| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
365
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 04:42:00 -
[301] - Quote
Quote:You're arguing semantics which have no bearing on the discussion. More obfuscation, have an indefensible point of view argue semantic technicalities to avoid the inescapable truth that you're wrong even if that argument is the reverse of what you were originally trying to prove - ie its not 100% certain your ship is an expense because they dont always die.
So... CONCORD is not a certainty of death?
Huh, I've been doing this all wrong then. :P
All snark aside, you are 100% guaranteed to lose your ship to CONCORD the moment you commit that particular criminal act in highsec. This is a risk/loss you are prepared to take by suicide ganking, that's why it's called suicide.
Working the smart way to mitigate the losses, is simply good gameplay. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
166
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 05:36:00 -
[302] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:You're arguing semantics which have no bearing on the discussion. More obfuscation, have an indefensible point of view argue semantic technicalities to avoid the inescapable truth that you're wrong even if that argument is the reverse of what you were originally trying to prove - ie its not 100% certain your ship is an expense because they dont always die.
So... CONCORD is not a certainty of death? Huh, I've been doing this all wrong then. :P All snark aside, you are 100% guaranteed to lose your ship to CONCORD the moment you commit that particular criminal act in highsec. This is a risk/loss you are prepared to take by suicide ganking, that's why it's called suicide. Working the smart way to mitigate the losses, is simply good gameplay. I was replying to Tippia who said its not always guaranteed. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
365
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 05:53:00 -
[303] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:You're arguing semantics which have no bearing on the discussion. More obfuscation, have an indefensible point of view argue semantic technicalities to avoid the inescapable truth that you're wrong even if that argument is the reverse of what you were originally trying to prove - ie its not 100% certain your ship is an expense because they dont always die.
So... CONCORD is not a certainty of death? Huh, I've been doing this all wrong then. :P All snark aside, you are 100% guaranteed to lose your ship to CONCORD the moment you commit that particular criminal act in highsec. This is a risk/loss you are prepared to take by suicide ganking, that's why it's called suicide. Working the smart way to mitigate the losses, is simply good gameplay. I was replying to Tippia who said its not always guaranteed.
Eh, fair enough.
As to this "risk or no risk" thing about ganking, I think of it this way.
Risk and cost are the same, fundamentally, when you are talking about suicide ganking. You WILL die. CONCORD will get you, if you fire on a non-aggressed ship in highsec.
But, the reason this seems like it's risk free, cost free to the ganked, is because the gankers have made this into a science, to mitigate the risk involved. This is because CCP has, over the years, caved in to the QQ and nerfed ganking over and over again. They've been forced to adapt, to strategize and to micromanage their efforts down to the last Catalyst. They've gotten good at it, and they've spread the word about their successful strategies. That's why they keep on winning, because as a whole, the PvP community is much more tightly knit together than the PvE community (incursions aside, of course. Those guys are some insular people though). Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

BoSau Hotim
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
5894
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 05:53:00 -
[304] - Quote
@Infinity
I've been reading as much as I can, but I want to know this because I haven't seen you post about it:
What exactly do you want CCP to do about this? I'm not a carebear... I'm a SPACE BARBIE!-á Now... where's Ken? |

Callyuk
Thundercats The Initiative.
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:03:00 -
[305] - Quote
U should quote infinity because who wants to troll thru 16 pages to see what ur talking about . How Freighters are ganked with the new flagging system.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdq5in9fR-Y
Theres a gear at the bottom right in every YOUTUBE video use it |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
166
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:20:00 -
[306] - Quote
BoSau Hotim wrote:@Infinity
I've been reading as much as I can, but I want to know this because I haven't seen you post about it:
What exactly do you want CCP to do about this? Nothing. Im just making observations about ganking being too easy, profitable and risk free. I would like to see it revert back to old style. Where a stupidly rich cargo gets ganked because people put in some effort and won the lotto for that. Currently jump freighters and freighters are being ganked by 30 dessies for less profit per hour than they could make in L4s solo.
Even though they gank these lootless ships for giggles they still admit to making trillions for expenditures of half a billion. No one should be making trillions in high sec risk free like this. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
366
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:27:00 -
[307] - Quote
Quote:Nothing. Im just making observations about ganking being too easy, profitable and risk free.
This is a player created problem. Were it not the tendency of people to load their freighters up with enough stuff to make it profitable, this would not happen.
Quote:Where a stupidly rich cargo gets ganked because people put in some effort and won the lotto for that. Currently jump freighters and freighters are being ganked by 30 dessies for less profit per hour than they could make in L4s solo.
At no point is it unfair for a single ship, flown by a single player, to lose to 30 people, flying 30 ships. Nothing you say can make that any less true. Gank originally stood for Gang Kill. Still applies pretty well today.
Quote:Even though they gank these lootless ships for giggles they still admit to making trillions for expenditures of half a billion. No one should be making trillions in high sec risk free like this.
Well, time to ban PI, Ice Mining, Salvaging, BPOs, and about half a dozen other odd highsec activities. Those have less risk than ganking, I mean, afterall, CONCORD doesn't chase you, and every player in the game can't shoot at you if you do those. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Zeus Zed
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
18
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:35:00 -
[308] - Quote
Instead of CCP hiring someone to improve on all these issues, they get someone to make their more money. |

Aura of Ice
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:49:00 -
[309] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:baltec1 wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote: Should be easy for no one.
Its much harder to set up a freighter gank than to make a freighter safe and requires at least 17 more people for the gank. Lol. Its not hard at all. As you pointed out you make very high profits while sitting in high sec totally safe from harm. You're pretty much identical to the risk averse hi-sec miner except your profit is much higher. The miner has to worry about ganks and performs some effort. You bump a freighter and click a button once or twice. If high sec pvers were as risk free and profitable as you, you guys would be screaming like little girls for CCP to nerf them. It benefits you, so you defend it. Thats pretty much the facts.
I <3 you.
Not being sarcastic. I've had enough of the machismo-can't-be-tough-irl-so-gotta-be-tough-on-a-videogame attitude that seems to permeate the EvE elite community.
Well, it's more of an illusory self-projection, but hey, some people need something to feel good about. Sometimes it's "winning" (lol Charlie) over someone else in a spaceship lasers game.
Nauseating at times. Thank you for a dose of fresh air. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
366
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 07:00:00 -
[310] - Quote
Quote:I <3 you.
Not being sarcastic. I've had enough of the machismo-can't-be-tough-irl-so-gotta-be-tough-on-a-videogame attitude that seems to permeate the EvE elite community.
Well, it's more of an illusory self-projection, but hey, some people need something to feel good about. Sometimes it's "winning" (lol Charlie) over someone else in a spaceship lasers game.
Nauseating at times. Thank you for a dose of fresh air.
"When confronted with their powerlessness, many noobs will attempt an attack on your real life, frequently insinuating that are a pathetic nerd irl. A special favorite of the noob is to question your sexuality, in particular to claim that you are a virgin, and that 'no real woman' would touch you voluntarily. Another popular tactic is to claim that you are/were helpless against physical abuse, and that you take out your frustrations on the innocent in game."
I took that off of a post in the (forgive me) WoW forums. You can replace "noob" with "carebear" and it applies to EVE easily. Aside from calling them all virgins, you pretty much nailed it.
I'd argue, that the kind of person you have to be to derive solace from imagining that someone who defeated you in a video game is actually a pathetic loser irl, would be the kind of person who isn't "winning!" irl themselves.
 Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Callyuk
Thundercats The Initiative.
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 08:05:00 -
[311] - Quote
I wonder if people really do quit eve after getting ganked ? Im sure some do . How Goons Gank Freighters with the new flagging system.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdq5in9fR-Y
Theres a gear at the bottom right in every YOUTUBE video use it |

baltec1
Bat Country
7194
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 08:37:00 -
[312] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:BoSau Hotim wrote:@Infinity
I've been reading as much as I can, but I want to know this because I haven't seen you post about it:
What exactly do you want CCP to do about this? Nothing. Im just making observations about ganking being too easy, profitable and risk free. I would like to see it revert back to old style. Where a stupidly rich cargo gets ganked because people put in some effort and won the lotto for that. Currently jump freighters and freighters are being ganked by 30 dessies for less profit per hour than they could make in L4s solo. Even though they gank these lootless ships for giggles they still admit to making trillions for expenditures of half a billion. No one should be making trillions in high sec risk free like this.
You do realise that it was cheaper to do it in the past right?
Also we have made trillions after investing at least 500 billion in lost ships. The profits are good but not THAT good and we don't do this just for ***** and giggles. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
3843
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 09:06:00 -
[313] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:There maybe a very remote possibility the bumpers may both lose connection at the same time on the off chance someone messed up and the ship didn't pop initially and reshipping is required but thats stretching things a little far.
There are any number of things that can go wrong: the gankers warp in too far away, can't get into range quickly enough or start shooting before they are at the appropriate range, or maybe the gankers warp in too close and end up bouncing off the target and landing tens of kilometres away. Then there's the good old loot fairy: each stack of items has a 50% chance to drop, but for whatever reason (mostly gambling psychology) it seems that the loot fairy tends to favour the worthless stacks of carbon and cordite rather than the valuable stacks of PLEX and moon-goo-du-jour.
So as Tippia has pointed out, there is risk involved, where risk is the product of cost and probability of failure. On the flip side is reward, which is value of success times probability of success. The probability of failure of a suicide gank is around 50% (that's the chance of the valuable cargo dropping, plus a teensy bit due to the times that the gankers stuff up).
Suicide ganking today is harder and less profitable than it has ever been. Even so, there are people who don't read the forums, don't understand killboards or have their heads buried in the sand and never heard that rule about never shipping more than 1B ISK worth of goods in a freighter: "it's got 800k m3 of capacity," the pilot thinks, "why shouldn't I fill it all?"
As for your statement about, "no one should be making trillions in high sec risk free like this," the only suggestion I have is that if the income really is so amazingly high and the cost so amazingly low, why isn't everyone doing it?
I have no qualms with suicide ganking per se, but I do have issues with game mechanics which allow someone to be bumped and aggressed indefinitely without any repercussions to the gankers. It's perfectly within the mechanics and rules of the game, but I just can't shake the feeling that it's a cheap tactic that needs to be addressed.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Warr Akini
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
61
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 09:50:00 -
[314] - Quote
As the person who caused this and many other highsec-related tempests in a teapot, I am both thrilled and dismayed at the lack of understanding displayed in this thread. Even more shocking is the fact that there are just so many damned pages of it.
Thank you. Thank all of you. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
373
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 09:52:00 -
[315] - Quote
Warr Akini wrote:As the person who caused this and many other highsec-related tempests in a teapot, I am both thrilled and dismayed at the lack of understanding displayed in this thread. Even more shocking is the fact that there are just so many damned pages of it.
Thank you. Thank all of you.
Details? I'd love to hear the "not whining" side of things. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Elecktra Blue
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
23
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 09:53:00 -
[316] - Quote
Warr Akini wrote:As the person who caused this and many other highsec-related tempests in a teapot, I am both thrilled and dismayed at the lack of understanding displayed in this thread. Even more shocking is the fact that there are just so many damned pages of it.
Thank you. Thank all of you.
O! Captain My Captain! Miniluv Minister |

Elecktra Blue
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
23
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 10:04:00 -
[317] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Warr Akini wrote:As the person who caused this and many other highsec-related tempests in a teapot, I am both thrilled and dismayed at the lack of understanding displayed in this thread. Even more shocking is the fact that there are just so many damned pages of it.
Thank you. Thank all of you. Details? I'd love to hear the "not whining" side of things.
How about you take the time to learn through trial and error, and then get back to us? Miniluv Minister |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
167
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 10:25:00 -
[318] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:I <3 you.
Not being sarcastic. I've had enough of the machismo-can't-be-tough-irl-so-gotta-be-tough-on-a-videogame attitude that seems to permeate the EvE elite community.
Well, it's more of an illusory self-projection, but hey, some people need something to feel good about. Sometimes it's "winning" (lol Charlie) over someone else in a spaceship lasers game.
Nauseating at times. Thank you for a dose of fresh air. "When confronted with their powerlessness, many noobs will attempt an attack on your real life, frequently insinuating that are a pathetic nerd irl. A special favorite of the noob is to question your sexuality, in particular to claim that you are a virgin, and that 'no real woman' would touch you voluntarily. Another popular tactic is to claim that you are/were helpless against physical abuse, and that you take out your frustrations on the innocent in game." I took that off of a post in the (forgive me) WoW forums. You can replace "noob" with "carebear" and it applies to EVE easily. Aside from calling them all virgins, you pretty much nailed it. I'd argue, that the kind of person you have to be to derive solace from imagining that someone who defeated you in a video game is actually a pathetic loser irl, would be the kind of person who isn't "winning!" irl themselves.  There is truth in the silly machismo stuff. I have ganked people. Suicided barges. Undocked disco battleship in Jita. Really the only thing I enjoy doing in EvE now is often called griefing. Thing is I do it for my own pleasure not to "harvest tears" or any of the childish prattle that comes from most gankers and or people who seem to want to superimpose their in game actions onto their out of game personality.
That does smack of desperation and a low self esteem.
I have this wonky friend. Hes a rl virgin and tall, gangly n nerdish. Those posts, especially the ones calling others "bads" really do conjure hos image in my mind. |

Warr Akini
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
61
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 10:29:00 -
[319] - Quote
Let me put it this way:
Ganking a freighter is -by no means- easy. Anyone who truthfully says otherwise has not done what I do. Jump freighters are even harder.
Protecting a freighter is incredibly easy. Jump freighters are even easier to protect, for reasons listed in this hilarious thread, and others.
In short, if you were to place the physical representation of the minuscule amount of effort it requires to protect your gigantic beast of a hauler on one end of a seesaw, then drop the Titanic-equivalent amount of effort it takes to actually coordinate and execute a gank on the other end, it would provide that little speck with enough velocity to escape the Earth's atmosphere.
As to ISK discussions and suggestions about what kind of people gank fools, that can fall to people who care about that kind of thing. |

Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
163
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 10:30:00 -
[320] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:Nothing. Im just making observations about ganking being too easy, profitable and risk free. This is a player created problem. Were it not the tendency of people to load their freighters up with enough stuff to make it profitable, this would not happen.
See, that's another "problem". :)
If you (the hypothetical hauler) fill You freighter only with goods worth 200m isk, You'll have minimized Your loss in case of a successfull attack.
But see, so long as You don't autopilot around in circles, the chance of You getting ganked in a freighter in highsec is astronomically low because there are so many freighters out there.
But with each trip in succession the risk of getting ganked increases (statistically).
So, it might be downright stupid to not load Your Cargo hold to it's fullest extend(with the most valuable items possible). On the other hand, You could always have a bad day and get ganked three times in a row (provided you have enough freighters).  There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
374
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 10:33:00 -
[321] - Quote
Quote:There is truth in the silly machismo stuff. I have ganked people. Suicided barges. Undocked disco battleship in Jita. Really the only thing I enjoy doing in EvE now is often called griefing. Thing is I do it for my own pleasure not to "harvest tears" or any of the childish prattle that comes from most gankers and or people who seem to want to superimpose their in game actions onto their out of game personality.
That does smack of desperation and a low self esteem.
Idk, people have been harvesting tears since long before EVE came into being. It's just funny, to be honest with you. Especially when you get that special someone who just explodes and pours all the vitriol he can muster at the person who killed his pixels.
Belan the Noble Looter, Angwe of Menethil Harbor, and more. It's been funny to me at least, for a very long time. I enjoy taking someone's unreasonable expectations and dashing them, typically by ganking them, and I know I'm not the only one.
So I'd say that harvesting tears is my pleasure. It's not to inflate my own sense of self esteem, it's because every time somebody just explodes on me for ganking them, I laugh so hard I fall out of my chair. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
374
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 10:37:00 -
[322] - Quote
Warr Akini wrote:Let me put it this way:
Ganking a freighter is -by no means- easy. Anyone who truthfully says otherwise has not done what I do. Jump freighters are even harder.
Protecting a freighter is incredibly easy. Jump freighters are even easier to protect, for reasons listed in this hilarious thread, and others.
In short, if you were to place the physical representation of the minuscule amount of effort it requires to protect your gigantic beast of a hauler on one end of a seesaw, then drop the Titanic-equivalent amount of effort it takes to actually coordinate and execute a gank on the other end, it would provide that little speck with enough velocity to escape the Earth's atmosphere.
As to ISK discussions and suggestions about what kind of people gank fools, that can fall to people who care about that kind of thing.
Never tried a jump freighter myself. Never got the chance, they always... jump.
Thanks for the perspective! :)
I had kinda figured that coordinating 30 people plus scouts/scanners plus bumpers, could not possibly be easy. The most I've ever even come close is using Tornados. Catalysts much be a far cry. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
167
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 11:00:00 -
[323] - Quote
Warr Akini wrote:Let me put it this way:
Ganking a freighter is -by no means- easy. Anyone who truthfully says otherwise has not done what I do. Jump freighters are even harder.
Protecting a freighter is incredibly easy. Jump freighters are even easier to protect, for reasons listed in this hilarious thread, and others.
In short, if you were to place the physical representation of the minuscule amount of effort it requires to protect your gigantic beast of a hauler on one end of a seesaw, then drop the Titanic-equivalent amount of effort it takes to actually coordinate and execute a gank on the other end, it would provide that little speck with enough velocity to escape the Earth's atmosphere.
As to ISK discussions and suggestions about what kind of people gank fools, that can fall to people who care about that kind of thing. If ganking a freighter is so difficult Ill make you a bet. If I can't ISBox a 5 man freighter gank Ill give you 20 bill. If I can you give me 20 bill. We'll use Chribba to hold the isk? |

Gaara's sniper
Raging Ducks Goonswarm Federation
12
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 11:30:00 -
[324] - Quote
Ganking a freighter with 5 guys is so easy. Even i could do it with just 1. Suicide ganking is harder. thou you can try getting 5 faction fitted talos(or 3 faction fitted vindicators) and just gank the first afk autopilot freighter.
But hey, if we can use mittani as 3rd party, i'm willing to bet. It just that i don't trust Chribba :roll: :badtroll: |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
167
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 12:01:00 -
[325] - Quote
Gaara's sniper wrote:Ganking a freighter with 5 guys is so easy. Even i could do it with just 1. Suicide ganking is harder. thou you can try getting 5 faction fitted talos(or 3 faction fitted vindicators) and just gank the first afk autopilot freighter.
But hey, if we can use mittani as 3rd party, i'm willing to bet. It just that i don't trust Chribba :roll: :badtroll: Never heard of mittani, one of your scamming alts? Chribba will be fine. |

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
75
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 12:05:00 -
[326] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Never heard of mittani, one of your scamming alts?
I think he's the guy who posts all those LoL reviews. |

Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
552
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 12:47:00 -
[327] - Quote
Regardless of other discussions, I actually think the cost (ISK wise) between a freighter (without cargo) and the ships/equipment you have to buy to suicide gank one is a tad disproportional in favor of the ganker. For industrial and transport ships it feels much better.
Not that I have any hope of any changes in that regard. HTFU and all that jazz. Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook-á |

baltec1
Bat Country
7197
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 12:51:00 -
[328] - Quote
Jowen Datloran wrote:Regardless of other discussions, I actually think the cost (ISK wise) between a freighter (without cargo) and the ships/equipment you have to buy to suicide gank one is a tad disproportional in favor of the ganker. For industrial and transport ships it feels much better.
Not that I have any hope of any changes in that regard. HTFU and all that jazz.
Given enough people you can gank anything for free. |

Doc Spectre
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 12:56:00 -
[329] - Quote
Elder TheRock wrote:its not about the loss of money....
and i don-¦t want a discussion about these...
Its only to give CCP a feedback from faithful players
If you buy a ship to transport things from A to B, but you can-¦t do this while you where killed, also without cargo(see goon kills), then something goes wrong, hopefully you will understand this You've been playing for 8 years and you don't understand how EVE works?
GTFO...whiner... |

Mii Kro
Pulsar Inc. Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 15:11:00 -
[330] - Quote
Yummmy Tears !!! |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |