| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mad Ilya
Erasers inc.
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
   |
Posted - 2008.07.27 15:33:00 -
[691]
against with all my .. erhm .. several characters 
|
shimmyckus
Blood Covenant
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 15:36:00 -
[692]
a g a i n s t
|
Captator
Universal Securities
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 15:38:00 -
[693]
lots of people forgetting to hit the support button...
|
Shamharoth
Beach Boys
BeachBoys
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 15:39:00 -
[694]
Against.
Enough reasons have been listed on loads of EVE-dedicated forums.
|
smallmouse7
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 15:42:00 -
[695]
lol ccp you FAIL
|
Sybil Loc0
Spartan Industries
Cruel Intentions
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 15:55:00 -
[696]
Imho CCP want to go to far with this nerf/patch. I think vaga can be fly litle slower but all that things about scrambler and web nerf (oh and btw vaga can killed by noob in raven with cruise and no heavy neut:D)???
|
luksajlo
Blood Covenant
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 15:56:00 -
[697]
\O/
|
Luremusa
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 16:02:00 -
[698]
Im against this idea, way to drastical and not very well thought through.
|
Rastadeen
The Illuminati.
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 16:06:00 -
[699]
Edited by: Rastadeen on 27/07/2008 16:07:10
Against this nerf, get it back to the blackboard. I do agree that cruisers and BS's top twinked speed is abit much, but there are other ways to go about this and in alot smaller steps.
|
ian666
Rave Technologies Inc.
C0VEN
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 16:15:00 -
[700]
signed against
|
|
|
Pimparella
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 16:16:00 -
[701]
/against the nerf!
|
De Morgean
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 16:29:00 -
[702]
against |
hajnak sujet
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 16:30:00 -
[703]
signed against
|
SheriffFruitfly
Caldari
M. Corp
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 16:31:00 -
[704]
Against - even though it works in my favor.
|
Jiifu
Beach Boys
BeachBoys
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 16:32:00 -
[705]
Edited by: Jiifu on 27/07/2008 16:37:52
against
|
Raimo
Gallente
Federal Defence Union
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 16:34:00 -
[706]
AGAINST the changes as outlined in the devblog. Not against more reasonable readjustment of ship speeds and especially "ludicrous speed", polycarbs et al.
|
Shovel TM
Minmatar Mafia
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 16:34:00 -
[707]
Edited by: Shovel TM on 27/07/2008 16:34:52
speed up, carebears down
Nerf snakes, maybe add slight stacking penalty, but please don't ruin nano gangs.
|
Seabhac
BudifulBC
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 16:35:00 -
[708]
Bart no like, baaaad medicine.
I wish my lawn was emo, so it would cut itself. |
Clair Bear
Coalition of Nations
Free Trade Zone.
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 16:53:00 -
[709]
As usual, when CCP set out to nerf something they miss the target and pound something completely unrelated into the ground.
Against the blasterboat nerf.
|
MilowFV
Echo Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 17:11:00 -
[710]
Funny I am not a big fan of ships going over 15k, but I just dont think this is the way to fix it with one hugh change. Rebalance the basic ship speeds and maybe add stacking penality and see what that does for you first.
|
|
|
innot
Corp 1 Allstars
The Requiem
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 17:37:00 -
[711]
AGAINST
|
Barnes Wallis
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 17:39:00 -
[712]
Against |
LuthienTinuviel
The Higher Standard
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 18:01:00 -
[713]
against the way hey are proposing to do the nano nerf "ludicrous speeds" need to be looked at however what CCP are doing is taking a sledghammer to a ming dynasty vase... it is usual CCP tactics they can't actually muster the brains (or the time it seems 5 hour meeting lol) to think through a problem and come up with an elegant solution as opposed to brute force.
|
Xzar Fyrarr
Tribal Liberation Force
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 18:25:00 -
[714]
VERY much against.
VERY<-
Speed does not need change.
It is fine as is.
Nanos die all the time.
AGAINST
|
TheMailman
GreenSwarm
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 18:35:00 -
[715]
CCP probably has some idea how to fix the game, but this is not one of them, AGAINST! |
flashfreaking
LFC
Executive Outcomes
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 18:39:00 -
[716]
Will you guys kill me if I say
Against AGAINST nanonerf?
Disallowed sig graphic. Send an e-mail to [email protected] when it meets the forum signature guidelines. ~Saint |
Laurgos Celek
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 18:40:00 -
[717]
against
|
Dunkan Hunt
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 18:43:00 -
[718]
Edited by: Dunkan Hunt on 27/07/2008 18:46:47
Aginst!
They kill Sabra! Now they kill Vaga!
Stop ruin this game and fix lag problem first!
|
Azumo
Starbridge
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 18:58:00 -
[719]
AGAINST
|
Mef Agann
Teladi Trade Expeditions
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 19:01:00 -
[720]
AGAINST
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |