| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 .. 22 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
777
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 19:31:00 -
[541] - Quote
Aesheera wrote:Battlingbean wrote:Where were all you whiners when this idea was proposed? I remember when everyone I knew in EVE thought that a Kaalakiota Drake would be freaking awesome. Now that it is finally here CCP is drowning in tears. I'm surprised they modify the game at all with this crying.
I like the changes. Especially the CreoDron Myrmidon. Whiners? No one is against the t2 versions of said BC's. In fact I welcome T2 Canes, Drakes and Myrms. Just don't slap them on perfectly fine Commandship hulls. The complaints are legit: most of these hulls are pretty damn signature to said ships. Make a new, special BC class to use these hulls for. Even with the update the command ships affected are still perfectly fine. I look forward to being able to fly an absolution again and will still fly the sleipnir. And really, looking at both I prefer a drake to a ferox in Kaalakiota colors.
Besides, when can we realistically expect another set of T2 BC's? Do we really have room for such a ship without further exasperating the issue of ships stepping on each others toes, something BC's of all categories are infamous for? What role would they serve? And personally, if we have to wait for all of that before getting these hulls, what are the chances of ever getting T2 ships with the ABC hulls? |

GordonO
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 19:36:00 -
[542] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Aesheera wrote:Battlingbean wrote:Where were all you whiners when this idea was proposed? I remember when everyone I knew in EVE thought that a Kaalakiota Drake would be freaking awesome. Now that it is finally here CCP is drowning in tears. I'm surprised they modify the game at all with this crying.
I like the changes. Especially the CreoDron Myrmidon. Whiners? No one is against the t2 versions of said BC's. In fact I welcome T2 Canes, Drakes and Myrms. Just don't slap them on perfectly fine Commandship hulls. The complaints are legit: most of these hulls are pretty damn signature to said ships. Make a new, special BC class to use these hulls for. Even with the update the command ships affected are still perfectly fine. I look forward to being able to fly an absolution again and will still fly the sleipnir. And really, looking at both I prefer a drake to a ferox in Kaalakiota colors. Besides, when can we realistically expect another set of T2 BC's? Do we really have room for such a ship without further exasperating the issue of ships stepping on each others toes, something BC's of all categories are infamous for? What role would they serve? And personally, if we have to wait for all of that before getting these hulls, what are the chances of ever getting T2 ships with the ABC hulls?
I would hope they make the nighthawk useable before they introduce a T2 version. Unless you using the NH for boosting, there really is no reason to choose it for pvp over the drake.
. |

Wrayeth
Inexorable Retribution
119
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 06:57:00 -
[543] - Quote
GordonO wrote:I would hope they make the nighthawk useable before they introduce a T2 version. Unless you using the NH for boosting, there really is no reason to choose it for pvp over the drake.
I was very disappointed when they didn't give the nighthawk a 6th mid, myself. I've been campaigning for that on and off for at least six years, and the only time I got a dev response was to say that it might be looked at the next time the Nighthawk comes up for general review. Well, the Nighthawk came up for general review, and it still didn't get the sixth mid it needs to become a good ship. |

May O'Neez
Flying Blacksmiths
35
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 07:49:00 -
[544] - Quote
Tempest Fleet issue killed in visual: check (lost square wings, station-camouflage painting) Claymore killed both in visual and minmatarness: check (wanna fly a charcoal ?)
and ... Sleipnir killed in visual: check
I'm really disappointed, again. What is proposed here is merely change the hull into a faction T1 with a different color. I wouldn't have mind the sleipnir to loose it's hull if it was for a better one, but it's not. Not only for the sleipnir but also the other CS.
Let's just hope it's temporary |

zerquse
Fallen Soldiers of Perseverance From Ashes.
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 13:21:00 -
[545] - Quote
make the myrm blackish like the eos |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
779
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 19:32:00 -
[546] - Quote
May O'Neez wrote:Tempest Fleet issue killed in visual: You shut your lying mouth. |

Varenth Esher
Reverberation Inc
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 20:02:00 -
[547] - Quote
I approve of this product/service. I've been waiting to fly a blood red harbinger! |

Celeste Lovette
1473
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 09:28:00 -
[548] - Quote
I really like those changes, keep doing it  "Life isn't about finding yourself. Life is about creating yourself." |

Aesheera
Blacklight Recon Strictly Unprofessional
450
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 10:32:00 -
[549] - Quote
zerquse wrote:make the myrm blackish like the eos Not using a color monitor I see? Primary since '07. GÖÑ
If it bleeds, kill it - II Support this man's tool! |

zerquse
Fallen Soldiers of Perseverance From Ashes.
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 13:09:00 -
[550] - Quote
Aesheera wrote:zerquse wrote:make the myrm blackish like the eos Not using a color monitor I see?
i could swear it used to be blackisk |

May O'Neez
Flying Blacksmiths
35
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 15:23:00 -
[551] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:May O'Neez wrote:Tempest Fleet issue killed in visual: You shut your lying mouth.
Not lying, you apparently didn't fly much these ships or didn't care. And when I look at other post it seems I'm not alone in thinking that it is not a model change but a texture change. I still don't understand why there's a few T2 ships which get a different hull and other not, this should also be part of balance ... |

Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
776
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:39:00 -
[552] - Quote
zerquse wrote:Aesheera wrote:zerquse wrote:make the myrm blackish like the eos Not using a color monitor I see? i could swear it used to be blackisk
Post-V3 CreoDron colors are some kind of weird spectral green-blueish thing. A lot of the people who are commenting on the Eos having strange colors are only previewing it or only looking at it in their hangar. When you undock in it (so glad I got BC V and Command Ships I trained before their changes came through) it's the correct Post-V3 color. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
779
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 19:14:00 -
[553] - Quote
May O'Neez wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:May O'Neez wrote:Tempest Fleet issue killed in visual: You shut your lying mouth. Not lying, you apparently didn't fly much these ships or didn't care. And when I look at other post it seems I'm not alone in thinking that it is not a model change but a texture change. I still don't understand why there's a few T2 ships which get a different hull and other not, this should also be part of balance ... Not saying it didn't change, I am saying I like the new one better. |

Aesheera
Blacklight Recon Strictly Unprofessional
453
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:04:00 -
[554] - Quote
zerquse wrote:Aesheera wrote:zerquse wrote:make the myrm blackish like the eos Not using a color monitor I see? i could swear it used to be blackisk Pre first graphics update, the Eos was white and Green :D Primary since '07. GÖÑ
If it bleeds, kill it - II Support this man's tool! |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
121
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 18:04:00 -
[555] - Quote
It would be nice to see some consistency out of these decisions.
Interdictors are also getting a rebalance with Rubicon. However, with this rebalance, there is no mention of changes to the models. This means that it's ok for the Flycatcher, primarily a missile ship, to continue to use the hull of the Cormorant, which is primarily a hybrid turret ship.
Yet somehow, it is wrong for the Nighthawk to have a Ferox hull instead of the Drake? Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Weasel Leblanc
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 18:19:00 -
[556] - Quote
This brings up one thing that annoys me to no end: certain Tech II paintjobs are damn near indistinguishable from their faction's base colors.
Now, don't get me wrong, I'm quite fond of how the new versions of the Absolution and the Nighthawk look thanks to their color schemes, but as for the other two? They are direly lacking in visual distinction from the base hulls. CreoDron colors inevitably wind up just looking like a slightly less shiny version of normal Gallente ships, and Boundless Creations - at least, as far as color goes - just winds up looking like a slightly brighter basic Minmatar ship. (I can't tell if the solar panel fins on the Sleipnir are any different from a Hurricane's because the resolution is so dang tiny.)
Adding a little bit of extra visual kibble would go a long way towards making the ships more distinctive. It works well enough for assault frigates. |

Takari
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
287
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 20:00:00 -
[557] - Quote
Quote: This means that it's ok for the Flycatcher, primarily a missile ship, to continue to use the hull of the Cormorant, which is primarily a hybrid turret ship.
I agree. A Kaalakiota Corax is too beautiful an idea to pass up. CCP should make it so! "Roll the dice, don't think twice. This is the way of things.
Welcome to EVE." ~ CCP Falcon |

Jaz Antollare
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
35
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 08:41:00 -
[558] - Quote
More exausts for the new EOS!!! Like on Ishkur and Ishtar |

Wey'oun
Fairlight Corp Rooks and Kings
138
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 09:59:00 -
[559] - Quote
Whilst you are at it, how about a new icon for Command Processors. Using the same icon as a cyno can get confusing when trying to fit cyno command ships in a rush. I accidentally warped to a titan with 4 cynos and no on-line links in a damnation the other day :P |

Yathsou Athanah
Sky Boxers Northern Associates.
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 19:20:00 -
[560] - Quote
I like the thukker mix impression hurricane from EOH labs a lot more to be honest:
http://www.eohgames.com/labs/Ships/Thukker%20Mix%20Hurricane
it's a much more distinguishable paintjob
also, obligatory sidenote: Wing Command boost fix? When? It's been too long... |

Boci
Order of the Black Dagger
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 00:02:00 -
[561] - Quote
Tech2 hurricane! Personally, like the car so much better than the toilet brushes!
Woooohoo! |

Czar Marcus
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 15:56:00 -
[562] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:More posts! The plan is to change the visuals of the ships as follows (the names of the ships are not changing at all): Absolution becomes a Carthum Harbinger
Eos becomes a CreoDron Myrmidon
Nighthawk becomes a Kaalakiota Drake
Sleipnir becomes a Boundless Creations Hurricane
Here's a gallery of screenshots I took of the new graphics from our internal test server.I know this is going to generate a lot of strong feelings due to nostalgia and I share many of those feelings. However I truly think these new versions look amazing and that in the long run this is a change that people will look back on as an obvious positive. Let us know what you think.
I'm not happy with many of these changes.
The Drake is too widely used as is. The hull is everywhere. Having a different Hull was a nice change of pace. Now the Caldari Path is just going from one Drake to the next.
This change seems uninspired. The same paint scheme was kept and only the hull was changed. I don't see any wow factor here. It's a boring paint scheme on an already overused ship.
The Prophecy is my favorite hull so I dislike the Abso change on that basis. I've never been a fan of the Harbinger hull. I can't get past that it looks like a bulimic hammerhead shark.
The Eos hull change makes sense, but the paint scheme is terrible. It's too muted and doesn't set itself apart from the Myrmidon much.
The Sleipnir is the only one so far that I actually like hull wise.
With the amount of time required to fit and fly these ships they deserve to look impressive. These changes are uninspired and boring. The only change seems to be taking an already used paint scheme and rotating it to another ship. Add something to their models and make them stand out. Make the paint look good. If your plan is to give us something new then give us something new. I understand that the current hulls don't do this, but you're asking for our opinions and that is mine. |

Wrayeth
Inexorable Retribution
120
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 00:36:00 -
[563] - Quote
Does anyone know if the devs said anything about the command ship model changes at EVE Vegas? I tuned into the stream late and missed most of the balancing and changes stuff. |

Kane Fenris
NWP
97
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 12:37:00 -
[564] - Quote
Wrayeth wrote:Does anyone know if the devs said anything about the command ship model changes at EVE Vegas? I tuned into the stream late and missed most of the balancing and changes stuff.
not on day 1 sa far as i have seen just watching day two now |

Oraac Ensor
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
294
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 09:45:00 -
[565] - Quote
Oraac Ensor wrote:As I see it, the entire relationship between the BC and CS types is messed up.
For instance, the Prophecy hull is all curves and yet it has slots for missile launchers which, being angular and non-retracting, look horribly out of place on it. Same situation on the Damnation. On the other hand, launchers would look fine lined up on the Harbinger's weapon sponsons.
Swapping the high slot layouts of the two hulls would correct this situation and make the Prophecy hull the appropriate choice for the Absolution and the Harbinger hull right for the Damnation.
No doubt this would also mean tinkering with cpu and powergrid stats, which I'm sure would be way beyond the scope of what is intended.
In other words, this is a classic "Don't start from here" situation. On second thoughts, forget the high slots and just swap the Prophecy and Harbinger hulls, then match the Damnation with the new Prophecy. |

Wrayeth
Inexorable Retribution
128
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 07:24:00 -
[566] - Quote
Oraac Ensor wrote: On second thoughts, forget the high slots and just swap the Prophecy and Harbinger hulls, then match the Damnation with the new Prophecy.
I am totally cool with this. The prophecy was originally a laser boat, anyway. |

Esteban Dragonovic
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
33
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 15:32:00 -
[567] - Quote
CCP, you are not touching the nighthawk model. The ferox hull needs as much love as it can get. Besides the ferox + kaal paintjob is a match made in paridise. Compare the current model to the proposed one and I dare you to tell me which looks better. Also, taking 5 launcher ship and throwing it on an 8 hardpoint hull is just plain awful. Some ships you could get away with it, but not the damn plain drake hull. Give me T2 ferox models, not just a striped drake. |

Sivney Quincannon
41
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 18:28:00 -
[568] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:More posts! One of the changes we were investigating for Odyssey 1.1 but had to drop due to time was adjustments to the models of half the command ships. The goal would be to move them over to hulls that match the T1 combat BC that shares their weapon type, creating some more variety, opening up options for the art guys in the future, and making the differences between the command ships more intuitive. This is something that first got discussed by us in this Features and Ideas thread. Feedback was overwhelmingly positive but obviously there are strong feelings about a lot of this stuff. The Sleipnir in particular creates very strong feelings for me. The plan is to change the visuals of the ships as follows (the names of the ships are not changing at all): Absolution becomes a Carthum Harbinger
Eos becomes a CreoDron Myrmidon
Nighthawk becomes a Kaalakiota Drake
Sleipnir becomes a Boundless Creations Hurricane
This change would affect the visuals of each of those four ships, as well as manufacturing and invention for them. For that reason I want to get it announced as early as possible. This change would not affect the stats or bonuses of the ships at all. Any changes to those are an entirely different discussion. Here's a gallery of screenshots I took of the new graphics from our internal test server.I know this is going to generate a lot of strong feelings due to nostalgia and I share many of those feelings. However I truly think these new versions look amazing and that in the long run this is a change that people will look back on as an obvious positive. Let us know what you think.
I truly dislike the decision to change the visuals of these ships to existing types already in the game. Changing the Sleipnir to a Hurricane model just pours more salt on the wound. There are already 2 existing Hurricane models.
Please come up with something new and original and please do not implement this change for Rubicon. These new versions do not look amazing at all and in the long run the change will never be positive.
Just plain LAZY! I hope this change dies in a fire.  |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
786
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 20:13:00 -
[569] - Quote
Esteban Dragonovic wrote:CCP, you are not touching the nighthawk model. The ferox hull needs as much love as it can get. Besides the ferox + kaal paintjob is a match made in paridise. Compare the current model to the proposed one and I dare you to tell me which looks better. Also, taking 5 launcher ship and throwing it on an 8 hardpoint hull is just plain awful. Some ships you could get away with it, but not the damn plain drake hull. Give me T2 ferox models, not just a striped drake. I'll take that dare, the drake looks better. |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
133
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 21:17:00 -
[570] - Quote
Esteban Dragonovic wrote:CCP, you are not touching the nighthawk model. The ferox hull needs as much love as it can get. Besides the ferox + kaal paintjob is a match made in paridise. Compare the current model to the proposed one and I dare you to tell me which looks better. Also, taking 5 launcher ship and throwing it on an 8 hardpoint hull is just plain awful. Some ships you could get away with it, but not the damn plain drake hull. Give me T2 ferox models, not just a striped drake.
Hear, hear!
(that's "+1" or "QFT" in internet speak) Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 .. 22 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |