| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Morgs44
Kangaroos With Frickin Lazerbeams
   |
Posted - 2010.04.26 09:49:00 -
[1]
Anyone else having a problem with ppl dropping 1 or 2 super carriers on there roams.
Its starting to get a little to common. Just when it was getting popular to drop a carrier or be dropped by one which could turn the tide of a small bs/bc gang, we now have to put up with SC coming in and doing crazy damage and not being able to do anything about it, unless you also have a massive cap fleet or part of a large 0.0 alliance.
Nurf those suckers when they come into low sec, cause this ain't 0.0
Pew Pew 
|
Dr Karsun
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 09:59:00 -
[2]
Well.. I smell a troll...
Why nerf them? They cost such a load of isk that you'd buy a fleet of normal carriers and dreads for that. And they are not insurable like normal carriers, so if you shoot one down... It's 20b in the back of your enemy. Not to mention fighters or fighter bombers vs interceptors... They vanish like candy in the hands of a 10-year old. 25m or so in the back for each fighter? Yarr. And as far as I recall the fighter bombers weren't to be effective against anything smaller than a carrier?
|
Aerilis
Gallente
Quantum Cats Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 09:59:00 -
[3]
*cough*cryhavoc*cough*
|
domitesting
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 10:05:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Dr Karsun
Well.. I smell a troll...
Why nerf them? They cost such a load of isk that you'd buy a fleet of normal carriers and dreads for that. And they are not insurable like normal carriers, so if you shoot one down... It's 20b in the back of your enemy. Not to mention fighters or fighter bombers vs interceptors... They vanish like candy in the hands of a 10-year old. 25m or so in the back for each fighter? Yarr. And as far as I recall the fighter bombers weren't to be effective against anything smaller than a carrier?
i would assume they wouldnt be fitting fighter bombers for a low sec gank, unless it was against another cap...tbh a normal fleet should not be getting ganked by a super carriers just warp off! its only if you sit around fighting it..
be smart dont hang around in caps as well in low sec, people like CH, PL etc love to hotdrop in low sec, any sign of a cap kill and they are on it and they have the means to take it out in seconds.
|
Morgs44
Kangaroos With Frickin Lazerbeams
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 10:10:00 -
[5]
Well yes you could fly away, but they are dropping them on anything.
2 super carriers for a t3?
http://bl3h-united.com/kwfl/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=160470
|
Kripple
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 11:15:00 -
[6]
Welp, people whining becuase they get outplayed.
|
Amberlamps
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 11:21:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Morgs44
Well yes you could fly away, but they are dropping them on anything.
2 super carriers for a t3?
http://bl3h-united.com/kwfl/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=160470
T3 is something worthy of killing. What else would you expect them to want to kill? I doubt they'd jump a t1 ship. T3 pilots thinking they have the Iwinbutton but when the button sticks they rage.
|
Pheusia
Gallente
The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 11:26:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Morgs44
Anyone else having a problem with ppl dropping 1 or 2 super carriers on there roams.
Its starting to get a little to common. Just when it was getting popular to drop a carrier or be dropped by one which could turn the tide of a small bs/bc gang, we now have to put up with SC coming in and doing crazy damage and not being able to do anything about it, unless you also have a massive cap fleet or part of a large 0.0 alliance.
Nurf those suckers when they come into low sec, cause this ain't 0.0
Pew Pew
Yeah CCP should introduce some kind of supertough heavy tackler that can even stop supercaps warping off. That would make this kind of thing really dangerous.
Signed,
Pheusia |
Omal Oma
Shadowed Command
Fatal Ascension
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 11:29:00 -
[9]
Join an alliance who holds sov, live in their systems and roam 0.0.
If they hold sov, they can cyno jam the system and defend against it.
________________________________________________
<--- My in-game me. |
Gnulpie
Minmatar
Miner Tech
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 11:30:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Morgs44
Well yes you could fly away, but they are dropping them on anything.
2 super carriers for a t3?
http://bl3h-united.com/kwfl/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=160470
Yeah, why not?
You could argue that dropping couple of HACS onto a t1 cruiser is also the same. WTF you could say, no fair! But Eve was never a fair game.
Besides, outsmart them. Lure them into a trap and then call the cavallery. And then laugh when they lost their shiny SCs. |
|
|
tiviirulez
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 11:32:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Pheusia
Originally by: Morgs44
Anyone else having a problem with ppl dropping 1 or 2 super carriers on there roams.
Its starting to get a little to common. Just when it was getting popular to drop a carrier or be dropped by one which could turn the tide of a small bs/bc gang, we now have to put up with SC coming in and doing crazy damage and not being able to do anything about it, unless you also have a massive cap fleet or part of a large 0.0 alliance.
Nurf those suckers when they come into low sec, cause this ain't 0.0
Pew Pew
Yeah CCP should introduce some kind of supertough heavy tackler that can even stop supercaps warping off. That would make this kind of thing really dangerous.
The focus-script works on moms/titans? Would be news to me.
|
Stan Smith
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 11:33:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Pheusia
Yeah CCP should introduce some kind of supertough heavy tackler that can even stop supercaps warping off. That would make this kind of thing really dangerous.
I think you may have something there. You should post that in features and ideas!
|
domitesting
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 11:33:00 -
[13]
Edited by: domitesting on 26/04/2010 11:35:52
Originally by: Morgs44
Well yes you could fly away, but they are dropping them on anything.
2 super carriers for a t3?
http://bl3h-united.com/kwfl/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=160470
look at the comments, seems to me he tried to kill the tempest even after the cyno was lit...should of gone as soon as cyno was lit..anyway you know for next time that they have super caps and the tempest obviously was waitin around to bait people..seems to me with respect the T3 guy agressed and tried to gank the tempest (4 BS on standby) and he got baited and killed - unlucky! you cant have it all your own way..
"had about 4 bs on standby. tempest warps to planet. i follow. tempest lights cyno and we call it off. got him to quarter armor before the supercarriers repped him"
lol he doesnt learn does he..this was BEFORE the T3 kill- so he KNEW they had supercaps
http://bl3h-united.com/kwfl/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=166296
Look at a person on the kill mail Viper Schizzle...ring any bells - ex PL....nuff said...
|
Wacktopia
Dark Side Of The Womb
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 11:33:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Kripple
Welp, people whining becuase they get outplayed.
|
bonza mraka
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 11:37:00 -
[15]
2 SC for t3 ship, 5 SC for a faction BS - it's a kinda cool :)
http://kb.starbridge.su//?a=kill_detail&kll_id=10678
I'm not whining but it would be good if SC will be unable to launch fighter bombers in low secs space.
|
Lindsay Logan
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 11:41:00 -
[16]
Originally by: tiviirulez
Originally by: Pheusia
Originally by: Morgs44
Anyone else having a problem with ppl dropping 1 or 2 super carriers on there roams.
Its starting to get a little to common. Just when it was getting popular to drop a carrier or be dropped by one which could turn the tide of a small bs/bc gang, we now have to put up with SC coming in and doing crazy damage and not being able to do anything about it, unless you also have a massive cap fleet or part of a large 0.0 alliance.
Nurf those suckers when they come into low sec, cause this ain't 0.0
Pew Pew
Yeah CCP should introduce some kind of supertough heavy tackler that can even stop supercaps warping off. That would make this kind of thing really dangerous.
The focus-script works on moms/titans? Would be news to me.
Would be news to most
|
Jack Dant
Minmatar
The Gentlemen of Low Moral Fibre
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 11:45:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Amberlamps
T3 is something worthy of killing. What else would you expect them to want to kill? I doubt they'd jump a t1 ship. T3 pilots thinking they have the Iwinbutton but when the button sticks they rage.
I've seen 4 supercarriers, along with 4 regular carriers, dropped on a solo drake.
Admitedly, I think that was done just for a laugh.
|
Tippia
Reikoku
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 11:47:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Lindsay Logan
Originally by: tiviirulez
The focus-script works on moms/titans? Would be news to me.
Would be news to most
The news-worthiness entirely depends on how much stock you put into this tidbit in the Focused Warp Disruption description:
“This allows the module to scramble ships of any size, including ships normally immune to all forms of electronic warfare.”
———
“If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡…
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.”
— Karath Piki |
Snake O'Donell
Gallente
Situation Grey
AIRSTRIKE.
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 12:23:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Aerilis
*cough*cryhavoc*cough*
Aerilis
Gallente
Quantum Cats Syndicate
Oh the irony.
Please re-size your signature to the maximum file size of 24000 bytes. Zymurgist |
Yarinor
Capital Construction Research
Pioneer Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 12:27:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Morgs44
Anyone else having a problem with ppl dropping 1 or 2 super carriers on there roams.
Its starting to get a little to common. Just when it was getting popular to drop a carrier or be dropped by one which could turn the tide of a small bs/bc gang, we now have to put up with SC coming in and doing crazy damage and not being able to do anything about it, unless you also have a massive cap fleet or part of a large 0.0 alliance.
Nurf those suckers when they come into low sec, cause this ain't 0.0
Pew Pew
their*
|
|
|
Lubomir Penev
interimo
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 12:29:00 -
[21]
Originally by: tiviirulez
Originally by: Pheusia
Originally by: Morgs44
Anyone else having a problem with ppl dropping 1 or 2 super carriers on there roams.
Its starting to get a little to common. Just when it was getting popular to drop a carrier or be dropped by one which could turn the tide of a small bs/bc gang, we now have to put up with SC coming in and doing crazy damage and not being able to do anything about it, unless you also have a massive cap fleet or part of a large 0.0 alliance.
Nurf those suckers when they come into low sec, cause this ain't 0.0
Pew Pew
Yeah CCP should introduce some kind of supertough heavy tackler that can even stop supercaps warping off. That would make this kind of thing really dangerous.
The focus-script works on moms/titans? Would be news to me.
It's not news it always did, that was the whole point of it. It put an end overnight on all the ***gots camping lowsec gates in smartbombing MS in what was the most riskless PvP posssible (though X13 managed to pop one such *** with epic tackle bumping).
--
081014 : emoragequit, char transfered to a friend, 090317 : back to original owner
blog |
Napro
Caldari
Buccaneers of New Eden
death from above..
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 12:31:00 -
[22]
I dont usually fly around low sec but this is ridiculous. 2 supercarriers for a T3 cruiser? Good Grief.
|
Lord Helghast
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 13:30:00 -
[23]
4 SC + 4 C on a solodrake is just ****ing histerical, i wudnt mind loosing a ship that way it wud be epic lol
|
Pheusia
Gallente
The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 13:49:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Lindsay Logan
Originally by: tiviirulez
Originally by: Pheusia
Originally by: Morgs44
Anyone else having a problem with ppl dropping 1 or 2 super carriers on there roams.
Its starting to get a little to common. Just when it was getting popular to drop a carrier or be dropped by one which could turn the tide of a small bs/bc gang, we now have to put up with SC coming in and doing crazy damage and not being able to do anything about it, unless you also have a massive cap fleet or part of a large 0.0 alliance.
Nurf those suckers when they come into low sec, cause this ain't 0.0
Pew Pew
Yeah CCP should introduce some kind of supertough heavy tackler that can even stop supercaps warping off. That would make this kind of thing really dangerous.
The focus-script works on moms/titans? Would be news to me.
Would be news to most
Except, you know, PvPers.
Signed,
Pheusia |
Rawr Cristina
Caldari
Omerta Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 14:04:00 -
[25]
Some people are very bored
Pretty much the second a Cap shows up, it's time to GTFO unless you have a LOT of backup somewhere
- Malyutka (The Virus) - |
Skippermonkey
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 14:32:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Stan Smith
Originally by: Pheusia
Yeah CCP should introduce some kind of supertough heavy tackler that can even stop supercaps warping off. That would make this kind of thing really dangerous.
I think you may have something there. You should post that in features and ideas!
And ladies and gentlemen, we have a valid option for the 'third t2 battleship'
Super tackler Rokh.... interesting..tackles from 250km,  
|
Bearded Lemming
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 14:34:00 -
[27]
At least they use them now
|
Sellmewarez
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 14:42:00 -
[28]
Edited by: Sellmewarez on 26/04/2010 14:43:18
Welcome to CAPITALS online.
If you do not have one, please log back out and don't come back until you have.
Best regards,
The Eve Community.
|
Isokuro
Yamamoto Tech.
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 14:55:00 -
[29]
i blame chribba's mothership lotery.
Yamamoto San sent me. |
Syn Callibri
Swag Co.
Sandbox Bullies
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 14:58:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Rawr Cristina
Some people are very bored
Pretty much the second a Cap shows up, it's time to GTFO unless you have a LOT of backup somewhere
^
^
^
^
THIS...
"I have just as much authority as the empress, just not as many people that believe it." |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |