| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 94 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 29 post(s) |

Maru Niffilen
United Trading Organisation
3
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 11:32:00 -
[2311] - Quote
Imagine Freighter with the classic high-mid-low slot layout. They could become more popular in nullsec. Thanks to cyno, WCS, more Tank and so on. |

Skytle DblooD
D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F. S.A.S Northern Associates.
2
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 11:38:00 -
[2312] - Quote
If the JF's now use 50% more fuel will the fuel bay be made bigger to accommodate more fuel or do we have to use some of our reduced cargo space to carry fuel aswell? |

Oxide Ammar
128
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 11:43:00 -
[2313] - Quote
Antihrist Pripravnik wrote:- Wars in higsec against lower skilled/newer characters... I was looking for the appropriate term and Urban dictionary told me "roflstomped" 
This is the most hilarious reason for not bringing capitals to hisec, you don't need capitals to roflstomp low skilled players. |

TigerXtrm
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
693
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 11:45:00 -
[2314] - Quote
Skytle DblooD wrote:If the JF's now use 50% more fuel will the fuel bay be made bigger to accommodate more fuel
Yes. My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things! |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3310
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 11:47:00 -
[2315] - Quote
Skytle DblooD wrote:If the JF's now use 50% more fuel will the fuel bay be made bigger to accommodate more fuel or do we have to use some of our reduced cargo space to carry fuel aswell?
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=340420&find=unread
Quote:To compensate for the extra isotopes that ships will need to carry, the volume of all four isotopes will be reduced by 1/3, to 0.1m3 Woo! CSM 9! http://fuzzwork.enterprises/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Korean Ninja
Im Watching You
2
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 11:56:00 -
[2316] - Quote
give us low-slot shield tanking module |

Sgt Ocker
Last Bastion of Freedom
230
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 12:06:00 -
[2317] - Quote
Walter Hart White wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Tippia wrote:SeeGǪ there was a reason why I was against rigs on freighters from the very startGǪ  T2 capital rigs and a significant reduction in survivability requried and/or speed to get them back to where they were. Gee thanks. T1 rigs are easily enough to bring normal freighters above their current cargo values. Quote: All Freighters and Jump Freighters will receive 3 low slots, and not receive any rig slots. Sorry but I am a little confused. In your reply to Tippia, you say T1 rigs, yet the description states (twice) that freighters and Jump Freighters will not receive Rig Slots. Could someone clarify which statement is true, as both statements are from the same Dev and one contradicts the other.. Are they getting rigs or not? What is there to clarify? Originally, freighters were supposed to get rigs. Now they get low slots instead. The reason for my question was because the comment about T1 rigs was made "in this thread". Sort of fits with the confusion in the Drone Blog - It states 1 thing but the forum says something to the contrary. Never hurts to have things clarified - especially when both comments are on the same page in the same thread. My opinions are mine. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK. Just don't bother Hating - I don't care.. |

Vivianne Athonille
Athonille Logistics and Provisions
16
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 12:12:00 -
[2318] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:This means that Freighters can get significantly higher maximum capacity than before using modules, and we're increasing the volume of packaged capital ships (to 1.3 million m3) and unpackaged station containers (to 2 million m3) to compensate.
I would like to suggest that you consider either leaving the packaged size of Freighters and JFs alone or better yet reduce them to 800K m3 or lower.
- Freighters and JFs are non-aggressive capital ships already allowed in high-sec
- You could eliminate some of the serious questions raised in the Contracts thread around getting Freighters and JFs to market, as they could be hauled in existing courier contracts. No need for the devs to even consider Contract changes just to solve this one problem.
You have an opportunity here that you might not want to pass up. |

Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1090
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 12:15:00 -
[2319] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Rowells wrote:plex hauling here I come Erm GǪ wouldn't you be better off hauling PLEX in a blockade runner, since you have the cloak and an incredibly short align time and high warp speed?
If you have a brain, what you really want to use to carry PLEX is a shuttle to get to the target location then redeem your PLEX once you are in the right station. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11701
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 12:21:00 -
[2320] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:Rowells wrote:plex hauling here I come Erm GǪ wouldn't you be better off hauling PLEX in a blockade runner, since you have the cloak and an incredibly short align time and high warp speed? If you have a brain, what you really want to use to carry PLEX is a shuttle to get to the target location then redeem your PLEX once you are in the right station.
You should carry as many as possible too. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Silvetica Dian
Manson Family Advent of Fate
1046
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 12:26:00 -
[2321] - Quote
Dareth Astrar wrote:Silvetica Dian wrote: Also i read the stuff written by Dareth and got the impression that he was a very poor industrialist. His description of huge effort for low profits amused me greatly and is the exact opposite of how i do industry.
Very nice to have opinions. May I ask what you base that on? I can base my proofs on cold hard maths, not that CCP listen that much to it. As I have stated before, most people involved in industrial effort (or what they call of it) cannot arrive at an accurate calculation of cost. I'm sure I will hear lots of people shout, but I can and am willing to prove my statements with figures, but you may be surprised how long the proofs can be. I and my team have made many billions in actual true profit in the game, before continual price depreciation and constant market entropy became massively significant factors that we stropped wasting our time. I know there are items out there which are still profitable, some T2 ones, but most T1 items (which is where new entries to market are) are not profitable, and ironically the larger you go the bigger the investment, the greater profit you believe people would insist upon. Unfortunately, that is just plain incorrect as an assumption (and we all know what phrases are out there warning us about assumptions). I did the maths last night, on a previously truely industrial involvement with investors that we took part in. I updated the figures last night using the Jita buy prices for Minerals, and based on the CURRENT Sell prices of the eventual items in Jita (invalid assumptions, as fails to account for speed of depreciation in eve of both source materials pricing and sales achievable prices). These figures even have factory production associated and all other market related costs included: Final Sales Cost Profit / Unit Margin Profit / Factory Hour Charon: 1,290,823,860.50 79,176,139.50 6.133% 2,778.93 Orca: 623,146,338.65 15,733,661.20 2.525% 1,104.86 Total Profit / Batch:267,980,073.85 Batches to Recover Investment:> 2,000 Time to Recover Investment:> 37,295 days! BEFORE you have recovered the investment costs, you have made no actual profit!! Simple business fact. Reader Tasks:Now I will leave you Add Real haulage costs both ways, and the increase for increased quantities of hauling and recalculate your impact on profit etc. ]
so i was correct. You were making low margin high effort stuff involving massive amounts of hauling. When i started my industrial alt about a year ago i was making t1 only for a profit of about 750 mill/week with about 40 mins a day off effort. It is now north of a billion /week as i can build T2 stuff. Manufacturing is the most profitable thing i have done in eve and i have done most activities. Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85 |

Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1090
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 12:34:00 -
[2322] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:Rowells wrote:plex hauling here I come Erm GǪ wouldn't you be better off hauling PLEX in a blockade runner, since you have the cloak and an incredibly short align time and high warp speed? If you have a brain, what you really want to use to carry PLEX is a shuttle to get to the target location then redeem your PLEX once you are in the right station. You should carry as many as possible too.
I must of worded that poorly. I meant you don't put the PLEX in the game until you are in the right station. Is there a mecanic I'm missing where there is a need to move PLEX around? |

Theng Hofses
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
64
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 12:39:00 -
[2323] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:addelee wrote: JF's are having their fuel usage increase by 50% in kronos.
This is not correct. The fuel change is currently scheduled for Crius.
While you are increasing jump fuel consumption could you also look at the different jump freighter fuel consumption numbers of the different races/jump freighters? |

Sipphakta en Gravonere
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
608
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 12:39:00 -
[2324] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:I must of worded that poorly. I meant you don't put the PLEX in the game until you are in the right station. Is there a mecanic I'm missing where there is a need to move PLEX around?
Buy in X, sell in Y. But in 99% of the cases, the price difference isn't worth it. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11701
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 12:44:00 -
[2325] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:baltec1 wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:Rowells wrote:plex hauling here I come Erm GǪ wouldn't you be better off hauling PLEX in a blockade runner, since you have the cloak and an incredibly short align time and high warp speed? If you have a brain, what you really want to use to carry PLEX is a shuttle to get to the target location then redeem your PLEX once you are in the right station. You should carry as many as possible too. I must of worded that poorly. I meant you don't put the PLEX in the game until you are in the right station. Is there a mecanic I'm missing where there is a need to move PLEX around?
I assumed you were being sarcastic and was building on it. Next step was to go on autopilot Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6458
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 12:47:00 -
[2326] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote: I must of worded that poorly. I meant you don't put the PLEX in the game until you are in the right station. Is there a mecanic I'm missing where there is a need to move PLEX around?
My last redemption of a half-dozen I bought from a contract was in the wrong Jita 4-4. That was hair raising. Moved them in an over tanked Abbadon. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Victor Dathar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
347
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 12:47:00 -
[2327] - Quote
stoicfaux wrote:Eh... hate to say it, but who cares if it's harder to gank a freighter in high-sec anymore? If we're going to be able to build player star gates, then we're probably going to need a huge (and reliable) industrial and *logistics* base with which to do it. The concerns of the builders is going to outweigh the concerns of the anarchists.
To put it simply, suicide ganking freighters is small time banditry. The real goal in attacking freighters is to disrupt another alliance from building their stargate first. That's where the real money/action/impetus will be, IMHO.
My apologies for sounding a bit harsh and dismissive of your concerns, but freighters haven't had any meaningful ways of adapting their freighters to the environment except by CCP Fiat. Now they finally get a buff and some options.
tl;dr - A Commerce Raiding release will happen. No more ganking. It's time for real war.
Guuuuyyysssssss these people do something I don't like so that means it is not important and I don't care if these poopy heads can't have their fun any more. ^^^ lol that post is so bad you should get back 2 GBS m8 o7
@grr_goons : Wisdom, Insight, GBS Posts |

Rain6637
Team Evil
14699
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 12:59:00 -
[2328] - Quote
I'm fairly certain I would have erected a research tower and tried a bit of industry with a Capital Cargohold BPO, exploring things like research, invention, production. I'm just guessing it would have impacted rig market and the economy a bit much. cuz I doubt it was reverted for the sake of player feels. President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub | Rainfleet mk.III-á| Twitch | Imgur | Content \o/ |

E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
631
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 13:07:00 -
[2329] - Quote
Querns wrote:Tippia wrote:Querns wrote:Oh -- I think I answered my own question. The JF agility adjustment is meant to compensate for the potential for rigging the Jump Freighter for agility.
My question then becomes "do you think that there is a compelling reason for anyone, ever, to rig for agility?" Jump freighter usage is all about cargo, cargo, cargo. I will, if I keep it (which is questionable). I picked a JF over a normal freighter for highsec use because it offered higher survivability and faster movement. The higher cargo was pointless since that just made it more worth-while to attack, and I wanted that improved survivability and movement exactly to avoid that problem. Why not rig it for warp speed, instead? You spend a lot more time in warp then you do aligning. Regarding the safety angle, rigging for hull HP is going to be a lot more effective at safeguarding you than align. Any serious freighter suicide ganker utilizes suicide newbie ships with a point to shut off your warp and stop your align before initiating a bump. Your align time won't be particularly useful in saving you when your align is already terrible (pre- and post-change.) +1 This guy, he must fly a freighter. |

Majin Shouten
Free-Space-Ranger Nulli Secunda
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 13:27:00 -
[2330] - Quote
My only concern is this: why is there absolutely no variation in between racial freighter variants? Same boni all around. The only choice between them is the optics. |

Daichi Yamato
Xero Security and Technologies
1573
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 13:27:00 -
[2331] - Quote
Walter Hart White wrote:Pensador wrote:Thank God. For years all of we were expecting that. Maybe this is the end of Ganking freighters in high sec That will never end. But it will raise the safe for transport value of goods. And that is a good thing.
safety is not good in eve. Saftey promotes complacency. Risk rewards effort.
u want things to be difficult because u want to be rewarded for ur efforts and risk. U want ur competition to lose out because they are lazy and/or died in a fire.
EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY?No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided""So it will be up to a pilot to remain vigilant wherever they may be flying and be ready for anything at any time" |

Grumpy Poster
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 13:27:00 -
[2332] - Quote
Customization by righs would be to prevent choices which give more possibilities compared to the status quo.
Let's take agility, hp and cargo as base points.
Rigging for agility should hit hp and cargo, rigging for cargo should hit hp and agility and of course rigging for hp should hit cargo and agility. So you have choices to take for certain purposes while the baseline (unrigged) should stay more or less the same as it is.
With the proposed changes only risk gets raised while there is no added real benefit. The potential benefit of getting more money for transport jobs will easily be eaten up by only one ship loss. And one medium term consequence will very probably be overall inflation anyway. Intended consequence?
And real life shows that markts do not diversify just because it is more expensive to get to the superstore. No local market will ever come near the reach and volume of the trade hubs and so it will still be better for most purposes to use the trade hubs and just raise prices.
In the long run it is also another blow agains single / small corp players since the large alliances and blocks will have a much easier time to mitigate any consquences of both transport nerf and industry changes whereas small enterprises will have a hard time. It will in no way lead to a more diverse or interesting 0.0 though but just furthers concentration even more. |

Sgt Ocker
Last Bastion of Freedom
230
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 13:38:00 -
[2333] - Quote
Silvetica Dian wrote: so i was correct. You were making low margin high effort stuff involving massive amounts of hauling. When i started my industrial alt about a year ago i was making t1 only for a profit of about 750 mill/week with about 40 mins a day off effort. It is now north of a billion /week as i can build T2 stuff. Manufacturing is the most profitable thing i have done in eve and i have done most activities.
Sorry to tell you but your T2 production costs may take a bit of a hit soon.
Fit anything other than Cargo Expanders to a JF, you end up with around half your current cargo capacity.
Should JF pilots have to take a 50% hit on earnings in what are the 3rd most expensive class of ships in the game?
To maintain current standards, why should a JF pilot have to face the extra risks - Mishmash defenses, longer align times
Should those wanting to kill JF have easier kills handed to them due to a Devs ill conceived idea of "interesting fitting choices"
A question for the OP regarding the resists on the Rhea; Current base shield resist; EM 0 / Therm 28 / Kin 40 / Exp 50
Quote: Base shield resistances (EM/Therm/Kin/Exp): 0 / 40(+20) / 47.5(+7.5) / 50 Signature Radius Current; 2928 Proposed ; 2930 -2
Possibly simple typos but as they are all through the stats it would be nice to know if the Rhea is in fact getting 28+20 = 48 thermal resist, or 28 +12 = 40. Is the Sig Radius going down to 2926 or up to 2930. Maybe someone could go through the resists on all the JF and correct errors - If for no other reason, than to at least make it look professional, let alone giving players correct information My opinions are mine. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK. Just don't bother Hating - I don't care.. |

Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1090
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 13:41:00 -
[2334] - Quote
Daichi Yamato wrote:Walter Hart White wrote:Pensador wrote:Thank God. For years all of we were expecting that. Maybe this is the end of Ganking freighters in high sec That will never end. But it will raise the safe for transport value of goods. And that is a good thing. safety is not good in eve. Saftey promotes complacency. Risk rewards effort. u want things to be difficult because u want to be rewarded for ur efforts and risk. U want ur competition to lose out because they are lazy and/or died in a fire.
Complacency leads to bigger whales. Bigger whales will be at risk. |

Aureus Ahishatsu
Deadspace Knights
14
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 13:43:00 -
[2335] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Rowells wrote:plex hauling here I come Erm GǪ wouldn't you be better off hauling PLEX in a blockade runner, since you have the cloak and an incredibly short align time and high warp speed?
not to mention they can't scan you so they have no way of knowing that you have plex in your hold... |

Daichi Yamato
Xero Security and Technologies
1573
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 13:50:00 -
[2336] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:Walter Hart White wrote:Pensador wrote:Thank God. For years all of we were expecting that. Maybe this is the end of Ganking freighters in high sec That will never end. But it will raise the safe for transport value of goods. And that is a good thing. safety is not good in eve. Saftey promotes complacency. Risk rewards effort. u want things to be difficult because u want to be rewarded for ur efforts and risk. U want ur competition to lose out because they are lazy and/or died in a fire. Complacency leads to bigger whales. Bigger whales will be at risk.
i suppose ill have to wait and see.
just out of curiosity, how much would ppl charge for freighter ganking? EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY?No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided""So it will be up to a pilot to remain vigilant wherever they may be flying and be ready for anything at any time" |

KIller Wabbit
The Scope Gallente Federation
580
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 13:55:00 -
[2337] - Quote
Aureus Ahishatsu wrote:Holy hell this forum is ridiculous at how fast it's going. We're over 109 pages and it's only been up 5 days LOL.
Well when stupid stuff happens...
CCP .. always first with the wrong stuff
|

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
3059
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 14:23:00 -
[2338] - Quote
For those that suggest the CSM has no control over CCP, this is an object lesson.
Fozzie puts out moronic changes that the entire Eve universe hates, except the griefers. Fozzie says he will talk with the CSM, and they are giving him good ideas. 72 hours later, Fozzie does a 180 and puts out changes past CSM members are stating are what the CSM wanted all along.
Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Warr Akini
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
128
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 14:27:00 -
[2339] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Complacency leads to bigger whales. Bigger whales will be at risk.
I keep seeing blanket statements like these being thrown around (and have since the beginning of time) - sure, idiots will continue to be idiots, but it's again a question of scaling (or balance). If you pump freighter EHP by 10x then you might see people hauling around a lot more money at once, making them "at risk," but I'd be willing to bet the number of people carrying 10x of goods (i.e. 100b versus 10b) will be a tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny fraction - mostly because people just don't have those kinds of assets. Usually. Meanwhile, the guys carrying the same old 1.5b are snugglier.
Not to say I know what the magic "I have more ehp therefore I carry x much more dollar" number is, but I wouldn't say anyone here can really assume that either. |

Dave Stark
5969
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 14:32:00 -
[2340] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Fozzie puts out moronic changes that the entire Eve universe hates, except the griefers.
actually, everyone hated the changes including the 'griefers'. the 'griefers' just got to be smug about it because we knew it was going to be a bad change and had been telling everyone that for as long as people had been asking for rig slots on freighters.
but don't let facts get in the way. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 94 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |