Originally by: LonTas 5

---

noone will ever see this. is it safe and does it work?

---

Originally by: Chesh Morgan

---

I have an odd bug report.

I am running Windows 7 Pro 64-bit.

Previously, I was running the Win 7 release candidate (32-bit), and had put EFT in C:\Program Files\EFT. Since I upgraded to 64-bit, I moved it to C:\Program Files (x86)\EFT. Since doing so, I hadn't been able to run EFT -- it would appear to start, and show on the taskbar, but the window just wasn't there.

I redownloaded and reextracted it to the same folder and the same thing happened. I moved it to the desktop and the same thing happened. I ran as an administrator and in Windows XP SP2 compatibility mode and the same thing happened.

In desperation, I extracted it to the desktop, and it worked. I renamed the directory in program files to the same as the archive name (EFT2.12.3) and it worked from there, too.

I don't think I've ever seen a program that depends on directory name to run properly.

---

Originally by: Chesh Morgan

---

I have an odd bug report.

I am running Windows 7 Pro 64-bit.

Previously, I was running the Win 7 release candidate (32-bit), and had put EFT in C:\Program Files\EFT. Since I upgraded to 64-bit, I moved it to C:\Program Files (x86)\EFT. Since doing so, I hadn't been able to run EFT -- it would appear to start, and show on the taskbar, but the window just wasn't there.

I redownloaded and reextracted it to the same folder and the same thing happened. I moved it to the desktop and the same thing happened. I ran as an administrator and in Windows XP SP2 compatibility mode and the same thing happened.

In desperation, I extracted it to the desktop, and it worked. I renamed the directory in program files to the same as the archive name (EFT2.12.3) and it worked from there, too.

I don't think I've ever seen a program that depends on directory name to run properly.

---

Originally by: AngelusJT

---

Love the program and first bug i have ever come across and a pretty minor one at that.

Nanoelectrical Co-Processor: EFT= CPU +6.3% vs EVE= CPU +7.35%
Nanomechanical CPU Enhancer: EFT= CPU +6.6% vs EVE= CPU +7.7%
Quantum Co-Processor: EFT= CPU +6.9% vs EVE= CPU +8.05%

Basic Co-Processor & Co-Processor I are ok. I did not check anything not listed in this message.

---

Originally by: Lord Regent

---

I'm having issues enabling Faction/complex mods in EFT.

I see the 'buttons' and know to hold down <ctrl> when clicking, but they look faded, the buttons that is, and won't click.

any help please?

thanks

---

Originally by: BiAir

---

o/

There is an export/import problem with EFT 2.12.3

If try to make an good T3 Tengu Fitting. it looks like below:

-----------
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile

....

Medium Warhead Flare Catalyst I
Medium Warhead Flare Catalyst I
Medium Bay Loading Accelerator II
--------------

when i now try to export this fitting to an xml file to make it possible to import it into EVE, there comes an error message that EVE couldnt find the sub system "Fuel Catalyst"!

---

Originally by: Ranka Mei

---

Edited by: Ranka Mei on 15/04/2010 22:37:51

Originally by: BiAir

---

o/

There is an export/import problem with EFT 2.12.3

If try to make an good T3 Tengu Fitting. it looks like below:

-----------
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile

....

Medium Warhead Flare Catalyst I
Medium Warhead Flare Catalyst I
Medium Bay Loading Accelerator II
--------------

when i now try to export this fitting to an xml file to make it possible to import it into EVE, there comes an error message that EVE couldnt find the sub system "Fuel Catalyst"!

---

Never mind the Fuel Catalyst. You managed to fit all the wrong rigs! Flare rigs for heavies?? (you'd need Rigors for it). Those rigs would be useful for HAM's. In fact, ... you just changed a HAM fit to heavies, didn't ya? :) Just buy a new Tengu for heavies, and rig it properly.

---

Originally by: Waters1

---

Edited by: Waters1 on 20/04/2010 02:17:04
Edited by: Waters1 on 20/04/2010 02:16:23
I dont know if anyone else has had a problem with this but an issue i have with my EFT is i can make up a fitting using my skills in eft and have it say that i either have enough power grid or am cap stable or both, get ingame and it turns out that a cap stable at 42% ends up depleting in 5 min and the fit that i had enough powergrid for i dont have enough for. i already redid my import of my character skills and its still doing the same thing, also downloaded the latest version 3 times.

---

Originally by: Killamongaro

---

Is there a mac version?

---

Originally by: Alsyth

---

If this link is right then here is the formula :

D_m = V_m * (T_m + T_0*[exp(- T_m/T_0)-1])

where :
D_m : maximum distance reached (m)
T_m : Missile flight Time (s)
V_m : Missile maximum velocity (m/s)
T_0 : 10^6/(M*I) (s) [Time constant, can be thought of as "Time to Accelerate", though it doesn't mean it reachs full speed within T_0]
M : Missile mass (kg)
I : Missile inertia modifier (s/kg)


For the above poster's Golem with Javelin, we have : V_m = 7487, T_m = 9, Inertia Modifier 1000 , Mass 1500, we have :
62,39 kilometers.



Guess it's right...


Edit : A little more information :

We have, for every Javelin torp, T_0 = 2/3 s.

And, if T_m >> T_0, we can approximate :

D_m == V_m*(T_m - T_0)

with above values, it gives... 62.39 kilometers too :) (in fact, error between the approximation and the real value is approximately (10^-6))

nb : EFT gives 67.4, which is exactly V_m*T_m

---

Originally by: DR jekyle

---

Play around see if you can get the same results I do.

---