Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:49:00 -
[121] - Quote
Mallikanth wrote:OP is: a) A troll b) a tard c) Both of the above. Please vote and then be prepared for a thread saying the vote was rigged 'cos of Falcon / Goons or any such meme. [Edited for stoopid speeling]
reported for trolling |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
280
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:49:00 -
[122] - Quote
Jada Maroo wrote:Andski wrote: "The supercap nerf is a good change but the goons support it because IT BENEFITS THEM so it shouldn't be changed!!!!"
i love your logic
Not what I said, but people with weak arguments often have to put words into their opponents mouths to make a point so I'll overlook it. Let's use a real world example: nuclear weapons. And before you start your inevitable whine about comparisons to the real world, it's called an analogy. Look it up in the dictionary. Country A and country B both have nuclear weapons. The traditional army of country A is twice as large as country B. Country A manages to convince country B that both sides would be better off if all nuclear weapons were destroyed. And so they sign a treaty and abolish all their nuclear weapons. Now, with the equalizer gone, who is at a massive numerical advantage? Country A.
yes, that is an analogy, but a terrible one |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:49:00 -
[123] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:I think you just errrr 'revealed your alts'... Quote:Are you seriously that paranoid? First you accused me of being Mittani and are you accusing me of being that person? I must be omnipotent. Dude you posted that remark with Brooks Puuntai Nomadic Asylum **********. Unless he thinks he is you... Yes I'm his alt. Or is he my alt? Iam confused. I'm not like you(iam guessing by character age) and don't need to hide behind alts. I have never been in Goons or have any alts in goons, actually I have no alts since all my other accounts are canceled. Then again you will believe whatever you want to believe. The fact of the matter is that what you've done with this thread is spin Hilmars words into a anti-goons speech. What Hilmar was talking about was not goons our any issues within the current CSM itself. He was talking about the CSM process and how the current CSM is majority if not all 0,0 delegates. The issues that he was talking about was that non 0,0 areas where not properly represented. No try read it again. It said Goons AND nullsec powermads. Im sorry but this game DOES NOT need people like Goons ruinng the game anymore. Its killing eve. Simple Fact. Im sorry it is... People like DRF are also ruining the game too. But goons are the people who all they care about is making eve a misery for people. Is this really the future of eve? Because if it is, then goodbye eve. Might as well shut up shop now. Can the game... People and eve have moved on from 5 years ago, yes it was ok back then becuase it didnt effect many people. Now its affecting thousands more. Which in return is affecting the game, badly. CCP needs to implement some drastic fundamental changes in eve for it to retain new and yes old players. Its ok for me and you, we may player longer we may not. But theres gonna be a drop off point where all the bitter vets have gone, and then whose left? No one... and will you care? no ofc you wont.. We've been around for years and we will continue to be around. Sorry, just because you wish for it to happen doesn't mean we will magically go away. We exist to make life hell for you. That's the point of this game. I can blow your ship up, I can prevent you from mining, I can scam, I can hire privateers to chase your butt down, etc. All while you scream "SAVE ME CONCORD, SAVE ME CCP :( BAN THOSE MEAN GOONIES." |
Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:50:00 -
[124] - Quote
David Carel wrote:Go biomass your characters and do us all a favor. reported for trolling
|
Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
84
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:53:00 -
[125] - Quote
TBH this is turning into an Anti-goon speech.
This should have nothing to do with the Goons, this is about CCP and how they run business. Goons are good for the game in all reality, bias CSM is not. |
Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:53:00 -
[126] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:I think you just errrr 'revealed your alts'... Quote:Are you seriously that paranoid? First you accused me of being Mittani and are you accusing me of being that person? I must be omnipotent. Dude you posted that remark with Brooks Puuntai Nomadic Asylum **********. Unless he thinks he is you... Yes I'm his alt. Or is he my alt? Iam confused. I'm not like you(iam guessing by character age) and don't need to hide behind alts. I have never been in Goons or have any alts in goons, actually I have no alts since all my other accounts are canceled. Then again you will believe whatever you want to believe. The fact of the matter is that what you've done with this thread is spin Hilmars words into a anti-goons speech. What Hilmar was talking about was not goons our any issues within the current CSM itself. He was talking about the CSM process and how the current CSM is majority if not all 0,0 delegates. The issues that he was talking about was that non 0,0 areas where not properly represented. No try read it again. It said Goons AND nullsec powermads. Im sorry but this game DOES NOT need people like Goons ruinng the game anymore. Its killing eve. Simple Fact. Im sorry it is... People like DRF are also ruining the game too. But goons are the people who all they care about is making eve a misery for people. Is this really the future of eve? Because if it is, then goodbye eve. Might as well shut up shop now. Can the game... People and eve have moved on from 5 years ago, yes it was ok back then becuase it didnt effect many people. Now its affecting thousands more. Which in return is affecting the game, badly. CCP needs to implement some drastic fundamental changes in eve for it to retain new and yes old players. Its ok for me and you, we may player longer we may not. But theres gonna be a drop off point where all the bitter vets have gone, and then whose left? No one... and will you care? no ofc you wont.. We've been around for years and we will continue to be around. Sorry, just because you wish for it to happen doesn't mean we will magically go away. We exist to make life hell for you. That's the point of this game. I can blow your ship up, I can prevent you from mining, I can scam, I can hire privateers to chase your butt down, etc. All while you scream "SAVE ME CONCORD, SAVE ME CCP :( BAN THOSE MEAN GOONIES."
Privateers....lol thats a funny one..
|
White Tree
XxBroski North Reloaded Federation NinjaGuldDotxX. Elite Space Guild
469
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:53:00 -
[127] - Quote
Gilentajsa wrote: What was that you said?
I couldn't hear you through the **** in your mouth.
I too get upset when my worldview is wrong and I am proved repeatedly to be a petulant infant. |
Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:55:00 -
[128] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:TBH this is turning into an Anti-goon speech.
This should have nothing to do with the Goons, this is about CCP and how they run business. Goons are good for the game in all reality, bias CSM is not.
Sadly its a goon making into a anti goon speech.. but yes please stay on topic guys..
|
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:55:00 -
[129] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:We've been around for years and we will continue to be around. Sorry, just because you wish for it to happen doesn't mean we will magically go away. We exist to make life hell for you. That's the point of this game. I can blow your ship up, I can prevent you from mining, I can scam, I can hire privateers to chase your butt down, etc. All while you scream "SAVE ME CONCORD, SAVE ME CCP :( BAN THOSE MEAN GOONIES."
Privateers....lol thats a funny one.. [/quote]What was inaccurate about it? We literally pay our own people to go hunt miners. How does that not fit the definition of privateering? Do I have to fit a specific definition that only you have? |
Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
313
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:55:00 -
[130] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:David Carel wrote:Go biomass your characters and do us all a favor. reported for trolling That is much more kind way to go than the one I suggested for you. However the end result with this method is the same, so I strongly support David's idea.
And OP, David is not trolling in his post. However you could try to get his post moved to "ideas and suggestions" subsection in forums if that makes you feel better .)
|
|
Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
616
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:56:00 -
[131] - Quote
Gilentajsa wrote:White Tree wrote:The Mittani wrote:As I relaxed in the aftermath of a time-dilated fight where supercaps didn't rule the day and lag didn't determine the outcome, I browsed a rack of podkills with implants, spun my recently rebalanced hybrid-gunned ship, and typed off a poorly-thought-out ragepost about how the CSM was irrelevant, because I'm literally a big babby who has no idea what he's talking about.
I then went off to enjoy a bunch of new spaceship-related content that CCP produced after they finally acknowledged that focusing on FiS instead of WiS was the right thing to do! [quote=The Mittani]As I relaxed in the aftermath of a time-dilated fight where supercaps didn't rule the day and lag didn't determine the outcome, I browsed a rack of podkills with implants, spun my recently rebalanced hybrid-gunned ship, and typed off a poorly-thought-out ragepost about how the CSM was irrelevant, because I'm literally a big babby who has no idea what he's talking about. I then went off to enjoy a bunch of new spaceship-related content that CCP produced after they finally acknowledged that focusing on FiS instead of WiS was the right thing to do! What was that you said? I couldn't hear you through the **** in your mouth.
While I wouldn't be quite so crass as the poster above me. This does actually illustrate a problem with this CSM. Mittani's personality is quite dominant in that group and it has become apparent its a case of mr Mittani organgrinder and his half dozen monkeys. It does damage the balance of the CSM when its quite obvious only one person is calling the shots and the rest are just acting like beta followers rather than presenting individual and independent viewpoints.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |
Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
257
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:56:00 -
[132] - Quote
Karadion wrote: 1) They do that in their own blogging efforts, tentonhammer, k.com, and other various sites. You're just not looking hard enough. 2) They did that. The Empire pubbies just didn't care 3) Again they did implement that function which I was able to vote 1 vote per account that I owned. 4) They do that job because they represent the people who voted for their platform. Are they supposed to be an empty slate platform going "Vote for me, I got nothing." 5) They consistently do that especially censuring the minutes which got them in trouble.
Hiding under a rock have you?
1) is not EVEonline.com 2) They obviously didn't do that 3) That function needs to be streamlined into eveonline.com forums better 4) At least 5 CSm members got in from just voting bloc power. I voted for Whitetree because he was in TEST the same time i was. He also said he was pushing hard for a hybrid/Gallente buff, i am really glad that has been won 5) Like i said, there is a lot to discuss that is not locked up under the NDA lock and key. New ideas the CSM members has. Permissable ideas to be discussed (eg new capital ship ideas etc)
Transparacy. Nothing more, nothing less. I don't mind if Brother Mittens is pushing hard to nerf ABC in low end WHs, as long as either his idea is supported by the players, or the players pushed that idea to him.
I don't want CSM members pushign their own agenda, or something that they have not discussed at all with anyone who has access to eveonline.com. I do not want to go view a short story at a third party website when it directly relates to EVE development. [img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |
Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:00:00 -
[133] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Privateers....lol thats a funny one..
What was inaccurate about it? We literally pay our own people to go hunt miners. How does that not fit the definition of privateering? Do I have to fit a specific definition that only you have?
What i meant was - 'lol privateers' not the most scary of adversaries.. |
XXSketchxx
Remote Soviet Industries
39
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:01:00 -
[134] - Quote
Oh look, another pubbie made a thread. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
792
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:01:00 -
[135] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:So much of CCP's RL ISK comes from empire and "pubbie's" If CCP wants to be successful they will have to cater to these people as well. GǪso why aren't they interested enough to make sure they find a representative on the CSM?
Gilentajsa wrote:Why not make it so that; unless you are a trial, when election time rolls around you need to cast a ballot to actually get past the character selection screen? I think that would get a more evenly distributed pool of voters that I'm doubting the goons could effectively combat with ballot stuffing. Because those who aren't interested in voting aren't interested in voting, and them adding a statistically even amount of votes onto everyone's numbers will lead to the same representation.
GǪor well, to be honest, it will lead to more representation for the larger parties, since they can blitz their name out there and win votes by name recognition alone.
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Im sorry but this game DOES NOT need people like Goons ruinng the game anymore. Its killing eve. Simple Fact. What do you base this GÇ£factGÇ¥ on? Where's the proof?
Oh, and I noticed that allegation here to so let's toss that one in here as well: how is the CSM corrupt? GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:02:00 -
[136] - Quote
Headerman wrote:Karadion wrote: 1) They do that in their own blogging efforts, tentonhammer, k.com, and other various sites. You're just not looking hard enough. 2) They did that. The Empire pubbies just didn't care 3) Again they did implement that function which I was able to vote 1 vote per account that I owned. 4) They do that job because they represent the people who voted for their platform. Are they supposed to be an empty slate platform going "Vote for me, I got nothing." 5) They consistently do that especially censuring the minutes which got them in trouble.
Hiding under a rock have you?
1) is not EVEonline.com 2) They obviously didn't do that 3) That function needs to be streamlined into eveonline.com forums better 4) At least 5 CSm members got in from just voting bloc power. I voted for Whitetree because he was in TEST the same time i was. He also said he was pushing hard for a hybrid/Gallente buff, i am really glad that has been won 5) Like i said, there is a lot to discuss that is not locked up under the NDA lock and key. New ideas the CSM members has. Permissable ideas to be discussed (eg new capital ship ideas etc) Transparacy. Nothing more, nothing less. I don't mind if Brother Mittens is pushing hard to nerf ABC in low end WHs, as long as either his idea is supported by the players, or the players pushed that idea to him. I don't want CSM members pushign their own agenda, or something that they have not discussed at all with anyone who has access to eveonline.com. I do not want to go view a short story at a third party website when it directly relates to EVE development. 1) Ohh wahhh, you're selectively cherry picking where you want them to post. They do their job, you just want them to bend over backwards and give you what they want. Until they're told to post on CCP's website, this is a CCP oversight. They do blog about their efforts consistently. 2) Yes they do. That's why it's a CSM team and they raise issues that are most important to them and the people that their people voted for them on their platform 3) It was streamlined into the freaking account when you log on. "Do you want to vote in the CSM? Click here" in a propaganda advertisement similar to any article they deem posting. Because Empire pubbies dismisses it, it's not CCP's fault or is it the CSM's team for ignoring the election. 5) Again NDA will always apply and that's the unfortunate process of any development in commercial products. If you want CCP to change their way, become a minority or majority controller of the company. |
Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
84
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:03:00 -
[137] - Quote
I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed. I want representatives who recognize my play style and the playing style of people like me.
The current CSM, and most of the CSM's before that, are not giving me that "feeling". They are elected representatives that should be representing all of EVE online, from mining in empire to null sec. Their primary concern should be game balancing in every aspect of the game...
If they can't do they there is no point to have them there.
At the very least we could use an Empire CSM, Low Sec CSM and Null Sec CSM (or something). What we have now can only steer CCP in the wrong direction, and I believe has. Purposefully or not, It doesn't really matter, because a null sec only CSM cannot fulfill the above requirements. These are important requirements.
No ones "idea" of how the game should be played should take precedence over anyone else's. CSM's must be fair, neutral and courteous in order to fulfill their intended roll. Else they are useless to everyone. |
Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum KUGUTSUMEN.
201
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:03:00 -
[138] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:
No try read it again. It said Goons AND nullsec powermads. Im sorry but this game DOES NOT need people like Goons ruinng the game anymore. Its killing eve. Simple Fact. Im sorry it is... People like DRF are also ruining the game too. But goons are the people who all they care about is making eve a misery for people. Is this really the future of eve? Because if it is, then goodbye eve. Might as well shut up shop now. Can the game...
People and eve have moved on from 5 years ago, yes it was ok back then becuase it didnt effect many people. Now its affecting thousands more. Which in return is affecting the game, badly. CCP needs to implement some drastic fundamental changes in eve for it to retain new and yes old players. Its ok for me and you, we may player longer we may not. But theres gonna be a drop off point where all the bitter vets have gone, and then whose left? No one... and will you care? no ofc you wont..
How is Goons ruining Eve? By creating content? While they may be pissing in some ice miners cheerios it does infact create content. You don't like it? Hire mercs to camp or hunt goons in highsec, or god forbid do it yourself. Thats what Eve is about, not Boo hoo goons are doing something I don't like. Change it.
In actuality CCP ruined their own game by shifting attention elsewhere and leaving Eve to rot. Nullsec is the way it is because CCP nerfed one of the key ways to keep people in 0.0 and fight for it. As well as supers. |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:04:00 -
[139] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Privateers....lol thats a funny one..
What was inaccurate about it? We literally pay our own people to go hunt miners. How does that not fit the definition of privateering? Do I have to fit a specific definition that only you have? What i meant was - 'lol privateers' not the most scary of adversaries.. You don't even read or comprehend well, do you? We pay our own people to go act as privateers. We've killed over 1200 exhumers to date since the beginning of the ice interdiction / privateering effort. http://killboard.goonfleet.com/shipgroup/Exhumer |
Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
259
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:06:00 -
[140] - Quote
Karadion wrote:1) Ohh wahhh, you're selectively cherry picking where you want them to post. They do their job, you just want them to bend over backwards and give you what they want. Until they're told to post on CCP's website, this is a CCP oversight. They do blog about their efforts consistently. 2) Yes they do. That's why it's a CSM team and they raise issues that are most important to them and the people that their people voted for them on their platform 3) It was streamlined into the freaking account when you log on. "Do you want to vote in the CSM? Click here" in a propaganda advertisement similar to any article they deem posting. Because Empire pubbies dismisses it, it's not CCP's fault or is it the CSM's team for ignoring the election. 5) Again NDA will always apply and that's the unfortunate process of any development in commercial products. If you want CCP to change their way, become a minority or majority controller of the company.
Never stop posting [img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |
|
Don Solette
ZiiP Dominion
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:07:00 -
[141] - Quote
As a new player I don't like to give my feedback, as it is constantly shot down by vets who apparently like the game the way it is. Original poster is dead on the money here. As much as I like this game, there are things I think that could and should be changed, in particular griefing activities in high-sec, and the ineptitude of concord. However, I can't say these without being called names by all the so called vets out there, likely the ones doing these kinds of activities.
Oh and if I don't like it? HTFU right?. See where the disconnect is? There's no middle ground of discussion, there's no discussion of pros and cons and why or why not this or that should work.. it immediately degenerates into name calling.
As a new player, I don't feel my voice is heard at all, actually I don't think the voice of anyone trying to improve hi-sec in general is heard at all. The mentality in regards to hi-sec is 'if you don't like it, leave'. But I want to like Eve, I'd like to play this game for years to come.
I'm pretty torn currently when it comes to this game as to whether or not it's worth it to me to keep playing. There are so many players out there to ruin your experience and at the end of the day, did I have fun today or didn't I? Will I be back tomorrow? I have 2 subs which isn't much I know, but surely my 2 subs are just as important as the next guy's?
Keep hearing lip service that Eve is our game, beginning to understand that's just talk. I can tell you what I do know about this game. Anyone can do anything they want to you in high-sec and if you don't have a big alliance, or a bigger ship, you have to just suck it up and apparently rename that bad experience to 'fun' just because people say that's the way it should be. |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:07:00 -
[142] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed. I want representatives who recognize my play style and the playing style of people like me. The current CSM, and most of the CSM's before that, are not giving me that "feeling". They are elected representatives that should be representing all of EVE online, from mining in empire to null sec. Their primary concern should be game balancing in every aspect of the game... If they can't do that then there is no point in having them. At the very least we could use an Empire CSM, Low Sec CSM and Null Sec CSM (or something). What we have now can only steer CCP in the wrong direction, and I believe has. Purposefully or not, It doesn't really matter, because a null sec only CSM cannot fulfill the above requirements. These are important requirements. No ones "idea" of how the game should be played should take precedence over anyone else's. CSM's must be fair, neutral and courteous in order to fulfill their intended roll. Else they are useless to everyone. They don't give you that warm feeling inside because they're not fighting to buff your mission bots / isk return. You got Trebor and that other person what's his name? Whatever. The current CSM got voted because they presented their platforms they believe in and also gained the favor of their own alliances because they share similar feelings.
PS: Use enter's less. Makes you look like you are skilled in grammar. |
Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:07:00 -
[143] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Privateers....lol thats a funny one..
What was inaccurate about it? We literally pay our own people to go hunt miners. How does that not fit the definition of privateering? Do I have to fit a specific definition that only you have? What i meant was - 'lol privateers' not the most scary of adversaries.. You don't even read or comprehend well, do you? We pay our own people to go act as privateers. We've killed over 1200 exhumers to date since the beginning of the ice interdiction / privateering effort. http://killboard.goonfleet.com/shipgroup/Exhumer
Please refrain from personal attacks thank you..
I apologise you said Privateers.. thats all, not your own privs.
Large alliance coming into highsec, ruining all the new players experience.. awesome.. no wonder new players dont stay playing the game.. and you say your good for eve?
|
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:08:00 -
[144] - Quote
Headerman wrote:Never stop posting I am well motivated. |
Rakshasa Taisab
Sane Industries Inc.
373
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:09:00 -
[145] - Quote
White Tree wrote:Gilentajsa wrote: What was that you said?
I couldn't hear you through the **** in your mouth.
I too get upset when my worldview is wrong and I am proved repeatedly to be a petulant infant. I see you did not make any attempt at refuting the claim that you are pleasuring mitten's reproductive organ with your mouth, and thus we can only conclude it is true.
That leaves only two questions; is it for love or favors, and does he clean himself daily?
BTW, I do like the OP, and wish him luck in the future for what ever ice mining venture he partakes in. 84,000 AUR ($420) spent on NeX store for Troll and Profit. |
Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
85
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:09:00 -
[146] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed. I want representatives who recognize my play style and the playing style of people like me. The current CSM, and most of the CSM's before that, are not giving me that "feeling". They are elected representatives that should be representing all of EVE online, from mining in empire to null sec. Their primary concern should be game balancing in every aspect of the game... If they can't do that then there is no point in having them. At the very least we could use an Empire CSM, Low Sec CSM and Null Sec CSM (or something). What we have now can only steer CCP in the wrong direction, and I believe has. Purposefully or not, It doesn't really matter, because a null sec only CSM cannot fulfill the above requirements. These are important requirements. No ones "idea" of how the game should be played should take precedence over anyone else's. CSM's must be fair, neutral and courteous in order to fulfill their intended roll. Else they are useless to everyone. They don't give you that warm feeling inside because they're not fighting to buff your mission bots / isk return. You got Trebor and that other person what's his name? Whatever. The current CSM got voted because they presented their platforms they believe in and also gained the favor of their own alliances because they share similar feelings. PS: Use enter's less. Makes you look like you are skilled in grammar.
You obviously do not know what my play style is. & are not taking the time to consider it, or how it may be just as valid as yours.
Even more then that the post made by Don Solette above is relevant to CCP's interests, and should thus be represented by the CSM's as well, without bias. |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:09:00 -
[147] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Privateers....lol thats a funny one..
What was inaccurate about it? We literally pay our own people to go hunt miners. How does that not fit the definition of privateering? Do I have to fit a specific definition that only you have? What i meant was - 'lol privateers' not the most scary of adversaries.. You don't even read or comprehend well, do you? We pay our own people to go act as privateers. We've killed over 1200 exhumers to date since the beginning of the ice interdiction / privateering effort. http://killboard.goonfleet.com/shipgroup/Exhumer Please refrain from personal attacks thank you.. I apologise you said Privateers.. thats all, not your own privs. Large alliance coming into highsec, ruining all the new players experience.. awesome.. no wonder new players dont stay playing the game.. and you say your good for eve? Refrain from personal attack? It's not my own fault that you couldn't comprehend the simple fact that we can act as privateers being paid for by own alliance. Comprehension goes a long way. Are you hitting the flag button everytime someone makes a post that disagrees with your absurd idea?
Large alliances coming into highsec, ruining the new player's experiences? Sounds like Eve Online! |
Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
259
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:10:00 -
[148] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Headerman wrote:Never stop posting I am well motivated.
It's just too bad ur pretty **** at it. Who sponsored you into the gewnies? I would like to chastise them. [img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |
Red Templar
Free Space Tech
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:11:00 -
[149] - Quote
When CSM was weak, fractured and couldnt do ****, that was ok. Because CSM was useless tool, that didnt actualy do good for anyone, but it actualy didnt do any bad stuff for anyone either. So no one cared about them. Seriously, let them play some councel or whatever.
When CSM actually acquired some fracture of power, was able to influence CCP, represent their voters, do some good for game itself. Thats is exactly the right time to whine and cry. Because now they actualy have power. And its NOT yours to control. Oh poor babies :(
The amount of unhappy "citizens" show me exactly how much work CSM does and how efficient they are. If everyone were happy, that means they do nada.
For Love. For Peace. For Honor.
For None of the Above.
For Pony! |
Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:11:00 -
[150] - Quote
Rakshasa Taisab wrote:White Tree wrote:Gilentajsa wrote: What was that you said?
I couldn't hear you through the **** in your mouth.
I too get upset when my worldview is wrong and I am proved repeatedly to be a petulant infant. I see you did not make any attempt at refuting the claim that you are pleasuring mitten's reproductive organ with your mouth, and thus we can only conclude it is true. That leaves only two questions; is it for love or favors, and does he clean himself daily? BTW, I do like the OP, and wish him luck in the future for what ever ice mining venture he partakes in.
I moved on to ratting now... more danger... i can fight back with my t2 drones now, but i do fit 1 mining laser on my cane, as i miss the blue beam and the feeling of hard rock entering my cargo hold
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |