Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 30 40 .. 40 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Kinvaryn
Deep Space Exploration and Industrial
9
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 18:28:00 -
[511] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Jenn aSide wrote: Why do these WiS people feel the need to lobby for something even after the developers say "we're just not doing that right now"?
I'll take a shot at an answer for that. There are a lot of people in this game that were sold on the idea put forward by CCP that the future of this game is as an all encompassing science fiction simulator. They were so enamored by the idea and feel so passionate about it that they will not let it die. I can't blame them. It's a great concept. Mr Epeen
I was about to write that up, myself. When I first encounter EvE, it was not advertised as "spaceships in space making pretty lights and then you're in the cloner" This was in 2007, around then a healthy discussion on "ambulation" and WiS content was already under way, as it was understood that a singular focus on internet spaceships was a very limited goal. This fact has not changed, only the argument has.
Any time I suggest EvE to someone, they either accept, or ask "isn't eve that stupid game where you're a spaceship and you really can't do anything aside from be a spaceship?" To which I (now) answer "oh, yeah." I now add: "You can get out of your spaceship and stare at it from a platform now, though." Funnily enough, the first group, those who accept the invitation, typically spend about 20minutes to an hour in their spaceship before asking "So what can I do, you know, out of my spaceship"
I love EvE. No other game has fulfilled this sandboxy game play desire I've had quite as well as EvE. Others have tried, but they fail either by pushing grind or not delivering on the sandbox.
WiS content is a true expansion in the EvE universe and what it contains. It can be tied in to any activity existing in the universe currently, and many that aren't. I see the current status of EvE as a platform. A foundation for vastly improved and expanded game play. This strange, backwards push to begin limiting the expansion of content is baffling to me.
|
Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition
667
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 18:28:00 -
[512] - Quote
Michael Turate wrote:Eve is in great shape. Relations between the company and the players are in great shape. The company is working hard and innovatively on content that the bulk of the player base want to see implemented or polished. The future is very bright for spaceships and that future should not and hopefully will not, include walking in stations or anything like it. Trawling this stuff up is just an exercise in futility. Play the game you want to play, that game is probably not Eve Online.
The strength of the current position has been achieved by identifying and building on core strengths, those strengths are CCP's brilliant skill with spaceships and the players themselves. WIS brought only discord, disagreement and disunity - it weakened the game, it weakened the cohesion of the brand and the threatened to dilute the purity of the ideal. It was a bad idea with no sound foundation. You cannot build anything without a sound foundation, the house will just collapse. The Eve house may be an old one but it has the most solid of foundations and it is unequivocally loved by the people that choose live in it. It will house us and support the people that built it and continue to maintain it for many years to come.
so WIS will kill EVE.... ROFL... Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction... |
Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
3602
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 18:30:00 -
[513] - Quote
TBH you should just block Jenn. He literally repeats the same thing thinking it makes him right. It's always 1) Go play another game. 2) Eve is spaceships only. 3) You're acting entitled and are therefore irrelevant.
This is literally all he posts. He doesn't get the passion of the playerbase who like the idea od WiS and will just **** talk all day. Trust me, block him.
|
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
3618
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 18:32:00 -
[514] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Jenn aSide wrote: Why do these WiS people feel the need to lobby for something even after the developers say "we're just not doing that right now"?
I'll take a shot at an answer for that. There are a lot of people in this game that were sold on the idea put forward by CCP that the future of this game is as an all encompassing science fiction simulator. They were so enamored by the idea and feel so passionate about it that they will not let it die. I can't blame them. It's a great concept. Mr Epeen The same company said we've be flying in atmosphere too. Where are the FiA fanatics? And why stick around for a game where the makers said it was going to be some kind of "all encompassing science fiction simulator" but failed to deliver when there are ACTUAL games like that that they could be playing. The fact is, the WiS crowd (by continuing to pay their subs in some way) are paying CCP to ignore them lol. Being a little black and white, aren't you? It's not WIS or nothing for most people. It's that it would be a great addition to the game they already love. Mr Epeen
It's not a black or white position. If CCP thought they could add substantial avatar gameplay that would enhance EVE Online and do so with their current resources, I think they would, and i wouldn't care much (CCP owns EVE, i don't, it's their money to spend).
But the reality is that CCP is too small to do this, EVE is it's bread and butter and Flying in space is EVE's bread and butter. As a customer I prefer a focused effort on what's important (spaceships and the universe they fly, fight, trade and die in) rather than more ham-fisted attempts to "expand" and thus attract more subs via people coming into the game who aren't particularly fond of THE core, bedrock aspect of EVE online (spaceships).
Let CCP do DUST and Valkyrie and WoD for those other things, but also let EVE be EVE. The Kind of Wis stuff the WiS crowd envisions makes as much sense as Light Sabres in Star Trek Online. |
Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition
667
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 18:35:00 -
[515] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Jenn aSide wrote: Why do these WiS people feel the need to lobby for something even after the developers say "we're just not doing that right now"?
I'll take a shot at an answer for that. There are a lot of people in this game that were sold on the idea put forward by CCP that the future of this game is as an all encompassing science fiction simulator. They were so enamored by the idea and feel so passionate about it that they will not let it die. I can't blame them. It's a great concept. Mr Epeen The same company said we've be flying in atmosphere too. Where are the FiA fanatics? And why stick around for a game where the makers said it was going to be some kind of "all encompassing science fiction simulator" but failed to deliver when there are ACTUAL games like that that they could be playing. The fact is, the WiS crowd (by continuing to pay their subs in some way) are paying CCP to ignore them lol.
Oh yes, I want FIA too. I am in the FIA crowd. I want to hear a sonic boom when I go fast and see my enemies die in a fire that lights up the entire horizon.
Seriously it will be great and is another thing that I don't understand why it hasn't been added to the game. It's spaceship content, an outpost on a planet's surface is no different in principle to one in orbit as far as the game engine is concerned, so why isn't it here already? Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction... |
Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
360
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 18:36:00 -
[516] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:CCP is concentrating on Flying space ships in
CCP is doing nothing of the sort. They're 'concentrating' on new games. I don't know if you've noticed this, but actual 'new content' has been barely a trickle in the last few expansions.
We got two new ships! (And might get a 3rd one if they can figure out wtf they're doing with it) and three deployables. And a new login screen. and some new loot tables that include bpcs for things that already spawn in game, but had no bps on the market.
And some fixes for stuff they screwed up previously, or left out from previous expansions.
Woo! So much Space Content!
Unless your thread is limited to how 'awesum!' Eve Online is, ISD will lock the thread.-á You will find it is particularly common if CCP might have to make a public response to the thread subject, as opposed to bury it in the GM que for the forseeable future and then prohibit telling anyone what the GM said, if it's ever answered at all. |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
3619
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 18:38:00 -
[517] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Jenn aSide wrote: Why do these WiS people feel the need to lobby for something even after the developers say "we're just not doing that right now"?
I'll take a shot at an answer for that. There are a lot of people in this game that were sold on the idea put forward by CCP that the future of this game is as an all encompassing science fiction simulator. They were so enamored by the idea and feel so passionate about it that they will not let it die. I can't blame them. It's a great concept. Mr Epeen The same company said we've be flying in atmosphere too. Where are the FiA fanatics? And why stick around for a game where the makers said it was going to be some kind of "all encompassing science fiction simulator" but failed to deliver when there are ACTUAL games like that that they could be playing. The fact is, the WiS crowd (by continuing to pay their subs in some way) are paying CCP to ignore them lol. Oh yes, I want FIA too. I am in the FIA crowd. I want to hear a sonic boom when I go fast and see my enemies die in a fire that lights up the entire horizon. Seriously it will be great and is another thing that I don't understand why it hasn't been added to the game. It's spaceship content, an outpost on a planet's surface is no different in principle to one in orbit as far as the game engine is concerned, so why isn't it here already?
Because it's too much for a small studio with ONE money making product (EVE Online) to do without detracting for the core aspects of the game (space ships that fly in space). This small company has learned a harsh lesson in the past about trying to do to much,, and now they take the more sensible path of understanding on which side their bread is buttered (the EVE side lol).
|
Kinvaryn
Deep Space Exploration and Industrial
9
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 18:39:00 -
[518] - Quote
A solution, since the two sides of the argument cannot meet in agreement: > Let's branch development, "Internet Spaecchips" can have a small team producing new paint jobs on your pretty spaceships and giving them a "role title" and changing existing function every once in a while. > The rest of the company should branch development to continue this harsh, space based sci fi simulation game known as EvE, without the clutter of limited thought and scope.
The only thing that is a constant between the posts of naysayers towards WiS is fear. Fear of not being able to lay claim to anyone at any time regardless of the protective measures taken to mitigate the risk towards such a claim.
Remember, now. Fear is the mind killer. Don't be so afraid of a singular branch of game play that you completely miss the creative force of potential that is the EvE Online universe.
|
Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
360
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 18:40:00 -
[519] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote: The Kind of Wis stuff the WiS crowd envisions makes as much sense as Light Sabres in Star Trek Online.
http://sto.gamepedia.com/Tholian_Crystalline_Sword
You were saying?
Unless your thread is limited to how 'awesum!' Eve Online is, ISD will lock the thread.-á You will find it is particularly common if CCP might have to make a public response to the thread subject, as opposed to bury it in the GM que for the forseeable future and then prohibit telling anyone what the GM said, if it's ever answered at all. |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
3619
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 18:49:00 -
[520] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:CCP is concentrating on Flying space ships in
CCP is doing nothing of the sort. They're 'concentrating' on new games. I don't know if you've noticed this, but actual 'new content' has been barely a trickle in the last few expansions. We got two new ships! (And might get a 3rd one if they can figure out wtf they're doing with it) and three deployables. And a new login screen. and some new loot tables that include bpcs for things that already spawn in game, but had no bps on the market. And some fixes for stuff they screwed up previously, or left out from previous expansions. Woo! So much Space Content!
This is a very good post in that it demonstrates the thing at the core of the WiS movement. Inability to appreciate the current EVE Online.
Rubicon is an excellent example, Few expansions gave me personally any content with which to play at all (i didn't complain, as i was already happy with EVE). THIS one blew my mind, it's changes so much about how I (as an explorer) do things. If all Rubicon did was add the mobile Depot it would have still be the single best expansion I've ever been a part of (being about to switch to defensive equipment before leaving a system where I just finished a plex has already saved my machariel FOUR times).
i think some people are kind of spolied, or they've played so long the game seems stale to them and they want something new. That's all personal problems, not a problem the game has to solve by constantly giving you more of what you think of is new content.
I made a comment in the "information portal" section a few weeks ago that seems apt here. CCP are saints because nothing they do is right. The community says "dump the jesus features and fix the small things". They fix the small things and everyone wants jesus features because rubicon is just a patch not an expansion.
The community says "damn it, it's a spaceship game, screw walking around and crap". CCP responds be refocusing on spaceships and people start yelling "hey, were's my WiS" lol. As soon as CCP responds to the "threadnaughts" about local and afk cloaking, the community will demand to know why they weren't consulted before CCP axes local and afk cloaking lol.
CCP literally can't win for losing
|
|
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
3619
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 18:51:00 -
[521] - Quote
Do not even mention that abomination., George Lucas' lawsuit should have never been thrown out. |
Stitcher
Alexylva Paradox
2632
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 18:59:00 -
[522] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote: The Kind of Wis stuff the WiS crowd envisions makes as much sense as Light Sabres in Star Trek Online.
Which bit of the corporate espionage, smuggling, general skullduggery and "we want it to be EVE online... but on foot" are you struggling with here? Seriously. How is it hard to grasp that we're asking for it to be thematically and mechanically EVE all the way? An in-character blog and a video: http://verinsjournal.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu1mbsgo738
|
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
3619
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 19:00:00 -
[523] - Quote
Stitcher wrote:Jenn aSide wrote: The Kind of Wis stuff the WiS crowd envisions makes as much sense as Light Sabres in Star Trek Online. Which bit of the corporate espionage, smuggling, general skullduggery and "we want it to be EVE online... but on foot" are you struggling with here? Seriously. How is it hard to grasp that we're asking for it to be thematically and mechanically EVE all the way?
The part where CCP said no (at least for now)...... |
Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
3603
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 19:03:00 -
[524] - Quote
Or you guys can ignore me and keep feeding the troll. vOv
|
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
3619
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 19:05:00 -
[525] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Or you guys can ignore me and keep feeding the troll. vOv
anslo being ignored? That's never happened before.
Sorry, you can't silence the truth bro.
|
Anna Karhunen
Inoue INEXP
198
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 19:05:00 -
[526] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Or you guys can ignore me and keep feeding the troll. vOv I haven't ignored you. Troll is blocked. As my old maths teacher used to say: "Statistics are like bikinis: It's what they don't show that's interesting". -CCP Aporia |
Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition
669
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 19:09:00 -
[527] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:CCP is concentrating on Flying space ships in
CCP is doing nothing of the sort. They're 'concentrating' on new games. I don't know if you've noticed this, but actual 'new content' has been barely a trickle in the last few expansions. We got two new ships! (And might get a 3rd one if they can figure out wtf they're doing with it) and three deployables. And a new login screen. and some new loot tables that include bpcs for things that already spawn in game, but had no bps on the market. And some fixes for stuff they screwed up previously, or left out from previous expansions. Woo! So much Space Content! This is a very good post in that it demonstrates the thing at the core of the WiS movement. Inability to appreciate the current EVE Online. Rubicon is an excellent example, Few expansions gave me personally any content with which to play at all (i didn't complain, as i was already happy with EVE). THIS one blew my mind, it's changes so much about how I (as an explorer) do things. If all Rubicon did was add the mobile Depot it would have still be the single best expansion I've ever been a part of (being about to switch to defensive equipment before leaving a system where I just finished a plex has already saved my machariel FOUR times). i think some people are kind of spolied, or they've played so long the game seems stale to them and they want something new. That's all personal problems, not a problem the game has to solve by constantly giving you more of what you think of is new content. I made a comment in the "information portal" section a few weeks ago that seems apt here. CCP are saints because nothing they do is right. The community says "dump the jesus features and fix the small things". They fix the small things and everyone wants jesus features because rubicon is just a patch not an expansion. The community says "damn it, it's a spaceship game, screw walking around and crap". CCP responds be refocusing on spaceships and people start yelling "hey, were's my WiS" lol. As soon as CCP responds to the "threadnaughts" about local and afk cloaking, the community will demand to know why they weren't consulted before CCP axes local and afk cloaking lol. CCP literally can't win for losing
I don't agree with your position on WIS but that is a very good post. CCP are talented and have a tough time given the nature of the community they've got. I for one am grateful for all of the work they do on EVE but would like to see a start on WIS with a few small gameplay improvements to the CQ such as station D-scan. Actually it would satisfy me if they just built a PC version of dust that would start from the EVE login screen giving us the option of a 4th character slot for a dust bunnie which then loads the Dust client (maybe an optional client). That last idea would probably do more to integrate the dust/eve communities and probably save dust from dying out than anything else out there. Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction... |
Naydra Adni
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
71
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 19:16:00 -
[528] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Little Dragon Khamez wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:[quote=Ramona McCandless]
That's been my entire point for the last couple of years lol. Why not just play STO or SWTOR or whatever Why do these WiS people demand EVE include something that it historically hasn't had when other games do have it?
o/ Jen. Historically Eve didn't have wormholes at one time, so why did CCP bother to add them, what about bloodlines, what about T2 stuff, they were all new additions to Eve at one time or another why single out WIS, it's been added to eve with the CQ how is it different in principle to adding advanced skills and auto cloaking when jumping through a gate (Castor Expansion). We didn't have POS's until the exodus expansion. If CCP took that attitude you'd never have another expansion again, they would just shrug and say 'what's the point? There's no point developing this it's fine Those are space things. Space games should add space things. We're talking about walking around, which you can do in real life ...and other games.
so.. space stations aren't in space? interesting |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
3619
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 19:20:00 -
[529] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:[ I don't agree with your position on WIS but that is a very good post. CCP are talented and have a tough time given the nature of the community they've got. I for one am grateful for all of the work they do on EVE but would like to see a start on WIS with a few small gameplay improvements to the CQ such as station D-scan.
The problem with "Station D-scan" is that it allows a single player to gain information about space without even the slightest risk. As it is now, you have to undock to see outside, which (out side of high sec or inside High Sec during a wardec) means you have to pick your station carefully, because some of them are kick outs.
Any game play addition that takes away an element of "I need to think 1st" is a bad addition.
Quote: Actually it would satisfy me if they just built a PC version of dust that would start from the EVE login screen giving us the option of a 4th character slot for a dust bunnie which then loads the Dust client (maybe an optional client). That last idea would probably do more to integrate the dust/eve communities and probably save dust from dying out than anything else out there.
I think of that the same as I do WiS, it detracts from EVE because those players who might otherwise be in space creating content in a space focused game (or otherwise doing something that might make a real difference like scamming in local or playing the market) might instead (now because they don't have to buy a ps3 to do it) be playing Dust (a see-saw FPs game).
I don't see a lot of this in other games I play. I have yet to see a thread on a World of Tanks board saying "man, tanks are great but what I really want to see is the addition of GMiG (greasy mechanics in the Garage) so i can really get immersed in this tank game by playing the guy who changes the oil LOL. |
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Pirate Nation.
197
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 19:21:00 -
[530] - Quote
Anslo wrote:TBH you should just block Jenn. He literally repeats the same thing thinking it makes him right. It's always 1) Go play another game. 2) Eve is spaceships only. 3) You're acting entitled and are therefore irrelevant.
This is literally all he posts. He doesn't get the passion of the playerbase who like the idea od WiS and will just **** talk all day. Trust me, block him.
I did not know you could do that for the forum, now blocked, thanks Pity it does not work for people quoting him... If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space,-áand those people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local,-álight a cyno and try jumping to it.-á-á There is a structural issue with Eve, based on accounts with no link, vast reserves of ISK-áand plex, which makes it too easy to metagame the destruction of small alliances. |
|
Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
3606
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 19:35:00 -
[531] - Quote
You're welcome. Now hopefully a more constructive conversationg regarding WiS implementation in a way that adds to Eve can occur without irrelevant repetition of non-facts.
|
Nadia Barsrallah
Nerbles
35
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 19:58:00 -
[532] - Quote
i wonder if the eve community should start a kick-starter for WiS content |
Ambassador Crane
Hellhound Productions
31
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 20:00:00 -
[533] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote: lol, "Read up on the history" of something I was present for and participated in.. And just who said that WiS was the only reason for any riots.
Being present for something, and understanding why something is happening is two different things. I suggest you read the history because multiple times you've pointed at WiS as being the reason for the riots when that's not at all true.
Jenn aSide wrote:This is why the word "delusional" comes to mind everytime the letters "WiS" come up. The small but vocal WiS crowd ("WiSiies?) can't understand why spaceships would be top priority in a spaceship game. or that they are pretty alone in what they want. Personally I think that is a lot of crossover between WiS people and role playing types who play game to imagine they are actually in the game conducting epic feats of brave bravery or something, it seems that way because a lot of the arguments are the same, revolving around "immersion".
Every time you log into an MMO, you are immersing yourself into the environment. Whether you like it or not, you are in fact role playing. Are you fighting for Sov? You're role playing for ownership of virtual pixel space. Are you fighting in FW. Same thing. Are you working the market to make isk? You're role playing for virtual wealth. Hey look! You even have an avatar you put some time into creating! You evil role player you!
Jenn aSide wrote:As for the question of why post? Why post in opposition to any falsehoods? Because they are falsehoods lol. The WiS crowd ignores reality (ie CCP is concentrating on FiS for good reasons, reasons the WiS crowd ignores and dismisses as some kind of conspiracy) and ignores history in nearly incredible (and I think selfish) fashion..
Ignores history? I'm just going to laugh and move on.
Jenn aSide wrote:Now that i've answered your question, answer mine. Why do these WiS people feel the need to lobby for something even after the developers say "we're just not doing that right now"? Of course they aren't the only ones, I'd put them in 3rd place behind the "get rid of local" and OMG do something about afk cloaking" fringes, but at some point you'd think adult EVE players would learn to let it go...
Little (old) news flash for you: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=161511&find=unread That being just over a year ago but after the Jita riots and refocus of development.
So even CCP hasn't quite let it go either. And I don't imagine it'll happen any time soon. However, when they speak of new projects (player built stargates) being in the works that we all know given CCP's track record will be released with it's own new set of problems that will need fixing, I can't help but jump on the bandwagon of why not expand on WiS rather than bring working on new stuff that nobody has really been asking for. Maybe you are right (though I'm of the opinion your not) that WiS people are a small niche crowd. But tell me how many people have been seriously lobbying for player built stargates? |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
3619
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 20:13:00 -
[534] - Quote
Sigh
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2023395#post2023395
CCP Unifex wrote:
So, all that being said, we have a great concept to expand the EVE Universe but now is not the right time for us to take that step. ItGÇÖs a step I very much want to take but I want to take it when it wonGÇÖt mean removing developers and focus from flying in space. So, for the time being, watch this space with regards to exploration gameplay for EVE avatars. The Avatar team will now be turning its attention to features it can put out for EVE in our winter expansion and beyond.
let me point something out for you.
History. Namely, the history of CCP and EVE Online.
CCP made EVE online a game with spaceships being the central element. And that's it. EVERYTHING else they have tried to do and venture out into has come back with mixed or bad results. Incarna/walking in stations = dead. DUST 514 = not as brilliant as expected. WoD = on the shelf, perhaps in development hell. Valkyrie = just getting started.
You WiS people want a company that has proven to do ONE THING superbly (FiS) to take away development resources (even if a little bit) from what they've have proven they know how to do (space ships) and use them on something they proved to not be so adept at (everything but spaceships)?
It's like having a brewery who has made epic beer for 10 years (and who failed to expanded into the wine market with their beer-flavor pinot......) and expecting them to give beer flavored wine another go.
Me, I'd rather them keep doing the thing that has kept them going (understanding that CCP is gonna do what it's gonna do even if i don't like it).. EVE has slaughtered every space game that people proclaimed would kill it by being what it is, and not by trying to be something else. |
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
3377
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 20:26:00 -
[535] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:
CCP made EVE online a game with spaceships being the central element. And that's it.
Because the technology didn't exist at the time for what they wanted to do. So they started with what they could manage to build with the tools and skills available. Flying in space.
They have stated since 2003 that that was only the beginning of what they wanted. Which was to create an entire interactive universal sandbox. This included the ability to leave your spaceship and venture forth into personal contact with other players while in stations.
Unfortunately, their first attempt failed so spectacularly that they backed off completely instead of reassessing and improving. I'd like to think, though, that the dream of the original designers hasn't died. It's only awaiting someone with the talent to implement it properly.
Mr Epeen
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |
Ambassador Crane
Hellhound Productions
32
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 21:06:00 -
[536] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Sigh https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2023395#post2023395
CCP Unifex wrote:
So, all that being said, we have a great concept to expand the EVE Universe but now is not the right time for us to take that step. ItGÇÖs a step I very much want to take but I want to take it when it wonGÇÖt mean removing developers and focus from flying in space. So, for the time being, watch this space with regards to exploration gameplay for EVE avatars. The Avatar team will now be turning its attention to features it can put out for EVE in our winter expansion and beyond.
let me point something out for you. History. Namely, the history of CCP and EVE Online. CCP made EVE online a game with spaceships being the central element. And that's it. EVERYTHING else they have tried to do and venture out into has come back with mixed or bad results. Incarna/walking in stations = dead. DUST 514 = not as brilliant as expected. Flying in atmosphere + dead before it was born WoD = on the shelf, perhaps in development hell. Valkyrie = just getting started, who knows, it might work, it's about spaceships. You WiS people want a company that has proven to do ONE THING superbly (FiS) to take away development resources (even if a little bit) from what they've have proven they know how to do (space ships) and use them on something they proved to not be so adept at (everything but spaceships)? It's like having a brewery who has made epic beer for 10 years (and who failed to expanded into the wine market with their beer-flavor pinot......) and expecting them to give beer flavored wine another go. Me, I'd rather them keep doing the thing that has kept them going (understanding that CCP is gonna do what it's gonna do even if i don't like it).. EVE has slaughtered every space game that people proclaimed would kill it by being what it is, and not by trying to be something else.
I respond to your sigh with a sigh of my own. There's a reason I linked the thread and not the post. I wasn't saying CCP was working on it. They're obviously not. My point was that WiS was not forgotten or dead as you claim. More like on the back burner. The point of threads like this is to let CCP know there are people that want it. And as much as you may attempt to silence it on your little personal trek to keep CCP focused only on what YOU want, they are still present.
And do one thing superbly? Seriously? They're good at creating a space MMO, yes. They've had 10 years put into developing that. But I'm not sure I would stretch it to say superb. Otherwise we wouldn't have need for all these expansions, 10 years into the game, that are focused on fixing broken aspects. There wouldn't be threadnaughts about fixing sovereignty or POS's or much else for that matter.
You're a bit too narrow minded and hell bent on them being about nothing other than spaceships, given the only thing in your list you gave them hope for was Valkyrie because it's spaceships. Yet Valkyrie probably has about as much development in it as WoD, if not WiS. CCP is a game company. They've had one game find a lot of success but that doesn't mean they should just stop there. That would be like going back in time and telling them "Hey! You shouldn't develop a computer game when you have so much success in creating your board game! You need to stay focused on that!" |
Peter Raptor
Galactic Hawks
595
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 21:52:00 -
[537] - Quote
After reading some of the pro-WiS ideas people have posted on forums over the years, WiS would simply become a haunt for pedophiles and perverts, the very motive for implementing WiS has been flawed from the beginning, completely pointless feature if theres no REAL advantage to game play (at one fanfest years ago , one of the devs struggled to come up for a viable use for WiS and simply suggested "smuggling" ) Evelopedia;-á
The Amarr Empire, is known for its omnipresent religion -áGÇá-á-á |
Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
360
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 21:53:00 -
[538] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote: This is a very good post in that it demonstrates the thing at the core of the WiS movement. Inability to appreciate the current EVE Online.
And now we get to the crux of the matter. One. I've been here since way before 'the current' eve online. I can appreciate it just fine, because I've been here for pretty much everything that has added up to it. I even caused some content to be added through my actions.
Jenn aSide wrote:THIS one blew my mind, it's changes so much about how I (as an explorer) do things. If all Rubicon did was add the mobile Depot it would have still be the single best expansion I've ever been a part of (being about to switch to defensive equipment before leaving a system where I just finished a plex has already saved my machariel FOUR times).
If that smokes your noodle, I hate to have seen the mess at your keyboard if you'd have been around for Castor when we got T2 or RMR when they dropped in 23 new ships. You think Outpost is a game changer? Warp Stabs were a game changer.
I remember when they introduced your mach. The morgue would have had to squeegee your brain matter off the monitor.
Go talk to some of the old guys in your corp about how things were back in the old days of Curse and Stain and Fountain (oh my!) We got real expansions back in those days and we'd get down on our knees and pray that CCP TomB wasn't going to nerf the **** out of whatever setup we had going on.
Jenn aSide wrote: The community says "damn it, it's a spaceship game, screw walking around and crap". CCP responds be refocusing on spaceships and people start yelling "hey, were's my WiS" lol. As soon as CCP responds to the "threadnaughts" about local and afk cloaking, the community will demand to know why they weren't consulted before CCP axes local and afk cloaking lol.
Well, to be honest I doubt we'll see the end of afk cloaks or local any time soon. CCP have already said as much.
The community did not say 'screw WiS'. a small vocal minority did (some of whom also continue to insist for some reason, that EvE ships don't have crews, despite fluff AND the fact that all eve ships originally had a crew stat.). The rest of us were pissed off because of P2W and the fact that despite promising WiS, CCP delivered absolutely nothing of the sort.
I'll wager you 500 billion isk that if a WiS expansion came out, and was in no way tied to P2W, the best you might muster is 20 guys and their alts banging on the statue.
Unless your thread is limited to how 'awesum!' Eve Online is, ISD will lock the thread.-á You will find it is particularly common if CCP might have to make a public response to the thread subject, as opposed to bury it in the GM que for the forseeable future and then prohibit telling anyone what the GM said, if it's ever answered at all. |
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
3381
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 21:58:00 -
[539] - Quote
Peter Raptor wrote:After reading some of the pro-WiS ideas people have posted on forums over the years, WiS would simply become a haunt for pedophiles and perverts,
If my avatar gives your avatar a beat down in the middle of a crowded promenade and I T-bag your dead body knowing that you are probably some under age dweeb in real life, am I a pedophile? Or am I just the meanest mofo in the station?
Mr Epeen
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |
Davon Mandra'thin
Rotten Legion Ops
359
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 22:27:00 -
[540] - Quote
Admit it Jenn, you have literally nothing. Every time, when it comes to brass taxes, and someone asks you to back up the bull your spouting, you can't. Because your wrong. Not only are you wrong, but your repeating yourself even after you get shot down over and over.
I would go through your posts and pick them apart, but it's already been done. You haven't made any new points to counter. Your just recycling crap now. Just give up, you making yourself look bad. Even those who just don't want Avatar content (a fair opinion if your unlikely to want to use it) are probably laughing at your lack of logic. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 30 40 .. 40 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |