| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Shanticat
the muppets
DARKNESS.
0
   |
Posted - 2013.10.03 17:03:00 -
[241] - Quote
wrong topic.. |
Hairpins Blueprint
Paragraph 22
Aureus Alae
13
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 17:44:00 -
[242] - Quote
Models are nice : ) But DO NOT Change the names .... there is totaly no need for that  please stop that fozzie :" |
stop changing names in game, it makes me dizzy and sad (sobing) |
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
4699
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 17:50:00 -
[243] - Quote
Takezo Kensei wrote:No, just no! Abso, sleip, nh have their _iconic_ models, which suit them _extremely_ well. Even the astarte looks cool in the brutix model. Abso and sleip especially look really badass and those models really deserve to stay! On top of it who the hell wants to fly another drake!?! Or a cane for that matter?? Didn't you guys gave us navy BC's already? I'm really sorry but _none_ of the new hulls look as great as the old ones. Wtf is team 5-0 thinking? You guys bored in office, no important stuff to work on so you're shitting on the command ships models?? Astarte / damnation / sleip - why on earth would anyone want them changed?? Just for the sake of standardization? A definitive NO to these ridiculous changes!
Well, since the Astarte and Damnation aren't going to be changed at all, 2/3rds of your argument falls a bit short. 
To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors.
If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
4699
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 17:51:00 -
[244] - Quote
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:Models are nice : ) But DO NOT Change the names .... there is totaly no need for that please stop that fozzie :" | stop changing names in game, it makes me dizzy and sad (sobing)
They aren't changing the names of the ships...
To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors.
If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |
John Ratcliffe
Sausy Sausages
225
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 18:48:00 -
[245] - Quote
I think changing the Sleipnir is a stupid idea. I love my Sleipnir just the way it is. If I wanted it to look like a Hurricane, I would have bought a ******* Hurricane.
FFS.
Plus +ºa change, plus c'est la m+¬me chose |
Siddicus
Nation of Sidd
Order of the Exalted
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 19:10:00 -
[246] - Quote
John Ratcliffe wrote:I think changing the Sleipnir is a stupid idea. I love my Sleipnir just the way it is. If I wanted it to look like a Hurricane, I would have bought a ******* Hurricane.
FFS.
Or a Hurricane Fleet Issue. which is just a camo hurricane, just like what they want the Sleipnir to be. |
FlinchingNinja Kishunuba
Crunchy Crunchy
Zero Hour Alliance
150
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 19:18:00 -
[247] - Quote
Also stay away from the nighthawk! Go do something important instead. |
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Ineluctable.
45
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 19:28:00 -
[248] - Quote
Goti fase wrote:Should the harbinger hull not be used for the Damnation instead of the Absolution?
NO! - as stated before, the Harbinger model is **** and should not be used. And in particular not for the Damnation! |
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
757
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 19:28:00 -
[249] - Quote
John Ratcliffe wrote:I think changing the Sleipnir is a stupid idea. I love my Sleipnir just the way it is. If I wanted it to look like a Hurricane, I would have bought a ******* Hurricane.
FFS.
Except that still wouldn't make the sleip look like a hurricane, more it acknowledges the hurricane looks like a hurricane and, at the moment, isn't a sleip. |
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Ineluctable.
45
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 19:32:00 -
[250] - Quote
Takezo Kensei wrote:No, just no! Abso, sleip, nh have their _iconic_ models, which suit them _extremely_ well. Even the astarte looks cool in the brutix model. Abso and sleip especially look really badass and those models really deserve to stay! On top of it who the hell wants to fly another drake!?! Or a cane for that matter?? Didn't you guys gave us navy BC's already? I'm really sorry but _none_ of the new hulls look as great as the old ones. Wtf is team 5-0 thinking? You guys bored in office, no important stuff to work on so you're shitting on the command ships models?? Astarte / damnation / sleip - why on earth would anyone want them changed?? Just for the sake of standardization? A definitive NO to these ridiculous changes!
Because some people are ******** (no sorry for flame escalation with this degree of trash talk and likes for this idea). Either new models or forget about this model change right away, Fozzie! CCP has 1 month, you better start concept-arting and drawing good stuff if you want a model change. |
Ludakin DarkTribal
Babylon Knights
Renegades Council
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 19:42:00 -
[251] - Quote
WTF ???
new skins for old hull...
that disapoint me, CCP dev need to work harder!!!
those ships look ugly!!!
|
hujciwdupe22
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 20:00:00 -
[252] - Quote
Dear Fozzie
i think its just lazy,
Didnt you guys learn nothing?
First Vagabond and its ****** skin
then you remodelled it, so where was the point in giving it other skin in first place?
That what you guys doing is total lazyness, give them new models or leave them,
What does it give to the lore?
NPC corporations seems to hire the junior brand manager ***** from the memes.
New models or gtfo (no offence but i have to say it) |
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
758
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 20:07:00 -
[253] - Quote
Ludakin DarkTribal wrote:there is a lot of bugs to resolve ingame, not doing useless cosmetic change on command ship !!! So lets have the artists redirected to bug fixes. That will go splendidly. |
Rhea Rankin Nolen
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
26
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 20:07:00 -
[254] - Quote
The whole idea is meh at best IMO.
Most of these ship models got faction variant textures, and now you want to recycle the SAME models again by retexturing them again and assigning them as CS. That is hardly adding to variety.
CS already have distinctive textures, and just giving them different models of 2 existing ship variants seems pointless and a change for the sake of change.
i.e. 3 versions of Hurricane. We really need that? 
I'd personally rather have things as they are and wait another 1-2 years for completely new models, than have this half-baked compromise solution.
|
Clendestined
Apologetic Tendencies
3
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 20:18:00 -
[255] - Quote
Rhea Rankin Nolen wrote:The whole idea is meh at best IMO. Most of these ship models got faction variant textures, and now you want to recycle the SAME models again by retexturing them again and assigning them as CS. That is hardly adding to variety. CS already have distinctive textures, and just giving them different models of 2 existing ship variants seems pointless and a change for the sake of change. i.e. 3 versions of Hurricane. We really need that? I'd personally rather have things as they are and wait another 1-2 years for completely new models, than have this half-baked compromise solution.
There are 3 model drakes too, or how about the brutix? hmm, or how about...well you get what I'm saying.
Love this idea for the model changes as it needed it but it's still bland to say the least. The split weapon platforms for the wrong ship chassis had me steer clear but i'm pretty happy they are at least doing this. Gives me a reason to train up for Gallente now... (btw, i think the brutix is ugly as....yeah..meh..)
LOVE YOU ALL! |
Maya Sazas
ASDF - the corporation
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 20:51:00 -
[256] - Quote
I can-¦t get behind this at all. These ships reputations and their places in the lore are connected to their current models.
They might not be everyones taste, but that-¦s just what makes them unique even more so. There are 3 main points why i don-¦t think this a good idea:
1) Why would you go for even more models of shiptypes that are already omnipresent in the game? Do we really need another Drake or another Hurricane?
2) The models you want to replace at least the Sleipnir and the Nighthawk with are much more streamlined and tailored to "please the eye". They are also much more boring and uncreative. Models with edges are fine, as long as the overall concept is sound.
3) As far as i get this you are planing to rework the t2 models anyway. So why not just wait until you got those new models ready? Why forcefully change models to completely unrelated ships? To establish continuity for people who did not know the old models?
The only reason i can think of is that you actually already worked on the new models for the Harbi, the Myrm, the Hurri and the Drake....Wait, didn-¦t you just revamp the Drake? Might it be that you can use some of the designs done at that point for the upcoming t2 models? Of course i am just speculating here, but if that was the case it would be a pretty cheap reason to break the lore and leave a sour taste with many of your customers.
Please rethink this. I really can-¦t see how this could be considered "obvious positive". And no, i am not even a fan of how the Ferox/Cyclone/Prophecy looks. But these ships earned their place in Eve history. It-¦s a shame to see ships many people grew accustomed to and have font memories of, be treated like totally exchangeable stuff. Do proper reworks of the models, even if it takes time.
|
Soldarius
Deadman W0nderland
Forsak3n.
344
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 21:04:00 -
[257] - Quote
Dat Absolution... damn...
Also, my T2 Drake cometh!
Free Ripley Weaver! |
Centurax
Eve Engineering Authority
Eve Engineering
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 21:26:00 -
[258] - Quote
Nighthawk = Kaalakiota Drake yay!!
Shame I cant really say anything about the 2 turrets, please not on the drake, needs 7 launchers otherwise the aesthetics will be lost  |
Dersen Lowery
Laurentson INC
StructureDamage
783
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 21:33:00 -
[259] - Quote
Yes, please. Eos, come to daddy.
Dersen will be a decent command ship pilot just about in time for this yummy goodness.
Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables. |
Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
404
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 21:36:00 -
[260] - Quote
Not too fond of the Eos change, I don't really like the Myrm. But since I like the Harbinger and also the Claymore, Vulture and, most important, the Damnation are not affected, I will get over it. Eventually  .
Remove insurance. |
Tinukeda'ya Naskingar
Minmatar Expeditions ltd.
12
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 21:51:00 -
[261] - Quote
btw: Changing the CS models into tier3 BC's makes much more sense from the lore side as well.
Basically the tier3 BC's are only recently developed designs using their hulls for CS can actually be explained by the companies adapting that design and finding it more suitable for the Command role with the excess power output and whatnot.
Then you bind it with the recent rebalance where it were the field command ships that grew quite different to the previous state and bang it all connects into reason.
And not just change for a change into old hulls which already have other variations anyway.
|
Kasumi 'Goto
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 21:59:00 -
[262] - Quote
I liked the models the way they were before. Its disappointing CCP couldn't have done something else more constructive with there time such as adding new features. |
Leto Atal
LoneStar Industries
Comatose Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 22:06:00 -
[263] - Quote
Siddicus wrote:Leave the Sleipnir alone!
At least give it some kind of variant of the Hurricane model instead of just giving us a *slightly* different Hurricane Fleet Issue. Maybe something like what you all did with the Stabber hulls. Increase the whingy bits on the side so it follows the side of the hull making a V of solar panels and maybe one on the top like a sail or fin. I am not an artist or else I'd have drawn something out for you but don't just give us the same old model with a different cammo.
PS: Give it Zebra stripes!
They aren't solar panels. They are radiators. Minmatar ships are powered by fusion generators that create a lot of heat. The vaccuum of space is a poor conductor of heat, so to dissipate the heat we use large radiator panels. Hence the fins on many of our ships. Minmatar are the only race in EVE to have a propulsion and power generation method based in real world physics. The other races use pixie dust and magic.
+1 for the Zebra stripes. |
Mixu Paatelainen
Stay Frosty.
52
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 22:25:00 -
[264] - Quote
Please please don't do this :( |
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
Cosmic Consortium
4154
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 22:34:00 -
[265] - Quote
Don't panic, folks, the names aren't changing!
CCP Fozzie wrote:The plan is:
Absolution becomes a Carthum Harbinger
Eos becomes a CreoDron Myrmidon
Nighthawk becomes a Kaalakiota Drake
Sleipnir becomes a Boundless Creations Hurricane
All this means is that e.g.: the Absolution is going to become a Harbinger model with Carthum Conglomerate colours.
They're not changing the names, relax! You can put down that pitchfork and douse your torches!
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |
Yunaki Tenzomura
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 22:54:00 -
[266] - Quote
how bout give them a very significant look rather than keep the same graphics crap over and over and over again... because now you are matching them with factional npc corporations wouldnt it make more sense to just give them a more unique look outside of the usual hulls and give them a total make over with alot of feel leaning to those said npc corporations rather than the same hull with a different paint job?
Is CCP so intent on using the same models over and over and over again that you mention you have an art department who does what? add a second or third flare to an already existing model? maybe add a turret slot platform on a ship somewhere to make it different?
Give your subscribers something different? not just simply changing it to a different hull. most players start off looking at all the ships they dream to one day fly. dreaming to fly another myrmidon, hurricane, drake, or harbinger doesnt give them much to look forward to.
Also, Paint job like Space Camo doesnt make sense. please put on something that does. unless there is a space jungle that we can hide in that no one in EVE was made aware of? |
maCH'EttE
Mafia Redux
Phobia.
76
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 23:08:00 -
[267] - Quote
These ships are hideous, especially the harbi one. Use the same designer that did the upcoming sisters ships, or the same kind of look and feel. |
Faye Nahkriin
Astral Wings
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 23:51:00 -
[268] - Quote
I really really love these changes. And are so looking forward to Rubicon now! |
Ace Chet-Chaz Fancyslacks
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 00:33:00 -
[269] - Quote
Lucine Delacourt wrote:Should have switched them the other way around.
Amarr - Laser Chicken & Missile Harb
Caldari - Blaster Drake & Missile Ferox
Minny - MissileCane & Auto Cyclone
Gal - Blaster Myrm and Drone Brutix
Doesn't ruin the Sleip/NH/Abso models and allows each hull to be used in different ways. With the Prophecy change and this we now have 0 Laser Chickens... who wants to live in a world with no Laser Chickens?!?!?
+1
If not new models then this works better for me than the proposed change. |
Naava Edios
404 File Not Found
Outlaw Horizon.
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 00:34:00 -
[270] - Quote
I'm sorry cant we just keep the Nighthawk as the Ferox hull. That drake looks ugly as *Insert what ever word or phrase of hate to Drake here*
Unless you plan on Fixing the model again to fit the 5 Launchers it has.... keep the Ferox.... Drake already has enough love "Navy Drake" they don't need any more love.
Much drake hate flows within me......
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |