Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 .. 80 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |
xVx dreadnaught
|
Posted - 2009.01.02 22:46:00 -
[871]
Why hasn't this been dev stamped? How many people backed this so far? I Believe the people of New Eden have spoken.
|
Sethose Olderon
Deepcor
|
Posted - 2009.01.03 02:56:00 -
[872]
Indeed, devs get on the ball! The current POS system sucks. Corporate & Alliance Owned Stargates
|
Franga
Gristle Industries
|
Posted - 2009.01.03 11:05:00 -
[873]
Continue flogging this horse to death. Revive, rinse and repeat. ----------
|
Darth Shenron
|
Posted - 2009.01.03 23:11:00 -
[874]
ABOUT TIME THEY WHERE UPDATED c'mon ccp time to tidy up the pos set up
you know it makes sense
|
Neo Zion
|
Posted - 2009.01.03 23:24:00 -
[875]
/signed
|
CommanderData211
|
Posted - 2009.01.04 21:29:00 -
[876]
bump
|
Karrade Krise
Galatic P0RN Starz
|
Posted - 2009.01.05 00:23:00 -
[877]
This thread is a zombie
Keep it undead!
Voluntold, New Webcomic
|
Dryson Bennington
|
Posted - 2009.01.05 05:09:00 -
[878]
Although not a POS owner, I have seen many POS' and I can say they do look a bit bland and not very station like. I would suppose this would be a good idea for a single person game where station building had been into the game structure and the graphics. But for the purpose of lag I would have to say no. Lag is bad enough already. Until the problem of corps contacting CCP just to free up bandwidth for a 200 ship fleet battle it woulnd't be worth it.
|
Ignition SemperFi
Private Nuisance
|
Posted - 2009.01.05 05:30:00 -
[879]
which comes first... POS overhaul or starcraft 2? ---- People Say Im paranoid because I have a gun, I say I dont have to be paranoid because I have a gun.
Quote:
They already did introduce a counter to missiles, it's called Quantum Rise
|
Elle D
The Taco Stand
|
Posted - 2009.01.05 07:49:00 -
[880]
definitely Diablo III
|
|
Michael Goldman
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.01.05 08:07:00 -
[881]
This is defiantly something I think is a good idea. I always thought the POS system looked off... Both with the combination of racial towers and standard mods, and with the lack of modularity.
|
Esiel
Caldari
|
Posted - 2009.01.05 14:32:00 -
[882]
Originally by: Dryson Bennington Although not a POS owner, I have seen many POS' and I can say they do look a bit bland and not very station like. I would suppose this would be a good idea for a single person game where station building had been into the game structure and the graphics. But for the purpose of lag I would have to say no. Lag is bad enough already. Until the problem of corps contacting CCP just to free up bandwidth for a 200 ship fleet battle it woulnd't be worth it.
What in heaven and hells name are you talking about. What does an upgrade in graphics and a repositioning of different parts have to do with lag. I want my station to be 1 piece that means moving the parts closer together I can't see how that would cause any lag whatsoever.
* * *
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente Gen Tec Arcos Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.01.05 16:13:00 -
[883]
Originally by: Esiel
Originally by: Dryson Bennington Although not a POS owner, I have seen many POS' and I can say they do look a bit bland and not very station like. I would suppose this would be a good idea for a single person game where station building had been into the game structure and the graphics. But for the purpose of lag I would have to say no. Lag is bad enough already. Until the problem of corps contacting CCP just to free up bandwidth for a 200 ship fleet battle it woulnd't be worth it.
What in heaven and hells name are you talking about. What does an upgrade in graphics and a repositioning of different parts have to do with lag. I want my station to be 1 piece that means moving the parts closer together I can't see how that would cause any lag whatsoever.
I agree, where does lag come in on this? there is no extra lag caused by this, as a matter of fact, it would be the same amount of lag pos's currently make if not less depending on how CCP does it. Support the DEAD HORSE POS's |
Mulco
Dark Star Mining and Industry inc.
|
Posted - 2009.01.05 16:58:00 -
[884]
Originally by: Syberbolt8
Originally by: Esiel
Originally by: Dryson Bennington Although not a POS owner, I have seen many POS' and I can say they do look a bit bland and not very station like. I would suppose this would be a good idea for a single person game where station building had been into the game structure and the graphics. But for the purpose of lag I would have to say no. Lag is bad enough already. Until the problem of corps contacting CCP just to free up bandwidth for a 200 ship fleet battle it woulnd't be worth it.
What in heaven and hells name are you talking about. What does an upgrade in graphics and a repositioning of different parts have to do with lag. I want my station to be 1 piece that means moving the parts closer together I can't see how that would cause any lag whatsoever.
I agree, where does lag come in on this? there is no extra lag caused by this, as a matter of fact, it would be the same amount of lag pos's currently make if not less depending on how CCP does it.
I would say that it actually reduces the lag due to that the database can handle it as one object with many propertys instead of multiple objects with the same amount of properties.
|
Zylawy
|
Posted - 2009.01.05 18:38:00 -
[885]
I honestly think at this point they just ignore this thred all together. It has been 3 years, and nothing has been done. That usually means that nothing will be done no matter what. CCP = lazy and just want to make new content. WiS is just dumb IMO, whats next walking in POS's (WiP)? That will never happen until the station is 1 unit!
but T3 POS's would be the best way to solve this issue, since there it could be considered new content! and they will not have to rewrite anything.
|
Murixo
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2009.01.06 02:47:00 -
[886]
very nice. /signed
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente Gen Tec Arcos Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.01.07 02:50:00 -
[887]
Originally by: Zylawy I honestly think at this point they just ignore this thred all together. It has been 3 years, and nothing has been done. That usually means that nothing will be done no matter what. CCP = lazy and just want to make new content. WiS is just dumb IMO, whats next walking in POS's (WiP)? That will never happen until the station is 1 unit!
but T3 POS's would be the best way to solve this issue, since there it could be considered new content! and they will not have to rewrite anything.
One would think, this would be tier 2 pos's or ok, fine we can do t3 but that would be a pain, having to find parts to build the module pos's though i guess I would own more then a few :) Support the DEAD HORSE POS's |
AngelOfSparta
Madhatters Inc. The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2009.01.07 18:23:00 -
[888]
It's sad to think the original post came in 2006 and nothing has been done to help improve the POS system. Will we see anything done at all?
-Angel
|
Jeanette Plato
Caldari Amargosa Observatory Zzz
|
Posted - 2009.01.07 20:29:00 -
[889]
Definitely!!! ----------------------------------------------- The Amargosa Observatory Initiative |
Esiel
Caldari
|
Posted - 2009.01.07 23:12:00 -
[890]
This was brought up by CSM last time and the answer sucked so I am hoping to have it brought up again untill they agree or give us a good reason why they wont't do it.
Please go to this link and suport the Reexamining of the dead horse |
|
Carniflex
Caldari Fallout Research Fallout Project
|
Posted - 2009.01.08 09:37:00 -
[891]
I have to agree, that CCP answer is highly unstatisfactory. Considering how hard the current system sucks I outright can not expect less from them that total rewrite of the POS system. That is not a reason to NOT do it!
|
Ens Gallente
Gallente Nebula Rasa Vanguard Nebula Rasa
|
Posted - 2009.01.08 11:03:00 -
[892]
/signed www.save-evetv.com |
Isee Usee
|
Posted - 2009.01.08 19:36:00 -
[893]
/signed
Love this idea, i too remember the real dissapointment of setting up our first POS and cried horribly for days when there wasn't a way to dock with it LOL |
Karrade Krise
Galatic P0RN Starz
|
Posted - 2009.01.08 20:25:00 -
[894]
FLOG THE HORSE FLOG IT!
/signed again
Voluntold, New Webcomic
|
BruisedMoon
Amarr Power Seed Enterprises
|
Posted - 2009.01.08 20:38:00 -
[895]
Signed!
|
Caldari 5
Amarr The Element Syndicate Black Mesa Project
|
Posted - 2009.01.09 03:51:00 -
[896]
Just read another thread ( http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=966154 ) Kuiper belts, Which could be an interesting idea for the location of a T2 POS such as this idea?
|
eth 2
|
Posted - 2009.01.09 07:08:00 -
[897]
thats how you do it docking mod would be cool as well
|
Leanne Esiel
Vinyl Roid
|
Posted - 2009.01.09 07:35:00 -
[898]
Edited by: Leanne Esiel on 09/01/2009 07:40:47
Originally by: Esiel This was brought up by CSM last time and the answer sucked so I am hoping to have it brought up again untill they agree or give us a good reason why they wont't do it.
Please go to this link and suport
One of the CSM represenatives had this to say
Originally by: LaVista Vista
As for this issue, I'm against it. We already talked to CCP about it and the answer was clear. If we raise it again, we will look like spoiled children who wont accept a no.
While the concept is nice and all, I don't think we should risk the good relation between CSM and CCP by not respecting their answer.
Go the Reexamining of the dead horse make it known we aren't children, we are customers.
|
Pookclug
omen. Gay4Life
|
Posted - 2009.01.09 10:13:00 -
[899]
This idea is great, much better than the current POS system which is diabolical.
and grats for the illustrations, which modeling software u use? |
Hercules Soban
Captain Soban Fleet
|
Posted - 2009.01.09 10:41:00 -
[900]
Damn you are good Awsome idea!
/-Signed-/ |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 .. 80 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |