| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 63 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 39 post(s) |
Neodell
Red Kite Industries
1
   |
Posted - 2012.12.06 13:32:00 -
[841] - Quote
tettenman1971 wrote:What is it with laptops?
When i try to log in i get a black screen and thats it!!!
That cant be right.....
Fix this CCP
Same problem! I used to get 50 FPS in station now it's 19!!!!!!! WTF!
Everything is on low settings, nothing on laptop has changed only eve.
Noticed 10% increase in memory usage as well.
Eve is unplayable at moment until this is fixed, lucky my desktop is unaffected.
|
Syri Taneka
Dopehead Industries
Republic Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 13:34:00 -
[842] - Quote
Haifisch Zahne wrote:Looks like you haven't been shopping lately for new skills, under Electronics. Take a peek at the new Sensor Compensation skills. The Caldari died in this expansion, apparently missiles and ECM were undeserving of any role in the game. I guess, the Gallente got a huge whack in the head too: forget those drones now. Syri Taneka wrote:CaptCommando wrote:Just saying but with the new ecm sensor skills u just basically made the ecm drones useless as the heavy's only have like 2 or 2.5 jam strength a piece so now there kinda useless even for ecm boats. with a carrier as the exception maybe since u can use like 12 of them at a time. i don't know if that was intended or not but that means unless your in a ecm boat and are using ecm mods u cant jam your way out from being killed. which means your now basically done for where as before u had a chance. just another way to promote mass blob warfare. a single person has no chance at running now Oh noes! Your large drones now only have an 8.8% chance (each) to jam my drake (with level 5 compensation) instead of the old 10.5% chance (a 16% efficacy reduction)! (Yeah, for those of you who weren't aware, jam chance does not stack additively; each jammer or jamming drone has its own chance to jam. While enough jammers too weak to autojam will approach a 100% jam chance, this is an asymptotic relationship - the only way to achieve true 100% jam is to have ECM stronger than the target's sensor strength.)
No, I accounted for those when I ran those numbers (hence the 'now' and 'old' chances) . I even picked the Drake because it's a classic. But I can go compare other ships.
Thrasher: 9 (old), 10.8 (new). 22% jam chance (per EC-900 drone) old, 18.5%/drone new. 16.6% efficacy loss (okay, I rounded that down yesterday).
Vagabond: 14/16.8. 14.3%/12%. 16.6% efficacy loss.
Sacrilege: 15/18. 13.3%/11.1%. 16.6% efficacy loss.
Myrmidon: 18/21.6. 11.1%/9.2%. 16.6% efficacy loss.
Re-ran the Vagabond with numbers from my Falcon fit (12.9521 racial jam strength), and, sure enough, 92.2%/76.9%, 16.6% efficacy loss.
So a 20% boost to sensor strength is only costing you 16.6% of your per-jammer chance to jam. Is that going to change up the battlefield a little, yes. Is it the end of the world? No. |
Jack' Sparrow
The Three Musketeers
30
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 13:38:00 -
[843] - Quote
Toi Algaert wrote:So have any dev's commented on the monumental balls up over drones yet?, Or are they still ignoring the player's ( yeah us that pay there wages )
Evidentially not, would be nice if they did  |
Maresse en Tilavine
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 13:41:00 -
[844] - Quote
robbyx wrote:Jukebox seems to have disappeared, asked a couple of corpies who also said that couldnt find it....although i did read the patch notes i may have missed if is a known issue.
This. 
I was sad when I found it has disappeared. I hope it gets put back in place soon. 
|
Morugnir
Negotiatores Aeternum
188
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 13:42:00 -
[845] - Quote
Canceling your subscribes is way to tell CCP your opinion, I guess.
So i did.
Let the butthurt flow through you... |
Riazal
SKULLDOGS
Unclaimed.
24
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 13:44:00 -
[846] - Quote
Jack' Sparrow wrote:Toi Algaert wrote:So have any dev's commented on the monumental balls up over drones yet?, Or are they still ignoring the player's ( yeah us that pay there wages ) Evidentially not, would be nice if they did
guys im a drone boat myself... but you can thank drone afk/bots for this... man up move on cos i can not see much getting done about this...its ccp's plan to get drones out of ratting
move onto the next thing untill that gets nerf'd |
Jognu
French Kiss Singularity
Astromechanica Federatis
20
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 13:47:00 -
[847] - Quote
tornpain wrote:"The limit for corp hangar divisions in stations was increased to 1500 items."
This is false; we used to be able to stack 10,000+ blueprints in corp hanger divisions. Since you can't invent out of cans, large invention-style corporations need to be able to stack thousands of blueprints in a single hanger division to invent out of.
This change makes it very inconvenient for large-scale inventors with thousands of BPCs. I'm honestly not sure why this change was necessary.
+1 for this.
With this limit we have to put all the BPC in cans, and when we need them for a job, we have to get them out of the can before being able to do so.
EveAI developper: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=21803
YamlToSQL developper: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=178572 |
Sable Moran
Moran Light Industries
72
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 13:54:00 -
[848] - Quote
Retribution 1.0.2 wrote:
Market
The scroll for an input field will now work when the mouse cursor is within the boundaries of the window as opposed to the boundaries of the input field.
Thank you.
Sable's Ammo Shop at Alentene V - Moon 4 - Duvolle Laboratories Factory. Hybrid charges, Projectile ammo, Missiles, Drones, Ships, Need'em? We have'em, at affordable prices. Pop in at our Ammo Shop in sunny Alentene. |
Stormchyld
Platinium Rats
Test Friends Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:03:00 -
[849] - Quote
Riazal wrote:Jack' Sparrow wrote:Toi Algaert wrote:So have any dev's commented on the monumental balls up over drones yet?, Or are they still ignoring the player's ( yeah us that pay there wages ) Evidentially not, would be nice if they did guys im a drone boat myself... but you can thank drone afk/bots for this... man up move on cos i can not see much getting done about this...its ccp's plan to get drones out of ratting move onto the next thing untill that gets nerf'd but it would be nice for a dev to say so or tell me im wrong to put and end to all the post's on drones this drones that... talk to us...just let us know ccp...
There is a thread about how the team in charge nows the drone AI is fubar, but insisted on putting it forward anyway: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=155703
There is also a... dare I write it ... exploit (shudder), or workaround ... or bug (that CCP devs know about but again, pushed it anyway so they could *fix* it later) ... so when does the ban hammer come down on people doing this..... ummmm .... thing?
The undock your drones, let take slight dmg from "known drone AI screw up" immediately dock them then undock and go about your business w/o worry about further damage, utter destruction of drones? If I commit this act of intentionally using a bug, altho using bugs is an exploit, and thus a bannable offence 3 weeks from now do my 3, 6 year old 90m SP titan pilots get scrwed because, all of a sudden they've "Gloriously Fixed The Unpopular Known Drone AI F**k-up.... All Hail The All Knowing Devs"????
Yes, some answers would be swell. |
Jack' Sparrow
The Three Musketeers
32
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:03:00 -
[850] - Quote
Riazal wrote:Jack' Sparrow wrote:Toi Algaert wrote:So have any dev's commented on the monumental balls up over drones yet?, Or are they still ignoring the player's ( yeah us that pay there wages ) Evidentially not, would be nice if they did guys im a drone boat myself... but you can thank drone afk/bots for this... man up move on cos i can not see much getting done about this...its ccp's plan to get drones out of ratting move onto the next thing untill that gets nerf'd
I can understand that something had to be done about it but making drones get blown to bits within seconds was not the solution.
|
|
|
Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security
Devlin Alliance
259
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:07:00 -
[851] - Quote
Stormchyld wrote:Spugg Galdon wrote:Wowzers there are some care bear tears in here.
First of all. The Hurricane needed a nerf along with HML's which were way over powered. The Hurricane is still a very good ship. The Drake is also excellent and falls in line with the other BC's.
Second. PvE in EvE is evolving. It needs to otherwise content becomes stale. PvE is to become more like PvP and crying about these changes to NPC AI is rediculous. Adapt or die. You can still use drones just manage them properly. I don't struggle so why do you? Also, why not take some risks to make money and leave hi sec?
Third. Sound FX being poor. I agree that sound FX may be poor in some cases.
and last. Where were all you whining wingebots when all this stuff was on the test server and all the dev blogs, dev forum threads and news and testing and feedback was going on? If you can't be bothered to keep up and then wet your nappies when D-Day happens then you'll get no sympathy from me. If you want sympathy it's in the dictionary. Somewhere between shite and syphilis. Thanks for the input, troll. I DO live in nullsec 4 days a week pal ... these drone issues are there as well. Perhaps you ONLY live in a frig ... if so fine, that's YOUR CHOICE ...... try flying a gallente ship now... in anoms... in 0.8 .. BOOM... no drones .... You MUST reside in a place in null where the market has 3m drones for sale... most DO NOT. and for someone complaining about whiners... you do a great job of it yourself.
Wot?
I just flew a 4/10 anom (Phi-Serpentis Outpost) in a Gallente ship with no trouble.
What I've noticed is that there are a lot of people complaining on the forums that are actually quite new to the forums. Has this patch woken the carebears from their slumber?
IMHO, we've all had it too easy up until now.
You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |
Stormchyld
Platinium Rats
Test Friends Please Ignore
3
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:14:00 -
[852] - Quote
new to forums?
bawhawhaw
|
Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security
Devlin Alliance
259
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:18:00 -
[853] - Quote
Stormchyld wrote:new to forums?
bawhawhaw
actually thank you ..... the laugh chilled me out a bit.
It's that, or a lot of people are posting with brand new alts just to complain about retribution. There is a very definitive trend of new character influx in the forums - whether they are the alts of people who are regulars here or just people that have never posted, I cannot say. But one is most definitely more likely than the other.
FYI, I have only lost one drone so far, and I have a stockpile of them. They are expendable - my primary weapons of choice have always been rails and drones are just a bit of extra dps to keep the AI busy.
You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |
Stormchyld
Platinium Rats
Test Friends Please Ignore
3
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:28:00 -
[854] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Stormchyld wrote:new to forums?
bawhawhaw
actually thank you ..... the laugh chilled me out a bit. It's that, or a lot of people are posting with brand new alts just to complain about retribution. There is a very definitive trend of new character influx in the forums - whether they are the alts of people who are regulars here or just people that have never posted, I cannot say. But one is most definitely more likely than the other. FYI, I have only lost one drone so far, and I have a stockpile of them. They are expendable - my primary weapons of choice have always been rails and drones are just a bit of extra dps to keep the AI busy.
Perhaps because they are newer players who cannot afford to lose tons of drones whilst climbing the standing ladder. This is the alt I always use for posting... and the last time I posted this much was during the fiasco that led to the Jita monument protest.
When things are this screwed up m8, saying nothing, does nothing. My other 2 alts are Skychyld (main.. 6 years in feb) and Wrathchyld, both veterans of eve.
It's good that you only lost one... and that you have a stockpile of them.... good on ya .... as do I .. you are utterly missing the point. So, enjoy your stockpile. |
RODIMUS PRIMAL
Engaged In Frivolous Revolution
Rebel Alliance of New Eden
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:33:00 -
[855] - Quote
When I use my Jump Freighter there are two location of each Cynosural generators arrays in my heads up display that I can jump too. Both work . |
Nene Ryuseika
The Ryuseika Group
7
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:37:00 -
[856] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:
FYI, I have only lost one drone so far, and I have a stockpile of them. They are expendable - my primary weapons of choice have always been rails and drones are just a bit of extra dps to keep the AI busy.
Then you are obviously not flying a drone boat. A Thron pilot can't really comment on an issue affecting Domis and Ishtars.
|
Stormchyld
Platinium Rats
Test Friends Please Ignore
3
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:39:00 -
[857] - Quote
Nene Ryuseika wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:
FYI, I have only lost one drone so far, and I have a stockpile of them. They are expendable - my primary weapons of choice have always been rails and drones are just a bit of extra dps to keep the AI busy.
Then you are obviously not flying a drone boat. A Thron pilot can't really comment on an issue affecting Domis and Ishtars.
This ^^ |
Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security
Devlin Alliance
259
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:41:00 -
[858] - Quote
Nene Ryuseika wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:
FYI, I have only lost one drone so far, and I have a stockpile of them. They are expendable - my primary weapons of choice have always been rails and drones are just a bit of extra dps to keep the AI busy.
Then you are obviously not flying a drone boat. A Thron pilot can't really comment on an issue affecting Domis and Ishtars.
What makes you think I'm not flying a drone boat? One with railguns?
You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |
Nene Ryuseika
The Ryuseika Group
7
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:43:00 -
[859] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Nene Ryuseika wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:
FYI, I have only lost one drone so far, and I have a stockpile of them. They are expendable - my primary weapons of choice have always been rails and drones are just a bit of extra dps to keep the AI busy.
Then you are obviously not flying a drone boat. A Thron pilot can't really comment on an issue affecting Domis and Ishtars. What makes you think I'm not flying a drone boat? One with railguns?
Because a DRONE BOAT is a ship who's primary DPS is DRONES.
not sure if trolling, or just stupid.jpg |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Project Wildfire
493
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:43:00 -
[860] - Quote
I know guys, instead of giving constructive feedback, why don't we keep insulting the developers who probably worked ungodly hours and neglected their families so that we could play a video game...
Chill out, wait a week and i'm sure they will answer your questions in due course.
They see me trolling, they hating... |
|
|
Tangsu
State War Academy
Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:44:00 -
[861] - Quote
CCP Explorer wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:CCP Explorer wrote:It's time and effort spent that might be better spent on something else. Or removing long time, beloved features on a regular basis? That is removing with no replacement. How can these be "iterations" when re factoring becomes re moving? It's perfectly normal for a long-lived game like EVE to have to remove some features at some point in its life. I even explained this in a devblog in 2009 http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=1777 (start from "Why do we constantly update EVE? "Why can't you just keep it the way it is?"").
Removing useful, well liked features without a working replacement is not an 'Update'. And by 'working replacement' I mean working (from the user's perspective) as well if not better than the function that was removed. Seems there should have been more thought put into this after the wonderful ship spinning debacle. There should especially have been some very serious thought put into this after the Unified Inventory debacle. If you can't make it better, don't just remove it, or break it. And then claim it's just because EVE is an ever changing game. That sounds disingenuous.
Removing the Jukebox might have been easier for you than leaving it in, but at what price? Loss of a measure of goodwill from customers, because it makes you look out of touch, or worse.
And in the grand scheme of things, compared to the many thousands and thousands of man hours you put into this expansion, would it have really taken that much to leave the jukebox in? What, maybe one half of one percent or less of the work involved in rolling out the entire expansion?
I know you put a huge amount of effort into this expansion, and it's too bad you're getting so much flac for so many things. But seriously, put the jukebox back asap. And stop removing features that we like, are working correctly, and make the game more enjoyable for us, the customers.
Regards |
Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security
Devlin Alliance
259
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:44:00 -
[862] - Quote
Nene Ryuseika wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Nene Ryuseika wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:
FYI, I have only lost one drone so far, and I have a stockpile of them. They are expendable - my primary weapons of choice have always been rails and drones are just a bit of extra dps to keep the AI busy.
Then you are obviously not flying a drone boat. A Thron pilot can't really comment on an issue affecting Domis and Ishtars. What makes you think I'm not flying a drone boat? One with railguns? Because a DRONE BOAT is a ship who's primary DPS is DRONES. not sure if trolling, or just stupid.jpg
Or maybe just doing it differently to you.
Nice work on the personal attack, though. Very mature. Maybe if you're so mad you should just put another half a billion of your isk on my head. It did nothing last time, but maybe this time will be different.
You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |
Nene Ryuseika
The Ryuseika Group
7
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:57:00 -
[863] - Quote
oh and Remiel, stop liking all my posts, that really makes it look like your primary intention is just stirring crap
I prescribe less forums and more ingame time for you, so you might begin to understand what we're all talking about.
|
GaiusAlexander
Abacus House
5
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 15:08:00 -
[864] - Quote
Are the salvage drones supposed to auto salvage or do I have to tell them to salvage each wreck? Couldn't find a setting to "salvage all" or the like. Right now they salvage one wreck then come back and orbit my ship. Saw where a DEV said they were aware of a Salvage drone issue and that may be it. If there is something I am missing, though, please let me know.
Thanks. |
Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security
Devlin Alliance
260
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 15:16:00 -
[865] - Quote
Nene Ryuseika wrote:oh and Remiel, stop liking all my posts, that really makes it look like your primary intention is just stirring crap
I prescribe less forums and more ingame time for you, so you might begin to understand what we're all talking about.
Maybe I'm just getting my half billion's worth 
You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |
Nene Ryuseika
The Ryuseika Group
7
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 15:16:00 -
[866] - Quote
GaiusAlexander wrote:Are the salvage drones supposed to auto salvage or do I have to tell them to salvage each wreck? Couldn't find a setting to "salvage all" or the like. Right now they salvage one wreck then come back and orbit my ship. Saw where a DEV said they were aware of a Salvage drone issue and that may be it. If there is something I am missing, though, please let me know.
Thanks.
They can be set to salvage with no wreaks targeted then auto salvage everything on thier own - but only if those wreaks were your own. (and you stayed on grid) It's stated in the description that it works like that.
but that seems totally contradictory to giving the Noctis a drone bay and saying so in the same breath as "oh we're giving you salvage drones!" |
KIller Wabbit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
137
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 15:34:00 -
[867] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:I know guys, instead of giving constructive feedback, why don't we keep insulting the developers who probably worked ungodly hours and neglected their families so that we could play a video game...
Chill out, wait a week and i'm sure they will answer your questions in due course.
Yeah, sure wait a week.. it's not like there are timers in game that don't wait on the Dev's to fix problems they introduced.
CCP isn't a startup... there is little evidence that a large number of Dev's are working "ungodly" hours. If they are - CCP is a screwed up company.
CCP Punkturis-á "I want to get in on the goodposter circle jerk!"
|
KIller Wabbit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
137
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 15:39:00 -
[868] - Quote
Either it's new or I hadn't noticed before, the Show condensed combat log switch - for losses the Name column shows my name, which seems totally useless. Shouldn't it show the Final Blow name?
CCP Punkturis-á "I want to get in on the goodposter circle jerk!"
|
|
CCP Punkturis
C C P
C C P Alliance
3916
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 15:47:00 -
[869] - Quote
KIller Wabbit wrote:Either it's new or I hadn't noticed before, the Show condensed combat log switch - for losses the Name column shows my name, which seems totally useless. Shouldn't it show the Final Blow name?
it's probably always been like this. it makes more sense in the corporation kill reports list
Gÿà EVE User Interface Programmer Gÿà
GÖÑ Team Super Friends GÖÑ
@CCP_Punkturis
My Dev Blogs |
|
Rhamascus Zagar
Lacking In Diplomacy
Unclaimed.
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 15:48:00 -
[870] - Quote
Give something new to the Black Ops, they're supposed to be for 'Infiltration' and 'Espionage' and yet they still can't even warp cloaked like coverts. We're just looking for something a little extra, even bonuses would be better now (like Widow, cause now they have new skills and mods that can easily water down ECMs now.. :/ ) No wonder Vic died in your trailer vid :P! |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 63 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |