Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 61 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 35 post(s) |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
75
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 08:32:00 -
[901] - Quote
Guys just give up.
SOMERblink is the EVE golden child now, CCP doesnt want all these attacks against them.
They are keeping their hundreds of billions of ships, the vegas thing is still happening, and the RMT exception is standing they dont need to give a reason for it.
Stop being so jelous. Just go play Star Citizen https://robertsspaceindustries.com/about-the-game if you don't like it.
PS
I am officially giving up. Going to just lapse my remaining account and play star craft or league of legends until star citizen is up and running.
Adios |

Frying Doom
2633
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 08:35:00 -
[902] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:Guys just give up. SOMERblink is the EVE golden child now, CCP doesnt want all these attacks against them. They are keeping their hundreds of billions of ships, and the vegas thing is still happening. Stop being so jelous. Just go play Star Citizen https://robertsspaceindustries.com/about-the-game if you don't like it. PS I am officially giving up. Going to just lapse my remaining account and play star craft or league of legends until star citizen is up and running. Adios Some of us are already convincing our wives why we need a TrakIR and a HOTAS Warthog to go with our Star Citizen account for the dog fighting module.  Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2499
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 09:48:00 -
[903] - Quote
Star Citizen and X Rebirth, oh my
shame about EVE though
Tell the bean counters to thank Navigator and Guard for lapsing subs |

sally Deninard
mss industry
64
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 10:04:00 -
[904] - Quote
I`m giving up, I`ve had one question to ask throughout this whole debacle and nobody has been able to answer it. I haven`t been repeatidly yelling and shiptoasting like a child, I`ve just asked... in various threads... that get locked....just like this one will. The CSM had recognised there were problems with the draw before it went ahead and listed them HERE before the draw happened. In the post they had brought to CCP`s attention that not everyone could compete in the SOMER draw and that was a problem. CCP ignored them and continued anyway.
My question is why CCP did you ignore the CSM and let a skewed lottery go ahead? It`s an easy question ....
Frankly from my point of view is unable to regulate itself, even with the tools to do so and that is why i`m offski 07. It undermines even the work that themselves and the CSM are doing right now and makes a mockery of the CSM process.
To any of the CSM..
What makes you think that CCP will listen to you and the playerbase when a situation blows up again
And stop spamming my inbox with re-subscription reminders CCP ffs... it`s just desperate. |

Tina Tin Tits
Bourbon.
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 10:50:00 -
[905] - Quote
If you are currently considering whether to leave, you might want to switch any accounts that are due for renewal soon to one month to minimise the expense of getting out.... |

Epikurus
The Mjolnir Bloc
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 11:04:00 -
[906] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Frying, the point is that Quote:Grey areas on the survey as in should gifts be given to for profit sites for prizes. The answer is NO, see no grey at all. YOU not seeing grey areas is a factor of your perspective, others see things differently and therein lies the shadowy boundary rules. The grey. m
The fact that an individual is unable or unwilling to grasp perfectly well-defined boundaries does not mean there is any kind of grey area. You are mistaking stupidity for complexity. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3134
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 11:23:00 -
[907] - Quote
sally Deninard wrote:What makes you think that CCP will listen to you and the playerbase when a situation blows up again? It is my experience that:
a) CCP listens to CSM after the sh*t hits the fan.
b) CCP listens to CSM when they brief us in advance about something and we say "that is a lump of sh*t approaching a fan". Note that in this case, you probably never hear about the situation.
These situations occur when:
c) CCP doesn't tell us something, so we don't get to smell-test approaching potential turds on fan-intersecting trajectories. (ie: the SOMER lottery)
d) Something just isn't on anyone's radar, until something else brings it to community awareness. (ie: the SOMER lottery sparking discussion of GTC-seller business practices).
The one thing that is entirely predictable is that no matter what, CSM will get sh*t on. (potential future candidates, take note!)
WRT to the politician analogy made a few posts back, keep in mind that CCP isn't a politician, CCP is the King. The King gets to set the rules, and if the King decides to change the rules, he does so by divine right.
CSM gets to tell the King, "Your Majesty, we believe what you are doing is bad for the Kingdom." Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |

Frying Doom
2638
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 11:32:00 -
[908] - Quote
and the citizens get to either try and assassinate the king or flee the kingdom. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Din Chao
404
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 11:32:00 -
[909] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:* This issue is not going to be resolved quickly. The problem was a long time in the making, and it will be months in the resolution, if for no other reason than there are significant legal issues CCP has to take into consideration. Furthermore, a quick resolution is unlikely to be one you will like.
Sorry if CCP's legal department is so incompetent that it takes them months to work out a problem that should have been considered years ago. But that doesn't mean I have to continue paying them while they find their collective asses. That's not rage, BTW, it's simple personal finance. If I'm unhappy with a product, I'm not going to continue to buy it for a yet to be determined number of months in the hope that it will improve. I'll stop buying it, and only buy it if it improves.
So again, that's one less dissenting opinion for your eventual, redundant survey. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
153
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 11:40:00 -
[910] - Quote
Din Chao wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:* This issue is not going to be resolved quickly. The problem was a long time in the making, and it will be months in the resolution, if for no other reason than there are significant legal issues CCP has to take into consideration. Furthermore, a quick resolution is unlikely to be one you will like.
Sorry if CCP's legal department is so incompetent that it takes them months to work out a problem that should have been considered years ago. But that doesn't mean I have to continue paying them while they find their collective asses. That's not rage, BTW, it's simple personal finance. If I'm unhappy with a product, I'm not going to continue to buy it for a yet to be determined number of months in the hope that it will improve. I'll stop buying it, and only buy it if it improves. So again, that's one less dissenting opinion for your eventual, redundant survey. Not Empty Quoting
seems CCP is committed to these 'special relationship's and gift giving, which is why they need their lawyers to do the legalese involved with sponsoring a casino. they also expect us to be mollified by what is likely to be a survey that doesn't explain the root of the issue and only offers questions that will lead to answers they want. we are also expected to wait months for this issue before it 'maybe' is resolved. please correct me where i'm wrong. |

sally Deninard
mss industry
68
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 11:47:00 -
[911] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:sally Deninard wrote:What makes you think that CCP will listen to you and the playerbase when a situation blows up again? It is my experience that: a) CCP listens to CSM after the sh*t hits the fan. b) CCP listens to CSM when they brief us in advance about something and we say "that is a lump of sh*t approaching a fan". Note that in this case, you probably never hear about the situation."
No offence but everyone including the CSM briefed CCP well in advance about the huge torrent of sh*t that was approaching. They responded with a big f*ck you and f*ck the CSM (here are some better prizes SOMER btw)
So it`s fair to say that any future agreements and negotiations are just going to be a joke to CCP when it suits. This is the real problem that everyone misses in this whole sh*tstorm, the fact the whole process is a sham. |

Frying Doom
2640
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 12:22:00 -
[912] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:CCP is the King. The King gets to set the rules, and if the King decides to change the rules, he does so by divine right. On further reflection why does this phrase make me feel like a massive F U is on the way to the playerbase?
I get the feeling they are going to say Somer and the like are allowed to RMT or that they will just give gifts as they want.
Why do I also get the feeling the king is also starting an experiment on poverty. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4412
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 12:31:00 -
[913] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: The one thing that is entirely predictable is that no matter what, CSM will get sh*t on. (potential future candidates, take note!)
WRT to the politician analogy made a few posts back, keep in mind that CCP isn't a politician, CCP is the King. The King gets to set the rules, and if the King decides to change the rules, he does so by divine right.
CSM gets to tell the King, "Your Majesty, we believe what you are doing is bad for the Kingdom."
1) The second and third sentences tell in a nutshell why CSM is a weak approach. It's a lot better than zero, but you guys get bypassed at whim, because CSM not only lacks of "veto" powers but also lacks of simple "visibility on everything" powers. Thus flying dogpiles can happily go for the fan without you being shown them.
2) The first sentence, is not just because of players prejudices or malice.
A real CSM member who cares would be a bit more vocal and a bit less "let's do a poll to see if breaking the law is OK or not".
It's a metter of common sense. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Sean DT
Revered Mining Corp
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 12:42:00 -
[914] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Gentlepods,
Since people have taken it upon themselves to deliver some "realtalk", you will forgive me if I take the opportunity to do the same.
Participants in this thread should be aware that:
* This issue is not going to be resolved quickly. The problem was a long time in the making, and it will be months in the resolution, if for no other reason than there are significant legal issues CCP has to take into consideration. Furthermore, a quick resolution is unlikely to be one you will like.
* Raging and repeating your position at every opportunity is not constructive, and actively hurts your argument. All it does is sh*t up the thread, and drown out other voices. If you want to be taken seriously, you want to encourage broad discussion. Threads that have a high percentage of posts by a small number of posters are not taken seriously by anyone.
* The reason for the surveys -- both CSMs and CCPs -- is to gather more data from more members of the community. CSM needs that data in order to make the best possible arguments on your behalf; "the data says" is a better argument than "the opinion of my ass is".
I understand that people are upset. I am upset too -- my personal position is very similar to that of Argus Sorn. But giving in to your anger will not get you a good result; it just makes it easier to avoid addressing the merits of your arguments.
Best Trebor
I just don't get the idea of the survey. I understand what you write about getting data, but the whole idea and concept of the CSM is that the CSM should function as a soundingboard for the community that elected them. They represent the community and should have both enough confidence, legitimacy, and feeling with the community to be taken seriously by CCP when voicing their opinions without needing to send out surveys. The survey is more or less useless for several reason:
1. A survey result is only as good as its interpretation and many questions can be interpreted differently both by the survey maker (CSM/CCP) and by the players answering the question.
2. If you need a suvey now when does it stop? Does the CSM then need a player-base-wide survey every time they have to deal with the CCP? Isn't the point of us electing you that we trust in your judgement without having to do large surveys every time an issue arises? The CSM are in the CSM council to be the voice of the players. If we disagree with your judgement we can elect new representatives in the future.
3. You have 40+ pages in this thread, granted with quit a bit of repetitive opinions, some hysteria/rage, but ultimately with a clear indication of the problem at hand and suggestions for its solution by many many different voices, not just a few repeaters. I as a normal player have read through the majority of this entire stack of posts and the least I expect from the CSM is that they do that too even if it isn't much fun. Grab a cold beer, bring in a box of cookies, and start reading. Make sure you take a pee break and have a smoke, then come back. Use a pen and a paper to note down the key points of the most interesting posts (there are several in between). Now you don't need the survey.
4. A lot of people are not going to answer a survey, it will get lost in the mail. do people with 10+ account's answers get more weight in the result, people's first language is not english, some don't even speak it, people misunderstand the question because they don't know the background for it and thus answers differently than they otherwise would, not everyone in a space game are old or mature enough that you necessarily want to base important game management decisions on their answers, etc etc etc. A survey is a bad idea and the CSM function is exactly the opposite, so that CCP doesn't have to bother us all with surveys since they have you whom we have elected.
Good luck ! :)  |

DarkDecay
The Scope Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 12:46:00 -
[915] - Quote
If you missed it then check out this thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287241
This post in it is pretty important: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3747593#post3747593 |

The Legendary Soldier
Interworld Venom
253
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 12:56:00 -
[916] - Quote
Sean DT wrote:[quote=Trebor Daehdoow]Gentlepods,
3. You have 40+ pages in this thread, granted with quit a bit of repetitive opinions, some hysteria/rage, but ultimately with a clear indication of the problem at hand and suggestions for its solution by many many different voices, not just a few repeaters. I as a normal player have read through the majority of this entire stack of posts and the least I expect from the CSM is that they do that too even if it isn't much fun. Grab a cold beer, bring in a box of cookies, and start reading. Make sure you take a pee break and have a smoke, then come back. Use a pen and a paper to note down the key points of the most interesting posts (there are several in between). Now you don't need the survey.
True. But they are not giving the answers CCP wants.
In a survey you can influence answers by the way you phrase questions.
Something marketeers and politicians have known for a long time. Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
155
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 13:27:00 -
[917] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote: But they are not giving the answers CCP wants.
In a survey you can influence answers by the way you phrase questions.
Something marketeers and politicians have known for a long time.
we are dealing with marketeers and politicians here, and it is pretty easy to see what they're doing. it's a good thing Eve has a generally older / more mature audience, because a lot of us can see through the wool they're trying to pull over our eyes. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
225
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 13:36:00 -
[918] - Quote
ATTN CCP GUARD
raven666wings wrote: Aknowledging the use of isk tokens to reward the GTC referrals in Somer Blink, EVE-GAMES.NET and other websites, CCP has apparently allowed everyone to set up their own GTC resale referral system+isk token reward. Official confirmation from CCP on this would be nice before we proceed so that we not risk getting accounts banned for misunderstandings.
PLZ CONFIRM THIS FOR US |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
225
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 13:41:00 -
[919] - Quote
Hey CSM dudes, you wanna be helpful here to the community? Plz tell your godfathers to come down and make a statement to confirm that we can engage in the same conduct as Somer Blink, Eve-Games.net and other websites out there rewarding isk for GTC referals. Let's get this over it. Feel free to send me a poll asking if I like babanas, watermellons or pineapples too. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3135
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 13:52:00 -
[920] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:A real CSM member who cares would be a bit more vocal and a bit less "let's do a poll to see if breaking the law is OK or not".
It's a matter of common sense. If I had an ISK for every time someone's told me what a "real CSM" would do, I'd be richer than SOMER.  Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
227
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 14:01:00 -
[921] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:If I had an ISK for every time someone's told me what a "real CSM" would do, I'd be richer than SOMER. 
Would CCP be profiting from that? Would other CSM members be allowed to do the same? If not you may wanna call it a Grey Area.
PS- Grow a pair and either tell people you allow the same behaviour for all or are only favoring a few. Everybody knows the only grey area here is between the white of an empty CCP wallet and the black of a full one. |

Frying Doom
2642
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 14:07:00 -
[922] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:A real CSM member who cares would be a bit more vocal and a bit less "let's do a poll to see if breaking the law is OK or not".
It's a matter of common sense. If I had an ISK for every time someone's told me what a "real CSM" would do, I'd be richer than SOMER.  And you wouldn't even have to RMT like Somer to get there. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

AayJay Crendraven
Dakka Unlimited
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 14:27:00 -
[923] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:A real CSM member who cares would be a bit more vocal and a bit less "let's do a poll to see if breaking the law is OK or not".
It's a matter of common sense. If I had an ISK for every time someone's told me what a "real CSM" would do, I'd be richer than SOMER. 
Then why dont you ******* do your job and get CCP to fix the problem instead of playing mommy's boy and telling us to not get angry? |

Din Chao
408
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 14:36:00 -
[924] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:A real CSM member who cares would be a bit more vocal and a bit less "let's do a poll to see if breaking the law is OK or not".
It's a matter of common sense. If I had an ISK for every time someone's told me what a "real CSM" would do, I'd be richer than SOMER.  So, in your words, you've been told TRILLIONS of times by the community that you do a poor job representing the community, but prefer to ignore these criticisms from the community because that would mean you'd have to start representing that community.
Got it, thank you for your service. |

RAW23
284
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:08:00 -
[925] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:A real CSM member who cares would be a bit more vocal and a bit less "let's do a poll to see if breaking the law is OK or not".
It's a matter of common sense. If I had an ISK for every time someone's told me what a "real CSM" would do, I'd be richer than SOMER. 
Can you explain how you reconcile your stance of two weeks ago, stating that you, and the CSM more generally, owe no duty of consultation to the player-base because you were elected as representatives to give your own views on their behalf, with your current unwillingness to take a position, instead supporting the rather ludicrous idea of a consultative, but thoroughly unscientific, survey 'to find out what the player-base wants'?
Also, no, you would have a few hundred thousand isk max  There are two types of EVE player:
those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not. |

adarma
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
17
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:08:00 -
[926] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Kate stark wrote:discussing the issue and suggesting alternatives is a bad idea; shut up and let's pretend this never happened No, that is a bad idea, Kate. We should discuss the issue without resorting to repetition, misquoting or over the top arguments. The issue does need fixing and we are working on that fix. Putting words in our mouths to inflame and troll isn't the way to progress. Threats to leave and unsubscribe make some sense as hitting a company where it lives is effective but if you are leaving then you shouldn't have a lot of say in what those of us staying behind live with for rules. I understand that some of you are angry . . . good. It shows you really care about this game. Otherwise your reaction would be 'meh, whatever'. But harness that anger. Apply it in a focused way rather than spinning on the floor kicking and yelling 'but I want it my way' over and over. Some of you are doing this and I appreciate the effort whether I agree with them or not. To put down what you want in simple statements without all the emotional baggage is hard, I get that. (I have kids) BUT THAT is what helps us move forward. That is what makes people read and think and consider change. Nobody asked you to shut up, just to pause, take a breath and present your arguments in calm rational way without all the repetition. I know that goes directly against the rules of threadnaughts but ti will work far better in the long run. As for me, my biggest fear is that if things become black and white we may lose a LOT of the community support for other sites, other people who have done so much for the game but may wind up on the wrong side of some line drawn in ink. It is why I like the grey. Sure, Eve players being who they are will dance in the grey areas to find where the line actually is and that is their right. But I really really do not want to see some babies thrown out with the bathwater. So making a snap decision and drawing hard and fast rules . . . well look over at the TOS thread and see how much that form of handling problems has worked out. So we listen to you, or try to. We talk to CCP and try to find what was done and why, what will happen next and make a format for the future that will address the current issues. m
This is a surprisingly mature post. Thanks. However our answer is a definite no... No we don't want any "grey" anymore. We want it black and white, with lines clearly drawn and pretty visible when anyone attempts to play a dirt game. It is mostly so when it comes to most matters in game, it should be so with CCP's other dealings as well. I understand that some people in the grey with white intentions might have losses. But then this is where a hard choice comes in, which CCP seems very very clearly delaying. It is a choice between us and the white in grey.
The consciense of the gaming community is deeply wounded and every week that passes by, more and more of the good intentions are dying. Please, as CSM, encourage CCP as hard as you can to make that choice and draw the lines ASAP. I understand that this involves a lot of intricacies and complications, but it is not rocket science either. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1453
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:12:00 -
[927] - Quote
It would be helpful if someone from Some Blink posted a defence of their activities, in particular the charge that they are involved in RMT. This is not a signature. |

Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
368
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:15:00 -
[928] - Quote
*continues reading this thread.
Now I remember why I have skipped voting for any CSM members these past few years... |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
228
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:30:00 -
[929] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: The one thing that is entirely predictable is that no matter what, CSM will get sh*t on. (potential future candidates, take note!)
News at 11.
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: WRT to the politician analogy made a few posts back, keep in mind that CCP isn't a politician, CCP is the King. The King gets to set the rules, and if the King decides to change the rules, he does so by divine right.
CSM gets to tell the King, "Your Majesty, we believe what you are doing is bad for the Kingdom."
And we as the commoners get to tell the King "You can get f*cked" while we unsub our accounts if we don't like the way he's ruling the kingdom (pretty much what you should be doing too instead of kissing his ass). |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4417
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:30:00 -
[930] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:A real CSM member who cares would be a bit more vocal and a bit less "let's do a poll to see if breaking the law is OK or not".
It's a matter of common sense. If I had an ISK for every time someone's told me what a "real CSM" would do, I'd be richer than SOMER. 
Don't try playing the "I have been forced into being a politician" card with me. It does not work.
If you joined the CSM is because you felt like you could do something and you knew that people would hold you accountable for what you do, say and also don't say or not do. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 61 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |