I wish you were speaking for everyone but a fair section of the reponses, even just in this thread, have gone beyond the boundaries of respectability. Customers demanding a quality product is fine, customers demanding hard working peoples' jobs, or calling their personal integrity, skill and commitment into question, isn't in my book. As to the current implementation, that has been addressed numerous times throughout this thread and in the dev blog that the thread comes from so I won't repeat myself and others further.

So let me get this straight.

1. Put Unified Inventory on test server, get tons of negative feedback.
2. Put the exact same version of Unified Inventory on main server so the entire EVE community can beta test your feature.
3. Receive even more negative feedback.
4. Slowly release updates that fix a small amount of errors in Unified Inventory.
5. Tell the players that because it's hard for you to release updates for a broken feature, you will slow down.

Bravo CCP.

I'll talk to some people about getting a/some devblog(s) written about our development processes and go into what you asked for. Don't fall into this trap of thinking that Sisi feedback is ignored though - plenty of feedback received on Sisi results in changes being made and plenty is taken on board but not implemented, for good and for bad. Look at the recent Incursion rebalancing and the continual input Affinity and team Five-0 had from seasoned incursion runners - they made a number of iterations based on that feedback.

This is what I was waiting for. I knew without a shadow of a doubt CCP would eventually say screw it and continue back to another feature while leaving this one unfinished. CCP will never learn from their mistakes. A majority of the community are more than fine being beta testers for shoddy features. This is why CCP doesn't care. As long as people continue to pay why would they?

I for one firmly believe if I'm paying for a game I should not be testing their product, or hunting down bugs for them. I should be enjoying my time playing the game. Isn't that what a game is for after all?

Testing should only occur on SiSi. Thats what SiSi is supposed to be for. However, in order for SiSi testing to actually make a difference the Devs MUST listen to the testers. Tippia and several others gave them more than enough feedback on the issues with this new feature. The problem is the Devs are arrogant and do not listen to feedback from their testers. That was obvious when one of the Devs posted about not listening to their feedback.

The only time the Devs care about our thoughts is when they dump a shoddy product on us and we light the torches and flame them here on the forum. Once people unsub is when they care. That unfortunately is the only time they care. Less people are flaming them on the forums now, so this is why they are going back to the hum drum workings at their offices. It is a direct result of the complacency of the community.

All of you can see that CCP has not learned their lesson from incarna. Did you expect anything different? I cancelled all my subs and this one expires in a couple days. I am debating on whether or not to get an in game plex with isk to monitor this debacle for another month. One thing is certain, until this game is fixed I will not open my wallet and give them another penny.

The few of you calling people whiners on here need to take a step back and look at the situation. People are upset that an unfinished product was thrust upon us. We are paying them to test their product. Therefore, of course people are upset. This new UI is crippling those who do industry and manage massive amounts of assets (im not an industrialist), and it is a major blow to guys that salvage their missions. Looting is atrocious. Anything asset related lags with this new UI. This and the lack of the old functionality of the old UI is why people are upset.

It is even more disheartening when we are promised a patch to get this working properly every week until old functionality is restored. We got a couple patches and are now told to basically suck it up for a few more weeks because we want to work on other features. Makes me wonder how bad those features are going to be and whether or not CCP will actually listen to the guys that decide to test the features on SISI for them. After all CCP didn't listen to the testers on this new feature and all of us are paying the price for it.

already there - just open your eyes and look around the UI for the new position of such info

No I am not going give you any more hints you lazy *$&%^ -- LOL

'back' button
No more changing 'folders' with simple item dragging
Compact tree names

Guys, the team isn't stopping working on fixes and improvements, they are changing their release cadence. Next release in 2 days, then another one 12 days after that. The 12 days (7 days development time) isn't going to spent doing no work! Please, I understand that you are angry, upset, etc. Your vitriolic hate is doing you no good - we don't listen harder because you call us worse names. To those who are still keeping it constructive, thanks, and we are working!

This is not the reason. We honestly thought we were ready.

** I want an account freeze, i'm not paying an MMO to be a beta tester, and i don't play to be frustrated, mad, irked, angered, fuming or blood-boiling at something, i play for fun and relaxation, Eve currently is not giving me that!

Guys, the team isn't stopping working on fixes and improvements, they are changing their release cadence. Next release in 2 days, then another one 12 days after that. The 12 days (7 days development time) isn't going to spent doing no work! Please, I understand that you are angry, upset, etc. Your vitriolic hate is doing you no good - we don't listen harder because you call us worse names. To those who are still keeping it constructive, thanks, and we are working!

When you guys release stuff that doesn't work, and you ignore tester feedback, this is what happens.

We didn't originate this issue, CCP did.

People are pissed because you guys made a series of compound mistakes (bad enough) and you ignored your most passionate users (much worse). You might not like how people are expressing it, but these tough words from people still subscribed are better for you and CCP than mass unsubscribes.

It's not about people motivating you to work. You're missing an essential part of understanding relationships. People are venting. We have very low expectations for you guys. We are simply expressing our frustration with that state of affairs the only way we can, short of unsubscribing.

The way you make this stop, is to fix the problem, not to lecture us on our tone. Our tone isn't the problem with the inventory.

What I think CCP misses, is that people like Tippia represent us much better than the CSM does, and we (the players) know it. So when you ignore her, you ignore us. And no one likes being in a relationship where they feel (right or wrong) that they are being ignored.

What I think CCP misses, is that people like Tippia represent us much better than the CSM does, and we (the players) know it. So when you ignore her, you ignore us. And no one likes being in a relationship where they feel (right or wrong) that they are being ignored.

All this bad feeling on both sides could have been avoided if the issues identifed by Tippia and others had been fixed before release.

Your vitriolic hate is doing you no good - we don't listen harder because you call us worse names.

Customers demanding a quality product is fine, customers demanding hard working peoples' jobs, or calling their personal integrity, skill and commitment into question, isn't in my book.

I don't have an issue with complaints, I have an issue with the manner of complaining.

Yeah, we'll make it easier to use. Added to what you're talking about, we're looking at adding bays to the neocom, so if you drag the drone bay to the neocom, you can access it from there when it's available, it's kind of cool. Anyway, on it

I know it's there, but I want it on the top level view, without clicking on the containers.