Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
![Julius Romanus Julius Romanus](https://images.evetech.net/characters/831845646/portrait?size=64)
Julius Romanus
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 05:55:00 -
[361]
I cant be the only one who would rather engage a nano gang than spider tanking battleships with a logistics ***** in tow can i? ------------------ For Medicinal Use Only. |
![Caelum Dominus Caelum Dominus](https://images.evetech.net/characters/890734292/portrait?size=64)
Caelum Dominus
Invicta.
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 05:58:00 -
[362]
Edited by: Caelum Dominus on 20/06/2008 06:02:26
Originally by: DeadDuck The important part is that game mechanics allow a BS to reach 17K m/s... dont you think that might be a "bit" to much? ![Rolling Eyes](/images/icon_rolleyes.gif)
You're full of ****.
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Caelum/Machariel_-_Test%5B2%5D.jpg
Even with a maxed-skilled Claymore, it cannot exceed 14km/s. Do you bunch really expect anyone to take you seriously when you cannot even present facts that are remotely trustworthy?
|
![Kery Syander Kery Syander](https://images.evetech.net/characters/886843940/portrait?size=64)
Kery Syander
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 07:18:00 -
[363]
Edited by: Kery Syander on 20/06/2008 07:18:26
Originally by: Caelum Dominus Edited by: Caelum Dominus on 20/06/2008 06:02:26
Originally by: DeadDuck The important part is that game mechanics allow a BS to reach 17K m/s... dont you think that might be a "bit" to much? ![Rolling Eyes](/images/icon_rolleyes.gif)
You're full of ****.
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Caelum/Machariel_-_Test%5B2%5D.jpg
Even with a maxed-skilled Claymore, it cannot exceed 14km/s. Do you bunch really expect anyone to take you seriously when you cannot even present facts that are remotely trustworthy?
![Laughing](/images/icon_lol.gif)
eft > deadduck
don't you think you exaggerated a "bit" too much?
![Laughing](/images/icon_lol.gif)
anywho nanos are fine. Stop being such a complete single minded bafoon and you might realize that (talking to podruski here). FYI, my cat may have less SP than you, but she's probably better at EVE then you. -----
|
![Viper ShizzIe Viper ShizzIe](https://images.evetech.net/characters/961207277/portrait?size=64)
Viper ShizzIe
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 07:24:00 -
[364]
Edited by: Viper ****zIe on 20/06/2008 07:25:05
EDIT: Added link.
Originally by: Caelum Dominus Edited by: Caelum Dominus on 20/06/2008 06:02:26
Originally by: DeadDuck The important part is that game mechanics allow a BS to reach 17K m/s... dont you think that might be a "bit" to much? ![Rolling Eyes](/images/icon_rolleyes.gif)
You're full of ****. http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Caelum/Machariel_-_Test%5B2%5D.jpg
Even with a maxed-skilled Claymore, it cannot exceed 14km/s. Do you bunch really expect anyone to take you seriously when you cannot even present facts that are remotely trustworthy?
http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/8752/macharielthisthreadisfujg6.jpg
You've gotta be really ******* stupid to be that **** at EFT.
Biomass.
|
![Kery Syander Kery Syander](https://images.evetech.net/characters/886843940/portrait?size=64)
Kery Syander
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 07:27:00 -
[365]
viper****zle? in the work shop? oh wait, this isn't this workshop!?!?! am I drunk or are people stammering about nanos and their overpoweredness in eve-general again?
![Laughing](/images/icon_lol.gif) -----
|
![HakanSherif HakanSherif](https://images.evetech.net/characters/589938566/portrait?size=64)
HakanSherif
Invicta.
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 11:44:00 -
[366]
There is nothing to fix with nanos. They are just fine. There is also nothing wrong with missiles against nano ships. The whole concept works just fine. The problem arises just like Cal said, u guys want to bring paper to battle field and want to beat the scissor.
Did u ever check the stats? Check Vagabond losses on the killboards, you will be suprised to see so many vagabonds die, study the fleets and ships that killed them, most of you militia guys have no clue about PvP just like the bear alliances in 0.0 who continously were crying for the same ****. What ****es me off instead of trying to adopt and improve yourselves you are just whining.
But if you guys are so lazy my offer stands, pay me 20 billion and i will teach you how to fight the dreaded nano fleets.:P
Est Sularus oth Mithas |
![Tenuo Tenuo](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1142786817/portrait?size=64)
Tenuo
Native Freshfood
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 13:14:00 -
[367]
Edited by: Tenuo on 20/06/2008 13:19:17 Edited by: Tenuo on 20/06/2008 13:18:54
Originally by: DeadDuck TBH this nano disease is killing the game. I dont like nanos and tbh today EVE is reduced to blobs, and nano gangs. Thats it.
And you want to nerf nano to reduce it from nano gangs and blobs to .. blobs. That's exciting isn't it?
Originally by: DeadDuck The small gang warfare is reduced to gankage and running away. Ships capable of out running missiles, BS faster then Interceptors, you name it... All ships must fit velocity modules and true alternatives reduced to a small number of ships. Yep I still play the game but more and more I'm starting to be more time docked and afk.
This is not true, please stop lying. Battleships faster than interceptors? Sure if you fit the ceptor with tech 2 and use snakes/officer/faction gear on your faction battleship. If you fit the ceptor with rigs, snakes set and deadspace/faction gear it'll go faster.
Originally by: DeadDuck I remember when 4k/5k speed was fast and all the focus in setups was in damage output or tank. I remember to fit ships to actually fight, but it seems today you fit them to be fast, the paper made tanks and laughable damage are balanced by the blobs and the hability to run. Sad way EVE has evolved. And no you cant have my stuff. I still hope CCP opens their eyes.
So, all eve combat should be reduced to rolling your head on the keyboard to see who has most SP?
![Rolling Eyes](/images/icon_rolleyes.gif)
:facepalm:
Also, Combat PL, Invictas & Co. perfectly strikes Useless **** Thread, wrecking for 1235643.45 damage.
______________________________________________ Euriti - I'll continue my nerd forum rage! |
![Sgt Napalm Sgt Napalm](https://images.evetech.net/characters/733533680/portrait?size=64)
Sgt Napalm
Synergy Evolved Daisho Syndicate
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 14:08:00 -
[368]
So about un nerfing the nano BS as a valid counter to nano Cruisers
|
![Tenuo Tenuo](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1142786817/portrait?size=64)
Tenuo
Native Freshfood
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 14:11:00 -
[369]
Originally by: Sgt Napalm So about un nerfing the nano BS as a valid counter to nano Cruisers
![Laughing](/images/icon_lol.gif) ______________________________________________ Euriti - I'll continue my nerd forum rage! |
![Xaen Xaen](https://images.evetech.net/characters/922855529/portrait?size=64)
Xaen
Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 18:30:00 -
[370]
Originally by: Kristoffer Belive it or not, most med guns track nanos at range.
This is completely true.
While the experiment that proved it for me was DPS fit vagabond vs. Huggin it proved to me that medium guns can track at nano ranges. YMMV
He had me webbed and was orbiting in a nano ship and got exploded. The heavy launcher may be what got the killmail, but you can be sure it was the autocannons that did the most damage.
Yes it was a corpmate in a staged 1v1. Had he had any gang support I most certainly would have gone down instead, but the guns were tracking just fine as the killmail shows.
Yes it I meant to stop before I killed him.![Embarassed](/images/icon_redface.gif)
Yes I reimbursed him. It was not cheap. Polycarbons.....![Crying or Very sad](/images/icon_cry.gif) - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |
|
![Xaen Xaen](https://images.evetech.net/characters/922855529/portrait?size=64)
Xaen
Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 18:44:00 -
[371]
Originally by: Spineker Crusier class ship should not be allowed to go that fast.
Says who? And actually there is only one cruiser. One cruiser that goes that fast and it's name be Vagabond.
Sure you can get an ishtar up that fast with a full snake set, but then you have two huge problems. You just dropped four billlion ISK (that's billion with a 'B') on a snake set and you still can't save your drones from anybody that decides to shoot at them.
I dare you to come up with an EFT setup without faction mods, deadspace mods, officer mods, or snake implants that gets any cruiser up past 4km/s and is still a viable ship. Heck, it might be possible, but good effing luck. I've tried it before.
My curse goes 3600 with three speed implants, five speed mods and a deadspace MWD.
But it owns other nanos with that disgusting -122 cap/s. *coughHGTALISMANSETcough* - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |
![Tenuo Tenuo](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1142786817/portrait?size=64)
Tenuo
Native Freshfood
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 18:47:00 -
[372]
Originally by: Xaen
Originally by: Spineker Crusier class ship should not be allowed to go that fast.
Says who? And actually there is only one cruiser. One cruiser that goes that fast and it's name be Vagabond.
Sure you can get an ishtar up that fast with a full snake set, but then you have two huge problems. You just dropped four billlion ISK (that's billion with a 'B') on a snake set and you still can't save your drones from anybody that decides to shoot at them.
I dare you to come up with an EFT setup without faction mods, deadspace mods, officer mods, or snake implants that gets any cruiser up past 4km/s and is still a viable ship. Heck, it might be possible, but good effing luck. I've tried it before.
My curse goes 3600 with three speed implants, five speed mods and a deadspace MWD.
But it owns other nanos with that disgusting -122 cap/s. *coughHGTALISMANSETcough*
Ishtar can go over 4000 with zor's and 2x 3% speed implants, polycarbs, 3 ODs and a nanofiber, but that's alot of speed mods and it wont hit that in orbit range. ______________________________________________ Euriti - I'll continue my nerd forum rage! |
![Xaen Xaen](https://images.evetech.net/characters/922855529/portrait?size=64)
Xaen
Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 18:49:00 -
[373]
Originally by: Euriti
Originally by: Spineker No that is not what I said at all. I gave you and your nano the benefit of the doubt.
I guess you have to experience the frustration to understand it otherwise if you are the one in your wtfpwnmobile without a scratch it all seems cool.
The idea that Caldari are useless at flying ships is a horrible argument and worth about 2 **** drops in a bowl. Caldari have no Nano ships that I know of period.
The problem is 10 guys kill at will with no chance of their victim even firing back. That is wrong and if you think pwnmobile nano's are fair or that having a helpless victim kicked in the teeth is some climax of skillzors then your hopeless anyway.
There should be risk to attacking and for some there are no risk. You don't stop to think what those guys think about it when they had no chance of even locking a nano ship much less seeing red on it.
There is a reason we mock and call Nano pilots yellow because they are.
There's plenty of risk already going into a fight in a 300million uninsurable ship.
My Curse is up to 480M not including implants.![Embarassed](/images/icon_redface.gif)
Imma cry like a little girl when I lose it. - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |
![Xaen Xaen](https://images.evetech.net/characters/922855529/portrait?size=64)
Xaen
Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 18:57:00 -
[374]
Originally by: Miss Stella Euriti, stop posting, you cant even fly a battleship. How can you suggest a solution to a problem when all you fly is t1 crusiers? Stop pretending to be knowledgeable when all you know is blob/bait.
You're an idiot.
I watched lil Euriti grow up from a brand spanking new newbie to one of the deadliest ******* around in about the space of three god damn days.
I'm serious, it was ridiculous, and the proof is on our KB.
Character age means precisely squat and he's the best example I've ever seen.
Caritas misses him. ![Crying or Very sad](/images/icon_cry.gif) - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |
![Xaen Xaen](https://images.evetech.net/characters/922855529/portrait?size=64)
Xaen
Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 18:59:00 -
[375]
Originally by: Kery Syander Don't worry though, your high SP will make your point valid, even if your post suggests you can barely control your bodily functions.
I laughed out loud in the middle of work.
A$$hole.![Laughing](/images/icon_lol.gif) - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |
![Xaen Xaen](https://images.evetech.net/characters/922855529/portrait?size=64)
Xaen
Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 19:03:00 -
[376]
Originally by: Xeronn nanos can get out of most fights they don`t want to fight unless they are braindead pilots
Not true.
I was goofing around 350km from a carrier and a nano ishtar hardly paying attention cause I was barely on grid.
Next thing I know the ishtar is right next to me and has me webbed and scrammed. HOLYSIHTWTF!#@$!
I'll give you a hint....ok ok, I'll spill the beans entirely. Cloaked covops wandered up to me and gave me them a warp in right ******* to me.
Do that to the next nano gang and watch as half of them asplode before the figure out how the **** you just warped to them. - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |
![Xaen Xaen](https://images.evetech.net/characters/922855529/portrait?size=64)
Xaen
Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 19:09:00 -
[377]
Originally by: Caelum Dominus The rather depressing fact that every single Caldari blob features 3-10 Drakes only goes to prove their incompetence of dealing with anything other than rolling their heads across the F-keys.
rofl @ imagery. - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |
![Ulstan Ulstan](https://images.evetech.net/characters/173268048/portrait?size=64)
Ulstan
State Protectorate
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 19:19:00 -
[378]
Quote: There is also nothing wrong with missiles against nano ships.
Oh, come now. Almost every reasonable person recognizes that heavy precision missiles are erroneously and hilariously awful, and wholly inadequate against nano ships. You do yourself no favors by holding such an untenable position. I realize you may be one of those "It's ok for weapons systems I don't use to suck" people, so, how about we switch the effectiveness of guns and missiles vs nano ships?
|
![Tenuo Tenuo](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1142786817/portrait?size=64)
Tenuo
Native Freshfood
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 19:23:00 -
[379]
Edited by: Tenuo on 20/06/2008 19:23:40
Originally by: Xaen
Originally by: Miss Stella Euriti, stop posting, you cant even fly a battleship. How can you suggest a solution to a problem when all you fly is t1 crusiers? Stop pretending to be knowledgeable when all you know is blob/bait.
You're an idiot.
I watched lil Euriti grow up from a brand spanking new newbie to one of the deadliest ******* around in about the space of three god damn days.
I'm serious, it was ridiculous, and the proof is on our KB.
Character age means precisely squat and he's the best example I've ever seen.
Caritas misses him. ![Crying or Very sad](/images/icon_cry.gif)
I appreciate this support.
Originally by: Ulstan
Quote: There is also nothing wrong with missiles against nano ships.
Oh, come now. Almost every reasonable person recognizes that heavy precision missiles are erroneously and hilariously awful, and wholly inadequate against nano ships. You do yourself no favors by holding such an untenable position. I realize you may be one of those "It's ok for weapons systems I don't use to suck" people, so, how about we switch the effectiveness of guns and missiles vs nano ships?
Missiles are a bit broken yes, but it needs to be a very fine balance between rapeing ceptors/nanos and being useless, lets see what ccp does with this, if they will ever do anything. ______________________________________________ Euriti - I'll continue my nerd forum rage! |
![Gort Gort](https://images.evetech.net/characters/464819554/portrait?size=64)
Gort
Storm Guard Elite
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 19:27:00 -
[380]
This endless nano whinging needs to go off and die somewhere dark and quiet. It's getting embarrassing.
Seriously.
G -- When in doubt, empty the magazine. |
|
![Tenuo Tenuo](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1142786817/portrait?size=64)
Tenuo
Native Freshfood
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 19:28:00 -
[381]
Originally by: Gort This endless nano whinging needs to go off and die somewhere dark and quiet. It's getting embarrassing.
Seriously.
G
Very.
I'm loosing faith in humanity right now
See
Loosing it more ______________________________________________ Euriti - I'll continue my nerd forum rage! |
![Xaen Xaen](https://images.evetech.net/characters/922855529/portrait?size=64)
Xaen
Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 19:39:00 -
[382]
Originally by: Caelum Dominus Edited by: Caelum Dominus on 20/06/2008 06:02:26
Originally by: DeadDuck The important part is that game mechanics allow a BS to reach 17K m/s... dont you think that might be a "bit" to much? ![Rolling Eyes](/images/icon_rolleyes.gif)
You're full of ****.
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Caelum/Machariel_-_Test%5B2%5D.jpg
Even with a maxed-skilled Claymore, it cannot exceed 14km/s. Do you bunch really expect anyone to take you seriously when you cannot even present facts that are remotely trustworthy?
Actually it can.
It only takes: A 2.5 BN+ ISK ship A 5,350,000,000 ISK head full of implants A max skilled mind linked warfare linked friend in a claymore
So yeah, you can totally do it with EIGHT BILLION ISK, a year of training and a friend.
Until you get webbed. - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |
![J Valkor J Valkor](https://images.evetech.net/characters/728568548/portrait?size=64)
J Valkor
Invicta.
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 19:43:00 -
[383]
Originally by: Ulstan
Quote: There is also nothing wrong with missiles against nano ships.
Oh, come now. Almost every reasonable person recognizes that heavy precision missiles are erroneously and hilariously awful, and wholly inadequate against nano ships. You do yourself no favors by holding such an untenable position. I realize you may be one of those "It's ok for weapons systems I don't use to suck" people, so, how about we switch the effectiveness of guns and missiles vs nano ships?
Yes, because heavy missiles are the only missiles you can use. There are no cruiser sized missile systems besides heavy missiles.
|
![DeadDuck DeadDuck](https://images.evetech.net/characters/250882917/portrait?size=64)
DeadDuck
Amarr Border Defense Consortium Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 21:04:00 -
[384]
Originally by: Tenuo And you want to nerf nano to reduce it from nano gangs and blobs to .. blobs. That's exciting isn't it?
Actually these late times more and more I see blobs of nanos.
Originally by: Tenuo This is not true, please stop lying. Battleships faster than interceptors? Sure if you fit the ceptor with tech 2 and use snakes/officer/faction gear on your faction battleship. If you fit the ceptor with rigs, snakes set and deadspace/faction gear it'll go faster.
In theory you are right . In practice what happens is that almost nobody will fit those kind of setups in intys. Even if I already saw KM's with fits of billions in ceptors. The expensive setups are more common in bigger ships.
Originally by: Tenuo So, all eve combat should be reduced to rolling your head on the keyboard to see who has most SP?
If you think creating a perfect balance between tank and damage output is reduced to most SP...
________________ God is my Wingman |
![Dianeces Dianeces](https://images.evetech.net/characters/808362361/portrait?size=64)
Dianeces
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 21:38:00 -
[385]
Originally by: DeadDuck
Originally by: Kery Syander
Originally by: FORD ESC0RT had entire fleet of ships trying to catch a nano typhoon with smartbombs. he killed off half our fleet and ran away.![Rolling Eyes](/images/icon_rolleyes.gif)
That's exactly what I'm saying. There is absolutely NO WAY to counter this CCP!!! We all chased him and webbed him and then got within 5.5km of him. I know webs go to 10km (13km t2 + heat) but we had to get like real close and stuff, cause you know we're excited.
Some weeks ago a Omen gang was killing stuff in Providence, one of them was flying a Machariel ... he was doing 17Km/s... I rest my case... ![Rolling Eyes](/images/icon_rolleyes.gif) ![ugh](/images/icon_ugh.gif)
Today I EFTed a Maelstrom setup that tanked 20k DPS. It had pirate implants and officer equipment and....see where I'm going with this?
|
![Ulstan Ulstan](https://images.evetech.net/characters/173268048/portrait?size=64)
Ulstan
State Protectorate
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 21:45:00 -
[386]
Quote: Yes, because heavy missiles are the only missiles you can use. There are no cruiser sized missile systems besides heavy missiles.
The only other cruiser sized missiles are heavy assault missiles. Are you suggesting that these are going to do better against nano cruisers? They don't even *have* a precision version and are much shorter ranged.
Seriously, only the most idiotic and blind-to-balance of the nano partisans can't see that heavy precision missiles need some help. It's an excellent litmus test for whether you understand balance and game mechanics or not.
|
![Hans Roaming Hans Roaming](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1529204917/portrait?size=64)
Hans Roaming
Body Count Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 22:23:00 -
[387]
Caldari fit rails and tracking mods, cmon guys that is killmail whorage beyond belief. Missiles are too easy, try to learn what tracking is about before complaining. No matter where you go, there you are.
|
![Dirtee Girl Dirtee Girl](https://images.evetech.net/characters/676150657/portrait?size=64)
Dirtee Girl
Omega Enterprises Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2008.06.21 04:34:00 -
[388]
Originally by: Barasu Nannofaggotry is just for ****s. Fit a real ship or fly something you can actually fit to fight with decently.
so we should sit in space bricks crawling about ... sounds like a fun game .
*
* |
![JVol JVol](https://images.evetech.net/characters/145066583/portrait?size=64)
JVol
The IMorral MAjority Imorral Dragons
|
Posted - 2008.06.21 06:18:00 -
[389]
IMO< Nannos are a great addition to eve, they give not so good PvP'ers a leg up in combat. Should they be nerfed? Hell no !! Heres the answer(s).
1) make neuts and webs have more trainable skills. Skills to increase their range, their drain/web percentage. Sick of nanof*gs?? Then you spend a bit of time getting your t1 web/neut to hit 15-17km before you overheat it. THEN when the gents who scream, "FIT A WEB/NEUT if you wanna kill nannos" actually have something instead of the useless hollow advice they generally spout. What good is a neut or a web that only reaches 12-13km when they orbit you from 19km plus? Useless!! It would make a one v one's in BC sized ships and smaller viable again. At this time only heavy neuts are viable, that means CCP is saying you need a BS to counter a nano cruiser. unbalanced in any stretch of the imagination
Currently if your caught by a nano ishtar in your 'tank' ishtar( replace 'ishtar' with any other ship in the game if you like that can be nannoed, same outcome ) your just dead, your web or your neut you so wisely fit is useless,(unless of course your using rare faction gear) and the nano knows this. Ships of the same class and race should not be invulnerable to each other just because of their speed.
2) Give the missiles that were designed to kill fast movers enough love to actually harm fast movers, either outright buff them or add skills to further increase expl velocity ect.
3) Seems to me nanos are here to stay. like it or not. If you guys are going to get what you want, = game balance, stop asking for what CCP clearly doesn't want to give and start asking for what they what they are more likely to give... skill sets designed to ACTUALLY counter an obvious imbalance.
Once a guys be-bopp'n thru the belts in his '********' ( place any ship under BS here )and gets jumped by a nano version of his same ship AND his training and fitting ACTUALLY either help him kill or escape his nanno counterpart without having to have a hugin/rapier/hyena in his back pocket you will see this nanno trend dry up to a large extent.
Now, BATHE YOUR WOMEN AND BRING THEM TO ME!! JVOL has spoken! :)
|
![Tenuo Tenuo](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1142786817/portrait?size=64)
Tenuo
Native Freshfood
|
Posted - 2008.06.21 11:03:00 -
[390]
Originally by: JVol IMO< Nannos are a great addition to eve, they give not so good PvP'ers a leg up in combat. Should they be nerfed? Hell no !! Heres the answer(s).
1) make neuts and webs have more trainable skills. Skills to increase their range, their drain/web percentage. Sick of nanof*gs?? Then you spend a bit of time getting your t1 web/neut to hit 15-17km before you overheat it. THEN when the gents who scream, "FIT A WEB/NEUT if you wanna kill nannos" actually have something instead of the useless hollow advice they generally spout. What good is a neut or a web that only reaches 12-13km when they orbit you from 19km plus? Useless!! It would make a one v one's in BC sized ships and smaller viable again. At this time only heavy neuts are viable, that means CCP is saying you need a BS to counter a nano cruiser. unbalanced in any stretch of the imagination
A BC should NOT be a nano solo pwn mobile considering the time and investment towards the time and investment of a nano cruiser, you need to move to make the overheated webs work, garmon does it, go watch his vids. The things that should stop nanos are a)) Other nanos and recons, perhaps command ships. b) battleships c) 2-3 t1 BCs or below given they think. letting 1 tech 1 BC be a nano solo pwnmobile is outrageous. Also on the subject of tanked hac vs nano hac, tanked hacs will outtank almost every nano ship, and they're generally fast with t2 mwds, fast enough to cut into orbits and get overloaded web just like garmon does in ruptures. ______________________________________________ Euriti - I'll continue my nerd forum rage! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |