Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Ranger 1
Amarr Dynaverse Corporation
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 04:14:00 -
[391]
Originally by: Xtover Edited by: Xtover on 22/02/2010 01:37:58 Edited by: Xtover on 22/02/2010 01:37:39
Originally by: Obsidian Hawk A list of things to fix before the expansion
Oh and look at this, it is in the right forum!!
Ultra fark: It is offers suggestions on how problems might be fixed rather than the endless whine in here that says, fix this with no suggestions or ideas on what the problem is or how to fix it.
Here is an idea, instead of complaining about problems here, start a thread in features and ideas identifying the problem and offering suggestions on how you would like to see it fixed.
Then get your friends and others who recognize the problem and post in that thread either supporting it or offering their point of view.
CCP won't listen to whining kids, but they will listen to people who make a half assed attempt to identify the problem give their thoughts on possible fixes to the problem and present it in a decent and respectable manner.
funny... I hate to make you look like a moron, but i'll just quote myself from one page back. Maybe you should read the thread.
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1271913&page=12#343
Oh look, all the whines you are referring to are ALREADY IN THE ASSEMBLY HALL AND IN FEATURES AND IDEAS.
Several have even had DEVs saying they're working on it. Such as Abathur saying AFs will be ready for..... DOMINION 1.1
That's the thing, they're not empty whines. You just haven't been paying enough attention to the forums you were referring to.
Sorry to make you look stupid.
You didn't make anyone look stupid.
Your previous post has a few valid points, a lot of very questionable personal opinions, and a long wish list of things you personally would like to see added to the game (as opposed to current issues).
To take the one example you made in your latest post, the two things people really wanted to see done fairly quickly was the Super Carrier buffing and the AF buffing. The more important of the two, the Super Carrier buff has already been done. It's pretty likely the AF buff will be dealt with long before this expansion see's the light of day.
Just take a deep breath and lets see what the entirety of the next patch contains, and what tweaks are done between now and then, before you start venting your spleen on everyone that likes what has been revealed so far.
===== If you go to Za'Ha'Dum I will gank you. |
Xtover
Suicide Kings
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 04:37:00 -
[392]
Originally by: Ranger 1
You didn't make anyone look stupid.
Your previous post has a few valid points, a lot of very questionable personal opinions, and a long wish list of things you personally would like to see added to the game (as opposed to current issues).
To take the one example you made in your latest post, the two things people really wanted to see done fairly quickly was the Super Carrier buffing and the AF buffing. The more important of the two, the Super Carrier buff has already been done. It's pretty likely the AF buff will be dealt with long before this expansion see's the light of day.
Just take a deep breath and lets see what the entirety of the next patch contains, and what tweaks are done between now and then, before you start venting your spleen on everyone that likes what has been revealed so far.
Many of the whines here are based upon changes that have been brought up. Yes I brought up what I support. That's nature.
I disagree, I feel the AF boost was just as important than the SC one. There are many, many more AF-capable pilots.
Both changes are needed, it's not really a personal opinion on a buff, but see if from my other char's (caldari spec) point of view- where both interceptors and assault frigates are pretty much worthless currently.
|
AnonyTerrorNinja
Minmatar Buggers' Advanced Interstellar Transport
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 04:49:00 -
[393]
Originally by: Jei'son Bladesmith SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
that was my happy scream
You're totally a mermaid.
I'm curious about this expansion, and sort of nervous that given Dust514's platform-specific nature, it may fall by the wayside infrastructure-wise and need to be dropped at some point.
The 360's already well into its lifespan as a platform, and we can't know as consumers whether or not full backward-compatibility will exist on whatever console Microsoft brings out next for the game, let alone the Live platform.
So yeah, I just hope things don't go wrong with the implementation of Tyrannis and Dust514 :l
---
|
Jericho Khaine
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 05:04:00 -
[394]
Any idea what this will do to the system requirements on Classic and Premium? I personally have a computer that has cut it on classic so far. I've lost about 15FPS in the last year, and can only sacrifice about 10FPS more at max before having to cancel my EVE account do to inability to run it. I know I'm not in the majority with my situation, but it will be a shame when that day comes because I very much enjoy EVE.
|
Aftermath 71
OMEGA DIRECTIVE Event Horizon.
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 06:14:00 -
[395]
Sounds intresting but ....
Its quite obvius that this upgrade is beeing forced before anything else will happen due to Dust beeing complete and must be released to pay the bills for that development ... I just hope to see as many already stated fix lowsec, lag and sov mechenics paralell to this ( Maby some Dust developers can lend a hand eh ? )
A tip , i bet its the planetary graphics that messed up and caused the new lag features :)
Also a shame that focus are on the planet side of things , this is primary a space game and i would rather see POS infrastructure and features increased/improved then on the planet side ... there is sooo much more you can do with this game before planet interaction and walking in stations happens....
Oh yeah may i do a small request ? Fuel rods BPO's for pos's to simplefy the fueling process ....
o/
|
Marlona Sky
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 08:04:00 -
[396]
Every time you pay for that subscription fee, you are saying, "I am happy the way the game is." So for all you people complaining about this and that, why don't you do something about it.
|
Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 09:23:00 -
[397]
Originally by: Marlona Sky Every time you pay for that subscription fee, you are saying, "I am happy the way the game is." So for all you people complaining about this and that, why don't you do something about it.
Is this the EVE version of "If you complain about something, why don't you move to another country." argument? Because that makes so much more sense than actually trying to fix perceived problems withing the project you have invested huge amount of time and effort in.
|
Aineko Macx
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 09:24:00 -
[398]
Originally by: Marlona Sky Every time you pay for that subscription fee, you are saying, "I am happy the way the game is." So for all you people complaining about this and that, why don't you do something about it.
That's not accurate. It could mean "I am happy with 51% of the game, the rest is crap". And I can't imagine any player being 100% happy with every single aspect and bug of the game...
|
Jamie Banks
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 09:48:00 -
[399]
Originally by: wr3cks If you want to help carebears....
Are there any plans to fix the god-awful invention and production interface? Why do I have to do ten different clicks and keystrokes to run an invention job? And why do I have to do 100 clicks and keystrokes to run 10 of them? Seriously, this should take like a couple of dev days to improve upon and would save every player a ton of time and needless repetitive clicking, like when you invented weapon grouping.
I'd give you bonus points if you came up with algorithmic trading, a way to make market orders automatically lower their price every 15 minutes (or whatever). Sell my EANMs for 100,000 isk, and cut the price by 100 isk every half hour until they all sell or the order expires. The current static-orders system turns people into miserable station traders who click and penny things like rats in a cage.
Please CCP this game is too hard... Where did I put the link to the website for Hello Kitty Online. I WANT MOAR iskies with less effort.
|
Sol Mortis
Caldari Warsmiths
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 10:22:00 -
[400]
I am also completely unenthusiastic about this. This game has already been moving away from everything that makes it fun. Combat is becoming rarer every patch, and now you're giving carebears another moneyhat machine that the people who actually play the game can't attack. I don't care about Dust 514 and it isn't nearly as clever to shoehorn a first person shooter into EVE as you think it is. Players have been begging for years now to make low security space worthwhile in some way, any way. Time and again we have asked you to fix and refine the existing gameplay mechanics, but you still keep on piling on half-baked buggy new content that makes the game more dull rather than more exciting.
Give me an option to disable the Engaged in Combat warning message. I'm sick of clicking through it every time I try to undock. We can disable warning messages for certain death by Concord, but we can't disable a message that is pointless most of the time? Try focusing on getting more players to interact with each other rather than just farm isk alone in missions and mining, they might as well be playing EVE OFFLINE. |
|
BBQfire
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 10:31:00 -
[401]
Hello CCP,
When do you, CCP, finally get it not to release awesome new expansions before you fix those bugs that are bugging us! I see it coming: the new expansion will bring new bugs plus not fixed old bugs. Someday this will break your neck because the project got too big.
Please CCP - don't put your resources in new expansions until the bugs are fixed. This is insane, fix the bugs first - the content of the game is already amasing and even now hard to understand for new players. And I can think about you CCP losing the overview and new expansions and features will make it even harder for you to find the bugs.
|
Chiralos
Epitoth Guard
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 10:44:00 -
[402]
Have a look at Marlenus's post on page 11 for some serious thought about the possibilities and dangers.
Originally by: Marlenus People in EVE care about two things: making ISK, and getting fights.
I would say: making ISK, getting fights and sov. I hope this expansion creates a new type of sov that people care about.
Originally by: Marlenus Now, there are thin reeds to grasp at. "This expansion is about exploration and industry." Exploration means, I hope, somebody has to go to each planet and drop some probes.
God I hope that the exploration game isn't a one-off like moons. Sure there's a lot of planets, but if the content is static then eventually you'll be able to look it up on a web site and the exploration game will be over. (hey, CCP should ninja-introduce new dynamic moon content without announcing it :-)
Originally by: Marlenus
What would be fun? Seriously: launch them into space, where they appear, on orbit, in cargo containers with the usual 1-hour life span ...
Oh yeah, we gotta have something like that.
Originally by: Marlenus ISK-making: We don't need faucets unless they are balanced by sinks, and if the sinks are too close to the faucets ...
Yeah this a problem: too profitable and it will wreck some other part of the game, not profitable enough and no-one will do it. I guess it needs to be (a) about as profitable as existing stuff, (b) be fun in itself, and (c) link in with existing economics in an interesting way.
How about a new set of components for tech I that you don't have to use (you can still build from minerals), but is more efficient (uses less minerals over all) if you incorporate them into the production chain ?
Originally by: Marlenus
But, think about this new planetary management screen. Where will "you" be while you "play" it? Surely CCP wouldn't let you dock up and manage your planets from a station ...
Yeah pretty sure they would. I hope you're right though, personal planetary hangers would be way cool. Hangers ? Bah ! I want a palace. With slaves.
Amarr Victor. |
Marlona Sky
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 11:09:00 -
[403]
Will the changes that can happen to a planet affect the moons of said planet?
|
Sidus Isaacs
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 11:27:00 -
[404]
Interesting. EVE is taking a step towards a second "Sim (Space) City" nature in addition to all it is now.
Looking forward to seeing how it turns out.
Also, I really hop rockets gets a fix now (hint hint). --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://desusig.crumplecorn.com/sigs.html |
Maxsim Goratiev
Gallente Imperial Tau Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 12:39:00 -
[405]
Originally by: Eoras Northwind There are no refinery killmails without a refinery to kill.
I for one am looking forward to EVE: Planet Carebear. If you want decent planetary PvP, you need targets. Rapid over-development now means rich, fulfilling 'opportunities' when the axe swings the other way. (Think about planetary sterilization fleets.)
Like others I'm wondering if CCP plans on permitting existing ships to attack these infrastructures and the systems pilots should be inhabiting to operate them? Will we need new bomb(ers)? Will assault frigates be able to strafe the surface? Will the wings on Caldari ships finally have a use?
And, can I crash a freighter into a corporate building because I'm unhappy with my corporation's tax rate?
most ships are clearly incapable of atmosferic flight, due to extremely unaerodinamic shape. Sure, suffishiently powerfull thrusters could keep them in the air, but. Please resize your signature to the maximum allowed of 400 x 120 pixels with a maximum file size of 24000 bytes.StevieSG |
Halo Phase
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 13:07:00 -
[406]
This sounds awesome, however I was just wondering if they are going to include us Wormhole hermits in this, even if not then it would be nice to be able to mine the moons. Some of us really work hard in our WHs and it smacks of favoritism for the big null/lo sec corps and alliances if the only people who cant take advantage of this are us bold explorers of W-Space.
Halo
|
Ronan Ko'dred
Minmatar Minmatar Ship Construction Services Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 15:04:00 -
[407]
Dear CCP
Your slogan for 2009/10 is Excellence. Stick to that and i won't loose my faith in your Vision which became the awesomness most of us know very well. U love to entertain us on many levels of frustration as enjoyment. Sometimes, when i am out there in my little internetspaceship, getting totally nuts over something,i feel like somewhere sits a dev, watching me and laughes his ass off when another ship gets blown up to my very surprise and hard earned isk turns into dust. oh c, what an coincidence. Incarna, Dust, Tyrannis whateva just keep up your high standard of a completly different MMORPG and i am fine and keep payin ^^ so far i exhausted my english
and fix stuff mhkay
|
Shandas
Gallente Garoun Investment Bank
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 15:08:00 -
[408]
Originally by: niroshido Edited by: niroshido on 21/02/2010 22:16:47 Common sense would dictate :
Planets in empire space, cannot be worked on, as these planets belong to caldari/gallente/amarr/minmatar factions, plus CONCORD.
I think you're very wrong here, as they mention in the keynotes and in the blog all planets and all pilots. Just because they "own" the planets doesn't mean the pod pilot can't rule over a sector/region. I would take it that the home planets will probably be excluded but there are also GAS, ICE and other types of planets in Hi-Sec that aren't colonizedc and would be avaliable.
Again, they say they was new pilots to easily slip into this, pushing a new pilot out of hi sec before they're ready isn't easing into it.
|
Otin Bison
Gallente Bison Industrial Inc
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 15:21:00 -
[409]
Edited by: Otin Bison on 22/02/2010 15:22:56 Edited by: Otin Bison on 22/02/2010 15:21:13 Hmmm .. Tyranus
Planetary interaction and mining. The industrialist in me jumps for joy.
A few questions of course are going to pop to mind but, realizing how CCP likes to keep us guessing I really don't expect too much clarification ... yet.
Question Part: - Available in NulSec, obviously - Available in LowSec, most likely - Available in HiSec, no clue (maybe 0.5 thru 0.7 like POS's?) - Alliance only or can a Corp delelop a planet? - Say Group X has a planet what happens to Corps W, Y and Z that have POS at moons that may not be part of the same alliance?
Bad Impression part: - another Isk printer for the Mega-Alliances in NulSec. - Expansion geared to the crying <10% of Eve in NulSec/LowSec as opposed to the 90% of us who pay the bills!. - If Planetary industry is allowed in HiSec, it will be half-baked just like HiSec POSs, no moon-mining etc ...
Good Impression Part: - Industry Expansion, fricken awesome! - Planetary Interaction/Mining, more awesome! - Planetary structures in place in preparation for Dust 514, wicked awesome. - New Exploration possibilities
For the Folk Taking Shots at CSM. - They have helped and they never stop trying. - A perception that CSM only servers the Mega-Alliance Num-LowSec crowd. Probably more bad PR than reality but, I prefer to give them the benifit of the doubt.
that's about it,
Otin
PS - if time permits, please fix blasters and Gallente droneboats. ------- Nothing especially witty to say at this time. |
Pseudo Sasaya
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 15:23:00 -
[410]
Originally by: Jericho Khaine Any idea what this will do to the system requirements on Classic and Premium?
This is one of my major concerns regarding WiS (though any expansion has the potential)... will a feature that I gain nothing from finally push EVE off my computer? Every release it has gotten slower and slower. I can not PvP anymore and I can easily imagine PvE at some point becoming unusual...
|
|
Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises Gentlemen's Club
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 16:14:00 -
[411]
Hurray! |
riverini
Gallente Reliables Inc Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 16:15:00 -
[412]
Edited by: riverini on 22/02/2010 16:15:23
Originally by: Pseudo Sasaya
Originally by: Jericho Khaine Any idea what this will do to the system requirements on Classic and Premium?
This is one of my major concerns regarding WiS (though any expansion has the potential)... will a feature that I gain nothing from finally push EVE off my computer? Every release it has gotten slower and slower. I can not PvP anymore and I can easily imagine PvE at some point becoming unusual...
I believe this will be addressed by letting ya have some low-resource but cutting edge graphics when u are doing sone WiS
Personally am expecting something like this: cutting edge graphics
German Giggles, riverini
|
Inmate 998901
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 16:56:00 -
[413]
Please make the Calendar shareable with Google Calendar
|
Bomberlocks
Minmatar Tribal Liberation Force
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 17:10:00 -
[414]
What I would really love in Eve: The ability to land on a planet and just wander around and look at fantastic randomly generated scenery. Not shoot at stuff (I appreciate CCP's push in First Person MMO shooting, but I honestly think that they did it as an attempt to broaden the market by only releasing it for consoles), not mine (I mean honestly, aren't there enough ways to do that in Eve already?), just look at wonderful scenery in between shooting stuff up in space.
Wouldn't it be wonderful to wander about a fantasy Eve city, walk on the edge of a lava field etc? The eve universe is huge, but pretty boring without the actual shooting bits. You can never get close enough to a planet to enjoy the scenery or interact with it.
I know I should perhaps go back to playing Riven or Myst, but damn those games would have been soething with the Eve graphics engine.
|
Jethro Hawkins
Capital Construction Research
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 19:53:00 -
[415]
If by "every planet" you guys mean: every planet except in WH's than this patch won't affect me income wise.
This makes me sad panda.
Also:
I'm very curious what this planet goo will provide the materials to make... or will it provide quafe so we can sell it to NPC's?
------------ Join: "CCRES Public" Farming WH's, making T3, making other people cry. Would you like to know more? |
Spinnakers
Minmatar Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 20:01:00 -
[416]
This will be a great time to fix the POS fuel problem. The "fuel pellet" could be created on planets. Would this be the end of ice mining?
Planetary production will open up to what new technology?? Would it be a good idea add research labs to the planet??
With Planetray interaction, the could als be the entry way for the Vice-Royalty for Low-Sec.
Originally by: Otin Bison Edited by: Otin Bison on 22/02/2010 15:22:56 Edited by: Otin Bison on 22/02/2010 15:21:13 Hmmm .. Tyranus
Planetary interaction and mining. The industrialist in me jumps for joy.
A few questions of course are going to pop to mind but, realizing how CCP likes to keep us guessing I really don't expect too much clarification ... yet.
Question Part: - Available in NulSec, obviously - Available in LowSec, most likely - Available in HiSec, no clue (maybe 0.5 thru 0.7 like POS's?) - Alliance only or can a Corp delelop a planet? - Say Group X has a planet what happens to Corps W, Y and Z that have POS at moons that may not be part of the same alliance?
Bad Impression part: - another Isk printer for the Mega-Alliances in NulSec. - Expansion geared to the crying <10% of Eve in NulSec/LowSec as opposed to the 90% of us who pay the bills!. - If Planetary industry is allowed in HiSec, it will be half-baked just like HiSec POSs, no moon-mining etc ...
Good Impression Part: - Industry Expansion, fricken awesome! - Planetary Interaction/Mining, more awesome! - Planetary structures in place in preparation for Dust 514, wicked awesome. - New Exploration possibilities
For the Folk Taking Shots at CSM. - They have helped and they never stop trying. - A perception that CSM only servers the Mega-Alliance Num-LowSec crowd. Probably more bad PR than reality but, I prefer to give them the benifit of the doubt.
that's about it,
Otin
PS - if time permits, please fix blasters and Gallente droneboats.
|
Ishuku
Amarr Dark Star Industries
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 21:26:00 -
[417]
Does this mean we will be able to have atmospheric flight like the demo that was shown to us in 2006? ~sghq.com~ |
Ranger 1
Amarr Dynaverse Corporation Sodalitas XX
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 21:39:00 -
[418]
I doubt there will be atmospheric flight in planetary interaction.
However in December (if things stay on schedule) you will have several atmospheric craft available if you choose to try DUST 514.
===== If you go to Za'Ha'Dum I will gank you. |
ELECTR0FREAK
Carpe Nocte
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 22:38:00 -
[419]
Pics or it didn't happen.
Discoverer of the Original Missile Damage Formula |
HeliosGal
Caldari
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 23:26:00 -
[420]
will there be some form of facilities for non sov space specifically wormhole 00 space ? they could be tied to poses in system and or shootable with limited defenses. Could allow wormhole corps some limited production at a local level. Signature - CCP what this game needs is more variance in PVE aspects and a little bit less PVP focus, more content more varied level 1-4 missions more than just 10 per faction high sec low sec and 00 |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |