EVE Search - Incoming titan adjustments

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Incoming titan adjustments

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 91 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 14 post(s)
Andski GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2776	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:23:00 - [1141] - Quote we're losers with 800bn monthly tech income and the ability to throw 1600 angry assholes at anybody we wish at the blink of a tilde "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012
Truce Billis Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 2	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:24:00 - [1142] - Quote Surge Roth wrote: Andski wrote: just to help you get started mission fits don't work in pvp I've got some news for your ****** drake fleets... don't diss the drake fleets, they just killed all the titans in eve
Weaselior GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2651	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:24:00 - [1143] - Quote Surge Roth wrote: Andski wrote: Surge Roth wrote: Don't be mad that I'm stylin' all over you little bee no. 2,567. Besides, don't you have some autist with assburgers to listen to on vent shout your primaries while spamming f1? Now go serve your queen little bee. look at the publord trying to talk down to his betters More like watching you get butt flustered over being wrong. dealing with people like you is always annoying because you're literally too dumb to realize when you've been humiliated sort of takes the fun out of it
Surge Roth Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 38	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:24:00 - [1144] - Quote School Nickname Worldmonkey wrote: Surge Roth wrote: Andski wrote: I'm so mad, I'm going to express my anger! Don't be mad that I'm right. Face it bro, using carrier signature sized vessels will get hit by titans. Of course they'll be hit by titans, we simply don't care. Our issue is that you can just throw down unsupported titans and devastate entire fleets with utter impunity. This has been covered enough over the course of this thread that you should be able to contain your rage when confronted with the truth. You can continue to desperately assault our valiant forum warriors for all the good that it will do. It won't change the facts. :heh: Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either.
Sir Marksalot GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 19	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:25:00 - [1145] - Quote Surge Roth wrote: Truce Billis wrote: Truce Billis wrote: [quote=Andski]just to help you get started mission fits don't work in pvp Intelligible response Yea huh, okay. Whatever you say bro. what the **** does this even mean
Andski GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2776	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:25:00 - [1146] - Quote Surge Roth wrote: Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either. because every engagement has been against a lone titan lmao look how clueless and disconnected you are from reality! "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012
Surge Roth Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 38	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:26:00 - [1147] - Quote Weaselior wrote: Surge Roth wrote: Andski wrote: Surge Roth wrote: Don't be mad that I'm stylin' all over you little bee no. 2,567. Besides, don't you have some autist with assburgers to listen to on vent shout your primaries while spamming f1? Now go serve your queen little bee. look at the publord trying to talk down to his betters More like watching you get butt flustered over being wrong. dealing with people like you is always annoying because you're literally too dumb to realize when you've been humiliated sort of takes the fun out of it You need to stop projecting bro. If anyone is dealing with anything here is eve as a whole against you something awful guys. But I suppose having to pay to use a forum wtih up tight rules would make any of you have a high horse about anything and everything
Sir Marksalot GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 19	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:26:00 - [1148] - Quote Surge Roth wrote: School Nickname Worldmonkey wrote: Surge Roth wrote: Andski wrote: I'm so mad, I'm going to express my anger! Don't be mad that I'm right. Face it bro, using carrier signature sized vessels will get hit by titans. Of course they'll be hit by titans, we simply don't care. Our issue is that you can just throw down unsupported titans and devastate entire fleets with utter impunity. This has been covered enough over the course of this thread that you should be able to contain your rage when confronted with the truth. You can continue to desperately assault our valiant forum warriors for all the good that it will do. It won't change the facts. :heh: Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either. as does afterburning rifters, preach on brother badposter!
Ishen Villone GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 15	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:26:00 - [1149] - Quote I should be able to beat 1200 people with my 200 what the hell this is totally not fair
Sir Marksalot GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 19	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:27:00 - [1150] - Quote seriously what the hell is forums badposter Surge Roth even saying
Surge Roth Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 38	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:28:00 - [1151] - Quote Andski wrote: Surge Roth wrote: Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either. because every engagement has been against a lone titan lmao look how clueless and disconnected you are from reality! With the way you guys fight, may as well be
School Nickname Worldmonkey GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 7	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:29:00 - [1152] - Quote Surge Roth wrote: Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either. Maybe you need more XXbn officer sebos to feel good about yourselves and whine some more about you can't hit jack without them.
Surge Roth Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 38	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:30:00 - [1153] - Quote Sir Marksalot wrote: Surge Roth wrote: School Nickname Worldmonkey wrote: Surge Roth wrote: Andski wrote: I'm so mad, I'm going to express my anger! Don't be mad that I'm right. Face it bro, using carrier signature sized vessels will get hit by titans. Of course they'll be hit by titans, we simply don't care. Our issue is that you can just throw down unsupported titans and devastate entire fleets with utter impunity. This has been covered enough over the course of this thread that you should be able to contain your rage when confronted with the truth. You can continue to desperately assault our valiant forum warriors for all the good that it will do. It won't change the facts. :heh: Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members, but let's be honest here. That don't happen. Freak accidents don't count either. as does afterburning rifters, preach on brother badposter! Maybe they should have maintained a transversal that was greater than those XL turrets.
Takashi Kaeda Perkone Caldari State 27	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:30:00 - [1154] - Quote Surge Roth wrote: Takashi Kaeda wrote: Boo hoo, why won't you believe I'm cool and edgy like naruto. World of Warcraft online: where whining like a prepubescent boy gets you what you want. AKA: welfare epics kill yourself.
Surge Roth Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 38	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:31:00 - [1155] - Quote Ishen Villone wrote: I should be able to beat 1200 people with my 200 what the hell this is totally not fair But nerfing other's play style to get a spoon fed win is fair, right. By the way, that sounds like hypocrisy to me.
Surge Roth Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 38	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:32:00 - [1156] - Quote Takashi Kaeda wrote: Surge Roth wrote: Takashi Kaeda wrote: Boo hoo, why won't you believe I'm cool and edgy like naruto. World of Warcraft online: where whining like a prepubescent boy gets you what you want. AKA: welfare epics kill yourself. Is that a threat? I take threats very seriously.
Takashi Kaeda Perkone Caldari State 27	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:32:00 - [1157] - Quote Yes I threatened you to kill yourself. Good one. But please, kill yourself.
Krutoj xSPECNAZx 42	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:33:00 - [1158] - Quote Lets summirise this patch with nerfing of the biggest End game item, most expenssive and now most useless. Well done at rolling this game back by 7 years. I will address some of the things that Greyscale thinks are true or were "discussed" Quote: We have talked to the CSM about this, and we're comfortable going forward with these changes in light of that discussion. I'm not going to put words in their mouths, though. While this is true and we did discuss this, the major consensus was that nerfing titans is just trying to use a quick fix on a problem that is larger than a titan. Its the problem of 0.0 warfare, ship balance and how the end game currently built around those. Fixing titans as opposed to trying to come up with a better sov mechanics and better ship balance (between tech3 ships and titans), seemed to CCP like an easier way out that would buy them some more affection from the majority of players who cant comprehend this. Quote: XL turret tracking halved, siege module tracking penalty removed Titans reduced to 3 maximum locked targets, and base scan resolution reduced to 5 So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place? Why nerf scan resolution, which together with cloak is non existent? I will tell you why, because CCP thinks that if some wanker managed to buy the most rarest fucken items in the game and killed with that titan 10 people, its a cause for concern for entire player base. That said, taking a look at statics, were a titan normaly an alliance asset, not many can afford to outfit their titan like a christmas tree of officer modules and yet, this became the major factor for this nerf. Funny that, tech 3 officer/deadspace ships (yes with deadspace/officer 100mn afterburners) dont get treated as such and yet there are more of them and they pose more balancing issues. Btw mr "our assumption"Greyscale, assumptions are the mother of all fukups. I hope you will remember this saying next time you draft a patch.
Ladie Harlot GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 1848	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:33:00 - [1159] - Quote Surge Roth wrote: Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members And this is where you show your ignorance. Lone titans are not the problem. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Surge Roth Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 38	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:33:00 - [1160] - Quote Takashi Kaeda wrote: Yes I threatened you to kill yourself. Good one. But please, kill yourself. Threatening someone over the forums is a bannable offense. I sincerely hope you're joking.
Takashi Kaeda Perkone Caldari State 27	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:36:00 - [1161] - Quote Surge Roth wrote: Takashi Kaeda wrote: Yes I threatened you to kill yourself. Good one. But please, kill yourself. Threatening someone over the forums is a bannable offense. I sincerely hope you're joking. Good thing I 'threatened' you then.
Ladie Harlot GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 1848	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:37:00 - [1162] - Quote Krutoj wrote: So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place? Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Surge Roth Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 38	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:38:00 - [1163] - Quote Ladie Harlot wrote: Surge Roth wrote: Keeping your mwds on all the time to increase your sig radius to near carrier levels with the hp of a battlecruiser deserves to get shot down by a lone titan without any fleet members And this is where you show your ignorance. Lone titans are not the problem. You show your ignorance on a daily basis and I have to deal with the garbage you and the likes of you spit out. i simply read missed the s behind titan in that one post. But it doesn't change the fact that this nerf is unjustified and is there to support failswarm.
Aryndel Vyst GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 285	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:39:00 - [1164] - Quote I demand Grath Telkin change his eve portrait
Surge Roth Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 38	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:39:00 - [1165] - Quote Ladie Harlot wrote: Krutoj wrote: So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place? Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life. You guys could of done the same without crying for nerfs. But here we are.
Takashi Kaeda Perkone Caldari State 27	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:41:00 - [1166] - Quote I too like posting out of my ass about things I can barely comprehend.
Surge Roth Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 38	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:43:00 - [1167] - Quote Takashi Kaeda wrote: I too like posting out of my ass about things I can barely comprehend. good for you. Maybe the rest of goonswarm will admit to this
bamason Dragon's Rage 2	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:45:00 - [1168] - Quote how about give the titan a tracking nerf and leave xl turrets alone, some of us like tracking dreads.
Takashi Kaeda Perkone Caldari State 27	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:46:00 - [1169] - Quote The fact that you unironically think Titans are balanced and good for the game in their current iteration is kind of funny though. Tell me, when the CFC have more Titans than you what would you cry about then?
Ladie Harlot GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 1848	Posted - 2012.03.14 02:52:00 - [1170] - Quote Surge Roth wrote: Ladie Harlot wrote: Krutoj wrote: So now titans cant lock fast enough or track. Whats the point of locking anything at all other than structures and supercaps if it cant be tracked in the first place? Every Titan nerf that CCP has done has been to lessen the impact Titans have on subcaps. Obviously, CCP doesn't want people using unsupported Titans to fight subcaps. Take their hint, adapt your strategies and be happy in life. You guys could of done the same without crying for nerfs. But here we are. It's impossible to kill a blob of titans once it reaches a critical mass. There's no way to adapt to it. Nothing in Eve should be unkillable. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 91 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,13s, ref 20250929/2045
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.