| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |

Gedrick frogue
Heuristic Industrial And Development
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 23:03:00 -
[271] - Quote
Lister Vindaloo wrote:So why change them now? Wouldn't it be better to rebalance drones across the board and modify all the mods/rigs at the same time? This just feels like a knee jerk reaction, it'll end up a waste of dev time as it'll all have to be reworked, why not introduce a sentry tracking link that works as proposed in the OP and make otl have no effect on sentries and leave the stats alone?
Drones seem to need some love, they really don't have the right ommpf as they used too, So it would be nice if CCP killed two birds with one stone, do a rewrite on the drones decision making to sort out the backend server issue and look more closely at drone performance in general. |

Batelle
Komm susser Tod
1385
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 23:12:00 -
[272] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote: I have issues imagining the DDA + T2 omni's made drones OP in PvE. They did certainly make them a strong contender, but those factors + the domi's bonuses and the MJD likely were pushing the envelope. Still, this affects several ships that weren't really pushing the upper bounds of drone capabilities with their bonuses.
Really the only thing I can think of that ever really made them seem OP before the bonuses was 125mbit cruiser hulls.
Where you draw the "OP" line is more subjective, the point being that they've gotten nothing but buffs for years. Maybe 125mbit needs adjusting as part of balancing drones. I didn't bring it up because we've had 125mbit cruiser for far longer than drones have been OP. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Midgen
DisturbedGamers. The Explicit Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 23:21:00 -
[273] - Quote
ah ok ... so ....CFC cry, CCP coddle K gotcha! |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
976
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 23:23:00 -
[274] - Quote
Batelle wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote: I have issues imagining the DDA + T2 omni's made drones OP in PvE. They did certainly make them a strong contender, but those factors + the domi's bonuses and the MJD likely were pushing the envelope. Still, this affects several ships that weren't really pushing the upper bounds of drone capabilities with their bonuses.
Really the only thing I can think of that ever really made them seem OP before the bonuses was 125mbit cruiser hulls.
Where you draw the "OP" line is more subjective, the point being that they've gotten nothing but buffs for years. Maybe 125mbit needs adjusting as part of balancing drones. I didn't bring it up because we've had 125mbit cruiser for far longer than drones have been OP. True, we have had those hulls for a while, it's just that with the buffs to mods, new mods and certain hull bonuses, the capabilities of a full flight of sentries doesn't stand out as much at the BS level when compared with the HAC or faction cruiser level. I still think that it may not be as imbalanced as it appears, with the drawbacks being what they are.
Just an observation, one I don't know if there is any real action is required. |

Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
110
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 23:34:00 -
[275] - Quote
Lister Vindaloo wrote:So why change them now? Wouldn't it be better to rebalance drones across the board and modify all the mods/rigs at the same time? This just feels like a knee jerk reaction, it'll end up a waste of dev time as it'll all have to be reworked, why not introduce a sentry tracking link that works as proposed in the OP and make otl have no effect on sentries and leave the stats alone?
That would take intelligence. |

Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
110
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 23:39:00 -
[276] - Quote
Batelle wrote:Nash MacAllister wrote:Batelle wrote:my rattlesnake is much more hurt by the scope chip nerf than the omni nerf. Secondary issue but the whole stacking on rigs is the nail in the coffin IMHO. I may be too suspicious but to me, this is actually what appears to be a significant driver behind the Omni/Rig change - http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/what-a-hed-ache/ Discouraging drone use ASAP to resolve server performance issues. The way I see it, sentry drones have been OP in PVE since drone damage amps and t2 omnilinks were introduced. Before that I could solo almost any guristas or serpentis nullsec site with an ishtar, getting 533 damage max with perfect skills, 2 damage rigs, and gardes, at a range of 39+10km. Nowadays flying an ishtar you get 750dps with nearly the same tank at twice the range while also fitting a cloak, a prop mod, and having cap stability. Projection without dps loss, frigate blapping, damage selection, good tracking. The introduction of the mobile depot, MJD, and ishtar/domi rebalance just made sentry drones that much better. However, a few things needed to happen for them to be adopted as a PVP doctrine. First, you needed pilots with near max skills. Their superior performance (for years) in pve meant lots of people had trained them already or were willing to. Second, there needed to be massive improvements in fleet fight stability. This pretty much has happened. Not only was TiDi invented, but we're a long way from turning our brackets off, and canceling gun cycles by clicking the icon beneath the target. Third, the obvious choices for a sentry-fleet doctrine, the ishtar and dominix, needed to get a whole lot more attractive. And boy did they ever. They got really really useful projection bonuses, the domi got its base stats balanced to match other battleships, and the ishtar got a half-decent capacitor and the CPU issues solved. Adding onto all this, you have the archon, considered the best carrier by far for years because of its armor resistance bonus. But it didn't need to be the archon, sentry drones synergize extremely well with a carrier blob of any type. You have functionally unlimited drone space, you're already slow and have huge HP, so moving away from your drones, or being unable to move to stay near them, is completely irrelevant. Slow targeting speed is not a downside because of drone assist, and archon blobs scale in both defense and offense as you add more due to having a 60km cap and armor tranfering, resistance bonused hull. The drone doctrines, and specifically HED-GP, were a perfect storm years in the making. It took a long time for their OP-ness to come to the fore (in PVP), but now that it has, this is just the other shoe dropping, so to speak. As an avid drone user and explorer I hope they're not overnerfed, and CCP approaches this as an oppourtunity to do a proper drone rebalance and rewrite (hint, get rid of "drone control range.')
Yea, and all those people that spent 6 - 8 months, more training, well they can just respec. Oh, no wait. This is eve.
You're fukt. |

Benjamin Hamburg
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
47
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 00:53:00 -
[277] - Quote
Drone causing lag in massive battle.
Nerf drone.
Problem resolved.
#genius |

Kevin Alpha
Midnight Caretakers The Methodical Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:15:00 -
[278] - Quote
Seeing how null-sec wars happen, and various doctrines on both sides, from n3 and friends and from CFC and friends I can see how the need to balance things is important. I used to fly a rattlesnake, but drone AI changes made the rattlesnake not a great choice for someone who did not use sentries and also was full on active in pve not the afk to win drones user. These changes being reported come not long after a bit of a scuffle in a system that suddenly had a incursion going, people on the defending side were of the notion of "gee someone pulled strings so capital fleets to decimate with sentries cannot come in" Probably untrue, but now seeing these changes, which will affect sentry carriers, domi's etc... That makes me wonder slightly. Test, but by all means get 100% feedback and if the numbers from us, your players don't come anywhere close to good scrap it poll us, see what we think would be better implement that and test. Fozzie, your at the helm of this ship, don't make us force you to wakka wakka the plank! |

Emiko Rowna
Aliastra Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 07:59:00 -
[279] - Quote
ISD Ezwal wrote:I have removed a rule breaking post and the one quoting it. The rules:11. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.
The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a petition under the Community & Forums Category.
I think you have a Fight Club thing going on here. The 11 rule of posting is we don't talk about the 11 rule.
|

Morrigan LeSante
The Lost and Forgotten Troopers
625
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 09:15:00 -
[280] - Quote
So it's going live in three days and damn the feedback?
Honestly, that's pretty disappointing.
I'll leave it with this - these are sufficiently heavy nerfs I'm selling pirate drone boats because they're now so far outclassed by a simple dominix or ishtar there's zero point in having them. |

Minnie Ryder
Flippin DaBird Corporation 2
5
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 10:15:00 -
[281] - Quote
Not only damn the feedback, damn testing to hell as well apparently.
Was just on the test server, and its still the same as before - no indication of having an omnidir on or off, scripted or not. And the launched drones still doesn't display hull bonuses even.
I'm not particularly surprised, but ham fisted is the least I can say about this whole shenanigan. |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
1218
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 10:20:00 -
[282] - Quote
This type of drones needs alot more nerfs, also remove drone assist from the game. The Tears Must Flow |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2085
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 14:54:00 -
[283] - Quote
Minnie Ryder wrote:Not only damn the feedback, damn testing to hell as well apparently.
Was just on the test server, and its still the same as before - no indication of having an omnidir on or off, scripted or not. And the launched drones still doesn't display hull bonuses even.
I'm not particularly surprised, but ham fisted is the least I can say about this whole shenanigan.
Are you really surprised? Given fozzie's track record, this is standard practice. Nothing like, what, 5 or 6 business days to test and give feedback on a huge nerf with massive implications. These changes go live Tuesday, no matter how bad they are.
fozzie's style is "I know best, and I never make mistakes, and only my view of the game matters". Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Priestess Lin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
78
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 15:15:00 -
[284] - Quote
More thoughtless, reactionary nerfs from CCP. Because its not like sentry drone users aren't gimped enough by having to remain stationary and needing to fit several drone control range mods.
Haven't you learned yet not to listen to the biased herd? |

Benjamin Hamburg
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
47
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 15:54:00 -
[285] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:This type of drones needs alot more nerfs, also remove drone assist from the game.
Drones, in general (AI, UI, mechanics, etc) are ****, and you propose to make them shitier if that's even possible.
Please, get out. |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
1223
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 16:47:00 -
[286] - Quote
All i see is people crying about their overpowered toys being balanced. You guys only care about your precious isk/hour, even if it means keeping the game broken. The Tears Must Flow |

Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
110
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 17:54:00 -
[287] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:All i see is people crying about their overpowered toys being balanced. You guys only care about your precious isk/hour, even if it means keeping the game broken.
Yes, and goon alt crying, which are the biggest cry babies in the game, begging for nerfs simply cause they suck and are getting spanked even with outnumbering their opponent by 3 and 4 to 1.
We love all the goon tears though. |

Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
110
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 20:55:00 -
[288] - Quote
New version of pyfa setup for omni changes.
https://github.com/DarkFenX/Pyfa/releases |

Lister Vindaloo
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 22:56:00 -
[289] - Quote
I thought they'd really gotten their act together, seeking feedback from the community and then modifying their intentions based on that feedback, but to make a change like this with no time at all to respond to feedback is ridiculous. I'm not a 100M sp bitter vet, but even I can see that this 'balance' is targeted at sentry drones, correct me if I'm wrong but, OTL's affect all types of drones don't they? Has ANY thought gone into how this will affect non-sentry drone users? I'm too bad at this game to do the maths but I fly Gal drone boats 90% of the time, so I'm pretty good with the changes considering my drone bonuses, sucks to fly an unbonused hull though. This is something you should have thought about sooner and implemented later...... |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2089
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 23:30:00 -
[290] - Quote
Lister Vindaloo wrote:I thought they'd really gotten their act together, seeking feedback from the community and then modifying their intentions based on that feedback, but to make a change like this with no time at all to respond to feedback is ridiculous. I'm not a 100M sp bitter vet, but even I can see that this 'balance' is targeted at sentry drones, correct me if I'm wrong but, OTL's affect all types of drones don't they? Has ANY thought gone into how this will affect non-sentry drone users? I'm too bad at this game to do the maths but I fly Gal drone boats 90% of the time, so I'm pretty good with the changes considering my drone bonuses, sucks to fly an unbonused hull though. This is something you should have thought about sooner and implemented later......
It was thought through. the dev in question has a long track record of hating any PvE income generation, particularly in high sec. This is just his latest attack. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Morrigan LeSante
The Lost and Forgotten Troopers
627
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 23:43:00 -
[291] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:All i see is people crying about their overpowered toys being balanced. You guys only care about your precious isk/hour, even if it means keeping the game broken.
Even though you're trolling, your post is apt to quote.
Drones were never overpowered in PvE (your 'isk/hour' remark assures me that is what you refer to). If(when) I wanted to feel 'overpowered' I would wheel out the TFI, marauder or a machariel...drone boats were just FUN.
My 'isk/hour' hasn't taken a hit, it'll go up because my favoured boats will no longer be fun so I'll be flying the stupid boats, like the rest of EvE.
Oh well. |

Celia Therone
University of Caille Gallente Federation
65
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 23:48:00 -
[292] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:With the at some point upcoming pirate ship rebalance I wonder what is in store for the RS. As is it's rather subpar compared to the domi since the BS round of changes and is now pretty objectively nerfed unless you load 4+ mids with scripted Omnis, which in many cases I imagine is more slots to then than is currently used for most drone ships/fits. The same of course can be said for any drone bonused ship without damage application bonuses, which enhances the feeling of sliding into obsolescence. Even the upcoming Nestor, in it's already lackluster state, is going to further suffer due to this. As I recall the balance team has stated that they think that the Rattlesnake and Gila are in a good place right now (this was before the omnidirectional change) so the implication was that they aren't going to get much love in the pirate faction re-balance. |

FT Diomedes
The Graduates RAZOR Alliance
329
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 04:19:00 -
[293] - Quote
Celia Therone wrote: As I recall the balance team has stated that they think that the Rattlesnake and Gila are in a good place right now (this was before the omnidirectional change) so the implication was that they aren't going to get much love in the pirate faction re-balance.
Anyone who things the Rattlesnake is in a good place right now is totally clueless. http://eveion.blogspot.com/ |

Andrea Keuvo
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
209
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 08:39:00 -
[294] - Quote
FT Diomedes wrote:Celia Therone wrote: As I recall the balance team has stated that they think that the Rattlesnake and Gila are in a good place right now (this was before the omnidirectional change) so the implication was that they aren't going to get much love in the pirate faction re-balance.
Anyone who things the Rattlesnake is in a good place right now is totally clueless.
Yes, and these are also the same people who control the game we put our time/money into. Not good. |

Zulu PG
Empyrean Warriors Insidious Empire
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 10:04:00 -
[295] - Quote
Dear CCP Fozzie,
It has been 10 days now since you announced the change of OTL and there have been several points from the community, which you should really reply to, since it is only two days before this change goes live.
1. By saying "the best primary method to balance the upsides of Sentry Drones is through the drones themselves", why are no chagnes to drones implemented? Since some people got it right and see it as an overall nerf to sentry drones and not just to the module. Basically the change means, that there will be no thermal damage available for sentry users, where there was freedom of damage type before. I think this question is releveant especially because you said the follwong: "We believe that with these changes Sentry Drones will still be very viable and popular weapon systems, and that the results will be a better set of choices for players to make when fitting and flying". A justified question by the community was then, why not have a longe range and a short range version of all drone types, so that there is still freedom of damage type at close range and at sniping range?
2. The community understands that this change intends to nerf the capability of Gardes to shoot with very good tracking and very high dps from very far ranges. But it was pointed out that this is basically only the case with the bonused hulls (Dominix and Ishtar). What is the explanation for crippling the damage potential of the unbonused hulls (Rattlesnake, Stratios, Proteus, Vexor etc.)?
3. Also pointed out by the community is, that this change seems to primary affect sentry usage in fleet fights. If this is true (and it very much seems so), why not directly removing or altering the drone assist?
4. You said "The results of this change for Omni balance are that pilots will now need to choose between having excellent range bonuses and excellent tracking bonuses", but this was a false statement, because in fact now drone users have to choose between "excelent tracking" and "just better" range, why not keep the choice at either 30% tracking or 30% range?
5. Of course we expect more changes in the future, but can you hint us in which direction the sentry drones are expected to evolve? Since it might be a hard choice for new players to invest a lot of SP into a weapon system they might not have wanted to learn and use after all the changes.
By saying: "These changes will be live on SISI very soon for your testing, and we as always thank you in advance for your constructive and useful feedback." I think that you should deliver at least one statement which covers the main points of critic and also positive feedback (which basically did not exist) to these changes, else your whole post of of would have missed the target of receiving feedback if all feedback is ignored.
Please remember: only two days left until a change goes live which seems to be not a very well balanced one. But maybe the community will change its mind after an explanation of yours.
Thank you
Z
|

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1177
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 12:34:00 -
[296] - Quote
Zulu PG wrote:Dear CCP Fozzie,
It has been 10 days now since you announced the change of OTL and there have been several points from the community, which you should really reply to, since it is only two days before this change goes live.
1. By saying "the best primary method to balance the upsides of Sentry Drones is through the drones themselves", why are no chagnes to drones implemented? Since some people got it right and see it as an overall nerf to sentry drones and not just to the module. Basically the change means, that there will be no thermal damage available for sentry users, where there was freedom of damage type before. I think this question is releveant especially because you said the follwong: "We believe that with these changes Sentry Drones will still be very viable and popular weapon systems, and that the results will be a better set of choices for players to make when fitting and flying". A justified question by the community was then, why not have a longe range and a short range version of all drone types, so that there is still freedom of damage type at close range and at sniping range?
2. The community understands that this change intends to nerf the capability of Gardes to shoot with very good tracking and very high dps from very far ranges. But it was pointed out that this is basically only the case with the bonused hulls (Dominix and Ishtar). What is the explanation for crippling the damage potential of the unbonused hulls (Rattlesnake, Stratios, Proteus, Vexor etc.)?
3. Also pointed out by the community is, that this change seems to primary affect sentry usage in fleet fights. If this is true (and it very much seems so), why not directly removing or altering the drone assist?
4. You said "The results of this change for Omni balance are that pilots will now need to choose between having excellent range bonuses and excellent tracking bonuses", but this was a false statement, because in fact now drone users have to choose between "excelent tracking" and "just better" range, why not keep the choice at either 30% tracking or 30% range?
5. Of course we expect more changes in the future, but can you hint us in which direction the sentry drones are expected to evolve? Since it might be a hard choice for new players to invest a lot of SP into a weapon system they might not have wanted to learn and use after all the changes.
By saying: "These changes will be live on SISI very soon for your testing, and we as always thank you in advance for your constructive and useful feedback." I think that you should deliver at least one statement which covers the main points of critic and also positive feedback (which basically did not exist) to these changes, else your whole post of of would have missed the target of receiving feedback if all feedback is ignored.
Please remember: only two days left until a change goes live which seems to be not a very well balanced one. But maybe the community will change its mind after an explanation of yours.
Thank you
Z
because currently Sentries are Overpowered. Even on unbonused range hulls.
They allow an armageddon for a clear example to have more effective damage projection and extra high slot resources thatn ANY turret ship.
Just check on TQ.. how much harder is to fit an abaddon do do damage at same range an armageddon does... with same level of tank and then armageddon can still sport NEuts, RR and stuff like that.
Simply... Sentry droens + omni links are OVERPOWERED. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Morrigan LeSante
The Lost and Forgotten Troopers
628
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 13:20:00 -
[297] - Quote
If you think unbonused sentries are overpowered, you should see what a real DPS boat can do.
Take a rattlesnake, I can outdamage that at any range it is capable of with a TFI, or a CNR. That's today, never mind once omis take the nerf bat to the face.
So the question remains, why are we hobbling unbonused hulls when the actual issue here, is the bonused hulls. Why are T1 battleships better drone boats than the pirate or navy equivalents? |

Zulu PG
Empyrean Warriors Insidious Empire
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 14:38:00 -
[298] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Zulu PG wrote:Dear CCP Fozzie,
It has been 10 days now since you announced the change of OTL and there have been several points from the community, which you should really reply to, since it is only two days before this change goes live.
1. By saying "the best primary method to balance the upsides of Sentry Drones is through the drones themselves", why are no chagnes to drones implemented? Since some people got it right and see it as an overall nerf to sentry drones and not just to the module. Basically the change means, that there will be no thermal damage available for sentry users, where there was freedom of damage type before. I think this question is releveant especially because you said the follwong: "We believe that with these changes Sentry Drones will still be very viable and popular weapon systems, and that the results will be a better set of choices for players to make when fitting and flying". A justified question by the community was then, why not have a longe range and a short range version of all drone types, so that there is still freedom of damage type at close range and at sniping range?
2. The community understands that this change intends to nerf the capability of Gardes to shoot with very good tracking and very high dps from very far ranges. But it was pointed out that this is basically only the case with the bonused hulls (Dominix and Ishtar). What is the explanation for crippling the damage potential of the unbonused hulls (Rattlesnake, Stratios, Proteus, Vexor etc.)?
3. Also pointed out by the community is, that this change seems to primary affect sentry usage in fleet fights. If this is true (and it very much seems so), why not directly removing or altering the drone assist?
4. You said "The results of this change for Omni balance are that pilots will now need to choose between having excellent range bonuses and excellent tracking bonuses", but this was a false statement, because in fact now drone users have to choose between "excelent tracking" and "just better" range, why not keep the choice at either 30% tracking or 30% range?
5. Of course we expect more changes in the future, but can you hint us in which direction the sentry drones are expected to evolve? Since it might be a hard choice for new players to invest a lot of SP into a weapon system they might not have wanted to learn and use after all the changes.
By saying: "These changes will be live on SISI very soon for your testing, and we as always thank you in advance for your constructive and useful feedback." I think that you should deliver at least one statement which covers the main points of critic and also positive feedback (which basically did not exist) to these changes, else your whole post of of would have missed the target of receiving feedback if all feedback is ignored.
Please remember: only two days left until a change goes live which seems to be not a very well balanced one. But maybe the community will change its mind after an explanation of yours.
Thank you
Z
because currently Sentries are Overpowered. Even on unbonused range hulls. They allow an armageddon for a clear example to have more effective damage projection and extra high slot resources thatn ANY turret ship. Just check on TQ.. how much harder is to fit an abaddon do do damage at same range an armageddon does... with same level of tank and then armageddon can still sport NEuts, RR and stuff like that. Simply... Sentry droens + omni links are OVERPOWERED.
|

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1178
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 15:25:00 -
[299] - Quote
Morrigan LeSante wrote:If you think unbonused sentries are overpowered, you should see what a real DPS boat can do.
Take a rattlesnake, I can outdamage that at any range it is capable of with a TFI, or a CNR. That's today, never mind once omis take the nerf bat to the face.
So the question remains, why are we hobbling unbonused hulls when the actual issue here, is the bonused hulls. Why are T1 battleships better drone boats than the pirate or navy equivalents?
But can you outdamage an armageddon or dominix WHILE fieldign 6 NEUTS at same time?
oo right.. YOU CANNOT!
Normal domi is better than navy domi because nooblets whined that the changes to the dominix were a nerf ( as I said noobs) and then rise kep the navy domi as the useless mix od hibrids and drones to kepe them happy. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

SuperBeastie
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
84
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 16:18:00 -
[300] - Quote
Nerf battleships they should only be able to hit things with 300 sig or greater for full damage. one class of ship under just like titans because being dunked by a battleship in a frigate is unfair if i only want to fly sup frigates there should be no downside.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |