| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

evedawn
Pacific Glori NZ
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 03:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
A Very Dissatisfied player!!!
Yesterday I got Insta popped in a Golem undocking from Osmon Station. What is the point of wardec's or faction warfare if you can get a team of 5 guys in high Sec with heavy fitted Teir 3 BC's & insta pop a 3 bil isk ship who has no connection with these idiots???
I think this is a serious flaw with the game!!!
I have worked hard & long hours to earn this ship for a easy kill from someone I didnt even know existed & thought just because they could pop me for being in the same place they were in, a supposidly "High Security" area.......... JOKE Joke!
CCP a very serious question if you wont honest missionaries to wont to play this game?
If I choose to, I should be able to play this game safely if that is the way you supposedly are saying I am able to do?????
Is that true???? Is High Sec a mith??? |

Unit XS365BT
The Synenose Accord Celestial Imperative
93
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 03:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
Firstly, this is the wrong section of the forums to post this.
Secondly, EvE is an open-world PvP game. High-sec has much stronger penalties for non-consentual PvP, but space is inherently a dangerous place.
While it is unfortunate that you lost such an expensive ship, It is the nature of the game. One of the first rules that many learn regarding EvE is this : Do not fly a ship you cannot afford to lose (read 'replace')
A war declaration simply removes the penalty for shooting someone in space. in this case, those 5 people, unless you somehow got a suspect flag with them or accepted a limited engagement with them (duel), would have lost their ships soon after opening fire upon yours.
I would note that it is likely you were somewhat unlucky. but I do wonder, How is it that you were flying a 3 billion isk ship, without knowing that you can be shot anywhere? |

evedawn
Pacific Glori NZ
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 04:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
Firstly what is the right section then?
Secondly because its never happened to me before & I've never heard it could happen!
The only thing that happened before was I got a pirate in a mission & laughed at him because he got shot from the mission pirates...
I never got a suspect flag & did not see any of them get blown up afterwards. I am still waiting to see battlelinic's report on the event.
Still think High Sec is a mith & the game is unbalanced towards or for the aggressor with skills. In other words bully training in motion... |

Samira Kernher
Praetorian Auxiliary Force Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
101
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 05:33:00 -
[4] - Quote
It happens all the time. It's suicide ganking, and there are many tactics developed specifically to accomplish it (fits that maximize alpha strike capability, etc). It will take several seconds for CONCORD to arrive, they do not arrive immediately (the time it takes is based on the security rating of the system). It's not immediate, but he people that attacked you would have gotten destroyed shortly after they killed you.
This is intended. You could indeed say that high security is a "myth", because it is not supposed to be 100% safe. Players who believe it is 100% safe are deluding themselves. The only thing high security does is ensure that your attacker will themselves die. It does not guarantee your survival, and is not intended to.
The only way to be 100% safe is to never undock. If you undock, you are always opening yourself to risk, even in high sec. That is the nature of EVE. |
|

CCP Eterne
C C P C C P Alliance
2245

|
Posted - 2013.03.18 08:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
Moving from Live Events Discussion to General Discussion. New Eden Community Representative GÇ+ New Eden Illuminati GÇ+ Fiction Adept
@CCP_Eterne GÇ+ @EVE_LiveEvents |
|

Radamant Nemess
Caribbean Coke Enterprises
13
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 08:48:00 -
[6] - Quote
Osmon is nice place to grind sisters missions and get (profit) sisters probe launchers from their lp store. This is probably one of the best stations (sisters only station in highsec with lvl 4 agent) for lvl4 missioning and others know that too. Osmon was (maybe still is) known as a Tengu graveyard, wonder why? Lots of people want fat kills on their kill list, so Tengus and Golems make a nice trophy.. If you want to stick there, be extra careful next time, and activate all defensive modules the moment you undock or change the location where you grind missions. EVE is not a safe place. Bear that in mind at all times, not just when you lose your isk printing ship.. i can fail at any speed you like |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13267
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 08:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
evedawn wrote:I think this is a serious flaw with the game!!! 0/10
Quote:If I choose to, I should be able to play this game safely No, you should not. Or, wellGǪ yes you should, and you are. You have all the tools at your disposal, but in the end, you are the one who has to make that happen GÇö not the game. This whole GÇ£sandboxGÇ¥ thing does not mean that you can do what you want GÇö it means everyone can do what they want, which will include stuff you don't want them to do (to you). It is up to you to ensure that they can't do those things.
Quote:Is that true? Is High Sec a mith? No. Partly because there is no such thing, and partly because you're confusing the relative word GÇ£highGÇ¥ with the absolute word GÇ£totalGÇ¥. Security in highsec is high. It is not complete. You have to tend to your own safety relative to the insecurity left by it merely being at a GÇ£highGÇ¥ level. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
373
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 09:01:00 -
[8] - Quote
Don't fly expensive ships in Osmon!
Also, if you flt ships like that, why did you not use an insta undocking and docking spot? My Tengu is worth under 1 Bil and i still use it. If you see so many Tornados with sebos at the undock, press ctrl + space, wait a few seconds and dock again.
Don't be stupid. German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Schmata Bastanold
Silver Octopus Infernal Octopus
675
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 09:01:00 -
[9] - Quote
evedawn wrote:Secondly because its never happened to me before & I've never heard it could happen!
Oh boy, one has to be totally oblivious to not hear about shiny ships getting ganked in hisec on daily basis. I mean amount of tears and whine is so huge that really... seriously... I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |

Diesel47
Bad Men Ltd.
542
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 09:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
Be happy the gankers didn't get the expensive shield booster they were after.
But for next time: Don't pimp your ship too much so you become a target.
You don't want to make it profitable for people to gank you, and it won't happen. |

John Ratcliffe
Sausy Sausages
99
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 09:11:00 -
[11] - Quote
evedawn wrote: A Very Dissatisfied player!!!
Yesterday I got Insta popped in a Golem undocking from Osmon Station. What is the point of wardec's or faction warfare if you can get a team of 5 guys in high Sec with heavy fitted Teir 3 BC's & insta pop a 3 bil isk ship who has no connection with these idiots???
I think this is a serious flaw with the game!!!
I have worked hard & long hours to earn this ship for a easy kill from someone I didnt even know existed & thought just because they could pop me for being in the same place they were in, a supposidly "High Security" area.......... JOKE Joke!
CCP a very serious question if you wont honest missionaries to wont to play this game?
If I choose to, I should be able to play this game safely if that is the way you supposedly are saying I am able to do?????
Is that true???? Is High Sec a mith???
Plus +ºa change, plus c'est la m+¬me chose |

Pantiy
Corporate Scum Test Friends Please Ignore
37
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 09:31:00 -
[12] - Quote
I must say these are dam tasty tears, this is eve a cold harsh universe. This isn't wow or kitty island. Try those if you want consensual pop. In eve sometimes you have no choice. ~|~(~-á (~~|~-á-á -á |-á-á (__)-á-á-á |
|

Roime
Shiva Furnace
2252
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 09:47:00 -
[13] - Quote
evedawn wrote: honest missionaries
I enjoy a honest missionary every now and then, it's very intimate
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |

Primary Me
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
48
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 09:52:00 -
[14] - Quote
Roime wrote:evedawn wrote: honest missionaries
I enjoy a honest missionary every now and then, it's very intimate Although looking at the OPs avatar, maybe not so much.
James 315 for CSM 8. A voice for hi-sec, a voice for reason. |

Buhhdust Princess
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
578
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 09:57:00 -
[15] - Quote
To be fair, I didn't know missionaries played this game.
I thought they were from Age of Empires!
Edit, was a **** golem anyway! |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
1084
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 09:58:00 -
[16] - Quote
As you were flying a pimped out 3 billion ship, the connection with you went straight through their wallet. Seriously, if you want to grind missions in pimp fits, look for lesser know lvl 4 agents in more remote areas of space.
You're just another fish in the big sea. Stuff yourself into a barrel and you will get shot.
After all it's "high" security space and not "total" security. You only get that "total" as a noob in a started system with a GM in a Polaris on kindergarten duty. Mining Overhaul Nothing changed since 2008. |

Tiberius StarGazer
StarGazer Heavy Industries And Exploration
308
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:03:00 -
[17] - Quote
I was going to get on this post and provide some constructive feedback, and then my OCD kicked in about the spelling of Myth...
Anyway: one thing you have failed to expand on in your post: Eve is not a safe place.
Empires provide a stable enviroment for people to live and work in, but just like in real life your not immune to being mugged every so often.
Fly a shiny ship, your gong to get blapped eventually, thats just a given, and without that, the great circle of Eve wouldn't exsist.
The game is not broken, particularly as without loss Eve would not work. But also this is what makes Eve so compelling, that ship you lost someone mined the minerals for, someone made the components for it, someone bought and spent months reserching the BPO and manufacturing that ship for you to buy.
If that ship you had was not lost, NONE of those players would have a role in EvE. Potentially dozens of people were involved in the manfacture of that ship for you to go and loose it. Now they have a chance to make another.
Next time you loose a ship, yes its an inconvenience for you, but think of all the people who will now be able to do the things they do because that ship went pop.
|

Djana Libra
The Black Ops Black Core Alliance
85
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:07:00 -
[18] - Quote
CCP Eterne wrote:Moving from Live Events Discussion to General Discussion.
now move it to crime and punishment tyvm
|

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1217
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:09:00 -
[19] - Quote
High-Sec isn't a myth, just many seem to misunderstand what it really is. The OP seems to be one of those.
Whenever you undock a ship, understand there is ALWAYS a possiblity that ship might explode due to interactions with other people. Highsec just LESSENS the chance of that happening, it does not eliminate it. Don't Vote for Malcanis
New Eden Training Simulation. -áIdea to improve NPE. |

Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle Tactical Narcotics Team
739
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:11:00 -
[20] - Quote
Welcome to EVE... I'm not entirely clear on the point of this, but I do have a sudden urge to jump in a catalyst and blow up a miner. Twitter! - @AzamiNevinyrall I'm half expecting a ban for this post. |

Azhy
Band of Cateteris Suddenly Spaceships.
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:11:00 -
[21] - Quote
Hi sec ganking is a mith. Potato eating carebears. |

Camper101
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
229
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:12:00 -
[22] - Quote
Confirming that highsec is a "mith".
OP: If you send me 1.5b ISK i can transfer you my Golem as a compensation. How someone could gank you in such a horrible way is beyond me. It is currently located in The Forge Highsec and worth around 2b, but I don't use it anymore.
Will create contract as soon as I receive ISK.
2013.03.01 13:30:58 notify For participating in the General Discussion Forum Section your trustworthiness has been adjusted by -2.5000.
|

Buhhdust Princess
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
578
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:19:00 -
[23] - Quote
As a legit 3rd party, I can guarantee that Camper101 is completely serious, and willing to trade the golem over to you as soon as he recieves the isk.
If you do not trust camper. Please contact me about my 3rd party services. -Buhhd |

Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
70
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:20:00 -
[24] - Quote
evedawn wrote: Yesterday I got Insta popped in a Golem undocking from Osmon Station.
That part made me smile a little, it means we high sec dwellers are not lost, yet. :) There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper. |

Runeme Shilter
New Order Logistics CODE.
54
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:21:00 -
[25] - Quote
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:I was going to get on this post and provide some constructive feedback, and then my OCD kicked in about the spelling of Myth...
[...]just like in real life your not immune to being mugged every so often.[....] [...]your gong to get blapped eventually[...]
Seriously?
|

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
14541
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:23:00 -
[26] - Quote
I smell a rat. No Golem KM, but did find this one that is nearly 3 years old. Malcanis for CSM 8. Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Tiberius StarGazer
StarGazer Heavy Industries And Exploration
308
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:25:00 -
[27] - Quote
Runeme Shilter wrote:Tiberius StarGazer wrote:I was going to get on this post and provide some constructive feedback, and then my OCD kicked in about the spelling of Myth...
[...]just like in real life your not immune to being mugged every so often.[....] [...]your gong to get blapped eventually[...]
Seriously?
God dammit, yeah I noticed that when re-reading after posting.... |

Cebraio
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
274
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:27:00 -
[28] - Quote
It's called hi-sec (high-security space), not complete-security space. If hi-sec was as safe as you thought it was, this would be a very boring game.
You have played EVE long enough to acquire a Golem and a 1.5B shield booster. You have played since 2008 (??) and you still didn't know how hi-sec works? It's a shame you didn't learn the hard way earlier.
Now that you are one experience richer, you may as well move into 0.0 or a wormhole and make money faster. |

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1218
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:29:00 -
[29] - Quote
Mag's wrote:I smell a rat. No Golem KM, but did find this one that is nearly 3 years old.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=16832717
Was posted earlier Don't Vote for Malcanis
New Eden Training Simulation. -áIdea to improve NPE. |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
373
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:31:00 -
[30] - Quote
Mag's wrote:I smell a rat. No Golem KM, but did find this one that is nearly 3 years old. I linked the km on page 1. It's on eve-kill. German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
14541
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:33:00 -
[31] - Quote
My bad. Malcanis for CSM 8. Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Cebraio
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
274
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:33:00 -
[32] - Quote
Mag's wrote:I smell a rat. No Golem KM, but did find this one that is nearly 3 years old. That's probably the "pirate" she encountered in a mission, before. Stealing her loot and successfully getting aggro.
The KM has been found and posted: http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&kll_id=16832717 Although, not API verified, it looks legit. |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
2253
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:34:00 -
[33] - Quote
Ok for a serious answer, hisec is a training ground for new players. New players don't fly Golems, and you were punished for driving a Ferrari waterjet in the local kiddie pool.
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
14541
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:35:00 -
[34] - Quote
Cebraio wrote:Mag's wrote:I smell a rat. No Golem KM, but did find this one that is nearly 3 years old. That's probably the "pirate" she encountered in a mission, before. Stealing her loot and successfully getting aggro. The KM has been found and posted: http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&kll_id=16832717Although, not API verified, it looks legit. Indeed. I just find these threads kinda tiresome tbh, hence why I didn't pay much attention. I shall look better next time. Malcanis for CSM 8. Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1219
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:35:00 -
[35] - Quote
Roime wrote:Ok for a serious answer, hisec is a training ground for new players.
This is false. Don't Vote for Malcanis
New Eden Training Simulation. -áIdea to improve NPE. |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
1084
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:36:00 -
[36] - Quote
Roime wrote:Ok for a serious answer, hisec is a training ground for new players. New players don't fly Golems, and you were punished for driving a Ferrari waterjet in the local kiddie pool.
Try to be a bit more subtle next time.
Mining Overhaul Nothing changed since 2008. |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
369
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:45:00 -
[37] - Quote
evedawn wrote: Secondly because its never happened to me before & I've never heard it could happen! [...] Still think High Sec is a mith & the game is unbalanced towards or for the aggressor with skills. In other words bully training in motion...
Engagment rules and mechanics are identical in any area of New Eden, high, low, null or wh. The only difference are the possible consequences.
This is a core design element in EVE.
If you can afford and pilot such a ship like in that killmail you're not entiteled to ignore this design logic.
|

Velicitia
Arma Artificer
1248
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:49:00 -
[38] - Quote
Cebraio wrote:Mag's wrote:I smell a rat. No Golem KM, but did find this one that is nearly 3 years old. That's probably the "pirate" she encountered in a mission before. Stealing her loot and successfully getting aggro. The KM has been found and posted: http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&kll_id=16832717Although, not API verified, it looks legit.
ouch ... so much ISK in modules turned into space-dust. didn't even cover the BCs... One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia Malcanis for CSM8 |

Pak Narhoo
Splinter Foundation
916
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:57:00 -
[39] - Quote
Yep this happens daily. 
Summing the thread up: Few things to watch for flying anything expensive can get you unwanted attention resulting in an attempt to kill your ship.
- Undock and immediately turn everything shield/armor wise on, can save you is not guaranteed. - Make a insta undock bookmark. The further away, the faster you align to it, so make it larger then 500-1000KM. Don't BM exactly on round numbers either. - When your mission is over, keep your hardners/shields whatever on, they may be waiting for you to dock. Having a jump to 0 bookmark on the stations top or bottom may help. - Keep your eyes on your surrounding, what is happening to who? Go to Dotlan find the place you're staying and look up the kills. From there mark those you think are "evil" in your people and places folder, then keep an eye on local, always. - Someone jumps in your mission and you fly something expensive? Get the frakk out yesterday. That little standing loss with your agent is not worth it. - Don't like to fly between so many high secs sharks? -> Move to a more quite system.
in the end you just have to accept that whenever you undock you are open for PvP. That is the nature of this game. Without that EVE would be really a boring game.
|

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
374
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 11:04:00 -
[40] - Quote
Pak Narhoo wrote: - Make a insta undock bookmark. The further away, the faster you align to it, so make it larger then 500-1000KM
What? German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
2256
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 11:08:00 -
[41] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Pak Narhoo wrote: - Make a insta undock bookmark. The further away, the faster you align to it, so make it larger then 500-1000KM
What?
He is from hisec, give the guy some slack.
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |

Radamant Nemess
Caribbean Coke Enterprises
13
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 11:15:00 -
[42] - Quote
Checked killmail and it`s a really nice shield booster. Gank magnet actually.. And why the hell are you using cruise missiles on a torp boat?? Torps and target painters go well together  i can fail at any speed you like |

Kagura Nikon
Emptiness.
16
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 11:17:00 -
[43] - Quote
evedawn wrote:Firstly what is the right section then?
Secondly because its never happened to me before & I've never heard it could happen!
The only thing that happened before was I got a pirate in a mission & laughed at him because he got shot from the mission pirates...
I never got a suspect flag & did not see any of them get blown up afterwards. I am still waiting to see battlelinic's report on the event.
Still think High Sec is a mith & the game is unbalanced towards or for the aggressor with skills. In other words bully training in motion...
The name is HIGH security, not PERFECT Security.
As in real life If i have a gun I can go out and kill anyone I want, I would just have to pay the price of going to jail (or worse depending on place). The only way to make that impossible is to not allow anyone to have weapons.
Eve is not a fantasy magical paradise where magical barriers make your guns work on some targets and not work on others. You have guns? Then you can use it on anything... you might be spanked for that, but you still can.
Want to take revenge? Put a bounty on those guys and go kil them or hire someoen to kill them |

Vilnius Zar
Ordo Ardish
775
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 11:18:00 -
[44] - Quote
Raging OP - check under performing faction fetish **** fit - check complete lack of understanding on the game - check tears - check
Good stuff. Amat victoria curam. Excellence in everything.
Some guides that may be useful to you: http://www.youtube.com/user/OrdoArdish |

Cebraio
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
275
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 11:20:00 -
[45] - Quote
Radamant Nemess wrote:Checked killmail and it`s a really nice shield booster. Gank magnet actually.. And why the hell are you using cruise missiles on a torp boat?? Torps and target painters go well together  Because with cruise missiles he can sit still in his mission. Just shoot stuff and loot wrecks with a tractor beam. You don't really expect a mission runner to move, do you? |

dexington
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
618
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 11:26:00 -
[46] - Quote
evedawn wrote:Yesterday I got Insta popped in a Golem undocking from Osmon Station.
and the nullbears keep whining about hi-sec being to safe... I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13270
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 11:42:00 -
[47] - Quote
dexington wrote:evedawn wrote:Yesterday I got Insta popped in a Golem undocking from Osmon Station. and the nullbears keep whining about hi-sec being to safe... GǪwhich it is if it takes a silly 3bn fit to get ganked.
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
1084
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 11:43:00 -
[48] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Pak Narhoo wrote: - Make a insta undock bookmark. The further away, the faster you align to it, so make it larger then 500-1000KM
What? Has something to do with the angle you undock at and some triangle geometry.
If I understand it right, the closer you are to the undock with your warp, the greater the angle you have to align yourself from the deviated angle to the straight instant warp angle.
So with a far enough away bookmark, even a freighter will warp instantly, even with maximum ejection velocity and maximum undock deviation angle.
Of course this will also depend on the accuracy of your bookmark. Flying straight isn't always as easy as it looks. Mining Overhaul Nothing changed since 2008. |

Skeln Thargensen
Filthy Carebear Tax Avoidance Shell Corp
63
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 11:51:00 -
[49] - Quote
a mith is a lady moth. I take back my previous statements and judgements of others. -áyou can mine in iteron if you want. |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
375
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 11:58:00 -
[50] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Pak Narhoo wrote: - Make a insta undock bookmark. The further away, the faster you align to it, so make it larger then 500-1000KM
What? If I understand it right, the closer you are to the undock with your warp, the greater the angle you have to align yourself from the deviated angle to the straight instant warp angle.. If the angel is the same, it should not matter how fare away the bookmark is. German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Vilnius Zar
Ordo Ardish
777
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 12:00:00 -
[51] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Pak Narhoo wrote: - Make a insta undock bookmark. The further away, the faster you align to it, so make it larger then 500-1000KM
What? Has something to do with the angle you undock at and some triangle geometry. If I understand it right, the closer you are to the undock with your warp, the greater the angle you have to align yourself from the deviated angle to the straight instant warp angle. So with a far enough away bookmark, even a freighter will warp instantly, even with maximum ejection velocity and maximum undock deviation angle. Of course this will also depend on the accuracy of your bookmark. Flying straight isn't always as easy as it looks.
That makes zero sense because range as such has nothing to do with it, only angle. So if someone undocks at a certain angle and then burns away without correcting his path and makes a BM at 170 and 500km you'll get the same behaviour when you undock and use either of those BM's. One could argue that it would be easier to correct your BM direction when you're further away but that's not really true, it's about doing it right and not about how far it is from station.
There's of course a good reason to make a BM some 500-1000km away from station but it has nothing to do with your angle and everything to do with wanting to be off grid. For more info on undock bookmarks and other undocking tricks check my guides, link is in my sig.
Amat victoria curam. Excellence in everything.
Some guides that may be useful to you: http://www.youtube.com/user/OrdoArdish |

Eram Fidard
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
57
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 12:11:00 -
[52] - Quote
...and THIS, ladies and gentlemen, is why carebearing is bad.
All those sugary treats rot your socks and lower your IQ.
Someone plays a game for over 4 years, while somehow not bothering to actually learn anything about the game.
So please, please, next time you see a newbie, toss them in the deep end before they end up like this guy 4 years later. |

Tub Chil
Last Men Standing
38
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 12:20:00 -
[53] - Quote
Dissatisfied customer is dissatisfied |

dexington
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
619
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 12:21:00 -
[54] - Quote
Eram Fidard wrote:...and THIS, ladies and gentlemen, is why carebearing is bad.
Everyone is allowed to **** up once, it's only carebaring if you do it over and over, choosing not to except the reality of eve. I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |

Sentient Blade
Walk It Off
820
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 12:27:00 -
[55] - Quote
In some ways its down to user common sense, with over pimping ships and not being aware of your surroundings.
In other cases it's down to the horrible difference between PVP and PVE fits where in a PVE ship has to out of necessity sacrifice most of its EHP in order to achieve a worthwhile active tank. A PVP ship shields has to last maybe 30 seconds to a minute in a brawl and takes maybe 70k EHP damage. A PVE ship may absorb 10x that much damage over the course of a mission, or more but only have 20k EHP at any given time.
But so long as PVE missions are what they are, people will continue to fly ships which can be instapopped by a small group of nados. |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
1084
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 12:33:00 -
[56] - Quote
Vilnius Zar wrote:Abrazzar wrote: Has something to do with the angle you undock at and some triangle geometry.
If I understand it right, the closer you are to the undock with your warp, the greater the angle you have to align yourself from the deviated angle to the straight instant warp angle.
So with a far enough away bookmark, even a freighter will warp instantly, even with maximum ejection velocity and maximum undock deviation angle.
Of course this will also depend on the accuracy of your bookmark. Flying straight isn't always as easy as it looks.
That makes zero sense because range as such has nothing to do with it, only angle. So if someone undocks at a certain angle and then burns away without correcting his path and makes a BM at 170 and 500km you'll get the same behaviour when you undock and use either of those BM's. One could argue that it would be easier to correct your BM direction when you're further away but that's not really true, it's about doing it right and not about how far it is from station. There's of course a good reason to make a BM some 500-1000km away from station but it has nothing to do with your angle and everything to do with wanting to be off grid. For more info on undock bookmarks and other undocking tricks check my guides, link is in my sig. Guess I am thinking too much in triangles and not enough in vectors. I was always bad with vectors. Mining Overhaul Nothing changed since 2008. |

dexington
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
619
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 12:37:00 -
[57] - Quote
Sentient Blade wrote:But so long as PVE missions are what they are, people will continue to fly ships which can be instapopped by a small group of nados.
A small group of 5 nados should be able to instapop a marauder, especially if fitted for low ehp, it's all working as intended.
You are not safe in hi-sec, and flying something worth killing makes it even less safe.
I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
358
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 12:42:00 -
[58] - Quote
I honestly thought it was a troll post until I saw this, the OP ticked so many carebear cliches. Poe's Law at work I guess. |

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2938
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 12:45:00 -
[59] - Quote
This sounds like Thalia Eng, usually in a cynabal scanning ships, has caught you. Please send her my best wishes.
Thank you. :)
@Mr. Nemess
Osmon is also a nice place to grind mission runners and ice miners. Not that i do that, but i've been there and have seen it. |

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
359
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 12:50:00 -
[60] - Quote
Sentient Blade wrote:In some ways its down to user common sense, with over pimping ships and not being aware of your surroundings.
In other cases it's down to the horrible difference between PVP and PVE fits where in a PVE ship has to out of necessity sacrifice most of its EHP in order to achieve a worthwhile active tank. A PVP ship shields has to last maybe 30 seconds to a minute in a brawl and takes maybe 70k EHP damage. A PVE ship may absorb 10x that much damage over the course of a mission, or more but only have 20k EHP at any given time.
But so long as PVE missions are what they are, people will continue to fly ships which can be instapopped by a small group of nados.
That's why an ISK tank is an option for mission ships. Without that 1.5bn Shield Booster, the Golem would make a much less tempting target.
However your EHP figures are off. A nekkid Golem would have 40k EHP. 60k EHP with the DC II. 80k with his hardeners on.
Judging by the damage taken on the killmail, he didn't have his tank modules turned on. |

Sentient Blade
Walk It Off
821
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 12:58:00 -
[61] - Quote
Takseen wrote:Judging by the damage taken on the killmail, he didn't have his tank modules turned on.
That was the bit I mentioned about not being familiar with how things work. My point was more towards the preferred ganked mission ships which are the T3s. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13271
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:01:00 -
[62] - Quote
Takseen wrote:However your EHP figures are off. A nekkid Golem would have 40k EHP. 60k EHP with the DC II. 80k with his hardeners on.
Judging by the damage taken on the killmail, he didn't have his tank modules turned on. Afaik, killmails display HP, not EHP, so the only difference you'd ever see as far as tanking goes is if it has received a lot of local or remote repping before it pops. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5599
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:06:00 -
[63] - Quote
I take it we have adressed that the OPs ship was profitable to gank right?
Also that the loot fairy said no. |

Rebecha Pucontis
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:09:00 -
[64] - Quote
evedawn wrote:Firstly what is the right section then?
Secondly because its never happened to me before & I've never heard it could happen!
The only thing that happened before was I got a pirate in a mission & laughed at him because he got shot from the mission pirates...
I never got a suspect flag & did not see any of them get blown up afterwards. I am still waiting to see battlelinic's report on the event.
Still think High Sec is a mith & the game is unbalanced towards or for the aggressor with skills. In other words bully training in motion...
They probably thought you were a good target and likely were fitted with lots of shiny faction mods which you would drop when destroyed thus making up for the loss of their BCs.
High sec isn't completely safe, I don't know where you got that impression. The fact that you have level 1.0 to 5.0 security ratings all encompassing high security should indicate to most people that high security isn't all the same.
Although you probably were a bit unlucky, eventually something like this was bound to happen to you, and hopefully this will be a good lesson to you in future. |

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
359
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:10:00 -
[65] - Quote
Sentient Blade wrote:Takseen wrote:Judging by the damage taken on the killmail, he didn't have his tank modules turned on. That was the bit I mentioned about not being familiar with how things work. My point was more towards the preferred ganked mission ships which are the T3s.
The lower EHP is generally compensated for by the smaller sig radius. Of course nothing will save a Tengu pilot who fits like this |

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
359
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:13:00 -
[66] - Quote
Tippia wrote: Afaik, killmails display HP, not EHP, so the only difference you'd ever see as far as tanking goes is if it has received a lot of local or remote repping before it pops.
Oh right. Then he might have had his tank mods on.
|

dexington
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
619
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:13:00 -
[67] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Also that the loot fairy said no.
sometimes the tears are worth a billion isk. I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |

Velicitia
Arma Artificer
1249
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:14:00 -
[68] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:I take it we have adressed that the OPs ship was profitable to gank right?
Also that the loot fairy said no.
it almost makes me feel bad for the gankers all that poten...
... oh wait, just saw a few 'nados sell, nevermind. One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia Malcanis for CSM8 |

Goldnut Sachs
9
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:34:00 -
[69] - Quote
haha this thread not locked for humane reasons yet? |

EvEa Deva
State War Academy Caldari State
227
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:43:00 -
[70] - Quote
If your going to a trade hub to buy eggs, bread, weapons, exotic dancers take a crappy ship, not your pimped ships. |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT
344
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:44:00 -
[71] - Quote
Boo hoo ?
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
1112
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:48:00 -
[72] - Quote
Definition of MITH
chiefly Scottish variant of might
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mith Personnel Division Director --áBene Gesserit Chapterhouse
"The universe is an ancient desert, a vast wasteland with only occasional habitable planets as oases. We Fremen, comfortable with deserts, shall now venture into another." - STILGAR, From the Sietch to the Stars. |

Aramatheia
European Nuthouse
106
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:51:00 -
[73] - Quote
Tippia wrote:evedawn wrote:I think this is a serious flaw with the game!!! 0/10 Quote:If I choose to, I should be able to play this game safely No, you should not. Or, wellGǪ yes you should, and you are. You have all the tools at your disposal, but in the end, you are the one who has to make that happen GÇö not the game. This whole GÇ£sandboxGÇ¥ thing does not mean that you can do what you want GÇö it means everyone can do what they want, which will include stuff you don't want them to do (to you). It is up to you to ensure that they can't do those things. Quote:Is that true? Is High Sec a mith? No. Partly because there is no such thing, and partly because you're confusing the relative word GÇ£highGÇ¥ with the absolute word GÇ£totalGÇ¥. Security in highsec is high. It is not complete. You have to tend to your own safety relative to the insecurity left by it merely being at a GÇ£highGÇ¥ level.
technically high sec isnt even high "security" as that would imply that theres guards around you who may get shot and killed and fail to defend you but they may beat back the attacker just fine. I'd consider it more of a "NPC Avenge-me sec" in that the "illegal" aggressor loses thier ship for thier unwarranted attack
to the OP you said you saw a pirate in your mission pocket and they were killed by the npcs, was this immediately prior to the incident of attack on your? Just wondering cause if they blew up and you looted something from the wreck that would make you free game for that pilot and i believe his entire corp (or does yellow wreck looting make you open target for all now?) |

HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy Caldari State
177
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:53:00 -
[74] - Quote
I understand where the op is coming from. I dont feel hi-sec should be completely safe and people should still have the ability to gank somone out of revenge or spite, but I dont feel it should be profitable.
I say if you want to gank people thats fine but it should cost you and anyone involved. This seemed to worked well for the miners. Macks seem still be on the profit list but rifter ganks have fallen off substantially. WHY? No profit in it.
People shouldnt be afraid to undock thier big shiny ships to play the game. Something needs to be in place to remove the profit margin for using high dps ships with no effort put in to them to kill ships people have worked hard to obtain.
Take away the profit and you remove 90% of the problem. |

Lin Suizei
116
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:55:00 -
[75] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Take away the profit and you remove 90% of the problem.
"It"'s not a problem.
Xeros S*** > are you really suprised? im not here to pvp so why the fuc not Xeros S**** > oh go cry somewhere else, im not in fw for the ****** pvp
Welcome to faction war. |

HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy Caldari State
177
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:57:00 -
[76] - Quote
Guessing this is what the op meant.
myth /miTH/Noun 1.A traditional story, esp. one concerning the early history of a people or explaining some natural or social phenomenon, and typically... 2.Such stories collectively.
Synonyms fable - legend
English is not everyones first language. Cut people some slack. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
6535
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:57:00 -
[77] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:Boo hoo ?
I'd have gone with diddums
Undocking from a station in a mission hub, flying a 3 billion isk ammunition magnet, while thinking that you were immune to other players, in an open PvP MMO renowned for its brutality and the ability for other players to ruin your day, and then whining about it on the forums shows a level of stupid that's generally only seen in those who wish that Eve was a single player game. Highsec is not safe, it is merely safer than everywhere else.
Eve in a nutshell, it's you vs the universe, and every machiavellian space bastard in it. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1474
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:58:00 -
[78] - Quote
lulz
The high sec crowd (a few individuals in particular) always pop up to tell me I'm evil for telling folks that EVE just isn't the right game for them. Well, I'm sorry, but it's true, some people just aren't cut out to play EVE online or any pvp game where they can lose stuff.
The OP is bad. What's worse though is that their are plenty of experienced, veteran high sec players who think exactly the way the OP does.
Like "High" sec should mean "perfectly safe" sec, or that people should be able to "screw with you" unless you screw with them (or leave high sec) 1st etc etc. If y'all really don't like the things that are at the heart of EVE online, my best advice is to make the transition form "very dissatisfied customer" to "ex-customer". |

HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy Caldari State
177
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:58:00 -
[79] - Quote
Lin Suizei wrote:HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Take away the profit and you remove 90% of the problem. "It"'s not a problem.
Seem to be a problem for the subscribing OP as well as others like him/her |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13274
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 13:59:00 -
[80] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:I understand where the op is coming from. I dont feel hi-sec should be completely safe and people should still have the ability to gank somone out of revenge or spite, but I dont feel it should be profitable. Why not? If someone presents a crapton of valuable loot in a easy-to-shoot ship, it sure as hell should be profitable to go after him.
Quote:People shouldnt be afraid to undock thier big shiny ships to play the game. They don't have to be. They just have to be smart about it and adjust their flying to fit what they choose to undock in.
Quote:Take away the profit and you remove 90% of the problem. It's not a problem to begin with, so there's nothing to remove.
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1474
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 14:02:00 -
[81] - Quote
evedawn wrote:
Secondly because its never happened to me before & I've never heard it could happen!
Above all, EVE is a game that demands a kind of personal responsibility. It was YOUR responsibility to learn the in and outs of the game BEFORE undocking 3 billion isk worth of spaceship. The game (and CCP) didn't fail you, YOU failed you.
Quote: Still think High Sec is a mith & the game is unbalanced towards or for the aggressor with skills. In other words bully training in motion...
Every game that is worth playing favors a skilled aggressor, otherwise it wouldn't be a game. And really, "bully training"? Why were you flying a space ship with missile launchers on it if you think the world should be happy happy sunshine?
You're a real piece of work, mate.
|

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1474
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 14:10:00 -
[82] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:I understand where the op is coming from. I dont feel hi-sec should be completely safe and people should still have the ability to gank somone out of revenge or spite, but I dont feel it should be profitable.
I say if you want to gank people thats fine but it should cost you and anyone involved. This seemed to worked well for the miners. Macks seem still be on the profit list but rifter ganks have fallen off substantially. WHY? No profit in it.
People shouldnt be afraid to undock thier big shiny ships to play the game. Something needs to be in place to remove the profit margin for using high dps ships with no effort put in to them to kill ships people have worked hard to obtain.
Take away the profit and you remove 90% of the problem.
Perfect case in point. This poster thinks EVE would be better if it weren't EVE.
In EVE, you should not fly what you cannot afford to lose. If you can't afford to lose the big shiney ship, you should not undock. I run incursions in a 3 billion isk Machariel, and if i don't have 3 billion isk in a wallet somewhere or at least 3 bil worth of stuff i can sell and don't need), i don't undock it at all, because even though it's rare, ship losses can happen in high sec incursions.
When I lost a vindicator in an incursions, I had the isk on hand to buy at least 1 more, and did so 20 minutes later. If a person can't do that but still flys shiney ships, their fault when they can't replace it.
And yes, ganking should be profitable if the targeted player:
A- undocks a ship full o shiney
and
B- does not take proper precautions/safety measures before undocking.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
6535
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 14:26:00 -
[83] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:I understand where the op is coming from. I dont feel hi-sec should be completely safe and people should still have the ability to gank somone out of revenge or spite, but I dont feel it should be profitable.
I say if you want to gank people thats fine but it should cost you and anyone involved. This seemed to worked well for the miners. Macks seem still be on the profit list but rifter ganks have fallen off substantially. WHY? No profit in it.
People shouldnt be afraid to undock thier big shiny ships to play the game. Something needs to be in place to remove the profit margin for using high dps ships with no effort put in to them to kill ships people have worked hard to obtain.
Take away the profit and you remove 90% of the problem.
CCP already nerfed suicide ganking profitabilty by removing the insurance payout from ships that get Concordokkened, crimewatch 2.0 has also affected it by giving killrights for initial aggression rather than actual destruction and global combat flagging for acts that previously only gave combat flagging to an affected group of players. I don't see many threads by the gankers bemoaning the changes, initially there was some whining, but they've adapted to the new dynamic and still successfully ply their trade in highsec, maybe the gankees should take a leaf from their book and do the same.
Highsec is technically safer now than it has been at any time in the past, and some people are still asking for it to be safer still, they are the people that would kill Eve, given half a chance, and turn it into a vague copy of what it once was.
Eve in a nutshell, it's you vs the universe, and every machiavellian space bastard in it. |

Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal
1227
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 14:37:00 -
[84] - Quote
So,
Considering the OP has been concorded before. And hasn't posted since page one, I'll say decent job on troll for making 5 pages. |

dexington
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
619
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 14:44:00 -
[85] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:I understand where the op is coming from. I dont feel hi-sec should be completely safe and people should still have the ability to gank somone out of revenge or spite, but I dont feel it should be profitable.
Then don't fit modules that make it profitable, you are just giving people and incentive to kill you. I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |

Sorlac
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
49
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 14:48:00 -
[86] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Lin Suizei wrote:HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Take away the profit and you remove 90% of the problem. "It"'s not a problem. Seem to be a problem for the subscribing OP as well as others like him/her
Then the problem is they subscribed to the wrong game; maybe they should have done just a little bit of research into the game before buying it.
If the OP had taken just a few precautionary measures they never would have been ganked to begin with. Hopefully they will take this opportunity to learn from their mistakes, and not expect to be coddled in the future. |

Theron Vetrus
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 15:06:00 -
[87] - Quote
evedawn wrote:If I choose to, I should be able to play this game safely if that is the way you supposedly are saying I am able to do?????
Osmon is a well-known mission hub and ice mining system. By definition, it is also therefore a prime target for piracy. CCP has already gone above and beyond helping carebears protect their ships. The rest is up to you.
Being a budding pirate myself, I will let you in on a little secret: Mission runners can be summed up in one word - predictable. Next time, don't make yourself such an easy target. Psychotic Monk for CSM8 |

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight
78
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 15:35:00 -
[88] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: ...lots of good points...
Highsec is technically safer now than it has been at any time in the past, and some people are still asking for it to be safer still, they are the people that would kill Eve, given half a chance, and turn it into a vague copy of what it once was.
This is why the road to nerfdom and scourge of carebear advocacy must be stopped dead in its tracks, each time its head appears like whack-a-mole we must knock it down.
We must as a community stop the ever continuing nerfs to hisec tear collection. Carebears think they are safe, they are not and never should be.
While CCP claims to agree with this philosophy, over time the actions (nerfs) taken prove otherwise with a worrying trend. http://evedarklord.blogspot.ca |

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
1149
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 15:45:00 -
[89] - Quote
Posting in stealth nerf-hisec thread. False-flag carebear alt of a nullbear is obvious. EvE is like prison.-á It's a place when bad people go to learn how to become even worse people. |

Zark Darkfigure
Special Krauts And Tactics Synergy of Steel
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 15:59:00 -
[90] - Quote
Thxs for the applause Thxs for the shitstorm Thxs for the wonderful carebeartearshower Thxs for motivation Thxs for the lols
we wondered why there is no crying, but this thread will fill our bios for decades
Osmon carebears need to get their fur shaved to milk more valuable tears
carebeartears is like spice, it fuels us
Plz donate bounty if you like our ganking art... |

horpaskron
Republic Industries Synergy of Steel
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:09:00 -
[91] - Quote
As a neutral third party that has been observing this thread i wish the TO my best of luck. These people safed your soul!
As a matter of fact, YOU were going to fight in a mission. Possibly dozens of Battleships on the other side. And YOU were going to kill every single crewmen by blowing up every single ship. This is a horrible death indeed. What my friends did was in a way, stop a serial killer (aka YOU) from killing more people. WE ARE THE GOOD GUYS!
1 dead ship vs. thousands of crewmen...
A good choice! |

Namdor
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
17
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:09:00 -
[92] - Quote
evedawn wrote: A Very Dissatisfied player!!!
Oh, no! Stay where you are, someone from the customer satisfaction assurance team will be with you shortly. 
Quote:Yesterday I got Insta popped in a Golem undocking from Osmon Station.
Good.
Quote:What is the point of wardec's or faction warfare if you can get a team of 5 guys in high Sec with heavy fitted Teir 3 BC's & insta pop a 3 bil isk ship who has no connection with these idiots???
Well, the point of wardecs is to allow them to do the same thing without getting Concordokkened. It's all about tradeoffs, in Eve.
Quote:I think this is a serious flaw with the game!!!
I can think of five people who disagree with you, though. 
Quote: I have worked hard & long hours to earn this ship for a easy kill from someone I didnt even know existed & thought just because they could pop me for being in the same place they were in, a supposidly "High Security" area.......... JOKE Joke!
CCP a very serious question if you wont honest missionaries to wont to play this game?
If I choose to, I should be able to play this game safely if that is the way you supposedly are saying I am able to do?????
Is that true???? Is High Sec a mith???
No, high sec is not a myth. It's a real place. It just doesn't mean what you think it means.
Supermax prisons are "high security" areas, too. People still get shivved there, though, right? |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1479
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:12:00 -
[93] - Quote
horpaskron wrote:As a neutral third party that has been observing this thread i wish the TO my best of luck. These people safed your soul!
As a matter of fact, YOU were going to fight in a mission. Possibly dozens of Battleships on the other side. And YOU were going to kill every single crewmen by blowing up every single ship. This is a horrible death indeed. What my friends did was in a way, stop a serial killer (aka YOU) from killing more people. WE ARE THE GOOD GUYS!
1 dead ship vs. thousands of crewmen...
A good choice!
Well, played sir! +1 |

HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy Caldari State
177
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:13:00 -
[94] - Quote
Tippia wrote:HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:I understand where the op is coming from. I dont feel hi-sec should be completely safe and people should still have the ability to gank somone out of revenge or spite, but I dont feel it should be profitable. Why not? If someone presents a crapton of valuable loot in a easy-to-shoot ship, it sure as hell should be profitable to go after him. Quote:People shouldnt be afraid to undock thier big shiny ships to play the game. They don't have to be. They just have to be smart about it and adjust their flying to fit what they choose to undock in. Quote:Take away the profit and you remove 90% of the problem. It's not a problem to begin with, so there's nothing to remove.
So you dont understand the difference between carrying around a bunch of loot or fitting your ship?
Smart has nothing to do with it. This person could be running a mission and get ganked.
Again it is a problem for the people getting ganked. They worked hard to make thier big nice shiny ships and they shouldnt be vunerable to a few low cost high dps fit ships.
You guys scream risk vs reward non stop on these forum. This should be no different. Gankers should not be able to use little effort and destroy high value targets. |

HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy Caldari State
177
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:19:00 -
[95] - Quote
Sorlac wrote:HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Lin Suizei wrote:HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Take away the profit and you remove 90% of the problem. "It"'s not a problem. Seem to be a problem for the subscribing OP as well as others like him/her Then the problem is they subscribed to the wrong game; maybe they should have done just a little bit of research into the game before buying it. If the OP had taken just a few precautionary measures they never would have been ganked to begin with. Hopefully they will take this opportunity to learn from their mistakes, and not expect to be coddled in the future.
Thats your opinion and your entitled to it no matter how wrong. People need a sence of balance in any game. This is not balanced at this point. People can fit high dps low cost fits and make a profit. Let em make thier profit in low/null. Oh wait they cant because people are fit and ready for pvp thier most times. They may get thier arse handed to them. |

Namdor
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
18
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:21:00 -
[96] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:
So you dont understand the difference between carrying around a bunch of loot or fitting your ship?
Smart has nothing to do with it. This person could be running a mission and get ganked.
Uh... if they're *smart*, it is very unlikely that will get ganked.
"Smart" could be accomplished any number of ways in this scenario.
-Don't needlessly bling your mission ship. This will make you an unattractive target and, thus, unlikely to be ganked.
-If you do needlessly bling your mission ship, use instant-undocks when leaving the station and keep an eye on your D-scan for combat probes/nearby ships while you're in your missions.
This will not give you perfect safety, but your'e not supposed to have perfect safety. It will keep you generally safe, howerver.
Quote:Again it is a problem for the people getting ganked.
Otherwise known as a "personal problem". It's not a problem for the GAME that they got ganked. It's a problem for them, and only for them.
Quote:They worked hard to make thier big nice shiny ships and they shouldnt be vunerable to a few low cost high dps fit ships.
If it's so important to them, they should take some simple common-sense steps to protect it.
|

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1084
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:25:00 -
[97] - Quote
evedawn wrote: A Very Dissatisfied player!!!
Yesterday I got Insta popped in a Golem undocking from Osmon Station. What is the point of wardec's or faction warfare if you can get a team of 5 guys in high Sec with heavy fitted Teir 3 BC's & insta pop a 3 bil isk ship who has no connection with these idiots???
I think this is a serious flaw with the game!!!
I have worked hard & long hours to earn this ship for a easy kill from someone I didnt even know existed & thought just because they could pop me for being in the same place they were in, a supposidly "High Security" area.......... JOKE Joke!
CCP a very serious question if you wont honest missionaries to wont to play this game?
If I choose to, I should be able to play this game safely if that is the way you supposedly are saying I am able to do?????
Is that true???? Is High Sec a mith???
This is the wrong game to be saying this. This is not a signature. |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
923
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:25:00 -
[98] - Quote
*ahem taloses and nados cost a lot
the dps/concord calculations have to be correct, everyone has to do their part, the target mustn't have support. the gank does have chances of failure
even then the expensive target mods may simply not drop
failure means the entire gank squad (which costs a lot) is lost
gankers make it look easy when they're competent and experienced
and when the gank is 'just for the mail', what 'reward' are we talking about? there is none. unless you want to try to put an isk value on a kill report? something that can never be sold? |

Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
503
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:29:00 -
[99] - Quote
evedawn wrote: A Very Dissatisfied player!!!
Yesterday I got Insta popped in a Golem undocking from Osmon Station. What is the point of wardec's or faction warfare if you can get a team of 5 guys in high Sec with heavy fitted Teir 3 BC's & insta pop a 3 bil isk ship who has no connection with these idiots???
I think this is a serious flaw with the game!!!
I have worked hard & long hours to earn this ship for a easy kill from someone I didnt even know existed & thought just because they could pop me for being in the same place they were in, a supposidly "High Security" area.......... JOKE Joke!
CCP a very serious question if you wont honest missionaries to wont to play this game?
If I choose to, I should be able to play this game safely if that is the way you supposedly are saying I am able to do?????
Is that true???? Is High Sec a mith???
Instapopped in a Golem? 
Wasn't paying attention? Didn't see people locking you? Didn't turn on your hardeners?
Ganking expensive ships to get a good drop is a well known passtime in highsec, you should at least pay attention to your surroundings..
The single biggest danger to EVE is the proliferation of ALTS! Kill an alt today!
Petition for a Minimum bounty of 10 mil. Prevent useless bounties!
|

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1084
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:29:00 -
[100] - Quote
Just checked OP Eve birth date: 2008
Has to be a troll, and a poor one at that.
I do not normally insult folk in Eve, but in this case I am seriously tempted. This is not a signature. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
6549
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:31:00 -
[101] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:
So you dont understand the difference between carrying around a bunch of loot or fitting your ship?
Fitting or carrying high value items makes you a target, don't like it? then don't do it.
Quote:Smart has nothing to do with it. This person could be running a mission and get ganked. And your point is?
Quote:Again it is a problem for the people getting ganked. They worked hard to make thier big nice shiny ships and they shouldnt be vunerable to a few low cost high dps fit ships. The only problem I see is that the OP expected to be immune from the actions of other players in an open ended PvP multiplayer game, 5x fitted tier 3 battle cruisers comes out at the best part of 3/4 billion Isk if not more, so not exactly cheap either.
Quote:You guys scream risk vs reward non stop on these forum. This should be no different. Gankers should not be able to use little effort and destroy high value targets. Coordinating a 5 player gank takes a considerable amount of effort, not a little.
I can pretty much guarantee that the gank operation took a fair amount of prior planning, which involved ship scanning potential targets, making sure that all the required pilots were in the right place, with the right equipment, at the right time to carry the operation off without a hitch, all of which are effort.
Eve in a nutshell, it's you vs the universe, and every machiavellian space bastard in it. |

Skeln Thargensen
Filthy Carebear Tax Avoidance Shell Corp
65
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:32:00 -
[102] - Quote
it's really a mithstery why you aren't the one laughing here. they got robbed. I take back my previous statements and judgements of others. -áyou can mine in iteron if you want. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1481
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:36:00 -
[103] - Quote
Namdor wrote: If it's so important to them, they should take some simple common-sense steps to protect it.
How dare you suggest Effort!? Don't you know how many missions and incursions those people had to run to get all that bling, they should have a right to be immune to all but similarly blingy ships!
Just like in real life. I mean it's not as if you can shoot down a billion dollar jet fighter with a 100 dollar hand held missile. That would be wrong and would mean life and reality are unbalanced.
|

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
217
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:40:00 -
[104] - Quote
Mith?
You mean like Mithril like the elves wear? "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

horpaskron
Republic Industries Synergy of Steel
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:40:00 -
[105] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Namdor wrote: If it's so important to them, they should take some simple common-sense steps to protect it.
How dare you suggest Effort!? Don't you know how many missions and incursions those people had to run to get all that bling, they should have a right to be immune to all but similarly blingy ships! Just like in real life. I mean it's not as if you can shoot down a billion dollar jet fighter with a 100 dollar hand held missile. That would be wrong and would mean life and reality are unbalanced.
Damn.... I LIKE!!! ^^
|

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1084
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:46:00 -
[106] - Quote
Well at least she got the pvp bit right.
http://evewho.com/corp/Pacific+Glori+NZ This is not a signature. |

Yabba Addict
Red Shift Enterprises
58
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:51:00 -
[107] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Vilnius Zar wrote:Abrazzar wrote: Has something to do with the angle you undock at and some triangle geometry.
If I understand it right, the closer you are to the undock with your warp, the greater the angle you have to align yourself from the deviated angle to the straight instant warp angle.
So with a far enough away bookmark, even a freighter will warp instantly, even with maximum ejection velocity and maximum undock deviation angle.
Of course this will also depend on the accuracy of your bookmark. Flying straight isn't always as easy as it looks.
That makes zero sense because range as such has nothing to do with it, only angle. So if someone undocks at a certain angle and then burns away without correcting his path and makes a BM at 170 and 500km you'll get the same behaviour when you undock and use either of those BM's. One could argue that it would be easier to correct your BM direction when you're further away but that's not really true, it's about doing it right and not about how far it is from station. There's of course a good reason to make a BM some 500-1000km away from station but it has nothing to do with your angle and everything to do with wanting to be off grid. For more info on undock bookmarks and other undocking tricks check my guides, link is in my sig. Guess I am thinking too much in triangles and not enough in vectors. I was always bad with vectors.
Actually angle does have something to do with it, it's all about how ships undock now. Before stations always spat you out in exactly the same direction, nowadays they have a slight varitation on the angle that you come out with, preventing instas as they used to be. So now you ship has to do a correction every time you want to jump to the insta, and the further away it is, the shallower the angle and so smaller correction before warp.
|

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
359
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:52:00 -
[108] - Quote
Katran Luftschreck wrote:Posting in stealth nerf-hisec thread. False-flag carebear alt of a nullbear is obvious.
Unless the killmail is removed for lack of verification, I doubt it. |

ElQuirko
Jester Syndicate WHY so Seri0Us
1120
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:54:00 -
[109] - Quote
-10/10. No seriously this is awful. CISPA - Readin' your secret corptheft mails since 2012 |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2981
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:57:00 -
[110] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Thats your opinion and your entitled to it no matter how wrong. People need a sence of balance in any game. This is not balanced at this point. People can fit high dps low cost fits and make a profit.
Only if the people being ganked make it profitable for them. I can't think of a single unfit ship that's profitable to gank just for the salvage from hull.
Quote:Let em make thier profit in low/null. Oh wait they cant because people are fit and ready for pvp thier most times. They may get thier arse handed to them.
So what, exactly, is stopping you from fitting for PvP in HS and kicking their ass there? Gank ships tend to have really low EHP, so you shouldn't have much trouble killing them before their target dies... if you're as prepared as they are. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Tiberius StarGazer
StarGazer Heavy Industries And Exploration
308
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:03:00 -
[111] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Pak Narhoo wrote: - Make a insta undock bookmark. The further away, the faster you align to it, so make it larger then 500-1000KM
What?
Fly out of a station to 500km or more and then make a bookmark. When you undock you right click and warp to bookmark.
The velocity your traveling at when you leave the station means you pretty much warp instantly, usually before anyone has a chance to lock and fire on you. Distance has no bearing on align time, but velocity does.
You set it to 500km+ because it usually means your our of visual overview range. Common tactic in low and null to avoid gate campers, useful when flying shiny ships in high to save your arse from gankers. |

Kaivar Lancer
Federal Defense Union
251
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:07:00 -
[112] - Quote
Yah, high security does not mean total security.
I lost 1B in goods a few years ago when I hauled in a cargo-fitted, tissue-armored Itty. I learned my lesson the hard way. But that's Eve, and that's why this game is awesome. Just remember that this is a game. Fly well. |

Zark Darkfigure
Special Krauts And Tactics Synergy of Steel
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:13:00 -
[113] - Quote
How dare you to walk around in shiny bling in our hood and dont even donate for our war funds??? How can you think you wont get your shiny i-pad, shoes and jacket ripped in the dark corner of eve??? What else to do with positive sec stat but ganking it down to get a reason to rat it up again??? Aint that the circle of eve-life??? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13278
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:26:00 -
[114] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:So you dont understand the difference between carrying around a bunch of loot or fitting your ship? Oh, I understand the difference: there is none. You fill your ship with valuables; you make yourself a valuable target; and if you don't take the precautions that need to come with it, you get ganked and lose your valuables. Whether you choose to put the valuables in your cargo hold or in your slots is utterly and completely irrelevant.
It is as it should be.
Quote:Smart has nothing to do with it. This person could be running a mission and get ganked. GǪwhich was dumb of him. So yes, being smart has a lot to do with it. A smart person would avoid putting themselves in a position where they're worth ganking, and if they do choose that for whatever reason, they take the precautions needed to avoid being ganked.
Quote:Again it is a problem for the people getting ganked. Then they should solve their problem, because that's where the problem is: with them. It is not a problem with the game.
Quote:They worked hard to make thier big nice shiny ships and they shouldnt be vunerable to a few low cost high dps fit ships. Yes they should. If they worked that hard to make their big nice shiny ship, they should take care of it. It should always be vulnerable to low-cost high-DPS ships because cost is not a factor in balance. If they spend a bajillion on a ship fit that offers no protection, and the other guy spends a bottlecap and a piece of gum on a fit that delivers massive DPS, the latter should always win, or there's something properly wrong with the balance.
Quote:People need a sence of balance in any game. Yes, please do. Cost is not a balancing factor. Costly ships going poof to cheap ships is balance. People making mint of other people's inability to protect their assets is balance. People being idiots and making themselves worth-while to kill is not a balance problem GÇö quite the opposite: it's proof positive that the game is working as it should. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Mayhaw Morgan
State War Academy Caldari State
63
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:33:00 -
[115] - Quote
Believe it or not, OP, you won the fight. The gankers probably lost the better part of a billion ISK ganking your Golem, and they didn't get your shield booster (or your pod, from the looks of it).
Is "high sec" a myth? No way. In low sec, they might have pulled that off with 1 Tornado or Talos. They wouldn't necessarily have lost a ship. They wouldn't have killrights hanging around their necks. In null, if you'd been in a bubble, they would have gotten your pod, too, almost guaranteed.
Losing a ship always sucks, even just a shuttle, but it would suck far worse if you had paid them to kill you. You fitted your ship smart by not putting stupid amounts of bling onto it. You dangled a shiny object in front of them. They gambled. They lost. It may not be satisfying, but sometimes, this is what winning looks like. In the real world, a 39 cent bullet can negate an Albert Einstein. The doers of violence have the advantage. EVE is just a reflection of that real-life imbalance.
One thing you may not be appreciating is that it took coordination and planning to pull off such an attack. There were at least 6 characters (5 shooters + 1 loot scooper). Someone locked and scanned your ship. (Maybe you noticed. Maybe you didn't.) Someone added up the value of all your ship's modules to determine if it was even worth trying to gank. People bought and fitted those Tier 3 BCs, etc., etc., etc. All of that effort was negated by a simple flip of a coin. I'm surprised the gankers aren't the ones on here complaining. |

HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy Caldari State
177
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:48:00 -
[116] - Quote
Namdor wrote:HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:
So you dont understand the difference between carrying around a bunch of loot or fitting your ship?
Smart has nothing to do with it. This person could be running a mission and get ganked.
Uh... if they're *smart*, it is very unlikely that will get ganked. "Smart" could be accomplished any number of ways in this scenario. -Don't needlessly bling your mission ship. This will make you an unattractive target and, thus, unlikely to be ganked. -If you do needlessly bling your mission ship, use instant-undocks when leaving the station and keep an eye on your D-scan for combat probes/nearby ships while you're in your missions. This will not give you perfect safety, but you're not supposed to have perfect safety. It will keep you generally safe, however. Avoid stargates and you will be EXTREMELY safe, even in a blinged ship. Quote:Again it is a problem for the people getting ganked. Otherwise known as a "personal problem". It's not a problem for the GAME that they got ganked. It's a problem for them, and only for them. Quote:They worked hard to make thier big nice shiny ships and they shouldnt be vunerable to a few low cost high dps fit ships. If it's so important to them, they should take some simple common-sense steps to protect it.
Not a personal problem when they pay thier monthly fee just like you and I do. |

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
1152
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:50:00 -
[117] - Quote
I propose removing CONCORD protection for people who can't spell "myth" correctly or know the difference between "sense" and "sence" (hint: one of them isn't even a real word). EvE is like prison.-á It's a place when bad people go to learn how to become even worse people. |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1370
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:51:00 -
[118] - Quote
Katran Luftschreck wrote:I propose removing CONCORD protection for people who can't spell "myth" correctly or know the difference between "sense" and "sence" (hint: one of them isn't even a real word). I propose removing CONCORD. I support Malcanis and Psychotic Monk for CSM8. |

HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy Caldari State
177
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:54:00 -
[119] - Quote
Tippia,
Smart has zero to do with it. People who are brilliant at this game can and do fall victim to this game flaw. You can and will argue all you want but it still wont change the truth or the facts. It is what it is at the moment.
Needs fixed. People will not gank high value non cargo carrying ships if they loose money. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13280
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:54:00 -
[120] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Not a personal problem when they pay thier monthly fee just like you and I do. They made the mistake. The game is working as intended. The problem is with them GÇö i.e. it's a personal problem.
The solution is for them to stop making the mistakes that get them killed.
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy Caldari State
177
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:55:00 -
[121] - Quote
Doubt it is working as intended or they would not have the Mining barge changes. Try again |

Primary This Rifter
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:55:00 -
[122] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Tippia,
Smart has zero to do with it. People who are brilliant at this game can and do fall victim to this game flaw. No, they don't. Yes, I'm an alt. Congratulations. |

Namdor
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
21
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:58:00 -
[123] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:
Not a personal problem when they pay thier monthly fee just like you and I do.
No, it's still a personal problem - as is your sense of entitlement.
Your subscription fee grants you access to the game, period, full-stop.
That's all it does. Entrance to the game does not guarantee that every game experience will conform to your personal ideal notion of what it should be.
If you get ganked in high-sec, you're about 99% at fault. You did all of the heavy lifting. The guys who did the ganking just seized an opportunity that you made available through laziness or incompetence.
Your $15/mo certainly doesn't offer you any protection from yourself. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13280
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:59:00 -
[124] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Doubt it is working as intended or they would not have the Mining barge changes. Those were not high-value ships, though.
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Namdor
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
21
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:00:00 -
[125] - Quote
Quote:Smart has zero to do with it. People who are brilliant at this game can and do fall victim to this game flaw.
No, they don't.
|

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1481
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:05:00 -
[126] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:
Not a personal problem when they pay thier monthly fee just like you and I do.
What does that have to do with it? Does paying a sub mean you get free total protection?
If so, CCP owes me several million dollars worth of real life cash as reimbursement for my pain and suffering...
Paying a sub means access to the game. The game features non-consensual pvp everywhere including high sec, and has since day one. If that don't want to use a game/service that has this kind of pvp, they should not pay a sub/should not be playing EVE.
It's very hard to understand why you can't get these very basic ideas.
|

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
359
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:09:00 -
[127] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Doubt it is working as intended or they would not have the Mining barge changes. Try again
Mining barges had a harder time fitting a decent tank compared to mission ships. |

horpaskron
Republic Industries Synergy of Steel
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:10:00 -
[128] - Quote
As a matter of fact, i was listening in on the action on TS, cause i came home from work to late to be part of this glorious action. It IS a lot of planning and experience. And we arent complaining about our loss, because we figured out we might loose our ships in an action like that. After all, our ships are just some bits and bytes. We take our losses, like the men we pretend to be. Oh and on the matter of us not getting our stuff done in null sec, better do your research the next time. We are playing the game as it is ment to be.
Do this, do that, get your iskies together (oh and boy do they love company, what a wonderful sight to behold)
But i read something truely disturbing in one of the posts.
You actually say, that a group of 5+ shouldnt be able to get to you?
Surely we did the right thing, because: You are mad. There is NO GAME where a single player, should be able to beat 5 (and a couple of !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! for effect) opponents. You Sir, are clearly insane. |

Namdor
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:10:00 -
[129] - Quote
Takseen wrote:HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Doubt it is working as intended or they would not have the Mining barge changes. Try again Mining barges had a harder time fitting a decent tank compared to mission ships.
More importantly, exhumers are still routinely ganked. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1482
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:12:00 -
[130] - Quote
Namdor wrote:
That's all it does. Entrance to the game does not guarantee that every game experience will conform to your personal ideal notion of what it should be. .
Problem is, MOST games including most MMOs DO pretty much guarantee that "very game experience will conform to your personal ideal notion of what it should be".
Most gamers don't want challenge, they want the illusion of challenge followed by assured victory so they can feel good about themselves and feel less bad about their actual lack of real life athletic ability (lol). That's why (traditional) video game makers don't make impossible to win games, but rather games that are "just hard enough" to be interesting.
Games like EVE buck the trend. It actively punishes you for being stupid, reckless or careless (even in high sec, just much less than in the other areas of the game). That's why EVE is a niche game and folks like you and me love it, if we wanted easy and friendly and assured victory where no one could screw with us, we'd be playing some other game.
But even in EVE the entitled, risk/pain/discomfort averse average gamer still plays, then comes to the forum asking mommie (ccp) to fix their boo-boo for them.
|

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:18:00 -
[131] - Quote
News flash, not that it matters.
Ganking is low ISK loss, high reward, high lulz and it requires nothing more then a ship scanner and the ability to press F1 in sync with the others in your gang of 3-5. It is not a profession requiring anymore skill and experience then a group of carebears blazing through an incursion. Only difference is the payout is better per unit of time.
|

Dave Stark
2047
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:18:00 -
[132] - Quote
Namdor wrote:Takseen wrote:HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Doubt it is working as intended or they would not have the Mining barge changes. Try again Mining barges had a harder time fitting a decent tank compared to mission ships. More importantly, exhumers are still routinely ganked.
except, it's at an all time low.... Want miners to move from high sec to null sec? Then give them a reason to join player corps, and stop null sec grav sites being worth less isk/hour than high sec asteroid belts. Really isn't difficult. |

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:21:00 -
[133] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Namdor wrote:Takseen wrote:HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Doubt it is working as intended or they would not have the Mining barge changes. Try again Mining barges had a harder time fitting a decent tank compared to mission ships. More importantly, exhumers are still routinely ganked. except, it's at an all time low....
Can you tell us why though Mr stark? Or does it allude you?
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13282
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:22:00 -
[134] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Ganking is low ISK loss, high reward, high lulz and it requires nothing more then a ship scanner and the ability to press F1 in sync with the others in your gang of 3-5. GǪif you choose to spend a lot of time on it, making it a low-reward activity.
If you do it quickly, it's high-loss/middling-reward instead.
Quote:Only difference is the payout is better per unit of time. SoooGǪ nerf incursions? Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Sofia Wolf
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
165
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:22:00 -
[135] - Quote
evedawn wrote: A Very Dissatisfied player!!!
Yesterday I got Insta popped in a Golem undocking from Osmon Station. What is the point of wardec's or faction warfare if you can get a team of 5 guys in high Sec with heavy fitted Teir 3 BC's & insta pop a 3 bil isk ship who has no connection with these idiots???
I think this is a serious flaw with the game!!!
I have worked hard & long hours to earn this ship for a easy kill from someone I didnt even know existed & thought just because they could pop me for being in the same place they were in, a supposidly "High Security" area.......... JOKE Joke!
CCP a very serious question if you wont honest missionaries to wont to play this game?
If I choose to, I should be able to play this game safely if that is the way you supposedly are saying I am able to do?????
Is that true???? Is High Sec a mith???
I usually tell people there are 2 cardinal rules of playing eve:
1- never undock something you are not willing to lose 2- never trust a Goon
You made me add 3th rule to that list:
3- never whine on EVE forums if you were broke rule 1 and got punished for it. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5605
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:22:00 -
[136] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:News flash, not that it matters.
Ganking is low ISK loss, high reward, high lulz and it requires nothing more then a ship scanner and the ability to press F1 in sync with the others in your gang of 3-5. It is not a profession requiring anymore skill and experience then a group of carebears blazing through an incursion. Only difference is the payout is better per unit of time.
You forgot the most important thing, the stupidity of the target.
Takseen wrote:HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Doubt it is working as intended or they would not have the Mining barge changes. Try again Mining barges had a harder time fitting a decent tank compared to mission ships.
The barges did need more fitting room. They did not need more base EHP though, especially the exhumers. |

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:27:00 -
[137] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Ganking is low ISK loss, high reward, high lulz and it requires nothing more then a ship scanner and the ability to press F1 in sync with the others in your gang of 3-5. GǪif you choose to spend a lot of time on it, making it a low-reward activity. If you do it quickly, it's high-loss/middling-reward instead. Quote:Only difference is the payout is better per unit of time. SoooGǪ nerf incursions?
It does not matter how much time you spend on it, it is a great payout in cheap ships and it requires very little prep-time and even less time executing it, comparative to they payout. Nothing else in EVE is as lucrative for such a tiny risk and tiny investment in both personal time and digital equity.
As for nerf incursions... doesn't matter. Some ganks as as easy as ratting in a belt. Nerf ratting?
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
6554
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:27:00 -
[138] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Doubt it is working as intended or they would not have the Mining barge changes. Try again
Mining barges were buffed because they were never meant to be profitable to gank (according to CCP anyway). They're also exploding at an historic low, once again according to CCP.
All the buff has managed to achieve is that more miners than ever are AFK ice mining, due to the size of the ore bay, with little or no tank because of the EHP buff, in short, business as usual for miners, no need to adapt and fit a tank to their max yield mining ships, CCP did it for them.
The gankers themselves adapted to the nerf to their playstyle very quickly, they downsized their ships, economised by seeding the market themselves, with the stuff that they need to carry on ganking, and brought more people to the party. The main source of profit in ganking is now in the supply of modules and ships to both the gankers and the ganked, although sometimes the loot fairy smiles upon the gankers and grants them nice drops as a bonus. Gankers aren't stupid, if there is no demand for something that they or someone they know is selling, they will create one, via an aggressive marketing campaign that involves people losing stuff, so that they have to buy new stuff.
Eve in a nutshell, it's you vs the universe, and every machiavellian space bastard in it. |

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:29:00 -
[139] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:News flash, not that it matters.
Ganking is low ISK loss, high reward, high lulz and it requires nothing more then a ship scanner and the ability to press F1 in sync with the others in your gang of 3-5. It is not a profession requiring anymore skill and experience then a group of carebears blazing through an incursion. Only difference is the payout is better per unit of time. You forgot the most important thing, the stupidity of the target.
Loading a freighter to near full and undocking is not stupidity. Fitting your ship with expensive mods (the correct way) is not stupidity.
No ship has a legitimate defense to ganking. Even a fleet of guardians could not save you from the Alpha strike of a small gang of cheap ships. Being ganked does not require stupidity. It is among the easiest and most lucrative professions in EVE atm.
|

Ginger Barbarella
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1212
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:29:00 -
[140] - Quote
evedawn wrote:Secondly because its never happened to me before & I've never heard it could happen!
Hang on a second... logical disconnect here.
So, you WORKED your way into a Golem (not cheap, not easy skill-wise), but you don't know anything about suicide ganking?!?!
Really?
0/10 for too-obvious of a troll. "Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac |

Theron Vetrus
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
18
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:30:00 -
[141] - Quote
Eve Online is 10 years old. I'm amazed that there are still this many people who are clueless to the non-consentual PvP aspect of the game, as if paying a subscription fee somehow entitles them to be immune from it. Take what you can, give nothing back. I'm looking for a pirate corp Psychotic Monk for CSM8 |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
3702
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:30:00 -
[142] - Quote
High Sec is not a mith. Nor is it a MYTH. The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.-á-á-á-á-á - Oscar Wilde |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13283
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:33:00 -
[143] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:It does not matter how much time you spend on it Sure it does. If you get a 100M haul (i.e. half a bil after losses) once a week because the loot fairy is being a *****, that comes out to slightly less payout than mining.
If you want good hauls and little loss, you have to spend time waiting for a stupid/willing target and then hope that the Shub-Internet and the Random Number God are pleased with your latest offerings; if you want to gamble, you can go for more risky targets more often. Either way, chances are that you won't earn much.
Quote:As for nerf incursions... doesn't matter. You said that the only thing that differs is payout per unit of time. Since incursions pay more, it only makes sense to bring it down to the level of ganking. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:42:00 -
[144] - Quote
You either don't have a great deal of experience ganking, or your are trying to cleverly mask the specifics of the profession. Either way, CCP does not care so... have a party.
It is however what it is.
|

Hecate Shaw
United Freemerchants Society
13
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:44:00 -
[145] - Quote
Does it seem likely to anyone else that the OP bought his character? As several people have pointed out, the odds of a 4-5 year vet not knowing about high-sec ganking and yet still working up to owning a Golem worth 3b are very slim. I sometimes wonder if the the character bizarre isn't hurting more than it helps. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13284
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:47:00 -
[146] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:You either don't have a great deal of experience ganking, or your are trying to cleverly mask the specifics of the profession. I know that it's so massively easy and profitable that it's an exceedingly rare occurrence, now more than everGǪ
GǪwhich rather suggest that it's actually rather dull and unprofitable, which comes as no surprise given all the pieces that have to fall into place for a gank to work and be worth it; given how easy they are to avoid and protect against; and given how easily the costs can run away from you if the target decides to make it so.
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5607
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:48:00 -
[147] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Loading a freighter to near full and undocking is not stupidity. Fitting your ship with expensive mods (the correct way) is not stupidity.
No ship has a legitimate defense to ganking. Even a fleet of guardians could not save you from the Alpha strike of a small gang of cheap ships. Being ganked does not require stupidity. It is among the easiest and most lucrative professions in EVE atm.
Putting 1 billion into the hold of a freighter means there is no profit in ganking you.
Putting 10 billion+ into the hold of a frighter make you very profitable to gank.
If you dont want to be ganked then dont be daft and stuff it full of goodies that makes you a target. The best defence is not making yourself a target. Tank your ships and limit your cargo value. Or dont and suffer the conciquences of your stupidity. |

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:51:00 -
[148] - Quote
It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing. Now, you literally will not survive your trip if you take loads like that between market hubs. Your death is next to certain.
That is not stupidity. That is a game "feature". Make a ship that can move all of that stuff at once to save time and generate wealth, and then if you do do it, you are "stupid".
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13284
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:53:00 -
[149] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Putting 1 billion into the hold of a freighter means there is no profit in ganking you. Oh, I don't knowGǪ If I tried that, it would be profitable to gank me. The bounty payout should pay for the gank ships. 
Eternum Praetorian wrote:That is not stupidity Putting 10bn worth of goods in a shuttle is not stupidity?! I think you might operate on drastically different understanding of what that word means than the rest of usGǪ Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:53:00 -
[150] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:You either don't have a great deal of experience ganking, or your are trying to cleverly mask the specifics of the profession. I know that it's so massively easy and profitable that it's an exceedingly rare occurrence, now more than everGǪ GǪwhich rather suggest that it's actually rather dull and unprofitable, which comes as no surprise given all the pieces that have to fall into place for a gank to work and be worth it; given how easy they are to avoid and protect against; and given how easily the costs can run away from you if the target decides to make it so.
Alternatively, maybe it's mechanics are not well understood by the masses. So there are allot more people "talking about doing it" then actually doing it. Your conclusion that it is dull and unprofitable is not only a forgone conclusion, it does not fit the facts presented in this thread via killmail.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
6554
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:54:00 -
[151] - Quote
Hecate Shaw wrote:Does it seem likely to anyone else that the OP bought his character? As several people have pointed out, the odds of a 4-5 year vet not knowing about high-sec ganking and yet still working up to owning a Golem worth 3b are very slim. I sometimes wonder if the the character bizarre isn't hurting more than it helps.
Some people are so insular that they take no notice of what is going on around them, there's plenty of highsec dwellers who've been "playing" for a couple of years or more that are shocked and horrified to find that people can shoot at them in highsec without killrights or a wardec. Time spent in game does not equal a knowledge of game mechanics, especially if people choose to play Eve as a single player game and ignore everything beyond their particular play style.
Eve in a nutshell, it's you vs the universe, and every machiavellian space bastard in it. |

Namdor
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:54:00 -
[152] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing. Now, you literally will not survive your trip if you take loads like that between market hubs. Your death is next to certain.
Lolwut?
I move comparable amounts between hubs on a routine basis without ever getting ganked.
How can this be? |

Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
504
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:55:00 -
[153] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:
So you dont understand the difference between carrying around a bunch of loot or fitting your ship?
Fitting or carrying high value items makes you a target, don't like it? then don't do it. Quote:Smart has nothing to do with it. This person could be running a mission and get ganked. And your point is? Quote:Again it is a problem for the people getting ganked. They worked hard to make thier big nice shiny ships and they shouldnt be vunerable to a few low cost high dps fit ships. The only problem I see is that the OP expected to be immune from the actions of other players in an open ended PvP multiplayer game. BTW 5x fitted tier 3 battle cruisers comes out at the best part of 3/4 billion Isk if not more, so not exactly cheap either. Quote:You guys scream risk vs reward non stop on these forum. This should be no different. Gankers should not be able to use little effort and destroy high value targets. Coordinating a 5 player gank takes a considerable amount of effort, not a little. I can pretty much guarantee that the gank operation took a fair amount of prior planning, which involved ship scanning potential targets, making sure that all the required pilots were in the right place, with the right equipment, at the right time to carry the operation off without a hitch, all of which are effort. Even after all the effort put into the planning and execution the loot fairy can still crap on gankers from a great height, in this case they took the risk and got little or no reward for their efforts, are they whining about risk vs reward? The answer is no, because next time the loot fairy may well smile upon them with lots and lots of shiny stuff.
ISBoxer makes all that coordination unnecessary...  The single biggest danger to EVE is the proliferation of ALTS! Kill an alt today!
Petition for a Minimum bounty of 10 mil. Prevent useless bounties!
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13284
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:57:00 -
[154] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Alternatively, maybe it's mechanics are not well understood by the masses. IOW, not easy. Also, not profitable since being profitable would mean that all the people doing it in the past (who do understand the mechanics) would flock to itGǪ but instead, it's very very rare.
Quote:Your conclusion that it is dull and unprofitable is not only a forgone conclusion, it does not fit the facts presented in this thread via killmail. It fits the facts just fine, since the KM in this thread is a unique case of stupidity that provides a one-time bonanza. Show me the KMs where people are getting those hits, one after another, in quick succession to generate any kind of decent ISK/h.
By the way, notice the singular here. Also notice that the other KM posted was a massive loss GÇö not just GÇ£unprofitable compared to miningGÇ¥, but a complete waste of time and money. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5607
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:58:00 -
[155] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing. Now, you literally will not survive your trip if you take loads like that between market hubs. Your death is next to certain.
That is not stupidity. That is a game "feature". Make a ship that can hall all that stuff at once to save time and generate wealth, and then if you do do it, you are "stupid".
Just because you can do it doesn't mean you should. Its like transporting 10 billion in gold in the back of a truck with an open sided trailer through the heart of Bagdad with no armed guards.
Its that stupid. |

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:03:00 -
[156] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Alternatively, maybe it's mechanics are not well understood by the masses. IOW, not easy. Also, not profitable since that would mean that all the people doing it in the past (who do understand the mechanics) would flock to itGǪ but instead, it's very very rare.
That does not mean that it is not easy, it could just as easily mean that people are simply having trouble understanding Concord mechanics. You used to be better at this Tippia 
|

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:04:00 -
[157] - Quote
Namdor wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing. Now, you literally will not survive your trip if you take loads like that between market hubs. Your death is next to certain. Lolwut? I move comparable amounts between hubs on a routine basis without ever getting ganked. How can this be?
Not in a freighter loaded to the brim and starting in Jita I imagine.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13284
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:04:00 -
[158] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:That does not mean that it is not easy, it could just as easily mean that people are simply having trouble understanding Concord mechanics. GǪwhich means it's not easy.
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
6554
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:05:00 -
[159] - Quote
baltec1 wrote: Just because you can do it doesn't mean you should. Its like transporting 10 billion in gold in the back of a truck with an open sided trailer through the heart of Bagdad with no armed guards.
Its that stupid.
Or sailing off the coast of Somalia in a Yacht made of money, it's that stupid too.
Eve in a nutshell, it's you vs the universe, and every machiavellian space bastard in it. |

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:06:00 -
[160] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:
It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing. Now, you literally will not survive your trip if you take loads like that between market hubs. Your death is next to certain.
That is not stupidity. That is a game "feature". Make a ship that can hall all that stuff at once to save time and generate wealth, and then if you do do it, you are "stupid".
Just because you can do it doesn't mean you should. Its like transporting 10 billion in gold in the back of a truck with an open sided trailer through the heart of Bagdad with no armed guards. Its that stupid.
No it is more like Arabs scanning your truck to see how much cash you have in your wallet. Ramming you with a bulldozer at a stoplight and mugging you. That is a somewhat more accurate analogy.
|

Namdor
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:07:00 -
[161] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Namdor wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing. Now, you literally will not survive your trip if you take loads like that between market hubs. Your death is next to certain. Lolwut? I move comparable amounts between hubs on a routine basis without ever getting ganked. How can this be? Not in a freighter loaded to the brim and starting in Jita I imagine.
The linked kill was a noobship, not a freighter. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5607
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:08:00 -
[162] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
No it is more like Arabs scanning your truck to see how much cash you have in your wallet. Ramming you with a bulldozer at a stoplight and mugging you. That is a somewhat more accurate analogy.
Because they are going to do that to a waggon full of carrots.
It doesnt matter how you try to word it, stuffing 10 billion into the hold of a rookie ship is a stupid thing to do. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13284
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:08:00 -
[163] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:No it is more like Arabs scanning your truck to see how much cash you have in your wallet. Ramming you with a bulldozer at a stoplight and mugging you. That is a somewhat more accurate analogy. GǪwhich means it's stupid to carry around tons of cash in known mugging spots.
The basic concept remains the same: you're doing something you shouldn't be doing. You're being stupid. You end up paying the price for your stupidity, as you should. It was all easily avoidable had you been a bit smarter about it.
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:08:00 -
[164] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:That does not mean that it is not easy, it could just as easily mean that people are simply having trouble understanding Concord mechanics. GǪwhich means it's not easy.
Actually no. Not being sure of how exactly concord works, has nothing to do with how easy/hard the act of ganking and profiting from that ganking is. It just means the idea of concord is ballyhoo functioning as a deterrent, without actually being one in physicality.
|

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1084
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:10:00 -
[165] - Quote
This thread started with a troll by the OP.
It has now degenerated into the usual ganking is too easy/too hard.
Blame the miners etc... This is not a signature. |

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:11:00 -
[166] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:
No it is more like Arabs scanning your truck to see how much cash you have in your wallet. Ramming you with a bulldozer at a stoplight and mugging you. That is a somewhat more accurate analogy.
Because they are going to do that to a waggon full of carrots. It doesnt matter how you try to word it, stuffing 10 billion into the hold of a rookie ship is a stupid thing to do.
No one seems to be talking about 10b in the hold of a rookie ship here, unless I missed something.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
6554
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:12:00 -
[167] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote: Actually no. Not being sure of how exactly concord works, has nothing to do with how easy/hard the act of ganking and profiting from that ganking is. It is just ballyhoo functioning as a deterrent.
I'm pretty sure the gankers know how Concord works, if they didn't they wouldn't be able to manipulate Concord spawns, or to drag Concord clear across a solar system to give them the window of opportunity required to carry out their nefarious plans. The information on Concord mechanics isn't exactly hard to find, Goonswarm have it down to a fine art, as do the New Order guys.
Eve in a nutshell, it's you vs the universe, and every machiavellian space bastard in it. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13284
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:13:00 -
[168] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Actually no. No? So it's not a case of GÇ£people are simply having troubleGÇ¥ with the mechanics (i.e. not that easy after all)? Then why is it so rare?
Quote:Not being sure of how exactly concord works, has nothing to do with how easy/hard the act of ganking and profiting from that ganking is GǪaside from the rather important fact that CONCORD is what determines how easy or hard something is to gank and how much profit you'll make from it, and not knowing how that mechanic works means a complete stab in the dark even before we add in the RNG GÇö a difficult task indeed.
Quote:No one seems to be talking about 10b in the hold of a rookie ship here, unless I missed something. You missed a lot. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Namdor
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:15:00 -
[169] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:baltec1 wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:
No it is more like Arabs scanning your truck to see how much cash you have in your wallet. Ramming you with a bulldozer at a stoplight and mugging you. That is a somewhat more accurate analogy.
Because they are going to do that to a waggon full of carrots. It doesnt matter how you try to word it, stuffing 10 billion into the hold of a rookie ship is a stupid thing to do. No one seems to be talking about 10b in the hold of a rookie ship here, unless I missed something.
You did. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5607
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:15:00 -
[170] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
No one seems to be talking about 10b in the hold of a rookie ship here, unless I missed something.
You did. |

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:17:00 -
[171] - Quote
You can't read then, I seem to have typed freighter.
|

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
359
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:19:00 -
[172] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:evedawn wrote:Secondly because its never happened to me before & I've never heard it could happen! Hang on a second... logical disconnect here. So, you WORKED your way into a Golem (not cheap, not easy skill-wise), but you don't know anything about suicide ganking?!?! Really? 0/10 for too-obvious of a troll.
If you don't read the forums and have a wee bit of luck, you could go for years without being suicide ganked. |

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:19:00 -
[173] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Actually no. No? So it's not a case of GÇ£people are simply having troubleGÇ¥ with the mechanics (i.e. not that easy after all)? Then why is it so rare?.
You carefully expunged a word, which I am sure you did by accident. Right? People are simply having trouble understanding the mechanics of concord.
See, when you put that word back in it changes the entire meaning of the sentence. Very important lesson there.
|

Namdor
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:23:00 -
[174] - Quote
Here, let me help.
See, we started here:
This is a kill of a rookie ship with 10 billion in melted nanoribbons in its hold.
To which YOU directly responded:
Quote:It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing. Now, you literally will not survive your trip if you take loads like that between market hubs. Your death is next to certain.
Implying one or more of the following:
1. You believe the function of a rookie ship is to transport 10 billion in nanoribbons. 2. You're incapable of discerning a rookie ship from a ship more suited to transporting 10 billion in nanoribbons. 3. You responded with a non sequitur, hoping everyone else would fail to notice that it was a rookie ship. |

Georgina Parmala
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:25:00 -
[175] - Quote
dexington wrote:evedawn wrote:Yesterday I got Insta popped in a Golem undocking from Osmon Station. and the nullbears keep whining about hi-sec being to safe...
It took him almost 5 YEARS of playing EvE in high sec and the loss of a shiny MARAUDER to realize he is not completely and absolutely safe in high sec.
The "null bears" are right. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13284
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:25:00 -
[176] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:You can't read then, I seem to have typed freighter. You can't read then. You are talking about the 10bn rookie ship.
Quote:You carefully expunged-ácut before a word GǪwhich made no difference. With or without it, you're saying it's not easy. That would explain why it's so rare, but would contradict your previous claim that it easy after all. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7124
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:25:00 -
[177] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:I understand where the op is coming from. I dont feel hi-sec should be completely safe and people should still have the ability to gank somone out of revenge or spite, but I dont feel it should be profitable.
I say if you want to gank people thats fine but it should cost you and anyone involved. This seemed to worked well for the miners. Macks seem still be on the profit list but rifter ganks have fallen off substantially. WHY? No profit in it.
People shouldnt be afraid to undock thier big shiny ships to play the game. Something needs to be in place to remove the profit margin for using high dps ships with no effort put in to them to kill ships people have worked hard to obtain.
Take away the profit and you remove 90% of the problem.
Years of work can vanish in a moment when you mess up. That's life and that's EVE, son. ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:28:00 -
[178] - Quote
Namdor wrote:Here, let me help. See, we started here: This is a kill of a rookie ship with 10 billion in melted nanoribbons in its hold. To which YOU directly responded: Quote:It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing. Now, you literally will not survive your trip if you take loads like that between market hubs. Your death is next to certain. Implying one or more of the following: 1. You believe the function of a rookie ship is to transport 10 billion in nanoribbons. 2. You're incapable of discerning a rookie ship from a ship more suited to transporting 10 billion in nanoribbons. 3. You responded with a non sequitur, hoping everyone else would fail to notice that it was a rookie ship.
I didn't click on it. The op is about Golem and I am referring to ships that have a specific function and role in the game. I am not discussing rookie ships.
But after looking at that KM, I'd say he was trying to outsmart the system by flying a ship that no one would suspect. Problem with that is... people have already figured out that trick.
|

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
359
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:31:00 -
[179] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:That does not mean that it is not easy, it could just as easily mean that people are simply having trouble understanding Concord mechanics. GǪwhich means it's not easy. Actually no. Not being sure of how exactly concord works, has nothing to do with how easy/hard the act of ganking and profiting from that ganking is. It just means the idea of concord is ballyhoo functioning as a deterrent, without actually being one in physicality.
Of course it acts as a deterrent. Otherwise pirates would just shoot ALL the miners and missioners they could lock. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13284
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:32:00 -
[180] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:I didn't click on it. So you were talking out of your ass when you said that GÇ£It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thingGÇ¥. You had absolutely no idea what you were talking about. Good on you. 
Quote:The op is about Golem and I am referring to ships that have a specific function and role in the game. I am not discussing rookie ships. GǪexcept that by saying to Gǣthat particular shipGǥ (i.e. referring to the rookie ship you were commenting on), you did exactly that. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5608
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:32:00 -
[181] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
I didn't click on it. The op is about Golem and I am referring to ships that have a specific function and role in the game. I am not discussing rookie ships.
Well lets talk about freighters then
Afterall, stupidity knows no bounds. |

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:35:00 -
[182] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:I didn't click on it. So you were talking out of your ass when you said that GÇ£It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thingGÇ¥. You had absolutely no idea what you were talking about. Good on you.  .
I was talking about the freighter that I mentioned in previous posts. The same type of ship I have been referring to all along. So no I am not talking out of my ass, you simply have the selective reading comprehension of a 16 year old cheerleader researching justin bieber headlines. Good for you.
I simply ignored the links provided by baltec1. As I just did again.
|

Namdor
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
24
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:35:00 -
[183] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:I didn't click on it. So you were talking out of your ass when you said that GÇ£It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thingGÇ¥. You had absolutely no idea what you were talking about. Good on you.  That's how the pros do it.
Informed replies are for newbs. |

Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:36:00 -
[184] - Quote
Namdor wrote:Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:I didn't click on it. So you were talking out of your ass when you said that GÇ£It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thingGÇ¥. You had absolutely no idea what you were talking about. Good on you.  That's how the pros do it. Informed replies are for newbs.
Here is another one. This is how "pros" read. Win?
|

baltec1
Bat Country
5608
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:41:00 -
[185] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
I simply ignored the links provided by baltec1. As I just did again.
Ignore anything that contradicts you, thats the way to go about discussions! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13284
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:43:00 -
[186] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:I was talking about the freighter that I mentioned in previous posts. Then perhaps you should choose your quotes more carefully and not go off and discuss something completely different than what you're quoting. In the post in question, there was exactly one ship mentioned: a n00bship, so common courtesy makes us conclude that you are not a complete idiot and that you are in fact talking about that one ship when you refer to GÇ£that shipGÇ¥.
I suppose it'll be better to not offer such courtesies in the future.
Quote:So no I am not talking out of my ass, you simply have the selective reading comprehension Not really. You just failed to read what you were responding to, and thus made an uninformed comment about something you had no clue about, as you just admitted.
That's ok. You just need to learn to actually read what people write when writing your responses so that you don't accidentally say something you don't mean.
baltec1 wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:I simply ignored the links provided by baltec1. As I just did again. Ignore anything that contradicts you, thats the way to go about discussions! Of course. Also notice how the other KM linked contradicts his claim that ganking is all about ze mad profitz.  Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1084
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:43:00 -
[187] - Quote
This thread should be locked. This is not a signature. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
6560
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:48:00 -
[188] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote: I was talking about the freighter that I mentioned in previous posts. The same type of ship I have been referring to all along. So no I am not talking out of my ass, you simply have the selective reading comprehension of a 16 year old cheerleader researching justin bieber headlines. Good for you.
Wrong demographic, I'd say the average person searching for Justin Bieber headlines has yet to hit puberty. You seem to be following the rather worrying trend of shiptoasters who either insult or ignore anyone that doesn't agree with their somewhat myopic view.
Speaking of selective reading comprehension, commenting on posts where you have ignored any relevant links, makes you look like a hypocrite and a fool.
Eve in a nutshell, it's you vs the universe, and every machiavellian space bastard in it. |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
3703
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:52:00 -
[189] - Quote
Wow.
Took a 1/2 hour nap and woke up to 45 updates to this nonsense OP.
Welp, we haven't had a good Threadnaught in awhile.  The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.-á-á-á-á-á - Oscar Wilde |

baltec1
Bat Country
5610
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:55:00 -
[190] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Wow. Took a 1/2 hour nap and woke up to 45 updates to this nonsense OP. Welp, we haven't had a good Threadnaught in awhile. 
I may have just nuked him.
Apologies |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
1776
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:56:00 -
[191] - Quote
Would you guys stop arguing in this thread?
I'll grant you the OP's tears were pretty good, but it hurts my eyes to keep seeing the word "Mith" on the front page.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7125
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:57:00 -
[192] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Some ganks as as easy as ratting in a belt. Nerf ratting?
probably because some players are dumber than NPCs ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

S'Way
Bitter Vets
472
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 20:04:00 -
[193] - Quote
 A few more like that and I guess we should expect CCP to get requests about adding a tutorial section on how to make double wrap hauler contracts for anyone buying a freighter or an "are you sure you want to be this silly" button when they undock carrying over X amount in cargo.
As for the OP - if you undock it - you're prepared to lose it, welcome to EvE where concord provides consequences not protection.
|

baltec1
Bat Country
5610
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 20:13:00 -
[194] - Quote
S'Way wrote: A few more like that and I guess we should expect CCP to get requests about adding a tutorial section on how to make double wrap hauler contracts for anyone buying a freighter or an "are you sure you want to be this silly" button when they undock carrying over X amount in cargo.
Oh have have worse cases than that one. |

Nova Satar
Rekall Incorporated Sinewave Alliance
51
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 20:15:00 -
[195] - Quote
i have to admit, even as a non-missioner i do think this is getting a bit ********. people saying "dont use if you cant afford to lose it" are utter imbeciles. I think you mean "dont risk it if you cant afford to lose" The high of hig-sec is that there should be minimal risk, and dont tell me thats for pussys, its jsut a fact, whats the point in low-sec if high is no different.
There should be limited risk, but not to the point where 4 or 5 BC's can kill pretty much any ship at will.
Anyone with relative brain activity will know its going to be nerfed soon. Mission runner is a style of play for many people, and one they enjoy, there should always be risk and inclusion into the game further than their own little bubble, but its too much at current.
It also makes office and deadspace mods pretty much obsolete except for supercaps and idiot lossmails spammed with CFC BOT DOWN comments. |
|

ISD LackOfFaith
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
494

|
Posted - 2013.03.18 20:17:00 -
[196] - Quote
Quote:3. Ranting is prohibited.
A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.
5. Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.
12. Spamming is prohibited.
Spam is defined as the repetitive posting of the same topic or nonsensical post that has no substance and is often designed to annoy other forum users. This can include the words GÇ£firstGÇ¥, GÇ£go back to [insert other game name]GÇ¥ and other such posts that contribute no value to forum discussion. Spamming also includes the posting of ASCII art within a forum post.
22. Post constructively.
Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online provided that it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.
26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.
Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued.
34. Posting of kill reports outside of the Crime & Punishment forum channel is prohibited.
More often than not, posts of this nature are made with inflammatory intent and are designed to promote trolling and flaming. Therefore, the posting of links to kill reports from any third party site, or the direct copy-pasting of kill reports from in game is prohibited on all forum channels of the EVE Online Forums, with the exception of the Crime & Punishment Channel.
As there are far too many breaches of the above rules, and the thread has veered hugely off topic, this thread is locked. ISD LackOfFaith Lieutenant Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: [one page] |