| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 105 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:43:00 -
[2761] - Quote
SOV Diplomat wrote:You are all a bunch of crybaby biotches. No joke at all. Each and everyone of you people in EVE get made fun of, especially all you Carebearing mofos. I personally hope you all die in a fire IRL, will i say i am sorry? Nope.
Says someone who doesn't have any kills or losses.  |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
1629
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:44:00 -
[2762] - Quote
Rodj Blake wrote:Lenrir Andven wrote:KanashiiKami wrote:Nick Bison wrote:Laying it to rest.
This threadnaught has about run it's "useful" course as we have pretty much two polarized sides that must agree to disagree on this topic.
The only real steps to getting us all to move on (IMHO) would be:
1. Mittani to complete his Step 2 (Resign from CSM) heck, he'll be back in next year but, he said the words, and as a man I would expect him to keep to it. 2. CCP to issue some flavor of an "official" statement.
not enough. CCP pls consider full account BAN on mittani Yes, ban him for something outside of the game! Some people's logic is gloriously bad. If people should only be banned from the game because of in-game actions, then presumably you'd be quite happy to see him banned from future Fanfests since that's where the incident happened?
Surely that would mean he couldn't be CSM chair anymore since he wouldn't be allowed to represent the CSM at fanfest?
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Karim alRashid
Aliastra Gallente Federation
140
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:49:00 -
[2763] - Quote
Rodj Blake wrote: If people should only be banned from the game because of in-game actions, then presumably you'd be quite happy to see him banned from future Fanfests since that's where the incident happened?
Does the Fanfest have an EULA or TOS ?
|

Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:54:00 -
[2764] - Quote
The F Word wrote:CCP's in a spot.
They really don't need additional negative press, and seeing if this thing will blow over is the logical first step. Then one of three things may happen:
CCP allows the guy to step down quietly - the mob is placated, and the Goons get over it. No dev blog needed - no press release - end of story.
CCP removes him from the CSM and issuing a temporary ban ( probably the most likely outcome ), followed by a simple clear cut statement regarding the rules. The mob is pleased, and the Goons have no leg to stand on.
CCP makes an example of him, forcibly removing him from his seat, and issuing a permanent ban along with a formal statement is another solution - albeit a more polarizing one. The mob is shocked at the severity of it, and the Goons get bent. I think there are far more outcomes than those 3... 'Nothing happens' is clearly a likely outcome, however as CCP themselves have created a petition against him for player harassment we're most likely looking at either your option 2 or 3.
|

Lenrir Andven
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:54:00 -
[2765] - Quote
Karim alRashid wrote:Rodj Blake wrote: If people should only be banned from the game because of in-game actions, then presumably you'd be quite happy to see him banned from future Fanfests since that's where the incident happened?
Does the Fanfest have an EULA or TOS ?
Just imagine it, you about to enter fanfest...then they force you to read the 10 pages worth of EULA/TOS, all in small print. I would rather about turn and go to the local brew. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
1631
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:56:00 -
[2766] - Quote
Karim alRashid wrote:Rodj Blake wrote: If people should only be banned from the game because of in-game actions, then presumably you'd be quite happy to see him banned from future Fanfests since that's where the incident happened?
Does the Fanfest have an EULA or TOS ?
Do you think somebody would get away with keeping their eve accounts if they surged up on stage and punched hillmar on the nose?
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Nylith Empyreal
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:57:00 -
[2767] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Karim alRashid wrote:Rodj Blake wrote: If people should only be banned from the game because of in-game actions, then presumably you'd be quite happy to see him banned from future Fanfests since that's where the incident happened?
Does the Fanfest have an EULA or TOS ? Do you think somebody would get away with keeping their eve accounts if they surged up on stage and punched hillmar on the nose?
Don't think it matters what happens to his accounts as opposed to being locked up in which he wouldn't get to play those accounts anyway. Which I'm surprised there has been no legal backlash about this beyond these petty talks of EULA and TOS. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
205
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:58:00 -
[2768] - Quote
honestly Mittenz should step down as chairman but remain in the CSM...
10 k people did vote for him so he should remain but has also lost the privilige of being chairman... Personally this is a good compromise. |

The F Word
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:59:00 -
[2769] - Quote
Arrs Grazznic wrote:The F Word wrote:CCP's in a spot.
They really don't need additional negative press, and seeing if this thing will blow over is the logical first step. Then one of three things may happen:
CCP allows the guy to step down quietly - the mob is placated, and the Goons get over it. No dev blog needed - no press release - end of story.
CCP removes him from the CSM and issuing a temporary ban ( probably the most likely outcome ), followed by a simple clear cut statement regarding the rules. The mob is pleased, and the Goons have no leg to stand on.
CCP makes an example of him, forcibly removing him from his seat, and issuing a permanent ban along with a formal statement is another solution - albeit a more polarizing one. The mob is shocked at the severity of it, and the Goons get bent. I think there are far more outcomes than those 3... 'Nothing happens' is clearly a likely outcome, however as CCP themselves have created a petition against him for player harassment we're most likely looking at either your option 2 or 3.
Of course, but the solution has become binary regardless, for one side to win, one side must lose. Doing nothing will have an outcome in and of itself. I'm guessing the 2nd or 3rd. |

Karim alRashid
Aliastra Gallente Federation
140
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:59:00 -
[2770] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Karim alRashid wrote:Rodj Blake wrote: If people should only be banned from the game because of in-game actions, then presumably you'd be quite happy to see him banned from future Fanfests since that's where the incident happened?
Does the Fanfest have an EULA or TOS ? Do you think somebody would get away with keeping their eve accounts if they surged up on stage and punched hillmar on the nose?
Yes, I see no legal basis for banning such a player from Eve Online, ordinary real-life charges aside.
|

Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
150
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:59:00 -
[2771] - Quote
Lenrir Andven wrote:Karim alRashid wrote:Rodj Blake wrote: If people should only be banned from the game because of in-game actions, then presumably you'd be quite happy to see him banned from future Fanfests since that's where the incident happened?
Does the Fanfest have an EULA or TOS ? Just imagine it, you about to enter fanfest...then they force you to read the 10 pages worth of EULA/TOS, all in small print. I would rather about turn and go to the local brew.
There are general rules of conduct that you don't have to sign, which you are accountable for. They're called laws. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
1631
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:02:00 -
[2772] - Quote
Nylith Empyreal wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:Karim alRashid wrote:Rodj Blake wrote: If people should only be banned from the game because of in-game actions, then presumably you'd be quite happy to see him banned from future Fanfests since that's where the incident happened?
Does the Fanfest have an EULA or TOS ? Do you think somebody would get away with keeping their eve accounts if they surged up on stage and punched hillmar on the nose? Don't think it matters what happens to his accounts as opposed to being locked up in which he wouldn't get to play those accounts anyway. Which I'm surprised there has been no legal backlash about this beyond these petty talks of EULA and TOS.
Well thats kind of the point. CCP have a line in the TOS that basically says "we can ban all your accounts anytime we want to if we think it appropriate" and its a catch all for this kind of thing.
Somebody sends death threat to Hilmar from their home address with a dead frog inside the envelope then they are going to get banned despite the fact RL doesn't have a specific TOS / EULA. This is why the whole "fanfest isn't covered by the same rules" argument the goons have been making is completely bogus.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
776
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:02:00 -
[2773] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Rodj Blake wrote:Lenrir Andven wrote:KanashiiKami wrote:Nick Bison wrote:Laying it to rest.
This threadnaught has about run it's "useful" course as we have pretty much two polarized sides that must agree to disagree on this topic.
The only real steps to getting us all to move on (IMHO) would be:
1. Mittani to complete his Step 2 (Resign from CSM) heck, he'll be back in next year but, he said the words, and as a man I would expect him to keep to it. 2. CCP to issue some flavor of an "official" statement.
not enough. CCP pls consider full account BAN on mittani Yes, ban him for something outside of the game! Some people's logic is gloriously bad. If people should only be banned from the game because of in-game actions, then presumably you'd be quite happy to see him banned from future Fanfests since that's where the incident happened? Surely that would mean he couldn't be CSM chair anymore since he wouldn't be allowed to represent the CSM at fanfest?
I do believe that it would!
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Karim alRashid
Aliastra Gallente Federation
140
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:03:00 -
[2774] - Quote
The whole situation reminds me of the Secret Service investigating Eminem about the "I don't rap for dead presidents. I'd rather see the president dead." lyrics.
|

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
1631
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:04:00 -
[2775] - Quote
Karim alRashid wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:Karim alRashid wrote:Rodj Blake wrote: If people should only be banned from the game because of in-game actions, then presumably you'd be quite happy to see him banned from future Fanfests since that's where the incident happened?
Does the Fanfest have an EULA or TOS ? Do you think somebody would get away with keeping their eve accounts if they surged up on stage and punched hillmar on the nose? Yes, I see no legal basis for banning such a player from Eve Online, ordinary real-life charges aside.
Let me point you at the line in the TOS that will be used to ban you.
(you agree with this when you login to game and pay your sub)
Quote:"CCP reserves the right to close, temporarily or permanently, any userGÇÖs account without advance notice as we deem necessary. Furthermore, we reserve the right to delete all user accounts or inventory of characters as warranted.
We reserve the right to ban any user from the game without refund or compensation."
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

KanashiiKami
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:05:00 -
[2776] - Quote
The F Word wrote:CCP's in a spot.
They really don't need additional negative press, and seeing if this thing will blow over is the logical first step. Then one of three things may happen:
CCP allows the guy to step down quietly - the mob is placated, and the Goons get over it. No dev blog needed - no press release - end of story.
CCP removes him from the CSM and issuing a temporary ban ( probably the most likely outcome ), followed by a simple clear cut statement regarding the rules. The mob is pleased, and the Goons have no leg to stand on.
CCP makes an example of him, forcibly removing him from his seat, and issuing a permanent ban along with a formal statement is another solution - albeit a more polarizing one. The mob is shocked at the severity of it, and the Goons get bent.
i do not think goons will be bent ... when CCP impose perma lifetime BAN on him. who knows some one in goons might just get synapses shorted and start another icegank episode?
so goons will still be goons (i m pretty sure about that), and the entire swarm of like minded with whateva they do in EVE (scamming, griefing, etc etc).
it will merely send a strong message, that inciting/suggesting actual violence/suicide or wadeva to that degree on another player in the real physical world does not sit well with CCP, and for that matter us players as well. and for that matter any other game ...
so CCP pls do consider PERMA BAN. who knows because of this piece of good news, people might just come back to subs and replay this game ... WUT ??? |

Kallynda Nai
Tightpants Inc
74
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:06:00 -
[2777] - Quote
KanashiiKami wrote:The F Word wrote:CCP's in a spot.
They really don't need additional negative press, and seeing if this thing will blow over is the logical first step. Then one of three things may happen:
CCP allows the guy to step down quietly - the mob is placated, and the Goons get over it. No dev blog needed - no press release - end of story.
CCP removes him from the CSM and issuing a temporary ban ( probably the most likely outcome ), followed by a simple clear cut statement regarding the rules. The mob is pleased, and the Goons have no leg to stand on.
CCP makes an example of him, forcibly removing him from his seat, and issuing a permanent ban along with a formal statement is another solution - albeit a more polarizing one. The mob is shocked at the severity of it, and the Goons get bent. i do not think goons will be bent ... when CCP impose perma lifetime BAN on him. who knows some one in goons might just get synapses shorted and start another icegank episode? so goons will still be goons (i m pretty sure about that), and the entire swarm of like minded with whateva they do in EVE (scamming, griefing, etc etc). it will merely send a strong message, that inciting/suggesting actual violence/suicide or wadeva to that degree on another player in the real physical world does not sit well with CCP, and for that matter us players as well. and for that matter any other game ... so CCP pls do consider PERMA BAN. who knows because of this piece of good news, people might just come back to subs and replay this game ...
Somewhere, your English teacher is sobbing into her Cheerios. |

Karim alRashid
Aliastra Gallente Federation
140
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:08:00 -
[2778] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote: Somebody sends death threat to Hilmar from their home address with a dead frog inside the envelope then they are going to get banned despite the fact RL doesn't have a specific TOS / EULA. This is why the whole "fanfest isn't covered by the same rules" argument the goons have been making is completely bogus.
My opinion is should such a case go in court, the CCP would have hard time explaining how sending death threats outside EVE constitutes a breach of contract.
If someone sent a death threat to Bill Gates, does this invalidate his Windows or Office licenses? |

KanashiiKami
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:08:00 -
[2779] - Quote
"CCP reserves the right to close, temporarily or permanently, any userGÇÖs account without advance notice as we deem necessary. Furthermore, we reserve the right to delete all user accounts or inventory of characters as warranted.
We reserve the right to ban any user from the game without refund or compensation."
i am sure CCP will issue a short statement when they BAN him for life. after that, game web community will spread the news like fire .... "cyber bully gets life ban" ... which is = good message WUT ??? |

Akelorian
FinFleet Raiden.
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:08:00 -
[2780] - Quote
Jade, making a valid point will only have goons mock you, and the forum police delete your posts. I find it rather pathetic though that CCP has taken this long to investigate a segment thats recorded. Unless they can't find out where in the presentation he actually said these things, perhaps we should just point them out in a timeline for CCP. |

Sleet Rameslay
Imperium Technologies F0RCEFUL ENTRY
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:09:00 -
[2781] - Quote
I think he should be removed from his CSM position. Why? Although this is a rough game and if he did in chat channels or on ts it's one thing, but to be on a trip paid for by CCP and technically a Representative for the company and its players for fanfest. He took it way to far on a live broadcast. I wonder if it's against the law in Iceland to try to recruit people to harass someone till death? |

Karim alRashid
Aliastra Gallente Federation
140
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:14:00 -
[2782] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote: Let me point you at the line in the TOS that will be used to ban you.
I see. Then yes, you're right, if this is actually legal to be in the EULA/TOS
(because, depending on jurisdiction, there exist things that cannot be forfeited in a contract, no matter what).
|

The F Word
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:15:00 -
[2783] - Quote
Sleet Rameslay wrote:I wonder if it's against the law in Iceland to try to recruit people to harass someone till death?
We might find out... Not that I think any legal action will (or should) come from it. He screwed up - he should probably be banned, and thats the very extent of it.
|

KanashiiKami
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:15:00 -
[2784] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:honestly Mittenz should step down as chairman but remain in the CSM...
10 k people did vote for him so he should remain but has also lost the privilige of being chairman... Personally this is a good compromise.
so its like, someone commits a crime, the criminal gets to walk because 10000 who likes his "wayward behavior" says he has not done wrong ... (wrong to the tune of suggesting a depressed whining player actually go have his suicide) LOL ! ...
what about the rest of the population who was not in the 10000 ? i am very sure they are not NPC related WUT ??? |

The Breadmaster
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:16:00 -
[2785] - Quote
The CSM published by CCP
Excerpt from page 20 of the linked CCP document-
CSM REPRESENTATIVE CONDUCT
any behavior or actions considered being a material breach of the eula or tos by a Csm representative is grounds for immediate dismissal and permanent exclusion from all pending and future participation in the council. There are no exceptions, regardless of the infraction. representatives are not only expected to uphold the social contract that all society members are held accountable to, but should also set a behavior standard for everyone else to follow. ____
This sounds pretty clear cut to me. Unless we don't play by these rules anymore?
"immediate dismissal and permanent exclusion"
Policies are created to insure all players are treated fairly and equally. We can't begin making exceptions to one without eliminating the rule altogether.
What kind of publicity will EVE receive if he or any future player does commit suicide? The media will look back on this incident and see how the company handeled it which could open them up for future liability.
Any player regardless of alliance affiliation needs to understand the gravity of this situation outside of the context of Eve.
This is a situation that could end Eve. |

Avid Bumhumper
Furian Necromongers
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:18:00 -
[2786] - Quote
Akelorian wrote:Jade, making a valid point will only have goons mock you, and the forum police delete your posts. I find it rather pathetic though that CCP has taken this long to investigate a segment thats recorded. Unless they can't find out where in the presentation he actually said these things, perhaps we should just point them out in a timeline for CCP.
They are hoping this will blow over so they don't behead the swarm. Bee hives have a nasty habit of going crazy when the Queen dies.....
My Tinfoil hat has been sugically implanted, so no,it is not for sale..... |

Piatora
Nagrom Security Syndicate Flatline.
122
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:19:00 -
[2787] - Quote
Are we still going on about this? Are you people SO butthurt by goons/mittens that you care this much? Quit trying to white knight a dude who played the oldest online sympathy card there is and just say "We hate Goons and Mittens and we want them all gone". By this point you are doing NOTHING for the community except squealing and hoping that your agenda gets met. If you gave a care about the "cyberbully victim" then you would actually try and talk to him. Counsel him. Give him support. But instead all we get is shiptoasting ALL OVER THE FORUMS about how Mittens sucks, goons suck too, everyone but you and your BFFs should be banned.
Meta-gaming is one thing, but this is becoming obscene. Like I said, if you really care about the dude who "ZOMGZ HE MIGHT KILL HISSELF" then spend your time and energy on him. If CCP is gonna ban Mittens/Goons/Me/You/Whoever then they will do it, any and all chestbeating and whiteknighting and agenda pushing from the likes of us will not accomplish anything besides making us look even stupider to the world at large. Shut up already. |

hioshi IV
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:21:00 -
[2788] - Quote
The Breadmaster wrote:The CSM published by CCPExcerpt from page 20 of the linked CCP document- CSM REPRESENTATIVE CONDUCT any behavior or actions considered being a material breach of the eula or tos by a Csm representative is grounds for immediate dismissal and permanent exclusion from all pending and future participation in the council. There are no exceptions, regardless of the infraction. representatives are not only expected to uphold the social contract that all society members are held accountable to, but should also set a behavior standard for everyone else to follow. ____ This sounds pretty clear cut to me. Unless we don't play by these rules anymore? "immediate dismissal and permanent exclusion" Policies are created to insure all players are treated fairly and equally. We can't begin making exceptions to one without eliminating the rule altogether. What kind of publicity will EVE receive if he or any future player does commit suicide? The media will look back on this incident and see how the company handeled it which could open them up for future liability. Any player regardless of alliance affiliation needs to understand the gravity of this situation outside of the context of Eve. This is a situation that could end Eve.
It's not just a case of been the rules, it's also a case of been morally unacceptable to keep him in any CSM position at all.. |

Blatant Forum Alt
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
103
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:21:00 -
[2789] - Quote
Come on guys, you can do better than this. You are STILL 60 pages short of space barbies. Keep posting, that way CCP will have to listen. *rolls eyes* |

Avid Bumhumper
Furian Necromongers
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:21:00 -
[2790] - Quote
Piatora wrote:Are we still going on about this? Are you people SO butthurt by goons/mittens that you care this much? Quit trying to white knight a dude who played the oldest online sympathy card there is and just say "We hate Goons and Mittens and we want them all gone". By this point you are doing NOTHING for the community except squealing and hoping that your agenda gets met. If you gave a care about the "cyberbully victim" then you would actually try and talk to him. Counsel him. Give him support. But instead all we get is shiptoasting ALL OVER THE FORUMS about how Mittens sucks, goons suck too, everyone but you and your BFFs should be banned.
Meta-gaming is one thing, but this is becoming obscene. Like I said, if you really care about the dude who "ZOMGZ HE MIGHT KILL HISSELF" then spend your time and energy on him. If CCP is gonna ban Mittens/Goons/Me/You/Whoever then they will do it, any and all chestbeating and whiteknighting and agenda pushing from the likes of us will not accomplish anything besides making us look even stupider to the world at large. Shut up already.
Hmm if the Goons are big Meta gamers, and this is considered Meta-gaming, can we pull out the old meme about Turnabout ?
My Tinfoil hat has been sugically implanted, so no,it is not for sale..... |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 105 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |