Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 24 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

Scott Webb
Scott Webb Corp
15
|
Posted - 2015.06.01 21:37:49 -
[601] - Quote
The contempt you show for your customer base in your agenda for Nomalising and collectivism must be hemoraging your player base. |

Daniela Doran
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2015.06.01 21:58:57 -
[602] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Hey everyone! For our Carnyx release at the beginning of June we're planning on making some moderate tweaks to sentry drones, part of our ongoing process of massaging drone combat into a healthier place in the meta.
These are a very specific and limited set of changes that we believe will benefit the game, but it's important to know that these are explicitly not intended to be a "once and for all" fix for every problem related to sentries. There's no such thing as a balance silver bullet.
The main goals of these changes are to further improve the intra-class balance between sentry drones (smoothing out the progression in tracking speed and compressing the damage spread a bit) and slightly reducing the power level of some sentry fits and doctrines, especially for Bouncers and Curators that are quite dominant in a few areas.
Current plan is: Gardes: -25% Optimal, +66.7% Falloff, -3% Damage, -6.67% Tracking Curators: -3.1% Damage, -13% Tracking Bouncers: -3.3% Damage, -12.5% Tracking
We welcome feedback as always!
Geez you guys been on a nerfing rampage lately. First there was the T3D's and now sentry drones.....sigh. Tell straight up Fozzie if this is gonna cripple-tize the domi as a pve boat? I have 3 accounts that I trained for the domi/Ishtar that I used for pve and I'm wondering if these changes (and the ones to come) are gonna make them NO LONGER NEEDED.
|

GankYou
Redshield Holding Company
456
|
Posted - 2015.06.01 21:59:43 -
[603] - Quote
afkalt wrote:With everything else empty 8 tachs uses 26726.4/26250 grid on an apoc/baddon. Already 2% over. 1400 arty on a mael uses 25740/26250 leaving you 510 for everything else. 425 rails are kinder, but then gallente is the master race 
Correct. Has always been so.
These people are oblivious.
Three times the tracking, same range and higher damage than equivalents!
Game meta right now is not healthy by any measure, and MegaZyd input doubling has hit battleships the most.
...And They All Crave One Thing - ISK. Gÿ+
Nullsec Ore Changes - Lowend Mineral Price Tracking [2015]
|

Daniela Doran
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2015.06.01 22:08:24 -
[604] - Quote
Amanda MonteCarlo wrote:Couple of fun facts about drones - current stats compared to other weapon systems - no skill bonuses applied.
Tracking: bouncer - 0.019 1400's - 0.009
curator - 0.028 tachyon beam - 0.014
warden - 0.012 425 rail - 0.01
Yup 2x the tracking than large guns (except wardens) - maybe more tracking nerfs are required?
Damage: 0 lvl skills, faction medium range ammo(you need it to have similiar range as drones).
bouncer - 24dps - 36+54km range 1400's with titanium sabot - 13dps - 48+35km range
Tachyon with standard - 16dps - 53+20km range Curator - 26dps - 42+12km range
425 rail with lead- 14dps - 58+24km range Warden - 22dps - 60+42km range
Eve if you count hat domi has 7.5 effective drones vs 8-10 effective turrets of battleships the damage at range is way better for drones boats. Maybe DPS should be decreased a bit more.
Also projectiles suck, AC's need more range - barrage would be ok-ish if it had +100% fallof and selectable damage, and arty can't fit on anything.
Nay, you can't do that type of comparision since you can't lock and destroy turrets.
|

Daniela Doran
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2015.06.01 22:12:34 -
[605] - Quote
Valterra Craven wrote:Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:Valterra Craven wrote:Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:
Why? Ishtar is bonused in all sentries and all other racial drones.
Nice try.
Then why is the zealot any more of a valid comparison? You're serious aren't you? Both the Zealot and the Ishtar are Heavy Assault Cruisers. People don't even remember, or know what ships like the Zealot, Muninn are. Good job, CCP. Serious about my first question: "I'm curious, what evidence do you have to support your argument that both drones and hulls are the problem, as opposed to just drones, or just hulls. I've seen no data analysis posted by devs in this thread as to why they think sentries themselves are still the problem." We all know that the ishtar having access to sentries is stupid beyond belief (and by we I mean everyone but CCP) No one would think twice about the ranges of sentries if they were bs only and above weapons. Hell in that regard they are even underpowered compared to them considering some of the extreme ranges you can hit with rails and artys! Yet, they keep nerfing sentries into the ground to try and fix this issue with the ishtar. So my question is, what the hell are they looking at that they think sentries are still the problem? As to your post, I'm not sure what point you were trying to prove as I already agree that the ishtar is stupid OP right now.
A simple solution would be to remove the sentry drone bonus on the Ishtar and make it into a heavy drone platform.
|

Daniela Doran
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2015.06.01 22:20:24 -
[606] - Quote
Ryan en Tilavine wrote:Ive always trusted you fozzie to not need a helping hand. But here i am. Making my first ever post, since you can't seem to see the forest for the trees. Sentry drones are FINE. Leave them as they are now and just do this...
The Ishtar we all want to see
Gallente cruiser bonus :
7.5% to light, medium, heavy drone max velocity and tracking speed 10% to drone damage and hitpoints
Heavy Assault Cruiser bonus :
5000m bonus to drone operation range 7.5% to sentry drone tracking
375 M3 drone bay 125 mb drone bandwidth
The Dominix we all want to see
Gellente Battleship bonus
7.5% to drone max velocity and optimal range 10% bonus to drone damage and hitpoints
375 m3 drone bay 125 mb drone bandwidth
The sentry drones out of any other ship are fine. Their ranges, tracking, damage, hitpoints, and immobility feel perfect as they are now. Nerfing them will only pound other ships that would use them into the dust. If you want to take 10-15% of the optimal from gardes and give them the same falloff then cool. But leave them be besides.
You're on the right track, but the Ishtar should be made into a heavy drone platform without any sentry bonus, since sentries are now been targeted because of it.
|

Daniela Doran
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2015.06.01 22:40:58 -
[607] - Quote
Harvey James wrote:i think drones need a much stronger dps nerf .. consider reducing the RoF on sentries
Another nerf happy fanatic post from the guy who wishes all ships in eve couldn't do more than 500 dps outside of 30km. You must be a miner.
|

DEFANDER
The Forbidden Few
10
|
Posted - 2015.06.01 23:23:30 -
[608] - Quote
So,
This is what we have discovered with all this posting:
- Sentries are OK the way they are now.
- Ishtar's are a breed between a big ass Mini-Carrier (no battleship so far comes in close to the dps output @ the same range) and an Interceptor (Low sig and high speed).
- Domi's are Ishtar's big fat brothers. They are slow, bulky, and they can't even compete with the Ishtar. Will they still be viable for big fleets ? Your guys know better.
- With the changes remaining the way they are in the works now: * Ishtar's will remain the dominant ship to go to in large fleet fights (cheaper then a BS or T3 - better range and damage - no necessity to retrain "Amarr Propultion V") * Dominix may still work or not, will not speculate as i have no flown one in years (Man is that ship ugly) * Rattlesnake will have the change setups away from sentries, and into heavy drones (And I'm not talking PvP here, but PvE) * Armageddon - don't know what this change will do it. Frankly i don't even think there are that many people out there that fit sentries on their geddons. I have always seen a geddon (after it was change to a mini-bhalgorn) to be usyng at most heavy drones, if at all. I change the Drone damage bonus on this ship to a ewar drones bonus. * Nestor - "nice" ship VISUAL design. But when it comes to using it for anything - NOT WORTH IT *** On any hull that does NOT have bonus to sentries tracking - sentries will be worthless. They already track for **** (without tracking links ).
- This post has been running for i believe over 2 week now (?), and with the replies and discussions on the matter, the changes are still planned to go live.
Who will have more and who will have less to lose after patch day ?
Big fleets that use the Ishtar regularly (fleets over what - 100 ~ ?), will still use them - just change 1-2 modules. And i bet there changes have already been made and alliance mails already sent out. As well as ship contracts changed to the new fits. I mean hey, why go with a ship that costs more and does only 50-70% of the job the Ishtar does - right ?
The little guys that use any of the others hulls for either PvP or PvE (primarily PvE - don't think people would use sentries on ships that don't have a bonus for them in pvp) WILL SUFFER after these changes.
- There have been discussion going back and forth about the differences in the range / tracking between sentries and Large Guns. The primary things to remember here are: <> Sentries: even do they more or less damage / tracking / range - THEY ARE DESTROYABLE. You can take them down. Even more so when they are deployed by Ishtar's (why ? cause Ishtar's can't just pick them up when they start taking fire - without loosing the ship in the process) <> Guns, guns, guns: even do they require pg and cpu to fit, more or less cap to use - THEY ARE NOT DESTROYABLE (unless you forget to turn overheat off). With guns you can also stop shooting and change ammo type, witch will give you more or less optimal / fallout / tracking / cap usage / and not to mention damage. <> And not to mention projectile ammo also allows you to change damage types. <> Now, try to change the range, tracking and off course the damage type with sentries drones. Well this is were it get's tricky: You can either go back and scoop the drones up (witch takes time and puts the ship in danger), or abandon said drones and deploy another set. You can carry loads of different ammo types in your cargo. But you can only carry a set amount of sentries set's with you. And most of the time changing a set of sentries means "loosing" the old set.
The problem is, we keep talking between us, and it's all for nothing. Nobody is paying attention and following these requests / complaints / what ever you want to call it.
We will see after DT today. |

Herpinetta Derpina
Intergalactic Trade and Harm
7
|
Posted - 2015.06.01 23:35:29 -
[609] - Quote
Its obvious you guys dont listen to your fan base at all and have become arrogant even with the replys.I have endured nerf after nerf after nerf from you guys and have changed weapon systems/ships more times then i care to admit, some of which really made the game a lot more fun for me.When this nerf goes into effect tomorrow it will further hinder my ability to get pve grinding isk to fund my pvp over quickly before i smash my face into a wall from boredom.I am seriously debating on whether or not i want to continue to contribute to your paychecks.More then likely, after 8 years of good times(for the most part), i will end my sub this month. |

Kinete Jenius
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
28
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 04:27:55 -
[610] - Quote
GankYou wrote:"Minor decrease".  People don't seem to play the game, and when they do they play in Ishtars, Gilas, Rattlesnakes. Drones in PvP have become what missiles were/are in PvE, but only for brain-dead & OP-broken PvP. Regarding Garde II sentries: 1) Base tracking is 0.036 rad/sec. 2) A 425mm Railgun II has 0.01 rad/sec base tracking! That's 3.6 times less, and with Javelin L T2 ammo, it's 0.01 * 1.25 = 0.0125 rad/sec. Thanks for the laugh! You're comparing apples to orangutans.
How about you go back to my post where I compare apples to apples?
It's clear you have no interest in actual real numbers. You clearly want to stay at "base" numbers which are completely meaningless in a world where implants, overheating, and more boost turrets/missiles but have no effect on drones.
I know it's dumb of me to try to have a real conversation with a troll alt named "gank you" that has a history of making wildly inaccurate assertions. I just can't help myself right now.
Ishtars should lose the sentry bonuses. |
|

Daniela Doran
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 05:23:27 -
[611] - Quote
Herpinetta Derpina wrote:Its obvious you guys dont listen to your fan base at all and have become arrogant even with the replys.I have endured nerf after nerf after nerf from you guys and have changed weapon systems/ships more times then i care to admit, some of which really made the game a lot more fun for me.When this nerf goes into effect tomorrow it will further hinder my ability to get pve grinding isk to fund my pvp over quickly before i smash my face into a wall from boredom.I am seriously debating on whether or not i want to continue to contribute to your paychecks.More then likely, after 8 years of good times(for the most part), i will end my sub this month.
Yea i totally get what you're saying. With all the nerfing and sudden changes, I just don't know how long my enthusiasm for eve is gonna last. CCP bought out the T3D's which was a great introduction and after hearing all the positive feedback for the Confessor, I decided to trained for it. Then CCP drops a bomb on them as soon as I finished training for the ships and now coincidentally I just finish training for 3 sentry Domis on 3 other accounts that I was gonna use for C3/C4 wormholes...sigh then CCP does it again. These sudden and often nerfs are starting to knock the wind out of me and now I'm thinking of dropping 3 accounts because of as of this nerf, they're worthless. |

Daniela Doran
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 05:33:37 -
[612] - Quote
Xavier Azabu wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:...making some moderate tweaks to sentry drones...  ...massaging drone combat... Current plan is:Gardes: -25% Optimal, +33% Falloff, -3% Damage, -6.67% Tracking Curators: -3.1% Damage, -13% Tracking Bouncers: -3.3% Damage, -12.5% Tracking We welcome feedback as always! Optimal nerf on Gardes is a little harsh. Maybe like 15%? No one uses them on towers or in kiting Ishtar combat anyway. The Curator and Bouncer nerf is needed. Will this finally discourage people from using the Ishtar?
NOPE |

Skia Aumer
Planetary Harvesting and Processing LLC Desman Alliance
152
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 05:48:39 -
[613] - Quote
DEFANDER wrote:Sentries: even do they more or less damage / tracking / range - THEY ARE DESTROYABLE... Guns, guns, guns: even do they require pg and cpu to fit, more or less cap to use - THEY ARE NOT DESTROYABLE The funny part is - it's easier to destroy guns with the ship itself, than the drones. Ishtar has about 60k EHP. How much do you think its drones have? Well... TWICE as much. |

afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1328
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 07:13:37 -
[614] - Quote
Skia Aumer wrote:DEFANDER wrote:Sentries: even do they more or less damage / tracking / range - THEY ARE DESTROYABLE... Guns, guns, guns: even do they require pg and cpu to fit, more or less cap to use - THEY ARE NOT DESTROYABLE The funny part is - it's easier to destroy guns with the ship itself, than the drones. Ishtar has about 60k EHP. How much do you think its drones have? Well... TWICE as much.
Shooting the drones is only slightly more useful than defender missiles.
See, here's how it really works:
Bombing kinda works, however if you have enough pilots to man a bombing wing AND threaten the main fleet what is more effective is simply sticking those bombers in ishtars and alphaing the enemy off field with superior numbers.
Bombers are fine if you're outmanned and outgunned and it's your only option. Of course the enemy then realises this and fans out a little but whatever.
Shooting with guns is silly because you'll be getting shot back by the drones and if you can tank them, then you're better off shooting the ishtars anyway. If you can't, you're trading ships for drones and the ishtars have 2 more sets of spares and are taking no losses in the meanwhile..
When you pop drones, the ONLY time you really do it is when the ishtar fleet warps off to regroup to reduce their ability to reconnect mid fight. Alternatively if they're in range of logi, you scoop the abandoned ones to replace your own.
But what do I know, I'm arguing with mission/PvE bears teary eyed because they've lost a little DPS and it's simply inconceivable to use another ship, thus the sky is falling. |

Skia Aumer
Planetary Harvesting and Processing LLC Desman Alliance
152
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 07:33:24 -
[615] - Quote
DEFANDER wrote:Sentries are OK the way they are now. No, I dont think so. People give the example of Dominix as a very good, balanced ship. Indeed, it is good and balanced. But its balance equation is weird: OP sentry drones are mounted on top of a mediocre hull that is T1 battleship. Did you know the battleships are **** in the current meta? Well they are. When was the last time you've seen the fleet of mighty Abaddons? Or unbeatable Mael/Rokh alpha fleet? Navy Apocs see some use, because they are the hard counter to Ishtars, but are weak otherwise. Even Machariel - the dream ship of many for years - can do nothing in the world of cruisers online and thus see not much use despite being dirt-cheap. |

Louanne Barros
Hole Violence Whole Squid
14
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 07:54:51 -
[616] - Quote
Skia Aumer wrote: Ishtar has about 60k EHP. How much do you think its drones have? Well... TWICE as much.
Very much worse damage resists, however, with no way to improve them. |

Valkin Mordirc
1083
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 10:04:43 -
[617] - Quote
Iroquoiss Pliskin.[/quote wrote:
Where did you pull that from?
Also can you show me what that graph would look like without Ishtar?
#DeleteTheWeak
|

Skia Aumer
Planetary Harvesting and Processing LLC Desman Alliance
152
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 10:48:35 -
[618] - Quote
Louanne Barros wrote:Skia Aumer wrote: Ishtar has about 60k EHP. How much do you think its drones have? Well... TWICE as much.
Very much worse damage resists, however, with no way to improve them. EHP means "effective hit points", resists are included. |

Asa Shahni
Doughboys Snuffed Out
60
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 12:04:36 -
[619] - Quote
Why do we still have a gallente cruiser hull with 5 med and 5 low ? Why promote a shield tanking approach to things that should not unless you have to sacrifice things for it ? Why don't you give the zealot or the oracle 5 mid too so they can be OP kite blob ships like this one ?  Why do we have to deal with your BS instead of getting a normal 5/4/5 ship ? Leave sentries alone and sort your lives out. It's unreasonable fitting and bonus changes that are the major problem here.  |

stopdropandlol
Empire Assault Corp Dead Terrorists
0
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 12:28:50 -
[620] - Quote
What if launching sentries spread them out around your ship in a fixed formation and they stay locked on to your ship, you are free to move around. Tracking could be cut down closer inline with other large weapons because you are able to manually pilot to reduce traversal to a degree. Drones are still destroyable and remote reps are viable. |
|

GankYou
Redshield Holding Company
462
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 12:31:36 -
[621] - Quote
Kinete Jenius wrote:GankYou wrote:"Minor decrease".  People don't seem to play the game, and when they do they play in Ishtars, Gilas, Rattlesnakes. Drones in PvP have become what missiles were/are in PvE, but only for brain-dead & OP-broken PvP. Regarding Garde II sentries: 1) Base tracking is 0.036 rad/sec. 2) A 425mm Railgun II has 0.01 rad/sec base tracking! That's 3.6 times less, and with Javelin L T2 ammo, it's 0.01 * 1.25 = 0.0125 rad/sec. Thanks for the laugh! You're comparing apples to orangutans. How about you go back to my post where I compare apples to apples?
Don't be so hurt that your 10 Domi solo Incursion operation is being impacted. A little. 
Be happy that drone assign are still in the game!
Quote:It's clear you have no interest in actual real numbers.
I don't? Numbers span my life.
Sentries are balanced against Large turrets.
Thank you, come again!
...And They All Crave One Thing - ISK. Gÿ+
Nullsec Ore Changes - Lowend Mineral Price Tracking [2015]
|

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1845
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 12:50:26 -
[622] - Quote
Daniela Doran wrote:Herpinetta Derpina wrote:Its obvious you guys dont listen to your fan base at all and have become arrogant even with the replys.I have endured nerf after nerf after nerf from you guys and have changed weapon systems/ships more times then i care to admit, some of which really made the game a lot more fun for me.When this nerf goes into effect tomorrow it will further hinder my ability to get pve grinding isk to fund my pvp over quickly before i smash my face into a wall from boredom.I am seriously debating on whether or not i want to continue to contribute to your paychecks.More then likely, after 8 years of good times(for the most part), i will end my sub this month. Yea i totally get what you're saying. With all the nerfing and sudden changes, I just don't know how long my enthusiasm for eve is gonna last. CCP bought out the T3D's which was a great introduction and after hearing all the positive feedback for the Confessor, I decided to trained for it. Then CCP drops a bomb on them as soon as I finished training for the ships and now coincidentally I just finish training for 3 sentry Domis on 3 other accounts that I was gonna use for C3/C4 wormholes...sigh then CCP does it again. These sudden and often nerfs are starting to knock the wind out of me and now I'm thinking of dropping 3 accounts because of as of this nerf, they're worthless.
TLDR, I join bandwagon once something is confirmed to be above it's peer and then whine when it get's nerfed. |

Skia Aumer
Planetary Harvesting and Processing LLC Desman Alliance
154
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 13:10:08 -
[623] - Quote
afkalt wrote:you scoop the abandoned ones to replace your own What if you could scoop any sentry drone? That would be fun.
Edit: I mean even if they are not abandoned. |

Egillief Tsun
Pampa Corp
0
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 13:35:44 -
[624] - Quote
> "healthier place in the meta." please be clear what meta.
you are talking about this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Vgy0KA6xCQ
Not about ratters or missioners.
definition of "Sentry" wrote:noun, plural sentries. 1. a soldier stationed at a place to stand guard and prevent the passage of unauthorized persons, watch for fires, etc., especially a sentinel stationed at a pass, gate, opening in a defense work, or the like. 2. a member of a guard or watch. So my best guess about the idea of this type of drone gameplay is "stationary". SO these drones only work if you are in near proximity. not based on "Drone range". you want a mechanic similar to a "control range". To be clear it's ok to hit something 160km+ out with Wardens but your ship has to be close so the "sentry drones" can work. if you would MWD out of that "control range" bubble the sentry drones would be rendered as abandoned.
CCP, you want to change how "Drone Range" works. so you can have a "-80% range" affect on sentries. That would nerf kiting and bring a "stationary gameplay" to them. If that is at all your design goal for sentries.
this change of yours will not help at all.
Yo Dawg I hear you like meta. so you nerfbat just evaded that.
[Ishtar, longer kite and deploy further away to have happy times]
Drone Damage Amplifier II Drone Damage Amplifier II Drone Damage Amplifier II Omnidirectional Tracking Enhancer I Damage Control II
F-90 Positional Sensor Subroutines, Targeting Range Script Omnidirectional Tracking Link II, Optimal Range Script Omnidirectional Tracking Link II, Optimal Range Script Omnidirectional Tracking Link II, Tracking Speed Script 10MN Microwarpdrive II
Drone Link Augmentor I Drone Link Augmentor I Drone Link Augmentor I [Empty High slot]
Medium Ionic Field Projector I Medium Processor Overclocking Unit I
Warden II x5 please feel free to hate this fit all you want, it's just there to get the idea across.
TL;DR; Did the meta change? - Not at all. It even gets harder to counter. But tracking is suboptiomal! - Ohh yes ... how ... unfortunate *sigh*
So because that meta didn't change at all. You did this to nerf sentry use in pve. Ok fine by me but please say so. GG ccp GG. |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1845
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 13:36:26 -
[625] - Quote
Skia Aumer wrote:afkalt wrote:you scoop the abandoned ones to replace your own What if you could scoop any sentry drone? That would be fun. Edit: I mean even if they are not abandoned.
Introducing a stupid mechanic is not the way to fix balance issue. If you have enough people to scoop the drones without gettign wrecked, you might as well put them in Ishtars and kill your enemy... |

Skia Aumer
Planetary Harvesting and Processing LLC Desman Alliance
154
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 16:46:24 -
[626] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Skia Aumer wrote:What if you could scoop any sentry drone? That would be fun. Edit: I mean even if they are not abandoned. Introducing a stupid mechanic is not the way to fix balance issue. If you have enough people to scoop the drones without gettign wrecked, you might as well put them in Ishtars and kill your enemy... Well you are stupid, and my mechanics is uber. I might better melt my enemy with mega pulse lazors. And what I would do NEVER is to take command of a ship named after the pagan goddess - Ishtar! Amarr victor! Burn the heretics! All hail the Imperium!
On a serious note, you dont have any proofs that suggested mechanics is more stupid than sentry drones themselves. CCP claims that their stats are so hilarious by design because they have the tradeoff by being destructable. But in real combat situation, killing drones is among the most re_tarded ideas you can come up with. One solution would be to reduce their hit points considerably. But hey! why dont we just use the popular ~enthosis~ technology to hack them off the host instead of grinding through useless ehp? |

Teebeutel
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 17:54:42 -
[627] - Quote
The whole issue with drone balance stems from the way drone size progresses up the ship hierarchy, since you are getting the biggest size of drones on medium ships, whereas with any other sort of weapon platform you'd have take one step up the ladder to get a ship to get a weapon system that can match the same DPS output - rebalancing the drone bandwidth of cruisers and adjusting the bonusses on some of them to settle them in a more appropriate place would fix this issue more cleanly, but would require a not quite trivial amount of work to get just right. A more blunt balance pass like this one will likely still be effective as a way to tone down the power of ishtar doctrines, but it hurts other parts of the game that were fine with the state of sentries before the patch(ie sentry battleships, sentry Rattlesnakes are hurt quite badly in particular since they get no tracking bonusses). |

Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
1177
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 17:57:17 -
[628] - Quote
Teebeutel wrote:The whole issue with drone balance stems from the way drone size progresses up the ship hierarchy, since you are getting the biggest size of drones on medium ships, whereas with any other sort of weapon platform you'd have take one step up the ladder to get a ship that can match the same DPS output, rebalancing the drone bandwidth of cruisers and adjusting the bonusses on some of them to settle them in a more appropriate place would fix this issue more cleanly, but would require a not quite trivial amount of work to get just right. A more blunt balance pass like this one will likely still be effective as a way to tone down the power of ishtar doctrines, but it hurts other parts of the game that were fine with the state of sentries before the patch(ie sentry battleships, sentry Rattlesnakes are hurt quite badly in particular since they get no tracking bonusses).
like 2k+ dps rattlesnakes care.. but otherwise a valid point
Tech 3's need to be multi-role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists.
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist, nerf sentries, -3 slots for droneboats
Nerf web strength, Make the blaster eagle worth using
|

Teebeutel
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 17:58:20 -
[629] - Quote
Harvey James wrote:Teebeutel wrote:The whole issue with drone balance stems from the way drone size progresses up the ship hierarchy, since you are getting the biggest size of drones on medium ships, whereas with any other sort of weapon platform you'd have take one step up the ladder to get a ship that can match the same DPS output, rebalancing the drone bandwidth of cruisers and adjusting the bonusses on some of them to settle them in a more appropriate place would fix this issue more cleanly, but would require a not quite trivial amount of work to get just right. A more blunt balance pass like this one will likely still be effective as a way to tone down the power of ishtar doctrines, but it hurts other parts of the game that were fine with the state of sentries before the patch(ie sentry battleships, sentry Rattlesnakes are hurt quite badly in particular since they get no tracking bonusses). like 2k+ dps rattlesnakes care.. but otherwise a valid point what kind of sentries do you feed your rattlesnakes? And are you fitting any kind of tank to it at all? |

afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1331
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 18:19:50 -
[630] - Quote
I'm about 1500 with a gecko and cruise. 2k would be doable with rage torps and heat (on paper only) |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 24 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |