| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 40 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

DrClit
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:12:00 -
[1051] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:
if you really did think, perhaps you would have noticed i'm in an npc corp. hence, i don't live in null.
the very fact that mining the ores in null sec requires more training time is the reason null sec ores should be worth more, not just because they're in null. just like the same way level 4 missions are worth more than level 1 missions because you have to spend more time training to fly things capable of dealing with the missions.
Thats complete rubbish you can mine all types of ore with level 1 skills. missioning is completely different since you are right to complete the hard missions solo you need higher skills. I remember the days of sitting mining Arkonor in a hulk rigged up for max yield per cycle and did it fairly effectively with bare mining skills.
You said it right there - why should someone in high sec suffer when they spent the same amount of time training mining skills to maximise their isk/hour then someone who does it in null sec? They've spent the same amount of time training so deserves to be rewarded.
Quote:During my seven weeks of mining in highsec, I never got attack. That was last Oct/Nov, so thing may have changed drastically, but I have my doubts. A max yield Procurer with a tank has little chance of being attacked, if you use some OPSEC. Even if you did lose one, it can easily be replace with two hours of mining.
I can't speak for other areas... and not even with that much experience..., but in CVA space you get reds a lot. Plus questionable neutrals. I don't mine there, but I do have a toon there.
Im not sure what point you are making here? If you read my comments i was talking about the concentration of players and the risk of the unexpected happening is much greater in high sec than in null sec where the concetration of players is much less. |

Bi-Mi Lansatha
Tactical Universal Research and Development Caldari Industrialist Association
69
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:21:00 -
[1052] - Quote
DrClit wrote:...Im not sure what point you are making here?... It might have been a non-sequitur post from me. Just saying, from my experience, the risk in 0.0 is worse than Highsec.
|

Dave Stark
2521
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:21:00 -
[1053] - Quote
DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
if you really did think, perhaps you would have noticed i'm in an npc corp. hence, i don't live in null.
the very fact that mining the ores in null sec requires more training time is the reason null sec ores should be worth more, not just because they're in null. just like the same way level 4 missions are worth more than level 1 missions because you have to spend more time training to fly things capable of dealing with the missions.
Thats complete rubbish you can mine all types of ore with level 1 skills. missioning is completely different since you are right to complete the hard missions solo you need higher skills. I remember the days of sitting mining Arkonor in a hulk rigged up for max yield per cycle and did it fairly effectively with bare mining skills. You said it right there - why should someone in high sec suffer when they spent the same amount of time training mining skills to maximise their isk/hour then someone who does it in null sec? They've spent the same amount of time training so deserves to be rewarded.
and you can fly a raven with nothing but caldari battleship II or something.
how is missioning different? need higher skills for harder missions, just like you need higher skills to mine, and refine rarer (or, "harder") ores.
but they haven't spent the same amount of time training skills. veldspar processing, for example, is a much faster train than things like arkonor processing. why shouldn't you be rewarded for spending the extra time training arkonor instead of veldspar? Maggie Thatcher. |

DrClit
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:37:00 -
[1054] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
if you really did think, perhaps you would have noticed i'm in an npc corp. hence, i don't live in null.
the very fact that mining the ores in null sec requires more training time is the reason null sec ores should be worth more, not just because they're in null. just like the same way level 4 missions are worth more than level 1 missions because you have to spend more time training to fly things capable of dealing with the missions.
Thats complete rubbish you can mine all types of ore with level 1 skills. missioning is completely different since you are right to complete the hard missions solo you need higher skills. I remember the days of sitting mining Arkonor in a hulk rigged up for max yield per cycle and did it fairly effectively with bare mining skills. You said it right there - why should someone in high sec suffer when they spent the same amount of time training mining skills to maximise their isk/hour then someone who does it in null sec? They've spent the same amount of time training so deserves to be rewarded. and you can fly a raven with nothing but caldari battleship II or something. how is missioning different? need higher skills for harder missions, just like you need higher skills to mine, and refine rarer (or, "harder") ores. but they haven't spent the same amount of time training skills. veldspar processing, for example, is a much faster train than things like arkonor processing. why shouldn't you be rewarded for spending the extra time training arkonor instead of veldspar?
Read my post again and try to make sense of it. People who spend the time training to make their isk/hour more efficient should be rewarded i say that quite clearly. |

Dave Stark
2521
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:39:00 -
[1055] - Quote
DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
if you really did think, perhaps you would have noticed i'm in an npc corp. hence, i don't live in null.
the very fact that mining the ores in null sec requires more training time is the reason null sec ores should be worth more, not just because they're in null. just like the same way level 4 missions are worth more than level 1 missions because you have to spend more time training to fly things capable of dealing with the missions.
Thats complete rubbish you can mine all types of ore with level 1 skills. missioning is completely different since you are right to complete the hard missions solo you need higher skills. I remember the days of sitting mining Arkonor in a hulk rigged up for max yield per cycle and did it fairly effectively with bare mining skills. You said it right there - why should someone in high sec suffer when they spent the same amount of time training mining skills to maximise their isk/hour then someone who does it in null sec? They've spent the same amount of time training so deserves to be rewarded. and you can fly a raven with nothing but caldari battleship II or something. how is missioning different? need higher skills for harder missions, just like you need higher skills to mine, and refine rarer (or, "harder") ores. but they haven't spent the same amount of time training skills. veldspar processing, for example, is a much faster train than things like arkonor processing. why shouldn't you be rewarded for spending the extra time training arkonor instead of veldspar? Read my post again and try to make sense of it. People who spend the time training to make their isk/hour more efficient should be rewarded i say that quite clearly.
i tried but it's full of things that are just plain incorrect. my response was just correcting you. Maggie Thatcher. |

Anva Dante
Bunch of Noobs Logistics
7
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:39:00 -
[1056] - Quote
Short answer: "No"
Long Answer: "nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo" |

DrClit
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:42:00 -
[1057] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
if you really did think, perhaps you would have noticed i'm in an npc corp. hence, i don't live in null.
the very fact that mining the ores in null sec requires more training time is the reason null sec ores should be worth more, not just because they're in null. just like the same way level 4 missions are worth more than level 1 missions because you have to spend more time training to fly things capable of dealing with the missions.
Thats complete rubbish you can mine all types of ore with level 1 skills. missioning is completely different since you are right to complete the hard missions solo you need higher skills. I remember the days of sitting mining Arkonor in a hulk rigged up for max yield per cycle and did it fairly effectively with bare mining skills. You said it right there - why should someone in high sec suffer when they spent the same amount of time training mining skills to maximise their isk/hour then someone who does it in null sec? They've spent the same amount of time training so deserves to be rewarded. and you can fly a raven with nothing but caldari battleship II or something. how is missioning different? need higher skills for harder missions, just like you need higher skills to mine, and refine rarer (or, "harder") ores. but they haven't spent the same amount of time training skills. veldspar processing, for example, is a much faster train than things like arkonor processing. why shouldn't you be rewarded for spending the extra time training arkonor instead of veldspar? Read my post again and try to make sense of it. People who spend the time training to make their isk/hour more efficient should be rewarded i say that quite clearly. i tried but it's full of things that are just plain incorrect. my response was just correcting you.
Are you talking about "MINING" or "Reprocessing" since now you are talking about something 2 completely different acts. |

Dave Stark
2521
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:43:00 -
[1058] - Quote
DrClit wrote:Are you talking about "MINING" or "Reprocessing" since now you are talking about something completely different.
both, it applies to both equally. Maggie Thatcher. |

DrClit
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:50:00 -
[1059] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:DrClit wrote:Are you talking about "MINING" or "Reprocessing" since now you are talking about something completely different. both, it applies to both equally.
I dont think it does since you can have someone do it for you and there are people that have "specialised" in having max processing yield. What has that got to do with null sec versus high sec? |

Dave Stark
2521
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:51:00 -
[1060] - Quote
DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:DrClit wrote:Are you talking about "MINING" or "Reprocessing" since now you are talking about something completely different. both, it applies to both equally. I dont think it does since you can have someone do it for you and there are people that have "specialised" in having max processing yield. What has that got to do with null sec versus high sec?
could just, y'know read my posts and then you'd realise what this has to do with high sec and null sec. Maggie Thatcher. |

DrClit
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:56:00 -
[1061] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:DrClit wrote:Are you talking about "MINING" or "Reprocessing" since now you are talking about something completely different. both, it applies to both equally. I dont think it does since you can have someone do it for you and there are people that have "specialised" in having max processing yield. What has that got to do with null sec versus high sec? could just, y'know read my posts and then you'd realise what this has to do with high sec and null sec.
Nope im obviously well below your intelligence so spell it out for me.
If its the point that to process arknor you need skills which means you should have a higher isk/hour then i've agreed with you. |

Dave Stark
2521
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:58:00 -
[1062] - Quote
small victory for me then. Maggie Thatcher. |

DrClit
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:59:00 -
[1063] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:small victory for me then.
I didnt realise having a discussion on a forum was a form of pvp.
But since you claimed victory im still waiting for you to write a half decent reply. |

Dave Stark
2521
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:01:00 -
[1064] - Quote
DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:small victory for me then. I didnt realise having a discussion on a forum was a form of pvp. But since you claimed victory im still waiting for you to write a have decent reply.
you wouldn't be waiting if you'd read my posts. *shrug* Maggie Thatcher. |

DrClit
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:03:00 -
[1065] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:small victory for me then. I didnt realise having a discussion on a forum was a form of pvp. But since you claimed victory im still waiting for you to write a have decent reply. you wouldn't be waiting if you'd read my posts. *shrug*
I read your posts and i'm asking your to use the single brain cell you have to explain what this has to do with high sec industry versus null sec. |

Dave Stark
2521
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:04:00 -
[1066] - Quote
DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:small victory for me then. I didnt realise having a discussion on a forum was a form of pvp. But since you claimed victory im still waiting for you to write a have decent reply. you wouldn't be waiting if you'd read my posts. *shrug* I read your posts and i'm asking your to use the single brain cell you have to explain what this has to do with high sec industry versus null sec.
go read my posts and find out. Maggie Thatcher. |

DrClit
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:09:00 -
[1067] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:
go read my posts and find out.
LOL....
you sound like Sheldon Cooper stuck in a loop so ill leave you there since it seems completely beyond you to have a civilised discussion. |

Dave Stark
2521
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:10:00 -
[1068] - Quote
DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
go read my posts and find out.
LOL.... you sound like Sheldon Cooper stuck in a loop so ill leave you there since it seems completely beyond you to have a civilised discussion.
hard to do that when one party refuses to read the posts. Maggie Thatcher. |

DrClit
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:20:00 -
[1069] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
go read my posts and find out.
LOL.... you sound like Sheldon Cooper stuck in a loop so ill leave you there since it seems completely beyond you to have a civilised discussion. hard to do that when one party refuses to read the posts.
I asked you to explain it again becuase i still get your argument.
There is a rule in effective commucation that says:
"The effectiveness of my communication is in the response i get".
just saying. |

Dave Stark
2521
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:24:00 -
[1070] - Quote
DrClit wrote:just saying.
you're not actually saying anything; that's the entire problem. Maggie Thatcher. |

DrClit
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:25:00 -
[1071] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:DrClit wrote:just saying. you're not actually saying anything; that's the entire problem.
read my posts again and you will see that there is no problem. |

Dave Stark
2521
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:31:00 -
[1072] - Quote
DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:DrClit wrote:just saying. you're not actually saying anything; that's the entire problem. read my posts again and you will see that there is no problem.
i've read them, there isn't anything for the last 2 pages or so.
how long do you think we can keep this up for before some one else posts, or it gets locked, or something? i'd put isk on at least another page. Maggie Thatcher. |

DrClit
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:34:00 -
[1073] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:DrClit wrote:just saying. you're not actually saying anything; that's the entire problem. read my posts again and you will see that there is no problem. i've read them, there isn't anything for the last 2 pages or so. how long do you think we can keep this up for before some one else posts, or it gets locked, or something? i'd put isk on at least another page.
I still think you should read them again im pretty sure you'd get it eventually. |

Bi-Mi Lansatha
Tactical Universal Research and Development Caldari Industrialist Association
69
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:38:00 -
[1074] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:... how long do you think we can keep this up for before some one else posts, or it gets locked, or something? i'd put isk on at least another page. Can i have my 1 ISK? 
It isn't my place, but you two seem to be somewhat 'warmed up'. Perhaps let it go for a while?
I have Guinness ! |

Dave Stark
2521
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:44:00 -
[1075] - Quote
Bi-Mi Lansatha wrote:Dave Stark wrote:... how long do you think we can keep this up for before some one else posts, or it gets locked, or something? i'd put isk on at least another page. Can i have my 1 ISK?  It isn't my place, but you two seem to be somewhat 'warmed up'. Perhaps let it go for a while? I have Guinness !
damn you. Maggie Thatcher. |

Velicitia
Nex Exercitus
1356
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:44:00 -
[1076] - Quote
DrClit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
if you really did think, perhaps you would have noticed i'm in an npc corp. hence, i don't live in null.
the very fact that mining the ores in null sec requires more training time is the reason null sec ores should be worth more, not just because they're in null. just like the same way level 4 missions are worth more than level 1 missions because you have to spend more time training to fly things capable of dealing with the missions.
Thats complete rubbish you can mine all types of ore with level 1 skills. missioning is completely different since you are right to complete the hard missions solo you need higher skills. I remember the days of sitting mining Arkonor in a hulk rigged up for max yield per cycle and did it fairly effectively with bare mining skills.
"bare" mining skills for a hulk "fit for max yield" are hardly "bare mining skills".
"bare mining skills" in a venture are more what you're arguing about.
Yes, you can use a no skill (L1 Ore Frig, L1 Mining) character to mine. You're getting just under 103m3 per laser (102.9), assuming you're running with Cu Vapor Miners (base 49 m3/cycle). with 2 lasers, that's about 206 m3/minute. Arkonor is 16 m3/unit, so you're getting 6 units per laser (well, 6.4 or so, but EVE rounds down).
You need 200 units (3,600 m3) to refine Ark. This will take you approximately 15 minutes (pulling in 12/minute), and net you about 850k (~129k for the zyd, ~717k for the mega, and 1620 for the trit using Eve-central Jita median buy price). ASSUMING PERFECT REFINING
In that same 30 minutes, mining veldspar, you get 61740 units of veld (205.8 m3/min = 2058 units/min * 30 min), netting you about 1m ISK. ASSUMING PERFECT REFINING.
Now, your no-skill miner isn't going to have perfect refining. IIRC, the base yield for a no-skill toon (after taxes) is a little over 80% (since you need refining 1 to refine).
Net yield is (station base) + ((refining constant) * (refining factor) * (efficiency factor) * (spec factor)) where:
- station base is the base yield of the station (50% in hisec usually) - refining constant is 37.5% - refining factor is 1+(0.02*Refining Skill Level) - efficiency factor is 1+(0.04*Refinery Efficiency Skill Level) - spec factor is 1+(0.05*Ore Processing Skill Level)
So, our rookie miner has a yield of 50 + (37.5*1.02*1*1) = 88.25, less station taxes ... 88.25*.95 = 83.83% Ark = 700k Veld = 830k
Now, we're assuming that there aren't any belt rats. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that a no-skill venture can't tank nullsec belt rats in the same vein as a no-skill frig can't tank a L4 mission. One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia Malcanis for CSM8 |

Bi-Mi Lansatha
Tactical Universal Research and Development Caldari Industrialist Association
69
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:47:00 -
[1077] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Bi-Mi Lansatha wrote:Dave Stark wrote:... how long do you think we can keep this up for before some one else posts, or it gets locked, or something? i'd put isk on at least another page. Can i have my 1 ISK?  It isn't my place, but you two seem to be somewhat 'warmed up'. Perhaps let it go for a while? I have Guinness ! damn you. 
|

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1597
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 12:49:00 -
[1078] - Quote
And now to get back on track :) .
The Question is: should null industry be better than high sec industry.
The real answer is - NO, it shouldn't by default be better, but players in null sec should (IF they put in the time and effort, risk loss and work to defend it) be able to build the "99% self sufficient" industrial empires CCP has said they them to be able to.
A player should be able to just live and play in null sec if thats what they choose to do. As it s now, that's nearly impossible, somehow, in some way either that player has to go back to "empire" (or maintain an empire presence via alts) for stuff OR pay someone else to bring them stuff from empire. After 10 years of spenidng TRILLIONS of isk and fighting (killing millions of ships), null sec has 3% of high sec's industrial capacity.
Is a player wants to live in null sec and be an industrialist/builder/whatever, they syhould be able to do that without having to be dependent on empire, in the EXACt same way that a player who doesn't want to leave high sec should not be forced to. High sec partisans wo't back any change though, because one the one hand they are condemning the kinds of people who go to null sec while on the other hand they are happily selling them the fruits of their high sec carebearing.....
Please CCP, free us from Core Worlds/High Sec Tyranny!. Cuba Null Sec Libre! |

Velicitia
Nex Exercitus
1356
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 13:00:00 -
[1079] - Quote
I'll agree that it shouldn't be better by default -- but, with the right amount of effort, it should be better, and be able to cut itself off from empire -- with the exception that minerals and moongoo be exported to fund the alliances (because you still need ISK to pay off CONCORD, etc). One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia Malcanis for CSM8 |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1597
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 13:02:00 -
[1080] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:I'll agree that it shouldn't be better by default -- but, with the right amount of effort, it should be better, and be able to cut itself off from empire -- with the exception that minerals and moongoo be exported to fund the alliances (because you still need ISK to pay off CONCORD, etc).
Needing to ship stuff to empire to fund alliances is still dependence, and ccp's stated goal for null was virtual independence ("99% self sufficent").
The relationship between null and high (and all other parts of EVE) should be free and fair trade, not the current one way slavery to high sec.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 40 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |