EVE Search - Woot t Interceptor Bonuses Changed!

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Woot t Interceptor Bonuses Changed!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 7 post(s)
Mei Jinn	Posted - 2007.10.13 11:29:00 - [1] Name: Stiletto Hull: Slasher Class Role: Interceptor Interceptors utilize a combination of advanced alloys and electronics to reduce their effective signature radius. This, along with superior maneuverability and speed, makes them very hard to target and track, particularly for high caliber turrets. Developer: Core Complexion Core Complexion's ships are unusual in that they favor electronics and defense over the "Lots of guns" approach traditionally favored by the Minmatar. Minmatar Frigate Skill Bonus: 5% bonus to Small Projectile Turret damage and 7.5% bonus to Small Projectile Turret tracking speed per level Interceptors Skill Bonus: 5% reduction in Signature Radius and 5% bonus to Warp Scrambler and Warp Disruptor range per level Role bonus: 80% reduction in Propulsion Jamming systems activation cost Name: Malediction Hull: Executioner Class Role: Interceptor Interceptors utilize a combination of advanced alloys and electronics to reduce their effective signature radius. This, along with superior maneuverability and speed, makes them very hard to target and track, particularly for high caliber turrets. Developer: Khanid Innovations In addition to robust electronics systems, the Khanid Kingdom's ships possess advanced armor alloys capable of withstanding a great deal of punishment. Generally eschewing the use of turrets, they tend to gear their vessels more towards close-range missile combat. Amarr Frigate Skill Bonus: 5% bonus to rocket damage and 5% bonus to armor resistances per level Interceptors Skill Bonus: 5% reduction in Signature Radius and 5% bonus to Warp Scrambler and Warp Disruptor range per level Role bonus: 80% reduction in Propulsion Jamming systems activation cost Whilst the up close and personal Anti-Inty-Inties get a 80% reduction in Warp Scram/Disrupt cap use. Unbelieveably good news. Come to Sisi and check it out
ArmyOfMe hirr Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2007.10.13 11:33:00 - [2] Edited by: ArmyOfMe on 13/10/2007 11:35:59 come to think about it, this would be a very bad change for any bs since they will now allways be scramed from outside nos/neut range
Sleepkevert Paradox v2.0	Posted - 2007.10.13 11:34:00 - [3] Damn, talk about uber tacklers! Only thing is, won't this obsolete the lachesis a bit? Sign my sig
Mei Jinn	Posted - 2007.10.13 11:36:00 - [4] Yup this is true,at least on the rangy tacklers.
Tsia Synthetic Frontiers	Posted - 2007.10.13 11:37:00 - [5] Omg. Wtf? BBQ! This calls for a celebration. I love you CCP <3 <3 <3
Kanonus Amarr 0utbreak	Posted - 2007.10.13 11:38:00 - [6] Originally by: ArmyOfMe Edited by: ArmyOfMe on 13/10/2007 11:35:59 come to think about it, this would be a very bad change for any bs since they will now allways be scramed from outside nos/neut range Did it ever come to you that's exactly the idea behind it? As it is right now a ceptor is dead meat when tackling a BS with a neut (and the number of neut equipped BS is on the rise). The job of the intercetor is tackling. A job it fails horribly at right now. They are no alternative over a sabre as it is.
ArmyOfMe hirr Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2007.10.13 11:40:00 - [7] Originally by: Kanonus Originally by: ArmyOfMe Edited by: ArmyOfMe on 13/10/2007 11:35:59 come to think about it, this would be a very bad change for any bs since they will now allways be scramed from outside nos/neut range Did it ever come to you that's exactly the idea behind it? As it is right now a ceptor is dead meat when tackling a BS with a neut (and the number of neut equipped BS is on the rise). The job of the intercetor is tackling. A job it fails horribly at right now. They are no alternative over a sabre as it is. I see your point, but u have to agree that a bs should be able to at least have some defence against small ships, and if these changes happen a interceptor can tackle a bs forever without any risk at all
Grimpak Gallente Trinity Nova KIA Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.13 11:40:00 - [8] holy ****. --- planetary interaction idea!
Kanonus Amarr 0utbreak	Posted - 2007.10.13 11:44:00 - [9] Originally by: ArmyOfMe Originally by: Kanonus Originally by: ArmyOfMe Edited by: ArmyOfMe on 13/10/2007 11:35:59 come to think about it, this would be a very bad change for any bs since they will now allways be scramed from outside nos/neut range Did it ever come to you that's exactly the idea behind it? As it is right now a ceptor is dead meat when tackling a BS with a neut (and the number of neut equipped BS is on the rise). The job of the intercetor is tackling. A job it fails horribly at right now. They are no alternative over a sabre as it is. I see your point, but u have to agree that a bs should be able to at least have some defence against small ships, and if these changes happen a interceptor can tackle a bs forever without any risk at all BS were never meant to be solo ships. Bring a friend. It's a mMog. That being said unless you are in a belt you can allways go for the gate. For webbign he still needs to enterer the world of pain.
iiOs Blood Corsair's	Posted - 2007.10.13 11:47:00 - [10] OMG ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- BB

Mei Jinn	Posted - 2007.10.13 11:53:00 - [11] Edited by: Mei Jinn on 13/10/2007 11:57:31 Edited by: Mei Jinn on 13/10/2007 11:54:00 Originally by: ArmyOfMe Edited by: ArmyOfMe on 13/10/2007 11:35:59 come to think about it, this would be a very bad change for any bs since they will now allways be scramed from outside nos/neut range Hehe as they say one man's meat is another man's poison ;p For me these changes are good,and yes good because they can scram outside of NOS range,oh and BTW I get 4.25 Energy costs/cycle on a T2 Warp disruptor (N.B with max Claymore GB I can get 39km scram range probably +40km with Inty LvL5)
ArmyOfMe hirr Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2007.10.13 11:53:00 - [12] Originally by: Kanonus Originally by: ArmyOfMe Originally by: Kanonus Originally by: ArmyOfMe Edited by: ArmyOfMe on 13/10/2007 11:35:59 come to think about it, this would be a very bad change for any bs since they will now allways be scramed from outside nos/neut range Did it ever come to you that's exactly the idea behind it? As it is right now a ceptor is dead meat when tackling a BS with a neut (and the number of neut equipped BS is on the rise). The job of the intercetor is tackling. A job it fails horribly at right now. They are no alternative over a sabre as it is. I see your point, but u have to agree that a bs should be able to at least have some defence against small ships, and if these changes happen a interceptor can tackle a bs forever without any risk at all BS were never meant to be solo ships. Bring a friend. It's a mMog. That being said unless you are in a belt you can allways go for the gate. For webbign he still needs to enterer the world of pain. the answer to any problem in this game seems to be, bring more friends. Sorry, but i dont agree that it has to be needed to have either a curse or a huginn in a gang to be able to undock in anything bigger then a interceptor
Mashie Saldana Minmatar Hooligans Of War Insurgency	Posted - 2007.10.13 11:59:00 - [13] Sweet, add a Claymore to the gang and a T2 disruptor fitted on one of those tacklers will reach over 40km :D The distributed market hub
Mei Jinn	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:00:00 - [14] *I wonder if Goonswarm are doing a Jig over this*
MassonA Caldari coracao ardente Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:03:00 - [15] now if only the claw could lock further than an ibis
Grimpak Gallente Trinity Nova KIA Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:13:00 - [16] Originally by: Sleepkevert Damn, talk about uber tacklers! Only thing is, won't this obsolete the lachesis a bit? considering that a lach can scram at ranges over 50km with faction/gang bonuses/overheating, no. ...however I am seeing a point in slapping 2pointers in inties now. --- planetary interaction idea!
Central Scrutinizer RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:15:00 - [17] Yeah, bad idea, tbh. BS currently have two choices to detackle themselves: neutralizer, or damps/ECM. After this, there is one choice: damps/ECM. I thought we wanted this game to move away from fitting damps/ECM to non-bonused ships, but apparently I'm out of touch with the Eve community.
Trypho Minmatar Infinitus Odium The Church.	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:16:00 - [18] The Lachesis can easily damp the hell out of you and do decent damage itself, while a ceptor will rely on others... Except if it tackles like a pod --- Newsposter/contenteditor EVE - MMOZone.nl
Central Scrutinizer RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:21:00 - [19] Lachesis doesn't do "nice damage"....
LUKEC Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:22:00 - [20] Imo bad idea. I like perhaps cap reduction, range isn't needed though

Wild Rho Amarr Endgame.	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:22:00 - [21] The locking ranges of these new "tackling" inties may need looked at, although they do have the mids to mount a sensor booster for the same effect.
LUKEC Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:24:00 - [22] Originally by: Central Scrutinizer Lachesis doesn't do "nice damage".... Actually this isn't true. Fit 3x ham II and 2 200mm rails with 2 bcus and 1 mag stab and 5 t2 drones.
Stakhanov Katana's Edge	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:25:00 - [23] Yay , my Ares will be useful at last Originally by: F'nog One does not simply log into Jita.
Kerfira	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:29:00 - [24] An easy solution to the range vs. neut problem would be to reduce the range of the web/scrambling modules so the specialised ship (the 'ceptor) would have unchanged range (or maybe slightly increased) range compared to today, but others would be reduced..... Not saying it would be a good idea..... Originally by: CCP Wrangler EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world.
fire 59 Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:31:00 - [25] thats more like it \o/
IamBen Caldari Celestial Apocalypse Insurgency	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:32:00 - [26] yeah this is a good change. Oh well, there goes my uber crow though :) But still its cool
Lowanaera Amarr Paladin Imperium Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:37:00 - [27] Wow 7.5km scrams are useful again.
Haerana The Republican Guard The Sundering	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:37:00 - [28] just wow... Im wondering what CCP are going to change next. Seems to me like they are trying to do a complete overhaul of the game. ------------------------------- Here comes the sig............. The Cake is a Lie The Cake is a Lie The Cake is a Lie The Cake is a Lie
Nian Banks Minmatar Berserkers of Aesir	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:41:00 - [29] Well this blows, good bye fighting in falloff with the Stiletto ;( So it can tackle, cool. It does it in range, so I guess its going to only ever fit artillery now. Cool. Can I get a buff artillery thread going please. Now that more ships are been forced to use them and they are borked atmo.
LUKEC Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2007.10.13 12:41:00 - [30] I'd still prefer web strength boosted or web range or something to "stop" people, not to hold them down. That can be done good enough with other ships.



Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.