Going to edit my previous post to be less sarcastic - we value your feedback, which is why we're posting here.

Regarding the Subsystem / PI groups, we're not saying it's going to be final, we're just mentioning our preference here, we definitely see where you are coming from.

Going to edit my previous post to be less sarcastic - we value your feedback, which is why we're posting here.

Regarding the Subsystem / PI groups, we're not saying it's going to be final, we're just mentioning our preference here, we definitely see where you are coming from.

looking things up in the wiki is appealing?

This is good however what does this mean for the primary and secondary attributes of the skills?
Previously it was possible to guess (mostly correctly)

Dropping my 2 cents:
[list]

Has people have already said, keep Spaceship Command, we are commanders, not pilots. We're not sitting on the deck and piloting our mighty battleships, we are on the deck ordering our men tasks that they were trained to do (on top of other things like the whole "we feel what the ship feels thing".)

Mechanics seems an odd one out in the armor group maybe just call it armor or armor managment?

To be precise we are not on ship's deck. I doubt there are decks on ships at all. Maintenance crew can be near gun ports or engine room, but there is no real need for deck. Capsuleer himself is located deep inside ship in capsule.

Just to clarify since I don't see any CSM saying nothing against it, the CSM agrees with this change: Spaceship command -> Spaceship Piloting ?

really?

explain

Edit: Can a CSM post here the official CSM position about those changes, now that the cat is out I would like to hear a official word about the people that represent me about this proposal.

Update based on what we have seen so far.

Multiple Targeting and Advanced Multiple Targeting:

Agreed, it doesn't sound that great. As with Spaceship Piloting, this will be discussed internally again - some options listed in that thread sound promising, but please remember that we would ideally like skill names to be representative of what they actually do.

If you want to fix "fighting UI" start with drone UI and corp management UI. Skill system is(was) ok. As i said earlier in this thread its not about dumbing game, but your new skill names lost flavor and became just another skills with generic names that doesn't have the feel of cold, harsh and unforgiving universe. The only sensible change was for Nanite Control skill.

Target Acquisition and Advanced Target Acquisition, increased levels in either skill allow you to 'aquire' more targets etc.

Targeting Acquisition and Signal Acquisition are too similar sounding and do two totally different things.

All other "Management" Skills increase your ability to handle the "thing" that you are managing. So it should be Target Management. And Signal Acquisition should be changed to Targeting Acquisition, because you acquire targets faster.

Still no mention about if you're really intending to change them or not!
Due to attribute remapping we do plan ahead about a year (more or less) so it would be great if you could let us know in advance (as in several months) before you change the primary and secondary attributes. Or you could just grant additional remaps or skill points.

Simply put, the hard and unforgiving nature of EVE should not be to retrieve information on a basic level, it should be on how players act based on that information and interact with the gameplay that revolves around it.