Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 52 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
15892
|
Posted - 2015.05.13 16:14:24 -
[901] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:baltec1 wrote:SilentAsTheGrave wrote:If high sec Incursions bother you so much; why don't you start suicide tanking them? You do it to freighters that are 100% empty "for the lulz" so why don't you go after them? Afraid of a target that can shoot back? you cant suicide gank actual BS fleets with logi support You can but at too high a cost. You won't cover your cost unless you really get lucky but there is nothing preventing you from parking tornadoes on the gate to a TCRC and just shooting whoever is the first poor chap to land after completing the previous site.
You will be bankrupt after ganking your second target. Suicide ganking simply is not an answer here not only because you cant pull it off but most importantly you because you don't fix game imbalances by telling other players to just gank others.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
10966
|
Posted - 2015.05.13 16:40:25 -
[902] - Quote
baltec1 wrote: you don't fix game imbalances by telling other players to just gank others.
Exactly. The constant talk about ganking is simply a diversion awayu from admitting that the problem exists.
Right now I'm living proof of the imbalance. Up until recently I lived in Delve. Me and my buddy 'lived' off of bllod raider anomalies. We both have done incursions and other pve before, but anoms are liquid isk and it's less boring doing pve with a friend. We pitched in together and bought a Vargur for the 10/10 esclations, but for ratting we used out machs.
And I would dual box an Ishtar on an alt semi-afking forsaken hubs while he and I did havens in machs.
Even with all that, even with escalations (that have RNG style rewards, sometimes we got nothing but the OPE box), it was hard to maintain the 'lifestyle'. Because of plex prices i went form plexing 4 accounts to plexxing 3 and paying the sub in cash with the 4th account (even though I'm capable of doing lvl 5 bltizing and have a FW alt, I can't be arsed to log in those characters sometimes, those activities just aren't fun). Roaming ceptors and cloaky campers were a constant concern, nothing we didn't handle though.
Then the recent upheaval in Delve happened, and We've had to leave. We both decided to take our alts to high sec to run incursions. I had recently trained what was a hauling alt to fly my incursion mach (so I could use my other mach capable pilots like jenn to do other things) and my buddy's alt could fly a raven so he simply trained over into a Nightmare. We run incursions with TVP and WTM.
After a week of incursion running I bought a Golem for Jenn and while I am incursion running I simply stick Jenn into a mission like Gone Berserk, Smash the Supplier, Buzz kill or some other mission with lots of npcs in one place, bastion up and start shooting FoF missiles. The Golem has a cap stable tank and tech1 light drones so i don't have to pay ANY attention to it except to restart the FoF missiles every 4-5 minutes.
The "semi-afk Golem" doesn't make as much isk as the afk Ishtar did, but since incursion running with the mach pays TWICE what using that same mach in null sec did, I come away way better off. I'm back to plexxing all 4 accounts without strain (playing fewer hours per day in fact), with way more left over to do other stuff with., all from he safety and convenience of high sec..
99% of the people claiming the above described situation isn't broken have 0% of the experience people like me have with playing the game in mutiple areas. |
Joe Atei
Aes Dei Asher
8
|
Posted - 2015.05.13 21:52:07 -
[903] - Quote
Vennicea wrote:It is actually quite amusing to see the heat that this topic is creating.
Unfortunately it appears that neither side will budge & this topic will devolve into an endless rant of arguments & counter-arguments which actually solves zip.
Time for me to do something productive.
Well, forums were never a place for real debate. I mean, once people realize they can't convince you of their point of view they start to throw insults around and claiming their point of view as the absolute truth and anyone who disagrees is either stupid or lying
It's so disgusting I retired the grand majority of my interest in this thread. The forums make me want to quit the game, so I take a break when I feel it's time. |
Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
83
|
Posted - 2015.05.13 23:57:32 -
[904] - Quote
Joe Atei wrote:Vennicea wrote:It is actually quite amusing to see the heat that this topic is creating.
Unfortunately it appears that neither side will budge & this topic will devolve into an endless rant of arguments & counter-arguments which actually solves zip.
Time for me to do something productive. Well, forums were never a place for real debate. I mean, once people realize they can't convince you of their point of view they start to throw insults around and claiming their point of view as the absolute truth and anyone who disagrees is either stupid or lyingIt's so disgusting I retired the grand majority of my interest in this thread. The forums make me want to quit the game, so I take a break when I feel it's time.
Disagree. What is missing is the ability to say "I stand corrected" or "Hey I learned something, thanks".
Stalemate is "we agree to disagree"
A forum is not always a competition, unless you make it one. And even then you "gf" when you lose a fight
btw, insulting or attacking your opponent directly is a "loss" in any proper debate. Always attack the argument ftw. I can agree with a sound argument regardless of who is posting it. |
Johny Tyler
Omega Tactical Group Reckoning Star Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 08:40:10 -
[905] - Quote
Kaldi Tsukaya wrote:Joe Atei wrote:Vennicea wrote:It is actually quite amusing to see the heat that this topic is creating.
Unfortunately it appears that neither side will budge & this topic will devolve into an endless rant of arguments & counter-arguments which actually solves zip.
Time for me to do something productive. Well, forums were never a place for real debate. I mean, once people realize they can't convince you of their point of view they start to throw insults around and claiming their point of view as the absolute truth and anyone who disagrees is either stupid or lyingIt's so disgusting I retired the grand majority of my interest in this thread. The forums make me want to quit the game, so I take a break when I feel it's time. Disagree. What is missing is the ability to say "I stand corrected" or "Hey I learned something, thanks". Stalemate is "we agree to disagree" A forum is not always a competition, unless you make it one. And even then you "gf" when you lose a fight btw, insulting or attacking your opponent directly is a "loss" in any proper debate. Always attack the argument ftw. I can agree with a sound argument regardless of who is posting it.
Just train rational thinking to 5 so you will always agree with me.
Then train forum etiquette to 5 and spam emoticons to keep the everyone happy. |
leavemymomalone idiot
State War Academy Caldari State
54
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 11:17:10 -
[906] - Quote
end incursions?
dont be stoopid, asking mummy and daddy to step in because you think its risk free isk does not make it true, its a sand box not a theme park. you dont like something do as we do. Fix it yourself.
i was born from the desire to stop arseholes killing the mom too early, our fleet of pilots never show up on killmails, we fly in and jam the logi pilots and let the sansha do the killing,
ending incursions would end the point of my existence and all the other pilots in band of blackbirds.
you think its risk free isk, i am here to tell you i know its not risk free.
The payments of isk and lp are not too large if anything i would say buff the payments. your going to need the isk.
|
Lan Wang
Stillwater Corporation That Escalated Quickly.
583
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 11:20:15 -
[907] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:end incursions?
dont be stoopid, asking mummy and daddy to step in because you think its risk free isk does not make it true, its a sand box not a theme park. you dont like something do as we do. Fix it yourself.
i was born from the desire to stop arseholes killing the mom too early, our fleet of pilots never show up on killmails, we fly in and jam the logi pilots and let the sansha do the killing,
ending incursions would end the point of my existence and all the other pilots in band of blackbirds.
you think its risk free isk, i am here to tell you i know its not risk free.
The payments of isk and lp are not too large if anything i would say buff the payments. your going to need the isk.
buff the payments? are you actually being serious
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Solecist Project
Shitt Outta Luck - GANKING4GOOD
24458
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 11:20:30 -
[908] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:end incursions?
dont be stoopid, asking mummy and daddy to step in because you think its risk free isk does not make it true, its a sand box not a theme park. you dont like something do as we do. Fix it yourself.
i was born from the desire to stop arseholes killing the mom too early, our fleet of pilots never show up on killmails, we fly in and jam the logi pilots and let the sansha do the killing,
ending incursions would end the point of my existence and all the other pilots in band of blackbirds.
you think its risk free isk, i am here to tell you i know its not risk free.
The payments of isk and lp are not too large if anything i would say buff the payments. your going to need the isk.
Stupid name. Hiding behind an npc alt. Can't spell properly.
Yeah, totally worth taking seriously and absolutely honest.
S.O.L. GANKING4GOOD
Abolish Rookiecorps.
Baaldor > ... Sol's Haiku manner of response ...
|
Lan Wang
Stillwater Corporation That Escalated Quickly.
583
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 11:27:50 -
[909] - Quote
I would love to see some evidence of your endeavours, jamming logi is still aggression so where are your kill/death mails please
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
10971
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 13:01:17 -
[910] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:I would love to see some evidence of your endeavours, jamming logi is still aggression so where are your kill/death mails please
That sound you are hearing coming from your speakers or headphones right now are Terran Insects called "crickets". That are particularly active when they detect that you are waiting for another poster to confirm something we already know is bullshit. |
|
Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1790
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 13:06:49 -
[911] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:I would love to see some evidence of your endeavours, jamming logi is still aggression so where are your kill/death mails please
Technically he/she won't get a KM if they only jam logi and if no-one shoot them for being criminal, then concord will be the only entity on the KM so it might not be posted.
This is of course taking for granted they don't even ***** on the target being potentially melted down by Sansha and somehow don't get rat aggro from e-war usage.
It kind of require every pieces to fall at the right places and people deliberately not whoring on the upcoming kill... I guess they could argue it takes a few seconds to spot which ship is getting shot to **** by deltoles, yulais and otunis... |
Aivo Dresden
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
464
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 13:37:01 -
[912] - Quote
Incursion income with a top notch blinged up fleet is like 150m/hr. That's assuming you get a nice rate on your LP as well. The only concern I have with it, isn't the income, it's the safety and ease. Incursions are run while you watch TV or do something else. The income vs effort / risk ratio is a little off. |
GankYou
Redshield Holding Company
382
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 14:34:32 -
[913] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:
i was born from the desire to stop arseholes killing the mom too early, our fleet of pilots never show up on killmails, we fly in and jam the logi pilots and let the sansha do the killing,
HAHAHA. Excellent.
...And They All Crave One Thing - ISK. Gÿ+
Nullsec Ore Changes - Lowend Mineral Price Tracking [2015]
|
Solecist Project
Shitt Outta Luck - GANKING4GOOD
24490
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 14:35:39 -
[914] - Quote
GankYou wrote:leavemymomalone idiot wrote:
i was born from the desire to stop arseholes killing the mom too early, our fleet of pilots never show up on killmails, we fly in and jam the logi pilots and let the sansha do the killing,
HAHAHA. Excellent. It's funny how she says it's a sandbox ... ... and at the same time insults the players who play sandboxxy.
And to top that she doesn't realise that greed isn't a right. Or doesn't realise greed.
Hypocrites.
S.O.L. GANKING4GOOD
Abolish Rookiecorps.
Baaldor > ... Sol's Haiku manner of response ...
|
GankYou
Redshield Holding Company
382
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 14:36:14 -
[915] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:I would love to see some evidence of your endeavours, jamming logi is still aggression so where are your kill/death mails please
Yespls.
PLS
...And They All Crave One Thing - ISK. Gÿ+
Nullsec Ore Changes - Lowend Mineral Price Tracking [2015]
|
Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1790
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 14:44:56 -
[916] - Quote
Aivo Dresden wrote:Incursion income with a top notch blinged up fleet is like 150m/hr. That's assuming you get a nice rate on your LP as well. The only concern I have with it, isn't the income, it's the safety and ease. Incursions are run while you watch TV or do something else. The income vs effort / risk ratio is a little off.
The issue is the PvE in EVE don't really offer all that much possibilities for change over this. You can make the rats hit harder to somehow overcome the logis but then fleets will bring more logis.
Enemy spawning in waves makes the whole process really procedural. At 3 point in the whole site you really ahve to pay a bit more attention because the aggro can go anywhere. The only thing that really has to be killed asap and isn't only spawning at the same time as waves are 1 ship that use ECM in TCRC. The drone bunny usually take care of it all by himself.
There is next to no situational awareness required because your position is either where you are supposed to be to do your job or burning toward that point. You never have to move because something happened.
The risk could come from other player too but the effect of this is probably harder to predict. The bling fit would most likely gets rarer which is not that bad of a result but I personally can't say if the content would still be run like it is now. It would probably depend on what freedom of intervention the players have different from the current concord response. |
Kaye Kaye
Mining and Trade
6
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 17:54:37 -
[917] - Quote
This thread should go to the Game Ideas Wasteland.
Note: Same type of junk call outs got Level 5 missions moved to Low Sec, which effectively just removed them from the game. Why not just pull any and all income activity from HS and let the game die a horrible death since you don't get your play style of PVP satisfied.
There is NOTHING you will be able to change in this game PERIOD that will get non-PVP players to PVP, it's just not going to happen in any meaningful numbers to be worth the change. They are completely different game styles.
I am surprised CCP hasn't learned by now that nerfing High Sec only means less things to do in game and less income for CCP.
Here's a thought.... Why not make more interesting things to do in game that costs a metric ton of ISK to do it - tihngs that don't involved nerfing someones play style, and add value to the game.
|
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
15892
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 18:00:21 -
[918] - Quote
Kaye Kaye wrote:Same type of junk call outs got Level 5 missions moved to Low Sec, which effectively just removed them from the game.
CCP fixed a bug, they were never meant to be in highsec.
Kaye Kaye wrote: There is NOTHING you will be able to change in this game PERIOD that will get non-PVP players to PVP
We don't want to, what we want is a reason for the people who do pvp to make their isk in null.
Kaye Kaye wrote: I am surprised CCP hasn't learned by now that nerfing High Sec only means less things to do in game and less income for CCP.
Highsec has had very very few nerfs.
Kaye Kaye wrote: Here's a thought.... Why not make more interesting things to do in game that costs a metric ton of ISK to do it - tihngs that don't involved nerfing someones play style, and add value to the game.
So using that argument you are a fan of giving goons back our tech moon monopoly?
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|
Lan Wang
Stillwater Corporation That Escalated Quickly.
589
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 18:23:20 -
[919] - Quote
Kaye Kaye wrote:This thread should go to the Game Ideas Wasteland.
Note: Same type of junk call outs got Level 5 missions moved to Low Sec, which effectively just removed them from the game. Why not just pull any and all income activity from HS and let the game die a horrible death since you don't get your play style of PVP satisfied.
There is NOTHING you will be able to change in this game PERIOD that will get non-PVP players to PVP, it's just not going to happen in any meaningful numbers to be worth the change. They are completely different game styles.
I am surprised CCP hasn't learned by now that nerfing High Sec only means less things to do in game and less income for CCP.
Here's a thought.... Why not make more interesting things to do in game that costs a metric ton of ISK to do it - tihngs that don't involved nerfing someones play style, and add value to the game.
You know highsec isnt the only place in eve, lvl 5's dead? Dont think so they just added risk (fixed a bug) now the only people who do them are the people who want to take the risk to make the isk, as said why buff everything else when you can sort the root of the problem
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Vic Jefferson
The Greater Goon Clockwork Pineapple
287
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 21:02:27 -
[920] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kaye Kaye wrote: There is NOTHING you will be able to change in this game PERIOD that will get non-PVP players to PVP
We don't want to, what we want is a reason for the people who do pvp to make their isk in null.
What's funny is that an entirely honest appraisal of the situation will probably be ignored in favour of vilification of null sec residents.
Vote Vic Jefferson for CSM X
|
|
ashley Eoner
473
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 21:11:32 -
[921] - Quote
Aivo Dresden wrote:Incursion income with a top notch blinged up fleet is like 150m/hr. That's assuming you get a nice rate on your LP as well. The only concern I have with it, isn't the income, it's the safety and ease. Incursions are run while you watch TV or do something else. The income vs effort / risk ratio is a little off. In non a blinged out fleet I made a little less to far more per hour in WHs AND null with little risk. Although I guess I had to click dscan occasionally in the WH so you could call that extra effort.
It's amazing how much isk you can make in null as an individual when your alliance isn't renting out most of the good space.
:others:
It's kind of sad how people are so obsessive over someone possibly making as much or more isk per hour with less effort or risk. Just enjoy the game you play and stop being so zealous over what someone may or may not be making.
If your obsession is too strong to ignore you can always take it on yourself to HTFU and make it harder for those that are the target of your jealously. Nah that would require effort in a sandbox game. I guess you can just continue whining on the forums in the hopes that you don't have to do anything in game. |
Vic Jefferson
The Greater Goon Clockwork Pineapple
288
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 21:32:18 -
[922] - Quote
ashley Eoner wrote: It's kind of sad how people are so obsessive over someone possibly making as much or more isk per hour with less effort or risk. Just enjoy the game you play and stop being so zealous over what someone may or may not be making.
It's not about raw isk per hour or per effort. There's always going to be someone who knows how to game things better and achieve better numbers than the rest of us, and there's nothing wrong with that at all. What's wrong about the situation is that the average pilot is better off in Hi Sec than they would be in null. Wouldn't it be cool if null sec actually supported it's population?
Vote Vic Jefferson for CSM X
|
ashley Eoner
474
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 21:39:40 -
[923] - Quote
Vic Jefferson wrote:ashley Eoner wrote: It's kind of sad how people are so obsessive over someone possibly making as much or more isk per hour with less effort or risk. Just enjoy the game you play and stop being so zealous over what someone may or may not be making.
It's not about raw isk per hour or per effort. There's always going to be someone who knows how to game things better and achieve better numbers than the rest of us, and there's nothing wrong with that at all. What's wrong about the situation is that the average pilot is better off in Hi Sec than they would be in null. Wouldn't it be cool if null sec actually supported it's population? The pilots are ONLY better off in highsec because of their corp and alliance. Choose a different corp or alliance is my suggestion. When I rented in null I made more then enough isk per hour to choose to live there instead of highsec. Of course renting out the system to me meant that the rank and file of the renter corp had one less system to make isk in. Repeat this by many times and you see why the corp/alliance doing the renting has completely screwed their rank and file..
Of course the isk being made by the renter corps goes into SRP and other fun things that the people in highsec don't have. So while you're in that corp your income is reduced you're also gaining benefits galore.
Comparing null income while part of a large alliance to that of a single player in an incursion fleet is apples to oranges. The incursion pilot might make a bit more isk per hour on paper but they have NOTHING resembling the benefits that the null pilot has (fleet and solo SRP, paid for activities like finding WHs, more opportunities for gameplay experience etc).
If Null is really so awful to live in then it shouldn't be difficult to convince people to go on strike and leave null en-mass. That would get CCPs attention. |
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
2155
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 21:47:44 -
[924] - Quote
Vic Jefferson wrote: It's not about raw isk per hour or per effort. There's always going to be someone who knows how to game things better and achieve better numbers than the rest of us, and there's nothing wrong with that at all. What's wrong about the situation is that the average pilot is better off in Hi Sec than they would be in null. Wouldn't it be cool if null sec actually supported it's population?
The 'average' pilot does not run Incursions in high sec. Incursions in Highsec simply do not support that many people. Even assuming 100/hour they only support 80-90 pilots at any one time. (calculated off the 2014 figures, I posted the breakdown in one of these repetitive threads by the same people crying for them to be nerfed). So if the issue is 'average pilots' then look elsewhere.
If the issue is Null vs High Incursions.... https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Incursion_sites#Vanguard Figures taken from here since I can't currently log into EVE, Ratio will be correct even if total value isn't. High Incursion Vanguard = 10 (number of pilots for max payout) *0.7 (highsec ratio)*15,000,000 (Individual payout) = 105,000,000 total income per site, 105 Million. High Incursion Vanguard = 15 (number of pilots for max payout) *1.0 (highsec ratio)*15,000,000 (Individual payout) = 225,000,000 total income per site, 225 Million. So a Null Vanguard site is worth just over DOUBLE a High Vanguard site.
Yes CCP haven't extended that past Vanguards for the additional pilots, but probably they should. Even if the sites take 50% longer (despite the extra pilots which should easily balance out T2 fits vs Deadspace fits) Null still earns more isk per site. As for 'Incursions get ended fast in Null'. Don't complain about your own choices. Now Caps can take gates you can move Caps around even with a cyno jammer effect in place. |
Vic Jefferson
The Greater Goon Clockwork Pineapple
288
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 21:59:23 -
[925] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote: Yes CCP haven't extended that past Vanguards for the additional pilots, but probably they should. Even if the sites take 50% longer (despite the extra pilots which should easily balance out T2 fits vs Deadspace fits) Null still earns more isk per site. As for 'Incursions get ended fast in Null'. Don't complain about your own choices. Now Caps can take gates you can move Caps around even with a cyno jammer effect in place.
The point of the thread isn't Null vs HS incursions, though I would find it hilarious to see you take a Jump Freighter from Jita to a Sov Capital of your choice without using cynos; it isn't really a choice.
The point of the thread is the payouts available by HS incursions are sufficiently high to push all other income generation options in other areas off the table of viability/desirability.
Vote Vic Jefferson for CSM X
|
Dantelion Shinoni
SQUIDS.
14
|
Posted - 2015.05.15 01:33:58 -
[926] - Quote
ashley Eoner wrote: The few fleets I was in where I made more then +110m an hour I had to wait for. Hell I had to wait for the 100m an hour fleets. Of course the fellow quoting 150m an hour doesn't include the hour or two spent on the waitlist earning nothing. God help you if you decide to make a little isk on the side while waiting thus being out of system when your name is called.
Oh gods, you ahve to wait an hour before making billions!... The horror.
ashley Eoner wrote: Comparing null income while part of a large alliance to that of a single player in an incursion fleet is apples to oranges. The incursion pilot might make a bit more isk per hour on paper (excluding wait times) but they have NOTHING resembling the benefits that the null pilot has (fleet and solo SRP, paid for activities like finding WHs, more opportunities for gameplay experience etc).
Yeah, just a bit. Such a tiny bit that Null-secers get on their alts to run them instead of profiting of the maaaany benefits they have. |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
15895
|
Posted - 2015.05.15 03:45:01 -
[927] - Quote
ashley Eoner wrote:Aivo Dresden wrote:Incursion income with a top notch blinged up fleet is like 150m/hr. That's assuming you get a nice rate on your LP as well. The only concern I have with it, isn't the income, it's the safety and ease. Incursions are run while you watch TV or do something else. The income vs effort / risk ratio is a little off. In non a blinged out fleet I made a little less to far more per hour in WHs AND null with little risk. Although I guess I had to click dscan occasionally in the WH so you could call that extra effort. It's amazing how much isk you can make in null as an individual when your alliance isn't renting out most of the good space. :others: It's kind of sad how people are so obsessive over someone possibly making as much or more isk per hour with less effort or risk. Just enjoy the game you play and stop being so zealous over what someone may or may not be making. If your obsession is too strong to ignore you can always take it on yourself to HTFU and make it harder for those that are the target of your jealously. Nah that would require effort in a sandbox game. I guess you can just continue whining on the forums in the hopes that you don't have to do anything in game. baltec1 wrote: We don't want to, what we want is a reason for the people who do pvp to make their isk in null.
If only that was true. Looking at your post history it's clear you haven't met a highsec nerf you didn't like. People can clearly make good isk in null and only propagandists or clueless/fail players claim otherwise. Your own alliance has corps that have created recruitment pictures galore bragging about the good isk you can make in their space (null). Regardless lets do a little theory crafting here and assume for a moment that your version of null actually exists. A null that pvp players can't make good isk and that the only place to make good isk is in highsec. Your solution to this problem is to... *drumroll*.....nerf highsec. So how does decreasing income in only highsec increase the ticks in null when ratting or running sites? Are you hoping that all the isk made in FW/low and WH somehow vanishes too? Or are those your next line of targets? Only at that point (after you've nerfed highsec low and WHs into the ground) would you see a relative increase in purchasing power from null PVE. CCP has already shown that their data shows nullsec making a LOT of isk (hence the nerfs). So I doubt CCP would buff null income after having just tried to get the isk fountains out there somewhat under control.
CCPs data shows more liqid isk is made in null due to the fact that all the reward for anoms come from bounties. That does not mean null has the best income, said anoms are on par with level 3 income in highsec. That propaganda about how great our great ratting income is in renter space is just that, propaganda. Shock horror, goons are scamming people into paying taxes for useless space. Do you honestly think we would not be using that space ourselves if it was any good?
What I want is a total revamp of income from PVE in all areas of space in the same way that mining, industry, exploration and PI now operate.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
10995
|
Posted - 2015.05.15 04:14:57 -
[928] - Quote
The sig of Malcanis the Great is relevant here:
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |
ashley Eoner
474
|
Posted - 2015.05.15 04:50:03 -
[929] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:CCPs data shows more liqid isk is made in null due to the fact that all the reward for anoms come from bounties. That does not mean null has the best income, said anoms are on par with level 3 income in highsec. That propaganda about how great our great ratting income is in renter space is just that, propaganda. Shock horror, goons are scamming people into paying taxes for useless space. Do you honestly think we would not be using that space ourselves if it was any good?
What I want is a total revamp of income from PVE in all areas of space in the same way that mining, industry, exploration and PI now operate. I think the fact that your alliance can throw hundreds of extremely well equiped supers and titans into a fight is more then enough evidence that nullsec makes plenty of isk. Remember how CCP swore that titans cost so much that only the biggest alliances would be able to field a few? I believe I remember similar statements about super carriers when they were introduced. Seems nullsec income far surpassed even CCP's expectations.
I was talking about recruitment banners/images not renter stuff.
I've done the renter thing and I've done the big alliance thing. I made more personal isk as a renter but the SRP, intel channels, and such from the big alliance thing certainly made up for the loss in income relative to renting. |
Kaarous Aldurald
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
12988
|
Posted - 2015.05.15 07:30:38 -
[930] - Quote
ashley Eoner wrote:Remember how CCP swore that titans cost so much that only the biggest alliances would be able to field a few?
That's a statement about CCP's legendary shortsightedness, not about relativity of personal income.
And as far as personal income goes, incursions are way out of whack.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 52 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |