Fixed that for you. I'd suggest waiting until we see that these T3 destroyers bring before passing final judgement. Maybe they have bonuses cancelling the penalty of these weapons? If that's the case, they'd be awesome.

Fixed that for you. I'd suggest waiting until we see that these T3 destroyers bring before passing final judgement. Maybe they have bonuses cancelling the penalty of these weapons? If that's the case, they'd be awesome.

What about the medium/large sized variants?

Fixed that for you. I'd suggest waiting until we see that these T3 destroyers bring before passing final judgement. Maybe they have bonuses cancelling the penalty of these weapons? If that's the case, they'd be awesome.

what bothers me most about the idea is that it doesn't make any sense in a scifi world. Sure you say that many things don't make sense in eve but this doesn't mean you have to ad more to it. Good scifi is believable.

To toss in my few cents regarding the missiles.

Rockets are kind of hit and miss. In a way, they make sense. In another way, they make no sense at all. Even fitting a buffer on a frigate, 0% resists means you're going still taking heavy damage. Moreso than if you just used a normal fit.
On a Hookbill, for instance, sure you can push 14km range on Rockets but exactly how many slots will you have to sacrifice to either survive long enough to kill someone or wreck their sensors so they can't even fight back?

HAMs and Torpedos just make no sense. Torpedos are mainly only a viable option for Stealth Bombers. Considering most SBs don't fit buffer or tank at all, this makes sense for them. However, adding a completely new weapon system for 4 ships? Seriously?
I can't think of a valid use for HAMs either, even in PvE. The only situation where HAMs would be remotely viable would be Lvl 3's in a Drake. In which case you're tossing the Drake as soon as you hit Lvl 4's anyway.

Lastly, let's face it, for the BCs that do use HAMs or Torps, they're hardly ever seen anymore because BCs just don't fit into a lot of fleet comps. The poor mobility and poor warp speeds make that a bit too difficult right now.

This is a reasonably bad idea. I wouldn't mind it too much if useful missile turrets were offered, like LMLs, RLMLs, and CMs.
Because, let's face it, Rockets and LML/RLML are the only missile fits used these days in PvP. CMs are awesome for PvE and PvP.

I also just thought of something...you might gain an increase in DPS by what 15%-18% but your opponent gains an increase up to 100% with your 0% resists. Just not worth it.

Fixed that for you. I'd suggest waiting until we see that these T3 destroyers bring before passing final judgement. Maybe they have bonuses cancelling the penalty of these weapons? If that's the case, they'd be awesome.

Given they seem to require 'thermonuclear charges' to build, I think 'irradiated' might be better than 'blighted' :)

The damage increase isn't exactly awe inspiring, given the vulnerability of ships fitting these things. A base thorax went from 278 to 309 dps. You can use layering membranes, plates, shield extenders etc to counter the effect to some degree so perhaps this has been taken into account. In this case, the degree of damage increase is kinda 'meh' and these strike me as being quite gimmicky, especially given the high price ccp have spoken about. Very niche. They seem to be quite functional on sisi.

Scrap the Idea CCP. USe that time in something more useful and that can be balanced.

The whole idea is flawed from start. And would be useful ONLY for blasters shooting structures.