Hey CCP Soundwave (or any other CCP wants to try),

When I drop item in to another Corperation Corperation Hanager Array, in say the first division it just gives me this error "You have been denied access for the following reason: This office does not belong to your corporation." Yes it is another Corporation PoS structured but before the new UI system we could still drop in. The function needs to be restored or improved.

I keep missing the thread shift and these seems to be on deaf ear.

Pushing a half-assed, non-working, bug-riddled, pile of horse crap on your paying customers because of some arbitrary internal schedule that you make up yourselves has to be the absolute stupidest thing I've ever heard of a company doing in the history of companies, ever. EVER! Laughably UNBELIEVABLE!

Fix the dissapearing inventory bug asap. None of us care about your internal schedules that you pull out of your own asses.

You can tell Hilmar I said he's fired.

We honestly thought we were ready.

Well I think you get the award for the dumbest **** I've read today. There's some others in this thread that are right on your heels though.

First the new inventory was 90% fine. The only reason not to release would have been to not have to listen to entitled whiny douche-bags like yourself ... but they'd probably have to shut down the eve forums for good to achieve that goal.

Secondly, Microsoft has been releasing half-assed, non-working, bug-riddled piles of horse crap on their paying customers for years and years and years... along with pretty much every other company that releases any sort of moderately complex software. But hey you probably didn't know that cause you're really more of a legal-pad and pencil kind of guy, right? You probably only use that awful fiddly computer thing to play eve so you wouldn't know about any of that other stuff I'm sure.

Soundwave,

Given the vast number of thread-naughts with comments and suggestions from every pod and his dog ; is there are definitive complete authoritative list of improvements that will be made at some point between UI - say between now and end of the year ?

Ramm

Soundwave,

Given the vast number of thread-naughts with comments and suggestions from every pod and his dog ; is there are definitive complete authoritative list of improvements that will be made at some point between UI - say between now and end of the year ?

Ramm

For your info, the issue is client side. I have tested the unified inventory on 2 different machines.

on a low end computer (lets say, a laptop that is aprox 3 years old by now) the inventory really lacks performace for viewing large containers, moving a large amount of items, trading items, loading the main inventory screen (I have mentioned this in a previous post and I don't like to post a link since I am lazy)

If you are using a high end computer (lets say, I7 920 bla with a lot of specs), you will noticed that the inventory screen does not lag that much.

If your developers are all running a high end cpu (which I think this is the case), improvements wouldn't really matter much imho since a developer on a high end CPU wouldn't notice a fraction of a millisecond by making changes.

There are some things that apparently constantly refresh / check / whatever the items in the UI making it sluggish as hell. With the previous inventory system this was never the case.

Not definitive, we have a long list that we're constantly adding to. You'll very likely see us iterating based on feedback till late in the year if needed, so this feature is definitely not being left behind :)

What is this Inventory system supposed to do better? Why not demonstrate some really excellent and real uses cases where this new UI makes the transition easy and rocks our collective inventory management worlds? Show us your excellent work. Please.

You know at the rate CCP is going... they might end up rolling back the whole thing one piece at a time.

All of this could have been avoided if they just tacked on the tree view to the old inventory scheme and didn't muck with anything else.

Adding a feature to an existing one is probably going to be a lot less painful than replacing it wholesale, AND THEN going on a loop back to the old feature.

Wow you guys really dont get this... THEY COULDNT DO ANYTHING TO THE OLD CRAP, it was 10 year old uncommented crappy code that they litterally had to fork lift out and replace from the ground up, there was no "tacking on XXX" to the inventory, it was a full and entire rewrite they've said it like a DOZEN times already.

Hey, sorry we've been hogging up all your time trying to get you to fix something we didn't want released yet. I'm sure most people would have been fine waiting until the next main release for this instead of the half-assed version we've been dealing with.

Hey, sorry we've been hogging up all your time trying to get you to fix something we didn't want released yet. I'm sure most people would have been fine waiting until the next main release for this instead of the half-assed version we've been dealing with.

You're right. It's totally our fault. We're all too ******* stupid to tell the difference between "This is different" and "This is garbage". I apologize. I didn't mean to offend your superior sensibilities. How dare us lowly people who actually have to USE this system criticize it.

Yeah, we'll make it easier to use. Added to what you're talking about, we're looking at adding bays to the neocom, so if you drag the drone bay to the neocom, you can access it from there when it's available, it's kind of cool. Anyway, on it