Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 40 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
813
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 01:58:00 -
[361] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Frying Doom wrote:I have little experience with Outposts This will be important for the next quote. Frying Doom wrote:outposts already give a fair few bonuses, docking being one of them. That you think being able to dock in an outpost that you own is a bonus really says it all. The NPC outposts have the best "bonuses" then? So er, I guess players shouldn't be building their own infrastructure.... Oh right, HIGHSEC is the place to be, the NPCs have the infrastructure all ready for you !
That infrastructure is just asking for a DBRB fleet to come cruising through. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |
Yonis Kador
KADORCORP
282
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 01:58:00 -
[362] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: more stuff I disagree with
FM, so far you've called me risk averse in this topic and lazy in another for expressing my opinions. Neither is accurate. And I own a POS. I don't own a dozen of them and do not have POS's stationed across known space. Which is never going to happen.
You again write that boosting manufacturing returns at a high sec POS is some kind of reward for owning one despite countless examples of why tethering a dynamic industry to a stationary object is not beneficial. (Stop doing me favors!) It would be a logistical nightmare for the same exact reasons cited in this topic explaining why it's a nightmare for null players.
Debating whether everything I've invested into my gameplay for the past 14 months is going to be made pointless does frustrate me as the consequences are potentially game-changing to an unacceptable degree. But I play this game because its fun. Piloting a freighter isn't. In fact, it's my least-favorite activity in the game. So tieing my least-favorite activity in the game to my primary source of income isn't something I'm ever going to be a vocal supporter of. How dumb would that be? This change would at best, make my game vastly less enjoyable and at worst end it entirely.
So until the black day comes to pass ushering in changes which ruin my game, I'm going to be a vocal opponent.
For me, there is no other option.
It's not personal. So if my opposition offends anyone, I apologize in advance.
YK
"He who fights and runs away lives to fight another day." |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3909
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 02:01:00 -
[363] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Frying Doom wrote: So just like portals in WoW.
So any other WoW like changes you would like to propose?
What's a portal in WoW? You seem to have experience with that game, I don't. Yes I do, having played most of the popular MMOs for years all the way back to text MUDS in the 80's. So that concerns me more as you are obviously unfamiliar with other MMOs, specifically the worlds most famous and the one with the highest subscriber level.
I also have started with MUDs and have played a lot of MMOs. I just bailed out of those that sucked balls, Post-vanilla WoW being one of them.
I played mostly PvP MMOs. Where there's no crap like hi sec, nor self inflicted paper wounds like living at a POS in null sec or WH (which I had both to do). Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
Nexus Day
Lustrevik Trade and Travel Bureau
474
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 02:07:00 -
[364] - Quote
Given the risk vs reward relationship the order should be WH industry > Low Industry > Null=Hi industry.
But my guess is CCP will keep things the way they are. Why not? It seems the formula is working. This thread has so much content it may be 'Thread of the Year' and it is only January.
|
Frostys Virpio
Lame Corp Name
341
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 02:08:00 -
[365] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Frying Doom wrote:I have little experience with Outposts This will be important for the next quote. Frying Doom wrote:outposts already give a fair few bonuses, docking being one of them. That you think being able to dock in an outpost that you own is a bonus really says it all. The NPC outposts have the best "bonuses" then? So er, I guess players shouldn't be building their own infrastructure.... Oh right, HIGHSEC is the place to be, the NPCs have the infrastructure all ready for you !
What if we put stations in sov null with docking right and service usage limited only to the aliance holding SOV in the system it is in?
I realise it's a huge middle finger to the whole idea of building your own base and stuff but isn't that all considered a huge pain in the ass anyway? |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3518
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 02:11:00 -
[366] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Frying Doom wrote:I have little experience with Outposts This will be important for the next quote. Frying Doom wrote:outposts already give a fair few bonuses, docking being one of them. That you think being able to dock in an outpost that you own is a bonus really says it all. The NPC outposts have the best "bonuses" then? So er, I guess players shouldn't be building their own infrastructure.... Oh right, HIGHSEC is the place to be, the NPCs have the infrastructure all ready for you ! What if we put stations in sov null with docking right and service usage limited only to the aliance holding SOV in the system it is in? I realise it's a huge middle finger to the whole idea of building your own base and stuff but isn't that all considered a huge pain in the ass anyway? It's basically what happens when you put down an outpost. You can't get rid of it, the big thing is only you can spend a TONt o upgrade it to be not-as-good-as-highsec. And your enemy can take it and lock you out, I think they can shoot the services stuff as well if the station is vulnerable.
It also means two timers to consider when trying to grind sov. I am a nullsec zealot. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1197
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 02:16:00 -
[367] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:
Because, for any serious manufacturer, costs are irrelevant.
What... More costs = less profits, what in the world makes you think more costs is a good thing? You honestly think we think costs are irrelevant in any of our choices? Even your own mad workings out show high sec is the only logical choice.
Not quite.
I can make X produce for Y cost.
I can make 3X product for 2Y cost.
The actual cost isn't relevant, as long as it's within my means. Because the profit is higher.
I'll admit, it wasn't well worded. FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities.As well as mysql and CSV/XLS conversions of the Static Data Extract. |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4147
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 02:17:00 -
[368] - Quote
Nexus Day wrote:Given the risk vs reward relationship the order should be WH industry > Low Industry > Null=Hi industry.
But my guess is CCP will keep things the way they are. Why not? It seems the formula is working. No, it isn't.
However bridging off your idea, I like the idea of making WH space the most optimal place for T3 production. A lot of POS changes would have to happen to make that possible, though. Malcanis for CSM 8 Module activation timers are buggy - CCP please fix |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3520
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 02:19:00 -
[369] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Nexus Day wrote:Given the risk vs reward relationship the order should be WH industry > Low Industry > Null=Hi industry.
But my guess is CCP will keep things the way they are. Why not? It seems the formula is working. No, it isn't. It is, you're a nullsec zealot, your "opinion" is worthless here on GENERAL DISCUSSION. I am a nullsec zealot. |
Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2604
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 02:22:00 -
[370] - Quote
Nexus Day wrote:Given the risk vs reward relationship the order should be WH industry > Low Industry > Null=Hi industry.
But my guess is CCP will keep things the way they are. Why not? It seems the formula is working. Wormholes weren't intended to be occupied long term (CCP actually said this). Lowsec industry is fairly on par with highsec, but people pretty much only build carriers, dreads & rorquals out there. Null is only as safe as it's residents make it through effort expended & was intended to be occupied long term. Saying that null industry shouldn't be a priority because it can be as safe as highsec is silly.
However, a POS revamp (particularly the awesome modular POS ideas) would benefit WH residents a lot aswell & this is what nullsec residents have been asking for. Apparently booking your flight & accomodation to Iceland BEFORE you buy the tickets for the convention which is pretty much the only reason you wanted to go there in the first place is popular. |
|
Frostys Virpio
Lame Corp Name
341
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 02:22:00 -
[371] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:What if we put stations in sov null with docking right and service usage limited only to the aliance holding SOV in the system it is in?
I realise it's a huge middle finger to the whole idea of building your own base and stuff but isn't that all considered a huge pain in the ass anyway? It's basically what happens when you put down an outpost. You can't get rid of it, the big thing is only you can spend a TON to upgrade it to be not-as-good-as-highsec. And your enemy can take it and lock you out, I think they can shoot the services stuff as well if the station is vulnerable. It also means two timers to consider when trying to grind sov.
All that null sec stuff looks so bad to someone who's never been there. It looks like do X more the recive Y less for it... It's not inviting at all... |
La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
814
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 02:24:00 -
[372] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote: It is, you're a nullsec zealot, your "opinion" is worthless here on GENERAL DISCUSSION.
MY POSTS FOR NULLSEC! This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |
Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2604
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 02:24:00 -
[373] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:All that null sec stuff looks so bad to someone who's never been there. It looks like do X more the recive Y less for it... It's not inviting at all...
This guy gets it. Apparently booking your flight & accomodation to Iceland BEFORE you buy the tickets for the convention which is pretty much the only reason you wanted to go there in the first place is popular. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3520
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 02:31:00 -
[374] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:All that null sec stuff looks so bad to someone who's never been there. It looks like do X more the recive Y less for it... It's not inviting at all... This guy gets it. No, it looks even worse when you're here and there's bitches trying to catch your jump freighter (a good JF pilot is of course "riskless" rite~) and you have to freighter stuff around in nullsec (minerals, parts, ships) again, with people camping your gates or JBs.
So yes, Jita it is. Buy, then just one run of JF, done. Drop in VFK where people will get caught in a bubble warping to the station and killed by Black Legion/NC./TerriblePubbies. while trying to buy it. I am a nullsec zealot. |
Frostys Virpio
Lame Corp Name
342
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 02:48:00 -
[375] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:All that null sec stuff looks so bad to someone who's never been there. It looks like do X more the recive Y less for it... It's not inviting at all... This guy gets it.
On the bright side, maybe I can make "I went to null sec and all I got is this lousy lossmail" t-shirts and sell them. Then I would get more than my efforts worth in reward. |
Frostys Virpio
Lame Corp Name
342
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 02:50:00 -
[376] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:All that null sec stuff looks so bad to someone who's never been there. It looks like do X more the recive Y less for it... It's not inviting at all... This guy gets it. No, it looks even worse when you're here and there's bitches trying to catch your jump freighter (a good JF pilot is of course "riskless" rite~) and you have to freighter stuff around in nullsec (minerals, parts, ships) again, with people camping your gates or JBs. So yes, Jita it is. Buy, then just one run of JF, done. Drop in VFK where people will get caught in a bubble warping to the station and killed by Black Legion/NC./TerriblePubbies. while trying to buy it.
I wonder how much items are destroyed by people losing whatever they just bought the very second they undock after buying it in null... |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1756
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 03:26:00 -
[377] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Frying Doom wrote:I have little experience with Outposts This will be important for the next quote. Frying Doom wrote:outposts already give a fair few bonuses, docking being one of them. That you think being able to dock in an outpost that you own is a bonus really says it all. But yet I own several POSs and am unable to dock, or reprocess or massive storage space. So if it is not a bonus on an outpost do you believe that it is a programming error on a POS, after all it is not a bonus? We all thought CSM 6 was a war crime with it's massive Null Presence CSM7 topped it by selling out our Council to CCP, don't let it happen again. Vote or next time Incarna is your fault Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1756
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 03:30:00 -
[378] - Quote
Yonis Kador wrote:Frying Doom wrote: more stuff I disagree with FD, so far you've called me risk averse in this topic and lazy in another for expressing my opinions. Neither is accurate. And I own a POS. I don't own a dozen of them and do not have POS's stationed across known space. Which is never going to happen. You again write that boosting manufacturing returns at a high sec POS is some kind of reward for owning one despite countless examples of why tethering a dynamic industry to a stationary object is not beneficial. (Stop doing me favors!) It would be a logistical nightmare for the same exact reasons cited in this topic explaining why it's a nightmare for null players. Debating whether everything I've invested into my gameplay for the past 14 months is going to be made pointless does frustrate me as the consequences are potentially game-changing to an unacceptable degree. But I play this game because its fun. Piloting a freighter isn't. In fact, it's my least-favorite activity in the game. So tieing my least-favorite activity in the game to my primary source of income isn't something I'm ever going to be a vocal supporter of. How dumb would that be? This change would at best, make my game vastly less enjoyable and at worst end it entirely. So until the black day comes to pass ushering in changes which ruin my game, I'm going to be a vocal opponent. For me, there is no other option. It's not personal. So if my opposition offends anyone, I apologize in advance. YK Like I said you are arguing that the yield on a procurer should be the same as on a hulk or it is not fair for the procurer pilot.
And how only being slightly less profitable makes it your training pointless? it would just mean you like every other profession in this game would have to max some skills and no matter how much you use sensationalist comments like that it will never make them true. We all thought CSM 6 was a war crime with it's massive Null Presence CSM7 topped it by selling out our Council to CCP, don't let it happen again. Vote or next time Incarna is your fault Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 |
Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2608
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 03:31:00 -
[379] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Frying Doom wrote:I have little experience with Outposts This will be important for the next quote. Frying Doom wrote:outposts already give a fair few bonuses, docking being one of them. That you think being able to dock in an outpost that you own is a bonus really says it all. But yet I own several POSs and am unable to dock, or reprocess or massive storage space. So if it is not a bonus on an outpost do you believe that it is a programming error on a POS, after all it is not a bonus?
POS towers & outposts are two completely different things. Apparently booking your flight & accomodation to Iceland BEFORE you buy the tickets for the convention which is pretty much the only reason you wanted to go there in the first place is popular. |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1756
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 03:34:00 -
[380] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:baltec1 wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:
Because, for any serious manufacturer, costs are irrelevant.
What... More costs = less profits, what in the world makes you think more costs is a good thing? You honestly think we think costs are irrelevant in any of our choices? Even your own mad workings out show high sec is the only logical choice. Not quite. I can make X produce for Y cost. I can make 3X product for 2Y cost. The actual cost isn't relevant, as long as it's within my means. Because the profit is higher. I'll admit, it wasn't well worded. How the hell are cost irrelevant?
You can produce a rifter for 4000 isk or you can produce a rifter for 40,000,000 isk
I know what one I would produce. We all thought CSM 6 was a war crime with it's massive Null Presence CSM7 topped it by selling out our Council to CCP, don't let it happen again. Vote or next time Incarna is your fault Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 |
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1756
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 03:38:00 -
[381] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Frying Doom wrote:I have little experience with Outposts This will be important for the next quote. Frying Doom wrote:outposts already give a fair few bonuses, docking being one of them. That you think being able to dock in an outpost that you own is a bonus really says it all. But yet I own several POSs and am unable to dock, or reprocess or massive storage space. So if it is not a bonus on an outpost do you believe that it is a programming error on a POS, after all it is not a bonus? POS towers & outposts are two completely different things. Yes they are but the ability to dock, reprocess, store massive amounts ect... are part of their bonuses. That is why it worries me about upgrading a structure so heavily in the industry side while it being cheap over time and cheap to install.
As an Outpost uses no fuel. But having said that I do feel that having an isk sink equal to the cost per slot of a POS would be a fair exchange. We all thought CSM 6 was a war crime with it's massive Null Presence CSM7 topped it by selling out our Council to CCP, don't let it happen again. Vote or next time Incarna is your fault Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1756
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 03:42:00 -
[382] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote: It is, you're a nullsec zealot, your "opinion" is worthless here on GENERAL DISCUSSION.
MY POSTS FOR NULLSEC! Bloody Nullsec Zealots. Actually after this thread it is really becoming "Bloody Hi-sec Zealots" We all thought CSM 6 was a war crime with it's massive Null Presence CSM7 topped it by selling out our Council to CCP, don't let it happen again. Vote or next time Incarna is your fault Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 |
Buzzy Warstl
The Strontium Asylum
506
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 03:45:00 -
[383] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Nexus Day wrote:Given the risk vs reward relationship the order should be WH industry > Low Industry > Null=Hi industry.
But my guess is CCP will keep things the way they are. Why not? It seems the formula is working. No, it isn't. However bridging off your idea, I like the idea of making WH space the most optimal place for T3 production. A lot of POS changes would have to happen to make that possible, though. It clearly isn't working, but industry is so far down the list of reasons why it isn't working that I'm personally surprised that anyone who knows what's going on at all even cares. http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm Richard Bartle: Players who suit MUDs |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4149
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 03:46:00 -
[384] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:All that null sec stuff looks so bad to someone who's never been there. It looks like do X more the recive Y less for it... It's not inviting at all... This guy gets it. No, it looks even worse when you're here and there's bitches trying to catch your jump freighter (a good JF pilot is of course "riskless" rite~) and you have to freighter stuff around in nullsec (minerals, parts, ships) again, with people camping your gates or JBs. So yes, Jita it is. Buy, then just one run of JF, done. Drop in VFK where people will get caught in a bubble warping to the station and killed by Black Legion/NC./TerriblePubbies. while trying to buy it. I wonder how much items are destroyed by people losing whatever they just bought the very second they undock after buying it in null... Not terribly often, since if you undock into a hot situation you can pretty much always dock again. You only run into trouble if you aggress like an idiot, or if you invalidate invuln/let it expire and get alpha'd. Malcanis for CSM 8 Module activation timers are buggy - CCP please fix |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3909
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 07:38:00 -
[385] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:All that null sec stuff looks so bad to someone who's never been there. It looks like do X more the recive Y less for it... It's not inviting at all... This guy gets it. No, it looks even worse when you're here and there's bitches trying to catch your jump freighter (a good JF pilot is of course "riskless" rite~) and you have to freighter stuff around in nullsec (minerals, parts, ships) again, with people camping your gates or JBs. So yes, Jita it is. Buy, then just one run of JF, done. Drop in VFK where people will get caught in a bubble warping to the station and killed by Black Legion/NC./TerriblePubbies. while trying to buy it. I wonder how much items are destroyed by people losing whatever they just bought the very second they undock after buying it in null...
Before the timers revamp there was a trick to stop without dropping the immunity timer and then re-dock, it has saved my butt some times in there. Of course there were some insanely quick reactions pro bumpers that could teach James315 dudes some lessons. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4151
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 07:51:00 -
[386] - Quote
That trick still works. Malcanis for CSM 8 Module activation timers are buggy - CCP please fix |
March rabbit
No Name No Pain
584
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 09:07:00 -
[387] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:March rabbit wrote:La Nariz wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Malcanis wrote:You're neglecting to take into account the huge investment of ISK, time and effort to secure that security in sov space. It doesn't just happen by itself. And it's still less secure than hi-sec. Being able to shape your own empire is the reward, not a cost. If you don't like that ability, nothing forces you to embark into it. False: Building the empire is a cost ok. then next question: what is the reward in being in SOV 0.0? What makes you to be in SOV 0.0 instead of low-sec/NPC 0.0/WH? "what is the reward in being in SOV 0.0?" That part is subjective, I would personally say control. Yet there isn't enough of a competitive advantage so that control isn't really useful. It's also one of the reasons people don't fight as often as the forum howls for. If there is no advantage to be taken from someone else why fight them? "What makes you to be in SOV 0.0 instead of low-sec/NPC 0.0/WH?" I think you are trying to say "What makes you want to be in SOV 0.0 instead of being in lowsec/NPC 0.0/WH" if that's not the case correct me. I am not in SOV 0.0 unless there is a fleet op, most of my time is spent awoxing people in highsec. We might have control of our area of space but, control of nothing is still nothing. Nullsec needs some substance to attract people like myself back to full-time living there. There needs to be an industrial backbone and the "farms and fields" concept needs to be fleshed out so there will be more things to do as well as fights to be had. you got me right.
and now i see another thing: 0.0 sov isn't interesting to you (and i guess we can speak about your alliance). However 0.0 sov can be interesting for another people who cannot take it from your BIG BLUE DONUT.
Maybe instead of having thing you don't need and complain for CCP to improve this thing you simply move to some other place which is more interesting then? You said you spend more time in empire so why return to 0.0 then? |
baltec1
Bat Country
5515
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 09:43:00 -
[388] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: Yes they are but the ability to dock, reprocess, store massive amounts ect... are part of their bonuses. That is why it worries me about upgrading a structure so heavily in the industry side while it being cheap over time and cheap to install.
As an Outpost uses no fuel. But having said that I do feel that having an isk sink equal to the cost per slot of a POS would be a fair exchange.
So you will be fine with high sec stations also charging the same sum to every pilot that used them then. |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4154
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 10:06:00 -
[389] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:you got me right.
and now i see another thing: 0.0 sov isn't interesting to you (and i guess we can speak about your alliance). However 0.0 sov can be interesting for another people who cannot take it from your BIG BLUE DONUT.
Maybe instead of having thing you don't need and complain for CCP to improve this thing you simply move to some other place which is more interesting then? You said you spend more time in empire so why return to 0.0 then? Stop trolling. You're not being funny, or clever, or smart, and you're just spouting fallacies and misinformation all over the place. We address this **** in practically every page of this thread and yet you idiots still post it. It's getting irritating. Malcanis for CSM 8 Module activation timers are buggy - CCP please fix |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1757
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 10:33:00 -
[390] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Yes they are but the ability to dock, reprocess, store massive amounts ect... are part of their bonuses. That is why it worries me about upgrading a structure so heavily in the industry side while it being cheap over time and cheap to install.
As an Outpost uses no fuel. But having said that I do feel that having an isk sink equal to the cost per slot of a POS would be a fair exchange.
So you will be fine with high sec stations also charging the same sum to every pilot that uses them then. No. I would be fine with High sec stations charging slightly more.
The objective is to allow Null Outposts and POSs to be the more than the NPC stations.
Outposts cost money, POSs cost money. Both attract risk to that money.
So therefore they should have abilities that are better and cheaper than NPC stations. We all thought CSM 6 was a war crime with it's massive Null Presence CSM7 topped it by selling out our Council to CCP, don't let it happen again. Vote or next time Incarna is your fault Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 40 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |