Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 11:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
Quote: Hilmar P+¬tursson: The CSM has been under constant evolution based on what's going on in the current environment, what's going on with CCP and Eve, who's on the Council and all that. The CSM has helped greatly through the years in getting feedback for aspects of the game.
But some of my concerns right now relate to whether the CSM is maybe focused on a particular aspect of the game and I'm starting to get feedback from players that they worry the CSM is too pre-occupied by a certain playstyle. That might mean we may need to change the structure, but definitely the CSM has worked as a feedback tool greatly throughout the years. We will have them over at the end of the year, after everything that's gone on, and we will have a chance to talk about that. We'll just see where we are and take it from there.
Too true, the CSM is all wrong at the moment. The problem is letting any goons in there, especially letting Mittani in as chair, and vile rat and other nullsec powermad idiots, big big mistake. Hilmar, if your removing some of your own people. Then remove the CSM, its not working and hasnt really worked. Now you just got CSM members trying to f**k over other CSM members, corruption and everything else. Just get rid of it, it sort of served its purpose.
Yes listen to the WHOLE community, but you also got to keep true to yourselves and make the decisions too. You cant keep pandering to the bitter vets, eve needs to move on. You have to start listening also ( and im a vet btw) to how new players find the game. These people are eves future, and i think I huge focus should be on that. Its these people you want to get excited about the game, the next generation so to speak. These are the people you want to shout about eve to other new players, not bitter vets, who only say, this is eve dont like it get lost attitude. Thats ALL WRONG. New players will not come to a game full of idiots. They just wont. So listen to the vets, but listen to new players too. The problem with CSM its full of idiot vets, some out to ruin the game (so why are they in there). Big mistake, remove the CSM now, before these idiots ruin the game entirely.
You know what the issues are now, you know what your mistakes are and you know where you want to be, so basically just get on with it! |

Signal11th
145
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 11:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Bascially thats just a warning shot saying "certain 0.0 dwellers who will remain nameless, it's time to shut the **** up" but I would like the CSM to continue because apart from some disruptive elements to it it actually does a good job.
I think he has just figured out that some people are getting a little to big for their boots and it's a polite way of telling them to calm down a bit. God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |

Scarlett Anstian
DPB Corporation
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 11:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
If the CSM was full of new players (like me), we wouldn't know where to start when it comes to addressing issues in game. The veterans know what promises have been made before and how changes to the game mechanics will influence the player base more than others.
Like you said though the CSM is just full of old players looking to secure their own interests in the game. I am sure however that CCP realizes this and so takes what they say with a pinch of salt. I have not been around long but the CSM does voice some of my major concerns so like all real political situations I will vote for them and take the good with the bad. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 11:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked. |

Signal11th
145
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 11:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked.
Nothing like reinforcing a stereotype mate! God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |

Scarlett Anstian
DPB Corporation
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 11:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Karadion wrote: At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked.
You think they had any real influence on the financial side of CCP? lol Good one  |

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
73
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 11:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
The "whole community" is limited to 10-15% of the population as that is the amount of people who care enough about Eve to vote in the CSM elections. The remaining 85-90% of people have NO SAY in the matter AT ALL! They chose not to participate and thus forfeit their rights to ***** and moan over anything not directly consumer related (which is covered by RL laws).
What CCP needs to do is tweak the election process for future CSM's to ensure that the members have a more even spread and represent all walks of life (in Eve) .. plus add a blank vote option as that is sorely needed. |

Astenion
Spiritus Draconis
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 11:58:00 -
[8] - Quote
The CSM was developed to be a sort of "class president" of Eve. As of right now, they think they're the goddamned Principal of the school. It is most definitely a biased and one-sided entity, even if they have good ideas. However, their ideas are so clearly self-serving and do not in any sense represent the player base as a whole that they are essentially treating their positions just as they treat their characters: as pirates.
Hilmar needs to knock them down a peg or ten. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 11:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
Signal11th wrote:Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked. Nothing like reinforcing a stereotype mate! Believe what you want. You can listen to those little voices in your head. |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 11:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
Scarlett Anstian wrote:If the CSM was full of new players (like me), we wouldn't know where to start when it comes to addressing issues in game. The veterans know what promises have been made before and how changes to the game mechanics will influence the player base more than others.
Like you said though the CSM is just full of old players looking to secure their own interests in the game. I am sure however that CCP realizes this and so takes what they say with a pinch of salt. I have not been around long but the CSM does voice some of my major concerns so like all real political situations I will vote for them and take the good with the bad.
Never said it should be full of new players m8, I said that new players need to have a voice. I been playing the gaem for 8 years by the way, so Im not talking from a new player point of view. But the problem is new players are not staying? Why? We need to understand that, we need to ensure that we keep that rentention. So we need to understand what is missing and how eve can be improved, to ensure new players not only stay but promote the game. I got in the game because my work mates, said hey look at this, its awesome. So i did and we all played together, and we had lots of convos at work about it. How exciting it was that we bought a cruiser today! and damn i can use t2 mods now etc etc. It was exciting and interesting.. But when new players come on, and all they see is load of idiot vets telling them to 'go back to wow', get lost, yada yada you think they want to stay? Of course not.. To be honest you probably wanted to weed out 30% of the vets, becuase they are not good for the game, and they breed hatred etc. Eve to move on needs to remove this, remove stuff like scamming as well or better ways to avoid it.
|

Victor Dathar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 11:59:00 -
[11] - Quote
Posting in a "Down with Mittens" thread. |

Darius III
Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.
261
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 11:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
Signal11th wrote:Bascially thats just a warning shot saying "certain 0.0 dwellers who will remain nameless, it's time to shut the **** up" but I would like the CSM to continue because apart from some disruptive elements to it it actually does a good job.
I think he has just figured out that some people are getting a little to big for their boots and it's a polite way of telling them to calm down a bit.
This
If Women aren't supposed to do the cooking, why are their bodies full of milk and eggs? |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 11:59:00 -
[13] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Signal11th wrote:Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked. Nothing like reinforcing a stereotype mate! Believe what you want. You can listen to those little voices in your head.
Goons are killing the game, everything they stand for is wrong for eve.
|

Mr LaForge
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
92
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
To the OP. STOP WHINING ABOUT NOTHING.
This CSM got CCP back on the right track in regards to EVE. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:00:00 -
[15] - Quote
Scarlett Anstian wrote:Karadion wrote: At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked.
You think they had any real influence on the financial side of CCP? lol Good one  Where did I talk about the financial side of their business? The World of Darkness MMO is a terrible concept and they missed Twilight by several years. What was their target audience especially? Doesn't exist. Dust 514, great concept, poor implementation. At least they're on the back burner and development is going full throttle into FiS concepts instead of WiS concept which you Second Life fans are screaming for. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:00:00 -
[16] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Signal11th wrote:Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked. Nothing like reinforcing a stereotype mate! Believe what you want. You can listen to those little voices in your head. Goons are killing the game, everything they stand for is wrong for eve. Good. If you have it your way, we might as well call it, "Dumb Pubbies In Space". |

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
82
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:01:00 -
[17] - Quote
Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked.
No you didn't. You had nothing to do with that.
The player base did when the protested and unsubed. So you can STFU.
The CSM is currently garbage, and for CCP to begin to recognize that fills me with tickles and giggles.
Quote: I'm starting to get feedback from players that they worry the CSM is too pre-occupied by a certain playstyle
^^^ This... & even more... because he dare not even address the CSM corruption and hypocrisy. |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum KUGUTSUMEN.
201
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:01:00 -
[18] - Quote
I don't think thats what he meant. What really should be done is break the CSM delegation into categories based off of certain areas/playstyles. This would allow a spread of delegates which would pertain to most aspects in the game.
There is nothing wrong with the current CSM, even if YOU personally don't like them or goons. They have done what they set out to do and that is to bring focus back to FiS and nullsec. You can't expect a 0,0 ran CSM to cater to all the issues concerning highsec or lowsec, its just not where their expertise is. |

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
170
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:01:00 -
[19] - Quote
Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked.
1: They didn't
2: The Mittani was anything but critical in his view towards incarna and MT
3: Vile Rat didn't even care about buying golden scorpions with Aurum
4: CSM was late jumping on the bandwagon and is now some are trying to claim victory while all they did was ride along. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:02:00 -
[20] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked. No you didn't. You had nothing to do with that. The player base did when the protested and unsubed. So you can STFU. The CSM is currently garbage, and for CCP to begin to recognize that fills me with tickles and giggles. And who was the driver behind that? Oh god I can't wait to hear your pubbie answer. |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:02:00 -
[21] - Quote
Hirana Yoshida wrote:What CCP needs to do is tweak the election process for future CSM's to ensure that the members have a more even spread and represent all walks of life (in Eve) ..
Oh good, affirmative action  |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:03:00 -
[22] - Quote
Ciar Meara wrote:Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked. 1: They didn't 2: The Mittani was anything but critical in his view towards incarna and MT 3: Vile Rat didn't even care about buying golden scorpions with Aurum 4: CSM was late jumping on the bandwagon and is now some are trying to claim victory while all they did was ride along. 1) Yes they were 2) Wrong 3) Yes he did 4) Wrong again.
All typical empire pubbie answers. |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:03:00 -
[23] - Quote
Hirana Yoshida wrote:The "whole community" is limited to 10-15% of the population as that is the amount of people who care enough about Eve to vote in the CSM elections. The remaining 85-90% of people have NO SAY in the matter AT ALL! They chose not to participate and thus forfeit their rights to ***** and moan over anything not directly consumer related (which is covered by RL laws).
What CCP needs to do is tweak the election process for future CSM's to ensure that the members have a more even spread and represent all walks of life (in Eve) .. plus add a blank vote option as that is sorely needed.
Thats a problem then isnt it.... They dont get involved because, its not really interesting for them to. They dont really get enough interaction. Also when big alliances vote for themselves, its a little pointless isnt it....seriously... Players in alliance, then out of alliance alts etc..
Just I think CCP (if they kept CSM) should vote internally who should be on the CSM - like an interview process.
|

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
82
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:04:00 -
[24] - Quote
Mr LaForge wrote:To the OP. STOP WHINING ABOUT NOTHING.
This CSM got CCP back on the right track in regards to EVE.
No they didn't. CCP as a company went into a panic when they saw their revenue stream drop into the toilet. The CSM did precisely jack.
The player base sent the message. |

Astenion
Spiritus Draconis
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:04:00 -
[25] - Quote
Well, the affirmative action concept is a good one as long as it doesn't get taken advantage of.
Read that last part again. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:04:00 -
[26] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Hirana Yoshida wrote:The "whole community" is limited to 10-15% of the population as that is the amount of people who care enough about Eve to vote in the CSM elections. The remaining 85-90% of people have NO SAY in the matter AT ALL! They chose not to participate and thus forfeit their rights to ***** and moan over anything not directly consumer related (which is covered by RL laws).
What CCP needs to do is tweak the election process for future CSM's to ensure that the members have a more even spread and represent all walks of life (in Eve) .. plus add a blank vote option as that is sorely needed. Thats a problem then isnt it.... They dont get involved because, its not really interesting for them to. They dont really get enough interaction. Also when big alliances vote for themselves, its a little pointless isnt it....seriously... Players in alliance, then out of alliance alts etc.. Just I think CCP (if they kept CSM) should vote internally who should be on the CSM - like an interview process. Hello Random Douche #12304: Question #1: Do you like to fellate our ego? |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:04:00 -
[27] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Ciar Meara wrote:Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked. 1: They didn't 2: The Mittani was anything but critical in his view towards incarna and MT 3: Vile Rat didn't even care about buying golden scorpions with Aurum 4: CSM was late jumping on the bandwagon and is now some are trying to claim victory while all they did was ride along. 1) Yes they were 2) Wrong 3) Yes he did 4) Wrong again. All typical empire pubbie answers.
Look stop sticking up for your leaders, people are now a little f**ked off with them, seems even CCP are... You need to now shut up, because quite frankly no one cares anymore. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:05:00 -
[28] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Mr LaForge wrote:To the OP. STOP WHINING ABOUT NOTHING.
This CSM got CCP back on the right track in regards to EVE. No they didn't. CCP as a company went into a panic when they saw their revenue stream drop into the toilet. The CSM did precisely jack. The player base sent the message. And you've yet to tell us what the cause of this was.
Hint: It contains the word 'minutes'. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:05:00 -
[29] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Ciar Meara wrote:Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked. 1: They didn't 2: The Mittani was anything but critical in his view towards incarna and MT 3: Vile Rat didn't even care about buying golden scorpions with Aurum 4: CSM was late jumping on the bandwagon and is now some are trying to claim victory while all they did was ride along. 1) Yes they were 2) Wrong 3) Yes he did 4) Wrong again. All typical empire pubbie answers. Look stop sticking up for your leaders, people are now a little f**ked off with them, seems even CCP are... You need to now shut up, because quite frankly no one cares anymore. No. |

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
82
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:06:00 -
[30] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked. No you didn't. You had nothing to do with that. The player base did when the protested and unsubed. So you can STFU. The CSM is currently garbage, and for CCP to begin to recognize that fills me with tickles and giggles. And who was the driver behind that? Oh god I can't wait to hear your pubbie answer.
The driver behind what? CSM corruption?
CCP's flawed voting system that allows multiple account holders to Vote for members of their own large alliances.
|

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
84
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:07:00 -
[31] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Mr LaForge wrote:To the OP. STOP WHINING ABOUT NOTHING.
This CSM got CCP back on the right track in regards to EVE. No they didn't. CCP as a company went into a panic when they saw their revenue stream drop into the toilet. The CSM did precisely jack. The player base sent the message. And you've yet to tell us what the cause of this was. Hint: It contains the word 'minutes'.
No. You're completely full of ****. |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:07:00 -
[32] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Ciar Meara wrote:Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked. 1: They didn't 2: The Mittani was anything but critical in his view towards incarna and MT 3: Vile Rat didn't even care about buying golden scorpions with Aurum 4: CSM was late jumping on the bandwagon and is now some are trying to claim victory while all they did was ride along. 1) Yes they were 2) Wrong 3) Yes he did 4) Wrong again. All typical empire pubbie answers. Look stop sticking up for your leaders, people are now a little f**ked off with them, seems even CCP are... You need to now shut up, because quite frankly no one cares anymore. No.
Keep looking stupid then....up to you... See that bit i posted about idiot vets....... Mittani alt perhaps? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
279
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:07:00 -
[33] - Quote
you're all dumb |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum KUGUTSUMEN.
201
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:07:00 -
[34] - Quote
This CSM has done more them most other CSMs have done in the past years. It may not have been what you wanted but thats life. Still shows that CCP has been taking the CSM a bit more seriously.
|

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:08:00 -
[35] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Karadion wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked. No you didn't. You had nothing to do with that. The player base did when the protested and unsubed. So you can STFU. The CSM is currently garbage, and for CCP to begin to recognize that fills me with tickles and giggles. And who was the driver behind that? Oh god I can't wait to hear your pubbie answer. The driver behind what? CSM corruption? CCP's flawed voting system that allows multiple account holders to Vote for members of their own large alliances. You know what we call answers like this people? A strawman attack. What is a strawman attack? It's a simple tactic to distract you from the primary focus. |

Astenion
Spiritus Draconis
20
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:08:00 -
[36] - Quote
I can see why people are upset at the CSM due to all the hubbub but what did you think was going to happen by electing Goons to be in charge of ANYTHING? Their mantra is complete and total anarchy and troublemaking. That's like electing Sid Vicious to Prime Minister and then getting pissed off when everything goes to ****.
I mean, you can fault them for it but then again you really can't. The American people elected GW Bush for a second term; did they think things were going to actually get better? They've only got themselves to blame. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:08:00 -
[37] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Keep looking stupid then....up to you... See that bit i posted about idiot vets.......  Mittani alt perhaps? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA No. |

Signal11th
147
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:09:00 -
[38] - Quote
I can see this thread is going to keep giving and giving and giving. God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:09:00 -
[39] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:This CSM has done more them most other CSMs have done in the past years. It may not have been what you wanted but thats life. Still shows that CCP has been taking the CSM a bit more seriously.
kugu? get out you have another (full of idiot vets forums) to tend to.....
keep them all in there please...
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
279
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:09:00 -
[40] - Quote
like seriously, you all have the attention span of gnats. this whole thing will blow over and you'll find something else to waste energy and time frothing at the mouth over |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:10:00 -
[41] - Quote
Astenion wrote:I can see why people are upset at the CSM due to all the hubbub but what did you think was going to happen by electing Goons to be in charge of ANYTHING? Their mantra is complete and total anarchy and troublemaking. That's like electing Sid Vicious to Prime Minister and then getting pissed off when everything goes to ****.
I mean, you can fault them for it but then again you really can't. The American people elected GW Bush for a second term; did they think things were going to actually get better? They've only got themselves to blame.
Well said ^^
|

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
84
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:10:00 -
[42] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Kardion Farts in public.....You know what we call answers like this people? A strawman attack. What is a strawman attack? It's a simple tactic to distract you from the primary focus.
You're right... That is exactly what you are doing right now. |

Scarlett Anstian
DPB Corporation
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:10:00 -
[43] - Quote
Karadion you are just a bleating sheep of Goonswarm, please remove yourself from this thread. The CSM have no power when it comes to financial decisions at CCP. Which the dropping of WoD and refocusing on EVE was.
The CSM has done good things in helping them readdress the current problems in the game, but you are fooling yourselves if you believe they are behind CCP cutting staff etc. That all points towards cash flow problems. |

knobber Jobbler
Holding Inc.
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:12:00 -
[44] - Quote
Looking at it objectively, the current csm is doing a good job. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:12:00 -
[45] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:This CSM has done more them most other CSMs have done in the past years. It may not have been what you wanted but thats life. Still shows that CCP has been taking the CSM a bit more seriously.
kugu? get out you have another (full of idiot vets forums) to tend to..... keep them all in there please... K.com has more useful information, maybe you should keep an open mind. But hey "Hear nothing, see nothing, say nothing" always works for you Empire pubbies. As long you fellate CCP's egos, they would go back to the way things were, keep working on WiS to bring you Second Life Redux. "Can I get chapless ass pants CCP?" |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
279
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:12:00 -
[46] - Quote
I mean it's hilarious, you all say "hurr the CSM has no influence" while posting ragethreads about GOONS ON THE CSM |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:12:00 -
[47] - Quote
Scarlett Anstian wrote:Karadion you are just a bleating sheep of Goonswarm, please remove yourself from this thread. The CSM have no power when it comes to financial decisions at CCP. Which the dropping of WoD and refocusing on EVE was.
The CSM has done good things in helping them readdress the current problems in the game, but you are fooling yourselves if you believe they are behind CCP cutting staff etc. That all points towards cash flow problems. No. |

Messoroz
AQUILA INC
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:12:00 -
[48] - Quote
Clearly Hilmar wants highsec pubbies on the team instead to whine about how incursions can't be run solo. |

non judgement
Without Fear Flying Burning Ships Alliance
98
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:12:00 -
[49] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Scarlett Anstian wrote:Karadion wrote: At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked.
You think they had any real influence on the financial side of CCP? lol Good one  Where did I talk about the financial side of their business? The World of Darkness MMO is a terrible concept and they missed Twilight by several years. What was their target audience especially? Doesn't exist. Dust 514, great concept, poor implementation. At least they're on the back burner and development is going full throttle into FiS concepts instead of WiS concept which you Second Life fans are screaming for. Dust isn't on the back burner. |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum KUGUTSUMEN.
201
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:13:00 -
[50] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:This CSM has done more them most other CSMs have done in the past years. It may not have been what you wanted but thats life. Still shows that CCP has been taking the CSM a bit more seriously.
kugu? get out you have another (full of idiot vets forums) to tend to..... keep them all in there please...
Nah you seem mad and butthurt over goons. So I think I'll stay.
|

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:13:00 -
[51] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Karadion wrote:Kardion Farts in public.....You know what we call answers like this people? A strawman attack. What is a strawman attack? It's a simple tactic to distract you from the primary focus. You're right... That is exactly what you are doing right now. Yes because editing quotes shows how brilliant and funny of a guy you are. Again another strawman attack. Want to go for 3? |

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
84
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:14:00 -
[52] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Scarlett Anstian wrote:Karadion you are just a bleating sheep of Goonswarm, please remove yourself from this thread. The CSM have no power when it comes to financial decisions at CCP. Which the dropping of WoD and refocusing on EVE was.
The CSM has done good things in helping them readdress the current problems in the game, but you are fooling yourselves if you believe they are behind CCP cutting staff etc. That all points towards cash flow problems. Yes..
|

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:15:00 -
[53] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:This CSM has done more them most other CSMs have done in the past years. It may not have been what you wanted but thats life. Still shows that CCP has been taking the CSM a bit more seriously.
kugu? get out you have another (full of idiot vets forums) to tend to..... keep them all in there please... K.com has more useful information, maybe you should keep an open mind. But hey "Hear nothing, see nothing, say nothing" always works for you Empire pubbies. As long you fellate CCP's egos, they would go back to the way things were, keep working on WiS to bring you Second Life Redux. "Can I get chapless ass pants CCP?"
No it doesnt. It full of bitter vets...who are lets say it bitter... kugu is the place where all those idiots i spoke about hang out. Who think they are epeen, its the sespit of eve players..
Thats fine keep them there...
|

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:15:00 -
[54] - Quote
non judgement wrote:Karadion wrote:Scarlett Anstian wrote:Karadion wrote: At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked.
You think they had any real influence on the financial side of CCP? lol Good one  Where did I talk about the financial side of their business? The World of Darkness MMO is a terrible concept and they missed Twilight by several years. What was their target audience especially? Doesn't exist. Dust 514, great concept, poor implementation. At least they're on the back burner and development is going full throttle into FiS concepts instead of WiS concept which you Second Life fans are screaming for. Dust isn't on the back burner. Really? Where have you been? Hiding under some rock? Dust development has been scaled back alot and a huge majority of the CCP development team is back on Eve Online. They're cranking out more content than they normally have done before the next expansion. But hey pubbie, you can believe whatever you want.
Even if Dust 514 comes to reality, I would just teamkill you all pubbies with my dreadnought to show you how terrible of a concept it is. |

Signal11th
147
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:15:00 -
[55] - Quote
:-) God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:16:00 -
[56] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:This CSM has done more them most other CSMs have done in the past years. It may not have been what you wanted but thats life. Still shows that CCP has been taking the CSM a bit more seriously.
kugu? get out you have another (full of idiot vets forums) to tend to..... keep them all in there please... K.com has more useful information, maybe you should keep an open mind. But hey "Hear nothing, see nothing, say nothing" always works for you Empire pubbies. As long you fellate CCP's egos, they would go back to the way things were, keep working on WiS to bring you Second Life Redux. "Can I get chapless ass pants CCP?" No it doesnt. It full of bitter vets...who are lets say it bitter... kugu is the place where all those idiots i spoke about hang out. Who think they are epeen, its the sespit of eve players.. Thats fine keep them there... And we can be here too. That's the great thing about forums. People can come and go. We don't serve at your pleasure. We serve to annoy you instead. |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:17:00 -
[57] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:This CSM has done more them most other CSMs have done in the past years. It may not have been what you wanted but thats life. Still shows that CCP has been taking the CSM a bit more seriously.
kugu? get out you have another (full of idiot vets forums) to tend to..... keep them all in there please... K.com has more useful information, maybe you should keep an open mind. But hey "Hear nothing, see nothing, say nothing" always works for you Empire pubbies. As long you fellate CCP's egos, they would go back to the way things were, keep working on WiS to bring you Second Life Redux. "Can I get chapless ass pants CCP?" No it doesnt. It full of bitter vets...who are lets say it bitter... kugu is the place where all those idiots i spoke about hang out. Who think they are epeen, its the sespit of eve players.. Thats fine keep them there... And we can be here too. That's the great thing about forums. People can come and go. We don't serve at your pleasure. We serve to annoy you instead.
Im glad YOU said that..... anyway with respect now, you think we can stay ON TOPIC, rather than derailing it. We wouldnt want to get banned for trolling now would we.. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:17:00 -
[58] - Quote
Signal11th wrote:Yep I'll bite, Your a tool? Is that a good enough strawman for you? I'm proud of being a tool to show pubbies that they are horribly ill prepared they are for accepting the reality of this game.
Here you guys go. http://www.secondlife.com/ Go put on your furry suits and stay there. |

Jada Maroo
Mysterium Astrometrics BRABODEN
309
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:18:00 -
[59] - Quote
Ansolutely agree with Hilmar on this one. The current CSM has done some good things, but let's not kid ourselves. Rarely are Goons good for the overall playing experience of an MMO. Mittani is looking out for himself and his own lulz, not anyone else's. And before he pipes in and says "But I supported the super cap nerf and I have super caps!" -- you also have more players than your potential targets, so weakening their supers really just makes them easier for you to take down. It's not selfless, it's blatantly self serving. |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum KUGUTSUMEN.
201
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:18:00 -
[60] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Really? Where have you been? Hiding under some rock? Dust development has been scaled back alot and a huge majority of the CCP development team is back on Eve Online. They're cranking out more content than they normally have done before the next expansion. But hey pubbie, you can believe whatever you want.
Even if Dust 514 comes to reality, I would just teamkill you all pubbies with my dreadnought to show you how terrible of a concept it is.
I don't think this is true. Dust is too far into development to scale back on. Chances are development was only shifted from the Atlanta team to Eve, where the Dust crew stayed the same.
|

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:19:00 -
[61] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Im glad YOU said that..... anyway with respect now, you think we can stay ON TOPIC, rather than derailing it. We wouldnt want to get banned for trolling now would we.. Trolling how? I'm disputing your questions and tactics to try to resort to cheap tactics in getting the CSM team dismissed for none other than that they don't represent your best interest, Second Life Redux. |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:20:00 -
[62] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Im glad YOU said that..... anyway with respect now, you think we can stay ON TOPIC, rather than derailing it. We wouldnt want to get banned for trolling now would we.. Trolling how? I'm disputing your questions and tactics to try to resort to cheap tactics in getting the CSM team dismissed for none other than that they don't represent your best interest, Second Life Redux.
Sorry but your not, i asked you to stay on topic, so i have had to report you..sorry.. |

non judgement
Without Fear Flying Burning Ships Alliance
99
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:20:00 -
[63] - Quote
Karadion wrote:non judgement wrote: Dust isn't on the back burner.
Really? Where have you been? Hiding under some rock? Dust development has been scaled back alot and a huge majority of the CCP development team is back on Eve Online. They're cranking out more content than they normally have done before the next expansion. But hey pubbie, you can believe whatever you want. Even if Dust 514 comes to reality, I would just teamkill you all pubbies with my dreadnought to show you how terrible of a concept it is. interview
Quote:Eurogamer: What impact do these changes have on World of Darkness? Is there still a roadmap for its development and eventual release?
Hilmar P+¬tursson: World of Darkness is now a smaller team. As we now really need to focus on Eve and Dust, we have a smaller team than before and it's less coupled into our development process. We were running a very integrated plan which led to a lot of energy being spent on coordination, which drew energy out of actual proper value being generated. We're hoping that by focusing the company more, we have a better chance to make progress - especially on Dust and Eve.
Did you bother reading his interview? |

Signal11th
148
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:21:00 -
[64] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Signal11th wrote:Yep I'll bite, Your a tool? Is that a good enough strawman for you? I'm proud of being a tool to show pubbies that they are horribly ill prepared they are for accepting the reality of this game. Here you guys go. http://www.secondlife.com/ Go put on your furry suits and stay there.
I'm actually going to apologize for calling you a tool, I was out of order.
In answer to your second question it's your (GSF) reality of the game, just because you think it's more acceptable than the "Pubbies" relaity of the game doens't make it right or needed. God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
84
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:21:00 -
[65] - Quote
Bai bai null sec only run CSM seats...
Cry moar... It wont save your space... I mean... Seat. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:21:00 -
[66] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:Karadion wrote:Really? Where have you been? Hiding under some rock? Dust development has been scaled back alot and a huge majority of the CCP development team is back on Eve Online. They're cranking out more content than they normally have done before the next expansion. But hey pubbie, you can believe whatever you want.
Even if Dust 514 comes to reality, I would just teamkill you all pubbies with my dreadnought to show you how terrible of a concept it is. I don't think this is true. Dust is too far into development to scale back on. Chances are development was only shifted from the Atlanta team to Eve, where the Dust crew stayed the same. Hilmar issues his apology, announces that full scale development focus on Eve Online, scales back Dust 514, puts WoD on the backburner (taken back to the shed and shot), fires some Atlanta people, etc.
Quote:As we reexamine our outward relations, we are also taking time to reevaluate our internal goals. In doing so, we have come to the conclusion that we are attempting too many things for a company our size. Developing EVE expansions, DUST 514 and World of Darkness has stretched our resources too thin. That isn't my quote, that's CCP's. |

Mekhana
Spiritus Draconis
205
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:22:00 -
[67] - Quote
Astenion wrote:The CSM was developed to be a sort of "class president" of Eve.
I always was class president and was a real douche, I even used to buy votes and tampered with the ballots in order to win. Would that make me a good CSM or politician? Joking aisde CCP you don't really need the CSM if you are going to be releasing more expansions like Winter.
Oh and buff my hybrids and Gallente hulls please. |

Phunnestyle
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:23:00 -
[68] - Quote
The current upcoming winter patch is a good example of bad influences by currupt CSMs More interested in self gain for there particular alliance rather than EVE community gain.
+1 for a purge |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum KUGUTSUMEN.
201
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:24:00 -
[69] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Im glad YOU said that..... anyway with respect now, you think we can stay ON TOPIC, rather than derailing it. We wouldnt want to get banned for trolling now would we.. Trolling how? I'm disputing your questions and tactics to try to resort to cheap tactics in getting the CSM team dismissed for none other than that they don't represent your best interest, Second Life Redux. Sorry but your not, i asked you to stay on topic, so i have had to report you..sorry..
Err. You do realize YOUR the one who disregarded what I said and just made a comment about my alliance, which then started the discussion about K.com. You derailed your own thread. Go report yourself.
|

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:24:00 -
[70] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Bai bai null sec only run CSM seats...
Cry moar... It wont save your space... I mean... Seat. Okay please take our space away from us. Oh by the way where do you live? Oh you're a pubbie trainie experiencing this wonderful brilliant game. Maybe you should be more involved in learning this game and less involved on this forum. But I can't stop you because you want to RAGE RAGE RAGE AGAINST THE..... CSM? |

Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
105
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:24:00 -
[71] - Quote
Dang, this is better than any TV show. *fetches the popcorn* Please don't stop. The universe is an ancient desert, a vast wasteland with only occasional habitable planets as oases. We Fremen, comfortable with deserts, shall now venture into another. - STILGAR, From the Sietch to the Stars. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:25:00 -
[72] - Quote
Phunnestyle wrote:The current upcoming winter patch is a good example of bad influences by currupt CSMs More interested in self gain for there particular alliance rather than EVE community gain.
+1 for a purge Purge how? Is this synonymous for "Ban the goonies, they're killing my mining bots! :(" |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:26:00 -
[73] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Im glad YOU said that..... anyway with respect now, you think we can stay ON TOPIC, rather than derailing it. We wouldnt want to get banned for trolling now would we.. Trolling how? I'm disputing your questions and tactics to try to resort to cheap tactics in getting the CSM team dismissed for none other than that they don't represent your best interest, Second Life Redux. Sorry but your not, i asked you to stay on topic, so i have had to report you..sorry.. Err. You do realize YOUR the one who disregarded what I said and just made a comment about my alliance, which then started the discussion about K.com. You derailed your own thread. Go report yourself.
I think you just errrr 'revealed your alts'... |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:27:00 -
[74] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Im glad YOU said that..... anyway with respect now, you think we can stay ON TOPIC, rather than derailing it. We wouldnt want to get banned for trolling now would we.. Trolling how? I'm disputing your questions and tactics to try to resort to cheap tactics in getting the CSM team dismissed for none other than that they don't represent your best interest, Second Life Redux. Sorry but your not, i asked you to stay on topic, so i have had to report you..sorry.. Err. You do realize YOUR the one who disregarded what I said and just made a comment about my alliance, which then started the discussion about K.com. You derailed your own thread. Go report yourself. I think you just errrr 'revealed your alts'... Are you seriously that paranoid? First you accused me of being Mittani and are you accusing me of being that person? I must be omnipotent. |

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
84
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:29:00 -
[75] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Bai bai null sec only run CSM seats...
Cry moar... It wont save your space... I mean... Seat. Okay please take our space away from us. Oh by the way where do you live? Oh you're a pubbie trainie experiencing this wonderful brilliant game. Maybe you should be more involved in learning this game and less involved on this forum. But I can't stop you because you want to RAGE RAGE RAGE AGAINST THE..... CSM?
Are not goons supposed to be pro new guy? Are you not a recruitment officer?
Why are you shitting on "pubbie's" in ever other post?  They provide a great deal of money into CCP revenue stream above all else. So they need to be represented by the CSM don't you agree? |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:29:00 -
[76] - Quote
I think you just errrr 'revealed your alts'... Quote:Are you seriously that paranoid? First you accused me of being Mittani and are you accusing me of being that person? I must be omnipotent.
Dude you posted that remark with
Brooks Puuntai Nomadic Asylum **********.
Unless he thinks he is you... |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:29:00 -
[77] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Karadion wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Bai bai null sec only run CSM seats...
Cry moar... It wont save your space... I mean... Seat. Okay please take our space away from us. Oh by the way where do you live? Oh you're a pubbie trainie experiencing this wonderful brilliant game. Maybe you should be more involved in learning this game and less involved on this forum. But I can't stop you because you want to RAGE RAGE RAGE AGAINST THE..... CSM? Are not goons supposed to be pro new guy? Are you not a recruitment officer? Why are you shitting on "pubbie's" in ever other post?  If you are interested in Goonswarm Federation, please contact me and I will help you out. Thank you. |

Scarlett Anstian
DPB Corporation
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:30:00 -
[78] - Quote
Karadion wrote:I must be omnipotent. Or just have an alt? Whatever is easier 
btw I don't think that is you, but just another sheep mindlessly bleating for Goonswarm.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
280
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:30:00 -
[79] - Quote
Phunnestyle wrote:The current up & coming winter patch being what it is, a failure, is however a good example of bad influences by currupt CSMs More interested in self gain for there particular alliance rather than EVE community gain.
+1 for a purge
lol |

Phunnestyle
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:30:00 -
[80] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Phunnestyle wrote:The current upcoming winter patch is a good example of bad influences by currupt CSMs More interested in self gain for there particular alliance rather than EVE community gain.
+1 for a purge Purge how? Is this synonymous for "Ban the goonies, they're killing my mining bots! :("
LOL goons are aweful thats just a fact, dont belittle yourself by calling others bots, when every other goon is a bot.
|

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
615
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:31:00 -
[81] - Quote
Ciar Meara wrote:Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked. 1: They didn't 2: The Mittani was anything but critical in his view towards incarna and MT 3: Vile Rat didn't even care about buying golden scorpions with Aurum 4: CSM was late jumping on the bandwagon and is now some are trying to claim victory while all they did was ride along.
This is a true statement of events.
I was pretty disappointed for the CSM allowing NeX for "vanity" items to slip in the game at all.
The reality is that the Jita Riots and Unsub protest have probably saved Eve. In the end the CSM did help publicise that so +rep for that.
But they were very slow seeing the problem coming.
If this does all turn out well in the end then the whole Eve player base, the gaming press, the CSM and (the volcano gods of iceland) can all share the credit equally - just as long as we get our Eve Online with spaceships and player driven economy back.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:31:00 -
[82] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:I think you just errrr 'revealed your alts'... Quote:Are you seriously that paranoid? First you accused me of being Mittani and are you accusing me of being that person? I must be omnipotent. Dude you posted that remark with Brooks Puuntai Nomadic Asylum **********. Unless he thinks he is you...  Let me add more for you. These are my alts people. Brooks Puuntai Nomadic Asylum The Mittani aryth thecrate Lyris Nairn Vily Andski
The plot thickens! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
280
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:31:00 -
[83] - Quote
look at you
posting from alts |

James Duar
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:31:00 -
[84] - Quote
Jada Maroo wrote:Ansolutely agree with Hilmar on this one. The current CSM has done some good things, but let's not kid ourselves. Rarely are Goons good for the overall playing experience of an MMO. Mittani is looking out for himself and his own lulz, not anyone else's. And before he pipes in and says "But I supported the super cap nerf and I have super caps!" -- you also have more players than your potential targets, so weakening their supers really just makes them easier for you to take down. It's not selfless, it's blatantly self serving. Supers are bad and make the game bad, and this is a bad post and you should feel bad. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:32:00 -
[85] - Quote
Phunnestyle wrote:Karadion wrote:Phunnestyle wrote:The current upcoming winter patch is a good example of bad influences by currupt CSMs More interested in self gain for there particular alliance rather than EVE community gain.
+1 for a purge Purge how? Is this synonymous for "Ban the goonies, they're killing my mining bots! :(" LOL goons are aweful thats just a fact, dont belittle yourself by calling others bots, when every other goon is a bot. Okay so report the bots you find. You're more than welcome to. We don't exist to please you pubbies, we exist to make your high-sec life hell. See: this thread for example. |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
94
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:32:00 -
[86] - Quote
Those asking for affirmative action so that all 'constituencies' can be represented should probably consider that The Mittani is a highsec representative since his main characters spend nearly all their time in Gallente highsec. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:33:00 -
[87] - Quote
James Duar wrote:Jada Maroo wrote:Ansolutely agree with Hilmar on this one. The current CSM has done some good things, but let's not kid ourselves. Rarely are Goons good for the overall playing experience of an MMO. Mittani is looking out for himself and his own lulz, not anyone else's. And before he pipes in and says "But I supported the super cap nerf and I have super caps!" -- you also have more players than your potential targets, so weakening their supers really just makes them easier for you to take down. It's not selfless, it's blatantly self serving. Supers are bad and make the game bad, and this is a bad post and you should feel bad. Pubbies don't feel bad, they just get dumber with each new thread. |

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
84
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:33:00 -
[88] - Quote
Maybe everyone should focus on the point and hand and avoid an obvious derailing?
So much of CCP's ISK comes from empire and "pubbie's" If CCP wants to be successful they will have to cater to these people as well.
Nuff said, and Hilmar seems to have realized that.  So maybe he is about to fire some of the CSM too, and I think this is him softening the "blow" before he brings down the Guillotine. |

Gilentajsa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:34:00 -
[89] - Quote
Hirana Yoshida wrote:The "whole community" is limited to 10-15% of the population as that is the amount of people who care enough about Eve to vote in the CSM elections. The remaining 85-90% of people have NO SAY in the matter AT ALL! They chose not to participate and thus forfeit their rights to ***** and moan over anything not directly consumer related (which is covered by RL laws).
What CCP needs to do is tweak the election process for future CSM's to ensure that the members have a more even spread and represent all walks of life (in Eve) .. plus add a blank vote option as that is sorely needed.

Why not make it so that; unless you are a trial, when election time rolls around you need to cast a ballot to actually get past the character selection screen? I think that would get a more evenly distributed pool of voters that I'm doubting the goons could effectively combat with ballot stuffing. s |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:34:00 -
[90] - Quote
Karadion wrote:James Duar wrote:Jada Maroo wrote:Ansolutely agree with Hilmar on this one. The current CSM has done some good things, but let's not kid ourselves. Rarely are Goons good for the overall playing experience of an MMO. Mittani is looking out for himself and his own lulz, not anyone else's. And before he pipes in and says "But I supported the super cap nerf and I have super caps!" -- you also have more players than your potential targets, so weakening their supers really just makes them easier for you to take down. It's not selfless, it's blatantly self serving. Supers are bad and make the game bad, and this is a bad post and you should feel bad. Pubbies don't feel bad, they just get dumber with each new thread.
Seriously stop trolling dude - stay on topic... |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
280
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:35:00 -
[91] - Quote
Jada Maroo wrote:Ansolutely agree with Hilmar on this one. The current CSM has done some good things, but let's not kid ourselves. Rarely are Goons good for the overall playing experience of an MMO. Mittani is looking out for himself and his own lulz, not anyone else's. And before he pipes in and says "But I supported the super cap nerf and I have super caps!" -- you also have more players than your potential targets, so weakening their supers really just makes them easier for you to take down. It's not selfless, it's blatantly self serving.
"The supercap nerf is a good change but the goons support it because IT BENEFITS THEM so it shouldn't be changed!!!!"
i love your logic |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
280
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:35:00 -
[92] - Quote
Gilentajsa wrote:Hirana Yoshida wrote:The "whole community" is limited to 10-15% of the population as that is the amount of people who care enough about Eve to vote in the CSM elections. The remaining 85-90% of people have NO SAY in the matter AT ALL! They chose not to participate and thus forfeit their rights to ***** and moan over anything not directly consumer related (which is covered by RL laws).
What CCP needs to do is tweak the election process for future CSM's to ensure that the members have a more even spread and represent all walks of life (in Eve) .. plus add a blank vote option as that is sorely needed.  Why not make it so that; unless you are a trial, when election time rolls around you need to cast a ballot to actually get past the character selection screen? I think that would get a more evenly distributed pool of voters that I'm doubting the goons could effectively combat with ballot stuffing.
because high-sec pubbies are known for their ability to coordinate and organize |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:36:00 -
[93] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:James Duar wrote:Jada Maroo wrote:Ansolutely agree with Hilmar on this one. The current CSM has done some good things, but let's not kid ourselves. Rarely are Goons good for the overall playing experience of an MMO. Mittani is looking out for himself and his own lulz, not anyone else's. And before he pipes in and says "But I supported the super cap nerf and I have super caps!" -- you also have more players than your potential targets, so weakening their supers really just makes them easier for you to take down. It's not selfless, it's blatantly self serving. Supers are bad and make the game bad, and this is a bad post and you should feel bad. Pubbies don't feel bad, they just get dumber with each new thread. Seriously stop trolling dude - stay on topic... I'm answering people's questions or adding to their statements. How about you quit derailing your own thread for starters? |

seany1212
Mind Games. 0ccupational Hazzard
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:36:00 -
[94] - Quote
Posting in an epic rage thread 
OP and Hilmar are both characters of the muppets show, CSM is filled with 0.0 players because nearly everything regarding 0.0 needs fixing. goons are bored due to lack of 0.0 shinanigans and so turn to high sec. If there were countless high sec problems im sure the CSM would reflect that. Its mostly always been filled with low and 0.0 players because they're the areas in need of balance and yet CCP always end up overcompensating on something. Funny how with a board of 0.0 CSM ccps first change? Make high sec wars virtually invalid. Cry moar  |

Jada Maroo
Mysterium Astrometrics BRABODEN
311
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:37:00 -
[95] - Quote
James Duar wrote: Supers are bad and make the game bad, and this is a bad post and you should feel bad.
I don't disagree. But it was hardly a selfless act and in the end will just allow Goons to expand territory. A truly selfless act would have been to nerf supercaps and work out a way to make holding massive amounts of space all but impossible. Split up null into lots of little competing parts.
Funny how Goons want to disrupt and weaken high sec and wormholes but sure don't have any problems keeping blob warfare and massive power blocs around in null. |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
94
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:38:00 -
[96] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:I was pretty disappointed for the CSM allowing NeX for "vanity" items to slip in the game at all.
How would you have them "disallow" the NeX store from going ahead, exactly? Attack the NeX development team with Molotov cocktails while they were at the spring summit?
Or do you just mean that the CSM should have made some feeble token gesture of protest, that CCP would have completely ignored and gone ahead anyway? |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:38:00 -
[97] - Quote
Gilentajsa wrote:Hirana Yoshida wrote:The "whole community" is limited to 10-15% of the population as that is the amount of people who care enough about Eve to vote in the CSM elections. The remaining 85-90% of people have NO SAY in the matter AT ALL! They chose not to participate and thus forfeit their rights to ***** and moan over anything not directly consumer related (which is covered by RL laws).
What CCP needs to do is tweak the election process for future CSM's to ensure that the members have a more even spread and represent all walks of life (in Eve) .. plus add a blank vote option as that is sorely needed.  Why not make it so that; unless you are a trial, when election time rolls around you need to cast a ballot to actually get past the character selection screen? I think that would get a more evenly distributed pool of voters that I'm doubting the goons could effectively combat with ballot stuffing.
Personally, stop all the open voting. CSMees should basically be interviewed by senior CCP Management. That panel then decides whos in the CSM. Having 5000 of your own alliance mates voting for you, well its a given and pretty much rigged voting.
But anyway I still think CSM should be just removed. Yes some things have happened, but 95% hasnt, and tbh since CSM inception eve as got in the state it has now.. So has it an impact? Well negatively then ..surely... |

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
84
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:38:00 -
[98] - Quote
seany1212 wrote:Make high sec wars virtually invalid.
That comes from CCP's fear of losing subs and wanting better new player retention. It was specific to the EVE university and as far as I know the CSM's had nothing to do with that either. |

Gilentajsa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:39:00 -
[99] - Quote
Andski wrote:Gilentajsa wrote:Hirana Yoshida wrote:The "whole community" is limited to 10-15% of the population as that is the amount of people who care enough about Eve to vote in the CSM elections. The remaining 85-90% of people have NO SAY in the matter AT ALL! They chose not to participate and thus forfeit their rights to ***** and moan over anything not directly consumer related (which is covered by RL laws).
What CCP needs to do is tweak the election process for future CSM's to ensure that the members have a more even spread and represent all walks of life (in Eve) .. plus add a blank vote option as that is sorely needed.  Why not make it so that; unless you are a trial, when election time rolls around you need to cast a ballot to actually get past the character selection screen? I think that would get a more evenly distributed pool of voters that I'm doubting the goons could effectively combat with ballot stuffing. derp
Wow, you're really flying your tool flag aren't you? s |

Phunnestyle
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:39:00 -
[100] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Phunnestyle wrote:Karadion wrote:Phunnestyle wrote:The current upcoming winter patch is a good example of bad influences by currupt CSMs More interested in self gain for there particular alliance rather than EVE community gain.
+1 for a purge Purge how? Is this synonymous for "Ban the goonies, they're killing my mining bots! :(" LOL goons are aweful thats just a fact, dont belittle yourself by calling others bots, when every other goon is a bot. Okay so report the bots you find. You're more than welcome to. We don't exist to please you pubbies, we exist to make your high-sec life hell. See: this thread for example.
ROFL@U and your brain cell. Theres rarely ever anything worthwhile to acknowledge from the mouth of a Goon, usually total nonesence or for self gain regardless of the impact on EVE community, or even more commonly a mixture of both. Not saying all, but majority of Goons have always been tools & will never change. |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum KUGUTSUMEN.
201
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:39:00 -
[101] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:I think you just errrr 'revealed your alts'... Quote:Are you seriously that paranoid? First you accused me of being Mittani and are you accusing me of being that person? I must be omnipotent. Dude you posted that remark with Brooks Puuntai Nomadic Asylum **********. Unless he thinks he is you... 
Yes I'm his alt. Or is he my alt? Iam confused. I'm not like you(iam guessing by character age) and don't need to hide behind alts. I have never been in Goons or have any alts in goons, actually I have no alts since all my other accounts are canceled. Then again you will believe whatever you want to believe.
The fact of the matter is that what you've done with this thread is spin Hilmars words into a anti-goons speech. What Hilmar was talking about was not goons our any issues within the current CSM itself. He was talking about the CSM process and how the current CSM is majority if not all 0,0 delegates. The issues that he was talking about was that non 0,0 areas where not properly represented. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
280
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:39:00 -
[102] - Quote
Jada Maroo wrote:James Duar wrote: Supers are bad and make the game bad, and this is a bad post and you should feel bad.
I don't disagree. But it was hardly a selfless act and in the end will just allow Goons to expand territory. A truly selfless act would have been to nerf supercaps and work out a way to make holding massive amounts of space all but impossible. Split up null into lots of little competing parts. Funny how Goons want to disrupt and weaken high sec and wormholes but sure don't have any problems keeping blob warfare and massive power blocs around in null.
hi
moon rebalancing moon rebalancing moon rebalancing |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:41:00 -
[103] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Gilentajsa wrote:Hirana Yoshida wrote:The "whole community" is limited to 10-15% of the population as that is the amount of people who care enough about Eve to vote in the CSM elections. The remaining 85-90% of people have NO SAY in the matter AT ALL! They chose not to participate and thus forfeit their rights to ***** and moan over anything not directly consumer related (which is covered by RL laws).
What CCP needs to do is tweak the election process for future CSM's to ensure that the members have a more even spread and represent all walks of life (in Eve) .. plus add a blank vote option as that is sorely needed.  Why not make it so that; unless you are a trial, when election time rolls around you need to cast a ballot to actually get past the character selection screen? I think that would get a more evenly distributed pool of voters that I'm doubting the goons could effectively combat with ballot stuffing. Personally, stop all the open voting. CSMees should basically be interviewed by senior CCP Management. That panel then decides whos in the CSM. Having 5000 of your own alliance mates voting for you, well its a given and pretty much rigged voting. But anyway I still think CSM should be just removed. Yes some things have happened, but 95% hasnt, and tbh since CSM inception eve as got in the state it has now.. So has it an impact? Well negatively then ..surely... Inaccurate, the 85-90% have a say in the election. The problem is that the null-sec alliances which represents probably 1/5 of the game in reality have a huge interest in seeing changes in the game to keep it fluid in contrast to the empire pubbies who wish to be left alone as long their isk farm missions do not get changed. |

Florestan Bronstein
The Waterworks
121
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:41:00 -
[104] - Quote
Gilentajsa wrote: Why not make it so that; unless you are a trial, when election time rolls around you need to cast a ballot to actually get past the character selection screen? I think that would get a more evenly distributed pool of voters that I'm doubting the goons could effectively combat with ballot stuffing. difficult
at the very least you would have to randomize candidate's positions on the list as you can expect those not interested in the CSM just to click the first entry to get into EVE asap.
Now, if those 85-90% cast random, evenly distributed votes your whole race suddenly looks very close which might have some other unfortunate implications (rgd legitimacy etc) ... |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:42:00 -
[105] - Quote
Phunnestyle wrote:Karadion wrote:Phunnestyle wrote:Karadion wrote:Phunnestyle wrote:The current upcoming winter patch is a good example of bad influences by currupt CSMs More interested in self gain for there particular alliance rather than EVE community gain.
+1 for a purge Purge how? Is this synonymous for "Ban the goonies, they're killing my mining bots! :(" LOL goons are aweful thats just a fact, dont belittle yourself by calling others bots, when every other goon is a bot. Okay so report the bots you find. You're more than welcome to. We don't exist to please you pubbies, we exist to make your high-sec life hell. See: this thread for example. ROFL@U and your brain cell. Theres rarely ever anything worthwhile to acknowledge from the mouth of a Goon, usually total nonesence or for self gain regardless of the impact on EVE community, or even more commonly a mixture of both. I have all my brain cells intact because I choose to abstain from alcohol. As I maintain, if you find bots, report them. We're not CCP's rats and they or empire pubbies can do that job themselves. |

White Tree
XxBroski North Reloaded Federation NinjaGuldDotxX. Elite Space Guild
469
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:42:00 -
[106] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:As I relaxed in the aftermath of a time-dilated fight where supercaps didn't rule the day and lag didn't determine the outcome, I browsed a rack of podkills with implants, spun my recently rebalanced hybrid-gunned ship, and typed off a poorly-thought-out ragepost about how the CSM was irrelevant, because I'm literally a big babby who has no idea what he's talking about.
I then went off to enjoy a bunch of new spaceship-related content that CCP produced after they finally acknowledged that focusing on FiS instead of WiS was the right thing to do!
The Mittani wrote:As I relaxed in the aftermath of a time-dilated fight where supercaps didn't rule the day and lag didn't determine the outcome, I browsed a rack of podkills with implants, spun my recently rebalanced hybrid-gunned ship, and typed off a poorly-thought-out ragepost about how the CSM was irrelevant, because I'm literally a big babby who has no idea what he's talking about.
I then went off to enjoy a bunch of new spaceship-related content that CCP produced after they finally acknowledged that focusing on FiS instead of WiS was the right thing to do!
The Mittani wrote:As I relaxed in the aftermath of a time-dilated fight where supercaps didn't rule the day and lag didn't determine the outcome, I browsed a rack of podkills with implants, spun my recently rebalanced hybrid-gunned ship, and typed off a poorly-thought-out ragepost about how the CSM was irrelevant, because I'm literally a big babby who has no idea what he's talking about.
I then went off to enjoy a bunch of new spaceship-related content that CCP produced after they finally acknowledged that focusing on FiS instead of WiS was the right thing to do!
The Mittani wrote:As I relaxed in the aftermath of a time-dilated fight where supercaps didn't rule the day and lag didn't determine the outcome, I browsed a rack of podkills with implants, spun my recently rebalanced hybrid-gunned ship, and typed off a poorly-thought-out ragepost about how the CSM was irrelevant, because I'm literally a big babby who has no idea what he's talking about.
I then went off to enjoy a bunch of new spaceship-related content that CCP produced after they finally acknowledged that focusing on FiS instead of WiS was the right thing to do!
The Mittani wrote:As I relaxed in the aftermath of a time-dilated fight where supercaps didn't rule the day and lag didn't determine the outcome, I browsed a rack of podkills with implants, spun my recently rebalanced hybrid-gunned ship, and typed off a poorly-thought-out ragepost about how the CSM was irrelevant, because I'm literally a big babby who has no idea what he's talking about.
I then went off to enjoy a bunch of new spaceship-related content that CCP produced after they finally acknowledged that focusing on FiS instead of WiS was the right thing to do!
|

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
255
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:42:00 -
[107] - Quote
Well i for one am not in favour of dumping the CSM elect....
Only because at a time like this, it's simply not a good thing to do. There is a time and a place for it, and that time has past.
I for one think CCP should introduce a new charter for every newly elected CSM member to represent the community of EVE. Literally. They should:
- Put up regular posts in a dedicated CSM forum here - have voting buttons on what they think they should bring to CCPs attention, so the people can say 'yes please raise this issue' or 'no, thats not important' etc. - Have CCP moderate the votes to allow only 1 vote per account and watch to see if the majority of votes are coming from 1 bloc only. - The CSm must not be allowed to push their own agenda directly to CCP. They are there for the players ONLY. If they have an idea on a change, then they should propose it and promote discussion and debate about it. - If CCP proposes a change to the CSM, then the CSM MUST convey that proposal to said forums and promote discussion and debate as to weather it is good/needed etc.
I don't want to see accountability.
I want to see transparacy, non bias and fairness from the CSM to and from CCP and us.
I think all these conditions (as an example) are fair. They should be straight forward to implement and would have no impact at all upon any NDAs under any circumstances. [img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |

Mallikanth
Awakened Brotherhood The Brotherhood Alliance
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:42:00 -
[108] - Quote
OP is:
a) A troll b) a tard c) Both of the above.
Please vote and them be prepared for a thread saying the vote was rigged 'cos of Falcon / Goons or any such meme.
 Believe in what they do, not what they say.
|

David Carel
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
68
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:42:00 -
[109] - Quote
Go biomass your characters and do us all a favor. |

Perramas
Pan Caldarian Ventures
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:43:00 -
[110] - Quote
Hilmar if you remove the CSM I will guarantee you at least six more months of subs on this account and all 52 of my monocled accounts. |

Jada Maroo
Mysterium Astrometrics BRABODEN
311
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:44:00 -
[111] - Quote
Andski wrote: "The supercap nerf is a good change but the goons support it because IT BENEFITS THEM so it shouldn't be changed!!!!"
i love your logic
Not what I said, but people with weak arguments often have to put words into their opponents mouths to make a point so I'll overlook it.
Let's use a real world example: nuclear weapons. And before you start your inevitable whine about comparisons to the real world, it's called an analogy. Look it up in the dictionary.
Country A and country B both have nuclear weapons. The traditional army of country A is twice as large as country B. Country A manages to convince country B that both sides would be better off if all nuclear weapons were destroyed. And so they sign a treaty and abolish all their nuclear weapons. Now, with the equalizer gone, who is at a massive numerical advantage? Country A. |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
94
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:45:00 -
[112] - Quote
Jada Maroo wrote:I don't disagree. But it was hardly a selfless act and in the end will just allow Goons to expand territory. Why would we want to expand territory?
"Oh boy more sov bills to pay for space that nobody uses! Hell yeah!"
Quote: A truly selfless act would have been to nerf supercaps and work out a way to make holding massive amounts of space all but impossible. Split up null into lots of little competing parts. Maybe you haven't been paying attention, but this is all tied in to the long term plans that Greyscale talked about a couple of months ago. Nerfing supercaps is a simple quick fix that can be done right now, change some numbers in the database and away we go.
Completely redesigning whole swathes of the sov system, on the other hand, is not something that can be bashed out for an expansion due in a few weeks.
|

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
313
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:46:00 -
[113] - Quote
I try to "STAY ON TOPIC" because you won't have "NO PROBLEM REPORTING TROLLS". However if this post gets flagged and moderator is reading this, I honestly believe that the following lines are not trolling, but a well thought reply to the wonderful ideas what OP presented.
OP, Find a rope, a tree and way to combine them with your neck.
|

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
616
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:46:00 -
[114] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:I was pretty disappointed for the CSM allowing NeX for "vanity" items to slip in the game at all.
How would you have them "disallow" the NeX store from going ahead, exactly? Attack the NeX development team with Molotov cocktails while they were at the spring summit? Or do you just mean that the CSM should have made some feeble token gesture of protest, that CCP would have completely ignored and gone ahead anyway?
Well firstly saying something more than "we don't care" would have been nice. To hear some of the stories on K forum Mitani might have gotten drunk and given Zinfandel the thumbs up on the golden scorps in a bar somewhere.
Then the whole "if its vanity" we don't care - formally, has the effect of green-flagging the NeX store and sensible people should know its the thin end of the wedge and once that genie gets out of the bottle there is literally no going back.
So first point - they didn't protest it enough and almost certainly made a tactical error in allowing CCP to negotiate NeX into game without strong CSM criticism (as is apparent from the minutes.)
Now secondly (on the assumption CCP would have said "screw you CSM we're doing it anyway" - if CSM had lodged strong complaints). Resignation is an option. I know people have done it down and say "it won't change anything" but in terms of PR impact it can be huge.
But mainly ... they didnt lodge strong complaints against NeX. They went on record saying "fine if its vanity only" and I think that was a big mistake and quite naive since in Eve Online there isn't really any such thing as vanity only content when you analyse it. Alliance logos and ship skins - defintely not vanity only.
Anyway hope that answers your question.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:46:00 -
[115] - Quote
Headerman wrote:Well i for one am not in favour of dumping the CSM elect....
Only because at a time like this, it's simply not a good thing to do. There is a time and a place for it, and that time has past.
I for one think CCP should introduce a new charter for every newly elected CSM member to represent the community of EVE. Literally. They should:
- Put up regular posts in a dedicated CSM forum here - have voting buttons on what they think they should bring to CCPs attention, so the people can say 'yes please raise this issue' or 'no, thats not important' etc. - Have CCP moderate the votes to allow only 1 vote per account and watch to see if the majority of votes are coming from 1 bloc only. - The CSm must not be allowed to push their own agenda directly to CCP. They are there for the players ONLY. If they have an idea on a change, then they should propose it and promote discussion and debate about it. - If CCP proposes a change to the CSM, then the CSM MUST convey that proposal to said forums and promote discussion and debate as to weather it is good/needed etc.
I don't want to see accountability.
I want to see transparacy, non bias and fairness from the CSM to and from CCP and us.
I think all these conditions (as an example) are fair. They should be straight forward to implement and would have no impact at all upon any NDAs under any circumstances. 1) They do that in their own blogging efforts, tentonhammer, k.com, and other various sites. You're just not looking hard enough. 2) They did that. The Empire pubbies just didn't care 3) Again they did implement that function which I was able to vote 1 vote per account that I owned. 4) They do that job because they represent the people who voted for their platform. Are they supposed to be an empty slate platform going "Vote for me, I got nothing." 5) They consistently do that especially censuring the minutes which got them in trouble.
Hiding under a rock have you? |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:46:00 -
[116] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:I think you just errrr 'revealed your alts'... Quote:Are you seriously that paranoid? First you accused me of being Mittani and are you accusing me of being that person? I must be omnipotent. Dude you posted that remark with Brooks Puuntai Nomadic Asylum **********. Unless he thinks he is you...  Yes I'm his alt. Or is he my alt? Iam confused. I'm not like you(iam guessing by character age) and don't need to hide behind alts. I have never been in Goons or have any alts in goons, actually I have no alts since all my other accounts are canceled. Then again you will believe whatever you want to believe. The fact of the matter is that what you've done with this thread is spin Hilmars words into a anti-goons speech. What Hilmar was talking about was not goons our any issues within the current CSM itself. He was talking about the CSM process and how the current CSM is majority if not all 0,0 delegates. The issues that he was talking about was that non 0,0 areas where not properly represented.
No try read it again. It said Goons AND nullsec powermads. Im sorry but this game DOES NOT need people like Goons ruinng the game anymore. Its killing eve. Simple Fact. Im sorry it is... People like DRF are also ruining the game too. But goons are the people who all they care about is making eve a misery for people. Is this really the future of eve? Because if it is, then goodbye eve. Might as well shut up shop now. Can the game...
People and eve have moved on from 5 years ago, yes it was ok back then becuase it didnt effect many people. Now its affecting thousands more. Which in return is affecting the game, badly. CCP needs to implement so drastic fundamentals in eve for it to retain new players. Its ok for me and you, we may player longer we may not. But theres gonna be a drop off point where all the bitter vets have gone, and then whose left? No one... and will you care? no ofc you wont..
|

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:47:00 -
[117] - Quote
Perramas wrote:Hilmar if you remove the CSM I will guarantee you at least six more months of subs on this account and all 52 of my monocled accounts. So in other words, CCP just lost 6 months of potential subscriptions across 52 accounts or characters, whatever...... |

Jada Maroo
Mysterium Astrometrics BRABODEN
311
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:47:00 -
[118] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:
Completely redesigning whole swathes of the sov system, on the other hand, is not something that can be bashed out for an expansion due in a few weeks.
If it works out that way, I'll happily agree. Nothing to do now but wait and see. |

Mr LaForge
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
92
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:48:00 -
[119] - Quote
Jada Maroo wrote:Andski wrote: "The supercap nerf is a good change but the goons support it because IT BENEFITS THEM so it shouldn't be changed!!!!"
i love your logic
Not what I said, but people with weak arguments often have to put words into their opponents mouths to make a point so I'll overlook it. Let's use a real world example: nuclear weapons. And before you start your inevitable whine about comparisons to the real world, it's called an analogy. Look it up in the dictionary. Country A and country B both have nuclear weapons. The traditional army of country A is twice as large as country B. Country A manages to convince country B that both sides would be better off if all nuclear weapons were destroyed. And so they sign a treaty and abolish all their nuclear weapons. Now, with the equalizer gone, who is at a massive numerical advantage? Country A.
COuntry A and Country B still kept their nukes though, but in more secret locations. |

Gilentajsa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:49:00 -
[120] - Quote
White Tree wrote:The Mittani wrote:As I relaxed in the aftermath of a time-dilated fight where supercaps didn't rule the day and lag didn't determine the outcome, I browsed a rack of podkills with implants, spun my recently rebalanced hybrid-gunned ship, and typed off a poorly-thought-out ragepost about how the CSM was irrelevant, because I'm literally a big babby who has no idea what he's talking about.
I then went off to enjoy a bunch of new spaceship-related content that CCP produced after they finally acknowledged that focusing on FiS instead of WiS was the right thing to do! The Mittani wrote:As I relaxed in the aftermath of a time-dilated fight where supercaps didn't rule the day and lag didn't determine the outcome, I browsed a rack of podkills with implants, spun my recently rebalanced hybrid-gunned ship, and typed off a poorly-thought-out ragepost about how the CSM was irrelevant, because I'm literally a big babby who has no idea what he's talking about.
I then went off to enjoy a bunch of new spaceship-related content that CCP produced after they finally acknowledged that focusing on FiS instead of WiS was the right thing to do! The Mittani wrote:As I relaxed in the aftermath of a time-dilated fight where supercaps didn't rule the day and lag didn't determine the outcome, I browsed a rack of podkills with implants, spun my recently rebalanced hybrid-gunned ship, and typed off a poorly-thought-out ragepost about how the CSM was irrelevant, because I'm literally a big babby who has no idea what he's talking about.
I then went off to enjoy a bunch of new spaceship-related content that CCP produced after they finally acknowledged that focusing on FiS instead of WiS was the right thing to do! The Mittani wrote:As I relaxed in the aftermath of a time-dilated fight where supercaps didn't rule the day and lag didn't determine the outcome, I browsed a rack of podkills with implants, spun my recently rebalanced hybrid-gunned ship, and typed off a poorly-thought-out ragepost about how the CSM was irrelevant, because I'm literally a big babby who has no idea what he's talking about.
I then went off to enjoy a bunch of new spaceship-related content that CCP produced after they finally acknowledged that focusing on FiS instead of WiS was the right thing to do!
What was that you said?
I couldn't hear you through the **** in your mouth. s |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:49:00 -
[121] - Quote
Mallikanth wrote:OP is: a) A troll b) a tard c) Both of the above. Please vote and then be prepared for a thread saying the vote was rigged 'cos of Falcon / Goons or any such meme.  [Edited for stoopid speeling]
reported for trolling |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
280
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:49:00 -
[122] - Quote
Jada Maroo wrote:Andski wrote: "The supercap nerf is a good change but the goons support it because IT BENEFITS THEM so it shouldn't be changed!!!!"
i love your logic
Not what I said, but people with weak arguments often have to put words into their opponents mouths to make a point so I'll overlook it. Let's use a real world example: nuclear weapons. And before you start your inevitable whine about comparisons to the real world, it's called an analogy. Look it up in the dictionary. Country A and country B both have nuclear weapons. The traditional army of country A is twice as large as country B. Country A manages to convince country B that both sides would be better off if all nuclear weapons were destroyed. And so they sign a treaty and abolish all their nuclear weapons. Now, with the equalizer gone, who is at a massive numerical advantage? Country A.
yes, that is an analogy, but a terrible one |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:49:00 -
[123] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:I think you just errrr 'revealed your alts'... Quote:Are you seriously that paranoid? First you accused me of being Mittani and are you accusing me of being that person? I must be omnipotent. Dude you posted that remark with Brooks Puuntai Nomadic Asylum **********. Unless he thinks he is you...  Yes I'm his alt. Or is he my alt? Iam confused. I'm not like you(iam guessing by character age) and don't need to hide behind alts. I have never been in Goons or have any alts in goons, actually I have no alts since all my other accounts are canceled. Then again you will believe whatever you want to believe. The fact of the matter is that what you've done with this thread is spin Hilmars words into a anti-goons speech. What Hilmar was talking about was not goons our any issues within the current CSM itself. He was talking about the CSM process and how the current CSM is majority if not all 0,0 delegates. The issues that he was talking about was that non 0,0 areas where not properly represented. No try read it again. It said Goons AND nullsec powermads. Im sorry but this game DOES NOT need people like Goons ruinng the game anymore. Its killing eve. Simple Fact. Im sorry it is... People like DRF are also ruining the game too. But goons are the people who all they care about is making eve a misery for people. Is this really the future of eve? Because if it is, then goodbye eve. Might as well shut up shop now. Can the game... People and eve have moved on from 5 years ago, yes it was ok back then becuase it didnt effect many people. Now its affecting thousands more. Which in return is affecting the game, badly. CCP needs to implement some drastic fundamental changes in eve for it to retain new and yes old players. Its ok for me and you, we may player longer we may not. But theres gonna be a drop off point where all the bitter vets have gone, and then whose left? No one... and will you care? no ofc you wont.. We've been around for years and we will continue to be around. Sorry, just because you wish for it to happen doesn't mean we will magically go away. We exist to make life hell for you. That's the point of this game. I can blow your ship up, I can prevent you from mining, I can scam, I can hire privateers to chase your butt down, etc. All while you scream "SAVE ME CONCORD, SAVE ME CCP :( BAN THOSE MEAN GOONIES." |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:50:00 -
[124] - Quote
David Carel wrote:Go biomass your characters and do us all a favor. reported for trolling
|

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
84
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:53:00 -
[125] - Quote
TBH this is turning into an Anti-goon speech.
This should have nothing to do with the Goons, this is about CCP and how they run business. Goons are good for the game in all reality, bias CSM is not. |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:53:00 -
[126] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:I think you just errrr 'revealed your alts'... Quote:Are you seriously that paranoid? First you accused me of being Mittani and are you accusing me of being that person? I must be omnipotent. Dude you posted that remark with Brooks Puuntai Nomadic Asylum **********. Unless he thinks he is you...  Yes I'm his alt. Or is he my alt? Iam confused. I'm not like you(iam guessing by character age) and don't need to hide behind alts. I have never been in Goons or have any alts in goons, actually I have no alts since all my other accounts are canceled. Then again you will believe whatever you want to believe. The fact of the matter is that what you've done with this thread is spin Hilmars words into a anti-goons speech. What Hilmar was talking about was not goons our any issues within the current CSM itself. He was talking about the CSM process and how the current CSM is majority if not all 0,0 delegates. The issues that he was talking about was that non 0,0 areas where not properly represented. No try read it again. It said Goons AND nullsec powermads. Im sorry but this game DOES NOT need people like Goons ruinng the game anymore. Its killing eve. Simple Fact. Im sorry it is... People like DRF are also ruining the game too. But goons are the people who all they care about is making eve a misery for people. Is this really the future of eve? Because if it is, then goodbye eve. Might as well shut up shop now. Can the game... People and eve have moved on from 5 years ago, yes it was ok back then becuase it didnt effect many people. Now its affecting thousands more. Which in return is affecting the game, badly. CCP needs to implement some drastic fundamental changes in eve for it to retain new and yes old players. Its ok for me and you, we may player longer we may not. But theres gonna be a drop off point where all the bitter vets have gone, and then whose left? No one... and will you care? no ofc you wont.. We've been around for years and we will continue to be around. Sorry, just because you wish for it to happen doesn't mean we will magically go away. We exist to make life hell for you. That's the point of this game. I can blow your ship up, I can prevent you from mining, I can scam, I can hire privateers to chase your butt down, etc. All while you scream "SAVE ME CONCORD, SAVE ME CCP :( BAN THOSE MEAN GOONIES."
Privateers....lol thats a funny one..
|

White Tree
XxBroski North Reloaded Federation NinjaGuldDotxX. Elite Space Guild
469
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:53:00 -
[127] - Quote
Gilentajsa wrote: What was that you said?
I couldn't hear you through the **** in your mouth.
I too get upset when my worldview is wrong and I am proved repeatedly to be a petulant infant. |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:55:00 -
[128] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:TBH this is turning into an Anti-goon speech.
This should have nothing to do with the Goons, this is about CCP and how they run business. Goons are good for the game in all reality, bias CSM is not.
Sadly its a goon making into a anti goon speech.. but yes please stay on topic guys..
|

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:55:00 -
[129] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:We've been around for years and we will continue to be around. Sorry, just because you wish for it to happen doesn't mean we will magically go away. We exist to make life hell for you. That's the point of this game. I can blow your ship up, I can prevent you from mining, I can scam, I can hire privateers to chase your butt down, etc. All while you scream "SAVE ME CONCORD, SAVE ME CCP :( BAN THOSE MEAN GOONIES."
Privateers....lol thats a funny one.. [/quote]What was inaccurate about it? We literally pay our own people to go hunt miners. How does that not fit the definition of privateering? Do I have to fit a specific definition that only you have? |

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
313
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:55:00 -
[130] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:David Carel wrote:Go biomass your characters and do us all a favor. reported for trolling That is much more kind way to go than the one I suggested for you. However the end result with this method is the same, so I strongly support David's idea.
And OP, David is not trolling in his post. However you could try to get his post moved to "ideas and suggestions" subsection in forums if that makes you feel better .)
|

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
616
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:56:00 -
[131] - Quote
Gilentajsa wrote:White Tree wrote:The Mittani wrote:As I relaxed in the aftermath of a time-dilated fight where supercaps didn't rule the day and lag didn't determine the outcome, I browsed a rack of podkills with implants, spun my recently rebalanced hybrid-gunned ship, and typed off a poorly-thought-out ragepost about how the CSM was irrelevant, because I'm literally a big babby who has no idea what he's talking about.
I then went off to enjoy a bunch of new spaceship-related content that CCP produced after they finally acknowledged that focusing on FiS instead of WiS was the right thing to do! [quote=The Mittani]As I relaxed in the aftermath of a time-dilated fight where supercaps didn't rule the day and lag didn't determine the outcome, I browsed a rack of podkills with implants, spun my recently rebalanced hybrid-gunned ship, and typed off a poorly-thought-out ragepost about how the CSM was irrelevant, because I'm literally a big babby who has no idea what he's talking about. I then went off to enjoy a bunch of new spaceship-related content that CCP produced after they finally acknowledged that focusing on FiS instead of WiS was the right thing to do! What was that you said? I couldn't hear you through the **** in your mouth.
While I wouldn't be quite so crass as the poster above me. This does actually illustrate a problem with this CSM. Mittani's personality is quite dominant in that group and it has become apparent its a case of mr Mittani organgrinder and his half dozen monkeys. It does damage the balance of the CSM when its quite obvious only one person is calling the shots and the rest are just acting like beta followers rather than presenting individual and independent viewpoints.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
257
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 12:56:00 -
[132] - Quote
Karadion wrote: 1) They do that in their own blogging efforts, tentonhammer, k.com, and other various sites. You're just not looking hard enough. 2) They did that. The Empire pubbies just didn't care 3) Again they did implement that function which I was able to vote 1 vote per account that I owned. 4) They do that job because they represent the people who voted for their platform. Are they supposed to be an empty slate platform going "Vote for me, I got nothing." 5) They consistently do that especially censuring the minutes which got them in trouble.
Hiding under a rock have you?
1) is not EVEonline.com 2) They obviously didn't do that 3) That function needs to be streamlined into eveonline.com forums better 4) At least 5 CSm members got in from just voting bloc power. I voted for Whitetree because he was in TEST the same time i was. He also said he was pushing hard for a hybrid/Gallente buff, i am really glad that has been won  5) Like i said, there is a lot to discuss that is not locked up under the NDA lock and key. New ideas the CSM members has. Permissable ideas to be discussed (eg new capital ship ideas etc)
Transparacy. Nothing more, nothing less. I don't mind if Brother Mittens is pushing hard to nerf ABC in low end WHs, as long as either his idea is supported by the players, or the players pushed that idea to him.
I don't want CSM members pushign their own agenda, or something that they have not discussed at all with anyone who has access to eveonline.com. I do not want to go view a short story at a third party website when it directly relates to EVE development. [img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:00:00 -
[133] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Privateers....lol thats a funny one..
What was inaccurate about it? We literally pay our own people to go hunt miners. How does that not fit the definition of privateering? Do I have to fit a specific definition that only you have?
What i meant was - 'lol privateers' not the most scary of adversaries.. |

XXSketchxx
Remote Soviet Industries
39
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:01:00 -
[134] - Quote
Oh look, another pubbie made a thread. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
792
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:01:00 -
[135] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:So much of CCP's RL ISK comes from empire and "pubbie's" If CCP wants to be successful they will have to cater to these people as well. GǪso why aren't they interested enough to make sure they find a representative on the CSM?
Gilentajsa wrote:Why not make it so that; unless you are a trial, when election time rolls around you need to cast a ballot to actually get past the character selection screen? I think that would get a more evenly distributed pool of voters that I'm doubting the goons could effectively combat with ballot stuffing. Because those who aren't interested in voting aren't interested in voting, and them adding a statistically even amount of votes onto everyone's numbers will lead to the same representation.
GǪor well, to be honest, it will lead to more representation for the larger parties, since they can blitz their name out there and win votes by name recognition alone.
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Im sorry but this game DOES NOT need people like Goons ruinng the game anymore. Its killing eve. Simple Fact. What do you base this GÇ£factGÇ¥ on? Where's the proof?
Oh, and I noticed that allegation here to so let's toss that one in here as well: how is the CSM corrupt? GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:02:00 -
[136] - Quote
Headerman wrote:Karadion wrote: 1) They do that in their own blogging efforts, tentonhammer, k.com, and other various sites. You're just not looking hard enough. 2) They did that. The Empire pubbies just didn't care 3) Again they did implement that function which I was able to vote 1 vote per account that I owned. 4) They do that job because they represent the people who voted for their platform. Are they supposed to be an empty slate platform going "Vote for me, I got nothing." 5) They consistently do that especially censuring the minutes which got them in trouble.
Hiding under a rock have you?
1) is not EVEonline.com 2) They obviously didn't do that 3) That function needs to be streamlined into eveonline.com forums better 4) At least 5 CSm members got in from just voting bloc power. I voted for Whitetree because he was in TEST the same time i was. He also said he was pushing hard for a hybrid/Gallente buff, i am really glad that has been won  5) Like i said, there is a lot to discuss that is not locked up under the NDA lock and key. New ideas the CSM members has. Permissable ideas to be discussed (eg new capital ship ideas etc) Transparacy. Nothing more, nothing less. I don't mind if Brother Mittens is pushing hard to nerf ABC in low end WHs, as long as either his idea is supported by the players, or the players pushed that idea to him. I don't want CSM members pushign their own agenda, or something that they have not discussed at all with anyone who has access to eveonline.com. I do not want to go view a short story at a third party website when it directly relates to EVE development. 1) Ohh wahhh, you're selectively cherry picking where you want them to post. They do their job, you just want them to bend over backwards and give you what they want. Until they're told to post on CCP's website, this is a CCP oversight. They do blog about their efforts consistently. 2) Yes they do. That's why it's a CSM team and they raise issues that are most important to them and the people that their people voted for them on their platform 3) It was streamlined into the freaking account when you log on. "Do you want to vote in the CSM? Click here" in a propaganda advertisement similar to any article they deem posting. Because Empire pubbies dismisses it, it's not CCP's fault or is it the CSM's team for ignoring the election. 5) Again NDA will always apply and that's the unfortunate process of any development in commercial products. If you want CCP to change their way, become a minority or majority controller of the company. |

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
84
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:03:00 -
[137] - Quote
I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed. I want representatives who recognize my play style and the playing style of people like me.
The current CSM, and most of the CSM's before that, are not giving me that "feeling". They are elected representatives that should be representing all of EVE online, from mining in empire to null sec. Their primary concern should be game balancing in every aspect of the game...
If they can't do they there is no point to have them there. 
At the very least we could use an Empire CSM, Low Sec CSM and Null Sec CSM (or something). What we have now can only steer CCP in the wrong direction, and I believe has. Purposefully or not, It doesn't really matter, because a null sec only CSM cannot fulfill the above requirements. These are important requirements.
No ones "idea" of how the game should be played should take precedence over anyone else's. CSM's must be fair, neutral and courteous in order to fulfill their intended roll. Else they are useless to everyone. |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum KUGUTSUMEN.
201
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:03:00 -
[138] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:
No try read it again. It said Goons AND nullsec powermads. Im sorry but this game DOES NOT need people like Goons ruinng the game anymore. Its killing eve. Simple Fact. Im sorry it is... People like DRF are also ruining the game too. But goons are the people who all they care about is making eve a misery for people. Is this really the future of eve? Because if it is, then goodbye eve. Might as well shut up shop now. Can the game...
People and eve have moved on from 5 years ago, yes it was ok back then becuase it didnt effect many people. Now its affecting thousands more. Which in return is affecting the game, badly. CCP needs to implement some drastic fundamental changes in eve for it to retain new and yes old players. Its ok for me and you, we may player longer we may not. But theres gonna be a drop off point where all the bitter vets have gone, and then whose left? No one... and will you care? no ofc you wont..
How is Goons ruining Eve? By creating content? While they may be pissing in some ice miners cheerios it does infact create content. You don't like it? Hire mercs to camp or hunt goons in highsec, or god forbid do it yourself. Thats what Eve is about, not Boo hoo goons are doing something I don't like. Change it.
In actuality CCP ruined their own game by shifting attention elsewhere and leaving Eve to rot. Nullsec is the way it is because CCP nerfed one of the key ways to keep people in 0.0 and fight for it. As well as supers. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:04:00 -
[139] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Privateers....lol thats a funny one..
What was inaccurate about it? We literally pay our own people to go hunt miners. How does that not fit the definition of privateering? Do I have to fit a specific definition that only you have? What i meant was - 'lol privateers' not the most scary of adversaries.. You don't even read or comprehend well, do you? We pay our own people to go act as privateers. We've killed over 1200 exhumers to date since the beginning of the ice interdiction / privateering effort. http://killboard.goonfleet.com/shipgroup/Exhumer |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
259
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:06:00 -
[140] - Quote
Karadion wrote:1) Ohh wahhh, you're selectively cherry picking where you want them to post. They do their job, you just want them to bend over backwards and give you what they want. Until they're told to post on CCP's website, this is a CCP oversight. They do blog about their efforts consistently. 2) Yes they do. That's why it's a CSM team and they raise issues that are most important to them and the people that their people voted for them on their platform 3) It was streamlined into the freaking account when you log on. "Do you want to vote in the CSM? Click here" in a propaganda advertisement similar to any article they deem posting. Because Empire pubbies dismisses it, it's not CCP's fault or is it the CSM's team for ignoring the election. 5) Again NDA will always apply and that's the unfortunate process of any development in commercial products. If you want CCP to change their way, become a minority or majority controller of the company.
Never stop posting [img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |

Don Solette
ZiiP Dominion
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:07:00 -
[141] - Quote
As a new player I don't like to give my feedback, as it is constantly shot down by vets who apparently like the game the way it is. Original poster is dead on the money here. As much as I like this game, there are things I think that could and should be changed, in particular griefing activities in high-sec, and the ineptitude of concord. However, I can't say these without being called names by all the so called vets out there, likely the ones doing these kinds of activities.
Oh and if I don't like it? HTFU right?. See where the disconnect is? There's no middle ground of discussion, there's no discussion of pros and cons and why or why not this or that should work.. it immediately degenerates into name calling.
As a new player, I don't feel my voice is heard at all, actually I don't think the voice of anyone trying to improve hi-sec in general is heard at all. The mentality in regards to hi-sec is 'if you don't like it, leave'. But I want to like Eve, I'd like to play this game for years to come.
I'm pretty torn currently when it comes to this game as to whether or not it's worth it to me to keep playing. There are so many players out there to ruin your experience and at the end of the day, did I have fun today or didn't I? Will I be back tomorrow? I have 2 subs which isn't much I know, but surely my 2 subs are just as important as the next guy's?
Keep hearing lip service that Eve is our game, beginning to understand that's just talk. I can tell you what I do know about this game. Anyone can do anything they want to you in high-sec and if you don't have a big alliance, or a bigger ship, you have to just suck it up and apparently rename that bad experience to 'fun' just because people say that's the way it should be. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:07:00 -
[142] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed. I want representatives who recognize my play style and the playing style of people like me. The current CSM, and most of the CSM's before that, are not giving me that "feeling". They are elected representatives that should be representing all of EVE online, from mining in empire to null sec. Their primary concern should be game balancing in every aspect of the game... If they can't do that then there is no point in having them.  At the very least we could use an Empire CSM, Low Sec CSM and Null Sec CSM (or something). What we have now can only steer CCP in the wrong direction, and I believe has. Purposefully or not, It doesn't really matter, because a null sec only CSM cannot fulfill the above requirements. These are important requirements. No ones "idea" of how the game should be played should take precedence over anyone else's. CSM's must be fair, neutral and courteous in order to fulfill their intended roll. Else they are useless to everyone. They don't give you that warm feeling inside because they're not fighting to buff your mission bots / isk return. You got Trebor and that other person what's his name? Whatever. The current CSM got voted because they presented their platforms they believe in and also gained the favor of their own alliances because they share similar feelings.
PS: Use enter's less. Makes you look like you are skilled in grammar. |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:07:00 -
[143] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Privateers....lol thats a funny one..
What was inaccurate about it? We literally pay our own people to go hunt miners. How does that not fit the definition of privateering? Do I have to fit a specific definition that only you have? What i meant was - 'lol privateers' not the most scary of adversaries.. You don't even read or comprehend well, do you? We pay our own people to go act as privateers. We've killed over 1200 exhumers to date since the beginning of the ice interdiction / privateering effort. http://killboard.goonfleet.com/shipgroup/Exhumer
Please refrain from personal attacks thank you..
I apologise you said Privateers.. thats all, not your own privs.
Large alliance coming into highsec, ruining all the new players experience.. awesome.. no wonder new players dont stay playing the game.. and you say your good for eve?
|

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:08:00 -
[144] - Quote
Headerman wrote:Never stop posting I am well motivated. |

Rakshasa Taisab
Sane Industries Inc.
373
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:09:00 -
[145] - Quote
White Tree wrote:Gilentajsa wrote: What was that you said?
I couldn't hear you through the **** in your mouth.
I too get upset when my worldview is wrong and I am proved repeatedly to be a petulant infant. I see you did not make any attempt at refuting the claim that you are pleasuring mitten's reproductive organ with your mouth, and thus we can only conclude it is true.
That leaves only two questions; is it for love or favors, and does he clean himself daily?
BTW, I do like the OP, and wish him luck in the future for what ever ice mining venture he partakes in. 84,000 AUR ($420) spent on NeX store for Troll and Profit. |

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
85
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:09:00 -
[146] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed. I want representatives who recognize my play style and the playing style of people like me. The current CSM, and most of the CSM's before that, are not giving me that "feeling". They are elected representatives that should be representing all of EVE online, from mining in empire to null sec. Their primary concern should be game balancing in every aspect of the game... If they can't do that then there is no point in having them.  At the very least we could use an Empire CSM, Low Sec CSM and Null Sec CSM (or something). What we have now can only steer CCP in the wrong direction, and I believe has. Purposefully or not, It doesn't really matter, because a null sec only CSM cannot fulfill the above requirements. These are important requirements. No ones "idea" of how the game should be played should take precedence over anyone else's. CSM's must be fair, neutral and courteous in order to fulfill their intended roll. Else they are useless to everyone. They don't give you that warm feeling inside because they're not fighting to buff your mission bots / isk return. You got Trebor and that other person what's his name? Whatever. The current CSM got voted because they presented their platforms they believe in and also gained the favor of their own alliances because they share similar feelings. PS: Use enter's less. Makes you look like you are skilled in grammar.
You obviously do not know what my play style is. & are not taking the time to consider it, or how it may be just as valid as yours.
Even more then that the post made by Don Solette above is relevant to CCP's interests, and should thus be represented by the CSM's as well, without bias. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:09:00 -
[147] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Karadion wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Privateers....lol thats a funny one..
What was inaccurate about it? We literally pay our own people to go hunt miners. How does that not fit the definition of privateering? Do I have to fit a specific definition that only you have? What i meant was - 'lol privateers' not the most scary of adversaries.. You don't even read or comprehend well, do you? We pay our own people to go act as privateers. We've killed over 1200 exhumers to date since the beginning of the ice interdiction / privateering effort. http://killboard.goonfleet.com/shipgroup/Exhumer Please refrain from personal attacks thank you.. I apologise you said Privateers.. thats all, not your own privs. Large alliance coming into highsec, ruining all the new players experience.. awesome.. no wonder new players dont stay playing the game.. and you say your good for eve? Refrain from personal attack? It's not my own fault that you couldn't comprehend the simple fact that we can act as privateers being paid for by own alliance. Comprehension goes a long way. Are you hitting the flag button everytime someone makes a post that disagrees with your absurd idea?
Large alliances coming into highsec, ruining the new player's experiences? Sounds like Eve Online! |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
259
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:10:00 -
[148] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Headerman wrote:Never stop posting I am well motivated.
It's just too bad ur pretty **** at it. Who sponsored you into the gewnies? I would like to chastise them. [img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |

Red Templar
Free Space Tech
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:11:00 -
[149] - Quote
When CSM was weak, fractured and couldnt do ****, that was ok. Because CSM was useless tool, that didnt actualy do good for anyone, but it actualy didnt do any bad stuff for anyone either. So no one cared about them. Seriously, let them play some councel or whatever.
When CSM actually acquired some fracture of power, was able to influence CCP, represent their voters, do some good for game itself. Thats is exactly the right time to whine and cry. Because now they actualy have power. And its NOT yours to control. Oh poor babies :(
The amount of unhappy "citizens" show me exactly how much work CSM does and how efficient they are. If everyone were happy, that means they do nada.
For Love. For Peace. For Honor.
For None of the Above.
For Pony! |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:11:00 -
[150] - Quote
Rakshasa Taisab wrote:White Tree wrote:Gilentajsa wrote: What was that you said?
I couldn't hear you through the **** in your mouth.
I too get upset when my worldview is wrong and I am proved repeatedly to be a petulant infant. I see you did not make any attempt at refuting the claim that you are pleasuring mitten's reproductive organ with your mouth, and thus we can only conclude it is true. That leaves only two questions; is it for love or favors, and does he clean himself daily? BTW, I do like the OP, and wish him luck in the future for what ever ice mining venture he partakes in.
I moved on to ratting now... more danger... i can fight back with my t2 drones now, but i do fit 1 mining laser on my cane, as i miss the blue beam and the feeling of hard rock entering my cargo hold
|

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:11:00 -
[151] - Quote
Headerman wrote:Karadion wrote:Headerman wrote:Never stop posting I am well motivated. It's just too bad ur pretty **** at it. Who sponsored you into the gewnies? I would like to chastise them. Senor Richard "Lowtax" Kyanka. |

T-Jay Charante
The Scope Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:13:00 -
[152] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed. I want representatives who recognize my play style and the playing style of people like me. The current CSM, and most of the CSM's before that, are not giving me that "feeling". They are elected representatives that should be representing all of EVE online, from mining in empire to null sec. Their primary concern should be game balancing in every aspect of the game... If they can't do that then there is no point in having them.  At the very least we could use an Empire CSM, Low Sec CSM and Null Sec CSM (or something). What we have now can only steer CCP in the wrong direction, and I believe has. Purposefully or not, It doesn't really matter, because a null sec only CSM cannot fulfill the above requirements. These are important requirements. No ones "idea" of how the game should be played should take precedence over anyone else's. CSM's must be fair, neutral and courteous in order to fulfill their intended roll. Else they are useless to everyone.
This post shouldn't go unnoticed.
|

Guy Grand
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:16:00 -
[153] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed.
This makes you different then the current CSM how?
Eternum Praetorian wrote:TBH this is turning into an Anti-goon speech.
No, I'm pretty sure goons being mentioned in the second sentence of the OP makes this thread an anti-goon speech.
Eternum Praetorian wrote:CSM's must be fair, neutral and courteous in order to fulfill their intended roll. Else they are useless to everyone.
Are you new to the world as well as this game?
|

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
85
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:17:00 -
[154] - Quote
Guy Grand wrote:[quote=Eternum Praetorian]I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed.
This makes you different then the current CSM how?
They are elected to represent people like me. I am not elected to represent myself am I?
Quote:CSM's must be fair, neutral and courteous in order to fulfill their intended roll. Else they are useless to everyone.
Are you new to the world as well as this game?
Are you new to a real-life working business model for a Video game? |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:17:00 -
[155] - Quote
Guy Grand wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed. This makes you different then the current CSM how? Eternum Praetorian wrote:TBH this is turning into an Anti-goon speech. No, I'm pretty sure goons being mentioned in the second sentence of the OP makes this thread an anti-goon speech. Eternum Praetorian wrote:CSM's must be fair, neutral and courteous in order to fulfill their intended roll. Else they are useless to everyone. Are you new to the world as well as this game? He probably also participated in those OWS protests. Clueless about the world around them. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
792
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:17:00 -
[156] - Quote
[quote=Don Solette]As a new player I don't like to give my feedback, as it is constantly shot down by vets who apparently like the game the way it is. Original poster is dead on the money here. As much as I like this game, there are things I think that could and should be changed, in particular griefing activities in high-sec, and the ineptitude of concord.[/quote[The problem here is that you're too new to the game to fully get the grasp of what it is you're asking for.
You're doing the equivalent of wanting to turn CS into Harvest Moon. If you want to harvest carrots, this is simply not the game for you.
Quote:Oh and if I don't like it? HTFU right? No. If you don't like it, then too bad. Maybe you just picked the wrong game. If you absolutely want to play EVE, then go ahead and play EVE GÇö if you want to turn EVE into something that is not EVE, then a better idea would be to play somehting that is not EVE.
Quote:There's no middle ground of discussion, there's no discussion of pros and cons and why or why not this or that should work.. it immediately degenerates into name calling. GǪbecause the discussion has been had for ages and nothing new is ever brought to the table. Oh, and don't think that GÇ£your sideGÇ¥ is particularly willing to discuss either GÇö in fact, you just did the same thing by immediately calling legitimate gameplay GÇ£griefingGÇ¥.
Trust me, having been on the receiving end of much name calling when I try to generate the kind of discussions you want to see by asking for the pros and cons of some (not at all) new proposal, I can tell you with some certainty that blaming that turn of the discussion on the vets isGǪ wellGǪ less informed.
Quote:As a new player, I don't feel my voice is heard at all, actually I don't think the voice of anyone trying to improve hi-sec in general is heard at all. The mentality in regards to hi-sec is 'if you don't like it, leave'. But I want to like Eve, I'd like to play this game for years to come. GǪand the problem here is that most of what's being proposed in the name of GÇ£improving highsecGÇ¥ usually comes in the form of GÇ£ruin core gameplayGÇ¥. That's why the name-calling starts: because the premise for most such changes almost always turn out to be something that is inherently incompatible with the game as a whole. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:18:00 -
[157] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Guy Grand wrote:[quote=Eternum Praetorian]I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed.
This makes you different then the current CSM how?
They are elected to represent people like me. I am not elected to represent myself am I? Sure you can. Fly to Iceland, attend the CCP event every year or how often they hold it and speak your opinion of how EVE IS REAL to you. |

Guy Grand
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:19:00 -
[158] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Guy Grand wrote:[quote=Eternum Praetorian]I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed.
This makes you different then the current CSM how?
They are elected to represent people like me. I am not elected to represent myself am I?
Your answer completely sidesteps my point. You fail completely to address the others. Try again.
|

Nehmen Geld
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:22:00 -
[159] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Too true, the CSM is all wrong at the moment. The problem is letting any goons in there, especially letting Mittani in as chair, and vile rat and other nullsec powermad idiots, big big mistake.
I figure that if you don't like a candidate then you should lobby against them. If, as is claimed elsewhere on this thread, only 10-15% of players actually vote then you can participate in the process by promoting an alternative candidate to whatever person you think is poisoning the CSM. 85% of potential votes are out there to win over. Right now they are blank. They shouldn't take much winning over. Suggesting that one candidate or class of candidate shouldn't be allowed to stand is absurd. You could always stand up and present yourself (or somebody else) as the antithesis of Mittens if you think he is such poison.
In any representative voting system people who don't vote rarely get representation... and they often complain after the fact too. No single successful candidate is the problem. The problem lies with the people who don't vote. So if you care about this then get people voting and get them voting for your favoured candidate, or at least against the one you want to keep out.
Personally, I like Mittens. He wears expensive jeans and expensive jeans are cool.... |

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
85
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:23:00 -
[160] - Quote
Guy Grand wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Guy Grand wrote:[quote=Eternum Praetorian]I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed.
This makes you different then the current CSM how?
They are elected to represent people like me. I am not elected to represent myself am I? Your answer completely sidesteps my point. You fail completely to address the others. Try again.
No, it does it just fine. I, like 99% of the player base, are meant to be represented by our elected representatives, the CSM. That is why they exist, and we should not have to "fly to Iceland" to have our interests communicated. |

Guy Grand
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:24:00 -
[161] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Guy Grand wrote:[quote=Eternum Praetorian]I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed.
This makes you different then the current CSM how?
They are elected to represent people like me. I am not elected to represent myself am I? Quote:CSM's must be fair, neutral and courteous in order to fulfill their intended roll. Else they are useless to everyone.
Are you new to the world as well as this game?
Are you new to a real-life working business model for a Video game?
Oh good you know how to edit.
So, no I am not new to business.
If I was, I would think that some customer elected body, in a biased election, could somehow represent anyone's interests but the elected. I would then whine about how my interests aren't being represented, even though any individual's interests are never served in a democracy, universal suffrage democracy or not. Then, having removed my own moral high ground by stating that I am the moral equivalent of who I am whining about, I would then go on to alienate everyone I could, you know, just to make my position as unsympathetic as possible. |

T-Jay Charante
The Scope Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:24:00 -
[162] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed. I want representatives who recognize my play style and the playing style of people like me. The current CSM, and most of the CSM's before that, are not giving me that "feeling". They are elected representatives that should be representing all of EVE online, from mining in empire to null sec. Their primary concern should be game balancing in every aspect of the game... If they can't do that then there is no point in having them.  At the very least we could use an Empire CSM, Low Sec CSM and Null Sec CSM (or something). What we have now can only steer CCP in the wrong direction, and I believe has. Purposefully or not, It doesn't really matter, because a null sec only CSM cannot fulfill the above requirements. These are important requirements. No ones "idea" of how the game should be played should take precedence over anyone else's. CSM's must be fair, neutral and courteous in order to fulfill their intended roll. Else they are useless to everyone. They don't give you that warm feeling inside because they're not fighting to buff your mission bots / isk return. You got Trebor and that other person what's his name? Whatever. The current CSM got voted because they presented their platforms they believe in and also gained the favor of their own alliances because they share similar feelings. PS: Use enter's less. Makes you look like you are skilled in grammar.
And just like in the Middle East, it's revolution time 
|

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
86
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:25:00 -
[163] - Quote
For the first time since the CSM was created, finally, we have got CCP to actually listen and start to fix many of the broken things in Eve, and to actually focus on what Eve is rather than force it into a change that wasnt that popular, while still promising to actually sort out Incarna when Eve is ready for it.
So, what is it you actually want? Are you mad that the CSM has actually succeeded, or are you mad that the success was partly due to someone you arbitrarily hate, probably due to what you have been told by your peers?
I really am sick of hearing about how Goonswarm and Mittani are destroying Eve, in my four and a half years of playing I have spent the last eight or nine months allied to Goonswarm, guess what I found? That they are alot of fun to fly with and are really not that different to every other faction in Eve. They scam, cheat, lie and splde people, just like everyone else does, they are simply more honest about it. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
27
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:26:00 -
[164] - Quote
T-Jay Charante wrote:And just like in the Middle East, it's revolution time  Just how do you figure I'm from the Middle East? What if it's my choice to abstain? |

Gilentajsa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:28:00 -
[165] - Quote
White Tree wrote:Gilentajsa wrote: What was that you said?
I couldn't hear you through the **** in your mouth.
I too get upset when my worldview is wrong and I am proved repeatedly to be a petulant infant.
Awwww, is someone full of themselves? s |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
202
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:29:00 -
[166] - Quote
Well its like i said when the current CSM got elected.. Mittens is a jerk.... but he is a jerk who is on our side (the players) so its a good thing.
Lawyers are jerks but everyone likes one when they're advocating our own cause. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
134
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:29:00 -
[167] - Quote
I don't like the Mittani, and I'm pretty sure from people copy pasting things to me that he doesn't like me either.
But he's worked pretty hard through every possible avenue (Media, direct contact, talking to players, radio speeches) to steer EVE back towards something that doesn't smell like a dying elk.
To deny that is pretty close minded and partial brain death may be responsible.
To help this thread, and my sworn overly-hair gelled-spitcatcher adorned nemesis, I reported all the pubbies in this thread that were so incapable of holding a normal human conversation that they had to result to swearing, insults, and name calling, like Mr.Randomspelledwithnumbers.
If you don't feel you got the representation you needed out of the CSM, there is literally nothing stopping you from creating a platform and running.
Its free.
Anybody can run, and the Nullsec population is dwarfed by the Empire population, if you get the word out, there is literally no way that any 0.0 group can stop you from becoming the CSM chair. Even if every Goon had 4 accounts and voted for their pick, if you got even 1/4 of the Empire population to vote for you, it would be a landslide.
Stop whining for CCP to do something for you, and go do it yourself. That's what EVE is all about, and always has been. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
202
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:30:00 -
[168] - Quote
Gilentajsa wrote:White Tree wrote:Gilentajsa wrote: What was that you said?
I couldn't hear you through the **** in your mouth.
I too get upset when my worldview is wrong and I am proved repeatedly to be a petulant infant. Awwww, is someone full of themselves?
Keep going =) Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Gilentajsa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:34:00 -
[169] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Gilentajsa wrote:White Tree wrote:The Mittani wrote:As I relaxed in the aftermath of a time-dilated fight where supercaps didn't rule the day and lag didn't determine the outcome, I browsed a rack of podkills with implants, spun my recently rebalanced hybrid-gunned ship, and typed off a poorly-thought-out ragepost about how the CSM was irrelevant, because I'm literally a big babby who has no idea what he's talking about.
I then went off to enjoy a bunch of new spaceship-related content that CCP produced after they finally acknowledged that focusing on FiS instead of WiS was the right thing to do! [quote=The Mittani]As I relaxed in the aftermath of a time-dilated fight where supercaps didn't rule the day and lag didn't determine the outcome, I browsed a rack of podkills with implants, spun my recently rebalanced hybrid-gunned ship, and typed off a poorly-thought-out ragepost about how the CSM was irrelevant, because I'm literally a big babby who has no idea what he's talking about. I then went off to enjoy a bunch of new spaceship-related content that CCP produced after they finally acknowledged that focusing on FiS instead of WiS was the right thing to do! What was that you said? I couldn't hear you through the **** in your mouth. While I wouldn't be quite so crass as the poster above me. This does actually illustrate a problem with this CSM. Mittani's personality is quite dominant in that group and it has become apparent its a case of mr Mittani organgrinder and his half dozen monkeys. It does damage the balance of the CSM when its quite obvious only one person is calling the shots and the rest are just acting like beta followers rather than presenting individual and independent viewpoints.
+1 for the mental picture
It does raise a very good point though, does a handful of narcissistic megalomaniacs (<--not even directed at the entire CSM) truly represent YOUR interests in Eve or just Toolswarm Federations? s |

Guy Grand
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:36:00 -
[170] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Guy Grand wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Guy Grand wrote:[quote=Eternum Praetorian]I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed.
This makes you different then the current CSM how?
They are elected to represent people like me. I am not elected to represent myself am I? Your answer completely sidesteps my point. You fail completely to address the others. Try again. No, it does it just fine. I, like 99% of the player base, are meant to be represented by our elected representatives, the CSM. That is why they exist, and we should not have to "fly to Iceland" to have our interests communicated.
No it doesn't. Your presumption that all players are like you, or can be, underlines your social solipsism at its most basic. You also presume to have information you don't have, by stating that you know what 99% of the player base wants (not to suggest that you didn't just pull that percentage straight out of your ass). OWS lemming indeed Karadion.
"The purpose of the CSM is to represent society interests to CCP. This requires active engagement with the player community to master EVE issue awareness, understanding, and evaluation in the context of the GÇ£greatest good for the greater player baseGÇ¥. The scope of issues is restricted only to EVE, its ongoing development, and limited meta (out-of-game) issues which have direct relevance to the EVE universe."
Notice it doesn't say, greatest good of Eternum Preatorian and his friends. Also note that I'm still not buying your baseless accusation that the CSM is corrupt, just because you are unhappy with things as they are. This is the actual thesis of your whole position, that your personal interests are not being met, and that that means that the communities are not as well. Which does not follow, and never will. |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum KUGUTSUMEN.
201
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:36:00 -
[171] - Quote
This thread has been fun. |

Signal11th
148
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:37:00 -
[172] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:I don't like the Mittani, and I'm pretty sure from people copy pasting things to me that he doesn't like me either.
But he's worked pretty hard through every possible avenue (Media, direct contact, talking to players, radio speeches) to steer EVE back towards something that doesn't smell like a dying elk.
To deny that is pretty close minded and partial brain death may be responsible.
To help this thread, and my sworn overly-hair gelled-spitcatcher adorned nemesis, I reported all the pubbies in this thread that were so incapable of holding a normal human conversation that they had to result to swearing, insults, and name calling, like Mr.Randomspelledwithnumbers.
If you don't feel you got the representation you needed out of the CSM, there is literally nothing stopping you from creating a platform and running.
Its free.
Anybody can run, and the Nullsec population is dwarfed by the Empire population, if you get the word out, there is literally no way that any 0.0 group can stop you from becoming the CSM chair. Even if every Goon had 4 accounts and voted for their pick, if you got even 1/4 of the Empire population to vote for you, it would be a landslide.
Stop whining for CCP to do something for you, and go do it yourself. That's what EVE is all about, and always has been.
Good post totally agree, You do realise the term "pubbie" is an insult as well though? God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |

baltec1
129
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:37:00 -
[173] - Quote
I'm betting this thread would not even be here if it wasn't for the war agaist the ice giants.
Nothing but tears and attempts to get back at people doing pvp in a pvp game. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
202
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:42:00 -
[174] - Quote
Gilentajsa wrote:While I wouldn't be quite so crass as the poster above me. This does actually illustrate a problem with this CSM. Mittani's personality is quite dominant in that group and it has become apparent its a case of mr Mittani organgrinder and his half dozen monkeys. It does damage the balance of the CSM when its quite obvious only one person is calling the shots and the rest are just acting like beta followers rather than presenting individual and independent viewpoints.
Erm.... what?
How can you state something like this, you have access to their Skype meetings or something? Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Barakkus
861
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:44:00 -
[175] - Quote
Wow, I saw this about 2 hours ago while I was getting ready for work, it now has 9 pages lol |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
97
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:44:00 -
[176] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:While I wouldn't be quite so crass as the poster above me. This does actually illustrate a problem with this CSM. Mittani's personality is quite dominant in that group and it has become apparent its a case of mr Mittani organgrinder and his half dozen monkeys. It does damage the balance of the CSM when its quite obvious only one person is calling the shots and the rest are just acting like beta followers rather than presenting individual and independent viewpoints.
Some people with strong personalities are able to dominate those around them.
Even if what you say is true, what you describe is not a 'problem with the CSM', its a basic feature of human interaction. |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
27
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:46:00 -
[177] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:Wow, I saw this about 2 hours ago while I was getting ready for work, it now has 9 pages lol You have to love the pubbie rage. |

Garia666
T.H.U.G L.I.F.E Xenon-Empire
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:46:00 -
[178] - Quote
what CCP should understand is that just like CCP the CSM sits there with there own agenda. If you have large alliances with allot of members voting for there guy. They will want what is best for them. This has nothing to do with what is best for eve in general or its players..
specialy that goon fecker.. ***** should be shot on sight... . ( in game :)
|

Garia666
T.H.U.G L.I.F.E Xenon-Empire
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:47:00 -
[179] - Quote
what CCP should understand is that just like CCP the CSM sits there with there own agenda. If you have large alliances with allot of members voting for there guy. They will want what is best for them. This has nothing to do with what is best for eve in general or its players..
specialy that goon fecker.. ***** should be shot on sight... . ( in game :)
|

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum KUGUTSUMEN.
203
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:50:00 -
[180] - Quote
Garia666 wrote:
specialy that goon fecker.. ***** should be shot on sight... . ( in game :)
Which one? Vile or Mittani, I would say Vile tbh but thats just me. |

Cailais
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
73
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:52:00 -
[181] - Quote
I love goons - they're just so passionate! 
C.
|

Phunnestyle
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:53:00 -
[182] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:Jada Maroo wrote:I don't disagree. But it was hardly a selfless act and in the end will just allow Goons to expand territory. Why would we want to expand territory? "Oh boy more sov bills to pay for space that nobody uses! Hell yeah!"
LOL Goons are almost always on the defencive. While PL,NCDOT,Raiden where on break even IRC where powning Goons arses. Skill is very loosely used when implying it with a Goon. Goons are what they are, a swarm of bad/average players with exceptions ofc, reliant upon corruption, self gaining influences, lagg & having mass odds on fights. But where else would they go, as quality alliances will only recruit skilled players/experienced Vets.
If Goons where any good with Supers/Titans, new how & when to use them & hadn't sold alot of there Super capital fleet off the current insult of a winter patch wouldn't be looming. The current patch can't viably go ahead anyway, so much wrong with it,does very little to benifit EVE community, but does benifit a insignificant few entities. It brakes a broken game even more. Refine Supers/Titans down, do something positive & benificial for the game, this is what every1 including Goons/DC should strive for regardless,not bl00dy minded self gain. |

Reislier
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:54:00 -
[183] - Quote
Back in the summer, I marked October on my calendar. Was anyone surprised to see staffing changes this month? I remember thinking.. if this is true.. then October.. and here we are. A reorganization is a wise move on CCPGÇÖs part.. itGÇÖs better than the alternatives.
Improving the CSM process would also be wise.. especially now. CSM election is only as good as attendance at the website. ThatGÇÖs not a big percentage when you think about it.
If CCP wants a thorough sampling of players for elections.. and it would seem a sound tactic to firm up communication with their customers. Tie the voting process to the game login screen.
You want a good spread on player input, that is where you get it because it is needed now. It will not happen in the forums.. hasnGÇÖt yet.. If players donGÇÖt vote then, it wonGÇÖt be because they didnGÇÖt know about it.
If a broader player representation is desired, change the process to reach them. It certainly wouldnGÇÖt hurt.
|

Killer Gandry
Oblivion's Regiment
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:56:00 -
[184] - Quote
Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked.
A few sidenotes to this:
NeXgate was an uproar from playerbase and not something the CSM set up. It was the playerbase which got CCP's attention. Any CSM adoring himself with feathers over this is nothing more than a smug crow walking around with a peacocks feathers.
The CSM has no influence. They are nothing more than an overglorified sounding board to see what CCP can get away with. Or think they can get away with since this CSM works only for a part of the playerbase. The fact WoD and Dust got scaled down is merely due to the fact that the only cashcow CCP has atm is EVE. the other 2 only cost money for the time being. Since CCP has to keep it's shareholders and other parties whom they owe money happy they firt have to make sure the cashcow doesn't die of starvation.
WoD and Dust development do continue and when they hit the market eventually and start bringing in money, THAT is the time to see what the value of EVE still is for them.
|

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:57:00 -
[185] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:I'm betting this thread would not even be here if it wasn't for the war agaist the ice giants.
Nothing but tears and attempts to get back at people doing pvp in a pvp game.
Wow you really believe that?
|

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
484
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 13:58:00 -
[186] - Quote
Awesome! Another one of these threads, all made by the same group of people.
I'm not sure if the thread actually has a point or is just another in a long string of "I hate goons so I'm going to post how angry I am that they are on the CSM" thread but this will be my contribution.
I think we've done a pretty good job. We all ran on platforms, I think I've helped move the narrative along in a way that has improved the status of the issues I've outlined in my platform. Mittens had his platform, he's done a fantastic job putting attention where it's been needed. The rest of the CSM get's along mostly great and our working relationship with the rank and file CCP devs has been nothing short of astounding so everything as far as I can see is going swimmingly.
I think some of the haters out there are mad because we're blowing up your empire miners.
Some others are upset because they don't like how some of us carry ourselves in public.
A few are just upset because they hated that they got scammed by a goon once and this is their venue to rant about it.
A few had vested interests in maintaining a broken status quo and our push to bring supercaps down to earth pissed them off (I'm especially smug about this one).
There have even been some people who were mad that I didn't take a silly rant thread seriously! I continue to be under no obligation to act as you want me to. You ain't my momma.
None of the above has any impact on our ability to do a KICKEN RAD job representing the players and doing what we can to help make this game great again.
So peace out thread, you've been fun. Can't wait to post in tomorrow's version!
hugs and kisses,
the guy who won the election by getting more votes by people who think we're doing exactly what they sent us here to do. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1066
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:00:00 -
[187] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:STAY ON TOPIC - I WILL HAVE NO PROBLEM REPORTING TROLLS 
oh no
you might report trolls who mock your horrible thread
*backs slowly out of the forum* |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:01:00 -
[188] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:STAY ON TOPIC - I WILL HAVE NO PROBLEM REPORTING TROLLS  oh no you WILL report trolls who mock your horrible thread *backs slowly out of the forum*
fixed that for you - its quite a serious thread m8. But as usual the goon squad make a mokery of anything thats remotely serious about this game.. As you can see the sentence has a smiley on the end, meaning dont take life too seriously mate also. |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum KUGUTSUMEN.
203
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:01:00 -
[189] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:STAY ON TOPIC - I WILL HAVE NO PROBLEM REPORTING TROLLS  oh no you might report trolls who mock your horrible thread *backs slowly out of the forum*
Reported for personal attack.
|

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
259
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:04:00 -
[190] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:Weaselior wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:STAY ON TOPIC - I WILL HAVE NO PROBLEM REPORTING TROLLS  oh no you might report trolls who mock your horrible thread *backs slowly out of the forum* Reported for personal attack.
Reported for no content [img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
202
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:05:00 -
[191] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:STAY ON TOPIC - I WILL HAVE NO PROBLEM REPORTING TROLLS  oh no you might report trolls who mock your horrible thread *backs slowly out of the forum*
For some reason I pictured a fat ginger in a sweaty shirt screaming what that guy said and waving the yellow "report" flag. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum KUGUTSUMEN.
203
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:06:00 -
[192] - Quote
Headerman wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:Weaselior wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:STAY ON TOPIC - I WILL HAVE NO PROBLEM REPORTING TROLLS  oh no you might report trolls who mock your horrible thread *backs slowly out of the forum* Reported for personal attack. Reported for no content
:( |

Vastek Non
State War Academy Caldari State
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:08:00 -
[193] - Quote
Signal11th wrote:Bascially thats just a warning shot saying "certain 0.0 dwellers who will remain nameless, it's time to shut the **** up" but I would like the CSM to continue because apart from some disruptive elements to it it actually does a good job.
I think he has just figured out that some people are getting a little to big for their boots and it's a polite way of telling them to calm down a bit.
^ This.
For what its worth, in my opinion the CSM has largely done a pretty good job of presenting 'many' different views. I'm thinking of Trebor, Seleene here in particular.
Mittani i'm not too fond of and suspect his ego needs taking down several notches. Its difficult to tell if his seeming contempt for any not Goons is genuine or just over the top roleplay, however I suspect somewhere inbetween. Either way not necessarily good for EVE as a whole. It appears Hilmar may agree with that viewpoint.
I find Vile Rats sudden interest in High Sec life a bit surprising, however am trying to be optimistic rather than my initial cynicism.
The rest of the CSM I can't really comment on.
|

Kazanir
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
333
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:09:00 -
[194] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:fixed that for you - its quite a serious thread m8. But as usual the goon squad make a mokery of anything thats remotely serious about this game..
So far Goons:
1. Have put two people on the CSM. 2. Have used the CSM to loudly demand that CCP put more resources towards EVE. 3. Have actually been effective in helping get CCP to change their tune towards EVE. 4. Have been dicks to people on public forums quite a lot of the time.
I personally am not prone to trolling, shitposting, or being a **** to people on forums. I'm a notoriously serious poster. But by any measure, the CSM this year has been damn effective, and if the price I have to pay for that is Vile Rat and Mittani being a **** to people like you on the forums, it is a price I am extremely willing to pay.
I think a lot of people -- even a lot of people who are no fans of Goonswarm politically -- will agree with me. |

RougeOperator
Autocannons Anonymous
94
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:09:00 -
[195] - Quote
Quote:Eurogamer: So you can confirm that the situation with CCP today is only different from that of six months ago because of the recent issues with the Incarna expansion?
Hilmar P+¬tursson: Absolutely. Incarna was the final point of realisation that we were trying to do too much at the same time. We were creating avatar tech for two games, integrating in a single code branch with teams around the world all contributing. It was a very ambitious thing and we didn't do it well enough. We're taking that in and addressing that. We've learned a lot, and we will certainly do everything we can to avoid those mistakes again. http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-10-21-eurogamer-interviews-ccps-hilmar-petursson-interview?page=2
Reading parts of the article make me wonder just how out of touch hilmar is. I could quote and break down more of it.
BUT i can say that the CSM is not the issue here after reading the interview.
|

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:11:00 -
[196] - Quote
Kazanir wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:fixed that for you - its quite a serious thread m8. But as usual the goon squad make a mokery of anything thats remotely serious about this game.. So far Goons: 1. Have put two people on the CSM. 2. Have used the CSM to loudly demand that CCP put more resources towards EVE. 3. Have actually been effective in helping get CCP to change their tune towards EVE. 4. Have been dicks to people on public forums quite a lot of the time. I personally am not prone to trolling, shitposting, or being a **** to people on forums. I'm a notoriously serious poster. But by any measure, the CSM this year has been damn effective, and if the price I have to pay for that is Vile Rat and Mittani being a **** to people like you on the forums, it is a price I am extremely willing to pay. I think a lot of people -- even a lot of people who are no fans of Goonswarm politically -- will agree with me.
I think you will also find ALOT dont.. Anyway everyone is entitiled to their own opinion and this is what discussions are for.
|

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
490
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:12:00 -
[197] - Quote
Vastek Non wrote:I find Vile Rats sudden interest in High Sec life a bit surprising, however am trying to be optimistic rather than my initial cynicism.
Honestly my interest in highsec is because I've had several people point out (correctly) that we haven't done a good enough job bringing attention to this gameplay style and I agree. I'm going to make an effort and do what I can.
Also I'm a one term candidate and have posted publicly, before I even got elected, that I was only going to run for one term. I don't have to care about 'pandering' accusations at all thankfully. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1066
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:12:00 -
[198] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Weaselior wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:STAY ON TOPIC - I WILL HAVE NO PROBLEM REPORTING TROLLS  oh no you WILL report trolls who mock your horrible thread *backs slowly out of the forum* fixed that for you - its quite a serious thread m8. But as usual the goon squad make a mokery of anything thats remotely serious about this game.. As you can see the sentence has a smiley on the end, meaning dont take life too seriously mate also.
oh no the uncertainty is gone :ohdear:
well i'm a dead man anyway now so I'm free, you cant do anything more to me to out of your thread :sun: |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1066
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:13:00 -
[199] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:I think you will also find ALOT dont.. Anyway everyone is entitiled to their own opinion and this is what discussions are for.
when you become entitled to an opinion you will be given one |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum KUGUTSUMEN.
206
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:14:00 -
[200] - Quote
RougeOperator wrote:
BUT i can say that the CSM is not the issue here after reading the interview.
Your right the current CSM isn't. However the CSM Process could be changed to have delegate positions for different aspects of the game, high, low, null. etc. So the CSM isn't completely biased towards a certain play style. This is the issue, not the current CSM or Goons. Sadly the OP is too butthurt over goons to realize this.
I await getting reported for personal attack. |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:14:00 -
[201] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:I think you will also find ALOT dont.. Anyway everyone is entitiled to their own opinion and this is what discussions are for.
when you become entitled to an opinion you will be given one

|

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:16:00 -
[202] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:RougeOperator wrote:
BUT i can say that the CSM is not the issue here after reading the interview.
Your right the current CSM isn't. However the CSM Process could be changed to have delegate positions for different aspects of the game, high, low, null. etc. So the CSM isn't completely biased towards a certain play style. This is the issue, not the current CSM or Goons. Sadly the OP is too butthurt over goons to realize this. I await getting reported for personal attack.
You are entitled to your own opinion. If you want to lower yourself to the state of your forums, and participate in personal attacks, then thats up to you also. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1066
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:16:00 -
[203] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:RougeOperator wrote:
BUT i can say that the CSM is not the issue here after reading the interview.
Your right the current CSM isn't. However the CSM Process could be changed to have delegate positions for different aspects of the game, high, low, null. etc. So the CSM isn't completely biased towards a certain play style. This is the issue, not the current CSM or Goons. Sadly the OP is too butthurt over goons to realize this.
i look forward to this, and a suprising number of highsec characters that are certainly not 0.0 alts voting for Iraf Thalbierd as their highsec representative |

Kismeteer
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:16:00 -
[204] - Quote
Yes, how dare the CSM push a certain play style that includes PVP (hybrids and assault ships scheduled to be fixed), industrial stuff (massive PI changes), reading (new font), massive battles (time dilation), and module use (t2 modules).
http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=2428
How DARE they change our game for the better with crap we've been complaining about from the beginning.
The cry of 'BUT THEY ARE GOONS!' does not mean we want to continue to play a terrible game. We'd rather play a better game. |

SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
125
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:16:00 -
[205] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:I don't like the Mittani, and I'm pretty sure from people copy pasting things to me that he doesn't like me either.
But he's worked pretty hard through every possible avenue (Media, direct contact, talking to players, radio speeches) to steer EVE back towards something that doesn't smell like a dying elk.
To deny that is pretty close minded and partial brain death may be responsible.
If you don't feel you got the representation you needed out of the CSM, there is literally nothing stopping you from creating a platform and running.
Its free.
Anybody can run, and the Nullsec population is dwarfed by the Empire population, if you get the word out, there is literally no way that any 0.0 group can stop you from becoming the CSM chair. Even if every Goon had 4 accounts and voted for their pick, if you got even 1/4 of the Empire population to vote for you, it would be a landslide.
Stop whining for CCP to do something for you, and go do it yourself. That's what EVE is all about, and always has been.
See, I don't like PL, because PL are our enemies, or something like that (And they probably feel the same way, I don't know, just a guess). But hey, if even him is claiming that a Goon (And not the average goon, the most goon of all goons) did something great, you've got to recognize that.
Empire dwellers (I mean, the 2/3 pubbies who come and ***** about how biased the CSM is toward nullsec entities) have votes too. They have alts too. Just like us. The thing is, that you have nullsec entities, organized, social groups (Like Goonswarm, AAA, the DRF, PL and so on), and then you have empire space peoples.
Sure, you have your 50 man corporation running lvl4s or even lvl5s, sure you do organize operations and such, it's just fine. But all in all, it's still a small group. Why ? Because empire space isn't competitive. Why ? Because there is no way to really compete. Why ? Hell if I know. But what does it brings us to ? Well, with no competition, there is no reason to have a group (Or at least, a big group, with much manpower). Why would you have a 1500 man alliance in empire ? What would you do with those guys ? You can wardec peoples, they'll just stay in a station. You can destroy poses (Pretty much the only thing you can do to a corporation who refuse to fight). You can run missions (Yeh, let's gather hundreds of peoples to run lvl 4s !)...
The leader of the 1500 dudes alliance will just stand up and say, we'll take a lowsec territory. Or, we will take some sovs in this area with the help of those guys. Or, we will support and backup those guys, because they want to be friends with us. Or something like that. Empire space doesn't and shouldn't support that. It's just not supposed to be like that. It's small scale because there is no reason for it to be something else.
No organization => No power in the CSM.
It's just like that, and it will probably stay like that.
Organizing empire pubbies is just...you can't do it. Lots and lots of pubbies just don't care about stuff, and they'll just keep doing lvl 4s until they get there ultimate missioning ship. You can't help it, it's just like that.
And then you have empire dwellers who actually cares about the CSM and all, but they are like 5% of the entire HS population. That means, they can't do crap about it. |

Slade Trillgon
Endless Possibilities Inc.
44
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:18:00 -
[206] - Quote
I am here to confirm that 'IT' had nothing to do with the massive hit CCP took to their wallet and everything to do with the CSM 
That is all I will contribute.
Slade |

Signal11th
149
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:20:00 -
[207] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Vastek Non wrote:I find Vile Rats sudden interest in High Sec life a bit surprising, however am trying to be optimistic rather than my initial cynicism.
Honestly my interest in highsec is because I've had several people point out (correctly) that we haven't done a good enough job bringing attention to this gameplay style and I agree. I'm going to make an effort and do what I can. Also I'm a one term candidate and have posted publicly, before I even got elected, that I was only going to run for one term. I don't have to care about 'pandering' accusations at all thankfully.
I do actually remember Vile Rat posting in another thread a while ago that he was looking to support High-Sec in matters of CSM'ness. Can't find the bloody thread.
Yes VR don;t faint I'm sticking up for you, not that you need it! just trying to be fair. God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |

Mr Management
Anger Management
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:21:00 -
[208] - Quote
The CSM is broken. The game was better in CCP's hand.
When 5000 people can vote for their alliance leader who publically writes that he wants to break Eve then the system is flawed. |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:22:00 -
[209] - Quote
Well I guess Hilmar as the same reservations and concerns as us 'non goons' do. The funny thing is, its only the goons coming in hear crying about it. What does that say? Whos butthurt?
Hilmar will make his own mind up. Hopefully he grows some balls and does the right thing. If he can fire his own staff he shouldmt have a problem doing this..
I think I have said my peace in this post. So ill leave you to discuss further without my intervention.
|

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1066
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:22:00 -
[210] - Quote
Mr Management wrote:The CSM is broken. The game was better in CCP's hand.
When 5000 people can vote for their alliance leader who publically writes that he wants to break Eve then the system is flawed.
sounds like you need...some anger management |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
792
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:32:00 -
[211] - Quote
Mr Management wrote:The CSM is broken. The game was better in CCP's hand.
When 5000 people can vote for their alliance leader who publically writes that he wants to break Eve then the system is flawed. No. It show that the system works. The "broken" part is that they only need 5,000 to get him the chair because the complainers can't stop complaining instead of activating and motivating an opposition.
That's a flaw in the opposition, not the system. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:35:00 -
[212] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Mr Management wrote:The CSM is broken. The game was better in CCP's hand.
When 5000 people can vote for their alliance leader who publically writes that he wants to break Eve then the system is flawed. No. It show that the system works. The "broken" part is that they only need 5,000 to get him the chair because the complainers can't stop complaining instead of activating and motivating an opposition. That's a flaw in the opposition, not the system.
Wow anything about goons, you are there feeling butthurt, goon alt spotted.... go away tippia you offer nothing of any worth.... 0/10
|

Jacob cirth
Ion Corp. Citex Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:37:00 -
[213] - Quote
The problem with the CSM is they operate without the consent of the players. There was no option for "no CSM at all", and instead, a lot of people just clicked "abstain" or didn't bother to vote in the first place. |

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
178
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:37:00 -
[214] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Ciar Meara wrote:Karadion wrote:"Goons this, goons that, goons everything, goons are ruining my "Walking in Station" experience! Give me my incarna, wah wah wah." Go play Second Life or in traffic.
At least the CSM had some influence in getting CCP to dump their stupid Vampire MMO and scale down Dust that both of would have never worked. 1: They didn't 2: The Mittani was anything but critical in his view towards incarna and MT 3: Vile Rat didn't even care about buying golden scorpions with Aurum 4: CSM was late jumping on the bandwagon and is now some are trying to claim victory while all they did was ride along. 1) Yes they were 2) Wrong 3) Yes he did 4) Wrong again. All typical empire pubbie answers.
I'll enjoy proving you wrong on all those statements. But I have to dig out the relevant forum topics where Vile Rat being is usual charming self and states that he doesn't care about golden scorpions and insults everybody for hours until somebody explains him about what everybody is talking about (him being CSM we explain it slowly, because he truly is clueless) and he (eventually) flip flops. (Mittani stated it also but at least he was drunk in a bar in Iceland when he did)
The expansive posts, articles and twits of the Mittani saying its very good that MT is in the NeX/Incarna store because then it wouldn't impact FiS and it is a bold new plan yadayada etc. We all know the NeX was stillborn together with incarna cause without player driven content you can't actually DO anything while walking around. The teams working with WiS said exactly that a week or so ago. The Mittani even recanted and almost claimed he was wrong himself in one of his more recent articles showing that at least he has some sense.
The minutes you like to rever to where a sad, useless and nothing saying document that held nothing of interest. Showing once again what the CSM truly is good at. Offcourse you don't have to argue with actual arguments, you can just go and continue to "yes, sir" without actually looking at facts, It is just easier that way, isn't it?
I am not saying that A CSM isn't usefull I am saying that in this, only a select few had impact, and it was only by chance.
- [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
126
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:39:00 -
[215] - Quote
Mr Management wrote:The CSM is broken. The game was better in CCP's hand.
Sure. More walking in a closet and more monocles. Go ahead.
When 5000 people can vote for their alliance leader who publically writes that he wants to break Eve then the system is flawed.
Nope.
Check what's happening in real life. I'll take America as an exemple, despite how stupid that is.
Two entites. Democrats and Republicans.
Democrats ideas are stupidities, for Republicans.
Republicans ideas are stupidities, for Democrats.
If a Democrat wins the election because he had more votes, the republicans will yell at everyone something along the lines of "When peoples can vote for someone who publically says he wants to do that kind of things and that kind of things (Which are equals to self destruction, in the eyes of a republican), the system is flawed".
I'm sorry but that's it. One's terrorist is another one's freedom fighter, am I right ?
And damn it the CSM isn't all about the Mittani you know.
The current list is :
The Mittani (GSF) Vile Rat (GSF) UAxDeath (Legion of Death) Seleene (PL) Draco Llasa (Thundercats) Trebor Daehwood (Dirt Nap Squad) Meissa Anunthiel (Rooks and Kings) Killer2 (Morsus Mihi) White Tree (Elite space guild)
GSF don't hold the majority of the council. Actually, more like 1/3 of it. And that's if you want to believe that everyone in GSF follow and blindly love everything the Mittani says. Which is untrue, but hey, can't force you to believe something you don't want to believe into, right ?
Also, the one who wrote about how the fight between Country A and Country B is unbalanced because Country A has more peoples, well then Country B should try to find peoples to fight Country A with. You know, allies. If you don't have allies, get mercenaries to help you. If you don't have neither allies nor some spacemoney to pay mercenaries, well then why are you here in the first place ?
Also, the tools to fight the blob exist. Those are called bombers (Ask Morsus Mihi, they use those. PL does aswell). Or, they are called "kiting fleets". You know, Tengus, Munnins, that kind of things. PL knows about Tengus and how they can still win outnumbered. They had a number problem, they came up with a well thought-out solution.
Supercapitals en masse weren't counter-able. You can't kite, speed tank, sigtank, you can't jam them, you can't slow them down with webs, logistics or any kind of interdiction ships were blowed up to bits by Titans or endless hordes of drones and all fuckups were covered by the CTRLQ elite maneuver. That's why the supercapital nerf was needed. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1066
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:39:00 -
[216] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Tippia wrote:Mr Management wrote:The CSM is broken. The game was better in CCP's hand.
When 5000 people can vote for their alliance leader who publically writes that he wants to break Eve then the system is flawed. No. It show that the system works. The "broken" part is that they only need 5,000 to get him the chair because the complainers can't stop complaining instead of activating and motivating an opposition. That's a flaw in the opposition, not the system. Wow anything about goons, you are there feeling butthurt, goon alt spotted.... go away tippia you offer nothing of any worth.... 0/10 didn't you say you were getting out of the thread
anyway offtopic post spotted, reported |

Ya Huei
Imperial Collective
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:39:00 -
[217] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Well I guess Hilmar as the same reservations and concerns as us 'non goons' do.
Who died and made you public speaker for all 'non goons' ?
|

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1066
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:40:00 -
[218] - Quote
Jacob cirth wrote:The problem with the CSM is they operate without the consent of the players. There was no option for "no CSM at all", and instead, a lot of people just clicked "abstain" or didn't bother to vote in the first place.
sure there is
you run as a candidate who promises to do nothing when elected
not our problem that not one of the thousands of you idiots thought up the solution I spotted in seconds |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:41:00 -
[219] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Tippia wrote:Mr Management wrote:The CSM is broken. The game was better in CCP's hand.
When 5000 people can vote for their alliance leader who publically writes that he wants to break Eve then the system is flawed. No. It show that the system works. The "broken" part is that they only need 5,000 to get him the chair because the complainers can't stop complaining instead of activating and motivating an opposition. That's a flaw in the opposition, not the system. Wow anything about goons, you are there feeling butthurt, goon alt spotted.... go away tippia you offer nothing of any worth.... 0/10 didn't you say you were getting out of the thread anyway offtopic post spotted, reported
Yeah sorry... I leave now... |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1066
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:42:00 -
[220] - Quote
I will be that candidate, I am extremely lazy and will do nothing but jabber about worthless crap, vote for me |

Meeogi
Debitum Naturae RED.Legion
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:43:00 -
[221] - Quote
This has been the most effective CSM team in the history of the program.
Good job guys. |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum KUGUTSUMEN.
206
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:43:00 -
[222] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Tippia wrote:Mr Management wrote:The CSM is broken. The game was better in CCP's hand.
When 5000 people can vote for their alliance leader who publically writes that he wants to break Eve then the system is flawed. No. It show that the system works. The "broken" part is that they only need 5,000 to get him the chair because the complainers can't stop complaining instead of activating and motivating an opposition. That's a flaw in the opposition, not the system. Wow anything about goons, you are there feeling butthurt, goon alt spotted.... go away tippia you offer nothing of any worth.... 0/10
So everyone who disagrees with you is a goon alt? Kindof a silly logic.
Plus Tippia is awesome and pretty well known around the forums. Next your going to say Akita T or Chribba are Goon alts if they don't agree with you. |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:46:00 -
[223] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:Tippia wrote:Mr Management wrote:The CSM is broken. The game was better in CCP's hand.
When 5000 people can vote for their alliance leader who publically writes that he wants to break Eve then the system is flawed. No. It show that the system works. The "broken" part is that they only need 5,000 to get him the chair because the complainers can't stop complaining instead of activating and motivating an opposition. That's a flaw in the opposition, not the system. Wow anything about goons, you are there feeling butthurt, goon alt spotted.... go away tippia you offer nothing of any worth.... 0/10 So everyone who disagrees with you is a goon alt? Kindof a silly logic. Plus Tippia is awesome and pretty well known around the forums. Next your going to say Akita T or Chribba are Goon alts if they don't agree with you.
Lol well known for his terrible posting, and his self righeous attitude you mean? Oh btw read hilmars quote (himself and OTHER PLAYERS) are concerned.. there must of been quite alot for him to pay attention..dont you think?
anyway im out....now the post has been moved to jita, its just gonna get trolled by you lot...\o |

Ya Huei
Imperial Collective
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:47:00 -
[224] - Quote
hey u started it... |

Vastek Non
State War Academy Caldari State
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:57:00 -
[225] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:RougeOperator wrote:
BUT i can say that the CSM is not the issue here after reading the interview.
Your right the current CSM isn't. However the CSM Process could be changed to have delegate positions for different aspects of the game, high, low, null. etc. So the CSM isn't completely biased towards a certain play style. This is the issue, not the current CSM or Goons. Sadly the OP is too butthurt over goons to realize this. I await getting reported for personal attack. You are entitled to your own opinion. If you want to lower yourself to the state of your forums, and participate in personal attacks, then thats up to you also.
Seriously you need to calm down man. You are being trolled mercilessly by the Goons and are feeding them tasty cookies.
I agree that their in game and forum response to people is pretty hopeless, to be polite, but why give them attention? |

Vastek Non
State War Academy Caldari State
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:01:00 -
[226] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Vastek Non wrote:I find Vile Rats sudden interest in High Sec life a bit surprising, however am trying to be optimistic rather than my initial cynicism.
Honestly my interest in highsec is because I've had several people point out (correctly) that we haven't done a good enough job bringing attention to this gameplay style and I agree. I'm going to make an effort and do what I can. Also I'm a one term candidate and have posted publicly, before I even got elected, that I was only going to run for one term. I don't have to care about 'pandering' accusations at all thankfully.
Ok, good to hear (the bit about paying attention to more than just your powerblock).
Honestly i'm mostly a HS player, but in reality we all know that massive sections of the game need looking at,mostly null to be honest. I have no problem with that and if you want to run for a second term and are looking out for the game, good luck to you. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
630
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:15:00 -
[227] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:While I wouldn't be quite so crass as the poster above me. This does actually illustrate a problem with this CSM. Mittani's personality is quite dominant in that group and it has become apparent its a case of mr Mittani organgrinder and his half dozen monkeys. It does damage the balance of the CSM when its quite obvious only one person is calling the shots and the rest are just acting like beta followers rather than presenting individual and independent viewpoints. Some people with strong personalities are able to dominate those around them. Even if what you say is true, what you describe is not a 'problem with the CSM', its a basic feature of human interaction.
Yes and no. I do agree it is an issue with human interaction certainly. This CSM has been pretty smooth internally with a united front and all that - but it has seemed a bit monotheistic at times. Good and bad I guess, but this thread was sparked by Hillmar's comment that a lot of people are worried about the nullsec vote bloc dominated CSM.
I guess the proposal might be that in the future nullsec get 3 seats, hisec get 3 seats, lowsec/fw/RP etc get 3 seats? I dunno something like that. That way you might at least get 3 sets of stronger personalities rather than one alpha male and other bloc vote candidates who either drop out earlier or learn to tow the line. Not sure exactly how it would (or could) work but its clearly something being considered.
For what its worth I think Mittani and this CSM have achieved some good things with publicising the Jita Riots and working on our behalf to mobilize the gaming press against CCP's summer insanity. Sometimes you need unity!
But the bad things like the NeX collaboration (boo-hiss) happen because Mittani didn't care and nobody else was sufficiently different enough in opinion and strong enough to stand up and be heard on it.
Despite the crazy horror show that was the battles on the first CSM (where certain delegates had to get threatened with being thrown in the habour) it did at least serve as a meeting point of different interest groups who genuinely did their best to represent and advocate message from their parts of the community.
It was a constant internal war but it did at least bring Eve together on the conference floor.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
630
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:19:00 -
[228] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Mr Management wrote:The CSM is broken. The game was better in CCP's hand.
When 5000 people can vote for their alliance leader who publically writes that he wants to break Eve then the system is flawed. No. It show that the system works. The "broken" part is that they only need 5,000 to get him the chair because the complainers can't stop complaining instead of activating and motivating an opposition. That's a flaw in the opposition, not the system.
Listen to Tippia. She knows what she's talking about.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Signal11th
152
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:20:00 -
[229] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Tippia wrote:Mr Management wrote:The CSM is broken. The game was better in CCP's hand.
When 5000 people can vote for their alliance leader who publically writes that he wants to break Eve then the system is flawed. No. It show that the system works. The "broken" part is that they only need 5,000 to get him the chair because the complainers can't stop complaining instead of activating and motivating an opposition. That's a flaw in the opposition, not the system. Listen to Tippia. She knows what she's talking about.
Wel not exactly hidden knowledge that one is it? Talk about saying the blindingly obvious. God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |

baltec1
129
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:24:00 -
[230] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:baltec1 wrote:I'm betting this thread would not even be here if it wasn't for the war agaist the ice giants.
Nothing but tears and attempts to get back at people doing pvp in a pvp game. Wow you really believe that?
People were not whining about goons untill they started the ice war and the boot CSM posts started soon after. So yea, I do.
Personally, this CSM have pushed to get many problems I have had with eve for years and given that the vast bulk are now getting fixed I would say successfull CSM, will vote for them again. |

Signal11th
152
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:29:00 -
[231] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:baltec1 wrote:I'm betting this thread would not even be here if it wasn't for the war agaist the ice giants.
Nothing but tears and attempts to get back at people doing pvp in a pvp game. Wow you really believe that? People were not whining about goons untill they started the ice war and the boot CSM posts started soon after. So yea, I do. Personally, this CSM have pushed to get many problems I have had with eve for years and given that the vast bulk are now getting fixed I would say successfull CSM, will vote for them again.
Humm half agree half not, People have been complaining about Goons for years, some of it deserved some of it not, I think there's a section of the populace that are just bored with them (not me btw)
CSM for me have been pretty good as I've mentioned in lots of posts I even quite like Darius for his not give a damn attitude. My only problem with them is it's slightly 0.0 heavy but thats the voters lack of action causing th eproblem not the CSM's
God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1068
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:43:00 -
[232] - Quote
Signal11th wrote: Humm half agree half not, People have been complaining about Goons for years, some of it deserved some of it not, I think there's a section of the populace that are just bored with them (not me btw I find them quite quaint)
yes but we didn't manage the deluge of goons :argh: post until we butchered over a thousand miners like swine |

Signal11th
154
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:47:00 -
[233] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Signal11th wrote: Humm half agree half not, People have been complaining about Goons for years, some of it deserved some of it not, I think there's a section of the populace that are just bored with them (not me btw I find them quite quaint)
yes but we didn't manage the deluge of goons :argh: post until we butchered over a thousand miners like swine
you may have a point God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |

baltec1
129
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:54:00 -
[234] - Quote
Signal11th wrote:you may have a point 
I think its safe to say the skull mountain has made many bitter |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
101
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:34:00 -
[235] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:While I wouldn't be quite so crass as the poster above me. This does actually illustrate a problem with this CSM. Mittani's personality is quite dominant in that group and it has become apparent its a case of mr Mittani organgrinder and his half dozen monkeys. It does damage the balance of the CSM when its quite obvious only one person is calling the shots and the rest are just acting like beta followers rather than presenting individual and independent viewpoints. Some people with strong personalities are able to dominate those around them. Even if what you say is true, what you describe is not a 'problem with the CSM', its a basic feature of human interaction. Yes and no. I do agree it is an issue with human interaction certainly. This CSM has been pretty smooth internally with a united front and all that - but it has seemed a bit monotheistic at times. Good and bad I guess, but this thread was sparked by Hillmar's comment that a lot of people are worried about the nullsec vote bloc dominated CSM.
CSM 6's 0.0 'monotheism' came about mostly as a response to the reverse situation in CSM 5, except that 0.0 responded by getting out the vote, not screeching to Hilmar that the voting process was unfair and that we needed some form of positive discrimination to give seats to less popular candidates.
Quote:I guess the proposal might be that in the future nullsec get 3 seats, hisec get 3 seats, lowsec/fw/RP etc get 3 seats? I dunno something like that. That way you might at least get 3 sets of stronger personalities rather than one alpha male and other bloc vote candidates who either drop out earlier or learn to tow the line. Not sure exactly how it would (or could) work but its clearly something being considered. I don't think this can work, simply because CSMs are human players rather than spaceship characters. If I have a highsec alt and a 0.0 alt and I run for CSM, which 'constituency' am I? Mittani currently spends most of his playing time killing ice miners in Gallente space, does that make him a highsec candidate? What if a 'highsec' character runs for CSM and his corp then joins a nullsec alliance? What if a nullsec candidate has their space invaded and they get evicted and flee to lowsec or wormspace? |

Vaffel Junior
NorCorp Security
65
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:34:00 -
[236] - Quote

CCP.... Do CSM their job ? Or have it turned in to weapon ? Maby find a new way to get EVE playerbase opinion ?
|

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
635
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:00:00 -
[237] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote: CSM 6's 0.0 'monotheism' came about mostly as a response to the reverse situation in CSM 5, except that 0.0 responded by getting out the vote, not screeching to Hilmar that the voting process was unfair and that we needed some form of positive discrimination to give seats to less popular candidates.
Well as you've probably noticed I'm not exactly that empathic about people whining about CSM and not voting - I do despise the section of the community that can't be bothered to vote and then says CSM doesn't represent them. But. There is a problem in that Nullsec alliances are simply better organized at conjuring bloc votes to get their candidates in and while you can leave it to tooth and claw and say "screw highsec if they can't get decent candidates and vote" I guess the reality of it is that highsec players tend to be more casual and less inclined to full engagement with the community.
Quote: don't think this can work, simply because CSMs are human players rather than spaceship characters. If I have a highsec alt and a 0.0 alt and I run for CSM, which 'constituency' am I? Mittani currently spends most of his playing time killing ice miners in Gallente space, does that make him a highsec candidate? What if a 'highsec' character runs for CSM and his corp then joins a nullsec alliance? What if a nullsec candidate has their space invaded and they get evicted and flee to lowsec or wormspace?
I guess you'd choose which kind of seat you wanted to contest at the time you entered the race - alongside registering your rl name and address and details etc you choose which kind of seat you were going for. Mittani would be free to run for a highsec seat but maybe only highsec players get to vote in that constituancy ? (who knows, I really don't have any specific proposal here)
But something probably does need to be done to ensure more variety in future CSMs - I think none of us really benefit from the monotheistic ones for a couple of reasons -> 1. they do miss important issues (as this one managed to miss NeX) and 2. it does become easier for CCP to ignore a particular CSM when they are armed by the whines of the community saying its unrepresentative of most players.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Mallak Azaria
Hole Plunderer's
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:04:00 -
[238] - Quote
This thread delivers.... Carebear tears! |

Signal11th
157
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:10:00 -
[239] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:This thread delivers.... Carebear tears!
It also delivers fail posts God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1378
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:20:00 -
[240] - Quote
The CSM has been going from success to success, but ever since Goonswarm began killing miners in hisec, a gaggle of politically naive rabble have been making thread after thread about me.
While I can't keep track day-to-day if it's a "CSM is powerless and a joke" day or a "Mittani has too much power, oh god" day, either way I assure you that I enjoy your hypocritical rage. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
636
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:37:00 -
[241] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:The CSM has been going from success to success, but ever since Goonswarm began killing miners in hisec, a gaggle of politically naive rabble have been making thread after thread about me.
Lies! We all know they are your alts 
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Vaffel Junior
NorCorp Security
65
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:38:00 -
[242] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:The CSM has been going from success to success, but ever since Goonswarm began killing miners in hisec, a gaggle of politically naive rabble have been making thread after thread about me.
While I can't keep track day-to-day if it's a "CSM is powerless and a joke" day or a "Mittani has too much power, oh god" day, either way I assure you that I enjoy your hypocritical rage.
Well said there sir... chairman of CSM Yeah.... maby CCP need a new way to comunicate with playerbase
|

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1071
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:46:00 -
[243] - Quote
what most ignorant highsec pubbies do not realize is part of the function of the csm these days is to filter out the feedback from utter idiots before the feedback reaches CCP
so these threads filled with the dumbest posts possible only solidify the need for the csm in its current iteration :sun: |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1071
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:47:00 -
[244] - Quote
a quick browse of the features and ideas forum also makes this point pretty strongly |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
102
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:51:00 -
[245] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote: CSM 6's 0.0 'monotheism' came about mostly as a response to the reverse situation in CSM 5, except that 0.0 responded by getting out the vote, not screeching to Hilmar that the voting process was unfair and that we needed some form of positive discrimination to give seats to less popular candidates.
Well as you've probably noticed I'm not exactly that empathic about people whining about CSM and not voting - I do despise the section of the community that can't be bothered to vote and then says CSM doesn't represent them. But. There is a problem in that Nullsec alliances are simply better organized at conjuring bloc votes to get their candidates in and while you can leave it to tooth and claw and say "screw highsec if they can't get decent candidates and vote" I guess the reality of it is that highsec players tend to be more casual and less inclined to full engagement with the community.
I think that there's a better chance of highsec getting themselves better organised this time around now that everyone has seen that the CSM can have a substantial impact on how CCP operates, and in the light of the refocusing on Eve that's now taking place there's likely to be more on the table for the CSM to actually fight over.
0.0 players are inherently better able to get out the vote because of the nature of 0.0 existance, but then there's more highseccers out there to grab votes from. There's an analogy about small groups of well organised players versus "disorganised blobbing noobs" in there somewhere.
Quote:Quote: don't think this can work, simply because CSMs are human players rather than spaceship characters. If I have a highsec alt and a 0.0 alt and I run for CSM, which 'constituency' am I? Mittani currently spends most of his playing time killing ice miners in Gallente space, does that make him a highsec candidate? What if a 'highsec' character runs for CSM and his corp then joins a nullsec alliance? What if a nullsec candidate has their space invaded and they get evicted and flee to lowsec or wormspace? I guess you'd choose which kind of seat you wanted to contest at the time you entered the race - alongside registering your rl name and address and details etc you choose which kind of seat you were going for. Mittani would be free to run for a highsec seat but maybe only highsec players get to vote in that constituancy ? (who knows, I really don't have any specific proposal here) But something probably does need to be done to ensure more variety in future CSMs - I think none of us really benefit from the monotheistic ones for a couple of reasons -> 1. they do miss important issues (as this one managed to miss NeX) and 2. it does become easier for CCP to ignore a particular CSM when they are armed by the whines of the community saying its unrepresentative of most players. Really, as long as NeX stays vanity only then its a non-issue. You can say its the thin end of the wedge if you like, but even the hint of going to pay-to-win over the summer was enough to get the jita riots rolling, thousands of accounts unsubscribing and Eve dragged through the mud on pretty much every gaming news website out there. I doubt our new-and-improved spaceship-focused CCP has any desire to go through all that again.
As for CCP ignoring unrepresentative CSMs, CCP had no problem ignoring issues raised by previous CSM lineups that were much more 'equally' divided - see the hilariously long issue backlog for details. As I said earlier, this is a point about social interaction rather than the CSM - the way that you get things done with CCP is by being able to convincingly articulate your points to them as one human being to another, not by waving a equal opportunities badge around.
And really, I have my doubts about how much good a "representative" CSM could agree on to get done seeing as there's every chance that you'd end up with 2 'nerf supercaps' guys, 2 'don't nerf supercaps, nerf blobs' guys, 3 highseccers who just want level 4 missions and veldspar mining to be buffed, and 2 guys running on a platform of 'oppose everything that goons suggest because they're mean and want to destroy eve'. Seems to me that CCP would find it much easier to ignore a divided CSM and just do whatever the hell they thought of than it would be with something like CSM6 which has shown a largely united front. |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
102
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:52:00 -
[246] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote: CSM 6's 0.0 'monotheism' came about mostly as a response to the reverse situation in CSM 5, except that 0.0 responded by getting out the vote, not screeching to Hilmar that the voting process was unfair and that we needed some form of positive discrimination to give seats to less popular candidates.
Well as you've probably noticed I'm not exactly that empathic about people whining about CSM and not voting - I do despise the section of the community that can't be bothered to vote and then says CSM doesn't represent them. But. There is a problem in that Nullsec alliances are simply better organized at conjuring bloc votes to get their candidates in and while you can leave it to tooth and claw and say "screw highsec if they can't get decent candidates and vote" I guess the reality of it is that highsec players tend to be more casual and less inclined to full engagement with the community.
I think that there's a better chance of highsec getting themselves better organised this time around now that everyone has seen that the CSM can have a substantial impact on how CCP operates, and in the light of the refocusing on Eve that's now taking place there's likely to be more on the table for the CSM to actually fight over.
0.0 players are inherently better able to get out the vote because of the nature of 0.0 existance, but then there's more highseccers out there to grab votes from. There's an analogy about small groups of well organised players versus "disorganised blobbing noobs" in there somewhere.
Quote:Quote: don't think this can work, simply because CSMs are human players rather than spaceship characters. If I have a highsec alt and a 0.0 alt and I run for CSM, which 'constituency' am I? Mittani currently spends most of his playing time killing ice miners in Gallente space, does that make him a highsec candidate? What if a 'highsec' character runs for CSM and his corp then joins a nullsec alliance? What if a nullsec candidate has their space invaded and they get evicted and flee to lowsec or wormspace? I guess you'd choose which kind of seat you wanted to contest at the time you entered the race - alongside registering your rl name and address and details etc you choose which kind of seat you were going for. Mittani would be free to run for a highsec seat but maybe only highsec players get to vote in that constituancy ? (who knows, I really don't have any specific proposal here) But something probably does need to be done to ensure more variety in future CSMs - I think none of us really benefit from the monotheistic ones for a couple of reasons -> 1. they do miss important issues (as this one managed to miss NeX) and 2. it does become easier for CCP to ignore a particular CSM when they are armed by the whines of the community saying its unrepresentative of most players. Really, as long as NeX stays vanity only then its a non-issue. You can say its the thin end of the wedge if you like, but even the hint of going to pay-to-win over the summer was enough to get the jita riots rolling, thousands of accounts unsubscribing and Eve dragged through the mud on pretty much every gaming news website out there. I doubt our new-and-improved spaceship-focused CCP has any desire to go through all that again.
As for CCP ignoring unrepresentative CSMs, CCP had no problem ignoring issues raised by previous CSM lineups that were much more 'equally' divided - see the hilariously long issue backlog for details. As I said earlier, this is a point about social interaction rather than the CSM - the way that you get things done with CCP is by being able to convincingly articulate your points to them as one human being to another, not by waving a equal opportunities badge around.
And really, I have my doubts about how much good a "representative" CSM could agree on to get done seeing as there's every chance that you'd end up with 2 'nerf supercaps' guys, 2 'don't nerf supercaps, nerf blobs' guys, 3 highseccers who just want level 4 missions and veldspar mining to be more lucrative, and 2 guys running on a platform of 'oppose everything that goons suggest because they're mean and want to destroy eve'. Seems to me that CCP would find it much easier to ignore a divided CSM and just do whatever the hell they thought of than it would be with something like CSM6 which has shown a largely united front. |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1379
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:10:00 -
[247] - Quote
Also, politically naive babbys don't understand that Trebor has one of the strongest voices on the CSM and we pretty much just defer to him when it comes to hisec issues.
CSM7 is likely to see both Trebor and Kelduum from Eve-Uni representing hisec, as well as only having one Goonswarm rep (Vile Rat is only running for one term).
What I wonder is: will the random tea-partiers of this forum still declare that I possess orbital mind-control lasers in the next CSM? |

SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
129
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:13:00 -
[248] - Quote
The Mittani wrote: What I wonder is: will the random tea-partiers of this forum still declare that I possess orbital mind-control lasers in the next CSM?
Oh wait, you didn't ? |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:55:00 -
[249] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:but this thread was sparked by Hillmar's comment that a lot of people are worried about the nullsec vote bloc dominated CSM.
A lot of people are worried the world is going to end in 2012, doesn't mean they're not all morons.
Forcing some kind of playstyle equality in CSM elections is only really being pushed by people who know they won't get elected any other way. The fact of the matter is most of the people who are engaged enough with the game to make a good CSM have at least some stake in 0.0. Not to mention where do you draw the lines when you're dividing constituencies? Sure the large alliance player deserves a representative but the guy who just logs in to fulfil his breast engorgement fantasies in the character editor probably doesn't.
What it comes down to is the CSM doesn't represent you, and it doesn't represent me. It represents the players of Eve and should be trying to do what is best for everyone collectively, not everyone individually. Sometimes things you don't like have to happen for the greater good. If you can't get your head around that then congratulations, you have the mental age of a spoiled, petulant child. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
135
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 19:56:00 -
[250] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:
What I wonder is: will the random tea-partiers of this forum still declare that I possess orbital mind-control lasers in the next CSM?
If this is you trying to tell me you don't then I'm going to be more than a little pissed...
|

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
494
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:21:00 -
[251] - Quote
Vastek Non wrote:Vile rat wrote:Vastek Non wrote:I find Vile Rats sudden interest in High Sec life a bit surprising, however am trying to be optimistic rather than my initial cynicism.
Honestly my interest in highsec is because I've had several people point out (correctly) that we haven't done a good enough job bringing attention to this gameplay style and I agree. I'm going to make an effort and do what I can. Also I'm a one term candidate and have posted publicly, before I even got elected, that I was only going to run for one term. I don't have to care about 'pandering' accusations at all thankfully. Ok, good to hear (the bit about paying attention to more than just your powerblock). Honestly i'm mostly a HS player, but in reality we all know that massive sections of the game need looking at, mostly null to be honest. I have no problem with that and if you want to run for a second term and are looking out for the game, good luck to you.
Words are put in our mouth by those who want to paint us as devils. We don't really care so we come across as callous.
I have zero interest in reelection and I'm putting all my effort into this year. I want to see high sec worked on in a way that improves the game play of those who choose to play the game that way. I did not get elected on high sec issues, but I'm arrogant, I'm a complete ******* when I need to be, and I'm passionate about the game and I want to help if I can.
That's why we were sent here and that's why we've been so successful. Contact us with your issues and help us fix this damn game. That's what we're here for.
Also don't get too worked up if you see me talking **** to people posting stone throwing threads. I'm under no obligation to take them seriously and it's more fun to give them what they give me. If you have a serious issue, no matter your gameplay style, please contact me. Yes I play in nullsec, but I recognize the connection and value between all parts of this game and I represent myself accordingly. Let's get this **** fixed gentlemen. |

Cidwm
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 10:14:00 -
[252] - Quote
The main problem with the current CSM is that its way too bisaed to one style of play. anyone that challenges that style basically gets the opinion that the delightful Rhaegor stormborn gave us amongst many others :- "0.0 makes Eve. All you empire chumps are worthless."... riiiight.... So were does a good proportion of industry and commerce take place?
Also, take a look at the current CSM especially its loudest members... 4-5 of them come from the same power bloc alone! Surely this is open to abuse as a result in some way or another?
I know what some of you are saying when you say that high seccers should have voted more/better... but have you ever tried to organise them? high sec life is very very different from 0.0 mainly because in high sec there alot more fractured. Ive operated in systems with over 50+ people from as many corps with little to no communication going on with them. They don't belong to a massive alliance or coalition were loyalty more than sense wavers votes for specific people within there own power bloc because that serves there best interest rather than somone who could think in the best interest of EVE as a whole.
I'm interested to see what CCP want to do in regards to the CSM. As long as the EVE player base doesnt lose its ability to communicate with CCP and get there point across without moaning too much then it could well be a good thing indeed! |
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
76

|
Posted - 2011.10.22 11:48:00 -
[253] - Quote
Thread has been cleaned of off topic and spam replies. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|

Elise DarkStar
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
81
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 13:19:00 -
[254] - Quote
Don't people think that changing the rules after one example is ridiculous reactionism?
So we finally see that the CSM can be a useful political tool, and instead of running some proper campaigns next time based on this new awareness, we want to neuter it back into obscurity? Is this really the best way to get the hisec voice heard?
If you guarantee hisec seats, then those hisec seats will be filled by people who sailed into the position because they had no real need to run a proper campaign and really get a majority of hisec players mobilized, heard, and represented. You're not talking about protecting a minority here, you're talking about reserving space for a huge majority who can't even be bothered to articulate their wants, and we suddenly think that forcing three seats will mean their voice gets heard?
You change things in this world through effort; just changing rules never guarantees the outcome you want. It's childish thinking. If the world worked that way we would just order everyone to be nice to each other, obviously this doesn't work that way.
Before we go neutering the csm back into obscurity, let's see if we can't get some proper hisec candidates to step up and run a campaign that actually does inspire their base and capture their sentiments. It's ultimately their race to lose, as they could fill every spot if they actually cared.
I'm honestly considering running on a hisec platform just to frame the issue and get people competing with me for hisec votes on an effective level. |

SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
138
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 14:29:00 -
[255] - Quote
The main problem with the highsec part of the CSM problem is that highsec peoples don't vote because they don't know about the CSM. They barely know what it is or what it did, they don't give a flying fsck about how it works and why they should vote.
CCP can fix that problem by allowing every candidate to send one, or two, evemails. To every single EVE account.
I know, it might be a little too much for the system to handle but I'm sure it can be done. And I'm pretty sure if you tell a highsec guy "Hey, if there are issues or things you would like to introduce in EVE, well, check the candidates, maybe one of them wants those issues fixed, vote for him ;)", he will take a second to read and vote. You just need to actually tell him in a way that no one can "avoid". The little box when you login, well, once you close it, it doesn't come up again until it's changed by CCP. Or you can just type your pass press enter and poof.
You can ignore it.
You can't ignore an EVEmail, especially if you're a highsec dweller who never receive EVEmails usually. |

Elise DarkStar
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
83
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 14:58:00 -
[256] - Quote
SMT008 wrote:The main problem with the highsec part of the CSM problem is that highsec peoples don't vote because they don't know about the CSM.
Absolutely. Let's talk about how to get hisec people voting and organized before we throw in the towel and force them to have 3 seats filled by people no one voted for.
|

Kengutsi Akira
78
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 15:23:00 -
[257] - Quote
best thing is, The in-chair Goons now are supported (indeed forced as Ive heard regardless of them pretending not) by the three biggest corps in the game at least. The biggest alliance in 0.0 at least. DCF what 72% of null sec?
Anyone in position now will never be voted out of position cause there arent enough votes what with alts and bots etc. Any DCF candidates elected afterwards just makes it worse till the CSM only represents one group in the game.
I agree remove it
Though the tears upon seeing a full Goon CSM would be magical What Mittani wants, Mittani gets, Mittani help us all
|

Mirima Thurander
Deventer Exploration An Acquisition
27
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 16:08:00 -
[258] - Quote
man i know why the CSM stays a null play thing now... ever time you speak of it in the most read forum section you thread gets locked or moved to this dismal place to be forgotten
I love the the smell of victory in the morning. It smells like... Blood, vomit and burning flesh. |

Kengutsi Akira
78
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 16:17:00 -
[259] - Quote
Mirima Thurander wrote:man i know why the CSM stays a null play thing now... ever time you speak of it in the most read forum section you thread gets locked or moved to this dismal place to be forgotten
pretty much.... cause enough Goons report it (they arent the police of the game they say against allegations of them botting unless its against other CSM apparent;y or on the forums) it gets taken out What Mittani wants, Mittani gets, Mittani help us all
|

Reislier
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 17:16:00 -
[260] - Quote
A few players log into the forums. Every single player logs into the the charachter select screen.
Pop up a poll for voting if you must..
Or just solicit input from players right there.. It's a high tech game.. automate the function of the CSM. Build it right into the news feed that is already there. |

Dalketh
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 17:35:00 -
[261] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:I was pretty disappointed for the CSM allowing NeX for "vanity" items to slip in the game at all.
How would you have them "disallow" the NeX store from going ahead, exactly? Attack the NeX development team with Molotov cocktails while they were at the spring summit? Or do you just mean that the CSM should have made some feeble token gesture of protest, that CCP would have completely ignored and gone ahead anyway?
That is what they say they did.... 
|

Dalketh
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 18:03:00 -
[262] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Signal11th wrote: Humm half agree half not, People have been complaining about Goons for years, some of it deserved some of it not, I think there's a section of the populace that are just bored with them (not me btw I find them quite quaint)
yes but we didn't manage the deluge of goons :argh: post until we butchered over a thousand miners like swine
Actually I have seen these posts about the goon/null sec heavy CSM since the election.
You may be right, the increase may be fueled a bit by the goons war on ice miners or whatever you call it, as naturally that can **** some people off. However I think the 'deluge' here is because the CEO of CCP expressed his own concern about the CSM bias publicly, and people are feeling hopeful about that. Also with possible changes coming to prevent future CSM's from being too biased in ANY direction.
|

Helena Russell Makanen
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 18:15:00 -
[263] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:The CSM has been going from success to success, but ever since Goonswarm began killing miners in hisec, a gaggle of politically naive rabble have been making thread after thread about me.
While I can't keep track day-to-day if it's a "CSM is powerless and a joke" day or a "Mittani has too much power, oh god" day, either way I assure you that I enjoy your hypocritical rage.
CCP CEO TO MITTENS:
"But some of my concerns right now relate to whether the CSM is maybe focused on a particular aspect of the game and I'm starting to get feedback from players that they worry the CSM is too pre-occupied by a certain playstyle. That might mean we may need to change the structure"
|

Takara Mora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 22:26:00 -
[264] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian --> love ur sig line:
"Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences"
Having a CSM is fine ... but real data should matter more ... |

C4LYP50
Solarwind Interstellar Mining and Production Ltd
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 06:27:00 -
[265] - Quote
Mr LaForge wrote:To the OP. STOP WHINING ABOUT NOTHING.
This CSM got CCP back on the right track in regards to EVE.
This. While I voted for someone else, I have to give credit to all the CSM this time around. These people jumped through hoops and dropped everything repeatedly to concentrate on fixing things that needed fixing, and were assailed on all sides for their stance, they were (and are) heroes to me. We owe them a bit of applause.
I don't always agree with what they say, or their views on alot of things, but over all, I feel these people were the guys we needed, on hand when we needed them. Cheers!
|

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
22
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 13:58:00 -
[266] - Quote
C4LYP50 wrote:Mr LaForge wrote:To the OP. STOP WHINING ABOUT NOTHING.
This CSM got CCP back on the right track in regards to EVE. This. While I voted for someone else, I have to give credit to all the CSM this time around. These people jumped through hoops and dropped everything repeatedly to concentrate on fixing things that needed fixing, and were assailed on all sides for their stance, they were (and are) heroes to me. We owe them a bit of applause. I don't always agree with what they say, or their views on alot of things, but over all, I feel these people were the guys we needed, on hand when we needed them. Cheers!
Funny how you lot are in the MINORITY. Funny how more and more posts have risen, asking for the CSM to be removed. Not just me. Keep arguing your lame case. The simple fact is YOU HAVE NO SUPPORT. ITS GONE. GAME OVER.
The more you keep desperately clinging onto what ever dignity you have left, and trying to give some lame reason, the more stupid you are looking. IM sorry to be a bit flippant, but myself and many others have simple had enough.
|

Takara Mora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 15:13:00 -
[267] - Quote
How do we know the CSM had anything to do with any improvements? --> maybe it was CCP's balance sheet and shrinking subs instead? |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 15:47:00 -
[268] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote: Funny how you lot are in the MINORITY. Funny how more and more posts have risen, asking for the CSM to be removed. Not just me. Keep arguing your lame case. The simple fact is YOU HAVE NO SUPPORT. ITS GONE. GAME OVER.
Funny how people who have no complaints with the product and/or service they are receiving rarely go complain on the internet eh? |

SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
145
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 16:04:00 -
[269] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote: Funny how you lot are in the MINORITY. Funny how more and more posts have risen, asking for the CSM to be removed. Not just me. Keep arguing your lame case. The simple fact is YOU HAVE NO SUPPORT. ITS GONE. GAME OVER.
Come on, I too can create a bunch of forum alts and post IN CAPS all over the forums. It doesn't prove anything.
Also, you seems to be....somewhat mad about a video game. Go out, take a deep breath, it helps 
You might want to think about something like trains. You know, peoples complain when trains are late right ? They'll complain. When trains arrives right on time, they won't go all "Hurray nice job you did there !" because it's normal. It's how it's supposed to be. Deal with it.
|

Elise DarkStar
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
87
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 16:16:00 -
[270] - Quote
I assume he's forgetting to click the heels of his ruby slippers together while repeating things to make them come true. |

Mr R4nd0m
Ministry Of Mining And Industry Shit.Happens
22
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 16:17:00 -
[271] - Quote
SMT008 wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote: Funny how you lot are in the MINORITY. Funny how more and more posts have risen, asking for the CSM to be removed. Not just me. Keep arguing your lame case. The simple fact is YOU HAVE NO SUPPORT. ITS GONE. GAME OVER.
Come on, I too can create a bunch of forum alts and post IN CAPS all over the forums. It doesn't prove anything. Also, you seems to be....somewhat mad about a video game. Go out, take a deep breath, it helps  You might want to think about something like trains. You know, peoples complain when trains are late right ? They'll complain. When trains arrives right on time, they won't go all "Hurray nice job you did there !" because it's normal. It's how it's supposed to be. Deal with it.
Funny hows it only idiot goons posting cry baby tears - keep deep throatng mittani its hilarious....goons just keeping look stupid... |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
148
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 16:20:00 -
[272] - Quote
Confirming that I am satisfied with the CSM as it stands now. They represent the interests of those who care enough about the game to be bothered to spend 5 minutes voting(that was a long freaking list of candidates)
Why would CCP care about the opinions of those who don't care enough about the game to speak up? o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
145
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 16:43:00 -
[273] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:SMT008 wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote: Funny how you lot are in the MINORITY. Funny how more and more posts have risen, asking for the CSM to be removed. Not just me. Keep arguing your lame case. The simple fact is YOU HAVE NO SUPPORT. ITS GONE. GAME OVER.
Come on, I too can create a bunch of forum alts and post IN CAPS all over the forums. It doesn't prove anything. Also, you seems to be....somewhat mad about a video game. Go out, take a deep breath, it helps  You might want to think about something like trains. You know, peoples complain when trains are late right ? They'll complain. When trains arrives right on time, they won't go all "Hurray nice job you did there !" because it's normal. It's how it's supposed to be. Deal with it. Funny hows it only idiot goons posting cry baby tears - keep deep throatng mittani its hilarious....goons just keeping look stupid...
Look at your post, now back to mine. Now back to your post, now back to mine. Sadly, it isn't mine. But if you stopped being so obsessed about the CSM, and switched to do something more constructive, it could look like my post.
Look down.
Back up.
Where are you ?
You're in the Jita Park Speakers Corner, scrolling through posts, writing a post your post could look like.
What's in your hand ?
Back at me. I have it. It's a post that look like it was written by me.
Look again, the post is now diamonds. Everything is possible when you think before you post. |

Takara Mora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 17:22:00 -
[274] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Confirming that I am satisfied with the CSM as it stands now. They represent the interests of those who care enough about the game to be bothered to spend 5 minutes voting(that was a long freaking list of candidates)
Why would CCP care about the opinions of those who don't care enough about the game to speak up?
Because those "uninterested people" are the bulk of the subs who keep EVE alive by paying for it ... .and subs have been decreasing ... so it would be in CCP's best interest to focus on them - and not let the CSM overly influence anything. |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
151
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 18:27:00 -
[275] - Quote
Takara Mora wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:Confirming that I am satisfied with the CSM as it stands now. They represent the interests of those who care enough about the game to be bothered to spend 5 minutes voting(that was a long freaking list of candidates)
Why would CCP care about the opinions of those who don't care enough about the game to speak up? Because those "uninterested people" are the bulk of the subs who keep EVE alive by paying for it ... .and subs have been decreasing ... so it would be in CCP's best interest to focus on them - and not let the CSM overly influence anything. v0v blame them for not speaking up.
And if you actually check out the background of the CSM, only 4 or 5 of the primary delegates are nullsec, so roughly half.
Non-nullsec players cannot claim to be unrepresented, tho, due to their inability to vote as a cohesive group, they are under-represented. And here is the thing, those same people want changes that will ultimately destroy Eve. 90% of the things highsec carebears ask for will turn Eve into WoW in Space. If you want that go play Star Trek Online.
I'll take my hard, gritty game, where loss means something and can happen for no good reason, even tho its guaranteed a small playerbase because most people are afraid by nature. o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Gheng Kondur
Serva Fidem
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 18:56:00 -
[276] - Quote
The 1 player 1 vote point is valid, a democratic system based on wealth and buying a vote (in this case having multiple accounts) doesn't work.
But if every elected group I disagreed with was disbanded there would be none left. Once the vote is done, we live with the consequences.
Next election those who don't like the current mix (which includes me) need to make sure we vote for a difference, but the current crop as voted in should serve their term of office and represent those who elected them. That's what democracy is. |

Leo Solen
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 00:40:00 -
[277] - Quote
Gheng Kondur wrote:(...) Once the vote is done, we live with the consequences.
Next election those who don't like the current mix (which includes me) need to make sure we vote for a difference, but the current crop as voted in should serve their term of office and represent those who elected them. That's what democracy is.
Not really, we do have Impeachment. 
|

Gheng Kondur
Serva Fidem
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 06:16:00 -
[278] - Quote
Leo Solen wrote:[ Not really, we do have Impeachment. 
Yes, once it can be proved that the elected official has broken terms of office, but not when we just don't like them or what they are doing.
There is a big difference between the 2 points and most of what I am seeing on these post is 'I don't like them and the way they play'. 'CSM is unbalanced towards Null' and some unsubstantiated comments.
If someone has proof of a member of CSM breaking their terms, fine, kick that person out. If not this is just looking like a witch hunt. Though halloween may almost be upon us, innocent until proven guilty is still the principle I'll stick with.
Some of what CSM have been involved in I do not like, but other things I do. Some play their characters in a way I don't like, other don't. But none of that is grounds for impeachment. |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
157
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 06:31:00 -
[279] - Quote
Hey, Trebor is the primary Highsec CSM, correct?
I think it may be time to start a remove useless highsec CSM delegates petition....
(Your doing great Trebor, as is everyone on the current CSM, but if your constituents are gonna turn it into a highsec vs nullsec smear campaign, I think some ******** over the top statements might need to be made) o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Leo Solen
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 09:56:00 -
[280] - Quote
Gheng Kondur wrote:Leo Solen wrote:[ Not really, we do have Impeachment.  Yes, once it can be proved that the elected official has broken terms of office, but not when we just don't like them or what they are doing. There is a big difference between the 2 points and most of what I am seeing on these post is 'I don't like them and the way they play'. 'CSM is unbalanced towards Null' and some unsubstantiated comments. If someone has proof of a member of CSM breaking their terms, fine, kick that person out. If not this is just looking like a witch hunt. Though halloween may almost be upon us, innocent until proven guilty is still the principle I'll stick with. Some of what CSM have been involved in I do not like, but other things I do. Some play their characters in a way I don't like, other don't. But none of that is grounds for impeachment.
Not at all! Impeachment can be due to the people losing faith at their elected representative. And honestly only a few criminal motivated Impeachments were actually proved, most of them had no proof at all of illicit activities. Nevertheless the ones in power were taken off their position. Basically, like I said, people lost their faith and took them out. That is the Democracy you so proud speak off, the +Š+++++++Š-ü+Š-ä+»+Š "rule/power of the people". |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
162
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 10:03:00 -
[281] - Quote
Leo Solen wrote:Gheng Kondur wrote:Leo Solen wrote:[ Not really, we do have Impeachment.  Yes, once it can be proved that the elected official has broken terms of office, but not when we just don't like them or what they are doing. There is a big difference between the 2 points and most of what I am seeing on these post is 'I don't like them and the way they play'. 'CSM is unbalanced towards Null' and some unsubstantiated comments. If someone has proof of a member of CSM breaking their terms, fine, kick that person out. If not this is just looking like a witch hunt. Though halloween may almost be upon us, innocent until proven guilty is still the principle I'll stick with. Some of what CSM have been involved in I do not like, but other things I do. Some play their characters in a way I don't like, other don't. But none of that is grounds for impeachment. Not at all! Impeachment can be due to the people losing faith at their elected representative. And honestly only a few criminal motivated Impeachments were actually proved, most of them had no proof at all of illicit activities. Nevertheless the ones in power were taken off their position. Basically, like I said, people lost their faith and took them out. That is the Democracy you so proud speak off, the +Š+++++++Š-ü+Š-ä+»+Š "rule/power of the people". How many presidents to you think were impeached?...
Also, what you are describing isn't an impeachment, its a vote of no-confidence.
Which the CSM charter does not allow for.
If you believe such a thing should exist, I suggest getting ahold of your CSM delegate, and have the bring it up with CCP 
(actually, I bet if you picked the right one to approach to advocate this, it actually would get brought to CCP, and might happen) o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Gheng Kondur
Serva Fidem
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 10:14:00 -
[282] - Quote
+1 to Tallian Saotome for saving me the trouble of correcting him |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
163
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 10:18:00 -
[283] - Quote
Gheng Kondur wrote:+1 to Tallian Saotome for saving me the trouble of correcting him I enjoy making sure people understand the facts.
Had some moron today try to tell me FA wouldn't shoot him because he was blue to test. Nearly hurt myself on that one.
Sadly, its VERY hard to tackle anyone in a scimitar  o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Leo Solen
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 10:34:00 -
[284] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:How many presidents to you think were impeached?... Some, you can google it.
Tallian Saotome wrote:Also, what you are describing isn't an impeachment, its a vote of no-confidence. Not really, that will depend on the country you live in. In my country for example, this case of motion is also called Impeachment. We do not have any variants for the term. Demoting an elected official will always be known as Impeachment here.
Tallian Saotome wrote:If you believe such a thing should exist, I suggest getting ahold of your CSM delegate, and have the bring it up with CCP  (actually, I bet if you picked the right one to approach to advocate this, it actually would get brought to CCP, and might happen) A great idea once you think of cultural factors. This 'motion of no confidence' by its name is new to me. Like I said, a motion of this kind would also be known as Impeachment here. So if I were to see that the CSM charter does not allow for vote of no-confidence IGÇÖd hardly link one thing to the other.
|

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
1019
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 11:20:00 -
[285] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Hey, Trebor is the primary Highsec CSM, correct? I view myself as a CSM who tries to treat all areas of the game equally. As such, I particularly push for resources to be allocated to things that help the 99%, so to speak -- UI, industrial infrastructure, etc. The whole point of the crowdsourcing is to help make those allocation decisions more efficient.
Tallian Saotome wrote:(Your doing great Trebor, as is everyone on the current CSM, but if your constituents are gonna turn it into a highsec vs nullsec smear campaign, I think some ******** over the top statements might need to be made) I am sure that a rough, tough nullsec forum-warrior such as yourself can defend himself quite ably. 
CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism! CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM blog |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
164
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 11:30:00 -
[286] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:Hey, Trebor is the primary Highsec CSM, correct? I view myself as a CSM who tries to treat all areas of the game equally. As such, I particularly push for resources to be allocated to things that help the 99, so to speak -- UI, industrial infrastructure, etc. The whole point of the crowdsourcing is to help make those allocation decisions more efficient. Well then, who is the highsec rep? I know SOMEONE came out a while back as primarily advocating highsec interests.
*DOWN WITH RANDOM CSM!!!*
Edit: It gave me bloody parse errors for quoting YOUR percent sign!!!! *rabble rabble rabble* o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Kendon Riddick
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 16:30:00 -
[287] - Quote
I think the CSM's need to be picked from each field and not make it too broad.
Would a small team of CSM for each high sec, low sec/fw and 0.0 be too much to ask?
Mining, ratting, holeing,pvp, pirating, suiside ganking, try to cover every profression with a small numnber, im not saying one CSM per profression per sector unless they are voted in for multiple sectors. |

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
47
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 19:32:00 -
[288] - Quote
I think the first step to getting the random "little guy" high sec pilot to become interested in the CSM is to make the campaign and election totally someting "in game". I should vote in game, I should be constantly reminded IN GAME there is an election and tie voting to getting something, like the "election shuttle". Randomize the order of the candidates when you are presented who to vote for and at least the argument that the "care bear" block doesn't vote because the they don't "forum" goes away.
Get the CSM election in game and then you can't not know about it.
Also, I know a lot of folks want to bash the current CSM for being focused on thier own agenda. To that I say it makes them one of the most "effective" CSMs ever. I don't like most of that they have gotten done because I have a different focus in Eve but you have to admit they represented their support base very well. If you didn't like what they did you should have worked harder on getting someone else elected because what they have done was no surprise.
Issler |

Rer Eirikr
Clearly Compensating The Dark Triad
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 20:11:00 -
[289] - Quote
I've said it once and I'll say it a thousand more times.
If you're gonna ***** about a CSM delegate, get off your lazy good for nothing ass, find a candidate, and support him.*
Otherwise, quit making completely pointless threads like this that continually clog up the front page.
The one time the CSM actually manages to refocus CCP on EVE, and suddenly everything's gone to **** and we should all blame Goons. I'mma go back to Kugu now o/
*Inb4 hurrrrr, we're in HighSec so we lack the organization of a big NullSec bloc. Get over it and work with each other for once. |

Jinli mei
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
56
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 23:34:00 -
[290] - Quote
I shudder to think of what highsec would be like if it weren't for past and present CSM delegates and conferences. No one, CSM or not, is out there to ruin highsec. It's not in our interest, nor CCP's. Without the CSM, I fear, this game would have been worthless years ago.
Oh and, by the by, attempting to raise voter participation by generating a lot of white noise is useless. The reason people in nullsec judge highsec so harshly is that we know very well there is a large percentage of highsec players that don't actually care. Add to that, the overall percentage of highsec players don't even realize some of the critically bad problems in this game.
|

Skaz
Skazmanian Industries
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 00:55:00 -
[291] - Quote
I was in a VERY early version of the CSMs way back.
It was basically a rep from various "professions" (yeah weird). And we'd prepare around 3-4 questions each, and get to ask the Devs those questions in turn and get answers in real time.
We'd never know what dev would be there if any would show up. Usually Pann or later Kieron would rounding available devs up on the fly it seemed.
And their answers were often vague to be generous.
The current format is way, way better than that "amateurism" early on.
But of course it wouldn't be any harm in setting up term limits and so on to prevent stagnation, something that EVE seems to have too much of now a days.
And if Goons are gaming the system, well EVE is a PVP game so game them back, beat them at their own game then.
|

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
167
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 06:09:00 -
[292] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:I think the first step to getting the random "little guy" high sec pilot to become interested in the CSM is to make the campaign and election totally someting "in game". I should vote in game, I should be constantly reminded IN GAME there is an election and tie voting to getting something, like the "election shuttle". Randomize the order of the candidates when you are presented who to vote for and at least the argument that the "care bear" block doesn't vote because the they don't "forum" goes away.
Get the CSM election in game and then you can't not know about it.
Actually, the CSMs DID go around in game spamming people trying to get votes, particularly in highsec.
Also, the day the vote went live, you got a nice little pop up when you logged in saying the election was on, and to click on the link(provided in the pop up) to go view the randomized list of candidates.
And yes, the list was randomized, as anyone with more than one character can tell you.
Anyone complaining about the process is someone who just clicks ok on whatever window they see to close it. I don't want those people voting, because they aren't going to make an informed decision, they are gonna click a name to close the window if forced to vote.
Mandatory voting is a terrible idea, as is any mechanism which changes the voting process from an opt-in system to an opt-out system, simply because of the ignorant masses who don't care.
If you care, you will vote, its that simple.
Oh, and those with multiple accounts, well our voice is worth more because we are worth more to the company, obviously. My votes got split between Mittens, and Trebor. Mittens is the leader the CSM needed this term, and maybe even next term. We NEEDED someone who would go out and be a media *****, because it brought attention, and thus pressure, on CCP to clean up their act. It worked. Trebor needed to be there, well, because he tends to opposed the Mittani, and that needs to happen too.
This coming CSM, I will probably vote the same way, but hope that Trebor takes chair and Mittens is there as a normal CSM to opposed him on his carebear initiative(also there to media ***** it up again should it be needed).
PS. Hey Trebor, did you hear they are making a Wizardry MMO? wut?  o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
1022
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 11:32:00 -
[293] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Well then, who is the highsec rep? I know SOMEONE came out a while back as primarily advocating highsec interests.
There is no "hisec CSM", but there are quite a few that try to broadly represent the interests of all of the players. Myself, Meissa, Seleene, and Two Step come to mind.
Tallian Saotome wrote:PS. Hey Trebor, did you hear they are making a Wizardry MMO? wut? 
Yeah, I heard. I have no direct connection to Wizardry these days, so I don't know any more than you do. CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism! CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM blog |

Big Bad Mofo
Comply Or Die
34
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 11:36:00 -
[294] - Quote
Skaz wrote:
And if Goons are gaming the system, well EVE is a PVP game so game them back, beat them at their own game then.
Instant 8000 man alliance and a nice region going spare? Oh and a few hundered wouldnt go a miss.
Seriously silly comments like this make me very angry stop talking out of your ass man
|

Mal Darkrunner
Zero Tau Research Institute
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 06:53:00 -
[295] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:...listen to the WHOLE community...
Fair enough, I'll add my voice then: I have no problem whatsoever with the current CSM and I feel that they're doing a fine job. Please do not remove them. |

Velyks
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 08:29:00 -
[296] - Quote
Big Bad Mofo wrote:Skaz wrote:
And if Goons are gaming the system, well EVE is a PVP game so game them back, beat them at their own game then.
Instant 8000 man alliance and a nice region going spare? Oh and a few hundered wouldnt go a miss. Seriously silly comments like this make me very angry  stop talking out of your ass man
You talk like you're unable to form an 8000 man alliance.
Its a lot easier than you think. http://i.imgur.com/JyLjl.jpg |

Red Templar
Raging Ducks Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:05:00 -
[297] - Quote
Mal Darkrunner wrote:Mr R4nd0m wrote:...listen to the WHOLE community... Fair enough, I'll add my voice then: I have no problem whatsoever with the current CSM and I feel that they're doing a fine job. Please do not remove them. You misunderstand. Everyone who is in support of current CSM, are not part of community. They are part of goon conspiracy to take over galaxy. And thats is why their voices and arguments should be ignored. See? Its easy  For Love. For Peace. For Honor.
For None of the Above.
For Pony! |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
177
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 11:22:00 -
[298] - Quote
Velyks wrote:Big Bad Mofo wrote:Skaz wrote:
And if Goons are gaming the system, well EVE is a PVP game so game them back, beat them at their own game then.
Instant 8000 man alliance and a nice region going spare? Oh and a few hundered wouldnt go a miss. Seriously silly comments like this make me very angry  stop talking out of your ass man You talk like you're unable to form an 8000 man alliance. Its a lot easier than you think. but you have to be willing to do more than whine on the forums.
Oh, and a region to spare? If you can get a 2000 man alliance together then you can take a region pretty easily. It will be a crap region, but its a foothold. With 8000 I imagine you could take almost any region you wanted.
Honestly, if you want an 8k alliance, only one exists... and its not goons.
(glad I checked dotlan before saying there are no 8k alliances... WTF X.W.X)
Edit:
Red Templar wrote:For Love. For Peace. For Honor.
For None of the Above.
For Pony! Ponies get likes. Always. o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
105
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 15:09:00 -
[299] - Quote
They won't be removed "now" Lets just wait until the end of the year to see what Himlar has in mind for them. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
578
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 19:34:00 -
[300] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:They won't be removed "now" Lets just wait until the end of the year to see what Himlar has in mind for them. So now you and your alts are going to take over other peoples' threads?
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 20:03:00 -
[301] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Himlar It's Hilmar. |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
210
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 20:17:00 -
[302] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Himlar It's Hilmar. Wasn't Himlar a member of the German Gov't during WWII?
OMG, I think I just figured it out!
/puts on his tinfoil hat o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 20:17:00 -
[303] - Quote
That's Himmler. |

Sephiroth CloneIIV
Vitriol Ventures BLACK-MARK
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 21:51:00 -
[304] - Quote
ccp makes big mistakes in recent expansions, including HIMAR and others running the show.
The CSM brings issues to ccp but does not really make decisions on them.
So remove the people who are little at fault with company direction..... as if ccp needs less player input.
Sounds like ccp's ex's wet dream, blame it in the CSM, remove them.... and then awesome? Problems fixed?
|

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 01:01:00 -
[305] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Funny hows it only idiot goons posting cry baby tears - keep deep throatng mittani its hilarious....goons just keeping look stupid... Well I, for one, am completely effin' sold and wholeheartedly support this product and/or service.
What are we on about again? |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
613
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 01:30:00 -
[306] - Quote
Sirhan Blixt wrote:What are we on about again? Apparently we have ruined our image.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Jehan Markow
Militant Mermen LEGIO ASTARTES ARCANUM
5
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 01:52:00 -
[307] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Quote: Hilmar P+¬tursson: The CSM has been under constant evolution based on what's going on in the current environment, what's going on with CCP and Eve, who's on the Council and all that. The CSM has helped greatly through the years in getting feedback for aspects of the game.
But some of my concerns right now relate to whether the CSM is maybe focused on a particular aspect of the game and I'm starting to get feedback from players that they worry the CSM is too pre-occupied by a certain playstyle. That might mean we may need to change the structure, but definitely the CSM has worked as a feedback tool greatly throughout the years. We will have them over at the end of the year, after everything that's gone on, and we will have a chance to talk about that. We'll just see where we are and take it from there.
Too true, the CSM is all wrong at the moment. The problem is letting any goons in there, especially letting Mittani in as chair, and vile rat and other nullsec powermad idiots, big big mistake. Hilmar, if your removing some of your own people. Then remove the CSM, its not working and hasnt really worked. Now you just got CSM members trying to f**k over other CSM members, corruption and everything else. Just get rid of it, it sort of served its purpose.
Rather than proposing removal of the CSM, which just seems to make the pro-CSM elitists grow stronger, I have proposed ongoing crowdsourcing which if implemented would ensure that every player would have the chance to vote on proposals in the game at any point in time. Yeah, it would take a little work on CCP's part, but it would pay off in terms of lower levels of customer complaints and feedback and at the same time provide a problem-solving model unique in the gaming world. My proposal is here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=25858
I don't think CCP wants to remove the CSM now and you have to admit that the Goons - just like Mussolini - got their power through legitimate and democratic means. But with CCP's technology and expertise, the means could be far more democratic. -JM |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
616
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 02:02:00 -
[308] - Quote
Jehan Markow wrote:crowdsourcing Still not a real word.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Takara Mora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 02:21:00 -
[309] - Quote
Crowdsourcing - wow, who knew it really was a word after all?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowdsourcing |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
619
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 02:34:00 -
[310] - Quote
Because everything on wikipedia is true. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Takara Mora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 02:42:00 -
[311] - Quote
Oh quit pouting ... 2001 called ... it wants its outdated social commentary back ... |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
620
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 03:15:00 -
[312] - Quote
I'm not the one upset that nobody takes my marketing doublespeak seriously. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Parsec Seti
1st Contact Fade 2 Black
20
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 04:53:00 -
[313] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Jehan Markow wrote:crowdsourcing Still not a real word.
All words are made up. What is a real word, vs. a non-real one? "Welcome to you're doom!" |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
20
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 13:49:00 -
[314] - Quote
Ok, now go read the link
These forums are already well within the umbrella of what is defined as crowdsourcing (despite being a stupid made up word). Whats being proposed is an absolute democracy, and I think history has made it quite clear those don't work. |

Parsec Seti
1st Contact Fade 2 Black
20
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 14:06:00 -
[315] - Quote
Yeep wrote: (despite being a stupid made up word)
Is this on the goonswarm talking points list? Does the hive think for you?
All words are made up. "Welcome to you're doom!" |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
20
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 15:41:00 -
[316] - Quote
Its a buzzword. A placating measure on a marketing agency's list for when customers feel ignored. Saying we should engage in crowdsourcing is about as useful as asking me to go to the shops for some stuff.
Now how about you address the rest of my post? |

Parsec Seti
1st Contact Fade 2 Black
24
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 23:33:00 -
[317] - Quote
Yeep wrote:Ok, now go read the link These forums are already well within the umbrella of what is defined as crowdsourcing (despite being a stupid made up word). Whats being proposed is an absolute democracy, and I think history has made it quite clear those don't work.
Yeep wrote:Now how about you address the rest of my post?
It seems like you're offering your opinions as fact. They are still just your opinions.
You (and many others) are still confused over the term democracy. As I understand it, a democracy is a system of government and implies that those voted in will govern over the public. While it true that the current CSM chair governs over you and decides what you can and can't do in EVE, the CSM does not govern over the playerbase.
What people are looking for here is a method of getting in touch with a great proportion of the players then the current method of the CSM. It is many peoples opinion that the CSM is biased and since their function is to be the lens through which CCP views customer issues, many people are left wanting a new system that the feel will do a better job in capturing the voice of the players. Crowdsourcing may not be the answer, but I like the idea of more representation, rather than less.
It's disappointing to see that most goonswarm posters on here seem to be trying to stop public discourse, rather than promote it...but I understand. "Welcome to you're doom!" |

Destru Kaneda
CTRL-Q
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 00:52:00 -
[318] - Quote
Tell him to give me "Cat Party" or it's going to be talon party. At your face's house. Music for robots, hackers, pirates, geeks and miscellaneous nerds. |

Parsec Seti
1st Contact Fade 2 Black
24
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 01:06:00 -
[319] - Quote
Destru Kaneda wrote:Tell him to give me "Cat Party" or it's going to be talon party. At your face's house.
Brilliant! took me a second (which is shameful) - but I support meeting these demands! "Welcome to you're doom!" |

Kerah Yahr
Corus Industries
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 08:51:00 -
[320] - Quote
SMT008 wrote:Mr Management wrote:The CSM is broken. The game was better in CCP's hand.
Sure. More walking in a closet and more monocles. Go ahead.
When 5000 people can vote for their alliance leader who publically writes that he wants to break Eve then the system is flawed. Nope. Check what's happening in real life. I'll take America as an exemple, despite how stupid that is. Two entites. Democrats and Republicans. Democrats ideas are stupidities, for Republicans. Republicans ideas are stupidities, for Democrats.
That is a pretty good analogy. Like American politics, posts on the forums break down into stereotypes, insults and name calling. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 08:55:00 -
[321] - Quote
Wait, what? Someone is actually trying to say that monoclegate and walking in a closet is the CSM's fault, and not CCP/Hilmar?
That's an interesting take on things. |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
20
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 09:59:00 -
[322] - Quote
Parsec Seti wrote: It's disappointing to see that most goonswarm posters on here seem to be trying to stop public discourse, rather than promote it...but I understand.
Have you read the features and ideas forum? Most of the ideas range from transparently self serving to completely braindead. The majority of players don't care about the state of the game outside their personal bubble of experience so yes, I'd rather keep the current system where people who at least understand the world is bigger than what they can see (even if they don't grasp the full implications or mechanics) get to filter communication with CCP. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
630
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 10:21:00 -
[323] - Quote
Parsec Seti wrote:It's disappointing to see that most goonswarm posters on here seem to be trying to stop public discourse, rather than promote it...but I understand. Because a thread titled "HILMAR - Remove the CSM Now" is an invitation to rational discourse.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Twisted Alice
Twisted Universe
24
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 11:59:00 -
[324] - Quote
CSM system flawed, totally.
Vote rigging, of course that won't change.
Corruption almost certainly.
Simple way to resolve it, get rid of the CSM.
Then problem solved. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 12:02:00 -
[325] - Quote
Twisted Alice wrote:Corruption almost certainly. What kind of corruption? |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
630
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 13:19:00 -
[326] - Quote
Twisted Alice wrote:Vote rigging, of course that won't change. I'm sure you have some proof of this, right? You wouldn't resort to making baseless accusations against the Chairman For Life...
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Big Bad Mofo
Retribution.
43
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 13:21:00 -
[327] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Twisted Alice wrote:Vote rigging, of course that won't change. I'm sure you have some proof of this, right? You wouldn't resort to making baseless accusations against the Chairman For Life...
So a few thousand of your own alliance members and a few thousand of their alts outside alliance is not considered vote rigging them? Im sure it is in real life..
|

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
630
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 13:30:00 -
[328] - Quote
Big Bad Mofo wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Twisted Alice wrote:Vote rigging, of course that won't change. I'm sure you have some proof of this, right? You wouldn't resort to making baseless accusations against the Chairman For Life... So a few thousand of your own alliance members and a few thousand of their alts outside alliance is not considered vote rigging them? Im sure it is in real life.. 
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
28
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 03:29:00 -
[329] - Quote
Big Bad Mofo wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Twisted Alice wrote:Vote rigging, of course that won't change. I'm sure you have some proof of this, right? You wouldn't resort to making baseless accusations against the Chairman For Life... So a few thousand of your own alliance members and a few thousand of their alts outside alliance is not considered vote rigging them? Im sure it is in real life..  So the real crime is ... that there are so many Goons?
I'm a little conflicted here.
I mean, consider the Goon stereotypes we hear, mostly from pubbies: fat neckbeards, addled by Asperger's Syndrome, living in parents' basements, condemned to dying alone.
On the other hand, now I'm in a position where I have to ask, quite pointedly and out loud ...
... that if you can't manage the level of social interaction and cooperation necessary to compete with Goons on this playing field ...
... WHY IS THAT OUR PROBLEM??
Seriously-- work with me here. I don't know which way to go with this.
(it's all because we don't open-recruit, isn't it?) |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
45
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 07:57:00 -
[330] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Twisted Alice wrote:Corruption almost certainly. What kind of corruption? I guess not? |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
641
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 08:34:00 -
[331] - Quote
I think he's honestly upset that so many people outside Goonswarm Federation voted for Mittens. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Red Templar
Raging Ducks Goonswarm Federation
59
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 09:53:00 -
[332] - Quote
Big Bad Mofo wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Twisted Alice wrote:Vote rigging, of course that won't change. I'm sure you have some proof of this, right? You wouldn't resort to making baseless accusations against the Chairman For Life... So a few thousand of your own alliance members and a few thousand of their alts outside alliance is not considered vote rigging them? Im sure it is in real life..  I dont think it is. Because it has nothing to do with voting systems that we have in real life.
And i dont remember CCP making a rule that you cannot vote from your alt accounts. The only restriction was that your account have to be paid and older than 30 days.
The more accounts you pay for - more votes you have. Its a simple share system. Even corporation voting inside the game is based on how many shares corp members/directors have.
Unless you want to make voting in game the same like voting in real life, e.g. coming in personally, presenting your ID, giving signature, filling papers.
But even if by some miracle CCP will go completely mad and forbid alt voting (i have no idea how, but still), it will not change anything. High-sec players are not interested in voting. And even if they will vote, they cannot agree on the candidate. Hell, they cannot agree on anything.
So good luck with replacing Chairman for Life :D For Love. For Peace. For Honor.
For None of the Above.
For Pony! |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
233
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 10:20:00 -
[333] - Quote
Kerah Yahr wrote: That is a pretty good analogy. Like American politics, posts on the forums break down into stereotypes, insults and name calling.
IS this guy trying to say that American politics are the only ones to pull this kind of thing? 
Oh, it is to laugh.  o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Kerah Yahr
Corus Industries
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 11:45:00 -
[334] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Kerah Yahr wrote: That is a pretty good analogy. Like American politics, posts on the forums break down into stereotypes, insults and name calling.
IS this guy trying to say that American politics are the only ones to pull this kind of thing?  Oh, it is to laugh. 
Not at all, just speaking to what I know. I'm sure Americans don't have the market cornered on that sort of thing.
For the record, I think the current CSM has done a good job, seeing past all the QQ over current Goonswarm representatives, positive changes have been made. The bar for the next CSM has been set higher. As long as they can listen to the concerns of the players and present that to CCP, cool. The community isn't going to agree on everything, we can at least try and get ideas across without the tears and flames. |

Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 18:25:00 -
[335] - Quote
Karadion wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:I have said this before, I want my interests and the interests of my friends addressed. I want representatives who recognize my play style and the playing style of people like me. The current CSM, and most of the CSM's before that, are not giving me that "feeling". They are elected representatives that should be representing all of EVE online, from mining in empire to null sec. Their primary concern should be game balancing in every aspect of the game... If they can't do that then there is no point in having them.  At the very least we could use an Empire CSM, Low Sec CSM and Null Sec CSM (or something). What we have now can only steer CCP in the wrong direction, and I believe has. Purposefully or not, It doesn't really matter, because a null sec only CSM cannot fulfill the above requirements. These are important requirements. No ones "idea" of how the game should be played should take precedence over anyone else's. CSM's must be fair, neutral and courteous in order to fulfill their intended roll. Else they are useless to everyone. They don't give you that warm feeling inside because they're not fighting to buff your mission bots / isk return. You got Trebor and that other person what's his name? Whatever. The current CSM got voted because they presented their platforms they believe in and also gained the favor of their own alliances because they share similar feelings. PS: Use enter's less. Makes you look like you are skilled in grammar.
You argue like a spoiled child throwing a tantrum, Karadroid. Please stop posting now, kthxbai.
I A/F/K cloak in Jita. Does that count? |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
648
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 18:45:00 -
[336] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:You argue like a spoiled child throwing a tantrum, Karadroid. Please stop posting now, kthxbai. That'll show him!
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Sirhan Blixt
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
29
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 00:43:00 -
[337] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:You argue like a spoiled child throwing a tantrum, Karadroid. Please stop posting now, kthxbai.
:ohsnap: |

Johan Krieger
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 01:47:00 -
[338] - Quote
Darius III wrote:Signal11th wrote:Bascially thats just a warning shot saying "certain 0.0 dwellers who will remain nameless, it's time to shut the **** up" but I would like the CSM to continue because apart from some disruptive elements to it it actually does a good job.
I think he has just figured out that some people are getting a little to big for their boots and it's a polite way of telling them to calm down a bit. This
Says the guy who can't honor an NDA. |

Vio Geraci
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
68
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 16:27:00 -
[339] - Quote
The CSM need to focus on particular issues in order to get elected. People vote for candidates because they offer solutions to specific issues, not because of vague hand-wringing about general areas of the game. This focus serves the candidates well because CCP have a history of expending their limited resources on particular areas of the game.
When this batch of CSM's pet issues is fixed, a new group will be elected that has different pet issues. They can then try to get CCP to work on those. If you as a high-sec dweller feel that your particular issues are not being addressed, you should probably find a candidate whose pet issues reflect your views, and vote for them next time.
Engaging in feckless attacks against elected officials or the institution of the CSM is entirely the wrong approach. It is also generally more reflective of antipathy toward particular members of the committee, or toward null-sec players in general.
The worst is a short-sighted belief that any attempt to fix null-sec/low-sec/w-space somehow makes high-sec worse. This is even more hypocritical in the case of players that did not vote in the previous election. Work within the system to effect change, rather than destroying the only direct means of influence that players have over CCP. This company needs to hear things to their face, not read the results of gerrymandered polls. |

Angel Lust
Vikinghall
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 16:45:00 -
[340] - Quote
Remove the CSM  |

Vio Geraci
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
68
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 17:28:00 -
[341] - Quote
Angel Lust wrote:Remove the CSM 
Supporting statements? |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
58
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 18:07:00 -
[342] - Quote
Vio Geraci wrote:Angel Lust wrote:Remove the CSM  Supporting statements? *crickets*
*crickets*
*crickets* |

HELIC0N ONE
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
13
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 18:19:00 -
[343] - Quote
Vio Geraci wrote:Angel Lust wrote:Remove the CSM  Supporting statements?
"The wrong people won" |

Angel Lust
Vikinghall
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 19:20:00 -
[344] - Quote
Remove the go.... eh CSM naow... |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 20:15:00 -
[345] - Quote
Everything i have read leads me to believe the current CSM is not working in my perceived best interests. I am not convinced that removing the concept of the CSM is the proper solution. I hope Hilmar is clever enough to realize that focusing the future of EVE and Dust on the rantings of the flavor of the month CSM chair is lunacy.
If this game builds it's future on catering to the bitter whiny afraid to undock alone vets of Null it's going to implode once the number of Null alts reach the diminishing number of new players that stick around longer then a few months.
While this self serving CSM tends to their own "sucking chest wounds" they scoff at every injury they inflict to player enjoyment and retention. I sincerely hope that CCP does not actually believe that players are quitting because they are upset that life is too easy for high sec players.
This game will hopefully always have a hardcore contingent of elite pvp zealots but that should not be at the cost of not improving the game and making it more enjoyable for all players.
Newer players and representation based on where most players play not on where CCP wishes they should play needs to be implemented. A reformed CSM could consist of a High sec rep, a low sec rep, a wh rep, a newbie rep, a null rep and an at large rep from each empire.
This could be verified by CCP to make sure Phony Alts of high sec members could not succeed in pretending to be Null seccers and vice versa.
No player owned corp member could vote for the at large rep that would be restricted to players who have remained in their starter NPC a bunch of great people there who help new players get their space legs.
Love Null vote only in Null, Love WH vote only in WH and so on in most Democracies you don't get to vote everywhere you have an interest or a business just where you live. EVE's biggest sucking chest wound is the lack of balanced representation that understands ignoring player apathy towards voting might be a good strategy for winning an election with a large Alliance block of votes but it is a terrible business model for sustained and prolonged growth. Wake up Hilmar! |

Takara Mora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 20:41:00 -
[346] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Everything i have read leads me to believe the current CSM is not working in my perceived best interests. I am not convinced that removing the concept of the CSM is the proper solution. I hope Hilmar is clever enough to realize that focusing the future of EVE and Dust on the rantings of the flavor of the month CSM chair is lunacy.
If this game builds it's future on catering to the bitter whiny afraid to undock alone vets of Null it's going to implode once the number of Null alts reach the diminishing number of new players that stick around longer then a few months.
While this self serving CSM tends to their own "sucking chest wounds" they scoff at every injury they inflict to player enjoyment and retention. I sincerely hope that CCP does not actually believe that players are quitting because they are upset that life is too easy for high sec players.
This game will hopefully always have a hardcore contingent of elite pvp zealots but that should not be at the cost of not improving the game and making it more enjoyable for all players.
Newer players and representation based on where most players play not on where CCP wishes they should play needs to be implemented. A reformed CSM could consist of a High sec rep, a low sec rep, a wh rep, a newbie rep, a null rep and an at large rep from each empire.
OK, totally with you on these points!
Temba Ronin wrote: This could be verified by CCP to make sure Phony Alts of high sec members could not succeed in pretending to be Null seccers and vice versa.
No player owned corp member could vote for the at large rep that would be restricted to players who have remained in their starter NPC a bunch of great people there who help new players get their space legs.
Love Null vote only in Null, Love WH vote only in WH and so on in most Democracies you don't get to vote everywhere you have an interest or a business just where you live. EVE's biggest sucking chest wound is the lack of balanced representation that understands ignoring player apathy towards voting might be a good strategy for winning an election with a large Alliance block of votes but it is a terrible business model for sustained and prolonged growth. Wake up Hilmar!
OK, on this one ... would it maybe sortta be like proposing ... "registered political parties in EVE"? ..... I'm not gonna touch the issues with trying to filter out alts and such ...
I don't mind the idea of political blocs/parties .... nor the CSM ... actually, the CSM is fine as long as CCP filters them properly (i.e.-teachers should be smart enough not to listen to schoolyard bullies if the shoe fits) .... seems to me though that CCP would want to exhaust ALL avenues of player input - so why not have periodic computerized surveys of ALL members for example ... add that input to the CSM's input and CCP's perspectives and wham-o, wouldn't that be a much better picture than the current limited perspective that the CSM can provide (even WITH crowdsourcing, etc.)? |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
58
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 20:42:00 -
[347] - Quote
Um. Point out those who are saying people are quitting because they think hisec life is too easy, please?
Also, how many sucking chest wounds are there for hisec that is actively threatening to stagnate hisec to death? |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 20:53:00 -
[348] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Um. Point out those who are saying people are quitting because they think hisec life is too easy, please?
Also, how many sucking chest wounds are there for hisec that is actively threatening to stagnate hisec to death? Gate camps at all the major trading hubs, station camps at every major trading hub station exit, laughable penalties for ganking, Empire wide interdiction of commerce by large Alliances still allowed free access to that same Empire space (like that would really happen), as far as pointing out who complains about the easy life driving players from EVE look to your Null sec reps on the CSM.
Come on Zim at least be realistic. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
59
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 21:52:00 -
[349] - Quote
Gatecamps and station camps on all the major trading hubs? Funny, I keep flying in and out of them all the time, they never seem to bother me.
As to my null sec reps on the CSM claiming hisec guys are leaving because it is too easy ... what I've seen so far has been mittens saying L4 botting is a problem, incursions are good because it teaches PVP-ish behavior (even though I find the wow-speak in incursion channels absolutely ******* atrocious), and Vile Rat wanting more hisec careers to make hisec more interesting.
Honestly, if I were to assume people in hisec left for a reason, I would assume it would be because hisec can be too boring, especially if they haven't found a good corp. Too safe? I think it seems mostly balanced wrt safety as it is. vOv |

Takara Mora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:33:00 -
[350] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Gatecamps and station camps on all the major trading hubs? Funny, I keep flying in and out of them all the time, they never seem to bother me.
As to my null sec reps on the CSM claiming hisec guys are leaving because it is too easy ... what I've seen so far has been mittens saying L4 botting is a problem, incursions are good because it teaches PVP-ish behavior (even though I find the wow-speak in incursion channels absolutely ******* atrocious), and Vile Rat wanting more hisec careers to make hisec more interesting.
Honestly, if I were to assume people in hisec left for a reason, I would assume it would be because hisec can be too boring, especially if they haven't found a good corp. Too safe? I think it seems mostly balanced wrt safety as it is. vOv
Interesting thoughts Lord Zim ... that hisec can both dangerous (enough), but boring at the same time ... maybe "boring" can't be measured simply by the level of danger ... and maybe it's not just a HiSec problem.
|

Rer Eirikr
Clearly Compensating The Dark Triad
50
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 05:11:00 -
[351] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:While this self serving CSM tends to their own "sucking chest wounds" they scoff at every injury they inflict to player enjoyment and retention.
Name one.
|

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 06:54:00 -
[352] - Quote
Rer Eirikr wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:While this self serving CSM tends to their own "sucking chest wounds" they scoff at every injury they inflict to player enjoyment and retention. Name one. The Mittani
My typical voters appreciate war, murder, and cunning. They can be nullsec warriors, spies, gankers, scammers. Most of my efforts go towards fixing nullsec issues, as those are both the most broken in the game currently, and those closest to the hearts of 'my people', but I generally advocate on behalf of grief, conquest and terror.
It's from his thread posted here in the Jita Park Speakers Corner Post #56 |

Rer Eirikr
Clearly Compensating The Dark Triad
50
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 06:57:00 -
[353] - Quote
Let's try this again.
Rer Eirikr wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:While this self serving CSM tends to their own "sucking chest wounds" they scoff at every injury they inflict to player enjoyment and retention. Name one.
Something THE CSM has done to inflict injury to the playerbase, not what someone on the CSM in the game has done. Completely seperate things, and if you are unable to realize that then well, debating this point further is pointless.
So again, Name One. |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 07:30:00 -
[354] - Quote
Rer Eirikr wrote:Let's try this again. Rer Eirikr wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:While this self serving CSM tends to their own "sucking chest wounds" they scoff at every injury they inflict to player enjoyment and retention. Name one. Something THE CSM has done to inflict injury to the playerbase, not what someone on the CSM in the game has done. Completely seperate things, and if you are unable to realize that then well, debating this point further is pointless. So again, Name One. If you can't differentiate between a CSM saying he advocates for griefing and doing the actual griefing you are correct further debate with someone of your limited capacity would be truly pointless. I could give you more direct quotes of his advocacy of things that harm the player base but since you have what passes for you mind made up it would not matter. In the quote supplied it did not imply that the actions of the CSM in game was what I was talking about and what you should have been responding to in an intelligent manner. As a member of the CSM in that capacity this CSM and others fail miserably an it's easily proven by their own words.
He takes care of his "people" and advocates for griefing not exactly the definition of a member of the CSM that i read. Perhaps you have a different understanding of that also.
EVELOPEDIA.Beta The Scope of the CSM
The purpose of the CSM is to represent society interests to CCP. This requires active engagement with the player community to master EVE issue awareness, understanding, and evaluation in the context of the GÇ£greatest good for the greater player baseGÇ¥.
Now square those statements about advocating for his "people" with the actual job description keeping in mind the greater player base is NOT in Nullsec.
So you can understand when the CSM focuses the attention of CCP to their pet projects and personal political base that is in reality a large group of whiny vets afraid to undock alone it harms the player base because real problems go unaddressed.
Now there you have his description of what he does, the written description of what he should be doing and your position is totally debunked by indisputable facts. So this is where you man up and admit you where wrong or call me a pubbie or some other low brow exit device and go back to boot licking. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
63
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 08:06:00 -
[355] - Quote
So, what you're saying is that the instant someone gets on the CSM, they can't actually advocate or perform any acts of griefing? Something which is, at least in my mind, a large cornerstone of how 0.0 works, and to a certain extent also hisec? |

Poetic Stanziel
Arrakis Technology
228
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 08:46:00 -
[356] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:STAY ON TOPIC - I WILL HAVE NO PROBLEM REPORTING TROLLS LOL
EVE Online: Incarna - New Coke EVE Online: Winter Expansion - Coke Classic |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
236
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 08:56:00 -
[357] - Quote
Advocating griefing is somehow anti-eve? My, the game I started playing has pulled a sudden about face, since I joined the game BECAUSE of the freedom to grief, scam, and otherwise be a jerk. I don't play that way personally, but part of the challenge of survival in eve is surviving those guys.
WTF kind of game is eve if you remove all the 'bad guys'(sic)? And when the game puts players in the role of 'bad guy' do they no longer rate as much attention as the precious little carebears or something?
Sure sounds fair to me. You have as much voice as any other carebear, and as much as any griefer. If you were to break free of the terrible things highsec has done to you, you could actually challenge the voices you oppose instead of whining on the forums.
Don't complain that griefers are ruining the highsec game, when highsec was added later and is actually ruining the griefers game. Learn to play the game in an engaged and intelligent manner, and the griefers/scammers/etc will not be able to bother you. They never bothered me in the 2 years I beared it up in highsec before I finally started playing the game the fun way. o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Poetic Stanziel
Arrakis Technology
228
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 09:03:00 -
[358] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Advocating griefing is somehow anti-eve? Just the opposite is true. You know that, of course. Sadly, this screaming Unista alt will never get it.
EVE Online: Incarna - New Coke EVE Online: Winter Expansion - Coke Classic |

Kire Moshiko
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 12:10:00 -
[359] - Quote
I also preferred Eve before the CSM for some very simple reasons.
I like my games designed by game designers. I enjoyed the game hugely when it was designed by CCP and I was looking forward to a lot of the future material CCP had planned.
It is the staff and shareholders/owners of CCP whose livelihoods stand or fall on the success of the game. The CSM have no investment, risk nothing, so they have neither the skill nor the incentive to look at creating a good game for all players.
The last concurrent usage figure recorded in the alliance tournament was something over 600,000 characters logged in. Most of these players do not care one whit about null sec. Most of them did not vote for the current CSM. Which means most of them did not want the current CSM. This CSM does not represent me. I did not choose them. I had no say in their appointment. It was CCP I chose, that I voted for with my wallet, and I never thought they needed anyone to tell them what to do.
I want to play the amazing, deep, open, engrossing, wonderful game I was playing before a bunch of unqualified nullsec muppets started screaming to have their own way. I want my Eve back. I want my CCP back. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 12:57:00 -
[360] - Quote
Kire Moshiko wrote:I also preferred Eve before the CSM for some very simple reasons.
I like my games designed by game designers. I enjoyed the game hugely when it was designed by CCP and I was looking forward to a lot of the future material CCP had planned.
It is the staff and shareholders/owners of CCP whose livelihoods stand or fall on the success of the game. The CSM have no investment, risk nothing, so they have neither the skill nor the incentive to look at creating a good game for all players. So, given the fact that the staff and shareholders/owners of CCP are dependent on EVE being a success, you would assume that they were in fact, you know, developing the game. Continuously. Not just barely keeping it alive for 18 months, amidst an increasingly vocal playerbase saying "this isn't right, fix it", followed by "holy fuckshit, we need to start developing the game again! SHUT. DOWN. EVERYTHING!".
Just sayin'.
Kire Moshiko wrote:The last concurrent usage figure recorded in the alliance tournament was something over 600,000 characters logged in. 600k characters logged in when there were, what, 357k accounts total in-game at the end of 2010? Where did you see this?
Kire Moshiko wrote:Most of these players do not care one whit about null sec. Most of them did not vote for the current CSM. Which means most of them did not want the current CSM. This CSM does not represent me. I did not choose them. I had no say in their appointment. It was CCP I chose, that I voted for with my wallet, and I never thought they needed anyone to tell them what to do. Actually, you did choose, and you did have a say in their appointment. You chose to not care, and as such, you not giving a **** about the voting process itself doesn't mean you can say you had no say in their appointment. You had your chance to try to vote in someone else.
Vote next time?
Kire Moshiko wrote:I want to play the amazing, deep, open, engrossing, wonderful game I was playing before a bunch of unqualified nullsec muppets started screaming to have their own way. I want my Eve back. I want my CCP back. What have the CSM done to make the game not "amazing, deep, open, engrossing and wonderful"? |

Angel Lust
Vikinghall
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 13:10:00 -
[361] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote: What have the CSM done to make the game not "amazing, deep, open, engrossing and wonderful"?

Remove CSM
|

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 13:22:00 -
[362] - Quote
Angel Lust wrote:Lord Zim wrote: What have the CSM done to make the game not "amazing, deep, open, engrossing and wonderful"?
 Remove CSM So what they did to make the game "not amazing, deep, open, engrossing and wonderful", as defined by Kire Moshiko, was sit at the meetings with bugeyes? |

MaiLina KaTar
Katar Corp
18
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 17:03:00 -
[363] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Vote next time? Why would I vote when the entire thing is a failure and ought to never have happened in the first place? You're basically asking me to vote for either ******* or ******. Ain't gonna happen.
Gome [b]professional[/i] CRM for the job, not a bunch of ******* nerds. |

Kire Moshiko
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 17:25:00 -
[364] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote: So, given the fact that the staff and shareholders/owners of CCP are dependent on EVE being a success, you would assume that they were in fact, you know, developing the game. Continuously. Not just barely keeping it alive for 18 months, amidst an increasingly vocal playerbase saying "this isn't right, fix it", followed by "holy fuckshit, we need to start developing the game again! SHUT. DOWN. EVERYTHING!".
Just sayin'.
I was having a great time, I didn't feel shorted at all until the CSMs started sticking their oars in. During the period of time you cite the game as barely being alive in fact.
That's my point - my love for the game started dying right about the time we got CSMs and certain sections of the playerbase discovered that they could influence game design by screaming a lot.
Lord Zim wrote:600k characters logged in when there were, what, 357k accounts total in-game at the end of 2010? Where did you see this?
I thought it was quoted on air during the Eve TV coverage. Maybe I'm wrong but it doesn't change the fact that the vast majority of Eve - be it 600,000 accounts or 400,000 - did not vote for the current CSM.
Lord Zim wrote: Actually, you did choose, and you did have a say in their appointment. You chose to not care, and as such, you not giving a **** about the voting process itself doesn't mean you can say you had no say in their appointment. You had your chance to try to vote in someone else.
Vote next time?
There wasn't an option for "none of the above." There was no button labelled "I don't hire a lawyer to fix my plumbing, why is one doing my game design?" I wasn't allowed to vote for "Someone Qualified." |

Kire Moshiko
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 17:27:00 -
[365] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Kire Moshiko wrote:I want to play the amazing, deep, open, engrossing, wonderful game I was playing before a bunch of unqualified nullsec muppets started screaming to have their own way. I want my Eve back. I want my CCP back. What have the CSM done to make the game not "amazing, deep, open, engrossing and wonderful"?
They've kicked and screamed and drummed their heels on the ground about their own tiny pet issues and made such a din that CCP have dragged people off projects I would have liked to see and onto whatever flavour-of-the-month-cause the loudest section of the playerbase has decided is important.
Running an eye down the list of resolved issues on the Evelopedia, there are two issues on the entire list I actually care about. There are a bunch of minor tweaks I'm not convinced CCP wouldn't have done anyway, and a couple of items that are pure hysteria. This quote is especially great:
"House cleanup by IA department (or creation of one if it doesn't exist) and clearing up all the "rotten apples" . Although there is no public T20 yet, I doubt the GM department is fully clean."
Yes, that is "some bloke" demanding a security audit of CCP employees because he doesn't believe a department is clean. Note that this is not CCP's HR department talking. This is "some guy" who happens to have a spare -ú15 every month to play a game with. There's no evidence of any corruption, this guy isn't privy to any special information, he just doesn't think that honesty is likely.
Do you know what a huge common factor is among successful games, be they MMOs or AAA boxed games? The successful games are the ones that are designed and developed by the people who are making something they want to play.
The game I fell in love with was CCP's. Not The Mittani's. Not Jade Constantine's. Not Vuk Lau's. Not that of any member of any of the CSMs. Where once we had a game being developed iteratively towards a vision of a complete, finished experience encompassing a vast range of concepts and variety of playstyles, now we have a thousand disparate pieces being screamed about until CCP pays attention. I want to go back to the days where expansions happened because someone had an idea and wanted to make something beautiful, not constant developmental firefighting based on rumour, hysteria and personal agenda. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 17:45:00 -
[366] - Quote
Kire Moshiko wrote:Lord Zim wrote: So, given the fact that the staff and shareholders/owners of CCP are dependent on EVE being a success, you would assume that they were in fact, you know, developing the game. Continuously. Not just barely keeping it alive for 18 months, amidst an increasingly vocal playerbase saying "this isn't right, fix it", followed by "holy fuckshit, we need to start developing the game again! SHUT. DOWN. EVERYTHING!".
Just sayin'.
I was having a great time, I didn't feel shorted at all until the CSMs started sticking their oars in. During the period of time you cite the game as barely being alive in fact. That's my point - my love for the game started dying right about the time we got CSMs and certain sections of the playerbase discovered that they could influence game design by screaming a lot. So what changes was it the CSM pushed through that has you all up in arms? Because from my perspective, CCP decided to revamp the SOV system, completely flubbed it and released 50% of what was planned, made some ships hideously overpowered, and set a team of 4 or something to fix critical problems for the next 18 months. From my perspective, CCP screwed the pooch back then, and is only NOW finally starting to breathe life back into the game.
So, since we're looking so differently at the whole thing, where do you live? Hisec, lowsec, nullsec? What has CCP changed the last 3 years that you're so pissed over?
Kire Moshiko wrote:There wasn't an option for "none of the above." There was no button labelled "I don't hire a lawyer to fix my plumbing, why is one doing my game design?" I wasn't allowed to vote for "Someone Qualified." What is required for someone to be "qualified"? |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 18:12:00 -
[367] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:So, what you're saying is that the instant someone gets on the CSM, they can't actually advocate or perform any acts of griefing? Something which is, at least in my mind, a large cornerstone of how 0.0 works, and to a certain extent also hisec? You picked the boot licking route, I am not surprised, can't really expect anyone who is afraid to undock alone to man up.  |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 18:17:00 -
[368] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Lord Zim wrote:So, what you're saying is that the instant someone gets on the CSM, they can't actually advocate or perform any acts of griefing? Something which is, at least in my mind, a large cornerstone of how 0.0 works, and to a certain extent also hisec? You picked the boot licking route, I am not surprised, can't really expect anyone who is afraid to undock alone to man up.  Do you have an actual answer to the question, or are you just going to fling impotent insults? |

Kire Moshiko
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 18:27:00 -
[369] - Quote
Apologies for the brevity here but I'm running short of time.
I currently have accounts that are active in high and lowsec - I spent about 2 years living in nullsec and still visit it fairly often but frankly I always found it to have either not enough people, or people I couldn't stand. In my time in eve, I've never been one single thing - I've always engaged in everything Eve has to offer. I'll fight solo, lead a fleet, run a mission or strip a belt with equal happiness but what I am most of all, is a tourist in someone else's vision.
Hilmar talked once about evolving Eve piece by piece into a "complete science-fiction simulator" and I'd like to see that. CCP have proven that they can create a game that I love, because I fell in love with Eve. There is no evidence that anyone on the CSMs has ever created a successful game, never mind one that is to my taste.
It's not any one thing that the CSM has done that has me, as you put it, "up in arms." It's the presumption of a group of players that they can chose what my money is spent on. I want the artists I am paying to make this game to decide what they spend time on, not "some random blokes."
For the playstyle I have, Eve has worked just fine, barring those horrible desyncs back in Cold War/RMR, which CCP fixed all by themselves. Even if we had a CSM back then, they'd probably have been demanding CCP change the rules on anchor ranges so they could make better penises and swasticas. Because from my PoV, that's what's happening. My FiS was working just fine so why would I want a body around that just forced CCP to "focus" on FiS when I could have had a more diverse and beautiful game to lose myself in that in future, could evolve in many different ways.
As for what I'd consider "qualified" to tell CCP what to do, how about a degree in Game Design including at least one business module, one AAA title shipped and having to successfully pass a two-stage interview by people at CCP who then decide to hire them. That's on a par with what makes you suitable to design a game in every other games company. |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 18:32:00 -
[370] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:Lord Zim wrote:So, what you're saying is that the instant someone gets on the CSM, they can't actually advocate or perform any acts of griefing? Something which is, at least in my mind, a large cornerstone of how 0.0 works, and to a certain extent also hisec? You picked the boot licking route, I am not surprised, can't really expect anyone who is afraid to undock alone to man up.  Do you have an actual answer to the question, or are you just going to fling impotent insults? Your question has been repeatedly answered but i'll give it one final try..... i never said any member of the CSM could not grief anyone in the game, so quit trying to win a point you created in your own mind .... the current choices as described by the CSM themselves, as the CSM does not square with the posted job definition and that is indisputable ..... perhaps I foolishly assumed that before running for the CSM every candidate would have read what it meant to be a member of the CSM and made the personal choice to operate under that definition ..... abusing the role of being a member of the CSM to reward your political supporters hurts the greater player base. CSM6 has not in any demonstrative way performed their roles as representatives of the greater player base as they are by job definition bound to do, and they are proud of it.
|

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
678
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 18:39:00 -
[371] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:CSM6 has not in any demonstrative way performed their roles as representatives of the greater player base as they are by job definition bound to do Sure they have.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 19:04:00 -
[372] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:CSM6 has not in any demonstrative way performed their roles as representatives of the greater player base as they are by job definition bound to do Sure they have. EVELOPEDIA.Beta Candidates are expected to be active on the CSM forums and participate in the discussion of topics. They are also expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. The Mittani Post #31 "I haven't given CCP any of my actual money in years"
So following his example EVE has no paying subscribers and you think that is good for the game?
You think CCP will continue to fund it out of the goodness in their hearts and their love of creating a PVP Gankers Heaven right?
CSM6 has not performed their duties in the best interests of the greater player base, and they are proud of it. |

Velicitia
Open Designs
56
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 19:23:00 -
[373] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:CSM6 has not in any demonstrative way performed their roles as representatives of the greater player base as they are by job definition bound to do Sure they have. EVELOPEDIA.Beta Candidates are expected to be active on the CSM forums and participate in the discussion of topics. They are also expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. The Mittani Post #31 "I haven't given CCP any of my actual money in years" So following his example EVE has no paying subscribers and you think that is good for the game? You think CCP will continue to fund it out of the goodness in their hearts and their love of creating a PVP Gankers Heaven right? CSM6 has not performed their duties in the best interests of the greater player base, and they are proud of it.
So ... Mittani has been playing off the PLEX that someone else shelled out the $15 per for...
You or I could do that just as easily as he can... |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 19:26:00 -
[374] - Quote
Kire Moshiko wrote:Apologies for the brevity here but I'm running short of time.
I currently have accounts that are active in high and lowsec - I spent about 2 years living in nullsec and still visit it fairly often but frankly I always found it to have either not enough people, or people I couldn't stand. In my time in eve, I've never been one single thing - I've always engaged in everything Eve has to offer. I'll fight solo, lead a fleet, run a mission or strip a belt with equal happiness but what I am most of all, is a tourist in someone else's vision.
Hilmar talked once about evolving Eve piece by piece into a "complete science-fiction simulator" and I'd like to see that. CCP have proven that they can create a game that I love, because I fell in love with Eve. There is no evidence that anyone on the CSMs has ever created a successful game, never mind one that is to my taste.
It's not any one thing that the CSM has done that has me, as you put it, "up in arms." It's the presumption of a group of players that they can chose what my money is spent on. I want the artists I am paying to make this game to decide what they spend time on, not "some random blokes." So, in other words, your current playstyle hasn't really been affected the last 2 years, since nothing has really changed where you go for the last 2 years. The only thing that really changed in that timeperiod, has been the supers buff (causing them to be literally **** out as quickly as they can be queued up), and half (or less) of the planned SOV revamp to be released, all of which affect 0.0 only (well, unless you think about PL camping amamake).
This 18+ month period wasn't something the CSM demanded of CCP, it was CCP themselves who decided to shift almost all its focus on to WoD and Dust514, and if some people in here is to be believed, it wasn't the CSM that got CCP "back on track", it was the unsubscription numbers.
Kire Moshiko wrote:Even if we had a CSM back then, they'd probably have been demanding CCP change the rules on anchor ranges so they could make better penises and swasticas. Because from my PoV, that's what's happening. My FiS was working just fine so why would I want a body around that just forced CCP to "focus" on FiS when I could have had a more diverse and beautiful game to lose myself in that in future, could evolve in many different ways. You do realize that the CSM can't actually force CCP to do anything if it's inane **** like that? The only way the CSM can actually leverage any power over CCP is if CCP themselves screw up royally. Like, say, not developing the game for 18 months so everyone is getting fed up.
Kire Moshiko wrote:As for what I'd consider "qualified" to tell CCP what to do, how about a degree in Game Design including at least one business module, one AAA title shipped and having to successfully pass a two-stage interview by people at CCP who then decide to hire them. That's on a par with what makes you suitable to design a game in every other games company. FYI: Seleene was the guy that was the lead designer of the expansion where the SOV revamp was in, and he himself has repeatedly said that it's not what he had envisioned, and he has himself been very vocal in getting CCP to start fixing issues that have plauged the game for years. And, if memory serves, literally everyone that's on the CSM right now are saying they're all mostly in agreement and seem very satisfied with the direction CCP have suddenly decided to take.
Temba Ronin wrote:perhaps I foolishly assumed that before running for the CSM every candidate would have read what it meant to be a member of the CSM and made the personal choice to operate under that definition ..... abusing the role of being a member of the CSM to reward your political supporters hurts the greater player base. Do you have an example of this abuse of power?
Temba Ronin wrote:Candidates are expected to be active on the CSM forums and participate in the discussion of topics. They are also expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. The Mittani Post #31 "I haven't given CCP any of my actual money in years"
So following his example EVE has no paying subscribers and you think that is good for the game? Wait a minute. Are you saying that what Mittani is doing, i.e. buying PLEX to keep his account running, is against the EULA/TOS? And that the entire playerbase is going to do exactly the same things Mittani is doing?
I'm hoping you know where the PLEX is coming from... |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 20:01:00 -
[375] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:perhaps I foolishly assumed that before running for the CSM every candidate would have read what it meant to be a member of the CSM and made the personal choice to operate under that definition ..... abusing the role of being a member of the CSM to reward your political supporters hurts the greater player base. Do you have an example of this abuse of power? Temba Ronin wrote:Candidates are expected to be active on the CSM forums and participate in the discussion of topics. They are also expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. The Mittani Post #31 "I haven't given CCP any of my actual money in years"
So following his example EVE has no paying subscribers and you think that is good for the game? Wait a minute. Are you saying that what Mittani is doing, i.e. buying PLEX to keep his account running, is against the EULA/TOS? And that the entire playerbase is going to do exactly the same things Mittani is doing? I'm hoping you know where the PLEX is coming from...
Business 101 customer---> company = maximum profits customer----> middleman-----> company =less potential profits unless volume increases to offset loss
So you are telling me CCP has explained their confidential revenue stream to you and after your expert analysis you have come to the conclusion a reduction in the direct subscriber base would in no way threaten their financial stability which would be very bad for the greater player base. I am just a subscriber/ player clearly I don't have the access you MUST have. |

Velicitia
Open Designs
56
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 20:39:00 -
[376] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:perhaps I foolishly assumed that before running for the CSM every candidate would have read what it meant to be a member of the CSM and made the personal choice to operate under that definition ..... abusing the role of being a member of the CSM to reward your political supporters hurts the greater player base. Do you have an example of this abuse of power? Temba Ronin wrote:Candidates are expected to be active on the CSM forums and participate in the discussion of topics. They are also expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. The Mittani Post #31 "I haven't given CCP any of my actual money in years"
So following his example EVE has no paying subscribers and you think that is good for the game? Wait a minute. Are you saying that what Mittani is doing, i.e. buying PLEX to keep his account running, is against the EULA/TOS? And that the entire playerbase is going to do exactly the same things Mittani is doing? I'm hoping you know where the PLEX is coming from... Business 101 customer---> company = maximum profits customer----> middleman-----> company =less potential profits unless volume increases to offset loss So you are telling me CCP has explained their confidential revenue stream to you and after your expert analysis you have come to the conclusion a reduction in the direct subscriber base would in no way threaten their financial stability which would be very bad for the greater player base. I am just a subscriber/ player clearly I don't have the access you MUST have.
OK, taking your Business 101...
Customer --> company = Player buys game time directly from CCP at ~ $10 per month (using a year sub). This is either a breakeven point for CCP, or they're still profiting.
Customer --> Middleman --> Company = um ... plex?
You do realise that there is a "Customer --> company" relationship between CCP and shatteredcrystal/battleclinic/etc, right?
Let's say CCP is selling the GTC at say $30 per (2x $15 PLEX per GTC), which Battleclinic is selling at about $35 to the consumer... CCP is making more off PLEX than they are subs (up to $10 per month, since each GTC can cover 2 accounts) ... and with the PLEX price going through the roof lately, there may very soon be an influx to CCP as people start seeing "buy GTC, convert to PLEX, sell for ISK" as a viable solution... |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 21:04:00 -
[377] - Quote
Add to that the fact that there are quite a few people who are doing this buy a plex thing who wouldn't otherwise be playing, so overall I would assume CCP is coming out ahead. vOv |

Elise DarkStar
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
133
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 21:46:00 -
[378] - Quote
"Remove the CSM because Mittani pays for his account(s) with plex."
This thread is done.
|

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 22:15:00 -
[379] - Quote
Elise DarkStar wrote:"Remove the CSM because Mittani pays for his account(s) with plex."
This thread is done.
Elise DarkStar #15Posted: 2011.09.15 03:03 | Report "I've got far more than 25b.
You must think very little of your marks here if you hope that such a weak deflection would work. Probably best to just pipe down or you'll ruin any chance at coming away with a noteworthy scam haul.
I retract my goodwishes."
so because you have a lot of isk you get to decide when a thread is done ...... Perfect example of a whiny vet with a built up sense of entitlement and authority..... sorry most of the conversation went over your head but your comments were mildly entertaining nonetheless. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 22:17:00 -
[380] - Quote
Huh?
Edit: Holy mother of god, did you really, unironically, go back to one of the very first posts a char made, on a completely different subject, to "own" him?
That's, uh... new. |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 22:26:00 -
[381] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:perhaps I foolishly assumed that before running for the CSM every candidate would have read what it meant to be a member of the CSM and made the personal choice to operate under that definition ..... abusing the role of being a member of the CSM to reward your political supporters hurts the greater player base. Do you have an example of this abuse of power? Temba Ronin wrote:Candidates are expected to be active on the CSM forums and participate in the discussion of topics. They are also expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. The Mittani Post #31 "I haven't given CCP any of my actual money in years"
So following his example EVE has no paying subscribers and you think that is good for the game? Wait a minute. Are you saying that what Mittani is doing, i.e. buying PLEX to keep his account running, is against the EULA/TOS? And that the entire playerbase is going to do exactly the same things Mittani is doing? I'm hoping you know where the PLEX is coming from... Business 101 customer---> company = maximum profits customer----> middleman-----> company =less potential profits unless volume increases to offset loss So you are telling me CCP has explained their confidential revenue stream to you and after your expert analysis you have come to the conclusion a reduction in the direct subscriber base would in no way threaten their financial stability which would be very bad for the greater player base. I am just a subscriber/ player clearly I don't have the access you MUST have. OK, taking your Business 101... Customer --> company = Player buys game time directly from CCP at ~ $10 per month (using a year sub). This is either a breakeven point for CCP, or they're still profiting. Customer --> Middleman --> Company = um ... plex? You do realise that there is a "Customer --> company" relationship between CCP and shatteredcrystal/battleclinic/etc, right? Let's say CCP is selling the GTC at say $30 per (2x $15 PLEX per GTC), which Battleclinic is selling at about $35 to the consumer... CCP is making more off PLEX than they are subs (up to $10 per month, since each GTC can cover 2 accounts) ... and with the PLEX price going through the roof lately, there may very soon be an influx to CCP as people start seeing "buy GTC, convert to PLEX, sell for ISK" as a viable solution... Unless you have facts to support the figures you are arbitrarily plugging in you really don't know do you? So how does that trump the Business 101 model i posted? It doesn't.
Have none of you ever had a debate where you had to support your position with facts instead of "My opinion is better then your opinion"? Come on upgrade your intellectual game to make this at least challenging. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 22:35:00 -
[382] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Velicitia wrote:Let's say CCP is selling the GTC at say $30 per (2x $15 PLEX per GTC), which Battleclinic is selling at about $35 to the consumer... CCP is making more off PLEX than they are subs (up to $10 per month, since each GTC can cover 2 accounts) ... and with the PLEX price going through the roof lately, there may very soon be an influx to CCP as people start seeing "buy GTC, convert to PLEX, sell for ISK" as a viable solution... Unless you have facts to support the figures you are arbitrarily plugging in you really don't know do you? So how does that trump the Business 101 model i posted? It doesn't. What's arbitrary about them? The $30 figure? The "say" bit means it's a guesstimate, but it makes sense that CCP is selling a GTC at the same price as 2 months' worth of subscription (assuming monthly subscription), as it yields 2 PLEX. Shatteredcrystal does indeed sell GTCs at $35:
http://www.shatteredcrystal.com/index.php/eve_online
The $10 pr month is a bit off, the actual figure is $8, as if you buy a yearly subscription you pay $11/month:
https://secure.eveonline.com/AddGametime/ (needs a login, can't be arsed to look for a non-login page).
Temba Ronin wrote:Have none of you ever had a debate where you had to support your position with facts instead of "My opinion is better then your opinion"? Come on upgrade your intellectual game to make this at least challenging. You might want to pipe down a bit on the personal insults, what with you actually going 13 pages back on elise darkstar's posting history just to find a quote about having more than 25b. |

Elise DarkStar
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
133
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 22:39:00 -
[383] - Quote
I have more than 120b, actually. So I can pretty much dictate everything that happens on this forum. I'm basically an overmod. |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 22:43:00 -
[384] - Quote
You might want to pipe down a bit on the personal insults, what with you actually going 13 pages back on elise darkstar's posting history just to find a quote about having more than 25b.[/quote]
Zim I concede your point here ...... I at times have too sharp a pen .... I admit to suffering fools poorly ..... it is because i have no problem admitting when i have been proven wrong or incorrect and it is an extreme annoyance when i encounter others incapable of growth and intellectual honesty. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 22:47:00 -
[385] - Quote
So what did Elise do wrong then? I don't see anything which is illogical or inherently wrong in what he posted. |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 22:58:00 -
[386] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Huh?
Edit: Holy mother of god, did you really, unironically, go back to one of the very first posts a char made, on a completely different subject, to "own" him?
That's, uh... new. Um ...... yeah I am a relentless researcher ........ because i am of the opinion facts more often then not win the day. Being armed with the best factual knowledge base can give an advantage to the person possessing that greater resource in my opinion. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 23:00:00 -
[387] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Um ...... yeah I am a relentless researcher ........ because i am of the opinion facts more often then not win the day. Being armed with the best factual knowledge base can give an advantage to the person possessing that greater resource in my opinion. Problem is, that quote had absolutely nothing to do with what you were responding to. Nada. Zip. Zilch. Nuh-uh. |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 23:03:00 -
[388] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:Um ...... yeah I am a relentless researcher ........ because i am of the opinion facts more often then not win the day. Being armed with the best factual knowledge base can give an advantage to the person possessing that greater resource in my opinion. Problem is, that quote had absolutely nothing to do with what you were responding to. Nada. Zip. Zilch. Nuh-uh. Kinda like your argument about the ingame activities of the CSM members when I was commenting on the activities of the CSM as the CSM. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 23:12:00 -
[389] - Quote
Oh, really? So when you're saying things like this (I'm leaving the weak insult out of it):
Temba Ronin wrote:If you can't differentiate between a CSM saying he advocates for griefing and doing the actual griefing you are correct you aren't talking about how the CSM members behave or what they say when they're communicating with CCP (which we aren't really privy to, so I've at least no idea what they actually do/say there) vs how the CSM members behave when playing the game or communicating their own opinions on forums? |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 23:21:00 -
[390] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Oh, really? So when you're saying things like this (I'm leaving the weak insult out of it): Temba Ronin wrote:If you can't differentiate between a CSM saying he advocates for griefing and doing the actual griefing you are correct you aren't talking about how the CSM members behave or what they say when they're communicating with CCP (which we aren't really privy to, so I've at least no idea what they actually do/say there) vs how the CSM members behave when playing the game or communicating their own opinions on forums? Of course I am not talking about stuff I am not privy to ...... but I have watched the videos of Our CSM Chairman talking with CCP .... I have watched the videos of our Chairman of the CSM being interviewed .... i have read some not all of the reports and personal descriptions of how members of CSM6 have conducted themselves in meetings with CCP(written by those members of CSM6 who were in fact present at those meetings) which by the way i strongly suggest to anyone who wants to contribute to a lively debate about the effectiveness or focus of the CSM should take the time to do so they might also be armed with FACTS they can be privy to. |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 23:36:00 -
[391] - Quote
Zim can you educate me on why super caps seem to be despised by many in Null? Also I was intrigued by your comments about making Sov battles more readily available to small fleet actions that you made in The Mittani's thread. I would appreciate your insight. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 00:08:00 -
[392] - Quote
Supercaps are despised, at least by me, because they're overly expensive, overly powerful and versatile (at least for now, let's see after they're hit by the nerfbat), needs SOV to be built and as such can be hard for smaller alliances to get hold of even if they should have enough isk, is difficult to counter except for by either having more supercaps or by breaking the will of the supercap pilots by running welpfleet against it (and if they run a proper support fleet, that option might go out the window as well, and we're stuck with "more supercaps"), and are a symptom of the fucktastic SOV system with its gajillion EHP structures.
As to small fleet actions, think how it works in other strategy games, with an actual line, attacks, counterattacks, guessing where the main push is and what is just a diversion, how many to put in which system as a defence force etc. Today's SOV system doesn't exactly give much room for diversions, feints etc, because you either go all the way with a system, or all your progress is reset (unless the defending alliance is incompetent and forgets to rep whatever damage you did). |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 00:22:00 -
[393] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Supercaps are despised, at least by me, because they're overly expensive, overly powerful and versatile (at least for now, let's see after they're hit by the nerfbat), needs SOV to be built and as such can be hard for smaller alliances to get hold of even if they should have enough isk, is difficult to counter except for by either having more supercaps or by breaking the will of the supercap pilots by running welpfleet against it (and if they run a proper support fleet, that option might go out the window as well, and we're stuck with "more supercaps"), and are a symptom of the fucktastic SOV system with its gajillion EHP structures.
As to small fleet actions, think how it works in other strategy games, with an actual line, attacks, counterattacks, guessing where the main push is and what is just a diversion, how many to put in which system as a defence force etc. Today's SOV system doesn't exactly give much room for diversions, feints etc, because you either go all the way with a system, or all your progress is reset (unless the defending alliance is incompetent and forgets to rep whatever damage you did). I think i'd like to participate in the type of small fleet actions you describe here ..... it could be an ice breaker for newer smaller Alliances to "earn" acceptance into a larger power block. Sadly i think CCP is completely sold on the thousands of ships versus thousand of ships in one battle concept. I think thousands of ships in hundreds of battles would make strategy tactics and initiative more valuable components. It also allows for stealth and deception which i think would enhance the combat experience for more players. |

Ms Twitch
Skunkwerx Manufacturing
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 02:28:00 -
[394] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Quote: Hilmar P+¬tursson: The CSM has been under constant evolution based on what's going on in the current environment, what's going on with CCP and Eve, who's on the Council and all that. The CSM has helped greatly through the years in getting feedback for aspects of the game.
But some of my concerns right now relate to whether the CSM is maybe focused on a particular aspect of the game and I'm starting to get feedback from players that they worry the CSM is too pre-occupied by a certain playstyle. That might mean we may need to change the structure, but definitely the CSM has worked as a feedback tool greatly throughout the years. We will have them over at the end of the year, after everything that's gone on, and we will have a chance to talk about that. We'll just see where we are and take it from there.
Too true, the CSM is all wrong at the moment. The problem is letting any goons in there, especially letting Mittani in as chair, and vile rat and other nullsec powermad idiots, big big mistake. Hilmar, if your removing some of your own people. Then remove the CSM, its not working and hasnt really worked. Now you just got CSM members trying to f**k over other CSM members, corruption and everything else. Just get rid of it, it sort of served its purpose. Yes listen to the WHOLE community, but you also got to keep true to yourselves and make the decisions too. You cant keep pandering to the bitter vets, eve needs to move on. You have to start listening also ( and im a vet btw) to how new players find the game. These people are eves future, and i think I huge focus should be on that. Its these people you want to get excited about the game, the next generation so to speak. These are the people you want to shout about eve to other new players, not bitter vets, who only say, this is eve dont like it get lost attitude. Thats ALL WRONG. New players will not come to a game full of idiots. They just wont. So listen to the vets, but listen to new players too. The problem with CSM its full of idiot vets, some out to ruin the game (so why are they in there). Big mistake, remove the CSM now, before these idiots ruin the game entirely. You are pretty much having activists running the CSM, its not the word of the entire playerbase. The only people who read Assembly Hall are the bitter vets, squabbling like children. You need to find away to interact more with the general playerbase as a whole. You know what the issues are now, you know what your mistakes are and you know where you want to be, so basically just get on with it! STAY ON TOPIC - I WILL HAVE NO PROBLEM REPORTING TROLLS 
The CSM is a democratically elected council, it's up to the people (the voter) to choose who we want to represent us, if we elect a power hungry dictator then we learn and don't vote him or her back in next election. Any attempt to restrict who we can have in would imped the democratic process (the purpose) of the CSM. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
680
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 03:56:00 -
[395] - Quote
Ms Twitch wrote:Any attempt to restrict who we can have in would imped the democratic process (the purpose) of the CSM. I have a feeling the OP understands this and is fine with it. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Rer Eirikr
Clearly Compensating The Dark Triad
52
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 05:53:00 -
[396] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:If you can't differentiate between a CSM saying he advocates for griefing and doing the actual griefing you are correct further debate with someone of your limited capacity would be truly pointless. I could give you more direct quotes of his advocacy of things that harm the player base but since you have what passes for you mind made up it would not matter. In the quote supplied it did not imply that the actions of the CSM in game was what I was talking about and what you should have been responding to in an intelligent manner. As a member of the CSM in that capacity this CSM and others fail miserably an it's easily proven by their own words.
He takes care of his "people" and advocates for griefing not exactly the definition of a member of the CSM that i read. Perhaps you have a different understanding of that also.
EVELOPEDIA.Beta The Scope of the CSM
The purpose of the CSM is to represent society interests to CCP. This requires active engagement with the player community to master EVE issue awareness, understanding, and evaluation in the context of the GÇ£greatest good for the greater player baseGÇ¥.
Now square those statements about advocating for his "people" with the actual job description keeping in mind the greater player base is NOT in Nullsec.
Alright Mr. Holier Than Thou, game on. Whether or not the 'greater' player base is in NullSec is completely irrelevant. Mittens was elected, by his peers to pursue their societal interests to CCP. Whether or not it is griefing is entirely irrelevant, because griefing is just another part of the game that is EVE. That's like saying Darius III shouldn't be on the CSM because he scammed votes in Jita, again, perfectly legal within the rules set forth by CCP.
Temba Ronin wrote:So you can understand when the CSM focuses the attention of CCP to their pet projects and personal political base that is in reality a large group of whiny vets afraid to undock alone it harms the player base because real problems go unaddressed.
Since when is Hybrid Rebalancing, Ship Rebalancing, POS Changes, Lag Improvements, Actually Working on EVE, New Ships, Mechanics Changes, ETC. ETC. AD NAUSEM a "pet project"? That is seriously short sighted. I'm sorry if CSM6 didn't fix "your" problems, but if you were unable to rally with others to secure a position of someone who could that's really not my problem. As an aside, you seem very bitter about NullSec. Almost in every post you say we're just a large group of whiny vets afraid to undock alone... First off, how does this play into any context of this discussion? Second off, how does addressing the problems of NullSec in any way harm the player base? Finally, seriously, what's with the rather random hate for NullSec?
Temba Ronin wrote:Now there you have his description of what he does, the written description of what he should be doing and your position is totally debunked by indisputable facts. So this is where you man up and admit you where wrong or call me a pubbie or some other low brow exit device and go back to boot licking.
A) Your argument is based upon a false premise that by advocating for ganking and griefing one cannot therefore be a member of the CSM. This is a rather odd premise given that griefing is a part of what makes EVE so unique, why should this aspect of the game be barred when it comes to CSM eligibility?
B) I find it funny that you say I'll be the one throwing around random insults when that's literally all you've done this entire thread.
C) Not a Goon, or even a NullSecer currently. Sorry, no boots to lick. 
|

Rer Eirikr
Clearly Compensating The Dark Triad
52
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 05:53:00 -
[397] - Quote
Seriously CCP your forums suck, I constantly get thrown to "We were ganked, go back" yet my post came up fine anyways, thus the doublepost. vOv
(And I had to retype this out because you deleted my post that I had posted from my iPhone via, we were ganked :P) |

Gloomy Gus
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 06:08:00 -
[398] - Quote
As a neutral third party in a neutral corporation, I'd like to observe that I think the Mittani and indeed the entire CSM have represented the players of EVE, both new and bitter, very well. I can't imagine a different candidate or set of candidates that would have made any positive change in what has been done so far.
They're doing a great job, what actual material issues are there to complain about? |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 07:55:00 -
[399] - Quote
Rer Eirikr wrote:Seriously CCP your forums suck, I constantly get thrown to "We were ganked, go back" yet my post came up fine anyways, thus the doublepost. vOv
(And I had to retype this out because you deleted my post that I had posted from my iPhone via, we were ganked :P) This. A thousand times this.
I also keep seeing threads switch between showing as updated (even though I'm the one that made the last post) randomly. It's like there's more than 1 node in a frontend cluster, and they are caching "too much", losing session timers (and thus losing post content), and "we were ganked!" for god knows what reason. This is literally the worst forum implementation I'm frequenting at the moment, and I'm not even sure if using source IP based hashing on the loadbalancing to select the node would make the forum behave more predictable wrt "we were ganked" and maybe even the eating of post content, or if it's just a random error the software throws out for fun.
All I know for certain is that whenever I post on here, I make sure to make a copy of the content before pressing either post or preview. |

Kire Moshiko
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 11:32:00 -
[400] - Quote
Ms Twitch wrote: The CSM is a democratically elected council, it's up to the people (the voter) to choose who we want to represent us, if we elect a power hungry dictator then we learn and don't vote him or her back in next election. Any attempt to restrict who we can have in would imped the democratic process (the purpose) of the CSM.
No voting system is truly democratic without the option to reject all, call for new candidates and a new vote. |

ExhumeToConsume
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 12:03:00 -
[401] - Quote
Kire Moshiko wrote:Ms Twitch wrote: The CSM is a democratically elected council, it's up to the people (the voter) to choose who we want to represent us, if we elect a power hungry dictator then we learn and don't vote him or her back in next election. Any attempt to restrict who we can have in would imped the democratic process (the purpose) of the CSM.
No voting system is truly democratic without the option to reject all, call for new candidates and a new vote.
Of course, Eve online is just like IRL student union elections and we should adopt these policies at once. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 12:17:00 -
[402] - Quote
It's not like there's any particular limiting factor on who actually brings forth their candidacy, unlike f.ex the US process where you basically have 2 candidates because the whole presidency process is expensive as all hell: **** you in the ass candidate 1, and **** you in the ass candidate 2; choose your pain. |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 15:27:00 -
[403] - Quote
Rer Eirikr wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:
EVELOPEDIA.Beta The Scope of the CSM
The purpose of the CSM is to represent society interests to CCP. This requires active engagement with the player community to master EVE issue awareness, understanding, and evaluation in the context of the GÇ£greatest good for the greater player baseGÇ¥.
Now square those statements about advocating for his "people" with the actual job description keeping in mind the greater player base is NOT in Nullsec.
Alright Mr. Holier Than Thou, game on. Whether or not the 'greater' player base is in NullSec is completely irrelevant. Mittens was elected, by his peers to pursue their societal interests to CCP. Whether or not it is griefing is entirely irrelevant, because griefing is just another part of the game that is EVE. That's like saying Darius III shouldn't be on the CSM because he scammed votes in Jita, again, perfectly legal within the rules set forth by CCP. Temba Ronin wrote:So you can understand when the CSM focuses the attention of CCP to their pet projects and personal political base that is in reality a large group of whiny vets afraid to undock alone it harms the player base because real problems go unaddressed. Since when is Hybrid Rebalancing, Ship Rebalancing, POS Changes, Lag Improvements, Actually Working on EVE, New Ships, Mechanics Changes, ETC. ETC. AD NAUSEM a "pet project"? That is seriously short sighted. I'm sorry if CSM6 didn't fix "your" problems, but if you were unable to rally with others to secure a position of someone who could that's really not my problem. As an aside, you seem very bitter about NullSec. Almost in every post you say we're just a large group of whiny vets afraid to undock alone... First off, how does this play into any context of this discussion? Second off, how does addressing the problems of NullSec in any way harm the player base? Finally, seriously, what's with the rather random hate for NullSec? Temba Ronin wrote:Now there you have his description of what he does, the written description of what he should be doing and your position is totally debunked by indisputable facts. So this is where you man up and admit you where wrong or call me a pubbie or some other low brow exit device and go back to boot licking. A) Your argument is based upon a false premise that by advocating for ganking and griefing one cannot therefore be a member of the CSM. This is a rather odd premise given that griefing is a part of what makes EVE so unique, why should this aspect of the game be barred when it comes to CSM eligibility? B) I find it funny that you say I'll be the one throwing around random insults when that's literally all you've done this entire thread. C) Not a Goon, or even a NullSecer currently. Sorry, no boots to lick.  So if i follow your line of reasoning here the job definition should not have **** to do with what a successful candidate does after he or she is elected. In that case why is a job definition created? CCP did not ask for each group of Alliance constituents to elect a monarch in the rules i read.
I understand all too well the shortsighted nature of how the herd mentality can make most people so negligent to the big picture as long as their personal desires get lip service from so called representatives by the time they wake up they are up to their shoulders in steer manure. If expecting candidates who run to hold a specific title to exercise the definition of that position makes me "Mr Holier Than Thou" so be it. I don't expect a cop to start working on my electrical system or a taxi driver to perform experimental heart surgery because job definitions have value!
I have invested some time into researching what exactly CSM6 has accomplished thus far and I never claimed in this post or any other that they have done nothing. That being clarified for the tinfoil hat contingent what they have, and from what i have read in their own words directly from them, focused CCP's attention on are issues and problems that never affected the greater player base, just significantly their own political constituency which is a minority special interest that none can honestly deny. Now you can rant and rave that that is not the case but since they wear their indifference for anyone but their self identified political constituents like a badge of honor you might look a little foolish.
Elections have outcomes, elections should be consequential, thus when the outcome of the election installs representatives who proudly boast of their distaste and revile for the MAJORITY of the electorate and their actions as the elected representatives ignore the description of the title they were elected to hold only a fool would expect that to go unchallenged.
This is by no means a personal attack on any member of CSM6, an in particular the Chairman who has shown an ability to interface with any EVE player who bothers to take the time to post to his thread. I actually find his writing style quite engaging and like me he suffers fools poorly.
I also liked the Joker character in the Batman film Dark Knight, however if I had to live in Gotham City I sure would not vote for him if he ran to be a representative.
A) from above response: I never said they could not be a CSM member merely that doing so when it does not reflect "the greater good for the greater player base" it conflicts with the definition of what they were actually elected to do.
B) From above response: Another poster firmly chastised me about my sharp toned statements and I had to agree he was right and have toned down my responses so they stay more on point and remain less pointy. I was overly harsh for no good reason other then verbal sport and the forums deserve better then that. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
67
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 15:46:00 -
[404] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:So if i follow your line of reasoning here the job definition should not have **** to do with what a successful candidate does after he or she is elected. In that case why is a job definition created? CCP did not ask for each group of Alliance constituents to elect a monarch in the rules i read. There's a difference between what one does in-game, and what one does out of game. I see no problems with being able to be a griefing ************ in-game, and yet try to work with others (CCP, CSM) to try to make the game as a whole a better game, which in turn would yield more people to grief.
I'll just ask you point blank, are you saying that this is what Mittani isn't doing, i.e. he's unable to separate the two different roles? |

Rer Eirikr
Clearly Compensating The Dark Triad
55
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 16:00:00 -
[405] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:A) from above response: I never said they could not be a CSM member merely that doing so when it does not reflect "the greater good for the greater player base" it conflicts with the definition of what they were actually elected to do.
B) From above response: Another poster firmly chastised me about my sharp toned statements and I had to agree he was right and have toned down my responses so they stay more on point and remain less pointy. I was overly harsh for no good reason other then verbal sport and the forums deserve better then that.
Part B, all good, I'm perfectly fine with engaging in a discussion over this but lets just keep it as that, a discussion.
Some fair points, and your opinion, while I disagree, does have merit. Let me try to elaborate on mine a bit.
First off, real fast
Quote:I understand all too well the shortsighted nature of how the herd mentality can make most people so negligent to the big picture as long as their personal desires get lip service from so called representatives by the time they wake up they are up to their shoulders in steer manure.
That's a bit of hyperbole there. First off, I wouldn't classify myself as shortsighted, I get it, some people are unhappy with the recent focus on NullSec, fair. However, "by the time I wake up I'm up to my shoulders in ****"? That doesn't really make any sense, first of all, none of these newer changes inflict harm on anyone unless you have a deathly fear of a newly balanced Brutix. These changes, while somewhat NullSec based yes, do in fact make EVE a better place for all of its subscribers. No one can argue that module and ship balance is an inherently bad or unfair thing to pursue, which was a rather large part of what people like CSM White Tree pushed for.
Quote: focused CCP's attention on are issues and problems that never affected the greater player base, just significantly their own political constituency which is a minority special interest that none can honestly deny
Again, I just disagree with this. Does it help NullSec pilots? Yes definitely, but does it only help us? No, definitely not. (And even then, just because there are fewer NullSec pilots than HighSec ones doesn't mean we don't deserve a little CCP love from time to time. That's in general an unfair argument to make because we voted and, by no slim margin, won. Why? Because we knew we wanted changes and we pursued them.
Alright moving on. Just from my point of view, trying to remain as objective as possible, there's a small conflict of interest, just in a few lines, of your previous post.
Quote:Elections have outcomes, elections should be consequential, thus when the outcome of the election installs representatives who proudly boast of their distaste and revile for the MAJORITY of the electorate and their actions as the elected representatives ignore the description of the title they were elected to hold only a fool would expect that to go unchallenged.
Technically that's actually not true. The majority of the electorate (not players, this is an important distinction) was this go around, NullSec pilots. I can prove this because well... we won the election. In that sense, CSM6 is doing exactly what the majority of its electorate have been wanting for years. Do you perhaps see how I'm viewing this?
CSM6 isn't necessarily doing everything it could for HighSec and LowSec, right now (because lets keep in mind they do have many more months to perhaps pursue other projects), but it is doing a fantastic job of doing what they were elected by the electorate to do, Fix NullSec and in general get CCP's ass back in gear towards working on EVE.
Hopefully that sort of fine tunes my argument. I await your reply sir.
|

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 17:18:00 -
[406] - Quote
Rer Eirikr wrote:Quote:Elections have outcomes, elections should be consequential, thus when the outcome of the election installs representatives who proudly boast of their distaste and revile for the MAJORITY of the electorate and their actions as the elected representatives ignore the description of the title they were elected to hold only a fool would expect that to go unchallenged. Technically that's actually not true. The majority of the electorate (not players, this is an important distinction) was this go around, NullSec pilots. I can prove this because well... we won the election. In that sense, CSM6 is doing exactly what the majority of its electorate have been wanting for years. Do you perhaps see how I'm viewing this? CSM6 isn't necessarily doing everything it could for HighSec and LowSec, right now (because lets keep in mind they do have many more months to perhaps pursue other projects), but it is doing a fantastic job of doing what they were elected by the electorate to do, Fix NullSec and in general get CCP's ass back in gear towards working on EVE. Hopefully that sort of fine tunes my argument. I await your reply sir. Are you by any chance from NZ? Because they have a different definition of Electorate ..... the one i use as an American is electorate [+¬-êl+¢kt+Ör+¬t] n 1. (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) the body of all qualified voters however in Australia and New Zealand (I have a very close friend from NZ) they us this definition ..... the voters in a constituency
So i must firmly disagree with your notion that serving his minority special interest political power base to what i perceive as a detriment to the greater player base is serving the Electorate as an elected representative he should by job definition represent. Now if you are from Australia or New Zealand we just need to reconcile our language variations to reflect our underlying concepts and move forward. |

Rer Eirikr
Clearly Compensating The Dark Triad
57
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 17:26:00 -
[407] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Are you by any chance from NZ? Because they have a different definition of Electorate ..... the one i use as an American is electorate [+¬-êl+¢kt+Ör+¬t] n 1. (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) the body of all qualified voters however in Australia and New Zealand (I have a very close friend from NZ) they us this definition ..... the voters in a constituency
So i must firmly disagree with your notion that serving his minority special interest political power base to what i perceive as a detriment to the greater player base is serving the Electorate as an elected representative he should by job definition represent. Now if you are from Australia or New Zealand we just need to reconcile our language variations to reflect our underlying concepts and move forward.
Nah I'm from the States like you sir, but the text book definition doesn't really work for me. If you don't vote, why the hell should you matter in a political process? I recognize that such an outlook is different from the norm however.
(Okay lemme reread this second paragraph, sorry but its kind of... oddly worded)
Alright, I *think* I got that. The point was Mittens working for NullSec pilots =/= Mittens working for everyone, which in your opinion is a part of the job requirement. Please do correct me if I'm reading that wrong, because that sentence would do well to perhaps be broken up, or have some commas inserted.
See here's the thing though, Mittens does work to represent everyone. All the CSM members do. They discuss with CCP changes they'd like to see or implement, and vice-versa. Again, regardless of if the CSM does spend most of its 'political capital' on fixing NullSec, I still fail to see how that is a 'detriment to the greater player base'. Could you perhaps elaborate on that a bit? Do you mean that resources that could be used on HighSec/LowSec are being diverted or something else?
Once I get a better idea of what exactly you mean by 'detriment to the greater player base' I think it'll be easier to move forward.
Edit: Seriously, CCP, please have one person look into the constant "We Were Ganked" messages. |

Kire Moshiko
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 17:28:00 -
[408] - Quote
ExhumeToConsume wrote:Kire Moshiko wrote:Ms Twitch wrote: The CSM is a democratically elected council, it's up to the people (the voter) to choose who we want to represent us, if we elect a power hungry dictator then we learn and don't vote him or her back in next election. Any attempt to restrict who we can have in would imped the democratic process (the purpose) of the CSM.
No voting system is truly democratic without the option to reject all, call for new candidates and a new vote. Of course, Eve online is just like IRL student union elections and we should adopt these policies at once.
No, lets keep letting noisy idiots who know nothing about the games industry keep thinking they're in charge. |

Vio Geraci
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
72
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 17:39:00 -
[409] - Quote
Kire Moshiko wrote:No voting system is truly democratic without the option to reject all, call for new candidates and a new vote.
Not all democracies are parliamentary.
In other news, I'm getting the distinct impression that you dislike the CSM because CCP is treating it as a hiring pool instead of hiring people with a BA in "game design" as though those are worth the paper they're printed on. |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 17:48:00 -
[410] - Quote
Rer Eirikr wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:Are you by any chance from NZ? Because they have a different definition of Electorate ..... the one i use as an American is electorate [+¬-êl+¢kt+Ör+¬t] n 1. (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) the body of all qualified voters however in Australia and New Zealand (I have a very close friend from NZ) they us this definition ..... the voters in a constituency
So i must firmly disagree with your notion that serving his minority special interest political power base to what i perceive as a detriment to the greater player base is serving the Electorate as an elected representative he should by job definition represent. Now if you are from Australia or New Zealand we just need to reconcile our language variations to reflect our underlying concepts and move forward.
Nah I'm from the States like you sir, but the text book definition doesn't really work for me. If you don't vote, why the hell should you matter in a political process? I recognize that such an outlook is different from the norm however. (Okay lemme reread this second paragraph, sorry but its kind of... oddly worded) Alright, I *think* I got that. The point was Mittens working for NullSec pilots =/= Mittens working for everyone, which in your opinion is a part of the job requirement. Please do correct me if I'm reading that wrong, because that sentence would do well to perhaps be broken up, or have some commas inserted. See here's the thing though, Mittens does work to represent everyone. All the CSM members do. They discuss with CCP changes they'd like to see or implement, and vice-versa. Again, regardless of if the CSM does spend most of its 'political capital' on fixing NullSec, I still fail to see how that is a 'detriment to the greater player base'. Could you perhaps elaborate on that a bit? Do you mean that resources that could be used on HighSec/LowSec are being diverted or something else? Once I get a better idea of what exactly you mean by 'detriment to the greater player base' I think it'll be easier to move forward. Edit: Seriously, CCP, please have one person look into the constant "We Were Ganked" messages.
^^^^^^On that we are in complete agreement! ^^^^ I think CSM6 fell into a trap a lot of crusading rookie politicians stumble into ..... they ride a single issue pony to victory and then come up short in a multi issue reality. If i were on the CSM and the part of the electorate that was in null was clamoring for what they perceived as long overdue changes would i address some of their issues even if they didn't vote for me? Absolutely yes i would, but at the same time i would address the concerns of all the electorate and try to fix what they were clamoring about also. Some for all instead none for most.
I recognize these people are not paid and despite whatever insults are hurled around for fun they have a real life and they get to choose how they allocate their time and what issues they champion, i as a member of the electorate do not see their narrow focus as being good for the greater player base so i speak out. Does that make me a goon hater no. Does that make me hate our CSM Chairman absolutely not. I disagree with their priorities when juxtaposed to their job definition, it's really just as simple and as complex as that.
|

Rer Eirikr
Clearly Compensating The Dark Triad
57
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 17:53:00 -
[411] - Quote
See, now that is a completely fair, and logical response. I can totally understand that point. Looking back it seems to me that ~18 months~ of basically nothing just all sort of complied itself into a massive wave of enough is enough, everyone vote now damnit and lets get some change. Whether that will carry into CSM7 I have no idea, though from what I've read it seems like EVE-Uni has seen the play and plans on trying it themselves. By all means, go for it! (As long as they don't go around editing killboard mechanics hehe)
Now if we could just decipher the rest of the thread and why they keep calling for the CSM to be obliterated as a whole. 
Good discussion sir. |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 18:02:00 -
[412] - Quote
Rer Eirikr wrote:See, now that is a completely fair, and logical response. I can totally understand that point. Looking back it seems to me that ~18 months~ of basically nothing just all sort of complied itself into a massive wave of enough is enough, everyone vote now damnit and lets get some change. Whether that will carry into CSM7 I have no idea, though from what I've read it seems like EVE-Uni has seen the play and plans on trying it themselves. By all means, go for it! (As long as they don't go around editing killboard mechanics hehe) Now if we could just decipher the rest of the thread and why they keep calling for the CSM to be obliterated as a whole.  Good discussion sir. Thank you sir I enjoyed the exchange and learned a few things, that is a good outcome in my book any day of the week. |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
71
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 18:05:00 -
[413] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:I don't think thats what he meant. What really should be done is break the CSM delegation into categories based off of certain areas/playstyles. This would allow a spread of delegates which would pertain to most aspects in the game.
There is nothing wrong with the current CSM, even if YOU personally don't like them or goons. They have done what they set out to do and that is to bring focus back to FiS and nullsec. You can't expect a 0,0 ran CSM to cater to all the issues concerning highsec or lowsec, its just not where their expertise is.
This.
When the CSM runs there should be cabinets that need filling then general elections for "popular vote".
Maybe 4 seats to represent a specific area, then 4 for general "leadership" for people like Trebor, The Mittani and others who have done well pushing for development of EVE.
It's not Rocket Surgery |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
72
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 18:11:00 -
[414] - Quote
I'm curious as to what the one trick the CSM did manage, and the tricks they didn't manage to do, are. |

Vio Geraci
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
72
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 18:12:00 -
[415] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:When the CSM runs there should be cabinets that need filling then general elections for "popular vote".
Maybe 4 seats to represent a specific area, then 4 for general "leadership" for people like Trebor, The Mittani and others who have done well pushing for development of EVE.
That's dumb; you're dumb.
In practice candidates already self-identify with various areas of the game. It's just that the high-sec players are so disengaged and disorganized that they have trouble getting a candidate elected. This is partially because of the casual nature of most (though by no means all) high sec players, and partially because most high-sec players don't vote in real life, let alone for a video game election. |

Vio Geraci
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 18:20:00 -
[416] - Quote
I can't think of any good way to ensure that a plurality of gameplay styles is elected, without somehow getting the completely disengaged, generally uninformed high-sec players to somehow do a 180 and start voting. That can happen, it's just not easy. People complaining about the CSM being slanted toward null-sec are in effect complaining that it's too hard to beat them. EVE University is a high-sec organization that will almost certainly get a candidate elected this upcoming election cycle, and though I doubt I will agree with all of their viewpoints, at least I feel sure that their opinions will not all be hyperbolic crap. |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 18:26:00 -
[417] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:I'm curious as to what the one trick the CSM did manage, and the tricks they didn't manage to do, are. Zim can you educate me a little on the history of the Goonswarm?
What i have read leads me to believe that initially a group of players who were tired of getting kicked around by the bigger alliances in bigger ships got together and with a superiority in numbers and better tactical execution starting winning more and more battles and grew and started winning wars and finally unseated the Alliance that motivated them to unite.
That is the lore i have read, ...... is it true, .......close to true, ......... utter nonsense, ....... or what?
Because if it's mostly true the Goons have become what they united to defeat now that is irony. |

Vio Geraci
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 18:39:00 -
[418] - Quote
How about you answer his question instead of changing subjects and talking past him? |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
72
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 18:41:00 -
[419] - Quote
I'm sure tons of goons are going to say "we've become what we hated", but I wasn't here for the first few years so I can't really tell. What I can tell, though, is that I don't really see how this pertains to the discussion at hand. |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 18:59:00 -
[420] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:I'm sure tons of goons are going to say "we've become what we hated", but I wasn't here for the first few years so I can't really tell. What I can tell, though, is that I don't really see how this pertains to the discussion at hand. Zim you have more experience than i do and have been gracious enough to answer my questions. I like to learn things from players with more experience then me because the alternative is learning everything the hard way.... not my first choice.
I am not so self indulgent as to think i know everything so even in the midst of a spirited debate i might ask your more experienced perspective on something i want clarity on. If the facts prove my positions are not correct then i am not afraid to change and evolve.
Winning an argument is often easy gaining knowledge is a better option for me when it's available. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
72
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:08:00 -
[421] - Quote
And I'm saying that I honestly can't really answer your question, because I'm not of the "old guard" goon. You're going to have to hope someone else is in a chatty mood on that topic.
But seriously, you've said the CSM was a one issue pony, and missed on the other issues. What is this one issue? What have they missed? |

Kire Moshiko
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:42:00 -
[422] - Quote
Vio Geraci wrote:Kire Moshiko wrote:No voting system is truly democratic without the option to reject all, call for new candidates and a new vote. Not all democracies are parliamentary. In other news, I'm getting the distinct impression that you dislike the CSM because CCP is treating it as a hiring pool instead of hiring people with a BA in "game design" as though those are worth the paper they're printed on.
Nope, not even slightly, mostly because I haven't noticed that happening. I think that the CSM are far too aggressive in pushing their own agendas when they have no idea whether the degree of focus they are demanding for their own, limited field of interest contributes to Eve becoming better overall and I think it's long past due for CCP to realize that they can stop apologizing for t20 now and go back to running their own game.
Also, I'm not sure what you think a parliamentary democracy is, but you're wrong. Most of them don't work the way I describe either. But if 85% of the playerbase isn't voting, it's because none of the candidates on offer make them want to, either because they have no contact or connection with those people (which makes them bad representatives) or because they simply are not wanted (which still makes them bad representatives).
Since there's no representative in the CSM who has my trust or carries my views, the only person that can speak for me, is me and I don't see any benefit from having the CSM. In fact, I believe the CSM is causing CCP to behave in a manner detrimental to its own interests. But I'm not demanding everything my own way, I'm just chipping in my viewpoint so whoever is collecting the stats for what players want, knows to add one to the "no CSM" side. So please Mr. Geraci, stop being so defensive and just deal with that fact that it's true - not every player wants what you want.
In summary, for me:
Eve before CSM 1: Awesome Eve since CSM 1: Meh Desire to have CSM no matter who is on it: 0% |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
689
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 20:17:00 -
[423] - Quote
Kire Moshiko wrote:
Eve before CSM 1: Awesome Eve since CSM 1: Meh Desire to have CSM no matter who is on it: 0%
What, specifically, did any CSM do to make the game worse?
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
82
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 23:59:00 -
[424] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Kire Moshiko wrote:
Eve before CSM 1: Awesome Eve since CSM 1: Meh Desire to have CSM no matter who is on it: 0%
What, specifically, did any CSM do to make the game worse? We're still waiting. |

Vio Geraci
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 00:12:00 -
[425] - Quote
Don't you get it, man? He's, like, against the inherent tyranny of representational democracy. Whoa! |

Vio Geraci
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 00:13:00 -
[426] - Quote
Kire Moshiko wrote:if 85% of the playerbase isn't voting, it's because none of the candidates on offer make them want to, either because they have no contact or connection with those people (which makes them bad representatives) or because they simply are not wanted (which still makes them bad representatives).
The reason nobody voted is because most high-sec players are goof balls that don't read the forums, don't think the CSM matters, don't know much about eve game mechanics aside from their very limited fields of interest, and only sometimes read the eve news as they log in. They don't vote in real life, let alone in a video game. They're casual beyond caring, and effectively amateurs at EVE. By contrast, all of the CSM candidates up there right now have experienced wide swaths of the game and have a much more holistic view of the game than you give them credit for. |

Kire Moshiko
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 01:14:00 -
[427] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Kire Moshiko wrote:
Eve before CSM 1: Awesome Eve since CSM 1: Meh Desire to have CSM no matter who is on it: 0%
What, specifically, did any CSM do to make the game worse? We're still waiting.
I'm sorry, did I dare offend your sensibilities by going to sleep?
As I said repeatedly in my previous posts, they pushed CCP's attention onto irrelevant things.
As I also explained previously, I'm speaking for myself here. I don't want what you want. I don't want your friends in charge of my game. |

Vio Geraci
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 01:19:00 -
[428] - Quote
Kire Moshiko wrote:As I said repeatedly in my previous posts, they pushed CCP's attention onto irrelevant things.
Like what? None of us has any clue what has you mad other than the implementation of a basic democracy. |

Kire Moshiko
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 01:29:00 -
[429] - Quote
Vio Geraci wrote:Kire Moshiko wrote:if 85% of the playerbase isn't voting, it's because none of the candidates on offer make them want to, either because they have no contact or connection with those people (which makes them bad representatives) or because they simply are not wanted (which still makes them bad representatives). The reason nobody voted is because most high-sec players are goof balls that don't read the forums, don't think the CSM matters, don't know much about eve game mechanics aside from their very limited fields of interest, and only sometimes read the eve news as they log in. They don't vote in real life, let alone in a video game. They're casual beyond caring, and effectively amateurs at EVE. By contrast, all of the CSM candidates up there right now have experienced wide swaths of the game and have a much more holistic view of the game than you give them credit for.
And you know that as surely and accurately as you know I'm a he, do you? Interviewed them all, have you? Ever played with them, talked to them? Or is it perhaps that they don't get involved because the nullsec boys have stormed the forums for years with the very vocal preconception that only they are allowed to speak? Take a read back through CAOD for a few years and you'll see what I mean.
Look, I'm really sorry that I don't see all the magnificent, wondrous things your friends have done for your game, but I liked what the Content and Community teams were doing and I'm entitled to do so. Not everyone cares about nullsec and it sure as hell isn't the be-all and end-all of my gameplay. |

Vio Geraci
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 01:34:00 -
[430] - Quote
Okay, so you're mad about nothing. Why didn't you just say so? |

Kire Moshiko
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 01:35:00 -
[431] - Quote
Vio Geraci wrote:Kire Moshiko wrote:As I said repeatedly in my previous posts, they pushed CCP's attention onto irrelevant things. Like what? None of us has any clue what has you mad other than the implementation of a basic democracy.
Firstly, dear boy, not mad. I came to a thread and stated my opinion and a bunch of blokes managed to gather that I disagreed with them and jumped down my throat. Tough. I still disagree. CCP does not need the CSM to build a wonderful game and they've already proven that. All those wonderful things that you think the CSM has done have, in my opinion, been horrendously bad business moves rooted in fanaticism and hysteria. |

Kire Moshiko
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 01:36:00 -
[432] - Quote
Vio Geraci wrote:Okay, so you're mad about nothing. Why didn't you just say so?
Oh right, you're a troll. kk |

Vio Geraci
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 01:38:00 -
[433] - Quote
Kire Moshiko wrote:All those wonderful things that you think the CSM has done have, in my opinion, been horrendously bad business moves rooted in fanaticism and hysteria.
Yet you can't actually cite a single example of this despite a page of people asking for it. How curious! |

Kire Moshiko
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 01:46:00 -
[434] - Quote
Vio Geraci wrote:Kire Moshiko wrote:All those wonderful things that you think the CSM has done have, in my opinion, been horrendously bad business moves rooted in fanaticism and hysteria. Yet you can't actually cite a single example of this despite a page of people asking for it. How curious!
List of CSM Resolved Issues
The above is the list of items the CSMs have brought to fruition.
As stated in my previous post, the number of those issues I personally care about is 2.
The number of them I think needed the intervention of a CSM is 0. |

Vio Geraci
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
77
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 02:04:00 -
[435] - Quote
Kire Moshiko wrote:List of CSM Resolved IssuesThe above is the list of items the CSMs have brought to fruition. As stated in my previous post, the number of those issues I personally care about is 2. The number of them I think needed the intervention of a CSM is 0.
What are the two issues you care about? What are the issues that are not on that list that you care about? |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
84
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 08:09:00 -
[436] - Quote
Specificity is a good thing in discussions like this. |

Vio Geraci
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
80
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 15:27:00 -
[437] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Specificity is a good thing in discussions like this.
We literally went through a whole page without getting an answer. I did get some guff about defaulting to the masculine gender on these 99% male forums, though. That's something, right? Right? |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
707
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 15:55:00 -
[438] - Quote
You'd think we were being unreasonable in asking for specific ways the CSM has harmed the game in a thread titled "HILMAR - Remove the CSM Now..." The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
84
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 20:28:00 -
[439] - Quote
I dunno, I'm starting to think we might be asking for the moon here. |

rootimus maximus
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
43
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 08:31:00 -
[440] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:The driver behind what? CSM corruption?
CCP's flawed voting system that allows multiple account holders to Vote for members of their own large alliances.
And it lets me vote with all 5 of my accounts, even though I'm in a small corp. Your point?
Also, where's the corruption? |

Levarr Burton
B0rthole Test Alliance Please Ignore
47
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:16:00 -
[441] - Quote
Why should the candidates who motivate the most people to vote for them not be the ones representing the player community? Running a competent campaign, both through effective and populist messaging, and motivating voters, is how you gain representation in a democratic and quasi-democratic system. The people who were involved in the electoral process, through candidacy and voting, should not be punished because less popular candidates garnered fewer votes, or because people who did not vote are upset with the result. |

dent308
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
21
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 14:14:00 -
[442] - Quote
Not reading all this blurf. If there are players who actually think they would be better off without representation, then your bonkers and have no idea how business works.
This CSM is composed of null-sec players, sure, but they are players. Most of them have had many different styles of play or roles in the past.
From what I have seen, this CSM has been madly effective in getting CCP back on track with "Flying In Space". How bout that, they had a name for what the players would call "Eve" or perhaps "the game itself".
High-sec, null-sec, low-sec, indy, pirate, sov-war, whatever. All will benefit. Do you think we would be seeing these current changes if this CSM hadn't made the moves they have made over the last few months. I think not. We would be looking at more useless fluff in stations, crap to wear, and a severe lack of particiation in fleet events. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
662
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 14:21:00 -
[443] - Quote
people in this thread hate freedom, democracy and representation and are literally al qaeda agents sowing anti-democratic ideals amongst us |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
21
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 14:53:00 -
[444] - Quote
Andski wrote:people in this thread hate freedom, democracy and representation and are literally al qaeda agents sowing anti-democratic ideals amongst us I wonder if the unrestricted freedom & democracy you seem to be a proponent of was implemented how well you could tolerate it?
Being a citizen of a real nation that has a representational government installed under the control of a constitutional democracy that protects the freedoms of all against the changing winds of the majority is a wonderful thing. I think the historical phrase is "Protecting the minority against the tyranny of the majority."
The majority of the player base is in High sec, they exercise their freedom of democratic majority to nerf the hell out of everything you like about null sec and EVE. For example make transit from null to high sec impossible for anything but shuttles and industrial ships. They vote to make it impossible for anyone with a negative sec status to fire a weapon in offense in high sec, you can defend yourself but can't gank .
Let's just fix the flaws in the CSM structure and not discard it. Maybe a way to recall members that are perceived as too biased against anyone who did not vote for them would be a good starting point. That way your voting power block could get you elected but only working for the greater good of the greater player base would keep you in office. Otherwise be careful what you hope for, ........ you might get it! |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
111
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 14:57:00 -
[445] - Quote
So what you're saying is that if you ask the majority of people in eve, they're going to say that the current CSM is doing a bad job? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
667
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 16:12:00 -
[446] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Andski wrote:people in this thread hate freedom, democracy and representation and are literally al qaeda agents sowing anti-democratic ideals amongst us I wonder if the unrestricted freedom & democracy you seem to be a proponent of was implemented how well you could tolerate it? Being a citizen of a real nation that has a representational government installed under the control of a constitutional democracy that protects the freedoms of all against the changing winds of the majority is a wonderful thing. I think the historical phrase is "Protecting the minority against the tyranny of the majority." The majority of the player base is in High sec, they exercise their freedom of democratic majority to nerf the hell out of everything you like about null sec and EVE. For example make transit from null to high sec impossible for anything but shuttles and industrial ships. They vote to make it impossible for anyone with a negative sec status to fire a weapon in offense in high sec, you can defend yourself but can't gank . Let's just fix the flaws in the CSM structure and not discard it. Maybe a way to recall members that are perceived as too biased against anyone who did not vote for them would be a good starting point. That way your voting power block could get you elected but only working for the greater good of the greater player base would keep you in office. Otherwise be careful what you hope for, ........ you might get it!
there are so many contradictions in your post that I'm not even going to bother writing up a response beyond this |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
21
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 16:18:00 -
[447] - Quote
Andski wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:Andski wrote:people in this thread hate freedom, democracy and representation and are literally al qaeda agents sowing anti-democratic ideals amongst us I wonder if the unrestricted freedom & democracy you seem to be a proponent of was implemented how well you could tolerate it? Being a citizen of a real nation that has a representational government installed under the control of a constitutional democracy that protects the freedoms of all against the changing winds of the majority is a wonderful thing. I think the historical phrase is "Protecting the minority against the tyranny of the majority." The majority of the player base is in High sec, they exercise their freedom of democratic majority to nerf the hell out of everything you like about null sec and EVE. For example make transit from null to high sec impossible for anything but shuttles and industrial ships. They vote to make it impossible for anyone with a negative sec status to fire a weapon in offense in high sec, you can defend yourself but can't gank . Let's just fix the flaws in the CSM structure and not discard it. Maybe a way to recall members that are perceived as too biased against anyone who did not vote for them would be a good starting point. That way your voting power block could get you elected but only working for the greater good of the greater player base would keep you in office. Otherwise be careful what you hope for, ........ you might get it! there are so many contradictions in your post that I'm not even going to bother writing up a response beyond this So many that you could not lower yourself to address them ..... yeah that is perfectly reasonable, get on with something more important. LOL! |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
112
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 16:39:00 -
[448] - Quote
So, most people in eve don't actually think the CSM is doing a bad job, then? |

Temba Ronin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
21
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 16:48:00 -
[449] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:So, most people in eve don't actually think the CSM is doing a bad job, then? What ???? If i had to venture a guess, taking into account how complex EVE is, and admitting the biased perspective i have presuming that most players want to enjoy their time online playing the game, I'd say most people don't know what the CSM does.
But that is a bare ass guess with no facts to support it i state that for the record so the tin foil hat crowd won't say i am contradicting my previous comments. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
922
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 18:05:00 -
[450] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:The majority of the player base is in High sec, they exercise their freedom of democratic majority to nerf the hell out of everything you like about null sec and EVE. That's what they were doing and why we had to step in.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Revolution Rising
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 14:36:00 -
[451] - Quote
I'd like CSM to continue.
I don't care who's in it as long as they have the best interests of the game in mind all the time - not just their own interests.
0.0 does need some serious work - however, so does empire.
I'm more a 0.0 person myself, don't care for goons, don't care one way or another about mittani, he seems ok. Big ego's wow so what, name a large alliance leader who hasn't got a big ego ?
|

Signal11th
196
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 14:45:00 -
[452] - Quote
jesus this sheet still going on, humm last time I looked Mit's is still on the CSM so bascially you lot have wasted x hours of your lives talking crap. God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
1074
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 15:08:00 -
[453] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Andski wrote:people in this thread hate freedom, democracy and representation and are literally al qaeda agents sowing anti-democratic ideals amongst us I wonder if the unrestricted freedom & democracy you seem to be a proponent of was implemented how well you could tolerate it? Being a citizen of a real nation that has a representational government installed under the control of a constitutional democracy that protects the freedoms of all against the changing winds of the majority is a wonderful thing. I think the historical phrase is "Protecting the minority against the tyranny of the majority." The majority of the player base is in High sec, they exercise their freedom of democratic majority to nerf the hell out of everything you like about null sec and EVE. For example make transit from null to high sec impossible for anything but shuttles and industrial ships. They vote to make it impossible for anyone with a negative sec status to fire a weapon in offense in high sec, you can defend yourself but can't gank . Let's just fix the flaws in the CSM structure and not discard it. Maybe a way to recall members that are perceived as too biased against anyone who did not vote for them would be a good starting point. That way your voting power block could get you elected but only working for the greater good of the greater player base would keep you in office. Otherwise be careful what you hope for, ........ you might get it!
You have some odd ideas about what the CSM can do and what it's for. The CSM isn't EVE-parliament or anything. They can't just "decide" that 0.0 can be arbitrarily nerfed and then CCP have to go and do it.
And your proposal that people be recalled for being "perceived" to be biased is flat out pants-on-head insane. Listen, I'll give you a tip about putting forward ideas for how things should be changed in EVE: the very first thing you do - even before you start working on details, is think to yourself "how could I abuse this". If you can think up even a single way to exploit the idea, then ditch it, because rest assured that for every one way you think up, some devious bastards will think up 9 more. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
133
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 16:27:00 -
[454] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:And your proposal that people be recalled for being "perceived" to be biased is flat out pants-on-head insane. Listen, I'll give you a tip about putting forward ideas for how things should be changed in EVE: the very first thing you do - even before you start working on details, is think to yourself "how could I abuse this". If you can think up even a single way to exploit the idea, then ditch it, because rest assured that for every one way you think up, some devious bastards will think up 9 more. And given his last few attempts, I'm thinking he should turn his idea truck into the ditch permanently, because I'm not particularly devious and I've had no problems basically blowing his ideas to kingdom come. He should rather leave that job to people such as yourself.
Malcanis for CSM7. |

Sephiroth CloneIIV
Vitriol Ventures BLACK-MARK
21
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 21:37:00 -
[455] - Quote
The goons are right. The lot of things going unfixed in the game and going down and disappointing expansions are due to hilmar and not the csm.
Between everything ccp is going to fix in the coming expansion, certain people have been advocating for this stuff years ago, dating to before the tyranis, or even dominion expansion. Hybrids, pos's, improvements to the flying ships part of game.
Seriously, was it goonswarms doing to have a whole race and weapons system horribly nerfed? Overpowered supercaps? Giant HP grinds, anominaly nerfs, dominion. If so, I want proof and citations where mitani and the majority in goonswarm were advocating for these things.
The upcoming expansion has nothing to do with the lot hilmar and others in company were pushing and ignoring for years.
The topic's idea would be better (if it were only possible) rearranged with "CSM remove hilmar now"
And.... new person leads company, why not mittan, or some other person? The person who spoke out against microtransactions. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
159
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 22:17:00 -
[456] - Quote
I'm not sure Hilmar needs to be removed at this point, to be honest, not if they keep up the pressure on updating EVE. |

May Zonday
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
13
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 23:28:00 -
[457] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:I'm not sure Hilmar needs to be removed at this point, to be honest, not if they keep up the pressure on updating EVE. Oh look they fired all the people working on Vampires and Dustmen to focus on EVE, fancy that.
Keep Hillmar
also reset TEST |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
1180
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 23:35:00 -
[458] - Quote
Never don't reset TEST Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
159
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 23:41:00 -
[459] - Quote
Reset test, snipe grath through walls. |

Sephiroth CloneIIV
Vitriol Ventures BLACK-MARK
22
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 15:55:00 -
[460] - Quote
May Zonday wrote:Lord Zim wrote:I'm not sure Hilmar needs to be removed at this point, to be honest, not if they keep up the pressure on updating EVE. Oh look they fired all the people working on Vampires and Dustmen to focus on EVE, fancy that. Keep Hillmar also reset TEST
Wut, you serious?
Proof. |

Signal11th
237
|
Posted - 2011.11.24 12:03:00 -
[461] - Quote
Damn is this silly thread still going? God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
183
|
Posted - 2011.11.24 14:14:00 -
[462] - Quote
You're not helping. :colbert: |

Temba Ronin
26
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 22:24:00 -
[463] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:[
You have some odd ideas about what the CSM can do and what it's for. The CSM isn't EVE-parliament or anything. They can't just "decide" that 0.0 can be arbitrarily nerfed and then CCP have to go and do it.
And your proposal that people be recalled for being "perceived" to be biased is flat out pants-on-head insane. Listen, I'll give you a tip about putting forward ideas for how things should be changed in EVE: the very first thing you do - even before you start working on details, is think to yourself "how could I abuse this". If you can think up even a single way to exploit the idea, then ditch it, because rest assured that for every one way you think up, some devious bastards will think up 9 more.
I had respect for your comments right up to this point ..... amazing to me that so many posting have such a profound arrogance of "their opinion is best". Perception is what we all rely upon, facts can persuade us to redefine our perception, so in real life "recalls" are often triggered by perceptions and then the battle of facts hopefully wins the day.
I will continue to put forth ideas that can be tested here in the forums to be battered and hopefully improved by those knowledgable enough to take the time to think and just not regurgitate their well staked out positions. You continue to dwell in your "fear the exploiters realm" if you are comfortable there, good luck with that.
From this point forward i will consider the "source" when you post comments about sanity, your lack of intellectual agility was dissapointing, you turned out to be just another name calling poster. I don't need to revisit adolesence so you just keep having fun calling people names when you can't defeat their points on merit.
Explains why the goons love your posts so much.
|

tengen san
Triton-TC
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 00:04:00 -
[464] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Malcanis wrote:And your proposal that people be recalled for being "perceived" to be biased is flat out pants-on-head insane. Listen, I'll give you a tip about putting forward ideas for how things should be changed in EVE: the very first thing you do - even before you start working on details, is think to yourself "how could I abuse this". If you can think up even a single way to exploit the idea, then ditch it, because rest assured that for every one way you think up, some devious bastards will think up 9 more. And given his last few attempts, I'm thinking he should turn his idea truck into the ditch permanently, because I'm not particularly devious and I've had no problems basically blowing his ideas to kingdom come. He should rather leave that job to people such as yourself. Malcanis for CSM7.
Lord Jim, that is trolling on high level, kowing Malcanis is not seeking office. But here you go, that what you are.
|

tengen san
Triton-TC
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 00:07:00 -
[465] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:I'm not sure Hilmar needs to be removed at this point, to be honest, not if they keep up the pressure on updating EVE.
Basically he gives no **** about. One day or another he will sell to Sony anyway and enjoy the retirement while you are still arguing the whereabouts.
|

tengen san
Triton-TC
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 00:10:00 -
[466] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:You'd think we were being unreasonable in asking for specific ways the CSM has harmed the game in a thread titled "HILMAR - Remove the CSM Now..."
There are no specifics. CSM are working as intended and the whole OP is just an emotional outburst already death serving the troll about. |

Tore Vest
Vikinghall
96
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 21:25:00 -
[467] - Quote
CSM still here ? |

Andramedae
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.29 21:52:00 -
[468] - Quote
Tore Vest wrote:CSM still here ?
Was going to ask that as well, but then realised its like asking the same question about that insane smelly auntie who continually turns up to family get togethers. No one really cares that she is there as long as everyone stands downwind. |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
23
|
Posted - 2011.12.03 02:22:00 -
[469] - Quote
Once upon a time, CSM served it's purpose.
I don't think that it can't again, but under the current leadership, I feel that it can't help but slant events in favor of one alliance or another. I propose that CSMs must be chosen from unaligned players who have no alts in any major alliance and that such players be prohibited from joining said for a period of eight months after their term ends.
Non Nobis Domine Non Nobis Sed Nomine Tua Da Na Glorium |

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
47
|
Posted - 2011.12.03 18:32:00 -
[470] - Quote
This thread reminds me of that botting thread where the title was asinine, but it became the 'official' thread for it anyway.
As I said back in July:
"This CSM sucks. No real surprise there. CSM is a PR stunt by CCP and should be done away with. CSM V tried to make it more than that and got put in their place.
Mittens is a drunken clown who doesn't even play the game. The rest of them are sycophants. All they do is protect CCP from the full force of customer outrage/unsubscriptions by letting CCP pretend that they listen to their customers. And act as meatshields.
The whole CSM had read Fearless weeks ahead of its public release and none of them were concerned about it. They chalk up the protests to a 'communications issue' (in other words, CCP needs to lie more convincingly.)
Anyway, complaining about them is a waste of time because they're more useless than anything else and there are bigger fish to fry. But it would be nice if the council were abolished or at least there were a formal way for the players to express the 'vote of no confidence' mentioned in the thread title."
Nothing has changed since then except that CSM VI has tried to take credit for the protest that they tried to extinguish. The more relevancy that CCP gives them, the more it demonstrates just how out of touch CCP still is.
|

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2463
|
Posted - 2011.12.03 20:21:00 -
[471] - Quote
Alright, so we have a BoB guy, a deranged PI conspiracy theorist, and Akjon still posting away at this thread. With critics like these, I'm feeling ever more confident about CSM6. We must be doing something right. The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
1341
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 12:36:00 -
[472] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Once upon a time, CSM served it's purpose.
I don't think that it can't again, but under the current leadership, I feel that it can't help but slant events in favor of one alliance or another. I propose that CSMs must be chosen from unaligned players who have no alts in any major alliance and that such players be prohibited from joining said for a period of eight months after their term ends.
I propose that you've excluded most of the people who actually play the game on the basis of a "feeling" that you've offered exactly zero evidence to support. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Red Templar
Raging Ducks Goonswarm Federation
99
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 13:55:00 -
[473] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Once upon a time, CSM served it's purpose.
I don't think that it can't again, but under the current leadership, I feel that it can't help but slant events in favor of one alliance or another. I propose that CSMs must be chosen from unaligned players who have no alts in any major alliance and that such players be prohibited from joining said for a period of eight months after their term ends. SO you propose to take random newbies fresh from trial, or even during trial, who know nothing about the game or its issues, and make them CSM? Because that would make the most unbiased CSM. And most worthless too.
For Love. For Peace. For Honor.
For None of the Above.
For Pony! |

Stahlregen
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
39
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 14:57:00 -
[474] - Quote
Red Templar wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Once upon a time, CSM served it's purpose.
I don't think that it can't again, but under the current leadership, I feel that it can't help but slant events in favor of one alliance or another. I propose that CSMs must be chosen from unaligned players who have no alts in any major alliance and that such players be prohibited from joining said for a period of eight months after their term ends. SO you propose to take random newbies fresh from trial, or even during trial, who know nothing about the game or its issues, and make them CSM? Because that would make the most unbiased CSM. And most worthless too.
Not specifically newbies, just anyone but somebody who might actually know what they're doing. It's really a brilliant plan; If you're into the whole game-wrecking thing!
That's it, I've got it. Let's put forward some shobon newbee as our representative next CSM elections. This is gonna be hilarious. EVERY MORNING I WAKE UP AND OPEN PALM SLAM A VHS INTO THE SLOT. IT'S CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK AND RIGHT THEN AND THERE I START DOING THE MOVES ALONGSIDE THE MAIN CHARACTER, RIDDICK. I DO EVERY MOVE AND I DO EVERY MOVE HARD. MAKIN' WHOOSHING SOUNDS WHEN I SLAM DOWN SOME NECRO BASTARDS. NOT MANY CAN SAY THEY ESCAPED THE GALAXY'S MOST DANGEROUS PRISON. I CAN. |

HaxTis
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 08:55:00 -
[475] - Quote
I'll be a CSM :shobon: |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
244
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 17:58:00 -
[476] - Quote
Oh hey, I should've known Cygnet would be in this thread with his overly paranoid ramblings. |

Dunbar Hulan
The Flaming Sideburn's Art of War Alliance
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 18:55:00 -
[477] - Quote
My biggest concern with the CSM right now isn't the Null sec thing, after all, I live in NPC null and I'm aware of the various issues going on in Null.
My main concern is with the representation of (or lack of) the "Average Joe'" The guy who tools around in hi sec doing level 4's and docking up in stations during war time, you know, that type of guy. I might be wrong here, but I'm sure they make up a large segment of the EVE community, sure, they'll probably never come down to null or whatever, but they still play the game and pay fees. I think that the CSM (as well as the rest of us who live and work in null or low) tend to narrow one's focus on what's important to their own interest at any particular time. I think a positive reinforcement campaign by the CSM that reaches out to the average Joe, would go a long way to giving them a feeling of inclusion. In other words, the CSM should work on their communication and provide regular updates and feedback. Just my two cents. -áThe Sideburns- Always Outnumbered- Never Outgunned. |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
138
|
Posted - 2011.12.08 11:13:00 -
[478] - Quote
Dunbar Hulan wrote:My biggest concern with the CSM right now isn't the Null sec thing, after all, I live in NPC null and I'm aware of the various issues going on in Null.
My main concern is with the representation of (or lack of) the "Average Joe'" The guy who tools around in hi sec doing level 4's and docking up in stations during war time, you know, that type of guy. I might be wrong here, but I'm sure they make up a large segment of the EVE community, sure, they'll probably never come down to null or whatever, but they still play the game and pay fees. I think that the CSM (as well as the rest of us who live and work in null or low) tend to narrow one's focus on what's important to their own interest at any particular time. I think a positive reinforcement campaign by the CSM that reaches out to the average Joe, would go a long way to giving them a feeling of inclusion. In other words, the CSM should work on their communication and provide regular updates and feedback. Just my two cents.
The problem is that your "Average Joe" typically doesn't get involved in the forums, doesn't read dev blogs or external news sites, doesn't even know who or what the CSM is, doesn't really interact with anyone except in their corp chat or the occasional small mining gang.
Its hard to represent or include somebody who lives in a bubble. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
1368
|
Posted - 2011.12.08 11:43:00 -
[479] - Quote
Dunbar Hulan wrote:My biggest concern with the CSM right now isn't the Null sec thing, after all, I live in NPC null and I'm aware of the various issues going on in Null.
My main concern is with the representation of (or lack of) the "Average Joe'" The guy who tools around in hi sec doing level 4's and docking up in stations during war time, you know, that type of guy. I might be wrong here, but I'm sure they make up a large segment of the EVE community, sure, they'll probably never come down to null or whatever, but they still play the game and pay fees. I think that the CSM (as well as the rest of us who live and work in null or low) tend to narrow one's focus on what's important to their own interest at any particular time. I think a positive reinforcement campaign by the CSM that reaches out to the average Joe, would go a long way to giving them a feeling of inclusion. In other words, the CSM should work on their communication and provide regular updates and feedback. Just my two cents.
What representation does this guy need though? He confines himself to a minute subsection of what it's possible to do in EVE and has no interest in the rest of it. His missions work pretty much the same as they always did, maybe he has recently been pleasantly surprised to find that his Kronos suddenly works somewhat better than it used to, and I bet he likes the new nebulae and generally improved look of EVE.
What are the burning issues confronting Average Joe that he will care about whether or not he's represented on the CSM? He'd probably like more missions, and maybe he'd like ones that are more fun to do but really, there's very little contention against improving EVE's horribly sub-par PvE. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Dunbar Hulan
The Flaming Sideburn's Art of War Alliance
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.08 14:42:00 -
[480] - Quote
Aye fair enough guys, I (like the rest of us down in null) would like to see some sort of structured reach out to these guys to get them to at least try null once or twice. I'm sure there probably some of them that have thought about it, but been talked out of it by a corp mate along the lines of : " No way, never go down there, you'll be podded, killed, laughed at, scammed", and all the other nonsense that someone will say. Does the CSM have the capabilities of sending subscribers emails like the EVE marketing dept does? Or sending updates and feedback via the EVE marketing dept? I'm sure a decent marketing campaign that reinforces the message of the CSM would be a big step to communication and feedback, which (in my humble opinion) is the #1 development point the CSM needs to work on. -áThe Sideburns- Always Outnumbered- Never Outgunned. |

Takara Mora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2011.12.09 17:55:00 -
[481] - Quote
Dunbar Hulan wrote:Aye fair enough guys, I (like the rest of us down in null) would like to see some sort of structured reach out to these guys to get them to at least try null once or twice. I'm sure there probably some of them that have thought about it, but been talked out of it by a corp mate along the lines of : " No way, never go down there, you'll be podded, killed, laughed at, scammed", and all the other nonsense that someone will say. Does the CSM have the capabilities of sending subscribers emails like the EVE marketing dept does? Or sending updates and feedback via the EVE marketing dept? I'm sure a decent marketing campaign that reinforces the message of the CSM would be a big step to communication and feedback, which (in my humble opinion) is the #1 development point the CSM needs to work on.
I like Dunbar and Malcanis' lines of reasoning here .... though I would mention, isn't it just simply true that if the "average Joe" type DOES head out to Null, he really will experience exactly what his corp mates have told him .... (he'll quickly be podded, killed, laughed at, scammed, and scorned as "not a member of the NullSec Elite club)?
I like the idea of reaching out to such players --> but really, wouldn't we first need an entirely new type of NullSec experience to sell them on? Some way they could actually go out there and do something fun, without having to become meatshield #999, loyal subject of Militant Alliance #675, with only Blob warfare to look forward to everyday? I've had probably 5 corp members head out to null and they ended up coming back in 3 months for exactly these reasons (they did join up with larger Alliances which lowered the scorn factor, and helped them not get podded often).
I realize I'm exagerrating here ... but isn't this really what the problem boils down to? --> we need a new type of nullsec experience if we want to get "average joes" to WANT to play it? |

Dunbar Hulan
The Flaming Sideburn's Art of War Alliance
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.11 21:09:00 -
[482] - Quote
There is a fantastic null sec survival training corp called OUCH (Open University of Celestial Hardship) Be a god idea if someone from the CSM or null sec corps looking to get their recruits trained, hi sec corps looking to get into null, to get in touch with them. -áThe Sideburns- Always Outnumbered- Never Outgunned. |

Ilvari
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
29
|
Posted - 2011.12.12 12:53:00 -
[483] - Quote
Dunbar Hulan wrote:My main concern is with the representation of (or lack of) the "Average Joe'" The guy who tools around in hi sec doing level 4's and docking up in stations during war time, you know, that type of guy.
You want representation for Python scripts? |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
279
|
Posted - 2011.12.12 13:03:00 -
[484] - Quote
dohoho, I see what you did there. |

Tore Vest
Vikinghall
105
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 13:51:00 -
[485] - Quote
So... why do we still have CSM ? |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
313
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 14:10:00 -
[486] - Quote
Because they're actually effective? |

Takara Mora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 15:51:00 -
[487] - Quote
NO doubt CSM is an effective tool for CCP!
It shouldn't be the ONLY tool though .... we SHOULD care about what the Average Joe (non voting) player cares about, because we need them to remain loyal subscribers .... so why doesn't CCP avail itself of all the other types of additional tools that good marketing companies use? (maybe they do and we just don't see it? Maybe it's under NDA?)
The CSM basically amounts to nothing more than simply a "long term" "Focus Group". Focus Groups are notoriously horrible at detecting what will be successful or unsuccessful in the market ... very hit and miss, and should not be relied upon without other sources of input.
While I do like much of what the CSM has advocated, it's unclear to me whether CCP would not have already done these things even without the CSM .... especially if they availed themselves of much more disciplined and widespread user surveys and feedback tools.
So yes, IMO, we should keep the CSM! No, it's probably not possible to optimize representation for different blocks (Nullsec, Losec, Hisec, etc.) - just as in real life, there's no way to PROVE anyone cares about a certain set of issues, other than through their actions after the vote. Yes, CCP should listen to their CSM "focus group" closely ... But they should supplement CSM feedback with better tools (global feedback surveys for example), so that they, AND the CSM, have good data to work with for making design decisions.
|

Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 17:32:00 -
[488] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Because they're actually effective?
Effective for themselves, yes. Effective for the entire player base, "no" is an understatement.
There is a reason a lot of the player base feels like the CCP and the CSM get drunk and gleefully give each other reacharounds.
Hint: It is NOT because the majority of the non-hardcore pvp player base which is still the clear majority in EVE feels CCP and the CSM are taking care of them. |

Takara Mora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 19:12:00 -
[489] - Quote
Nullbeard Rager wrote:[
This is how CCP looks to a lot of the player base, past, current and future:
CCP: "Ooo let's make a game where people can scam,steal, be pirates and basically entertain themselves at others expense and let's focus on that player segment at the expense of the others!" Trolls: "YAY!!!"
CCP: "Damn, we need to get more players into our game. Any suggestions?" Trolls: *crickets*
There's no mystery here.
Wow, well put ....
On the plus side, their approach gets big headlines .... seems like all the headlines do though is pull in 3 week trial subs who abruptly leave .... |

Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 19:18:00 -
[490] - Quote
Takara Mora wrote:Nullbeard Rager wrote:[
This is how CCP looks to a lot of the player base, past, current and future:
CCP: "Ooo let's make a game where people can scam,steal, be pirates and basically entertain themselves at others expense and let's focus on that player segment at the expense of the others!" Trolls: "YAY!!!"
CCP: "Damn, we need to get more players into our game. Any suggestions?" Trolls: *crickets*
There's no mystery here. Wow, well put .... On the plus side, their approach gets big headlines .... seems like all the headlines do though is pull in 3 week trial subs who abruptly leave ....
I think part of that is because people like READING about scams and piracy but discover how NOT fun it is to have those things happen to them.
It's not that I have any issues with scams and piracy and ganking per se, it's just that CCP seems to still mostly be working on that part of the game when it is clear the majority of their player base have other in-game pursuits in entertaining themselves. |

Tore Vest
Vikinghall
105
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 21:31:00 -
[491] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Because they're actually effective?
I knew i dint have to comment this post 
|

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
146
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 21:52:00 -
[492] - Quote
Takara Mora wrote:seems like all the headlines do though is pull in 3 week trial subs who abruptly leave ....
[citation needed]
|

Takara Mora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 22:12:00 -
[493] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:Takara Mora wrote:seems like all the headlines do though is pull in 3 week trial subs who abruptly leave .... [citation needed]
Anecdotal experience based on ~15 new joiners personally witnessed, no citation forthcoming but maybe you can get CCP to share recent subscription trends? |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
1451
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 22:21:00 -
[494] - Quote
Takara Mora wrote:Nullbeard Rager wrote:[
This is how CCP looks to a lot of the player base, past, current and future:
CCP: "Ooo let's make a game where people can scam,steal, be pirates and basically entertain themselves at others expense and let's focus on that player segment at the expense of the others!" Trolls: "YAY!!!"
CCP: "Damn, we need to get more players into our game. Any suggestions?" Trolls: *crickets*
There's no mystery here. Wow, well put .... On the plus side, their approach gets big headlines .... seems like all the headlines do though is pull in 3 week trial subs who abruptly leave ....
I got interested in EVE when I heard about the GHSC heist, as did a lot of others.
Who the hell joins because they heard that you can mine Scordite in hi-sec? Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Takara Mora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 22:29:00 -
[495] - Quote
Do the headlines KEEP you around too though? |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
316
|
Posted - 2011.12.19 01:10:00 -
[496] - Quote
Nullbeard Rager wrote:Still, it IS CCP's right to run their game however they see fit even if they alienate past, current and future customers. Funny, last I checked there was a huge sigh of relief across literally the entire playerbase when crucible was released.
Well, maybe the supercap owners weren't the happiest bunch, but oh well so sad. |

Temba Ronin
30
|
Posted - 2011.12.19 15:23:00 -
[497] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Takara Mora wrote:Nullbeard Rager wrote:[
This is how CCP looks to a lot of the player base, past, current and future:
CCP: "Ooo let's make a game where people can scam,steal, be pirates and basically entertain themselves at others expense and let's focus on that player segment at the expense of the others!" Trolls: "YAY!!!"
CCP: "Damn, we need to get more players into our game. Any suggestions?" Trolls: *crickets*
There's no mystery here. Wow, well put .... On the plus side, their approach gets big headlines .... seems like all the headlines do though is pull in 3 week trial subs who abruptly leave .... I got interested in EVE when I heard about the GHSC heist, as did a lot of others. Who the hell joins because they heard that you can mine Scordite in hi-sec? If CCP does not want players to mine Scordite ih Highsec it is something they should eliminate. In fact mining is something they feature in their promotion of the game (Watch the promos). Player retention is negatively impacted by ganking people who did not join the game to be targets for feckless pirate PVP wannabes.
Truth be told gankers of highsec miners are cowards with no balls, even the miners risk getting killed by NPC belt rats without the player rats hunting them. It is a bunch of crap that so many people join because it is a free to scam, steal, and murder game, people join because it is a complex space sandbox with one connected universe that is constantly reshaped by individual player choices.
You wannabe pirates need to go PVP with someone who wants combat also, if you have the skills and the balls stop saying you love highsec carebear tears when the truth is you are too much of a coward to spend your time in wormholes, lowsec and null sec where you'd get your pitiful ass shot to pieces if you were not with your swarm of other juvenile misfits.
This is a fact that all your trolling can't change, grow a set of balls and target other PVP enthusiasts in WH's, lowsec, or nullsec or admit you want to get killmails with no risk of the target surviving and beating you for the easy exchange of a ganking ship. |

Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
18
|
Posted - 2011.12.19 17:13:00 -
[498] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Nullbeard Rager wrote:Still, it IS CCP's right to run their game however they see fit even if they alienate past, current and future customers. Funny, last I checked there was a huge sigh of relief across literally the entire playerbase when crucible was released. Well, maybe the supercap owners weren't the happiest bunch, but oh well so sad.
Superlatives are almost always wrong, (c wut i did ther?), but I am glad there was relief for some people but will it mean that much to people who either don't play or play but felt Crucible wasn't hugely meaningful? Crucible was a fart in a hurricane albeit a welcome fart. |

Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
13
|
Posted - 2011.12.19 23:23:00 -
[499] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Rage about suicide ganking
You've never tried suicide ganking have you?
You rage at miners being ganked in highsec by people with no balls who wouldn't last in WHs/low/null, yet you seem to be ignoring that one of the most prolific group of miner gankers recently has been Goonswarm, a nullsec sov holding alliance who just the other day have started invading a neighboring nullsec sov holding alliance. These are people who live in nullsec, who are now targeting "other PVP enthusiasts"
The irony is that you also say that EVE's appeal is "because it is a complex space sandbox with one connected universe that is constantly reshaped by individual player choices". Suicide ganking is a player choice that shapes the universe. The supply and price of oxygen isotopes has been driven by this player generated content. It is also precisely those player choices that make this a complex space sandbox - no PvE content can possibly hope to compete with the depth and complexity of player to player interactions.
Removing suicide ganking to improve the complex player-driven universe is simply throwing the baby out instead of the bath water. |

Takara Mora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2011.12.19 23:46:00 -
[500] - Quote
Calling suicide ganking "deep" and "complex"? Hehehehe ....
Worthy behavior of a sov holding nullsec alliance? Nah, not really ....
But hey, the Goons are happy with the way they are ... they attract a certain demographic .... the "game breaking bad guys" of EVE .... they're not out to be honorable and so aren't liable to care what names they get called.
I wonder what overall net effect such behavior (and it's allowance by the rules & sandbox) might have on subscriber numbers though long term .... would be awesome to be able to answer such questions! Lots of plusses and minusses to consider. It IS cool to play in a universe that allows such freedom of behavior ... |

Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
13
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 02:31:00 -
[501] - Quote
Takara Mora wrote:Calling suicide ganking "deep" and "complex"? Hehehehe ....
Worthy behavior of a sov holding nullsec alliance? Nah, not really ....
But hey, the Goons are happy with the way they are ... they attract a certain demographic .... the "game breaking bad guys" of EVE .... they're not out to be honorable and so aren't liable to care what names they get called.
I wonder what overall net effect such behavior (and it's allowance by the rules & sandbox) might have on subscriber numbers though long term .... would be awesome to be able to answer such questions! Lots of plusses and minusses to consider. It IS cool to play in a universe that allows such freedom of behavior ...
Please quote the section of my post that you misinterpreted as me 'Calling suicide ganking "deep" and "complex" ', and be sure to show your working, I'd really like to know how you got there.
Would you prefer an internet spaceships game where the only bad guys are mindless NPCs? Player generated content is the best content, and besides, what good would an epic spaceships game be without a good villain?
As for the long term effects of "such behavior", one only needs to look at the past 8 years, cause scamming, ganking and general treachery is nothing new in this game. |

Temba Ronin
31
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 11:59:00 -
[502] - Quote
Imigo Montoya wrote:Takara Mora wrote:Calling suicide ganking "deep" and "complex"? Hehehehe ....
Worthy behavior of a sov holding nullsec alliance? Nah, not really ....
But hey, the Goons are happy with the way they are ... they attract a certain demographic .... the "game breaking bad guys" of EVE .... they're not out to be honorable and so aren't liable to care what names they get called.
I wonder what overall net effect such behavior (and it's allowance by the rules & sandbox) might have on subscriber numbers though long term .... would be awesome to be able to answer such questions! Lots of plusses and minusses to consider. It IS cool to play in a universe that allows such freedom of behavior ... Please quote the section of my post that you misinterpreted as me 'Calling suicide ganking "deep" and "complex" ', and be sure to show your working, I'd really like to know how you got there. Would you prefer an internet spaceships game where the only bad guys are mindless NPCs? Player generated content is the best content, and besides, what good would an epic spaceships game be without a good villain? As for the long term effects of "such behavior", one only needs to look at the past 8 years, cause scamming, ganking and general treachery is nothing new in this game. You demand Takara quote the section you claim she misinterpreted while you write in "Quotes" words i never wrote lol what low brow arrogance.
Face it you and your afraid to undock alone swarm mates are the least common denominator in this game, the stuff you scrape off of your shoes after walking in a stable, the bottom of the bell curve losers that are holding the game back with your ignorance and childish game play.
I'll tell you what the difference is between a mindless ganker and a mindless npc .... not very much at all, just a killmail for the mindless ganker.
What would a spaceship game be without a good villain you ask, first you and your swarm mates are not good villains, not even close, you are low skill players who overwhelm almost unarmed highsec opponents with superior numbers and weapons. Your game play style is a hollow replica of the Sansha whose hallmark is their inability to think as an individual an are slaves to the Sansha nation, gratz on that accomplishment.
I certainly agree you and your juvenile swarm mates are the baby in the bath water, but i don't want to throw you out, just want you to mature and add to the sandbox something other then tantrums whenever someone prefers not to play your way.
Grow a pair and venture out on your own. Can't you think for yourself? Do really find enjoyment in being a faceless nameless tool for use by your alliance masters? I have great pity for things like you unable to make it on their own.
So your swarm is attacking another alliance in null sec? Exactly the point i made, this is what you follow the leader types should be doing all the time to keep your little minds occupied. If you think ganking ice miners in high sec made you a bunch of heroes you are not surprisingly wrong again. You simply made a lot of people aware that something needs to be done about the misfit horde that survives off of leeching from the builders and the makers in this game like an unwanted parasite.
Those choices made by your Alliance masters stimulated us to recognize the disease and now we need to identify the proper cure before you drive even more new players away from the game. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
316
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 13:55:00 -
[503] - Quote
Nullbeard Rager wrote:Superlatives are almost always wrong, (c wut i did ther?), but I am glad there was relief for some people but will it mean that much to people who either don't play or play but felt Crucible wasn't hugely meaningful? Crucible was a fart in a hurricane albeit a welcome fart.  Who thought crucible was a step back, then? |

Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 19:08:00 -
[504] - Quote
Yeah. I addressed your points in the "Office of the Chairman" thread, but I'm calling this as further indication of forum troll alt rather than naivety.
True, I paraphrased what you said, because quite frankly I wasn't going to use the entire 6000 characters available to me to simply restate what you said, it is still there for all to see anyway. See, I did it again without actually misinterpreting what you've said, just snipping it to show that I'm addressing your (rather bitter) post.
I think "Rage about suicide ganking" is a fairly good summary actually, when your post (both that one and this last one) is showing a lot of rage.
Examples:
"Player retention is negatively impacted by ganking people who did not join the game to be targets for feckless pirate PVP wannabes. ", "gankers of highsec miners are cowards with no balls", "You wannabe pirates"...
One last, very interesting quote:
"I recognize that hostile action is a part of EVE. If someone can profit from my demise, they WILL do so. Killmails have value to some people, so a kill just for the sake of a kill has value to them. This changes your perspective. Once you realize people will scam you, gank you, etc., you realize that it is entirely impersonal. They aren't out to get you, you just happened to be there. If your hulk gets randomly ganked, any other hulk that had been there would get ganked just the same. In other words, PVP is part of EVE, and it is going to happen. Consider it a force of nature. Raging about it is like raging because a tree fell on your car. Yes, it sucks, but who are you mad at? In EVE, the only person to blame is yourself. You didn't consider the threats, you didn't protect yourself, and you died. You just got killed in a video game. A video game. And here you are, frothing at the mouth, unable to even type coherently through the blinding force of your rage. "
From your bio. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
1478
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 19:23:00 -
[505] - Quote
That's a class 1 owning Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Temba Ronin
31
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 20:17:00 -
[506] - Quote
Imigo Montoya wrote:Yeah. I addressed your points in the "Office of the Chairman" thread, but I'm calling this as further indication of forum troll alt rather than naivety. True, I paraphrased what you said, because quite frankly I wasn't going to use the entire 6000 characters available to me to simply restate what you said, it is still there for all to see anyway. See, I did it again without actually misinterpreting what you've said, just snipping it to show that I'm addressing your (rather bitter) post. I think "Rage about suicide ganking" is a fairly good summary actually, when your post (both that one and this last one) is showing a lot of rage. Examples: "Player retention is negatively impacted by ganking people who did not join the game to be targets for feckless pirate PVP wannabes. ", "gankers of highsec miners are cowards with no balls", "You wannabe pirates"... One last, very interesting quote: "I recognize that hostile action is a part of EVE. If someone can profit from my demise, they WILL do so. Killmails have value to some people, so a kill just for the sake of a kill has value to them. This changes your perspective. Once you realize people will scam you, gank you, etc., you realize that it is entirely impersonal. They aren't out to get you, you just happened to be there. If your hulk gets randomly ganked, any other hulk that had been there would get ganked just the same. In other words, PVP is part of EVE, and it is going to happen. Consider it a force of nature. Raging about it is like raging because a tree fell on your car. Yes, it sucks, but who are you mad at? In EVE, the only person to blame is yourself. You didn't consider the threats, you didn't protect yourself, and you died. You just got killed in a video game. A video game. And here you are, frothing at the mouth, unable to even type coherently through the blinding force of your rage. " From your bio. This proves you can read but lack the ability to understand..........You call me a troll while not putting forth one reasonable idea of your own just, wah wah wah! play the way i play or you are doing it wrong statements. Perhaps if you had something to offer beyond fear ..... fear of change.... fear of flying alone..... fear of having to learn things on your own ...... you might consider that the person who does not agree with you is doing so not from your predetermined summary of their point of view. You take all the shortcuts of those who have nothing to offer intellectually but still for some sick reason feel compelled to shoot off their mouths so the similarly small of mind who also are fearful of change will pat them on the back.
You got the universe you want in nullsec ......... it filled with a lot of your type ....... and it is not working. Which explains why you need to gank in highsec. What a sad sorry little person you must be, to be able to read but not comprehend, to play a science fiction game but have no imagination of your own. I pity you and the type of player you are a good example of. Because you have the right of free speech as a sub of EVE doesn't imply you really have anything to say. |

Temba Ronin
31
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 20:22:00 -
[507] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:That's a class 1 owning The self delusional self appointed defender of the status quo whimpers again, yawn nothing new here. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
1478
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 20:25:00 -
[508] - Quote
Says the guy who whined that he should be allowed to shoot characters with a GCC timer...
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Temba Ronin
31
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 20:52:00 -
[509] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Says the guy who whined that he should be allowed to shoot characters with a GCC timer...
You have been playing since 2006 i sincerely hope you know things about the game i haven't had the opportunity to learn yet, so don't break your arm patting yourself on the back for that knowledge.
When you first started EVE how old was the game? Which relates directly to how much of a skill experience lead the veterans had over you when you were a rookie.
A rookie today faces players with years and years of a head start and you noble sage like veterans think or at least post like it's the same learning/ experience curve you faced when it clearly is not. It's a really simple point to understand if you pull your head out of your ***.
The game has evolved and changed and it seems a lot of vets are in their happy place and horrified that changes will disrupt their now easy gameplay ..... i only hope you remember how the game challenged you in your rookie year and that you can one day comprehend that it is far more difficult with thousands of you multiyear vets flying around with mega skills, top notch implants, ammo that takes longer to train for then many of us have been playing the game, boosters and hordes of your fleet mates preying upon the little new guy with a few months in the game still in or fresh out of his starter corp.
You have great knowledge that you can share, you have imparted some to me and i thank you for that, i hope you use your ability to communicate to help improve the game instead of being happy to pat on the back those small minded players who are so fearful of change in a game that has constantly evolved and will continue to do so despite the overly vocal minority of comfortable predatory veterans and their loyal toadies. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
319
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 21:10:00 -
[510] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Malcanis wrote:That's a class 1 owning The self delusional self appointed defender of the status quo whimpers again, yawn nothing new here. Hey, have you spoken to your fellow NPC citizens yet? |

Temba Ronin
31
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 21:21:00 -
[511] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:Malcanis wrote:That's a class 1 owning The self delusional self appointed defender of the status quo whimpers again, yawn nothing new here. Hey, have you spoken to your fellow NPC citizens yet? Waiting to see how many times you'll ask a question that foolishly assumes i did not do it before posting .... it is always mildly entertaining watching you try to weigh in on things way above your head!
Do you know about my blog or weekly online surveys? Just because you lack knowledge of events does not mean they do not occur. It's a very connected world when you don't have to "always have to follow orders little bee!" |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
319
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 21:29:00 -
[512] - Quote
So what did they say, then? "Yes, let's go take a system from these easy to own carebears"? |

Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 21:42:00 -
[513] - Quote
I would say here that Goonswarm Federation has recently finished a very successful newbee drive that has brought heaps of new players into the game and is helping them get started, which directly contradicts some of the statements made in this thread. But you know what they say about feeding trolls and letting facts get in the way of a good story.
What I'm REALLY interested in is Malcanis's law ("Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players."). This is something that is worthy of Raph Koster's (designer of Ultima Online and Star Wars: Galaxies for the unaware) Laws of Online World Design, particularly given the kudos it gets from wise and knowledgeable members of EVE's community.
There's a possibility I might get the chance to work with him soon - the company I am starting a new job with do contract work for Koster's Playdom. If I get the chance I'll be sure to mention it.
Although, I have to say, I particularly liked the irony of this bit: "you might consider that the person who does not agree with you is doing so not from your predetermined summary of their point of view". Well played sir, well played. |

Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 21:44:00 -
[514] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Just because you lack knowledge of events does not mean they do not occur.
WOW. You're just full of irony today aren't you! |

Temba Ronin
31
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 22:10:00 -
[515] - Quote
Imigo Montoya wrote:I would say here that Goonswarm Federation has recently finished a very successful newbee drive that has brought heaps of new players into the game and is helping them get started, which directly contradicts some of the statements made in this thread. But you know what they say about feeding trolls and letting facts get in the way of a good story. What I'm REALLY interested in is Malcanis's law ("Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players."). This is something that is worthy of Raph Koster's (designer of Ultima Online and Star Wars: Galaxies for the unaware) Laws of Online World Design, particularly given the kudos it gets from wise and knowledgeable members of EVE's community. There's a possibility I might get the chance to work with him soon - the company I am starting a new job with do contract work for Koster's Playdom. If I get the chance I'll be sure to mention it. Although, I have to say, I particularly liked the irony of this bit: "you might consider that the person who does not agree with you is doing so not from your predetermined summary of their point of view". Well played sir, well played. Wow .... could you please elaborate on the numerical value of "heaps" and detail how the swarm advertised and brought new paying (cash or isk) subscribers to the game? This is potentially good news and might give us a way to compare retention rates amongst two groups of new subscribers of equal size.
|

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1071
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 01:50:00 -
[516] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:You got the universe you want in nullsec ......... it filled with a lot of your type ....... and it is not working. Which explains why you need to gank in highsec. No it explains how we are so awesome that we can conquer nullsec and blow up highsec miners at the same time.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
20
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 03:36:00 -
[517] - Quote
Imigo Montoya wrote:I would say here that Goonswarm Federation has recently finished a very successful newbee drive that has brought heaps of new players into the game and is helping them get started, which directly contradicts some of the statements made in this thread. But you know what they say about feeding trolls and letting facts get in the way of a good story.
Feel free to post your facts whenever you are ready.
Numbers went down recently then CCP fired people, you may have missed that.
If you can provide any proof, or if CCP says anything that supports your supposition, that goons brought heaps of players into EVE much less players who graduated from trial accounts to full accounts then good on the goons, but I think it's a bit too soon for goons to count their lemmings before they've hatched. Or is the goon koolaid, (goonaid?), really that good?
Until then don't let facts get in the way of your story. |

Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 04:32:00 -
[518] - Quote
Nullbeard Rager wrote:Feel free to post your facts whenever you are ready. Numbers went down recently then CCP fired people, you may have missed that. If you can provide any proof, or if CCP says anything that supports your supposition, that goons brought heaps of players into EVE much less players who graduated from trial accounts to full accounts then good on the goons, but I think it's a bit too soon for goons to count their lemmings before they've hatched. Or is the goon koolaid, (goonaid?), really that good? Until then don't let facts get in the way of your story. 
LOL.
All I did was state that Goons had a very successful newbee drive (around 600 accounts apparently) and you start spouting off about things that I have supposedly missed, but hadn't even hinted at in any way whatsoever.
Nice one. |

Temba Ronin
31
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 05:30:00 -
[519] - Quote
Imigo Montoya wrote:Nullbeard Rager wrote:Feel free to post your facts whenever you are ready. Numbers went down recently then CCP fired people, you may have missed that. If you can provide any proof, or if CCP says anything that supports your supposition, that goons brought heaps of players into EVE much less players who graduated from trial accounts to full accounts then good on the goons, but I think it's a bit too soon for goons to count their lemmings before they've hatched. Or is the goon koolaid, (goonaid?), really that good? Until then don't let facts get in the way of your story.  LOL. All I did was state that Goons had a very successful newbee drive (around 600 accounts apparently) and you start spouting off about things that I have supposedly missed, but hadn't even hinted at in any way whatsoever. Nice one. Waiting to hear about your experience with claiming sov or running an Alliance ..... for a master of PVE you certainly lost a good number of ships to other solo players in 1 vs 1 match ups and somehow can only claim a solo kill of a velator over a year ago .... kind of a long dry spell for someone who claims to fly alone regularly. But to be fair to you, you never said you flew alone outside of your alliance space so i'll give you one point for that.
You don't think it fallacious to quote "heaps" of new members brought in when you can't give a specific number or details of their subscription status? Sounds like you are repeating stuff you heard from "unnamed" sources, aka rumors/ propaganda.
Would it be fallacious to talk about how much fun the difficulty of obtaining sov is when you have never done it for an Alliance you ran, or should you be credited for just been a member of a large rabble of drones following the orders of others? |

Dietrich Krohs
Fuzzy Duck Flying V Squadron
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 08:30:00 -
[520] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:...for a master of PVE you certainly lost a good number of ships to other solo players in 1 vs 1 match ups... 1v1 = PvE??
Temba Ronin wrote:...fallacious... ...fallacious... You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. |

Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 08:49:00 -
[521] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Waiting to hear about your experience with claiming sov or running an Alliance ..... for a master of PVE you certainly lost a good number of ships to other solo players in 1 vs 1 match ups and somehow can only claim a solo kill of a velator over a year ago .... kind of a long dry spell for someone who claims to fly alone regularly. But to be fair to you, you never said you flew alone outside of your alliance space so i'll give you one point for that.
I'd like to know why you think experience running an alliance has anything to do with this conversation. I have fought in several contests for sov, the Fountain campaign against IT Alliance for example (good times), but tbh I prefer small gang skirmishing which I've been enjoying quite a lot lately. I also fly all over both nullsec and highsec, including all regions in the north (both before and after the fall of the NC), Querious, Delve, Period Basis, Catch, Tenerefis, and the Drone regions, and have got kills (and a few losses) in most of those areas. None this month but plenty down south last month (the Delve war was lots of fun). But wait a second - there's no record of Imigo Montoya being involved in killmails for ages. How on earth could both of these things be true?
Here's the most recent logical fallacy you appear to be making - thinking that killboards are a full and complete record of a player's combat experience.
Also you have just offered an example of misrepresenting what I have said (again) - I never claimed to be a master of PvE, I merely stated that it is easy to master, and when done right you shouldn't be losing ships. I phrased it slightly differently before, so I would recommend re-reading what I wrote on the topic earlier and what I wrote in the previous sentence, and compare both to how you've interpreted them. You should find that your interpretation (based on your statements on the topic) is quite different to what I have stated.
Temba Ronin wrote:You don't think it fallacious to quote "heaps" of new members brought in when you can't give a specific number or details of their subscription status? Sounds like you are repeating stuff you heard from "unnamed" sources, aka rumors/ propaganda.
Would it be fallacious to talk about how much fun the difficulty of obtaining sov is when you have never done it for an Alliance you ran, or should you be credited for just been a member of a large rabble of drones following the orders of others?
You seem to be misunderstanding what fallacious means. It is, for example, not fallacious to use a generalisation when you don't have explicit knowledge of specific facts (eg I didn't know exactly how many new members had signed up when I posted, but a rough figure became available later). I have trouble asserting things that I have little or no knowledge of so I tend to avoid it. You seem to have no such trouble.
It is however, for example, fallacious to assert that somebody needs to have been the leader of a nullsec alliance to know anything about the game mechanics around nullsec sov.
Now where could we possibly get some definitive and unbiased (ie not rumors or propaganda) information about how many people are in a particular Alliance (Goonswarm Federation) or corporation (GoonWaffe), and how that has changed over time, since say the last month or so? If only there was some place that took the information from EVE's API regarding such matters and displayed them in an easy to use manner. I pray to Wollari to deliver us from this perilous void of data!
|

Slaver Filth
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 09:27:00 -
[522] - Quote
Imigo Montoya wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:You don't think it fallacious to quote "heaps" of new members brought in when you can't give a specific number or details of their subscription status? Sounds like you are repeating stuff you heard from "unnamed" sources, aka rumors/ propaganda.
Would it be fallacious to talk about how much fun the difficulty of obtaining sov is when you have never done it for an Alliance you ran, or should you be credited for just been a member of a large rabble of drones following the orders of others? Imigo Montoya wrote: So on the chance that it's naivety, I'll address some of your points: Temba Ronin wrote: The myth that pve players are adverse to losing ships is nonsense! What is distasteful is losing a ship to a punk thug who enjoys having the game mechanics set up to support his limited thinking style of gameplay. Imigo Montoya wrote: PvE, once mastered (eg, having read the missions guide on the eve-o wiki) is highly predictible and therefore easily beaten. The NPCs do the same things in the same scenarios. Even Incursions, while requiring player cooperation to beat, are still predictible. If you're regularly losing ships in PvE, you're doing it wrong. Game mechanics don't support suicide ganking, they allow it. In fact, as I stated in my previous response to your idea (which I note you haven't addressed), the game mechanics spawn unbeatable irresistable NPCs to destroy a suicide ganker's ship, so all the gankee has to do is survive long enough. Temba Ronin wrote: Lets try some new ways to break the ice for players who rightly perceive that nullsec can be a fast way to lose a ship and get podded without a reasonable chance of making isk. Imigo Montoya wrote: Not everything is about making ISK. Sometimes it's about challenge, competition, fun, or simply beating the other guy. Making ISK is one appeal, there are so many others. If your only measure of how good something is is "how much ISK will I make", you'll miss out on some of the best content that makes EVE a unique experience. Temba Ronin wrote: I think trying to conquer a system held by vet players would be far more challenging then any other mission being offered to PVE players now. Sure i know i can get my friends and do it now blah blah blah, but what prevents us from trying something more attractive like bounties and claiming sov for a NPC Empire faction to get the mission runners who get shot at everyday from looking at nullsec as an opportunity instead of an obstacle? Imigo Montoya wrote: Sov nullsec is an opportunity, and of course it has obstacles. It wouldn't be any damn fun if it didn't. I really don't see what your point is here. Temba Ronin wrote: EVE needs a balance between things that favor a spoiled minority versus the things that work for the greater good of all the players. Imigo Montoya wrote: You seem to be misunderstanding what fallacious means. It is, for example, not fallacious to use a generalisation when you don't have explicit knowledge of specific facts (eg I didn't know exactly how many new members had signed up when I posted, but a rough figure became available later). I have trouble asserting things that I have little or no knowledge of so I tend to avoid it. You seem to have no such trouble. It is however, for example, fallacious to assert that somebody needs to have been the leader of a nullsec alliance to know anything about the game mechanics around nullsec sov. Now where could we possibly get some definitive and unbiased (ie not rumors or propaganda) information about how many people are in a particular Alliance (Goonswarm Federation) or corporation (GoonWaffe), and how that has changed over time, since say the last month or so? If only there was some place that took the information from EVE's API regarding such matters and displayed them in an easy to use manner. I pray to Wollari to deliver us from this perilous void of data! Pretty clear you are just a liar hiding behind a mountain of words Mr. Montoya, you clearly put forth as facts information you had no command of until you talked to your corp handlers. You constantly contradict your own words. You are a complete fraud aka a perfect goon foot soldier. Check my kill board i have plenty of phantom kills of you in the past month that don't show up also haha! You are a total fraud and your lies fail. Run back to your corp handlers you **** poor propagandist. |

Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 09:32:00 -
[523] - Quote
Slaver Filth wrote:Pretty clear you are just a liar hiding behind a mountain of words Mr. Montoya, you clearly put forth as facts information you had no command of until you talked to your corp handlers. You constantly contradict your own words. You are a complete fraud aka a perfect goon foot soldier. Check my kill board i have plenty of phantom kills of you in the past month that don't show up also haha! You are a total fraud and your lies fail. Run back to your corp handlers you **** poor propagandist.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
That's brilliant. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
1480
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 09:43:00 -
[524] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Malcanis wrote:Says the guy who whined that he should be allowed to shoot characters with a GCC timer...
You have been playing since 2006 i sincerely hope you know things about the game i haven't had the opportunity to learn yet, so don't break your arm patting yourself on the back for that knowledge. When you first started EVE how old was the game? Which relates directly to how much of a skill experience lead the veterans had over you when you were a rookie. .
The game was in it's 4th year when I started. Malc was created with about 60,000 skillpoints, stats that couldn't be remapped - and with +3 implants costing 19-22M each in hi-sec I was pretty happy with +1s and +2s. Drakes didn't exist; after a month of play I was able to do level 3 missions with a passive-tanked HML Ferox, making up to 5M ISK per hour (there was no LP store then; LP worked more like lottery tickets and they never paid off for me).
There were plenty of people with 40-50M SP who had carriers, HACs, T2 fitted ships and other baubles I could only dream of owning. (How I pined for that 300 mill Cerb when I was flying my dinky little Caracal! ) The days I started playing, everyone had a skill advantage over me. And a wealth advantage, an assets advantage, an experience advantage, a game knowledge advantage, an in-game friends advantage, everything.
However I did make an effort to talk to people in game, and asked for the information I needed. I certainly never whined for the rules to be changed to accomodate me out of pure ignorance of the fact that they already did. I certainly never presumed to make proposals to change aspects of the game I knew nothing about. And I most certainly never complained that the people who started playing before me had accumulated those advantages; instead, I set about accumulating them for myself to the best of my ability. I found it a much more effective strategy to focus on what I could do rather than on what I couldn't. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Temba Ronin
34
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 16:24:00 -
[525] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:Malcanis wrote:Says the guy who whined that he should be allowed to shoot characters with a GCC timer...
You have been playing since 2006 i sincerely hope you know things about the game i haven't had the opportunity to learn yet, so don't break your arm patting yourself on the back for that knowledge. When you first started EVE how old was the game? Which relates directly to how much of a skill experience lead the veterans had over you when you were a rookie. . The game was in it's 4th year when I started. Malc was created with about 60,000 skillpoints, stats that couldn't be remapped - and with +3 implants costing 19-22M each in hi-sec I was pretty happy with +1s and +2s. Drakes didn't exist; after a month of play I was able to do level 3 missions with a passive-tanked HML Ferox, making up to 5M ISK per hour (there was no LP store then; LP worked more like lottery tickets and they never paid off for me). There were plenty of people with 40-50M SP who had carriers, HACs, T2 fitted ships and other baubles I could only dream of owning. (How I pined for that 300 mill Cerb when I was flying my dinky little Caracal! ) The days I started playing, everyone had a skill advantage over me. And a wealth advantage, an assets advantage, an experience advantage, a game knowledge advantage, an in-game friends advantage, everything. However I did make an effort to talk to people in game, and asked for the information I needed. I certainly never whined for the rules to be changed to accomodate me out of pure ignorance of the fact that they already did. I certainly never presumed to make proposals to change aspects of the game I knew nothing about. And I most certainly never complained that the people who started playing before me had accumulated those advantages; instead, I set about accumulating them for myself to the best of my ability. I found it a much more effective strategy to focus on what I could do rather than on what I couldn't. I started this year and have to face and compete against players with a 9 year advantage on me, something you'll never have to experience, so please take my word it's a lot more difficult to avoid getting killed by a 6 year vet then a 4 year vet.
I don't apologize for speaking up against what i perceive to be fixable flaws that negatively impact player enjoyment and retention and the fact that i choose to speak up now while it took you more years to discover your voice in the forums is something i wonder/ question why you wear as a badge of honor?
I've learned a lot from other players with more experience in game and in the forums but because it's not the way you chose to learn i am doing it wrong, right? This is a song sang over and over in this game, do it the way i did it or you are doing it the wrong way!
The game is far different from when you first started, it has changed a lot, a fact which i am hopeful even you would agree with. But the one thing that seems to have remained constant is some personality types just put their head down and plod forward never questioning their situation and quietly join the herd. Other personality types are more proactive and have the courage and the imagination to want to improve their position in things and make the overall situation more equitable for everyone.
So honestly i don't feel compelled to plod along and follow your well worn path of the past when i am trying to get to, and help create a completely different future.
|

Dietrich Krohs
Fuzzy Duck Flying V Squadron
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 22:01:00 -
[526] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:I started this year and have to face and compete against players with a 9 year advantage on me, something you'll never have to experience, so please take my word it's a lot more difficult to avoid getting killed by a 6 year vet then a 4 year vet. That's your big beef? That people who have been playing the game for longer than you have more experience?
You know, not only have I faced the same thing, but I've outsmarted them.
Temba Ronin wrote:I've learned a lot from other players with more experience in game and in the forums but because it's not the way you chose to learn i am doing it wrong, right? This is a song sang over and over in this game, do it the way i did it or you are doing it the wrong way!
Temba Ronin wrote:So honestly i don't feel compelled to plod along and follow your well worn path of the past when i am trying to get to, and help create a completely different future.
And yet, here's what Malcanis said:
Malcanis wrote:However I did make an effort to talk to people in game, and asked for the information I needed... ...I set about accumulating them for myself to the best of my ability. I found it a much more effective strategy to focus on what I could do rather than on what I couldn't...
So, how does that work, precisely?
You're doing things differently from Malcanis by doing what Malcanis did? |

Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
20
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 22:17:00 -
[527] - Quote
Imigo Montoya wrote:Nullbeard Rager wrote:Feel free to post your facts whenever you are ready. Numbers went down recently then CCP fired people, you may have missed that. If you can provide any proof, or if CCP says anything that supports your supposition, that goons brought heaps of players into EVE much less players who graduated from trial accounts to full accounts then good on the goons, but I think it's a bit too soon for goons to count their lemmings before they've hatched. Or is the goon koolaid, (goonaid?), really that good? Until then don't let facts get in the way of your story.  LOL. All I did was state that Goons had a very successful newbee drive (around 600 accounts apparently) and you start spouting off about things that I have supposedly missed, but hadn't even hinted at in any way whatsoever. Nice one.
Actually I was quite sure you knew about it but I did want see what "heaps" was.
600 is not too shabby. I hope they stay.
|

Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
20
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 22:43:00 -
[528] - Quote
Imigo Montoya wrote:Nullbeard Rager wrote:Feel free to post your facts whenever you are ready. Numbers went down recently then CCP fired people, you may have missed that. If you can provide any proof, or if CCP says anything that supports your supposition, that goons brought heaps of players into EVE much less players who graduated from trial accounts to full accounts then good on the goons, but I think it's a bit too soon for goons to count their lemmings before they've hatched. Or is the goon koolaid, (goonaid?), really that good? Until then don't let facts get in the way of your story.  LOL. All I did was state that Goons had a very successful newbee drive (around 600 accounts apparently) and you start spouting off about things that I have supposedly missed, but hadn't even hinted at in any way whatsoever. Nice one.
I will admit it WAS a bit much. My apologies. |

Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 00:26:00 -
[529] - Quote
Nullbeard Rager wrote:Actually I was quite sure you knew about it but I did want see what "heaps" was.
600 is not too shabby. I hope they stay.
Judging by the accounts of newbees chalking up many pod kills in rifters and thrashers, I think some will be hooked.
Nullbeard Rager wrote:I will admit it WAS a bit much. My apologies. 
Civility?! On this forum?!? You trendsetter! |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
1484
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 09:07:00 -
[530] - Quote
Dietrich Krohs wrote:And yet, here's what Malcanis said: Malcanis wrote:However I did make an effort to talk to people in game, and asked for the information I needed... ...I set about accumulating [the advantages held by others] for myself to the best of my ability. I found it a much more effective strategy to focus on what I could do rather than on what I couldn't... So, how does that work, precisely? You're doing things differently from Malcanis by doing what Malcanis did?
Well, to be fair to him, he's whining about it as well, which admittedly I never tried. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Laechyd Eldgorn
Molden Heath Angels
23
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 11:26:00 -
[531] - Quote
CSM should have different boards for different aspects of game play and you should be able to vote one person for each. Amount and purpose of these boards could change over time however CCP determines is needed for different times.
For example we would have option to vote one canditate for each CSM board:
- 0.0 sov warfare - piracy (including 0.0, low sec, hi sec) - small scale warfare - pve - industry
Each of these would only discuss about stuff designated to them not interfere with other stuff. And like said names and purposes for boards could change over time periods.
That is how you could vote a guy you know has some experience about the stuff he's going to handle. |

Temba Ronin
98
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 15:37:00 -
[532] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Dietrich Krohs wrote:And yet, here's what Malcanis said: Malcanis wrote:However I did make an effort to talk to people in game, and asked for the information I needed... ...I set about accumulating [the advantages held by others] for myself to the best of my ability. I found it a much more effective strategy to focus on what I could do rather than on what I couldn't... So, how does that work, precisely? You're doing things differently from Malcanis by doing what Malcanis did? Well, to be fair to him, he's whining about it as well, which admittedly I never tried. Oh self righteous defender of the "do it the way i did it or you are doing it wrong" herd you know quite well your major snipe which you call whining is my willingness to state my points of displeasure with the status quo in forums. But you being the intellectual hero that you are want to seem fair to me by repeating thinly veiled insults which only demonstrate your inability to win any debate on merit ...... which forces you to trot out your refined ability to word spin aka lie, so that the tin foil hat afraid of change crowd you play to give you applause.
If that is what you need from your online fans i am happy to help, because i find it entertaining when people can't man up to win on merit. Toss your red meat punchlines to your foaming at the mouth small minded herd of protect "their advantage" followers that rise up to wail against every new notion that might improve the game.
For the record ..... your signature is in fact a whine against change so every post you have made since you implemented it has ended in a whine which you Truthfully??? just stated you never tried. Take those tin foil pants off your head. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
324
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 15:41:00 -
[533] - Quote
1/10. |

Takara Mora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 15:52:00 -
[534] - Quote
Nullbeard Rager wrote:Imigo Montoya wrote:
LOL.
All I did was state that Goons had a very successful newbee drive (around 600 accounts apparently) and you start spouting off about things that I have supposedly missed, but hadn't even hinted at in any way whatsoever.
Nice one.
Actually I was quite sure you knew about it but I did want see what "heaps" was. 600 is not too shabby. I hope they stay.
Imigo, 600 is almost statistically significant - not that we have a controlled study going on, but very interesting :) ....
Wonder, would it be possible to track how many stay and report back here in a month or two?
If Goonfleet can get good retention, I may have to eat crow, biomass all my characters, and "if you can't beat em, join em" somehow lol. |

Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 18:15:00 -
[535] - Quote
Takara Mora wrote:Imigo, 600 is almost statistically significant - not that we have a controlled study going on, but very interesting :) ....
Wonder, would it be possible to track how many stay and report back here in a month or two?
If Goonfleet can get good retention, I may have to eat crow, biomass all my characters, and "if you can't beat em, join em" somehow lol.
Such a feat would require god-like levels of data access that you would have to pray to CCP or Solo to get anything, and I doubt that they would be inclined to either gather or share said data.
In the meantime, there's always Dotlan, unspecific as it may be. |

Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 18:35:00 -
[536] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Oh self righteous defender of the "do it the way i did it or you are doing it wrong" herd you know quite well your major snipe which you call whining is my willingness to state my points of displeasure with the status quo in forums. But you being the intellectual hero that you are want to seem fair to me by repeating thinly veiled insults which only demonstrate your inability to win any debate on merit ...... which forces you to trot out your refined ability to word spin aka lie, so that the tin foil hat afraid of change crowd you play to give you applause.
If that is what you need from your online fans i am happy to help, because i find it entertaining when people can't man up to win on merit. Toss your red meat punchlines to your foaming at the mouth small minded herd of protect "their advantage" followers that rise up to wail against every new notion that might improve the game.
For the record ..... your signature is in fact a whine against change so every post you have made since you implemented it has ended in a whine which you Truthfully??? just stated you never tried. Take those tin foil pants off your head.
Your trolling was much more effective when it didn't match the first paragraph of the wikipedia entry on the subject so precisely.
If you actually addressed at least some of the points people have made without misrepresenting or insulting them, you might be a bit more convincing.
The funny thing about it is that you're derailing discussion on your own "ideas", which I must say is brilliant in its irony. Well played on that front, but the rest is just too obvious. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1882
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 20:25:00 -
[537] - Quote
Takara Mora wrote: Imigo, 600 is almost statistically significant - not that we have a controlled study going on, but very interesting :) ....
Wonder, would it be possible to track how many stay and report back here in a month or two?
If Goonfleet can get good retention, I may have to eat crow, biomass all my characters, and "if you can't beat em, join em" somehow lol.
We have much better retention than average because our alliance is based on being able to recruit and keep new people. For every horrible barrier to entry CCP throws up, we have ways around it because our success requires we effectively recruit new players (since we do not recruit from the general EVE community).
We have great retention as a result; if you join goonfleet you need never spend a single second mining or doing one of those other horrible highsec activities to get on your feet. There are tons of goons who consider 5m a rounding error that will shower more isk on newbies than they know what to do with (literally, given that they no longer need advanced learning skills), skillbooks, advice on how to actually have fun, and documentation that's head and sholders above what the average new player has (which is basically "this is a spaceship, this is the undock button, have fun") |

Temba Ronin
116
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 23:36:00 -
[538] - Quote
Imigo Montoya wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:Oh self righteous defender of the "do it the way i did it or you are doing it wrong" herd you know quite well your major snipe which you call whining is my willingness to state my points of displeasure with the status quo in forums. But you being the intellectual hero that you are want to seem fair to me by repeating thinly veiled insults which only demonstrate your inability to win any debate on merit ...... which forces you to trot out your refined ability to word spin aka lie, so that the tin foil hat afraid of change crowd you play to give you applause.
If that is what you need from your online fans i am happy to help, because i find it entertaining when people can't man up to win on merit. Toss your red meat punchlines to your foaming at the mouth small minded herd of protect "their advantage" followers that rise up to wail against every new notion that might improve the game.
For the record ..... your signature is in fact a whine against change so every post you have made since you implemented it has ended in a whine which you Truthfully??? just stated you never tried. Take those tin foil pants off your head. Your trolling was much more effective when it didn't match the first paragraph of the wikipedia entry on the subject so precisely. If you actually addressed at least some of the points people have made without misrepresenting or insulting them, you might be a bit more convincing. The funny thing about it is that you're derailing discussion on your own "ideas", which I must say is brilliant in its irony. Well played on that front, but the rest is just too obvious. Imigo is that you responding once again to a post i addressed to someone else? You proudly professed you didn't do that remember? So much for honesty on your part. Besides i already have a personal troll appointed to me, Lord Zim, but if you really need the work he surely needs an assistant troll. So post away!
Happy Holidays to you and yours in the real world! Then we can get back to improving EVE with spirited debate. |

Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 01:43:00 -
[539] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Imigo is that you responding once again to a post i addressed to someone else? You proudly professed you didn't do that remember? So much for honesty on your part. Besides i already have a personal troll appointed to me, Lord Zim, but if you really need the work he surely needs an assistant troll. So post away!
Heh, I guess I missed a vital part of what I meant to say, and for that I apologise. Let me clarify. What I meant to say was (modification in bold):
"I also see no reason whatsoever to NOT address a post directed at somebody else, especially when that post is another example of misrepresenting what somebody has said (as trolls do)"
Simple failure to proof read, but to be perfectly honest the rest of what I had written doesn't make much sense without that part, which should be fairly straight forward to pick up on.
Temba Ronin wrote:Happy Holidays to you and yours in the real world! Then we can get back to improving EVE with spirited debate.
I am having a very happy holiday right now thank you, because what I really enjoy is discussing game mechanics (I really love my job). I wish you the same and hope we really can return to a spirited debate, so I will part with a word of advice:
Somebody who truly wishes to have a spirited debate will respond to criticism with either well reasoned counter points or acceptance of the flaws in their position (like this guy does here, which gets a whole lot more discussion going), rather than try to be the biggest smartass with the best insults (which only shuts down discussion), like this guy here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, ... oh god the list just goes on! |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
329
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 12:24:00 -
[540] - Quote
I'm someone's personal troll? News to me. |

Thredd Necro
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
85
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 15:18:00 -
[541] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:I'm someone's personal troll? News to me.
He didn't want to pay for health, vision, dental and a 6% match 401K for you... Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. - Douglas Adams |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: [one page] |