| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
SaltyandSweet
SniggWaffe
WAFFLES.
51
   |
Posted - 2013.10.04 17:05:00 -
[301] - Quote
omfg please dont change the abso, it looks amazing. If anything change the damnation since it looks like ****.
Im So Baller I Buy Plex Cuz im too lazy to do PVE! |
Dredge Durst
Kiith Tremor
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 17:08:00 -
[302] - Quote
Why the heck should we play in hulls we got sick of? 1 year of drake just to sit in a... drake
the ferox hull atleast was new to missile users, and the myrmidon ? well.. maybe if they fix that horrible low polly tubes on the front -.-.
And srysly... there were sooo many awesome designs on the last deviant art contest.. just apply something fresh and menacing.
You can literally see the nervs of every eve player trobbing on their forhead in anticipation when they seen the new SOE ships.. just DOEEEET ! |
Juh Stice
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 17:26:00 -
[303] - Quote
No more motherfucking CAMO skin for matar please .... |
Jerick Ludhowe
Internet Tuff Guys
557
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 17:31:00 -
[304] - Quote
Ekaterina 'Ghetto' Thurn wrote:How adding a third type of Hurricane into the game in addition to the standard and fleet ones is beyond me. It would not in any way add 'variety' in terms of ship models to the game.
Well atm there are 3 cyclone models... So it's either 3 cyclones, or 3 cane models. As for "not adding variety" In terms of command ships it sure as **** adds variety. |
Hando Patel
The Notebook Fan Club
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 17:55:00 -
[305] - Quote
I was looking forward to getting into a Nighthawk so I didn't have to look at the ugly Drake model anymore. Why are you forcing me to choose between good heavy missile dps and looking cool? |
Matthew Charbonneaux
Coalescent Dynamics
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 17:56:00 -
[306] - Quote
Skins look decent. Sleipnir leaves some to be desired (like a bit of a change from the regular hull, add some sails, make more aggressive appearance. As is with the camo, it looks to close to the Fleet Issue)
Drake doesn't look bad, but again, changing up the model would be better. Granted, Black drake looks better than grey drake.
T2 Myrm looks sweet.
Abso looks decent enough.
Taking these are t2 hulls, it would be awsome to have new designs, based on the t1 varients, but significantly changed (like the SB to frigs), showing there was a rework to make them command ships.
But for now, this will do.
+1 |
Jason Redfort
State War Academy
Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 18:07:00 -
[307] - Quote
I dont know what you have in mind with that idea but i think you do it wrong. The t2 drake looks bad and as command ship  . Instead using the drake myrm cane harbi as command ships you should use them in a different role atm unknown role.
Because its then the 1st time that a tier 3 hull becomes a t2 variant and what next then? The Rohk hull as the widow?
If you really want a different looking command ship design a new one.
|
jwingender
Tar Valon Research and Development
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 18:36:00 -
[308] - Quote
I support this 100% and can't wait for the change.  |
Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
68
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 20:58:00 -
[309] - Quote
Seriously?!?
Did we really need more Drakes in this game? The Nighthawk at least offered a little variety in hull design for the Caldari missile pilot. Now it is reduced to just another flying space brick.
Oh, but this one has racing stripes!
Um, yeah, the first thought that went through my mind when I saw that shade of red on the hull was. "so now it's all rusted." And that's what it still looks like, a rusted out old shell, not interesting at all.
Either leave the Nighthawk as it is, or come up with something new and interesting. Don't just recycle the most boring missile ship in the game yet again.
Warde Guildencrantz wrote:the more i look at the nighthawk, the more i want you to keep it a ferox hull. the nighthawk was the "drake for people who hated how the drake looks". It's not fair to take this joy away from people.
This.
Why a switch on/off?
Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying.
In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless.
Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |
Kane Fenris
NWP
79
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 21:19:00 -
[310] - Quote
the only way youll ever get me to like this change is promising me the whole command ships get awesome altered models in a future patch somtime soon.
else ill hate you forever for changeing the sleipnir and the nighthawk |
Utremi Fasolasi
La Dolce Vita
279
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 22:25:00 -
[311] - Quote
DO WANT. ALL THE THINGS. |
Riscx
MatrixSphere
Fade 2 Black
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 00:24:00 -
[312] - Quote
I say umm noooo!
Reasons:
- This is not really needed.
- The names good Currently. This not go with the current naming seems of the other command ship counter part!
- This messes with t2 production now.
- Still disgruntled about name changes to the haulers.
|
sens1
Conditioned Response
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 00:51:00 -
[313] - Quote
I don't like these changes. |
Cselle
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 01:00:00 -
[314] - Quote
While I approve of mixing things up and adding variety and spice to the game, I unfortunately have a negative opinion on changing both the names and the models of these ships.
models:
interceptors, assault ships, recon cruisers, and command ships all currently follow the same pattern of paired ships with set color schemes. If you change command ships arbitrarily, do you plan to change all of the others too? It doesnt seem very practical to me.
I cant speak for all the races, but it seems like drakes and hurricanes are already very popular models, to the point of overuse. Practically, and unfortunately, the only time you will see a ferox model is as a command ship. I do like variations on the skins, but we just got the Navy Faction versions to play with if we want different skins.
*suggestions*
1: If you REALLY want to mix the pairs up, remember there is another battlecruiser set available that is only being with one skin: naga, talos, oracle, and tornado. why not reskin those? \
2: Do what was done with the stealth bombers, sleek new models based on the old ones.
3: If you really want to make t2 drakes, hurricanes etc. just add a new class of battlecruiser. there is currently only one t2 variation. maybe make marauder-equivalent battlecruisers? or even t3 strategic battlecruisers? do something BIG and CRAZY! These ideas definitely leave you room to make changes, add new art, and still respect the current designs.
Names:
No. Each Empire has nice naming schemes that match their ideologies, history, and personality. The current names are perfect for reflecting that. Throwing out the old names for no good reason, just to add generic faction names seems wrong to me. |
chaosgrimm
Universal Production and Networking Services
31
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 02:28:00 -
[315] - Quote
Hurricane + T2 =  |
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
768
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 02:37:00 -
[316] - Quote
Cselle wrote:Names:
No. Each Empire has nice naming schemes that match their ideologies, history, and personality. The current names are perfect for reflecting that. Throwing out the old names for no good reason, just to add generic faction names seems wrong to me.
The names aren't changing. The post is identifying the hull and corp whose color scheme is being chosen. |
SOL Ranger
SOL.
31
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 03:30:00 -
[317] - Quote
Been waiting for this a long time.
The next step is to give all BC/Command Ships large weapon systems. |
Aglais
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
404
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 05:07:00 -
[318] - Quote
SOL Ranger wrote:Been waiting for this a long time.
The next step is to give all BC/Command Ships large weapon systems.
No.
No no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no. |
SOL Ranger
SOL.
31
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 05:16:00 -
[319] - Quote
Aglais wrote:
No.
No no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no.
I must insist. |
Aglais
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
404
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 06:29:00 -
[320] - Quote
SOL Ranger wrote:Aglais wrote:
No.
No no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no.
I must insist.
You already have four battlecruisers that use large weapons! They're UTTERLY BROKEN and for the longest time, COMPLETELY PUT HACS OUT OF THE GAME FOR THE MOST PART. |
Arcin Hamir
Sigillum Militum Xpisti
Fatal Ascension
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 07:56:00 -
[321] - Quote
Please don't do this to the Nighthawk, the Drake model must be amongst the least immaginative and ugly thing in Eve. |
Solhild
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
1219
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 08:41:00 -
[322] - Quote
I agree with matching up the hulls so t1 turret hull -> t2 turret hull and t1 missile hull -> t2 missile hull.
I'm absolutely fine with the invention/manufacturing implications of the proposal.
All is really needed is a commitment to make adapted t2 models rather than basic re-skins, before Christmas would be fine.
Start with the Sleip(cane) as this seems to be the most controversial (Hound - Vargur inspired of course!).
|
Chonuss
Vetus Inmortales
Insidious Empire
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 10:33:00 -
[323] - Quote
I've been waiting for a T2 Myrmidon since starting out as a Gallente mission runner 4 years ago. |
Xilas Saissore
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 10:50:00 -
[324] - Quote
*sighs...
Yep... as always CCP has to screw something up in a expansion. There's always 1 thing.. seriously always 1. This takes the cake right here.
dumbest change EVER. |
non judgement
Without Fear
Flying Burning Ships Alliance
861
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 11:40:00 -
[325] - Quote
What's the go with blueprints?
A whole lot of bc bpc now will only be used to make one of the commandship, instead of the other.
I guess there will be a few people buying the other bc bpo and copying them now. |
Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
530
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 13:36:00 -
[326] - Quote
Fozzie.. any chance of changing the Vulture to Lai Dai or make ishukone paint scheme much more interesting half grey half light gold is a bit lame? ... pretty please
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name
AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
Petrov Kreigt
TunDraGon
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 14:35:00 -
[327] - Quote
Eos -> Myrm. That sounds awesome
The rest, not so much.
The new NH is just a black and red dinner tray. It's boring and unimaginative.
The Sleipnir is Iconic, it's the toilet brush of death. Leave it be.
The Abso forever should be known as the angry red turkey.
Just because something has been around for ages, doesn't mean it needs to change. Especially when its things like cosmetics. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Polarized.
1001
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 14:46:00 -
[328] - Quote
The amarr and caldari ships look great but the gal and min colour scheme doesn't stand out enough.
The art department made some bad decisions when they decided to change the gallente colour scheem. If the old one was still in place, we would have a cool looking white and gold eos but now we just have the same green/blue look of every gallente ship.
+1 |
CW Itovuo
The Executioners
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 15:33:00 -
[329] - Quote
Proposed idea is pointless, I fail to see any benefit.
It reminds me of the fool who decided to change the name of all the missiles. Then rename them. Then change the name to something else. Then rename them because the a proposed new name sounded cooler. Then realize that the name should be what they were originally, and change it back again. All the while, refusing to accept the best solution would be to simply call a thermal missile a..... thermal missile.
Proposed idea is pointless, I fail to see any benefit.
If the art department is trying to justify their existence, they need to work harder. Create something new. Don't repackage/rename something old, that's just plain lazy. |
Niko Lorenzio
United Eve Directorate
269
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 15:48:00 -
[330] - Quote
Very good move. I strongly approve. I'm guessing you will simply switch the models on the T2 BPOs for those ships as well then? |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |