Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 [32]:: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 62 post(s) |
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
344
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 11:54:00 -
[931] - Quote
**** it CCP, you are done if the old inventory behavior is restored. |
Dragonzchilde
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 17:14:00 -
[932] - Quote
Knalldari Testpilot wrote:CCP Explorer wrote:Panhead4411 wrote:So is this the real reason the new Inventory was initially PUSHED onto TQ?
I understand and appreciate that you have in house dealines, but you seem to not be understanding that your customers would prefer a fully functional system before you try to work on something new.
Unless i've misread most of the feedback given in all the major threadnaughts thus far. This is not the reason. We honestly thought we were ready. lol? are you trolling us?
must say i loved his reply too. wonderful game designers i would call that even better quality assurance still.
I'm down from 9 accounts to 1. The way ccp is doing in the last 4 - 5 patches I wont be resubbing any. GTC with tech moon money it is.
Great Job CCP.... I hope dust will go the same way cause you don't deserve your customers. |
Kusum Fawn
State War Academy Caldari State
210
|
Posted - 2012.09.13 05:13:00 -
[933] - Quote
Because. just because. maybe one day it will be good again. Its not possible to please all the people all the time, but it sure as hell is possible to Displease all the people, most of the time.
|
ZaBob
Twilight Labs Unsung Voices
269
|
Posted - 2012.09.18 20:23:00 -
[934] - Quote
Kusum Fawn wrote:Because. just because. maybe one day it will be good again.
I get the impression -- from the lack of any further progress -- that they think it's good again. |
Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
319
|
Posted - 2012.09.18 22:13:00 -
[935] - Quote
ZaBob wrote:Kusum Fawn wrote:Because. just because. maybe one day it will be good again. I get the impression -- from the lack of any further progress -- that they think it's good again. Could be. Or that they have prioritized their coder and designer resources on other ventures.
I still have several UI-related bugs open and unfiltered at this point in time -- this can't be a unique situation...
I remember Hilmar's humble communication from about 11 months ago where he announced a renewed focus on customers as he was laying off a couple hundred of his own people.
Once he got his books in order, it was back to the usual 'ignore our customers until something else blows up in our face' business methodology. So much potential with EVE and CCP. And they always blow it.
+++++++ I have never shed a tear for a fellow EVE player until now. Mark GÇ£SeleeneGÇ¥ Heard's Blog Honoring Sean "Vile Rat" Smith. |
poppeteer
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.09.19 04:35:00 -
[936] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=155053
Get on board and provide feedback. |
Bubanni
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
442
|
Posted - 2012.09.19 16:00:00 -
[937] - Quote
Robert Caldera wrote:**** it CCP, you are done if the old inventory behavior is restored.
This iteration would do exactly that if you ask me, (in terms of the areas I use it for, not pos's and such?) I am looking forward to adding shortcuts directly to the neocom, that will make me able to use the unifiec inventory as if it was just like the old one. (wont have to use the tree view at all) Christmas wish list https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=134275 Module activation delay! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1180934 |
Panhead4411
Rothschild's Sewage and Septic Sucking Services The Possum Lodge
210
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 01:26:00 -
[938] - Quote
Bubanni wrote: This iteration would do exactly that if you ask me, (in terms of the areas I use it for, not pos's and such?) I am looking forward to adding shortcuts directly to the neocom, that will make me able to use the unifiec inventory as if it was just like the old one. (wont have to use the tree view at all)
From the sound of it, you'll have to add a shortcut for each division of the corp hanger in order to not use the tree...funny how he's not saying anything specific about that part... http://blog.beyondreality.se/shift-click-does-nothing -á-á < Unified Inventory is NOT ready... |
Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
319
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 15:45:00 -
[939] - Quote
Quoting for emphasis. Re-link posts, copy-n-paste post content, etc. Whatever you have to do to put player requirements back in front of the developers' eyes.
@ CCP: was it that hard to lock this thread and put a link to Arrow's new and hopefully constructive thread?
+++++++ I have never shed a tear for a fellow EVE player until now. Mark GÇ£SeleeneGÇ¥ Heard's Blog Honoring Sean "Vile Rat" Smith. |
Mr Bimble
Lost Ark Enterprises
14
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 15:56:00 -
[940] - Quote
Still a pain in the arse.UI is still a piece of ****. Takes a back seat to "improvements" to the avatars.Spaceships guns missiles lasers.Not even a spacesuit.Get your heads out of your arses and fix broken **** before playing with useless frillies |
|
Amaldor Themodius
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
6
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 21:53:00 -
[941] - Quote
The unified inventory UI is literally worse than the previous UI in pretty much all ways. I don't understand why ccp persist in investing developer resources and cash into the ongoing serries of band aids to fix the unified UI when they could roll back to the old UI which was fine tbh.
The key pain points for me with the unified inventory UI are:
1 - it's counter intuitive. Even after months of using this new UI its always a task to remember to do what is needed to ensure the action I want to undertake.
2 - its clunky and poorly designed. There are just too many flaws especially when dealing with multiple large pools of inventory in a station. Activity such as putting drones into ships or ships into carriers are needlessly complex and tome consuming.
3 - Literally nobody I know likes or wants this ui in preference to the old one
Please chamge back.
|
shado20
EXTERMINATUS. Nulli Secunda
47
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 17:25:00 -
[942] - Quote
Amaldor Themodius wrote:The unified inventory UI is literally worse than the previous UI in pretty much all ways. I don't understand why ccp persist in investing developer resources and cash into the ongoing serries of band aids to fix the unified UI when they could roll back to the old UI which was fine tbh.
The key pain points for me with the unified inventory UI are:
1 - it's counter intuitive. Even after months of using this new UI its always a task to remember to do what is needed to ensure the action I want to undertake.
2 - its clunky and poorly designed. There are just too many flaws especially when dealing with multiple large pools of inventory in a station. Activity such as putting drones into ships or ships into carriers are needlessly complex and tome consuming.
3 - Literally nobody I know likes or wants this ui in preference to the old one
Please chamge back.
i 2ed this
ok like the summer has been over for some time now! and CCP is still stuck in the mud on this failed UI. I mite make a youtube video showing where you fail because its obvious CCP cant read!
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 [32]:: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |