Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 .. 80 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |
Krennel Darius
Caldari Nova Security Systems
|
Posted - 2010.03.25 23:17:00 -
[1831]
Edited by: Krennel Darius on 25/03/2010 23:21:05 Edited by: Krennel Darius on 25/03/2010 23:20:44
Originally by: Mekela So what are the reasons CCP isn't doing this? I don't understand they have done alot of things that don't change gameplay. (updated graphics for ships, planets...) why is it so hard for them to do some updating for POS's?
CCP enjoys adding more and more broken things far more than they enjoy fixing things.
Edit: 62nd page! Woot!
_________________________________________________ If at first you don't succeed, you're not Chuck Norris |
Elrica bloodbane
|
Posted - 2010.03.27 15:21:00 -
[1832]
Originally by: Krennel Darius Edited by: Krennel Darius on 25/03/2010 23:21:05 Edited by: Krennel Darius on 25/03/2010 23:20:44
Originally by: Mekela So what are the reasons CCP isn't doing this? I don't understand they have done alot of things that don't change gameplay. (updated graphics for ships, planets...) why is it so hard for them to do some updating for POS's?
CCP enjoys adding more and more broken things far more than they enjoy fixing things.
Edit: 62nd page! Woot!
Quoted for the truth of it
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.04.01 03:59:00 -
[1833]
Saved from page 8,
Still trying to get CCP to see the light and fix our pos's since 2006. The Resurrection: Support the Revised Dead Horse Pos thread in Assembly Hall |
Yilan Cheran
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.04.03 20:39:00 -
[1834]
I am still betting that something like this will be implemented at about the same time as ambulation. Would be nice for Tech 3 stuff, too- and totally fit the theme! After all, the Strategic Cruisers are all nice and modular as well, so why not the POSes?
But just in case: bump |
Gerard Deneth
Caldari Pavlov Labs GmBH Independent Faction
|
Posted - 2010.04.04 06:20:00 -
[1835]
Originally by: Yilan Cheran I am still betting that something like this will be implemented at about the same time as ambulation. Would be nice for Tech 3 stuff, too- and totally fit the theme! After all, the Strategic Cruisers are all nice and modular as well, so why not the POSes?
But just in case: bump
We can only hope!
---------------------------- The Game's always changing under your feet; don't start moaning when you get a toe caught in the gears. |
KuroiOokami
|
Posted - 2010.04.04 19:07:00 -
[1836]
Just adding my First Flogging into the thread, poses need to be like this at the very least. I don't see why they have to be the way they are now, plus if you look at the mission areas, all there modules are pretty much connected abeit rather crap like, though they are still connected.
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente Mercurialis Inc. RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.04.09 00:44:00 -
[1837]
Zombie Horse never dies,
/me Picks up old stick smeared in gore, and beats the carcass for the umpteenth time
The Resurrection: Support the Revised Dead Horse Pos thread in Assembly Hall |
clay trax
|
Posted - 2010.04.09 12:58:00 -
[1838]
Edited by: clay trax on 09/04/2010 12:58:46 Here is my wish-list
1. Pos access by standings (this one might happen SOONÖ) 2. Fuel Pellets 3. Anchor and Online queue (no more baby sitting pos's while they are being setup) 4. Modular Pos 5. Fighterbays 6. New UI 7. Jump Bridge toll 8. Pos Gunners get pos attacked mail (this one might happen SOONÖ) 9. Missile Batteries stay online while in RF 10. Centralized Hangers.
POS access needs to be extended to standings AND/OR "allow lists" limited to 5-10 members pr. module.
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente Mercurialis Inc. RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.04.10 00:38:00 -
[1839]
Originally by: clay trax Edited by: clay trax on 09/04/2010 12:58:46 Here is my wish-list
1. Pos access by standings (this one might happen SOONÖ) 2. Fuel Pellets 3. Anchor and Online queue (no more baby sitting pos's while they are being setup) 4. Modular Pos 5. Fighterbays 6. New UI 7. Jump Bridge toll 8. Pos Gunners get pos attacked mail (this one might happen SOONÖ) 9. Missile Batteries stay online while in RF 10. Centralized Hangers.
POS access needs to be extended to standings AND/OR "allow lists" limited to 5-10 members pr. module.
Where have I seen this list before... The Resurrection: Support the Revised Dead Horse Pos thread in Assembly Hall |
Kyle Cataclysm
Blue.
|
Posted - 2010.04.10 20:16:00 -
[1840]
up
|
|
Seby
Caldari OMICRON HighTech Development
|
Posted - 2010.04.12 09:35:00 -
[1841]
signed.
************************************************************** The voices in my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas! |
Borgh Brainbasher
Path of Now and Forever
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 09:26:00 -
[1842]
If there are children who have been born, learned to walk, talk and possibly read this very thread after it was created, something went wrong somewhere.
Also, Bump --- Warning: You are on the pvp only server. |
Syberbolt8
Gallente Mercurialis Inc. RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 20:53:00 -
[1843]
Originally by: Borgh Brainbasher If there are children who have been born, learned to walk, talk and possibly read this very thread after it was created, something went wrong somewhere.
Also, Bump
Thats kinda funny, kinda sad. but Its possible.. lol
Bumps are fun The Resurrection: Support the Revised Dead Horse Pos thread in Assembly Hall |
Taladool
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 18:28:00 -
[1844]
Lets not let this fall to many pages.
Still the best idea regarding pos's
|
Goyathla
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 18:37:00 -
[1845]
Just went to check the fuel status of a POS today, accidentally his put offline instead of manage. I am appauled to find that there is no warning asking you to confirm. The rest of my afternoon is now spend reonlining the damn thing. Thank god I dont have to anchor anything. If you ask me, they could put an entire patch towards fixing POSs and they wouldnt even come close. The simplest, most easy to fix things never get done. I mean how long have POSs been out, and the offline button is right next to the manage button? What happens when my pos is under attack and my guys start manning guns, then someone accidentally offlines everything. I mean come on, fix this **** already.
~Goya
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente Mercurialis Inc. RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:07:00 -
[1846]
Originally by: Goyathla Just went to check the fuel status of a POS today, accidentally his put offline instead of manage. I am appauled to find that there is no warning asking you to confirm. The rest of my afternoon is now spend reonlining the damn thing. Thank god I dont have to anchor anything. If you ask me, they could put an entire patch towards fixing POSs and they wouldnt even come close. The simplest, most easy to fix things never get done. I mean how long have POSs been out, and the offline button is right next to the manage button? What happens when my pos is under attack and my guys start manning guns, then someone accidentally offlines everything. I mean come on, fix this **** already.
~Goya
There is a warning you just have it turned off.
But I agree it could be in a better place. The Resurrection: Support the Revised Dead Horse Pos thread in Assembly Hall |
Bael Gar
|
Posted - 2010.04.18 10:02:00 -
[1847]
/bump
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente Mercurialis Inc. RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.04.21 14:10:00 -
[1848]
saved from page 5 The Resurrection: Support the Revised Dead Horse Pos thread in Assembly Hall |
RedLion
Caldari State Constructions
|
Posted - 2010.04.25 14:31:00 -
[1849]
/flog
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The Gallenteans must be destroyed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
Laboratory Monkey
|
Posted - 2010.04.27 18:32:00 -
[1850]
Three and a half years later, and this is still an awesome idea.
|
|
Novs Slave
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 13:21:00 -
[1851]
Originally by: Laboratory Monkey Three and a half years later, and this is still an awesome idea.
agreed!!
|
Kidzior
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 09:38:00 -
[1852]
Originally by: Novs Slave
Originally by: Laboratory Monkey Three and a half years later, and this is still an awesome idea.
agreed!!
yup - but getting some x-box and ps players is much more important than complaining from hundreds ppl - it's just because it's complaining and ppl will not leave because of that simple bugs ;p
|
Novs Slave
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 16:44:00 -
[1853]
Originally by: Kidzior
Originally by: Novs Slave
Originally by: Laboratory Monkey Three and a half years later, and this is still an awesome idea.
agreed!!
yup - but getting some x-box and ps players is much more important than complaining from hundreds ppl - it's just because it's complaining and ppl will not leave because of that simple bugs ;p
Sure, 62 pages of thread proves this is a complain of just a few who want to bring casual players care about this topic
|
wr3cks
Combat Support Associates Reckoning.
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 18:02:00 -
[1854]
I am trying to set up a POS for small-scale corp member use, and it is a huge headache.
I cannot give anyone access to take things from a single hangar without also giving them access to offline the entire damn POS and unanchor structures.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!?
|
Tonto Auri
Vhero' Multipurpose Corp
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 18:16:00 -
[1855]
Edited by: Tonto Auri on 29/04/2010 18:16:36
Originally by: Cyberman Mastermind Edited by: Cyberman Mastermind on 25/03/2010 05:28:06
Originally by: Mekela So what are the reasons CCP isn't doing this? I don't understand they have done alot of things that don't change gameplay. (updated graphics for ships, planets...) why is it so hard for them to do some updating for POS's?
Old code. Very old code. (My guess at least.)
No one dares going near it. Besides, why bother? New shiny stuff brings new money. Old money stays anyway :-(
I think they're waiting for some divine intervention when something completely new will be introduced that can replace the POS system entirely.
There's new outposts code that is closely resembling current POS mechanics without current POS deficiencies.
Originally by: wr3cks I am trying to set up a POS for small-scale corp member use, and it is a huge headache.
I cannot give anyone access to take things from a single hangar without also giving them access to offline the entire damn POS and unanchor structures.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!?
You are doing it wrong then... -- Thanks CCP for cu |
wr3cks
Combat Support Associates Reckoning.
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 19:14:00 -
[1856]
Originally by: Tonto Auri Edited by: Tonto Auri on 29/04/2010 18:16:36
Originally by: wr3cks I am trying to set up a POS for small-scale corp member use, and it is a huge headache.
I cannot give anyone access to take things from a single hangar without also giving them access to offline the entire damn POS and unanchor structures.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!?
You are doing it wrong then...
Awesome, glad to hear! Maybe you can enlighten me?
So I created a title, Foreman, give him Hangar Access(Other), Query and Take access to the Mining hangar, Query access to the Production hangar.
But when a guy with that title tries to go to the POS, open the corporate hangar, and take things from the Mining hangar, he gets an error. You need Config Starbase Equip roles. However, that role also allows offlining towers, unanchoring hangars, etc. How do I accomplish my goal without giving him Config Starbase Equip?
Thanks in advance,
Wr3cks
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente Mercurialis Inc. RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 19:48:00 -
[1857]
Originally by: wr3cks
Originally by: Tonto Auri Edited by: Tonto Auri on 29/04/2010 18:16:36
Originally by: wr3cks I am trying to set up a POS for small-scale corp member use, and it is a huge headache.
I cannot give anyone access to take things from a single hangar without also giving them access to offline the entire damn POS and unanchor structures.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!?
You are doing it wrong then...
Awesome, glad to hear! Maybe you can enlighten me?
So I created a title, Foreman, give him Hangar Access(Other), Query and Take access to the Mining hangar, Query access to the Production hangar.
But when a guy with that title tries to go to the POS, open the corporate hangar, and take things from the Mining hangar, he gets an error. You need Config Starbase Equip roles. However, that role also allows offlining towers, unanchoring hangars, etc. How do I accomplish my goal without giving him Config Starbase Equip?
Thanks in advance,
Wr3cks
This is quite easy, Goto your control tower, right click it and click manage, find the access tab and click on it, you will see a list of the arrays you have anchored/onlined for each of them you can set an access level, for instance in your case you would set the corp hanger array to corp, this will allow your corp member use the hanger provided he has roles in the corp to use normal corp hangers. The Resurrection: Support the Revised Dead Horse Pos thread in Assembly Hall |
Party Scout
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 20:27:00 -
[1858]
I approve of this horse flogging!
Man, this idea is so old, why hasn't CCP picked up on it? This is simply an awesome idea.
|
wert668
|
Posted - 2010.04.30 13:13:00 -
[1859]
Edited by: wert668 on 30/04/2010 13:13:18
Originally by: Party Scout I approve of this horse flogging! Man, this idea is so old, why hasn't CCP picked up on it? This is simply an awesome idea.
They give a **** on what forum says, they stop reading forum years ago. They even miss this thread when they were making new graphic.
|
RedLion
Caldari State Constructions
|
Posted - 2010.05.01 20:22:00 -
[1860]
This could also be copied for PI.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The Gallenteans must be destroyed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 .. 80 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |