| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Concordh8er
   |
Posted - 2008.08.22 08:04:00 -
[1861]
|
Ghost IX
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 08:05:00 -
[1862]
nerf is too harsh
|
Semkhet
Spartan Industries
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 17:57:00 -
[1863]
Against the nerf. Increment missile speed, explosion velocity, and add 200% falloff on webs.
|
Amarr Holymight
Bat Country
Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 19:10:00 -
[1864]
Good ideas Semkhet you should clik the box to actually vote against it. Web falloff is a great idea imo but not voting properly here is a bad one  .
|
nofeel
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 20:53:00 -
[1865]
against
|
Joachim Kato
Zawa's Fan Club
|
Posted - 2008.08.23 18:14:00 -
[1866]
|
Xasz
AnTi.
|
Posted - 2008.08.24 06:27:00 -
[1867]
Against.
--Random Links:--
eve-pirate.com, read and share your Yarr adventures
Ransom Boards, get one for your corp |
Shadow Sapphire
|
Posted - 2008.08.24 06:32:00 -
[1868]
MY slepnir won't kick ass anymore but then again I can finaly stop using nanos .
Speed tanks need some serious balancing , althou it's funny as hell seing a whole gang of idiots trying to shut you down while you blow them out of the sky 1 by 1
But one a more serious note , when was the last time you tooks a armor/shield tannk over speed/dps .
Atm speed needs to be nerfed a bit .
Not suported .
|
PriceCheckAlt
|
Posted - 2008.08.24 06:46:00 -
[1869]
 Originally by: Shadow Sapphire
But one a more serious note , when was the last time you tooks a armor/shield tannk over speed/dps .
Snipers, RR BS gangs, capitals. So basically anytime we're trying to deny someone the use of a system or heavy defenses are present.
|
Robocop
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.08.25 11:40:00 -
[1870]
AGAINST
|
|
|
fuze
Chosen Path
Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2008.08.25 13:19:00 -
[1871]
These kind of ideas make me wonder why devs even try to play this game and still come up with these terrible ideas.
Just fix what's causing this by adjusting it slightly to get a viable compromise.
Stuff like tweaking percentages to downsize the speed gain from eightfold to sixfold for interceptors, to fourfold for cruisers and twofold for BS.
Or if you have your head full of snakes your MWD will get heat dmg after 10 cycles (+metalevel). |
Die Warzau
|
Posted - 2008.08.25 14:20:00 -
[1872]
Against. Too heavy handed for the intended objective. I support some of the mass rebalancing to make frigates and AFs faster, and the web nerf, but that's about all. Instead, nerf stacking if "ludicrous speed" is the real problem.
|
Sylvmar
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.08.25 15:21:00 -
[1873]
Against nerf.
CCP are either a wielding a very large and over-compensated nerf bat or they are trying to introduce many less justified changes under the guise of a nano nerf
|
iLike ISK
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 04:27:00 -
[1874]
against
|
SFX Bladerunner
Naval Protection Corp
Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 12:24:00 -
[1875]
I vote for matari friendliness
we need our speed, it's basically the only bloody thing we have left!
__________________________________________________
History is much like an endless waltz, the three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever.. |
Mellow Wind
|
Posted - 2008.08.29 17:39:00 -
[1876]
against
|
Zhang Shicheng
|
Posted - 2008.08.30 07:22:00 -
[1877]
Reduce blobs the game can not currently handle.
|
Grunt MacHardFist
|
Posted - 2008.08.30 11:17:00 -
[1878]
My main character is a Gallente who flies Amarrian ships. Needless to say, a nano nerf would help me out tremendously. Even so, I am against it.
I enjoy the uphill challenge of countering nano tactics with my limited abilities. So why mess with it? I also like the thought of Minmatar ships out-running cruise missiles. That means that a Raven needs to rely on an interceptor to take down a nano fleet. So it builds teamwork. Is teamwork suddenly a bad enough thing that CCP should discourage it?
Finally, it's fun to zoom around at top speed. Period. This nano nerf is like the nation of India deciding to shave a few thousand feet off the top of Mt Everest. It's a waste of time, energy, and resources that's gonna change the way we look at the world, **** ppl off, and bog down CCP when they could be focusing on other issues, such as what new ships or skills to roll out in the next build.
|
StoneCold
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.08.31 11:26:00 -
[1879]
Against the nerf.
|
Icylce
Elektrum Bullet
|
Posted - 2008.08.31 18:56:00 -
[1880]
Edited by: Icylce on 31/08/2008 18:56:27
against the nerf
|
|
|
tib0
|
Posted - 2008.08.31 20:01:00 -
[1881]
against
|
TpyIIoff
Rage and Terror
Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2008.08.31 20:04:00 -
[1882]
against
|
Oun'zi
|
Posted - 2008.08.31 20:17:00 -
[1883]
AGAINST
|
Antyk Kelam
|
Posted - 2008.08.31 22:23:00 -
[1884]
AGAINST
|
Basicou France
|
Posted - 2008.08.31 23:21:00 -
[1885]
AGAINST
|
Templar Jindarri
|
Posted - 2008.09.01 10:28:00 -
[1886]
Against |
JordanParey
Minmatar
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2008.09.01 11:29:00 -
[1887]
Against. I'm so against the nerf I figured I would state it two times, a month apart. |
Havohej
The Defias Brotherhood
|
Posted - 2008.09.01 13:38:00 -
[1888]
Edited by: Havohej on 01/09/2008 13:39:03
If a single 10M SP Hurricane pilot can kill a nano'd Rapier with AutoCannons, then it can't be that "broken" can it?
|
HypnotiX
Brutor tribe
|
Posted - 2008.09.01 14:34:00 -
[1889]
AGAINST |
Brisingia
|
Posted - 2008.09.01 18:23:00 -
[1890]
Against this stupid "nerf". Try to balance it another way and stop this UBAR-pimped pirate-imp-sets (not only snake)! |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |