PVP. PVE.
Just wait. We will make it happen.
Then we reset TEST. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2695
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:17:00 -
[1921] - Quote
lroh wrote:Thank you CCP, now i don't have to play for 4 years to eventualy get the skills to fly a SC/Titan and get to the "end game" stage. Now i only have to train for Carrier and be done quicker to go play the next mmo you don't really get eve you should probably go back to WoW |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
165
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:17:00 -
[1922] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:The Mittani wrote:Watch as the Titan apologist tries to deflect blame away from himself. Nerf tech, he says - yet we all agree. Anything, anything to get the topic away from how the Titan pilots brought this nerf on themselves through their own blatant misbehavior.
I have always supported a tech rebalance. This is not news. Then push it at the same time, king Mittani. Show some ******* impartiality.
It's like you don't want to see what's going on, and only want to deflect the issue: Mittani raised this issue repeatedly in his widely publicized debate with Riverini for CSM 7 under two weeks ago. He spotlighted it as one of the critical issues impacting son warfare in 0.0, along with super capitals, which prevent small alliances from breaking in to the 0.0 game.
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2695
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:18:00 -
[1923] - Quote
i do wish to echo my raiden. friends call for an ability to reprocess titans, however
implement a Capital Ship Disassembly Array, allow titans to be melted down to scrap, so raiden. can reprocess all their titans in a rage |

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:21:00 -
[1924] - Quote
lroh wrote:Thank you CCP, now i don't have to play for 4 years to eventualy get the skills to fly a SC/Titan and get to the "end game" stage. Now i only have to train for Carrier and be done quicker to go play the next mmo
There is no endgame in a sandbox. |

niishke
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:21:00 -
[1925] - Quote
I can't wait to see how titan-heavy alliances perform without their huge space buttplugs to bail them out all the time. |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:22:00 -
[1926] - Quote
Kyle Myr wrote:FeLiZk wrote:The Mittani wrote:Watch as the Titan apologist tries to deflect blame away from himself. Nerf tech, he says - yet we all agree. Anything, anything to get the topic away from how the Titan pilots brought this nerf on themselves through their own blatant misbehavior.
I have always supported a tech rebalance. This is not news. Then push it at the same time, king Mittani. Show some ******* impartiality. It's like you don't want to see what's going on, and only want to deflect the issue: Mittani raised this issue repeatedly in his widely publicized debate with Riverini for CSM 7 under two weeks ago. He spotlighted it as one of the critical issues impacting son warfare in 0.0, along with super capitals, which prevent small alliances from breaking in to the 0.0 game.
So show me the post pushing this before the next big patch.
|

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
58
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:22:00 -
[1927] - Quote
If grinding (or botting/rmting of course, but we'll ignore that lovely aspect of the supercap arms race) towards the biggest ship in the game is your "endgame", then you're just going to quit once you've blapped fools for a few months anyway. Then you'll start moaning for a superdeeduper capital to really show how special you are.
I'm sorry that an entire virtual galaxy of possibilities and opportunities isn't enough to keep you interested, and you need to climb some self-defined ladder of ship power. |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
58
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:24:00 -
[1928] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:So show me the post pushing this before the next big patch.
Dude, stop. You got owned. Tech nerf and titan nerf have gone hand in hand, and have had equal focus.
You look like a total jerkoff right now.
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2695
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:24:00 -
[1929] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote: So show me the post pushing this before the next big patch.
there's thousands
literally
goonswarm has been open about how much tech needs a nerf for a long time, the issue is that idiots like yourself do not understand the complexity of fixing moon minerals so they stop bottlenecking
basically the reason tech is what it is is because someone like you tried to nerf prom/dysp |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2695
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:24:00 -
[1930] - Quote
raiden.: terrible at eve, terrible at posting, terrible at reading |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
166
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:26:00 -
[1931] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:FeLiZk wrote:The Mittani wrote:Watch as the Titan apologist tries to deflect blame away from himself. Nerf tech, he says - yet we all agree. Anything, anything to get the topic away from how the Titan pilots brought this nerf on themselves through their own blatant misbehavior.
I have always supported a tech rebalance. This is not news. Then push it at the same time, king Mittani. Show some ******* impartiality. It's like you don't want to see what's going on, and only want to deflect the issue: Mittani raised this issue repeatedly in his widely publicized debate with Riverini for CSM 7 under two weeks ago. He spotlighted it as one of the critical issues impacting son warfare in 0.0, along with super capitals, which prevent small alliances from breaking in to the 0.0 game. So show me the post pushing this before the next big patch.
Sure, here you go: http://soundcloud.com/csmdebate/eve-radio-csm-debate-mittani
There's a transcript that one of our deaf members paid one of our newbies to make, but as it's Goonfleet material, leaking it to you would be violating opsec. You'll just need to wait until after your current fleet to be able to listen to it, but I feel this communicates what Mittani's role in the CSM is: clearly communicating about sucking chest wounds in EVE to CCP. |

niishke
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:28:00 -
[1932] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:FeLiZk wrote:The Mittani wrote:Watch as the Titan apologist tries to deflect blame away from himself. Nerf tech, he says - yet we all agree. Anything, anything to get the topic away from how the Titan pilots brought this nerf on themselves through their own blatant misbehavior.
I have always supported a tech rebalance. This is not news. Then push it at the same time, king Mittani. Show some ******* impartiality. It's like you don't want to see what's going on, and only want to deflect the issue: Mittani raised this issue repeatedly in his widely publicized debate with Riverini for CSM 7 under two weeks ago. He spotlighted it as one of the critical issues impacting son warfare in 0.0, along with super capitals, which prevent small alliances from breaking in to the 0.0 game. So show me the post pushing this before the next big patch. The last time CCP rebalanced moons they cocked it up. They're going to need more than a few months to get it right. |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:28:00 -
[1933] - Quote
So you can make a crap fix for titans, but not for something as vital as Tech. And I will be the judge of when someone comes with a good augment. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2699
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:29:00 -
[1934] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:So you can make a crap fix for titans, but not for something as vital as Tech. And I will be the judge of when someone comes with a good augment. wrong idiot |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2699
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:30:00 -
[1935] - Quote
things raiden. doesn't understand, volume mmmccclxxxi: what a bottlenecking system is and the impossibility of fixing it just by tweaking a few numbers |

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:30:00 -
[1936] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:So you can make a crap fix for titans, but not for something as vital as Tech. And I will be the judge of when someone comes with a good augment.
So far your judgement seems pretty poor. Why don't you give us a good argument. |

Count Spectacula
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:32:00 -
[1937] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:.... And I will be the judge of when someone comes with a good augment.
and yet you still made this post.
|

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:33:00 -
[1938] - Quote
niishke wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:FeLiZk wrote:The Mittani wrote:Watch as the Titan apologist tries to deflect blame away from himself. Nerf tech, he says - yet we all agree. Anything, anything to get the topic away from how the Titan pilots brought this nerf on themselves through their own blatant misbehavior.
I have always supported a tech rebalance. This is not news. Then push it at the same time, king Mittani. Show some ******* impartiality. It's like you don't want to see what's going on, and only want to deflect the issue: Mittani raised this issue repeatedly in his widely publicized debate with Riverini for CSM 7 under two weeks ago. He spotlighted it as one of the critical issues impacting son warfare in 0.0, along with super capitals, which prevent small alliances from breaking in to the 0.0 game. So show me the post pushing this before the next big patch. The last time CCP rebalanced moons they cocked it up. They're going to need more than a few months to get it right.
And they need more for titan fix that's is very clear.
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2699
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:33:00 -
[1939] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? tech doesn't have a "quick fix" or "stop-gap measure" off cause it does. your kidding me right, you just have to not care what happens if you do it... you make 500 ish of the moons in empire/low sec tech that was gas before. Done holy **** i missed this post
clearly we can't permit you to judge what kind of shoes you can wear in the morning |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2699
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:34:00 -
[1940] - Quote
FeLiZk you literally have the worst ideas ever in the history of eve |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:34:00 -
[1941] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? tech doesn't have a "quick fix" or "stop-gap measure" off cause it does. your kidding me right, you just have to not care what happens if you do it... you make 500 ish of the moons in empire/low sec tech that was gas before. Done holy **** i missed this post clearly we can't permit you to judge what kind of shoes you can wear in the morning
so this **** is important to you ? |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:36:00 -
[1942] - Quote
Not trying to come up with good ones, just equal ones |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2704
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:36:00 -
[1943] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote: so this **** is important to you ?
ahahahaha you censored your own post what a tool |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2704
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:38:00 -
[1944] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Not trying to come up with good ones, just equal ones i do not believe you're smart enough to understand why dumping extra tech moons wouldn't solve anything because it involves math so i will skip explaining that
however
i do believe you might (and i could be wrong here) be able to grasp that you can't moon mine in highsec idiot |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
167
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:38:00 -
[1945] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:So you can make a crap fix for titans, but not for something as vital as Tech. And I will be the judge of when someone comes with a good augment.
These titan fixes aren't actually the final balance. CCP has been adjusting Titans and super caps since the start of the Crucible patch, with iterative patches based on testing, both internal, and open player tests on Singularity. I also presume they watch statistics on what's going on in EVE to determine their balance.
Crucible brought the removable of the ability to DD sub caps, the immunity of super caps to friendly EWAR as well as enemy EWAR (Remote Sensor Boosters and Tracking Links), as well as the removal of their Drone bay, as a start of CCP's attempt to bring them into the anti-capital, rather than anti-everything role. There was also a mild EHP nerf to attempt to adjust Titan survivability.
So far, these changes have done nothing to the ability of massed Titans to dominate all sub capital fleets. This is CCP's next step in fixing that problem. Perhaps if titans were not used to destroy after burning Rifters, this would not be going on, but as it stands, this is simply one step in CCP's iterative design process. |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
59
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:40:00 -
[1946] - Quote
And remember, CCP did come directly to Mittani's throneroom in Wisconsin and beg for his divine wisdom as to whether they should nerf tech or titans first.
Holy **** :elitepvpposting: so bad. |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:40:00 -
[1947] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Not trying to come up with good ones, just equal ones i do not believe you're smart enough to understand why dumping extra tech moons wouldn't solve anything because it involves math so i will skip explaining that however i do believe you might (and i could be wrong here) be able to grasp that you can't moon mine in highsec idiot
change it, nothing is holy is it. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2704
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:40:00 -
[1948] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Weaselior wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Not trying to come up with good ones, just equal ones i do not believe you're smart enough to understand why dumping extra tech moons wouldn't solve anything because it involves math so i will skip explaining that however i do believe you might (and i could be wrong here) be able to grasp that you can't moon mine in highsec idiot change it thats the stupidest idea i've ever heard and that includes the other ones you've had good job |

Shadoo
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
93
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:41:00 -
[1949] - Quote
Oh lord, why has this thread degenerated into some sort of :BLOOOOOOBS: discussion...
No ship in eve should stop a large fleet on its tracks, get over it and stop being ********. No ship in a game should be even designed as such because all it would do is people who like to push boundaries to simply gather as many of them as possible into an unstopable force.
That's not good for the game. Titans are overpowered when used in large numbers because they scale exponentially better than any other ship in this game.
Yes, they cost a lot of isk and require a lot of SP -- but that's not an excuse for them to be massively overpowered when used in numbers.
Now -- I *do* believe that something fundemental needs to be done in this game to combat the ever escalating numbers used in combat and that applies to ANY type of ship. I sincerely believe the time of the sandbox has come to an end in some respects, and we not only need a diminishing returns system for damage applied and we need to have shield/armor transfered from logistics ships applied with similar diminishing returns.
But people... A thread about Titans is not the place to have this discussion.
I once swore (3.5years ago or so, someone eve-search the post) that I would ABUSE the AOE DD to its greatest extend until it got changed. And it did. I'm fairly sure I said ~8 months ago on another site I'd do the same with tracking titans, and I believe that we have.
I'm happy therefore the ship is getting attention, but I am very disapointed we STILL lack the FINAL solution to bring this "end game" ship to a role which is UNIQUE, USEFUL for the alliance/corp/gang as a whole and WORTHY of investing a lot of money, time and effort for getting into.
Reducing tracking/increasing locking will solve nothing. Only a change out of the combat role completely will do this. It''s NOT ENOUGH to tweak it.
Hopefully CCP will look at the 100+ pages of discussion generated and realize this IS a ship which is important, and it IS important to bring it to a proper, well thoughtout change in role with the effort and resources devoded to it which match those of the pilors who aspire to fly them. |

Sethur Blackcoat
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:45:00 -
[1950] - Quote
See this is why we kind of like PL even though they use a lot of supercaps and don't like Raidendot because they use a lot of supercaps. It's this post. This post right here. |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:49:00 -
[1951] - Quote
Oh god the tears in this thread, so delicious. (Even though a 50% nerf isn't really all that serious and in TiDi with sensible targeting order, with *GASP* communication and/or fitting appropriately even the target delay can be worked around; but Raiden. gonna keep up the crying.)
Also, theorycraft time, Titans working as actual stations would give them a pretty good end-game role and monstrous combat asset; Ability to redock and spit out ships forever, with clones waking up at the titan? (Which is how the clone vat bay system probably should have worked but :CCP:). Committing a Titan to a front-line instantly escalates a battle. (Please ignore this terrible theorycraft and overall bad post) |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:51:00 -
[1952] - Quote
Shadoo, I could not agree more I am raging because of the way this is being done. |

Khadmos
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:51:00 -
[1953] - Quote
Shadoo wrote:Oh lord, why has this thread degenerated into some sort of :BLOOOOOOBS: discussion...
No ship in eve should stop a large fleet on its tracks, get over it and stop being ********. No ship in a game should be even designed as such because all it would do is people who like to push boundaries to simply gather as many of them as possible into an unstopable force.
That's not good for the game. Titans are overpowered when used in large numbers because they scale exponentially better than any other ship in this game.
Yes, they cost a lot of isk and require a lot of SP -- but that's not an excuse for them to be massively overpowered when used in numbers.
Now -- I *do* believe that something fundemental needs to be done in this game to combat the ever escalating numbers used in combat and that applies to ANY type of ship. I sincerely believe the time of the sandbox has come to an end in some respects, and we not only need a diminishing returns system for damage applied and we need to have shield/armor transfered from logistics ships applied with similar diminishing returns.
But people... A thread about Titans is not the place to have this discussion.
I once swore (3.5years ago or so, someone eve-search the post) that I would ABUSE the AOE DD to its greatest extend until it got changed. And it did. I'm fairly sure I said ~8 months ago on another site I'd do the same with tracking titans, and I believe that we have.
I'm happy therefore the ship is getting attention, but I am very disapointed we STILL lack the FINAL solution to bring this "end game" ship to a role which is UNIQUE, USEFUL for the alliance/corp/gang as a whole and WORTHY of investing a lot of money, time and effort for getting into.
Reducing tracking/increasing locking will solve nothing. Only a change out of the combat role completely will do this. It''s NOT ENOUGH to tweak it.
Hopefully CCP will look at the 100+ pages of discussion generated and realize this IS a ship which is important, and it IS important to bring it to a proper, well thoughtout change in role with the effort and resources devoded to it which match those of the pilors who aspire to fly them.
Well said. I agree completely. |

Khadmos
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:52:00 -
[1954] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Shadoo, I could not agree more I am raging because of the way this is being done.
You agree that titans need to be nerfed MORE? I'm pretty sure that goes against everything you've said so far. |

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:52:00 -
[1955] - Quote
GallowsCalibrator wrote:Oh god the tears in this thread, so delicious. (Even though a 50% nerf isn't really all that serious and in TiDi with sensible targeting order, with *GASP* communication and/or fitting appropriately even the target delay can be worked around; but Raiden. gonna keep up the crying.)
Also, theorycraft time, Titans working as actual stations would give them a pretty good end-game role and monstrous combat asset; Ability to redock and spit out ships forever, with clones waking up at the titan? (Which is how the clone vat bay system probably should have worked but :CCP:). Committing a Titan to a front-line instantly escalates a battle. (Please ignore this terrible theorycraft and overall bad post)
This is kinda what I would like to see titans do. Coupled with a staging pos you can get a decent beachhead into enemy territory. |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:53:00 -
[1956] - Quote
Khadmos wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Shadoo, I could not agree more I am raging because of the way this is being done. You agree that titans need to be nerfed MORE? I'm pretty sure that goes against everything you've said so far.
RaidenDOT don't get reading comprehension. |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:54:00 -
[1957] - Quote
Khadmos wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Shadoo, I could not agree more I am raging because of the way this is being done. You agree that titans need to be nerfed MORE? I'm pretty sure that goes against everything you've said so far.
Want my ship to have a role, that's not a once in every 2 months role. Kinda stuck in a titan.
|

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
167
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:54:00 -
[1958] - Quote
Shadoo wrote:Oh lord, why has this thread degenerated into some sort of :BLOOOOOOBS: discussion...
No ship in eve should stop a large fleet on its tracks, get over it and stop being ********. No ship in a game should be even designed as such because all it would do is people who like to push boundaries to simply gather as many of them as possible into an unstopable force.
That's not good for the game. Titans are overpowered when used in large numbers because they scale exponentially better than any other ship in this game.
Yes, they cost a lot of isk and require a lot of SP -- but that's not an excuse for them to be massively overpowered when used in numbers.
Now -- I *do* believe that something fundemental needs to be done in this game to combat the ever escalating numbers used in combat and that applies to ANY type of ship. I sincerely believe the time of the sandbox has come to an end in some respects, and we not only need a diminishing returns system for damage applied and we need to have shield/armor transfered from logistics ships applied with similar diminishing returns.
But people... A thread about Titans is not the place to have this discussion.
I once swore (3.5years ago or so, someone eve-search the post) that I would ABUSE the AOE DD to its greatest extend until it got changed. And it did. I'm fairly sure I said ~8 months ago on another site I'd do the same with tracking titans, and I believe that we have.
I'm happy therefore the ship is getting attention, but I am very disapointed we STILL lack the FINAL solution to bring this "end game" ship to a role which is UNIQUE, USEFUL for the alliance/corp/gang as a whole and WORTHY of investing a lot of money, time and effort for getting into.
Reducing tracking/increasing locking will solve nothing. Only a change out of the combat role completely will do this. It''s NOT ENOUGH to tweak it.
Hopefully CCP will look at the 100+ pages of discussion generated and realize this IS a ship which is important, and it IS important to bring it to a proper, well thoughtout change in role with the effort and resources devoded to it which match those of the pilors who aspire to fly them.
While I don't have great ideas of what sort of role Titans should play, this is a well reasoned post. As long as every player on the field matters, and people are always able to join in to a fleet, I think your ideas are completely reasonable.
|

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:55:00 -
[1959] - Quote
Shadoo wrote:Oh lord, why has this thread degenerated into some sort of :BLOOOOOOBS: discussion...
(content snipped) At risk of posting "this, totally this," this is really the best way to bookend this thread. It encapsulates just about everything that sane, knowledgeable minds have been thinking on the topic.
Too bad none of you feckless douchebag wheezeposters, rising up on your ****-stained hind legs and howling about Goon conspiracies and "blobbing" and The Invincible 1600, could manage a tenth of this.
Can we end this thread now?
|

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:56:00 -
[1960] - Quote
Kerensky White wrote:GallowsCalibrator wrote:Oh god the tears in this thread, so delicious. (Even though a 50% nerf isn't really all that serious and in TiDi with sensible targeting order, with *GASP* communication and/or fitting appropriately even the target delay can be worked around; but Raiden. gonna keep up the crying.)
Also, theorycraft time, Titans working as actual stations would give them a pretty good end-game role and monstrous combat asset; Ability to redock and spit out ships forever, with clones waking up at the titan? (Which is how the clone vat bay system probably should have worked but :CCP:). Committing a Titan to a front-line instantly escalates a battle. (Please ignore this terrible theorycraft and overall bad post) This is kinda what I would like to see titans do. Coupled with a staging pos you can get a decent beachhead into enemy territory.
Yeah. Imagine when you drop them into different systems and watch people **** A BRICK over which Titan is going to be the actual attack? Which one do I drop dreads one?
... Strategy? IN MY EVE?
(Probably some hilarious logistical abuses in the waiting though jumping a Titan full of Industrials in.) |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
167
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:59:00 -
[1961] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Khadmos wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Shadoo, I could not agree more I am raging because of the way this is being done. You agree that titans need to be nerfed MORE? I'm pretty sure that goes against everything you've said so far. Want my ship to have a role, that's not a once in every 2 months role. Kinda stuck in a titan.
I completely understand this point of view - I, too, want my ship to have a role in fleets. That's why I think Titan tracking is a problem, as it can be used to kill any fleet in the game regardless of numbers and composition, barring a larger number of Titans.
As for being stuck in a space coffin, I'd suggest purchasing a holding alt. A character, minimally skilled to be able to sit in a Titan, should run you much less than the hull you're currently stuck in. Once you're out of the ship, you'll have (presumably) a character great at flying a whole range of this game's incredibly diverse and fun capital and sub capital ships. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
190
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:02:00 -
[1962] - Quote
Kerensky White wrote:GallowsCalibrator wrote:Oh god the tears in this thread, so delicious. (Even though a 50% nerf isn't really all that serious and in TiDi with sensible targeting order, with *GASP* communication and/or fitting appropriately even the target delay can be worked around; but Raiden. gonna keep up the crying.)
Also, theorycraft time, Titans working as actual stations would give them a pretty good end-game role and monstrous combat asset; Ability to redock and spit out ships forever, with clones waking up at the titan? (Which is how the clone vat bay system probably should have worked but :CCP:). Committing a Titan to a front-line instantly escalates a battle. (Please ignore this terrible theorycraft and overall bad post) This is kinda what I would like to see titans do. Coupled with a staging pos you can get a decent beachhead into enemy territory.
how about a titan can turn an outpost into a BATTLEOUTPOST!!!! when it latches on to an outpost (its version of docking one titan per outpost) the ship requires fuel to stay "docked" and acts as a battlestation for the outpost... once its there it takes like 24 hours to un-latch its self...
this would go great with the whole destructable outposts speil thats going on... |

Sofia Wolf
Ubuntu Inc. Lonely Maple Conglomeration
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:05:00 -
[1963] - Quote
Count Spectacula wrote:Sofia Wolf wrote:Is CCP willing to reimburse titan owners for years of SP and ISK lost, or will just let them quit game in frustration? I know it is not that many accounts but I don't think CCP at this moment can afford to lose any. Why should they reimburse anything? The ship is still there, the skills are still useful, you can still target and shoot things. no one is stopping you from flying your titan. I didnt get heavy drone skills back when they removed them from myrmadons, I didnt get cruise missile skills back when they removed them from stealth bombers. I didnt get drone skills or isk for drones back when they removed them from supercarriers... On another note, they just banned, what was it 2000 accounts for botting? how do you think 800 or so titan accounts would make a difference? Maybe if titan pilots had been more responsible with their power, they would still be able to hit the tiny things they shoot at.
What is this nonsense about titan pilots abusing their power? You donGÇÖt seem entirely rational about it, especially as you compare titan players with botters. That seems rather warped perception of what constitutes legitimate play and what is an abuse. 
Anyhow I think any of the changes you mentioned warranted reassignment of SP, and the fact CCP did not allow such reassignment is a mistake on their side. This mistake is even bigger in this case as titans represent much bigger investment in skill time and ISK, and with this nerf have their general utility is reduced to the extent they no longer even remotely justify cost and effort required to get them. |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:06:00 -
[1964] - Quote
Kyle Myr wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Khadmos wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Shadoo, I could not agree more I am raging because of the way this is being done. You agree that titans need to be nerfed MORE? I'm pretty sure that goes against everything you've said so far. Want my ship to have a role, that's not a once in every 2 months role. Kinda stuck in a titan. I completely understand this point of view - I, too, want my ship to have a role in fleets. That's why I think Titan tracking is a problem, as it can be used to kill any fleet in the game regardless of numbers and composition, barring a larger number of Titans. As for being stuck in a space coffin, I'd suggest purchasing a holding alt. A character, minimally skilled to be able to sit in a Titan, should run you much less than the hull you're currently stuck in. Once you're out of the ship, you'll have (presumably) a character great at flying a whole range of this game's incredibly diverse and fun capital and sub capital ships.
you really thing this is a good solution. make money buy another char, park titan. you really that selfish that you can't even agree on the fact that they should be allowed to dock, and if the new role comes that we could chose not to fly them if we don't like it and get our skills back.
|

Zen Sarum
Hour of Reckoning
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:10:00 -
[1965] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of tracking
Too big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem.
All turrets already have sig resolution attribute. This is already used in the damage calculation, you just need to double it for XL weapons. This doesn't scale the damage, it scales the hit chance. Part of the problem we're having is that titans aren't hitting subcaps all that often, but when they do hit they do full anti-capital damage and frequently one-hit things as a result.
This is true, blapping can occur with any sized ship.. as a friend in a rifter once learned with neutron blaster cannons fitted to my ship.
Missiles are scaled pretty well, guns are not. What is needed is a simple lower cap on the sig radius of gun vs target:
Looking at sig radius effects on guns today: If the sig radius of the gun is 1000m (Giga pulse laser)
Shooting at a battlecruiser (<300m) or a battleship (<500m) you are still screwed
If the titan / dread can track the battleship it can do say 1/2 damage no problem every hit
Even if it is out-tracking the dread with speed even a glanced shot can occur and this may be sufficient to blap the ship to its doom.
Then you turn on a MWD +500% (x5) you are fundimently screwed unless your sig is less then the magic 200. Even then you still have a chance of being blapped. This doesn't even include painter bonus's which any self respecting titan pilot has on his support fleet / supercarriers
What is the sig radius of a dread? ~3.10 km carrier ~ 3km
So..
1. Why can the anti cap gun hit something 3 times smaller then its main prey? XL guns should be 3000m. 2. If the sig radius of the gun is the same or less then the sig radius of the ship it is supposed to kill it could do100% damage if it hits 3. If a ship targeted is a half of the size of the sig radius of a weapon any damage should be heavily scaled (25%) 4. If a ship targeted is a third the size of the gun, damage = 0
so: MWD battleship 2500m yea you are still gonna die
MWD battlecruiser 1500m I hope you like 25% damage from those titan guns (die in a fire)
MWD cruiser 750m .. enjoy
AB battleship 500m .. enjoy
etc
Seems almost fair to me.. on its own..
5. Target painters give 30% bonus to sig outside of other bonus's which means you just put one on each of your 60 titans... not good for the above logic.. say you pile these up the best you could achieve is what +67% (I may be wrong on stacking /faction blah nerd blah)?
6. So there is an issue with the scaling of sigs of smaller ships vs medium vs large sub caps vs supers.. increase the sigs of capitals and capital weapons (not including fighters) to were they are 2x larger then the minimum cap radius sig today (so around 6000m) suddenly:
MWD battleship 2500m I hope you like >25% damage from those titan guns (die in a fire)
MWD battlecruiser 1500m LOL .. oh crap supers with target painters...
MWD cruiser 750m LOL
AB battleship 500m LOL
etc
7. The only other thing you can do (perhaps in parallel) is scale tracking so if a ship is travelling faster then the gun tracking it, it cannot be hit - ever and.. makes logical sense? How can you gain a higher radian/s over something that at a tangent and distance completes more radians/s. This can be countered by webs and scram obviously.
In all yea will take some work to balance.. but it is just simple maths and logic?
You knew about this being broken over a year ago so what maths logic and testing has been done in this time? Seriously? |

Sethur Blackcoat
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:10:00 -
[1966] - Quote
Nobody ever got skills or money back for not liking changes made to a ship they flew. Didn't happen with the supercarrier change either, before you go all BUT THEY COULD DOCK on me. |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:11:00 -
[1967] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:
how about a titan can turn an outpost into a BATTLEOUTPOST!!!! when it latches on to an outpost (its version of docking one titan per outpost) the ship requires fuel to stay "docked" and acts as a battlestation for the outpost... once its there it takes like 24 hours to un-latch its self...
this would go great with the whole destructable outposts speil thats going on...
This'd leave this hypothetical station-Titan as a purely defensive measure. There needs to be some tangible benefit to bringing one on the offensive if this was a route to take a Titan down.
Sofia Wolf wrote:and with this nerf have their general utility is reduced to the extent they no longer even remotely justify cost and effort required to get them.
The Jump Bridge is the single best module in EVE. That ALONE is worth the price tag and delay to train a Titan. It is the ultimate force projection, pure and simple - but you need to have other people with you to take advantage of it! |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
167
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:13:00 -
[1968] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Khadmos wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Shadoo, I could not agree more I am raging because of the way this is being done. You agree that titans need to be nerfed MORE? I'm pretty sure that goes against everything you've said so far. Want my ship to have a role, that's not a once in every 2 months role. Kinda stuck in a titan. I completely understand this point of view - I, too, want my ship to have a role in fleets. That's why I think Titan tracking is a problem, as it can be used to kill any fleet in the game regardless of numbers and composition, barring a larger number of Titans. As for being stuck in a space coffin, I'd suggest purchasing a holding alt. A character, minimally skilled to be able to sit in a Titan, should run you much less than the hull you're currently stuck in. Once you're out of the ship, you'll have (presumably) a character great at flying a whole range of this game's incredibly diverse and fun capital and sub capital ships. you really thing this is a good solution. make money buy another char, park titan. you really that selfish that you can't even agree on the fact that they should be allowed to dock, and if the new role comes that we could chose not to fly them if we don't like it and get our skills back.
No, I'm suggesting a valid solution present under the current game mechanics. Purchasing a holder alt is less expensive than a well-fit super carrier, last time I checked. Removing the hull and refunding the skills would also be a fine solution, but that sort of drastic change is something CCP seems to be trying to avoid with these small, iterative nerfs.
I'd like for all hulls to have roles. Hell, I'm a fan of Electronic Attack Frigates myself, which are notably flown less than titans, but their only roll is a microscopic niche within faction warfare, as their performance is largely superseded by t1 cruisers or recons in 0.0. Titans, on the other hand, have a current 'niche' which kills all other hulls in the EVE ecosystem. This isn't healthy, and if there's a period where Titans don't have a defined role while CCP reworks them, that's better than the alternative. |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:13:00 -
[1969] - Quote
They don't want to use afterburners have not seen a fleet with them. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
190
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:16:00 -
[1970] - Quote
GallowsCalibrator wrote:MeBiatch wrote:
how about a titan can turn an outpost into a BATTLEOUTPOST!!!! when it latches on to an outpost (its version of docking one titan per outpost) the ship requires fuel to stay "docked" and acts as a battlestation for the outpost... once its there it takes like 24 hours to un-latch its self...
this would go great with the whole destructable outposts speil thats going on...
This'd leave this hypothetical station-Titan as a purely defensive measure. There needs to be some tangible benefit to bringing one on the offensive if this was a route to take a Titan down. Sofia Wolf wrote:and with this nerf have their general utility is reduced to the extent they no longer even remotely justify cost and effort required to get them. The Jump Bridge is the single best module in EVE. That ALONE is worth the price tag and delay to train a Titan. It is the ultimate force projection, pure and simple - but you need to have other people with you to take advantage of it!
I am saying this ontop of what they do now... but CCP said they are looking at ways to get a titan to dock... so when peeps dont want to do just capital stuff with their characters...
i think a titan is too big to just dock... but i think its jus the right size to latch on to an outpost and turn it into a battleoutpost  |

Sethur Blackcoat
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:16:00 -
[1971] - Quote
Our alphafleet scimitars are AB fit just for one random example straight off the top of my head.
hth |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
584
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:17:00 -
[1972] - Quote
Dear NCdot, Raiden and PL,
Please do not use rockets against the CFC. I just unlocked tech 2 rockets and would like to have some fun hunting people in my Vengeance. I have several ideas on how to maximize specific aspects of it, but please don't use rockets. Last thing rockets need is a nerf. 
Thanks!
|

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
190
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:18:00 -
[1973] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:They don't want to use afterburners have not seen a fleet with them.
i know you have been in a titan since like 07 but there are these things called ahacs... |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
168
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:18:00 -
[1974] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:They don't want to use afterburners have not seen a fleet with them.
Afterburning logi. Afterburning T3s. Oversized, afterburning t3s. Afterburning assault frigates holding heavy tackle.
Come on, we were having a good discussion, you can do better than this. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
227
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:22:00 -
[1975] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Dear NCdot, Raiden and PL, Please do not use rockets against the CFC. I just unlocked tech 2 rockets and would like to have some fun hunting people in my Vengeance. I have several ideas on how to maximize specific aspects of it, but please don't use rockets. Last thing rockets need is a nerf.  Can we put rockets on our rifters for a bigger bang?
Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:23:00 -
[1976] - Quote
I like rocket rifters |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2711
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:26:00 -
[1977] - Quote
Kyle Myr wrote:FeLiZk wrote:They don't want to use afterburners have not seen a fleet with them. Afterburning logi. Afterburning T3s. Oversized, afterburning t3s. Afterburning assault frigates holding heavy tackle. Come on, we were having a good discussion, you can do better than this. all of which, let us not forget, have been one-shotted by titans who simply couldn't help themselves |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
289
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:28:00 -
[1978] - Quote
Bashe Zor wrote:FeLiZk wrote:
Risk / Reward anyone ever heard this concept, thought it was what this game was suppose to be based on.
And what risk do these titan pilots take exactly? They're nigh-invincible when fielded in flocks.
Perhaps he was attempting to be ironic. Titans were never meant to be fielded in blobs. It's a testament to the economy crashing (mudflation, mature Nullsec, etc) that they can be. |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:29:00 -
[1979] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:FeLiZk wrote:They don't want to use afterburners have not seen a fleet with them. Afterburning logi. Afterburning T3s. Oversized, afterburning t3s. Afterburning assault frigates holding heavy tackle. Come on, we were having a good discussion, you can do better than this. all of which, let us not forget, have been one-shotted by titans who simply couldn't help themselves
|

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
289
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:30:00 -
[1980] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Dear NCdot, Raiden and PL, Please do not use rockets against the CFC. I just unlocked tech 2 rockets and would like to have some fun hunting people in my Vengeance. I have several ideas on how to maximize specific aspects of it, but please don't use rockets. Last thing rockets need is a nerf.  Can we put rockets on our rifters for a bigger bang?
I would pay good hard PLEX for a weapon for subcaps that causes said ship to explode upon firing. A terrorist suicide bombing ship, as it were.
Could you imagine the abloobloobloooo if the Anti-blob alliances' Titan blobs were being killed by 500-1000 Goons in rifters just flying up to them and exploding? |

Daviclond
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:31:00 -
[1981] - Quote
Death2AllSupercaps snypa |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:31:00 -
[1982] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:FeLiZk wrote:They don't want to use afterburners have not seen a fleet with them. Afterburning logi. Afterburning T3s. Oversized, afterburning t3s. Afterburning assault frigates holding heavy tackle. Come on, we were having a good discussion, you can do better than this. all of which, let us not forget, have been one-shotted by titans who simply couldn't help themselves
These forums are amazing and certainly don't eat posts, not just empty quoting the last post.
It's not like Titans are being hit by the nerf-bat that hard either yet but people can't see that through their tear-covered eyes (I enjoy abusing games as a hobby) |

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:33:00 -
[1983] - Quote
Skill is having a dozen afterburning targets locked up then waiting for their transversal to get juuust right. And you have all the time in the world to do it too, because really is that fleet of subcaps actually doing anything to you?
|

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:37:00 -
[1984] - Quote
100 pages of shitstorm \o/
Greyscale has this unique gift to come up with changes that are even more imba than the issues they ought to fix.
|

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
289
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:37:00 -
[1985] - Quote
The next obvious nerf is to kill Titan Blobbing. Make it so you can't have more than X number of Titans on grid at any given time. Justify it as "warp instability due to the massive engines" or what not -- the engines just emergency warp the titans away (then shut down for a few minutes for good measure). Like old Asheron's Call Portal Storms. |

Bashe Zor
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:38:00 -
[1986] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:as mittanie stated you have one of the biggest ones.
wow taken out of context this could be read as high praise!
thank you, I shall read what I wanna read here
|

Sotar Armana
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:40:00 -
[1987] - Quote
So the titan-heavy alliances are mad that they cannot/will not field the number of subcap ships we field and cry NUMBERS GAME! yet they don't want Titans nerfed and tell us to get more Titans to counter theirs. I small hypocrisy here. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
227
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:45:00 -
[1988] - Quote
Xython wrote:Could you imagine the abloobloobloooo if the Anti-blob alliances' Titan blobs were being killed by 500-1000 Goons in rifters just flying up to them and exploding? Not only clog their guns with rifters now it's straight up exploding rifters in their exhaust ports. Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |

FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:46:00 -
[1989] - Quote
Kerensky White wrote:Skill is having a dozen afterburning targets locked up then waiting for their transversal to get juuust right. And you have all the time in the world to do it too, because really is that fleet of subcaps actually doing anything to you?
You seem to think that Titans should be targets for your fleet, without bringing caps yourself. Isn't that just turning the tables. |

Sotar Armana
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:47:00 -
[1990] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Xython wrote:Could you imagine the abloobloobloooo if the Anti-blob alliances' Titan blobs were being killed by 500-1000 Goons in rifters just flying up to them and exploding? Not only clog their guns with rifters now it's straight up exploding rifters in their exhaust ports.
If this happens we all must make new pilots and name them some variation of Major Kong |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
59
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:50:00 -
[1991] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Kerensky White wrote:Skill is having a dozen afterburning targets locked up then waiting for their transversal to get juuust right. And you have all the time in the world to do it too, because really is that fleet of subcaps actually doing anything to you?
You seem to think that Titans should be targets for your fleet, without bringing caps yourself. Isn't that just turning the tables.
Just stop...unless you're a spy alt purposefully embarrassing your entire infiltrated alliance, in which case carry on and well done.
|

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:50:00 -
[1992] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Kerensky White wrote:Skill is having a dozen afterburning targets locked up then waiting for their transversal to get juuust right. And you have all the time in the world to do it too, because really is that fleet of subcaps actually doing anything to you?
You seem to think that Titans should be targets for your fleet, without bringing caps yourself. Isn't that just turning the tables.
You seem to think everything should be targets for your Titan without bringing a fleet yourself. |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:50:00 -
[1993] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:100 pages of shitstorm \o/
Greyscale has this unique gift to come up with changes that are even more imba than the issues they ought to fix.
(Studiously ignores his own contribution) |

Sotar Armana
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:50:00 -
[1994] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Kerensky White wrote:Skill is having a dozen afterburning targets locked up then waiting for their transversal to get juuust right. And you have all the time in the world to do it too, because really is that fleet of subcaps actually doing anything to you?
You seem to think that Titans should be targets for your fleet, without bringing caps yourself. Isn't that just turning the tables.
Capitals should have support fleets of ships. It should be a dumb move to dump 80 titans into a group of 500 subcaps unprotected. They should not be a way to win all fleet fights, they should be a tool that has specific uses, not a big I WIN button. |

Mioelnir
Cataclysm Enterprises Ev0ke
57
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:51:00 -
[1995] - Quote
Histocomp wrote:Dreads were also boosted at the same time to try and provide better mechanics of taking these monsters down. No.
Suggestions on how to accomplish that were posted by the players. Neither CCP nor the CSM decided to pick up on it. There may have been a few dials that got turned a few degrees, but base dreadnought mechanics are still Red Moon Rising mechanics, designed around 3-5 dreadnoughts sieging a POS with invulnerable guns and near infinite tracking.
Supercapitals were made to be capital killers. But there are no regular combat capitals. Carriers are support ships, dreads are static siege tools, rorquals are rorquals. None of them is an actual combat capital designed around ship vs ship combat. Thus an old, limping wolf was promoted badass in a valley of sheeps.
We do not need supercapitals, capable of shifting planetary tides, helpless against 5 rifters. That is ridiculous even within eve's own set of fiction (think 3 jovian supercaps against an entire amarr subcap armada). We need a real and regular ship to ship combat capital.
The main broken mechanic of Titans is their lack of a natural enemy within their intended prey (I am not talking about the suggestions that float around the forums all the time about a single frigate module that needs 250 SP on a trial account an takes out a titan. Get real.).
That they are used nowadays the way they are, is because it turned out, that once the blocks capable of wielding huge numbers with incoherent fleets were done in, and got replaced by new blocks of the same size but coherent setups - that there emerge fleet mechanics so broken, you can only counter them with other broken mechanics. And so the problems winded each other up and up and up and up. This can not be fixed by patting one of the sides on the head. At best it slows the process down a bit. At worst it creates unbeatable fleets in sov warfare, where can have the most awesome bombrun ever without doing anything about that ihub or station timer.
Also, what is this all the time with the bad propaganda that "old players" (are the original goons nowadays not "old players" as well?) try to hinder new players from accessing nullsec? YOU WANT TO TAKE THEIR SPACE. They defend it. Have a nice day, this is EVE. There is no right to be in nullsec that is granted to you upon subscription, unless you take it with autocannon and neutralizer in hand.
@Kyle Myr: if they weren't giant space piniatas while waiting I'd agree. More numbers (of characters) is a laughable solution at best, considering how much flak we the players always give CCP for making alt-requiring game mechanics. Also, if a garage character is the optimal solution, that means the best way to play the game is by not actually playing it. Kind of a declaration of gamedesign bankruptcy. |

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:51:00 -
[1996] - Quote
Sotar Armana wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Xython wrote:Could you imagine the abloobloobloooo if the Anti-blob alliances' Titan blobs were being killed by 500-1000 Goons in rifters just flying up to them and exploding? Not only clog their guns with rifters now it's straight up exploding rifters in their exhaust ports. If this happens we all must make new pilots and name them some variation of Major Kong
Well boys, I reckon this is it. Nuklar combat, toe to toe with the rooskies. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2927
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:54:00 -
[1997] - Quote
Mioelnir wrote:original goons
i love how idiots still believe this crap "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
168
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:54:00 -
[1998] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Kerensky White wrote:Skill is having a dozen afterburning targets locked up then waiting for their transversal to get juuust right. And you have all the time in the world to do it too, because really is that fleet of subcaps actually doing anything to you?
You seem to think that Titans should be targets for your fleet, without bringing caps yourself. Isn't that just turning the tables.
When people say straw man arguments, this is the sort of thing they're talking about.
You seem to think bringing super caps to a fight escalates the battle somehow, so it becomes a playing field where only capital ships matter, titans most of all. This attitude is toxic, and it goes against the EVE where a newbie's hero tackle can start a chain of events which can reshape the landscape: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08hmqyejCYU
That's CCP's trailer of a vision of EVE, and one of the most attractive parts of this MMO. The idea of fights 'escalating' and super caps being some kind of 'endgame' hull is detrimental to EVE as a game. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2711
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:54:00 -
[1999] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Kerensky White wrote:Skill is having a dozen afterburning targets locked up then waiting for their transversal to get juuust right. And you have all the time in the world to do it too, because really is that fleet of subcaps actually doing anything to you?
You seem to think that Titans should be targets for your fleet, without bringing caps yourself. Isn't that just turning the tables. i see we have the raiden. badposter advocating for "my money should make me invulnerable to everyone" again |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2711
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:56:00 -
[2000] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Kerensky White wrote:Skill is having a dozen afterburning targets locked up then waiting for their transversal to get juuust right. And you have all the time in the world to do it too, because really is that fleet of subcaps actually doing anything to you?
You seem to think that Titans should be targets for your fleet, without bringing caps yourself. Isn't that just turning the tables. Just stop...unless you're a spy alt purposefully embarrassing your entire infiltrated alliance, in which case carry on and well done. raiden. is literally incapable of being embarrassed, it requires a level of self awareness they simply do not possess |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:01:00 -
[2001] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Darth Tickles wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Kerensky White wrote:Skill is having a dozen afterburning targets locked up then waiting for their transversal to get juuust right. And you have all the time in the world to do it too, because really is that fleet of subcaps actually doing anything to you?
You seem to think that Titans should be targets for your fleet, without bringing caps yourself. Isn't that just turning the tables. Just stop...unless you're a spy alt purposefully embarrassing your entire infiltrated alliance, in which case carry on and well done. raiden. is literally incapable of being embarrassed, it requires a level of self awareness they simply do not possess
Don't need self awareness to blap subcaps.
Until now! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2927
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:02:00 -
[2002] - Quote
i wonder why gordon cain (aka ~the supremacy~) jumped from that sinking ship "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
190
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:02:00 -
[2003] - Quote
Mioelnir wrote:Histocomp wrote:Dreads were also boosted at the same time to try and provide better mechanics of taking these monsters down. No. Suggestions on how to accomplish that were posted by the players. Neither CCP nor the CSM decided to pick up on it. There may have been a few dials that got turned a few degrees, but base dreadnought mechanics are still Red Moon Rising mechanics, designed around 3-5 dreadnoughts sieging a POS with invulnerable guns and near infinite tracking. Supercapitals were made to be capital killers. But there are no regular combat capitals. Carriers are support ships, dreads are static siege tools, rorquals are rorquals. None of them is an actual combat capital designed around ship vs ship combat. Thus an old, limping wolf was promoted badass in a valley of sheeps. We do not need supercapitals, capable of shifting planetary tides, helpless against 5 rifters. That is ridiculous even within eve's own set of fiction (think 3 jovian supercaps against an entire amarr subcap armada). We need a real and regular ship to ship combat capital. The main broken mechanic of Titans is their lack of a natural enemy within their intended prey (I am not talking about the suggestions that float around the forums all the time about a single frigate module that needs 250 SP on a trial account an takes out a titan. Get real.). That they are used nowadays the way they are, is because it turned out, that once the blocks capable of wielding huge numbers with incoherent fleets were done in, and got replaced by new blocks of the same size but coherent setups - that there emerge fleet mechanics so broken, you can only counter them with other broken mechanics. And so the problems winded each other up and up and up and up. This can not be fixed by patting one of the sides on the head. At best it slows the process down a bit. At worst it creates unbeatable fleets in sov warfare, where can have the most awesome bombrun ever without doing anything about that ihub or station timer. Also, what is this all the time with the bad propaganda that "old players" (are the original goons nowadays not "old players" as well?) try to hinder new players from accessing nullsec? YOU WANT TO TAKE THEIR SPACE. They defend it. Have a nice day, this is EVE. There is no right to be in nullsec that is granted to you upon subscription, unless you take it with autocannon and neutralizer in hand. @Kyle Myr: if they weren't giant space piniatas while waiting I'd agree. More numbers (of characters) is a laughable solution at best, considering how much flak we the players always give CCP for making alt-requiring game mechanics. Also, if a garage character is the optimal solution, that means the best way to play the game is by not actually playing it. Kind of a declaration of gamedesign bankruptcy.
dreads are missing thier two best friends...
one is the juggernaut a capital ship that uses capital nuets/nos captal cap injectors and an infinity point when in siege...
two is a shipt like the bc that is the size of a frieghter that are like t3 bc's... make them use oversized guns but does not have seige... so it uses 8 turrets but has the tank of a tier 1 bs.... that way a gallente one using 3 mag stabs will do about 3500 dps each... |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
227
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:02:00 -
[2004] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:raiden. is literally incapable of being embarrassed, it requires a level of self awareness they simply do not possess Are they able to feel fear when welpcanes attack or is that just a knee jerk response to enemies that aren't dead? Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2711
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:06:00 -
[2005] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Weaselior wrote:raiden. is literally incapable of being embarrassed, it requires a level of self awareness they simply do not possess Are they able to feel fear when welpcanes attack or is that just a knee jerk response to enemies that aren't dead? even a cockroach can feel fear |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:09:00 -
[2006] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Weaselior wrote:raiden. is literally incapable of being embarrassed, it requires a level of self awareness they simply do not possess Are they able to feel fear when welpcanes attack or is that just a knee jerk response to enemies that aren't dead? even a cockroach can feel fear
So no then? |

Sir Marksalot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:14:00 -
[2007] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Mioelnir wrote:Histocomp wrote:Dreads were also boosted at the same time to try and provide better mechanics of taking these monsters down. No. Suggestions on how to accomplish that were posted by the players. Neither CCP nor the CSM decided to pick up on it. There may have been a few dials that got turned a few degrees, but base dreadnought mechanics are still Red Moon Rising mechanics, designed around 3-5 dreadnoughts sieging a POS with invulnerable guns and near infinite tracking. Supercapitals were made to be capital killers. But there are no regular combat capitals. Carriers are support ships, dreads are static siege tools, rorquals are rorquals. None of them is an actual combat capital designed around ship vs ship combat. Thus an old, limping wolf was promoted badass in a valley of sheeps. We do not need supercapitals, capable of shifting planetary tides, helpless against 5 rifters. That is ridiculous even within eve's own set of fiction (think 3 jovian supercaps against an entire amarr subcap armada). We need a real and regular ship to ship combat capital. The main broken mechanic of Titans is their lack of a natural enemy within their intended prey (I am not talking about the suggestions that float around the forums all the time about a single frigate module that needs 250 SP on a trial account an takes out a titan. Get real.). That they are used nowadays the way they are, is because it turned out, that once the blocks capable of wielding huge numbers with incoherent fleets were done in, and got replaced by new blocks of the same size but coherent setups - that there emerge fleet mechanics so broken, you can only counter them with other broken mechanics. And so the problems winded each other up and up and up and up. This can not be fixed by patting one of the sides on the head. At best it slows the process down a bit. At worst it creates unbeatable fleets in sov warfare, where can have the most awesome bombrun ever without doing anything about that ihub or station timer. Also, what is this all the time with the bad propaganda that "old players" (are the original goons nowadays not "old players" as well?) try to hinder new players from accessing nullsec? YOU WANT TO TAKE THEIR SPACE. They defend it. Have a nice day, this is EVE. There is no right to be in nullsec that is granted to you upon subscription, unless you take it with autocannon and neutralizer in hand. @Kyle Myr: if they weren't giant space piniatas while waiting I'd agree. More numbers (of characters) is a laughable solution at best, considering how much flak we the players always give CCP for making alt-requiring game mechanics. Also, if a garage character is the optimal solution, that means the best way to play the game is by not actually playing it. Kind of a declaration of gamedesign bankruptcy. dreads are missing thier two best friends... one is the juggernaut a capital ship that uses capital nuets/nos captal cap injectors and an infinity point when in siege... two is a shipt like the bc that is the size of a frieghter that are like t3 bc's... make them use oversized guns but does not have seige... so it uses 8 turrets but has the tank of a tier 1 bs.... that way a gallente one using 3 mag stabs will do about 3500 dps each... Just what the hell did you make me read? |

Sir Marksalot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:15:00 -
[2008] - Quote
. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2928
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:15:00 -
[2009] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:dreads are missing thier two best friends...
one is the juggernaut a capital ship that uses capital nuets/nos captal cap injectors and an infinity point when in siege...
two is a shipt like the bc that is the size of a frieghter that are like t3 bc's... make them use oversized guns but does not have seige... so it uses 8 turrets but has the tank of a tier 1 bs.... that way a gallente one using 3 mag stabs will do about 3500 dps each...
yes let's shelve hictors and require capitals to tackle titans
"hmm how do i shake off this <3m ehp tackler" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
168
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:20:00 -
[2010] - Quote
Some interesting points here. I'll break up the quote to address them.
Mioelnir wrote:Histocomp wrote:Dreads were also boosted at the same time to try and provide better mechanics of taking these monsters down. No. Suggestions on how to accomplish that were posted by the players. Neither CCP nor the CSM decided to pick up on it. There may have been a few dials that got turned a few degrees, but base dreadnought mechanics are still Red Moon Rising mechanics, designed around 3-5 dreadnoughts sieging a POS with invulnerable guns and near infinite tracking. Supercapitals were made to be capital killers. But there are no regular combat capitals. Carriers are support ships, dreads are static siege tools, rorquals are rorquals. None of them is an actual combat capital designed around ship vs ship combat. Thus an old, limping wolf was promoted badass in a valley of sheeps. We do not need supercapitals, capable of shifting planetary tides, helpless against 5 rifters. That is ridiculous even within eve's own set of fiction (think 3 jovian supercaps against an entire amarr subcap armada). We need a real and regular ship to ship combat capital. The main broken mechanic of Titans is their lack of a natural enemy within their intended prey (I am not talking about the suggestions that float around the forums all the time about a single frigate module that needs 250 SP on a trial account an takes out a titan. Get real.).
I don't actually have a strong opinion when it comes to combat roles of capitals, beyond the concept that they should be vulnerable enough to tackle and destruction. Where you suggest a combat capital, I think that re-examining super capital immunity to conventional tackle has some merit. Perhaps with an innate WCS of something like 15-25, so that a large presence of vulnerable tackle or heavy tackle is required to hold each ship on the field.I don't necessarily see validity to keeping Titans immune to conventional tackle, but it's only one idea. I suggest it because it works with the present game mechanics, addresses the issue of super capitals being unchecked entirely in low sec, and gives a role to coordinated groups of new players flying ships which are extremely vulnerable to any sort of sub capital support fleet. Even carriers spewing masses of Warrior IIs can kill frigates as fast as they lock them. Either way, we can agree that the status quo is not healthy.
Mioelnir wrote: That they are used nowadays the way they are, is because it turned out, that once the blocks capable of wielding huge numbers with incoherent fleets were done in, and got replaced by new blocks of the same size but coherent setups - that there emerge fleet mechanics so broken, you can only counter them with other broken mechanics. And so the problems winded each other up and up and up and up. This can not be fixed by patting one of the sides on the head. At best it slows the process down a bit. At worst it creates unbeatable fleets in sov warfare, where can have the most awesome bombrun ever without doing anything about that ihub or station timer.
Given your ticker is from one of the better alliances at bombing in EVE, I'm somewhat surprised by this. The advent of TiDi opens up a range of fleet options to combat sub capital fleets, as things which cycle faster now work in combat, and logistics ships have their effective reaction time improved. That said, I'd rather hash this out with a fight than posting theory craft. I don't think we're unbeatable, and I'm sure you'd find many allies willing to support you if you wanted to prove that.
Mioelnir wrote: Also, what is this all the time with the bad propaganda that "old players" (are the original goons nowadays not "old players" as well?) try to hinder new players from accessing nullsec? YOU WANT TO TAKE THEIR SPACE. They defend it. Have a nice day, this is EVE. There is no right to be in nullsec that is granted to you upon subscription, unless you take it with autocannon and neutralizer in hand.
The arguments originate from a perceived elitism among 0.0 entities - that they don't want new members, or do much to recruit them, and that they have unreasonably high SP barriers for welcoming pilots into the fold. Goonfleet does have a few members that have been around since 2006, but plenty of us are legitimately new, or resubscribed with little SP.
For example, I myself have only been around for 11 months. I've got 17m SP to my name, and I'm only just now approaching being able to fly a well-skilled logistics ship (24 days out). Plenty of alliance demand a 20m SP minimum, which creates a situation where players need to either wait a year to experience the joy of EVE PvP, or spend large amounts of ISK to acquire someone's combat character. This isn't a good solution. TEST and Goonfleet are the only two entities I know of in 0.0 that are willing to nurture players from day 1. If there are other groups out there, power to them. I'm glad I've been able to enjoy EVE since I subscribed last April.
Mioelnir wrote: @Kyle Myr: if they weren't giant space piniatas while waiting I'd agree. More numbers (of characters) is a laughable solution at best, considering how much flak we the players always give CCP for making alt-requiring game mechanics. Also, if a garage character is the optimal solution, that means the best way to play the game is by not actually playing it. Kind of a declaration of gamedesign bankruptcy.
I agree it's kind of a terrible solution to the issue of super caps being space coffins, but it's a way to throw bad money after good to get much of the initial investment (a character with excellent combat skills) back. As long as changes given to super caps to allow them to dock comes with further reductions to their combat dominance, I think I'd agree that they'd be good changes for EVE. While Titans can shoot down after burning Rifters, anything goes. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
190
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:27:00 -
[2011] - Quote
Andski wrote:MeBiatch wrote:dreads are missing thier two best friends...
one is the juggernaut a capital ship that uses capital nuets/nos captal cap injectors and an infinity point when in siege...
two is a shipt like the bc that is the size of a frieghter that are like t3 bc's... make them use oversized guns but does not have seige... so it uses 8 turrets but has the tank of a tier 1 bs.... that way a gallente one using 3 mag stabs will do about 3500 dps each... yes let's shelve hictors and require capitals to tackle titans "hmm how do i shake off this <3m ehp tackler"
with other juggers... they have lower ehp then dreads and have neglagible dps... they are there to nuet caps and tackle caps... |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2930
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:29:00 -
[2012] - Quote
again how do you propose that 50 titans shake off 10 "juggers" that nobody will fly because ahaha stupid gimmicks
try to answer that with less than 20 ellipses in one sentence "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2930
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:33:00 -
[2013] - Quote
i realize that highsec pubbies who post with npc alts to avoid wardecs over awful posts don't understand how 0.0 combat works, so please take your excellent ideas to F&I "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Balderic Lunacy
Ever Flow Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:37:00 -
[2014] - Quote
WTF is CCPs problem?
I can't believe that you have the balls and are willing to flat our admit that your just doing this cause you don't want to take the time to do it right.
Proving yet again that the apologies and " I'm gonna do better" were just bullshit and empty comments.
I think Titans need to be re-balanced, but a 90 billion is paper weight?
Goon and friends just played you, and I have some ocean front property in Arizona for sale.
I will be turning off my account and personally using Greyscale as a replacement for C * nt.
I hope you at least have the rational to provide the people that spent 2 years training and 4 years building assets a buyout option.
If and when you get your head out of your ass, and actually want to improve the game let me know. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
478
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:39:00 -
[2015] - Quote
andski you know better then to engage an npc corp poster |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2932
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:39:00 -
[2016] - Quote
Balderic Lunacy wrote:I will be turning off my account and personally using Greyscale as a replacement for C * nt.
stuff? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Ganthrithor
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
147
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:42:00 -
[2017] - Quote
I'd just like to point out that, using current ship/mod data, a somewhat ganky (Tank mids but for one sebo, DC II, 2x gyro, 1x TE, 2x CN PDS in the lows) using faction +tracking ammo, does:
- zero dps to a non-MWDing cruiser out to ~50km, and peaks at ~250 dps at 100km
- Does under 500 dps to battleships that are closer than 20km (again, no prop) with essentially zero DPS until 10km
- zero dps to a no-prop BC under 20km, peaks at ~1600 dps @ ~70km
Obviously combat conditions are different from Pyfa graphs, but I doubt tracking needs to be nerfed by 50%, or that scan res needs to be reduced to the point where officer sebos are required to lock a tower in under a minute.
I think a 15-20% tracking reduction plus elimination of combat-refitting and a buff to tacklers is a better answer than "make another class of ships as awful as dreads." I made a whole post about it, because I care. Go flame me!
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=81507&find=unread |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
190
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:48:00 -
[2018] - Quote
Andski wrote:again how do you propose that 50 titans shake off 10 "juggers" that nobody will fly because ahaha stupid gimmicks
try to answer that with less than 20 ellipses in one sentence
say i happen to like ellipses so meh get used to it...
as for how would 50 titans shake these things off is... if all you brought is 50 titans and no support you deserve to go down in a blaze of glory...
yeah i also expect the game mechanics to be changed to add a diminishing returns for stacked applied damage and remote repair... so alpha fleets wont be able to stack 400 maels alpha and be more effective then 40 maels alpha...
man the ellipses must really irk you 
as for you ad hominem/ straw man argument about my alleged play style and/or history... i have only one word to say to you! FREGE!  |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
20
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:48:00 -
[2019] - Quote
Fun Fact:
It took almost a week for the anomaly nerf thread to get to page 100 http://community.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1487231&page=1
This one managed it in only two days.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2933
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:56:00 -
[2020] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Andski wrote:again how do you propose that 50 titans shake off 10 "juggers" that nobody will fly because ahaha stupid gimmicks
try to answer that with less than 20 ellipses in one sentence say i happen to like ellipses so meh get used to it...  as for how would 50 titans shake these things off is... if all you brought is 50 titans and no support you deserve to go down in a blaze of glory... yeah i also expect the game mechanics to be changed to add a diminishing returns for stacked applied damage and remote repair... so alpha fleets wont be able to stack 400 maels alpha and be more effective then 40 maels alpha... man the ellipses must really irk you  as for you ad hominem/ straw man argument about my alleged play style and/or history... i have only one word to say to you! FREGE! 
the answer you're looking for is "they'd get doomsdayed" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Powers Sa
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:00:00 -
[2021] - Quote
Is this thread over yet? |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
503
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:04:00 -
[2022] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote: And remember that 50% of the posts here are Grath's :) Vote for The Mittani http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=438 |

Alemanha Pereira
S0utherN Comfort Cascade Imminent
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:05:00 -
[2023] - Quote
Its clear to me Titan blobs are hated,
and so is Goon Subcap blobs
This leaves 1 common place, everyone hates some sort of blob
My proposition: Nerf blobs, make it where no more then 20 people can aggress in 1 system at a time. Naturally you'll be able to lower structures HP too. [:twisted
If you really want to make it even more fool proof and easier to program, make it where no more then 20 peopl can undock from a station in any 1 system.
also I am making an offer to purchase all titans owned by Raiden for an equal trade of a fully fitted Hurricane per titan Since it's proven Goons can be killed by Hurricanes price on them has sky rocketed, I can only hold my offer in place 5minutes at a time
proof the caek is not a lie: http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12743537
OFFER IS STILL VALID < i will edit this as I can still afford to purchase the expensive sky rocketing prices of Hurricanes. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
190
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:05:00 -
[2024] - Quote
Andski wrote:MeBiatch wrote:Andski wrote:again how do you propose that 50 titans shake off 10 "juggers" that nobody will fly because ahaha stupid gimmicks
try to answer that with less than 20 ellipses in one sentence say i happen to like ellipses so meh get used to it...  as for how would 50 titans shake these things off is... if all you brought is 50 titans and no support you deserve to go down in a blaze of glory... yeah i also expect the game mechanics to be changed to add a diminishing returns for stacked applied damage and remote repair... so alpha fleets wont be able to stack 400 maels alpha and be more effective then 40 maels alpha... man the ellipses must really irk you  as for you ad hominem/ straw man argument about my alleged play style and/or history... i have only one word to say to you! FREGE!  the answer you're looking for is "they'd get doomsdayed"
i remember before titans got boosted you had fights with like 400 dreads... i think if you came with 300 dreads and 100 juggers you could take on the titan blob.... in the first min 50 ships die! but then the juggers nuet the hell out of the sc's and titans and then no more rr or ddd's.... especially if you got (t3bc like ships that are the gap between bs's and cap ships that are the size of freighters, so they can go threw gates) that use capital weapons... |

Dovinian
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1014
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:17:00 -
[2025] - Quote
Look at all these ******* nerds crying over spaceship pixels. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2935
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:19:00 -
[2026] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:i remember before titans got boosted you had fights with like 400 dreads... i think if you came with 300 dreads and 100 juggers you could take on the titan blob.... in the first min 50 ships die! but then the juggers nuet the hell out of the sc's and titans and then no more rr or ddd's.... especially if you got (t3bc like ships that are the gap between bs's and cap ships that are the size of freighters, so they can go threw gates) that use capital weapons...
juggers
you already came up with pubbie shorthand for a ship type that will never exist because it's dumb "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
358
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:26:00 -
[2027] - Quote
Alemanha Pereira wrote:Its clear to me Titan blobs are hated, and so is Goon Subcap blobs This leaves 1 common place, everyone hates some sort of blob My proposition: Nerf blobs, make it where no more then 20 people can aggress in 1 system at a time. Naturally you'll be able to lower structures HP too. [:twisted If you really want to make it even more fool proof and easier to program, make it where no more then 20 peopl can undock from a station in any 1 system. also I am making an offer to purchase all titans owned by Raiden for an equal trade of a fully fitted Hurricane per titan Since it's proven Goons can be killed by Hurricanes price on them has sky rocketed, I can only hold my offer in place 5minutes at a time proof the caek is not a lie: http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12743537OFFER IS STILL VALID < i will edit this as I can still afford to purchase the expensive sky rocketing prices of Hurricanes.
lol |

Mathicluanna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:30:00 -
[2028] - Quote
Combat capitals are stupid. Remove Titans and Supercarriers from the game and the Dread would actually become pretty balanced again. Its a ship with a specific, necessary role that has to commit to a fight and is vulnerable if not protected. Adding a combat capital is a terrible idea much like the original field command ships being better HACs was a terrible idea. It just creates a new baseline for combat ship and panders to the people who think their 05 regdate should give them in game advantage. |

Titan Keeper 22
State War Academy Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:35:00 -
[2029] - Quote
I wish CCP start acting normal back again and remove all the troll posts - especially posts made by their friendly GoonSwarm buddies
anyways, -Mittani the criminal savior from DC- i hear that he has some good number of titans in his alliance too. so why didn't he actually use them to counter? is he scared of losing? does he not have ability to recruit capital pilots?
he went the easy way. since he never thought about looking at the future, and not have recruited enough veterans but instead just focused on growing larger and teaching them only how to fly hurricanes, maelstroms and troll; thus making himself and the alliance weak and vulernable to REAL all-out fights that involves subcapitals, capitals, supers and titans.
even if he had enough titan pilots, like couple pages ago, when he spit the word out of his own mouth, was he worried about isk loss if he had fielded supers/titans on fights? i hear that Goonswarm/CFC have just as many techmoons and more space sov than all PL RDN NC. combined. so he had said that the alliance spends isk for reimbursing ships that can be insured when those three typical titan abusing alliances also do.
oh, have i missed somthing? are they losing too many ships to cover both supcaps and super/titans? then they should either start limiting subcap reimbursement or fly their ships better.
the only reason this problem have happend is because that you Goonswarm and them CFC don't use capitals and supercapitals even when you have them. the titan/moms numbers will surely be keep rising and rising like there is no tomorrow if there aren't any fights(super/titan including capital fights.)
a lot of people and i myself here would surely be confused at reason why you're trying to turn those titans into totally useless waste of factor in game.
we'll since i'm aware that 99% of trolls tend to ignore the true facts and go on, i may let them do so.
and finally word directly pointed at CCP,
it wasn't your fault for this imbalanced state in EvE game mechanics; the game was driven by players. but atleast have mercy to not hit one part(end game players)users and favorite the other too much. you may nerf them as you wish, but please don't forget how much effort us titan pilots put in to get them. some may have gotten them easily, but some just have put thousands of hours and spent years to get to that point. reimburse of the loss i'd say, is very neccessary; just like most GoonSwarm and you might have agree'd on the fact that we are very, very small in numbers(only 0.03% of total players?), it wont affect the market or in any other way for reimbursing for the loss we are soon to be taking. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
358
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:36:00 -
[2030] - Quote
Mathicluanna wrote:Combat capitals are stupid. Remove Titans and Supercarriers from the game and the Dread would actually become pretty balanced again. Its a ship with a specific, necessary role that has to commit to a fight and is vulnerable if not protected. Adding a combat capital is a terrible idea much like the original field command ships being better HACs was a terrible idea. It just creates a new baseline for combat ship and panders to the people who think their 05 regdate should give them in game advantage.
B-b-b-b-but I have more S-S-S-SP than you do an-an-an-and I-I-I spent a lot-t-t-t on my t-t-t-titan.
I D-D-D-DESERVE IT. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
358
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:36:00 -
[2031] - Quote
Why yes, that's my impression of the average Raidendot pilot, why do you ask? |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
170
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:48:00 -
[2032] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:-snip-
Posts like this make me miss that Raiden. dude's posts. They at least had some points to respond to, as he expressed the frustration of being stuck in a hull that prevents him from flying other, fun ships.
EVE is a game where we can fly and lose spaceships fighting over anything at all. Titans detract from this by killing everything without being able to be killed in a reasonable fashion in return. If you want a more carefully thought out response, post on your main next time. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2940
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:51:00 -
[2033] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:a bloo bloo bloo
i'm sorry that our alliance policy was never to recruit every mouthbreather with a pulse and a titan
this thread has shown that your sorry excuse for an alliance depended entirely on broken game mechanics to prop itself up - we'll see if you can disprove that "soon" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Katalci
Creative Cookie Procuring Veto Corp
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:55:00 -
[2034] - Quote
Ra Death wrote:I'm almost at a loss of words here. Almost, therefore I am going to speak my mind.
So now capitals are basically structure grinding machines and you only deploy them if you have something to grind down or if someone else is grinding stuff down and you catch someone else grinding down something. This is not a solution, this is a plaster for a symptom. There is now ZERO reason to deploy supercapitals except to grind down a structure. Do you really want structure grinding to become the motivator for people to build and create supercapitals in EVE? I mean, I don't believe you have thought at all about the consequences of these changes.
EVE is now effectively sectioned off into two tier combat systems. Capital combat and sub-capital combat. The difference is, capitals cannot touch sub-capitals, but sub-capitals can, in the numbers that are brought at the moment, almost 1-3 volley capitals. The titans were a workaround for that because numbers were no longer the only deciding factor, your playing time, your assets and your skillpoints actually played a role. Now we are going back to a time again where the only effective tool, a VERY limited tool might I add, against blobbing is a damn stealth bomber. No more force projection by taking advantage of the many years you have spent in the game and the money you have pooled into a titan, you are better off selling off said titan and joining the nearest Maelstrom fleet.
What am I meant to aspire for in EVE in terms of combat? What is my incentive for actually training all these skills. To fly the next flavour of the month subcapital ship?
EVE is now a numbers game when there is a large effort to remove counters for large fleets. If this is the direction we're going, we're going to see a bipolar political landscape because being a small alliance, you can now only exist if you are a part of the inevitable two powerblocks that will come to dominate EVE. If you can't match the numbers, too bad... join or die.
Let's get a rethink of the roles of supercapitals and not a temporary plaster that will reduce supercapitals to nothing but ihub and station grinders. |

May Zonday
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:01:00 -
[2035] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote::words:
You seem mad.
That's a lot of word that you're mad about, TitanKeeper Man.
Maybe if you didn't hose down so many subcaps with your terrible space *****, you wouldn't be in the position you're in, bent over and crying from a npc corp alt because you're so buttfrustrated that CCP WANTS TO NERF TITANS AGAIN |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:02:00 -
[2036] - Quote
Mioelnir wrote:Histocomp wrote:Dreads were also boosted at the same time to try and provide better mechanics of taking these monsters down. No. Suggestions on how to accomplish that were posted by the players. Neither CCP nor the CSM decided to pick up on it. There may have been a few dials that got turned a few degrees, but base dreadnought mechanics are still Red Moon Rising mechanics, designed around 3-5 dreadnoughts sieging a POS with invulnerable guns and near infinite tracking. Supercapitals were made to be capital killers. But there are no regular combat capitals. Carriers are support ships, dreads are static siege tools, rorquals are rorquals. None of them is an actual combat capital designed around ship vs ship combat. Thus an old, limping wolf was promoted badass in a valley of sheeps. We do not need supercapitals, capable of shifting planetary tides, helpless against 5 rifters. And that's where you revealed yourself to be the latest claimant to the Unclear on the Concept Throne. Perhaps you should have left your hyperbole in your other space-pants.
All major alliances field significant capital fleets. If they're not regularly seen in battle, it's because it's completely effin' stupid to field them there. All dreadnaughts are good for is shooting large, stationary targets, or other capitals. Carriers can harm subcaps, but that's not worth the risk of putting them in the front lines, especially against an opponent able to drop a couple dozen supercaps into the fray that will gobble them up like McNuggets. Instead, they're quietly breaking those large, stationary targets out of view, or repping them.
Which is just fine.
Where things go off the rails, for the thousandth goddamned time, is where the appearance of a large number of titans spontaneously ends the fight in the titan owners' favor, regardless of whatever else had been on the field.
Ordinarily I'd say that Repetition is the Mother of Learning. But it's futile when the other guy's arguments and worldview depend on them not learning. |

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
182
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:03:00 -
[2037] - Quote
asdf ghyj wrote:Dmitry Sychev wrote:asdf ghyj wrote:Dear CCP if do this nerf then gief back to all pilots titan skills cuz we spend 5 bil for skill and 100 bils = for titan and wasting like 3 month + for make skill AND NOW WE CANT USE THIS SHIP cuz this MITANI not have skill and isk to take titan
MR MITANI go play PREPELIX ONLINE and stop cry to CCP cuz u guys (goon) cant fly titans
OR MAKE SERVER FOR GOONS AND LET US PLAY FAIR And CCp what prefer to have 6-7k players( goons) or 60k players ?????? Think before do wrong changes 60k players? How many titans in Game? - Titan's pilots will leave game, no changes to online. I dont care how many titans pilot are in game, but i dont wasting my time 3+ month for perfect titan and a lot time to make isk to buy skill and titan and now ????? we all pay to play this game not only GOONS or MItani CCP must listen all players not only 5-6k
I don't own a Titan and I don't belong to a large null sec alliance so wasn't really going to say anything on this topic until I saw this post.
And what about me? What about the other 50,000 odd people that log in each day that don't own Titans? Don't we count?
One day I might like to head out to null to see another part of the game but I've seen the killmails and saw the threads about how YOU! and your buddies in Titans have been basically kicking the crap out of everything with impunity.
Why would I or anyone else that ALSO! pays to play EVE even waste our time trying to get to null just to be slapped down by a couple of bored Titan pilots, regardless of the time and effort we put into our skills?
Doesn't matter if we even got a good fleet together to try and take space because, hey, you have Titans and therefore you should automatically win all fights, right? WRONG!
I have read the posts by the anti-Titan nerf brigade and, jesus, you guys are weak. You can't give one coherent reason as to why it's a bad idea without pulling your head out of your ass long enough to think of the other players or the game as a whole.
All the NPC Alt posters and Raiden should stop posting, you are making yourselves look stupid by trying to imply there's nothing wrong with Titan blobs and that it's all Goon's fault for crying to CCP. Fact is, it is your own fault.
And as to the idiots that postd about Goons and friends blobbing, why do you think that is? They have the largest alliance in the game. If they were really that terrible, no-one would fly with them. May be you should look at your own policies and recruitment before you point fingers elsewhere.
As it stands, if I had to join any alliance in null to experience a new part of the game, I would certainly not choose any of the idiots from Raiden and friends. You have only ever considered the game from your perspective and have given no thought for anyone else.
Oh and by the way? Think about this really hard, if Goons have the largest alliance in EVE, who do you think will have the most Titans and Super Caps in the end? Who do you think they would use all of these shiney toys on in 6 months to a year's time? Do you think the nerf only affects you?
Think about it. |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
584
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:06:00 -
[2038] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:
Would also be nice if someone listed the percentage of post in each thread that are by alliance and individuals. Also toss in some other threadnoughts like Zulu's carrier change, AoE DD changed to focus and nanonerf to name a few. I would do it myself, but I'm restricted to my cell phone till I get home later.
|

Bok Aeden
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:14:00 -
[2039] - Quote
Dovinian wrote:When TEST grows up....
Anyone else laugh at the thought of TEST growing up? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2944
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:18:00 -
[2040] - Quote
Katalci wrote:Titans were balanced just fine before this awful change. What is their combat use over a supercarrier, now?
dunno the ability to apply 3 million alpha is pretty significant "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
358
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:20:00 -
[2041] - Quote
Guys, Titans were just fine before the change, honest!
I mean, blapping afterburning frigates is perfectly fine! Also camping gates in lowsec and killing literally everything that goes through it is 100% A-OK as well.
Why can't you guys see this? |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
358
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:20:00 -
[2042] - Quote
Really! |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
358
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:21:00 -
[2043] - Quote
Guys, my SP and ISK and ~gamechanger~
lol goonNOOBS only have 5mil SP hahahahahaha |

StainLessStealRat
Blood Covenant Pandemic Legion
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:37:00 -
[2044] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Shadoo wrote:I don't think anyone who has flown a titan in combat can argue that the ship is not currently overpowered in combat when used in great numbers, just like no one could seriously argue about AOD DDs when they started to be used in 3+3 scale every 10 minutes
Of course, same goes for every ship in eve -- when used in great numbers, but Supercapitals certainly show this curve more often on the field
So I'm extremely happy that you state that the ship needs a role change - last time we were campaigning for AOD DD change -- this was exactly what a lot of us were asking for
But that was 3 years ago
I am therefore rather dissapointed that what we, the community at large, have been asking for a very long time is rather haphazardly brushed off as something that "will be looked at long term" with a surgical change that SCREAMS of a kneejerk reaction without really providing us with much to go on here to see your vision or have comfort you are going to do something in the long term for the "end game" ship in EVE
And forgive me for saying this -- but you have not always had a great track record of revisiting changes you've made in the past as surgical adjustments. Thus I feel like pressing a bit harder on the high level thoughts that have lead you to make this current fix
What is your intended role for Titan with this change on TQ today?
How will you evaluate if your changes implemented will match up with that role on the TQ combat field in this release? For example -- as far as I can see -- a large group of titans will still obliterate a large group of battleships/drakes -- all you've delayed is the first hit and require more micromanagement in making sure the lock queue is evenly spaced out
Given how large fights today unfold on TQ -- how do you see this ship fulfilling your intended role on heavily TiDi systems with the sig change
What is your future vision, even at high level, for the Titan ship class? Will it remain a combat asset or are you looking and overhauling it for something else (personally btw I've argued for the last 4 years that titans should NOT be a combat ship at all, but rather a massive alliance level asset for logistics/cloning/staging/etc)
What assurances can you offer us this change will not remain a permanent fixture for the long term?
With the combat ability of this ship being "surgically adjusted", would you be even willing to look at for example increasing the jump range of the ship to balance the change
And lastly -- are you going to allow those pilots who wish to wait for your stated longer term role adjustments to GM-dock their ship until such a time that this change is no longer a surgical measure in order to still utilize the account/character for combat in EVE? The intended role for titans is a) jump bridging, b) doomsdaying things, c) fleet boosting and d) doing a decent job of killing capitals with their main guns. We'll be assessing the success of this change based in the first instance on whether or not players are still telling us they're having problems with this sort of thing, and then if they are, looking at the situation objectively and seeing if it merits further work. On systems under Time Dilation, we're expecting this to work mechanically identically but subjectively slower. Time Dilation is a technical fix to prevent performance issues on heavily loaded systems; it's not a game mechanic and we're not currently considering it for balancing purposes. We don't currently have a clear future vision for titans, as mentioned in the first post. We've repeatedly tried and failed to find a role for them that we're happy with in the past, and we don't want to spend significant balance resources on revisiting this right now because we have other priorities. We can't offer any assurances about our future plans. Every release (~6 months) we sit down and look at what our priorities are for the various different resources we have available (balancers, general designers, UI designers, various breeds of programmer, artists etc) and then allocate accordingly. These priorities change based on the current state of the game, the resources available and so on. Spending significant resources on a major titan rework is not currently on our short-term plan, and beyond that we don't have any reliable way of offering guarantees on what we will and won't be working on. This approach means that we're always delivering maximum possible value, but at the cost of not having rock-solid long-term plans. I would also note here that we're doing this "quick fix" precisely because we don't know when we're going to have a comprehensive solution - we regard the current situation as broken, and we don't want to leave it broken indefinitely while we wait for a "proper fix" with no clear timetable. This is the best way to deal with this general sort of problem in our opinion. We're considering additional changes to balance out this adjustment; we'll do it if we feel it's necessary, but we'd prefer to make as few changes as possible at this time. We're also considering ways of letting people "park up", but we can't make any commitments about that this morning.
50% of our fights now take place in TiDi,Not balancing with this in mind is idiotic.
When you admit to looking at allowing players to park there 100 B+ Investment you must realize you are admitting that the ship is not worth wasting a high SP char on that could be flying the "End game " ship in eve, a Faction BS.
Also when i burn away from BS in a straight line in my Slicer i allways die, when will you look at BS tracking?
|

Blawrf McTaggart
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
630
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:48:00 -
[2045] - Quote
StainLessStealRat wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Shadoo wrote:I don't think anyone who has flown a titan in combat can argue that the ship is not currently overpowered in combat when used in great numbers, just like no one could seriously argue about AOD DDs when they started to be used in 3+3 scale every 10 minutes
Of course, same goes for every ship in eve -- when used in great numbers, but Supercapitals certainly show this curve more often on the field
So I'm extremely happy that you state that the ship needs a role change - last time we were campaigning for AOD DD change -- this was exactly what a lot of us were asking for
But that was 3 years ago
I am therefore rather dissapointed that what we, the community at large, have been asking for a very long time is rather haphazardly brushed off as something that "will be looked at long term" with a surgical change that SCREAMS of a kneejerk reaction without really providing us with much to go on here to see your vision or have comfort you are going to do something in the long term for the "end game" ship in EVE
And forgive me for saying this -- but you have not always had a great track record of revisiting changes you've made in the past as surgical adjustments. Thus I feel like pressing a bit harder on the high level thoughts that have lead you to make this current fix
What is your intended role for Titan with this change on TQ today?
How will you evaluate if your changes implemented will match up with that role on the TQ combat field in this release? For example -- as far as I can see -- a large group of titans will still obliterate a large group of battleships/drakes -- all you've delayed is the first hit and require more micromanagement in making sure the lock queue is evenly spaced out
Given how large fights today unfold on TQ -- how do you see this ship fulfilling your intended role on heavily TiDi systems with the sig change
What is your future vision, even at high level, for the Titan ship class? Will it remain a combat asset or are you looking and overhauling it for something else (personally btw I've argued for the last 4 years that titans should NOT be a combat ship at all, but rather a massive alliance level asset for logistics/cloning/staging/etc)
What assurances can you offer us this change will not remain a permanent fixture for the long term?
With the combat ability of this ship being "surgically adjusted", would you be even willing to look at for example increasing the jump range of the ship to balance the change
And lastly -- are you going to allow those pilots who wish to wait for your stated longer term role adjustments to GM-dock their ship until such a time that this change is no longer a surgical measure in order to still utilize the account/character for combat in EVE? The intended role for titans is a) jump bridging, b) doomsdaying things, c) fleet boosting and d) doing a decent job of killing capitals with their main guns. We'll be assessing the success of this change based in the first instance on whether or not players are still telling us they're having problems with this sort of thing, and then if they are, looking at the situation objectively and seeing if it merits further work. On systems under Time Dilation, we're expecting this to work mechanically identically but subjectively slower. Time Dilation is a technical fix to prevent performance issues on heavily loaded systems; it's not a game mechanic and we're not currently considering it for balancing purposes. We don't currently have a clear future vision for titans, as mentioned in the first post. We've repeatedly tried and failed to find a role for them that we're happy with in the past, and we don't want to spend significant balance resources on revisiting this right now because we have other priorities. We can't offer any assurances about our future plans. Every release (~6 months) we sit down and look at what our priorities are for the various different resources we have available (balancers, general designers, UI designers, various breeds of programmer, artists etc) and then allocate accordingly. These priorities change based on the current state of the game, the resources available and so on. Spending significant resources on a major titan rework is not currently on our short-term plan, and beyond that we don't have any reliable way of offering guarantees on what we will and won't be working on. This approach means that we're always delivering maximum possible value, but at the cost of not having rock-solid long-term plans. I would also note here that we're doing this "quick fix" precisely because we don't know when we're going to have a comprehensive solution - we regard the current situation as broken, and we don't want to leave it broken indefinitely while we wait for a "proper fix" with no clear timetable. This is the best way to deal with this general sort of problem in our opinion. We're considering additional changes to balance out this adjustment; we'll do it if we feel it's necessary, but we'd prefer to make as few changes as possible at this time. We're also considering ways of letting people "park up", but we can't make any commitments about that this morning. 50% of our fights now take place in TiDi,Not balancing with this in mind is idiotic. When you admit to looking at allowing players to park there 100 B+ Investment you must realize you are admitting that the ship is not worth wasting a high SP char on that could be flying the "End game " ship in eve, a Faction BS. Also when i burn away from BS in a straight line in my Slicer i allways die, when will you look at BS tracking?
When BS cost over 60,000,000,000 ISK to build and are nigh unkillable, I expect. |

Vonce forthelulz
The Ankou Raiden.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:52:00 -
[2046] - Quote
One can argue that this is a good end point for the titan class, but making this change as an immediate, entirely class-nerfing release drastically changes the balance of 0.0 power-blocks and sends a bad message about the role of the CSM. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2944
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:54:00 -
[2047] - Quote
Vonce forthelulz wrote:One can argue that this is a good end point for the titan class, but making this change as an immediate, entirely class-nerfing release drastically changes the balance of 0.0 power-blocks and sends a bad message about the role of the CSM.
"our success can't rely entirely on broken ships anymore" is not "drastically changing the balance of 0.0 powerblocs" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
359
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:55:00 -
[2048] - Quote
StainLessStealRat wrote:Also when i burn away from BS in a straight line in my Slicer i allways die, when will you look at BS tracking?
lol
This isn' t the same situation and you know it. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2944
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:56:00 -
[2049] - Quote
with raiden's high skillpoint concentration and ability to adapt to a changing combat environment I am sure that they will continue to fight us just fine
right? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
359
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:57:00 -
[2050] - Quote
Vonce forthelulz wrote:One can argue that this is a good end point for the titan class, but making this change as an immediate, entirely class-nerfing release drastically changes the balance of 0.0 power-blocks and sends a bad message about the role of the CSM.
Sorry that you won't be able to win fights with this nerf.
Then again, any time you guys dropped Titans we declared it as a victory anyway since we know you can't kill us without them~~ |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
359
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:57:00 -
[2051] - Quote
Andski wrote:with raiden's high skillpoint concentration and ability to adapt to a changing combat environment I am sure that they will continue to fight us just fine
right?
The real question is here, are they, too, a professional merc alliance like Pandemic Legion??? |

Death2all Supercaps
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 02:02:00 -
[2052] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:Guys, my SP and ISK and ~gamechanger~
lol goonNOOBS only have 5mil SP hahahahahaha
Death2all Supercaps wrote:Skrypt wrote:Sounds like a good idea. Let me dedicate my 120m SP character to a spacecoffin that opens bridges and can shoot non-existent capital fleets.
Oh well, at least this means there's one less account for me to sub. I have 2 mil sp and am a threat to you now 
correction 2 mil sp :colbert: |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
62
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 02:24:00 -
[2053] - Quote
All the tears have been teared, laughs laughed, and backs slapped.
That was a great 100 pages. Thanks to everyone who contributed. |

Titan Keeper 22
State War Academy Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 02:33:00 -
[2054] - Quote
there are just too many trolls around here. i dont know why CCP is letting those cluleless goonswarm trolls make troll posts at almost every post giving opinions and feedbacks about the incomming titan adjustments that are not from their own, without any legimate reason.
please remove idiotic posts here so that people would actually read other peoples feedbacks and react by agreeing, disagreeing, leaving feedback of a feedback without trolling.
and by the way, i'm not any part of rdn, nc., pl, goonswarm, cfc, or any 0.0 sov holding alliance. (infact, i personally hate some of rdn members for the insulting of me in the past still then, was never in or part of thier alliance.)
therefore i'm not favoring anyone and have no reason to. but i must say this, that you GoonSwarm and CFC are acting ridiculous here.
all the hate from the past because they(rdn nc. pl) have overwhelmed, ripped apart your maelstrom/drake fleet by titan blobbing needs to be said and done somwhere else. usually when this kind of thing happens, CCP tend to act against, and favourite the other side a little bit.(doesn't mean that they have always favorited in a way that affected the game fix) but for somreason they are agreeing upon everything that Goonswarm/CFC says, including troll posts.
i'm starting to think that there must've been some kind of bribery, extortion, some kind of simillar way done with this issue thats going on right now. CCP need not to act ridiculously keep letting things go like this. |

Sotar Armana
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 02:56:00 -
[2055] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:there are just too many trolls around here. i dont know why CCP is letting those cluleless goonswarm trolls make troll posts at almost every post giving opinions and feedbacks about the incomming titan adjustments that are not from their own, without any legimate reason.
please remove idiotic posts here so that people would actually read other peoples feedbacks and react by agreeing, disagreeing, leaving feedback of a feedback without trolling.
and by the way, i'm not any part of rdn, nc., pl, goonswarm, cfc, or any 0.0 sov holding alliance. (infact, i personally hate some of rdn members for the insulting of me in the past still then, was never in or part of thier alliance.)
therefore i'm not favoring anyone and have no reason to. but i must say this, that you GoonSwarm and CFC are acting ridiculous here.
all the hate from the past because they(rdn nc. pl) have overwhelmed, ripped apart your maelstrom/drake fleet by titan blobbing needs to be said and done somwhere else. usually when this kind of thing happens, CCP tend to act against, and favourite the other side a little bit.(doesn't mean that they have always favorited in a way that affected the game fix) but for somreason they are agreeing upon everything that Goonswarm/CFC says, including troll posts.
i'm starting to think that there must've been some kind of bribery, extortion, some kind of simillar way done with this issue thats going on right now. CCP need not to act ridiculously keep letting things go like this.
Conspiracy post. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2949
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 02:57:00 -
[2056] - Quote
NPC alts "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Zxmagus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:00:00 -
[2057] - Quote
The timing of this is perfect the forces of elite PvP are loosing on all fronts tenal, the fall of c-j they don't even have this nerf to say that's why they failed. |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
584
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:02:00 -
[2058] - Quote
There is the block feature you know. Don't like a poster who just trolls, block them. It makes this thread far easier to read.
|

Titan Keeper 22
State War Academy Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:04:00 -
[2059] - Quote
CCP, i understand that you are trying to give favor to the starters, so called noobs(I.E. more than 50% of GoonSwarm and CFC). you have already done so by killing the end-game content out of EvE in a semi way, by making supercapitals worthless other than the ones owned by PL that are using them for ganking other supercapitals and capitals only.
now you're trying to kill end game content to an extinct.
how many people do you think will get bored of EvE after pvp'ing in battlecruisers/battleships/t3 and structure grinding for several months and have realized that that was the endgame content?
right now, you Goonswarm and CFC will surely be happy about the killing of the titan out of game, so that you can conquer sov. without the worries of titan blobbing. but do you really think in the future, will still be interested in playing EvE after playing in the same environment over and over without the possibility of going any further?
look for an example - RvB they are doing almost same thing as you all sov holding alliances including both Goonswarm/CFC, and RDN, NC., PL without structure grinding part. but how many members do you think that they've stayed there and enjoyed being active in part of their activites for longer than 1 year? 2years? i doubt that there are many. they'll most likely leave RvB and seek for another level towards end-game.(means switching from friagates to battlecruisers, batlteships, t2ships, t3 ships, or even capitals)
CCP, you are basically going backwards and ruining the game by removing of the current end-game content.
but then i slightly agree on the fact that they are becomming more available to people.(i heard the max was 37titans fielded on single grid of a battle)
but by removing them of their use by making them utterly useless? haven't heard of any game that have successed by doing this way.
just to give you a slight advice here; most successful MMO, MMORPG games have done it in an opposite way to fix the inflation of end-game content by 'adding more' end-game content |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
584
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:07:00 -
[2060] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:CCP, i understand that you are trying to give favor to the starters, so called noobs(I.E. more than 50% of GoonSwarm and CFC). you have already done so by killing the end-game content out of EvE in a semi way, by making supercapitals worthless other than the ones owned by PL that are using them for ganking other supercapitals and capitals only.
now you're trying to kill end game content to an extinct.
how many people do you think will get bored of EvE after pvp'ing in battlecruisers/battleships/t3 and structure grinding for several months and have realized that that was the endgame content?
right now, you Goonswarm and CFC will surely be happy about the killing of the titan out of game, so that you can conquer sov. without the worries of titan blobbing. but do you really think in the future, will still be interested in playing EvE after playing in the same environment over and over without the possibility of going any further?
look for an example - RvB they are doing almost same thing as you all sov holding alliances including both Goonswarm/CFC, and RDN, NC., PL without structure grinding part. but how many members do you think that they've stayed there and enjoyed being active in part of their activites for longer than 1 year? 2years? i doubt that there are many. they'll most likely leave RvB and seek for another level towards end-game.(means switching from friagates to battlecruisers, batlteships, t2ships, t3 ships, or even capitals)
CCP, you are basically going backwards and ruining the game by removing of the current end-game content.
but then i slightly agree on the fact that they are becomming more available to people.(i heard the max was 37titans fielded on single grid of a battle)
but by removing them of their use by making them utterly useless? haven't heard of any game that have successed by doing this way.
just to give you a slight advice here; most successful MMO, MMORPG games have done it in an opposite way to fix the inflation of end-game content by 'adding more' end-game content
Holy **** man. I'm going to take the advice I just gave you and use it myself. To block your blabbing.
|

Zxmagus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:07:00 -
[2061] - Quote
Balderic Lunacy wrote:WTF is CCPs problem?
I can't believe that you have the balls and are willing to flat our admit that your just doing this cause you don't want to take the time to do it right.
Proving yet again that the apologies and " I'm gonna do better" were just bullshit and empty comments.
I think Titans need to be re-balanced, but a 90 billion isk paper weight?
Goon and friends just played you, and I have some ocean front property in Arizona for sale.
I will be turning off my account and personally using Greyscale as a replacement for C * nt.
I hope you at least have the rational to provide the people that spent 2 years training and 4 years building assets a buyout option.
If and when you get your head out of your ass, and actually want to improve the game let me know.
No you played your self because you couldn't keep your dik in your pants blapping small cruiser gangs in synd with titans.
|

Sotar Armana
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:10:00 -
[2062] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:CCP, i understand that you are trying to give favor to the starters, so called noobs(I.E. more than 50% of GoonSwarm and CFC). you have already done so by killing the end-game content out of EvE in a semi way, by making supercapitals worthless other than the ones owned by PL that are using them for ganking other supercapitals and capitals only.
now you're trying to kill end game content to an extinct.
how many people do you think will get bored of EvE after pvp'ing in battlecruisers/battleships/t3 and structure grinding for several months and have realized that that was the endgame content?
right now, you Goonswarm and CFC will surely be happy about the killing of the titan out of game, so that you can conquer sov. without the worries of titan blobbing. but do you really think in the future, will still be interested in playing EvE after playing in the same environment over and over without the possibility of going any further?
look for an example - RvB they are doing almost same thing as you all sov holding alliances including both Goonswarm/CFC, and RDN, NC., PL without structure grinding part. but how many members do you think that they've stayed there and enjoyed being active in part of their activites for longer than 1 year? 2years? i doubt that there are many. they'll most likely leave RvB and seek for another level towards end-game.(means switching from friagates to battlecruisers, batlteships, t2ships, t3 ships, or even capitals)
CCP, you are basically going backwards and ruining the game by removing of the current end-game content.
but then i slightly agree on the fact that they are becomming more available to people.(i heard the max was 37titans fielded on single grid of a battle)
but by removing them of their use by making them utterly useless? haven't heard of any game that have successed by doing this way.
just to give you a slight advice here; most successful MMO, MMORPG games have done it in an opposite way to fix the inflation of end-game content by 'adding more' end-game content You removed it yourself with blapping frigates in your 60 bil isk toys. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2951
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:16:00 -
[2063] - Quote
just checked and my posts make up 10% of this thread
what up "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Sotar Armana
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:22:00 -
[2064] - Quote
Andski wrote:just checked and my posts make up 10% of this thread
what up I am a lazy poster  |

Balderic Lunacy
Ever Flow Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:29:00 -
[2065] - Quote
Zxmagus wrote:Balderic Lunacy wrote:WTF is CCPs problem? I can't believe that you have the balls and are willing to flat our admit that your just doing this cause you don't want to take the time to do it right. Proving yet again that the apologies and " I'm gonna do better" were just bullshit and empty comments. I think Titans need to be re-balanced, but a 90 billion isk paper weight? Goon and friends just played you, and I have some ocean front property in Arizona for sale. I will be turning off my account and personally using Greyscale as a replacement for C * nt. I hope you at least have the rational to provide the people that spent 2 years training and 4 years building assets a buyout option. If and when you get your head out of your ass, and actually want to improve the game let me know. No you played your self because you couldn't keep your dik in your pants blapping small cruiser gangs in synd with titans.
You mean the ones that are dumb enough to fly in a straight line with a MWD on? I believe that is called natural selection.
If your referring to a gang of pilots that keep their wits and do not panic, then perhaps you should read before a quote.
I stated " I think Titans need to be re-balanced "
My complaint is not that something is being done. My complaint is that CCP is doing a half ass job of it and directly contradicting their promise to the player base.
If you do not remember then allow me to refresh you. A few months ago the DEV blogs and PR all reported that CCP understands they made a lot of rash choices / mistakes and that they did not invest enough time into the things they were doing.
Now, before the dust even settles on their peace offering of " Crucible " they pull out the same old poor planning and un-educated maneuvers. Nerf this or that, whatever, but do it properly. Do not change a major part of the game like the end ship with the comment of " This will require a reasonably significant amount of work, which we unfortunately don't have the spare resources for right now. " if you cannot support something properly then you shouldn't do it.
So I say again.... the apologies and " I'm gonna do better" were just bullshit and empty comments. |

Venus Vermillion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
430
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:31:00 -
[2066] - Quote
Hello pubbies.
This is a public service announcement for all of you who don't seem to grasp the concept. Eve Online is not World of Warcraft. It is not made by Blizzard. Eve Online is not Everquest, either. Eve Online, made by CCP, does not have an "End Game". There are no master bosses, no giant dragons, no top levels. There are no raids. There are no guilds.
The sooner you come to understand these facts, the sooner you will stop referring to owning a Titan as "the end game". I know this bursts your bubbles, as newbies look toward Nullsec and think "Wow! One day I'm going to own a Titan and have all the best mods and cool gear!" but it is sadly my duty to inform you that this is simply not the case. You will have more fun playing this game in the way most comfortable to you - be that flying frigates and becoming really good at them, flying cruisers and becoming really good at them, or picking some other specialty like, I dare say, mining (note: don't be an idiot and mine). Building your character directly toward "I want to fly a titan!" is going to turn you into one of the spergy weirdos that thinks that Eve Online has an "end game" like the aforementioned horrible games. |

Balderic Lunacy
Ever Flow Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:35:00 -
[2067] - Quote
Venus Vermillion wrote:Hello pubbies.
This is a public service announcement for all of you who don't seem to grasp the concept. Eve Online is not World of Warcraft. It is not made by Blizzard. Eve Online is not Everquest, either. Eve Online, made by CCP, does not have an "End Game". There are no master bosses, no giant dragons, no top levels. There are no raids. There are no guilds.
The sooner you come to understand these facts, the sooner you will stop referring to owning a Titan as "the end game". I know this bursts your bubbles, as newbies look toward Nullsec and think "Wow! One day I'm going to own a Titan and have all the best mods and cool gear!" but it is sadly my duty to inform you that this is simply not the case. You will have more fun playing this game in the way most comfortable to you - be that flying frigates and becoming really good at them, flying cruisers and becoming really good at them, or picking some other specialty like, I dare say, mining (note: don't be an idiot and mine). Building your character directly toward "I want to fly a titan!" is going to turn you into one of the spergy weirdos that thinks that Eve Online has an "end game" like the aforementioned horrible games.
Your right. A Titan is not the end game for everyone. But you are a fool if you think that the majority of pilots do not view it as such.
The game is ever changing and evolving, but until you show me something beyond a Titan then that is the ceiling.
|

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
171
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:38:00 -
[2068] - Quote
Andski wrote:just checked and my posts make up 10% of this thread
what up
I can't keep up with you. |

Sotar Armana
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:38:00 -
[2069] - Quote
Balderic Lunacy wrote:Venus Vermillion wrote:Hello pubbies.
This is a public service announcement for all of you who don't seem to grasp the concept. Eve Online is not World of Warcraft. It is not made by Blizzard. Eve Online is not Everquest, either. Eve Online, made by CCP, does not have an "End Game". There are no master bosses, no giant dragons, no top levels. There are no raids. There are no guilds.
The sooner you come to understand these facts, the sooner you will stop referring to owning a Titan as "the end game". I know this bursts your bubbles, as newbies look toward Nullsec and think "Wow! One day I'm going to own a Titan and have all the best mods and cool gear!" but it is sadly my duty to inform you that this is simply not the case. You will have more fun playing this game in the way most comfortable to you - be that flying frigates and becoming really good at them, flying cruisers and becoming really good at them, or picking some other specialty like, I dare say, mining (note: don't be an idiot and mine). Building your character directly toward "I want to fly a titan!" is going to turn you into one of the spergy weirdos that thinks that Eve Online has an "end game" like the aforementioned horrible games. Your right. A Titan is not the end game for everyone. But you are a fool if you think that the majority of pilots do not view it as such. The game is ever changing and evolving, but until you show me something beyond a Titan then that is the ceiling.
There is no end game content. The game is player-driven. |

Kitfox Mikakka
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:45:00 -
[2070] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:stuff
There is no endgame content in EVE. It's not WoW, it's not Guild Wars, you don't hit 80 and run raids over and over with your guild to get the super optimal layout of gear for your character. They're nerfing Titans to the point where they'll be useless, you say? Then log out and get on one of your other characters who doesn't need to sit in a giant strategic weapon in a POS and hop into some frigate roams, get out there and camp some gates in terribly fit industrials for fun, station camp in jerkbags (Like us!) using an Amarr gimmickfleet that has tons of rainbow laser setups so it looks hilarious and awesome. Show your awesome skills by leading some small fleet ops using battleships and cruisers and tackle-fit Kestrels! Come **** off us idiots up in Dek with some rad AHAC gangs and jumpbridge camps and meta-game spying so that you can drop on DBRB while he tells some stupid story and makes us warp to our deaths by sending us directly into some awesome trap you set up. Do some stuff other than fly around in the giant strategic dongweapon that is the Titan! Just because the Titan is the last ship class on the big ol' list doesn't mean it's some omni-own tool and you don't have anywhere else to go. There's probably at least 3 other racial trees you can give a go at, maybe some specialty ships like interceptors or AHACs and stuff.
There is so much more to this terrible game than just sitting there staring at your 10+km long ship and getting mad that you can't hotdrop it into a battle, spread out, and start Winning At EVE anymore. And if you don't want to do that because you don't enjoy anything other than Winning At EVE, then just sell the titan, sell the character, and go play a game that actually has endgame content, because that's obviously what you want instead of EVE. I've barely been playing for 4 months and even I'm aware of this.
e;fb by Venus. :mad: |

Sir Marksalot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:45:00 -
[2071] - Quote
Sotar Armana wrote:Balderic Lunacy wrote:Venus Vermillion wrote:Hello pubbies.
This is a public service announcement for all of you who don't seem to grasp the concept. Eve Online is not World of Warcraft. It is not made by Blizzard. Eve Online is not Everquest, either. Eve Online, made by CCP, does not have an "End Game". There are no master bosses, no giant dragons, no top levels. There are no raids. There are no guilds.
The sooner you come to understand these facts, the sooner you will stop referring to owning a Titan as "the end game". I know this bursts your bubbles, as newbies look toward Nullsec and think "Wow! One day I'm going to own a Titan and have all the best mods and cool gear!" but it is sadly my duty to inform you that this is simply not the case. You will have more fun playing this game in the way most comfortable to you - be that flying frigates and becoming really good at them, flying cruisers and becoming really good at them, or picking some other specialty like, I dare say, mining (note: don't be an idiot and mine). Building your character directly toward "I want to fly a titan!" is going to turn you into one of the spergy weirdos that thinks that Eve Online has an "end game" like the aforementioned horrible games. Your right. A Titan is not the end game for everyone. But you are a fool if you think that the majority of pilots do not view it as such. The game is ever changing and evolving, but until you show me something beyond a Titan then that is the ceiling. There is no end game content. The game is player-driven.
no you dont understand when you finally get a spacecoffin you can start never logging in
truly, the end game in eve online |

Sir Marksalot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:47:00 -
[2072] - Quote
Kitfox Mikakka wrote:Titan Keeper 22 wrote:stuff I've barely been playing for 4 months and even I'm aware of this. e;fb by Venus. :mad:
you're also not a stupid pubbie so theres that |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2953
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:51:00 -
[2073] - Quote
Balderic Lunacy wrote:Your right. A Titan is not the end game for everyone. But you are a fool if you think that the majority of pilots do not view it as such.
The game is ever changing and evolving, but until you show me something beyond a Titan then that is the ceiling.
How is that any different from being "another dude in a battleship?" You're just in a bigger ship.
Some people see FCing as their end-game. Others see alliance leadership as their end-game. Your end-game is nothing more than an extension of "press F1." "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Titan Keeper 22
State War Academy Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:00:00 -
[2074] - Quote
losing battles because of not using end-game ships that are available and which of the enemies have used, but instead you brought early to mid game content ships and whine like little girls.
here's a little story - say that there was a war going on between 'A country' and 'B country',
'A country' brought hundreads of elite soldiers in tanks and elite ground troops equipped with most modernised guns with a Commander on the field. 'B country' brought thousands of pesty peasants equipped with tridents and their working gear and having a Commander on the field.
now the results, obviously 'A country' would win.
even if B country's Commander is much, much better in every way than the A country's Commander, it wouldn't have mattered. the A country wins the battle.
but then, one of the two things happend
(assuming that 'B country's god named CCP exists)
1) 'B country' prayed to their god, made sacrifises, gave him offerings and wished that they would win the war.
2) 'B country' turned all their available resources into researching and manufacturing weapons to fight back 'A country'
later on, B country chose option '1)' and have won the war by god's power.
but they didn't want to keep the technology and the weapons they have acquired by salvaging looting 'A country', because they thought those things were too conflicated and weapons as brutal.
if they have kept them, it would have brought happiness and excitement, through out the entire country because of the complete change in their bordrum life. which they have never thought of, then they kept on living the same usual unchangeable life(just like those poor north korean people under the command of the Kim Jeong-Eun) that just dont ever change.
p.s. when i mentioned the end-game content which i obviously thought of it as a titan, it's just my opinion of saying. reason why? because i couldn't think of any other thing that's harder to get than a titan pilot and a titan. and the cost of the isk as well.
should you argue that some people got theirs easily? they got help from other people, alliance, corp, botting, and etc. if anyone had used those source on somthing other than aquiring a titan pilot plus a titan, then they'd get what they seeked for with much ease.
p.p.s Marlona Sky thanks for the tip, but there are just too many posts and one simply cannot block those trolls without so much effort. thats why i left the problem to CCP so that way thousands of ppl could save time and would actually be able to read the good feedbacks. and by the way, you should first stop trolling before you agreeingmg on the fact that troll posts should get removed. |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
89
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:02:00 -
[2075] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:'A country' brought hundreads of elite soldiers in tanks and elite ground troops equipped with most modernised guns with a Commander on the field. 'B country' brought thousands of pesty peasants equipped with tridents and their working gear and having a Commander on the field.
now the results, obviously 'A country' would win.
Ho Chi Minh just lol'd in his grave |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:04:00 -
[2076] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:losing battles because of not using end-game ships that are available and which of the enemies have used, but instead you brought early to mid game content ships and whine like little girls.
here's a little story - say that there was a war going on between 'A country' and 'B country',
'A country' brought hundreads of elite soldiers in tanks and elite ground troops equipped with most modernised guns with a Commander on the field. 'B country' brought thousands of pesty peasants equipped with tridents and their working gear and having a Commander on the field.
now the results, obviously 'A country' would win.
even if B country's Commander is much, much better in every way than the A country's Commander, it wouldn't have mattered. the A country wins the battle.
but then, one of the two things happend
(assuming that 'B country's god named CCP exists)
1) 'B country' prayed to their god, made sacrifises, gave him offerings and wished that they would win the war.
2) 'B country' turned all their available resources into researching and manufacturing weapons to fight back 'A country'
later on, B country chose option '1)' and have won the war by god's power.
but they didn't want to keep the technology and the weapons they have acquired by salvaging looting 'A country', because they thought those things were too conflicated and weapons as brutal.
if they have kept them, it would have brought happiness and excitement, through out the entire country because of the complete change in their bordrum life. which they have never thought of, then they kept on living the same usual unchangeable life(just like those poor north korean people under the command of the Kim Jeong-Eun) that just dont ever change.
p.s. when i mentioned the end-game content which i obviously thought of it as a titan, it's just my opinion of saying. reason why? because i couldn't think of any other thing that's harder to get than a titan pilot and a titan. and the cost of the isk as well.
should you argue that some people got theirs easily? they got help from other people, alliance, corp, botting, and etc. if anyone had used those source on somthing other than aquiring a titan pilot plus a titan, then they'd get what they seeked for with much ease.
p.p.s Marlona Sky thanks for the tip, but there are just too many posts and one simply cannot block those trolls without so much effort. thats why i left the problem to CCP so that way thousands of ppl could save time and would actually be able to read the good feedbacks. and by the way, you should first stop trolling before you agreeingmg on the fact that troll posts should get removed.
Try to compare RL to eve again for me. Which country has the phallus shaped vehicles?
Obligitory :smug: :smug: :smug: DEATH2ALLSUPERCAPS |

Prideof USA
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:09:00 -
[2077] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Titan Keeper 22 wrote:'A country' brought hundreads of elite soldiers in tanks and elite ground troops equipped with most modernised guns with a Commander on the field. 'B country' brought thousands of pesty peasants equipped with tridents and their working gear and having a Commander on the field.
now the results, obviously 'A country' would win. Ho Chi Minh just lol'd in his grave
And the American Revolution. Country B are inspiration |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2954
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:12:00 -
[2078] - Quote
titan keeper's posts are why titans should be nerfed to the ground in ~iterations~ "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Monthly Monique
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:12:00 -
[2079] - Quote
Here's what it comes down to space bros.
When you own a SC or a Titan there are alliances that take great pleasure and use much skill to try and remove you from these uber expensive weapons of destruction. And for some, PL comes to mind, it's an e-peen way of game play. To remove (kill) as many as possible with out losing a single one.
Papa CCP is coming along and slapping the e-peen grin off the face of the fat turd smelling bully with the elitist attitude because the 250 pound (17 -ish stones) 14 year old bully is not going to be able to throw his big fat belly around at the 90 pound 10 year olds and win any more. They will still be able to for awhile to come yet. But as they continue to do so it will serve to prove the need for papa CCP to keep coming back and chopping off more and more belly fat from the bully.
There's a saying out there in Eve land. Something to the effect of STFU when you have a good thing and don't let the cat out of the bag or it'll get nerfed. Should of remembered that when dropping Titans on frigs in low sec went from a once in a lifetime chance happening to a regular thing. Just saying.
HAve fun space bros. This ho is out o7 |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
171
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:18:00 -
[2080] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:-snip-
Those are some words.
'Endgame ships' 'Early to mid game ships'. I don't know if you legitimately believe what you're typing, but these are not concepts EVE has. It has hulls that cost more, and hulls that cost less. Some you need more SP to fly, but much of your SP is in support skills that make you fly everything better.
Support SP. Money sunk into hulls. Money sunk into modules, implants, and boosters. All of these things have diminishing returns on investment, except Titans. That hull shouldn't have the exception. |

Titan Keeper 22
State War Academy Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:21:00 -
[2081] - Quote
since most of you arguing people cannot agree and understand anything thats if by any means, related against the titan fix, i'll make it simple.
when i meant end game content, it was based on what the majority of people that play PC/Console games think.
one of you say that FC'ing is the end game? well there are other games that have the very similar to FC'ing available. but how many of that game's players think of that as the end-game? i'm thinking around 0.01~0.0001% of players.
eve is a game where you fly ships mostly especially combat ships; more than 80% of the ships are combat ships anyways. everything, manufacturing, researching, trading, exploring, pve'ing leads to what? combat ships, PvP. and now, whats the most expensive, and with the best attribute combat ship in game? a titan.
now which content, which ship, should be the end-game?
you Goonswarm and CFC just cannot think outside the mittani box, can you?
everything, every single thoughts and words of you Goonswarm/CFC members are based on mittani's thinking box. he is smart, he has power, and he's playing mindgames with all of you. yet none of you GW/CFC understands and realizes about it. even if one do so, you are denying for your own benefit.
you keep trying hard to make eve like a casual game after 10years and with your number, and conspiracy going on, yes the game will change towards your benefiting point.
eve is dying that, i can tell for sure. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2954
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:21:00 -
[2082] - Quote
real life war analogies, won't be long before Titan Keeper 22 starts quoting Sun Tzu "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
90
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:24:00 -
[2083] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:you Goonswarm and CFC just cannot think outside the mittani box, can you?
- someone losing their **** because a single hull got nerfed |

Zain Andreas
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
61
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:36:00 -
[2084] - Quote
I too, think people in npc corps know a lot about titans. |

Kitfox Mikakka
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:40:00 -
[2085] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:Holy **** what
What in the everloving hell. The game's not a solid trek up where the list goes Titans>Mothers>Dreads>Carriers>Battleships>Cruisers>Frigates. If you honestly believe that you're a damn ****** for trying to play this game instead of some other MMO where there is a line up the ranks that way, but a frigate can be just as useful as a battleship which is just as useful as a force recon which is just as useful as an interceptor which is just as useful as, yes, a Titan. They've got roles and places for them, just because the tinier ones are cheaper doesn't mean a tiny gang of frigates won't destroy the **** out of an unsupported cruiser or battleship or two. Just because Titans are the most expensive, largest, and most EHP loaded and potentially skill intensive hulls in the game doesn't mean they're the endgame because there is no endgame no matter how you're trying to twist what that means around.
Literally in the very first day I played this game I went out on a roam into WN. space with the people who convinced me to give it a try, and after asking why my projectile guns on my rifter were greyed out I found out Caldari don't start with the skills to use them. Even so, I went along for fun. That roam ended with me tackling a ratting Tengu in WN. space with them, us not being able to pump out the DPS we needed to kill it, and having several battleships and interceptors rush over to give us aid from Goonwaffe after we went 'hey help?' to them. Call me a stupid *** if you want, but it was completely ******* awesome and sold me on this game, because I felt useful from day one, which is a hell of a lot more than I can say for any other MMO I have ever played. Not half a month ago I went on a 30 man gimmick roam with one of our FCs where people had brought battle badgers and Moas with laser systems and ****, and we still killed the hell out of several Navy variants while camping a station with these horrendous ships, because we were playing better than them in their pimped out faction hulls even though we only had dumb **** like my Coercer with 4 different gun types and one of each crystal type loaded in so I shot a rainbow.
In huge fleet fights with the maelstroms and drakes, I can fly a crappy dinky little Rifter or Griffin or Thrasher and still feel like I'm contributing as much as the other people playing by sending out jams or annoying logistics or tackling bombers. I have yet to actually train cruiser skills because I wanted to get support stuff out of the way first, and in the 4 months I've spent in the various frigate-scale ships I've not once felt like I was ****** out of something because I wasn't some two year old player who was level 80 with full epic sets or whatever. And since you're apparently all for that, it's my opinion that shitheads like you are the ones killing EVE and trying to turn it into a copy of every other damn massively multiplayer game out there, just with terrible looking asymmetric spaceships instead of huge shoulderpads.
Holy **** I'm careposting, **** |

Titan Keeper 22
State War Academy Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:50:00 -
[2086] - Quote
CCP has never thought of what new players would think of EvE after playing for several months, play around in a battleship class ships and realize, that there is nothing more to achieve
1) manufactureres - i build from frigate sized ships to carriers and dreads and modules. i think i can finish all that in about year. 2) traders - isk isk isk..and with those isk, what do i buy? currently being used and that are most expensive ships i can think of..carrier, dreads. nah.. that's just too easy i think i'd rather rmt. 3) researchers - almost same with manufactureres and traders. 4) freedom fighters(aka pvp'ers) - ok! i've finally acuired carrier/dread now time to shoot and repair structures! oh forgot that i can rat in a carrier! 5) bounty hunters - wtf is this **** 6) miner - most exciting content in eve! hear the calming sound wave of mining modules activating! oh wait AH HELL, I JUST GOT HULKAGEDDONED! 7) planetary industralist - i've finished every content of it in less than a month! yay i think im so good at this game! 8) explorer - scan, loot nothing, get frustrated, scan, loot nothing, scan, loot nothing, scan, fu*k i just lost my tengu! screw this, i'm buying plex to buy another tengu. scan, loot, somthing decent, happy, scan, loot nothing, scan, loot somthing decent, scan, ganked. 9) loyalist - uh which alliance should i join..um..i think Gooswarm is the strongest alliance in the game. maybe i'll give it a try. flys rifters/canes/maelstroms, shoots structure for longer than the time pvp'ing, start to think where all the taxes and the moon minerals go. gets explained by mittani that all of those isk are for reimbursing combat ships. but i payed for the ship and the modules to pvp and i get insurance that covers more than half of the price of the loss! 10) fleet commander - i cant FC.. im terrible at eve 11) empire builder - there are already more than enough of them! without a miracle, it's impossible! |

Klann Schreck
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:50:00 -
[2087] - Quote
Kitfox Mikakka wrote:Titan Keeper 22 wrote:Holy **** what What in the everloving hell. The game's not a solid trek up where the list goes Titans>Mothers>Dreads>Carriers>Battleships>Cruisers>Frigates. If you honestly believe that you're a damn ****** for trying to play this game instead of some other MMO where there is a line up the ranks that way, but a frigate can be just as useful as a battleship which is just as useful as a force recon which is just as useful as an interceptor which is just as useful as, yes, a Titan. They've got roles and places for them, just because the tinier ones are cheaper doesn't mean a tiny gang of frigates won't destroy the **** out of an unsupported cruiser or battleship or two. Just because Titans are the most expensive, largest, and most EHP loaded and potentially skill intensive hulls in the game doesn't mean they're the endgame because there is no endgame no matter how you're trying to twist what that means around. Literally in the very first day I played this game I went out on a roam into WN. space with the people who convinced me to give it a try, and after asking why my projectile guns on my rifter were greyed out I found out Caldari don't start with the skills to use them. Even so, I went along for fun. That roam ended with me tackling a ratting Tengu in WN. space with them, us not being able to pump out the DPS we needed to kill it, and having several battleships and interceptors rush over to give us aid from Goonwaffe after we went 'hey help?' to them. Call me a stupid *** if you want, but it was completely ******* awesome and sold me on this game, because I felt useful from day one, which is a hell of a lot more than I can say for any other MMO I have ever played. Not half a month ago I went on a 30 man gimmick roam with one of our FCs where people had brought battle badgers and Moas with laser systems and ****, and we still killed the hell out of several Navy variants while camping a station with these horrendous ships, because we were playing better than them in their pimped out faction hulls even though we only had dumb **** like my Coercer with 4 different gun types and one of each crystal type loaded in so I shot a rainbow. In huge fleet fights with the maelstroms and drakes, I can fly a crappy dinky little Rifter or Griffin or Thrasher and still feel like I'm contributing as much as the other people playing by sending out jams or annoying logistics or tackling bombers. I have yet to actually train cruiser skills because I wanted to get support stuff out of the way first, and in the 4 months I've spent in the various frigate-scale ships I've not once felt like I was ****** out of something because I wasn't some two year old player who was level 80 with full epic sets or whatever. And since you're apparently all for that, it's my opinion that shitheads like you are the ones killing EVE and trying to turn it into a copy of every other damn massively multiplayer game out there, just with terrible looking asymmetric spaceships instead of huge shoulderpads. Holy **** I'm careposting, ****
If you aren't DAWWWWWWWWWWing at this adorable little newbee I really feel bad for you. Someone just won himself a faction frigate or cruiser of his choice. |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
171
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:53:00 -
[2088] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:Incoherence
Ok, so you're equating wealth with quality, you see absolutely no worth in people with effective leadership skills (or dogs with effective leadership skills), and you think EVE has an endgame.
EVE doesn't have an endgame. You can do what you want from day 1. Every pilot matters.
For a few references, here's how CCP's own propaganda describes this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08hmqyejCYU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGplrpWvz0I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSxSyv4LC1c
Nothing about how there's an endgame ship. Simply about how each pilot can matter. |

Sotar Armana
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:59:00 -
[2089] - Quote
What I don't get is why people without titans in empire would want to not see titans nerfed. If Raiden., NC. and PL had their way Nullsec would be a private playhouse where only those with tremendously high SP could be instead of a place where you can survive regardless of SP and even thrive based on your wits, skill and game understanding. Where is the satisfaction from getting into a Titan and just noskilling your way to a win? |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:59:00 -
[2090] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:CCP has never thought of what new players would think of EvE after playing for several months, play around in a battleship class ships and realize, that there is nothing more to achieve
Do you even play Eve Online? This isn't even a joke, it's a serious question, because holy hell I've never seen a concept fly this far above someone's head in a long time. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 05:32:00 -
[2091] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote: And they need more for titan fix that's is very clear. So i see no difference making bad fix to one or the other.
Maybe if you scream loud enough about Tech, everyone will forget what you have done with Titans.
Keep trying, maybe it will work.
|

Titan Keeper 22
State War Academy Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 05:38:00 -
[2092] - Quote
Kyle Myr theres a huge difference in with knowing the possibilities that you can go much further than of your current position and doing whatever activities you are up to, but then when you're playing eve knowing that you will not get to be in a ship that has the attribute of better than a battleship.
small sized t2s and t3s are indeed important for their situable roles, but you'll just never know what it'll feel like after trashing super capital class ships out of the game because you have never imaginzied about it nor have any ability to imagine.
they've added super capital class ships for a reason but then now since that they are going to be useless other than structure grinding, and forgot to mention that because of the super nerf, they are actually only useful for PL that uses them for ganking other supers.
i noticed you've linked that there were capital ships including super capital class ships present in the videos
i dont know why you've listed them as references without actually seeing the videos
yea like all other Goons, you are just here to troll
and i dont see any other reason that most goons are enjoying the actual game other than trolling people around.
but i must say this, you goon trolls are really terrible at trolling |

Sotar Armana
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 05:41:00 -
[2093] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Titan Keeper 22 wrote:CCP has never thought of what new players would think of EvE after playing for several months, play around in a battleship class ships and realize, that there is nothing more to achieve Do you even play Eve Online? This isn't even a joke, it's a serious question, because holy hell I've never seen a concept fly this far above someone's head in a long time.
I think that answer has been proved to be a nope. |

esc shk
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
102
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 05:41:00 -
[2094] - Quote
You're a ****** fyi.
Titans are supposed to be capital killers. Not Afterburning Rifter killers.
Kill yourself |

Sotar Armana
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 05:44:00 -
[2095] - Quote
esc shk wrote:You're a ****** fyi.
Titans are supposed to be capital killers. Not Afterburning Rifter killers.
Kill yourself
BUT MY STATUS SYMBOLS!  |

Gistatis Praefectus
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 05:51:00 -
[2096] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:everyone should be flying titans because :endgame:, nothing else in eve is fun waaaaaaaaaaaa
There is no endgame in Eve There is no endgame in Eve There is no endgame in Eve There is no endgame in Eve There is no endgame in Eve
You're trolling right? I can't take your posts seriously.
As far as exploration goes, I've lucked out many times in low and null sites with some pretty great mag, radar and DED sites, and I've only ever had a close call at worst. You're taking the negatives and blasting them out of proportion to the point where you think that blapping in titans is the only way to have fun in Eve. I think that if you ever bothered to really try those things that you mentioned and not have such a pessimistic outlook on things, you'd eat your words and stop madposting.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2962
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 05:56:00 -
[2097] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:gets explained by mittani that all of those isk are for reimbursing combat ships. but i payed for the ship and the modules to pvp and i get insurance that covers more than half of the price of the loss!
tell me more about t2 hulls being fully insured "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2962
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 05:57:00 -
[2098] - Quote
"Won't CCP think of the new players? Everyone skills into titans!" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2962
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 06:04:00 -
[2099] - Quote
105 pages and we've so far seen these arguments:
- but they're expensive and take forever to build and skill into - but eve needs an end-game - i agree that titan tracking is out of whack but GOONS - how else is my failing alliance going to kill fleets 5-10 times as large as ours - CCP is screwing over their veterans because everyone above an arbitrary number of skillpoints owns titans - my titan keeps getting nerfed please stop - there is no problem with titan tracking, i can say this objectively from the perspective of my hisec welfare incursions - reimburse my isk and skillpoints because my 50 million ehp portable stargate with a doomsday is useless
all we need now are some sun tzu quotes, ww2 analogies and it's hi5s all around "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 06:09:00 -
[2100] - Quote
Sotar Armana wrote:What I don't get is why people without titans in empire would want to not see titans nerfed. If Raiden., NC. and PL had their way Nullsec would be a private playhouse where only those with tremendously high SP could be instead of a place where you can survive regardless of SP and even thrive based on your wits, skill and game understanding. Where is the satisfaction from getting into a Titan and just noskilling your way to a win?
None of these people are from empire. These are all the alts of PL/Raiden. They've been told not to post with their mains, in some sad misguided attempt to make it look like all of eve really gives a crap about their overpowered super weapons they've been throwing around to win every fight. Do you really think a ton of guys in empire corps really care that Raiden's titans are being nerfed. Considering as you pointed out, if titans aren't nerfed then the only thing that matters in 0.0 warfare is titans. Something empire guys don't have, and won't have if they try to move to 0.0.
|

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
171
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 06:10:00 -
[2101] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:Kyle Myr theres a huge difference in with knowing the possibilities that you can go much further than of your current position and doing whatever activities you are up to, but then when you're playing eve knowing that you will not get to be in a ship that has the attribute of better than a battleship.
It's funny that you think legitimate points are trolling. Also, **** battleships. I don't particularly like large hulls, and if I never have to fly anything larger than a battlecruiser, except maybe a bridging BLOPs, I couldn't be happier.
Post on your main, coward. I'm done with you. |

Sotar Armana
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 06:13:00 -
[2102] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:Sotar Armana wrote:What I don't get is why people without titans in empire would want to not see titans nerfed. If Raiden., NC. and PL had their way Nullsec would be a private playhouse where only those with tremendously high SP could be instead of a place where you can survive regardless of SP and even thrive based on your wits, skill and game understanding. Where is the satisfaction from getting into a Titan and just noskilling your way to a win? None of these people are from empire. These are all the alts of PL/Raiden. They've been told not to post with their mains, in some sad misguided attempt to make it look like all of eve really gives a crap about their overpowered super weapons they've been throwing around to win every fight. Do you really think a ton of guys in empire corps really care that Raiden's titans are being nerfed. Considering as you pointed out, if titans aren't nerfed then the only thing that matters in 0.0 warfare is titans. Something empire guys don't have, and won't have if they try to move to 0.0.
I figured as much, I know a lot of them are NPC corp alts but there are some that are all BUT GOONS |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5552
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:15:00 -
[2103] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:Kyle Myr theres a huge difference in with knowing the possibilities that you can go much further than of your current position and doing whatever activities you are up to, but then when you're playing eve knowing that you will not get to be in a ship that has the attribute of better than a battleship. Fun fact: I'm already in a ship with better attributes than a battleship.
In fact, i'm in 193 ships with better attributes than battleships. In about a year, I will have reached my GÇ£end gameGÇ¥ and there will be no way of going further. Would you like to guess what I'll be able to fly by then (hint: it doesn't include any titans)? Come to think of it, I'm in 193 ships that have better attributes than titans, much less some silly battleship.
The problem here comes back to the same fundamental fact that you're trying, but failing, to work your way around: EVE has no end-game beyond what you decide for yourself. When you talk about GÇ£going furtherGÇ¥ and GÇ£better attributesGÇ¥, you are incorrectly assuming there is an objective measure of those things, which is the same kind of fallacy as thinking there is an objective end-game. You need to stop thinking that way because it simply doesn't apply to EVE. It's not even a vote; what the majority thinks is irrelevant; if more people think a particular ship is their end-game then it only means exactly that: that more people think of that ship as their end-game. It does in no way mean that there is an end-game to the game itself.
If anything, if a whole lot of people think that the GÇ£biggestGÇ¥ ship is the best and therefore they go for that one, then it's rather a worrying sign of a whole lot of people not understanding the fundamental design principles of EVE, and it's sad to see that CCP has failed to educate these poor people properly about what the game has to offer.
As such, the whole appeal to GÇ£preserve the end-gameGÇ¥ only manages to convey a complete failure to understand the very basics of EVE (and you'd think that people who have stuck around for long enough to get into a titan would understand those basics by now, but then again, as this thread has shown, they even have trouble with basic game mechanics, so mehGǪ). The only thing there is for CCP to preserve is a proper balance between ship classes, and if that balancing act happens to trample all over your subjective end-game, then tough luck. If that truly offends you, just pick a new end-game. There are bajillions of them to choose from (and all of them will be adjusted by CCP at some point or another, so you might as well inoculate yourself against that right now). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

bl4ckL0tus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:22:00 -
[2104] - Quote
how about instead of nerfing titans that much (tracking should be enough) removing tech moons or rather spreading them acros the galaxy .. this way maybe goonies that fly only 100 mils ships tops wont cry about getting a beat from high-skilled players that used the ultimate ship. I myself wanted to fly a titan now jst got one and trained like over a year skills and now all this dream is gone cos suddenly its jst something u show to friends that come over ... whos going to pay me back for everything i invested to got to this point? Also why dont ure making some t2 dreads or something that can fight them and maybe even goons can afford from their 1k+ 2-300 of this to fight (btw i heard their fcs lacks balls and jst wants to shoot structures with their super fleet on a diff timezone then the enemy) to match others ... Also when i started this game i wanted to see jove unlock that hasnt happened so far. Also a rumour was that drone regions will be nerfed if u do this faster and tech moon spreading even big alliances will have problems getting supers so easy. Peace |

bl4ckL0tus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:32:00 -
[2105] - Quote
for hakkart : no actually i`m not pl or rdn alt u jst trolling cos ure the 25 mil sp guy that wants to win eve i know...but why ure awesome fcs dont use supers on enemies and cry of imbalance since u already have them? cowards? |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:34:00 -
[2106] - Quote
Titan nerf, yeha.. |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:34:00 -
[2107] - Quote
Doublepost wooooooooooooo |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:35:00 -
[2108] - Quote
Going for tripppppples |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:35:00 -
[2109] - Quote
Triskian wrote:Going for tripppppples
tripppples more like tribbles amirite |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:36:00 -
[2110] - Quote
Triskian wrote:Triskian wrote:Going for tripppppples tripppples more like tribbles amirite
wrong sci fi universe ******* |

hakkart
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:38:00 -
[2111] - Quote
bl4ckL0tus wrote:for hakkart : no actually i`m not pl or rdn alt u jst trolling cos ure the 25 mil sp guy that wants to win eve i know...but why ure awesome fcs dont use supers on enemies and cry of imbalance since u already have them? cowards?
I almost responded to that with a thought-out argument, and then realized I was being trolled. Wouldn't say "Well played", but "Decently played" is good enough.
BTW, posting on an alt accomplishes nothing. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3005
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:38:00 -
[2112] - Quote
bl4ckL0tus wrote:how about instead of nerfing titans that much (tracking should be enough) removing tech moons or rather spreading them acros the galaxy .. this way maybe goonies that fly only 100 mils ships tops wont cry about getting a beat from high-skilled players that used the ultimate ship. I myself wanted to fly a titan now jst got one and trained like over a year skills and now all this dream is gone cos suddenly its jst something u show to friends that come over ... whos going to pay me back for everything i invested to got to this point? Also why dont ure making some t2 dreads or something that can fight them and maybe even goons can afford from their 1k+ 2-300 of this to fight (btw i heard their fcs lacks balls and jst wants to shoot structures with their super fleet on a diff timezone then the enemy) to match others ... Also when i started this game i wanted to see jove unlock that hasnt happened so far. Also a rumour was that drone regions will be nerfed if u do this faster and tech moon spreading even big alliances will have problems getting supers so easy. Peace
Goonswarm is buying back titans. Contact me. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Cyaron wars
D00M. Northern Coalition.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:42:00 -
[2113] - Quote
Issue here is removing titan role as it is now without replacing that role with something else. Today there is a huge gap between battleship fleets and supercapital fleets that are fielded. Capitals were filling that role once but after supercapitals appeared only carriers are ones that are fielded and only with logistics purpose. So CCP made 1+bil dreads useless. Would be nice to see some apital ship re balancing so they will take their place on battlefield against battleship fleets. Issue here is not in a titan but in variety of ships that CCP made useless up until now (remember EOS). I find CCP's approach wrong. Instead of nerfing 1 ship why don't u guys review all those ships that u made useless up until now? |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:42:00 -
[2114] - Quote
Andski wrote:bl4ckL0tus wrote:how about instead of nerfing titans that much (tracking should be enough) removing tech moons or rather spreading them acros the galaxy .. this way maybe goonies that fly only 100 mils ships tops wont cry about getting a beat from high-skilled players that used the ultimate ship. I myself wanted to fly a titan now jst got one and trained like over a year skills and now all this dream is gone cos suddenly its jst something u show to friends that come over ... whos going to pay me back for everything i invested to got to this point? Also why dont ure making some t2 dreads or something that can fight them and maybe even goons can afford from their 1k+ 2-300 of this to fight (btw i heard their fcs lacks balls and jst wants to shoot structures with their super fleet on a diff timezone then the enemy) to match others ... Also when i started this game i wanted to see jove unlock that hasnt happened so far. Also a rumour was that drone regions will be nerfed if u do this faster and tech moon spreading even big alliances will have problems getting supers so easy. Peace Goonswarm is buying back titans. Contact me.
I've got a titan for sale if yanno what I mean. |

bl4ckL0tus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:43:00 -
[2115] - Quote
lol @ Andski ... when i wanted to buy it like alotof goons tried their scam scheme all over again ... witth their scamming leader who says hes representing players right @ ccp .. ROFL |

BrokenBC
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
24
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:43:00 -
[2116] - Quote
lroh wrote:Thank you CCP, now i don't have to play for 4 years to eventualy get the skills to fly a SC/Titan and get to the "end game" stage. Now i only have to train for Carrier and be done quicker to go play the next mmo
Use many titans on the jita 44 undock do you? |

hakkart
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:44:00 -
[2117] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:Issue here is removing titan role as it is now without replacing that role with something else. Today there is a huge gap between battleship fleets and supercapital fleets that are fielded. Capitals were filling that role once but after supercapitals appeared only carriers are ones that are fielded and only with logistics purpose. So CCP made 1+bil dreads useless. Would be nice to see some apital ship re balancing so they will take their place on battlefield against battleship fleets. Issue here is not in a titan but in variety of ships that CCP made useless up until now (remember EOS). I find CCP's approach wrong. Instead of nerfing 1 ship why don't u guys review all those ships that u made useless up until now?
Reading comprehension.
This "nerf" is just a quick fix to something that is not working as intended, a full ship rebalance will come in time, I have no doubt. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3005
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:45:00 -
[2118] - Quote
bl4ckL0tus wrote:lol @ Andski ... when i wanted to buy it like alotof goons tried their scam scheme all over again ... witth their scamming leader who says hes representing players right @ ccp .. ROFL scamming is not allowed in eve online you should petition that
ahahahahahahaha "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Cyaron wars
D00M. Northern Coalition.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:51:00 -
[2119] - Quote
So my point is any side should have advantage on battlefield as it now (Numbers and technology). So you filed 1000 Drakes which can be countered by 200 Abaddons. Each side should be able to decide what it will bring for a fight - High SP+Expensive ships or less PS but en mass. |

joshua boston
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:54:00 -
[2120] - Quote
DEATH TO ALL CAPITAL SHIPS!!! LONG LIVE THE SUBCAPS!!! |

hakkart
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:57:00 -
[2121] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:So my point is any side should have advantage on battlefield as it now (Numbers and technology). So you filed 1000 Drakes which can be countered by 200 Abaddons. Each side should be able to decide what it will bring for a fight - High SP+Expensive ships or less PS but en mass.
You're oversimplifying it. 1000 drakes does not make a fleet. Fleet is all about composition. 1000 drakes would lose HARD to a 500-man fleet with an actual composition, with logis and dictors and recons. . And that's the way it ought to be. A titan blob, on the other hand, stands on its own with no need for support other than supercarriers, which are equally unkillable in large numbers.
Edit before someone puts words in my mouth: The 500-man fleet is mostly drakes. |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 07:58:00 -
[2122] - Quote
I'm watching cyst removal vids on youtube, someone more sober should draw an analogy between this and Titans. |

bl4ckL0tus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:04:00 -
[2123] - Quote
except cyst arent the ultimate cool thing in a videogame that others have but not use against enemies and cry in their corner |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3007
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:06:00 -
[2124] - Quote
bl4ckL0tus wrote:except cyst arent the ultimate cool thing in a videogame that others have but not use against enemies and cry in their corner
feel free to return to WoW if you believe that the "ultimate cool thing in a videogame" is an entitlement to unopposed one-sided victories in every engagement "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:07:00 -
[2125] - Quote
Anyone, literally anyone, who mentions 'but why the scan res change a bloo boo boo why not change XL gun signature instead' doesn't actually know how the tracking formula works and why that still wouldn't stop Titan blobs blapping with impunity. (Hint: Ship signature / weapon signature is only a multiplier to tracking, not a base% chance to hit, so if you're at low traversal to one of the titans in the 50-100km lump that they form in blob (hint 2: you are) you're going to get blapped). The tracking nerf is goddamn INCONSEQUENTIAL regarding this. The scan res one is the one they needed. |

bl4ckL0tus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:07:00 -
[2126] - Quote
its a game with many ships and u can counter them u jst want to use cheap stuff to kill the game |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:09:00 -
[2127] - Quote
I just wanted to remind everyone in this thread that penguins are the most adorable thing ever. |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:10:00 -
[2128] - Quote
|

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:12:00 -
[2129] - Quote
I like to pretend that the penguin's cries are the incoherent screams of the anti-nerfers. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3007
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:13:00 -
[2130] - Quote
bl4ckL0tus wrote:its a game with many ships and u can counter them u jst want to use cheap stuff to kill the game
alright since you're clearly the expert on these matters tell me exactly how to counter 30 tracking titans
don't say dreads because trying to kill titans with the very ships they are designed to counter is an idea i'd expect from a toddler "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

bl4ckL0tus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:15:00 -
[2131] - Quote
the market value of a tit worth 5 combat fitted nyx-es ... wich lets say u dont get 5 u get 3-4 u could kill them 2 much dps from fb ... insted of getting more of those u like dieing in loads of subcaps over and over againd and cry imbalance... |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3008
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:16:00 -
[2132] - Quote
bl4ckL0tus wrote:the market value of a tit worth 5 combat fitted nyx-es ... wich lets say u dont get 5 u get 3-4 u could kill them 2 much dps from fb ... insted of getting more of those u like dieing in loads of subcaps over and over againd and cry imbalance...
if you think that the only counter to a ship is an ISK equivalent in smaller ships you are pretty helpless
hmm i think i should fit estamel's ~adaptive~ invulns on a drake and i should effortlessly kill supercarriers
also the market value is so far off from the actual cost of the ship by almost two times "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

asdf ghyj
Zorg Solutions
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:18:00 -
[2133] - Quote
STOP NERF TITANS
B O O S T goons |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:18:00 -
[2134] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Khadmos wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Shadoo, I could not agree more I am raging because of the way this is being done. You agree that titans need to be nerfed MORE? I'm pretty sure that goes against everything you've said so far. Want my ship to have a role, that's not a once in every 2 months role. Kinda stuck in a titan.
"Waaaah, waaah, titans are easy to kill, waaah waaah, goonie blobbers controlling CCP, waah waah, you don't use titans, waah waah, nerf Tech, waah waah..."
Yeah guys, I was just debating how I would like my ship to have a role. |

bl4ckL0tus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:21:00 -
[2135] - Quote
dont tell me goons dont have isk to do that its jst fc are cowards to fight in that way cos if they fail once they can get alot of bshit for how crap they were ... isntead jst ordering waves of drakes/maels trying repeatedly t odo the same thing ... one wise man once said : those who cannot adapt become victims of evolution ... |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:22:00 -
[2136] - Quote
bl4ckL0tus wrote:dont tell me goons dont have isk to do that its jst fc are cowards to fight in that way cos if they fail once they can get alot of bshit for how crap they were ... isntead jst ordering waves of drakes/maels trying repeatedly t odo the same thing ... one wise man once said : those who cannot adapt become victims of evolution ...
dude i'm drunk and even i make more sense than you |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3008
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:25:00 -
[2137] - Quote
bl4ckL0tus wrote:one wise man once said : those who cannot adapt become victims of evolution ...
hmm yes that's apparently going to be the case with the alliances whose success has entirely depended on abusing broken ships
thanks for your insight npc alt o7 "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
584
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:26:00 -
[2138] - Quote
hakkart wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:So my point is any side should have advantage on battlefield as it now (Numbers and technology). So you filed 1000 Drakes which can be countered by 200 Abaddons. Each side should be able to decide what it will bring for a fight - High SP+Expensive ships or less PS but en mass. You're oversimplifying it. 1000 drakes does not make a fleet. Fleet is all about composition. 1000 drakes would lose HARD to a 500-man fleet with an actual composition, with logis and dictors and recons. . And that's the way it ought to be. A titan blob, on the other hand, stands on its own with no need for support other than supercarriers, which are equally unkillable in large numbers. Edit before someone puts words in my mouth: The 500-man fleet is mostly drakes.
How are these titans tackling you guys? No chance in hell I would get point range of one, much less scram and web. 
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3008
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:29:00 -
[2139] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:hakkart wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:So my point is any side should have advantage on battlefield as it now (Numbers and technology). So you filed 1000 Drakes which can be countered by 200 Abaddons. Each side should be able to decide what it will bring for a fight - High SP+Expensive ships or less PS but en mass. You're oversimplifying it. 1000 drakes does not make a fleet. Fleet is all about composition. 1000 drakes would lose HARD to a 500-man fleet with an actual composition, with logis and dictors and recons. . And that's the way it ought to be. A titan blob, on the other hand, stands on its own with no need for support other than supercarriers, which are equally unkillable in large numbers. Edit before someone puts words in my mouth: The 500-man fleet is mostly drakes. How are these titans tackling you guys? No chance in hell I would get point range of one, much less scram and web. 
properly fit supercarriers (i.e. the ones that fit officer points) have scram strength at 30km
sometimes you're in a bubble too "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:30:00 -
[2140] - Quote
Andski wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:hakkart wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:So my point is any side should have advantage on battlefield as it now (Numbers and technology). So you filed 1000 Drakes which can be countered by 200 Abaddons. Each side should be able to decide what it will bring for a fight - High SP+Expensive ships or less PS but en mass. You're oversimplifying it. 1000 drakes does not make a fleet. Fleet is all about composition. 1000 drakes would lose HARD to a 500-man fleet with an actual composition, with logis and dictors and recons. . And that's the way it ought to be. A titan blob, on the other hand, stands on its own with no need for support other than supercarriers, which are equally unkillable in large numbers. Edit before someone puts words in my mouth: The 500-man fleet is mostly drakes. How are these titans tackling you guys? No chance in hell I would get point range of one, much less scram and web.  properly fit supercarriers (i.e. the ones that fit officer points) have scram strength at 30km sometimes you're in a bubble too
I found myself in a bubble. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:34:00 -
[2141] - Quote
FeLiZk wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Khadmos wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Shadoo, I could not agree more I am raging because of the way this is being done. You agree that titans need to be nerfed MORE? I'm pretty sure that goes against everything you've said so far. Want my ship to have a role, that's not a once in every 2 months role. Kinda stuck in a titan. I completely understand this point of view - I, too, want my ship to have a role in fleets. That's why I think Titan tracking is a problem, as it can be used to kill any fleet in the game regardless of numbers and composition, barring a larger number of Titans. As for being stuck in a space coffin, I'd suggest purchasing a holding alt. A character, minimally skilled to be able to sit in a Titan, should run you much less than the hull you're currently stuck in. Once you're out of the ship, you'll have (presumably) a character great at flying a whole range of this game's incredibly diverse and fun capital and sub capital ships. you really thing this is a good solution. make money buy another char, park titan. you really that selfish that you can't even agree on the fact that they should be allowed to dock, and if the new role comes that we could chose not to fly them if we don't like it and get our skills back.
I didn't get my skills back when they nerfed Kestrels, Armageddons, Ravens, Dominixes, Rokhs, Apocalypses, Falcons, ...
Wow, it's almost as if there is a pattern here. |

Titan Keeper 22
State War Academy Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:38:00 -
[2142] - Quote
back on my previous posts, you goon idiots couldn't even deny a single fact about what i said with a reason, but instead kept on trolling like kids straight out of kindergarten.
so much hate i sense in you goons.
having trouble comming up with legimate facts to argue?
even if you tried so, but then it didn't seem right?
and only going to show your anger by trolling?
one of you said somthing like.. 'im done with you.' and like i've said anything about wanting them at all..
you see this is exactly the reason why im not posting in my main even though im not a member of any alliance thats been talked about in this thread.
dont think of me as one of you from goons; i dont listen to your nonsense, i dont kiss mittani's ass, i dont play along by trolling
all you trolls have failed.
|

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:40:00 -
[2143] - Quote
Hi iniquita. |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
702
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:43:00 -
[2144] - Quote
Leer0y Brown wrote:Here's a though,
Keep the lock timer the same, and triple the sig size of carriers and dreads + supers. What would that negatively impact?
Since all guns should be able to capitals, including super caps vs capitals, just blow up the sig size. Right now, MWD based drakes, and battleships have similar sizes to capitals ships...
This is the problem, and a simple solution. Everything else is very reasonable in this context. However, titans should not take 30 seconds to lock a carrier or a dread, it should be almost instant.
Make the changes to the caps, and we're good.
As a side note, thanks for depopulating nullsec. By taking away Sanctums and havens from low sec status systems, you have effectivly destroyed new alliances from being able to populate into crappier regions of nullsec.
Has it effected the current group of people? No, not at all. Has it caused more conflict for us? No not at all. All you succeeded in doing is to create a giant empty nullsec. At the height of dominion there were MANY MANY people in nullsec. It was getting crowded, and a crowded profitable nullsec mean lots of players to kill and drama, etc.
Instead you create incursions, able to be run in the safety of high sec... You want to know where most of your end game users went who were trying to make it into nullsec? Well, they went back to incursions making 100mil isk per pilot per hour, and collecting nicely on some concord bounties and creating a giant isk facet just like the one you shutoff in nullsec.
The only difference is its highsec, so they arn't fighting eachother or themselves.
Come on guys this ain't rocket science. +1 to the titan nerf, if you blow up the sig size of capitals and fix this mess.
(sidenote) please reduce locktime on nyx as well... 24+ fighters on 1 BS that it can lock with its faction sensor boosters... Lets bring it in balence with the titans.
Also, consider doubling the titan turret damage. It should be able to wreck capitals, since this is one of the primary roles of the titans as you stated, and with a 80bisk + pricetag, it should do a DAMN good job
+1 to this.
Especially in the drone lands you can go flying around for quite some time and not see anyone at all.
Same up in Gurrista pirate space too.
The changes in the last 1 to 2 years to Nulsec have left people think "well wtf am i doing here?". I doubt this titan nerf will change this at all simply due to the fact that seeing a blob of titans, friendly or not is actually pretty damn rare (unless you deliberately go out to bait them, goons).
At the moment CCP, you are taking more things away from Nulsec, and turning it into a desert.
Please. Stop JUST taking things away. Give us new things to make eve more interesting. The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:44:00 -
[2145] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:losing battles because of not using end-game ships that are available and which of the enemies have used, but instead you brought early to mid game content ships and whine like little girls.
here's a little story - say that there was a war going on between 'A country' and 'B country',
'A country' brought hundreads of elite soldiers in tanks and elite ground troops equipped with most modernised guns with a Commander on the field. 'B country' brought thousands of pesty peasants equipped with tridents and their working gear and having a Commander on the field.
now the results, obviously 'A country' would win.
even if B country's Commander is much, much better in every way than the A country's Commander, it wouldn't have mattered. the A country wins the battle.
but then, one of the two things happend
(assuming that 'B country's god named CCP exists)
1) 'B country' prayed to their god, made sacrifises, gave him offerings and wished that they would win the war.
2) 'B country' turned all their available resources into researching and manufacturing weapons to fight back 'A country'
later on, B country chose option '1)' and have won the war by god's power.
but they didn't want to keep the technology and the weapons they have acquired by salvaging looting 'A country', because they thought those things were too conflicated and weapons as brutal.
if they have kept them, it would have brought happiness and excitement, through out the entire country because of the complete change in their bordrum life. which they have never thought of, then they kept on living the same usual unchangeable life(just like those poor north korean people under the command of the Kim Jeong-Eun) that just dont ever change.
p.s. when i mentioned the end-game content which i obviously thought of it as a titan, it's just my opinion of saying. reason why? because i couldn't think of any other thing that's harder to get than a titan pilot and a titan. and the cost of the isk as well.
should you argue that some people got theirs easily? they got help from other people, alliance, corp, botting, and etc. if anyone had used those source on somthing other than aquiring a titan pilot plus a titan, then they'd get what they seeked for with much ease.
p.p.s Marlona Sky thanks for the tip, but there are just too many posts and one simply cannot block those trolls without so much effort. thats why i left the problem to CCP so that way thousands of ppl could save time and would actually be able to read the good feedbacks. and by the way, you should first stop trolling before you agreeingmg on the fact that troll posts should get removed.
Jesus hates you... |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
584
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:48:00 -
[2146] - Quote
Triskian wrote:Andski wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:hakkart wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:So my point is any side should have advantage on battlefield as it now (Numbers and technology). So you filed 1000 Drakes which can be countered by 200 Abaddons. Each side should be able to decide what it will bring for a fight - High SP+Expensive ships or less PS but en mass. You're oversimplifying it. 1000 drakes does not make a fleet. Fleet is all about composition. 1000 drakes would lose HARD to a 500-man fleet with an actual composition, with logis and dictors and recons. . And that's the way it ought to be. A titan blob, on the other hand, stands on its own with no need for support other than supercarriers, which are equally unkillable in large numbers. Edit before someone puts words in my mouth: The 500-man fleet is mostly drakes. How are these titans tackling you guys? No chance in hell I would get in point range of one, much less scram and web.  properly fit supercarriers (i.e. the ones that fit officer points) have scram strength at 30km sometimes you're in a bubble too I found myself in a bubble.
The super capitals had time to anchor bubbles?
|

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:51:00 -
[2147] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:
The super capitals had time to anchor bubbles?
No, I forgot where I put myself. |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:52:00 -
[2148] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote: The super capitals had time to anchor bubbles?
Those Nano-Ragnaroks are quite sneaky...
|

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
584
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:56:00 -
[2149] - Quote
Triskian wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:
The super capitals had time to anchor bubbles?
No, I forgot where I put myself.
I suggest you always let your FC know about when your own fleet members bubble you causing you to die. I would also suggest (you can pass this on directly from me if you like) that instead of your HIC's using the bubble feature, change to focused scripts. You get farther tackle range and there is no chance of your fleet tackling itself so to speak. Thus allowing anyone the supers are attacking, able to warp out and possible come back.
Maybe some game mechanics changed and I didn't see it on the forums, but it should mean far longer staying power for your fleet members against these super capitals.
|

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 09:00:00 -
[2150] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Triskian wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:
The super capitals had time to anchor bubbles?
No, I forgot where I put myself. I suggest you always let your FC know about when your own fleet members bubble you causing you to die. I would also suggest (you can pass this on directly from me if you like) that instead of your HIC's using the bubble feature, change to focused scripts. You get farther tackle range and there is no chance of your fleet tackling itself so to speak. Thus allowing anyone the supers are attacking, able to warp out and possible come back. Maybe some game mechanics changed and I didn't see it on the forums, but it should mean far longer staying power for your fleet members against these super capitals.
What? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3009
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 09:05:00 -
[2151] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Triskian wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:
The super capitals had time to anchor bubbles?
No, I forgot where I put myself. I suggest you always let your FC know about when your own fleet members bubble you causing you to die. I would also suggest (you can pass this on directly from me if you like) that instead of your HIC's using the bubble feature, change to focused scripts. You get farther tackle range and there is no chance of your fleet tackling itself so to speak. Thus allowing anyone the supers are attacking, able to warp out and possible come back. Maybe some game mechanics changed and I didn't see it on the forums, but it should mean far longer staying power for your fleet members against these super capitals.
dictors are the more prevalent bubblers especially after the hics die to titan guns "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 09:06:00 -
[2152] - Quote
I assume you know what alcohol is right? |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 09:06:00 -
[2153] - Quote
My last post was directed at Marlona Sky, I think.
I'm not really sure what's going on here. |

Triskian
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 09:07:00 -
[2154] - Quote
All I really know is that it's 5:07am and I am out of beer. That's the real tragedy here. |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 09:18:00 -
[2155] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:there are just too many trolls around here. i dont know why CCP is letting those cluleless goonswarm trolls make troll posts at almost every post giving opinions and feedbacks about the incomming titan adjustments that are not from their own, without any legimate reason.
please remove idiotic posts here so that people would actually read other peoples feedbacks and react by agreeing, disagreeing, leaving feedback of a feedback without trolling. Starting with this one right here.
You keep using the word "trolling." I do not think it means what you think it means. In fact, I'm sure of it. At least, I'm pretty sure that "trolling" does not mean "giving valid answers that Titan Keeper 22 does not want."
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:back on my previous posts, you goon idiots couldn't even deny a single fact about what i said with a reason, but instead kept on trolling like kids straight out of kindergarten. "Couldn't deny a single fact" does not mean "wouldn't agree with my pants-on-head stupid rantings." Your rantings. Which are stupid. Pants-on-head stupid.
Actually, when someone shows your level of willful obtuseness, I begin to believe that it is actually they that are trolling. I suppose you could prove me wrong. I just don't think it's likely.
bl4ckL0tus wrote:dont tell me goons dont have isk to do that its jst fc are cowards to fight in that way cos if they fail once they can get alot of bshit for how crap they were ... isntead jst ordering waves of drakes/maels trying repeatedly t odo the same thing ... one wise man once said : those who cannot adapt become victims of evolution ... If it takes me longer to read your drivel than it took you to type it, I just can't friggin' be bothered. Sorry. |

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 09:38:00 -
[2156] - Quote
If we could add alliances to the ignore on forums ;( |

Tector
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 09:52:00 -
[2157] - Quote
I think a very important point to consider here is the massive roadblock a supercapital fleet presents to an alliance attempting to carve a niche for itself in 0.0. It is simply not possible for an alliance with very few or no supercapitals to seriously contest sov against an entrenched alliance and its supercapital fleet. Numbers can be neutralized via bombers or various fleet doctrines, but there is virtually no counter for titans as they stood, save for even more titans. Supercapital pilots are for the most part no different in attitude from the grognards in BoB that felt that someone had no right to be in 0.0 unless they had at least 25m SP.
Rebalancing supercapitals, and with any luck the sov system too, will allow new blood to come into 0.0. |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
702
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 09:59:00 -
[2158] - Quote
Tector wrote:I think a very important point to consider here is the massive roadblock a supercapital fleet presents to an alliance attempting to carve a niche for itself in 0.0. It is simply not possible for an alliance with very few or no supercapitals to seriously contest sov against an entrenched alliance and its supercapital fleet. Numbers can be neutralized via bombers or various fleet doctrines, but there is virtually no counter for titans as they stood, save for even more titans. Supercapital pilots are for the most part no different in attitude from the grognards in BoB that felt that someone had no right to be in 0.0 unless they had at least 25m SP.
Rebalancing supercapitals, and with any luck the sov system too, will allow new blood to come into 0.0.
Evoke + Cloud ring back in 2010/2011 = ... what exactly?
Let me make this clear:
Tector wrote:I think a very important point to consider here is the massive roadblock a 1000+ fleet presents to an alliance attempting to carve a niche for itself in 0.0. It is simply not possible for an alliance with very few or no manpower to seriously contest sov against an entrenched alliance and its drake/Mael fleet. Numbers can be neutralized via bombers or various fleet doctrines, but there is virtually no counter for superior numbers as they stand, save for even more people in subcaps. Subcap pilots are for the most part no different in attitude from the grognards in GSF that felt that someone had no right to be in 0.0 unless they had at least 25 SP.
Rebalancing fleet limits, and with any luck the sov system too, will allow new blood to come into 0.0.
The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
89
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 09:59:00 -
[2159] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:when i meant end game content, it was based on what the majority of people that play PC/Console games think. Because the idiotic console gamers (of which I assume you are one) is the standard we want to lower ourselves to.
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:one of you say that FC'ing is the end game? well there are other games that have the very similar to FC'ing available. but how many of that game's players think of that as the end-game? i'm thinking around 0.01~0.0001% of players. The number of people who think any activity is an "end game" doesnt matter at all. Eve is a game where you make your own "end game" if you want a game where they hold your hand and tell you, you've done a good job when you reach max level WoW is ==========> this way
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:eve is a game where you fly ships mostly especially combat ships; more than 80% of the ships are combat ships anyways. everything, manufacturing, researching, trading, exploring, pve'ing leads to what? combat ships, PvP. and now, whats the most expensive, and with the best attribute combat ship in game? a titan.
now which content, which ship, should be the end-game?
you Goonswarm and CFC just cannot think outside the mittani box, can you? This is one way of looking at the game, and honestly, it isnt at all how I describe the game to people; to me Eve is all about economy and manufacturing. An alliance conquers space in order to get the ability to earn more faster, and to produce their own caps/supercaps. Combat is just a means to an end, but not the purpose of the game.
A sandbox means everyone is free to pursue their own idea of what the end game is, and your pursuit of your end game is not allowed to step on my idea of an end game.
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:everything, every single thoughts and words of you Goonswarm/CFC members are based on mittani's thinking box. he is smart, he has power, and he's playing mindgames with all of you. yet none of you GW/CFC understands and realizes about it. even if one do so, you are denying for your own benefit.
you keep trying hard to make eve like a casual game after 10years and with your number, and conspiracy going on, yes the game will change towards your benefiting point.
Yep, not a goon, in fact im opposed to the entire idea behind their alliance, but im able to rationally think though things and come to the same conclusion.
The only thing that I hope dies is the stupid idea that Eve needs a definite confirmed "end game" |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3012
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:08:00 -
[2160] - Quote
Headerman wrote:Tector wrote:I think a very important point to consider here is the massive roadblock a supercapital fleet presents to an alliance attempting to carve a niche for itself in 0.0. It is simply not possible for an alliance with very few or no supercapitals to seriously contest sov against an entrenched alliance and its supercapital fleet. Numbers can be neutralized via bombers or various fleet doctrines, but there is virtually no counter for titans as they stood, save for even more titans. Supercapital pilots are for the most part no different in attitude from the grognards in BoB that felt that someone had no right to be in 0.0 unless they had at least 25m SP.
Rebalancing supercapitals, and with any luck the sov system too, will allow new blood to come into 0.0. Evoke + Cloud ring back in 2010/2011 = ... what exactly? Let me make this clear: Tector wrote:I think a very important point to consider here is the massive roadblock a 1000+ fleet presents to an alliance attempting to carve a niche for itself in 0.0. It is simply not possible for an alliance with very few or no manpower to seriously contest sov against an entrenched alliance and its drake/Mael fleet. Numbers can be neutralized via bombers or various fleet doctrines, but there is virtually no counter for superior numbers as they stand, save for even more people in subcaps. Subcap pilots are for the most part no different in attitude from the grognards in GSF that felt that someone had no right to be in 0.0 unless they had at least 25 SP.
Rebalancing fleet limits, and with any luck the sov system too, will allow new blood to come into 0.0.
let's assume that only these two extremes were possible
do you prefer large-scale engagements to be decided by 20 or 1000+?
hmm i think i'm going with 1000+ "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
554
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:19:00 -
[2161] - Quote
I should have bought stock in the aluminum industry the moment I saw this thread go up. Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:29:00 -
[2162] - Quote
Headerman wrote:Tector wrote:I think a very important point to consider here is the massive roadblock a supercapital fleet presents to an alliance attempting to carve a niche for itself in 0.0. It is simply not possible for an alliance with very few or no supercapitals to seriously contest sov against an entrenched alliance and its supercapital fleet. Numbers can be neutralized via bombers or various fleet doctrines, but there is virtually no counter for titans as they stood, save for even more titans. Supercapital pilots are for the most part no different in attitude from the grognards in BoB that felt that someone had no right to be in 0.0 unless they had at least 25m SP.
Rebalancing supercapitals, and with any luck the sov system too, will allow new blood to come into 0.0. Evoke + Cloud ring back in 2010/2011 = ... what exactly? Let me make this clear: Tector wrote:I think a very important point to consider here is the massive roadblock a 1000+ fleet presents to an alliance attempting to carve a niche for itself in 0.0. It is simply not possible for an alliance with very few or no manpower to seriously contest sov against an entrenched alliance and its drake/Mael fleet. Numbers can be neutralized via bombers or various fleet doctrines, but there is virtually no counter for superior numbers as they stand, save for even more people in subcaps. Subcap pilots are for the most part no different in attitude from the grognards in GSF that felt that someone had no right to be in 0.0 unless they had at least 25 SP.
Rebalancing fleet limits, and with any luck the sov system too, will allow new blood to come into 0.0.
I like the part where you leave the solution to numbers in your 'fixed' version regarding numbers, so actually proving the point.
|

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
702
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:36:00 -
[2163] - Quote
GallowsCalibrator wrote:Headerman wrote:Tector wrote:I think a very important point to consider here is the massive roadblock a supercapital fleet presents to an alliance attempting to carve a niche for itself in 0.0. It is simply not possible for an alliance with very few or no supercapitals to seriously contest sov against an entrenched alliance and its supercapital fleet. Numbers can be neutralized via bombers or various fleet doctrines, but there is virtually no counter for titans as they stood, save for even more titans. Supercapital pilots are for the most part no different in attitude from the grognards in BoB that felt that someone had no right to be in 0.0 unless they had at least 25m SP.
Rebalancing supercapitals, and with any luck the sov system too, will allow new blood to come into 0.0. Evoke + Cloud ring back in 2010/2011 = ... what exactly? Let me make this clear: Tector wrote:I think a very important point to consider here is the massive roadblock a 1000+ fleet presents to an alliance attempting to carve a niche for itself in 0.0. It is simply not possible for an alliance with very few or no manpower to seriously contest sov against an entrenched alliance and its drake/Mael fleet. Numbers can be neutralized via bombers or various fleet doctrines, but there is virtually no counter for superior numbers as they stand, save for even more people in subcaps. Subcap pilots are for the most part no different in attitude from the grognards in GSF that felt that someone had no right to be in 0.0 unless they had at least 25 SP.
Rebalancing fleet limits, and with any luck the sov system too, will allow new blood to come into 0.0. I like the part where you leave the solution to numbers in your 'fixed' version regarding numbers (EG: That they have a counter that isn't 'bring more'), so actually proving the point.
And that point was "but there is virtually no counter for superior numbers as they stand".
And for Andski, i think i would much rather (in an ideal world) see a 50-100 man gang Vs similar numbers, or a handful of carriers for the fun of it.
Having been in a RR carrier gang of 6, we nearly lost to a 50 man gang or so. They are pretty exciting battles :)
But back on topic though, Has a Mael/drake blob won battles where a titan blob was involved? The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

asdf ghyj
Zorg Solutions
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:51:00 -
[2164] - Quote
nerf TEMPEST pls they lose against tempest now
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12745045
GOONS stop cry about nerf ships , l2p maybe |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3017
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:51:00 -
[2165] - Quote
Headerman wrote:And that point was "but there is virtually no counter for superior numbers as they stand".
And for Andski, i think i would much rather (in an ideal world) see a 50-100 man gang Vs similar numbers, or a handful of carriers for the fun of it.
Having been in a RR carrier gang of 6, we nearly lost to a 50 man gang or so. They are pretty exciting battles :)
But back on topic though, Has a Mael/drake blob won battles where a titan blob was involved?
naaaaaah i'm asking you which of those two extremes (you know, because it's clearly not a false dilemma) is more reasonable "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Cyaron wars
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:52:00 -
[2166] - Quote
you are all missing main point of current game mechanics that is broken. Every fleet based on numbers has it's counter based on SP and ISK. Bringing 100 rifters with logistics will be countered by bringing 20 vagabonds with less logistics. So let's assume Fleet A is T1 frigate, Fleet B is Hacs, Fleet C is battleships. So every fleet can be countered by fleet of less size but higher SP, u can always field something that requires less numbers but more SP/ISK and that something will be only like 1 rank higher then hostile fleet . This is how it looks like: frigs > cruisers > BCs > BS > Capitals > Supercapitals > Titans. Current mechanics is good up intil BS. there is a huuuuuge gap between BS and titan. U can say that capitals are under powered and that's why they are not used or state that titans and supers are overpowered and should be nerfed. In any case this is not solving major issue - Gap between BS and a Titan. Fill that missing point and game become much better.
I've to admit - CCP Sucks in game balance. I remember same way ppl where whining about atlas capitals, so ccp created another ship to counter them. After ppl were whining about supers, now titans. in any case tweaking 1 certain ship will never fix game. If you want to fix something to and review all ships that are affected by tracking titans. I would also say that Signature stuff is kinda bullshit, ship size doesn't change by turning MWD on. So how can missile do more damage to same ship w MWD on and less damage w MWD off? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3017
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:52:00 -
[2167] - Quote
wow 6 capitals
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&kll_id=12522897 "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Sendo Jarix
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:53:00 -
[2168] - Quote
If there is one thing I've learnt from this thread it's that the majority of the games Titan's seem to be in NPC corps. |

Cyaron wars
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:55:00 -
[2169] - Quote
now this is awesome. This is how supers and titans should be used. They made what they were designed for by CCP - Obliterate capital ships. |

asdf ghyj
Zorg Solutions
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:56:00 -
[2170] - Quote
If u guys are so PRO why cry to CCP to nerf ships ?? cuz cant kill Raiden & Co What u guys do now i do when i have 4 year and some1 take my toys and i start cry : MOM ( CCP) some one take my toys pls help me GOONS = PENIBLE |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3018
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:02:00 -
[2171] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:you are all missing main point of current game mechanics that is broken. Every fleet based on numbers has it's counter based on SP and ISK. Bringing 100 rifters with logistics will be countered by bringing 20 vagabonds with less logistics. So let's assume Fleet A is T1 frigate, Fleet B is Hacs, Fleet C is battleships. So every fleet can be countered by fleet of less size but higher SP, u can always field something that requires less numbers but more SP/ISK and that something will be only like 1 rank higher then hostile fleet . This is how it looks like: frigs > cruisers > BCs > BS > Capitals > Supercapitals > Titans. Current mechanics is good up intil BS. there is a huuuuuge gap between BS and titan. U can say that capitals are under powered and that's why they are not used or state that titans and supers are overpowered and should be nerfed. In any case this is not solving major issue - Gap between BS and a Titan. Fill that missing point and game everybody will be happy.
hey tell me what happens when you throw maelstroms and logis at hacs
let me save you some time: they get murdered by the hacs
add some lokis, huginns, lachesis and dictors into the mix and, hey, the hacs die in a fire
"fleet composition" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

baltec1
816
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:05:00 -
[2172] - Quote
asdf ghyj wrote:
If u guys are so PRO why cry to CCP to nerf ships ?? cuz cant kill Raiden & Co What u guys do now i do when i have 4 year and some1 take my toys and i start cry : MOM ( CCP) some one take my toys pls help me GOONS = PENIBLE
We a burning raiden into the ground anyway (again), we make our case on behalf of the tens of thousands who have suffered at the hands of three powerblocks who have abused titans. CCP agree with us and have seen fit to fix titans (again).
The only people shedding tears are the three blocks who abused it and their neural alts. |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:05:00 -
[2173] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:you are all missing main point of current game mechanics that is broken. Every fleet based on numbers has it's counter based on SP and ISK. Bringing 100 rifters with logistics will be countered by bringing 20 vagabonds with less logistics.
Not necessarily; 20 vagabonds vs 100 rifters? Sure, it's a slaughter. 100 rifters versus 10 battleships? I'd be putting my money on the rifters. Those 20 vagabonds may take out, say, 10 Maelstroms; 10 Tempests packing neuts may be an entirely different story. Most ships in the game are balanced around having a number of weaknesses and strengths.
Edit: What Andski said.
Quote:So let's assume Fleet A is T1 frigate, Fleet B is Hacs, Fleet C is battleships. So every fleet can be countered by fleet of less size but higher SP, u can always field something that requires less numbers but more SP/ISK and that something will be only like 1 rank higher then hostile fleet . This is how it looks like: frigs > cruisers > BCs > BS > Capitals > Supercapitals > Titans. Current mechanics is good up intil BS. there is a huuuuuge gap between BS and titan. U can say that capitals are under powered and that's why they are not used or state that titans and supers are overpowered and should be nerfed. In any case this is not solving major issue - Gap between BS and a Titan. Fill that missing point and game become much better. See above. There's no clear hierarchy as regards what ship wins. Until supercaps come in.
Quote:I've to admit - CCP Sucks in game balance. I remember same way ppl where whining about atlas capitals, so ccp created another ship to counter them. After ppl were whining about supers, now titans. in any case tweaking 1 certain ship will never fix game. If you want to fix something to and review all ships that are affected by tracking titans. I would also say that Signature stuff is kinda bullshit, ship size doesn't change by turning MWD on. So how can missile do more damage to same ship w MWD on and less damage w MWD off? Game balance is a ******* abysmal field, it's extraordinarily difficult to get right. Also, the signature isn't necessarily the ship size, [insert RP fluff here]. In any case, it is a balance mechanic all the same; MWD's serve the 'get there fast oh god gogogo' function, afterburners provide a more modest speed increase, but increase survivability at the same time.
Sendo Jarix wrote:If there is one thing I've learnt from this thread it's that the majority of the games Titan's seem to be in NPC corps.
NPC alt tears are the most delicious tears.
Quote:If u guys are so PRO why cry to CCP to nerf ships ?? cuz cant kill Raiden & Co What u guys do now i do when i have 4 year and some1 take my toys and i start cry : MOM ( CCP) some one take my toys pls help me GOONS = PENIBLE :wtc: |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3021
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:07:00 -
[2174] - Quote
asdf ghyj wrote:If u guys are so PRO why cry to CCP to nerf ships ?? cuz cant kill Raiden & Co What u guys do now i do when i have 4 year and some1 take my toys and i start cry : MOM ( CCP) some one take my toys pls help me GOONS = PENIBLE thank you for your insights on 0.0 combat asdf ghyj "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
705
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:09:00 -
[2175] - Quote
GallowsCalibrator wrote:Yeah, more opportunities for small fights would be great, especially with mixed fleets! Unfortunately the current Sov system doesn't work that way. Also, a Titan fleet is the exact opposite of a mixed fleet.
Where will it stop though? with carriers?
If somehow titans were deemed too risky to send in to battle, what ship class will be next in line to send in?
Super carriers.
What counter is there to a RR super carrier fleet? One whos HP count is higher than a titans? Will we see calls for another HP/ability nerf for SCs before long?
There are ways to put incentives in place for people to be effective with their titans without them being on the battlefield, and those incentives go beyond a simple nerf.
I think CCP has taken leave of creative thinking. The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC 0ccupational Hazzard
60
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:12:00 -
[2176] - Quote
great now remove ECM, eve fixed Everytime you dont like my comments/posts the terrorists win and your a disgrace to your country. |

baltec1
817
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:13:00 -
[2177] - Quote
Headerman wrote:GallowsCalibrator wrote:Yeah, more opportunities for small fights would be great, especially with mixed fleets! Unfortunately the current Sov system doesn't work that way. Also, a Titan fleet is the exact opposite of a mixed fleet. Where will it stop though? with carriers? If somehow titans were deemed too risky to send in to battle, what ship class will be next in line to send in? Super carriers. What counter is there to a RR super carrier fleet? One whos HP count is higher than a titans? Will we see calls for another HP/ability nerf for SCs before long?
Several, most of them involving subcaps. SC are balanced and beatable. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3021
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:15:00 -
[2178] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:great now remove ECM, eve fixed
hmm yes 10k ehp recons that die when you sneeze at them are comparable to titans indeed "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Cyaron wars
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:19:00 -
[2179] - Quote
Andski wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:you are all missing main point of current game mechanics that is broken. Every fleet based on numbers has it's counter based on SP and ISK. Bringing 100 rifters with logistics will be countered by bringing 20 vagabonds with less logistics. So let's assume Fleet A is T1 frigate, Fleet B is Hacs, Fleet C is battleships. So every fleet can be countered by fleet of less size but higher SP, u can always field something that requires less numbers but more SP/ISK and that something will be only like 1 rank higher then hostile fleet . This is how it looks like: frigs > cruisers > BCs > BS > Capitals > Supercapitals > Titans. Current mechanics is good up intil BS. there is a huuuuuge gap between BS and titan. U can say that capitals are under powered and that's why they are not used or state that titans and supers are overpowered and should be nerfed. In any case this is not solving major issue - Gap between BS and a Titan. Fill that missing point and game everybody will be happy. hey tell me what happens when you throw maelstroms and logis at hacs let me save you some time: they get murdered by the hacs add some lokis, huginns, lachesis and dictors into the mix and, hey, the hacs die in a fire "fleet composition"
So basically all u say is that every fleet doctrine can be countered. So with proper fleet composition u can **** battleships with ahacs. but if battleships will burn in different directions they will murder ahacs. This is exactly what I want to say. no imagine that on a higher tier. imagine you have fleet of dreads with enough DPS to kill and track battleships out of siege mode. u dield supers to take them out. but then dreads can go to siege and start raping supers if they have enough numbers or ask for suppercap support to counter your super fleet. that's exactly what is missing. that is what I'm trying to say.
There should be no uber ship. Titans atm are viewed from solo point of view. ppl are looking at what 1 titan does instead of looking on it from fleet doctrine perspective and counter them same way. 1 dread will never kill a full fleet of battleships but 100 dreads will. 1 battleship will never alpha hac or cruiser but in numbers they will, same goes for for hacs that will **** battleships, dreads that will **** titansand so on.
Once again stop looking at 1 particular ship. Look at all those ships that are before and after it in tier rank.
Battleship killer - that is what missing in this game. ship with enough tank to adsorb a huge damage comming from number of battleships and enough DPS to bring some of them down before he dies. Titans are the ones that fulfill that role, dreads can be significant replacement to them in this case. |

Mathicluanna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:21:00 -
[2180] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:1 dread will never kill a full fleet of battleships but 100 dreads will.
Lets test this. You bring the dreads I'll bring the battleships. |

baltec1
817
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:22:00 -
[2181] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:
So basically all u say is that every fleet doctrine can be countered. So with proper fleet composition u can **** battleships with ahacs. but if battleships will burn in different directions they will murder ahacs. This is exactly what I want to say. no imagine that on a higher tier. imagine you have fleet of dreads with enough DPS to kill and track battleships out of siege mode. u dield supers to take them out. but then dreads can go to siege and start raping supers if they have enough numbers or ask for suppercap support to counter your super fleet. that's exactly what is missing. that is what I'm trying to say.
There should be no uber ship. Titans atm are viewed from solo point of view. ppl are looking at what 1 titan does instead of looking on it from fleet doctrine perspective and counter them same way. 1 dread will never kill a full fleet of battleships but 100 dreads will. 1 battleship will never alpha hac or cruiser but in numbers they will, same goes for for hacs that will **** battleships, dreads that will **** titansand so on.
Once again stop looking at 1 particular ship. Look at all those ships that are before and after it in tier rank.
Battleship killer - that is what missing in this game. ship with enough tank to adsorb a huge damage comming from number of battleships and enough DPS to bring some of them down before he dies. Titans are the ones that fulfill that role, dreads can be significant replacement to them in this case.
The counter to a blob of titans is a bigger blob of titans. Hence the nerf. |

Cyaron wars
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:22:00 -
[2182] - Quote
Mathicluanna wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:1 dread will never kill a full fleet of battleships but 100 dreads will. Lets test this. You bring the dreads I'll bring the battleships.
Read my post above again! dreads as they are now are a waste of isk and nothing else. |

God-Emperor of Amarr
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:23:00 -
[2183] - Quote
It has been two days. Tears still create a river. Mittani can't dance. |

Cyaron wars
D00M. Northern Coalition.
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:24:00 -
[2184] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:
So basically all u say is that every fleet doctrine can be countered. So with proper fleet composition u can **** battleships with ahacs. but if battleships will burn in different directions they will murder ahacs. This is exactly what I want to say. no imagine that on a higher tier. imagine you have fleet of dreads with enough DPS to kill and track battleships out of siege mode. u dield supers to take them out. but then dreads can go to siege and start raping supers if they have enough numbers or ask for suppercap support to counter your super fleet. that's exactly what is missing. that is what I'm trying to say.
There should be no uber ship. Titans atm are viewed from solo point of view. ppl are looking at what 1 titan does instead of looking on it from fleet doctrine perspective and counter them same way. 1 dread will never kill a full fleet of battleships but 100 dreads will. 1 battleship will never alpha hac or cruiser but in numbers they will, same goes for for hacs that will **** battleships, dreads that will **** titansand so on.
Once again stop looking at 1 particular ship. Look at all those ships that are before and after it in tier rank.
Battleship killer - that is what missing in this game. ship with enough tank to adsorb a huge damage comming from number of battleships and enough DPS to bring some of them down before he dies. Titans are the ones that fulfill that role, dreads can be significant replacement to them in this case.
The counter to a blob of titans is a bigger blob of titans. Hence the nerf.
No, counter blob of titan with Sieged dreads (still needs a buff) and support fleet. |

baltec1
817
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:27:00 -
[2185] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:
No, counter blob of titan with Sieged dreads (still needs a buff) and support fleet.
Which was tried and failed. This also does not fix the problem in that titans invalidated 99% of ships in EVE and made winning fights impossible for smaller alliances. |

Mathicluanna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:27:00 -
[2186] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:Mathicluanna wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:1 dread will never kill a full fleet of battleships but 100 dreads will. Lets test this. You bring the dreads I'll bring the battleships. Read my post above again! dreads as they are now are a waste of isk and nothing else.
Why should 100 dreads kill 256 battleships other than a misguided belief that more skillpoints and isk should equal more power? Dreads are balanced pretty well against battleships (i.e. they die in a fire), you don't see them on the field because supercaps are broken. |

Cyaron wars
D00M. Northern Coalition.
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:32:00 -
[2187] - Quote
Mathicluanna wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:Mathicluanna wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:1 dread will never kill a full fleet of battleships but 100 dreads will. Lets test this. You bring the dreads I'll bring the battleships. Read my post above again! dreads as they are now are a waste of isk and nothing else. Why should 100 dreads kill 256 battleships other than a misguided belief that more skillpoints and isk should equal more power? Dreads are balanced pretty well against battleships (i.e. they die in a fire), you don't see them on the field because supercaps are broken.
Why can Assault frigate like Ishkur **** 5 T1 frigates? Why Garmon rapes pretty much everything in his videos while flying ship fitted for over 5 bil and implants for 2bil? What's the point of training and perfecting skills then? |

baltec1
818
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:37:00 -
[2188] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:Mathicluanna wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:Mathicluanna wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:1 dread will never kill a full fleet of battleships but 100 dreads will. Lets test this. You bring the dreads I'll bring the battleships. Read my post above again! dreads as they are now are a waste of isk and nothing else. Why should 100 dreads kill 256 battleships other than a misguided belief that more skillpoints and isk should equal more power? Dreads are balanced pretty well against battleships (i.e. they die in a fire), you don't see them on the field because supercaps are broken. Why can Assault frigate like Ishkur **** 5 T1 frigates? Why Garmon rapes pretty much everything in his videos while flying ship fitted for over 5 bil and implants for 2bil? What's the point of training and perfecting skills then?
Garmon has skill as a pilot. Put most people in the same ship and they will die in a fire. Pilot skill > Skillpoints/money. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3022
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:37:00 -
[2189] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:Mathicluanna wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:Mathicluanna wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:1 dread will never kill a full fleet of battleships but 100 dreads will. Lets test this. You bring the dreads I'll bring the battleships. Read my post above again! dreads as they are now are a waste of isk and nothing else. Why should 100 dreads kill 256 battleships other than a misguided belief that more skillpoints and isk should equal more power? Dreads are balanced pretty well against battleships (i.e. they die in a fire), you don't see them on the field because supercaps are broken. Why can Assault frigate like Ishkur **** 5 T1 frigates? Why Garmon rapes pretty much everything in his videos while flying ship fitted for over 5 bil and implants for 2bil? What's the point of training and perfecting skills then?
hmm yes i'm sure garmon solos carriers because he's fielding more isk than they are "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Cyaron wars
D00M. Northern Coalition.
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:43:00 -
[2190] - Quote
looks like you really don't understand my point or u just don't want to understand what I'm talking about. Once again I'm saying that there is a gap that should be filled. removing a role from ship and leaving that role empty is silly. |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
79
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:45:00 -
[2191] - Quote
It's adorable that we're 110 pages in, and people are still posting about these THOUSANDS OF BATTLESHIPS that goons can supposedly bring to a fight. Nevermind that goons have been consistently matched in numbers, in every major fight we've had in the last few months. I was in a fleet last night with 146 people. Not sure where the other 1400+ were, but man I wish they'd show up soon.
But go ahead and continue to post about these thousands of goons that are going to come riding out of the sun like some mongol horde, to wipe out everything not protected by the flying Alamo Fortresses that are titans. Everytime a ttian is fielded, it is literally a last stand against the forces of evil and badposting. In the meantime the rest of us will be here in reality, where titans are still overpowered and broken. Where a group of alliances abused that broken mechanic to the point that CCP sees they have no choice but to make immediate changes before the abuse gets worse.
Remember these are the same people who dropped their titan blob onto a CCP fleet, just a few jumps from Jita. The largest hub in all of eve. And they did so with absolutely no fear, because even though there might have been 2-3000 people in that system, the titan blob was just as invincible then as it is on any other battlefield. CCP saw this firsthand, and so has everyone else. Titans need a nerf, nerf is coming, whine more. |

Mathicluanna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:50:00 -
[2192] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:looks like you really don't understand my point or u just don't want to understand what I'm talking about. Once again I'm saying that there is a gap that should be filled. removing a role from ship and leaving that role empty is silly.
Those of us with fully developed critical thinking skills don't think "invulnerable subcap killing machine" is a role that needs filling at all. |

baltec1
818
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:50:00 -
[2193] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:looks like you really don't understand my point or u just don't want to understand what I'm talking about. Once again I'm saying that there is a gap that should be filled. removing a role from ship and leaving that role empty is silly.
When that roll results in turning every subcap into something more useless than a meatshield your damn right it should be removed and left empty. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3022
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:53:00 -
[2194] - Quote
btw strong drop still nullifies this change quite a bit
75% nerf or bust "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Iris Bravemount
Aliastra Gallente Federation
64
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:55:00 -
[2195] - Quote
I may be a bit late in this thread, but hey...
Why don't you just forbid Sensor Boosters and Signal Amplifiers on Titans instead of nerfing their sensors ? This way they will still have a hard time locking subcaps, but can keep rolling against caps and structures.
Forbidding Tracking Enhancers and Tracking Computers on Titans could also work instead of nerfing the turrets I guess, but I'm not as sure as for the sensor mods... Improve weapon sound effects |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3023
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 12:00:00 -
[2196] - Quote
Iris Bravemount wrote:Why don't you just forbid Sensor Boosters, Auto Targeting Systems and Signal Amplifiers on Titans instead of nerfing their sensors ? This way they will still have a hard time locking subcaps, but can keep rolling against caps and structures.
and keep the 3 max locked targets "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Mathicluanna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 12:02:00 -
[2197] - Quote
Because arbitrary rules are bad. Supercaps already have enough of them.
The game doesn't forbid you to fit a 100mn afterburner on a cruiser hull, it just makes it very difficult and while you get massive speed you trade off in maneuverability and other fittings. |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 12:05:00 -
[2198] - Quote
Andski wrote:btw strong drop still nullifies this change quite a bit
75% nerf or bust
Eh, even 75% may still not be enough to prevent a degree of blapping once Titan numbers reach a higher critical mass. (Can't be bothered to do the maths right this minute). Lock time and no. of locks is pretty much the big impact here - you'd have to sacrifice guns, the JB, or doomsday to fit ATS for more locks, and mids for locktime. |

Max50
Parental Control HELL4S
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 12:36:00 -
[2199] - Quote
Just as any other nerf players will have to adapt to what CCP has for them.Drone nerf from supercarriers,now another titan nerf,tomorrow a tengu nerf because the worse side of players cant field 500+ everyday to blap them and who knows what else.
For over a year i am watching goons crying for various things in game,all of them having to do with them dying over and over.. CCP has already chose the side that will be supported.You have to be realistic about it and move on just as every other nerf(aka goon boosts).
For some players,this game has to do with planning,gaining ISK,spending them to buy new toys,buy new characters like this character created back in 2003 and is used a an "alt" from a 2008 player.Getting "better" in this game is different for all of us.
Lets just take CCP's place for a moment.They have 2 conflicting sides in this game.The one that seeks in game improvement and the other side that is heavily roleplaying and counts on it to play.I ve been in other games before EVE and if CCP doesnt take steps to sustain the roleplaying side the game will die itself.Most of you will propably say that goons should "gtfo and send ISK" before they do but here is the problem:the typical goon grunt doesnt have ISK to give.
What they do have though is real life money wich is what keeps this game ticking.So yeah,dont expect any counter to blob,the future has more and more things to favour them.So we are now in that tear circle where the worse players cry because they lose and the better players have to adapt everytime CCP is boosting.
Lets see whats next to be nerfed |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 12:54:00 -
[2200] - Quote
Max50 wrote:Just as any other nerf players will have to adapt to what CCP has for them.Drone nerf from supercarriers,now another titan nerf,tomorrow a tengu nerf because the worse side of players cant field 500+ everyday to blap them and who knows what else.
For over a year i am watching goons crying for various things in game,all of them having to do with them dying over and over.. CCP has already chose the side that will be supported.You have to be realistic about it and move on just as every other nerf(aka goon boosts).
For some players,this game has to do with planning,gaining ISK,spending them to buy new toys,buy new characters like this character created back in 2003 and is used a an "alt" from a 2008 player.Getting "better" in this game is different for all of us.
Lets just take CCP's place for a moment.They have 2 conflicting sides in this game.The one that seeks in game improvement and the other side that is heavily roleplaying and counts on it to play.I ve been in other games before EVE and if CCP doesnt take steps to sustain the roleplaying side the game will die itself.Most of you will propably say that goons should "gtfo and send ISK" before they do but here is the problem:the typical goon grunt doesnt have ISK to give.
What they do have though is real life money wich is what keeps this game ticking.So yeah,dont expect any counter to blob,the future has more and more things to favour them.So we are now in that tear circle where the worse players cry because they lose and the better players have to adapt everytime CCP is boosting.
Lets see whats next to be nerfed
Ahahahahahahahaha I have some tinfoil here for you
|

Sam McCausland
Pax Mortis Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:09:00 -
[2201] - Quote
It's amusing to see that not only are Goons & pets bad at the game itself but also horrible at poasting. Equally amusing is CCP Greyscale's blatantly obvious ignorance about his own game.
I tip my hat to the Mittani, this has to be the biggest meta-gaming stunt ever performed in any MMO to this date.
|

Terrorfrodo
Deep Space Darwinian Law Enforcement Agency
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:16:00 -
[2202] - Quote
One aspect that should get more attention is that dedicated titan pilots are inherently lamers. How much player skill does it take to fly a juggernaut that has many millions of hitpoints, takes a looong time to be killed and also a long time to perform any action, like maneuvering, targeting, killing? You have so much more time to do the right thing than in a small ship where you often die if you do not make the right call or move in a split-second.
Virtually every elite pvper in the game (I don't count myself among them) prefers small, fast ships. Because they require GÇô and reward GÇô player skill.
Supercaps... get rid of these stupid things. And if their owners think that EVE isn't worthwile without them, good riddance. |

Cyaron wars
D00M. Northern Coalition.
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:20:00 -
[2203] - Quote
Terrorfrodo wrote:One aspect that should get more attention is that dedicated titan pilots are inherently lamers. How much player skill does it take to fly a juggernaut that has many millions of hitpoints, takes a looong time to be killed and also a long time to perform any action, like maneuvering, targeting, killing? You have so much more time to do the right thing than in a small ship where you often die if you do not make the right call or move in a split-second.
Virtually every elite pvper in the game (I don't count myself among them) prefers small, fast ships. Because they require GÇô and reward GÇô player skill.
Supercaps... get rid of these stupid things. And if their owners think that EVE isn't worthwile without them, good riddance.
there is a huge difference between elit pvp aka small gang engagements and sov warfare that requires a blob fights, sov grinding, capitals and supercapitals. You think ppl hot those systems in 0.0 by fighting with 10 man gans?
You are looking only on 1 side of coin. Surprise, there's another one and it's completely different from what u are talking about. this post is exactly about that stuff. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:26:00 -
[2204] - Quote
Balderic Lunacy wrote: Your right. A Titan is not the end game for everyone. But you are a fool if you think that the majority of pilots do not view it as such.
The game is ever changing and evolving, but until you show me something beyond a Titan then that is the ceiling.
I presume you are talking about that 0.3% majority, right? |

XxTheKmanxX
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:37:00 -
[2205] - Quote
Terrorfrodo wrote:One aspect that should get more attention is that dedicated titan pilots are inherently lamers. How much player skill does it take to fly a juggernaut that has many millions of hitpoints, takes a looong time to be killed and also a long time to perform any action, like maneuvering, targeting, killing? You have so much more time to do the right thing than in a small ship where you often die if you do not make the right call or move in a split-second.
Virtually every elite pvper in the game (I don't count myself among them) prefers small, fast ships. Because they require GÇô and reward GÇô player skill.
Supercaps... get rid of these stupid things. And if their owners think that EVE isn't worthwile without them, good riddance.
I would stop posting while you are ahead, this post has nothing to do with the titan nerf - because it doesn't take skill to fly a titan, it takes money. |

Valearx
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:39:00 -
[2206] - Quote
CCP have made it clear that titans are not performing in the role(s) they want them to, and are therefore changing the way they function.
Elitepvp really didn't help matters by dropping their unkillable titan blob on any engagement they decided that they needed to win, with CCP watching. Repeatedly.
Oops? |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:42:00 -
[2207] - Quote
Titan Keeper 22 wrote:CCP has never thought of what new players would think of EvE after playing for several months, play around in a battleship class ships and realize, that there is nothing more to achieve
1) manufactureres - i build from frigate sized ships to carriers and dreads and modules. i think i can finish all that in about year. 2) traders - isk isk isk..and with those isk, what do i buy? currently being used and that are most expensive ships i can think of..carrier, dreads. nah.. that's just too easy i think i'd rather rmt. 3) researchers - almost same with manufactureres and traders. 4) freedom fighters(aka pvp'ers) - ok! i've finally acuired carrier/dread now time to shoot and repair structures! oh forgot that i can rat in a carrier! 5) bounty hunters - wtf is this **** 6) miner - most exciting content in eve! hear the calming sound wave of mining modules activating! oh wait AH HELL, I JUST GOT HULKAGEDDONED! 7) planetary industralist - i've finished every content of it in less than a month! yay i think im so good at this game! 8) explorer - scan, loot nothing, get frustrated, scan, loot nothing, scan, loot nothing, scan, fu*k i just lost my tengu! screw this, i'm buying plex to buy another tengu. scan, loot, somthing decent, happy, scan, loot nothing, scan, loot somthing decent, scan, ganked. 9) loyalist - uh which alliance should i join..um..i think Gooswarm is the strongest alliance in the game. maybe i'll give it a try. flys rifters/canes/maelstroms, shoots structure for longer than the time pvp'ing, start to think where all the taxes and the moon minerals go. gets explained by mittani that all of those isk are for reimbursing combat ships. but i payed for the ship and the modules to pvp and i get insurance that covers more than half of the price of the loss! 10) fleet commander - i cant FC.. im terrible at eve 11) empire builder - there are already more than enough of them! without a miracle, it's impossible!
Look at this 1 day old newbie already finishing the game.
Awww, cute. |

George Holden
The Shadow Plague BLACK-MARK
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:49:00 -
[2208] - Quote
Too bad you can't outrange 1200mm arties, oh wait you can. Too bad you can't orbit with more than 0.016 rad/sec to beat tracking, oh wait you can. Too bad you can't drop your fleet out of range or just on top of them, oh wait you can. Too bad you can't use bombs in nullsec, oh wait you can.
Do I need to go on?
There is no unbeatable fleet doctrine but you might want to turn your brains on before you blap the forums :> |

Terrorfrodo
Deep Space Darwinian Law Enforcement Agency
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:51:00 -
[2209] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:Terrorfrodo wrote:One aspect that should get more attention is that dedicated titan pilots are inherently lamers. How much player skill does it take to fly a juggernaut that has many millions of hitpoints, takes a looong time to be killed and also a long time to perform any action, like maneuvering, targeting, killing? You have so much more time to do the right thing than in a small ship where you often die if you do not make the right call or move in a split-second.
Virtually every elite pvper in the game (I don't count myself among them) prefers small, fast ships. Because they require GÇô and reward GÇô player skill.
Supercaps... get rid of these stupid things. And if their owners think that EVE isn't worthwile without them, good riddance. there is a huge difference between elit pvp aka small gang engagements and sov warfare that requires a blob fights, sov grinding, capitals and supercapitals. You think ppl hot those systems in 0.0 by fighting with 10 man gans?
No, but I think peple who have/need no skill should not wield the enormous power over other players a titan currently has. I flew together with a noob player once who had bought himself a supercap character (and lied about how he did not buy it). He got himself killed twice in one day because he parked his drake inside our own catch bubble. But in a titan no one might have noticed what a ****** he was. The thought that guys like that could wield serious power and influence in EVE is horrifying to me.
XxTheKmanxX wrote:I would stop posting while you are ahead, this post has nothing to do with the titan nerf True, but after 110 pages I thought it is time to move on to the next step on the agenda: Abolishing supercaps altogether  |

Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises Test Alliance Please Ignore
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:03:00 -
[2210] - Quote
Sentinel Eeex wrote:Balderic Lunacy wrote: Your right. A Titan is not the end game for everyone. But you are a fool if you think that the majority of pilots do not view it as such.
The game is ever changing and evolving, but until you show me something beyond a Titan then that is the ceiling.
I presume you are talking about that 0.3% majority, right?
It is the end game right now because it is a do everything, kill everything ship. If the game has an I-Win button, it is the end game. It works well for single player games, but is pretty terrible for MMOs. |

Cyaron wars
D00M. Northern Coalition.
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:13:00 -
[2211] - Quote
Terrorfrodo wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:Terrorfrodo wrote:One aspect that should get more attention is that dedicated titan pilots are inherently lamers. How much player skill does it take to fly a juggernaut that has many millions of hitpoints, takes a looong time to be killed and also a long time to perform any action, like maneuvering, targeting, killing? You have so much more time to do the right thing than in a small ship where you often die if you do not make the right call or move in a split-second.
Virtually every elite pvper in the game (I don't count myself among them) prefers small, fast ships. Because they require GÇô and reward GÇô player skill.
Supercaps... get rid of these stupid things. And if their owners think that EVE isn't worthwile without them, good riddance. there is a huge difference between elit pvp aka small gang engagements and sov warfare that requires a blob fights, sov grinding, capitals and supercapitals. You think ppl hot those systems in 0.0 by fighting with 10 man gans? No, but I think peple who have/need no skill should not wield the enormous power over other players a titan currently has. I flew together with a noob player once who had bought himself a supercap character (and lied about how he did not buy it). He got himself killed twice in one day because he parked his drake inside our own catch bubble. But in a titan no one might have noticed what a ****** he was. The thought that guys like that could wield serious power and influence in EVE is horrifying to me.
I agree about titans being overpowered. I'm saying that role they have now should be taken by other ship, and it should be several tiers bellow then titan.
|

Aurora B
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:17:00 -
[2212] - Quote
Bagehi wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:Balderic Lunacy wrote: Your right. A Titan is not the end game for everyone. But you are a fool if you think that the majority of pilots do not view it as such.
The game is ever changing and evolving, but until you show me something beyond a Titan then that is the ceiling.
I presume you are talking about that 0.3% majority, right? It is the end game right now because it is a do everything, kill everything ship. If the game has an I-Win button, it is the end game. It works well for single player games, but is pretty terrible for MMOs.
So it just need a role rework like some have already said in this thread, this "quickfuckup" is just plain fuckup. Also dreads should be reworked / boosted. |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
452
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:18:00 -
[2213] - Quote
Bagehi wrote: It is the end game right now because it is a do everything, kill everything ship. If the game has an I-Win button, it is the end game. It works well for single player games, but is pretty terrible for MMOs.
Raiden/NCdot/PL has enjoyed a supercapital superiority now for well over a year. After the fall of the NC last fall, that superiority became massive. If these fleets were an I-win button, why is it that they dont controll all of nullsec by now? Why is it that their invasion of Deklein failed? Why is it that Goonswarm havent been chased into lowsec with their tails between their legs?
Is it because Raiden dont hate the Goons strongly enough? Is it because they didnt want those systems anyway? Or is it because these fleets are not the I-win button their enemies claim them to be? |

Mathicluanna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:28:00 -
[2214] - Quote
Because supercap pilots are not mindless automatons who can stay logged into the game 24/7 without burning out.
Or your thing (hint: its not your thing). |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:30:00 -
[2215] - Quote
Andski wrote: all we need now are some sun tzu quotes, ww2 analogies and it's hi5s all around
GÇ£Even the finest Avatar plunged into salt water will eventually rust.GÇ¥ |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:31:00 -
[2216] - Quote
"What is of the greatest importance in war is extraordinary speed: One cannot afford to neglect transversal." |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:33:00 -
[2217] - Quote
"If an enemy has tracking Titans, the problem is grave and the enemy's position strong; if he has no tracking Titans, the problem is minor and the enemy's position weak." |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
452
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:34:00 -
[2218] - Quote
Mathicluanna wrote:Because supercap pilots are not mindless automatons who can stay logged into the game 24/7 without burning out.
Or your thing (hint: its not your thing).
Really? they had the stamina to topple the Northern coalition across 5 regions, but not the Goons in Deklein? |

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
189
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:35:00 -
[2219] - Quote
Pesadel0 wrote:If we could add alliances to the ignore on forums ;(
That would be great! Then we'd never hear the whining from Raiden. PL Ev0ke NC. + friends ever again!
It'd be like they ceased to exist ingame and out of game.
Oh wait, that wouldn't be great. There'd be no-one left to troll.  |

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
189
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:39:00 -
[2220] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Mathicluanna wrote:Because supercap pilots are not mindless automatons who can stay logged into the game 24/7 without burning out.
Or your thing (hint: its not your thing). Really? they had the stamina to topple the Northern coalition across 5 regions, but not the Goons in Deklein?
Umm if I remember correctly from other forums, the only reason they failed was because they tried a 'headshot' operation in VFK and totally f**ked it up. Wasn't anything Goons did, rather it was the failure of their own FC's.
But then you knew that. I wish I could use a Damage Control II out of game too. 
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2746
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:40:00 -
[2221] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Mathicluanna wrote:Because supercap pilots are not mindless automatons who can stay logged into the game 24/7 without burning out.
Or your thing (hint: its not your thing). Really? they had the stamina to topple the Northern coalition across 5 regions, but not the Goons in Deklein? why is the noname worthless empiredweller trying to talk about nullsec warfare |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:46:00 -
[2222] - Quote
Leer0y Brown wrote:Here's a though,
Keep the lock timer the same, and triple the sig size of carriers and dreads + supers. What would that negatively impact?
Since all guns should be able to capitals, including super caps vs capitals, just blow up the sig size. Right now, MWD based drakes, and battleships have similar sizes to capitals ships...
This is the problem, and a simple solution. Everything else is very reasonable in this context. However, titans should not take 30 seconds to lock a carrier or a dread, it should be almost instant.
I just realized that Avatar was always supposed to be just an oversized Zealot.
|

Caldari Citizen20110707
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:48:00 -
[2223] - Quote
So titan pilots i have some good news...and drake pilots...not so good news...
tl;dr: Tracking titans are gonna own battleships in the face...battlecruisers however are getting off the hook
So lets take this one step a time and put down some facts. 1. Tracking cut down by a factor of 2 2. Scan res reduced to 5.
Lets discuss scan res reduction first, cause utimately it affects gank titans more than the tracking reduction. Current base scan res is 50, so it's going down by a factor of 10, sounds hefty...
So lets work out the numbers... Base scan res: 5 Skill bonus: 1.25 Fleet bonus: 1.1 3x Fed Navy Sebo: 4.026 65% per computer with 87% and 57% stacking penalty on 2nd and 3rd 1.65+(1.65*0.87)+(1.65*0.57) Total multiplier: 5.5
This makes your scan res a whooping 27...yay
Now the lock time relates to scan res and sig radius as follows: 40000/(Scan*(sinh-1(sig)2))
Since most of you don't have any clue what this looks like, here it is: http://imageshack.us/f/407/titlocktime.jpg/ this is lock time vs sig radius. blue line is for 2 sebo which gives scan res of 21 and red is for 3 sebo and scan res of 27 and change.
So morale of the story here is that is that it takes the same order of magnitude time to lock more or less any ship that titan has an chance of hitting at all (more about trackng coming up). I don't have a problem with this apart from the fact that it takes about 20s to lock a carrier which means any pos hugging carriers are more than likely to make it into shields before you can lock and dd them. On a more down to earth level with a maximum of 3 targets locked and assuming 3 shots per target it takes an erebus 20s to kill a target which means you can keep 3 targets locked almost constantly and don't have to slow down even while killing battleships, as you will be locking at them at close to if not faster than killing rate. I think CCP didn't do their math properly here...or maybe I shoud throw my math degree away but ok...i'll take this nerf...
Part 2...lets nerf titan tracking!
In science and math you can generally gain and drop factors of 2 without much consiquence to the final result, since most things are frankly order of magnitude assessment. In some instances in matters but as a whole, there is 1, 10, 100, anything in between can be attributed to one of them so when I heard that titan tracking was getting halfed I sort of giggled a little since frankly i was thinking that nerf would be an order of magnitude decrese or heck maybe at least half...but no...in their infinite wisdow ccp took it down by a factor of 2...well ya know what TITAN BLOBS ARE STILL GO **** ****.
In any case lets look at a generic tracking titan fit.
[Erebus, Tracking] Damage Control II Corpum A-Type Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane Corpum A-Type Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane Federation Navy Magnetic Field Stabilizer Federation Navy Magnetic Field Stabilizer Federation Navy Magnetic Field Stabilizer Republic Fleet Tracking Enhancer
Gist X-Type 100MN MicroWarpdrive Chelm's Modified Cap Recharger Chelm's Modified Cap Recharger Tracking Computer II, Tracking Speed Tracking Computer II, Tracking Speed Federation Navy Sensor Booster, Scan Resolution
Limited Mega Ion Siege Blaster I, Guristas Antimatter Charge XL Limited Mega Ion Siege Blaster I, Guristas Antimatter Charge XL Limited Mega Ion Siege Blaster I, Guristas Antimatter Charge XL Limited Mega Ion Siege Blaster I, Guristas Antimatter Charge XL Limited Mega Ion Siege Blaster I, Guristas Antimatter Charge XL Limited Mega Ion Siege Blaster I, Guristas Antimatter Charge XL Aurora Ominae Selynne's Modified Large EMP Smartbomb
Large Trimark Armor Pump II Large Trimark Armor Pump II Large Trimark Armor Pump II
this is actually my exact erebus fit (yes you can laugh i'm too cheap for faction tracking comps). In any case after skills, implants, bonuses, and tracking enhancers and computers the tracking speed is 0.01243 rad/s, while the non-tracking titan setup is 0.007172 rad/s.
|

Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:58:00 -
[2224] - Quote
George Holden wrote:Too bad you can't outrange 1200mm arties, oh wait you can. Too bad you can't orbit with more than 0.016 rad/sec to beat tracking, oh wait you can. Too bad you can't drop your fleet out of range or just on top of them, oh wait you can. Too bad you can't use bombs in nullsec, oh wait you can.
Do I need to go on?
There is no unbeatable fleet doctrine but you might want to turn your brains on before you blap the forums :>
too bad you can't go into a fight without your 30M EHP 8k DPS omnipwnmobile
oh wait, you can't
Please don't go on |

Pinky Denmark
The Cursed Navy Tactical Narcotics Team
102
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 15:14:00 -
[2225] - Quote
+1 for dealing with a real issue... The only people to blaim is the ones abusing Titans against subcaps aka the Titan owners themself!!
However ccp still need to work out how they will get people to still bring titans to the battle. 2 issues: Titans should help their fleet ON FIELD while at the same time not being a guaranteed cassaulty when fielded.
How about a module to remotely provide another ship a fixed 99% structure resistance for a 5 minute cycle while making the Titan immobile... How about making titans go into a reinforced mode for 10 minutes when it goes below 95% structure - And let it be immobilized, unable to be targeted, not recharging cap or shield and only capable of locking 1 target at a time with a -50% RoF penalty...
It's important to make sure the titans doesn't **** with everything, but at the same time give them modules to be usefull... Being able to prolong a carrier or comand ships death by 5 minutes could be usefull, but won't make stuff invulnerable because the effect on 1 ship doesn't stack with numbers. Also making sure a titan is only lost after at least 10 minutes of fighting might give people a reason to use them. Whatever you end up with make it worth to have a titan without making it impossible to break them down.
Pinky |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 16:04:00 -
[2226] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:hakkart wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:So my point is any side should have advantage on battlefield as it now (Numbers and technology). So you filed 1000 Drakes which can be countered by 200 Abaddons. Each side should be able to decide what it will bring for a fight - High SP+Expensive ships or less PS but en mass. You're oversimplifying it. 1000 drakes does not make a fleet. Fleet is all about composition. 1000 drakes would lose HARD to a 500-man fleet with an actual composition, with logis and dictors and recons. . And that's the way it ought to be. A titan blob, on the other hand, stands on its own with no need for support other than supercarriers, which are equally unkillable in large numbers. Edit before someone puts words in my mouth: The 500-man fleet is mostly drakes. How are these titans tackling you guys? No chance in hell I would get in point range of one, much less scram and web. 
Hahaha. Ok, so you never fought a bunch of titans, we get it. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 16:14:00 -
[2227] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:you are all missing main point of current game mechanics that is broken. Every fleet based on numbers has it's counter based on SP and ISK. Bringing 100 rifters with logistics will be countered by bringing 20 vagabonds with less logistics. So let's assume Fleet A is T1 frigate, Fleet B is Hacs, Fleet C is battleships. So every fleet can be countered by fleet of less size but higher SP, u can always field something that requires less numbers but more SP/ISK and that something will be only like 1 rank higher then hostile fleet . This is how it looks like: frigs > cruisers > BCs > BS > Capitals > Supercapitals > Titans. Current mechanics is good up intil BS. there is a huuuuuge gap between BS and titan. U can say that capitals are under powered and that's why they are not used or state that titans and supers are overpowered and should be nerfed. In any case this is not solving major issue - Gap between BS and a Titan. Fill that missing point and game become much better.
I've to admit - CCP Sucks in game balance. I remember same way ppl where whining about atlas capitals, so ccp created another ship to counter them. After ppl were whining about supers, now titans. in any case tweaking 1 certain ship will never fix game. If you want to fix something to and review all ships that are affected by tracking titans. I would also say that Signature stuff is kinda bullshit, ship size doesn't change by turning MWD on. So how can missile do more damage to same ship w MWD on and less damage w MWD off?
I have 62mil SP.
If I fit 5 officer sensor boosters on my Drake, should I be able to kill a Titan pilot that has 62mil SP?
Thanks for your insight. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 16:19:00 -
[2228] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:baltec1 wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:
So basically all u say is that every fleet doctrine can be countered. So with proper fleet composition u can **** battleships with ahacs. but if battleships will burn in different directions they will murder ahacs. This is exactly what I want to say. no imagine that on a higher tier. imagine you have fleet of dreads with enough DPS to kill and track battleships out of siege mode. u dield supers to take them out. but then dreads can go to siege and start raping supers if they have enough numbers or ask for suppercap support to counter your super fleet. that's exactly what is missing. that is what I'm trying to say.
There should be no uber ship. Titans atm are viewed from solo point of view. ppl are looking at what 1 titan does instead of looking on it from fleet doctrine perspective and counter them same way. 1 dread will never kill a full fleet of battleships but 100 dreads will. 1 battleship will never alpha hac or cruiser but in numbers they will, same goes for for hacs that will **** battleships, dreads that will **** titansand so on.
Once again stop looking at 1 particular ship. Look at all those ships that are before and after it in tier rank.
Battleship killer - that is what missing in this game. ship with enough tank to adsorb a huge damage comming from number of battleships and enough DPS to bring some of them down before he dies. Titans are the ones that fulfill that role, dreads can be significant replacement to them in this case.
The counter to a blob of titans is a bigger blob of titans. Hence the nerf. No, counter blob of titan with Sieged dreads (still needs a buff) and support fleet.
Why are you so stupid? |

Demonachizer
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 16:19:00 -
[2229] - Quote
Can someone explain to me in simple terms what is going on here? I played this game years ago and came back recently. I am really confused.
What is a Titan? How do you track? Is this a bad thing that is happening or a good thing? I can't tell because some people seem happy and some unhappy. Should I stop playing eve because of this change? I want to be able to do cool stuff when I have more skills and some people seem to be saying that the game is useless now because of this. It is really making me nervous. |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
584
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 16:20:00 -
[2230] - Quote
Meh, this thread is worthless. Has been for oh about... 100 pages now. It is literally the same dozen posters making wild accusations, trolling and other nonsense.
For the record, if anyone is looking for any entity to blame for these changes to titans and super carriers, blame CCP. Not the players who used the ships in a specific way. That is like blaming all those pilots who flew Dramiels with this dual prop, medium shield extended fits. This game is full of players who will always find a way to push any ship to the limit of its capability. Given enough time without CCP making adjustments here and there and these issues will always happen.
Again, the fault lies with CCP, not the players. Saying that I really like the new CCP and I am not trying to be harsh on them, just pointing out the facts. NCdot, Raiden and PL will roll with this punch and find something new to combat the mindless blob.
The real shame in all of this is power blocks. Null has been divided into two or three super blocks for how many years now? My point is a lot of ships scale in a severely broken manner. Some ships are balanced when there is only a few on the battlefield, but in a game of players who, with enough time, find the very best way to fit and fly a ship, multiply that by massive numbers and viola... one broken fleet doctrine.
CCP, you need to address the way sov, power projection and intel gather works or you will ALWAYS have ship scaling issues. That is the true root cause of all of this. Many have said on both sides of this fail thread that alone or a couple, titans are balanced. Because this game encourages creating a massive blue list, thus putting all of those titans in one group or any ship (hi maelstroms o/) for that matter it will be one ****** up game.
CCP, is there any blog, post or anything planed for any of that???
|

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
584
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 16:22:00 -
[2231] - Quote
Demonachizer wrote:Can someone explain to me in simple terms what is going on here?
Two power blocks swinging their purses at each other pretty much. Nothing new to see really.
|

Demonachizer
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 16:22:00 -
[2232] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Demonachizer wrote:Can someone explain to me in simple terms what is going on here? Two power blocks swinging their purses at each other pretty much. Nothing new to see really.
Should I stop playing eve because of this change? I want to be able to do cool stuff when I have more skills and some people seem to be saying that the game is useless now because of this. It is really making me nervous. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 16:25:00 -
[2233] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:looks like you really don't understand my point or u just don't want to understand what I'm talking about. Once again I'm saying that there is a gap that should be filled. removing a role from ship and leaving that role empty is silly.
Problem is not that people won't understand what you are talking about.
You just have no idea what you are talking about.
|

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
584
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 16:25:00 -
[2234] - Quote
Sentinel Eeex wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:hakkart wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:So my point is any side should have advantage on battlefield as it now (Numbers and technology). So you filed 1000 Drakes which can be countered by 200 Abaddons. Each side should be able to decide what it will bring for a fight - High SP+Expensive ships or less PS but en mass. You're oversimplifying it. 1000 drakes does not make a fleet. Fleet is all about composition. 1000 drakes would lose HARD to a 500-man fleet with an actual composition, with logis and dictors and recons. . And that's the way it ought to be. A titan blob, on the other hand, stands on its own with no need for support other than supercarriers, which are equally unkillable in large numbers. Edit before someone puts words in my mouth: The 500-man fleet is mostly drakes. How are these titans tackling you guys? No chance in hell I would get in point range of one, much less scram and web.  Hahaha. Ok, so you never fought a bunch of titans, we get it.
No. I'm just a bit confused how titans are able to tackle you guys when you said they didn't bring any support. With all those officer sensor boosters and officer tracking computers, is there room for tackle too?
|

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
584
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 16:27:00 -
[2235] - Quote
Demonachizer wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Demonachizer wrote:Can someone explain to me in simple terms what is going on here? Two power blocks swinging their purses at each other pretty much. Nothing new to see really.  Should I stop playing eve because of this change? I want to be able to do cool stuff when I have more skills and some people seem to be saying that the game is useless now because of this. It is really making me nervous. 
Nah, don't quit the game. Just stay out of null space till CCP addresses the real problems there. Broken game mechanics that encourage super power blocks. 
|

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
483
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 16:41:00 -
[2236] - Quote
more npc corps weigh in with their valuable opinion |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
173
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 16:52:00 -
[2237] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Demonachizer wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Demonachizer wrote:Can someone explain to me in simple terms what is going on here? Two power blocks swinging their purses at each other pretty much. Nothing new to see really.  Should I stop playing eve because of this change? I want to be able to do cool stuff when I have more skills and some people seem to be saying that the game is useless now because of this. It is really making me nervous.  Nah, don't quit the game. Just stay out of null space till CCP addresses the real problems there. Broken game mechanics that encourage super power blocks. 
I'd actually strongly advise against this (staying out of null, that is. I agree EVE is worth playing - I still do).
Basically, as it stands, this is a lot of bluster over changes to the largest and most expensive ship in the game. As it stands, 3 of the 4 versions of that ship are capable of killing any number of others (hundreds, thousands), when brought in numbers of 20 or more. There are 800+ active in the game, and more made every day. There are a few groups that think this is fine, and the rest of us that feel this make EVE less fun for everyone else not flying one of these expensive ships.
Basically, don't stay out of null sec. Join a group, either a large one, or a small one, and get out there and shoot people. There are groups out there willing to take on new players, and with them you can experience some of the fun and unique parts of EVE. This shouldn't impact your gameplay experience. |

Demonachizer
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 16:55:00 -
[2238] - Quote
Kyle Myr wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Demonachizer wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Demonachizer wrote:Can someone explain to me in simple terms what is going on here? Two power blocks swinging their purses at each other pretty much. Nothing new to see really.  Should I stop playing eve because of this change? I want to be able to do cool stuff when I have more skills and some people seem to be saying that the game is useless now because of this. It is really making me nervous.  Nah, don't quit the game. Just stay out of null space till CCP addresses the real problems there. Broken game mechanics that encourage super power blocks.  I'd actually strongly advise against this (staying out of null, that is. I agree EVE is worth playing - I still do). Basically, as it stands, this is a lot of bluster over changes to the largest and most expensive ship in the game. As it stands, 3 of the 4 versions of that ship are capable of killing any number of others (hundreds, thousands), when brought in numbers of 20 or more. There are 800+ active in the game, and more made every day. There are a few groups that think this is fine, and the rest of us that feel this make EVE less fun for everyone else not flying one of these expensive ships. Basically, don't stay out of null sec. Join a group, either a large one, or a small one, and get out there and shoot people. There are groups out there willing to take on new players, and with them you can experience some of the fun and unique parts of EVE. This shouldn't impact your gameplay experience. You seem nice can I join your group? |

Hey You
Spricer Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 17:07:00 -
[2239] - Quote
Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing. All things aside, this is a pretty hilarious assumption that doesn't make sense in context. With a base sensor strength of 5, you are talking about a few seconds difference between t2 and cormack out of a probable minute+ lock time. Well worth the 4b+ sensor booster imo  Gains you 25s against frigates (105 to 79, assuming 3 are fitted), 15s against cruisers (64 to 49) and 10s against battleships (44 to 33). If you see this as a big difference, then it's worth balancing around the officer fit given that dropping 12bn on SBs is not a huge fraction of the outlay for a properly-fit titan. If you don't see this as a big difference, then balancing around the officer fit isn't a big deal because it's not having a major impact. Either way, it's a functional assumption  And these numbers are all calculated with TRIPLE cormack sensor boosters? Which are 10b each atm and will surely go up? CCP Greyscale wrote:"Not a huge fraction of the outlay for a properly-fit titan" So you are saying that 30bil, or about half the build cost of a titan in sensor boosters is a reasonable investment in titans for a 10 second gain in lock time that still comes out to over half a minute, or about triple the warp speed of a maelstrom. You are a funny dude :)
No no man hes not funny. He is reta*rded. Much as anyone in CCP who don't see significance in shooting yourself in a foot in order to fix small cut on your little finger.
|

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 17:13:00 -
[2240] - Quote
Max50 wrote:Just as any other nerf players will have to adapt to what CCP has for them.Drone nerf from supercarriers,now another titan nerf,tomorrow a tengu nerf because the worse side of players cant field 500+ everyday to blap them and who knows what else.
For over a year i am watching goons crying for various things in game,all of them having to do with them dying over and over.. CCP has already chose the side that will be supported.You have to be realistic about it and move on just as every other nerf(aka goon boosts).
For some players,this game has to do with planning,gaining ISK,spending them to buy new toys,buy new characters like this character created back in 2003 and is used a an "alt" from a 2008 player.Getting "better" in this game is different for all of us.
Lets just take CCP's place for a moment.They have 2 conflicting sides in this game.The one that seeks in game improvement and the other side that is heavily roleplaying and counts on it to play.I ve been in other games before EVE and if CCP doesnt take steps to sustain the roleplaying side the game will die itself.Most of you will propably say that goons should "gtfo and send ISK" before they do but here is the problem:the typical goon grunt doesnt have ISK to give.
What they do have though is real life money wich is what keeps this game ticking.So yeah,dont expect any counter to blob,the future has more and more things to favour them.So we are now in that tear circle where the worse players cry because they lose and the better players have to adapt everytime CCP is boosting.
Lets see whats next to be nerfed
There is no danger for your brain, though. It can't get nerfed any more than it is.
|

Demonachizer
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 17:28:00 -
[2241] - Quote
Hey You wrote:
And these numbers are all calculated with TRIPLE cormack sensor boosters? Which are 10b each atm and will surely go up?
No no man hes not funny. He is reta*rded. Much as anyone in CCP who don't see significance in shooting yourself in a foot in order to fix small cut on your little finger.
Should I stop playing eve because of this change? I want to be able to do cool stuff when I have more skills and some people seem to be saying that the game is useless now because of this. It is really making me nervous.
You seem to be one of the people that feels that this is a bad change so I would like your opinion too. Sorry to bother you :( |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
70
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 17:30:00 -
[2242] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Sentinel Eeex wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:hakkart wrote:Cyaron wars wrote:So my point is any side should have advantage on battlefield as it now (Numbers and technology). So you filed 1000 Drakes which can be countered by 200 Abaddons. Each side should be able to decide what it will bring for a fight - High SP+Expensive ships or less PS but en mass. You're oversimplifying it. 1000 drakes does not make a fleet. Fleet is all about composition. 1000 drakes would lose HARD to a 500-man fleet with an actual composition, with logis and dictors and recons. . And that's the way it ought to be. A titan blob, on the other hand, stands on its own with no need for support other than supercarriers, which are equally unkillable in large numbers. Edit before someone puts words in my mouth: The 500-man fleet is mostly drakes. How are these titans tackling you guys? No chance in hell I would get in point range of one, much less scram and web.  Hahaha. Ok, so you never fought a bunch of titans, we get it. No. I'm just a bit confused how titans are able to tackle you guys when you said they didn't bring any support. With all those officer sensor boosters and officer tracking computers, is there room for tackle too?
Titans scram dictors, then slowly chew through their tank.
That's how it is done. |

Temmu Guerra
Genco Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
48
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 17:34:00 -
[2243] - Quote
I really love the argument of goons coming and saying that SP and wealth dont matter in the game. Why doesnt CCP just get rid of all the ship costs and make us all fly rifters. Everything coming from the goons camp seems to be favoring numbers.
If goons were actually willing to fit up dreads and have them on the battlefield and take a bunch of losses. I am sure they could kill a bunch of suppers. The real problem here is that dictors dont have enough EHP to stay alive to keep the titan pointed and on the field. |

Bob Random
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 17:48:00 -
[2244] - Quote
Temmu Guerra wrote:Why doesnt CCP just get rid of all the ship costs and make us all fly rifters.
I gave you a 'like' for that.
|

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
453
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 17:50:00 -
[2245] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:Mathicluanna wrote:Because supercap pilots are not mindless automatons who can stay logged into the game 24/7 without burning out.
Or your thing (hint: its not your thing). Really? they had the stamina to topple the Northern coalition across 5 regions, but not the Goons in Deklein? why is the noname worthless empiredweller trying to talk about nullsec warfare
Call me a concerned citizen. And I find it rather surprising that you still havent been able to cough up a good lie to explain why it is that the CFC havent been kicked out of nullsec long ago, despite your adversaries holding the supposedly undefeatable "iWin" button for more than a year. |

George Holden
The Shadow Plague BLACK-MARK
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 17:55:00 -
[2246] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote: Call me a concerned citizen. And I find it rather surprising that you still havent been able to cough up a good lie to explain why it is that the CFC havent been kicked out of nullsec long ago, despite your adversaries holding the supposedly undefeatable "iWin" button for more than a year.
Maybe they're scared that whatever they do to make sure they can drive away the CFC gets nerfed into oblivion because CCP loves the goons so much?
Just a hypothesis feel free to iterate on that :> |

Dungar's Sister
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 17:59:00 -
[2247] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Weaselior wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:Mathicluanna wrote:Because supercap pilots are not mindless automatons who can stay logged into the game 24/7 without burning out.
Or your thing (hint: its not your thing). Really? they had the stamina to topple the Northern coalition across 5 regions, but not the Goons in Deklein? why is the noname worthless empiredweller trying to talk about nullsec warfare Call me a concerned citizen. And I find it rather surprising that you still havent been able to cough up a good lie to explain why it is that the CFC havent been kicked out of nullsec long ago, despite your adversaries holding the supposedly undefeatable "iWin" button for more than a year. Because everyone else is a coward and terrified of losing even a single one of their overcompensation devices. |

Le Cardinal
Spricer Raiden.
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:11:00 -
[2248] - Quote
Dungar's Sister wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:Weaselior wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:Mathicluanna wrote:Because supercap pilots are not mindless automatons who can stay logged into the game 24/7 without burning out.
Or your thing (hint: its not your thing). Really? they had the stamina to topple the Northern coalition across 5 regions, but not the Goons in Deklein? why is the noname worthless empiredweller trying to talk about nullsec warfare Call me a concerned citizen. And I find it rather surprising that you still havent been able to cough up a good lie to explain why it is that the CFC havent been kicked out of nullsec long ago, despite your adversaries holding the supposedly undefeatable "iWin" button for more than a year. Because everyone else is a coward and terrified of losing even a single one of their overcompensation devices.
So goon mains claim we used them too much as iWin buttons and goonalts say we are afraid of using them. Better make up your mind. |

Death2all Supercaps
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:19:00 -
[2249] - Quote
Le Cardinal wrote:
So goon mains claim we used them too much as iWin buttons and goonalts say we are afraid of using them. Better make up your mind.
No. You're bad. Both are correct. You used them too much as "I Win" buttons, except since that time you failed the ~vfk headshot~ But now you are too afraid :P
What will be the name of the next BOB iteration once Raiden failcascades? |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
66
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:20:00 -
[2250] - Quote
"If we can't have godmobiles, then why don't we all just fly rifters?"
WOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Such a terrible argument.
100+ pages of confirmation that Eve shouldn't be designed for 500 elite pvp, no-life, turbonerds who will only play if they can be invincible.
Supercaps were a game-killing dead-end, and the policy decision to reverse that game development path has been made. All you guys are doing is screaming into the void as the rest of the game moves on to a brighter future for the 99.999% of players who aren't total social rejects. |

Le Cardinal
Spricer Raiden.
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:20:00 -
[2251] - Quote
Death2all Supercaps wrote:Le Cardinal wrote:
So goon mains claim we used them too much as iWin buttons and goonalts say we are afraid of using them. Better make up your mind.
No. You're bad. Both are correct. You used them too much as "I Win" buttons, except since that time you failed the ~vfk headshot~ But now you are too afraid :P What will be the name of the next BOB iteration once Raiden failcascades?
We use them quite regularly. |

RDevz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:24:00 -
[2252] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote: Call me a concerned citizen. And I find it rather surprising that you still havent been able to cough up a good lie to explain why it is that the CFC havent been kicked out of nullsec long ago, despite your adversaries holding the supposedly undefeatable "iWin" button for more than a year.
Cynojammers are a pain to shoot when your titans aren't in that system. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
70
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:27:00 -
[2253] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote:"If we can't have godmobiles, then why don't we all just fly rifters?"
WOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Such a terrible argument.
100+ pages of confirmation that Eve shouldn't be designed for 500 elite pvp, no-life, turbonerds who will only play if they can be invincible.
Supercaps were a game-killing dead-end, and the policy decision to reverse that game development path has been made. All you guys are doing is screaming into the void as the rest of the game moves on to a brighter future for the 99.999% of players who aren't total social rejects.
Don't exaggerate.
It's 99.97%.
|

Temmu Guerra
Genco Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
48
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:30:00 -
[2254] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote:"If we can't have godmobiles, then why don't we all just fly rifters?"
WOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Such a terrible argument.
100+ pages of confirmation that Eve shouldn't be designed for 500 elite pvp, no-life, turbonerds who will only play if they can be invincible.
Supercaps were a game-killing dead-end, and the policy decision to reverse that game development path has been made. All you guys are doing is screaming into the void as the rest of the game moves on to a brighter future for the 99.999% of players who aren't total social rejects.
Well all goons are saying SP and isk shouldnt determine who wins so why not all get into rifters. While were at it let CCP give everyone the same skills and modules that everything is very fair.
|

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
292
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:31:00 -
[2255] - Quote
Le Cardinal wrote:So goon mains claim we used them too much as iWin buttons and goonalts say we are afraid of using them. Better make up your mind.
I personally made up my mind a long time ago about RaidenDOT:
You're all complete and utter morons. |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:33:00 -
[2256] - Quote
Temmu Guerra wrote:Well all goons are saying SP and isk shouldnt determine who wins so why not all get into rifters. While were at it let CCP give everyone the same skills and modules that everything is very fair.
Yes, repeating terrible arguments makes them less terrible.
You're starting off pretty low with this one, but by the 500th repetition you should start gaining some traction.
Go get 'em, champ.
|

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:47:00 -
[2257] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Weaselior wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:Mathicluanna wrote:Because supercap pilots are not mindless automatons who can stay logged into the game 24/7 without burning out.
Or your thing (hint: its not your thing). Really? they had the stamina to topple the Northern coalition across 5 regions, but not the Goons in Deklein? why is the noname worthless empiredweller trying to talk about nullsec warfare Call me a concerned citizen. And I find it rather surprising that you still havent been able to cough up a good lie to explain why it is that the CFC havent been kicked out of nullsec long ago, despite your adversaries holding the supposedly undefeatable "iWin" button for more than a year. I'm just gonna file you under "False Dichotomy / Reductio ad Absurdam". |

Gloomy Gus
GoonWaffe
240
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:01:00 -
[2258] - Quote
Don't worry titan pilots I'm pretty sad too Sincerely, Gloomy Gus, Spaceship Pilot.
This post has been signed and sealed by Gloomy Gus, poster on an internet space ship forum entitled EVE: Gate. All Rights Reserved. |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:06:00 -
[2259] - Quote
You know, Mittani is absolutely right about the "it's your own fault" thing.
Supercaps Online had its chance after the fall of the NC. A bunch of elite-pvp supercap-heavy alliances got together and burned down a 60k-man blob coalition. Fine, a small number of elite players controlled the most valuable 15ish regions in the game, displacing a bunch of low-skilled scrub players, so be it. Then what did you guys do? Did you then take all that tech income and all those supers and use them to actually play "Elite-PvP Supercaps Online" in some kind of tech-fueled charnel house of t3 and supercap violence?
NO. You made a huge blob yourselves and then proceeded to go off and stomp on anyone and everyone who couldn't match your massive supercap fleets, so you had absolutely no risk of ever losing anything. All you did was prove that players are gonna blob, and giving them even bigger and better ships to do it with was only going to facilitate game-crushing blobs.
Wisely CCP have recognized this development dead-end, and taken away a tool for blobbing. You guys had your chance to prove the viability of Supercaps Online, and you blew it by being huge blobbing hypocrites yourselves. Now if you want to blob someone, you need to create massive coalitions that are inherently more vulnerable the larger they get, instead of a blob merely made up of invincible supercap fleets.
QQ
You ******* lose, and it's your own fault. |

Aurora B
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:16:00 -
[2260] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote:You know, Mittani is absolutely right about the "it's your own fault" thing.
Supercaps Online had its chance after the fall of the NC. A bunch of elite-pvp supercap-heavy alliances got together and burned down a 60k-man blob coalition. Fine, a small number of elite players controlled the most valuable 15ish regions in the game, displacing a bunch of low-skilled scrub players, so be it. Then what did you guys do? Did you then take all that tech income and all those supers and use them to actually play "Elite-PvP Supercaps Online" in some kind of tech-fueled charnel house of t3 and supercap violence?
NO. You made a huge blob yourselves and then proceeded to go off and stomp on anyone and everyone who couldn't match your massive supercap fleets, so you had absolutely no risk of ever losing anything. All you did was prove that players are gonna blob, and giving them even bigger and better ships to do it with was only going to facilitate game-crushing blobs.
Wisely CCP have recognized this development dead-end, and taken away a tool for blobbing. You guys had your chance to prove the viability of Supercaps Online, and you blew it by being huge blobbing hypocrites yourselves. Now if you want to blob someone, you need to create massive coalitions that are inherently more vulnerable the larger they get, instead of a blob merely made up of invincible supercap fleets.
QQ
You ******* lose, and it's your own fault.
Easy lad, you're gonna pop an artery. |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:17:00 -
[2261] - Quote
Aurora B wrote:Easy lad, you're gonna pop an artery. Don't be so stingy with your good advice. Share it with your friends. |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:23:00 -
[2262] - Quote
Oh no, I've been "umad?"ed.
The ultimate rebuttal. |

Cephelange du'Krevviq
Hephaestus LLC Get Off My Lawn
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:26:00 -
[2263] - Quote
Wal-Mart and K-Mart must be restocking tinfoil at this very moment. So many conspiracy theorists. |

Khadmos
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company Fatal Ascension
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:35:00 -
[2264] - Quote
No posts for 9 minutes? This thread is really losing speed.
I was hoping we'd find out what the posts per thread limit is on these forums. I was betting on INT_MAX but I guess we'll never know now.
Next time CCP, announce each change in the nerf 1 week apart, could have kept the speed up on this thing a lot longer. |

God-Emperor of Amarr
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:52:00 -
[2265] - Quote
The galaxy laughs At the Titan in your pants. You need a blue pill. |

Ntrails
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:57:00 -
[2266] - Quote
There were three good posts in this thread. Three
This wouldn't be a bad ratio in a traditional 100 page eve-o thread, but around 25 of those pages are goon posts and only one of the three good posts was by them. And one of the others came from PL.
Elite posting? I think not. |

Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 20:14:00 -
[2267] - Quote
Ntrails wrote: There were three good posts in this thread. Three
This wouldn't be a bad ratio in a traditional 100 page eve-o thread, but around 25 of those pages are goon posts and only one of the three good posts was by them. And one of the others came from PL.
Elite posting? I think not.
I am pretty sure that all of my posts were good. Sorry. I know that goons might find them offensive but that is to be expected. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
485
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 20:25:00 -
[2268] - Quote
eve-o forums - normally a haven for goodposts but this time... something went wrong |

Zain Andreas
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
61
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 20:40:00 -
[2269] - Quote
Sirhan Blixt wrote:Aurora B wrote:Easy lad, you're gonna pop an artery. Don't be so stingy with your good advice. Share it with your friends.
I believe "niggardly" would be a better word here.
(It's a better word everywhere) |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
453
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:09:00 -
[2270] - Quote
Sirhan Blixt wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:Weaselior wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:Mathicluanna wrote:Because supercap pilots are not mindless automatons who can stay logged into the game 24/7 without burning out.
Or your thing (hint: its not your thing). Really? they had the stamina to topple the Northern coalition across 5 regions, but not the Goons in Deklein? why is the noname worthless empiredweller trying to talk about nullsec warfare Call me a concerned citizen. And I find it rather surprising that you still havent been able to cough up a good lie to explain why it is that the CFC havent been kicked out of nullsec long ago, despite your adversaries holding the supposedly undefeatable "iWin" button for more than a year. I'm just gonna file you under "False Dichotomy / Reductio ad Absurdam".
You can file it wherever you like mate. Along with your sorry ass propaganda would be a good place. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3126
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:14:00 -
[2271] - Quote
George Holden wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote: Call me a concerned citizen. And I find it rather surprising that you still havent been able to cough up a good lie to explain why it is that the CFC havent been kicked out of nullsec long ago, despite your adversaries holding the supposedly undefeatable "iWin" button for more than a year.
Maybe they're scared that whatever they do to make sure they can drive away the CFC gets nerfed into oblivion because CCP loves the goons so much? Just a hypothesis feel free to iterate on that :>
hey why are you in the CFC
posting on the wrong alt???? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3126
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:17:00 -
[2272] - Quote
oh man pubbie duvolle just stop while you're ahead
there is no reasonable way to justify why 20 people should decide coalition-level engagements with groups 10+ times their size
hope
this
helps "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:17:00 -
[2273] - Quote
just checking in to see if andski has found a new hobby yet
keep dreamin' buddy~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3126
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:19:00 -
[2274] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:just checking in to see if andski has found a new hobby yet
keep dreamin' buddy~
hmm you keep checking back to this thread too
i wonder if this is indicative of anything "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

God-Emperor of Amarr
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:24:00 -
[2275] - Quote
Andski wrote:Dez Affinity wrote:just checking in to see if andski has found a new hobby yet
keep dreamin' buddy~ hmm you keep checking back to this thread too i wonder if this is indicative of anything
It hurts him too much. His veins, about to burst forth. Angioplasty. |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
53
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:33:00 -
[2276] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Sirhan Blixt wrote: I'm just gonna file you under "False Dichotomy / Reductio ad Absurdam".
You can file it wherever you like mate. Along with your sorry ass propaganda would be a good place. Because accrding to that, your sorry ass should have been kicked out of nullsec last summer. o7o7o7o7o7o7m8m8m8m8m8m8m8m8 PONTIUS: Ah, this one has spiwit!
CENTURION: Has what, sir?
PONTIUS: Spiwit!
CENTURION: Oh, yes he did, sir!
PONTIUS: No, spiwit! Bwavado. A dash of dewing do.
CENTURION: Oh, about 11 o'clock, sir.
|

baltec1
829
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:39:00 -
[2277] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
You can file it wherever you like mate. Along with your sorry ass propaganda would be a good place. Because accrding to that, your sorry ass should have been kicked out of nullsec last summer.
Goes to show just how little you know doesn't it. |

supr3m3justic3
Imperium Technologies F0RCEFUL ENTRY
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:42:00 -
[2278] - Quote
Sirhan Blixt wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:Sirhan Blixt wrote: I'm just gonna file you under "False Dichotomy / Reductio ad Absurdam".
You can file it wherever you like mate. Along with your sorry ass propaganda would be a good place. Because accrding to that, your sorry ass should have been kicked out of nullsec last summer. o7o7o7o7o7o7m8m8m8m8m8m8m8m8 PONTIUS: Ah, this one has spiwit! CENTURION: Has what, sir? PONTIUS: Spiwit! CENTURION: Oh, yes he did, sir! PONTIUS: No, spiwit! Bwavado. A dash of dewing do. CENTURION: Oh, about 11 o'clock, sir.
WTF kinda emo **** is this? A 1950 beatnik just called, he wants his lame ass poetry back. |

Gloomy Gus
GoonWaffe
240
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:52:00 -
[2279] - Quote
Win or lose, nerfed or unnerfed, caps or rifters, one thing we can all agree on.
This thread needs more posts. I think its bringing us closer together. Sincerely, Gloomy Gus, Spaceship Pilot.
This post has been signed and sealed by Gloomy Gus, poster on an internet space ship forum entitled EVE: Gate. All Rights Reserved. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3127
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:58:00 -
[2280] - Quote
 "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2778
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:58:00 -
[2281] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Weaselior wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:Mathicluanna wrote:Because supercap pilots are not mindless automatons who can stay logged into the game 24/7 without burning out.
Or your thing (hint: its not your thing). Really? they had the stamina to topple the Northern coalition across 5 regions, but not the Goons in Deklein? why is the noname worthless empiredweller trying to talk about nullsec warfare Call me a concerned citizen. And I find it rather surprising that you still havent been able to cough up a good lie to explain why it is that the CFC havent been kicked out of nullsec long ago, despite your adversaries holding the supposedly undefeatable "iWin" button for more than a year. i think im going to continue to call you a noname worthless empiredweller i think it gets the point across better |

HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:00:00 -
[2282] - Quote
i hope there's at least one fist fight at fanfest because of this thread |

Gistatis Praefectus
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:01:00 -
[2283] - Quote
Gloomy Gus wrote:Win or lose, nerfed or unnerfed, caps or rifters, one thing we can all agree on.
This thread needs more posts. I think its bringing us closer together.
Page 200 by April, also |

Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:01:00 -
[2284] - Quote
Where is the 1.8 billion I was promised? |

Gistatis Praefectus
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:02:00 -
[2285] - Quote
z |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2778
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:02:00 -
[2286] - Quote
0 |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
179
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:06:00 -
[2287] - Quote
r |

Venus Vermillion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
436
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:11:00 -
[2288] - Quote
HVAC Repairman wrote:i hope there's at least one fist fight at fanfest because of this thread
Maybe that guy from IT Alliance that swore he was going to punch a goon in the mouth will show up again. Of course, IT Alliance doesn't exist anymore so... |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
453
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:29:00 -
[2289] - Quote
Weaselior wrote: i think im going to continue to call you a noname worthless empiredweller i think it gets the point across better
And I think I will continue to call you a worthless little lying weasel. I think that gets the point across better. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3128
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:33:00 -
[2290] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:
You can file it wherever you like mate. Along with your sorry ass propaganda would be a good place. Because accrding to that, your sorry ass should have been kicked out of nullsec last summer.
Goes to show just how little you know doesn't it.
it's like he completely glossed over billy merc's attempt to headshot VFK which trapped enough of their supercaps to allow us to basically undo all of the progress they had made up to that day
lol "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Berke Negri
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:37:00 -
[2291] - Quote
without supers there's no way small, elite alliances going up against huge blob alliances would be able to trap all their supers in VFK-IV and give up on an invasion |

SolusLunes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:38:00 -
[2292] - Quote
z |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
453
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:39:00 -
[2293] - Quote
Andski wrote:baltec1 wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:
You can file it wherever you like mate. Along with your sorry ass propaganda would be a good place. Because accrding to that, your sorry ass should have been kicked out of nullsec last summer.
Goes to show just how little you know doesn't it. it's like he completely glossed over billy merc's attempt to headshot VFK which trapped enough of their supercaps to allow us to basically undo all of the progress they had made up to that day lol
No I think the point I am making is that your adversaries now have hade their supposedly undefateable iWin button for a year, and mystrerioulsy you still hold territory in nullsec. How can an undefeatable iwin button ever be "trapped"? It is a logical impossibility. Unless of course, it really isnt undefeatble after all.
But you allready knew that. You just conviniently forget to mention it. |

SolusLunes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:40:00 -
[2294] - Quote
no my zor chain backbone |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2782
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:41:00 -
[2295] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote: No I think the point I am making is that your adversaries now have hade their supposedly undefateable iWin button for a year, and mystrerioulsy you still hold territory in nullsec. How can an undefeatable iwin button ever be "trapped"? It is a logical impossibility. Unless of course, it really isnt undefeatble after all.
But you allready knew that. You just conviniently forget to mention it.
yes, let us spend hours explaining the basics of nullsec warfare to someone barely more literate than a plant, that sounds like a wise use of time |

Berke Negri
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:43:00 -
[2296] - Quote
the whining has pretty much wrapped around to the point where someone is arguing that because goons still have space this means supers are not unbalanced |

Gloomy Gus
GoonWaffe
240
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:44:00 -
[2297] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:[quote=Reilly Duvolle]a plant
Weaselior quit being an intellectual bully. While you were pushing around someone barely able to form sentences let alone post goodly, SolusLunes had a z0r chain broken. Try and think about the consequences of your actions in the future. Sincerely, Gloomy Gus, Spaceship Pilot.
This post has been signed and sealed by Gloomy Gus, poster on an internet space ship forum entitled EVE: Gate. All Rights Reserved. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3131
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:48:00 -
[2298] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:yes, let us spend hours explaining the basics of nullsec warfare to someone barely more literate than a plant, that sounds like a wise use of time
you're arguing with the guy who thinks that venal/tribute/vale tech moons "produce more tech" than ours
he also uses valuable intelligence sources like dotlan, evenews24 and kugu "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
453
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:49:00 -
[2299] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote: No I think the point I am making is that your adversaries now have hade their supposedly undefateable iWin button for a year, and mystrerioulsy you still hold territory in nullsec. How can an undefeatable iwin button ever be "trapped"? It is a logical impossibility. Unless of course, it really isnt undefeatble after all.
But you allready knew that. You just conviniently forget to mention it.
yes, let us spend hours explaining the basics of nullsec warfare to someone barely more literate than a plant, that sounds like a wise use of time
Then dont. You have painted yourself into a corner with wildly exaggregated claims of your enemies employing supposedly undefeatable iWin buttons. And when someone points out that logically, this would mean that they would have wiped the floor with you many months ago and chased you back to lowsec, you have real trouble explaing how you can still hold territory in nullsec and even how you have expanded your holdings the last months.
|

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
378
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:51:00 -
[2300] - Quote
This thread is going places. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
378
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:51:00 -
[2301] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Weaselior wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote: No I think the point I am making is that your adversaries now have hade their supposedly undefateable iWin button for a year, and mystrerioulsy you still hold territory in nullsec. How can an undefeatable iwin button ever be "trapped"? It is a logical impossibility. Unless of course, it really isnt undefeatble after all.
But you allready knew that. You just conviniently forget to mention it.
yes, let us spend hours explaining the basics of nullsec warfare to someone barely more literate than a plant, that sounds like a wise use of time Then dont. You have painted yourself into a corner with wildly exaggregated claims of your enemies employing supposedly undefeatable iWin buttons. And when someone points out that logically, this would mean that they would have wiped the floor with you many months ago and chased you back to lowsec, you have real trouble explaing how you can still hold territory in nullsec and even how you have expanded your holdings the last months.
lol |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3131
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:52:00 -
[2302] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Then dont. You have painted yourself into a corner with wildly exaggregated claims of your enemies employing supposedly undefeatable iWin buttons. And when someone points out that logically, this would mean that they would have wiped the floor with you many months ago and chased you back to lowsec, you have real trouble explaing how you can still hold territory in nullsec and even how you have expanded your holdings the last months.
the rock my posts blocked so somebody explain what happens when the "i win" buttons are trapped where their staging towers used to be, surrounded by bubbles in our home system because the brilliant tactician known as bmerc thought that was the best plan "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
378
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:53:00 -
[2303] - Quote
Guys, we still hold space so supers aren't overpowered. |

supr3m3justic3
Imperium Technologies F0RCEFUL ENTRY
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:53:00 -
[2304] - Quote
All this talk about titans makes me want to watch "Immortals" again. They got nerfed in that movie too....they should make a movie about the nerfing of eve titans, i think it would be a Action/Drama.  |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
378
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:54:00 -
[2305] - Quote
Forums poster Reilly Duvolle has us on the ropes. |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
453
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:54:00 -
[2306] - Quote
Andski wrote:the rock my posts blocked so somebody explain what happens when the "i win" buttons are trapped where their staging towers used to be, surrounded by bubbles in our home system
Oh but you misunderstand my dear Andski. You see, undefatable iWin buttons would be impossible to "trap". They would have just blasted out of there, killing everything. This is after all, what you claim them to be capable off. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3131
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:59:00 -
[2307] - Quote
they had to use an exploit to crash our clients and siege the cynojammer
i'm sure you're perfectly fine with exploits in the war against the blob "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
453
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:02:00 -
[2308] - Quote
Andski wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:Andski wrote:the rock my posts blocked so somebody explain what happens when the "i win" buttons are trapped where their staging towers used to be, surrounded by bubbles in our home system Oh but you misunderstand my dear Andski. You see, undefatable iWin buttons would be impossible to "trap". They would have just blasted out of there, killing everything. This is after all, what you claim them to be capable off. hmm yes we've clearly demonstrated the ability of supercapitals to disregard 150km of bubbles
Bubbles arent really a problem if everything else is dead, is it? It just take time slowboating out of them, but again - if everything is dead anyway because you just kill them, whats the big problem? I mean, there was a LOT of supers trapped in VFK. An unstoppable rapetrain to quote your own views on the matter. it is a mystery indeed. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
378
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:03:00 -
[2309] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Andski wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:Andski wrote:the rock my posts blocked so somebody explain what happens when the "i win" buttons are trapped where their staging towers used to be, surrounded by bubbles in our home system Oh but you misunderstand my dear Andski. You see, undefatable iWin buttons would be impossible to "trap". They would have just blasted out of there, killing everything. This is after all, what you claim them to be capable off. hmm yes we've clearly demonstrated the ability of supercapitals to disregard 150km of bubbles Bubbles arent really a problem if everything else is dead, is it? It just take time slowboating out of them, but again - if everything is dead anyway because you just kill them, whats the big problem? I mean, there was a LOT of supers trapped in VFK. An unstoppable rapetrain to quote your own views on the matter. it is a mystery indeed.
This isn't what I requested. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
378
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:03:00 -
[2310] - Quote
Not even close :( |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3131
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:08:00 -
[2311] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Andski wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:Andski wrote:the rock my posts blocked so somebody explain what happens when the "i win" buttons are trapped where their staging towers used to be, surrounded by bubbles in our home system Oh but you misunderstand my dear Andski. You see, undefatable iWin buttons would be impossible to "trap". They would have just blasted out of there, killing everything. This is after all, what you claim them to be capable off. hmm yes we've clearly demonstrated the ability of supercapitals to disregard 150km of bubbles Bubbles arent really a problem if everything else is dead, is it? It just take time slowboating out of them, but again - if everything is dead anyway because you just kill them, whats the big problem? I mean, there was a LOT of supers trapped in VFK. An unstoppable rapetrain to quote your own views on the matter. it is a mystery indeed.
we also had a lot of supers in VFK, but they weren't trapped "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Berke Negri
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:08:00 -
[2312] - Quote
not the pubbie complaining we need, but the pubbie complaining we deserve
wait strike that makes no goddamn sense |

Berke Negri
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:12:00 -
[2313] - Quote
what i mean to say is
z |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
378
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:14:00 -
[2314] - Quote
0 |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
95
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:22:00 -
[2315] - Quote
r |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
453
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:23:00 -
[2316] - Quote
Some pages ago, someone once said that this thread was 80 pages of delicios tears. But really, its at least 70% sperging Goons.
Goons that mysterioulsy still hold nullsec territory despite their enemies holding the iWin button for the last year. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2785
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:31:00 -
[2317] - Quote
Andski wrote:Weaselior wrote:yes, let us spend hours explaining the basics of nullsec warfare to someone barely more literate than a plant, that sounds like a wise use of time you're arguing with the guy who thinks that venal/tribute/vale tech moons "produce more tech" than ours he also uses valuable intelligence sources like dotlan, evenews24 and kugu oh cripes i forgot this was that guy
forget more literate than a plant |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2785
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:32:00 -
[2318] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle remember that time you were right about anything
i don't either |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3131
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:32:00 -
[2319] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Some pages ago, someone said that this thread was 80 pages of delicios tears. But really, its at least 70% sperging Goons.
Goons that mysterioulsy still hold nullsec territory despite their enemies holding the iWin button for the last year.
look at you completely ignoring the discussion about a failed invasion by the failure who is bmerc
thank you for giving us your valuable insights on nullsec warfare "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2785
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:33:00 -
[2320] - Quote
man that was a good thread where reilly spent literally days talking about technetium without knowing literally the first thing about it
guess he thought it was good too so he's doin it again |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
378
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:35:00 -
[2321] - Quote
But guys, don't you see? He's pulling our strings!
We got so caught up in proving him wrong at every turn that we didn't realize that he was pulling our strings and making us sperg! |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:35:00 -
[2322] - Quote
This is not a shitposting contest. Please try to write something usefull. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3131
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:35:00 -
[2323] - Quote
i wonder how many of these titan apologists believe that titans are built with minerals in freighters escorted from jita, or worse yet, from homesourced minerals from mining "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

I'm Down
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:36:00 -
[2324] - Quote
There is a reason why IGÇÖve said for the past 2 years that adjusting tracking will not fix the problem. Just like fixing lock time also does not address the problem at all.
You developers have for years completely ignored your tracking mechanics and how utterly garbage they are. You have also ignored people informing you of why you canGÇÖt fix tracking under the current design. So let me drop this knowledge on you for why your first fix to titans has changed so little in what they do that it will have virtually 0 impact on the game after a few months of adaptation:
The current problem is that titans in large numbers can blap the ever living **** out of a fleet with basically no risk simply because they are huge HP buffers that can be repaired by motherships which are also huge HP buffers. Now I could ***** and moan about Capital Remote repairers and their range and their effectiveness, particularly on huge hp and resist stars like supers, but that would go off track of my point, so IGÇÖll avoid the temptation.
So you changed trackingGǪ big whoop. Rather than track around 220 m/s for every 10km of range, an Erebus/Rag now tracks about 110 m/s for every 10km of range. In addition, they have a gun sig size of about double that of a BS. This creates some magical world where a ship further away can be tracked better, but is some how mysteriously the same size as though range dilation has no affect at all on how well you can see that now tiny little dot. In laymanGÇÖs termsGǪ. This means that if Eve mechanics worked in the real universe, Every star in the whole freaking universe would look approximately the same size as our sun, as would all the planets in size relation to our moon rather than the tiny specs in the sky that they are. So hereGÇÖs what happens after your patch to just circumvent the whole problem you just createdGǪ. Lock time you sayGǪ Tracking speed you sayGǪ
Hello MR Proteus, Hello either 5 AEONS with 4 Domi painters or 50 Archons with 4 T2 Painters (and just for luls cause the ship is cheap, why not throw in 2 range extenders for the painters as well). Now that wonderful tengu has an 800-1200 sig and at 60km can be tracked plus has a sig size near the same as the guns do. That Maelstrom has a 1700 + sigGǪ ie bigger than the guns do, and can be tracked at about 12km rangeGǪ. And oh yeah, you can easily get those 300-400,000 ehp small sig lokis to web down anything closer than those ranges to prevent them from avoiding the tracking problemsGǪ not like tech 3GÇÖs are rare these days.
Oh but lock time you sayGǪ well if the carrier paints before the Titans ever lockGǪ. Oh yeah, Lock a tengu in 30-35 seconds, lock a Maelstrom in 23-30 secondsGǪ thatGÇÖs so brutal. Oh yeah, and thatGÇÖs just with ******* Navy tracking computers and sensor boosters, I didnGÇÖt even toss in the Meta 13-14 gear.
GeeGǪ in 20 minutes of planning and a slight modification to what my fleet roles are, IGÇÖve just circumvented your entire titan patch plans b/c you thought this was enough to warrant not changing the coding of your formulas so that they make sense.
Good thing thereGÇÖs nobody in this game who couldnGÇÖt ya know, divide their titan pilots up on mumble into 10-15 sub channels, have a few SCGÇÖs assigned to each for painting and just perform the exact same way where itGÇÖs GÇ£paint, blap, blap, boomGÇ¥ rather than the old, GÇ£blap, blap, boomGÇ¥GǪ. That extra stepGǪ it will be the death of me. Guess us PL folk, or Raiden folk, or NC. Folk will have a horrible time adapting to this fix bros.
Thanks for the effortGǪ maybe next time youGÇÖll listen to sense, put in the extra time needed, and avoid yet another **** fix. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
378
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:37:00 -
[2325] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:This is not a shitposting contest. Please try to write something usefull.
No backseat moderating. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
378
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:37:00 -
[2326] - Quote
Nerd. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
378
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:39:00 -
[2327] - Quote
I'm Down wrote:There is a reason why IGÇÖve said for the past 2 years that adjusting tracking will not fix the problem. Just like fixing lock time also does not address the problem at all.
You developers have for years completely ignored your tracking mechanics and how utterly garbage they are. You have also ignored people informing you of why you canGÇÖt fix tracking under the current design. So let me drop this knowledge on you for why your first fix to titans has changed so little in what they do that it will have virtually 0 impact on the game after a few months of adaptation:
The current problem is that titans in large numbers can blap the ever living **** out of a fleet with basically no risk simply because they are huge HP buffers that can be repaired by motherships which are also huge HP buffers. Now I could ***** and moan about Capital Remote repairers and their range and their effectiveness, particularly on huge hp and resist stars like supers, but that would go off track of my point, so IGÇÖll avoid the temptation.
So you changed trackingGǪ big whoop. Rather than track around 220 m/s for every 10km of range, an Erebus/Rag now tracks about 110 m/s for every 10km of range. In addition, they have a gun sig size of about double that of a BS. This creates some magical world where a ship further away can be tracked better, but is some how mysteriously the same size as though range dilation has no affect at all on how well you can see that now tiny little dot. In laymanGÇÖs termsGǪ. This means that if Eve mechanics worked in the real universe, Every star in the whole freaking universe would look approximately the same size as our sun, as would all the planets in size relation to our moon rather than the tiny specs in the sky that they are. So hereGÇÖs what happens after your patch to just circumvent the whole problem you just createdGǪ. Lock time you sayGǪ Tracking speed you sayGǪ
Hello MR Proteus, Hello either 5 AEONS with 4 Domi painters or 50 Archons with 4 T2 Painters (and just for luls cause the ship is cheap, why not throw in 2 range extenders for the painters as well). Now that wonderful tengu has an 800-1200 sig and at 60km can be tracked plus has a sig size near the same as the guns do. That Maelstrom has a 1700 + sigGǪ ie bigger than the guns do, and can be tracked at about 12km rangeGǪ. And oh yeah, you can easily get those 300-400,000 ehp small sig lokis to web down anything closer than those ranges to prevent them from avoiding the tracking problemsGǪ not like tech 3GÇÖs are rare these days.
Oh but lock time you sayGǪ well if the carrier paints before the Titans ever lockGǪ. Oh yeah, Lock a tengu in 30-35 seconds, lock a Maelstrom in 23-30 secondsGǪ thatGÇÖs so brutal. Oh yeah, and thatGÇÖs just with ******* Navy tracking computers and sensor boosters, I didnGÇÖt even toss in the Meta 13-14 gear.
GeeGǪ in 20 minutes of planning and a slight modification to what my fleet roles are, IGÇÖve just circumvented your entire titan patch plans b/c you thought this was enough to warrant not changing the coding of your formulas so that they make sense.
Good thing thereGÇÖs nobody in this game who couldnGÇÖt ya know, divide their titan pilots up on mumble into 10-15 sub channels, have a few SCGÇÖs assigned to each for painting and just perform the exact same way where itGÇÖs GÇ£paint, blap, blap, boomGÇ¥ rather than the old, GÇ£blap, blap, boomGÇ¥GǪ. That extra stepGǪ it will be the death of me. Guess us PL folk, or Raiden folk, or NC. Folk will have a horrible time adapting to this fix bros.
Thanks for the effortGǪ maybe next time youGÇÖll listen to sense, put in the extra time needed, and avoid yet another **** fix.
This is a good post.
Address the points, call everyone stupid, including CCP Games, and even give how it should be properly fixed.
And it's from Pandemic Legion.
I always knew you guys were on our side :shobon:
|

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
453
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:42:00 -
[2328] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:This is not a shitposting contest. Please try to write something usefull.
Its what Goons do when they run out of arguments. NBD. |

May Zonday
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:43:00 -
[2329] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:This is not a shitposting contest. Please try to write something usefull. Its what Goons do when they run out of arguments. NBD.
Shitposting is its own reward, get it right, nerd. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
380
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:49:00 -
[2330] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:This is not a shitposting contest. Please try to write something usefull. Its what Goons do when they run out of arguments. NBD.
Even your arguments were shitposts, nerd. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3132
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:50:00 -
[2331] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:This is not a shitposting contest. Please try to write something usefull. Its what Goons do when they run out of arguments. NBD.
hmm yes proving you wrong multiple times and calling you out on your utter ignorance of nullsec warfare due to a limited perspective based on highsec incursion running is "shitposting" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
181
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:50:00 -
[2332] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Andski wrote:the rock my posts blocked so somebody explain what happens when the "i win" buttons are trapped where their staging towers used to be, surrounded by bubbles in our home system Oh but you misunderstand my dear Andski. You see, undefatable iWin buttons would be impossible to "trap". They would have just blasted out of there, killing everything. This is after all, what you claim them to be capable off.
On the off chance you're somehow not trolling and trying to engage in a discussion here, let me break it down for you as simply as I can:
Just because a tool is powerful and potent to the point of being unbalancing, doesn't mean that the players behind that tool are perfectly organized, rational, or reasonable in how they employ that tool.
To give specific examples, Dropping 20 titans on a 500 vs 500 sub capital brawl is the sort of rational move that immediately ends the fight in favor of the person dropping those titans. Sure, you could argue about counter-drops, reforming some kind of counter fleet, or such, but by the time that sort of thing goes through, those 20 titans have done their job of murdering that initial 500 subcap fleet.
Now, dropping 46 titans into your enemies' capital with no support fleet and logging them off there, that's a fairly stupid move. You're handing your opponent the chance to fight your titans on his terms, negating the chance of any reinforcements, on a silver platter. Especially when that's 46 titans over 4+ disparate alliances only loosely organized by a hatred of Goonfleet, motivated by a very angry ex-goon. At that point, everyone gets nervous that the plan wasn't terribly good, starts eyeing that 90b isk spaceship that's stuck in a vise, and starts trying to figure out how to get out of Dodge. |

Berke Negri
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:59:00 -
[2333] - Quote
Andski wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:This is not a shitposting contest. Please try to write something usefull. Its what Goons do when they run out of arguments. NBD. hmm yes proving you wrong multiple times and calling you out on your utter ignorance of nullsec warfare due to a limited perspective based on highsec incursion running is "shitposting" being wrong about everything is the cornerstone of the puppet master's devious plans, however |

Venus Vermillion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:02:00 -
[2334] - Quote
Proof that Titans aren't overpowered:
1: A blob of titans is easily countered by a bigger blob of titans.
2: Titans are worth more isk than any other ship and therefore should be more powerful than any other ship.
3: Titans require more SP than any other ship and therefore should be more powerful than any other ship.
4: No other ship has roles to play in the game, they're all generic combat ships, so titans should be the most powerful of them.
5: A "Titan" is literally the son Uranus and Gaea. The son of two gods. Seriously people.
6: Goons still exist in game, therefore titans should aren't overpowered. Everyone knows people with titans would immediately wipe them out if titans were overpowered.
7: More people who own titans say that they are fine than people who don't own titans say they aren't. (Goons don't count because goons aren't people.)
8: CCP is under The Mittani's control and therefore anything they decide is suspect. (Read: The Mittani is literally Rasputin.)
9: People in other countries are starving. It isn't right that hard working titan pilots should have to suffer.
10: Technetium hasn't been fixed yet. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
380
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:05:00 -
[2335] - Quote
Mittani has mind controlling laser beams.
Vote Lasers, Vote Mittani |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
453
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:06:00 -
[2336] - Quote
I'm changing my numbers. This thread isnt 70% sperging Goons. Its 90%. Thats funny, since after all - you have apparently "won" EVE. |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:09:00 -
[2337] - Quote
Venus Vermillion wrote:Proof that Titans aren't overpowered:
1: A blob of titans is easily countered by a bigger blob of titans.
2: Titans are worth more isk than any other ship and therefore should be more powerful than any other ship.
3: Titans require more SP than any other ship and therefore should be more powerful than any other ship.
4: No other ship has roles to play in the game, they're all generic combat ships, so titans should be the most powerful of them.
5: A "Titan" is literally the son Uranus and Gaea. The son of two gods. Seriously people.
6: Goons still exist in game, therefore titans surely aren't overpowered. Everyone knows people with titans would immediately wipe them out if titans were overpowered.
7: More people who own titans say that they are fine than people who don't own titans say they aren't. (Goons don't count because goons aren't people.)
8: CCP is under The Mittani's control and therefore anything they decide is suspect. (Read: The Mittani is literally Rasputin.)
9: People in other countries are starving. It isn't right that hard working titan pilots should have to suffer.
10: Technetium hasn't been fixed yet.
The titans are not properly balanced! However, in order to fix them, CCP needs to devote proper ressources and develop a real solution and not some kind of ****** fix that doesn't solve the problem at all. This "fix" proves once again that CCP neither plays its own game nor understands it. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3133
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:10:00 -
[2338] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:I'm changing my numbers. This thread isnt 70% sperging Goons. Its 90%. Thats funny, since after all - you have apparently "won" EVE.
i think you're the only one sperging here l0l
please learn what words mean "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
453
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:11:00 -
[2339] - Quote
Andski wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:I'm changing my numbers. This thread isnt 70% sperging Goons. Its 90%. Thats funny, since after all - you have apparently "won" EVE. i think you're the only one sperging here l0l please learn what words mean
really? shows how much you understand then. |

Venus Vermillion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
438
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:12:00 -
[2340] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:I'm changing my numbers. This thread isnt 70% sperging Goons. Its 90%. Thats funny, since after all - you have apparently "won" EVE.
Hey, I'm just summarizing for people who don't want to read 115 pages. I took all the pro-titan arguments and wrapped them up nicely into one little post. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3133
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:13:00 -
[2341] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Andski wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:I'm changing my numbers. This thread isnt 70% sperging Goons. Its 90%. Thats funny, since after all - you have apparently "won" EVE. i think you're the only one sperging here l0l please learn what words mean really? shows how much you understand then.
you have been "SNORT SNORT TITANS ARE BALANCED SNORT ITS JUST T1 GOONIES WHO CANT BLOB EVERY1"
we've been replying "lol"
hmm i wonder who's the sperg
(it's you) "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
380
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:13:00 -
[2342] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Andski wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:I'm changing my numbers. This thread isnt 70% sperging Goons. Its 90%. Thats funny, since after all - you have apparently "won" EVE. i think you're the only one sperging here l0l please learn what words mean really? shows how much you understand then.
"I am rubber you're glue; whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you" |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
380
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:14:00 -
[2343] - Quote
Except it's less rubber and more fat. |

Ser Berus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:14:00 -
[2344] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:I'm changing my numbers. This thread isnt 70% sperging Goons. Its 90%. Thats funny, since after all - you have apparently "won" EVE.
Nobody wins at eve. |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
453
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:20:00 -
[2345] - Quote
Keep sperging, morons. LOL. I'm sure you can fill another 10 pages with useless dribble in 3 more hours. Come on, you know you can do it. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3133
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:21:00 -
[2346] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Keep sperging, morons. LOL. I'm sure you can fill another 10 pages withe useless dribble in 3 more hours. Come on, you know you can do it.
reported for trolling "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Berke Negri
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:23:00 -
[2347] - Quote
to reilly's credit, they have stumbled upon one truth in this thread about goons
we will never stop posting |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
453
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:23:00 -
[2348] - Quote
Andski wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:Keep sperging, morons. LOL. I'm sure you can fill another 10 pages withe useless dribble in 3 more hours. Come on, you know you can do it. reported for trolling
Thats rich. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
381
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:30:00 -
[2349] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Keep sperging, morons. LOL. I'm sure you can fill another 10 pages with useless dribble in 3 more hours. Come on, you know you can do it.
~PuPpEtMaStA~ defense in full swing, I see. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3134
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:32:00 -
[2350] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:~PuPpEtMaStA~ defense in full swing, I see.
you should see this guy sperging out in a thread where we discussed nerfing tech "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
523
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:43:00 -
[2351] - Quote
Ser Berus wrote:Reilly Duvolle wrote:I'm changing my numbers. This thread isnt 70% sperging Goons. Its 90%. Thats funny, since after all - you have apparently "won" EVE. Nobody wins at eve.
Especially not if they read his posting. |

SolusLunes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:43:00 -
[2352] - Quote
We had an entire page without a z0r chain this is unacceptable
z |

Berke Negri
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:46:00 -
[2353] - Quote
0 |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
70
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:47:00 -
[2354] - Quote
m |

SolusLunes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:48:00 -
[2355] - Quote
b |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
381
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:49:00 -
[2356] - Quote
o |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3136
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:56:00 -
[2357] - Quote
c "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

SolusLunes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:57:00 -
[2358] - Quote
o |

trenny jr
Order of Celestial Knights S I L E N T.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:59:00 -
[2359] - Quote
m |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
381
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:59:00 -
[2360] - Quote
THE UNATTAINABLE IS UNKNOWN |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
381
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 01:00:00 -
[2361] - Quote
AT ZOMBO COM |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
181
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 01:01:00 -
[2362] - Quote
****, dude, did you just burn your spy to finish that? That's some guts right there.
I noticed my points weren't addressed. So, I think that pretty convincingly pins this one at 'troll' rather than 'opposing viewpoint'. |

SolusLunes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 01:08:00 -
[2363] - Quote
Titans were never nerfed, at ZOMBOCOM
Kyle Myr wrote:****, dude, did you just burn your spy to finish that? That's some guts right there.
Zombocom chains are srs business. |

Berke Negri
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 01:18:00 -
[2364] - Quote
it was worth it |

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
192
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 01:20:00 -
[2365] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Keep sperging, morons. LOL. I'm sure you can fill another 10 pages with useless dribble in 3 more hours. Come on, you know you can do it.
As a neutral bystander in this drama, even I can see you are an idiot.
All the 'sperging' (that even a word??) is coming from you. You have just repeated the same crap over and over. You know perfectly well why Goons weren't kicked out of null last year....PL's FC totally f**ked up in VFK!
If they hadn't had a brain meltdown, then Goons would probably sitting on the Jita 4-4 undock ganking noobs and Privateers right about now.
The only thing I can see wrong with the Titan 're-balance' is the timing.
However, when is there never any fighting going on in null? Seems CCP are damned if they do, damned if they don't, so I guess they chose to annoy the very vocal minority this time.
Hey! Had a thought....maybe CCP like tears too? Would explain all of this very well   
*EDIT*
DAMN IT! Missed page 119 snipe :sad panda: |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
385
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 01:24:00 -
[2366] - Quote
Smiling Menace wrote:If they hadn't had a brain meltdown, then Goons would probably sitting on the Jita 4-4 undock ganking noobs and Privateers right about now.
We plan on doing that anyway Soon(tm). |

Dyfed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 01:27:00 -
[2367] - Quote
All I can say is fives. Fives all around. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
385
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 01:29:00 -
[2368] - Quote
55555 55555 55555 55555 55555 |

SolusLunes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 01:33:00 -
[2369] - Quote
Time for a haiku about this titan nerf.
fofofofofo fofofofofofofo fofofofofo |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 02:05:00 -
[2370] - Quote
Is mittani giving you a plex for all posts in this thread? Better watch out, he might scam even you. |

Venus Vermillion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
442
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 02:18:00 -
[2371] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Is mittani giving you a plex for all posts in this thread? Better watch out, he might scam even you.
Gotta spend all of our moon money somewhere. The Mittani gives me like three plexes a month. Its pretty tight. |

May Zonday
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 02:23:00 -
[2372] - Quote
Venus Vermillion wrote:Acwron wrote:Is mittani giving you a plex for all posts in this thread? Better watch out, he might scam even you. Gotta spend all of our moon money somewhere. The Mittani gives me like three plexes a month. Its pretty tight.
We can literally lose a rifter every ******* second of every goddamn day and still make money. Eat it, poors. |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
104
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 02:30:00 -
[2373] - Quote
I'm Down wrote:There is a reason why IGÇÖve said for the past 2 years that adjusting tracking will not fix the problem. Just like fixing lock time also does not address the problem at all.
You developers have for years completely ignored your tracking mechanics and how utterly garbage they are. You have also ignored people informing you of why you canGÇÖt fix tracking under the current design. So let me drop this knowledge on you for why your first fix to titans has changed so little in what they do that it will have virtually 0 impact on the game after a few months of adaptation:
The current problem is that titans in large numbers can blap the ever living **** out of a fleet with basically no risk simply because they are huge HP buffers that can be repaired by motherships which are also huge HP buffers. Now I could ***** and moan about Capital Remote repairers and their range and their effectiveness, particularly on huge hp and resist stars like supers, but that would go off track of my point, so IGÇÖll avoid the temptation.
So you changed trackingGǪ big whoop. Rather than track around 220 m/s for every 10km of range, an Erebus/Rag now tracks about 110 m/s for every 10km of range. In addition, they have a gun sig size of about double that of a BS. This creates some magical world where a ship further away can be tracked better, but is some how mysteriously the same size as though range dilation has no affect at all on how well you can see that now tiny little dot. In laymanGÇÖs termsGǪ. This means that if Eve mechanics worked in the real universe, Every star in the whole freaking universe would look approximately the same size as our sun, as would all the planets in size relation to our moon rather than the tiny specs in the sky that they are. So hereGÇÖs what happens after your patch to just circumvent the whole problem you just createdGǪ. Lock time you sayGǪ Tracking speed you sayGǪ
Hello MR Proteus, Hello either 5 AEONS with 4 Domi painters or 50 Archons with 4 T2 Painters (and just for luls cause the ship is cheap, why not throw in 2 range extenders for the painters as well). Now that wonderful tengu has an 800-1200 sig and at 60km can be tracked plus has a sig size near the same as the guns do. That Maelstrom has a 1700 + sigGǪ ie bigger than the guns do, and can be tracked at about 12km rangeGǪ. And oh yeah, you can easily get those 300-400,000 ehp small sig lokis to web down anything closer than those ranges to prevent them from avoiding the tracking problemsGǪ not like tech 3GÇÖs are rare these days.
Oh but lock time you sayGǪ well if the carrier paints before the Titans ever lockGǪ. Oh yeah, Lock a tengu in 30-35 seconds, lock a Maelstrom in 23-30 secondsGǪ thatGÇÖs so brutal. Oh yeah, and thatGÇÖs just with ******* Navy tracking computers and sensor boosters, I didnGÇÖt even toss in the Meta 13-14 gear.
GeeGǪ in 20 minutes of planning and a slight modification to what my fleet roles are, IGÇÖve just circumvented your entire titan patch plans b/c you thought this was enough to warrant not changing the coding of your formulas so that they make sense.
Good thing thereGÇÖs nobody in this game who couldnGÇÖt ya know, divide their titan pilots up on mumble into 10-15 sub channels, have a few SCGÇÖs assigned to each for painting and just perform the exact same way where itGÇÖs GÇ£paint, blap, blap, boomGÇ¥ rather than the old, GÇ£blap, blap, boomGÇ¥GǪ. That extra stepGǪ it will be the death of me. Guess us PL folk, or Raiden folk, or NC. Folk will have a horrible time adapting to this fix bros.
Thanks for the effortGǪ maybe next time youGÇÖll listen to sense, put in the extra time needed, and avoid yet another **** fix.
Re-quoting this for CCP. Even PL admits their titans are still going to be overpowered after this nerf. Continue to further nerf titans. |

Esbelta
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 03:06:00 -
[2374] - Quote
SolusLunes wrote:Time for a haiku about this titan nerf.
fofofofofo fofofofofofofo fofofofofo
Bloo bloo bloo bloo bloo Bloo bloo bloo bloo bloo bloo bloo Bloo bloo bloo bloo bloo
|

Jengardan Cadelanne
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 03:24:00 -
[2375] - Quote
So PL blew up a CCP battleship fleet and they also had members on this CSM yet are now crying about the titan nerfs? 
Sounds like someone had a fit of hubris and is throwing their toys out of the pram now that it's come home to roost.
That the gist of it?
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3144
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 04:20:00 -
[2376] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Is mittani giving you a plex for all posts in this thread? Better watch out, he might scam even you.
does the BRASIL HUE HUE alliance even have isk lol "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
718
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 04:29:00 -
[2377] - Quote
^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

Death2all Supercaps
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 04:33:00 -
[2378] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaoLU6zKaws
Sexy Sax Man subcap pilot |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
279
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 04:37:00 -
[2379] - Quote
I can haz ur stuffs, Titan-peenzor gaiz? In irae, veritas. |

Anastasia Shimaya
Viziam Amarr Empire
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 05:15:00 -
[2380] - Quote
I'm Down wrote:There is a reason why IGÇÖve said for the past 2 years that adjusting tracking will not fix the problem. Just like fixing lock time also does not address the problem at all.
You developers have for years completely ignored your tracking mechanics and how utterly garbage they are. You have also ignored people informing you of why you canGÇÖt fix tracking under the current design. So let me drop this knowledge on you for why your first fix to titans has changed so little in what they do that it will have virtually 0 impact on the game after a few months of adaptation:
The current problem is that titans in large numbers can blap the ever living **** out of a fleet with basically no risk simply because they are huge HP buffers that can be repaired by motherships which are also huge HP buffers. Now I could ***** and moan about Capital Remote repairers and their range and their effectiveness, particularly on huge hp and resist stars like supers, but that would go off track of my point, so IGÇÖll avoid the temptation.
So you changed trackingGǪ big whoop. Rather than track around 220 m/s for every 10km of range, an Erebus/Rag now tracks about 110 m/s for every 10km of range. In addition, they have a gun sig size of about double that of a BS. This creates some magical world where a ship further away can be tracked better, but is some how mysteriously the same size as though range dilation has no affect at all on how well you can see that now tiny little dot. In laymanGÇÖs termsGǪ. This means that if Eve mechanics worked in the real universe, Every star in the whole freaking universe would look approximately the same size as our sun, as would all the planets in size relation to our moon rather than the tiny specs in the sky that they are. So hereGÇÖs what happens after your patch to just circumvent the whole problem you just createdGǪ. Lock time you sayGǪ Tracking speed you sayGǪ
Hello MR Proteus, Hello either 5 AEONS with 4 Domi painters or 50 Archons with 4 T2 Painters (and just for luls cause the ship is cheap, why not throw in 2 range extenders for the painters as well). Now that wonderful tengu has an 800-1200 sig and at 60km can be tracked plus has a sig size near the same as the guns do. That Maelstrom has a 1700 + sigGǪ ie bigger than the guns do, and can be tracked at about 12km rangeGǪ. And oh yeah, you can easily get those 300-400,000 ehp small sig lokis to web down anything closer than those ranges to prevent them from avoiding the tracking problemsGǪ not like tech 3GÇÖs are rare these days.
Oh but lock time you sayGǪ well if the carrier paints before the Titans ever lockGǪ. Oh yeah, Lock a tengu in 30-35 seconds, lock a Maelstrom in 23-30 secondsGǪ thatGÇÖs so brutal. Oh yeah, and thatGÇÖs just with ******* Navy tracking computers and sensor boosters, I didnGÇÖt even toss in the Meta 13-14 gear.
GeeGǪ in 20 minutes of planning and a slight modification to what my fleet roles are, IGÇÖve just circumvented your entire titan patch plans b/c you thought this was enough to warrant not changing the coding of your formulas so that they make sense.
Good thing thereGÇÖs nobody in this game who couldnGÇÖt ya know, divide their titan pilots up on mumble into 10-15 sub channels, have a few SCGÇÖs assigned to each for painting and just perform the exact same way where itGÇÖs GÇ£paint, blap, blap, boomGÇ¥ rather than the old, GÇ£blap, blap, boomGÇ¥GǪ. That extra stepGǪ it will be the death of me. Guess us PL folk, or Raiden folk, or NC. Folk will have a horrible time adapting to this fix bros.
Thanks for the effortGǪ maybe next time youGÇÖll listen to sense, put in the extra time needed, and avoid yet another **** fix.
Now I'm assuming whatever the sig penalty plan was that you had was based at least in part on what I propsed about 6 months ago as I've not seen any other signiture plans offered ever. If you would just ******* do it, It would balance so many combat problems currently seen in this game that it's actually worth the effort. So please stop taking the easy way and do something ******* useful for once in you entire gaming careers.
REPOSTED FOR CCP, HEAR THAT CCP THAT PL PILOT SAID YOUR NOT ****, PROVE EM WRONG |

Johnny Marzetti
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
304
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 05:15:00 -
[2381] - Quote
Well, I read this whole thread, and what they say is true.
Tears make the best lube.
|

Aurora B
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 06:58:00 -
[2382] - Quote
I'm Down wrote:There is a reason why IGÇÖve said for the past 2 years that adjusting tracking will not fix the problem. Just like fixing lock time also does not address the problem at all.
You developers have for years completely ignored your tracking mechanics and how utterly garbage they are. You have also ignored people informing you of why you canGÇÖt fix tracking under the current design. So let me drop this knowledge on you for why your first fix to titans has changed so little in what they do that it will have virtually 0 impact on the game after a few months of adaptation:
The current problem is that titans in large numbers can blap the ever living **** out of a fleet with basically no risk simply because they are huge HP buffers that can be repaired by motherships which are also huge HP buffers. Now I could ***** and moan about Capital Remote repairers and their range and their effectiveness, particularly on huge hp and resist stars like supers, but that would go off track of my point, so IGÇÖll avoid the temptation.
So you changed trackingGǪ big whoop. Rather than track around 220 m/s for every 10km of range, an Erebus/Rag now tracks about 110 m/s for every 10km of range. In addition, they have a gun sig size of about double that of a BS. This creates some magical world where a ship further away can be tracked better, but is some how mysteriously the same size as though range dilation has no affect at all on how well you can see that now tiny little dot. In laymanGÇÖs termsGǪ. This means that if Eve mechanics worked in the real universe, Every star in the whole freaking universe would look approximately the same size as our sun, as would all the planets in size relation to our moon rather than the tiny specs in the sky that they are. So hereGÇÖs what happens after your patch to just circumvent the whole problem you just createdGǪ. Lock time you sayGǪ Tracking speed you sayGǪ
Hello MR Proteus, Hello either 5 AEONS with 4 Domi painters or 50 Archons with 4 T2 Painters (and just for luls cause the ship is cheap, why not throw in 2 range extenders for the painters as well). Now that wonderful tengu has an 800-1200 sig and at 60km can be tracked plus has a sig size near the same as the guns do. That Maelstrom has a 1700 + sigGǪ ie bigger than the guns do, and can be tracked at about 12km rangeGǪ. And oh yeah, you can easily get those 300-400,000 ehp small sig lokis to web down anything closer than those ranges to prevent them from avoiding the tracking problemsGǪ not like tech 3GÇÖs are rare these days.
Oh but lock time you sayGǪ well if the carrier paints before the Titans ever lockGǪ. Oh yeah, Lock a tengu in 30-35 seconds, lock a Maelstrom in 23-30 secondsGǪ thatGÇÖs so brutal. Oh yeah, and thatGÇÖs just with ******* Navy tracking computers and sensor boosters, I didnGÇÖt even toss in the Meta 13-14 gear.
GeeGǪ in 20 minutes of planning and a slight modification to what my fleet roles are, IGÇÖve just circumvented your entire titan patch plans b/c you thought this was enough to warrant not changing the coding of your formulas so that they make sense.
Good thing thereGÇÖs nobody in this game who couldnGÇÖt ya know, divide their titan pilots up on mumble into 10-15 sub channels, have a few SCGÇÖs assigned to each for painting and just perform the exact same way where itGÇÖs GÇ£paint, blap, blap, boomGÇ¥ rather than the old, GÇ£blap, blap, boomGÇ¥GǪ. That extra stepGǪ it will be the death of me. Guess us PL folk, or Raiden folk, or NC. Folk will have a horrible time adapting to this fix bros.
Thanks for the effortGǪ maybe next time youGÇÖll listen to sense, put in the extra time needed, and avoid yet another **** fix.
Now I'm assuming whatever the sig penalty plan was that you had was based at least in part on what I propsed about 6 months ago as I've not seen any other signiture plans offered ever. If you would just ******* do it, It would balance so many combat problems currently seen in this game that it's actually worth the effort. So please stop taking the easy way and do something ******* useful for once in you entire gaming careers.
Clearly +110 pages of tears proves you are wrong and cccp is doing the right thing. |

Roland Hova
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 07:06:00 -
[2383] - Quote
I just read 119 pages of pure ******* gold with only a minimal desire to gouge out my own eyes.
CCP should perma sticky this thread so that future generations of goons and pubbies can admire how many gallons of tears were shed over this issue. |

Aurora B
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 08:40:00 -
[2384] - Quote
Roland Hova wrote:I just read 119 pages of pure ******* gold with only a minimal desire to gouge out my own eyes.
CCP should perma sticky this thread so that future generations of goons and pubbies can admire how many gallons of tears were shed over this issue.
You clearly are lost in a wormhole after dbrb op as your reality is so distorted. I see 110 pages of CFC nerdrage, 2 pages of tears, 7 pages of some kind of argumentation of this issue. Even those tears are because ccp's evil dead zombie arm is trying to do open brain surgery. |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 08:50:00 -
[2385] - Quote
Let me explain this in a very simple way :
Nerfing Titan and cap ships that bad, forces a high skilled player to go back to subcap ships. No reason to fly again a cap ship as long as they are nerfed big time. A high skilled player already been thru sub capital skills and prolly learned most of them. Next challenge for him is a capital ship. No challenge anymore now.
Titans are nothing without support, a single interdictor can nail him down forever. A 30 mil ship with fit included keeps a 100 bill ship in place. A few mil SP against 100+ mil SP.
A titan in the field is tank fitted, Anyone that has a titan knows that hits like shite without tracking and damage mods. Either you tank and have 20-30 mil EHP, either you go tracking/damage and have 3-4 mil EHP. I guess just a few would risk a titan to go in the field with 3-4 mil EHP, that's double a dread has. Dread = ~2,5 bil Titan = ~100 bil not including the fit.
A dread is inflicting more damage than a Titan tracking and damage fitted ! What to say about a tanked Titan I can't see where is the threat.
Goons want people to go back to T1 frigates ? Those times are past long time ago. They just need to adapt and fight instead of whining like retards. This is not 2003, it's 2012, it's absolutely normal to have high end characters/ships and fight with them.
Nerfing Titans will give goons a big advantage as they can put up 1.000 ships or more. Where's the small alliances advantage? There's none, don't bother to look. On the contrary...
You don't need to be a scientist and fill the post with numbers and equations. You just need to play the game to see how it is
You are just killing alot of people's dream. To fly the mother of all ships. |

SolusLunes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 09:08:00 -
[2386] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Let me explain this in a very simple way :
Nerfing Titan and cap ships that bad, forces a high skilled player to go back to subcap ships. No reason to fly again a cap ship as long as they are nerfed big time. A high skilled player already been thru sub capital skills and prolly learned most of them. Next challenge for him is a capital ship. No challenge anymore now.
Titans are nothing without support, a single interdictor can nail him down forever. A 30 mil ship with fit included keeps a 100 bill ship in place. A few mil SP against 100+ mil SP.
A titan in the field is tank fitted, Anyone that has a titan knows that hits like shite without tracking and damage mods. Either you tank and have 20-30 mil EHP, either you go tracking/damage and have 3-4 mil EHP. I guess just a few would risk a titan to go in the field with 3-4 mil EHP, that's double a dread has. Dread = ~2,5 bil Titan = ~100 bil not including the fit.
A dread is inflicting more damage than a Titan tracking and damage fitted ! What to say about a tanked Titan I can't see where is the threat.
Goons want people to go back to T1 frigates ? Those times are past long time ago. They just need to adapt and fight instead of whining like retards. This is not 2003, it's 2012, it's absolutely normal to have high end characters/ships and fight with them.
Nerfing Titans will give goons a big advantage as they can put up 1.000 ships or more. Where's the small alliances advantage? There's none, don't bother to look. On the contrary...
You don't need to be a scientist and fill the post with numbers and equations. You just need to play the game to see how it is
You are just killing alot of people's dream. To fly the mother of all ships.
Allow me to respond with a haiku:
a bloo bloo bloo bloo a bloo bloo bloo bloo bloo bloo a bloo bloo bloo bloooooooooo
|

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 09:11:00 -
[2387] - Quote
SolusLunes wrote: Allow me to respond with a haiku:
a bloo bloo bloo bloo a bloo bloo bloo bloo bloo bloo a bloo bloo bloo bloooooooooo
Typical for a goon, can't say anything but he is very convincing when acting like a monkey. |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
60
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 09:25:00 -
[2388] - Quote
Acwron wrote:You are just killing alot of people's dream. To fly the mother of all ships.
My dream is for a healthy and well balanced EvE. My dream is more important than yours because you are stupid. |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 09:32:00 -
[2389] - Quote
Yeep wrote:Acwron wrote:You are just killing alot of people's dream. To fly the mother of all ships. My dream is for a healthy and well balanced EvE. My dream is more important than yours because you are stupid.
I could swear it's the other way around. In my world, you're the stupid one. Eve(rything) is relative. |

GeneralDisturbed
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
105
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 09:56:00 -
[2390] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Yeep wrote:Acwron wrote:You are just killing alot of people's dream. To fly the mother of all ships. My dream is for a healthy and well balanced EvE. My dream is more important than yours because you are stupid. I could swear it's the other way around. In my world, you're the stupid one. Eve(rything) is relative.
Unfortunately for you, my world is the one where CCP, the CSM, and the majority of the playerbase resides. So nerfs ahoy.
|

Kitfox Mikakka
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
20
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 10:22:00 -
[2391] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Let me explain this in a very simple way :
Nerfing Titan and cap ships that bad, forces a high skilled player to go back to subcap ships. No reason to fly again a cap ship as long as they are nerfed big time. A high skilled player already been thru sub capital skills and prolly learned most of them. Next challenge for him is a capital ship. No challenge anymore now.
Titans are nothing without support, a single interdictor can nail him down forever. A 30 mil ship with fit included keeps a 100 bill ship in place. A few mil SP against 100+ mil SP.
A titan in the field is tank fitted, Anyone that has a titan knows that hits like shite without tracking and damage mods. Either you tank and have 20-30 mil EHP, either you go tracking/damage and have 3-4 mil EHP. I guess just a few would risk a titan to go in the field with 3-4 mil EHP, that's double a dread has. Dread = ~2,5 bil Titan = ~100 bil not including the fit.
A dread is inflicting more damage than a Titan tracking and damage fitted ! What to say about a tanked Titan I can't see where is the threat.
Goons want people to go back to T1 frigates ? Those times are past long time ago. They just need to adapt and fight instead of whining like retards. This is not 2003, it's 2012, it's absolutely normal to have high end characters/ships and fight with them.
Nerfing Titans will give goons a big advantage as they can put up 1.000 ships or more. Where's the small alliances advantage? There's none, don't bother to look. On the contrary...
You don't need to be a scientist and fill the post with numbers and equations. You just need to play the game to see how it is
You are just killing alot of people's dream. To fly the mother of all ships.
Believe it or not the claims of us throwing out 1k+ ships is dumb as hell, let alone the 1600 that was being tossed around earlier. That sorta **** is rare as hell. Sure, 1 dictor locks down 1 titan forever. The problem is that, at this point, with the massive levels of Titan proliferation occurring in Null-Sec among all major alliances, nobody throws down Just One Titan. They thrown down a group, and that group pops apart, and then the 2, 3, 4 dictors on each Titan get torn apart because it's impossible to keep transversal against a dozen or more spread out Titans. Once you've hit that critical mass of Titans, there is more or less no possible way to reasonably defeat them but to throw down More Supercapitals. And once that battle of More Supercapitals begins, it entirely cuts those of us who can't fly supercaps out of the fight, more or less. It goes from cool battles of 500+ on each side to 30, 40, 50 people blapping each other with their huge space penises, and that sucks **** for those of us not in a space *****, which is the vast majority of the game.
CCP got to see this sort of insanity themselves, and they're realizing it really is a problem that can't be ignored for much longer. And my dream sure as hell isn't to fly one of these Super Star Destroyer space penises, my dream is to be able to suicide frigs into them A-wing style. And I sure as hell ain't gonna get that dream to come true, now am I? |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 10:34:00 -
[2392] - Quote
Kitfox Mikakka wrote:Acwron wrote:Let me explain this in a very simple way :
Nerfing Titan and cap ships that bad, forces a high skilled player to go back to subcap ships. No reason to fly again a cap ship as long as they are nerfed big time. A high skilled player already been thru sub capital skills and prolly learned most of them. Next challenge for him is a capital ship. No challenge anymore now.
Titans are nothing without support, a single interdictor can nail him down forever. A 30 mil ship with fit included keeps a 100 bill ship in place. A few mil SP against 100+ mil SP.
A titan in the field is tank fitted, Anyone that has a titan knows that hits like shite without tracking and damage mods. Either you tank and have 20-30 mil EHP, either you go tracking/damage and have 3-4 mil EHP. I guess just a few would risk a titan to go in the field with 3-4 mil EHP, that's double a dread has. Dread = ~2,5 bil Titan = ~100 bil not including the fit.
A dread is inflicting more damage than a Titan tracking and damage fitted ! What to say about a tanked Titan I can't see where is the threat.
Goons want people to go back to T1 frigates ? Those times are past long time ago. They just need to adapt and fight instead of whining like retards. This is not 2003, it's 2012, it's absolutely normal to have high end characters/ships and fight with them.
Nerfing Titans will give goons a big advantage as they can put up 1.000 ships or more. Where's the small alliances advantage? There's none, don't bother to look. On the contrary...
You don't need to be a scientist and fill the post with numbers and equations. You just need to play the game to see how it is
You are just killing alot of people's dream. To fly the mother of all ships. Believe it or not the claims of us throwing out 1k+ ships is dumb as hell, let alone the 1600 that was being tossed around earlier. That sorta **** is rare as hell. Sure, 1 dictor locks down 1 titan forever. The problem is that, at this point, with the massive levels of Titan proliferation occurring in Null-Sec among all major alliances, nobody throws down Just One Titan. They thrown down a group, and that group pops apart, and then the 2, 3, 4 dictors on each Titan get torn apart because it's impossible to keep transversal against a dozen or more spread out Titans. Once you've hit that critical mass of Titans, there is more or less no possible way to reasonably defeat them but to throw down More Supercapitals. And once that battle of More Supercapitals begins, it entirely cuts those of us who can't fly supercaps out of the fight, more or less. It goes from cool battles of 500+ on each side to 30, 40, 50 people blapping each other with their huge space penises, and that sucks **** for those of us not in a space *****, which is the vast majority of the game. CCP got to see this sort of insanity themselves, and they're realizing it really is a problem that can't be ignored for much longer. And my dream sure as hell isn't to fly one of these Super Star Destroyer space penises, my dream is to be able to suicide frigs into them A-wing style. And I sure as hell ain't gonna get that dream to come true, now am I?
Did I mention this is year 2012 and not 2003? I could swear I did...Grow up and fly some ships, T1 frigates are obsolete. |

esc shk
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
108
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 10:44:00 -
[2393] - Quote
I too claim Maelstroms are Obsolete. |

Susie Chow
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
48
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 11:14:00 -
[2394] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Kitfox Mikakka wrote:Believe it or not the claims of us throwing out 1k+ ships is dumb as hell, let alone the 1600 that was being tossed around earlier. That sorta **** is rare as hell. Sure, 1 dictor locks down 1 titan forever. The problem is that, at this point, with the massive levels of Titan proliferation occurring in Null-Sec among all major alliances, nobody throws down Just One Titan. They thrown down a group, and that group pops apart, and then the 2, 3, 4 dictors on each Titan get torn apart because it's impossible to keep transversal against a dozen or more spread out Titans. Once you've hit that critical mass of Titans, there is more or less no possible way to reasonably defeat them but to throw down More Supercapitals. And once that battle of More Supercapitals begins, it entirely cuts those of us who can't fly supercaps out of the fight, more or less. It goes from cool battles of 500+ on each side to 30, 40, 50 people blapping each other with their huge space penises, and that sucks **** for those of us not in a space *****, which is the vast majority of the game.
CCP got to see this sort of insanity themselves, and they're realizing it really is a problem that can't be ignored for much longer. And my dream sure as hell isn't to fly one of these Super Star Destroyer space penises, my dream is to be able to suicide frigs into them A-wing style. And I sure as hell ain't gonna get that dream to come true, now am I? Did I mention this is year 2012 and not 2003? I could swear I did...Grow up and fly some ships, T1 frigates are obsolete.
Yes, I completely agree. In fact, I just had an amazing idea totally out of nowhere: you should also have to complete challenging group PvE content to unlock higher "tiers" of ship. You could call it "raiding" or something, and top corps could compete for "world first heroic Titans." |

Orion GUardian
129
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 11:20:00 -
[2395] - Quote
Susie Chow wrote:Acwron wrote:Kitfox Mikakka wrote:Believe it or not the claims of us throwing out 1k+ ships is dumb as hell, let alone the 1600 that was being tossed around earlier. That sorta **** is rare as hell. Sure, 1 dictor locks down 1 titan forever. The problem is that, at this point, with the massive levels of Titan proliferation occurring in Null-Sec among all major alliances, nobody throws down Just One Titan. They thrown down a group, and that group pops apart, and then the 2, 3, 4 dictors on each Titan get torn apart because it's impossible to keep transversal against a dozen or more spread out Titans. Once you've hit that critical mass of Titans, there is more or less no possible way to reasonably defeat them but to throw down More Supercapitals. And once that battle of More Supercapitals begins, it entirely cuts those of us who can't fly supercaps out of the fight, more or less. It goes from cool battles of 500+ on each side to 30, 40, 50 people blapping each other with their huge space penises, and that sucks **** for those of us not in a space *****, which is the vast majority of the game.
CCP got to see this sort of insanity themselves, and they're realizing it really is a problem that can't be ignored for much longer. And my dream sure as hell isn't to fly one of these Super Star Destroyer space penises, my dream is to be able to suicide frigs into them A-wing style. And I sure as hell ain't gonna get that dream to come true, now am I? Did I mention this is year 2012 and not 2003? I could swear I did...Grow up and fly some ships, T1 frigates are obsolete. Yes, I completely agree. In fact, I just had an amazing idea totally out of nowhere: you should also have to complete challenging group PvE content to unlock higher "tiers" of ship. You could call it "raiding" or something, and top corps could compete for "world first heroic Titans."
Thats a nice idea, and you could limit PvP fights by numbers and add CTF on it, and add "honor points" for each kill to buy nice looking gear. And make "sets" which give better bonusses when fit together. but to complete the higher raids you will need the earlier sets yet. Wouldn't that be fun? Grinding and grinding and grinding and grinding? |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 11:23:00 -
[2396] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Let me explain this in a very simple way :
Nerfing Titan and cap ships that bad, forces a high skilled player to go back to subcap ships. No reason to fly again a cap ship as long as they are nerfed big time. A high skilled player already been thru sub capital skills and prolly learned most of them. Next challenge for him is a capital ship. No challenge anymore now.
Titans are nothing without support, a single interdictor can nail him down forever. A 30 mil ship with fit included keeps a 100 bill ship in place. A few mil SP against 100+ mil SP.
A titan in the field is tank fitted, Anyone that has a titan knows that hits like shite without tracking and damage mods. Either you tank and have 20-30 mil EHP, either you go tracking/damage and have 3-4 mil EHP. I guess just a few would risk a titan to go in the field with 3-4 mil EHP, that's double a dread has. Dread = ~2,5 bil Titan = ~100 bil not including the fit.
A dread is inflicting more damage than a Titan tracking and damage fitted ! What to say about a tanked Titan I can't see where is the threat.
Goons want people to go back to T1 frigates ? Those times are past long time ago. They just need to adapt and fight instead of whining like retards. This is not 2003, it's 2012, it's absolutely normal to have high end characters/ships and fight with them.
Nerfing Titans will give goons a big advantage as they can put up 1.000 ships or more. Where's the small alliances advantage? There's none, don't bother to look. On the contrary...
You don't need to be a scientist and fill the post with numbers and equations. You just need to play the game to see how it is
You are just killing alot of people's dream. To fly the mother of all ships.
If this a simple explanation, I am horrified to think how more comprehensive explanation would look like.
Also, noone is preventing you from flying 'the mother of all ships'. Right-click, board, fly. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3164
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 11:23:00 -
[2397] - Quote
Acwron wrote:A titan in the field is tank fitted, Anyone that has a titan knows that hits like shite without tracking and damage mods. Either you tank and have 20-30 mil EHP, either you go tracking/damage and have 3-4 mil EHP. I guess just a few would risk a titan to go in the field with 3-4 mil EHP, that's double a dread has. Dread = ~2,5 bil Titan = ~100 bil not including the fit.
sorry that you apparently fly a T1 rigged ragnarok with t2 tank mods lma0
also wow you're in a space holding alliance and you pay 100b for a titan, just wow "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 11:27:00 -
[2398] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Dread = ~2,5 bil Titan = ~100 bil not including the fit.
Oh, hahaha, I missed this.
Would you like to buy few Titans for ~100bil each?
No fitings, of course 
|

Johnny Marzetti
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
305
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 11:29:00 -
[2399] - Quote
Aurora B wrote:[quote=Roland Hova]I see 110 pages of CFC nerdrage, 2 pages of tears, 7 pages of some kind of argumentation of this issue.
You posters from FinFleet, you just type words without thinking about what they actually mean, don't you? I mean, think about it, who has the nerdrage here?
Quote:Even those tears are because ccp's evil dead zombie arm is trying to do open brain surgery.
It's you. You have the nerdrage. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3164
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 11:32:00 -
[2400] - Quote
Aurora B wrote:[quote=Roland Hova]I see 110 pages of CFC nerdrage
yes we're very, very angry about the fact that we will no longer murder raiden subcaps with titans in eurotime "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Cyaron wars
D00M. Northern Coalition.
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 11:38:00 -
[2401] - Quote
Can we balance artillery as well? |

Jacob Kelbrand
Quantum Horizons C0NVICTED
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 11:44:00 -
[2402] - Quote
This joy I'm feeling Titan fans are suffering That's schadenfreude |

Annabell Prime
ZC Industries Dark Stripes
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 12:04:00 -
[2403] - Quote
Honestly i don't think this is the "right" way to fix it.
The titans should present a viable threat to an enemy fleet.
with this said i think what the game is missing is A combat link instead that promotes fleets of beeing balanced. (Give bonus to fleet on composition of fleet)
so that the number of caps give a bonus to subcaps and subcaps gives a bonus to capital ships.
only then will we lose the big blobbs of ship type XX with dominate the battlefield today.
when its benefical to have several kinds of ship on the field in the fleet the FC will build there fleet with this in mind.
what if a Two titans supported by 20 Subcap ships was more efficent then 5 titans due to the bonuses they present to each other.
Noone enjoys beeing on the reciving end of big nerfs and i my self think tracking titans is pretty fine ...
as long as your not allowed to switch modules in combat as i have no problem with a ship that drop survivability for the ability to hit subcaps .....
and i realy want a ship BS size with low signature radius with XL size weapons that when they got the numbers realy can make a wreck of a Capital ship. make them hard for the capitals to hit and for subcaps easy to hit. and voila you got a Cap killer that cant survive in a subcap enviroment.
|

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
556
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 12:10:00 -
[2404] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:i do wish to echo my raiden. friends call for an ability to reprocess titans, however
implement a Capital Ship Disassembly Array, allow titans to be melted down to scrap, so raiden. can reprocess all their titans in a rage I bet they give great salvage after being self destructed  Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

Aurora B
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 12:17:00 -
[2405] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Weaselior wrote:i do wish to echo my raiden. friends call for an ability to reprocess titans, however
implement a Capital Ship Disassembly Array, allow titans to be melted down to scrap, so raiden. can reprocess all their titans in a rage I bet they give great salvage after being self destructed 
Seems to be only way you are able to kill one. |

Dr 0wnage
The Dark Tribe Against ALL Authorities
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 12:26:00 -
[2406] - Quote
OK, i seriously just spent the past few hours reading through every page of this post. Granted i skimmed a good portion of it or i think id still be somewhere on page 40... anyway all i see are bitching and whining from both sides of this argument and only a handful of actual real constructive posts. I think Shadoo of all damn people has contributed the most to this thread...
SO EVERYBODY, stop a minute and take a look at the situation that has caused this issue. Quite simply its the imbalance between titans and subcaps. Well, i have news that everyone doesn't seem to know... YOU CAN'T BALANCE A 90B ISK SHIP AGAINST A 60M OR 200M ISK SHIP! You just can't do it, it doesn't work! Havn't we figured that out by now?? Titans will NEVER be balanced against battleships!!
The problem is not the titans, its the broken capital ships that are supposed to fill the gap between them and the subs. The food chain that exists in EVE works well all the way up until you hit capital ships. Carriers and Dreads are very simply ineffective against sub-capital fleets. THIS is where the imbalance is! You don't have to be a damn rocket scientist to see it! We admit there's a problem but we don't want to change our current paradigm to fix it.
Lets, just for the sake of argument, say we move dreads and carriers into the anti-sub role. If they can effectively kill supcap fleets then what is their counter? Well supers of course as they can effectively kill cap fleets. But what can kill the super fleet? After some of these changes in the OP, a sub fleet! Rock, Paper, Siscors! ie. balance!!!
There are probably 100 ways to go about this but consider this solution:
Offensive and Defensive scripts for Siege and Triage modules (only changeable while not active)
Offensive Siege script +50% tracking, +50% falloff Defensive Siege script +25% to all resist? Offensive Triage script +100% to fighter dmg (allows drones to be launched) Defensive Triage script + some bonus i can't think of right now
Obviously im focusing on the offensive potential of these scripts to prove a point which is how we can very easily make these ships quite formidable against a sub-cap only fleet. With each ship type having a defined role and counter we will inevitably see more well rounded fleets being fielded.
/me is done beating the dead horse for now... -Doc |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3165
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 12:39:00 -
[2407] - Quote
Annabell Prime wrote:Honestly i don't think this is the "right" way to fix it.
The titans should present a viable threat to an enemy fleet.
with this said i think what the game is missing is A combat link instead that promotes fleets of beeing balanced. (Give bonus to fleet on composition of fleet)
so that the number of caps give a bonus to subcaps and subcaps gives a bonus to capital ships.
only then will we lose the big blobbs of ship type XX with dominate the battlefield today.
when its benefical to have several kinds of ship on the field in the fleet the FC will build there fleet with this in mind.
what if a Two titans supported by 20 Subcap ships was more efficent then 5 titans due to the bonuses they present to each other.
Noone enjoys beeing on the reciving end of big nerfs and i my self think tracking titans is pretty fine ...
as long as your not allowed to switch modules in combat as i have no problem with a ship that drop survivability for the ability to hit subcaps .....
and i realy want a ship BS size with low signature radius with XL size weapons that when they got the numbers realy can make a wreck of a Capital ship. make them hard for the capitals to hit and for subcaps easy to hit. and voila you got a Cap killer that cant survive in a subcap enviroment.
thank you for your insights from the hisec veldspar belt
"WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Derkata
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 12:46:00 -
[2408] - Quote
Gotta love Andki's responses. I'm pretty sure he is a bot that scans your alliance. If it's a titan using alliance its something to the effect of "bloooo" and if its not a titan alliance its "lulhisec".
You have yet to respond to anyone with any kind of intelligence.
Anyways, back to your trolling. |

Johnny Marzetti
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
305
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 12:51:00 -
[2409] - Quote
Derkata wrote:Gotta love Andki's responses. I'm pretty sure he is a bot that scans your alliance. If it's a titan using alliance its something to the effect of "bloooo" and if its not a titan alliance its "lulhisec".
You have yet to respond to anyone with any kind of intelligence.
Anyways, back to your trolling.
lulhisec "all you can eat asteroid buffet" in Amarr space with NOVA 5 corp in Brainfarts alliance |

Aurora B
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:01:00 -
[2410] - Quote
Dr 0wnage wrote:OK, i seriously just spent the past few hours reading through every page of this post. Granted i skimmed a good portion of it or i think id still be somewhere on page 40... anyway all i see are bitching and whining from both sides of this argument and only a handful of actual real constructive posts. I think Shadoo of all damn people has contributed the most to this thread...
SO EVERYBODY, stop a minute and take a look at the situation that has caused this issue. Quite simply its the imbalance between titans and subcaps. Well, i have news that everyone doesn't seem to know... YOU CAN'T BALANCE A 90B ISK SHIP AGAINST A 60M OR 200M ISK SHIP! You just can't do it, it doesn't work! Havn't we figured that out by now?? Titans will NEVER be balanced against battleships!!
The problem is not the titans, its the broken capital ships that are supposed to fill the gap between them and the subs. The food chain that exists in EVE works well all the way up until you hit capital ships. Carriers and Dreads are very simply ineffective against sub-capital fleets. THIS is where the imbalance is! You don't have to be a damn rocket scientist to see it! We admit there's a problem but we don't want to change our current paradigm to fix it.
Lets, just for the sake of argument, say we move dreads and carriers into the anti-sub role. If they can effectively kill supcap fleets then what is their counter? Well supers of course as they can effectively kill cap fleets. But what can kill the super fleet? After some of these changes in the OP, a sub fleet! Rock, Paper, Siscors! ie. balance!!!
There are probably 100 ways to go about this but consider this solution:
Offensive and Defensive scripts for Siege and Triage modules (only changeable while not active)
Offensive Siege script +50% tracking, +50% falloff Defensive Siege script +25% to all resist? Offensive Triage script +100% to fighter dmg (allows drones to be launched) Defensive Triage script + some bonus i can't think of right now
Obviously im focusing on the offensive potential of these scripts to prove a point which is how we can very easily make these ships quite formidable against a sub-cap only fleet. With each ship type having a defined role and counter we will inevitably see more well rounded fleets being fielded.
/me is done beating the dead horse for now... -Doc
You are correct ont the biggest problem issue. Titans need tweaking/reworking but dreads (+carriers) need the most work. |

Derkata
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:01:00 -
[2411] - Quote
Johnny Marzetti wrote:Derkata wrote:Gotta love Andki's responses. I'm pretty sure he is a bot that scans your alliance. If it's a titan using alliance its something to the effect of "bloooo" and if its not a titan alliance its "lulhisec".
You have yet to respond to anyone with any kind of intelligence.
Anyways, back to your trolling. lulhisec "all you can eat asteroid buffet" in Amarr space with NOVA 5 corp in Brainfarts alliance
You should check how often I play. I think I've played about 3 hours combined since the fall of the NC. So actually "lulfailblob" would be significantly more accurate.
PS: spai info about my corp... but but but I'm not showing my corp/alliance name    how do you know?!!? |

Orion GUardian
129
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:09:00 -
[2412] - Quote
Derkata wrote:Johnny Marzetti wrote:Derkata wrote:Gotta love Andki's responses. I'm pretty sure he is a bot that scans your alliance. If it's a titan using alliance its something to the effect of "bloooo" and if its not a titan alliance its "lulhisec".
You have yet to respond to anyone with any kind of intelligence.
Anyways, back to your trolling. lulhisec "all you can eat asteroid buffet" in Amarr space with NOVA 5 corp in Brainfarts alliance You should check how often I play. I think I've played about 3 hours combined since the fall of the NC. So actually "lulfailblob" would be significantly more accurate. PS: spai info about my corp... but but but I'm not showing my corp/alliance name     how do you know?!!?
He could just have looked ingame? |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
61
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:17:00 -
[2413] - Quote
Aurora B wrote:You are correct ont the biggest problem issue. Titans need tweaking/reworking but dreads (+carriers) need the most work.
Yes you're right, the real problem is not that Titan's can destroy subcap fleets, its that dreads and carriers can't. |

Derkata
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:27:00 -
[2414] - Quote
Orion GUardian wrote:Derkata wrote:Johnny Marzetti wrote:Derkata wrote:Gotta love Andki's responses. I'm pretty sure he is a bot that scans your alliance. If it's a titan using alliance its something to the effect of "bloooo" and if its not a titan alliance its "lulhisec".
You have yet to respond to anyone with any kind of intelligence.
Anyways, back to your trolling. lulhisec "all you can eat asteroid buffet" in Amarr space with NOVA 5 corp in Brainfarts alliance You should check how often I play. I think I've played about 3 hours combined since the fall of the NC. So actually "lulfailblob" would be significantly more accurate. PS: spai info about my corp... but but but I'm not showing my corp/alliance name     how do you know?!!? He could just have looked ingame?
The internet needs a sarcasm font. I was hoping a bunch of surprised faces would do it but alas. |

Aurora B
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:27:00 -
[2415] - Quote
Yeep wrote:Aurora B wrote:You are correct ont the biggest problem issue. Titans need tweaking/reworking but dreads (+carriers) need the most work. Yes you're right, the real problem is not that Titan's can destroy subcap fleets, its that dreads and carriers can't.
But you could possibly get one of those killed without committing your supers, maybe. |

Johnny Marzetti
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
306
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:30:00 -
[2416] - Quote
Yeep wrote:Aurora B wrote:You are correct ont the biggest problem issue. Titans need tweaking/reworking but dreads (+carriers) need the most work. Yes you're right, the real problem is not that Titan's can destroy subcap fleets, its that dreads and carriers can't.
The real problem is that there aren't enough ultimate ratmobiles in this game.
|

Johnny Marzetti
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
306
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:33:00 -
[2417] - Quote
Derkata wrote:
The internet needs a sarcasm font. I was hoping a bunch of surprised faces would do it but alas.
But then we'd miss a lot of hilarious posts. Anyhow, I wouldn't have posted anything if I hadn't seen "all you can eat asteroid buffet" -- and I'm not picking on it, I just want an excuse to type it. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:34:00 -
[2418] - Quote
Annabell Prime wrote:Honestly i don't think this is the "right" way to fix it.
The titans should present a viable threat to an enemy fleet.
CCP could maybe implement some mechanics that would allow Titan to damage/destroy all ships on the grid.
Maybe even through a cyno? |

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
193
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:46:00 -
[2419] - Quote
Sentinel Eeex wrote:Annabell Prime wrote:Honestly i don't think this is the "right" way to fix it.
The titans should present a viable threat to an enemy fleet.
CCP could maybe implement some mechanics that would allow Titan to damage/destroy all ships on the grid. Maybe even through a cyno?
I don't think that would be fair. The Titan would still attract some 'risk'.
I propose that all Titan pilots get the ability to kill any and all ships in EVE just by thinking about it. They wouldn't need to log in either.
This would totally balance Titans and fix the problems for Raiden and friends. Errrr, what was this thread about again? |

Kismeteer
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
136
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:51:00 -
[2420] - Quote
Andski is doing some pro posting in here.
In the end, balance was required. People couldn't help themselves. Dictors will at least have a chance at being able to hold down groups of solo titans. Should be interesting times. |

Aurora B
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:53:00 -
[2421] - Quote
Kismeteer wrote:Andski is doing some pro posting in here.
In the end, balance was required. People couldn't help themselves. Dictors will at least have a chance at being able to hold down groups of solo titans. Should be interesting times.
Balance yes, "quickfix" never. |

Orion GUardian
129
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:53:00 -
[2422] - Quote
Well everytime someone hops in a Titan you could give him a "You won eve, logging off now" popup that shuts down his eve....
That way they have still their endgame won, and don't disturb the 99.7% w/o Titan ;) |

Derkata
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:54:00 -
[2423] - Quote
Johnny Marzetti wrote:Derkata wrote:
The internet needs a sarcasm font. I was hoping a bunch of surprised faces would do it but alas.
But then we'd miss a lot of hilarious posts. Anyhow, I wouldn't have posted anything if I hadn't seen "all you can eat asteroid buffet" -- and I'm not picking on it, I just want an excuse to type it.
Truth be told, I laughed out loud. |

Gistatis Praefectus
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 14:26:00 -
[2424] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Did I mention this is year 2012 and not 2003? I could swear I did...Grow up and fly some ships, T1 frigates are obsolete.
This is what madposting titan pilots actually believe
|

Mirmedon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 14:30:00 -
[2425] - Quote
Can blackbirds jam these hideous space dounges yet? |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
403
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 14:43:00 -
[2426] - Quote
Mirmedon wrote:Can blackbirds jam these hideous space dounges yet?
No, because ewar immunity is obviously needed and isn't unbalanced at all because, |

Derkata
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 15:06:00 -
[2427] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:Mirmedon wrote:Can blackbirds jam these hideous space dounges yet? No, because ewar immunity is obviously needed and isn't unbalanced at all because,
because you still have space duhduhduhdhu o7o7o7o7 |

Johnny Marzetti
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
307
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 15:06:00 -
[2428] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:Mirmedon wrote:Can blackbirds jam these hideous space dounges yet? No, because ewar immunity is obviously needed and isn't unbalanced at all because,
nobody pays 80b isk for a limp space donge.
|

Derkata
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 15:12:00 -
[2429] - Quote
Gonna need to change the avatar to not look like a dong, maybe make it an anus to symbolize these changes.
EDIT: or at least make it flaccid now |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
404
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 15:24:00 -
[2430] - Quote
Avatar = Butte Plug Erebus = Boot Leviathan = Jew Nose Ragnarok = Javelin |

Johnny Marzetti
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
308
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 15:56:00 -
[2431] - Quote
Uh oh. I think this thread is haunted. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:32:00 -
[2432] - Quote
I'm scared hold my hand. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
231
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:32:00 -
[2433] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:Avatar = Butte Plug Erebus = Boot Leviathan = Jew Nose Ragnarok = Javelin Hm, I havn't thought of the Levi that way.
No wonder the avatar is (was?) the most popular. Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
293
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:39:00 -
[2434] - Quote
That's a damned fine point -- why isn't there a capship tier jammer? Like a Capital Ship ECM ship. Or a variant of the T3 Cruisers only with really overcharged jammers that can nail the bigger ships.
Capships would need a subcap escort to deal with this kind of counter (and this escort would require it's own counter, which would require it's own counter, which would in general, make for more balanced fleets).
That would definitely shake up the Capital ship endgame. Of course, it would also **** off people who were using the Titan blob crap since hey, what good is an invincible iWin button if there are actual counters to it? |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2809
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:01:00 -
[2435] - Quote
Xython wrote:That's a damned fine point -- why isn't there a capship tier jammer? Like a Capital Ship ECM ship. Or a variant of the T3 Cruisers only with really overcharged jammers that can nail the bigger ships.
Capships would need a subcap escort to deal with this kind of counter (and this escort would require it's own counter, which would require it's own counter, which would in general, make for more balanced fleets).
That would definitely shake up the Capital ship endgame. Of course, it would also **** off people who were using the Titan blob crap since hey, what good is an invincible iWin button if there are actual counters to it? because it'd be even cooler if EAS could do it |

supr3m3justic3
Imperium Technologies F0RCEFUL ENTRY
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:12:00 -
[2436] - Quote
CCP GREYSCALE, Can you rename this thread, Eve-O CFC Troll Pit stop..
Kthx |

Andski
GoonWaffe
3172
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:29:00 -
[2437] - Quote
anybody want to hear a joke?
titans "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

FeralShadow
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
75
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:33:00 -
[2438] - Quote
Tbh they are pretty funny. The avatar looks like a giant space ****. Go look up space**** on reddit, and you'll find "avatars" all over :evil: Successful "carebear" attitudes:-áhttps://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=37279 |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:37:00 -
[2439] - Quote
Andski wrote:anybody want to hear a joke?
titans
THIS IS AN INTERVENTION
I AM HERE FOR YOU, WE CARE ABOUT YOU.
You're addicted to posting on EVE-O, it's unhealthy, but we can work through this.
Check your posting history, it's scary, I'm genuinely worried for you, friend. 8 hours a day for at least the last week, posting at 5-10 minute intervals. That is not normal.
There's more to life than posting on an internet spaceship forum and there are avenues you can pursue to curb this.
PLEASE SEEK HELP.
WE CARE ABOUT YOU. |

Dusty H Lens
French Advance LLC
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:38:00 -
[2440] - Quote
Wait!
They can still mount mining lasers right? I don't want to lose my endgame. |

Andski
GoonWaffe
3174
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:54:00 -
[2441] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Andski wrote:anybody want to hear a joke?
titans THIS IS AN INTERVENTION I AM HERE FOR YOU, WE CARE ABOUT YOU. You're addicted to posting on EVE-O, it's unhealthy, but we can work through this. Check your posting history, it's scary, I'm genuinely worried for you, friend. 8 hours a day for at least the last week, posting at 5-10 minute intervals. That is not normal. There's more to life than posting on an internet spaceship forum and there are avenues you can pursue to curb this. PLEASE SEEK HELP. WE CARE ABOUT YOU.
my sanity "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Derkata
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:56:00 -
[2442] - Quote
I think we need to give the Covetor a ship bonus: Mining a Super Capital Removes EWAR Immunity
That solves like 3 problems at once, use for a useless ship, removes stupid immunity, gets miners involved. |

Dusty H Lens
French Advance LLC
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:05:00 -
[2443] - Quote
Derkata wrote:I think we need to give the Covetor a ship bonus: Mining a Super Capital Removes EWAR Immunity
That solves like 3 problems at once, use for a useless ship, removes stupid immunity, gets miners involved.
Or simply make it so one can mine a Titan. That way everyone swapping out buckets of tears (don't forget to rehydrate!) can recoup their perceived losses and blobs of pvp Covetors can be the answer to cap fleets everyone has been asking for.
I think they did something like that in WW II. RL references. |

Nao Oikawasan
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:08:00 -
[2444] - Quote
At 0800 this morning "Team Tech", who had promised to superblob CFC for control of three moons, instead sat in front of their computers, sobbing and rocking, refusing to login and help the brave few souls who were being slaughtered by the Goons. We know they were in front of their computers because they had all promised to take off of work and do this. A concerned citizen when round to an absent participant's house to make sure he hadn't hurt himself and got no answer, aside from loud crying and a muffled "mummy, mummy, why did they do this? I HATE IT." Has RDN. been broken? |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
63
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:08:00 -
[2445] - Quote
FeralShadow wrote:Go ... on reddit
No don't  |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
588
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:14:00 -
[2446] - Quote
The problem with ships designed to be a very specific and high threat to another ship is it immediately becomes primary. See all super capital overview tabs that is for HICs and dictors only. Sure make some ships more of a threat, but every ship should be some form of threat no matter what.
|

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:21:00 -
[2447] - Quote
Andski wrote:Dez Affinity wrote:Andski wrote:anybody want to hear a joke?
titans THIS IS AN INTERVENTION I AM HERE FOR YOU, WE CARE ABOUT YOU. You're addicted to posting on EVE-O, it's unhealthy, but we can work through this. Check your posting history, it's scary, I'm genuinely worried for you, friend. 8 hours a day for at least the last week, posting at 5-10 minute intervals. That is not normal. There's more to life than posting on an internet spaceship forum and there are avenues you can pursue to curb this. PLEASE SEEK HELP. WE CARE ABOUT YOU. my sanity
Never. Stop. Posting. |

Derkata
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:37:00 -
[2448] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:The problem with ships designed to be a very specific and high threat to another ship is it immediately becomes primary. See all super capital overview tabs that is for HICs and dictors only. Sure make some ships more of a threat, but every ship should be some form of threat no matter what.
Make it all mining lasers remove EWAR immune then, holy eff watch out for the industry hot drop. |

Aurora B
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:49:00 -
[2449] - Quote
Nao Oikawasan wrote:At 0800 this morning "Team Tech", who had promised to superblob CFC for control of three moons, instead sat in front of their computers, sobbing and rocking, refusing to login and help the brave few souls who were being slaughtered by the Goons. We know they were in front of their computers because they had all promised to take off of work and do this. A concerned citizen when round to an absent participant's house to make sure he hadn't hurt himself and got no answer, aside from loud crying and a muffled "mummy, mummy, why did they do this? I HATE IT." Has RDN. been broken?
Listening to ghetto ***** Vile again? |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:56:00 -
[2450] - Quote
GallowsCalibrator wrote:
Never. Stop. Posting.
Not empty quoting. |

DaiTengu
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
53
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 19:26:00 -
[2451] - Quote
Dusty H Lens wrote:Wait!
They can still mount mining lasers right? I don't want to lose my endgame.
Yes, but now you have a chance of missing the high-value asteroids since they're so small.
|

Sotar Armana
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 19:28:00 -
[2452] - Quote
Didn't want those moons anyway. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
410
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 19:42:00 -
[2453] - Quote
Aurora B wrote:Nao Oikawasan wrote:At 0800 this morning "Team Tech", who had promised to superblob CFC for control of three moons, instead sat in front of their computers, sobbing and rocking, refusing to login and help the brave few souls who were being slaughtered by the Goons. We know they were in front of their computers because they had all promised to take off of work and do this. A concerned citizen when round to an absent participant's house to make sure he hadn't hurt himself and got no answer, aside from loud crying and a muffled "mummy, mummy, why did they do this? I HATE IT." Has RDN. been broken? Listening to ghetto ***** Vile again?
Considering we have spies in your alliance, we know it's a fact.
But please, deflect away~~ |

Agente
Milking Interstellar Incorporated.
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 19:43:00 -
[2454] - Quote
I just saw CCP_Diagoras statistics and have to completely agree with goons.
Titans awarded 0.62% of the kills last year and that incredibly high number is a good reason to explain why the I-Win deserves to be nerfed.
The I-Win button killing 62% of the ships is clearly overpowered and it must be nerfed because it is impossible to wage war against this odds.
No, wait, it is 0.62%. lol
You where defeated by that? re-lol
|

Andski
GoonWaffe
3176
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 19:59:00 -
[2455] - Quote
Agente wrote:I just saw CCP_Diagoras statistics and have to completely agree with goons.
Titans awarded 0.62% of the kills last year and that incredibly high number is a good reason to explain why the I-Win deserves to be nerfed.
The I-Win button killing 62% of the ships is clearly overpowered and it must be nerfed because it is impossible to wage war against this odds.
No, wait, it is 0.62%. lol
You where defeated by that? re-lol
keep scratching veldspar "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

RDevz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 19:59:00 -
[2456] - Quote
Agente wrote:I just saw CCP_Diagoras statistics and have to completely agree with goons.
Titans awarded 0.62% of the kills last year and that incredibly high number is a good reason to explain why the I-Win deserves to be nerfed.
The I-Win button killing 62% of the ships is clearly overpowered and it must be nerfed because it is impossible to wage war against this odds.
No, wait, it is 0.62%. lol
You where defeated by that? re-lol
It's very difficult to use titans for highsec ice interdiction. :( |

Johnny Marzetti
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
312
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:03:00 -
[2457] - Quote
Agente wrote:I just saw CCP_Diagoras statistics and have to completely agree with goons.
Titans awarded 0.62% of the kills last year and that incredibly high number is a good reason to explain why the I-Win deserves to be nerfed.
The I-Win button killing 62% of the ships is clearly overpowered and it must be nerfed because it is impossible to wage war against this odds.
No, wait, it is 0.62%. lol
You where defeated by that? re-lol
You were defeated by not having a basic understanding of statistics. re-re-lol |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:11:00 -
[2458] - Quote
Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber....
Just leaving this here. |

Warde Guildencrantz
TunDraGon
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:15:00 -
[2459] - Quote
Kissapasi wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:This will require a reasonably significant amount of work, which we unfortunately don't have the spare resources for right now. - We have revamped the rookie ships which are the first ships new players see in the game. You can read, and see, all the changes to the Ibis, Impairor, Reaper and Velator in this blog.Sounds like CCP is using their resources well to make the game better for us all. Well, the at least newbship models were completely broken for so long time so it is great that they finally fixed them! Good work CCP.
Nice one bro, I guess the art designers should be working on game mechanics then?
The last patch barely contained any mechanic changes, if at all. That shows some work is currently being done, since there is a group SOLELY based on working on and balancing game mechanics. If nothing was released, they can't go to work and do absolutely nothing, so CLEARLY they have to be doing something.
Horrible comparison, horrible comment.
|

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:15:00 -
[2460] - Quote
Jake Warbird wrote:Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Just leaving this here.
Just leaving a roll of tinfoil for you here. |

Andski
GoonWaffe
3176
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:18:00 -
[2461] - Quote
Jake Warbird wrote:Mike712 wrote:So goons fly blobs of 2 LSE perma MWDing drakes(read massive sig, in fact as big as a carrier) against titans for 2 months to make them look OP, then titans get nerfed.
Good job goons/mittens now you should have the upper hand against a foe who you greatly outnumber.... Just leaving this here.
indeed, the opinions of battleclinic morons are relevant in discussions about 0.0 warfare "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Nao Oikawasan
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:19:00 -
[2462] - Quote
Aurora B wrote:Nao Oikawasan wrote:At 0800 this morning "Team Tech", who had promised to superblob CFC for control of three moons, instead sat in front of their computers, sobbing and rocking, refusing to login and help the brave few souls who were being slaughtered by the Goons. We know they were in front of their computers because they had all promised to take off of work and do this. A concerned citizen when round to an absent participant's house to make sure he hadn't hurt himself and got no answer, aside from loud crying and a muffled "mummy, mummy, why did they do this? I HATE IT." Has RDN. been broken? Listening to ghetto ***** Vile again?
What is the new CCP tagline again?
Oh yeah........I WAS THERE!
Luckily, I don't think I'll be THERE much longer. Just long enough to figure out when I want to burn my main and get some revenge for the waste of my time by "Team Tech". Already have a fair group of dissidents ready to do the same. I suppose we should be thankful to Goons for showing us just how heavy the yoke of slavery to a fail coalition truly is. See you on the other side, Goons. It will be glorious. |

Andski
GoonWaffe
3176
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:32:00 -
[2463] - Quote
Nao Oikawasan wrote:Luckily, I don't think I'll be THERE much longer. Just long enough to figure out when I want to burn my main and get some revenge for the waste of my time by "Team Tech". Already have a fair group of dissidents ready to do the same. I suppose we should be thankful to Goons for showing us just how heavy the yoke of slavery to a fail coalition truly is. See you on the other side, Goons. It will be glorious.
huh "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Aurora B
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:35:00 -
[2464] - Quote
Nao Oikawasan wrote:Aurora B wrote:Nao Oikawasan wrote:At 0800 this morning "Team Tech", who had promised to superblob CFC for control of three moons, instead sat in front of their computers, sobbing and rocking, refusing to login and help the brave few souls who were being slaughtered by the Goons. We know they were in front of their computers because they had all promised to take off of work and do this. A concerned citizen when round to an absent participant's house to make sure he hadn't hurt himself and got no answer, aside from loud crying and a muffled "mummy, mummy, why did they do this? I HATE IT." Has RDN. been broken? Listening to ghetto ***** Vile again? What is the new CCP tagline again? Oh yeah........I WAS THERE! Luckily, I don't think I'll be THERE much longer. Just long enough to figure out when I want to burn my main and get some revenge for the waste of my time by "Team Tech". Already have a fair group of dissidents ready to do the same. I suppose we should be thankful to Goons for showing us just how heavy the yoke of slavery to a fail coalition truly is. See you on the other side, Goons. It will be glorious.
I think you have Lupus |

Derkata
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:41:00 -
[2465] - Quote
CCP Mittani wrote:Andski, as our super-troll I need you to flood the forums
Found this while doing spai stuff. |

Berke Negri
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
60
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 21:08:00 -
[2466] - Quote
i for one am inspired that Aurora B, in an act of bravery, went against the wishes of raidenDOT high command and courageously posts with their main |

Berke Negri
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
60
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 21:08:00 -
[2467] - Quote
too bad they're just a goon false flag alt anyhow |

Mac Zehn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 21:10:00 -
[2468] - Quote
This is a brilliant thread filled with brilliant people discussing brilliant things. |

Aurora B
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 21:20:00 -
[2469] - Quote
Shadoo wrote:I don't think anyone who has flown a titan in combat can argue that the ship is not currently overpowered in combat when used in great numbers, just like no one could seriously argue about AOD DDs when they started to be used in 3+3 scale every 10 minutes
Of course, same goes for every ship in eve -- when used in great numbers, but Supercapitals certainly show this curve more often on the field
So I'm extremely happy that you state that the ship needs a role change - last time we were campaigning for AOD DD change -- this was exactly what a lot of us were asking for
But that was 3 years ago
I am therefore rather dissapointed that what we, the community at large, have been asking for a very long time is rather haphazardly brushed off as something that "will be looked at long term" with a surgical change that SCREAMS of a kneejerk reaction without really providing us with much to go on here to see your vision or have comfort you are going to do something in the long term for the "end game" ship in EVE
And forgive me for saying this -- but you have not always had a great track record of revisiting changes you've made in the past as surgical adjustments. Thus I feel like pressing a bit harder on the high level thoughts that have lead you to make this current fix
What is your intended role for Titan with this change on TQ today?
How will you evaluate if your changes implemented will match up with that role on the TQ combat field in this release? For example -- as far as I can see -- a large group of titans will still obliterate a large group of battleships/drakes -- all you've delayed is the first hit and require more micromanagement in making sure the lock queue is evenly spaced out
Given how large fights today unfold on TQ -- how do you see this ship fulfilling your intended role on heavily TiDi systems with the sig change
What is your future vision, even at high level, for the Titan ship class? Will it remain a combat asset or are you looking and overhauling it for something else (personally btw I've argued for the last 4 years that titans should NOT be a combat ship at all, but rather a massive alliance level asset for logistics/cloning/staging/etc)
What assurances can you offer us this change will not remain a permanent fixture for the long term?
With the combat ability of this ship being "surgically adjusted", would you be even willing to look at for example increasing the jump range of the ship to balance the change
And lastly -- are you going to allow those pilots who wish to wait for your stated longer term role adjustments to GM-dock their ship until such a time that this change is no longer a surgical measure in order to still utilize the account/character for combat in EVE?
Yes, this thread has brilliant post, not by your side though. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 21:27:00 -
[2470] - Quote
Aurora B wrote:Yes, this thread has brilliant post, not by your side though.
a bloo bloo bloo |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
411
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 21:49:00 -
[2471] - Quote
Aurora B wrote:Yes, this thread has brilliant post, not by your side though.
Too bad that Shadoo is right and you're wrong.
In fact, most of the PL posters have been decently levelheaded about it all, while your alliance has done nothing but whine and then send out an alliance wide mail saying to stop posting on your mains.
Heh.
Nerd. |

Berke Negri
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
60
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 22:18:00 -
[2472] - Quote
makes sense that raidenDOT would have to rely on PL to make posts |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
281
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 22:47:00 -
[2473] - Quote
ASCMD (All Super-Capitals Must Die).
Because...
Because...errrrm...
Well, because **** them, that's why. In irae, veritas. |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
718
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 05:25:00 -
[2474] - Quote
A counter to titan blobs:
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12761765
works better than drakes. The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
326
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 06:57:00 -
[2475] - Quote
Tell me more about how the death of an comedy titan fit with smartbombs and no tank has any relevance to the tracking abilities of massed XL guns. ~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever.
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006 |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
718
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 07:24:00 -
[2476] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:Tell me more about how the death of an comedy titan fit with smartbombs and no tank has any relevance to the tracking abilities of massed XL guns.
More tracking = less tank maybe?
More tracking = easier to gank maybe?
More tracking = greater risk of losing the ship to a half thought out fleet composition that, surprisingly, is cap heavy?
And did you miss the rest of the titans in that battle report? They could have been there from anytime tho The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
94
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 07:32:00 -
[2477] - Quote
LOL heres the other side of that story . . .
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&kll_id=12761765 |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
718
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 08:05:00 -
[2478] - Quote
Yep, a lot of dreads died alright... but you would have to assume they were insured (well, they would be if smart people were in them..) The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

Cyaron wars
D00M. Northern Coalition.
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 08:05:00 -
[2479] - Quote
You can link many killmails and say different things, but you all will be wrong. As one guy already posted in this thread: You cannot balance 70 billion ship vs 200 million ship. With same success you can try to balance Lamborghini vs Volkswagen Golf. Any attempt that you make will fail since it will be wrong from very beginning. CCP should balance titans and supers against capitas and balance capitals against subcaps. that is the main point. |

Berke Negri
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
62
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 08:17:00 -
[2480] - Quote
Headerman wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:Tell me more about how the death of an comedy titan fit with smartbombs and no tank has any relevance to the tracking abilities of massed XL guns. More tracking = less tank maybe? More tracking = easier to gank maybe? More tracking = greater risk of losing the ship to a half thought out fleet composition that, surprisingly, is cap heavy? And did you miss the rest of the titans in that battle report? They could have been there from anytime tho PL didn't get there in enough time and the pilot supposedly missed an opportunity to refit into something less terrible because he tried to log off forgetting that winter is here |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
326
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 08:32:00 -
[2481] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:You can link many killmails and say different things, but you all will be wrong. As one guy already posted in this thread: You cannot balance 70 billion ship vs 200 million ship. With same success you can try to balance Lamborghini vs Volkswagen Golf. Any attempt that you make will fail since it will be wrong from very beginning. CCP should balance titans and supers against capitas and balance capitals against subcaps. that is the main point. My bot made me more ISK therefore I should win! ~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever.
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006 |

Ed Hardi
Evej0ke
43
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 10:43:00 -
[2482] - Quote
CCP = GOON PETs  |

Dr 0wnage
The Dark Tribe Against ALL Authorities
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 11:17:00 -
[2483] - Quote
Actually, this is how it should work...
killed (144.04B ISK) lost (75.38B ISK)
When you bring capitals to fight anti-capital ships, shouldn't they die? |

Andski
GoonWaffe
3180
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 11:29:00 -
[2484] - Quote
good god you're retarded aren't you
one shitfit titan dying to dreads in lowsec (no DDs) is irrelevant "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
718
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 12:00:00 -
[2485] - Quote
Andski wrote:good god you're all retar ded aren't you one shitfit titan dying to dreads in lowsec (no DDs) is irrelevant
Oh well, you just keep sending them drakes, i am sure they will kill something... one day  The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

Berke Negri
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
66
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 12:04:00 -
[2486] - Quote
and it will probably the fc's pod in a thunderdome |

Miner Leo
Core Mining United Industries
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 12:07:00 -
[2487] - Quote
Maybe the only solution in order to make it balanced / stable would be to completly change the role of a Titan imo change its Class even and introduce new Classes of Capital ships given them all more Specefic roles similar to T2 Frigs but without the Freedom in customizing. Also **If** Possible, Change Attributes or how Cap-sized modules work for Example: Have this makes you that much better but in turn, you lose a Turret / Missile Point.
If no added classes, then titans / capitals need Hard points so that the Smaller classes can destroy example: Bridge, which for instance would make you unavailable to change direction, jump or anything 'Electronical' etc etc and after said hard points destroyed. The Capital self-destructs. And with this in mind, Titan should have most hardpoints out of it imo. Remove DD weaponary completly and rather give 16 turret / missile slots cause that attracts sci-fi lovers. It's stupid and no logic behind how a ship nearly 2 miles long is more like a passive Truck with Heavy machine gun mounted.. Should more be like Bishmark/Yamoto/Iowa etc.
Another thing, Make restrictions to Alliances etc. So that a Alliance can maximum support a number of these Titans and Motherships to a low amount while Dreads/carriers nearly unlimited.
(Example, 1 titan - 2 mother ship per Corporation)..
Something quite similar would make the Super caps rare and Titans rare but still kicking ass when fielded. Instead of using it like the ultimate domino brick.
And CCP.. Could you do something about Capitals Velocity? like Every singel one of them.. It's mass and it drags someone down but would beilive when 1/3 of a ship is the propulsion system.. it would move faster... If every ship in eve moved 100% faster.. We would talk fun fast phased action and you could see Capitals move forward without viewing it and look at the thrusters.. :-/
Time to drink another one! cheers :D
|

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
326
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 12:16:00 -
[2488] - Quote
Miner Leo wrote:Maybe the only solution in order to make it balanced / stable would be to completly change the role of a Titan
That seems to be the plan.
Hotfixing XL tracking isn't the end point for Titans, its merely to cut out one of the more glaring imbalances while CCP works on a proper role for them that doesn't begin and end with 'killing literally everything in sight' and helps clarify that there are no 'endgame' hulls in Eve. ~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever.
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006 |

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
194
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 12:21:00 -
[2489] - Quote
Headerman wrote:Andski wrote:good god you're all retar ded aren't you one shitfit titan dying to dreads in lowsec (no DDs) is irrelevant Oh well, you just keep sending them drakes, i am sure they will kill something... one day 
Think you and all the rest of the Anti-Titan nerf brigade are missing a very important point.....no-one brings Drakes to kill Titans.
I've seen the videos and other threads about this and the fights usually go something like this.
Goons/FA/FCON/RZR/SMA + Friends bring a sub-cap fleet to fight Init./Raiden./Ev0ke/NC./PL/-A-/Hell4s + Friends (lol? and you guys whine about blobs, you serious??) sub-cap fleet.
Init./Raiden./Ev0ke/NC./PL/-A-/Hell4s + Friends realise they are losing and jump in a ton of Titans/Super Caps and then run to the forums to say Titans aren't OP as Goons + Friends are using the wrong tactics in countering them.
I have yet to see anything that suggests that anyone is solely using Drakes to actively engage Titans or Super Caps.
It's always the sub-cap fight wrecked by Init./Raiden./Ev0ke/NC./PL/-A-/Hell4s + Friends jumping in their Titans when they are losing.
But 10/10 for your obfuscation and sleight of hand maneuvers to try and justify your points. |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 12:24:00 -
[2490] - Quote
I would say the simplest method to balance (quickfix like) titans without upsetting too many people would be to simply nerf the tank of supercaps so that a fully tank fitted titan has 3x the EHP of a Dread. That would mean that a tracking titan would have 1x the EHP of a dread and could be alphaed with a hige mael fleet. Furthermore, the mobility/ force projection of all supercaps should be nerfed to hell. You know, the biggest disadvantage of huge weapons was always the lack of mobility and flexibility. |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 12:34:00 -
[2491] - Quote
Smiling Menace wrote:
I've seen the videos and other threads about this and the fights usually go something like this.
We were actually there and haven't read about it on forums so plz stop talking about things you have no clue about.
Quote: Goons/FA/FCON/RZR/SMA + Friends bring a sub-cap fleet to fight Init./Raiden./Ev0ke/NC./PL/-A-/Hell4s + Friends (lol? and you guys whine about blobs, you serious??) sub-cap fleet.
Number of alliances != number of ships in the fleet or rather fleets. CFC never engages us without having an advantage in numbers.
Quote: Init./Raiden./Ev0ke/NC./PL/-A-/Hell4s + Friends realise they are losing and jump in a ton of Titans/Super Caps and then run to the forums to say Titans aren't OP as Goons + Friends are using the wrong tactics in countering them.
Yeah, what a suprise team dot uses its supers in order to counterbalance the CFC numbers. CFC certainly never expects that. They are surprised every singe time. 
Quote: I have yet to see anything that suggests that anyone is solely using Drakes to actively engage Titans or Super Caps.
Than stop reading forums and watching videos and join a CFC fleet instead.
Quote: It's always the sub-cap fight wrecked by Init./Raiden./Ev0ke/NC./PL/-A-/Hell4s + Friends jumping in their Titans when they are losing.
And you came to this conclusion by reading goon propaganda? I am not sure why I am even answering your post...
|

Orion GUardian
131
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 12:36:00 -
[2492] - Quote
Smiling Menace wrote:Headerman wrote:Andski wrote:good god you're all retar ded aren't you one shitfit titan dying to dreads in lowsec (no DDs) is irrelevant Oh well, you just keep sending them drakes, i am sure they will kill something... one day  Think you and all the rest of the Anti-Titan nerf brigade are missing a very important point.....no-one brings Drakes to kill Titans. I've seen the videos and other threads about this and the fights usually go something like this. Goons/FA/FCON/RZR/SMA + Friends bring a sub-cap fleet to fight Init./Raiden./Ev0ke/NC./PL/-A-/Hell4s + Friends (lol? and you guys whine about blobs, you serious??) sub-cap fleet. Init./Raiden./Ev0ke/NC./PL/-A-/Hell4s + Friends realise they are losing and jump in a ton of Titans/Super Caps and then run to the forums to say Titans aren't OP as Goons + Friends are using the wrong tactics in countering them. I have yet to see anything that suggests that anyone is solely using Drakes to actively engage Titans or Super Caps. It's always the sub-cap fight wrecked by Init./Raiden./Ev0ke/NC./PL/-A-/Hell4s + Friends jumping in their Titans when they are losing. But 10/10 for your obfuscation and sleight of hand maneuvers to try and justify your points.
Beautiful summary of whats happening. Oh and getting blueballed by RaidenDOT and friends happens alot as well ;). |

Orion GUardian
131
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 12:41:00 -
[2493] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:
Yeah, what a suprise team dot uses its supers in order to counterbalance the CFC numbers. CFC certainly never expects that. They are surprised every singe time
Well lying seems not to be above you. More often than not the DOT coalition brings about the same amount of people to a fight as the CFC. So they are blobbing as much as we do. Sometimes they outnumber us anyway and we still fight. A little different from DOTs tactics: "Oh noes, Goons got 50 ships more than us... BRING TITANS!" and if Titans are not avaible just don't show up... "We didn't want this Region anyway" And you are surprised Titans get a nerfbat?
Btw I doubt some Highsec NSC corper goes into Nullsec that much, at least post with your main, coward. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 13:02:00 -
[2494] - Quote
Cyaron wars wrote:You can link many killmails and say different things, but you all will be wrong. As one guy already posted in this thread: You cannot balance 70 billion ship vs 200 million ship. With same success you can try to balance Lamborghini vs Volkswagen Golf. Any attempt that you make will fail since it will be wrong from very beginning. CCP should balance titans and supers against capitas and balance capitals against subcaps. that is the main point.
Hahaha.
Ok, so tell me - can you balance 70 billion ship vs 350 200 million ships? |

Berke Negri
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
66
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 13:03:00 -
[2495] - Quote
i never understood why a person living in nullsec like a raidenDOT pilot would have to post with an npc alt
what can people do, wardec your corp?
oh no that's right raidenDOT directorate is so embarrassed of their posting they order them to not post with their mains |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 13:15:00 -
[2496] - Quote
Headerman wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:Tell me more about how the death of an comedy titan fit with smartbombs and no tank has any relevance to the tracking abilities of massed XL guns. More tracking = less tank maybe? More tracking = easier to gank maybe? More tracking = greater risk of losing the ship to a half thought out fleet composition that, surprisingly, is cap heavy? And did you miss the rest of the titans in that battle report? They could have been there from anytime tho
What you are saying is - you have no idea what happened there, but are using it as an argument anyway?
Sweet  |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 13:18:00 -
[2497] - Quote
Orion GUardian wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:
Yeah, what a suprise team dot uses its supers in order to counterbalance the CFC numbers. CFC certainly never expects that. They are surprised every singe time
Well lying seems not to be above you. More often than not the DOT coalition brings about the same amount of people to a fight as the CFC. So they are blobbing as much as we do. Sometimes they outnumber us anyway and we still fight. A little different from DOTs tactics: "Oh noes, Goons got 50 ships more than us... BRING TITANS!" and if Titans are not avaible just don't show up... "We didn't want this Region anyway" And you are surprised Titans get a nerfbat? Btw I doubt some Highsec NSC corper goes into Nullsec that much, at least post with your main, coward.
Oh please, how did the whole thing start? Raiden asked for help because you have started to openly threaten them. Everyone has seen your 900 man blobs and knew that RDN wouldn't stand a chance even with their supers.
And there is a huge misperception from your side. When team dot doesn't show up it is simply because we don't get enough people into the fleet to achieve at least a 2 cfc to 1 team dot ratio. Simply because our whole coalition is much smaller than yours. http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance Simply do your math. + NC. and PL are not always around due to merc contracts but even with them, you still outnumber us.
You fight Raiden, Evoks and Init most of the time. The number of members of these three alliances combined are by far smaller than the Goonswarm alone!
Oh, and I would understand your whining if the CFC would be some kind of poor alliance without the ability to counter our supers. But you simply don't have the balls to do so for what reason ever. We risk our supers every time we bring them on field. Your alliance seems only to be able to field cheap ships even though you have a shitload of tech. And then you wonder why your horde of peasants with pitch forks is losing against a well equiped army. Hillarious!
P.S: I won't comment on this issue any further, this is not what this thread should be about. P.P.S: I still agree that the titans should be balanced.... I just think that this should be done properly instead of turning them into giant stargates. According to PL this changes will not change anything, though. Which makes the proposed changes even more stupid. |

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
195
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 13:36:00 -
[2498] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:And you came to this conclusion by reading goon propaganda? I am not sure why I am even answering your post...
LMAO! Actually it was from reading the forums from/about Raiden. and watching their videos on Youtube. Your own 'propaganda' is not painting your argument in a good light.
I rarely if ever bother with Goon propaganda as it's not that great to be honest. You can see the punchlines coming a mile off with them.
John Maynard Keynes wrote:Oh please, how did the whole thing start? Raiden asked for help because you have started to openly threaten them. Everyone has seen your 900 man blobs and knew that RDN wouldn't stand a chance even with their supers. And there is a huge misperception from your side. When team dot doesn't show up it is simply because we don't get enough people into the fleet to achieve at least a 2 cfc to 1 team dot ratio. Simply because our whole coalition is much smaller than yours. http://evemaps.dotlan.net/allianceSimply do your math. + NC. and PL are not always around due to merc contracts but even with them, you still outnumber us. You fight Raiden, Evoks and Init most of the time. The number of members of these three alliances combined are by far smaller than the Goonswarm alone! Oh, and I would understand your whining if the CFC would be some kind of poor alliance without the ability to counter our supers. But you simply don't have the balls to do so for what reason ever. We risk our supers every time we bring them on field. Your alliance seems only to be able to field cheap ships even though you have a shitload of tech. And then you wonder why your horde of peasants with pitch forks is losing against a well equiped army. Hillarious! P.S: I won't comment on this issue any further, this is not what this thread should be about. P.P.S: I still agree that the titans should be balanced.... I just think that this should be done properly instead of turning them into giant stargates. According to PL this changes will not change anything, though. Which makes the proposed changes even more stupid.
Raiden. may want to change their killboards then as the fights over the last 2-3 weeks have pretty much shown equal numbers in the fights between them and the CFC.
Again, out right lies and obfuscation to try and prove your points.
I suggest you read the forums and watch the Youtube videos because you say you were there, but which fights? Certainly doesn't seem to be the same one's Raiden. + Friends and the CFC have been at. |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 14:32:00 -
[2499] - Quote
Smiling Menace wrote: stuff
You know, it is hard to argue with a forum warrior. You simply take a period of your choise and claim it to be representative for the entire war. And it is not like you present any evidence.
Yes, the more often goons get supers dropped on their heads the fewer goons are apparently willing to join the fleets.
It started more like this though: http://dog-net.org/brdoc/?brid=5706
And now, everyone keep trolling and whining and forum warrioring... |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
412
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 15:43:00 -
[2500] - Quote
Ok |

Andski
GoonWaffe
3189
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 16:29:00 -
[2501] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:words
look at this pubbie trash acting like he has a clue "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
53
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 16:45:00 -
[2502] - Quote
Andski wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:words look at this pubbie trash acting like he has a clue
For just 5 dollars a month you can get this guy a hobby.
MAKE A DIFFERENCE TODAY |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
412
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 17:47:00 -
[2503] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Andski wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:words look at this pubbie trash acting like he has a clue For just 5 dollars a month you can get this guy a hobby. MAKE A DIFFERENCE TODAY
or 10bux so he can join the valiant posters on the Something Awful Dot Com forums |

Andski
GoonWaffe
3189
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 17:54:00 -
[2504] - Quote
2007 account whatup "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
412
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 17:58:00 -
[2505] - Quote
...2009 :regd09: |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
499
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 18:09:00 -
[2506] - Quote
2001 OG |

HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 18:56:00 -
[2507] - Quote
everyone after 2004 is a spy |

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 18:59:00 -
[2508] - Quote
Sorry bros been away working , any news from the devs on the changes more nerfs? |

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
196
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 19:22:00 -
[2509] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:You simply take a period of your choise and claim it to be representative for the entire war. And it is not like you present any evidence.
So do you it seems. You pick a one fight from January and point to that as representative. How about you check the Raiden. killboard for the last 6 weeks? That would be the best representation, don't you think, as that's the longer period of time.
John Maynard Keynes wrote:Yes, the more often goons get supers dropped on their heads the fewer goons are apparently willing to join the fleets.
So by this statement you are contradicting yourself. There aren't really thousands of Goons in fleets you are now saying? Also, it nice that you confirm that you do have to abuse broken game mechanics to actually win your fights.
John Maynard Keynes wrote:And now, everyone keep trolling and whining and forum warrioring...
lol I am not the one whining, trolling or forum 'warrioring' (that isn't even a word by the way).
I am only pointing out the fallacy in your statements and showing utter contempt for the lies you are spewing all over the forums in a vain attempt to somehow prove that the Titan mechanics aren't broken. By your own words you have even confirmed they are so shhh, and stop whining that your shiny ship is getting nerfed.
It happens to us all, live with it same as us non-Titan owning peons have to. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
412
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 22:31:00 -
[2510] - Quote
Hi |

Kosh Seere
Dissonance Corp BLACK-MARK
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 22:44:00 -
[2511] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:I'm changing my numbers. This thread isnt 70% sperging Goons. Its 90%. Thats funny, since after all - you have apparently "won" EVE. YAY! |

Kosh Seere
Dissonance Corp BLACK-MARK
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 23:13:00 -
[2512] - Quote
Headerman wrote:Andski wrote:good god you're all retar ded aren't you one shitfit titan dying to dreads in lowsec (no DDs) is irrelevant Oh well, you just keep sending them drakes, i am sure they will kill something... one day 
http://www.black-mark.net/3.1.8/index.php/kill_related/26009/
Look at ze drake fleet killing Lokis abas guardians etc. |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
60
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 23:23:00 -
[2513] - Quote
Hi guis!! I thought I would dip my toe in here and remind everyone of one thing.......the CFC are free to log in their Supers at anytime. The fact is your FC's feel they are too incompetent to use them so they distract you with "imbalance issues" to hide this fact.
The CFC out number everyone you're told to attack or, let's face it, you would'nt attack. You have just as many, if not more, Super caps than anyone you attack. Yet you're cowards and to scared to use them.
You only throw fleets at fights where you have 2/1 favor. As the fight escalates to Capitals your FC's choose to run instead of logging in your own Supers to fight. This is EVE, 0.0 warfare is where the strong survive, not the ones too scared to use big boy toys. Since you are too fail to use the ships that are required during any size fleet fight escalation, you tell CCP to nerf that which you are too scared to use.
Sorry to call you out on this but the facts are so clear........even I can see it for Jita 4-4... . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.......... [url]http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753[/url]
|

RDevz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 00:16:00 -
[2514] - Quote
It's amazing how playing station games in Jita qualifies you to talk about titans. |

Sethur Blackcoat
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 00:18:00 -
[2515] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Hi guis!! I thought I would dip my toe in here and remind everyone of one thing.......the CFC are free to log in their Supers at anytime. The fact is your FC's feel they are too incompetent to use them so they distract you with "imbalance issues" to hide this fact. The CFC out number everyone you're told to attack or, let's face it, you would'nt attack. You have just as many, if not more, Super caps than anyone you attack. Yet you're cowards and to scared to use them. You only throw fleets at fights where you have 2/1 favor. As the fight escalates to Capitals your FC's choose to run instead of logging in your own Supers to fight. This is EVE, 0.0 warfare is where the strong survive, not the ones too scared to use big boy toys. Since you are too fail to use the ships that are required during any size fleet fight escalation, you tell CCP to nerf that which you are too scared to use. Sorry to call you out on this but the facts are so clear........even I can see it for Jita 4-4...  . WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
328
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 00:34:00 -
[2516] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Hi guis!! I thought I would dip my toe in here and remind everyone of one thing.......the CFC are free to log in their Supers at anytime. The fact is your FC's feel they are too incompetent to use them so they distract you with "imbalance issues" to hide this fact. The CFC out number everyone you're told to attack or, let's face it, you would'nt attack. You have just as many, if not more, Super caps than anyone you attack. Yet you're cowards and to scared to use them. You only throw fleets at fights where you have 2/1 favor. As the fight escalates to Capitals your FC's choose to run instead of logging in your own Supers to fight. This is EVE, 0.0 warfare is where the strong survive, not the ones too scared to use big boy toys. Since you are too fail to use the ships that are required during any size fleet fight escalation, you tell CCP to nerf that which you are too scared to use. Sorry to call you out on this but the facts are so clear........even I can see it for Jita 4-4...  . you were supposed to use your npc alt to post itt ~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever.
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006 |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
60
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 00:53:00 -
[2517] - Quote
RDevz wrote:It's amazing how playing station games in Jita qualifies you to talk about titans. What's to be qualified for? Everyone has access to the same ships in EVE, you have more pilots than any coalition in EVE, yet you're tying to make it sound like other alliances have some sort of unfair advantage over you? Face it, it's simply your FC's are too scared to use Super Caps....so you want them nerf'd.
What else are your FC's scared of that CCP needs to nerf? . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.......... [url]http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753[/url]
|

Kosh Seere
Dissonance Corp BLACK-MARK
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 01:25:00 -
[2518] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Hi guis!! I thought I would dip my toe in here and remind everyone of one thing.......the CFC are free to log in their Supers at anytime. The fact is your FC's feel they are too incompetent to use them so they distract you with "imbalance issues" to hide this fact. The CFC out number everyone you're told to attack or, let's face it, you would'nt attack. You have just as many, if not more, Super caps than anyone you attack. Yet you're cowards and to scared to use them. You only throw fleets at fights where you have 2/1 favor. As the fight escalates to Capitals your FC's choose to run instead of logging in your own Supers to fight. This is EVE, 0.0 warfare is where the strong survive, not the ones too scared to use big boy toys. Since you are too fail to use the ships that are required during any size fleet fight escalation, you tell CCP to nerf that which you are too scared to use. Sorry to call you out on this but the facts are so clear........even I can see it for Jita 4-4...  . Jita -------------------------------------> that way, go away pubbie.... |

Kosh Seere
Dissonance Corp BLACK-MARK
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 01:29:00 -
[2519] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:RDevz wrote:It's amazing how playing station games in Jita qualifies you to talk about titans. What's to be qualified for? Everyone has access to the same ships in EVE, you have more pilots than any coalition in EVE, yet you're tying to make it sound like other alliances have some sort of unfair advantage over you? Face it, it's simply your FC's are too scared to use Super Caps....so you want them nerf'd. What else are your FC's scared of that CCP needs to nerf? . You actually asking that question just shows how little you know; now stfu and go concentrate about shooting noobs on the undock in jita.
Edit: Oh btw nice wardec u had on BLM last time, 1 kill..... a pod. |

Sir Marksalot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 01:46:00 -
[2520] - Quote
Kosh Seere wrote:Snot Shot wrote:RDevz wrote:It's amazing how playing station games in Jita qualifies you to talk about titans. What's to be qualified for? Everyone has access to the same ships in EVE, you have more pilots than any coalition in EVE, yet you're tying to make it sound like other alliances have some sort of unfair advantage over you? Face it, it's simply your FC's are too scared to use Super Caps....so you want them nerf'd. What else are your FC's scared of that CCP needs to nerf? . You actually asking that question just shows how little you know; now stfu and go concentrate about shooting noobs on the undock in jita. Edit: Oh btw nice wardec u had on BLM last time, 1 kill..... a pod.
i like your idea, i shall see about implementing it soon |

Andski
GoonWaffe
3202
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 02:30:00 -
[2521] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:RDevz wrote:It's amazing how playing station games in Jita qualifies you to talk about titans. What's to be qualified for? Everyone has access to the same ships in EVE, you have more pilots than any coalition in EVE, yet you're tying to make it sound like other alliances have some sort of unfair advantage over you? Face it, it's simply your FC's are too scared to use Super Caps....so you want them nerf'd. What else are your FC's scared of that CCP needs to nerf? .
fly away~ "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 03:48:00 -
[2522] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:RDevz wrote:It's amazing how playing station games in Jita qualifies you to talk about titans. What's to be qualified for? Everyone has access to the same ships in EVE, you have more pilots than any coalition in EVE, yet you're tying to make it sound like other alliances have some sort of unfair advantage over you? Face it, it's simply your FC's are too scared to use Super Caps....so you want them nerf'd. What else are your FC's scared of that CCP needs to nerf? . meanwhile at jita undock
|

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
60
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 04:34:00 -
[2523] - Quote
Kosh Seere wrote:Snot Shot wrote:Hi guis!! I thought I would dip my toe in here and remind everyone of one thing.......the CFC are free to log in their Supers at anytime. The fact is your FC's feel they are too incompetent to use them so they distract you with "imbalance issues" to hide this fact. The CFC out number everyone you're told to attack or, let's face it, you would'nt attack. You have just as many, if not more, Super caps than anyone you attack. Yet you're cowards and to scared to use them. You only throw fleets at fights where you have 2/1 favor. As the fight escalates to Capitals your FC's choose to run instead of logging in your own Supers to fight. This is EVE, 0.0 warfare is where the strong survive, not the ones too scared to use big boy toys. Since you are too fail to use the ships that are required during any size fleet fight escalation, you tell CCP to nerf that which you are too scared to use. Sorry to call you out on this but the facts are so clear........even I can see it for Jita 4-4...  . Jita -------------------------------------> that way, go away pubbie.... I guess I took the wind outa your sails here hu... Sorry for pointing out the obvious but after pages of you goonies taking credit for making CCP nerf titans, I figured we might as well tell everyone reading this thread why you pushed so hard to get them nerf'd...... . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.......... [url]http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753[/url]
|

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
718
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 07:25:00 -
[2524] - Quote
Pesadel0 wrote:Sorry bros been away working , any news from the devs on the changes more nerfs?
Yep, Devs came back and admitted it was all an April fools joke.
in actual fact trackings being buffed. The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

Falin Whalen
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
171
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 07:33:00 -
[2525] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:I guess I took the wind outa your sails here hu...  Oh Snot, you're such a pretentious windbag that you could never take the wind out of our sails.Quote:Sorry for pointing out the obvious but after pages of you goonies taking credit for making CCP nerf titans, I figured we might as well tell everyone reading this thread why you pushed so hard to get them nerf'd......  . We are not taking credit for CCP nerfing titans, PL hotdroping the CCP loot pinata fleet, did that all on their own.
You've got to remember that these are just simple miners. These are people of the land. The common clay of New Eden. You know... morons. |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 09:33:00 -
[2526] - Quote
HVAC Repairman wrote:Snot Shot wrote:RDevz wrote:It's amazing how playing station games in Jita qualifies you to talk about titans. What's to be qualified for? Everyone has access to the same ships in EVE, you have more pilots than any coalition in EVE, yet you're tying to make it sound like other alliances have some sort of unfair advantage over you? Face it, it's simply your FC's are too scared to use Super Caps....so you want them nerf'd. What else are your FC's scared of that CCP needs to nerf? . meanwhile at jita undock
I wonder if he'll be around for the victory parade |

Mynas Atoch
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 10:09:00 -
[2527] - Quote
I'm Down wrote:... adjusting tracking will not fix the problem. Just like fixing lock time also does not address the problem at all.
You developers have for years completely ignored your tracking mechanics and how utterly garbage they are. You have also ignored people informing you of why you canGÇÖt fix tracking under the current design. So let me drop this knowledge on you for why your first fix to titans has changed so little in what they do that it will have virtually 0 impact on the game after a few months of adaptation:
The current problem is that titans in large numbers can blap the ever living **** out of a fleet with basically no risk simply because they are huge HP buffers that can be repaired by motherships which are also huge HP buffers. Now I could ***** and moan about Capital Remote repairers and their range and their effectiveness, particularly on huge hp and resist stars like supers, but that would go off track of my point, so IGÇÖll avoid the temptation.
So you changed trackingGǪ big whoop. Rather than track around 220 m/s for every 10km of range, an Erebus/Rag now tracks about 110 m/s for every 10km of range. In addition, they have a gun sig size of about double that of a BS. This creates some magical world where a ship further away can be tracked better, but is some how mysteriously the same size as though range dilation has no affect at all on how well you can see that now tiny little dot. In laymanGÇÖs termsGǪ. This means that if Eve mechanics worked in the real universe, Every star in the whole freaking universe would look approximately the same size as our sun, as would all the planets in size relation to our moon rather than the tiny specs in the sky that they are. So hereGÇÖs what happens after your patch to just circumvent the whole problem you just createdGǪ. Lock time you sayGǪ Tracking speed you sayGǪ
Hello MR Proteus, Hello either 5 AEONS with 4 Domi painters or 50 Archons with 4 T2 Painters (and just for luls cause the ship is cheap, why not throw in 2 range extenders for the painters as well). Now that wonderful tengu has an 800-1200 sig and at 60km can be tracked plus has a sig size near the same as the guns do. That Maelstrom has a 1700 + sigGǪ ie bigger than the guns do, and can be tracked at about 12km rangeGǪ. And oh yeah, you can easily get those 300-400,000 ehp small sig lokis to web down anything closer than those ranges to prevent them from avoiding the tracking problemsGǪ not like tech 3GÇÖs are rare these days.
Oh but lock time you sayGǪ well if the carrier paints before the Titans ever lockGǪ. Oh yeah, Lock a tengu in 30-35 seconds, lock a Maelstrom in 23-30 secondsGǪ thatGÇÖs so brutal. Oh yeah, and thatGÇÖs just with ******* Navy tracking computers and sensor boosters, I didnGÇÖt even toss in the Meta 13-14 gear.
GeeGǪ in 20 minutes of planning and a slight modification to what my fleet roles are, IGÇÖve just circumvented your entire titan patch plans b/c you thought this was enough to warrant not changing the coding of your formulas so that they make sense.
Good thing thereGÇÖs nobody in this game who couldnGÇÖt ya know, divide their titan pilots up on mumble into 10-15 sub channels, have a few SCGÇÖs assigned to each for painting and just perform the exact same way where itGÇÖs GÇ£paint, blap, blap, boomGÇ¥ rather than the old, GÇ£blap, blap, boomGÇ¥GǪ. That extra stepGǪ it will be the death of me. Guess us PL folk, or Raiden folk, or NC. Folk will have a horrible time adapting to this fix bros.
Thanks for the effortGǪ maybe next time youGÇÖll listen to sense, put in the extra time needed, and avoid yet another **** fix.
Now I'm assuming whatever the sig penalty plan was that you had was based at least in part on what I propsed about 6 months ago as I've not seen any other signiture plans offered ever. If you would just ******* do it, It would balance so many combat problems currently seen in this game that it's actually worth the effort. So please stop taking the easy way and do something ******* useful for once in you entire gaming careers.
This man gets it. Its a little bit spergy, but if you can get past that, he gets to the heart of the problem. Two of alliances with some of the largest titan fleets in the game studied the proposal, found the loophole CCP had missed, and insist CCP haven't gone far enough and give them some suggestions of where to look. This is how it should be.
Obviously fixing tracking is not a trivial task, and any impact and risk analysis would rule it out for now. It does reopen other options - a simple hack to limit titans being able to target anything smaller than a carrier now looks inevitable. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1936
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 12:03:00 -
[2528] - Quote
GallowsCalibrator wrote:HVAC Repairman wrote:Snot Shot wrote:RDevz wrote:It's amazing how playing station games in Jita qualifies you to talk about titans. What's to be qualified for? Everyone has access to the same ships in EVE, you have more pilots than any coalition in EVE, yet you're tying to make it sound like other alliances have some sort of unfair advantage over you? Face it, it's simply your FC's are too scared to use Super Caps....so you want them nerf'd. What else are your FC's scared of that CCP needs to nerf? . meanwhile at jita undock I wonder if he'll be around for the victory parade
He always docks up when Goons enter local.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

SPAECMARNIES
The Milkmen Test Alliance Please Ignore
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 13:01:00 -
[2529] - Quote
I'm pretty sure the solution is to just remove titans from the game and refund 1 tritanium and 100 isk. |

Slaver9
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 13:14:00 -
[2530] - Quote
what about to let Titans the trackings and just change them in a different way?
For example, make them immun to remote repair and give them more more more EHP @ all - woudn't this be a solution too?
So they can be still on Field and attack subcaps/caps but still have the risk to die if they can't warp out/jump |

May Zonday
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 13:34:00 -
[2531] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Hi guis!! I thought I would dip my toe in here and remind everyone of one thing.......the CFC are free to log in their Supers at anytime. The fact is your FC's feel they are too incompetent to use them so they distract you with "imbalance issues" to hide this fact. The CFC out number everyone you're told to attack or, let's face it, you would'nt attack. You have just as many, if not more, Super caps than anyone you attack. Yet you're cowards and to scared to use them. You only throw fleets at fights where you have 2/1 favor. As the fight escalates to Capitals your FC's choose to run instead of logging in your own Supers to fight. This is EVE, 0.0 warfare is where the strong survive, not the ones too scared to use big boy toys. Since you are too fail to use the ships that are required during any size fleet fight escalation, you tell CCP to nerf that which you are too scared to use. Sorry to call you out on this but the facts are so clear........even I can see it for Jita 4-4...  . Hi Snot Shot, how's your mom doing? Is she still making those nice crullers for breakfast? |

Emmerik
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 13:46:00 -
[2532] - Quote
Hmm... please CCP stop talking about docking/parking Supers.... Don't even think about it.... ^^ |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
414
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 14:13:00 -
[2533] - Quote
Slaver9 wrote:what about to let Titans the trackings and just change them in a different way?
For example, make them immun to remote repair and give them more more more EHP @ all - woudn't this be a solution too?
So they can be still on Field and attack subcaps/caps but still have the risk to die if they can't warp out/jump
Except they easily kill the 2 classes of ships that are able to keep them from warping/jumping out.
What I'm saying is: No. |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
63
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 15:17:00 -
[2534] - Quote
Falin Whalen wrote:Snot Shot wrote:Sorry for pointing out the obvious but after pages of you goonies taking credit for making CCP nerf titans, I figured we might as well tell everyone reading this thread why you pushed so hard to get them nerf'd......  . We are not taking credit for CCP nerfing titans, PL hotdroping the CCP loot pinata fleet, did that all on their own.  Ok so now that I call you out on the reason for goonies crying all this time for CCP to nerf titans, you flip flop to it being PL hot dropping a rare CCP pinata fleet........ So you're trying to tell us that CCP are the whiny bitches in this situation and not goonies after how many pages of you taking credit for the nerf?.... ...Failing Wailing try haaaarduuuur.....
Ladie Harlot wrote: He always docks up when Goons enter local. Is that when I'm in Jita once a year or because Goonies gave me docking rights in EC-.....oh wai... . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.......... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Andski
GoonWaffe
3214
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 16:11:00 -
[2535] - Quote
lol look at this tryhard "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
63
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 16:41:00 -
[2536] - Quote
Goonies............winning EVE..........one nerf at a time......... . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Mutheer Lelmata'eb
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 18:15:00 -
[2537] - Quote
Do we have the ability to make CCP shape the game into whatever we liked? I mean, if that's the case, than can they make me a ship that literally mounts other ships and has its way with them? It would add a whole other level of anger to the game. |

Falin Whalen
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
172
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 18:20:00 -
[2538] - Quote
Snot Shot........sperging about ebil Goonies........one post at a time.  You've got to remember that these are just simple miners. These are people of the land. The common clay of New Eden. You know... morons. |

baltec1
834
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 19:46:00 -
[2539] - Quote
Mutheer Lelmata'eb wrote:Do we have the ability to make CCP shape the game into whatever we liked? I mean, if that's the case, then can they make me a ship that literally mounts other ships and has its way with them? It would add a whole other level of anger to the game.
CCP fixed blasters and gal hulls as a personal favour to me. |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 21:57:00 -
[2540] - Quote
Mutheer Lelmata'eb wrote:Do we have the ability to make CCP shape the game into whatever we liked? I mean, if that's the case, then can they make me a ship that literally mounts other ships and has its way with them? It would add a whole other level of anger to the game.
Sssshhhh you'll give the big announcement away. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1938
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 22:10:00 -
[2541] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Goonies............winning EVE..........one nerf at a time.........  .
Yes, we are winning EVE once again. You must be so jealous.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

FlameOfSurvival
Kriegsmarinewerft Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 23:38:00 -
[2542] - Quote
Let's give Titans a bomb launcher - we need more bombs - more more more more more |

Syzygium
Friends Of Harassment
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 01:17:00 -
[2543] - Quote
The tracking change is fine imho, Give XL-Turrets a 3000m Signature to make it perfect
Hint Frigs: 30-40m Sig, S-Guns: 40m Sig Cruisers: 120-150m Sig, M-Guns: 150m Sig BS: 340-400m Sig, L-Guns: 400m Sig
Caps: 2800-3000m Sig, XL-Guns...: 1000m Sig .... wait what? 3000 is the value to match their primary targets sig, like all other platforms
The locking restriction to 3 targets and the base scanreso of 5 is bad. While it may solve some problems you have identified, it makes the usage of these ships just annoying. Think about locking times under Time Dilatation. You want to play a game in which a battle lasts maybe 2 hours and you need 5 *Minutes* to even lock a target? 8 Targets and Base Scanreso of 30-40 seems in-line with the other caps and supercaps, with the tracking of the XL-Guns and their Signature blown up like I suggested, that should be way enough penalty in an engagement against subcaps
If you still experience mass-killing of subcaps with "tracking titans", you also have the option to change the damage formula in a way, that the target signature in comparison to the signature of the gun used, defines the max-damage the target can take Example (Full hit means: 0 Transversal, Target in Optimal Range) XL-Turret (3000m Sig) hits Capital (3000m Sig) -> Full hit = 100% damage XL-Turret (3000m Sig) hits Battleship (400m Sig) -> Full hit = 400/3000 = 13.3% Damage XL-Turret (3000m Sig) hits Cruiser (150m Sig) -> Full hit = 5% Damage XL-Turret (3000m Sig) hits Frigate (40m Sig) -> Full hit = 1.3% Damage
This makes small targets basically highly resistant against damage coming from large guns, also helping in many other scenarios (HACs vs BS, AFs vs BCs etc...) |

Cambarus
Baros Reloaded
142
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 02:36:00 -
[2544] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Mutheer Lelmata'eb wrote:Do we have the ability to make CCP shape the game into whatever we liked? I mean, if that's the case, then can they make me a ship that literally mounts other ships and has its way with them? It would add a whole other level of anger to the game. CCP fixed blasters and gal hulls as a personal favour to me. You were fine with blasters the way they were, I had to do terrible, unspeakable things to certain CCP employees to get those buffs put in. |

baltec1
835
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 09:41:00 -
[2545] - Quote
Cambarus wrote: I had to do terrible, unspeakable things to certain CCP employees to get those buffs put in.
You didn't fall for Soundwaves trick did you |

Il Reverendo
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 14:12:00 -
[2546] - Quote
Goon thread, goon dev, goon bad ideas...
These are the somethingawful forums rght? |

Andski
GoonWaffe
3225
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 14:34:00 -
[2547] - Quote
Il Reverendo wrote:Goon thread, goon dev, goon bad ideas...
These are the somethingawful forums rght?
faceless forum alt, bad post
you're retarded right? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

zh0uXiao
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 15:46:00 -
[2548] - Quote
how about u beeing ******** andski for not letting ppl saying what they think. Every1 is entitled to have an opinion |

Andski
GoonWaffe
3227
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 16:17:00 -
[2549] - Quote
zh0uXiao wrote:how about u beeing ******** andski for not letting ppl saying what they think. Every1 is entitled to have an opinion
yours is irrelevant though "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

fukier
Handsome Millionaire Playboys Flatline.
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 18:17:00 -
[2550] - Quote
if you read this thread about half the posts are by andski using: Abusive ad hominem (also called personal abuse or personal attacks) usually involves insulting or belittling one's opponent in order to attack his claim or invalidate his argument, but can also involve pointing out true character flaws or actions that are irrelevant to the opponent's argument. This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.
Pretty much Andski does not posses a valid argument (or if he does has decided not to put if foward) and uses intimidation and abusivness to try to concvnce the reader that his POV is the only valid one. Which is a shame because threads like this can be used to have a contructive argument. But Alas this is typical of a "goon" thread.
example: high sec alt says: this is a good idea for reasons a b and c
andski: you are a pubbie so your argument is mute.
great way to have a discussion. |

Andski
GoonWaffe
3227
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 18:22:00 -
[2551] - Quote
you should get a browser with a spellchecker
toodles "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
67
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 18:53:00 -
[2552] - Quote
zh0uXiao wrote:how about u beeing ******** andski for not letting ppl saying what they think. Every1 is entitled to have an opinion
Express your opinion in public and people are entitled (or in your case, guaranteed) to form their own opinion that you're a moron. |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
188
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 19:03:00 -
[2553] - Quote
fukier wrote:if you read this thread about half the posts are by andski using: Abusive ad hominem (also called personal abuse or personal attacks) usually involves insulting or belittling one's opponent in order to attack his claim or invalidate his argument, but can also involve pointing out true character flaws or actions that are irrelevant to the opponent's argument. This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions. Pretty much Andski does not posses a valid argument (or if he does has decided not to put if foward) and uses intimidation and abusivness to try to concvnce the reader that his POV is the only valid one. Which is a shame because threads like this can be used to have a contructive argument. But Alas this is typical of a "goon" thread. example: high sec alt says: this is a good idea for reasons a b and c andski: you are a pubbie so your argument is mute. great way to have a discussion. 
You're missing the underlying point. While Andski's posting is partially there to rile the other side of this discussion into a frothing rage, he has a central underlying point: when you post on a high sec alt, you use it to disguise your background, and to either hide your bias or attempt to make it look like your argument has broader appeal than it actually does.
This kind of subterfuge is pretty crude, but it's still worth calling it out. I post on my main so you can know who I am. If this means you read my posts and assume I'm part of some kind of bizarre hive mind, that's your problem. I'm not trying to disguise anything.
There plenty of posters in this thread that aren't allies of us that agree that these changes are part of necessary action that needs to be taken to bring super caps in line with the role CCP intends for them given their proliferation, as spelled out in the early posts. I see little evidence of non-PL/NCdot/Raiden alliances which favor super caps superiority as the ultimate answer to any fight.
More to the point, even given those biases, posting on your main going against the assumed grain holds my weight. I go out of my way to post reasonable discussion because people see my corp ticker and assume I'm not capable of it. Shadoo's post on the need to change super caps so they function differently carries a lot of weight because he's a highly visible figure of importance in a very super cap rich organization.
Post on a main to prove that you've worked with super caps, friendly and enemy. If you post on an empire alt, there's no way you can say that you're not just an EFT warrior who thinks current titan tracking can't hit dictors because he's never left empire.
yeep wrote:Alternatively pretty much every pro-titan argument has been shot down earlier in the thread so its safe to assume everyone who insists on repeating them is functionally illiterate.
This is also the point we're getting at. A lot of the anti Titan in the recent pages have been so difficult to comprehend that I haven't been trying to respond because I'm not sure either side can understand the other. |

Yamarash
13th Squadron Cascade Imminent
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 22:29:00 -
[2554] - Quote
CCP YOURE TELLING ME THE BEST IDEA YOU HAVE WAS NERF TITANS CAUSE A ****** LIKE ACTUAL CSM PRO GOONS TELL YOU "WERE NOT HAPPY WITH ACTUAL TITANS BEHAVIOR?"
CCP YOURE TELLING ME YOU WILL NERF TITANS TO GIVE A BUNCH OF NOOBS IN 0.0 (A PLACE WHERE THEY DONT BELONG TBH) WITH ONLY 2 OR 3 MONTHS SKILLING TO USE A ******* DRAKE AND SPAM LOCAL LIKE RETARDS WIN THE BATTLES AGAINST PEOPLE PLAYING THIS GAME SINCE 5 OR MORE YEARS SKILLING AND MAYBE SAVINGS TO USE A TITAN. I HAVE NOTHING VS NOOB GUYS BUT THEY EVEN DONT USE NEW TACTICS. ONLY CRY IN LOCAL ALL THE TIME CAUSE TEY FEEL UNUSEFUL WITH HIS NOOBIE DRAKE.
IS TOTALLY CLEAR CCP YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW TO DEAL WITH ALL THIS **** AND SUPERS RIGHT? I HAVE YEARS TELLING YOU THE SAME **** THINK. NERF THE ******* MOONS AND CONTROL THE ******* BOTS. DOING ISK AFK IS NOT HEALTHY FOR THE GAME. MOONS ARE THE BEST WAY TO DO THAT AND YOU KNOW IT, BUT FOR A HIDDEN REASON YOU NEVER TALK ABOUT.
**** YOURSELF CCP. AND YES IM REALLY MAD AND CRAZY CAUSE I INVEST MORE THAN 5 YEARS IN THIS GAME (MY HOBBY) AND YOU ARE DOING **** TO IMPROVE IT. YOURE JUST HEARING 2 OR 3 VOICES NOT WHOLE COMMUNITY AND HAVE NO COMMON SENSE.
TITANS OWNERS: BEGIN THINKING IN A WAY TO **** CCP REPEATEDLY , THEY DESERVE IT.
SRY FOR BAD WORDS, WRONG CHANNEL oops. |

HELIC0N ONE
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
181
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 22:32:00 -
[2555] - Quote
Yeah this thread is dead since the opponents had essentially nothing to offer except "the more expensive ship should always win, titan pilots are like level 80 WoW characters, if you haven't played Eve for 6 years you shouldn't be allowed to compete", "if you nerf my precious pretend spaceship I am quitting and taking my 700 alt accounts with me", and insinuations about CCP devs engaging in sexual acts with goonwaffe members.
hi5s all round |

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
200
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 22:42:00 -
[2556] - Quote
Yamarash wrote:**** YOURSELF CCP. AND YES IM REALLY MAD AND CRAZY CAUSE I INVEST MORE THAN 5 YEARS IN THIS GAME (MY HOBBY) AND YOU ARE DOING **** TO IMPROVE IT. YOURE JUST HEARING 2 OR 3 VOICES NOT WHOLE COMMUNITY AND HAVE NO COMMON SENSE.
Listen to 2 or 3 voices? Are you nuts as well as mad?
So according to you CCP should just listen to Titan pilots because you've 5 years of investment?
That it? That your whole argument as to why Titans shouldn't be nerfed?
Don't think we'll miss you when you unsub and never come back.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe
3227
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 23:02:00 -
[2557] - Quote
SirMolle wrote:NOOBS IN 0.0 (A PLACE WHERE THEY DONT BELONG TBH)
"WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

D Derp
xXxSePhIrOtHSSJ420xXx W33D4LYFE Fanclub
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 23:42:00 -
[2558] - Quote
Yamarash wrote:CCP YOURE TELLING ME THE BEST IDEA YOU HAVE WAS NERF TITANS CAUSE A ****** LIKE ACTUAL CSM PRO GOONS TELL YOU "WERE NOT HAPPY WITH ACTUAL TITANS BEHAVIOR?"
CCP YOURE TELLING ME YOU WILL NERF TITANS TO GIVE A BUNCH OF NOOBS IN 0.0 (A PLACE WHERE THEY DONT BELONG TBH) WITH ONLY 2 OR 3 MONTHS SKILLING TO USE A ******* DRAKE AND SPAM LOCAL LIKE RETARDS WIN THE BATTLES AGAINST PEOPLE PLAYING THIS GAME SINCE 5 OR MORE YEARS SKILLING AND MAYBE SAVINGS TO USE A TITAN. I HAVE NOTHING VS NOOB GUYS BUT THEY EVEN DONT USE NEW TACTICS. ONLY CRY IN LOCAL ALL THE TIME CAUSE TEY FEEL UNUSEFUL WITH HIS NOOBIE DRAKE.
IS TOTALLY CLEAR CCP YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW TO DEAL WITH ALL THIS **** AND SUPERS RIGHT? I HAVE YEARS TELLING YOU THE SAME **** THINK. NERF THE ******* MOONS AND CONTROL THE ******* BOTS. DOING ISK AFK IS NOT HEALTHY FOR THE GAME. MOONS ARE THE BEST WAY TO DO THAT AND YOU KNOW IT, BUT FOR A HIDDEN REASON YOU NEVER TALK ABOUT.
**** YOURSELF CCP. AND YES IM REALLY MAD AND CRAZY CAUSE I INVEST MORE THAN 5 YEARS IN THIS GAME (MY HOBBY) AND YOU ARE DOING **** TO IMPROVE IT. YOURE JUST HEARING 2 OR 3 VOICES NOT WHOLE COMMUNITY AND HAVE NO COMMON SENSE.
TITANS OWNERS: BEGIN THINKING IN A WAY TO **** CCP REPEATEDLY , THEY DESERVE IT.
SRY FOR BAD WORDS, WRONG CHANNEL oops.
This is just beautiful.
|

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 01:05:00 -
[2559] - Quote
Cascade Imminent: bastion of NEW TACTICS IN 0.0 PVP NOT JUST DRAKES |

OfBalance
Caldari State
194
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 01:15:00 -
[2560] - Quote
Yamarash wrote:CCP YOURE TELLING ME THE BEST IDEA YOU HAVE WAS NERF TITANS CAUSE A ****** LIKE ACTUAL CSM PRO GOONS TELL YOU "WERE NOT HAPPY WITH ACTUAL TITANS BEHAVIOR?"
CCP YOURE TELLING ME YOU WILL NERF TITANS TO GIVE A BUNCH OF NOOBS IN 0.0 (A PLACE WHERE THEY DONT BELONG TBH) WITH ONLY 2 OR 3 MONTHS SKILLING TO USE A ******* DRAKE AND SPAM LOCAL LIKE RETARDS WIN THE BATTLES AGAINST PEOPLE PLAYING THIS GAME SINCE 5 OR MORE YEARS SKILLING AND MAYBE SAVINGS TO USE A TITAN. I HAVE NOTHING VS NOOB GUYS BUT THEY EVEN DONT USE NEW TACTICS. ONLY CRY IN LOCAL ALL THE TIME CAUSE TEY FEEL UNUSEFUL WITH HIS NOOBIE DRAKE.
IS TOTALLY CLEAR CCP YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW TO DEAL WITH ALL THIS **** AND SUPERS RIGHT? I HAVE YEARS TELLING YOU THE SAME **** THINK. NERF THE ******* MOONS AND CONTROL THE ******* BOTS. DOING ISK AFK IS NOT HEALTHY FOR THE GAME. MOONS ARE THE BEST WAY TO DO THAT AND YOU KNOW IT, BUT FOR A HIDDEN REASON YOU NEVER TALK ABOUT.
**** YOURSELF CCP. AND YES IM REALLY MAD AND CRAZY CAUSE I INVEST MORE THAN 5 YEARS IN THIS GAME (MY HOBBY) AND YOU ARE DOING **** TO IMPROVE IT. YOURE JUST HEARING 2 OR 3 VOICES NOT WHOLE COMMUNITY AND HAVE NO COMMON SENSE.
TITANS OWNERS: BEGIN THINKING IN A WAY TO **** CCP REPEATEDLY , THEY DESERVE IT.
SRY FOR BAD WORDS, WRONG CHANNEL oops.
Tell us how you really feel. |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1872
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 01:19:00 -
[2561] - Quote
Suggestion: look at remote tracking and remote sensor boosting as a whole because those combined with off-grid links provide SO SO many advantages to campers and home-defenders that should probably be considered.
I say this as a solo PVPer of course but even farting about in frigates doing unimportant PVP these instalocking, uber tracking and linked up groups are of course an issue. It's still a problem for small skirmish gangs wanting to engage larger forces and it goes right up the engagement scale to tracking linked titans.
Your current proposal deals with Titan tracking but doesnt really consider the smaller scale. I don't know if you care about the above but it would be nice if you at least considered it GÖÑ (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Andski
GoonWaffe
3232
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 02:33:00 -
[2562] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Suggestion: look at remote tracking and remote sensor boosting as a whole because those combined with off-grid links provide SO SO many advantages to campers and home-defenders that should probably be considered.
I say this as a solo PVPer of course but even farting about in frigates doing unimportant PVP these instalocking, uber tracking and linked up groups are of course an issue. It's still a problem for small skirmish gangs wanting to engage larger forces and it goes right up the engagement scale to tracking linked titans.
Your current proposal deals with Titan tracking but doesnt really consider the smaller scale. I don't know if you care about the above but it would be nice if you at least considered it GÖÑ
off-grid links, remote sensor boosts and tracking links are not a problem
hint: if they own the space, they rightly have the advantage "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Yamarash
13th Squadron Cascade Imminent
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 02:44:00 -
[2563] - Quote
oh no sry all for my later statement. i was wrong and mad. lol.
NOOBS need to have equal opportunities as older people. LMAO in what game this is true??? examples please?
One drake with a guy 3 MONTHS old can beat a 5 years older (no ******) guy cause CCP will nerf every ship when somebody cry telling CCP they cant win a s.h.i.t ?
What CCP will do when 200 guys in Machariels kick a.ss 700 noobies Drakes ?? Nerf Machariels ???
What CCP will do when 2000 noobs attack a technetium pos and 20 random guys in bombers kill all that cra.p ??? nerf bombers?
WE WILL SEE. JUST SAYING and want to leave this as history to copy-paste in a future.
do your bets.. |

Andski
GoonWaffe
3233
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 03:03:00 -
[2564] - Quote
Yamarash wrote:oh no sry all for my later statement. i was wrong and mad. lol.
NOOBS need to have equal opportunities as older people. LMAO in what game this is true??? examples please?
One drake with a guy 3 MONTHS old can beat a 5 years older (no ******) guy cause CCP will nerf every ship when somebody cry telling CCP they cant win a s.h.i.t ?
What CCP will do when 200 guys in Machariels kick a.ss 700 noobies Drakes ?? Nerf Machariels ???
What CCP will do when 2000 noobs attack a technetium pos and 20 random guys in bombers kill all that cra.p ??? nerf bombers?
WE WILL SEE. JUST SAYING and want to leave this as history to copy-paste in a future.
do your bets..
hey bro your alliance never uses its titans anyway
200 machariels will not kill 700 drakes (or anything) without logistics, recons, dictors and other support, and they certainly will not engage 700 of any ship without losses
bombers are easily avoided by spreading out - anyone who stays in a ball, especially when shooting towers, deserves to get bombed
keep bleating it's hilarious "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 05:23:00 -
[2565] - Quote
My Rag has a 68 mm scan resolution. With 3 Cormack Sebos I have 296mm
Without any sensor booster, I target a Dramiel in 33 sec.
With a Shadow Serpentis sebo I target in 20 sec. With a Cormack Sebo it takes 18 sec With 2 Cormack Sebo it takes 11 Sec With 3 Cormack Sebo it takes 8 sec
Without any sensor booster, I target a Nightmare in 13 sec
With a Cormack Sebo it takes 8 sec With 2 Cormack Sebos it takes 4 sec With 3 Cormack Sebo it takes less than 3 sec
Now, getting scan resolution from 68 to 5, imagine how much it will take to target a frigate. With TiDi on, you have time to take a bath, eat, watch a movie, sleep, wake up, take a shower then check if your target is locked. Meh, it's not there anymore. he's in his home system. For a long time now. But tomorrow is another day, you can try to lock something again. Make sure you got everything you need: food, water/beer/scotch, movies and popcorn ofc
Oh crap, I can't hit anything cos my tracking is halved. nevermind, going back to the movie. |

Yamarash
13th Squadron Cascade Imminent
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 05:40:00 -
[2566] - Quote
Andski wrote:
hey bro your alliance never uses its titans anyway
200 machariels will not kill 700 drakes (or anything) without logistics, recons, dictors and other support, and they certainly will not engage 700 of any ship without losses
bombers are easily avoided by spreading out - anyone who stays in a ball, especially when shooting towers, deserves to get bombed
keep bleating it's hilarious
Bro. Who is talking about alliances??? topic is about nerf titans. grown up. this is no local channel lmao.
and yes i use mine.
and 700 drakes never go withoput logistics, recons, dictors and other support. Lets see what will be your next cry me a river after titans nerf. |

Andski
GoonWaffe
3237
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 06:13:00 -
[2567] - Quote
Yamarash wrote:Bro. Who is talking about alliances??? topic is about nerf titans. grown up. this is no local channel lmao.
and yes i use mine.
and 700 drakes never go withoput logistics, recons, dictors and other support. Lets see what will be your next cry me a river after titans nerf.
hi this thread is about groups of 20-30 titans killing subcaps with impunity, zero losses, and zero risk
keep up, your alliance never uses titans like that, and they hardly ever use titans besides for bridging
do feel free to link some killmails where you blap idiots coming through a gate or something because what you do when every supercapital fleet of consequence is 7 mids away is absolutely irrelevant "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

DaiTengu
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
54
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 06:43:00 -
[2568] - Quote
Acwron wrote:My Rag has a 68 mm scan resolution. With 3 Cormack Sebos I have 296mm
Without any sensor booster, I target a Dramiel in 33 sec.
With a Shadow Serpentis sebo I target in 20 sec. With a Cormack Sebo it takes 18 sec With 2 Cormack Sebo it takes 11 Sec With 3 Cormack Sebo it takes 8 sec
Without any sensor booster, I target a Nightmare in 13 sec
With a Cormack Sebo it takes 8 sec With 2 Cormack Sebos it takes 4 sec With 3 Cormack Sebo it takes less than 3 sec
Now, getting scan resolution from 68 to 5, imagine how much it will take to target a frigate. With TiDi on, you have time to take a bath, eat, watch a movie, sleep, wake up, take a shower then check if your target is locked. Meh, it's not there anymore. he's in his home system. For a long time now. But tomorrow is another day, you can try to lock something again. Make sure you got everything you need: food, water/beer/scotch, movies and popcorn ofc
Oh crap, I can't hit anything cos my tracking is halved. nevermind, going back to the movie.
Wait, I can't tell from this post, are you FOR or AGAINST this nerf?
Why are you trying to lock a frigate anyway?
This is most definitely the nerf you deserve.
|

Aurora B
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 07:22:00 -
[2569] - Quote
HELIC0N ONE wrote:Yeep wrote:Alternatively pretty much every pro-nerf argument has been shot down earlier in the thread so its safe to assume everyone who insists on repeating them is goon or jew. Yeah this thread is dead since we had essentially nothing to offer except "the most drakes should always win, drake pilots are like level 8 WoW characters, if you have played Eve for 6 weeks you should be able to kill everything with drakes", "if you don't nerf my enemies precious spaceships I am whining and taking my 7000 fellow whiners with me". fab5s all round
Fixed... |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
719
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 09:04:00 -
[2570] - Quote
Aurora B wrote:HELIC0N ONE wrote:Yeep wrote:Alternatively pretty much every anti-nerf argument has been shot down earlier in the thread so its safe to assume everyone who keeps whining about them is goon or jew. Yeah this thread is dead since we had essentially nothing to offer except "the most drakes should always win, drake pilots are like level 8 WoW characters, if you have played Eve for 6 weeks you should be able to kill everything with drakes", "if you don't nerf my enemies precious spaceships I am whining and taking my 7000 fellow whiners with me". fab5s all round Fixed...
The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

Orion GUardian
132
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 10:16:00 -
[2571] - Quote
So and when are you going to present a reason why Titans should be able to klock frigates in 8s and kill them easily?
I mean except for "They are expensive" or "They need alot of SP" or "Goons!"?
Die the Cascade Imminent guy: "Noobs don't belong in nullsec". What did you smoke? If they stay in highsec for too long they miss out alot. I know because I did. When I wanted to move into nullsec in 2005 I instead paused the game for 1.5 years and waited till 2009 till I got into nullsec, what a waste of time that was ;)
|

A-Z
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 10:48:00 -
[2572] - Quote
Andski wrote:conqueror2006 wrote:no weapons - yes no weapons, if they can-¦t kill solo one simple dictor, nwo with this nerf, never again Let's just get something out of the way here: are you saying that titans should be able to effectively solo one of the only two hulls that can tackle them? Do you have any idea how game balancing works?
|

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
65
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 12:11:00 -
[2573] - Quote
Andski wrote:Yamarash wrote:Bro. Who is talking about alliances??? topic is about nerf titans. grown up. this is no local channel lmao.
and yes i use mine.
and 700 drakes never go withoput logistics, recons, dictors and other support. Lets see what will be your next cry me a river after titans nerf. hi this thread is about groups of 20-30 titans killing subcaps with impunity, zero losses, and zero risk keep up, your alliance never uses titans like that, and they hardly ever use titans besides for bridging do feel free to link some killmails where you blap idiots coming through a gate or something because what you do when every supercapital fleet of consequence is 7 mids away is absolutely irrelevant ItGÇÖs only a topic because your NCCFC Super Cap FCGÇÖs are too incompetent to field your own Super Caps so you cry when others use them against your 1,000 pilot subcap fleets. Since everyone else is flaunting their math skills in this thread IGÇÖm going to lay out another complex formula:
1,000 CFC vs. 250 Team Tech ( subcaps ) = Only time CFC will fight.
1,000 CFC vs. 250 Team Tech + 100 Super Caps = CFC runs away and crys for CCP to nerf TitansGǪ.
1,000 CFC + 100 Super Caps vs. 250 Team Tech + 100 Super Caps = Normal fleet fight escalation but CFC is too scared to use their Supers, so you run away and cry for CCP nerf instead....
You guys are funnyGǪGǪ.youGÇÖre like one of those giant body builders strutting around trying to act tough while youGÇÖre sporting a camel toe where your junk should beGǪGǪ . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Kelvan Hemanseh
Starwinders The Unwilling.
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 12:28:00 -
[2574] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:semi-coherent stuff
You know Snot Shot you never did answer me in that last thread.
Quote: So SnotShot, why such a hard on for goons? They seem to make you really randy.
|

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
65
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 12:54:00 -
[2575] - Quote
Kelvan Hemanseh wrote:Snot Shot wrote:semi-coherent stuff You know Snot Shot you never did answer me in that last thread. Quote: So SnotShot, why such a hard on for goons? They seem to make you really randy.
Because poasts that contradict their poasts = hard onGǪGǪ GǪGǪGǪor better yet, GÇ£where did they touch me?GÇ¥GǪGǪ GǪGǪGǪ..or maybe IGÇÖm just fightin whacky with craaaazy with a little loopy thrown in for good measureGǪGǪ.. . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Andski
GoonWaffe
3242
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 13:06:00 -
[2576] - Quote
Aurora B wrote:HELIC0N ONE wrote:Yeep wrote:Alternatively pretty much every anti-nerf argument has been shot down earlier in the thread so its safe to assume everyone who keeps whining about them is goon or jew. Yeah this thread is dead since we had essentially nothing to offer except "the most drakes should always win, drake pilots are like level 8 WoW characters, if you have played Eve for 6 weeks you should be able to kill everything with drakes", "if you don't nerf my enemies precious spaceships I am whining and taking my 7000 fellow whiners with me". fab5s all round Fixed...
hey mouthbreather you've only managed to rub enough brain cells together to come up with some false dilemma where the only alternatives are 20 titans winning or hundreds of drakes winning
if you're really dumb enough to do this maybe you should realize that any sane person would go with the hundreds of drakes - you know, more people, better for business
stop being dumb "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Dr 0wnage
The Dark Tribe Against ALL Authorities
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 13:16:00 -
[2577] - Quote
Hey Greyscale,
Is there any way to have a thread where goons / PL / Raiden / NC. and NPC alts can't post? It would make discussing this topic much more constructive 
But anyway, assuming you've sifted your way through the spam of the before mentioned parties, have you come up with anything more then the "i promise we'll fix it eventually" position that your currently sticking to? Any possibilities, ideas, anything?
Hell, if nothing else, give us some "options" on duality to test out. PLEASE! |

John Zorg
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 13:29:00 -
[2578] - Quote
Yamarash wrote:CCP YOURE TELLING ME THE BEST IDEA YOU HAVE WAS NERF TITANS CAUSE A ****** LIKE ACTUAL CSM PRO GOONS TELL YOU "WERE NOT HAPPY WITH ACTUAL TITANS BEHAVIOR?"
CCP YOURE TELLING ME YOU WILL NERF TITANS TO GIVE A BUNCH OF NOOBS IN 0.0 (A PLACE WHERE THEY DONT BELONG TBH) WITH ONLY 2 OR 3 MONTHS SKILLING TO USE A ******* DRAKE AND SPAM LOCAL LIKE RETARDS WIN THE BATTLES AGAINST PEOPLE PLAYING THIS GAME SINCE 5 OR MORE YEARS SKILLING AND MAYBE SAVINGS TO USE A TITAN. I HAVE NOTHING VS NOOB GUYS BUT THEY EVEN DONT USE NEW TACTICS. ONLY CRY IN LOCAL ALL THE TIME CAUSE TEY FEEL UNUSEFUL WITH HIS NOOBIE DRAKE.
IS TOTALLY CLEAR CCP YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW TO DEAL WITH ALL THIS **** AND SUPERS RIGHT? I HAVE YEARS TELLING YOU THE SAME **** THINK. NERF THE ******* MOONS AND CONTROL THE ******* BOTS. DOING ISK AFK IS NOT HEALTHY FOR THE GAME. MOONS ARE THE BEST WAY TO DO THAT AND YOU KNOW IT, BUT FOR A HIDDEN REASON YOU NEVER TALK ABOUT.
**** YOURSELF CCP. AND YES IM REALLY MAD AND CRAZY CAUSE I INVEST MORE THAN 5 YEARS IN THIS GAME (MY HOBBY) AND YOU ARE DOING **** TO IMPROVE IT. YOURE JUST HEARING 2 OR 3 VOICES NOT WHOLE COMMUNITY AND HAVE NO COMMON SENSE.
TITANS OWNERS: BEGIN THINKING IN A WAY TO **** CCP REPEATEDLY , THEY DESERVE IT.
SRY FOR BAD WORDS, WRONG CHANNEL oops.
ALL CAPS BEST CAPS!
May I suggest a new keyboard and some more IQ please. |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
65
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 13:30:00 -
[2579] - Quote
Andski wrote:Aurora B wrote:HELIC0N ONE wrote:Yeep wrote:Alternatively pretty much every anti-nerf argument has been shot down earlier in the thread so its safe to assume everyone who keeps whining about them is goon or jew. Yeah this thread is dead since we had essentially nothing to offer except "the most drakes should always win, drake pilots are like level 8 WoW characters, if you have played Eve for 6 weeks you should be able to kill everything with drakes", "if you don't nerf my enemies precious spaceships I am whining and taking my 7000 fellow whiners with me". fab5s all round Fixed... hey mouthbreather you've only managed to rub enough brain cells together to come up with some false dilemma where the only alternatives are 20 titans winning or hundreds of drakes winning if you're really dumb enough to do this maybe you should realize that any sane person would go with the hundreds of drakes - you know, more people, better for business stop being dumb If I understand your frothy mouth rant correctly, couldnGÇÖt the same apply where 20 Titans is the answer to your 700 drakesGǪGǪGǪ.since at the end of the day itGÇÖs all about winningGǪGǪright?
I guess if you asked the Alliances nicely that actually use their Titans not to use them, while you promise not to be a bunch of system **** packing goat fondlers, you would not find yourself sobbing to CCP to nerf the ships that a lot of your pilots would like log in or fly somedayGǪGǪGǪGǪGǪGǪ.or you could grow a setGǪ. . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Andski
GoonWaffe
3242
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 13:54:00 -
[2580] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:If I understand your frothy mouth rant correctly, couldnGÇÖt the same apply where 20 Titans is the answer to your 700 drakesGǪGǪGǪ.since at the end of the day itGÇÖs all about winningGǪGǪright? I guess if you asked the Alliances nicely that actually use their Titans not to use them, while you promise not to be a bunch of system **** packing goat fondlers, you would not find yourself sobbing to CCP to nerf the ships that a lot of your pilots would like log in or fly somedayGǪGǪGǪGǪGǪGǪ.or you could grow a setGǪ.  .
lol look who's mad "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Kozmic
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 14:07:00 -
[2581] - Quote
I'm Down wrote:There is a reason why IGÇÖve said for the past 2 years that adjusting tracking will not fix the problem. Just like fixing lock time also does not address the problem at all.
You developers have for years completely ignored your tracking mechanics and how utterly garbage they are. You have also ignored people informing you of why you canGÇÖt fix tracking under the current design. So let me drop this knowledge on you for why your first fix to titans has changed so little in what they do that it will have virtually 0 impact on the game after a few months of adaptation:
The current problem is that titans in large numbers can blap the ever living **** out of a fleet with basically no risk simply because they are huge HP buffers that can be repaired by motherships which are also huge HP buffers. Now I could ***** and moan about Capital Remote repairers and their range and their effectiveness, particularly on huge hp and resist stars like supers, but that would go off track of my point, so IGÇÖll avoid the temptation.
So you changed trackingGǪ big whoop. Rather than track around 220 m/s for every 10km of range, an Erebus/Rag now tracks about 110 m/s for every 10km of range. In addition, they have a gun sig size of about double that of a BS. This creates some magical world where a ship further away can be tracked better, but is some how mysteriously the same size as though range dilation has no affect at all on how well you can see that now tiny little dot. In laymanGÇÖs termsGǪ. This means that if Eve mechanics worked in the real universe, Every star in the whole freaking universe would look approximately the same size as our sun, as would all the planets in size relation to our moon rather than the tiny specs in the sky that they are. So hereGÇÖs what happens after your patch to just circumvent the whole problem you just createdGǪ. Lock time you sayGǪ Tracking speed you sayGǪ
Hello MR Proteus, Hello either 5 AEONS with 4 Domi painters or 50 Archons with 4 T2 Painters (and just for luls cause the ship is cheap, why not throw in 2 range extenders for the painters as well). Now that wonderful tengu has an 800-1200 sig and at 60km can be tracked plus has a sig size near the same as the guns do. That Maelstrom has a 1700 + sigGǪ ie bigger than the guns do, and can be tracked at about 12km rangeGǪ. And oh yeah, you can easily get those 300-400,000 ehp small sig lokis to web down anything closer than those ranges to prevent them from avoiding the tracking problemsGǪ not like tech 3GÇÖs are rare these days.
Oh but lock time you sayGǪ well if the carrier paints before the Titans ever lockGǪ. Oh yeah, Lock a tengu in 30-35 seconds, lock a Maelstrom in 23-30 secondsGǪ thatGÇÖs so brutal. Oh yeah, and thatGÇÖs just with ******* Navy tracking computers and sensor boosters, I didnGÇÖt even toss in the Meta 13-14 gear.
GeeGǪ in 20 minutes of planning and a slight modification to what my fleet roles are, IGÇÖve just circumvented your entire titan patch plans b/c you thought this was enough to warrant not changing the coding of your formulas so that they make sense.
Good thing thereGÇÖs nobody in this game who couldnGÇÖt ya know, divide their titan pilots up on mumble into 10-15 sub channels, have a few SCGÇÖs assigned to each for painting and just perform the exact same way where itGÇÖs GÇ£paint, blap, blap, boomGÇ¥ rather than the old, GÇ£blap, blap, boomGÇ¥GǪ. That extra stepGǪ it will be the death of me. Guess us PL folk, or Raiden folk, or NC. Folk will have a horrible time adapting to this fix bros.
Thanks for the effortGǪ maybe next time youGÇÖll listen to sense, put in the extra time needed, and avoid yet another **** fix.
Now I'm assuming whatever the sig penalty plan was that you had was based at least in part on what I propsed about 6 months ago as I've not seen any other signiture plans offered ever. If you would just ******* do it, It would balance so many combat problems currently seen in this game that it's actually worth the effort. So please stop taking the easy way and do something ******* useful for once in you entire gaming careers.
Spot on. |

Kelvan Hemanseh
Starwinders The Unwilling.
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 15:00:00 -
[2582] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Kelvan Hemanseh wrote:Snot Shot wrote:semi-coherent stuff You know Snot Shot you never did answer me in that last thread. Quote: So SnotShot, why such a hard on for goons? They seem to make you really randy.
Because poasts that contradict their poasts = hard onGǪGǪ  GǪGǪGǪor better yet, GÇ£where did they touch me?GÇ¥GǪGǪ  GǪGǪGǪ..or maybe IGÇÖm just fightin whacky with craaaazy with a little loopy thrown in for good measureGǪGǪ..  . You know it's okay to have those feelings you don't have to call it crazy. As long as you aren't in Texas or a republican/evangelical Christian controlled state. |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 15:02:00 -
[2583] - Quote
DaiTengu wrote:
Wait, I can't tell from this post, are you FOR or AGAINST this nerf?
Why are you trying to lock a frigate anyway?
This is most definitely the nerf you deserve.
There's any physics law I don't know about that prevents me to lock a frigate? Anyway, it doesn't help me if I lock it or not, it's unlikely to hit it even tracking fitted.
And yes, we deserve the nerf after training for Titan. Time spent that will never come back. In a blink of an eye, they just mess with all your work. GOOD JOB CCP.
(Somehow CCP reminds me of old -í-+-Ħü-+ -í-+-¦-¦¦ü-é-ü-¦-+-à -í-+-å-+-¦-+-+-ü-é-+¦ü-ç-¦-ü-¦-+-à -á-¦-ü-+-â¦ü-¦-+-+-¦ -Soiuz Sovie+¢kih So+¢ialisticeskih Respublik-Union of Soviet Socialist Republics)
No offense to the russians, really. It's history. |

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 15:30:00 -
[2584] - Quote
Andski wrote:Snot Shot wrote:If I understand your frothy mouth rant correctly, couldnGÇÖt the same apply where 20 Titans is the answer to your 700 drakesGǪGǪGǪ.since at the end of the day itGÇÖs all about winningGǪGǪright? I guess if you asked the Alliances nicely that actually use their Titans not to use them, while you promise not to be a bunch of system **** packing goat fondlers, you would not find yourself sobbing to CCP to nerf the ships that a lot of your pilots would like log in or fly somedayGǪGǪGǪGǪGǪGǪ.or you could grow a setGǪ.  . lol look who's mad
Well you petty mad yourself like 1000 post mad in this thread :) |

knobber Jobbler
Seniors Clan Get Off My Lawn
65
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 15:39:00 -
[2585] - Quote
DaiTengu wrote:
Why are you trying to lock a frigate anyway?
Because people are dropping giant EPEENs on frigate gangs. I kid you not. |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
206
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 15:56:00 -
[2586] - Quote
knobber Jobbler wrote:DaiTengu wrote:
Why are you trying to lock a frigate anyway?
Because people are dropping giant EPEENs on frigate gangs. I kid you not.
That or gate camping in 0.4 systems with a gang of Titans, Supers, and standard caps. And getting their Erebus blown up by the Gallente Militia while doing so.
|

Aiden Andraste
State War Academy Caldari State
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 16:36:00 -
[2587] - Quote
I'm Down wrote:There is a reason why IGÇÖve said for the past 2 years that adjusting tracking will not fix the problem. Just like fixing lock time also does not address the problem at all.
You developers have for years completely ignored your tracking mechanics and how utterly garbage they are. You have also ignored people informing you of why you canGÇÖt fix tracking under the current design. So let me drop this knowledge on you for why your first fix to titans has changed so little in what they do that it will have virtually 0 impact on the game after a few months of adaptation:
The current problem is that titans in large numbers can blap the ever living **** out of a fleet with basically no risk simply because they are huge HP buffers that can be repaired by motherships which are also huge HP buffers. Now I could ***** and moan about Capital Remote repairers and their range and their effectiveness, particularly on huge hp and resist stars like supers, but that would go off track of my point, so IGÇÖll avoid the temptation.
So you changed trackingGǪ big whoop. Rather than track around 220 m/s for every 10km of range, an Erebus/Rag now tracks about 110 m/s for every 10km of range. In addition, they have a gun sig size of about double that of a BS. This creates some magical world where a ship further away can be tracked better, but is some how mysteriously the same size as though range dilation has no affect at all on how well you can see that now tiny little dot. In laymanGÇÖs termsGǪ. This means that if Eve mechanics worked in the real universe, Every star in the whole freaking universe would look approximately the same size as our sun, as would all the planets in size relation to our moon rather than the tiny specs in the sky that they are. So hereGÇÖs what happens after your patch to just circumvent the whole problem you just createdGǪ. Lock time you sayGǪ Tracking speed you sayGǪ
Hello MR Proteus, Hello either 5 AEONS with 4 Domi painters or 50 Archons with 4 T2 Painters (and just for luls cause the ship is cheap, why not throw in 2 range extenders for the painters as well). Now that wonderful tengu has an 800-1200 sig and at 60km can be tracked plus has a sig size near the same as the guns do. That Maelstrom has a 1700 + sigGǪ ie bigger than the guns do, and can be tracked at about 12km rangeGǪ. And oh yeah, you can easily get those 300-400,000 ehp small sig lokis to web down anything closer than those ranges to prevent them from avoiding the tracking problemsGǪ not like tech 3GÇÖs are rare these days.
Oh but lock time you sayGǪ well if the carrier paints before the Titans ever lockGǪ. Oh yeah, Lock a tengu in 30-35 seconds, lock a Maelstrom in 23-30 secondsGǪ thatGÇÖs so brutal. Oh yeah, and thatGÇÖs just with ******* Navy tracking computers and sensor boosters, I didnGÇÖt even toss in the Meta 13-14 gear.
GeeGǪ in 20 minutes of planning and a slight modification to what my fleet roles are, IGÇÖve just circumvented your entire titan patch plans b/c you thought this was enough to warrant not changing the coding of your formulas so that they make sense.
Good thing thereGÇÖs nobody in this game who couldnGÇÖt ya know, divide their titan pilots up on mumble into 10-15 sub channels, have a few SCGÇÖs assigned to each for painting and just perform the exact same way where itGÇÖs GÇ£paint, blap, blap, boomGÇ¥ rather than the old, GÇ£blap, blap, boomGÇ¥GǪ. That extra stepGǪ it will be the death of me. Guess us PL folk, or Raiden folk, or NC. Folk will have a horrible time adapting to this fix bros.
Thanks for the effortGǪ maybe next time youGÇÖll listen to sense, put in the extra time needed, and avoid yet another **** fix.
Now I'm assuming whatever the sig penalty plan was that you had was based at least in part on what I propsed about 6 months ago as I've not seen any other signiture plans offered ever. If you would just ******* do it, It would balance so many combat problems currently seen in this game that it's actually worth the effort. So please stop taking the easy way and do something ******* useful for once in you entire gaming careers. CCP, listen to this man. He knows things. |

Orion GUardian
133
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 16:48:00 -
[2588] - Quote
Go back camping Jita please, the only time when CFC severly outnumbers the DOT-Coalition is when we get blueballed. |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
65
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 17:13:00 -
[2589] - Quote
Orion GUardian wrote:Go back camping Jita please, the only time when CFC severly outnumbers the DOT-Coalition is when we get blueballed. How come you are'nt allowed to use your Super Caps in fights with the DOTs? I'm getting a little aggravated since the only thing I'm missing to complete my Goonie KM Safari is the Super Cap mails.... ..
Help me out and stop hiding them, or get one on the gate in EC- so I can alpha it in my Rapier...
BTW....tell SmilingVagrant to stop flying Hounds as he is a terrible pilot......... . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Andski
GoonWaffe
3243
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 17:20:00 -
[2590] - Quote
"We're a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Falin Whalen
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
178
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 17:50:00 -
[2591] - Quote
Oh Snot Shot, it is not that we are hiding our supers, or we are scared to field them, it is more of we want everyone in our fleets to have fun. If someone gets into a fight and drops 30 titans on the field, it only is "fun" for those 30. Everybody else is irrelevant when titans are on the field. You may have had a good 600 vs. 600 fight going on, but when one side drops two dozen titans 1200 people just became relevant. You have a lot of experience with being irrelevant, so you know how it feels. You've got to remember that these are just simple miners. These are people of the land. The common clay of New Eden. You know... morons. |

Nao Oikawasan
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 19:02:00 -
[2592] - Quote
Aurora B wrote:Nao Oikawasan wrote:Aurora B wrote:Nao Oikawasan wrote:At 0800 this morning "Team Tech", who had promised to superblob CFC for control of three moons, instead sat in front of their computers, sobbing and rocking, refusing to login and help the brave few souls who were being slaughtered by the Goons. We know they were in front of their computers because they had all promised to take off of work and do this. A concerned citizen when round to an absent participant's house to make sure he hadn't hurt himself and got no answer, aside from loud crying and a muffled "mummy, mummy, why did they do this? I HATE IT." Has RDN. been broken? Listening to ghetto ***** Vile again? What is the new CCP tagline again? Oh yeah........I WAS THERE! Luckily, I don't think I'll be THERE much longer. Just long enough to figure out when I want to burn my main and get some revenge for the waste of my time by "Team Tech". Already have a fair group of dissidents ready to do the same. I suppose we should be thankful to Goons for showing us just how heavy the yoke of slavery to a fail coalition truly is. See you on the other side, Goons. It will be glorious. I think you have Lupus
I'm seriously considering filing a petition against you for revealing my personal medical information on these forums.
|

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
65
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 19:34:00 -
[2593] - Quote
Falin Whalen wrote:Oh Snot Shot, it is not that we are hiding our supers, or we are scared to field them, it is more of we want everyone in our fleets to have fun. If someone gets into a fight and drops 30 titans on the field, it only is "fun" for those 30. Everybody else is irrelevant when titans are on the field. You may have had a good 600 vs. 600 fight going on, but when one side drops two dozen titans 1200 people just became relevant. You have a lot of experience with being irrelevant, so you know how it feels. Ok so Goonies are the 0.0 Fleet Fight Police now?... Because youGÇÖre lookin out for the peeps in CFC 1,000 man fleets now to make sure their time online is quality fleet fight timeGǪGǪ..
IGÇÖm sure your quality and well thought out poast just made every SC pilot in the CFC say a collective GÇ£WTF?GÇ¥GǪ GǪGǪhow much do those babies cost these days 80 bill?? And their only involvement in 0.0 combat, if they are in the CFC, is to bridge out the guys to where the fun isGǪ GǪGǪGǪGǪor shoot structuresGǪGǪ GǪGǪ.wow, no wonder you guys want these things nerfGÇÖd. They truly are useless in your hands and so you want them to be just as useless to those that are willing to use themGǪGǪ..
Flailing Wailing wrote:You may have had a good 600 vs. 600 fight going on, but when one side drops two dozen titans 1200 people just became relevant. Ok there smart guyGǪ. . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

DaiTengu
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 19:53:00 -
[2594] - Quote
I think this needs to be re-posted:
In February, titans were responsible for destroying 823 ships in null security space. Of these, 764 were subcapitals.
https://twitter.com/CCP_Diagoras/status/180712331515396096 |

supr3m3justic3
Imperium Technologies F0RCEFUL ENTRY
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 20:04:00 -
[2595] - Quote
LOL.....764 ships, Are you kidding? That like what, 2 fleet fights. Better nerf that **** quick, cause i can see that easily hitting 800.
 |

OfBalance
Caldari State
200
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 20:26:00 -
[2596] - Quote
Acwron wrote: There's any physics law I don't know about that prevents me to lock a frigate? Anyway, it doesn't help me if I lock it or not, it's unlikely to hit it even tracking fitted.
And yes, we deserve the nerf after training for Titan. Time spent that will never come back. In a blink of an eye, they just mess with all your work. GOOD JOB CCP.
(Somehow CCP reminds me of old -í-+-Ħü-+ -í-+-¦-¦¦ü-é-ü-¦-+-à -í-+-å-+-¦-+-+-ü-é-+¦ü-ç-¦-ü-¦-+-à -á-¦-ü-+-â¦ü-¦-+-+-¦ -Soiuz Sovie+¢kih So+¢ialisticeskih Respublik-Union of Soviet Socialist Republics)
No offense to the russians, really. It's history.
"Anyone who nerfs my pwnmobile is literally Stalin."
lmao |

DaiTengu
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 20:36:00 -
[2597] - Quote
supr3m3justic3 wrote:LOL.....764 ships, Are you kidding? That like what, 2 fleet fights. Better nerf that **** quick, cause i can see that easily hitting 800. 
20-30 dudes killed 764 sub-caps with no risk when CCP has said they should be an anti-capital platform.
92% of the ships killed by Titans - which CCP has said should be for shooting capitals and structures - were sub-capitals. |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
65
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 20:40:00 -
[2598] - Quote
WelpGǪGǪGǪGǪif you guys are too scared to log in your own SC what else are they going to shoot?
GÇ£Hey I know!! LetGÇÖs hide all our SC, throw welp fleets at the DOT Super caps, and then run to CCP with some great statistics on how many subcaps died in a month!!GÇ¥ GÇô CFC 2012 Titan Nerf Plan GÇô Step 1.
Well played gooniesGǪGǪ..well playedGǪ. . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

OfBalance
Caldari State
200
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 20:42:00 -
[2599] - Quote
Inb4 an unironic "how many subcaps did drakes kill," from the entitlement crowd. |

DaiTengu
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 21:18:00 -
[2600] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:WelpGǪGǪGǪGǪif you guys are too scared to log in your own SC what else are they going to shoot? GÇ£Hey I know!! LetGÇÖs hide all our SC, throw welp fleets at the DOT Super caps, and then run to CCP with some great statistics on how many subcaps died in a month!!GÇ¥ GÇô CFC 2012 Titan Nerf Plan GÇô Step 1. Well played gooniesGǪGǪ..well playedGǪ.  .
\ -\ --Snot Shot, member of Elite Empire Pee vee Pee Alliance Zerophanage
|

supr3m3justic3
Imperium Technologies F0RCEFUL ENTRY
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 21:55:00 -
[2601] - Quote
DaiTengu wrote:supr3m3justic3 wrote:LOL.....764 ships, Are you kidding? That like what, 2 fleet fights. Better nerf that **** quick, cause i can see that easily hitting 800.  20-30 dudes killed 764 sub-caps with no risk when CCP has said they should be an anti-capital platform. 92% of the ships killed by Titans - which CCP has said should be for shooting capitals and structures - were sub-capitals.
80% of all the post in this thread that are non-supportive of the nerf dont really give 2 ***** about the titans, they would rather see some super over power ship, than goons get thier way, ny ******* day of the week. Our hate for you fuels the tracking titans, and i hope that thousands more of you die to the titans before they get nerfed, then after that, i hope we find a new way to shove all 1600 drakes right up your troll holes. |

supr3m3justic3
Imperium Technologies F0RCEFUL ENTRY
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 21:57:00 -
[2602] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:WelpGǪGǪGǪGǪif you guys are too scared to log in your own SC what else are they going to shoot? GÇ£Hey I know!! LetGÇÖs hide all our SC, throw welp fleets at the DOT Super caps, and then run to CCP with some great statistics on how many subcaps died in a month!!GÇ¥ GÇô CFC 2012 Titan Nerf Plan GÇô Step 1. Well played gooniesGǪGǪ..well playedGǪ.  .
why else would you welp fleets of sub-caps.... last time i checked, getting your **** pushed in wasnt fun. Unless you are a goon or Mike.Jackson! |

OfBalance
Caldari State
202
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 22:40:00 -
[2603] - Quote
Quote:FORCEFUL ENTRY - NCDOT B TEAM -- When almost as good is good enough |

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
210
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 22:47:00 -
[2604] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:WelpGǪGǪGǪGǪif you guys are too scared to log in your own SC what else are they going to shoot? GÇ£Hey I know!! LetGÇÖs hide all our SC, throw welp fleets at the DOT Super caps, and then run to CCP with some great statistics on how many subcaps died in a month!!GÇ¥ GÇô CFC 2012 Titan Nerf Plan GÇô Step 1. Well played gooniesGǪGǪ..well playedGǪ.  .
I used to think Riverini was the biggest idiot in EVE. Then you came along to prove me wrong. SHAME ON YOU! SHAME ON YOU SNOT ****!!
*fake edit*
Made a spelling error in there somewhere but I will be damned if I can find it..... |

supr3m3justic3
Imperium Technologies F0RCEFUL ENTRY
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 22:51:00 -
[2605] - Quote
OfBalance wrote:Quote:FORCEFUL ENTRY - NCDOT B TEAM -- When almost as good is good enough
FORUM ALT - GOONS A TEAM - When Getting owned by tracking titans isnt good enough, we get them nerfed. |

Andski
GoonWaffe
3249
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 23:53:00 -
[2606] - Quote
supr3m3justic3 wrote:80% of all the post in this thread that are non-supportive of the nerf dont really give 2 ***** about the titans, they would rather see some super over power ship, than goons get thier way, ny ******* day of the week. Our hate for you fuels the tracking titans, and i hope that thousands more of you die to the titans before they get nerfed, then after that, i hope we find a new way to shove all 1600 drakes right up your troll holes.
the paste must be especially tasty this season "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

supr3m3justic3
Imperium Technologies F0RCEFUL ENTRY
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 00:18:00 -
[2607] - Quote
Andski wrote:supr3m3justic3 wrote:80% of all the post in this thread that are non-supportive of the nerf dont really give 2 ***** about the titans, they would rather see some super over power ship, than goons get thier way, ny ******* day of the week. Our hate for you fuels the tracking titans, and i hope that thousands more of you die to the titans before they get nerfed, then after that, i hope we find a new way to shove all 1600 drakes right up your troll holes. the paste must be especially tasty this season
Yea, it was cooked in a XL antimatter casing, tastes like salmander dicks. |

Falin Whalen
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
179
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 00:56:00 -
[2608] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:WelpGǪGǪGǪGǪI'm an Empire piwat, and don't know the first thing about anything beyond Jita 4-4 undock. GÇ£Hey I know!! LetGÇÖs keep all our SC logged in 23.5/7, throw welp fleets at the DOT Super caps, and then counter drop them. What could go wrong!!GÇ¥ GÇô Snot Shot idiotic idea #27491 Paint chips are tastyGǪGǪ..I just poopedGǪin my pants.  .
Fixed your post. for you.
You've got to remember that these are just simple miners. These are people of the land. The common clay of New Eden. You know... morons. |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
719
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 00:58:00 -
[2609] - Quote
DaiTengu wrote:supr3m3justic3 wrote:LOL.....764 ships, Are you kidding? That like what, 2 fleet fights. Better nerf that **** quick, cause i can see that easily hitting 800.  20-30 dudes killed 764 sub-caps with no risk when CCP has said they should be an anti-capital platform. 92% of the ships killed by Titans - which CCP has NOW said should be for shooting capitals and structures - were sub-capitals.
fyp The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

Orion GUardian
133
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 01:15:00 -
[2610] - Quote
supr3m3justic3 wrote:LOL.....764 ships, Are you kidding? That like what, 2 fleet fights. Better nerf that **** quick, cause i can see that easily hitting 800 
or, to come from the other side: The "Capital Ship killer" did kill 59 capital ships in Nullsec in February....BUT it killed 764 Non-Capitals...
Not sure....sounds broken
And the "1200 people become irrelevant" reason for taking down Titans is kind of convincing...I mean...not everyone who started playing in 2004 even WANTS to fly a kilometer long spacecoffin after all. And most people who started much later cannot fly them competently really.
I mean: Subcapitals have a hard time killing Titans without Capital support, so why shouldn't Titans have a hard time killing subcapitals without support? Well that even could create two different battlefields to a conflict...a subcapital heavy and a capital heavy. If CCP went out of their way to actually deliver a sov system where different playstyles next to X00vsX00 where needed....well then it actually would make even more sense
And you know what my opinion is: Titans should have a non-combat role. Someone suggested "mobile station" or "field HQ" then tehre wouldn't be a reason for any alliance to have 40 of thos
Until then: Still heard no reason why the only counter to Titans should be "more Titans" |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 02:55:00 -
[2611] - Quote
[/quote]
Until then: Still heard no reason why the only counter to Titans should be "more Titans"[/quote]
Because drakes and maelstroms have some difficulties in killing a TITAN ! You need to bring the equivalent to kill it !
You don't have ? Grind isk and get it ! Are you afraid ? Go back to high sec. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3252
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 05:27:00 -
[2612] - Quote
Acwron wrote:
Until then: Still heard no reason why the only counter to Titans should be "more Titans"
Because drakes and maelstroms have some difficulties in killing a TITAN ! You need to bring the equivalent to kill it !
You don't have ? Grind isk and get it ! Are you afraid ? Go back to high sec.
your titan in particular doesn't require much effort to counter
a simple scam is all it takes "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3252
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 05:29:00 -
[2613] - Quote
"hey my friend's ragnarok is dying because he's an idiot, let me warp in my 25b nyx to save him instead of this 900m triage carrier" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Berke Negri
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
75
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 05:30:00 -
[2614] - Quote
if anything we shouldn't be rewarding people that would be willing to grind out 70billion isk |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3252
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 05:31:00 -
[2615] - Quote
acwron bots/rmts, nobody with two brain cells to rub together would get scammed out of a nyx and expect GMs to care "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Citamarret
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 06:08:00 -
[2616] - Quote
quote this if you click and drag the mittani's avatar around titan careposts so it looks like he's taunting them |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 09:00:00 -
[2617] - Quote
supr3m3justic3 wrote:DaiTengu wrote:supr3m3justic3 wrote:LOL.....764 ships, Are you kidding? That like what, 2 fleet fights. Better nerf that **** quick, cause i can see that easily hitting 800.  20-30 dudes killed 764 sub-caps with no risk when CCP has said they should be an anti-capital platform. 92% of the ships killed by Titans - which CCP has said should be for shooting capitals and structures - were sub-capitals. 80% of all the post in this thread that are non-supportive of the nerf dont really give 2 ***** about the titans, they would rather see some super over power ship, than goons get thier way, ny ******* day of the week. Our hate for you fuels the tracking titans, and i hope that thousands more of you die to the titans before they get nerfed, then after that, i hope we find a new way to shove all 1600 drakes right up your troll holes.
You mad? You sound pretty mad.
|

Orion GUardian
133
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 09:22:00 -
[2618] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Quote:Until then: Still heard no reason why the only counter to Titans should be "more Titans" Because drakes and maelstroms have some difficulties in killing a TITAN ! You need to bring the equivalent to kill it ! You don't have ? Grind isk and get it ! Are you afraid ? Go back to high sec.
So with a proper quote: If you tried proper grammar you might even bring across your point without me going: "Wtf is he trying to say?". I try it anyway
What kind of equivalent do you mean? Equivalent ISK? -> Why doesn't an officer fit Mach fleet of say 10, no kill a Titan then?
Skill: Well I am quite sure I pounded as much SP in Subcapitals as you did in your Titan, why can't I solo you?
EHP: Well, then go for the "few hundred Drakes" Theory.
EPEEN: Ok, I get it, nothing compares to a Titan in EPEENishness (what a strange made up word). But frankly, I don't really think they are that cool to enlarge your imaginary primary sexual organ that much.
What Equivalent may you possibly mean?
Second point: If you only used Drakes and Maelstroms I could understand your point...but lets see. Maelstrom, Huginn, Lachesis, Intereceptors*4, Interdictors*4, Heavy Interdictors*2, Hurricanes, Scimitars, Scorpions, Rooks. That is for a MAelstrom fleet, at least the shiptypes I normally see. 7 different Shiptypes, 17 different Ships....equivalent diversity after all.
btw: Its about a similar diversity with Drakes and AHACs and Welpcanes and I heard one of our allies used Abaddons as well oh and Tengus, well Bombers are not as divers only 1 shiptype and 4 shipos there. Or Black Ops. The only thing we do NOT field is a Titanblob to counter other peoples Titanblobs. edit: Don't forget Tier 3 Battlecruisers..
And before you start again: It would be rather stupid to field even 250 Dreadnoughts against a Titanblob (if we had that many people even wanting to fly Capitals). They'd most likely just get killed, without killing a single Titan because with our dictors and Hictors being killed by the Titan blapping they cannot be pointed. Ofc, after these changes that won't change, but I don't think THAT is a mistake at all. After all Titans are meant to be Anti Capital now. INSTEAD of being a big Support ship. |

Sentinel Eeex
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 14:11:00 -
[2619] - Quote
Acwron wrote:My Rag has a 68 mm scan resolution. With 3 Cormack Sebos I have 296mm
Without any sensor booster, I target a Dramiel in 33 sec.
With a Shadow Serpentis sebo I target in 20 sec. With a Cormack Sebo it takes 18 sec With 2 Cormack Sebo it takes 11 Sec With 3 Cormack Sebo it takes 8 sec
Without any sensor booster, I target a Nightmare in 13 sec
With a Cormack Sebo it takes 8 sec With 2 Cormack Sebos it takes 4 sec With 3 Cormack Sebo it takes less than 3 sec
Now, getting scan resolution from 68 to 5, imagine how much it will take to target a frigate. With TiDi on, you have time to take a bath, eat, watch a movie, sleep, wake up, take a shower then check if your target is locked. Meh, it's not there anymore. he's in his home system. For a long time now. But tomorrow is another day, you can try to lock something again. Make sure you got everything you need: food, water/beer/scotch, movies and popcorn ofc
Oh crap, I can't hit anything cos my tracking is halved. nevermind, going back to the movie.
It is amusing that you've answered to yourself, but didn't even realize it.
|

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
65
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 16:56:00 -
[2620] - Quote
Is it true that Goonie Titans come with training wheels? GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

John Zorg
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 17:11:00 -
[2621] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Is it true that Goonie Titans come with training wheels?
c |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 18:29:00 -
[2622] - Quote
DaiTengu wrote:supr3m3justic3 wrote:LOL.....764 ships, Are you kidding? That like what, 2 fleet fights. Better nerf that **** quick, cause i can see that easily hitting 800.  20-30 dudes killed 764 sub-caps with no risk when CCP has said they should be an anti-capital platform. 92% of the ships killed by Titans - which CCP has said should be for shooting capitals and structures - were sub-capitals.
You mad?
Also: During the Ice interdiction, 90% of killed ice miners in high sec were killed by Goons - who are supposed to be a null sec alliance. |

Citamarret
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 18:33:00 -
[2623] - Quote
goons are really bad at this game and it is a mystery as to how we actually hold sov
oh wait no it isn't everyone else is just terrible
heh,. owned |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
66
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 19:31:00 -
[2624] - Quote
Citamarret wrote:goons are really bad at this game and it is a mystery as to how we actually hold sov
oh wait no it isn't everyone else is just terrible
heh,. owned I think you got it right the first sentenceGǪGǪGǪ.after goonies were given 3 regions by PL & NC, you then proceeded to lose all 3 regions faster than any Alliance in EVE history, then TCF handed you their space prior to them disbanding.
Now you just collect **** Alliances as cannon fodder to protect and insulate your space while you cry to CCP to nerf anything that might threaten itGǪGǪ.
Think that sums it upGǪ.. .
GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
191
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 19:35:00 -
[2625] - Quote
Andski wrote:"hey my friend's ragnarok is dying because he's an idiot, let me warp in my 25b nyx to save him instead of this 900m triage carrier"
900m triage carrier? what like fully fit or sometin?
|

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
559
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 20:06:00 -
[2626] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Andski wrote:"hey my friend's ragnarok is dying because he's an idiot, let me warp in my 25b nyx to save him instead of this 900m triage carrier" 900m triage carrier?  what like fully fit or sometin? Sometimes its :effort: to strip the non-triage mods off a carrier, ya know? Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

baltec1
845
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 23:33:00 -
[2627] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Citamarret wrote:goons are really bad at this game and it is a mystery as to how we actually hold sov
oh wait no it isn't everyone else is just terrible
heh,. owned I think you got it right the first sentenceGǪGǪGǪ.after goonies were given 3 regions by PL & NC, you then proceeded to lose all 3 regions faster than any Alliance in EVE history, then TCF handed you their space prior to them disbanding. Now you just collect **** Alliances as cannon fodder to protect and insulate your space while you cry to CCP to nerf anything that might threaten itGǪGǪ.  Think that sums it upGǪ..  .
This from a nobody who camps jita station all day with their neutral alts on standby just in case the hauler you're ganking tries to shoot back... |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
66
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 23:48:00 -
[2628] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Snot Shot wrote:Citamarret wrote:goons are really bad at this game and it is a mystery as to how we actually hold sov
oh wait no it isn't everyone else is just terrible
heh,. owned I think you got it right the first sentenceGǪGǪGǪ.after goonies were given 3 regions by PL & NC, you then proceeded to lose all 3 regions faster than any Alliance in EVE history, then TCF handed you their space prior to them disbanding. Now you just collect **** Alliances as cannon fodder to protect and insulate your space while you cry to CCP to nerf anything that might threaten itGǪGǪ.  Think that sums it upGǪ..  . This from a nobody who camps jita station all day with their neutral alts on standby just in case the hauler you're ganking tries to shoot back... You guys keep spouting off about this mystical place called Jita.........but I just can't seem to locate it on my KB link below... . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3265
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 00:20:00 -
[2629] - Quote
guys my killboard "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

baltec1
845
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 00:33:00 -
[2630] - Quote
Poor little snot's not getting on any mails because he spends all his time providing sebo for the alpha boats. |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
66
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 02:21:00 -
[2631] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Poor little snot's not getting on any mails because he spends all his time providing sebo for the alpha boats. When a fight starts I usually crank LMFAO "Sexy and I know it" uncloak and let my sebo flag fly baby!!!.....
How many albums did you go through while you were shooting those 233 POS mods this month..... . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Kelvan Hemanseh
Starwinders The Unwilling.
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 03:14:00 -
[2632] - Quote
I can't tell who's more dumb now Snot Shot or Xenuria. |

Klann Schreck
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 03:51:00 -
[2633] - Quote
You know....all of amok(dot) are a better group of posters than snot shot. It's really pretty sad... |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
66
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 04:35:00 -
[2634] - Quote
Welp..........I gots more "Likes" than the two of you combined so I think I'm a pretty good poaster.........and my mom says thats all that counts.....
Hey I got more CFC kills in EC- today............you guize are fun to farm!!!.. . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
560
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 05:24:00 -
[2635] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:How many albums did you go through while you were shooting those 233 POS mods this month.....Lol I imagine about 3. Super carriers, dreads, and titans much through poses pdq, ya know, and CFC uses them a fair amount for doing these things(I was watching mods die almost as fast as I could lock em in a bomber not long ago)
Snot Shot wrote:Welp..........I gots more "Likes" than the two of you combined so I think I'm a pretty good poaster.........and my mom says thats all that counts.....  Hey I got more CFC kills in EC- today............you guize are fun to farm!!!..  . 66 likes for someone with your prolific posting habits is not exactly good. Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3272
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 07:42:00 -
[2636] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Welp..........I gots more "Likes" than the two of you combined so I think I'm a pretty good poaster.........and my mom says thats all that counts.....  Hey I got more CFC kills in EC- today............you guize are fun to farm!!!..  .
oh boy look who's dropping the likes bomb "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

baltec1
845
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 09:06:00 -
[2637] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:baltec1 wrote:Poor little snot's not getting on any mails because he spends all his time providing sebo for the alpha boats. When a fight starts I usually crank LMFAO "Sexy and I know it" uncloak and let my sebo flag fly baby!!!.....  How many albums did you go through while you were shooting those 233 POS mods this month.....  .
I had cant stop this on a loop while I burned down towers in my little throax |

Eliniale
Blackbox.
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 11:59:00 -
[2638] - Quote
Tomytronic wrote:This is a sad, sad day for elite pvp. If I spent years earning a titan by logging on every month and changing a few skills on an alt and then exploiting drone minerals in order to pay for it, I should be able to kill any other ship in the game with impunity, from capsules to motherships. This is a totally unwarranted and ridiculous change. I'm sad to see that CCP is now catering to casuals.
We pay for our rent by exploiting broken game mechanics to bathe in isk and RMT, and this is how you treat us? I'm sickened CCP, sickened. Titans are endgame earners for some of us and we need to be able to dominate the game single-handedly to feel good about ourselves. You're hurting your most loyal customers here in favour of pubbie casuals.
Well this isn't exactly true anymore, now is it? Titans are never earned by a single person, nor will a single account person ever fly one. And Titans (currently) are built to serve a very specific purpose, namely to **** anything bigger than a battleship. And i would love to see titans **** vast amounts of carriers and dreads, just because they can.
But making titans the answer to everything as you suggest is just the worst idea ever, it would make any other ship in than game pretty much redundant. Moreover although supercapfleets should be super, you still want other stuff to be able to beat them. Otherwise it would just be a slugmatch between supercapfleets where the side with the most ships wins. At least now fleetbattles get an extra strategic dimension, before it was just titans kill everything, and everything supports the titans. Now you are confronted with extra choices, do you attack the titans first, so they can't kill your capitals with impunity, but opening up your supcapfleets to enemy subcap fire, or do you go after the regular caps of the enemy, hoping to kill the titan's support? O do you ignore the screams of your dieing capitals as you ignore the titans and kill the enemy subcaps?
This makes the game a lot less tic tac toe, and more organic. I like it.
|

Wyatt 3arp
IPT BR3
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 13:50:00 -
[2639] - Quote
CCP ***** bends over to GSF, again. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3276
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 14:00:00 -
[2640] - Quote
Wyatt 3arp wrote:CCP ***** bends over to GSF, again.
quiet peasant "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 17:20:00 -
[2641] - Quote
So greyscale how soon can you put this nerfs in the test server so titans can test the fittings out pwaning peoiple :D |

Sir Marksalot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 21:21:00 -
[2642] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:baltec1 wrote:Poor little snot's not getting on any mails because he spends all his time providing sebo for the alpha boats. When a fight starts I usually crank LMFAO "Sexy and I know it" uncloak and let my sebo flag fly baby!!!.....  How many albums did you go through while you were shooting those 233 POS mods this month.....  .
i thought all you guys did was wardec larger alliances, then cull their stupider members who undock in jita |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
564
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 21:35:00 -
[2643] - Quote
Just to reiterate what we learned at fanfest.
The Mittani is a Wizard and Shoots Lightning Bolts out his Fingers! Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

Calipso Star
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 10:04:00 -
[2644] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Just to reiterate what we learned at fanfest.
The Mittani is a Wizard and Shoots Lightning Bolts out his Fingers!
What you learned at fanfest ? Can i tell you what we learned from the live stream ? Ok , let me sum it up.
mittani is the biggest ******* and king of faggots from all eve aka goons. He eats **** all day long ofc he has a ego problem he thinks he is "the ****" and you are all a bunch of retards because you support him but thats what headless chickens do because is to hard to think for themselfs is easier to borrow the thinking from a "special olympics champion". |

baltec1
853
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 10:15:00 -
[2645] - Quote
Calipso Star wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:Just to reiterate what we learned at fanfest.
The Mittani is a Wizard and Shoots Lightning Bolts out his Fingers! What you learned at fanfest ? Can i tell you what we learned from the live stream ? Ok , let me sum it up. mittani is the biggest ******* and king of faggots from all eve aka goons. He eats **** all day long ofc he has a ego problem he thinks he is "the ****" and you are all a bunch of retards because you support him but thats what headless chickens do because is to hard to think for themselfs is easier to borrow the thinking from a "special olympics champion".
Hey guys look at this bitterpost. |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
580
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 10:53:00 -
[2646] - Quote
Calipso Star wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:Just to reiterate what we learned at fanfest.
The Mittani is a Wizard and Shoots Lightning Bolts out his Fingers! What you learned at fanfest ? Can i tell you what we learned from the live stream ? Ok , let me sum it up. mittani is the biggest ******* and king of faggots from all eve aka goons. He eats **** all day long ofc he has a ego problem he thinks he is "the ****" and you are all a bunch of retards because you support him but thats what headless chickens do because is to hard to think for themselfs is easier to borrow the thinking from a "special olympics champion".


       Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

Orion GUardian
133
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 11:31:00 -
[2647] - Quote
Calipso Star wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:Just to reiterate what we learned at fanfest.
The Mittani is a Wizard and Shoots Lightning Bolts out his Fingers! What you learned at fanfest ? Can i tell you what we learned from the live stream ? Ok , let me sum it up. mittani is the biggest ******* and king of faggots from all eve aka goons. He eats **** all day long ofc he has a ego problem he thinks he is "the ****" and you are all a bunch of retards because you support him but thats what headless chickens do because is to hard to think for themselfs is easier to borrow the thinking from a "special olympics champion".
It seems like the "State War Academy" is really going to be CFCs next big Nemesis, **** the DOT coalition, lets go to war with SWA!
Btw is there a recording up somewhere? |

Calipso Star
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 11:49:00 -
[2648] - Quote
Orion GUardian wrote:Calipso Star wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:Just to reiterate what we learned at fanfest.
The Mittani is a Wizard and Shoots Lightning Bolts out his Fingers! What you learned at fanfest ? Can i tell you what we learned from the live stream ? Ok , let me sum it up. mittani is the biggest ******* and king of faggots from all eve aka goons. He eats **** all day long ofc he has a ego problem he thinks he is "the ****" and you are all a bunch of retards because you support him but thats what headless chickens do because is to hard to think for themselfs is easier to borrow the thinking from a "special olympics champion". It seems like the "State War Academy" is really going to be CFCs next big Nemesis, srew the DOT coalition, lets go to war with SWA! Btw is there a recording up somewhere?
Difference between Goons and Raiden. is that Raiden. fights the battles in game you just cry on forums. Thats why you don't see them in here talking to people that spammed anything they had to say. I personaly don't balme you is your intelect can't do more then that understandable, but ccp has allowed goons to troll anyone , swa , it doesn't matter if i am in SWA is my problem i play the game how i want it i have no problem you can nerf titans as much as you want but goons will remain ******** like ****.
|

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
66
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 11:54:00 -
[2649] - Quote
Calipso Star wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:Just to reiterate what we learned at fanfest.
The Mittani is a Wizard and Shoots Lightning Bolts out his Fingers! What you learned at fanfest ? Can i tell you what we learned from the live stream ? Ok , let me sum it up. mittani is the biggest ******* and king of faggots from all eve aka goons. He eats **** all day long ofc he has a ego problem he thinks he is "the ****" and you are all a bunch of retards because you support him but thats what headless chickens do because is to hard to think for themselfs is easier to borrow the thinking from a "special olympics champion". Chill my friendGǪGǪGǪ.remember, the more a goonie is hated by non-goonies, the more he is looked up to by goonies. Yes, Mitini is the biggest douchebag in EVE but thatGÇÖs why he is loved by goonies.
Example of this fact is why goonies were told to hate SirMolle. Currently the only difference between Molle and Mittni is that Mitini quit his job to be a real life space spy and has a dog as a pleasure companion. Other than that everything goonies were told to hate about Molle is exactly what Mittini represents today. Which brings us back to my opening statementGǪGǪGǪ. Gǣthe more a goonie is hated by non-goonies, the more he is looked up to by gooniesGǥ. Once you get thatGǪGǪGǪ..you get gooniesGǪ.
AnywhooGǪGǪ..sounds like Fan Fest is great!! If anyone was planning on going to the Ice Bar donGÇÖt waste your moneyGǪGǪ.when I went last year they didnGÇÖt have a jacket that fit me so I had to wear a comforter from the hotelGǪGǪ. .
GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Orion GUardian
133
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 13:22:00 -
[2650] - Quote
Calipso Star wrote:
Difference between Goons and Raiden. is that Raiden. fights the battles in game you just cry on forums. Thats why you don't see them in here talking to people that spammed anything they had to say. I personaly don't balme you is your intelect can't do more then that understandable, but ccp has allowed goons to troll anyone , swa , it doesn't matter if i am in SWA is my problem i play the game how i want it i have no problem you can nerf titans as much as you want but goons will remain ******** like ****.
So again someone using no understandable grammar, punctuation or syntax whatsoever. So again I am trying to make sense of what you want to tell me, I am taking a leap here:
Well the difference between the DOT and the CFC is: the DOT coalition uses NPC corp alts (like you could be) to whine on the forums, while the CFC (like Goons) use their main characters. So while the Goons do spam this thread in an obvious manner. most of those NPC alt characters spamming back (especially the whining about the nerf) are in fact part of the DOT coalition. Obviously YOU are not, because I think even RaidenDOT has certain standards who they let into their alliance and who they don't [Oh snap!]
Quote: personaly don't balme you is your intelect can't do more then that understandable
Sorry I have to do this but: I personally do not blame your intellect as well, for not being to insult mine without making typing, grammar and punctuation mistakes. You cannot do better than that, as far as I understand it.
Disclaimer: I apologize to all serious internet trolls for doing the "insult the other person's writing skills" step. I know it is low, but having my intellect questioned by him just got to me, personally *grabs his chest* It is my solemn duty to match his niveau as low as it can get, don't blame me. |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
66
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 14:09:00 -
[2651] - Quote
Orion GUardian wrote:[quote=Calipso Star] Quote: personaly don't balme you is your intelect can't do more then that understandable Sorry I have to do this but: I personal ly do not blame your intel lect as well, for not being to insult mine without making typing, grammar and punctuation mistakes. You cannot do better th an that, as far as I understand it. Disclaimer: I apologize to all serious internet trolls for doing the "insult the other person's writing skills" step. I know it is low, but having my intel lect questioned by him just got to me, personal ly *grabs his chest* It is my solemn duty to match his niveau as low as it can get, don't blame me. So you corrected him with more writing mistakes...... .........nice job there bud, yah really told him off..... . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Orion GUardian
133
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 14:17:00 -
[2652] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Orion GUardian wrote:[quote=Calipso Star] Quote: personaly don't balme you is your intelect can't do more then that understandable Sorry I have to do this but: I personal ly do not blame your intel lect as well, for not being to insult mine without making typing, grammar and punctuation mistakes. You cannot do better th an that, as far as I understand it. Disclaimer: I apologize to all serious internet trolls for doing the "insult the other person's writing skills" step. I know it is low, but having my intel lect questioned by him just got to me, personal ly *grabs his chest* It is my solemn duty to match his niveau as low as it can get, don't blame me. So you corrected him with more writing mistakes......  .........nice job there bud, yah really told him off.....  .
So perhaps I AM stupid, but I don't see any mistakes in my text. So either there are real mistakes done because I don't know better (being non-native speaker and all) or I am just blind because I dont see them.
And tbh: I was not complaining about single mistakes there either *shrug* I mean if there are more mistakes than right stuff while insulting the intelligence of someone else...it just sounds wrong ;)
edit: if there was a mistake in my text I missed, well thats how trolling works either way ;) |

forator2
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 16:03:00 -
[2653] - Quote
Calipso Star wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:Just to reiterate what we learned at fanfest.
The Mittani is a Wizard and Shoots Lightning Bolts out his Fingers! What you learned at fanfest ? Can i tell you what we learned from the live stream ? Ok , let me sum it up. mittani is the biggest ******* and king of faggots from all eve aka goons. He eats **** all day long ofc he has a ego problem he thinks he is "the ****" and you are all a bunch of retards because you support him but thats what headless chickens do because is to hard to think for themselfs is easier to borrow the thinking from a "special olympics champion".
you are so wright. U saw the ****** being so important yesterday at the csmpanel. I have nothing with the goonswarm guys, but how did they vote such an idiot? why didn't they let the same ones, at least they knew what they wanted. And by the way what about the titan? I hope they realise is not ok what decided. |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 16:34:00 -
[2654] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Welp..........I gots more "Likes" than the two of you combined so I think I'm a pretty good poaster.........and my mom says thats all that counts.....  Hey I got more CFC kills in EC- today............you guize are fun to farm!!!..  .
I hate Orphanage, but you sir should join the DOT coalition, create a NPC alt and then continue the quality posting here. |

Orion GUardian
133
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 17:46:00 -
[2655] - Quote
forator2 wrote:Calipso Star wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:Just to reiterate what we learned at fanfest.
The Mittani is a Wizard and Shoots Lightning Bolts out his Fingers! What you learned at fanfest ? Can i tell you what we learned from the live stream ? Ok , let me sum it up. mittani is the biggest ******* and king of faggots from all eve aka goons. He eats **** all day long ofc he has a ego problem he thinks he is "the ****" and you are all a bunch of retards because you support him but thats what headless chickens do because is to hard to think for themselfs is easier to borrow the thinking from a "special olympics champion". you are so wright. U saw the retar.d being so important yesterday at the csmpanel. I have nothing with the goonswarm guys, but how did they vote such an idiot? why didn't they let the same ones, at least they knew what they wanted. And by the way what about the titan? I hope they realise is not ok what decided.
I am not sure if you are making fun of this guy, but if you are: That was an awesome post. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
252
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 20:17:00 -
[2656] - Quote
Great discussion on the titan balancing steps, guys.
Keep up the good posting on EVE-O, a supercapitals online forum. Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |

forator2
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 00:01:00 -
[2657] - Quote
what matters what we say or don't say on the forum.... anyway nobody cares. You can see how affected mrs CCP Greyscale of our problem. I assume that the decision was already taken, seeing that he's not bothering to write anything on this forum, as he already spoke with CSM....players representatives :)))). He has too many problems to deal with (Mittani you should buy him some clips to have something to do while he speaks at fanfest), so is too busy to listen to us.
but I still have two questions: 1. If he nerf the titan, maybe he will return all the SP for all the time we lost ? 2. will they drop down the prices for the plex, seeing that we cannot use the titans for the PVE either? |

Orion GUardian
133
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 07:48:00 -
[2658] - Quote
forator2 wrote:what matters what we say or don't say on the forum.... anyway nobody cares. You can see how affected mrs CCP Greyscale of our problem. I assume that the decision was already taken, seeing that he's not bothering to write anything on this forum, as he already spoke with CSM....players representatives :)))). He has too many problems to deal with (Mittani you should buy him some clips to have something to do while he speaks at fanfest), so is too busy to listen to us.
but I still have two questions: 1. If he nerf the titan, maybe he will return all the SP for all the time we lost ? 2. will they drop down the prices for the plex, seeing that we cannot use the titans for the PVE either?
So you did not make fun of him you are just normally bad at posting then.....what a shame. Btw: Please try to use Verbs, and support Verbs as well. That would be awesome.
1. They never do return SP for ship changes 2. PLEX cost a little above normal subscription price so why would they lower it? 2.a sure you can use Titans for PvE....boosting your Tengu and the affiliated asigned fighters with your maxed leadership skills.
|

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 12:23:00 -
[2659] - Quote
forator2 wrote:what matters what we say or don't say on the forum.... anyway nobody cares. You can see how affected mrs CCP Greyscale of our problem. I assume that the decision was already taken, seeing that he's not bothering to write anything on this forum, as he already spoke with CSM....players representatives :)))). He has too many problems to deal with (Mittani you should buy him some clips to have something to do while he speaks at fanfest), so is too busy to listen to us.
but I still have two questions: 1. If he nerf the titan, maybe he will return all the SP for all the time we lost ? 2. will they drop down the prices for the plex, seeing that we cannot use the titans for the PVE either? Meanwhile I am quite convinced that the proposed changes won't change much. Epic goon whine threadnaught is incoming. |

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 21:06:00 -
[2660] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:forator2 wrote:what matters what we say or don't say on the forum.... anyway nobody cares. You can see how affected mrs CCP Greyscale of our problem. I assume that the decision was already taken, seeing that he's not bothering to write anything on this forum, as he already spoke with CSM....players representatives :)))). He has too many problems to deal with (Mittani you should buy him some clips to have something to do while he speaks at fanfest), so is too busy to listen to us.
but I still have two questions: 1. If he nerf the titan, maybe he will return all the SP for all the time we lost ? 2. will they drop down the prices for the plex, seeing that we cannot use the titans for the PVE either? Meanwhile I am quite convinced that the proposed changes won't change much. Epic goon whine threadnaught is incoming.
I will lol at them being owned inj the same way , but with the difference that there will be more titans and more lokis and panters going on :D |

forator2
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 21:42:00 -
[2661] - Quote
Where is the CSM ??? .... who are they? "We have talked to the CSM about this, and we're comfortable going forward with these changes in light of that discussion." .... When ? Where? We have no right to know |

forator2
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 22:19:00 -
[2662] - Quote
CSM meeting minutes GÇô Iceland 7th to the 9th of December 2011
"Supercapital Rebalancing: The CSM noted that Crucible had not adjusted the tracking of Titan guns, which allow Titans to destroy subcapital ships with relative impunity when in a large group. The CSM mentioned allowing Electronic Attack Ships to impact ewar-immune vessels as a possible fix. The CSM suggested that supercarriers be allowed to dock in outposts which have an appropriate upgrade. The CSM noted it that it did not wish Titans to ever be able to dock, but that supercarriers were now less powerful and more common and should thus be treated more as regular ships rather than special snowflakes."
Nothing About '' Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5 ''
http://community.eveonline.com/council/transcripts/2011/CSM_CCP_Mettings_7-9_12_2011.pdf |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3387
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 22:23:00 -
[2663] - Quote
Calipso Star wrote:Difference between Goons and Raiden. is that Raiden. fights the battles in game you just cry on forums. Thats why you don't see them in here talking to people that spammed anything they had to say. I personaly don't balme you is your intelect can't do more then that understandable, but ccp has allowed goons to troll anyone , swa , it doesn't matter if i am in SWA is my problem i play the game how i want it i have no problem you can nerf titans as much as you want but goons will remain ******** like ****.
learn to spell m8 "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3387
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 22:25:00 -
[2664] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:forator2 wrote:what matters what we say or don't say on the forum.... anyway nobody cares. You can see how affected mrs CCP Greyscale of our problem. I assume that the decision was already taken, seeing that he's not bothering to write anything on this forum, as he already spoke with CSM....players representatives :)))). He has too many problems to deal with (Mittani you should buy him some clips to have something to do while he speaks at fanfest), so is too busy to listen to us.
but I still have two questions: 1. If he nerf the titan, maybe he will return all the SP for all the time we lost ? 2. will they drop down the prices for the plex, seeing that we cannot use the titans for the PVE either? Meanwhile I am quite convinced that the proposed changes won't change much. Epic goon whine threadnaught is incoming.
followed by an epic smug threadnaught after they are nerfed even further into the ground "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3390
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 01:22:00 -
[2665] - Quote
http://dog-net.org/brdoc/?brid=5869
LOL GOONIES CAN'T DEAL WITH TITANS "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3390
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 01:27:00 -
[2666] - Quote
also RF Gyrostabs on an erebus are the new FOTM OP WTF OH GOD fit "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 02:11:00 -
[2667] - Quote
Andski wrote:http://dog-net.org/brdoc/?brid=5869
LOL GOONIES CAN'T DEAL WITH TITANS Pretty smart of you to throw this right at the end of a thread about nerf'ing them hu....
Seems to me that the fight looked pretty fair when you crybabies finanly log in your Super caps...the only thing that swayed the battle was you **** packing the system as usual. I think you guys were pretty dumb to do this now before the nerf since now CCP can easily see that they don't need nerfing, you guys just need to stop being pussies.......
Congrats on poping your cherry......will you keep loging them in or go back to hiding now?....
Hey I got 3 Goonies carrier kills in EC- thanks for that ... . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3390
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 02:18:00 -
[2668] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Andski wrote:http://dog-net.org/brdoc/?brid=5869
LOL GOONIES CAN'T DEAL WITH TITANS Pretty smart of you to throw this right at the end of a thread about nerf'ing them hu....  Seems to me that the fight looked pretty fair when you crybabies finanly log in your Super caps...the only thing that swayed the battle was you **** packing the system as usual. I think you guys were pretty dumb to do this now before the nerf since now CCP can easily see that they don't need nerfing, you guys just need to stop being pussies.......  Congrats on poping your cherry......will you keep loging them in or go back to hiding now?....  Hey I got 3 Goonies carrier kills in EC- thanks for that ...  .
i literally don't care about a multiboxer losing 3 carriers at a gate "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Klann Schreck
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 02:54:00 -
[2669] - Quote
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12842464
I too salvage in my ratting titan. Errr, no I don't because that's a terrible idea. (well both of those ideas) |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 04:30:00 -
[2670] - Quote
Andski wrote:Snot Shot wrote:Andski wrote:http://dog-net.org/brdoc/?brid=5869
LOL GOONIES CAN'T DEAL WITH TITANS Pretty smart of you to throw this right at the end of a thread about nerf'ing them hu....  Seems to me that the fight looked pretty fair when you crybabies finanly log in your Super caps...the only thing that swayed the battle was you **** packing the system as usual. I think you guys were pretty dumb to do this now before the nerf since now CCP can easily see that they don't need nerfing, you guys just need to stop being pussies.......  Congrats on poping your cherry......will you keep loging them in or go back to hiding now?....  Hey I got 3 Goonies carrier kills in EC- thanks for that ...  . i literally don't care about a multiboxer losing 3 carriers at a gate So now that you guys have figured out how to log them in.........can we get a Titan on the gate in EC-... . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3393
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 06:31:00 -
[2671] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:So now that you guys have figured out how to log them in.........can we get a Titan on the gate in EC-...  .
Not our gimmick. Try the Ossogur gate, Amamake. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

J3ssica Biel
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 11:03:00 -
[2672] - Quote
forator2 wrote:CSM meeting minutes GÇô Iceland 7th to the 9th of December 2011"Supercapital Rebalancing: The CSM noted that Crucible had not adjusted the tracking of Titan guns, which allow Titans to destroy subcapital ships with relative impunity when in a large group. The CSM mentioned allowing Electronic Attack Ships to impact ewar-immune vessels as a possible fix. The CSM suggested that supercarriers be allowed to dock in outposts which have an appropriate upgrade. The CSM noted it that it did not wish Titans to ever be able to dock, but that supercarriers were now less powerful and more common and should thus be treated more as regular ships rather than special snowflakes." Nothing About '' Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5 '' http://community.eveonline.com/council/transcripts/2011/CSM_CCP_Mettings_7-9_12_2011.pdf Hey Dumbass that was released before CCP announced this nerf, You even said the date in your post
|

Calipso Star
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 11:57:00 -
[2673] - Quote
Andski wrote:http://dog-net.org/brdoc/?brid=5869
LOL GOONIES CAN'T DEAL WITH TITANS
Isn't this what you implied all along ? And after that you came with that link to contradict what you were saying. Perfect, can you start making sense for once in your life ? |

Gravis MacClay
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 12:21:00 -
[2674] - Quote
J3ssica Biel wrote:forator2 wrote:CSM meeting minutes GÇô Iceland 7th to the 9th of December 2011"Supercapital Rebalancing: The CSM noted that Crucible had not adjusted the tracking of Titan guns, which allow Titans to destroy subcapital ships with relative impunity when in a large group. The CSM mentioned allowing Electronic Attack Ships to impact ewar-immune vessels as a possible fix. The CSM suggested that supercarriers be allowed to dock in outposts which have an appropriate upgrade. The CSM noted it that it did not wish Titans to ever be able to dock, but that supercarriers were now less powerful and more common and should thus be treated more as regular ships rather than special snowflakes." Nothing About '' Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5 '' http://community.eveonline.com/council/transcripts/2011/CSM_CCP_Mettings_7-9_12_2011.pdf Hey Dumbass that was released before CCP announced this nerf, You even said the date in your post
.... |

Infinimo
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
416
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 15:14:00 -
[2675] - Quote
first world problems itt Theta Squad best squad. Monocle crew represent~ |

John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 18:14:00 -
[2676] - Quote
Andski wrote:John Maynard Keynes wrote:forator2 wrote:what matters what we say or don't say on the forum.... anyway nobody cares. You can see how affected mrs CCP Greyscale of our problem. I assume that the decision was already taken, seeing that he's not bothering to write anything on this forum, as he already spoke with CSM....players representatives :)))). He has too many problems to deal with (Mittani you should buy him some clips to have something to do while he speaks at fanfest), so is too busy to listen to us.
but I still have two questions: 1. If he nerf the titan, maybe he will return all the SP for all the time we lost ? 2. will they drop down the prices for the plex, seeing that we cannot use the titans for the PVE either? Meanwhile I am quite convinced that the proposed changes won't change much. Epic goon whine threadnaught is incoming. followed by an epic smug threadnaught after they are nerfed even further into the ground Fine with me as long as they get a proper meaningfull role. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3398
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 19:31:00 -
[2677] - Quote
Calipso Star wrote:Andski wrote:http://dog-net.org/brdoc/?brid=5869
LOL GOONIES CAN'T DEAL WITH TITANS Isn't this what you implied all along ? And after that you came with that link to contradict what you were saying. Perfect, can you start making sense for once in your life ?
quiet worm "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3398
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 19:34:00 -
[2678] - Quote
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12842287
titans are fine wolololol "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 02:24:00 -
[2679] - Quote
Andski wrote:http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12842287
titans are fine wolololol So what point do you think that proves? The fact still remains that if CCP nerf Titans so they can't hit subcaps then the CFC will just **** pack systems to "win" fight just like the NC use to do..... ......but you won't need to worry about any counter.....yaaaay goonies... . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3404
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 05:16:00 -
[2680] - Quote
hey idiot look at the shiptype
if you knew anything about titans you'd know that's beyond broken "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Calipso Star
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:53:00 -
[2681] - Quote
Andski wrote:hey idiot look at the shiptype
if you knew anything about titans you'd know that's beyond broken
Is not that you know something about this game either or manners. You know for the 2 years that you spent in game you are pretty vocative considering that you do not have the knowledge or the experience to give advices or lectures. I would say fly another 2 years and come back on forums. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3404
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 08:45:00 -
[2682] - Quote
Calipso Star wrote:Andski wrote:hey idiot look at the shiptype
if you knew anything about titans you'd know that's beyond broken Is not that you know something about this game either or manners. You know for the 2 years that you spent in game you are pretty vocative considering that you do not have the knowledge or the experience to give advices or lectures. I would say fly another 2 years and come back on forums.
try posting from your main before telling me to "fly another 2 years and come back on the forums" ;p
i'm just going to assume that you're a hisec mission runner so fly away "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
72
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 10:58:00 -
[2683] - Quote
Andski wrote:hey idiot look at the shiptype
if you knew anything about titans you'd know that's beyond broken Hey **** packerGǪGǪ GǪGǪ..log in your Super Caps and stop flailing around on the forums like a bunch of crybabies. Last weekendGÇÖs fight proved that the only thing broken all this time was the CFCGÇÖs confidence to field there Super CapsGǪ.
You proved that your plan all along is to get Titans nerfGÇÖd so you could roll in with your 1,000 man fleets of noobs, take whatever systems and regions you want, and kill fleets of Super Caps with riftersGǪ
So the question is, is that bump down by your taint a clitoris or the beginning of something Goons have been lacking since Mitini took the helm of your ship of fools? . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3405
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:23:00 -
[2684] - Quote
the entirety of your knowledge of nullsec warfare is making awful solo bombing runs and being cloaked on the torrinos gate in a rapier
at least it's better than 99% of your worthless alliance ;p "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3405
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:31:00 -
[2685] - Quote
also considering that your irrelevant ass failed to answer my question, i'll throw you a bone:
you need dictors to kill supercaps "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
72
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:01:00 -
[2686] - Quote
If hundreds of you idiots can show up here an flaunt your GÇ£knowledgeGÇ¥ on the topic, which you get fed via A2M by Mitini, I can easily wander in here and call you out on being a bunch of crybabies that want to play EVE on GÇ£easyGÇ¥. ThereGÇÖs not a single person playing EVE, high sec or null sec, that doesnGÇÖt know your GÇ£Coalition Of CrybabiesGÇ¥ have been hiding your Super Caps for months now while you scream about nerfGÇÖing Titans.
Throwing countless welp fleets at Super Cap heavy Alliances trying to die in the fires so you can build a case against Titans has been Mitinis goal and we all know it. Your Coalition is a giant sack of rotting camel **** filled with pilots that are GÇ£terrible at this gameGÇ¥GǪ. and want 0.0 dumbed down so they donGÇÖt need to learn tactics, proper fits, and other general skills that should be known if you are to survive in null secGǪ.
Go back to playing WOW and stop taking up valuable space in this game. 0.0 use to be considered the toughest place in the game to survive, but now itGÇÖs just a place where Goonies hang out and sob like little girlsGǪGǪGǪ
Of course you need dictors to kill Super Caps but it doesnGÇÖt mean that a ship costing 100 bill which sacrifice its tank for tracking enhancers should be able to hit the ships that are keeping it from saving itself. You want to be able to **** pack systems like the NC use to do so you can win fights and kill super caps with 1,000 of rifters. What else can I help you see through all those tears streaming down your faceGǪGǪ .
GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Shobon Welp
Band of Brothers
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 17:19:00 -
[2687] - Quote
So a little birdy told me at fanfest that this nerf isn't happening and instead Titans will be unable to lock subcaps at all.
lmao |

Dusty H Lens
French Advance LLC
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 17:38:00 -
[2688] - Quote
Only four pages to go until CCP can claim the largest first world problems tribute thread on the internet. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3421
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 19:38:00 -
[2689] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Of course you need dictors to kill Super Caps but it doesnGÇÖt mean that a ship costing 100 bill, which sacrifice its tank for tracking enhancers, should'nt be able to hit the ships that are keeping it from saving itself.
the isk cost does not determine its capabilities, it determines how much you're losing "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
72
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 21:01:00 -
[2690] - Quote
Andski wrote:Snot Shot wrote:Of course you need dictors to kill Super Caps but it doesnGÇÖt mean that a ship costing 100 bill, which sacrifice its tank for tracking enhancers, should'nt be able to hit the ships that are keeping it from saving itself. the isk cost does not determine its capabilities, it determines how much you're losing Because itGÇÖs common to see dictors bought on the market for 100 bill GǪGǪ . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3421
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 21:05:00 -
[2691] - Quote
snot shot: illiterate "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Orion GUardian
133
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 21:11:00 -
[2692] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Andski wrote:Snot Shot wrote:Of course you need dictors to kill Super Caps but it doesnGÇÖt mean that a ship costing 100 bill, which sacrifice its tank for tracking enhancers, should'nt be able to hit the ships that are keeping it from saving itself. the isk cost does not determine its capabilities, it determines how much you're losing Because itGÇÖs common to see dictors bought on the market for 100 bill GǪGǪ  .
You really ARE bad at reading comprehension.....cost is no reason for superiority over everything else!
Unless you find reasons other than: ISK-cost, SP investment or "because they should be" for Titans to be wtfbbqpwnmobiles that kill anything despite the obvious "Smaller ships should be harder to hit than bigger ships. There seems to be no arguing with you.
Why should a Titan instapop a T2 Destroyer? It should be like trying to headshot an ant with an Artillerie....if it hits, fine, but it should miss 99.9% of the time anyway. |

Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 00:29:00 -
[2693] - Quote
Andski wrote:http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12842287
titans are fine wolololol
Day to day in goonfleet coms :
FC-Titans on grid bubble those fu++s(auf auf)
Stupid dictors- Yes sir -runs straith ahead mwd drive on and full trotlle- Gets pooped
FC-**** titans are hard
Stupid dictors- God damn titan needs nerf
All go to forum whine like asses. |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
72
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 01:16:00 -
[2694] - Quote
Orion GUardian wrote:Why should a Titan instapop a T2 Destroyer? It should be like trying to headshot an ant with an Artillerie....if it hits, fine, but it should miss 99.9% of the time anyway. Honestly I had high hopes for Andski to hang in there yet he easily gets trampled beneith my poasting hooooves.....
As for you Orion.........why should Titans get nerf'd when the only reason you're crying for it is because you gimps won't log yours in? What else are they going to shoot at when they are supposed to be fighting a competent Alliance/Coalition of **** packers that have just as many, if not more, Titans....
Sorry there m8 but I fart in you and Nopeskis general direction on this one.... And besides.....why should an artillery round miss a ants head 99.9% of the time? ...........can't it just get it in the ass and still kill it? . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Elena Melkan
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 07:55:00 -
[2695] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Orion GUardian wrote:Why should a Titan instapop a T2 Destroyer? It should be like trying to headshot an ant with an Artillerie....if it hits, fine, but it should miss 99.9% of the time anyway. Honestly I had high hopes for Andski to hang in there yet he easily gets trampled beneith my poasting hooooves.....  As for you Orion.........why should Titans get nerf'd when the only reason you're crying for it is because you gimps won't log yours in? What else are they going to shoot at when they are supposed to be fighting a competent Alliance/Coalition of **** packers that have just as many, if not more, Titans.... 
Yes, you can tell that to yourself and believe it's true and live in your fantasy world, if that makes your game experience better! But by doing this, you are ignoring the facts. It IS stupid that a titan can even lock on a small target, not even mentioning the titan being able to kill it. For that duty, you should have other ships around, to hit those tinier ships - and let the titans deal with bigger targets.
A bit more diversity.
But it's starting to look like (oh well, it has been obvious all the time...) that there are certain group of people lacking common sense. They expect to win everything with their 'quality ships' by just facerolling on their keyboards like maniacs.
|

Daviclond
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 13:32:00 -
[2696] - Quote
Pesadel0 wrote:Andski wrote:http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12842287
titans are fine wolololol Day to day in goonfleet coms : FC-Titans on grid bubble those fu++s(auf auf) Stupid dictors- Yes sir -runs straith ahead mwd drive on and full trotlle- Gets pooped FC-**** titans are hard Stupid dictors- God damn titan needs nerf All go to forum whine like asses.
Your precious titans are getting nerfed ^______^ |

captain sparro
untaught Suddenly Spaceships.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 07:10:00 -
[2697] - Quote
simple, make titans unable to lock sub caps, Titans are a "superweapon" but warping in 2 tracking titans aint suppose to wipe the floor with 300 drakes, personally i'v lost experianced loosing abaddons and guardians to tracking titans thought orbitting the damm titan at 500m, and it still takes care of a abaddon in 2 shots, this need to be nerfed. making titans able to lock subcaps woul solve the problem, (since DD dont work on sub caps why should it lock) since the DD is meant to be the rason you warp in a titan. -jump in -DD some poor carrier/dread/super/titan -use them huuge guns to deal additional dmg to CAPS! - jump out.
BRING BACK THE CAP FIGHTS! |

Acwron
Meet The Fockers Vera Cruz Alliance
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 10:54:00 -
[2698] - Quote
captain sparro wrote:simple, make titans unable to lock sub caps, Titans are a "superweapon" but warping in 2 tracking titans aint suppose to wipe the floor with 300 drakes, personally i'v lost experianced loosing abaddons and guardians to tracking titans thought orbitting the damm titan at 500m, and it still takes care of a abaddon in 2 shots, this need to be nerfed. making titans able to lock subcaps woul solve the problem, (since DD dont work on sub caps why should it lock) since the DD is meant to be the rason you warp in a titan. -jump in -DD some poor carrier/dread/super/titan -use them huuge guns to deal additional dmg to CAPS! - jump out.
BRING BACK THE CAP FIGHTS!
DO NOT WARP in range of a titan. Problem solved. |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
76
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 11:56:00 -
[2699] - Quote
Elena Melkan wrote:Yes, you can tell that to yourself and believe it's true and live in your fantasy world, if that makes your game experience better! But by doing this, you are ignoring the facts. It IS stupid that a titan can even lock on a small target, not even mentioning the titan being able to kill it. For that duty, you should have other ships around, to hit those tinier ships - and let the titans deal with bigger targets.
A bit more diversity.
But it's starting to look like (oh well, it has been obvious all the time...) that there are certain group of people lacking common sense. They expect to win everything with their 'quality ships' by just facerolling on their keyboards like maniacs.
It actually looks like there are a certain group of people that want to have rifters determine the course of 0.0 warfare by taking away anything that can hold the door closed to your giant ball of space **** Alliances that wonGÇÖt use Capitals during fleet fights.
I guess we will see what happens but itGÇÖs good that you guys didnGÇÖt get what you wanted and thatGÇÖs really all that mattersGǪ. . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
227
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 12:38:00 -
[2700] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Elena Melkan wrote:Yes, you can tell that to yourself and believe it's true and live in your fantasy world, if that makes your game experience better! But by doing this, you are ignoring the facts. It IS stupid that a titan can even lock on a small target, not even mentioning the titan being able to kill it. For that duty, you should have other ships around, to hit those tinier ships - and let the titans deal with bigger targets.
A bit more diversity.
But it's starting to look like (oh well, it has been obvious all the time...) that there are certain group of people lacking common sense. They expect to win everything with their 'quality ships' by just facerolling on their keyboards like maniacs.
It actually looks like there are a certain group of people that want to have rifters determine the course of 0.0 warfare by taking away anything that can hold the door closed to your giant ball of space **** Alliances that wonGÇÖt use Capitals during fleet fights. I guess we will see what happens but itGÇÖs good that you guys didnGÇÖt get what you wanted and thatGÇÖs really all that mattersGǪ.  .
Dude, you are quite possibly the biggest moron on these forums by a country mile.
God I hope the CFC do start using their Titans and Super Caps just as Raiden. NC. and friends have been. Wonder how long before they would praying for the nerf to happen sooner?
If you don't realise by now that they are the largest alliance in the game and they will massively outnumber all other Capital using corps/alliance very soon, then you need a good slap to wake you up.
I personally would hate the idea of the CFC steamrollering all of EVE when they can field 300+ titans in a single fight, welp them all and laugh as they replace them an hour later and do it all over again. That would kill EVE quicker than anything else.
But typical of you, Snotter, you just troll the forums doing your usual 'WAAAAA!!! Goonies will win and I will look like even more of a moron!! Must troll harder!!!' rather than support changes that benefit ALL of the people that play EVE.
This isn't called Titans Online for a reason after all......
|

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
76
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:01:00 -
[2701] - Quote
YouGÇÖre too cute.. If you stopped and looked at the history of why Goons have been crying for a Titan nerf to happen so far itGÇÖs because of the following:
GÇóCFC tried GÇ£helicopter dickingGÇ¥ sov by using their Super Caps but kept losing them because their pilots are GÇ£terrible at this gameGÇ¥ so the CFC stopped logging them inGǪ..
GÇóCFC tried to resort to **** packing systems to take sov and moons thinking that they could avoid using their Super Caps and still win by sheer attrition during fleet fights. Their pilotGÇÖs started getting really mad that they had to shoot structures with subcaps because if they logged in their Super Caps they would die in firesGǪ.
GÇóThey tried to **** pack Tenal to take it but unlike Whit Noise, Raidens not a dead Alliance and their Super Cap fleet stopped the CFC Subcap fleets dead in their tracks....
GÇóCFC response to this was **** pack the systems more, but still not log in their Capitals to counter RaidenGǪ
GÇóWhen this didnGÇÖt work, the CFC had welpGÇÖd enough Fleets to try and build a false case to get Titans nerfGÇÖd so their **** packing numbers would end up GÇ£winningGÇ¥ them fightsGǪ..
Now that you have the history straight you might want to say thanks to PL/Raiden/NC. for keeping the door closed on the CFC this long, otherwise the CFC would span from Fountain all the way around to Geminate at this pointGǪGǪ . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
228
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:23:00 -
[2702] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote: Some crap
Looks like CFC did use their caps.
Titans Online
Where were you? Staying in dock range in Jita as per usual?
And this is the reason why the nerf is a must or we will see more of this. |

Joyelle
State War Academy Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:16:00 -
[2703] - Quote
Smiling Menace wrote:Snot Shot wrote: Some crap Looks like CFC did use their caps. Titans OnlineWhere were you? Staying in dock range in Jita as per usual? And this is the reason why the nerf is a must or we will see more of this. Titans are still viable imo. Make sure to bring a long a **** ton of target painters and scimitars/oneiros for tracking boost. With that aside, I was wondering what CCP were thinking when they decided to give titans 5 scan res. lol
P.S. that killmail doesn't relate to anything. Equal number of titans on both sides and the cfc has about 2 or 3 times the man power. |

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
228
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:36:00 -
[2704] - Quote
Joyelle wrote:Smiling Menace wrote:Snot Shot wrote: Some crap Looks like CFC did use their caps. Titans OnlineWhere were you? Staying in dock range in Jita as per usual? And this is the reason why the nerf is a must or we will see more of this. Titans are still viable imo. Make sure to bring a long a **** ton of target painters and scimitars/oneiros for tracking boost. With that aside, I was wondering what CCP were thinking when they decided to give titans 5 scan res. lol P.S. that killmail doesn't relate to anything. Equal number of titans on both sides and the cfc has about 2 or 3 times the man power.
Actually it does. Snotter and friends have been warned that if the CFC decided to use their caps then they would have more than everyone else combined. Without the nerf, do you really want Goons and friends effectively 'winning' EVE by default?
I certainly don't. I quite like this game and I would like to play it more before it really does become Titans Online. |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
77
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:49:00 -
[2705] - Quote
Smiling Menace wrote:Joyelle wrote:Smiling Menace wrote:Snot Shot wrote: Some crap Looks like CFC did use their caps. Titans OnlineWhere were you? Staying in dock range in Jita as per usual? And this is the reason why the nerf is a must or we will see more of this. Titans are still viable imo. Make sure to bring a long a **** ton of target painters and scimitars/oneiros for tracking boost. With that aside, I was wondering what CCP were thinking when they decided to give titans 5 scan res. lol P.S. that killmail doesn't relate to anything. Equal number of titans on both sides and the cfc has about 2 or 3 times the man power. Actually it does. Snotter and friends have been warned that if the CFC decided to use their caps then they would have more than everyone else combined. Without the nerf, do you really want Goons and friends effectively 'winning' EVE by default? I certainly don't. I quite like this game and I would like to play it more before it really does become Titans Online. ItGÇÖs ok to look foolish once in a while but throttle back from time to time hereGǪGǪGǪ..CFC have GÇ£warned EVEGÇ¥GǪGǪGǪ . As the guy mentioned above, the link you posted had equal the Titans and CFC had calls out to as far as AAA to come to the fight and thatGÇÖs why CFC logged them in, and only a small fraction of what they actually have.
So you posting that fleet fight proves my point in that the CFC want the only thing that could stop them nerfGÇÖd so they can **** pack to win through attrition and not have to worry about losing subcaps to Supers which is what keeps the door closed on them at this point...
IGÇÖm sorry that youGÇÖve been brain washed, or bullied, by Mittani into believing that Titans shouldnGÇÖt be able to hit Sub-caps.. . GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Saiphas Cain
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 20:07:00 -
[2706] - Quote
CONSTRUCTIVE SUGGESTION
rather than more argument and banter.
If the devs are noting that code rewrites are more of an issue than they're worth you look for the smaller kludge. Currently XL weapons apply to all capitals, yet much like cruisers and battleships, Capitals and Supercapitals are in different classes. Simplest solution I would think is introduce a new class of XXL weapons for Titans specifically, and change the bonuses to those to discourage people from undergunning their titans to blap subcaps ( or if they do undergun they enjoy no bonuses ). It's a bit more work in the art department, yes, but new weapons can have stats that do not effect Dreads use of XL weapons and doesn't require re-coding much of anything in terms of raw mechanics. Worst case if the issue is one of sig radius ( which admittedly ONLY missiles handle properly ) rather than tracking then just make all XXL weapons behave like missiles to the server. ( Wouldn't be hard to make excuses to support it. How fast would shells that large really travel anyway? lasers that big? Well, I seem to remember a certain deaths-starr from a popular movie franchise taking some time to gear up and fire. Not an issue. ) |

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
229
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 21:04:00 -
[2707] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:Smiling Menace wrote:Joyelle wrote:Smiling Menace wrote:Snot Shot wrote: Some crap Looks like CFC did use their caps. Titans OnlineWhere were you? Staying in dock range in Jita as per usual? And this is the reason why the nerf is a must or we will see more of this. Titans are still viable imo. Make sure to bring a long a **** ton of target painters and scimitars/oneiros for tracking boost. With that aside, I was wondering what CCP were thinking when they decided to give titans 5 scan res. lol P.S. that killmail doesn't relate to anything. Equal number of titans on both sides and the cfc has about 2 or 3 times the man power. Actually it does. Snotter and friends have been warned that if the CFC decided to use their caps then they would have more than everyone else combined. Without the nerf, do you really want Goons and friends effectively 'winning' EVE by default? I certainly don't. I quite like this game and I would like to play it more before it really does become Titans Online. ItGÇÖs ok to look foolish once in a while but throttle back from time to time hereGǪGǪGǪ..CFC have GÇ£warned EVEGÇ¥GǪGǪGǪ  . As the guy mentioned above, the link you posted had equal the Titans and CFC had calls out to as far as AAA to come to the fight and thatGÇÖs why CFC logged them in, and only a small fraction of what they actually have. So you posting that fleet fight proves my point in that the CFC want the only thing that could stop them nerfGÇÖd so they can **** pack to win through attrition and not have to worry about losing subcaps to Supers which is what keeps the door closed on them at this point...  IGÇÖm sorry that youGÇÖve been brain washed, or bullied, by Mittani into believing that Titans shouldnGÇÖt be able to hit Sub-caps..  .
I am starting to think there's something very wrong with you. You don't appear to be able to read which is very sad. Maybe some lessons?
I most certainly do not and never will support Goons.
Ok, let's try simple things for you since you need someone to hold your hand here. You say that Titans/Super Caps are all that stand in Goons way to total EVE domination? You ok to this point? Just stop me if I am going too fast for you Snotter.
Based on this you believe the nerf is a bad idea as Raiden./NC./PL and buddies have been the thin red line stopping Goons.
However, my point is, without this nerf, the CFC will have even more Titans/Super Caps than Raiden./NC./PL and buddies combined and it won't matter that the CFC is terrible. They will be able to blap the total crap out of ANY fleet that ANYONE brings using the mechanics that exit today.
You seem to feel that this nerf is purely to hurt your brosefs in Raiden./NC./PL + friends (if they will admit to being brosefs with you is debatable) but I don't think it is. It's purely to stop stupid game mechanics from screwing up EVE completely when Goons and friends can bring thousands of Titans/Super Caps to a fight in the not too distant future.
As to your thoughts that Goons and friends will win by sheer weight of numbers, ask yourself this, why is they have the largest alliance in the game? Why do people fly with this evil terrible alliance that you claim it to be?
May be if people like you stopped being such an arse on the forums that people might actually see the light and join the side of the angels? Food for thought. |

Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
77
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 13:04:00 -
[2708] - Quote
OkGǪGǪGǪif youGÇÖre going to get all serious business for the last 6 poasts I might as well toss you a bone.
Smiling Menace wrote:Based on this you believe the nerf is a bad idea as Raiden./NC./PL and buddies have been the thin red line stopping Goons.
However, my point is, without this nerf, the CFC will have even more Titans/Super Caps than Raiden./NC./PL and buddies combined and it won't matter that the CFC is terrible. They will be able to blap the total crap out of ANY fleet that ANYONE brings using the mechanics that exit today.
My opinion is simply that to this point itGÇÖs been what is keeping the door closed on this ever growing blob of Alliances jumping on the CFC GÇ£easy button band wagonGÇ¥ in order to live in null sec. The CFC has refused to log in their Super Caps for a few reasons, one being so PL would lose interest in hunting them down, and so the CFC can welp enough fleets to try and push a nerf through.
I think itGÇÖs foolish of you to think that nerfing Titans will keep the CFC from rolling through regions when they want since, in most cases, itGÇÖs the numbers that grind down any opponents in 0.0 warfare. Yes IGÇÖm cheering for Raiden and the others but mainly because they arenGÇÖt afraid to take on the CFC mob. They are the underdogs. The CFC only attacks Alliances when they are already dying or they are sure they have the overwhelming numbers. They are cowards and I donGÇÖt cheer for the cowards.
Smiling Menace wrote:You seem to feel that this nerf is purely to hurt your brosefs in Raiden./NC./PL + friends (if they will admit to being brosefs with you is debatable) but I don't think it is. It's purely to stop stupid game mechanics from screwing up EVE completely when Goons and friends can bring thousands of Titans/Super Caps to a fight in the not too distant future.
ThatGÇÖs fine if the CFC can field thousands of Titans/Super Caps to fights in the near future. Raiden/PL/NCDot are typically interested in the GÇ£good fightsGÇ¥ anyways and would just go back to baiting reasonable size fights. If they needed to they would up and move somewhere else to find the fights since they have said many times they think owning space is a pain in the ass.
Smiling Menace wrote:As to your thoughts that Goons and friends will win by sheer weight of numbers, ask yourself this, why is they have the largest alliance in the game? Why do people fly with this evil terrible alliance that you claim it to be?
Because they can get in. Raiden/PL/NCDot have specific expectations of their pilots to match their style of game play. CFC Alliances donGÇÖt. Therefore anyone can join the CFC where their immediatly told that Raiden/PL/NCDot is the enemy and whatever else they can be brainwashed into believing. GÇ£PL/Raiden/NCDot are elitist ass holes!!GÇ¥GǪGǪGÇ¥Bob still lives as Raiden!GÇ¥GǪGǪand on and on it goes. The numbers grow, and all of a sudden you have half of the EVE map playing EVE on GÇ£EasyGÇ¥ as they are a part of the GÇ£friendly CFCGÇ¥ where everyone is supportive of each other and itGÇÖs all rainbows and pillow fights.
Their excuse? Their excuse is that they are all really GÇ£separate entitiesGÇ¥ that arenGÇÖt Goon pets, and only come together to support each otherGÇÖs goals in 0.0 conquestsGǪGǪGǪGǪ.I think that turns into a GÇ£mobGÇ¥ btwGǪ So the hypocrisy lives on with the CFC and it always will. There will always be a GÇ£Northern CoalitionGÇ¥ in this game and the CFC has simply taken their place at this point.
Smiling Menace wrote:May be if people like you stopped being such an arse on the forums that people might actually see the light and join the side of the angels? Food for thought. I think that youGÇÖre the one that needs to pull your head out of the CFC Kool-Aid bowl on this one. No one is going to GÇ£join the side of the angelsGÇ¥ because the angels are selective in whom they accept and therefore will always have a minority populousGǪGǪGǪGǪand hated for being GÇ£elitistGÇ¥GǪGǪ .
IGÇÖm the minority on these forums for a reason and itGÇÖs not because I blindly follow around The Martini and the CFC cheering about how great they areGǪGǪGǪI leave that up to the 30,000 sheep in the CFC to do.... 
GÇ£God grant me the serenity to accept the things I canGÇÖt shoot, the courage to shoot the things I can, and the wisdom to GTFO!!GÇ¥GÇô Snot Shot - 2012.....Yeah I'm a killin machine..... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
|

Barqs
Peanut Factory Good Sax
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 21:17:00 -
[2709] - Quote
Saiphas Cain wrote:CONSTRUCTIVE SUGGESTION
rather than more argument and banter.
If the devs are noting that code rewrites are more of an issue than they're worth you look for the smaller kludge. Currently XL weapons apply to all capitals, yet much like cruisers and battleships, Capitals and Supercapitals are in different classes. Simplest solution I would think is introduce a new class of XXL weapons for Titans specifically, and change the bonuses to those to discourage people from undergunning their titans to blap subcaps ( or if they do undergun they enjoy no bonuses ). It's a bit more work in the art department, yes, but new weapons can have stats that do not effect Dreads use of XL weapons and doesn't require re-coding much of anything in terms of raw mechanics. Worst case if the issue is one of sig radius ( which admittedly ONLY missiles handle properly ) rather than tracking then just make all XXL weapons behave like missiles to the server. ( Wouldn't be hard to make excuses to support it. How fast would shells that large really travel anyway? lasers that big? Well, I seem to remember a certain deaths-starr from a popular movie franchise taking some time to gear up and fire. Not an issue. )
Do you REALLY think that giant battleship guns velocity is lower then an average hand held rifle round? REALLY? Your an idiot, Not to mention a laser travles at LIGHT SPEED for your small brain that is 186,000 miles a second. No gravity no air to casue drag. if anything cannons in space would be MUCH MUCH higher then anything we would be used to.
Barqs |

Ken Ishitawa
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 11:00:00 -
[2710] - Quote
I dont think it's Titan guns exclusively that need ballancing. Projectile weapons as a whole need to be revamped. Projectiles need an apparent projectile velocity build into it's calculations. Alas I know this is possibly too difficult for CCP to do and definetly would require more resourse than they are willing to dedicate to it but here goes.
Current example Titan shoots at a frig stationary at 200Km, the frig is dead in one shot.
If the projectiles had an apparent velocity (But not an object in space like missiles) Titan shoots at Frig at 200Km with a projectile with a 10km/s velocity the frig would have 20 seconds to get out of the way which would be easy. The targeted ships ability to evade the shot should be based on it's sig a new attribute for the ship and the evasive manouvering skill.
To make it not too complex to code and more importantly server load you might still need to apply the damage instantly.
Under this system the closer you get to your target the easier you are to hit up untill the point that your transversal velocity makes you untrackable.
You would not need to limit a Titan to locking 3 target or give them stupidly low scan res which to be honest is counter intuative at the moment anyway, dont you think the biggest most technilogicaly powerful ships in the game having the poorest sensors is a little off.
Given that CCP are currently planning a total ship rework which I'm guessing has a fairly large team once it's finished weapons might be a nice thing to go over once they are looking for a new task. |

steave435
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
55
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 11:16:00 -
[2711] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=87286&find=unread |

Ken Ishitawa
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 11:52:00 -
[2712] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:StainLessStealRat wrote:Also when i burn away from BS in a straight line in my Slicer i allways die, when will you look at BS tracking?
lol This isn' t the same situation and you know it.
You're right. There are 3 classes of ship between a Frig and a BS but only one between a BS and a Titan so a BS is even more overpowered. Also BS have BS sized Neutes and smart bombs where as capitals dont so they are EVEN more overpowered.
NERF BATTLE SHIPS |

Corp 5py
University of Caille Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 12:23:00 -
[2713] - Quote
Ken Ishitawa wrote: If the projectiles had an apparent velocity (But not an object in space like missiles) Titan shoots at Frig at 200Km with a projectile with a 10km/s velocity the frig would have 20 seconds to get out of the way which would be easy.
Motion prediction, level V
|

steave435
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
56
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 22:55:00 -
[2714] - Quote
Ken Ishitawa wrote:EnderCapitalG wrote:StainLessStealRat wrote:Also when i burn away from BS in a straight line in my Slicer i allways die, when will you look at BS tracking?
lol This isn' t the same situation and you know it. You're right. There are 3 classes of ship between a Frig and a BS but only one between a BS and a Titan so a BS is even more overpowered. Also BS have BS sized Neutes and smart bombs where as capitals dont so they are EVEN more overpowered. NERF BATTLE SHIPS Yeah, as discussed in the other titan nerf thread, CCP is considering a hard cap on turret damage based on sig res of the gun VS base sig rad of the target. For now it would only apply to XL guns, but may be moved down to sub-capital weapons as well when they have time to re-visit the tracking formula properly. |

Daniel L'Siata
Echelon Conflict Resolution. Psychotic Tendencies.
92
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 00:28:00 -
[2715] - Quote
Removing the ability to refit while targetted, smashing job CCP.
I think it's an utterly fantastic idea to remove the only serious defense vanilla capitals have against being blobbed to death.
In other words - That's an absolutely terrible idea, you just killed the complexity of small gang warfare. Think your changes through instead of making knee-jerk reactions which do far more harm than good in other situations.
How about... I don't know... "Titans can only refit at a Ship Maintenance Array due to their size". There, problem solved, that was hard. |

Trinkets friend
Obstergo Persona Non Gratis
282
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 02:24:00 -
[2716] - Quote
NERF THREADNAUGHTS The skilful employer of men will employ the wise man, the brave man, the covetous man, and the stupid man. Sun Tzu @trinketsfriend on twatter
|

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
237
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 16:34:00 -
[2717] - Quote
Dude, you say you are cheering on the underdog? With you on their side, I would hate to have enemies. 
You do nothing to encourage the people that Raiden. + friends would like to recruit as they take on look at their biggest fan in you and wonder why the hell they would even consider looking at them let alone joining them. Me included in that by the way.
So we have **** poasting from you, the 'leet' pvp'ers jumping into Titans anytime there's a fight and why would anyone else want to join something that's to all intents and purposes worse than the CFC and many other alliances in eve?
I think you've trolled for so long now you actually believe the crap that you type.
I am a bit worried about you now though. What are you going to do when Jita burns? Move to Rens?   
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
412
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 16:55:00 -
[2718] - Quote
Smiling Menace wrote:Dude, you say you are cheering on the underdog? With you on their side, I would hate to have enemies.  You do nothing to encourage the people that Raiden. + friends would like to recruit as they take on look at their biggest fan in you and wonder why the hell they would even consider looking at them let alone joining them. Me included in that by the way. So we have **** poasting from you, the 'leet' pvp'ers jumping into Titans anytime there's a fight and why would anyone else want to join something that's to all intents and purposes worse than the CFC and many other alliances in eve? I think you've trolled for so long now you actually believe the crap that you type. I am a bit worried about you now though. What are you going to do when Jita burns? Move to Rens?    Too soon for such jokes...
One thing at least people can be assured of is that they'll always be able to get into the next elite pvp alliance, suckle on some tech moons/whatever isk source and then try to blow up their inferiors with their superior skill and magnificently balanced megaships.
We ourselves have some large boats about, like a big red one that (probably) doesn't go faster, but regardless of all that ... being able to deploy and easily find yourself a swarm of ~bad pvp~ers to shoot with your titan is a definite plus. If you have a spy you can even find out in advance how many hundreds of fools will warp to you at zero for your blapping convenience. Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |

Lord Morpheus
Pilipino Corp ROMANIAN-LEGION
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 17:47:00 -
[2719] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone, We're not happy with the effectiveness of large groups of titans against subcapital ships, so we're making some adjustments to titans and to XL turrets. This is a quick, surgical adjustment to solve a specific issue we have identified. It's not a general titan balance pass, and we don't consider titans "done" after this change. Titans will require significant further changes, and probably an overall adjustment in role, before they're in a place where we're really happy with them. This will require a reasonably significant amount of work, which we unfortunately don't have the spare resources for right now. In a similar vein, we're not making more extensive balance changes (or addressing this issue in a more technically complex way) because we're allocating the minimum resources needed to resolve the specific issue (titans performing excessively well against subcaps in certain circumstances) satisfactorily. If you have any further questions about this paragraph, please ask away  For the immediate future and until such time as we have the resources available to do a comprehensive overhaul, we want to ensure that titans perform decently against other capitals, but do not represent a serious threat to subcaps. We want titans to have clear vulnerabilities, and as much as possible to have them acting in support of the main capital/subcap fleet rather than the other way round. We've already prevented doomsdays from being fired at subcaps, and this adjustment should continue that trend. We have talked to the CSM about this, and we're comfortable going forward with these changes in light of that discussion. I'm not going to put words in their mouths, though. Specific changes being made:XL turret tracking halved, siege module tracking penalty removedThis should generally make titan performance against small targets significantly worse, without seriously impacting their effectiveness against larger targets, or negatively impacting dreadnaughts in their common use-case (ie, in siege mode). Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5This should make trying to engage smaller targets very inefficient, due to long lock-times and an inability to queue many targets at once. This reinforces the titan's MO as a slow-acting but hard-hitting platform (in line with the doomsday's huge damage and 10 minute RoF). The scan res number is balanced around multiple Cormack's sensor boosters, on the assumption that money is not a limiting factor for titan pilots, and therefore that people will shell out for officer SBs if that lets them continue do this kind of thing. Our understanding is that this isn't standard practice right now, but we have to balance for expected behavior after the change, and for worst-case scenarios. Expected release schedule for these changesThese changes should hit TQ some time in April. If there is a sizable release in April then expect them to turn up then; if not then we'll announce deployment dates for these changes closer to the time. Changes considered and discarded:(I'm expecting at least three people to not read the word "discarded" and make angry posts about something in this section. C'est la vie.)Titans can't lock subcaps at allGuaranteed effective solution, but we considered it too hacky and restrictive. Adding a "minimum sig radius" attribute to turrets, below which damage would fall off regardless of trackingToo big a change and more technical work than we actually needed to solve the problem. Changing the lock time formulaAs it is, the lock time formula doesn't really scale in a nice way between battleships and capitals (the kink in the curve always happens around cruisers regardless of the scan res and sig radius), but again we decided we could solve the issue without resorting to this sort of technical work. Changing XL missiles to matchWhile in a strictly regimented world we ought in principle to nerf XL missiles and remove the penalties from the siege module for them too, in practice they're not actually a problem due to the way missile damage scales against small targets. Leaving them unchanged also serves to differentiate missiles further from turrets, which might make them more useful on capitals under certain circumstances.
Wow your really killing the greatest ship ingame and planning to turn it to a frig. Pretty soon a frig can kill it. When is this gonna stop? Are you planning to make it even cheaper to build this ship and less costly. Thats what you should concentrate on instead. I understand it can one volley a dread or carrier but consider the COST involved and RISK in building a Titan. Did you put that in the equation. Once you can build it in a station with less minerals then nerf away otherwise dont destroy the Power of this ship. |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
907
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 18:20:00 -
[2720] - Quote
I'm Down wrote:There is a reason why IGÇÖve said for the past 2 years that adjusting tracking will not fix the problem. Just like fixing lock time also does not address the problem at all.
You developers have for years completely ignored your tracking mechanics and how utterly garbage they are. You have also ignored people informing you of why you canGÇÖt fix tracking under the current design. So let me drop this knowledge on you for why your first fix to titans has changed so little in what they do that it will have virtually 0 impact on the game after a few months of adaptation:
The current problem is that titans in large numbers can blap the ever living **** out of a fleet with basically no risk simply because they are huge HP buffers that can be repaired by motherships which are also huge HP buffers. Now I could ***** and moan about Capital Remote repairers and their range and their effectiveness, particularly on huge hp and resist stars like supers, but that would go off track of my point, so IGÇÖll avoid the temptation.
So you changed trackingGǪ big whoop. Rather than track around 220 m/s for every 10km of range, an Erebus/Rag now tracks about 110 m/s for every 10km of range. In addition, they have a gun sig size of about double that of a BS. This creates some magical world where a ship further away can be tracked better, but is some how mysteriously the same size as though range dilation has no affect at all on how well you can see that now tiny little dot. In laymanGÇÖs termsGǪ. This means that if Eve mechanics worked in the real universe, Every star in the whole freaking universe would look approximately the same size as our sun, as would all the planets in size relation to our moon rather than the tiny specs in the sky that they are. So hereGÇÖs what happens after your patch to just circumvent the whole problem you just createdGǪ. Lock time you sayGǪ Tracking speed you sayGǪ
Hello MR Proteus, Hello either 5 AEONS with 4 Domi painters or 50 Archons with 4 T2 Painters (and just for luls cause the ship is cheap, why not throw in 2 range extenders for the painters as well). Now that wonderful tengu has an 800-1200 sig and at 60km can be tracked plus has a sig size near the same as the guns do. That Maelstrom has a 1700 + sigGǪ ie bigger than the guns do, and can be tracked at about 12km rangeGǪ. And oh yeah, you can easily get those 300-400,000 ehp small sig lokis to web down anything closer than those ranges to prevent them from avoiding the tracking problemsGǪ not like tech 3GÇÖs are rare these days.
Oh but lock time you sayGǪ well if the carrier paints before the Titans ever lockGǪ. Oh yeah, Lock a tengu in 30-35 seconds, lock a Maelstrom in 23-30 secondsGǪ thatGÇÖs so brutal. Oh yeah, and thatGÇÖs just with ******* Navy tracking computers and sensor boosters, I didnGÇÖt even toss in the Meta 13-14 gear.
GeeGǪ in 20 minutes of planning and a slight modification to what my fleet roles are, IGÇÖve just circumvented your entire titan patch plans b/c you thought this was enough to warrant not changing the coding of your formulas so that they make sense.
Good thing thereGÇÖs nobody in this game who couldnGÇÖt ya know, divide their titan pilots up on mumble into 10-15 sub channels, have a few SCGÇÖs assigned to each for painting and just perform the exact same way where itGÇÖs GÇ£paint, blap, blap, boomGÇ¥ rather than the old, GÇ£blap, blap, boomGÇ¥GǪ. That extra stepGǪ it will be the death of me. Guess us PL folk, or Raiden folk, or NC. Folk will have a horrible time adapting to this fix bros.
Thanks for the effortGǪ maybe next time youGÇÖll listen to sense, put in the extra time needed, and avoid yet another **** fix. requoting all over this thread My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
75
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 19:00:00 -
[2721] - Quote
Lord Morpheus wrote:
Wow your really killing the greatest ship ingame and planning to turn it to a frig. Pretty soon a frig can kill it. When is this gonna stop? Are you planning to make it even cheaper to build this ship and less costly. Thats what you should concentrate on instead. I understand it can one volley a dread or carrier but consider the COST involved and RISK in building a Titan. Did you put that in the equation. Once you can build it in a station with less minerals then nerf away otherwise dont destroy the Power of this ship.
I can see where the developers are coming from in that the Titans are over powered
But at the same time what you say is also true. Getting into a Titan not only takes a massive amount of SP and resources but Once you are in it you are stuck in it
True you can buy/make a holding alt but that is a work around not an intended game mechanic
With the recent nerfs to Titans and the coming additional nerfs however needed they may seem, Titans are losing more and more of there versatility. When initially implemented into the game they were a great addition but they were never intended the reach the numbers they now have. They were ment to be rare with the largest alliances only having one or two, not hundreds across the universe
If Titans are to be changed into something more like a mobile station/support ship and lose their battlefield superiority than they need to be given something back to off set the pain of the nerfs. I am not saying these nerfs are not needed or even not wanted, but with the huge cost of getting into a Titan combined with the fact that you can not leave the ship without leaving it floating in space the Titan pilots need something given back to them in return. I suggest one of two options
Either give Titans a massive defensive boost, they lost offensive capability and will now only be able to fight against other capital ships. If they can not hit sub caps than sub caps should not be able to pop the Titans. Balancing the loss in offensive capability with an increase in defensive capability would maintain the level of power they were meant to have
the other option is if Titans are to be reduced to little more than massive support ships than allow them to dock so the Titan pilots can switch to another ship to partake in more active combat. I started a thread in the new idea's forum suggesting a outpost upgrade docking ring that would allow super capitals to dock at upgraded alliance outposts. I think it would be a fair trade to super cap pilots in exchange for the drastic reduction in versatility of the ships they worked so hard to get into. |

Eon Far
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 07:42:00 -
[2722] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:You'll have to excuse all the NPC alts everyone, Raidendot gave a command to their troops to only post on alts instead of mains so 'goons wouldn't enjoy tears'.
(we can tell you're all from Raidendot, f y i)
Your smugness and gloating only shows how corrupt that change is.
|

Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
59
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 11:09:00 -
[2723] - Quote
It is quite telling though that the obvious raiden alts are the only ones going 'no,no changes needed here everythings fine' or 'that change is stupid, heres no reasons why and no alternative suggestions' whereas everyone else agrees changes are needed and has moved on to arguing over what form the changes should take. |

Gustav Mannfred
The Black Suicidegankers
29
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 08:29:00 -
[2724] - Quote
scan res at 5? Concord Battleshps has 60.
they need 40s to target a frig, a titan needs 8 minutes to do this...LOL i'm REALY miss the old stuff.-á
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=24183 |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1131
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 12:08:00 -
[2725] - Quote
Ken Ishitawa wrote:NERF BATTLE SHIPS
It's exactly the other way it needs to be done: buff significantly battle-ships |

Katy Ling
Crimnson Concept Flame Flaming Nebula
11
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 17:55:00 -
[2726] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone,
We're not happy with the effectiveness of large groups of titans against subcapital ships, so we're making some adjustments to titans and to XL turrets.
nerf nerf nerf .... why so much work about this ?
super caps are overpowered and them you have to grab a scissor and nerf them all the time and it never ends ...
how about simply removing ewar invulnerability and let the sub caps that dare to face them, to deal with the super caps, now vulnerable to more things than just neutralising.
that way, they would have to bring they're escort to help them deal with normal ships.
in this case, it would be the sub caps responsibility to track disrupt the super caps ... if they bother to fit for it ...
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 91 :: [one page] |