Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
101
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 23:35:00 -
[301] - Quote
Large Collidable Object wrote:Diesel47 wrote:
Personally I don't care if OGBs exist or not. The only thing I care about (and most of the pro-ogb pilots here) is the changes effect on small gang pvp. If CCP can somehow fix this problem without buffing blobs then I'd be happy with it.
Even if they removed boosting entirely I'd be cool. But we both know that is very unlikely.
I don't particularly like boosting at all, but if CCP is going to go forward with this balancing of boosting then I think they should do something along the lines of my OP. Unless there is a better idea that anybody has which doesn't give another unneeded buff to blobs then I won't change my mind and I'll keep posting until my keyboard turns to dust (514).
Any numbers limit you put on ingame fleets will easily be circumvented breaking down the fleet into multiple small gangs, neglecting any disadaventage using OOG comms. Hence your proposal is naive and futile. Nevertheless, offgrid boosting hurts the smallest guy first and is flat out a wrong and abusive mechanic. I can live with a complete removal of any gangboosts, but offgrid boosting has to die. (And in case I didn't mention it before, I have 2 characters with close to perfect leadership skills (never really bothered with information warfare links), CS V and flying multiple T3s with all subsystems @ V).
If they want to have a separate tengu/loki for each 5 pilots in their entire fleet they can be my guest.
Nobody is going to do that, and if they do it will be a rare one time event.
Saying that my idea is bad because one could theoretically do something like this if they really wanted to isn't a good argument.
At least my solution is makes it so they need 20 tengus to boost a fleet instead of just one.
Do you have a better solution? preferably one that CCP would be willing to do? I'd love for boosts to just disappear altogether, but we both know that won't happen. |

Melodee619
The Scope Gallente Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 23:38:00 -
[302] - Quote
it will happen, just like this idiotic highsec flagging system they want to bring in so the wow community can feel safe. Dramatize the thing enough, make it sound much worse than it is, an CCP will fold EVERY SINGLE TIME.....They know this, an even mission runners have caught onto the fact now that CCP will bend over backwards if you just make enough of a stink on forums. had 2 guys in Scope yesterday said ninjas should be banned for life an they wanted it like miners where they cant be effected by "griefers"...
SO the off grid booster nerf.... yer, it's coming.
For most of us, its never been an issue, but the minority who dont like it, an want things all cuddles an flowers, will make it sound much more dramatic. |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1220
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 23:41:00 -
[303] - Quote
Does the WoW community cry about EVE players this much?
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
101
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 23:43:00 -
[304] - Quote
Melodee619 wrote:it will happen, just like this idiotic highsec flagging system they want to bring in so the wow community can feel safe. Dramatize the thing enough, make it sound much worse than it is, an CCP will fold EVERY SINGLE TIME.....They know this, an even mission runners have caught onto the fact now that CCP will bend over backwards if you just make enough of a stink on forums. had 2 guys in Scope yesterday said ninjas should be banned for life an they wanted it like miners where they cant be effected by "griefers"...
SO the off grid booster nerf.... yer, it's coming.
For most of us, its never been an issue, but the minority who dont like it, an want things all cuddles an flowers, will make it sound much more dramatic.
If you are trying to call us carebears then you are so ignorant to the issue that I'm astounded. 
Marlona Sky wrote:Does the WoW community cry about EVE players this much?
I'm sure they don't even know what EvE is . |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
1885
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 23:44:00 -
[305] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Does the WoW community cry about EVE players this much?
I'd say that 80% of the time that Eve comes up in game design discussions, the WOW players are like "WTF, those guys are ******* nuts and all of them should be locked up under the jail..."
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
101
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 23:45:00 -
[306] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Does the WoW community cry about EVE players this much? I'd say that 80% of the time that Eve comes up in game design discussions, the WOW players are like "WTF, those guys are ******* nuts and all of them should be locked up under the jail..." -Liang
You sure they know what we even are? I'm going to go search WoW forums to see what they think of us.
If I don't make it back.... Any pro-ogb warrior can have my assets. Wish me luck. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
1885
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 23:49:00 -
[307] - Quote
Diesel47 wrote: You sure they know what we even are? I'm going to go search WoW forums to see what they think of us.
If I don't make it back.... Any pro-ogb warrior can have my assets. Wish me luck.
I'd say we're not a regular topic of conversation, but Eve definitely comes up in our game design discussions at work.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Melodee619
The Scope Gallente Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 23:51:00 -
[308] - Quote
Diesel47 wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Does the WoW community cry about EVE players this much? I'd say that 80% of the time that Eve comes up in game design discussions, the WOW players are like "WTF, those guys are ******* nuts and all of them should be locked up under the jail..." -Liang You sure they know what we even are? I'm going to go search WoW forums to see what they think of us. If I don't make it back.... Any pro-ogb warrior can have my assets. Wish me luck.
Good luck man, you can feel your IQ slowly killing itself in objection to being subjected to the crap on those forums. It makes crime an punishment look intelligent. (Even SA forums are not as brain dead as wow's) As for calling people "carebears", no I dont. carebears are just a silly notion made up some idiot. But I do think you new exactly what you were getting when you signed up to EVE. Demanding it be changed to suit your obliviously "safer" idea of what EVE should be is just flat out stupid. |

Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
101
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 23:53:00 -
[309] - Quote
Melodee619 wrote: As for calling people "carebears", no I dont. carebears are just a silly notion made up some idiot. But I do think you new exactly what you were getting when you signed up to EVE. Demanding it be changed to suit your obliviously "safer" idea of what EVE should be is just flat out stupid.
Are we even talking about the same topic here? |

Large Collidable Object
morons.
1903
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:03:00 -
[310] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote: I'm sure there's a lot of things that could be better. Why are you so dead set on ruining the play style that I want to have?
You'e also misinterpreting my intent - I'm all for any advantage for small gangs, but offgrid boosting simply is the wrong way.
Maybe you've seen the fubared offgrid, warpcore stabbed, interdiction nullified cov ops cloaked 4 link 'unproabable' probing bonused 4-link tengu fit I posted in the other thread. I have two characters capable of flying that (well - both have caldari cruiser V, but I'd just need ~25 days to train all tengu subsystems to V which I didn't thus far because I hate Tengus), yet I don't because it would be abhorrently lame.
However, I know people do and many more are training alts for that purpose and quite frankly, they shouldn't exist.
I have a noob T1 frig alt @ ~20 mill SP I use for ***** and giggles, I don't mind KB stats and considering the ship that alt flies, have literally unlimited ressources and know how to avoid blobs, but finding a non-boosted opponent can be frustrating. I can't imagine how frustrating it must be for a real beginner.
You know... morons. |
|

Wacktopia
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
258
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:14:00 -
[311] - Quote
Your sole argument is "because I would unsub".
And your suggestions are basically to nerf boosting in different ways, so, I'm not really sure what point you are trying to make?
Then at the end you say "stop thinking about your play style" yet half your idea is clearly geared up to your play style.... off-grid boosting is fine so long as its just for a small number of players and after that you are a "noob blobber" and must use a CS on-grid. What? The bottom line is that now I have one of those annoying signatures. |

Melodee619
The Scope Gallente Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:17:00 -
[312] - Quote
Diesel47 wrote:Melodee619 wrote: As for calling people "carebears", no I dont. carebears are just a silly notion made up some idiot. But I do think you new exactly what you were getting when you signed up to EVE. Demanding it be changed to suit your obliviously "safer" idea of what EVE should be is just flat out stupid.
Are we even talking about the same topic here? I was responding to a post back up the page |

Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
101
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:21:00 -
[313] - Quote
Wacktopia wrote:Your sole argument is "because I would unsub".
And your suggestions are basically to nerf boosting in different ways, so, I'm not really sure what point you are trying to make?
Then at the end you say "stop thinking about your play style" yet half your idea is clearly geared up to your play style.... off-grid boosting is fine so long as its just for a small number of players and after that you are a "noob blobber" and must use a CS on-grid. What?
I'll break it into bite sized pieces for you.
With T3s only being able to boost small gangs then the command ships will be the only real choice for larger fleets and the command ship pilots who whine about not being able to use their ships because of T3s being better won't have that problem anymore and they will be happy. Ok?
Following that change, the small gangs will also be happy because they can still use their T3s to stay competitive with big blobs that run links (which any good blob should). Ok?
Both parties are happy, the only unhappy people are the ones that don't have links or don't know anybody that do. But nothing can be done about them because CCP would have to remove boosting altogether to make them happy. Which probably won't happen.
And I said if anybody thinks that blobs should be the only ones to be able to effectively run fleet boost that they are "blobbing noobs". IE the notion to remove OGBs all together without giving small gangs a choice but to fly expensive command ships in battle.
If you still don't get it I sadly can't help you. |

Melodee619
The Scope Gallente Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:22:00 -
[314] - Quote
Large Collidable Object wrote:Liang Nuren wrote: I'm sure there's a lot of things that could be better. Why are you so dead set on ruining the play style that I want to have?
You'e also misinterpreting my intent - I'm all for any advantage for small gangs, but offgrid boosting simply is the wrong way. Maybe you've seen the fubared offgrid, warpcore stabbed, interdiction nullified cov ops cloaked 4 link 'unproabable' probing bonused 4-link tengu fit I posted in the other thread. I have two characters capable of flying that (well - both have caldari cruiser V, but I'd just need ~25 days to train all tengu subsystems to V which I didn't thus far because I hate Tengus), yet I don't because it would be abhorrently lame. However, I know people do and many more are training alts for that purpose and quite frankly, they shouldn't exist. I have a noob T1 frig alt @ ~20 mill SP I use for ***** and giggles, I don't mind KB stats and considering the ship that alt flies, have literally unlimited ressources and know how to avoid blobs, but finding a non-boosted opponent can be frustrating. I can't imagine how frustrating it must be for a real beginner.
if I am readning this right, you want 1v1 "fair" fights ?... boosting is just fine as it is. You should remember that there is no such thing as 1v1 an "fair" fights. You do what it takes to win no matter what, end always justifys the means so to speak.
EG... If I had to bridge 15 Avatars to kill your one vexor, I would do it because it means winning.... |

Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
101
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:32:00 -
[315] - Quote
Melodee619 wrote:Large Collidable Object wrote:Liang Nuren wrote: I'm sure there's a lot of things that could be better. Why are you so dead set on ruining the play style that I want to have?
You'e also misinterpreting my intent - I'm all for any advantage for small gangs, but offgrid boosting simply is the wrong way. Maybe you've seen the fubared offgrid, warpcore stabbed, interdiction nullified cov ops cloaked 4 link 'unproabable' probing bonused 4-link tengu fit I posted in the other thread. I have two characters capable of flying that (well - both have caldari cruiser V, but I'd just need ~25 days to train all tengu subsystems to V which I didn't thus far because I hate Tengus), yet I don't because it would be abhorrently lame. However, I know people do and many more are training alts for that purpose and quite frankly, they shouldn't exist. I have a noob T1 frig alt @ ~20 mill SP I use for ***** and giggles, I don't mind KB stats and considering the ship that alt flies, have literally unlimited ressources and know how to avoid blobs, but finding a non-boosted opponent can be frustrating. I can't imagine how frustrating it must be for a real beginner. if I am readning this right, you want 1v1 "fair" fights ?... boosting is just fine as it is. You should remember that there is no such thing as 1v1 an "fair" fights. You do what it takes to win no matter what, end always justifys the means so to speak. EG... If I had to bridge 15 Avatars to kill your one vexor, I would do it because it means winning....
Wait what? I thought you were against boosting, but now you are for it?
wat da fuq  |

Large Collidable Object
morons.
1903
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:37:00 -
[316] - Quote
Melodee619 wrote:
if I am readning this right, you want 1v1 "fair" fights ?... boosting is just fine as it is. You should remember that there is no such thing as 1v1 an "fair" fights. You do what it takes to win no matter what, end always justifys the means so to speak.
EG... If I had to bridge 15 Avatars to kill your one vexor, I would do it because it means winning....
No - you're reading this entirely wrong. Eve is about getting the other guy engaged in an unfair fight.
Offgrid boosting however makes that too easy, so any rich noob can do it and it renders first attempts at solo and small gang pvp extremely frusrtrating for new players.
It just adds an option for carebears who are trying to pvp to make it relatively risk free, to discourage the real daring noob.
Personally, I'd actually appreciate it if you drop 15 avatars on my vexor, because I'd just call pandemic-phone (although it may not work, because you dropping 15 avatars on me may mean you actually are the lady answering pandemic-phone ;) - besides I'd still call it a victory because your fuel cost would have been way higher than the cost of my ship - so no - you're not the lady answeing pandemic-phone). You know... morons. |

Ensign X
86
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:39:00 -
[317] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Does the WoW community cry about EVE players this much?
I'm pretty sure they're too busy enjoying the most popular MMO in the history of MMOs to give a **** about what some whiny space-douches think.  |

Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
101
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:41:00 -
[318] - Quote
Ensign X wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Does the WoW community cry about EVE players this much? I'm pretty sure they're too busy enjoying the most popular MMO in the history of MMOs to give a **** about what some whiny space-douches think. 
Why is your avatar so... sideways? |

Ensign X
86
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:44:00 -
[319] - Quote
Diesel47 wrote:Ensign X wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Does the WoW community cry about EVE players this much? I'm pretty sure they're too busy enjoying the most popular MMO in the history of MMOs to give a **** about what some whiny space-douches think.  Why is your avatar so... sideways?
It makes it easier to read the posts when you're looking at them? 
How can you read the forums when your avatar is looking the completely wrong way? |

Wacktopia
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
259
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:45:00 -
[320] - Quote
Diesel47 wrote:Wacktopia wrote:Your sole argument is "because I would unsub".
And your suggestions are basically to nerf boosting in different ways, so, I'm not really sure what point you are trying to make?
Then at the end you say "stop thinking about your play style" yet half your idea is clearly geared up to your play style.... off-grid boosting is fine so long as its just for a small number of players and after that you are a "noob blobber" and must use a CS on-grid. What? I'll break it into bite sized pieces for you. With T3s only being able to boost small gangs, the command ships will be the only real choice for larger fleets. Then the command ship pilots who whine about not being able to use their ships because of T3s being better won't have that problem anymore. And they will be happy. Ok? Following that change, the small gangs will also be happy because they can still use their T3s to stay competitive with big blobs that run links (which any good blob should). Ok? Both parties are happy, the only unhappy people are the ones that don't have links or don't know anybody that do. But nothing can be done about them because CCP would have to remove boosting altogether to make them happy. Which probably won't happen. And I said that if anybody thinks that blobs should be the only ones to be able to effectively run fleet boost that they are "blobbing noobs". IE the notion to remove OGBs all together without giving small gangs a choice but to fly expensive command ships in battle. Which basically screws small gangs over, hard. If you still don't get it I sadly can't help you.
No, I get it. I just think you're trying to solve the problem in the wrong way, which is to ...
a) threaten to quit if CCP don't listen to your ideas
b) suggest a game mechanic that limits access based upon an arbitrary factor decided by you
Your logic is a bit like this... "My small gang only has one Titan but that big blob over there has100 Titans so I think that Titans should only be available to small gangs to give small gangs a chance".
So, what arbitrary gang size are you suggesting will be "allowed" to use a T3 and what size gang will be limited to the lowly command ship? I'd be genuinely interested to know you're answer to this. What number?
Quote:Then the command ship pilots who whine about not being able to use their ships because of T3s being better won't have that problem anymore. And they will be happy. Ok?
Which CS pilots are these? CS Pilots who can't train up and fly a T3 in a matter of weeks if they wanted to? Or the CS pilots who don't know when a CS is actually as much or more use than a T3 in a particular gang type?
Quote:the only unhappy people are the ones that don't have links or don't know anybody that do.
Wait, I thought the unhappy people were those people with links but who only had a command ship but couldn't train up or fly a T3 for some reason? The bottom line is that now I have one of those annoying signatures. |
|

Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
101
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:46:00 -
[321] - Quote
Ensign X wrote:Diesel47 wrote:Ensign X wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Does the WoW community cry about EVE players this much? I'm pretty sure they're too busy enjoying the most popular MMO in the history of MMOs to give a **** about what some whiny space-douches think.  Why is your avatar so... sideways? It makes it easier to read the posts when you're looking at them?  How can you read the forums when your avatar is looking the completely wrong way? edit: You're asking me about my avatar when just above my previous post sits the most hideous space-creature in all of EVE?
Good point...
I guess hes looking at a smartphone or something.
edit: oh well... yours was still stranger.... So sideways  |

Melodee619
The Scope Gallente Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:47:00 -
[322] - Quote
Large Collidable Object wrote:Melodee619 wrote:
if I am readning this right, you want 1v1 "fair" fights ?... boosting is just fine as it is. You should remember that there is no such thing as 1v1 an "fair" fights. You do what it takes to win no matter what, end always justifys the means so to speak.
EG... If I had to bridge 15 Avatars to kill your one vexor, I would do it because it means winning....
No - you're reading this entirely wrong. Eve is about getting the other guy engaged in an unfair fight. Offgrid boosting however makes that too easy, so any rich noob can do it and it renders first attempts at solo and small gang pvp extremely frusrtrating for new players. It just adds an option for carebears who are trying to pvp to make it relatively risk free, to discourage the real daring noob. Personally, I'd actually appreciate it if you drop 15 avatars on my vexor, because I'd just call pandemic-phone (although it may not work, because you dropping 15 avatars on me may mean you actually are the lady answering pandemic-phone ;) - besides I'd still call it a victory because your fuel cost would have been way higher than the cost of my ship - so no - you're not the lady answeing pandemic-phone).
lol I was trying to make a point :D.. But I must admit this made me laugh alot. Of coarse in true EVE style this hypothetical fight would quickly get out of control, as I would "ask" my Nulli friends to get involved since they dont care alot for PL :p... all PL would do at that point is get the entire CFC in on the event.... :p
edit, I am not a member of Nulli either :)
on topic, I really never seen off grid boost as an issue. if you force them to only be within fleet then booster becomes useless because he will be the primary every time... instant death. |

Large Collidable Object
morons.
1903
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:56:00 -
[323] - Quote
Melodee619 wrote:
edit, I am not a member of Nulli either :)
I'm not a member of PL either (not anymore for quite some time at least...), but I hope i got the message accross: All offgrid boosters do is giving risk-averse carebears an option to buy into to making their frig alt 'own' with the money they made in highsec incursions whilst any real noob quits in frustration. You know... morons. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
1887
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:57:00 -
[324] - Quote
Wacktopia wrote:Your sole argument is "because I would unsub".
And your suggestions are basically to nerf boosting in different ways, so, I'm not really sure what point you are trying to make?
Then at the end you say "stop thinking about your play style" yet half your idea is clearly geared up to your play style.... off-grid boosting is fine so long as its just for a small number of players and after that you are a "noob blobber" and must use a CS on-grid. What?
What? Who's said anything about unsubbing? You... need to read the thread again.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Wacktopia
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
259
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 00:58:00 -
[325] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:What? Who's said anything about unsubbing? You... need to read the thread again. -Liang
Diesel47 wrote:CCP is a business afterall and it isn't good for business to be making changes that will reduce their income. I for one don't really feel too strongly how this matter is resolved, but I will unsub my OGB toon if they remove off grid boosting. Thats $15 a month less income for CCP. I'm sure many other OGB alt owners feel the same. .
From OP
Edit: I'm not even sure if I'm fore or against nerfing off grid boosting. The fact is that introducing a mechanic that stops people using certain ships after their fleet is over an exact certain number of pilots is not good design in my opinion. The bottom line is that now I have one of those annoying signatures. |

Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
101
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 01:03:00 -
[326] - Quote
Wacktopia wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:What? Who's said anything about unsubbing? You... need to read the thread again. -Liang Diesel47 wrote:CCP is a business afterall and it isn't good for business to be making changes that will reduce their income. I for one don't really feel too strongly how this matter is resolved, but I will unsub my OGB toon if they remove off grid boosting. Thats $15 a month less income for CCP. I'm sure many other OGB alt owners feel the same. .
I made an economical prediction of the repercussions of removing a function of the game.
Thats different than your twisted version of the story.
And I'd appreciate it if you didn't spam insults at me in other threads in the forum if you don't agree with my ideas in here. Stop being a child, its time to grow up. |

Ensign X
87
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 01:05:00 -
[327] - Quote
I think it's fair to say, for better or worse, there will be a lot of accounts unsubbed if Off-grid Boosting is simply eliminated. |

Melodee619
The Scope Gallente Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 01:05:00 -
[328] - Quote
Large Collidable Object wrote:Melodee619 wrote:
edit, I am not a member of Nulli either :)
I'm not a member of PL either (not anymore for quite some time at least...), but I hope i got the message accross: All offgrid boosters do is giving risk-averse carebears an option to buy into to making their frig alt 'own' with the money they made in highsec incursions whilst any real noob quits in frustration.
Maybe mate, but I would argue that boost isnt so powerful that you automatically win??.. least not in my experience. |

Wacktopia
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
259
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 01:07:00 -
[329] - Quote
Diesel47 wrote: And I'd appreciate it if you didn't spam insults at me in other threads in the forum if you don't agree with my ideas in here. Stop being a child, its time to grow up.
And from your other thread....
Diesel47 wrote:Pretty mean thread but deal with it. 
Yeah so you want to make a big tough-guy thread about people who fail but when someone does it back to you you get all defensive. Ok, well I'll lay off it then.
Diesel47 wrote:Stop being a child, its time to grow up.
Don't patronise me. The bottom line is that now I have one of those annoying signatures. |

Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
101
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 01:13:00 -
[330] - Quote
Wacktopia wrote:Diesel47 wrote: And I'd appreciate it if you didn't spam insults at me in other threads in the forum if you don't agree with my ideas in here. Stop being a child, its time to grow up.
And from your other thread.... Diesel47 wrote:Pretty mean thread but deal with it.  Yeah so you want to make a big tough-guy thread about people who fail but when someone does it back to you you get all defensive. Diesel47 wrote:Stop being a child, its time to grow up. Stop patronising me.
There is no need to bother an entire forum of people because you can't have a normal discussion in a thread. If they cared about this topic they would be in this thread. Stop being a drama queen.
I'll patronize you as long as you act like an obnoxious baby.
Pft, and I thought the WoW forums were terrible. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |