| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |

Batelle
Komm susser Tod
1414
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 15:51:00 -
[331] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Shpenat wrote:[quote=Emiko Rowna]
Granted, directly copying tracking computer over to omnidirectional tracking link is tad lazy especially considering there are no faction variants. Are you saying that the incompetence was so bad that Fed Navy Omni's no longer have any bonus over T2's?
This is worth repeating. Fed Navy Omnis are now trash.
old t2 omni - 25% optimal, 25% tracking old faction omni - 30% optimal, 30% tracking (based on the copy&paste from faction tracking comps)
new t2 omni (range) - 15% optimal, 30% falloff new faction omni (range) - 16% optimal, 35% falloff (oh wow 1% optimal, 5% falloff, and 3 CPU saved, wow this is a piece of junk for low-sp plebs).
On my Rattlesnake I run two faction omnis with a t2 scope chip. After the nerf, here is how gardes are affected. 40% reduction in tracking, and 20-25% reduction in effective range, from 59+12 to 45+21 (once you're a few km into garde falloff you're better switching to different drones). The optimal range nerf on scope chips and omnis is so heavy that they're giving up all their tracking bonuses and still lose a chunk of range even with scripts. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Andrea Keuvo
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
217
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 16:24:00 -
[332] - Quote
Since ISD is all over locking the GD thread what does anyone think the percentage chance that Fozzie will come to this thread and address these issues is? I'm going with 0% |

Arthur Aihaken
State Protectorate Caldari State
2848
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 17:46:00 -
[333] - Quote
Batelle wrote:This is worth repeating. Fed Navy Omnis are now trashGǪ On my Rattlesnake I run two faction omnis with a t2 scope chip. After the nerf, here is how gardes are affected. 40% reduction in tracking, and 20-25% reduction in effective range, from 59+12 to 45+21 (once you're a few km into garde falloff you're better switching to different drones). The optimal range nerf on scope chips and omnis is so heavy that they're giving up all their tracking bonuses and still lose a chunk of range even with scripts. You forgot that they're now active modules that require capacitor.  Rubicon 1.1: "Everything Is Fair Game" (for the nerf bat!) I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Morrigan LeSante
The Lost and Forgotten Troopers
637
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 17:52:00 -
[334] - Quote
Just get with the lolrauder program already. |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2148
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 22:59:00 -
[335] - Quote
Andrea Keuvo wrote:Since ISD is all over locking the GD thread what does anyone think the percentage chance that Fozzie will come to this thread and address these issues is? I'm going with 0%
He did respond in my GD thread before ISD locked it down. Standard "I did what I said I was going to do. Drones are competitive with other weapon systems now". I believe he was talking about rockets and light missiles, but can't be sure. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Arthur Aihaken
State Protectorate Caldari State
2850
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 23:01:00 -
[336] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:He did respond in my GD thread before ISD locked it down. Standard "I did what I said I was going to do. Drones are competitive with other weapon systems now". I believe he was talking about rockets and light missiles, but can't be sure. Drones just became un-op. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Cypher Decypher
Flowery Twats
23
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 23:04:00 -
[337] - Quote
An ill-conceived, poorly implemented, knee-jerk response to an issue that could have so easily been addressed by looking at Drone Assist mechanics.
No supporting code (read: statistical info in-game) to allow for proper testing.
Twelve days' notice for SISI testing and no acknowledgment of feedback whatsoever.
Pretty unimpressive.
|

Arthur Aihaken
State Protectorate Caldari State
2850
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 23:11:00 -
[338] - Quote
This is so awesome.  I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
986
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 23:12:00 -
[339] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:He did respond in my GD thread before ISD locked it down. Standard "I did what I said I was going to do. Drones are competitive with other weapon systems now". I believe he was talking about rockets and light missiles, but can't be sure. Drones just became un-op. Since when was the rattlesnake OP? |

Arthur Aihaken
State Protectorate Caldari State
2850
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 23:27:00 -
[340] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Since when was the rattlesnake OP? What does this have to do with the Rattlesnake? It's only one of a handful of ships that will be affected. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
986
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 23:36:00 -
[341] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Since when was the rattlesnake OP? What does this have to do with the Rattlesnake? It's only one of a handful of ships that will be affected. Rattlesnake is actually indicative of the capabilities of most sentry platforms, if it isn't OP, it's pretty hard to argue drones are OP.
And the armageddon, gilla, nestor, stratios, drone proteus, myrm, eos and anything else with a drone damage bonus and no sentry application bonus I may be forgetting could equally be applied. |

Hasikan Miallok
Republic University Minmatar Republic
224
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 23:52:00 -
[342] - Quote
Emiko Rowna wrote:Can someone tell me when the change was made to sentries that made them so over powered? In what patch did they receive this large buff that lead to them being over powered?
no no .. its not Sentries that were ever the problem.
there are two contentious drone issues ...
Issue 1. The Dominix and the Ishtar have got hull bonuses that have made them ridiculously good sentry boats and they have become the drone mission/rat boat of choice.
2. in fleet battles people started assigning sentry drones en masse to "assist" a single fast locking FC who then fires all the drones at once, creating server issues and seriously upsetting the GSF who for reasons of their own do not want to adopt this doctrine and have trouble countering it.
However I doubt this change is about those issues. The omni change have made the Domi and ishtar even MORE the drone boat of choice than before (the nerf mainly effects unbonused hulls) and is unlikely to have much effect on drone assist doctrines at all (bouncers firing at 150-200km are still fine after the nerf) .
What is actually more likely is this change is nothing to do with omnis/sentries being OP at all ... but is instead part of an overall "dumbing down" we are seeing where all modules and ships are getting "balanced" to be more and more similar ... presumably to make it "easier" for new players to get into the game.
|

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1529
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 00:12:00 -
[343] - Quote
Hasikan Miallok wrote:Emiko Rowna wrote:Can someone tell me when the change was made to sentries that made them so over powered? In what patch did they receive this large buff that lead to them being over powered? no no .. its not Sentries that were ever the problem. there are two contentious drone issues ... Issue 1. The Dominix and the Ishtar have got hull bonuses that have made them ridiculously good sentry boats and they have become the drone mission/rat boat of choice. 2. in fleet battles people started assigning sentry drones en masse to "assist" a single fast locking FC who then fires all the drones at once, creating server issues and seriously upsetting the GSF who for reasons of their own do not want to adopt this doctrine and have trouble countering it. However I doubt this change is about those issues. The omni change have made the Domi and ishtar even MORE the drone boat of choice than before (the nerf mainly effects unbonused hulls not teh Domi/Ishtar) and it is unlikely the change will have much effect on drone assist doctrines at all (bouncers firing at 150-200km are still fine after the nerf for example) . What is actually more likely is this change is nothing to do with omnis/sentries being OP at all ... but is instead part of an overall "dumbing down" we are seeing where all modules and ships are getting "balanced" to be more and more similar ... presumably to make it "easier" for new players to get into the game. ******** change.
The issue with omni's is the same as with all other drone modules. Apart from the almost non-existent officer DDA and the FNODTL there are no real variations.
Basically we're all flying around with effectively officer level drone gear equipped. Were the drone mods done in the same way as the rest of the mods in game you would have basic omni's, T1 omni's, T2 omnis, faction omni's, deadspace and officer.
To get the uber omni's you would have to pay for them. All this has done is .. nothing... because it didn't address the problem... |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
2138
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 01:20:00 -
[344] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Arthur Aihaken wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Since when was the rattlesnake OP? What does this have to do with the Rattlesnake? It's only one of a handful of ships that will be affected. Rattlesnake is actually indicative of the capabilities of most sentry platforms, if it isn't OP, it's pretty hard to argue drones are OP. And the armageddon, gilla, nestor, stratios, drone proteus, myrm, eos and anything else with a drone damage bonus and no sentry application bonus I may be forgetting could equally be substituted in the sentence. Sounds like the issue is more, heavy drones are crap so the only large drone is sentries.
The OP part is was having a passive module that gives a 25% bonus to optimal and tracking at the same time. Novis Initiis is Recruting-á --á Ideas for Drone Improvement |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
988
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 01:39:00 -
[345] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Arthur Aihaken wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Since when was the rattlesnake OP? What does this have to do with the Rattlesnake? It's only one of a handful of ships that will be affected. Rattlesnake is actually indicative of the capabilities of most sentry platforms, if it isn't OP, it's pretty hard to argue drones are OP. And the armageddon, gilla, nestor, stratios, drone proteus, myrm, eos and anything else with a drone damage bonus and no sentry application bonus I may be forgetting could equally be substituted in the sentence. Sounds like the issue is more, heavy drones are crap so the only large drone is sentries. The OP part is was having a passive module that gives a 25% bonus to optimal and tracking at the same time. Heavy drones are crap, but that mainly has to do with the limitations and mechanics of non-sentry drones. Heavies, no matter how well balanced, aren't practical long range weapons and as such, can't supplement sentries the way you seem to insinuate they should.
Regarding the mods being OP, fine, I can buy that in itself, though unless the end result was OP I'd expect some counterbalance in the stats of the sentries themselves. Across the line of applicable ships as a whole I don't see them as OP, but we didn't have any counter adjustment at all. |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
2139
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 03:30:00 -
[346] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Heavy drones are crap, but that mainly has to do with the limitations and mechanics of non-sentry drones. Heavies, no matter how well balanced, aren't practical long range weapons and as such, can't supplement sentries the way you seem to insinuate they should. Not saying that heavies should replace sentries as long range weapons, but then again 20k is not long range for a battleship weapon, but it is long enough to not want to use heavy drones for. Novis Initiis is Recruting-á --á Ideas for Drone Improvement |

Hasikan Miallok
Republic University Minmatar Republic
231
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 05:25:00 -
[347] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Heavy drones are crap, but that mainly has to do with the limitations and mechanics of non-sentry drones. Heavies, no matter how well balanced, aren't practical long range weapons and as such, can't supplement sentries the way you seem to insinuate they should. Not saying that heavies should replace sentries as long range weapons, but then again 20k is not long range for a battleship weapon, but it is long enough to not want to use heavy drones for.
One issue is that whilst heavies have their uses - such as blapping structures, or hitting large (BS sized) targets that are really really close to you (as in 5000m close) - when it comes down to it a single flight of heavies takes up the same space as a flight of sentries, two and half flights of mediums or 5 flights of lights, All of the latter are a better use of space.
If heavies were 20m3 bandwidth they may see more use though many people would still see them as suboptimal compared to what else there is to occupy the space.
One alternative that might see more heavy use is allow the mobile depot to facilitate swapping drones between cargo and drone bay. |

Morrigan LeSante
The Lost and Forgotten Troopers
638
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 07:34:00 -
[348] - Quote
Hasikan Miallok wrote: One alternative that might see more heavy use is allow the mobile depot to facilitate swapping drones between cargo and drone bay.
That works already.
I'm really very disappointed in how this has been handled by CCP - why bother asking for feedback if you're not even going to so much acknowledge it? Were you so hell bent on destroying drone blob warfare that scorched earth was the way to go? Because honestly that is what it feels like. All the fun sentry boats without bonuses are massively damaged by this.
Still, I suppose heavy missiles will have some company at the back of the cupboard, covered in dust. Every cloud eh? |

DemonX Bane
Fusion Enterprises Ltd Northern Associates.
2
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 07:42:00 -
[349] - Quote
Lets put it this way. Either I train for skills to improve my sentries (about 3 months in total) or I quit eve until next patch or so. Guess what I will probably do the later as they are seriously ******* up the newbie low-sp Players over. Incase I dont reply on forums. Please send ingame mail. I log in atleast once a day. |

baltoxtdl
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 07:59:00 -
[350] - Quote
so now, rattlesnake in lvl5 mission neuted to the hell and back, can't even turn ON new ODLs, and even load tracking script to get some tracking now. Nice going CCP very nice. Well played CCP |

Mournful Conciousness
Embers Children TOHA Conglomerate
491
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 08:35:00 -
[351] - Quote
Tried the new omnis on an Ishtar in a. C3 w-space site last night. They still work. There's more to do since the Ishtar now needs to swap scripts and maneuver. Previous setup was single omni plus dual prop. Will probably change to single prop dual omni just to save the hassle of switching scripts.
This change is unlikely to affect the general greatness of sentry doctrines. For that they just need to remove drone assist for sentries. Embers Children is recruiting carefully selected pilots who like wormholes, green killboards and the sweet taste of tears. You can convo me in game or join the chat "TOHA Lounge".
|

Trimmaloth
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 11:38:00 -
[352] - Quote
Mournful Conciousness wrote:Tried the new omnis on an Ishtar in a. C3 w-space site last night. They still work. There's more to do since the Ishtar now needs to swap scripts and maneuver. Previous setup was single omni plus dual prop. Will probably change to single prop dual omni just to save the hassle of switching scripts.
This change is unlikely to affect the general greatness of sentry doctrines. For that they just need to remove drone assist for sentries.
While Ishtar and Dominix will "still work" as you have stated, all the other drone boats will terribly suffer.
This was not a goddamn sentry issue, it was an Ishtar and Dominix bonus issue. These 2 ships had really unlogical hull range bonuses over the other drone boats.
The other problem i have is, that this change is very poorly implemented. I mean we cannot even tell in space or in hanger what the range or tracking bonus is with these new modules. And this from a game i pay every month for....
And still no response from any Dev so far!
|

Mournful Conciousness
Embers Children TOHA Conglomerate
491
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 12:48:00 -
[353] - Quote
Trimmaloth wrote:Mournful Conciousness wrote:Tried the new omnis on an Ishtar in a. C3 w-space site last night. They still work. There's more to do since the Ishtar now needs to swap scripts and maneuver. Previous setup was single omni plus dual prop. Will probably change to single prop dual omni just to save the hassle of switching scripts.
This change is unlikely to affect the general greatness of sentry doctrines. For that they just need to remove drone assist for sentries. While Ishtar and Dominix will "still work" as you have stated, all the other drone boats will terribly suffer. This was not a goddamn sentry issue, it was an Ishtar and Dominix bonus issue. These 2 ships had really unlogical hull range bonuses over the other drone boats. The other problem i have is, that this change is very poorly implemented. I mean we cannot even tell in space or in hanger what the range or tracking bonus is with these new modules. And this from a game i pay every month for.... And still no response from any Dev so far!
I actually agree with you. I mercilessly exploit the domi and ishtar sentry range bonus every day in w-space PVE because it's logical to do so.
This does not mean I agree with the way these ships were changed.
Tracking bonus for all drones makes sense. Range bonus for sentries turns the dominix into a pirate-battleship-beating point defence system. It feels good to be a domi pilot exploiting this nonsense, but in my guts I know it's bad for the game.
Embers Children is recruiting carefully selected pilots who like wormholes, green killboards and the sweet taste of tears. You can convo me in game or join the chat "TOHA Lounge".
|

Andrea Keuvo
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
235
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 12:56:00 -
[354] - Quote
Mournful Conciousness wrote:Trimmaloth wrote:Mournful Conciousness wrote:Tried the new omnis on an Ishtar in a. C3 w-space site last night. They still work. There's more to do since the Ishtar now needs to swap scripts and maneuver. Previous setup was single omni plus dual prop. Will probably change to single prop dual omni just to save the hassle of switching scripts.
This change is unlikely to affect the general greatness of sentry doctrines. For that they just need to remove drone assist for sentries. While Ishtar and Dominix will "still work" as you have stated, all the other drone boats will terribly suffer. This was not a goddamn sentry issue, it was an Ishtar and Dominix bonus issue. These 2 ships had really unlogical hull range bonuses over the other drone boats. The other problem i have is, that this change is very poorly implemented. I mean we cannot even tell in space or in hanger what the range or tracking bonus is with these new modules. And this from a game i pay every month for.... And still no response from any Dev so far! I actually agree with you. I mercilessly exploit the domi and ishtar sentry range bonus every day in w-space PVE because it's logical to do so. This does not mean I agree with the way these ships were changed. Tracking bonus for all drones makes sense. Range bonus for sentries turns the dominix into a pirate-battleship-beating point defence system. It feels good to be a domi pilot exploiting this nonsense, but in my guts I know it's bad for the game.
Nothing should ever be nerfed because its too good at PvE. PvE is at best tertiary content (behind PvP and industry and hell probably even scamming) in this game and has clearly been an afterthought of the devs since WH space was introduced. The Domi isn't even close to OP in pvp and this was a completely unnecessary nerf that raped the ships that were previously "rebalanced" with drones as a primary weapon system but not given a range/tracking bonus to the hull.
|

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
1225
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 13:00:00 -
[355] - Quote
Oh noes, my overpowered toys don't work anymore i better quit the game!!!!.
Themepark carebears are really disgusting. The Tears Must Flow |

Mournful Conciousness
Embers Children TOHA Conglomerate
491
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 13:01:00 -
[356] - Quote
Andrea Keuvo wrote: Nothing should ever be nerfed because its too good at PvE. PvE is at best tertiary content (behind PvP and industry and hell probably even scamming) in this game and has clearly been an afterthought of the devs since WH space was introduced. The Domi isn't even close to OP in pvp and this was a completely unnecessary nerf that raped the ships that were previously "rebalanced" with drones as a primary weapon system but not given a range/tracking bonus to the hull.
I'm not sure I agree with that. Given that we have the ability to slave sentry drones to a SEBO'd FC in a cruiser I'd say that a domi fleet is the fastest way to burn through an opposing fleet of the same size at any range below 140km.
Even 2 domis or ishtars with a TP amongst them are deadly to any HAC within 100km.
Embers Children is recruiting carefully selected pilots who like wormholes, green killboards and the sweet taste of tears. You can convo me in game or join the chat "TOHA Lounge".
|

Andrea Keuvo
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
235
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 13:07:00 -
[357] - Quote
Mournful Conciousness wrote:Andrea Keuvo wrote: Nothing should ever be nerfed because its too good at PvE. PvE is at best tertiary content (behind PvP and industry and hell probably even scamming) in this game and has clearly been an afterthought of the devs since WH space was introduced. The Domi isn't even close to OP in pvp and this was a completely unnecessary nerf that raped the ships that were previously "rebalanced" with drones as a primary weapon system but not given a range/tracking bonus to the hull.
I'm not sure I agree with that. Given that we have the ability to slave sentry drones to a SEBO'd FC in a cruiser I'd say that a domi fleet is the fastest way to burn through an opposing fleet of the same size at any range below 140km. Even 2 domis or ishtars with a TP amongst them are deadly to any HAC within 100km.
if they are so OP then trade in your HAC for Domis and a drone bunny cruiser. |

Trimmaloth
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 13:11:00 -
[358] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:Oh noes, my overpowered toys don't work anymore i better quit the game!!!!.
Themepark carebears are really disgusting.
What a productive forum post. You must be really proud of yourself! Well done!
I congratulate you!
|

Lakarin G'Kar
Bolt Hole Cartel
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 13:28:00 -
[359] - Quote
Edmark I wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Once again, a PvE tactic is ruined by another bad CCP hire, who is obsessed with PvP This is primarily a pvp game Br0beans. The challenge is balancing the two- hence the word: balance.
The concept of balance is a fools endeavour. other MMO's have attempted to "Balance" their games and what did they end up with you ask? A game that was so dumbed down, all the skills were essentially the same for all factions in the game.
If CCP attempts to start this process with their game to try and attract new player or to please the PVP crowd. They will drive their game into the ground.
People in this game skill themselves in order to reach a desired result. When the game masters are constantly shifting the post forward and backward, it creates instability. People who play these games are always searching for something that is OP and when the game reaches "balance" in this way, everyone will use the same ship and configuration as soon as and while it remains OP.
Consider this before you stat shifting the goal posts trying to achieve "balance" ccp
|

Batelle
Komm susser Tod
1437
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 13:41:00 -
[360] - Quote
Lakarin G'Kar wrote: The concept of balance is a fools endeavour....
If CCP attempts to start this process with their game to try and attract new player or to please the PVP crowd. They will drive their game into the ground.
Have you been living under a rock for the last two years? "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |